Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
「certiorari」の共起表現(1語右で並び替え) - Weblio英語共起表現検索
[go: Go Back, main page]


小窓モード

プレミアム

ログイン
設定

設定

Weblio 辞書 > 英和辞典・和英辞典 > certiorariの意味・解説 > certiorariに関連した共起表現

「certiorari」の共起表現一覧(1語右で並び替え)

該当件数 : 39



On February 19, 2002, the Court granted Certiorari, agreeing to hear the case.
The 89-page petition for certiorari and prohibition with a prayer for temporary
lined the plaintiff's petition for a writ of certiorari and refused to hear the Native American grou
a leading author of the petition for writ of certiorari and the merits briefs on behalf of State Far
a complete retrial, the Supreme Court denied certiorari, and allowed the State of Georgia to acquire
Sell, on Writ of Certiorari, appealed to the United States Supreme Court
n which the Court either dismissed a writ of certiorari as improvidently granted, or summarily rever
upport of Petitioners' Request For a Writ of Certiorari Before JudgementPDF (173 KB)
A writ of certiorari currently means an order by a higher court d
. Rehnquist, the Court dismissed the writ of certiorari for want of jurisdiction.
In the certiorari from the Supreme Court to the Appeal court t
(estoppel, laches, and voir dire) and Latin ( certiorari, habeas corpus, prima facie, inter alia, men
upreme Court denied a petition for a writ of certiorari in Lyons' case on 6 October 2003, the state
2 hours past the US Supreme Court's grant of certiorari in Baze v. Rees, the case that would eventua
The Supreme Court denied the Writ of Certiorari in this case.
Certiorari is sometimes informally referred to as cert.
e Court's denial of a petition for a writ of certiorari is sometimes misunderstood to mean that the
Granting a writ of certiorari means merely that at least four of the justi
In particular, a denial of a writ of certiorari means that no binding precedent is created b
The appellee sought certiorari review from the United States Supreme Court.
Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court granted certiorari, seeking to resolve an inconsistency among t
he Supreme Court of the United States denied certiorari, sending the case back to the District Court
firmed in 1993, and the Supreme Court denied certiorari that year.
The court denied certiorari, thereby allowing the lower court's decision
1, 2001, the plaintiffs filed a petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States.
Stogner appealed on writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, first
eld the order, and the Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve a circuit split.
ived immunity, and the Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve the conflict.
The Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine whether the United States Court
The Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve the conflict in Jones v. Bock, an
The Supreme Court granted certiorari to hear the case in 2000.
States Supreme Court refused to hear (denied certiorari to) the April 2009 challenge to Connection D
While certiorari under Rule 65 (in relation to Rule 64) appli
e Court granted the plaintiffs' petition for certiorari, vacated the judgment and remanded the case
Thus, certiorari was not the proper remedy to question the sa
y to the U.S. Supreme Court, but his writ of certiorari was denied.
A writ of certiorari was filed on March 8, 2010.
Certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court of the Unite
the United States only pursuant to a writ of certiorari when an important question of federal law is
                                                                                                    


こんにちは ゲスト さん

ログイン

Weblio会員(無料)になると

会員登録のメリット検索履歴を保存できる!

会員登録のメリット語彙力診断の実施回数増加!

無料会員に登録する
英→日 日→英
こんにちは ゲスト さん

ログイン

Weblio会員(無料)になると

会員登録のメリット検索履歴を保存できる!

会員登録のメリット語彙力診断の実施回数増加!

無料会員に登録する

©2025 GRAS Group, Inc.RSS