scope of an expressionとは 意味・読み方・使い方

According to this High Court judgment, although due criticism of, comments on, and introduction of activities for public entertainment performed by a personality should be respected in light of the freedom of expression, the act of selling, under the pretext of the freedom of expression, a publication for commercial purposes that includes a photograph (an image etc.) of or comments on such personality without his/her consent thereto should be beyond the scope of his/her due activities involving the matters pertaining to the freedom of expression. The judgment further argues that the object matter of the expression (a magazine with photos) should be much less valued than that (a published book) in the King Crimson Case and concluded that such magazine is not worthy of being protected on the ground of the freedom of expression. It would appear that this judgment has led to a slightly different approach that does not necessarily place emphasis on the protection of the freedom of expression.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

同高裁判決は、芸能活動への正当な批判や批評、紹介については、表現の自由として尊重されなければならないとする一方、表現の自由の名のもとに、当該芸能人に無断で商業的な利用目的でその芸能人の写真（肖像等）や記述を掲載した出版物を販売することは、正当な表現活動の範囲を逸脱するものと述べており、対象とされた表現行為（写真掲載雑誌）の価値をキングクリムゾン高裁判決（出版書籍）に比べ著しく低く、表現の自由の保護に値しないとしており、この判断が（表現の自由の保護に比重を大きく置かない）上記判示につながったものと考えられる。 - 経済産業省

Therefore, whether or not the dissemination of such photograph is unlawful should be determined by comprehensive consideration of circumstances such as the extent his/her portrait rights or privacy are infringed. Circumstances which may be considered include; the relevancy between the object matter appearing therein, his/her activities in society, the place and method of photographing, and whether or not such photograph is an indispensable means for the photographer to express his/her intention. In other words the court, in considering whether the photograph is lawful will consider, whether or not the level of infringement is within the scope reasonably tolerated in our lives, in light of the balancing the need for protection of portrait and privacy rights with the need for protection of freedom of expression."発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

そこで、写真の撮影・頒布が違法となるかどうかは、それによる肖像権ないしプライバシーの侵害の程度がどの位か、撮影対象事項とその者の社会的活動との関係がどの程度か、その写真撮影の場所・態様がどのようなものであるか、その写真が当該表現行為に必要不可欠なものかどうか等を併せ考慮し、肖像権及びプライバシー保護の必要性と表現の自由保護の必要性とを比較衡量して、その侵害が社会生活上受忍の限度を超えるものかどうかを判断してこれを決すべきである。」とする。 - 経済産業省