JP4580583B2 - Evaluation method of cleaning condition in stationary cleaning - Google Patents
Evaluation method of cleaning condition in stationary cleaning Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP4580583B2 JP4580583B2 JP2001129036A JP2001129036A JP4580583B2 JP 4580583 B2 JP4580583 B2 JP 4580583B2 JP 2001129036 A JP2001129036 A JP 2001129036A JP 2001129036 A JP2001129036 A JP 2001129036A JP 4580583 B2 JP4580583 B2 JP 4580583B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- cleaning
- area
- flow rate
- range
- appropriate
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Cleaning By Liquid Or Steam (AREA)
- Filling Of Jars Or Cans And Processes For Cleaning And Sealing Jars (AREA)
Description
【0001】
【発明の属する技術分野】
本発明は各種食品工場における定置洗浄工程(CIP工程)、例えば、ビール工場におけるガラスびんの洗浄工程等、各種CIP工程での洗浄状況の評価方法に係り、特に、洗浄に使用される洗浄剤の濃度、温度および流量の適正のバランスを一見して判断して洗浄状況を迅速に、容易に、かつ正確に判断し得るCIP工程における洗浄状況の評価方法に関する。
【0002】
【従来の技術】
多くの食品工場では現在、コンピューターシステムによるCIPモニターが採用されている。このCIPモニターはCIP工程での洗浄剤濃度、洗浄剤温度、洗浄剤流量等をコンピューター上に表示し、これを保存するという機能を有するのみであった。
【0003】
【発明が解決すべき課題】
しかし、これら各種データを解析したりして定置洗浄(CIP)における洗浄状況を評価し、洗浄剤の品質管理を行うようなことは不可能であった。
【0004】
そこで、本発明の目的は例えば、各種食品工場の定置洗浄(CIP)工程において、洗浄に使用される洗浄剤の濃度、温度および流量の適正なバランスを瞬時に、一見して判断し、洗浄状況を迅速に、容易に、かつ正確に把握して洗浄におけるエネルギーの削減と品質管理の向上を達成し、上述の公知技術に存する欠点を改良した定置洗浄における洗浄状況の評価方法を提供することにある。
【0005】
【課題を解決するための手段】
上述の目的を達成するため、本発明によれば、定置洗浄工程における洗浄剤の適正な濃度の上限および下限、適正な温度の上限および下限および適正な流量の上限および下限をグラフの縦軸上に長さ(a)として定め、洗浄時間を横軸上に長さ(b)として定め、上限と下限の範囲内の面積/(a)×(b)×100を適正範囲の面積比率、下限値に達しない範囲の面積/(a)×(b)×100を過少範囲の面積比率、上限値を超えた範囲の面積/(a)×(b)×100を過大範囲の面積比率として計算し、さらに、これら面積比率を円グラフ上に表示して洗浄状況を評価することを特徴とする。
【0006】
【発明の実施の態様】
以下、本発明を添付図面を用いて詳述する。
【0007】
図1は本発明にかかる洗浄剤濃度のコンピューターシステムによるバンドグラフを表した一具体例であり、図2は図1に基づく洗浄剤濃度の適正範囲、過少範囲および過大範囲をコンピューター上に表した円グラフであり、図3は図1と同様な洗浄剤濃度のバンドグラフ、図4は図3の円グラフ、図5は洗浄剤温度のバンドグラフ、図6は図5の円グラフ、図7は洗浄剤流量のバンドグラフ、図8は図7の円グラフである。
【0008】
図1において、ビール工場における定置洗浄(CIP)の洗浄剤濃度変化をバンドグラフで表す。まず、洗浄剤濃度ヲ例えば1.0重量%に設定しておき、1.2重量%を上限値、0.8重量%を下限値としてコンピューターシステムに入力し、これら上限値および下限値の範囲を適正範囲、下限値に達しない範囲を過少範囲、上限値を越えた範囲を過大範囲として面積比率でバンドグラフに表す。
【0009】
図1において、適正範囲の面積比率は上限と下限の範囲内の面積/上限と下限の長さ(a)×洗浄時間(b)×100で計算され、過少範囲の面積比率で下限値に達しない範囲の面積/上限と下限の長さ(a)×洗浄時間(b)×100で計算され、また、過大範囲の面積比率は上限値を越えた範囲の面積/上限と下限の長さ(a)×洗浄時間(b)×100で計算される。
【0010】
次いで、これら面積比率を図2に示されるように、円グラフ上に表示する。このような円グラフに表示することにより、CIPにおける洗浄剤濃度状況が一見して、一瞬に理解でき、洗浄状況を評価することができる。
【0011】
本発明では、このような評価を洗浄剤の濃度、温度および流量について行い、洗浄状況の評価を完全ならしめる。すなわち、CIPの洗浄に使用される洗浄剤の濃度、温度および流量の適正なバランスを一見して判断して洗浄状態を迅速に、容易に、かつ正確に判断し得る。
