Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP4682614B2 - H-section steel quality judgment method - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP4682614B2 - H-section steel quality judgment method - Google Patents

H-section steel quality judgment method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4682614B2
JP4682614B2 JP2004371429A JP2004371429A JP4682614B2 JP 4682614 B2 JP4682614 B2 JP 4682614B2 JP 2004371429 A JP2004371429 A JP 2004371429A JP 2004371429 A JP2004371429 A JP 2004371429A JP 4682614 B2 JP4682614 B2 JP 4682614B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
temperature
flange
quality
section steel
temperature distribution
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2004371429A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2006177779A (en
Inventor
高志 黒木
直樹 中田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JFE Steel Corp
Original Assignee
JFE Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by JFE Steel Corp filed Critical JFE Steel Corp
Priority to JP2004371429A priority Critical patent/JP4682614B2/en
Publication of JP2006177779A publication Critical patent/JP2006177779A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4682614B2 publication Critical patent/JP4682614B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Radiation Pyrometers (AREA)

Description

本発明はH形鋼の品質判定方法に関し、特に、熱間圧延後のH形鋼の幅方向の表面温度分布から品質管理のための温度データを採取する方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a method for determining the quality of H-section steel , and more particularly to a method for collecting temperature data for quality control from the surface temperature distribution in the width direction of H-section steel after hot rolling .

熱間圧延を行った鋼材の強度などの品質判定は、温度測定値を用いて行うことが多い。例えば、厚板やH形鋼などの鋼材の製造では、熱間仕上圧延後に水冷を行い、その後に温度を測定し、測定値が許容範囲内であれば、品質が良好であると判定している。厚板では、最エッジを除く板幅方向全ての部分を品質管理対象とするために、放射温度計を用いて板幅方向温度分布測定を行っている。H形鋼では、強度を保証するフランジ部分の温度分布を測定し、その温度分布から代表部分、例えばフランジ端部からフランジ幅の1/4内側の部分(以下、クォータ部とよぶ)の温度を求めて品質管理を行っている。   In many cases, the quality judgment such as the strength of the steel material that has been hot-rolled is performed using a temperature measurement value. For example, in the manufacture of steel materials such as thick plates and H-section steel, water cooling is performed after hot finish rolling, and then the temperature is measured. If the measured value is within an allowable range, it is determined that the quality is good. Yes. In the thick plate, in order to make all the portions in the plate width direction excluding the outermost edge a quality control target, a temperature distribution measurement in the plate width direction is performed using a radiation thermometer. For H-section steel, the temperature distribution of the flange part that guarantees strength is measured, and the temperature of the representative part, for example, the part inside the flange width ¼ from the flange end (hereinafter referred to as the quarter part) is determined from the temperature distribution. We are seeking quality control.

連続して測定する温度分布データからは、図3に示されるようにしきい値を設け、温度データの立上がりと立下がり部分を熱間鋼材の両端部と見なし、その間に採取した温度データを温度分布として認識する場合が一般的である。例えばクォータ部の温度は、温度データの総数の1/4にあたる順番のデータとしている。   From the temperature distribution data measured continuously, a threshold is set as shown in FIG. 3, the rising and falling portions of the temperature data are regarded as both ends of the hot steel material, and the temperature data collected during that time is the temperature distribution. It is common to recognize as For example, the temperature of the quarter portion is data in an order corresponding to 1/4 of the total number of temperature data.

H形鋼では、肉厚の薄いウェブが先に冷えてフランジとの温度差が極度に大きくなると、ウェブ波が発生する。こうなると製品として出荷できなくなるので、温度差の拡大を防ぐためにフランジの外側中央、すなわちウェブの付け根であるフィレット部分を特に集中的に冷却する場合がある。このような場合には、フランジの幅方向の温度分布は図3に示されるような凹型になる。   In H-shaped steel, when a thin web is cooled first and the temperature difference from the flange becomes extremely large, a web wave is generated. Since it becomes impossible to ship as a product when it becomes like this, in order to prevent the expansion of a temperature difference, the fillet part which is the outer center of a flange, ie, the base of a web, may be cooled especially intensively. In such a case, the temperature distribution in the width direction of the flange has a concave shape as shown in FIG.

放射温度計による温度測定では、温度の応答の立ち上がりや立ち下がりにある程度の時間がかかることから、端部の急激な温度変化、すなわち鋼材がない部分から鋼材端部への温度の立ち上がり、あるいは鋼材端部から鋼材がない部分への温度の立ち下がりを正確にとらえることができない。したがって、端部温度の立ち上がりや立ち下がり部分を相対的に広めに計測してしまう。このような場合には、例えばフィレットを水冷した後のH形鋼のフランジ温度分布は図3に示されるように凹型となるが、クォータ部の位置を実際より外側に、温度を実際よりも高めに認識してしまうという問題があった。   In temperature measurement with a radiation thermometer, it takes a certain amount of time for the temperature response to rise and fall, so there is a sudden temperature change at the edge, that is, the temperature rise from the part without steel to the steel edge, or the steel. The fall of the temperature from the end part to the part where there is no steel material cannot be accurately captured. Therefore, the rising and falling portions of the end temperature are measured relatively wide. In such a case, for example, the flange temperature distribution of the H-shaped steel after cooling the fillet with water becomes concave as shown in FIG. 3, but the quarter portion is positioned outside the actual position and the temperature is increased from the actual position. There was a problem of recognizing.

そして、実際よりも高めに測定してしまった測定値が許容範囲に入っていなければ、その部分を温度不良と判定し、切り出して引張試験などの材料試験を行っていた。材料試験を行う場合には、製品の歩留まりが悪化する上、その結果が出るまでは製品が倉庫内に滞留するという問題が発生する。滞留する材料が多くなると、圧延の操業そのものを停止せざるを得なくなる状況が発生するという問題も発生していた。   If the measured value measured higher than the actual value does not fall within the allowable range, the portion was determined to be defective in temperature, cut out, and subjected to a material test such as a tensile test. When performing a material test, the yield of the product deteriorates, and there is a problem that the product stays in the warehouse until the result is obtained. When the amount of accumulated material increases, there has also been a problem that a situation occurs in which the rolling operation itself must be stopped.

上述のように、温度を認識する位置がずれていることが原因で温度不良と判定される場合が多いが、材料試験を行っても実際の強度は全く問題ないという場合も多かった。温度判定の精度が悪いので、不必要な材料試験が数多く行われることになり、歩留まりが低下するばかりかコストがかかるという問題もあった。   As described above, it is often determined that the temperature is defective because the position for recognizing the temperature is shifted. However, even if a material test is performed, there is often no problem with the actual strength. Since the accuracy of the temperature determination is poor, many unnecessary material tests are performed, and there is a problem that the yield is reduced and the cost is increased.

これに対し、許容温度範囲を広めるという対策も考えられるが、実際に許容温度範囲からはずれた場合を見逃すことになるので問題があった。ところで、放射温度計が端部を相対的に広めに計測してしまうという傾向は、温度計からの距離によっても異なるということが、本発明者らの研究によって明らかになった。H形鋼の左右のフランジ冷却を全く同一とし、同一の温度分布が得られたとしても、測定距離が異なると測定値も異なってしまう。こうなると、温度と材質の対応にばらつきが大きくなるので、材質が許容範囲を超えた部分を絶対に見逃さないように、温度の許容範囲をより狭くし、温度不良と判定された部分に対して数多く材料試験を行うということをせざるを得なかった。   On the other hand, a measure to widen the allowable temperature range is also conceivable, but there is a problem because the case where the temperature actually deviates from the allowable temperature range is missed. By the way, the present inventors have clarified that the tendency of the radiation thermometer to measure the end portion relatively wide is different depending on the distance from the thermometer. Even if the left and right flange cooling of the H-shaped steel is exactly the same and the same temperature distribution is obtained, the measured value will be different if the measurement distance is different. If this happens, the variation in the correspondence between temperature and material will increase, so the temperature tolerance range will be narrowed so that parts where the material exceeds the tolerance range will not be overlooked. I had to do many material tests.

本発明は、このような問題点を解決するためになされたものであり、熱間圧延後のH形鋼の表面温度の内、適切な判定部位の温度を取り込んで高精度な品質判定を行うことを可能にしたH形鋼の品質判定方法を提供することを目的とする。 The present invention has been made in order to solve such problems, and performs high-accuracy quality determination by taking in the temperature of an appropriate determination portion from the surface temperature of the H-shaped steel after hot rolling. It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for judging the quality of H-section steel that makes it possible.

本発明に係るH形鋼の品質判定方法は、熱間圧延後のH形鋼のフランジ幅方向温度分布を放射温度計により測定し、その温度分布からフランジ端部を認識して温度判定位置を求め、その温度判定位置の温度データに基づいてH形鋼の品質判定を行う方法であって、実際のH形鋼製品の強度を保証する品質管理点と前記温度判定位置とのずれが小さくなるように、前記放射温度計とフランジ間の距離に応じて、測定されたフランジ幅に対する温度判定位置のフランジ端部からの位置又はフランジ端部を認識する温度しきい値を設定するThe quality determination method of the H-section steel according to the present invention measures the flange width direction temperature distribution of the H-section steel after hot rolling with a radiation thermometer, recognizes the flange end from the temperature distribution, and determines the temperature determination position. This is a method for determining the quality of the H-section steel based on the temperature data at the temperature determination position, and the deviation between the quality control point that guarantees the strength of the actual H-section steel product and the temperature determination position is reduced. Thus, a temperature threshold value for recognizing the position of the temperature determination position from the flange end or the flange end with respect to the measured flange width is set according to the distance between the radiation thermometer and the flange .

本発明に係るH形鋼の品質判定方法は、前記品質管理点のフランジ幅方向の位置に対応した、前記温度分布のフランジ幅方向の位置から幅方向内側に3〜15%の範囲で、前記温度判定位置を、前記放射温度計とフランジ間の距離に応じて設定する。 In the method for judging the quality of the H-section steel according to the present invention, in the range of 3 to 15% from the position in the flange width direction of the temperature distribution to the inside in the width direction, corresponding to the position in the flange width direction of the quality control point, The temperature determination position is set according to the distance between the radiation thermometer and the flange.

本発明に係るH形鋼の品質判定方法は、フランジ端部を認識する温度しきい値を、前記放射温度計とフランジ間の距離に応じて、前記距離が遠いほど前記温度しきい値が高温になるように変更するAccording to the quality determination method for the H-section steel according to the present invention, the temperature threshold value for recognizing the flange end is set such that the temperature threshold value increases as the distance increases, according to the distance between the radiation thermometer and the flange. Change to be .

本発明に係るH形鋼の品質判定方法は、熱間圧延後のH形鋼の左右両面のフランジ幅方向温度分布を同時に測定して品質判定する際に、フランジの左右それぞれと放射温度計との距離に応じて、上記のいずれかの方法でフランジ両面の品質判定を行うThe method for judging the quality of the H-section steel according to the present invention comprises measuring the temperature distribution in the flange width direction on both the left and right sides of the H-section steel after hot rolling at the same time, Depending on the distance, the quality of both surfaces of the flange is determined by any of the above methods .

本発明に係るH形鋼の品質判定方法は、熱間圧延後のH形鋼を搬送するラインが2つ以上平行してある設備において、前記ラインの外側からH形鋼の左右のフランジ幅方向温度分布を同時に測定して品質判定する際に、フランジの左右それぞれと放射温度計との距離に応じて、上記のいずれかの方法でフランジ両面の品質判定を行うThe method for judging the quality of H-section steel according to the present invention is a facility in which two or more lines carrying the H-section steel after hot rolling are parallel to each other. When determining the quality by measuring the temperature distribution at the same time, the quality of both surfaces of the flange is determined by one of the above methods according to the distance between the left and right sides of the flange and the radiation thermometer .

本発明によれば、熱間圧延後のH形鋼の幅方向の表面温度分布を放射温度計で測定し、その表面温度分布の内、放射温度計の出力特性を考慮して温度データを採取する点(即ち温度判定位置)を求め、その採取点(温度判定位置)の温度に基づいて品質判定を行うようにしたので、高精度な品質判定が可能になっており、生産性が向上する。 According to the present invention, the surface temperature distribution in the width direction of the H-shaped steel after hot rolling is measured with a radiation thermometer, and temperature data is collected in consideration of the output characteristics of the radiation thermometer in the surface temperature distribution. Since a point to be performed (that is, a temperature determination position) is obtained and quality determination is performed based on the temperature of the sampling point (temperature determination position), high-accuracy quality determination is possible and productivity is improved. .

図1は本発明の一実施形態に係る鋼材の品質判定方法が適用されたH形鋼の製造設備の構成図であり、図2はH形鋼と温度計A及び温度計Bとの相対的な位置関係を示した説明図である。この製造設備においては、粗圧延機10、冷却設備11、仕上圧延機12及び冷却設備13が直列に配置されている。仕上圧延機12の入側には1対の仕上入側温度計21,22が配置されており、冷却設備13の出側にはH形鋼20のフランジの表面温度分布を測定するための温度計A23及び温度計B24が配置されている。これらの温度計21〜24には何れも放射温度計が用いられている。温度計A23及び温度計B24は、図2に示されるように、ガイド15に設けられた狭い幅のスリット(図示せず)から、テーブルローラー14上のH形鋼20の左右のフランジをそれぞれ覗いて、フランジ幅方向の温度分布を測定する。   FIG. 1 is a configuration diagram of an H-section steel manufacturing facility to which a steel quality determination method according to an embodiment of the present invention is applied, and FIG. 2 is a relative view of the H-section steel and thermometer A and thermometer B. It is explanatory drawing which showed various positional relationships. In this manufacturing facility, a rough rolling mill 10, a cooling facility 11, a finish rolling mill 12, and a cooling facility 13 are arranged in series. A pair of finish entry side thermometers 21 and 22 are arranged on the entry side of the finishing mill 12, and the temperature for measuring the surface temperature distribution of the flange of the H-section steel 20 on the exit side of the cooling facility 13. A meter A23 and a thermometer B24 are arranged. As these thermometers 21 to 24, radiation thermometers are used. As shown in FIG. 2, the thermometer A23 and the thermometer B24 look into the left and right flanges of the H-section steel 20 on the table roller 14 from narrow slits (not shown) provided in the guide 15, respectively. And measure the temperature distribution in the flange width direction.

図1の製造設備において、H形鋼は粗圧延機10によって粗圧延された後、冷却設備11によりフランジ外面に冷却水が供給されて冷却され、更に、仕上圧延機12によって仕上圧延され、その後に、冷却設備13にてフランジ外面に冷却水が供給されて冷却される。そして、冷却設備13の下流側では、図示しない熱間鋸断機にて鋸断が行われる。   In the production facility of FIG. 1, the H-shaped steel is roughly rolled by the roughing mill 10, cooled by supplying cooling water to the outer surface of the flange by the cooling facility 11, and further finish-rolled by the finishing mill 12, In addition, cooling water is supplied to the outer surface of the flange by the cooling equipment 13 to be cooled. Then, on the downstream side of the cooling facility 13, cutting is performed by a hot sawing machine (not shown).

フランジの両面の幅方向温度分布は、仕上圧延機12による仕上圧延前と冷却設備13による水冷後に、1対の仕上入側温度計21,22及び温度計A23及び温度計B24によりそれぞれ測定される。この温度計21〜24は連続的にスキャンするが、或る温度(しきい値)以上の指示が出力された際に材料を認識し、連続的に取れた温度データを温度分布として認識する。このしきい値を、以下、単に温度しきい値とよぶことにする。この温度分布の測定より、例えば図3に示されるような温度分布の温度データが得られる。仕上入側温度計21,22、温度計A23及び温度計B24の各出力(フランジの幅方向の温度分布の温度データ)はコンピュータ25に取り込まれ、H形鋼の品質判定等の処理がなされる。   The temperature distribution in the width direction on both sides of the flange is measured by a pair of finish-side thermometers 21 and 22, a thermometer A23, and a thermometer B24 before finish rolling by the finish mill 12 and after water cooling by the cooling equipment 13, respectively. . The thermometers 21 to 24 continuously scan. When an instruction higher than a certain temperature (threshold value) is output, the thermometer 21-24 recognizes the material and recognizes continuously obtained temperature data as a temperature distribution. Hereinafter, this threshold value is simply referred to as a temperature threshold value. From this temperature distribution measurement, for example, temperature data of the temperature distribution as shown in FIG. 3 is obtained. Each output (temperature data of the temperature distribution in the width direction of the flange) of finishing input side thermometers 21 and 22, thermometer A23 and thermometer B24 is taken into computer 25, and processing such as quality judgment of H-section steel is performed. .

コンピュータ25は、温度計A23及び温度計B24からのフランジの幅方向の温度分布の温度データから後述の実施例において詳細に述べているようにして(後述の実施例1〜3参照)、温度判定位置の温度を抽出し、その温度に基づいて鋼材の品質評価を行っている。どのようにH形鋼の温度判定位置を特定しているかは後述の実施例1〜3において説明する。なお、本発明において、品質管理点とは実際の製品の材質を保証する点(クォータ部)を意味している。また、温度判定位置とは実際の品質管理点での温度として処理される温度データを採取するための位置(部位)であり、放射温度計の出力特性を考慮して決められる。このため、放射温度計による測定条件等によって変わる。   The computer 25 determines the temperature from the temperature data of the temperature distribution in the width direction of the flange from the thermometer A23 and the thermometer B24 as described in detail in the embodiments described later (see the embodiments 1-3 described later). The temperature at the position is extracted and the quality of the steel is evaluated based on the temperature. How the temperature determination position of the H-section steel is specified will be described in Examples 1 to 3 described later. In the present invention, the quality control point means a point (quarter part) that guarantees the actual product material. The temperature determination position is a position (part) for collecting temperature data processed as the temperature at the actual quality control point, and is determined in consideration of the output characteristics of the radiation thermometer. For this reason, it changes with the measurement conditions by a radiation thermometer.

本発明の実施例として、仕上圧延機12による熱間仕上圧延後に、ウェブ高さ700mm、ウェブ厚9mm、フランジ幅200mm、フランジ厚22mmのH型鋼のフランジ外面に冷却設備13にて冷却水を供給し、その後、搬送ラインにて温度計A23,温度計B24によりフランジ両面の温度分布を測定する場合について説明する。   As an embodiment of the present invention, after hot finish rolling by the finishing mill 12, cooling water is supplied to the outer surface of the H-shaped steel having a web height of 700 mm, a web thickness of 9 mm, a flange width of 200 mm, and a flange thickness of 22 mm by the cooling equipment 13. Then, the case where the temperature distribution of both surfaces of the flange is measured by the thermometer A23 and the thermometer B24 on the transfer line will be described.

図1に示されたH形鋼の製造設備において、温度計A23、B24とH形鋼の相対的な位置関係は図2に示されるようになっており、測定距離は温度計A23が2m、温度計B24が6mであった。それぞれがガイド15に設けられた狭い幅のスリット(図示せず)からフランジ面を覗いてフランジ幅方向、図2の例では上下方向の温度分布を測定している。   In the H-section steel manufacturing facility shown in FIG. 1, the relative positional relationship between the thermometers A23, B24 and the H-section steel is as shown in FIG. 2, and the measurement distance is 2 m for the thermometer A23. Thermometer B24 was 6 m. Each of the temperature distributions in the flange width direction, that is, the vertical direction in the example of FIG. 2 is measured by looking through the flange surface from a narrow slit (not shown) provided in the guide 15.

Figure 0004682614
Figure 0004682614

比較例1は温度しきい値を350℃とする従来の技術であり、実施例1〜3は本発明が適用された実施例である。実施例1では、遠い方の温度計B24で測定する場合で温度しきい値を450℃とした。実施例2では、温度計A23による温度分布Aの温度判定位置をフランジ端から30%内側、温度計B24による温度分布の温度判定位置をフランジ端から35%内側の位置とした。実施例3では、凹型となる温度分布の内、温度判定位置を温度極大位置と温度極小位置の中間位置として認識して処理を行った。   Comparative Example 1 is a conventional technique for setting the temperature threshold to 350 ° C., and Examples 1 to 3 are examples to which the present invention is applied. In Example 1, the temperature threshold value was set to 450 ° C. in the case of measuring with the farther thermometer B24. In Example 2, the temperature determination position of the temperature distribution A by the thermometer A23 was 30% inside the flange end, and the temperature determination position of the temperature distribution by the thermometer B24 was 35% inside the flange end. In Example 3, processing was performed by recognizing the temperature determination position as an intermediate position between the temperature maximum position and the temperature minimum position in the concave temperature distribution.

いずれの場合も、粗圧延後及び仕上圧延後に冷却設備11,13おいてフランジ中央部分160mmの幅に対してスプレー冷却を行い、フランジの左右両面(温度計A及びB側)ともに幅方向中央部の表面温度を600℃とした場合について比較する。温度データの採取点である温度判定位置は、フランジ左右面(温度計A及びB側)の上下のクォータ部(又はそれに補正を加えた位置)QA1,QA2,QB1,QB2の4点とし、各温度計により測定した温度分布からクォータ部4点の温度を抽出して出力している。クォータ部で目的の材質(強度及び伸び)を得るための温度の許容範囲は、例えば560〜680℃であり、測定値が許容範囲内に入らない場合には、温度不良判定材として認識し、製品の一部(クォータ部)を切り出して材料試験を行った。 In any case, after rough rolling and finish rolling, spray cooling is performed on the width of the flange central portion 160 mm in the cooling facilities 11, 13, and both the left and right sides (the thermometers A and B sides) of the flange are center portions in the width direction. The case where the surface temperature is 600 ° C. is compared. The temperature judgment position, which is the sampling point of temperature data, is the upper and lower quarters (or positions with corrections) Q A1 , Q A2 , Q B1 , Q B2 on the left and right sides of the flange (the thermometers A and B sides). The temperature of the four quarters is extracted from the temperature distribution measured by each thermometer and output. The allowable range of temperature for obtaining the target material (strength and elongation) in the quarter part is, for example, 560 to 680 ° C., and if the measured value does not fall within the allowable range, it is recognized as a temperature defect determination material, A part of the product (quarter part) was cut out and a material test was conducted.

比較例1では、放射温度計で測定する温度分布は、端部温度の立ち上がり、立ち下がりの範囲が相対的に広く、温度極大位置が実際よりも内側となった。遠い方の温度計B23で測定された温度分布Bでは、特にその傾向が強かった。温度分布及び温度判定位置(比較例1の温度判定位置はクオータ部と一致)であるQA1,QA2,QB1,QB2の温度は、図4(a)に示されるようになった。すなわちQA1,QA2は640±30℃(以下±は、測定値の90%がおさまるばらつきを表す)であるのに対し、QB1,QB2は670±30℃と測定された。680℃を超える部分が多く、温度不良判定が40%にもなった。材料試験結果がわかるまでは製品倉庫で滞留するので、物流が混乱するという問題点が発生した。温度不良判定材のうち、実際に材質不良であったのは2.5%であり、品質不良材を出荷するのを防止するためとはいえ、極めて効率が悪い品質管理を行っていたことになる。 In Comparative Example 1, the temperature distribution measured by the radiation thermometer has a relatively wide range of rising and falling edge temperatures, and the temperature maximum position is on the inner side than the actual temperature. This tendency was particularly strong in the temperature distribution B measured by the farther thermometer B23. The temperatures of Q A1 , Q A2 , Q B1 , and Q B2 , which are the temperature distribution and the temperature determination position (the temperature determination position in Comparative Example 1 is the same as the quota portion), are as shown in FIG. That is, Q A1 and Q A2 were 640 ± 30 ° C. (hereinafter, “±” represents a variation within which 90% of the measured values are subtracted), whereas Q B1 and Q B2 were measured to be 670 ± 30 ° C. There were many parts exceeding 680 ° C., and the temperature defect judgment was 40%. Until the material test result is known, it stays in the product warehouse, resulting in the problem of logistics disruption. Of the materials with defective temperature, only 2.5% were actually defective, and quality control was extremely inefficient, even though it prevented the shipment of defective materials. Become.

実施例1では、温度分布Aは比較例1と変わらなかったが、温度計B24の温度しきい値を450℃まで上げたため、温度分布Bでの立ち上がり立ち下がり部分がやや小さくなった。温度分布及び温度判定位置(比較例1の温度判定位置はクォータ部と一致)であるQA1,QA2,QB1,QB2の温度は、図4(b)に示されるようになった。すなわちQA1,QA2は640±30℃であるのに対し、QB1,QB2は655±30℃と測定された。680℃を超える部分がいくらか少なくなり、温度不良判定は10%に低下した。材質不良的中率は10%であり、比較例1よりは品質管理の効率がよくなった。 In Example 1, the temperature distribution A was not different from that in Comparative Example 1. However, since the temperature threshold value of the thermometer B24 was increased to 450 ° C., the rising and falling portion in the temperature distribution B was slightly reduced. The temperatures of Q A1 , Q A2 , Q B1 , and Q B2 , which are the temperature distribution and the temperature determination position (the temperature determination position of Comparative Example 1 matches the quarter portion), are as shown in FIG. That is, Q A1 and Q A2 were 640 ± 30 ° C., whereas Q B1 and Q B2 were measured to be 655 ± 30 ° C. The part exceeding 680 ° C. was somewhat reduced, and the temperature defect judgment was reduced to 10%. The defective percentage of the material was 10%, and the quality control efficiency was better than that of Comparative Example 1.

実施例2では、温度分布Aでの温度判定位置を端部から30%の位置とし、温度分布Bでの温度判定位置を端部から35%の位置として処理した。したがって、実施例2の温度判定位置はクオータ部より内側に位置することになる。温度分布及び温度判定位置であるQA1,QA2,QB1,QB2の温度は、図4(c)に示されるようになった。すなわちQAl,QA2,QB1,QB2は630±30℃と測定された。680℃を超えて測定される場合がまれにあるだけで、温度不良判定は2%に低下した。材質不良的中率は50%であり、比較例及び実施例1よりも品質管理の効率が飛躍的によくなった。不必要な材料試験の数が減ったので、歩留まりが向上し、コストを削減させることができた。 In Example 2, the temperature determination position in the temperature distribution A was processed as a position 30% from the end, and the temperature determination position in the temperature distribution B was processed as a position 35% from the end. Therefore, the temperature determination position of Example 2 is located inside the quarter portion. FIG. 4C shows the temperature distribution and the temperatures of Q A1 , Q A2 , Q B1 , and Q B2 that are the temperature determination positions. That is, Q Al , Q A2 , Q B1 , and Q B2 were measured as 630 ± 30 ° C. Only in rare cases was the temperature measured above 680 ° C., and the temperature defect judgment decreased to 2%. The median failure rate was 50%, and the efficiency of quality control was dramatically improved as compared with Comparative Example and Example 1. Since the number of unnecessary material tests has been reduced, yields have been improved and costs have been reduced.

実施例3では、温度分布A,Bともに、温度判定位置を極大位置と極小位置の中間位置とし、温度判定位置の温度をその中間位置における温度として処理した。温度分布及び温度判定位置であるQA1,QA2,QB1,QB2の温度は、図4(d)に示されるようになった。すなわちQA1,QA2,QB1,QB2は30±630℃と測定された。実施例2と同様に、温度不良判定は2%に低下した。材質不良的中率は50%であり、比較例及び実施例1に比べて不必要な材料試験の数が減ったので、歩留まりが向上し、コストを削減させることができた。 In Example 3, both the temperature distributions A and B were processed with the temperature determination position as an intermediate position between the maximum position and the minimum position, and the temperature at the temperature determination position as the temperature at the intermediate position. The temperature distribution and temperature of Q A1 , Q A2 , Q B1 , and Q B2 that are temperature determination positions are as shown in FIG. That is, Q A1 , Q A2 , Q B1 , and Q B2 were measured as 30 ± 630 ° C. Similar to Example 2, the temperature defect determination decreased to 2%. The median failure rate was 50%, and the number of unnecessary material tests was reduced as compared with Comparative Example and Example 1. Therefore, the yield was improved and the cost could be reduced.

なお、実施例1〜3では温度不良判定が10%以下であったので、物流の混乱は全く発生しなかった。   In Examples 1 to 3, since the temperature defect determination was 10% or less, no disruption of physical distribution occurred.

また、上記の実施例では、H形鋼のフランジ両面の温度分布を、距離が異なる2つの放射温度計にて測定し、品質を管理する方法について示したが、本発明はこれに限るものではない。例えば、フランジの片面だけを測定する場合であっても、あるいは2つの温度計を同じ距離に設置した場合であっても、後述の実施例1〜3を適用すれば、程度の差はあるものの、精度の高い品質管理が行われる。   In the above embodiment, the temperature distribution on both sides of the flange of the H-shaped steel was measured with two radiation thermometers with different distances, and the method for managing the quality was shown. However, the present invention is not limited to this. Absent. For example, even when only one side of the flange is measured, or even when two thermometers are installed at the same distance, there is a difference in degree if Examples 1 to 3 described later are applied. High quality control is performed.

また、実施例2では、温度分布上で品質判定を行う温度判定位置(定義点)は材質を保証する実際の品質管理点(クオータ部)よりもフランジ幅の5〜10%内側に補正したが、フランジ幅の3〜15%の範囲であればよい。測定距離が本発明の実施例よりも短い場合、例えば1.5mの場合は、その比率を小さくして3%としてもよい。ちなみに、補正が3%より小さければ補正の意味をなさず、本発明の効果はほとんど得られないし、15%を超えると中央部温度と区別がつかなくなるので本発明の意味をなさなくなる。   In the second embodiment, the temperature determination position (definition point) for performing quality determination on the temperature distribution is corrected to 5 to 10% of the flange width from the actual quality control point (quarter part) that guarantees the material. It may be in the range of 3 to 15% of the flange width. When the measurement distance is shorter than the embodiment of the present invention, for example, 1.5 m, the ratio may be reduced to 3%. Incidentally, if the correction is smaller than 3%, the meaning of the correction is not made, and the effect of the present invention is hardly obtained, and if it exceeds 15%, it becomes indistinguishable from the central temperature, so the meaning of the present invention is not made.

また、実施例3では、温度判定位置を温度分布の極大位置と極小位置の内挿によって求めたが、品質管理点の温度を温度分布の極大値と極小値から内挿によって直接求めるようにしてもよい。さらには、H形鋼以外の形鋼の製造で適用してもよいし、また厚板の製造などにおいても適用してもよい。また、上記の例は何れも搬送ラインが1つの例であるが、搬送ラインが2ライン以上ある設備においても本発明は同様に適用される。   In the third embodiment, the temperature determination position is obtained by interpolation between the maximum position and the minimum position of the temperature distribution. However, the temperature of the quality control point is directly obtained from the maximum value and the minimum value of the temperature distribution by interpolation. Also good. Furthermore, it may be applied in the manufacture of shape steels other than H-section steel, and may also be applied in the manufacture of thick plates. In addition, each of the above examples is an example of one transfer line, but the present invention is similarly applied to an installation having two or more transfer lines.

図5は2つの搬送ラインが設けられている場合におけるH形鋼と温度計A及び温度計Bとの関係を示した説明図である。図5の例は、例えばH形鋼20が冷却設備13の下流側に2つの搬送ライン(テーブルローラー14,14a)が設けられていて、冷却設備13で冷却されたH形鋼20が何れか一方の搬送ラインに送り出されるような構成を前提としており、温度計A23及び温度計B24により何れか一方の搬送ラインのH形鋼20のフランジの幅方向の温度分布をガイド15及び15aのスリット(図示せず)を介して測定する。温度計A23及び温度計B24からのフランジの幅方向の温度分布の温度データに基づいて、品質管理点の温度を抽出し、その温度に基づいて鋼材の品質評価を行うが、それは上記の実施例1〜実施例3と同様である。   FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram showing the relationship between the H-section steel, the thermometer A, and the thermometer B when two transport lines are provided. In the example of FIG. 5, for example, the H-section steel 20 is provided with two transport lines (table rollers 14 and 14 a) on the downstream side of the cooling facility 13, and the H-section steel 20 cooled by the cooling facility 13 is any one. Assuming a configuration that is sent to one of the transfer lines, the temperature distribution in the width direction of the flange of the H-section steel 20 of one of the transfer lines is determined by the thermometer A23 and the thermometer B24 in the slits of the guides 15 and 15a ( (Not shown). Based on the temperature data of the temperature distribution in the width direction of the flange from the thermometer A23 and the thermometer B24, the temperature of the quality control point is extracted, and the quality evaluation of the steel material is performed based on the temperature. 1 to Example 3.

H形鋼の製造設備の概略図。Schematic of the manufacturing equipment of H section steel. H形鋼と温度計A,Bとの相対関係の例を示した説明図。Explanatory drawing which showed the example of the relative relationship between H-section steel and thermometers A and B. H形鋼のフランジの幅方向の温度分布を示した図。The figure which showed the temperature distribution of the width direction of the flange of H-section steel. H形鋼のフランジの幅方向の温度分布データと温度判定位置とを表した図。The figure showing the temperature distribution data and temperature judgment position of the width direction of the flange of H-section steel. H形鋼と温度計A,Bとの相対関係の他の例を示した説明図。Explanatory drawing which showed the other example of the relative relationship between H-section steel and thermometers A and B.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

10 粗圧延機、11 冷却設備、12 仕上圧延機、13 冷却設備、15 ガイド、
20 H形鋼、21,22 仕上入側温度計、23 温度計A、24 温度計B。
10 coarse rolling mill, 11 cooling facility, 12 finish rolling mill, 13 cooling facility, 15 guide,
20 H-section steel, 21, 22 Finish entry side thermometer, 23 thermometer A, 24 thermometer B.

Claims (5)

熱間圧延後のH形鋼のフランジ幅方向温度分布を放射温度計により測定し、その温度分布からフランジ端部を認識して温度判定位置を求め、その温度判定位置の温度データに基づいてH形鋼の品質判定を行う方法であって、
実際のH形鋼製品の強度を保証する品質管理点と前記温度判定位置とのずれが小さくなるように、前記放射温度計とフランジ間の距離に応じて、測定されたフランジ幅に対する温度判定位置のフランジ端部からの位置又はフランジ端部を認識する温度しきい値を設定することを特徴とするH形鋼の品質判定方法。
The temperature distribution in the flange width direction of the H-shaped steel after hot rolling is measured with a radiation thermometer, the end of the flange is recognized from the temperature distribution, the temperature determination position is obtained, and H based on the temperature data at the temperature determination position A method for determining the quality of a shape steel,
The temperature judgment position relative to the measured flange width according to the distance between the radiation thermometer and the flange so that the deviation between the quality control point that guarantees the strength of the actual H-shaped steel product and the temperature judgment position becomes small. A method for determining the quality of H-section steel, comprising setting a temperature threshold value for recognizing the position from the flange end of the flange or the flange end .
前記品質管理点のフランジ幅方向の位置に対応した、前記温度分布のフランジ幅方向の位置から幅方向内側に3〜15%の範囲で、前記温度判定位置を、前記放射温度計とフランジ間の距離に応じて設定することを特徴とする請求項1記載のH形鋼の品質判定方法。 Corresponding to the position in the flange width direction of the quality control point, the temperature judgment position is set in the range of 3 to 15% in the width direction from the position in the flange width direction of the temperature distribution between the radiation thermometer and the flange. 2. The method for judging the quality of H-section steel according to claim 1, wherein the quality is determined according to a distance . フランジ端部を認識する温度しきい値を、前記放射温度計とフランジ間の距離に応じて、前記距離が遠いほど前記温度しきい値が高温になるように変更することを特徴とする請求項1記載のH形鋼の品質判定方法。 The temperature threshold value for recognizing an end of the flange is changed according to the distance between the radiation thermometer and the flange so that the temperature threshold value becomes higher as the distance increases. A method for judging the quality of the H-section steel according to 1. 熱間圧延後のH形鋼の左右両面のフランジ幅方向温度分布を同時に測定して品質判定する際に、フランジの左右それぞれと放射温度計との距離に応じて、請求項1〜3のいずれかの方法でフランジ両面の品質判定を行うことを特徴とするH形鋼の品質判定方法。 When measuring the temperature distribution in the flange width direction on both the left and right sides of the H-shaped steel after hot rolling at the same time, depending on the distance between the left and right flanges and the radiation thermometer, any one of claims 1 to 3 A method for judging the quality of an H-section steel, characterized in that the quality judgment on both sides of the flange is performed by such a method. 熱間圧延後のH形鋼を搬送するラインが2つ以上平行してある設備において、前記ラインの外側からH形鋼の左右のフランジ幅方向温度分布を同時に測定して品質判定する際に、フランジの左右それぞれと放射温度計との距離に応じて、請求項1〜3のいずれかの方法でフランジ両面の品質判定を行うことを特徴とするH形鋼の品質判定方法。 In equipment where two or more lines carrying H-shaped steel after hot rolling are parallel, when measuring the temperature distribution in the left and right flange width directions of the H-shaped steel from the outside of the line at the same time, A method for judging the quality of an H-section steel, characterized in that the quality judgment of both surfaces of the flange is performed by the method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, in accordance with the distance between the left and right sides of the flange and the radiation thermometer .
JP2004371429A 2004-12-22 2004-12-22 H-section steel quality judgment method Expired - Fee Related JP4682614B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004371429A JP4682614B2 (en) 2004-12-22 2004-12-22 H-section steel quality judgment method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004371429A JP4682614B2 (en) 2004-12-22 2004-12-22 H-section steel quality judgment method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2006177779A JP2006177779A (en) 2006-07-06
JP4682614B2 true JP4682614B2 (en) 2011-05-11

Family

ID=36732029

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2004371429A Expired - Fee Related JP4682614B2 (en) 2004-12-22 2004-12-22 H-section steel quality judgment method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4682614B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5577581B2 (en) * 2008-10-28 2014-08-27 Jfeスチール株式会社 Material assurance system based on temperature history of thick steel plates
JP5577583B2 (en) * 2008-11-06 2014-08-27 Jfeスチール株式会社 Online quality assurance system for thick steel plates
JP5326611B2 (en) * 2009-02-03 2013-10-30 Jfeスチール株式会社 Thick steel plate quality assurance equipment
JP5577580B2 (en) * 2008-10-27 2014-08-27 Jfeスチール株式会社 Thick steel plate quality assurance system
KR101362300B1 (en) 2008-03-31 2014-02-12 제이에프이 스틸 가부시키가이샤 Steel plate quality assurance system
JP5589260B2 (en) * 2008-03-31 2014-09-17 Jfeスチール株式会社 Thick steel plate quality assurance system
JP5326612B2 (en) * 2009-02-03 2013-10-30 Jfeスチール株式会社 Thick steel plate quality assurance equipment

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5226158B2 (en) * 1971-10-14 1977-07-12
JPS5282375A (en) * 1975-12-29 1977-07-09 Chino Works Ltd Temperature measuring method
JPS57184939A (en) * 1981-05-11 1982-11-13 Nippon Kokan Kk <Nkk> Apparatus for measuring surface temperature distribution of belt shaped body
JP3117856B2 (en) * 1993-10-25 2000-12-18 株式会社セルテックシステムズ Hot dimension measuring device for section steel
JP3225001B2 (en) * 1997-03-04 2001-11-05 住友金属工業株式会社 H-section flange edge detection method and H-section flange temperature measurement device
JP3417301B2 (en) * 1998-07-02 2003-06-16 住友金属工業株式会社 Temperature measurement method and apparatus for parallel flange rolled section steel

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2006177779A (en) 2006-07-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP7158569B2 (en) Methods and electronic devices for monitoring the production of metal products, associated computer programs and equipment
JP5647917B2 (en) Control apparatus and control method
TWI602624B (en) Method for manufacturing hot-rolled steel sheet, apparatus for setting position of steel plate, setting method of steel plate cutting position, and method for manufacturing steel plate
JP4682614B2 (en) H-section steel quality judgment method
US20230118015A1 (en) Method Of Controlling Flatness Of Strip Of Rolled Material, Control System And Production Line
KR101442892B1 (en) Method for manufacturing hot-rolled steel by accuratelty predicting temperature in finish-rolling of hot steel sheet
KR100997337B1 (en) Calculation method of exit results temperature of crude rolling mill
JP3521853B2 (en) Manufacturing method of LP steel sheet
JP2950157B2 (en) Control cooling method
JP3520868B2 (en) Steel sheet manufacturing method
US20240399434A1 (en) Strip thickness control device for hot rolling mill
TWI794084B (en) Method for reducing edge warping diff of cold rolled steel coil
JP2006292486A (en) Hot steel quality control method
CN105195523A (en) Method for improving calculation precision of temperature of intermediate billet in hot rolling
JP7743845B2 (en) Rolling method and rolling equipment for shapes
JP2713158B2 (en) Roll width control method and apparatus for variable width roll
JP4669376B2 (en) Manufacturing method of thick steel plate with high flatness
EP4609962A1 (en) Method for predicting width of rough-rolled material, method for controlling width of rough-rolled material, method for producing hot-rolled steel sheet, and method for generating width prediction model for rough-rolled material
WO2026048463A1 (en) Shaped steel cold-rolled dimension prediction method, shaped steel manufacturing method, cold-rolled dimension prediction model generation method, and shaped steel cold-rolled dimension prediction device
JP6172015B2 (en) Tapered steel sheet rolling method
JP2010227948A (en) Thick steel plate rolling method
JP2019118917A (en) Bend correction method of shape steel and manufacturing method of shape steel
JP2002113510A (en) Strip width control method in hot rolling
JP2001179316A (en) Method for controlling dimensions and shape of section steel
JPH081201A (en) Method for manufacturing shaped steel having flange

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20071025

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20100204

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20101019

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20101214

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20110111

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20110124

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140218

Year of fee payment: 3

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4682614

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees