litigation costsとは 意味・読み方・使い方

Of the costs arising from the collaboration of a patent attorney in litigation concerning signs, fees up to the amount of a full fee according to Section 11 of the Federal Fee Ordinance for Attorneys-at-law shall be refunded, as well as the necessary expenses of the patent attorney.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

標識に関する訴訟に特許弁護士が関与することにより生ずる費用については，弁護士報酬に関する連邦規則第11条の規定に基づく最高額までの報酬及びその他の特許弁護士経費が返還されるものとする。 - 特許庁

(2) Articles 61 to 66, 69(1), 69(2), 70 and 71(2) (Bearing of litigation costs) of the Code of Civil Procedure shall apply mutatis mutandis to the costs in connection with the trial under the preceding paragraph. In this case, the term "Supreme Court Rules" in Article 71(2) of the said Code shall be deemed to be replaced with "Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry."発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

２　民事訴訟法第六十一条から第六十六条まで、第六十九条第一項及び第二項、第七十条並びに第七十一条第二項（訴訟費用の負担）の規定は、前項に規定する審判に関する費用に準用する。この場合において、同法第七十一条第二項中「最高裁判所規則」とあるのは、「経済産業省令」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

If a party to civil litigation in which an action is brought to assert a claim arising from one of the legal relationships regulated under this Law satisfies the court that the awarding of the costs of the case against him according to the full value in dispute would considerably endanger his financial position, the court may, at his request, order that party's liability to pay court costs to be adjusted in accordance with a portion of the value in dispute that shall be appropriate to his financial position.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

本法で定める法律諸関係についての請求が訴訟によって追求される民事事件において当事者の一方が訴訟物の総額に従い当該訴訟の費用を支払う義務を履行するならば自己の財政的地位が著しく危殆におとし入れられるであろうことを疎明するときは，裁判所は当該当事者の請求により当該当事者の経済的地位に従い定められる訴訟物の部分に従い訴訟費用の支払義務を減額すべきことを命ずることができる。 - 特許庁

If, in civil litigation whereby a claim arising out of one of the legal relationships regulated under this Law is asserted by a law suit, a party satisfies the court that the awarding of the costs of the case against him according to the full value in dispute would considerably endanger his financial position, the court may, at his request, order that the said party's liability to pay court costs be adjusted in accordance with a portion of the value in dispute that shall be appropriate to his financial position.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

本法に基づき定められる法律関係の1つから生ずる請求が訴訟によって主張されている民事事件において，当事者が，係争中の価額の最高額に従って自己に対し事件の費用を裁定することが自己の財務状態を相当に危うくすることを裁判所に納得させる場合は，裁判所は，その者の請求により，裁判費用を支払うべきその者の負担を，その者の財務状態に適応した係争中の価額の割合に従って調整すべきことを命ずることができる。 - 特許庁

Article 52 Articles 131(1) and (2), 131-2 (excluding item (i) of paragraph 2) to 134, 135 to 154, 155(1) and (2), 156 to 158, 160(1) and (2), 161, and 167 to 170 (request for trial, trial examiner, procedures of trial, relation to litigation and costs of trial) of the Patent Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a trial. In this case, the term "a trial against the examiner's decision of refusal" in Article 161 and the term "a trial against an examiner's decision of refusal and a trial for correction" in Article 169(3) of the said Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a trial against an examiner's decision of refusal and a trial against an examiner's ruling dismissing an amendment."発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