【0012】
【発明の実施例】
実施例1
食品工場のCIPモニターを稼働させ、使用する洗浄剤の、それぞれ濃度、温度および流量の各要素について、バンドグラフおよび円グラフに記録し、各要素の適正、過大過少状況を示した。
【0013】
図3は洗浄剤の濃度についてのバンドグラフであり、図4はその円グラフである。図3において、設定値を1.0%、上限値を1.2%、下限値を0.8%(いずれも重量)として定めて入力し、適正、過少、過大を面積比率で表し、これらをもって図4の円グラフを作成した。図4から濃度にかかる洗浄状況が一見してわかる。
【0014】
図5は洗浄剤の温度についてのバンドグラフであり、図6はその円グラフである。図5において、設定値を70℃、上限値を85℃、下限値を60℃として定めて入力し、適正、過少、過大を面積比率で表し、図6の円グラフを作成した。
図6から温度にかかる洗浄状況が一見してわかる。
【0015】
図7は洗浄剤の流量についてのバンドグラフであり、図8はその円グラフである。図7において、設定値。17000 L/hr 、上限値を 2000 L/hr 、下限値を16000 L/hr として定めて入力し、適正、過少、過大を面積比率で表示し、図8の円グラフを作成した。図8から流量にかかる洗浄状況が一見してわかる。
【0016】
実施例2
小型のCIPテスト装置を使用し、(1) 洗浄しやすいものとして人工的に調整した牛乳汚れ (2)洗浄しにくいものとして人工的に調整したコーヒー汚れを付着させたテストピースを作り、これを洗浄剤溶液の温度・流量(流速)・洗浄剤濃度の3要素についてそれぞれ条件を設定し、これらの条件を変化させながら洗浄を行った。
【0017】
この洗浄状態をCIPモニターで記録し、得られた結果の結果の解析と洗浄後のテストピース汚れの洗浄効果を目視確認した。なお、シングルユースCIPの場合は洗浄溶液の温度と流量(流速)のみ、リュースCIPの場合洗浄溶液の温度と流量(流速)と洗浄剤濃度の各要素を確認した。
【0018】
【0019】
洗浄剤供給条件として、解析結果で得られる円グラフ中の適正値面積が、50%と40%を占めるようにコントロールした。結果を表1に示す。
【0020】
【表1】
【0021】
表1より、適正値面積の範囲内に各条件が維持されている場合、洗浄効果は良好な結果を保ち、各条件の適正値面積以上の場合では、洗浄溶液温度・濃度・流量(流速)が無駄に使用されていることが考えられる。一方、適正値面積の範囲より一つの条件で面積が小さくなった場合は洗浄効果が劣った。
【0022】
【0023】
洗浄剤供給条件として、解析結果で得られる円グラフ中の適正面積が、60%と50%を占めるようにコントロールした。結果を表2に示す。
【0024】
【表2】
【0025】
表2より、適正範囲面積の範囲内に各条件が維持されている場合、洗浄効果は良好な結果を保ち、各条件の適正値面積以上の場合では洗浄溶液の温度・濃度・流量(流速)が無駄に使用されていることが考えられる。一方、適正値面積の範囲より、一つの条件でも面積が小さかった場合は、洗浄効果が劣った。
【0026】
実施例3
乳飲料工場のCIP装置の本発明にかかるCIPモニターを取り付け、標準の洗浄条件で洗浄を行った。洗浄およびすすぎ後に、工業用フアイバースコープを用いて飲料が通過する配管内および殺菌プレートの表面を観察し、洗浄の効果を確認した。結果は下記の通りであった。
【0027】
〔1号ライン〕
(1) CIPモニターの結果では、洗浄剤濃度、洗浄溶液温度、洗浄溶液流量のいずれも設定の適切な範囲内の条件で洗浄されていたことを示していた。
【0028】
(2) フアイバースコープによる観察の結果では、配管内および殺菌プレートの表面には汚れの残存は見られず、完全洗浄がなされた。
【0029】
〔2号ライン〕
(1) CIPモニターの結果では、洗浄剤濃度と洗浄溶液温度はいずれも設定の適切な範囲内の条件で洗浄されており、洗浄溶液流量については適切な範囲を下まわる条件で洗浄されていたことを示した。
(2) フアイバースコープによる観察の結果では、配管内の表面には汚れの残存は見られず、きれいに洗浄されていたが、殺菌プレートの表面に若干の汚れが残存しており、不完全な洗浄であった。
【0030】
【発明の効果】
以上のとおり、本発明はコンピュータシテスムを用いて、例えば、各種食品工場の定置洗浄(CIP)工程において、洗浄に使用される洗浄剤の濃度・温度・および流量の適正なバランスを瞬時に、一見して判断し、洗浄状況を迅速に、容易に、かつ正確に把握して洗浄におけるエネルギーの削減と品質管理の向上を達成する。
【図面の簡単な説明】
【図1】本発明にかかる洗浄剤濃度のコンピュータシステムによるバンドグラフを表した一具体例である。
【図2】図1に基づく洗浄剤濃度の適正範囲、過少範囲および過大範囲をコンピュータ上に表した円グラフである。
【図3】洗浄剤濃度のバンドグラフである。
【図4】図3の円グラフである。
【図5】洗浄剤温度のバンドグラフである。
【図6】図5の円グラフである。
【図7】洗浄剤流量のバンドグラフである。
【図8】図7の円グラフである。[0001]
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a method for evaluating a cleaning situation in various CIP processes such as a stationary cleaning process (CIP process) in various food factories, for example, a glass bottle cleaning process in a beer factory, and in particular, a cleaning agent used for cleaning. The present invention relates to a method for evaluating a cleaning state in a CIP process that can determine a cleaning state at a glance by determining an appropriate balance of concentration, temperature, and flow rate at a quick, easy and accurate level.
[0002]
[Prior art]
Many food factories currently employ computer-based CIP monitors. This CIP monitor only has a function of displaying the concentration of the cleaning agent in the CIP process, the cleaning agent temperature, the cleaning agent flow rate, etc. on a computer and storing it.
[0003]
[Problems to be Solved by the Invention]
However, it has been impossible to analyze the various data and evaluate the cleaning situation in the stationary cleaning (CIP) to control the quality of the cleaning agent.
[0004]
Therefore, an object of the present invention is to instantly determine, at a glance, an appropriate balance of the concentration, temperature and flow rate of the cleaning agent used for cleaning in the stationary cleaning (CIP) process of various food factories, and the cleaning status To provide a method for evaluating the cleaning situation in stationary cleaning, which quickly, easily and accurately grasps, achieves energy reduction and quality control improvement in cleaning, and improves the above-mentioned drawbacks of the known technology is there.
[0005]
[Means for Solving the Problems]
In order to achieve the above object, according to the present invention, the upper and lower limits of the proper concentration of the cleaning agent in the stationary cleaning step , the upper and lower limits of the appropriate temperature, and the upper and lower limits of the appropriate flow rate are plotted on the vertical axis of the graph. As the length (a), the cleaning time is defined as the length (b) on the horizontal axis, and the area within the range between the upper limit and the lower limit / (a) × (b) × 100 is the area ratio and lower limit of the appropriate range Area not reaching the value / (a) × (b) × 100 is the area ratio of the underrange, and the area of the range exceeding the upper limit / (a) × (b) × 100 is the area ratio of the overrange In addition, the area ratio is displayed on a pie chart to evaluate the cleaning condition.
[0006]
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
[0007]
FIG. 1 is a specific example showing a band graph by the computer system of the detergent concentration according to the present invention, and FIG. 2 shows an appropriate range, under range and over range of the detergent concentration based on FIG. 1 on a computer. 3 is a band graph of the detergent concentration similar to FIG. 1, FIG. 4 is a pie chart of FIG. 3, FIG. 5 is a band graph of the detergent temperature, FIG. 6 is a pie chart of FIG. Is a band graph of the cleaning agent flow rate, and FIG. 8 is a pie chart of FIG.
[0008]
In FIG. 1, a change in detergent concentration of stationary cleaning (CIP) in a beer factory is represented by a band graph. First, set the cleaning agent concentration to 1.0% by weight, for example, and input 1.2% by weight into the computer system as the upper limit and 0.8% by weight as the lower limit. Is represented in the band graph as an area ratio, with an appropriate range, a range not reaching the lower limit value being an underrange, and a range exceeding the upper limit value being an overrange range.
[0009]
In FIG. 1, the area ratio of the appropriate range is calculated by the area within the upper limit and the lower limit range / length of the upper limit and the lower limit (a) × cleaning time (b) × 100, and reaches the lower limit with the area ratio of the underrange. Area / upper limit and lower limit length (a) × cleaning time (b) × 100, and the area ratio of the excessive range is the area / upper limit / lower limit length of the range exceeding the upper limit ( a) × washing time (b) × 100.
[0010]
Next, these area ratios are displayed on a pie chart as shown in FIG. By displaying on such a pie chart, the cleaning agent concentration status in CIP can be understood at a glance, and the cleaning status can be evaluated.
[0011]
In the present invention, such an evaluation is performed on the concentration, temperature and flow rate of the cleaning agent to complete the evaluation of the cleaning condition. That is, it is possible to determine the cleaning state quickly, easily and accurately by judging at a glance an appropriate balance of the concentration, temperature and flow rate of the cleaning agent used for CIP cleaning.
[0012]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Example 1
The CIP monitor of the food factory was operated, and each element of concentration, temperature and flow rate of the cleaning agent to be used was recorded in a band graph and a pie chart, and the appropriateness of each element and the over and under condition of each element were shown.
[0013]
FIG. 3 is a band graph for the concentration of the cleaning agent, and FIG. 4 is a pie chart thereof. In Fig. 3, set the value as 1.0%, set the upper limit as 1.2%, and set the lower limit as 0.8% (both by weight). The pie chart of FIG. 4 was created. From FIG. 4, it can be seen at a glance the cleaning situation related to the concentration.
[0014]
FIG. 5 is a band graph for the temperature of the cleaning agent, and FIG. 6 is a pie chart thereof. In FIG. 5, the set value was set to 70 ° C., the upper limit value was set to 85 ° C., and the lower limit value was set to 60 ° C., and appropriate, under and over were expressed as area ratios, and the pie chart of FIG. 6 was created.
From FIG. 6, it can be seen at a glance the cleaning situation related to the temperature.
[0015]
FIG. 7 is a band graph for the flow rate of the cleaning agent, and FIG. 8 is a pie chart thereof. In FIG. 7, the set value. The pie chart of FIG. 8 was created by entering 17000 L / hr, an upper limit value of 2000 L / hr and a lower limit value of 16000 L / hr. From FIG. 8, it can be seen at a glance the cleaning situation concerning the flow rate.
[0016]
Example 2
Using a small CIP test device, (1) Milk dirt artificially adjusted to be easy to clean (2) Artificially adjusted test pieces with coffee dirt adhering to difficult to wash Conditions were set for each of the three factors of temperature, flow rate (flow rate), and concentration of the detergent solution, and washing was performed while changing these conditions.
[0017]
This cleaning state was recorded with a CIP monitor, and the results obtained were analyzed and the cleaning effect of the test piece stains after cleaning was visually confirmed. In the case of single-use CIP, only the temperature and flow rate (flow rate) of the cleaning solution were checked, and in the case of Ruus CIP, each element of the temperature and flow rate (flow rate) and cleaning agent concentration of the cleaning solution was confirmed.
[0018]
[0019]
The cleaning agent supply conditions were controlled so that the appropriate area in the pie chart obtained from the analysis results accounted for 50% and 40%. The results are shown in Table 1.
[0020]
[Table 1]
[0021]
According to Table 1, if each condition is maintained within the range of the appropriate value area, the cleaning effect will be good, and if it exceeds the appropriate value area for each condition, the cleaning solution temperature / concentration / flow rate (flow rate) May be used in vain. On the other hand, the cleaning effect was inferior when the area was reduced under one condition from the range of the appropriate value area.
[0022]
[0023]
The cleaning agent supply conditions were controlled so that the appropriate area in the pie chart obtained from the analysis results accounted for 60% and 50%. The results are shown in Table 2.
[0024]
[Table 2]
[0025]
From Table 2, if each condition is maintained within the range of the appropriate range, the cleaning effect will be good, and if it exceeds the appropriate value area for each condition, the temperature, concentration and flow rate (flow rate) of the cleaning solution May be used in vain. On the other hand, when the area was smaller even under one condition than the range of the appropriate value area, the cleaning effect was inferior.
[0026]
Example 3
A CIP monitor according to the present invention of a CIP apparatus of a milk beverage factory was attached, and washing was performed under standard washing conditions. After cleaning and rinsing, the effect of the cleaning was confirmed by observing the inside of the pipe through which the beverage passed and the surface of the sterilizing plate using an industrial fiberscope. The results were as follows.
[0027]
[Line 1]
(1) The results of the CIP monitor showed that the cleaning agent concentration, the cleaning solution temperature, and the cleaning solution flow rate were all washed under conditions within the appropriate setting range.
[0028]
(2) As a result of observation with a fiber scope, no dirt remained on the pipe and the surface of the sterilization plate, and the product was thoroughly cleaned.
[0029]
[Line 2]
(1) According to the results of CIP monitoring, the cleaning agent concentration and the cleaning solution temperature were both cleaned within the appropriate range of the setting, and the cleaning solution flow rate was cleaned under the appropriate range. Showed that.
(2) As a result of observation with a fiberscope, no dirt remained on the surface in the pipe, and the surface was cleanly cleaned. Met.
[0030]
【The invention's effect】
As described above, the present invention uses a computer system, for example, in the stationary cleaning (CIP) process of various food factories, to instantly see an appropriate balance of concentration, temperature, and flow rate of the cleaning agent used for cleaning. Judgment is made, and the cleaning situation is quickly, easily and accurately grasped to achieve energy reduction and improvement of quality control in cleaning.
[Brief description of the drawings]
FIG. 1 is a specific example showing a band graph by a computer system of a detergent concentration according to the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a pie chart showing a proper range, an under range and an over range of the detergent concentration based on FIG. 1 on a computer.
FIG. 3 is a band graph of detergent concentration.
4 is a pie chart of FIG.
FIG. 5 is a band graph of cleaning agent temperature.
6 is a pie chart of FIG.
FIG. 7 is a band graph of a cleaning agent flow rate.
FIG. 8 is a pie chart of FIG.
Claims (1)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2001129036A JP4580583B2 (en) | 2001-04-26 | 2001-04-26 | Evaluation method of cleaning condition in stationary cleaning |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2001129036A JP4580583B2 (en) | 2001-04-26 | 2001-04-26 | Evaluation method of cleaning condition in stationary cleaning |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2002320928A JP2002320928A (en) | 2002-11-05 |
| JP4580583B2 true JP4580583B2 (en) | 2010-11-17 |
Family
ID=18977626
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2001129036A Expired - Fee Related JP4580583B2 (en) | 2001-04-26 | 2001-04-26 | Evaluation method of cleaning condition in stationary cleaning |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP4580583B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP4835944B2 (en) * | 2007-05-30 | 2011-12-14 | 株式会社日立プラントテクノロジー | Cleaning time calculation method, parameter value calculation method, and cleaning design support method during pipe cleaning |
| DE102010009138A1 (en) * | 2010-02-23 | 2011-08-25 | Krones Ag, 93073 | Filling plant for filling containers and operating methods for a filling plant for filling containers |
Family Cites Families (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP3656256B2 (en) * | 1993-11-20 | 2005-06-08 | 伸夫 鈴木 | Computer judgment display system for obesity and skinny |
| JPH08299923A (en) * | 1995-05-11 | 1996-11-19 | Hitachi Ltd | Cleaning method and device |
| JP2000107146A (en) * | 1998-10-07 | 2000-04-18 | Nippon Colin Co Ltd | Blood pressure monitoring device |
-
2001
- 2001-04-26 JP JP2001129036A patent/JP4580583B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2002320928A (en) | 2002-11-05 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US11627861B2 (en) | Control of cleaning machine cycles using machine vision | |
| AU2020395109B2 (en) | Verification of cleaning process efficacy | |
| EP3376931B1 (en) | Method for operating a dish washing machine and dish washing machine | |
| CN109158366B (en) | In-situ cleaning process and in-situ cleaning system | |
| CN116823363B (en) | Dish-washing machine performance rating system and evaluation method | |
| JP4580583B2 (en) | Evaluation method of cleaning condition in stationary cleaning | |
| DE60314015T2 (en) | DISHWASHING MACHINE AND ASSOCIATED METHOD OF OPERATION | |
| CN102539643A (en) | Water quality detection device and method of drinking water | |
| US20030213069A1 (en) | System and method of surfactant dosing | |
| CN103221152A (en) | Apparatus and method for monitoring cleaning | |
| EP1281446B1 (en) | Measuring device for monitoring the cleaning of containers in a washing installation | |
| JP6876650B2 (en) | Automatic analyzer and automatic analysis method | |
| Worsfold et al. | An assessment of cleaning regimes and standards in butchers' shops | |
| CN107052005B (en) | Cleaning control method and device and full-automatic multifunctional cleaning system | |
| WO2004071681A1 (en) | A method of monitoring and controlling a cleaning process and a method of checking cleanliness | |
| EP0862891A3 (en) | Household apparatus with a measuring device for determining the contamination degree of the cleaning liquid | |
| CN218854988U (en) | A multi-chamber cleaning and disinfection equipment capable of detecting protein residues | |
| JP5354722B2 (en) | Fluid work monitoring device | |
| CN209377496U (en) | Controllers and control systems for home appliances | |
| CN110118855A (en) | A kind of test method for evaluating detergent decontamination effect | |
| CN220508791U (en) | Dairy product conveying pipeline cleaning device | |
| CN104148328A (en) | Method for cleaning pharmaceutical tablet mold | |
| Tsuyuki et al. | Impact of sanitation on product shelf life | |
| WO2004061447A3 (en) | Method and corresponding system for indicating a time for titrating a chemical solution | |
| KR102851750B1 (en) | Smart Sanitizing-Rinsing Apparatus and Disinfection-Rinsing Monitoring System Utilizing the Same |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20080423 |
|
| A711 | Notification of change in applicant |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A712 Effective date: 20080826 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20100401 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20100518 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20100720 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20100810 |
|
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20100830 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130903 Year of fee payment: 3 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 4580583 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130903 Year of fee payment: 3 |
|
| S111 | Request for change of ownership or part of ownership |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313111 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130903 Year of fee payment: 3 |
|
| R350 | Written notification of registration of transfer |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| S533 | Written request for registration of change of name |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533 |
|
| R350 | Written notification of registration of transfer |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| S111 | Request for change of ownership or part of ownership |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313111 |
|
| R350 | Written notification of registration of transfer |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |