JP4540428B2 - Method for producing hot rolled non-heat treated steel bar - Google Patents
Method for producing hot rolled non-heat treated steel bar Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP4540428B2 JP4540428B2 JP2004250348A JP2004250348A JP4540428B2 JP 4540428 B2 JP4540428 B2 JP 4540428B2 JP 2004250348 A JP2004250348 A JP 2004250348A JP 2004250348 A JP2004250348 A JP 2004250348A JP 4540428 B2 JP4540428 B2 JP 4540428B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- less
- steel bar
- steel
- cooling rate
- precipitates
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Heat Treatment Of Steel (AREA)
Description
本発明は、熱間圧延ままの非調質材であっても、引張強度が700MPa以上で、かつ表層部と中央部の引張強度の差が80MPa以下、降伏強度の差が100MPa以下であり、しかも高靱性で切削性にも優れる、熱間圧延型非調質棒鋼の製造方法に関するものである。 The present invention is a non-tempered material as it is hot-rolled, the tensile strength is 700 MPa or more, and the difference in tensile strength between the surface layer portion and the central portion is 80 MPa or less, the difference in yield strength is 100 MPa or less, Moreover excellent in machinability in high tenacity, a method of manufacturing a hot rolled type non-heat treated bar steel.
なお、本発明おける熱間圧延型非調質棒鋼とは、棒鋼圧延後の冷却中に微細析出物を析出させて特性の改善を図ったもので、製品に加工後に調質処理を要しない棒鋼のことを意味する。 The hot-rolled non-tempered steel bar in the present invention is a steel bar that does not require a tempering treatment after it is processed into a product by precipitating fine precipitates during cooling after rolling the steel bar. Means that.
自動車をはじめとして、輸送機械や建設機械に用いられる構造部品には、機械構造用炭素鋼や機械構造用合金鋼を焼入れ焼戻した調質鋼だけでなく、焼入れ焼戻しによらず鋼の化学成分や組織の調整によって強度を確保した非調質鋼が用いられている。 Structural components used in transportation equipment and construction machinery, including automobiles, include not only tempered steel that has been tempered and tempered carbon steel for machine structure and alloy steel for machine structure, Non-tempered steel whose strength is secured by adjusting the structure is used.
このような用途に用いられる非調質鋼は、VやNbを添加したフェライト−パーライト二層組織が一般的で、調質鋼に比べると、引張強度を同程度にした場合には、降伏強度、絞り値および衝撃値が低く、一方降伏強度を同程度とした場合には、引張強度すなわち硬度が過度に上昇し、切削性が低下することが指摘されていた。 Non-tempered steel used for such applications generally has a ferrite-pearlite double-layered structure with V and Nb added. When tensile strength is comparable to tempered steel, yield strength is higher. It has been pointed out that when the drawing value and impact value are low and the yield strength is comparable, the tensile strength, that is, the hardness is excessively increased and the machinability is decreased.
上記の背景の下で、特許文献1および特許文献2には、高強度で高降伏比、かつ高靱性な非調質鋼を得るために、フェライト、ベイニティックフェライト、疑似マルテンサイトを有する組織をそなえた鋼材を、冷間加工後、600℃以下で時効処理し、CuおよびTi−Nb系炭化物を析出させることからなる技術が開示されている。 Under the background described above, Patent Document 1 and Patent Document 2 describe a structure having ferrite, bainitic ferrite, and pseudo martensite in order to obtain a high-strength, high yield ratio, and high toughness non-heat treated steel. A technique comprising aging treatment of a steel material having the above-mentioned after cold working at 600 ° C. or less to precipitate Cu and Ti—Nb-based carbides is disclosed.
しかしながら、実製造において、上記したような複数の組織の比率を厳格に制御することは極めて難しく、また多量のCu添加による析出強化を利用する場合には高温割れ防止のために高価なNiを多量に添加する必要があるため、大量消費される構造部品としては適当ではないという問題があった。 However, in actual production, it is extremely difficult to strictly control the ratio of multiple structures as described above, and when using precipitation strengthening by adding a large amount of Cu, a large amount of expensive Ni is used to prevent hot cracking. Therefore, there is a problem that it is not suitable as a structural part that is consumed in large quantities.
そこで、発明者らは、実製造においても生産性が低下せず、また安価な成分系で700MPa以上の引張強度と0.85以上の降伏比を有し、かつ靱性にも優れる熱間圧延型非調質棒鋼を得る技術として、フェライト単相組織中に粒径が10nm未満の微細析出物を分散析出させる技術を開発し、特許文献3において開示した。
しかしながら、特許文献3の技術は、その実施例からも判るように比較的直径の小さな小径の棒鋼を対象として考案されたものであり、直径の大きな大径の棒鋼には必ずしも適用することができないという問題があった。
すなわち、特許文献3の技術は、熱間圧延後の冷却中に微細析出物を分散析出させることを基本としているが、直径が大きくなり、棒鋼の冷却速度が0.2℃/s以下になると、析出物が十分に微細とはならず、所定の特性が得られない場合があった。また、棒鋼の表層部と中央部の冷却速度差に配慮していないため、冷却速度が比較的早い表層部にはベイナイト等の低温変態相が生成し、表層部と中央部とで引張強度および降伏強度に大きな差異を生じる場合があることが知見された。
Therefore, the inventors have not reduced the productivity even in actual production, have a tensile strength of 700 MPa or more and a yield ratio of 0.85 or more with an inexpensive component system, and are excellent in hot rolling type non-adjustment. As a technique for obtaining a solid steel bar, a technique for dispersing and precipitating fine precipitates having a particle size of less than 10 nm in a ferrite single phase structure was developed and disclosed in Patent Document 3.
However, the technique of Patent Document 3 was devised for a small-diameter steel bar having a relatively small diameter, as can be seen from the examples, and is not necessarily applicable to a large-diameter steel bar having a large diameter. There was a problem.
In other words, the technique of Patent Document 3 is based on dispersing fine precipitates during cooling after hot rolling, but when the diameter increases and the cooling rate of the steel bar becomes 0.2 ° C./s or less, precipitation occurs. In some cases, the object is not sufficiently fine, and predetermined characteristics cannot be obtained. Moreover, since the cooling rate difference between the surface layer portion and the central portion of the steel bar is not taken into consideration, a low temperature transformation phase such as bainite is generated in the surface layer portion where the cooling rate is relatively fast, and the tensile strength and It has been found that there may be a large difference in yield strength.
本発明は、上記の実状に鑑み開発されたもので、安価な成分系で、かつ実製造で容易に製造可能で、しかも棒鋼の寸法が120〜400mmと大径の棒鋼であっても、700MPa以上の引張強度と調質材に匹敵する高い靱性を有し、しかも表層部と中央部の引張強度および降伏強度の差が小さく直径方向の強度均一性に優れた熱間圧延型非調質棒鋼の有利な製造方法を提案することを目的とする。 The present invention has been developed in view of the above-mentioned actual situation, and can be easily manufactured by an inexpensive component system and by actual manufacturing. Moreover, even if the steel bar has a large diameter of 120 to 400 mm , 700 MPa Hot-rolled non-tempered rod with high tensile strength and high toughness comparable to tempered material, with small difference in tensile strength and yield strength between the surface layer and center, and excellent strength uniformity in the diameter direction The object is to propose an advantageous method for producing steel .
さて、発明者らは、上記の目的を達成すべく鋭意研究を重ねた結果、析出物の微細化には、析出物の析出挙動とフェライト変態の進行が密接に関係していることを突き止めた。
具体的には、圧延後の冷却中に生じるフェライト変態の変態開始温度と析出物の析出開始温度との差が小さく、フェライト変態と析出物の析出が競合するような場合に、析出物が効果的に微細化されることの知見を得た。
本発明は、上記の知見に立脚するものである。
Now, as a result of intensive studies to achieve the above object, the inventors have found that the precipitation behavior of the precipitate and the progress of the ferrite transformation are closely related to the refinement of the precipitate. .
Specifically, the precipitate is effective when the difference between the transformation start temperature of the ferrite transformation that occurs during cooling after rolling and the precipitation start temperature of the precipitate is small and the ferrite transformation and the precipitation of the precipitate compete with each other. The knowledge that it refines automatically is obtained.
The present invention is based on the above findings.
すなわち、本発明の要旨構成は次のとおりである。
1.質量%で、
C:0.060〜0.120%、
Si:0.5%以下、
Mn:下記(1)式の範囲、
Al:0.1%以下、
Ti:0.03〜0.35%および
Mo:0.05〜0.8%
を含有し、残部はFeおよび不可避的不純物の組成になる鋼素材を、1100℃以上に加熱後、仕上温度:850℃以上で仕上径を120〜400mmとして熱間圧延を終了したのち、冷却することを特徴とする熱間圧延型非調質棒鋼の製造方法。
記
-0.239×log(CR1)+0.889≦Mn≦-0.524×log(CR2)+1.218 ・・・(1)
ここで、CR1:圧延後、500℃までの棒鋼中央部の平均冷却速度(℃/s)
CR2:圧延後、500℃までの棒鋼表層部の平均冷却速度(℃/s)
That is, the gist configuration of the present invention is as follows.
1 . % By mass
C: 0.060 to 0.120%,
Si: 0.5% or less,
Mn: the range of the following formula (1),
Al: 0.1% or less,
Ti: 0.03-0.35% and
Mo: 0.05-0.8%
After heating the steel material containing Fe and the inevitable impurities composition to 1100 ° C or higher, finishing temperature: 850 ° C or higher and finishing diameter 120-400mm, and then cooling A method for producing a hot rolled non-heat treated steel bar characterized by the above.
Record
-0.239 × log (CR 1 ) + 0.889 ≦ Mn ≦ −0.524 × log (CR 2 ) +1.218 (1)
Where, CR 1 : Average cooling rate at the center of the steel bar up to 500 ° C after rolling (° C / s)
CR 2 : Average cooling rate of steel bar surface layer up to 500 ° C after rolling (° C / s)
2.上記1において、鋼中のC,TiおよびMo量が、次式(2)の関係を満足することを特徴とする熱間圧延型非調質棒鋼の製造方法。
0.5≦(C/12)/[(Ti/48)+(Mo/96)]≦1.5 ・・・(2)
2 . 1. A method for producing a hot-rolled non-tempered steel bar according to 1 above, wherein the amounts of C, Ti and Mo in the steel satisfy the relationship of the following formula (2).
0.5 ≦ (C / 12) / [(Ti / 48) + (Mo / 96)] ≦ 1.5 (2)
3.上記1または2において、鋼素材が、さらに質量%で
Nb:0.08%以下、
V:0.15%以下および
W:1.5%以下
のうちから選んだ一種または二種以上を含有する組成になることを特徴とする熱間圧延型非調質棒鋼の製造方法。
3 . In the above 1 or 2 , the steel material is further in mass%.
Nb: 0.08% or less,
A method for producing a hot-rolled non-tempered steel bar, comprising a composition containing one or more selected from V: 0.15% or less and W: 1.5% or less.
4.上記3において、鋼中のC,Ti,Mo,Nb,VおよびW量が、次式(3)の関係を満足することを特徴とする熱間圧延型非調質棒鋼の製造方法。
0.5≦(C/12)/[(Ti/48)+(Mo/96)+(Nb/93)+(V/51)+(W/184)]≦1.5 ・・・(3)
4. 3. The method for producing a hot-rolled non-tempered steel bar according to 3 above, wherein the amounts of C, Ti, Mo, Nb, V and W in the steel satisfy the relationship of the following formula (3).
0.5 ≦ (C / 12) / [(Ti / 48) + (Mo / 96) + (Nb / 93) + (V / 51) + (W / 184)] ≦ 1.5 (3)
本発明によれば、安価な成分系で、しかも実製造で容易に製造可能な、700 MPa以上の引張強度と調質材に匹敵する高い靱性を有し、さらに表層部と中央部の引張強度および降伏強度の差が小さく直径方向の強度均一性に優れた熱間圧延型非調質棒鋼を得ることができる。
また、本発明によれば、調質処理が不要なだけでなく、棒鋼の寸法に制約がないので、産業上極めて有用である。
According to the present invention, the tensile strength of 700 MPa or more and high toughness comparable to the tempered material, which is an inexpensive component system and can be easily produced by actual production, are further obtained. Further, it is possible to obtain a hot-rolled non-tempered steel bar having a small difference in yield strength and excellent strength uniformity in the diameter direction.
Further, according to the present invention, not only the tempering treatment is unnecessary, but also there is no restriction on the dimensions of the steel bar, which is extremely useful industrially.
以下、本発明を具体的に説明する。
まず、本発明において、鋼の成分組成を上記の範囲に限定した理由について説明する。なお、成分に関する「%」表示は特に断らない限り質量%を意味するものとする。
C:0.060〜0.120%
Cが0.060%に満たないと微細析出物の析出量が不足して、700MPa以上の引張強度が得られず、一方Cを0.120%を超えて含有させると析出物が粗大化し、やはり700MPa以上の引張強度が得られないため、C量は0.060〜0.120%の範囲に限定した。
The present invention will be specifically described below.
First, the reason why the component composition of steel is limited to the above range in the present invention will be described. Unless otherwise specified, “%” in relation to ingredients means mass%.
C: 0.060 to 0.120%
If C is less than 0.060%, the precipitation amount of fine precipitates is insufficient, and a tensile strength of 700 MPa or more cannot be obtained. Since tensile strength cannot be obtained, the C content is limited to a range of 0.060 to 0.120%.
Si:0.5%以下
Siは、冷間加工性を向上させるために添加するが、含有量が0.5%を超えると、むしろその効果が損なわれるため、Si量は0.5%以下とする。より好ましくは0.15%以下である。
Si: 0.5% or less
Si is added to improve cold workability, but if the content exceeds 0.5%, the effect is rather impaired, so the Si content is 0.5% or less. More preferably, it is 0.15% or less.
Mn:下記(1)式の範囲
記
-0.239×log(CR1)+0.889≦Mn≦-0.524×log(CR2)+1.218 ・・・(1)
ここで、CR1:圧延後、500℃までの棒鋼中央部の平均冷却速度(℃/s)
CR2:圧延後、500℃までの棒鋼表層部の平均冷却速度(℃/s)
Mnは、析出物を微細に析出させるため、並びに表層部におけるベイナイト等の低温変態相の生成を防止するために、上掲(1)式の範囲に制御することが重要である。
Mn: Range of the following formula (1)
Record
-0.239 × log (CR 1 ) + 0.889 ≦ Mn ≦ −0.524 × log (CR 2 ) +1.218 (1)
Where, CR 1 : Average cooling rate at the center of the steel bar up to 500 ° C after rolling (° C / s)
CR 2 : Average cooling rate of steel bar surface layer up to 500 ° C after rolling (° C / s)
It is important to control Mn within the range of the above formula (1) in order to precipitate precipitates finely and to prevent the formation of a low-temperature transformation phase such as bainite in the surface layer portion.
図1に、0.075%C−0.2%Si−0.16%Ti−0.34%Mo−0.015%P−0.015%S−0.045%Al−0.0033%N鋼をベースに、Mn量を種々変化させた鋼を溶製し、これを1200℃に加熱後、仕上温度900℃で棒鋼に熱間圧延した際の、鋼組織と析出物の大きさについて調査した結果を、鋼中Mn量および熱間圧延後の冷却速度との関係で示す。
なお、熱間圧延に際しては、熱間圧延後の冷却速度を変化させるために、棒鋼の仕上寸法を20mmφ〜400mmφの範囲で変えると共に、圧延後の冷却を空冷、保温カバー内徐冷、ミスト冷却の3種の方法で行った。冷却速度についてはオンラインでの測定が困難なため、熱間圧延での仕上寸法と同サイズの短尺の棒鋼を準備し、表層から中心方向に6mm深さ入った位置(以下表層部という)と棒鋼中心(以下中心部という)に熱電対を装着し、これをオフラインで900℃に加熱後、上記の熱間圧延の場合と同様に、空冷 、保温カバー内徐冷、ミスト冷却することで、500℃までの平均冷却速度を求めた。
Fig. 1 shows the melting of 0.075% C-0.2% Si-0.16% Ti-0.34% Mo-0.015% P-0.015% S-0.045% Al-0.0033% N steel with various Mn contents. After heating to 1200 ° C and hot rolling to a steel bar at a finishing temperature of 900 ° C, the results of investigations on the steel structure and the size of precipitates were investigated. The amount of Mn in the steel and the cooling after hot rolling Shown in relation to speed.
In hot rolling, in order to change the cooling rate after hot rolling, the finishing dimensions of the steel bar are changed in the range of 20mmφ to 400mmφ, and cooling after rolling is air cooling, slow cooling in the heat insulation cover, mist cooling. The following three methods were used. Since it is difficult to measure the cooling rate online, a short steel bar of the same size as the finished dimensions in hot rolling is prepared, and the position of the steel bar 6 mm deep from the surface (hereinafter referred to as the surface layer) and the steel bar A thermocouple is attached to the center (hereinafter referred to as the center), heated to 900 ° C offline, and then air-cooled, gradually cooled in the heat insulation cover, and mist-cooled in the same manner as in the case of the above hot rolling. The average cooling rate to ° C was determined.
図1から明らかなように、棒鋼の組織と析出物の大きさは、Mn量と冷却速度に応じて変化する。
Mn量が 直線aおよび直線bで挟まれる領域、すなわち冷却速度から計算される値{-0.239×log(CR)+0.889}以上、{-0.524×log(CR)+1.218}以下である場合に、フェライト単相で、しかもこのフェライト中に粒径:10nm未満の微細析出物が分散した組織が得られている。
これに対し、Mn量が冷却速度から計算される値{-0.239×log(CR)+0.889}を下回る場合には、フェライト単相とはなるものの、析出物の粒径は10nm以上になってしまう。また、Mn量が{-0.524×log(CR)+1.218}を超えた場合には、組織の一部にフェライトが存在するものの、大部分はベイナイト等の低温変態相になってしまう。
As is clear from FIG. 1, the structure of the steel bar and the size of the precipitates change according to the amount of Mn and the cooling rate.
Mn amount is the region between straight line a and straight line b, that is, a value calculated from the cooling rate {−0.239 × log (CR) +0.889} or more and {−0.524 × log (CR) +1.218} or less In some cases, a structure is obtained in which the ferrite is a single phase and fine precipitates having a particle size of less than 10 nm are dispersed in the ferrite.
On the other hand, when the amount of Mn is less than the value calculated from the cooling rate {−0.239 × log (CR) +0.889}, although the ferrite single phase is formed, the grain size of the precipitate becomes 10 nm or more. End up. When the amount of Mn exceeds {−0.524 × log (CR) +1.218}, ferrite exists in a part of the structure, but most of it becomes a low temperature transformation phase such as bainite.
従って、フェライト単相で、かつこのフェライト中に粒径:10nm未満の微細析出物が分散した組織を得るには、Mn量を冷却速度との関連で、{-0.239×log(CR)+0.889}以上、{-0.524×log(CR)+1.218}以下の範囲に調整することが重要である。
しかしながら、棒鋼の冷却速度は、必ずしも均等ではなく、中央部が最も小さく、表層部で最も大きい。
Therefore, in order to obtain a structure in which ferrite is a single phase and fine precipitates having a particle size of less than 10 nm are dispersed in this ferrite, the amount of Mn is related to {−0.239 × log (CR) +0. It is important to adjust to a range of 889} or more and {−0.524 × log (CR) +1.218} or less.
However, the cooling rate of the steel bar is not necessarily uniform, the center portion is the smallest and the surface layer portion is the largest.
そこで、本発明では、直線a{=-0.239×log(CR)+0.889}に対して、冷却速度が最も小さい中央部の冷却速度CR1を適用し、一方直線b{=-0.524×log(CR)+1.218}に対して、冷却速度が最も大きい表層部の冷却速度CR2を適用し、鋼中のMn量がこれらの直線で挟まれる範囲すなわち上掲(1)式を満足する範囲に制御することにより、棒鋼の表層部から中央部にわたる何れの位置においても、フェライト単相中に粒径:10nm未満の微細析出物が分散した組織を得るものとした。
なお、フェライト変態および析出物の析出とも500℃までに終了するので、冷却速度については、圧延後から500℃までを考えれば良い。
Therefore, in the present invention, the cooling rate CR 1 at the center where the cooling rate is the smallest is applied to the straight line a {= − 0.239 × log (CR) +0.889}, while the straight line b {= − 0.524 × log. For (CR) +1.218}, the cooling rate CR 2 of the surface layer with the highest cooling rate is applied, and the range in which the Mn content in the steel is sandwiched between these straight lines, that is, the above formula (1) is satisfied. By controlling to the range, a structure in which fine precipitates having a particle size of less than 10 nm were dispersed in the ferrite single phase at any position from the surface layer portion to the central portion of the steel bar was obtained.
It should be noted that since the ferrite transformation and precipitation of precipitates are all finished by 500 ° C., the cooling rate may be considered from 500 ° C. after rolling.
ところで、上記したような検討を進めるなかで、発明者らは、析出物の析出挙動がフェライト変態の進行と密接に関係しており、圧延後の冷却中に生じるフェライト変態の変態開始温度と析出物の析出開始温度の差が小さく、フェライト変態と析出が競合するような場合に、効果的に析出物が微細化することを新たに見出した。
図1に示したとおり、析出物が10nm未満に微細化するためのMn量の下限は冷却速度が遅いほど上昇するが、これもフェライト変態と析出の競合関係から、以下のように説明することができる。
By the way, while proceeding with the examination as described above, the inventors have closely related the precipitation behavior of the precipitate to the progress of the ferrite transformation, and the transformation start temperature and precipitation of the ferrite transformation that occurs during cooling after rolling. It was newly found that precipitates are effectively refined when the difference in precipitation start temperature of the products is small and the ferrite transformation and precipitation compete.
As shown in FIG. 1, the lower limit of the amount of Mn for making precipitates smaller than 10 nm increases as the cooling rate slows. This is also explained as follows from the competitive relationship between ferrite transformation and precipitation. Can do.
本発明では、熱間圧延後の冷却中にフェライト変態が開始した後に析出物の析出が開始する。ここで、フェライト変態温度は冷却速度が遅いほど高いため、冷却速度が遅い場合には、フェライト変態が開始した後、かなりの温度降下を待って析出が開始する。ところが、析出物を微細化するには、フェライト変態の開始温度と析出の開始温度の差を縮め、フェライト変態と析出を競合させる必要がある。
そこで、本発明では、Mnを添加し、フェライト変態温度の低下を図るのである。この場合、フェライト変態温度が高くなる低冷却速度側ほどフェライト変態温度の下げ代が増大するため、Mnの添加量を増大することが必要になるのである。
そのため、図1に示したように、析出物微細化のためのMn量の下限は冷却速度が遅いほど上昇するのである。
In the present invention, precipitation of precipitates starts after ferrite transformation starts during cooling after hot rolling. Here, since the ferrite transformation temperature is higher as the cooling rate is slower, when the cooling rate is slow, after the ferrite transformation starts, precipitation starts after a considerable temperature drop. However, in order to make the precipitate finer, it is necessary to reduce the difference between the start temperature of the ferrite transformation and the start temperature of the precipitation, thereby competing the ferrite transformation and the precipitation.
Therefore, in the present invention, Mn is added to lower the ferrite transformation temperature. In this case, the lower the cooling rate side where the ferrite transformation temperature becomes higher, the lower the allowance for lowering the ferrite transformation temperature. Therefore, it is necessary to increase the amount of Mn added.
Therefore, as shown in FIG. 1, the lower limit of the amount of Mn for refinement of precipitates increases as the cooling rate decreases.
また、Mn量の上限も冷却速度が遅いほど上昇する。この理由は、冷却速度が遅い場合には、ベイナイト等の低温変態相が生じにくいため、焼入れ性上昇元素でもあるMnの添加許容量が拡大するためと考えられる。 Further, the upper limit of the Mn amount also increases as the cooling rate is slower. The reason for this is considered to be that when the cooling rate is low, a low-temperature transformation phase such as bainite hardly occurs, so that the amount of addition of Mn, which is a hardenability increasing element, is increased.
Al:0.1%以下
Alは、脱酸剤として作用する。しかしながら、含有量が 0.1%を超えるとその効果が飽和するため、Al量は0.1%以下とする。より好ましくは0.05%以下である。
Al: 0.1% or less
Al acts as a deoxidizer. However, if the content exceeds 0.1%, the effect is saturated, so the Al content is 0.1% or less. More preferably, it is 0.05% or less.