第五十二条　特許法第百三十一条第一項及び第二項、第百三十一条の二（第二項第一号を除く。）から第百三十四条まで、第百三十五条から第百五十四条まで、第百五十五条第一項及び第二項、第百五十六条から第百五十八条まで、第百六十条第一項及び第二項、第百六十一条並びに第百六十七条から第百七十条まで（審判の請求、審判官、審判の手続、訴訟との関係及び審判における費用）の規定は、審判に準用する。この場合において、同法第百六十一条中「拒絶査定不服審判」とあり、及び同法第百六十九条第三項中「拒絶査定不服審判及び訂正審判」とあるのは、「拒絶査定不服審判及び補正却下決定不服審判」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 56 (1) The provisions of Articles 131(1), 131-2(1), 132 to 133-2, 134(1), 134(3), 134(4), 135 to 154, 155(1), 155(2), 156 to 158, 160(1), 160(2), 161, and 167 to 170 (effect of trial decision, request for trial, trial examiner, trial procedures in relation to litigation, and costs of trial) of the Patent Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a trial. In this case, the term "is made with respect to the grounds for the request as provided in item (iii) of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article in the course of filing a request for a trial other than a trial for Patent invalidation, or in the event that approval is granted by the chief trial examiner under the following paragraph" in Article131-2(1) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "is made with respect to the grounds for the request as provided in Article 131(1)(iii) of the Patent Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 56(1) of this Act in the course of filing a request for a trial other than a trial under Article 46(1) of the Trademark Act," the term "a trial for Patent invalidation and a trial for invalidation of the registration of extension of term" in Articles 132(1) and 167 of the Patent Act and the term "a trial for Patent invalidation or a trial for invalidation of the registration of extension of term" in Articles 145(1) and 169(1) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a trial under Article 46(1), 50(1), 51(1), 52-2(1), 53(1) or 53-2 of the Trademark Act," the term "a party in the case or an intervener in the case" in Article 139(i), (ii) and (v) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a party in the case, an intervener in the case or an opponent to the registration in the case", the term "a party in the case or an intervener in the case" in Article 139(iii) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a party in the case, an intervener in the case or an opponent to the registration in the case," the term "a trial against the examiner's decision of refusal" in Article 161 of the Patent Act and "a trial against an examiner's decision of refusal and a trial for correction" in Article 169(3) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a trial under Article 44(1) or 45(1) of the Trademark Act," and the term "the decision in another trial" in Article 168(1) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a decision on the opposition to registration or a trial decision in another trial."発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

第五十六条　特許法第百三十一条第一項、第百三十一条の二第一項、第百三十二条から第百三十三条の二まで、第百三十四条第一項、第三項及び第四項、第百三十五条から第百五十四条まで、第百五十五条第一項及び第二項、第百五十六条から第百五十八条まで、第百六十条第一項及び第二項、第百六十一条並びに第百六十七条から第百七十条まで（審決の効果、審判の請求、審判官、審判の手続、訴訟との関係及び審判における費用）の規定は、審判に準用する。この場合において、同法第百三十一条の二第一項中「特許無効審判以外の審判を請求する場合における同項第三号に掲げる請求の理由についてされるとき、又は次項の規定による審判長の許可があつたとき」とあるのは「商標法第四十六条第一項の審判以外の審判を請求する場合における同法第五十六条第一項において準用する特許法第百三十一条第一項第三号に掲げる請求の理由についてされるとき」と、同法第百三十二条第一項及び第百六十七条中「特許無効審判又は延長登録無効審判」とあり、並びに同法第百四十五条第一項及び第百六十九条第一項中「特許無効審判及び延長登録無効審判」とあるのは「商標法第四十六条第一項、第五十条第一項、第五十一条第一項、第五十二条の二第一項、第五十三条第一項又は第五十三条の二の審判」と、同法第百三十九条第一号、第二号及び第五号中「当事者若しくは参加人」とあるのは「当事者、参加人若しくは登録異議申立人」と、同条第三号中「当事者又は参加人」とあるのは「当事者、参加人又は登録異議申立人」と、同法第百六十一条中「拒絶査定不服審判」とあり、及び同法第百六十九条第三項中「拒絶査定不服審判及び訂正審判」とあるのは「商標法第四十四条第一項又は第四十五条第一項の審判」と、同法第百六十八条第一項中「他の審判の審決」とあるのは「登録異議の申立てについての決定若しくは他の審判の審決」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム