Hoer et al., 2004 - Google Patents
The accuracy of electronic working length determinationHoer et al., 2004
View PDF- Document ID
- 320718737950061047
- Author
- Hoer D
- Attin T
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- International endodontic journal
External Links
Snippet
Aim To determine in vivo the accuracy of two impedance quotient apex locators under clinical conditions. Methodology Electronic working length determination was carried out before extraction in 79 human teeth with 93 root canals. In 51 root canals, the determination …
- 210000004262 Dental Pulp Cavity 0 abstract description 21
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
- A61B5/4538—Evaluating a particular part of the muscoloskeletal system or a particular medical condition
- A61B5/4542—Evaluating the mouth, e.g. the jaw
- A61B5/4547—Evaluating teeth
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/0059—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons using light, e.g. diagnosis by transillumination, diascopy, fluorescence
- A61B5/0082—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons using light, e.g. diagnosis by transillumination, diascopy, fluorescence adapted for particular medical purposes
- A61B5/0088—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons using light, e.g. diagnosis by transillumination, diascopy, fluorescence adapted for particular medical purposes for oral or dental tissue
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C19/00—Dental auxiliary appliances
- A61C19/04—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry
- A61C19/05—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry for determining occlusion
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/107—Measuring physical dimensions, e.g. size of the entire body or parts thereof
- A61B5/1076—Measuring physical dimensions, e.g. size of the entire body or parts thereof for measuring dimensions inside body cavities, e.g. using catheters
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, OR TOILET PURPOSES
- A61K49/00—Preparations for testing in vivo
- A61K49/0004—Screening or testing of compounds for diagnosis of disorders, assessment of conditions, e.g. renal clearance, gastric emptying, testing for diabetes, allergy, rheuma, pancreas functions
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups
- G01N33/48—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C5/00—Filling or capping teeth
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/48—Diagnostic techniques
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Hoer et al. | The accuracy of electronic working length determination | |
| Haffner et al. | Accuracy of electronic apex locators in comparison to actual length—an in vivo study | |
| Wrbas et al. | In vivo comparison of working length determination with two electronic apex locators | |
| Vizzotto et al. | CBCT for the assessment of second mesiobuccal (MB 2) canals in maxillary molar teeth: effect of voxel size and presence of root filling | |
| ElAyouti et al. | The ability of root ZX apex locator to reduce the frequency of overestimated radiographic working length | |
| Gordon et al. | Electronic apex locators | |
| Duran‐Sindreu et al. | In vivo evaluation of the iPex and Root ZX electronic apex locators using various irrigants | |
| ElAyouti et al. | Determining the apical terminus of root‐end resected teeth using three modern apex locators: a comparative ex vivo study | |
| Vieyra et al. | Comparison of working length determination with radiographs and four electronic apex locators | |
| Somma et al. | In vivo accuracy of three electronic root canal length measurement devices: Dentaport ZX, Raypex 5 and ProPex II | |
| Tsesis et al. | The precision of electronic apex locators in working length determination: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature | |
| Lucena et al. | Accuracy of working length measurement: electronic apex locator versus cone‐beam computed tomography | |
| Plotino et al. | Ex vivo accuracy of three electronic apex locators: Root ZX, Elements Diagnostic Unit and Apex Locator and ProPex | |
| Leonardo et al. | Ex vivo evaluation of the accuracy of two electronic apex locators during root canal length determination in primary teeth | |
| Ebrahim et al. | Ex vivo evaluation of the ability of four different electronic apex locators to determine the working length in teeth with various foramen diameters | |
| Senan et al. | Root form and canal morphology of maxillary first premolars of a Yemeni population | |
| Vieyra et al. | Comparison of working length determination with radiographs and two electronic apex locators | |
| Mahmoud et al. | Comparative evaluation of accuracy of different apex locators: Propex IQ, Raypex 6, Root ZX, and Apex ID with CBCT and periapical radiograph—in vitro study | |
| Azabal et al. | Accuracy of the Justy II Apex locator in determining working length in simulated horizontal and vertical fractures | |
| Mancini et al. | Accuracy of three electronic apex locators in anterior and posterior teeth: an ex vivo study | |
| Pascon et al. | An in vivo comparison of working length determination of two frequency‐based electronic apex locators | |
| Arora et al. | An in vivo evaluation of the ENDEX and RCM Mark II electronic apex locators in root canals with different contents | |
| Soares et al. | Evaluation of the Joypex 5 and Root ZX II: an in vivo and ex vivo study | |
| Jain et al. | Comparative evaluation of accuracy of two electronic apex locators in the presence of various irrigants: An: in vitro: study | |
| Hör et al. | Ex vivo comparison of two electronic apex locators with different scales and frequencies |