Ti:0.03〜0.35%
Tiは、Ti系炭化物やTi−Mo系炭化物を含む析出物を微細に析出させて、強度を向上させる有用元素である。ここに、引張強度:700MPa以上を確保するためには0.03%以上のTi添加が必要であるが、0.35%を超えて添加すると析出物が粗大化し、強度、靭性が低下する。そのため、Ti量は0.03〜0.35%の範囲に限定した。より好ましくは0.03〜0.20%の範囲である。
Ti: 0.03-0.35%
Ti is a useful element that improves the strength by finely depositing precipitates including Ti-based carbides and Ti-Mo-based carbides. Here, in order to ensure a tensile strength of 700 MPa or more, Ti addition of 0.03% or more is necessary. However, if it exceeds 0.35%, precipitates are coarsened and strength and toughness are lowered. Therefore, the Ti amount is limited to the range of 0.03 to 0.35%. More preferably, it is 0.03 to 0.20% of range.
Mo:0.05〜0.8%
Moは、Mo系炭化物やTi−Mo系炭化物を含む析出物を微細に析出させて、強度を向上させる有用元素である。また、Moは、拡散速度が遅く、Tiと共に析出する場合、析出物の成長速度が低下して、微細な析出物が得易いという利点もある。ここに、引張強度:700MPa以上を確保するためには0.05%以上のMo添加が必要であるが、0.8%を超えて添加するとベイナイト等の低温変態相を形成し、微細析出物による析出強化が不足し、強度が低下するため、Mo量は0.05〜0.8%の範囲に限定した。より好ましくは0.15〜0.50%の範囲である。
Mo: 0.05-0.8%
Mo is a useful element that improves the strength by finely depositing precipitates including Mo-based carbides and Ti-Mo-based carbides. In addition, Mo has an advantage that the diffusion rate is slow, and when it is precipitated together with Ti, the growth rate of the precipitate is reduced and a fine precipitate is easily obtained. Here, in order to secure a tensile strength of 700 MPa or more, it is necessary to add 0.05% or more of Mo, but if added over 0.8%, a low-temperature transformation phase such as bainite is formed, and precipitation strengthening by fine precipitates is achieved. The amount of Mo was limited to a range of 0.05 to 0.8% because the strength was insufficient. More preferably, it is 0.15 to 0.50% of range.
また、上記の成分組成において、特に鋼中のC,TiおよびMo量に関し、次式(2)の関係を満足させることが有利である。
0.5≦(C/12)/[(Ti/48)+(Mo/96)]≦1.5 ・・・(2)
この(2)式で示すパラメーターは、析出物の大きさに影響を与えるもので、0.5以上、1.5以下とした場合に、粒径:10nm未満の微細析出物の形成が容易となりとりわけ有利である。
Moreover, in said component composition, it is advantageous to satisfy the relationship of following Formula (2) regarding especially the amount of C, Ti, and Mo in steel.
0.5 ≦ (C / 12) / [(Ti / 48) + (Mo / 96)] ≦ 1.5 (2)
The parameter shown in the equation (2) affects the size of the precipitate, and when it is 0.5 or more and 1.5 or less, the formation of fine precipitates having a particle size of less than 10 nm is facilitated, which is particularly advantageous. .
なお、微細なTi−Mo系炭化物では、炭化物中のTi,Moは原子比でTi/Moが0.2〜2.0、さらに微細な炭化物ではTi/Mo比が0.7〜1.5であることが観察された。 In addition, it was observed that Ti and Mo in carbides have a Ti / Mo atomic ratio of 0.2 to 2.0 in fine carbides and Ti / Mo ratios in 0.7 to 1.5 in finer carbides.
以上、必須成分について説明したが、本発明では、その他にも、強度などの一層の向上を図るために、Nb,VおよびWのうちから選んだ一種または二種以上を添加することができる。
Nb:0.08%以下
Nbは、Tiと微細析出物を形成して強度上昇に寄与する。また、組織を微細化し、結晶粒を整粒化することで延性を向上させる。しかしながら、Nbを0.08%を超えて含有させると過度に微細化し、かえって延性が低下するため、添加量は0.08%以下とする。より好ましくは0.04%以下である。
Although the essential components have been described above, in the present invention, one or more selected from Nb, V, and W can be added in order to further improve the strength and the like.
Nb: 0.08% or less
Nb contributes to strength increase by forming fine precipitates with Ti. Moreover, ductility is improved by refining the structure and adjusting the crystal grains. However, if Nb is contained in excess of 0.08%, it will be excessively refined and the ductility will be lowered. Therefore, the addition amount is set to 0.08% or less. More preferably, it is 0.04% or less.
V:0.15%以下
Vも、Tiと微細析出物を形成して強度上昇に寄与する。しかしながら、0.15%を超えて含有させると析出物が粗大化するようになるため、含有量は0.15%以下とする。より好ましくは0.10%以下である。
V: 0.15% or less V also forms a fine precipitate with Ti and contributes to an increase in strength. However, if the content exceeds 0.15%, the precipitate becomes coarse, so the content is made 0.15% or less. More preferably, it is 0.10% or less.
W:1.5%以下
Wも、Tiと徹細析出物を形成して強度上昇に寄与する。しかしながら、1.5%を超えて含有させると析出物が粗大化するようになるため、含有量は1.5%以下とする。より好ましくは1.0%以下である。
W: 1.5% or less W also contributes to strength increase by forming fine precipitates with Ti. However, if the content exceeds 1.5%, the precipitate becomes coarse, so the content is 1.5% or less. More preferably, it is 1.0% or less.
上記したNb,V,Wなどを添加した場合、析出物を微細化させるためには、これらの元素とC,Ti,Moの量について、次式(3)の関係を満足させることが有利である。
0.5≦(C/12)/[(Ti/48)+(Mo/96)+(Nb/93)+(V/51)+(W/184)]≦1.5 ・・・(3)
この(3)式で示すパラメーターも、前掲(2)式と同様、析出物の大きさに影響を与えるもので、この値を0.5以上、1.5以下とした場合に、粒径:10nm未満の微細析出物の形成が容易となる。
When the above-mentioned Nb, V, W, etc. are added, in order to refine the precipitate, it is advantageous to satisfy the relationship of the following formula (3) with respect to the amount of these elements and C, Ti, Mo. is there.
0.5 ≦ (C / 12) / [(Ti / 48) + (Mo / 96) + (Nb / 93) + (V / 51) + (W / 184)] ≦ 1.5 (3)
The parameter shown in the equation (3) also affects the size of the precipitate as in the equation (2). When this value is 0.5 or more and 1.5 or less, the particle size is finer than 10 nm. Formation of precipitates is facilitated.
なお、Nb,V,Wの一種または二種以上を含む微細な炭化物では、炭化物中のTi,Mo,Nb,V,Wの原子比(Ti+Nb+V)/(Mo+W)が0.2〜2.0、さらに微細な炭化物ではこの比が0.7〜1.5であることが観察された。 In the case of fine carbides containing one or more of Nb, V, and W, the atomic ratio (Ti + Nb + V) / (Mo + W) of Ti, Mo, Nb, V, and W in the carbide is 0.2 to 2.0, which is finer It was observed that this ratio was 0.7-1.5 for carbides.
さらに、本発明では、部品加工時の切削性を向上させるために、Sを0.03〜0.1%とした上で、Pb≦0.2%、Ca≦0.005%、Bi≦0.1%およびB≦0.02%のうちから選んだ一種または二種以上を含有させることが有利である。
ここに、S量を0.03〜0.1%としたのは、S量が0.03%に満たないと切削性の向上が図れず、一方0.1%を超えると靭性や延性が劣化するからである。また、Pb,Ca,BiおよびBについても、これらの元素がそれぞれ上限値を超えると靭性や延性が低下するからである。
Furthermore, in the present invention, in order to improve the machinability at the time of machining the part, S is set to 0.03 to 0.1%, and Pb ≦ 0.2%, Ca ≦ 0.005%, Bi ≦ 0.1% and B ≦ 0.02%. It is advantageous to contain one or more selected from
Here, the reason why the S amount is 0.03 to 0.1% is that if the S amount is less than 0.03%, the machinability cannot be improved, whereas if it exceeds 0.1%, the toughness and ductility deteriorate. Moreover, also about Pb, Ca, Bi, and B, when these elements each exceed an upper limit, toughness and ductility will fall.
その他、強度、延性の向上を目的として、Cr,NiおよびCuのうちから選んだ一種または二種以上をCr≦0.5%、Ni≦0.5%、Cu≦0.5%の範囲で添加することができる。
また、さらに棒鋼の靱性を向上させるためには、不可避的不純物であるPとNを低減することが望ましい。具体的には、Pについては0.03%以下に規制することが好ましい。Nについては0.01%以下に規制することが好ましく、0.005%以下に規制することがさらに好ましい。
In addition, for the purpose of improving strength and ductility, one or more selected from Cr, Ni and Cu can be added in the range of Cr ≦ 0.5%, Ni ≦ 0.5% and Cu ≦ 0.5%.
In order to further improve the toughness of the steel bar, it is desirable to reduce P and N which are inevitable impurities. Specifically, it is preferable to restrict P to 0.03% or less. N is preferably regulated to 0.01% or less, more preferably 0.005% or less.
次に、本発明における鋼組織について説明する。
まず、本発明において、鋼組織をフェライト単相組織とした理由は、鋼組織をフェライト単相にすることで調質材に匹敵する靭性が得られるからである。
Next, a description will be given to your Keru steel organization to the present invention.
First, the reason why the steel structure is a ferrite single phase structure in the present invention is that the toughness comparable to the tempered material can be obtained by making the steel structure a ferrite single phase.
本発明において、フェライト単相組織とは、断面組織観察(200倍の光学顕微鏡組織観察)でフェライトの面積率が棒鋼の表層部から中央部の何れにおいても95%以上、好ましくは98%以上であることを指す。 In the present invention, the ferrite single-phase structure means that the area ratio of ferrite is 95% or more, preferably 98% or more in any of the surface layer portion to the central portion of the steel bar in cross-sectional structure observation (observation of optical microscope structure at 200 times). It points to something.
また、フェライト単相組織中に析出する微細析出物について、粒径:10nm未満の微細析出物とした理由は次のとおりである。
析出物の粒径が10nm以上の場合、自動車をはじめとする輸送機械や建設機械などの機械構造部品として必要な引張強度700MPa以上が得難い。また、フェライト単相組織に粒径:10nm未満の微細析出物を析出させた場合、降伏比が上昇し、調質材に匹敵する高降伏比が得られる。降伏比が高いと、降伏強度の上昇に対して引張強度の上昇が抑えられ鋼の硬化を小さくできるため、調質鋼に匹敵する被削性が得られる。なお、微細析出物は熱間圧延後の冷却中に析出させる。
The reason why the fine precipitates precipitated in the ferrite single-phase structure are made as fine precipitates having a particle size of less than 10 nm is as follows.
When the particle size of the precipitate is 10 nm or more, it is difficult to obtain a tensile strength of 700 MPa or more necessary for machine structural parts such as automobiles and other transportation machines and construction machines. In addition, when fine precipitates having a particle size of less than 10 nm are precipitated in the ferrite single phase structure, the yield ratio increases and a high yield ratio comparable to the tempered material can be obtained. When the yield ratio is high, the increase in tensile strength is suppressed with respect to the increase in yield strength, and the hardening of the steel can be reduced, so that machinability comparable to tempered steel is obtained. The fine precipitate is precipitated during cooling after hot rolling.
微細析出物の粒径は、小さい程強度上昇に有効であり、望ましくは5nm以下、さらに望ましくは3nm以下である。かような微細析出物としては、Ti,Moを複合含有した炭化物、またそれらにさらにNb,V,Wの一種または二種以上を含有させた炭化物が有利に適合する。 The smaller the particle size of the fine precipitates, the more effective the strength increase, and is preferably 5 nm or less, more preferably 3 nm or less. As such fine precipitates, carbides containing a composite of Ti and Mo, and carbides further containing one or more of Nb, V, and W are advantageously suitable.
また、粒径が10nm未満の微細析出物は、その個数が1000個/μm3以上であると、700MPa以上の引張強度を得やすくなるため、1000個/μm3以上存在させることが好ましい。
これらの微細析出物の分布形態は特に規定しないが、母相中に均一分散することが好ましい。また、析出物の大きさは、全析出物のうちの90%以上が10nm未満であれば700MPa以上の引張強度が得られる。但し、粒径があまりに大きい析出物は、微細析出物形成元素を消費し、強度に悪影響を与えるため、存在する析出物の粒径は、50nm以下に抑えることが好ましい。
The particle size of fine precipitates of less than 10nm, when the number is at 1000 / [mu] m 3 or more, it becomes easier to obtain a tensile strength of at least 700 MPa, it is preferable to present 1000 / [mu] m 3 or more.
Although the distribution form of these fine precipitates is not particularly defined, it is preferable to uniformly disperse in the matrix. Moreover, as for the size of the precipitate, if 90% or more of the total precipitate is less than 10 nm, a tensile strength of 700 MPa or more can be obtained. However, a precipitate having an excessively large particle size consumes fine precipitate-forming elements and adversely affects the strength. Therefore, the particle size of the existing precipitate is preferably suppressed to 50 nm or less.
なお、上述した析出物とは別に、少量のFe炭化物を含有しても本発明の効果は損なわれないが、平均粒径が1μm 以上のFe炭化物を多量に含むと靱性を阻害するため、本発明においては、含有されるFe炭化物の大きさの上限は1μm、含有率は析出物全体の1%以下とすることが望ましい。 In addition to the precipitates described above, the effect of the present invention is not impaired even if a small amount of Fe carbide is contained. However, if a large amount of Fe carbide having an average particle size of 1 μm or more is contained, the toughness is inhibited. In the invention, it is desirable that the upper limit of the size of Fe carbide contained is 1 μm and the content is 1% or less of the entire precipitate.
微細析出物の析出個数は以下の方法により求める。
電子顕微鏡試料をツインジェット法を用いた電解研磨法で作成し、加速電圧200kVで観 察する。その際、微細析出物が母相に対して計測可能なコントラストになるように母相の結晶方位を制御し、析出物の数え落としを最小限に抑えるために、焦点を正焦点からずらしたデフォーカス法で観察を行う。また、析出物粒子の計測を行った領域の試料厚さは電子エネルギー損失分光法を用いて、弾性散乱ピークと非弾性散乱ピーク強度を測定することで評価する。
The number of fine precipitates is determined by the following method.
An electron microscope sample is prepared by electropolishing using the twin jet method and observed at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. At this time, the crystal orientation of the matrix is controlled so that the fine precipitates have a measurable contrast with respect to the matrix, and the focus is shifted from the normal focus in order to minimize the number of precipitates. Observe with focus method. Moreover, the sample thickness of the area | region which measured the deposit particle | grains is evaluated by measuring an elastic scattering peak and an inelastic scattering peak intensity using an electron energy loss spectroscopy.
この方法により、粒子数の計測と試料厚さの計測を同じ領域について行うことができる。粒子数および粒子径の測定は試料の0.5μm×0.5μmの領域4箇所について行い、1μm2当りに分布する析出物を粒径ごとの個数として算出する。この値と試料の厚さから析出物の1μm3当りに分布する粒子径ごとの個数を算出し、粒径が10nm未満の析出物について、測定した全析出物に占める割合を算出する。 By this method, the number of particles and the sample thickness can be measured in the same region. The number of particles and the particle diameter are measured at four locations of a 0.5 μm × 0.5 μm region of the sample, and the precipitates distributed per 1 μm 2 are calculated as the number for each particle diameter. From this value and the thickness of the sample, the number of precipitates distributed per 1 μm 3 of particle diameter is calculated, and the ratio of the precipitate having a particle diameter of less than 10 nm to the measured total precipitate is calculated.
次に、本発明の好適製造条件について説明する。
・加熱温度
本発明では、熱間圧延後の冷却中に析出物を微細に析出させるために、熱間圧延前の鋳片に析出している析出物を、加熱炉にて一旦固溶させる必要がある。その際、加熱温度が1100℃未満であると、Ti−Mo系炭化物等が十分に固溶しないため、加熱温度は1100℃以上とする。
Next, preferred manufacturing conditions of the present invention will be described.
-Heating temperature In the present invention, in order to precipitate precipitates finely during cooling after hot rolling, it is necessary to once dissolve the precipitates precipitated on the slab before hot rolling in a heating furnace. There is. At that time, if the heating temperature is less than 1100 ° C., Ti—Mo-based carbides and the like are not sufficiently dissolved, so the heating temperature is set to 1100 ° C. or higher.
・仕上温度
本発明では、微細析出物を得るために、熱間圧延後の冷却速度に応じてMn量を調整し、フェライト変態の開始温度を制御することで、フェライト変態と析出の競合を図っている。ところが、熱間圧延おける仕上温度が低い場合には、圧延で導入される歪がフェライト変態の開始温度を変化させ、Mn量の適正範囲に影響を及ぼしてしまう。これを避けるには、仕上温度を歪の影響が現れない高温にすれば良い。この点から、仕上温度は850℃以上とする 。
-Finishing temperature In the present invention, in order to obtain fine precipitates, the amount of Mn is adjusted according to the cooling rate after hot rolling, and the start temperature of ferrite transformation is controlled, thereby competing between ferrite transformation and precipitation. ing. However, when the finishing temperature in hot rolling is low, the strain introduced by rolling changes the starting temperature of the ferrite transformation and affects the appropriate range of the Mn amount. In order to avoid this, the finishing temperature may be set to a high temperature at which the influence of strain does not appear. From this point, the finishing temperature is 850 ° C or higher.
・冷却速度
フェライト変態の開始温度を制御し、フェライト変態と析出を競合させれば析出物は微細に析出する。本発明では、熱間圧延後の冷却速度に応じてMn量を調整することでフェライト変態の開始温度を制御する。また、冷却速度に応じてMn量を調整すれば、ベイナイト等の低温変態相の生成を防止することができる。
このように、本発明では冷却速度を制御するのではなく、冷却速度に応じてMn量を調整することで適正組織が得られるため、冷却速度については特に規定する必要はない。
-Cooling rate If the starting temperature of the ferrite transformation is controlled and the ferrite transformation competes with the precipitation, the precipitate precipitates finely. In the present invention, the ferrite transformation start temperature is controlled by adjusting the amount of Mn according to the cooling rate after hot rolling. Moreover, if the amount of Mn is adjusted according to the cooling rate, the generation of a low-temperature transformation phase such as bainite can be prevented.
In this way, in the present invention, the cooling rate is not controlled, but an appropriate structure can be obtained by adjusting the amount of Mn according to the cooling rate . Therefore, it is not necessary to specifically define the cooling rate .
表1に示す成分組成になる鋼を溶製し、これを表2および表4に記載の条件で所定寸法の棒鋼に熱間圧延した。溶製に際しては、本発明の適正範囲を満たす発明鋼、本発明の適正範囲を外れた比較鋼に加えて、従来鋼としてS45C調質材の非調質鋼(鋼番10)も溶製した。 Steel having the component composition shown in Table 1 was melted, and this was hot-rolled into bar steel of a predetermined size under the conditions described in Table 2 and Table 4. In melting, in addition to the invention steel that satisfies the proper range of the present invention and the comparative steel that deviates from the proper range of the present invention, S45C tempered non-heat treated steel (steel number 10) was also melted as a conventional steel. .
熱間圧延においては、図1のところで述べたのと同様に、棒鋼の仕上寸法と圧延後の冷却方法を変えることで冷却速度を変化させた。冷却速度についてはオンラインでの測定が困難なため、熱間圧延での仕上寸法と同サイズの短尺の棒鋼を準備し、表層部と中心部に熱電対を装着し、これをオフラインで熱間圧延と同様の条件で冷却し、500℃までの平均冷却速度を求めた。なお、本発明では、Mn量を圧延後の冷却速度に合わせて適正化することが重要であるため、表1には、各鋼を熱間圧延した際の圧延後の冷却速度と、それから計算されるMn量の適正範囲を併記した。 In hot rolling, the cooling rate was changed by changing the finishing dimensions of the steel bar and the cooling method after rolling, as described in FIG. Since it is difficult to measure the cooling rate online, we prepare short steel bars of the same size as the finished dimensions in hot rolling, attach thermocouples to the surface layer and center, and perform hot rolling offline. The sample was cooled under the same conditions as above, and the average cooling rate up to 500 ° C. was determined. In the present invention, since it is important to optimize the amount of Mn according to the cooling rate after rolling, Table 1 shows the cooling rate after rolling when each steel is hot-rolled, and the calculation based on the cooling rate. The appropriate range of Mn content is also shown.
かくして得られた棒鋼について、組織観察、引張試験および衝撃試験を行った。
組織観察としては.棒鋼断面をナイタールで腐食後、棒鋼の表層部と中心部を光学顕微鏡で観察した。
また、棒鋼の表層部と中心部から電解研磨にて薄膜試料を作製し、透過型電子顕微鏡(TEM)で観察することにより、析出物の粒子径を測定すると共に、エネルギー分散型X線分光装置(EDX)を併用し、析出物を同定した。
The steel bar thus obtained was subjected to structure observation, tensile test and impact test.
For tissue observation. After the steel bar cross section was corroded with nital, the surface layer and the center of the steel bar were observed with an optical microscope.
In addition, a thin film sample is prepared by electropolishing from the surface layer and the center of the steel bar and observed with a transmission electron microscope (TEM) to measure the particle size of the precipitate, and an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDX) was used in combination to identify precipitates.
引張試験では、表層部と中央部の2箇所の引張試験値を得るため、平行部の直径が6mmφ、平行部長さが40mmの小径試験片を用いた。
衝撃試験では、JIS3号のUノッチ衝撃試験片を用い、棒鋼中心部の試験温度:20℃における吸収エネルギーを測定した。
In the tensile test, a small diameter test piece having a parallel part diameter of 6 mmφ and a parallel part length of 40 mm was used in order to obtain two tensile test values of the surface layer part and the central part.
In the impact test, JIS 3 U-notch impact test pieces were used, and the absorbed energy at a test temperature of 20 ° C. at the center of the steel bar was measured.
上記した組織観察、引張試験および衝撃試験によって得られた結果を、表3および表5に示す。
表中のNo.は個々の結果を区分するためのものであり、供試鋼と熱延条件の組合せが明 示されるよう、鋼番と熱延条件を組み合せて起番した(例えば、鋼番1を条件Aで熱間圧延した場合は1−Aと起番した)。
Tables 3 and 5 show the results obtained by the above-described structure observation, tensile test, and impact test.
The numbers in the table are used to classify the individual results, and the steel numbers and hot-rolling conditions were combined to indicate the combination of the test steel and hot-rolling conditions (for example, steel numbers). 1 was numbered 1-A when hot rolled under condition A).
組織については、フェライトはF、パーライトはP、ベイナイト等の低温変態相が生成し、その体積分率が60%以上を超える場合はTと略記した。
析出物については、平均粒子径を記載した。なお、粒子径のバラツキは10nm未満の析出物では最大でも±1nm、それ以上の大きさの析出物では±3nmから±10nmであった。また、組織に低温変態相が生成した場合、転位密度が高くなり析出物の観察が困難となるため、粒子径の測定は省略した。
Regarding the structure, low temperature transformation phases such as F for ferrite, P for pearlite, bainite, etc. were generated, and the volume fraction was abbreviated as T when the volume fraction exceeded 60% or more.
For the precipitate, the average particle size is described. The variation in particle diameter was ± 1 nm at the maximum for precipitates of less than 10 nm, and ± 3 nm to ± 10 nm for precipitates larger than that. In addition, when a low-temperature transformation phase is generated in the structure, the dislocation density becomes high and observation of precipitates becomes difficult, so measurement of the particle diameter was omitted.
表中のYS(中央部)、TS(中央部)は棒鋼中心部の降伏強度と引張強度、△YSは棒鋼の表層部の降伏強度と中心部の降伏強度の差:YS(表層部)−YS(中央部)、△TSは棒鋼の表層部の引張強度と中心部の引張強度の差:TS(表層部)−TS(中央部)、そしてuE20は棒鋼中心部の試験温度:20℃における吸収エネルギーである。
ここで、引張強度が700MPa以上、また絶対値で△YSが100MPa以下、△TSが80MPa以下 を満たすことが本発明の要件の一つである。
In the table, YS (center part) and TS (center part) are the yield strength and tensile strength of the steel bar center part, and △ YS is the difference between the yield strength of the steel bar surface part and the yield strength of the central part: YS (surface part)- YS (center part), △ TS is the difference between the tensile strength of the steel bar surface layer and the tensile strength of the center part: TS (surface layer part)-TS (center part), and u E20 is the test temperature of the steel bar center part: 20 ° C Is the absorbed energy.
Here, it is one of the requirements of the present invention that the tensile strength is 700 MPa or more, the absolute value ΔYS is 100 MPa or less, and ΔTS is 80 MPa or less.
表3、表5から明らかなように、鋼組成および熱間圧延条件とも本発明の適正範囲を満足する発明例はいずれも、700MPa以上の高い引張強度が得られ、また表層部と中央部の降伏強度の差△YSは100MPa以下、表層部と中央部の引張強度の差△TSは80MPa以下であり、直径方向の強度の均一性に優れていることが分かる。さらに、吸収エネルギーuE20も 100J/cm2以上であり、強度が同程度の従来例(No.10−A、10−B、10−C)に比べて高靱性であることが分かる。 As is apparent from Tables 3 and 5, all of the inventive examples satisfying the appropriate range of the present invention in both steel composition and hot rolling conditions can obtain a high tensile strength of 700 MPa or more, and the surface layer portion and the central portion can be obtained. The difference in yield strength ΔYS is 100 MPa or less, and the difference in tensile strength ΔTS between the surface layer portion and the central portion is 80 MPa or less, which shows that the strength in the diameter direction is excellent. Furthermore, the absorbed energy u E20 also at 100 J / cm 2 or more, it can be seen the strength is high toughness as compared with the conventional example (No.10-A, 10-B , 10-C) of the same degree.
これに対し、鋼組成および熱間圧延条件の少なくともどちらかが本発明の適正範囲を外れた比較例では、引張強度、表層部と中央部の降伏強度の差△YSおよび表層部と中央部の引張強度の差△TSの何れかが本発明の要件を満たさない。
No.6−Aは、Cが低いため、微細析出物の析出量が不足しており、引張強度が低い。
No.7−Aは、Cが高すぎるため、析出物が粗大化しており.引張強度が低い。また、吸収エネルギーuE20も88J/cm2と低く、靱性に劣る。
No.8−A、16−Bは、Mnが低いため、中央部の析出物が粗大化しており、引張強度が低い 。また、表層部と中央部の降伏強度の差△YSおよび引張強度の差△TSとも大きく、直径方向の強度の均一性に劣る。さらに、吸収エネルギーuE20も低く、靱性にも劣る。
No.29−Cも、Mnが低いが、この例では表層部、中央部とも析出物が粗大化しており、引張強度が低い。また、吸収エネルギーuE20も85J/cm2と低く、靱性に劣る。
Mnの高いNo.9−A、17−B、30−Cでは、表層部に低温変態相が生成してしまう。また、表層部と中央部の降伏強度の差△YSおよび引張強度の差△TSの少なくとも一方が大きく、直径方向の強度の均一性に劣る。
No.18−Bは、Tiが低いため、引張強度が低い。一方、Tiが高いNo.19−Bでは、表層部、中央部とも析出物が粗大化しており、引張強度が低く、吸収エネルギーも低い。
No.20−Bは、Moが低いため、引張強度が低い。一方、Moが高いNo.21−Bでは、表層部、中央部とも低温変態相が生成しており、微細析出物による析出強化が不足するため、引張強度が低い。また、表層部と中央部の引張強度の差△TSが大きく、直径方向の強度の均一性に劣る。さらに、吸収エネルギーuE20も51J/cm2と低く、靱性にも劣る。
On the other hand, in the comparative example in which at least one of the steel composition and the hot rolling condition is outside the appropriate range of the present invention, the tensile strength, the difference ΔYS in the yield strength between the surface layer portion and the central portion, and the surface layer portion and the central portion Any of the tensile strength differences ΔTS do not meet the requirements of the present invention.
Since No. 6-A has a low C, the amount of fine precipitates is insufficient, and the tensile strength is low.
In No. 7-A, because C is too high, the precipitates are coarsened. Low tensile strength. Also, the absorbed energy u E20 is as low as 88 J / cm 2, which is inferior in toughness.
Nos. 8-A and 16-B have a low Mn, so the precipitate in the center is coarsened and the tensile strength is low. Further, both the difference in yield strength ΔYS and the difference in tensile strength ΔTS between the surface layer portion and the central portion are large, and the uniformity in strength in the diameter direction is inferior. Furthermore, the absorbed energy u E20 is also low and the toughness is also inferior.
No. 29-C also has a low Mn, but in this example, precipitates are coarsened in the surface layer portion and the central portion, and the tensile strength is low. Further, the absorption energy u E20 also 85 J / cm 2 and lower, inferior in toughness.
In Nos. 9-A, 17-B, and 30-C having a high Mn, a low temperature transformation phase is generated in the surface layer portion. Further, at least one of the difference in yield strength ΔYS and the difference in tensile strength ΔTS between the surface layer portion and the central portion is large, and the uniformity of the strength in the diameter direction is inferior.
No. 18-B has low tensile strength because Ti is low. On the other hand, in No. 19-B with high Ti, precipitates are coarsened in the surface layer portion and the central portion, the tensile strength is low, and the absorbed energy is also low.
No. 20-B has a low tensile strength because of its low Mo. On the other hand, in No. 21-B having a high Mo, a low temperature transformation phase is generated in both the surface layer portion and the central portion, and precipitation strengthening due to fine precipitates is insufficient, so that the tensile strength is low. Further, the difference in tensile strength ΔTS between the surface layer portion and the central portion is large, and the uniformity of the strength in the diameter direction is poor. Furthermore, the absorbed energy u E20 is also as low as 51 J / cm 2 and inferior in toughness.
No.1−Gは、加熱温度が低いため、熱間圧延前の鋳片に析出しているTi−Mo系炭化物等の析出物が加熱時に十分固溶せず、引張強度が低い。なお、析出物に関しては、圧延後の冷却中に微細に析出したと思われるものと、鋳片で析出した析出物の溶け残りと思われるものが混在しており、析出物の平均粒子径は100nm以上となっていた。
No.1−Hは、仕上温度が低いため、圧延で導入された歪がフェライト変態の開始温度を変化させ、Mn量の適正範囲に影響を及ぼした。このため、中央部で析出物が粗大化しており、引張強度が低い。また、表層部と中央部の降伏強度の差△YSおよび引張強度の差△TSとも大きく、直径方向の強度の均一性に劣る。さらに、吸収エネルギーuE20も低く、靱性にも劣る。
なお、本実施例において、発明例について観察された微細析出物(粒径<10nm)は、主にMo,Tiの炭化物、またNb,V,Wのいずれかが含まれている鋼の場合には、Mo,Tiと、Nb,V,Wのうちいずれかが含まれる炭化物であることを同定できた。
Since No.1-G has a low heating temperature, precipitates such as Ti—Mo-based carbides precipitated on the slab before hot rolling are not sufficiently dissolved during heating, and the tensile strength is low. In addition, regarding the precipitate, what seems to have precipitated finely during cooling after rolling and what seems to be the undissolved residue of the precipitate deposited on the slab are mixed, and the average particle size of the precipitate is It was over 100nm.
Since No. 1-H had a low finishing temperature, the strain introduced by rolling changed the starting temperature of the ferrite transformation and affected the appropriate range of Mn content. For this reason, the precipitate is coarsened in the center, and the tensile strength is low. Further, both the difference in yield strength ΔYS and the difference in tensile strength ΔTS between the surface layer portion and the central portion are large, and the uniformity in strength in the diameter direction is inferior. Furthermore, the absorbed energy u E20 is also low and the toughness is also inferior.
In this example, the fine precipitates (particle size <10 nm) observed for the inventive examples are mainly in the case of steel containing Mo, Ti carbide, or Nb, V, or W. Was able to be identified as a carbide containing Mo, Ti and any of Nb, V, and W.
Claims (4)
C:0.060〜0.120%、
Si:0.5%以下、
Mn:下記(1)式の範囲、
Al:0.1%以下、
Ti:0.03〜0.35%および
Mo:0.05〜0.8%
を含有し、残部はFeおよび不可避的不純物の組成になる鋼素材を、1100℃以上に加熱後、仕上温度:850℃以上で仕上径を120〜400mmとして熱間圧延を終了したのち、冷却することを特徴とする熱間圧延型非調質棒鋼の製造方法。
記
-0.239×log(CR1)+0.889≦Mn≦-0.524×log(CR2)+1.218 ・・・(1)
ここで、CR1:圧延後、500℃までの棒鋼中央部の平均冷却速度(℃/s)
CR2:圧延後、500℃までの棒鋼表層部の平均冷却速度(℃/s) % By mass
C: 0.060 to 0.120%,
Si: 0.5% or less,
Mn: the range of the following formula (1),
Al: 0.1% or less,
Ti: 0.03-0.35% and
Mo: 0.05-0.8%
After heating the steel material containing Fe and the inevitable impurities composition to 1100 ° C or higher, finishing temperature: 850 ° C or higher and finishing diameter 120-400mm, and then cooling A method for producing a hot rolled non-heat treated steel bar characterized by the above.
Record
-0.239 × log (CR 1 ) + 0.889 ≦ Mn ≦ −0.524 × log (CR 2 ) +1.218 (1)
Where, CR 1 : Average cooling rate at the center of the steel bar up to 500 ° C after rolling (° C / s)
CR 2 : Average cooling rate of steel bar surface layer up to 500 ° C after rolling (° C / s)
0.5≦(C/12)/[(Ti/48)+(Mo/96)]≦1.5 ・・・(2) The method for producing a hot-rolled non-tempered steel bar according to claim 1, wherein the amounts of C, Ti and Mo in the steel satisfy the relationship of the following formula (2).
0.5 ≦ (C / 12) / [(Ti / 48) + (Mo / 96)] ≦ 1.5 (2)
Nb:0.08%以下、
V:0.15%以下および
W:1.5%以下
のうちから選んだ一種または二種以上を含有する組成になることを特徴とする熱間圧延型非調質棒鋼の製造方法。 The steel material according to claim 1 or 2 , further in mass%.
Nb: 0.08% or less,
A method for producing a hot-rolled non-tempered steel bar, comprising a composition containing one or more selected from V: 0.15% or less and W: 1.5% or less.
0.5≦(C/12)/[(Ti/48)+(Mo/96)+(Nb/93)+(V/51)+(W/184)]≦1.5 ・・・(3) The method for producing a hot-rolled non-tempered steel bar according to claim 3, wherein the amounts of C, Ti, Mo, Nb, V and W in the steel satisfy the relationship of the following formula (3).
0.5 ≦ (C / 12) / [(Ti / 48) + (Mo / 96) + (Nb / 93) + (V / 51) + (W / 184)] ≦ 1.5 (3)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2004250348A JP4540428B2 (en) | 2004-08-30 | 2004-08-30 | Method for producing hot rolled non-heat treated steel bar |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2004250348A JP4540428B2 (en) | 2004-08-30 | 2004-08-30 | Method for producing hot rolled non-heat treated steel bar |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2006063425A JP2006063425A (en) | 2006-03-09 |
| JP4540428B2 true JP4540428B2 (en) | 2010-09-08 |
Family
ID=36110166
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2004250348A Expired - Lifetime JP4540428B2 (en) | 2004-08-30 | 2004-08-30 | Method for producing hot rolled non-heat treated steel bar |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP4540428B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP4589242B2 (en) * | 2006-01-30 | 2010-12-01 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | Hot-rolled non-tempered steel bar excellent in toughness and method for producing the same |
| CN104801563B (en) * | 2014-01-28 | 2017-01-04 | 宝钢特钢有限公司 | Manufacturing method of medium-carbon non-quenched and tempered steel for crankshaft |
| CN104148410B (en) * | 2014-07-30 | 2016-06-29 | 东北大学 | A kind of control method of titanium micro-alloyed steel nano-scaled precipitate |
| CN108359897B (en) * | 2018-03-19 | 2020-01-31 | 武汉钢铁有限公司 | precipitation strengthening ferritic steels with yield strength of 1000MPa and production method thereof |
| CN113215492B (en) * | 2021-05-12 | 2022-04-08 | 大冶特殊钢有限公司 | Rolling method of high-toughness low-alloy high-strength steel |
Family Cites Families (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP3812488B2 (en) * | 2001-07-17 | 2006-08-23 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | High-strength steel with excellent workability and material uniformity and method for producing the same |
| JP2003313631A (en) * | 2002-04-25 | 2003-11-06 | Jfe Steel Kk | High-strength steel excellent in workability and material uniformity and method for producing the same |
| JP4268825B2 (en) * | 2002-04-26 | 2009-05-27 | Jfe条鋼株式会社 | Hot rolled non-heat treated steel bar and manufacturing method thereof |
| JP3785114B2 (en) * | 2002-04-26 | 2006-06-14 | Jfe条鋼株式会社 | Non-tempered bolt with excellent fatigue characteristics and method for producing the same |
-
2004
- 2004-08-30 JP JP2004250348A patent/JP4540428B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2006063425A (en) | 2006-03-09 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP5257082B2 (en) | Steel wire rod excellent in cold forgeability after low-temperature annealing, method for producing the same, and method for producing steel wire rod excellent in cold forgeability | |
| JP5270274B2 (en) | High strength cold-rolled steel sheet with excellent elongation and stretch flangeability | |
| KR101368514B1 (en) | Pearlite-based high-carbon steel rail having excellent ductility and process for production thereof | |
| JP4855553B2 (en) | High-strength ultra-thick H-section steel and its manufacturing method | |
| JP5363922B2 (en) | High-strength cold-rolled steel sheet with an excellent balance between elongation and stretch flangeability | |
| JP5620336B2 (en) | Steel parts for high fatigue strength and high toughness machine structure and manufacturing method thereof | |
| JP4802435B2 (en) | Non-tempered steel with small material anisotropy and excellent strength, toughness and machinability, and method for producing the same | |
| CN114729435A (en) | High-hardness wear-resistant steel with excellent low-temperature impact toughness and manufacturing method thereof | |
| WO2016148037A1 (en) | Steel sheet for carburization having excellent cold workability and toughness after carburizing heat treatment | |
| JP4528275B2 (en) | High-strength hot-rolled steel sheet with excellent stretch flangeability | |
| CN116018418A (en) | Steel plate and method for manufacturing the steel plate | |
| JP4077167B2 (en) | Steel plate with excellent arrest properties and its manufacturing method | |
| JP4171398B2 (en) | High strength and high toughness non-heat treated steel bar and method for producing the same | |
| JP2015166495A (en) | Case-hardened steel with excellent cold forgeability and ability to suppress grain coarsening | |
| JPH06306543A (en) | High strength PC bar wire excellent in delayed fracture resistance and its manufacturing method | |
| JP2025519238A (en) | Hot stamping parts | |
| JP5510024B2 (en) | High-strength steel sheet excellent in hole expansibility and local ductility and method for producing the same | |
| JP5413276B2 (en) | Hot-rolled steel sheet and manufacturing method thereof | |
| JP5302840B2 (en) | High-strength cold-rolled steel sheet with an excellent balance between elongation and stretch flangeability | |
| CN103210106B (en) | High-toughness cold-drawn non-heat-treated wire rod, and method for manufacturing same | |
| CN108350550B (en) | High-strength cold-rolled steel sheet having excellent shear workability and method for producing same | |
| JP4540428B2 (en) | Method for producing hot rolled non-heat treated steel bar | |
| JP2004183064A (en) | Steel for case hardening excellent in cold workability and properties of preventing coarse grains during carburizing and method for producing the same | |
| JP4589242B2 (en) | Hot-rolled non-tempered steel bar excellent in toughness and method for producing the same | |
| JPH0672258B2 (en) | Method for producing rolled steel bar with excellent homogeneity |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| RD04 | Notification of resignation of power of attorney |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7424 Effective date: 20060622 |
|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20070312 |
|
| RD03 | Notification of appointment of power of attorney |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7423 Effective date: 20070312 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20090121 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20100112 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20100315 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20100622 |
|
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20100622 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 4540428 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130702 Year of fee payment: 3 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| EXPY | Cancellation because of completion of term |