Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP4433765B2 - Emission spectroscopic method - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP4433765B2 - Emission spectroscopic method - Google Patents

Emission spectroscopic method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4433765B2
JP4433765B2 JP2003375274A JP2003375274A JP4433765B2 JP 4433765 B2 JP4433765 B2 JP 4433765B2 JP 2003375274 A JP2003375274 A JP 2003375274A JP 2003375274 A JP2003375274 A JP 2003375274A JP 4433765 B2 JP4433765 B2 JP 4433765B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
sample
intensity
spectral line
unknown sample
unknown
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP2003375274A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2005140565A (en
Inventor
晴行 依田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Murata Manufacturing Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Murata Manufacturing Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Murata Manufacturing Co Ltd filed Critical Murata Manufacturing Co Ltd
Priority to JP2003375274A priority Critical patent/JP4433765B2/en
Publication of JP2005140565A publication Critical patent/JP2005140565A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4433765B2 publication Critical patent/JP4433765B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Investigating, Analyzing Materials By Fluorescence Or Luminescence (AREA)

Description

本発明は、放電により試料を蒸発・励起発光させ、その光を分光し、原子スペクトル線の波長及び強度を測定する発光分光分析において、未知試料の定量分析を行う方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a method for quantitative analysis of an unknown sample in emission spectroscopic analysis in which a sample is evaporated and excited to emit light by discharge, the light is dispersed, and the wavelength and intensity of atomic spectral lines are measured.

近年、プラスチック・樹脂等に含まれる有害物質使用禁止規制が施行されるにあたり、その分析方法が重要となっている。とりわけ欧州においては、国によりCdの規制値は異なり、10〜100μg/gの許容範囲がある。分析方法は湿式分析方法を指定するところが多く、代表的な分析方法として非特許文献1に示すBSEN1122.2001が用いられることが多い。 In recent years, the analysis method has become important when the ban on the use of harmful substances contained in plastics and resins is enforced. Particularly in Europe, the Cd regulation value varies from country to country, and there is an allowable range of 10 to 100 μg / g. In many cases, the wet analysis method is designated as the analysis method, and BSEN 1122.2001 shown in Non-Patent Document 1 is often used as a typical analysis method.

BSEN1122.2001の分析法は、試料を硫酸、硝酸、及び過酸化水素水で分解し、不溶解分をろ別除去したのち、ろ液に含まれる重金属を、ICP発光分光分析法または同位体分析法などにより分析する。このように、分析の前処理として試料を分解する必要があるため、試料の分解に非常に時間がかかるという問題があった。
また、他の湿式分析方法として、硫酸灰化法、マイクロ波照射による高温・高圧酸溶解法などもあるが、いずれも試料を溶液化する必要があり、この溶液化処理に時間を要する。
In the analysis method of BSEN1122.2001, the sample is decomposed with sulfuric acid, nitric acid, and hydrogen peroxide, and insoluble components are removed by filtration, and then heavy metals contained in the filtrate are analyzed by ICP emission spectroscopy or isotope analysis. Analyze by law. Thus, since it is necessary to decompose the sample as a pretreatment for analysis, there is a problem that it takes a very long time to decompose the sample.
In addition, as other wet analysis methods, there are a sulfuric acid ashing method, a high temperature / high pressure acid dissolution method by microwave irradiation, etc., all of which require a sample to be in solution, and this solution processing takes time.

試料を固体のままで分析する迅速な非破壊定量法として、一般的に蛍光X線分析が使用されるが、Cdの検出感度は1〜10μg/gであり、必ずしも十分とは言えない。また、定量精度(正確さ)も標準試料と未知試料との密度・厚み・共存元素などが類似しておれば問題ないが、有機物のように構成元素や共存元素が大きく異なる物質の場合には、各種補正法を使用しても対応できない場合が多い。 As a rapid nondestructive quantitative method for analyzing a sample in a solid state, fluorescent X-ray analysis is generally used. However, the detection sensitivity of Cd is 1 to 10 μg / g, which is not always sufficient. Quantitative accuracy (accuracy) is not a problem if the standard sample and the unknown sample are similar in density, thickness, and coexisting elements. However, in the case of substances with significantly different constituent elements and coexisting elements, such as organic substances. In many cases, various correction methods cannot be used.

試料を固体のままで分析する他の方法として固体発光分光分析法がある。固体発光分光分析法は、励起源にアーク放電やスパーク放電が用いられ、固体試料を直接測定できることから、金属や酸化物などを迅速で簡便に分析できる分析方法として広く利用されてきた。アーク放電とスパーク放電は感度的に使い分けされ、一般的にアーク放電が超微量分析で感度は<10μg/g、スパーク放電が>10μg/gを対象としている。また、スパーク放電は試料に導電性を付与する必要があるが、アーク放電は酸化物などの非導電性試料を直接分析することができる励起源である。 Another method for analyzing a sample in a solid state is solid-state emission spectroscopy. Solid-state emission spectroscopy has been widely used as an analysis method that can analyze metals and oxides quickly and easily because arc discharge or spark discharge is used as an excitation source and a solid sample can be directly measured. Arc discharge and spark discharge are used separately in terms of sensitivity. Generally, arc discharge is ultra-trace analysis, and sensitivity is <10 μg / g and spark discharge is> 10 μg / g. In addition, the spark discharge needs to impart conductivity to the sample, but the arc discharge is an excitation source that can directly analyze a non-conductive sample such as an oxide.

しかし、固体発光分光分析の最大の難点は定量精度が低いことである。そのため、前述のような試料を溶液化して測定するICP発光分光分析法、ICP質量分析法や、固体試料を直接測定できる蛍光X線分析法などが現在の主流分析法となっており、固体発光分光分析は溶解の困難な貴金属試料や確立された定量法のある原子燃料などの一部でのみしか使用されない手法となっている。
また、プラスチック・樹脂などの有機物に対する固体発光分光分析では、濃縮灰化して酸化物化するか、または溶液にして測定されるのが一般的であり、前処理に多大の時間を要するという欠点があった。
However, the biggest difficulty of solid-state emission spectrometry is that the quantitative accuracy is low. Therefore, ICP emission spectroscopy, ICP mass spectrometry, and X-ray fluorescence analysis, which can directly measure solid samples, are the current mainstream analysis methods. Spectroscopic analysis is a technique that is used only for some of the precious metal samples that are difficult to dissolve and nuclear fuels that have established quantitative methods.
In solid-state emission spectrometry for organic substances such as plastics and resins, it is generally measured by ashing and oxidization or in solution, and there is a drawback that it takes a lot of time for pretreatment. It was.

固体発光分光分析の定量精度を高めるため、特許文献1では、分析用放電を行う前に、対向電極と試料との極性を逆にした放電を行い、この放電による発光強度が増加しはじめた時に、極性を反転させて分析用放電に切り換えるようにした発光分光分析方法が提案されている。
また、特許文献2では、試料の面を分光器の採光軸とほぼ平行にして放電させることにより、試料自体の光や蒸気雲による影響を受けていないスペクトル線を分光器に採光し、分析精度を高める方法が提案されている。
さらに、特許文献3では、近接スペクトル線の重なりによる影響を補正するため、測定毎に補正係数算出用試料を同時に測定し、補正係数をその都度求めて共存元素による誤差を補正する発光分光分析方法が提案されている。
しかしながら、いずれの分析方法を用いても、標準試料と密度や構成元素が類似しない未知試料では、そこに含まれる構成元素の定量精度を向上させることは困難であった。
BSEN1122.2001(「Plastics-Determinationof cadmium-Wet decomposition method」BRITISH STANDARD 2001 年) 特開平5−264455号公報 特開平8−50097号公報 特開平5−45287号公報
In order to improve the quantitative accuracy of solid-state emission spectrometry, in Patent Document 1, before performing the discharge for analysis, a discharge in which the polarity of the counter electrode and the sample is reversed is performed, and the emission intensity due to this discharge starts to increase. An emission spectroscopic analysis method has been proposed in which the polarity is inverted and switched to the analysis discharge.
Further, in Patent Document 2, the sample surface is discharged substantially parallel to the light collection axis of the spectrometer, and thereby the spectral lines that are not affected by the light of the sample itself or the vapor cloud are collected by the spectrometer. A method has been proposed for enhancing the above.
Further, in Patent Document 3, in order to correct the influence of overlapping of adjacent spectral lines, an emission spectroscopic analysis method that simultaneously measures a correction coefficient calculation sample for each measurement and calculates a correction coefficient each time to correct an error due to a coexisting element. Has been proposed.
However, regardless of which analysis method is used, it is difficult to improve the quantitative accuracy of the constituent elements contained in an unknown sample whose density and constituent elements are not similar to those of the standard sample.
BSEN 1122.2001 ("Plastics-Determinationof cadmium-Wet decomposition method" BRITISH STANDARD 2001) JP-A-5-264455 JP-A-8-50097 Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 5-45287

そこで、本発明の目的は、定量精度を向上させ、測定対象物として分析困難であったプラスチック・樹脂等の有機物も分析可能な、迅速で簡便な発光分光分析方法を提供することにある。 Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a rapid and simple emission spectroscopic analysis method capable of improving the accuracy of quantification and analyzing organic substances such as plastics and resins that have been difficult to analyze as a measurement object.

前記目的を達成するため、請求項1に係る発明は、放電によって試料を蒸発ならびに励起発光させ、その光を分光して得られるスペクトル線の波長と強度とを測定する発光分光分析方法において、成分元素の含有率が既知の標準試料を励起発光させ、標準試料の所定の成分元素の含有率とスペクトル線の強度との関係から検量線を求める工程と、未知試料を励起発光させ、前記標準試料の成分元素と同一の成分元素におけるスペクトル線の強度を測定する工程と、前記標準試料と未知試料との蒸発した重量比を用いて、前記未知試料から得られたスペクトル線の強度を補正する工程と、前記補正したスペクトル線の強度と前記検量線とに基づいて、前記未知試料の成分元素の含有率を求める工程と、を含む発光分光分析方法を提供する。 In order to achieve the above object, the invention according to claim 1 is an emission spectroscopic analysis method for measuring the wavelength and intensity of a spectral line obtained by evaporating and exciting emission of a sample by discharge and spectroscopically analyzing the light. A standard sample with a known element content is excited to emit light, a calibration curve is obtained from the relationship between the content of a predetermined component element of the standard sample and the intensity of the spectral line, and the unknown sample is excited to emit light, A step of measuring the intensity of a spectral line in the same component element as that of the component element, and a step of correcting the intensity of the spectral line obtained from the unknown sample by using an evaporated weight ratio of the standard sample and the unknown sample And a step of obtaining the content of the component elements of the unknown sample based on the corrected intensity of the spectral line and the calibration curve.

一般的に固体発光分光分析法の定量方法は、標準試料(構成元素の含有率が既知の試料)を測定し、含有率と各元素の原子スペクトル線の強度との関係を求める検量線法が用いられる。そして、未知試料を励起発光させ、標準試料と同一成分元素におけるスペクトル線の強度を測定し、そのスペクトル線の強度と検量線とに基づいて未知試料の成分元素の含有率(濃度)を求める。
ところが、未知試料に含まれる構成元素を定量する場合、標準試料と未知試料間で構成元素に差があると、密度に差が生じ、スペクトル線の強度の変動を伴う。そのため、同一形態・同一体積の試料を蒸発、励起発光させ、そのスペクトル強度を測定しても、正確な定量分析を行うことができない。
本発明では、蒸発した未知試料と標準試料との重量比に着目した。すなわち、重量比を用いて未知試料のスペクトル線の強度を補正し、この補正したスペクトル強度と検量線とを用いて含有率を求めれば、たとえ標準試料と未知試料との間で構成元素や密度に差があっても、最終的に求められる含有率または濃度の誤差を小さくすることが可能であり、より精度の高い定量分析が可能になる。
In general, the quantification method of solid-state emission spectrometry is a standard curve (a sample whose constituent element content is known) is measured, and a calibration curve method is used to obtain the relationship between the content ratio and the intensity of the atomic spectral line of each element. Used. Then, the unknown sample is excited to emit light, the intensity of the spectral line in the same component element as the standard sample is measured, and the content (concentration) of the component element in the unknown sample is obtained based on the intensity of the spectral line and the calibration curve.
However, when quantifying constituent elements contained in an unknown sample, if there is a difference in constituent elements between the standard sample and the unknown sample, a difference in density occurs, which causes fluctuations in the intensity of the spectral line. Therefore, accurate quantitative analysis cannot be performed even if samples having the same form and volume are evaporated and excited to emit light and the spectrum intensity is measured.
In the present invention, attention is paid to the weight ratio between the evaporated unknown sample and the standard sample. That is, if the intensity of the spectral line of the unknown sample is corrected using the weight ratio, and the content rate is obtained using the corrected spectral intensity and the calibration curve, the constituent elements and density between the standard sample and the unknown sample are calculated. Even if there is a difference, it is possible to reduce the error of the content rate or concentration finally obtained, and it is possible to perform quantitative analysis with higher accuracy.

本発明における放電とは、アーク放電、スパーク放電など、試料を蒸発,励起発光させる放電であれば、いかなる放電を用いても良い。
また、試料を固体のまま励起発光させる方法もあるが、試料を粉末状とし、これを電極に設けた凹部に収容して励起発光させることもできる。
試料を固体のまま励起発光させる場合には、試料の一部が蒸発するに過ぎないので、励起発光の前後での試料の重量を測定することで、蒸発した試料の重量比を求めることができる。一方、粉末状の試料を蒸発・励起発光させる場合には、電極の凹部に充填された試料の重量を予め測定しておき、充填された粉末試料の全量を蒸発させれば、励起発光後に試料の重量を測定しなくても、重量比を求めることができる。但し、粉末試料の場合も、励起発光の前後での試料の重量を測定することで、蒸発した試料の重量比を求めてもよい。
本発明により分析可能な試料は、微量元素を含む金属、酸化物、有機物などあらゆるものを含む。
The discharge in the present invention may be any discharge as long as it is a discharge that evaporates and excites a sample, such as arc discharge or spark discharge.
In addition, there is a method in which the sample is excited to emit light while being solid, but the sample can be powdered and accommodated in a recess provided in the electrode to emit light.
When the sample is excited to emit light while being solid, only a part of the sample is evaporated, so the weight ratio of the evaporated sample can be obtained by measuring the weight of the sample before and after the excitation light emission. . On the other hand, when evaporating / exciting light emission of a powdery sample, the weight of the sample filled in the concave portion of the electrode is measured in advance, and if the entire amount of the filled powder sample is evaporated, the sample is excited after emission of light. The weight ratio can be obtained without measuring the weight. However, also in the case of a powder sample, the weight ratio of the evaporated sample may be obtained by measuring the weight of the sample before and after excitation light emission.
Samples that can be analyzed according to the present invention include all kinds of metals, oxides, organic substances including trace elements.

請求項1では、未知試料の所定の成分元素について測定されたスペクトル線の強度を重量比によって補正した後、その補正後のスペクトル線の強度と検量線とに基づいて未知試料の成分元素の含有率を求めたが、請求項2のように、未知試料の所定の成分元素におけるスペクトル線の強度を測定し、その測定されたスペクトル線の強度と検量線とに基づいて、未知試料の成分元素の含有率を求めた後、標準試料と未知試料との蒸発した重量比を用いて、未知試料の成分元素の含有率を補正してもよい。
この場合も、請求項1と同様に、未知試料に含まれる元素成分の含有率または濃度を精度よく分析することができる。
In claim 1, after correcting the intensity of the spectrum line measured for a predetermined component element of the unknown sample by the weight ratio, the content of the element element of the unknown sample is corrected based on the intensity of the spectrum line and the calibration curve after the correction. Although the rate was determined, the intensity of the spectral line in the predetermined component element of the unknown sample was measured as in claim 2, and based on the measured spectral line intensity and the calibration curve, the component element of the unknown sample After obtaining the content ratio, the content ratio of the component elements of the unknown sample may be corrected using the weight ratio of the evaporated sample to the standard sample.
In this case as well, the content or concentration of the elemental component contained in the unknown sample can be analyzed with high accuracy, as in the first aspect.

本発明の固体発光分光分析法において、請求項3のように、重量比Jによって測定された未知試料のスペクトル線の強度SIRを除算することで、スペクトル線強度を補正すれば、試料の種類に関係なく定量することができる。
J=未知試料の蒸発重量/標準試料の蒸発重量 …(1)
補正されたスペクトル線の強度=SIR/J …(2)
すなわち、重量の大きな未知試料の場合、スペクトル線の強度も大きくでるので、これを重量比Jで除算することで、スペクトル線の強度を標準試料のスペクトル線の強度に調整することができ、定量誤差を小さくできる。
In the solid-state emission spectroscopic analysis method of the present invention, as in claim 3, if the spectral line intensity is corrected by dividing the spectral line intensity SIR of the unknown sample measured by the weight ratio J, the type of the sample is obtained. It can be quantified regardless.
J = evaporation weight of unknown sample / evaporation weight of standard sample (1)
Intensity of corrected spectral line = SIR / J (2)
That is, in the case of an unknown sample having a large weight, the intensity of the spectrum line is also large, and by dividing this by the weight ratio J, the intensity of the spectrum line can be adjusted to the intensity of the spectrum line of the standard sample. The error can be reduced.

請求項4のように、標準試料および未知試料が無機元素を含む有機物である場合に本発明方法は適している。
プラスチックや樹脂などの有機物は多用途で使用され、その特性は機能に応じて改質され、多くの添加剤(例えば顔料、充填剤、難燃剤等)が加えられる。これらが添加された有機物は、有機物単体の密度に比べて例えば2倍程度大きくなるため、標準試料と未知試料の構成成分を類似させるのが難しく、定量分析を困難にしている。
このような有機物よりなる試料に含まれる無機元素を定量する場合、一定体積の標準試料と未知試料とを準備しても、その重量に差が生じ、スペクトル線の強度の変動を伴う。そのため、固体発光分光分析法は有機物に含まれる無機元素の分析には適さないとされていた。
本発明では、重量比を用いてスペクトル線の強度あるいは未知試料の成分元素の含有率を補正しているので、有機物に含まれる無機元素であっても高精度な定量分析が可能になる。
As in claim 4, the method of the present invention is suitable when the standard sample and the unknown sample are organic substances containing inorganic elements.
Organic substances such as plastics and resins are used for many purposes, and their properties are modified according to their functions, and many additives (for example, pigments, fillers, flame retardants, etc.) are added. Since the organic substance to which these are added is about twice as large as the density of the organic substance alone, it is difficult to make the constituents of the standard sample and the unknown sample similar, making quantitative analysis difficult.
When quantifying an inorganic element contained in a sample made of such an organic substance, even if a standard sample and an unknown sample having a constant volume are prepared, a difference in the weight is generated, and the intensity of the spectral line is changed. For this reason, solid-state emission spectroscopy has been considered unsuitable for analysis of inorganic elements contained in organic substances.
In the present invention, the intensity of the spectral line or the content rate of the component elements of the unknown sample is corrected using the weight ratio, so that even with an inorganic element contained in an organic substance, a highly accurate quantitative analysis is possible.

請求項5のように、放電を行うための電極対の一方の電極に凹部を形成し、この凹部にそれぞれ粉末状とされた標準試料および未知試料を収容し、この凹部に収容された標準試料および未知試料をアーク放電により蒸発ならびに励起発光させるのがよい。
試料を粉末状にすれば、アーク放電によって容易に蒸発、励起発光させることができる。アーク放電は、10μg/g未満と高感度であり、超微量分析に適している。しかも、有機物や酸化物などの非導電性試料を、溶液化せずに直接分析することができるという利点がある。
6. A concave portion is formed in one electrode of an electrode pair for discharging as in claim 5, and a standard sample and an unknown sample, which are each in powder form, are accommodated in the concave portion, and the standard sample is accommodated in the concave portion. It is preferable that the unknown sample is evaporated and excited by arc discharge.
If the sample is powdered, it can be easily evaporated and excited by arc discharge. Arc discharge has a high sensitivity of less than 10 μg / g and is suitable for ultra-trace analysis. In addition, there is an advantage that non-conductive samples such as organic substances and oxides can be directly analyzed without forming a solution.

請求項1に記載の発明を用いることで、ある特定の標準物質から作製した標準試料の検量線を基準に、未知試料と標準試料との重量比を用いて補正することで、共存元素や構成元素の異なる未知試料について定量することが可能である。これにより、溶液化などの煩雑な前処理を必要とせず、少ない試料量で他の分析法(蛍光X線分析法、湿式化学分析法)よりも迅速な定量分析方法を提供できる。 By using the invention according to claim 1, by correcting the weight ratio between the unknown sample and the standard sample based on the calibration curve of the standard sample prepared from a specific standard substance, the coexisting elements and the configuration It is possible to quantify unknown samples with different elements. Thereby, a complicated pretreatment such as solutionization is not required, and a quantitative analysis method that is quicker than other analysis methods (fluorescent X-ray analysis method, wet chemical analysis method) can be provided with a small amount of sample.

以下に、本発明の実施の形態を、実施例を参照して説明する。 Embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to examples.

図1は本発明にかかる発光分光分析方法を実施するための分析装置の一例を示す。
1はDCアーク放電を発生させるための放電発生装置であり、DC電源2と、この電源2に接続された対をなす電極3,4とで構成されている。陰極側電極3はコーン状に形成され、陽極側電極4はカップ状に形成され、陽極側電極4の先端部には粉末試料Wを充填するための凹部4aが設けられている。電極3,4は例えば黒鉛で形成されている。両電極3,4間に直流電圧を印加することにより、アーク放電を発生させ、電極4の凹部4aに充填された試料Wを蒸発および励起発光させる。
励起発光された光は入射スリット5を通り、凹面鏡6で反射され、プリズム7によって分光された後、回析格子8によって固有スペクトル線に分解される。所定の成分元素に対応したスペクトル線は、凹面鏡9で反射して半導体検出器などの検出器10によって検出される。
ここでは、単一のスペクトル線の検出方法について図示したが、複数の検出器10を設けることで、複数のスペクトル線を同時に検出することもできる。
また、試料の励起発光は、大気中で行ってもよいし、Ar+O2 雰囲気で行ってもよい。
なお、図1はDCアーク励起発光分光分析装置の一例を示すに過ぎず、本発明の分析方法を実施する装置は図1に限定されるものではない。
FIG. 1 shows an example of an analyzer for carrying out an emission spectroscopic analysis method according to the present invention.
Reference numeral 1 denotes a discharge generator for generating a DC arc discharge, which is composed of a DC power supply 2 and a pair of electrodes 3 and 4 connected to the power supply 2. The cathode side electrode 3 is formed in a cone shape, the anode side electrode 4 is formed in a cup shape, and a recess 4 a for filling the powder sample W is provided at the tip of the anode side electrode 4. The electrodes 3 and 4 are made of graphite, for example. By applying a DC voltage between the electrodes 3 and 4, arc discharge is generated, and the sample W filled in the recess 4a of the electrode 4 is evaporated and excited to emit light.
The excited light passes through the entrance slit 5, is reflected by the concave mirror 6, is split by the prism 7, and is then decomposed into eigenspectral lines by the diffraction grating 8. A spectral line corresponding to a predetermined component element is reflected by the concave mirror 9 and detected by a detector 10 such as a semiconductor detector.
Although a single spectral line detection method is illustrated here, a plurality of spectral lines can be detected simultaneously by providing a plurality of detectors 10.
The excitation emission of the sample may be performed in air, it may be carried out in Ar + O 2 atmosphere.
FIG. 1 merely shows an example of a DC arc excitation emission spectroscopic analysis apparatus, and the apparatus for performing the analysis method of the present invention is not limited to FIG.

次に、本発明にかかる発光分光分析方法の具体例について説明する。
まず、表1に示す標準物質(European Commission Certified Reference Material BCR−680,681)と希釈材にポリエチレン(SCIENTIIFIC POLYMER PRODUCTS,INC. 製POLYETHYLENE low density)とを用い、表2の配合を行い、凍結粉砕によって粉末状の標準試料STD1〜STD7を作製した。なお、凍結粉砕だけでなく、通常の粉砕を行ってもよい。試料が電極4の凹部4aに収まる固体であれば、粉砕することなく、そのまま分析することも可能である。
Next, a specific example of the emission spectroscopic analysis method according to the present invention will be described.
First, using the reference materials shown in Table 1 (European Commission Certified Reference Material BCR-680,681) and polyethylene as diluent (POLYETHYLENE low density made by SCIENTIIFIC POLYMER PRODUCTS, INC.), The composition shown in Table 2 was blended and freeze-ground. Thus, powdery standard samples STD1 to STD7 were prepared. In addition to the freeze pulverization, normal pulverization may be performed. If the sample is a solid that can fit in the recess 4a of the electrode 4, it can be analyzed as it is without being crushed.

Figure 0004433765
Figure 0004433765

Figure 0004433765
Figure 0004433765

表3は、図1に示す分析装置を用いて、標準試料STD1〜STD7から検量線を作成するための測定条件を示し、図2のSTDは、前記測定条件で作成した検量線を示す。

Figure 0004433765
Table 3 shows the measurement conditions for creating a calibration curve from the standard samples STD1 to STD7 using the analyzer shown in FIG. 1, and STD in FIG. 2 shows the calibration curve created under the measurement conditions.
Figure 0004433765

図1,表3に示す分析装置の場合、検量線の関数は次式で近似できる。
SIR=A0 +(A1 ×C)n +(A2 ×C)2n …(3)
ただし、SIR:スペクトル線の強度,A0 :オフセット,A1 :ゲイン係数,A2 :曲線係数,C:濃度,n:最良フィット係数である。
パラメータA0 ,A1 ,A2 ,nは分析装置および測定条件によって決まる値であるから、スペクトル線の強度SIRを測定すれば、その濃度Cを計算で求めることができる。
なお、(3)式は表3のような測定条件における分析装置の計算式であり、測定条件や構成が異なる分析装置の場合には、計算式も異なる。
In the case of the analyzer shown in FIG. 1 and Table 3, the function of the calibration curve can be approximated by the following equation.
SIR = A 0 + (A 1 × C) n + (A 2 × C) 2n (3)
Where SIR: spectral line intensity, A 0 : offset, A 1 : gain coefficient, A 2 : curve coefficient, C: concentration, n: best fit coefficient.
Since the parameters A 0 , A 1 , A 2 , n are values determined by the analyzer and measurement conditions, the concentration C can be obtained by calculation by measuring the intensity SIR of the spectral line.
Equation (3) is a calculation formula of the analyzer under the measurement conditions as shown in Table 3. In the case of analyzers having different measurement conditions and configurations, the calculation formulas are also different.

次に、表4に示す4種類の物質(PPS樹脂,エポキシ樹脂,PPO樹脂,PVC樹脂)を準備した。これら物質のうち、PPS樹脂が190ppmのCdを含有するが、他の樹脂はそれぞれCdの含有率が1ppm未満である。これら物質の定量には、μ−Wave酸溶解法を用いて溶液化し、ICP−AES分析法またはICP−MS分析法を用いた。 Next, four types of substances shown in Table 4 (PPS resin, epoxy resin, PPO resin, PVC resin) were prepared. Of these materials, the PPS resin contains 190 ppm of Cd, while the other resins each have a Cd content of less than 1 ppm. For quantification of these substances, a solution was prepared using a μ-Wave acid dissolution method, and an ICP-AES analysis method or an ICP-MS analysis method was used.

Figure 0004433765
Figure 0004433765

次に、表4に示す4種類の物質を使用し、表5に示す配合を行って、Cd含有率(濃度)の異なる15種類の検討試料を作製した。ここでも、凍結粉砕によって粉末状の試料を作製したが、凍結粉砕だけでなく、通常の粉砕を行ってもよい。
表5−1は、エポキシ樹脂にPPS樹脂を配合してCd濃度の異なる5種類の試料(エポ−1〜エポ−5)を作製したものであり、表5−2は、PPO樹脂にPPS樹脂を配合してCd濃度の異なる5種類の試料(PPO−1〜PPO−5)を作製したものであり、表5−3は、PVC樹脂にBCRを配合して標準試料STDと同様な5種類の試料(PVC−1〜PVC−5)を作製したものである。
Next, four types of substances shown in Table 4 were used and blended as shown in Table 5 to prepare 15 types of examination samples having different Cd contents (concentrations). Here, a powder sample was prepared by freeze pulverization, but not only freeze pulverization but also normal pulverization may be performed.
Table 5-1 shows five samples (Epo-1 to Epo-5) having different Cd concentrations by blending an epoxy resin with a PPS resin, and Table 5-2 shows a PPS resin with a PPS resin. 5 types of samples (PPO-1 to PPO-5) having different Cd concentrations were prepared, and Table 5-3 shows the same 5 types as the standard sample STD by adding BCR to PVC resin. Samples (PVC-1 to PVC-5) were prepared.

Figure 0004433765
Figure 0004433765

図2には、検量線STDのほかに、上述の検討試料について、表3と同一条件でCdのスペクトル強度を測定し、その強度とCd濃度との関係をプロットしてある。ここで、Cdのスペクトル線の波長は228.8nmである。
図2から明らかなように、PVC樹脂を用いた検討試料については検量線STDに近似しているが、エポキシ樹脂を用いた検討試料、およびPPO樹脂を用いた検討試料では、スペクトル線の強度が検量線STDから大きくかけ離れていることがわかる。
このように樹脂のような有機物に含まれる無機元素を定量する場合、そのスペクトル線の強度を測定しても、そのスペクトル強度−濃度の関係が検量線からかけ離れている可能性があるため、測定したスペクトル線強度と検量線とから濃度を正確に定量することができない。
In FIG. 2, in addition to the calibration curve STD, the spectral intensity of Cd was measured for the above-mentioned examination samples under the same conditions as in Table 3, and the relationship between the intensity and the Cd concentration was plotted. Here, the wavelength of the spectral line of Cd is 228.8 nm.
As is clear from FIG. 2, the test sample using PVC resin approximates the calibration curve STD, but the test sample using epoxy resin and the test sample using PPO resin have spectral line intensities. It can be seen that this is far from the calibration curve STD.
In this way, when quantifying inorganic elements contained in organic substances such as resins, even if the intensity of the spectral line is measured, the relationship between the spectral intensity and concentration may be far from the calibration curve. The concentration cannot be accurately determined from the spectral line intensity and the calibration curve.

そこで、本発明では、電極4の凹部4aに一定体積で充填される試料の重量比を用いて、未知試料のスペクトル強度に対して補正を行う。
重量比Jは、次式のように、電極4の凹部4aに充填された未知試料の重量と標準試料STDの重量との比で求められる。
J=未知試料の重量/標準試料の重量 …(1)
そして、重量比Jで未知試料のスペクトル強度SIRに対して次式のような補正を行う。なお、SIR’は補正後のスペクトル強度である。
SIR’=SIR/J …(2)
前記補正式と、前述の検量線の(3)式とを用いて未知試料の濃度Cを計算する式は次の通りである。
SIR/J=A0 +(A1 ×C)n +(A2 ×C)2n …(4)
Therefore, in the present invention, the spectral intensity of the unknown sample is corrected using the weight ratio of the sample filled in the concave portion 4a of the electrode 4 with a constant volume.
The weight ratio J is obtained by the ratio between the weight of the unknown sample filled in the concave portion 4a of the electrode 4 and the weight of the standard sample STD as shown in the following equation.
J = weight of unknown sample / weight of standard sample (1)
And correction | amendment like following Formula is performed with respect to the spectral intensity SIR of an unknown sample by weight ratio J. SIR ′ is the corrected spectral intensity.
SIR ′ = SIR / J (2)
An equation for calculating the concentration C of the unknown sample using the correction equation and the above-described calibration curve (3) is as follows.
SIR / J = A 0 + (A 1 × C) n + (A 2 × C) 2n (4)

表6は重量比の一例を示す。ここでは、エポキシ樹脂よりなる検討試料がPPO樹脂やPVC樹脂よりなる検討試料に比べて重量比が大きい。なお、この重量比は各樹脂に含まれる成分元素およびその濃度によって異なる。

Figure 0004433765
Table 6 shows an example of the weight ratio. Here, the weight ratio of the examination sample made of epoxy resin is larger than that of the examination sample made of PPO resin or PVC resin. In addition, this weight ratio changes with the component elements contained in each resin, and its density | concentration.
Figure 0004433765

図3は、表6の重量比Jを用いて補正した検討試料のスペクトル強度とCd濃度との関係と、検量線STDとを示す。
図3から明らかなように、Cdの低濃度域である30ppm付近までは、STDと検討試料とが良く一致していることがわかる。
FIG. 3 shows the relationship between the spectral intensity and Cd concentration of the test sample corrected using the weight ratio J in Table 6 and the calibration curve STD.
As is apparent from FIG. 3, it can be seen that the STD and the sample to be examined are in good agreement up to around 30 ppm, which is a low Cd concentration range.

表7は、補正後のスペクトル線強度から検討試料のCdについて定量した結果を、化学分析法と比較して示す。化学分析とは、表4と同様に、μ−Wave酸溶解法を用いて溶液化し、ICP−AES分析法またはICP−MS分析法を用いて定量したものであり、高精度の分析法である。
ここでも、Cdの低濃度域である30ppm付近までは、本発明方法と化学分析法とが一致傾向にあり、本発明方法の定量精度が向上したことがわかる。

Figure 0004433765
Table 7 shows the result of quantifying the Cd of the sample to be examined from the corrected spectral line intensity in comparison with the chemical analysis method. Similarly to Table 4, chemical analysis is a solution using the μ-Wave acid dissolution method and quantified using the ICP-AES analysis method or ICP-MS analysis method, and is a highly accurate analysis method. .
Here, it can be seen that the method of the present invention and the chemical analysis method tend to coincide with each other up to around 30 ppm, which is a low concentration region of Cd, and the quantitative accuracy of the method of the present invention is improved.
Figure 0004433765

なお、図3および表7から明らかなように、重量比による補正を行うことで定量精度が向上するが、化学分析法に比べて十分な精度を有するとは言えない。
これを改善するため、例えば重量比J以外にCd化合物別の発光挙動や、キャリア効果(共存元素)を考慮した標準試料を用いると、さらに精度を向上させることができる。
また、(2)式では測定されたスペクトル強度SIRを重量比Jで除算することで補正スペクトル強度SIR’を求めたが、(2)式以外の補正式を用いることも可能である。
As is clear from FIG. 3 and Table 7, correction by weight ratio improves the quantitative accuracy, but it cannot be said to have sufficient accuracy compared to chemical analysis.
In order to improve this, for example, in addition to the weight ratio J, the accuracy can be further improved by using a standard sample in consideration of the light emission behavior for each Cd compound and the carrier effect (coexisting element).
Further, in the equation (2), the corrected spectral intensity SIR ′ is obtained by dividing the measured spectral intensity SIR by the weight ratio J, but a correction equation other than the equation (2) can also be used.

前記実施例では、一方の電極の凹部に粉末試料を充填し、この電極と対向する電極との間でアーク放電を発生させて試料を励起発光させるようにしたが、固体試料を用い、これにアーク放電またはスパーク放電を作用させて励起発光させてもよい。 In the above embodiment, the concave portion of one electrode is filled with a powder sample, and an arc discharge is generated between the electrode and the opposite electrode so that the sample is excited and emitted, but a solid sample is used. An arc discharge or a spark discharge may be applied to cause excitation light emission.

また、前記実施例では、(2)式のようにスペクトル強度SIRを重量比Jで補正した後、補正したスペクトル線の強度SIR’と検量線とに基づいて、未知試料の成分元素の含有率(濃度)を求める方法について説明したが、未知試料から得られたスペクトル線の強度と検量線とに基づいて、未知試料の成分元素の含有率(濃度)を求めた後、この含有率を重量比Jを用いて補正してもよい。
この場合の補正式は、含有率を重量比Jで除算するものに限らず、他の補正式を用いることができる。
Moreover, in the said Example, after correcting spectral intensity SIR by weight ratio J like (2) Formula, based on the corrected spectral line intensity | strength SIR 'and a calibration curve, the content rate of the component element of an unknown sample Although the method for obtaining (concentration) has been described, the content (concentration) of the component elements of the unknown sample is obtained based on the intensity of the spectral line obtained from the unknown sample and the calibration curve, and this content is then weighted. Correction may be performed using the ratio J.
The correction formula in this case is not limited to dividing the content ratio by the weight ratio J, and other correction formulas can be used.

本発明にかかる発光分光分析方法が用いられる発光分光分析装置の一例の概略図である。It is the schematic of an example of the emission-spectral-analysis apparatus with which the emission-spectral-analysis method concerning this invention is used. 補正前の検討試料のCdスペクトル強度とCd濃度との関係および検量線を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the relationship between the Cd spectrum intensity | strength of the examination sample before correction | amendment, and Cd density | concentration, and a calibration curve. 補正後の検討試料のCdスペクトル強度とCd濃度との関係および検量線を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the relationship between the Cd spectrum intensity | strength of the examination sample after correction | amendment, and Cd density | concentration, and a calibration curve.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1 アーク放電発生装置
3,4 電極
4a 凹部
8 回析格子
10 検出器
W 試料
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Arc discharge generator 3, 4 Electrode 4a Recessed part 8 Diffraction grating 10 Detector W Sample

Claims (5)

放電によって試料を蒸発ならびに励起発光させ、その光を分光して得られるスペクトル線の波長と強度とを測定する発光分光分析方法において、
成分元素の含有率が既知の標準試料を励起発光させ、標準試料の所定の成分元素の含有率とスペクトル線の強度との関係から検量線を求める工程と、
未知試料を励起発光させ、前記標準試料の成分元素と同一の成分元素におけるスペクトル線の強度を測定する工程と、
前記未知試料と標準試料との蒸発した重量比を用いて、前記未知試料から得られたスペクトル線の強度を補正する工程と、
前記補正したスペクトル線の強度と前記検量線とに基づいて、前記未知試料の成分元素の含有率を求める工程と、を含む発光分光分析方法。
In an emission spectroscopic analysis method for measuring the wavelength and intensity of a spectral line obtained by evaporating and exciting emission of a sample by electric discharge and dispersing the light,
A step of exciting and emitting a standard sample whose component element content is known, and obtaining a calibration curve from the relationship between the content of the predetermined component element of the standard sample and the intensity of the spectral line;
A step of exciting an unknown sample to emit light and measuring the intensity of a spectral line in the same component element as that of the standard sample;
Correcting the intensity of the spectral line obtained from the unknown sample using the evaporated weight ratio of the unknown sample and the standard sample;
Determining the content of the component element of the unknown sample based on the corrected intensity of the spectral line and the calibration curve.
放電によって試料を蒸発ならびに励起発光させ、その光を分光して得られるスペクトル線の波長と強度とを測定する発光分光分析方法において、
成分元素の含有率が既知の標準試料を励起発光させ、標準試料の所定の成分元素の含有率とスペクトル線の強度との関係から検量線を求める工程と、
未知試料を励起発光させ、前記標準試料の成分元素と同一の成分元素におけるスペクトル線の強度を測定する工程と、
前記未知試料から得られたスペクトル線の強度と前記検量線とに基づいて、前記未知試料の成分元素の含有率を求める工程と、
前記未知試料と標準試料との蒸発した重量比を用いて、前記未知試料の成分元素の含有率を補正する工程と、を含む発光分光分析方法。
In an emission spectroscopic analysis method for measuring the wavelength and intensity of a spectral line obtained by evaporating and exciting emission of a sample by electric discharge and dispersing the light,
A step of exciting and emitting a standard sample whose component element content is known, and obtaining a calibration curve from the relationship between the content of the predetermined component element of the standard sample and the intensity of the spectral line;
A step of exciting an unknown sample to emit light and measuring the intensity of a spectral line in the same component element as that of the standard sample;
Based on the intensity of the spectral line obtained from the unknown sample and the calibration curve, determining the content of component elements of the unknown sample;
Correcting the content of the component elements of the unknown sample by using the evaporated weight ratio of the unknown sample and the standard sample.
前記未知試料から得られたスペクトル線の強度SIRを前記重量比Jを用いて、次式により補正することを特徴とする請求項1に記載の発光分光分析方法。
J=未知試料の蒸発重量/標準試料の蒸発重量 …(1)
補正されたスペクトル線の強度=SIR/J …(2)
The emission spectroscopic analysis method according to claim 1, wherein the intensity SIR of the spectral line obtained from the unknown sample is corrected by the following equation using the weight ratio J.
J = evaporation weight of unknown sample / evaporation weight of standard sample (1)
Intensity of corrected spectral line = SIR / J (2)
前記標準試料および未知試料は無機元素を含む有機物であることを特徴とする請求項1ないし3のいずれかに記載の発光分光分析方法。 The emission spectroscopic analysis method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the standard sample and the unknown sample are organic substances containing an inorganic element. 前記放電を行うための電極対の一方の電極に凹部が形成され、この凹部にそれぞれ粉末状とされた標準試料および未知試料が収容され、この凹部に収容された標準試料および未知試料をアーク放電により蒸発ならびに励起発光させることを特徴とする請求項1ないし4のいずれかに記載の発光分光分析方法。 A concave portion is formed in one electrode of the electrode pair for performing the discharge, and a standard sample and an unknown sample which are in powder form are accommodated in the concave portion, respectively, and the standard sample and the unknown sample accommodated in the concave portion are arc-discharged. 5. The emission spectroscopic analysis method according to claim 1, wherein the light is evaporated and excited to emit light.
JP2003375274A 2003-11-05 2003-11-05 Emission spectroscopic method Expired - Lifetime JP4433765B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2003375274A JP4433765B2 (en) 2003-11-05 2003-11-05 Emission spectroscopic method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2003375274A JP4433765B2 (en) 2003-11-05 2003-11-05 Emission spectroscopic method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2005140565A JP2005140565A (en) 2005-06-02
JP4433765B2 true JP4433765B2 (en) 2010-03-17

Family

ID=34686689

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2003375274A Expired - Lifetime JP4433765B2 (en) 2003-11-05 2003-11-05 Emission spectroscopic method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4433765B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2008103937A2 (en) 2007-02-23 2008-08-28 Thermo Niton Analyzers Llc Hand-held, self-contained optical emission spectroscopy (oes) analyzer
JP2008241336A (en) * 2007-03-26 2008-10-09 Tokyo Metropolitan Industrial Technology Research Institute Analysis of trace components in materials by arc emission spectroscopy
JP5251816B2 (en) * 2009-09-30 2013-07-31 株式会社島津製作所 Luminescence analyzer
KR102609886B1 (en) * 2019-11-05 2023-12-04 한화솔루션 주식회사 Analysis method for trace harmful substances in polymer resin using matrix correction XRF method
CN113376144A (en) * 2021-06-08 2021-09-10 山东非金属材料研究所 Analysis method for low bromine content in fluororubber
CN114720373B (en) * 2022-02-18 2024-09-13 中国航发北京航空材料研究院 Method for measuring element content in high-temperature alloy by adopting hollow cathode photoelectric spectrometry
CN114720374B (en) * 2022-02-18 2024-09-13 中国航发北京航空材料研究院 Method for measuring component content in high-temperature alloy by adopting hollow cathode photoelectric spectrometry
CN114720375B (en) * 2022-02-18 2024-09-13 中国航发北京航空材料研究院 Method for determining trace elements in high-temperature alloy

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2005140565A (en) 2005-06-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Manjusha et al. Determination of major to trace level elements in Zircaloys by electrolyte cathode discharge atomic emission spectrometry using formic acid
JP4433765B2 (en) Emission spectroscopic method
Lee et al. Determination of mercury in urine by electrothermal vaporization isotope dilution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
Spolnik et al. Optimization of measurement conditions of an energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometer with high-energy polarized beam excitation for analysis of aerosol filters
Gandhi et al. Atomic absorption spectroscopy and flame photometry
Mohammed Elemental analysis using atomic absorption spectroscopy
Al-Ammar et al. Correction for non-spectroscopic matrix effects in inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry by common analyte internal standardization
Greda et al. Determination of mercury in mosses by novel cold vapor generation atmospheric pressure glow microdischarge optical emission spectrometry after multivariate optimization
JP2009085943A (en) ICP emission spectroscopy method
Thieleke et al. A calibration strategy for LA-ICP-MS using isotope dilution for solid reference materials
Schramm et al. Fast analysis of traces and major elements with ED (P) XRF using polarized X-rays: TURBOQUANT
Barreiros et al. Quality assurance of X-ray spectrometry for chemical analysis
Rehan et al. Detection of nutritional and toxic elements in Pakistani pepper powders using laser induced breakdown spectroscopy
Brown et al. Spectroscopic temperatures of a moderate-power argon microwave-induced plasma
Tong Stationary cold-vapor atomic absorption spectrometric method for mercury determination
Itoh et al. Determination of alloying elements and trace titanium in 2.25 Cr-1Mo steel by glow discharge mass spectrometry
Li et al. Calibration-free quantitative analysis of D/H isotopes with a fs-laser filament
Molt et al. Determination of light elements in organic liquid matrices by principal component regression in EDXRS using backscattered radiation
Lincoln et al. Quantitative determination of platinum in alumina base reforming catalyst by X-ray spectroscopy
Šerá et al. Determination of key elements in plant samples by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry with electrothermal vaporization
JP2010014513A (en) Metal component analysis method in solder flux
Owoade et al. Model estimated uncertainties in the calibration of a total reflection X‐ray fluorescence spectrometer using single‐element standards
Crooks III et al. A General Technique for Heteropolyanion Analysis Using Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectroscopy, Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy and Gravimetry
Molt et al. Application of factor analysis in EDXRF
Liu et al. Characterization of the analytical capabilities of an atmospheric micro‐plasma device for the detection of nonmetals

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20061012

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20091208

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20091221

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4433765

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130108

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130108

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140108

Year of fee payment: 4

EXPY Cancellation because of completion of term