JP5117597B2 - Simulation apparatus and program - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention relates to a simulation apparatus and a program.

  As a successful bid method for public works, etc., a comprehensive evaluation successful bid method is known in which a successful bidder is determined comprehensively in consideration of evaluation factors (technical power, etc.) other than price, instead of determining a successful bidder only by price. Yes. Patent Document 1 proposes a bid simulation apparatus that performs a simulation in order to obtain a bid price with which a bidder has a high possibility of winning a bid, with regard to a comprehensive evaluation bidding method.

  In the successful bidder selection method (hereinafter referred to as selection method) based on the comprehensive evaluation successful bid method, there are a plurality of types (evaluation types) in which an evaluation value calculation method (evaluation method) and evaluation elements are different from each other. Accordingly, there may be a case where the type adopted by a certain orderer is not optimal as a selection method for the business assumed by the orderer. For this reason, for example, an orderer who orders a business (construction / operation) such as a national or local government desirably determines whether the selection method employed is appropriate.

JP 2008-250461 A

  However, in the method of Patent Document 1, although the bidder can know the optimal bid price by simulation, the orderer cannot determine whether the selection method employed is optimal.

  The present invention has been made in view of the above, and an object of the present invention is to provide a simulation device and a program capable of evaluating whether a successful bidder selection method is appropriate.

In order to solve the above-described problems and achieve the object, the present invention provides a computer, a bid price for each bidder, an evaluation point for each bidder for an evaluation element other than the bid price, and the bid price. Among the plurality of bid results including the first evaluation value calculated by the first method specified among the plurality of successful bidder selection methods for calculating the evaluation value from the evaluation points, the designation is made as a simulation target. A first reception unit that receives a bid result and a designation of a second method that is different from the first method that calculates the first evaluation value included in the accepted bid result among a plurality of the successful bidder selection methods. Using the second reception unit, the bid price included in the accepted bid result, and the evaluation point included in the accepted bid result, a second evaluation value is calculated by the second method. Parts, is a program for functioning as a.
It is characterized by.

  The present invention also provides a bid price for each bidder, an evaluation score for each bidder for evaluation elements other than the bid price, and a plurality of successful bidder selections for calculating an evaluation value from the bid price and the evaluation score. A first reception unit that receives a bid result designated as a simulation target among a plurality of bid results including a first evaluation value calculated by a first method designated among methods; and a plurality of the successful bidders Among the selection methods, a second reception unit that accepts designation of a second method different from the first method that calculated the first evaluation value included in the accepted bid result, and included in the accepted bid result A simulation device comprising: a calculation unit that calculates a second evaluation value by the second method using the bid price and the evaluation score included in the accepted bid result.

  The simulation apparatus and program according to the present invention have an effect that it is possible to evaluate whether the successful bidder selection method is appropriate.

FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a configuration example of a system including a simulation apparatus according to the present embodiment. FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of a hardware configuration of the apparatus according to the present embodiment. FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating a functional configuration example of the application server. FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing the overall flow of the support processing in this embodiment. FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of the operation mode selection screen. FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of an input screen in the bid mode. FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating a display example of the tree display area. FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating an example of an evaluation screen 801 that displays an evaluation result (overall evaluation) including the determined successful bidder. FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating an example of the input screen 901 displayed when the simulation mode is designated. FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of a pattern list screen. FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating an example of a pattern list screen. FIG. 12 is a diagram illustrating an example of a pattern setting screen. FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating an example of a comprehensive comparison evaluation screen. FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating an example of a detail display screen. FIG. 15 is a diagram illustrating an example of a graph display screen. FIG. 16 is a diagram illustrating an example of the condition designation screen. FIG. 17 is a diagram illustrating an example of a search result screen. FIG. 18 is a diagram illustrating an example of a count result screen. FIG. 19 is a diagram showing an example of a pattern list screen 1901 when executing the aggregation simulation function. FIG. 20 is a diagram illustrating an example of the pattern list screen 2001. FIG. 21 is a diagram showing an example of the pattern list screen 2101. FIG. 22 is a diagram showing an example of the total result screen 2201.

  Embodiments of a simulation apparatus and a program according to the present invention will be described below in detail with reference to the drawings. In addition, this invention is not limited by this embodiment.

  First, the comprehensive evaluation successful bid method will be described. As described above, the selection method of the comprehensive evaluation successful bid method includes a plurality of types having different setting items for determining the selection method, such as an evaluation value calculation method. For example, a simple type, a standard type, a high technology proposal type, and the like are known as a type of selection method for the comprehensive evaluation successful bid method. Further, for example, even methods that are classified into the same type may be further subdivided due to differences in detailed setting items.

