Change of Construction Planとは 意味・読み方・使い方

To provide the structure margin setting system of a building for easily coping with future plan change by designing a building by considering a structure margin without causing excess design even in renovation resulting in increase of a slight vertical load, or in conforming to the revision of a construction standard law or the revision of each standard and to provide a building designed and constructed by using this system.例文帳に追加

本発明は、軽微な鉛直荷重が増加するリフォームを行う場合や建築基準法改正や各基準類の改正対応にしても過剰設計が懸念されることがなく、構造余裕度を考慮して設計することで将来のプラン変更時における対応が容易に出来る建物の構造余裕度設定システム及びそれを利用して設計建設された建物を提供することを可能にすることを目的としている。 - 特許庁

(2) Where a fire chief or fire station chief is requested to give consent pursuant to the provision of the preceding paragraph, if the plan for the building is not in violation of the provisions of any Acts or any order or prefectural/municipal ordinance thereunder (if a fire chief or fire station chief is requested to give consent in cases where a building official or designated confirmation and inspection body makes a confirmation pursuant to the provisions of Article 6, paragraph (4) or Article 6-2, paragraph (1) of the Building Standards Act (including cases where these provisions are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 87, paragraph (1) of said Act) for the construction, major repair (meaning a major repair as set forth in Article 2, item (xiv) of said Act), major remodeling (meaning major remodeling as set forth in Article 2, item (xv) of said Act) of a building set forth in Article 6-3, paragraph (1), item (i) or item (ii) of said Act or for a change of intended purpose of such building, or makes a confirmation for the construction of a building as set forth in Article 6-3, paragraph (1), item (iii) of said Act, the provisions of the laws and regulations concerning the building standards specified by Cabinet Order as set forth in Article 6, paragraph (1) of said Act as applied by replacing the relevant terms and phrases pursuant to the provision of Article 6-3, paragraph (1) of said Act shall be excluded), the fire chief or fire station chief shall give consent within three days from the day on which he/she was requested to give consent in the case falling under Article 6, paragraph (1), item (iv) of said Act or within seven days from the day on which he/she was requested to give consent in other cases, and give notice to the administrative agency or person delegated thereby or the designated confirmation and inspection body to that effect. In this case, the fire chief or fire station chief, when he/she finds any grounds on which he/she cannot give consent, shall give notice to the administrative agency or person delegated thereby or the designated confirmation and inspection body to that effect by such time limit.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

２　消防長又は消防署長は、前項の規定によつて同意を求められた場合において、当該建築物の計画が法律又はこれに基づく命令若しくは条例の規定（建築基準法第六条第四項又は第六条の二第一項（同法第八十七条第一項の規定によりこれらの規定を準用する場合を含む。）の規定により建築主事又は指定確認検査機関が同法第六条の三第一項第一号若しくは第二号に掲げる建築物の建築、大規模の修繕（同法第二条第十四号の大規模の修繕をいう。）、大規模の模様替（同法第二条第十五号の大規模の模様替をいう。）若しくは用途の変更又は同項第三号に掲げる建築物の建築について確認する場合において同意を求められたときは、同項の規定により読み替えて適用される同法第六条第一項の政令で定める建築基準法令の規定を除く。）で建築物の防火に関するものに違反しないものであるときは、同法第六条第一項第四号に係る場合にあつては、同意を求められた日から三日以内に、その他の場合にあつては、同意を求められた日から七日以内に同意を与えて、その旨を当該行政庁若しくはその委任を受けた者又は指定確認検査機関に通知しなければならない。この場合において、消防長又は消防署長は、同意することができない事由があると認めるときは、これらの期限内に、その事由を当該行政庁若しくはその委任を受けた者又は指定確認検査機関に通知しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

After the subway facilities were completed, Kyoto Kosoku Railway Co., Ltd., bought the subway facilities from the Japan Railway Construction Public Corporation using a 25-year installment plan in order to lend them to the Kyoto Municipal Transportation Bureau, which would in turn operate the section between Daigo and Nijo integrally, and accordingly the Kyoto Municipal Transportation Bureau became a Type I Railway Business Operator for the sections between Daigo and Misasagi and between Sanjo-keihan and Nijo, as well as a Type II Railway Business Operator for the section between Misasagi and Sanjo-keihan, while Kyoto Kosoku Railway Co., Ltd., became a Type Ⅲ Railway Business Operator for the section between Misasagi and Sanjo-keihan based on the Railway Business Act, which had taken effect after the abolishment of the old local railway law when Japanese National Railways was split and privatized on April 1, 1987, whereby Keihan Electric Railway was also positioned as a Type II Railway Business Operator; therefore, the idea of continuing passenger services in the section between Misasagi and Sanjo on the Keishin Line, borrowing the subway facilities from Kyoto Kosoku Railway Co., Ltd., in cooperation with Kyoto Municipal Transportation Bureau to underground and change the route of the relevant section was re-examined; however, the parties involved decided to follow the established policy due to overhead expenses.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

そして、鉄道施設の完成後、京都高速鉄道が日本鉄道建設公団から25年間の分割払いで鉄道施設を譲り受け、京都市交通局に貸与し、京都市交通局が醍醐～二条間を一体的に運営することになり、1987年4月1日の国鉄分割民営化によって、それまでの「地方鉄道法」が廃止され、新たに「鉄道事業法」が施行されたことによって、京都市交通局が醍醐～御陵間と三条京阪～二条間の第一種鉄道事業者、御陵～三条京阪間の第二種鉄道事業者となり、京都高速鉄道が御陵～三条京阪間の第三種鉄道事業者となったことから、京阪電気鉄道も第二種鉄道事業者という経営形態が確立されたため、京津線の御陵～三条間の旅客営業を廃止せず、京都市交通局とともに京都高速鉄道から鉄道施設を借り受け、同区間の地下化、ルート変更する形で旅客営業を継続してはどうかと再検討されたが、諸経費などの絡みで既定方針どおりとなった。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス