ovinelyとは 意味・読み方・使い方

副詞

ovinely (not generally comparable, comparative more ovinely, superlative most ovinely)

1. In an ovine manner.

   Coordinate terms: bovinely, equinely, porcinely

   Near-synonyms: sheepily, sheepishly, sheepwise

   • 2015 [1938], “Forty years of evolution theory”, in Joseph Needham, Walter Pagel, editors, Background to Modern Science‎, reprint edition, Cambridge University Press, →ISBN, pages 192-193:

     For all their many virtues the Romans appear to have been singularly lacking in curiosity. Though the collecting instinct was by no means wanting among them it seems to have been directed almost exclusively to the acquisition of man-made things such as books, pictures, sculptures and religions. In spite of opportunity there seems to be no evidence of the getting together of anything resembling a museum of natural history objects. Even Pliny, most curious of the Romans, contented himself with the filling of note-books. And the time when curiosity might have led to collection, and this in turn have stimulated classification and inquiry into causes, rapidly passed away; for with the establishing of Christianity a new mental atmosphere possessed the world. The problem of causation was definitely determined in favour of the first of our three alternatives, and men's thoughts were turned to that future life which had been so opportunely called into existence to redress the balance of the present. It is true that a few of the Church's authorities—notably Augustine and, later, Thomas Aquinas—flirted at times with the second alternative, but in this they had little influence on the great body of the Church and its supporters. Routine marked out the path of the shepherds and the flock ovinely followed. Then came the crash of the Renaissance. Curiosity, so long pent up, surged forth, and natural objects once more became objects of natural inquiry. Contributory were the voyages of exploration now starting, bringing with them new and strange forms of plant and animal life. Collections of natural history objects were brought together, and as they grew in magnitude some system of classification became imperative. In this field the botanists were in advance of the zoologists.

   • 1940 April, John M. Cooper, “Anthropology and the Indian problems of the Americas”, in Indians of the United States‎, volume 1, number 1, page 12:

     Distinct from, but akin to, respect for peoples and their cultures is respect for their rights. In problems of culture-contact no factor is more detrimental to respect for another people's rights than the double code. By the double code is here meant one code of justice and fair play toward my own group or people, and another or no code toward those of groups not my own. Anthropology does not pass ethical judgments of value, since it is a strictly empirical discipline. It can, however, and does, study such phenomena as the double code in operation, and the results of this deep-rooted, ancient and deadly code upon social and individual wellbeing. It can and does bring it out into the light and investigate its characteristics and effects. In so doing it can at least help to inhibit rationalizations naively though often cleverly formulated to salve Caucasian consciences uneasy under the guilt of injustices being wrought for selfish purposes upon Indian victims of the code. Man is a wolf to men of another group. Acquaintance with the anthropological data will at least make clear the wolfish behavior, however ovinely such behavior be rationalized. What we are advocating here, with a view to promoting aspect for the Indian and his culture and rights, is a certain amount of training in and acquaintance with the data of anthropology on the part of those who have to do practically with the American Indian. Concrete procedures will be suggested later.

2. With regard to ovines.

   Synonym: sheepwise

   • 1927 January, “Survey of the live mutton trade: by a market reporter”, in American Sheep Breeder and Wool Grower‎, volume 47, number 1, pages 17-18:

     On the late December break the top fell to $12.50. That price was regarded as the season's low mark, and quickly reacted upward to $13.25, only to flatten out again to $13.00 on the early January decline, the general trade then emitting signs of again falling below $13.00, of probably dropping to $12.50, and all the while carrying the possibility of descending to $12.00 on a glutted badly distributed run. December was the lowest month of the year 1926; that year, while, with the exception of the fall fed crop, a satisfactory one ovinely speaking, was the lowest since 1921; Colorado lost money on their overweight crop, but native and western springers and the grass rangers were profitable. Having made money on the 1925-26 fed crop the cornbelt bought their heads off both at the market centers and on the range, and having taken on too much weight to the detriment of their pocketbooks and lost thereby, Colorado and Nebraska kept out of the thin lamb market, which was made in a high-handed fashion by the farmer-feeders in the cornbelt. And now having run into the rapids the cornbelt farmer will not be such a keen competitor this fall and the supply of fed lambs will more than likely approach their former sectional distribution. The average price of fat lambs at Chicago for the first month and latter part of 1926 was as follows: Jan. $15.25; Sept. $13.55; Nov. $13.00; Dec. $12.40.