  Conventionally, an orderer who orders a business (construction / operation) determines each of such various setting items and determines which type of selection method to use at least at the time of ordering. The simulation apparatus according to the present embodiment can support any of various selection methods employed by various orderers by providing a function capable of specifying various setting items.

  As setting items, for example, there are an evaluation value calculation method, a conversion method, an evaluation element other than a price, and the like. Hereinafter, the calculation method of the evaluation value is referred to as “evaluation method”.

  As an evaluation method, a division method and an addition method are known. The division method is a method of calculating an evaluation value by dividing a technical evaluation point obtained by quantifying evaluation elements other than a price by a bid price. That is, in the division method, the evaluation value is calculated by evaluation value = technical evaluation point (= standard point + addition point) / bid price. The addition method is a method of calculating an evaluation value by adding a price evaluation point obtained by scoring a bid price according to a certain rule and a technical evaluation point. That is, in the addition method, the evaluation value is calculated by evaluation value = price evaluation point + technical evaluation point.

  In addition, for example, in the division method, scoring information, whether or not two-stage selection is performed, and the like exist as examples of more detailed setting items. The scoring information is information that determines the scoring of each score (standard score, added score, etc.) constituting the technical evaluation score. When execution of two-stage selection is designated, the setting items such as the rank from the highest bidder selected in the primary examination are further set items.

  As a conversion method, there are known a raw point counting method, a first place perfect score method, a first place perfect score / lowest 0 point method, and the like. As evaluation elements other than price, enterprise / engineer evaluation, technical proposal evaluation, construction system evaluation, and the like are known.

  Note that the setting items described above are merely examples, and the present invention is not limited to these, and any setting item that has been used conventionally can be applied. Further, when a new setting item is added, the simulation apparatus and the program may be changed so that the setting item can be specified. For example, the setting items may be stored in a database or file, and the setting items read from the database or file may be displayed on the screen so as to be inputable. Thereby, it becomes possible to easily change the selection method and customize according to each user's request.

  Next, a simulation apparatus and a program that can deal with such bidding operations by various selection methods and can evaluate (simulate) whether the selected selection method is appropriate will be described. FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a configuration example of a system including a simulation apparatus according to the present embodiment. As shown in FIG. 1, this system has a configuration in which user systems 10a and 10b and an administrator system 20 are connected by a network 30 such as the Internet.

  The user systems 10a and 10b are information processing systems used by countries and local governments that can be, for example, public construction orderers (ordering agencies). On the other hand, the administrator system 20 is an information processing system used by an administrator (management organization) that manages the version of the devices provided in each user system 10.

  The user systems 10a and 10b include an application server 11 as a simulation device, a database server 12, and user terminals 13a and 13b. Since the user systems 10a and 10b have the same configuration, they may be simply referred to as the user system 10 below. In addition, since the user terminals 13a and 13b have the same configuration, they may be simply referred to as user terminals 13 below.

  The application server 11 is a server that executes an application program (hereinafter referred to as a support program) that supports work related to bidding such as public works. This support program includes not only a bidding function that supports actual bidding work but also a totaling function and a simulation function. The totaling function is a function that stores the results of bidding (bidding results) in the database server 12 and enables a plurality of bidding results to be totaled and analyzed. The simulation function is a function for simulating evaluation using a selection method different from the selection method used at the time of actual bidding based on the bid result. Details of the function of the application server 11 will be described later.

  The database server 12 is a server that accumulates bid results. The bid results stored in the database server 12 are used for counting and analysis by the counting function of the application server 11 as described above.

  The user terminal 13 is a terminal used by the user of the ordering organization. The user terminal 13 can be configured by, for example, a normal PC (personal computer), a notebook PC, or the like. The user terminal 13 implements various functions of the support program by executing the support program provided from the application server 11.

  The execution form of the support program is arbitrary, and any application execution form conventionally used can be applied. For example, the application server 11 executes the support program as a WEB application, and the function of the support program can be used using a WEB browser executed on the user terminal 13. Alternatively, the support program execution file may be transmitted from the application server 11 to the user terminal 13 so that the support program received by the user terminal 13 is executed.

  The numbers of user systems 10 and user terminals 13 are not limited to two, and may be one or three or more. Further, each server does not need to be physically configured by one device. For example, one server may be configured by a plurality of physical devices. Moreover, you may comprise so that the function of the application server 11 and the function of the database server 12 may be provided in one or more physical apparatuses. Although omitted in FIG. 1, the user system 10 may be configured to connect to the network 30 via a firewall or the like.

  The administrator system 20 includes a management server 21 and a management terminal 22. The management server 21 is a server having a function for managing servers (the application server 11 and the database server 12) in the user system 10. The management server 21 includes, for example, a function for managing information necessary for upgrading the support program, a function for downloading the support program to the application server 11, and a function for releasing an operation manual and help for the support program. .

  The management terminal 22 is a terminal used by a user of the management organization. The management terminal 22 can be configured by, for example, a normal PC (personal computer), a notebook PC, or the like. The management terminal 22 has a function of updating a support program to the latest version by executing a predetermined program, a function of updating an operation manual, and the like.

  Next, the hardware configuration of each device (the application server 11, the database server 12, the user terminal 13, the management server 21, and the management terminal 22) according to the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of a hardware configuration of the apparatus according to the present embodiment.

  The apparatus according to the present embodiment communicates with a control device such as a CPU (Central Processing Unit) 51 and a storage device such as a ROM (Read Only Memory) 52 and a RAM (Random Access Memory) 53 by connecting to a network. A bus 61 that connects the communication I / F 54, an external storage device such as an HDD (Hard Disk Drive) and a CD (Compact Disc) drive device, a display device such as a display device, an input device such as a keyboard and a mouse, and the like. And has a hardware configuration using a normal computer.

  The support program executed by the application server 11 is an installable or executable file, which is a CD-ROM (Compact Disk Read Only Memory), a flexible disk (FD), a CD-R (Compact Disk Recordable), a DVD. It is recorded on a computer-readable recording medium such as (Digital Versatile Disk) and provided as a computer program product.

  Further, the support program may be provided by being stored on a computer connected to a network such as the Internet and downloaded via the network. Further, the support program may be provided or distributed via a network such as the Internet. Further, the support program may be provided by being incorporated in advance in a ROM or the like.

  The support program has a module configuration including each unit for realizing the software configuration of FIG. 3 (described later). As actual hardware, the CPU 51 (processor) reads out and executes the support program from the storage medium, whereby each unit is loaded on the main storage device, and each unit is generated on the main storage device.

  Next, details of the function of the application server 11 will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating a functional configuration example of the application server 11. As shown in FIG. 3, the application server 11 includes a support program 100 that is a main software configuration, and a display unit 111 and a storage unit 121 that are main hardware configurations.

  The display unit 111 displays various types of information and corresponds to a display device such as the display device described above. The storage unit 121 stores the support program 100 and various information necessary for executing the support program 100. The storage unit 121 can be configured by any commonly used storage medium such as an HDD, an optical disk, a memory card, and a RAM.

  The support program 100 includes a reception unit 101, a calculation unit 102, a determination unit 103, a storage control unit 104, a totaling unit 105, and a display control unit 106 as main functions.

  The accepting unit 101 accepts various information input or designated from an input device (not shown) such as a keyboard or a mouse. For example, the accepting unit 101 evaluates basic information about a matter for bidding, a selection method at the time of bidding (first method), a bid price, and evaluation elements other than the price at the time of actual bidding (when the bidding function is executed). Accept points etc. The accepting unit 101 accepts designation of a bid result to be simulated by the simulation function from a plurality of bid results output by the bid function. The accepting unit 101 accepts designation of a method different from the selection method (first method) at the time of bidding as a selection method (second method) to be simulated.

  The calculation unit 102 calculates an evaluation value by a designated selection method using the bid price and the evaluation score. For example, at the time of bidding, the calculation unit 102 calculates an evaluation value (first evaluation value) based on a selection method at the time of bidding designated by the orderer in advance, using the bid price and the evaluation score input to each bidder. To do. Further, when executing the simulation function, the calculation unit 102 uses the bid price and the evaluation score included in the bid result specified as the simulation target, and the evaluation value (second evaluation value) by the selection method specified to be simulated. ) Is calculated.

  The determination unit 103 determines the winning bidder using the evaluation value calculated for each bidder. For example, the determination unit 103 determines a bidder having the highest calculated evaluation value as a successful bidder.

  The storage control unit 104 controls a process of storing a bid result obtained by the bidding function in a storage unit (not shown) in the database server 12. Bid results are required for simulation and aggregation functions such as basic information, bid price and evaluation points entered at the time of bidding, selection method at the time of bidding, calculated evaluation value, and determined winning bidder Information.

  The totaling unit 105 totalizes the stored bid results by designated statistical processing. For example, the totaling unit 105 executes a regression analysis between a plurality of setting items and outputs the totaling result so that it can be output as a scatter diagram or the like.

  The display control unit 106 controls display processing of various information on the display unit 111. For example, the display control unit 106 displays a display screen for inputting various information received by the receiving unit 101 on the display unit 111. In addition, the display control unit 106 displays the statistical information (aggregation result) aggregated by the aggregation unit 105 in a format such as a table or a graph.

  Next, support processing by the support program according to the present embodiment configured as described above will be described with reference to FIGS. FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing the overall flow of the support processing in this embodiment.

  The support program starts to operate when the user of the user system 10 instructs activation from the user terminal 13. Thereafter, an authentication screen and a function selection screen (not shown) are obtained, and an operation mode selection screen as shown in FIG. 5 is displayed. The authentication screen is a screen for inputting authentication information such as a user name and a password used for user authentication. The function selection screen is a screen for selecting which of the bidding function, the simulation function, and the aggregation function is executed. In the present embodiment, which of the bidding function and the simulation function is to be executed is designated on the operation mode selection screen in FIG. 5, but the designation method is not limited to this.

  FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of the operation mode selection screen 501. The operation mode field 511 displays, in a pull-down format, either “bid” or “simulation” corresponding to the bid mode and the simulation mode. The bidding mode and the simulation mode are operation modes for executing the bidding function and the simulation function. FIG. 5 illustrates a case where “simulation” corresponding to the simulation function is selected.

  Returning to FIG. 4, the accepting unit 101 accepts selection of an operation mode (step S101). The support program 100 determines whether or not the accepted operation mode is a simulation mode (step S102). If the simulation mode is not set, that is, if the bid mode is selected (step S102: No), the bid function is executed. First, the display control unit 106 displays an input screen corresponding to the bid mode.

  FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of the input screen 601 in the bid mode. As shown in FIG. 6, the input screen 601 includes a tree display area 611 and an input area 612. The tree display area 611 is displayed in a tree form so that setting items necessary for bidding are arranged from top to bottom in the setting order. In addition, the display control unit 106 displays the set setting items in the tree display area 611 in a display mode different from the display mode of the setting items that are not set.

  FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating a display example of the tree display area 611. FIG. 7 shows an example in which the inside of the symbol 701 corresponding to the setting item that has been set is black, and the inside of the symbol 702 corresponding to the setting item that has not been set is white. Note that the method of changing the display mode is not limited to this.

  With such a configuration, the work situation can be visually recognized accurately. Further, by displaying the tree in the order of setting, the process and procedure of the bid evaluation work are visualized, and the work can be efficiently performed.

  Returning to FIG. 4, the accepting unit 101 accepts designation of basic information input on the input screen 601 or another screen (not shown) that transitions from the input screen 601 (step S <b> 103). The basic information includes, for example, item information and bidder information. The project information includes, for example, a public notice date, a bid date, a bid opening time, a construction name, a project number, a construction location, construction contents, and a construction period. The bidder information includes, for example, a trade name or name, an address, and a member.

  Next, the reception unit 101 receives designation of a selection method to be applied (step S104). For example, the accepting unit 101 uses the input screen 601 in FIG. 6 to display the “evaluation method”, “conversion method”, and “items other than price (prior to bid: raw points)” under “evaluation information”. Accepts information entered for each setting item. Note that the selection method designation method is not limited to this, and any method may be used as long as it can identify which one of the various selection methods.

  This completes the input of information necessary for bidding. Thereafter, for example, when a bid date arrives and information such as a bid price is obtained from each bidder, the orderer inputs the obtained information.

  That is, the accepting unit 101 accepts the input bid price and evaluation points for evaluation elements other than the bid price (step S105). For example, the accepting unit 101 uses the input screen 601 in FIG. 6 to input for each setting item of “price item” under “evaluation information” and “items other than price (review etc.)”. Accept information.

  When the input of the above information is received for all bidders, the calculation unit 102 calculates an evaluation value according to the designated selection method using the input bid price and evaluation point for each bidder (step S106). . The determination unit 103 determines the winning bidder using the evaluation value calculated for each bidder (step S109). In this way, the winning bidder at the time of actual bidding is determined. In addition, the display control unit 106 outputs an evaluation screen that displays an evaluation result including information such as the determined successful bidder to the display unit 111 and the like (step S110).

  FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating an example of an evaluation screen 801 that displays an evaluation result (overall evaluation) including the determined successful bidder. FIG. 8 shows an example in which the trader name C having the highest evaluation value is determined as the successful bidder. When the database registration button 811 on the evaluation screen 801 is pressed, the storage control unit 104 stores the bid result in the database server 12. Thereby, for example, a counting function for counting a plurality of past bid results is possible. In addition, it is possible to execute a simulation based on the stored bid results.

  When the simulation button 812 on the evaluation screen 801 is pressed, a simulation function based on the displayed bid result is executed. That is, in addition to the method of specifying the simulation mode in the operation mode field 511 of FIG. 5, the simulation function can also be executed by pressing the simulation button 812 on the evaluation screen 801. Note that these execution methods are merely examples, and any method can be applied as long as a simulation is executed by designating any bid result.

  Returning to FIG. 4, processing when the simulation function is executed will be described. FIG. 4 illustrates an example in which the simulation function is executed by specifying the simulation mode in the operation mode field 511 of FIG.

  If it is determined in step S102 that the simulation mode is set (step S102: Yes), the simulation function is executed. In the example of FIG. 5, when the new creation button 512 is pressed while the simulation mode is designated, the display control unit 106 displays a screen (not shown) for designating a bid result to be simulated. The accepting unit 101 accepts a bid result designated by the user on this screen as a bid result to be simulated.

  In addition, although not displayed in FIG. 5, when the bid results and setting item patterns simulated in the past are saved in a file, a list of saved files is displayed in the file list area of the operation mode selection screen 501. Is displayed. When one of the displayed files is selected and the open button 513 is pressed, the accepting unit 101 accepts the bid result corresponding to the saved file as a simulation target again. A simulation function is executed on the bid result received in this way.

  When the designation of the bid result to be simulated is accepted, the display control unit 106 displays an input screen corresponding to the simulation mode.

  FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating an example of the input screen 901 displayed when the simulation mode is designated. In the present embodiment, the setting item of the selection method to be simulated and the pattern of the setting value for the setting item are stored as described above, and the stored pattern can be designated. This eliminates the need to set a large number of setting items and the like that determine the selection method for simulation each time, and improves operability.

  For example, by clicking “Pattern Information” on the input screen 901 in FIG. 9, a pattern list screen for executing addition, change and deletion of patterns is displayed. FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of the pattern list screen 1001. In the present embodiment, five patterns (pattern 1 to pattern 5) can be stored. In the pattern list screen 1001, the pattern name, information indicating whether or not the evaluation method has been changed for each pattern, information indicating whether or not the conversion method has been changed for each pattern, and whether or not the evaluation point magnification has been changed An example is shown in which information that represents is displayed in a table format. “◯” in the table indicates that the setting item of the selection method to be simulated is changed with respect to the setting item of the selection method at the time of bidding.

  Further, as illustrated in the pattern list screen 1001, the display control unit 106 compares the setting items at the time of bidding and the setting values for the setting items with the setting values to be simulated and the setting values for the setting items for the evaluation method. To display. The display control unit 106 displays at least one of the setting item and the setting value changed with respect to the selection method at the time of bidding in a display mode different from at least one of the setting item and the setting value at the time of bidding. FIG. 10 shows an example in which the setting value 1011 is displayed in a different display mode from the setting value 1012 at the time of bidding by making the background of the setting value 1011 a slanted line. The display mode of FIG. 10 is an example, and any display mode can be applied as long as it is displayed so that it can be recognized that the setting item or the setting value has been changed. In this way, the setting items and setting values at the time of bidding and simulation are displayed so that they can be compared, and by changing the display mode of the setting items and setting values that have been changed, changes to the setting items and setting values can be identified. It becomes possible to grasp clearly.

  FIG. 11 is a diagram showing an example of the pattern list screen 1101 displayed when the conversion method tab is selected on the pattern list screen 1001 of FIG. Similarly to FIG. 10, the display control unit 106 displays the conversion method by comparing the setting items at the time of bidding and the setting values for the setting items with the setting values to be simulated and the setting values for the setting items.

  The add button 1021, the change button 1022, and the delete button 1023 in FIG. 10 or FIG. 11 are buttons for executing creation of a new pattern, change of setting contents of an existing pattern, and deletion of an existing pattern, respectively. 10 and 11 show examples of pattern list screens displayed when five patterns have already been created. When a pattern has not been created, each item of the table such as the pattern name and each item of the pattern information column are not displayed on the pattern list screen.

  FIG. 12 shows an example of a pattern setting screen 1201 displayed when the add button 1021 or the change button 1022 is pressed. The pattern setting screen 1201 includes a tree display area 1211 and an input area 1212 in the same manner as the input screen 601 in the bid mode shown in FIG. In the tree display area 1211 of the pattern setting screen 1201, only the setting items that can be changed during simulation are displayed among the setting items displayed in the tree display area 611 of the input screen 601. For example, in the tree display area 1211, bid information of price items, that is, bid prices are not displayed. This is because the purpose of the simulation is to calculate an evaluation value when the selection method is actually changed with respect to the bid price. Therefore, on the pattern setting screen 1201, for example, the bid price input in step S105 and the evaluation points for evaluation elements other than the bid price cannot be changed. As setting items that can be changed, it is possible to apply arbitrary items such as an evaluation method, an evaluation score for each setting item, a full score value, and a conversion method. The score of the evaluation points may be changed, for example, by specifying a magnification (weighting) for the evaluation points.

  Returning to FIG. 4, the accepting unit 101 accepts the change of the selection method through the pattern setting screen 1201 (step S <b> 107). After the setting item is changed, for example, when the “overall evaluation” field in FIG. 12 is designated, the calculation unit 102 calculates an evaluation value according to the changed selection method (step S108). Further, the determination unit 103 uses the evaluation value calculated for each bidder to determine a successful bidder according to the changed selection method (step S109). In this way, the successful bidder at the time of simulation is determined.

  The overall evaluation at the time of simulation may be confirmed on a screen similar to the evaluation screen 801 in FIG. 8, for example. For example, when the “overall evaluation” field in FIG. 12 is designated, the calculation unit 102 calculates the evaluation value, and the display control unit 106 displays the evaluation value at the time of simulation on the evaluation screen 801 similar to that at the time of bidding. The determined successful bidder is displayed.

  By clicking “evaluation result” on the input screen 901 in FIG. 9, an overall comparison evaluation screen for displaying the winning bidder (bid determination) determined at the time of bidding and the winning bidder determined for each pattern is displayed. Is done. FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating an example of the comprehensive comparison evaluation screen 1301. With such a comprehensive comparison evaluation screen 1301, the user can confirm the results of simulations of a plurality of patterns in comparison. In addition, by analyzing the simulation results of each pattern and the setting items of each pattern, for example, it is determined which setting item affects the bid result and which setting item does not affect the bid result. it can. Then, it is possible to optimize the selection method such as deleting setting items that do not affect the bid result.

  When the detail button 1311 is pressed in FIG. 13, the display control unit 106 displays a detail display screen for confirming details of the determination result for each pattern.

  FIG. 14 is a diagram showing an example of the detail display screen 1401. FIG. 14 shows an example of displaying the bid price (bid amount) and the ranking of each bidder for each evaluation element other than the price for pattern 1. By selecting another tab in which the pattern name is described, the display can be switched to display the details of the pattern corresponding to the selected tab. When the graph display button 1411 is pressed in FIG. 14, the display control unit 106 displays a graph display screen for displaying a graph in a predetermined format.

  FIG. 15 is a diagram illustrating an example of a graph display screen. FIG. 15 shows an example of displaying a line graph indicating the relationship between the trader name and the rank for each pattern. Note that the format of the displayed graph is an example, and is not limited to the example of FIG. Further, for example, a screen for designating a graph format may be displayed, and a graph in a format designated by the user on the screen may be displayed on the graph display screen. For example, if a graph for displaying points and scores of evaluation elements other than price, bid price distribution, successful bid rate, bidding rate, etc. is determined in advance, the user can easily specify the desired graph by specifying the desired graph. Can be created and displayed.

  Next, the aggregation function will be described. When execution of the aggregation function is selected on the function selection screen (not shown) or the like as described above, the display control unit 106 displays a condition designation screen for designating conditions for aggregation (aggregation conditions). . FIG. 16 is a diagram illustrating an example of the condition designation screen 1601. In FIG. 16, aggregation conditions such as a case type, a target year, a bid participation requirement, an evaluation type, and a type are illustrated.

  Note that the aggregation condition is not limited to this, and any condition can be applied as long as the data to be aggregated can be specified. The method for specifying the totaling condition is not limited to the method shown in FIG. 16, and any method can be applied as long as the data to be totaled can be specified.

  When an OK button 1611 on the condition designation screen 1601 is pressed, the counting unit 105 searches for a bid result that satisfies the counting condition from the bid results stored in the database server 12. The display control unit 106 displays a search result screen that displays the searched bid results. FIG. 17 is a diagram illustrating an example of the search result screen 1701. On the search result screen 1701, a list of searched bid results is displayed. In the search result screen 1701, search results to be counted can be designated from the searched bid results. FIG. 17 shows an example in which whether or not to add is specified by a check box on the left of each bid result.

  When the open button 1711 on the search result screen 1701 is pressed, the totaling unit 105 totals the bid results selected for totaling by the designated counting method. The display control unit 106 displays the aggregation result obtained by the aggregation unit 105 on the screen. FIG. 18 is a diagram showing an example of a total result screen 1801 for displaying the total result. The graph type field 1811 of the total result screen 1801 is a field for designating a graph to be displayed among a plurality of predetermined graphs. In FIG. 18, an example of a graph showing the ratio of successful bidders according to the bid price and the technical evaluation score is displayed.

  When a simulation button 1712 on the search result screen 1701 in FIG. 17 is pressed, a simulation function (hereinafter referred to as a total simulation function) targeting the total result of the selected bid results is executed. For example, when the simulation button 1712 is pressed, a pattern list screen for changing setting items of the selection method is displayed. FIG. 19 is a diagram showing an example of a pattern list screen 1901 when executing the aggregation simulation function.

  The points assigned in each evaluation method differ for each data (individual item) to be counted. For this reason, the total simulation function does not allow the “scoring” to be changed, but allows the “scoring magnification” to be changed. The scoring magnification represents the magnification by which the scoring is multiplied to change the scoring. In FIG. 19, an example is shown in which the scoring magnification of “addition point (full score)” is changed to 0.5. Thereby, the evaluation result which simulated using the value which multiplied "addition score (full score)" of the bid result of an individual case 0.5 times, respectively is obtained. The pull-down 1912 is used to change the evaluation method. For example, the pull-down 1912 is configured to select either the division method or the addition method as the evaluation method.

  When the conversion method tab 1911 is selected, the screen is switched to a pattern list screen for changing the conversion method. FIG. 20 is a diagram showing an example of the pattern list screen 2001 in this case. In the case of the total simulation function, an evaluation score magnification tab 2011 is displayed on the pattern list screen. When the evaluation score magnification tab 2011 is selected, the screen is switched to a pattern list screen for changing the evaluation score magnification for the evaluation element (evaluation item). The evaluation score magnification represents a magnification by which the evaluation score is multiplied in order to change the evaluation score.

  FIG. 21 is a diagram showing an example of the pattern list screen 2101 in this case. FIG. 21 shows an example of a screen in which evaluation elements are classified into two layers of a major classification and a middle classification, and the evaluation score magnification can be changed with the middle classification as a unit. In addition, the unit which can change evaluation point magnification is not restricted to this. It may be a large classification unit or a unit that further refines the middle classification. Further, the evaluation point magnification may be changeable in units of individual evaluation elements corresponding to the lowest layer.

  When the close button 2111 is pressed, a count result screen for displaying a count result reflecting the change is displayed. FIG. 22 is a diagram showing an example of the total result screen 2201. In the case of the totaling simulation function, the totaling unit 105 totalizes the results of changing the stored bid result setting items according to the designation on the pattern list screen by the designated statistical processing. For example, when the scoring magnification of “addition point (full score)” is changed to 0.5, the counting unit 105 designates using the value obtained by multiplying “addition point (full score)” of each bid result by 0.5. The bid results are counted again by the statistical processing.

  On the aggregation result screen 2201, an area 2211 for displaying the graph before the change and an area 2212 for displaying the graph after the change are displayed. Thus, by displaying the graph representing the total of the bid results and the graph representing the total of the simulation results, the influence on the evaluation value by the setting item changed by the simulation can be easily grasped.

  For example, it is possible to grasp how the order ratio (the ratio of successful bidders) of the highest technical scorer and the lowest pricer changes by changing the score of the additional points. In the example of FIG. 22, it can be seen that by increasing the score of the addition points by 0.5 times, the order ratio of the lowest price person increases, that is, the evaluation is focused on price. On the contrary, if the result of the simulation is hardly different from the result of the bid, it can be determined that the changed setting item is an item that does not affect the evaluation result (an unnecessary item).

  Such an analysis can also be executed by a simulation function for an individual case as described above. However, if the aggregation simulation function based on the aggregation result is used, analysis with higher accuracy can be performed.

  As described above, according to the simulation apparatus and the program of the present embodiment, it is possible to improve the efficiency of the bidding work by the selection method of various comprehensive evaluation bidding methods having different setting items. Further, based on the result of the bidding operation, it is possible to simulate an evaluation result by a selection method different from the selection method at the time of bidding. This makes it possible to evaluate whether the selection method employed at the time of bidding is appropriate.

(Modification)
In FIG. 1, each user system 10 includes an application server 11 and a database server 12 as simulation apparatuses. With such a configuration, it is possible to reduce the possibility that various information input at the time of bidding, such as a bid price, and information that needs to be prevented from leaking, such as a bid result, will be leaked via the network 30 or the like.

  On the other hand, for example, the administrator system 20 may include the application server 11 and the database server 12, and the user system 10 may include only the user terminal 13. In this case, the user terminal 13 accesses the application server 11 in the administrator system 20 via the network 30 and executes the support program. Such a configuration eliminates the need for server installation, server maintenance, and support program version upgrade for each user system 10. That is, the system introduction cost and the system maintenance cost can be reduced.

10a, 10b User system 11 Application server 12 Database server 13a, 13b User terminal 20 Administrator system 21 Management server 22 Management terminal 30 Network 100 Support program 101 Reception unit 102 Calculation unit 103 Determination unit 104 Storage control unit 105 Totaling unit 106 Display Control unit 111 Display unit 121 Storage unit

Claims (9)

Computer
A bid price for each bidder, an evaluation score for each bidder for an evaluation element other than the bid price, and a designated bidder selection method for calculating an evaluation value from the bid price and the evaluation score. A first reception unit that receives a bid result designated as a simulation target among a plurality of bid results including the first evaluation value calculated by the first method;
A second accepting unit that accepts designation of a second method different from the first method in which the first evaluation value included in the accepted bidding result among the plurality of successful bidder selection methods is calculated;
A calculation unit that calculates a second evaluation value by the second method using the bid price included in the accepted bid result and the evaluation score included in the accepted bid result;
Program to function as. The computer,
Further functioning as a display control unit for displaying at least one second method specified in the past with respect to the accepted bid result on a display unit,
The second receiving unit receives the second method designated from the displayed second methods;
The program according to claim 1. In the first method and the second method, at least one of a setting item for determining the successful bidder selection method and a setting value for the setting item is different from each other,
The display control unit includes at least one of the setting item and the setting value of the first method for calculating the first evaluation value included in the accepted bidding result, and the accepted bidding result in the past. Displaying at least one of the setting item and the setting value of the second method specified in the display unit so as to be comparable,
The program according to claim 2. The display control unit displays the setting value of the second method different from the setting value of the first method on the display unit in a display mode different from the corresponding setting value of the first method.
The program according to claim 3. The computer,
It further functions as a display control unit that displays the winning bidder determined by the first evaluation value included in the accepted bidding result and the winning bidder determined by the second evaluation value on the display unit so as to be comparable. ,
The program according to claim 1. The computer,
Further functioning as a third reception unit for receiving the designation of the first method, the bid price, and the evaluation score;
The calculation unit further receives the designation received by the third receiving unit using the bid price received by the third receiving unit and the evaluation score received by the third receiving unit. Calculating the first evaluation value by a first method;
The program according to claim 1. The computer,
A plurality of setting items that define the first method are displayed on the display unit in the same order as the setting order, and the setting items that have been set are displayed on the display unit in a display mode different from the setting items that have not been set. To further function as a display control unit,
The program according to claim 6. The computer,
Totalizing at least one of the bid price, the evaluation score, and the first evaluation value included in a plurality of the bid results, and further functioning as a counting unit that outputs the counting results;
The program according to claim 1. A bid price for each bidder, an evaluation score for each bidder for an evaluation element other than the bid price, and a designated bidder selection method for calculating an evaluation value from the bid price and the evaluation score. A first reception unit that receives a bid result designated as a simulation target among a plurality of bid results including the first evaluation value calculated by the first method;
A second accepting unit that accepts designation of a second method different from the first method in which the first evaluation value included in the accepted bidding result among the plurality of successful bidder selection methods is calculated;
A calculation unit that calculates a second evaluation value by the second method using the bid price included in the accepted bid result and the evaluation score included in the accepted bid result;
A simulation apparatus comprising:

Images