Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP5120820B2 - Equipment that evaluates appropriate standard residential land by regression analysis that eliminates "multicollinearity" - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP5120820B2 - Equipment that evaluates appropriate standard residential land by regression analysis that eliminates "multicollinearity" - Google Patents

Equipment that evaluates appropriate standard residential land by regression analysis that eliminates "multicollinearity" Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP5120820B2
JP5120820B2 JP2009190501A JP2009190501A JP5120820B2 JP 5120820 B2 JP5120820 B2 JP 5120820B2 JP 2009190501 A JP2009190501 A JP 2009190501A JP 2009190501 A JP2009190501 A JP 2009190501A JP 5120820 B2 JP5120820 B2 JP 5120820B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
price
variable
correlation
removal
variables
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2009190501A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2011034542A (en
Inventor
雅浩 白井
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to JP2009190501A priority Critical patent/JP5120820B2/en
Publication of JP2011034542A publication Critical patent/JP2011034542A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5120820B2 publication Critical patent/JP5120820B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Description

本発明は、標準宅地の適正な評価を行う装置である。  The present invention is an apparatus that performs an appropriate evaluation of a standard residential land.

宅地の鑑定評価の主要な方式である取引事例比較法は、近隣地域にある取引事例価格と価格形成要因による比較を行って対象地の価格を求める。しかし、宅地の売買取引の当事者は土地市場に精通しているとは言えず、また、個人の事情に左右されるため、成立した価格は宅地の適正と思われる価格から乖離する場合が多く、取引事例価格に適正な価格格差を期待することはできない。  The transaction case comparison method, which is the main method of appraisal evaluation of residential land, obtains the price of the target site by comparing the transaction case price in the neighborhood with the price formation factor. However, it cannot be said that the parties of the residential land transaction are familiar with the land market, and because it depends on the circumstances of the individual, the established price often deviates from the price that seems to be appropriate for the residential land, We cannot expect an appropriate price gap for the transaction case price.

価格格差評定基準として「土地価格比準表」が公表されており、更に、毎年地価公示法による地価公示及び国土利用計画法施行令による地価調査が行われていて、評価の指針となっている。しかし、これらの公的評価は価格表示だけで、専門家である鑑定士の評価合議による価格という妥当性の担保があるものの、標準地相互の価格格差についての価格形成要因による客観的、合理的根拠が明示されていない。  The “land price ratio table” has been published as the price disparity evaluation standard, and the land price survey is conducted annually by the Land Price Public Notice Act and the Land Use Plan Act Enforcement Order, which serves as a guideline for evaluation. . However, these public evaluations are price indications only, and although there is a guarantee of the price as a result of an expert appraisal by an expert appraiser, it is objective and rational due to price formation factors regarding price differences between standard sites. The grounds are not specified.

宅地の評価は、価格形成要因に基づいて行われなければならないが、宅地課税の標準宅地評価のように、多数で、かつ、多様な宅地の適正な価格格差を求める場合、評価の根拠を明らかにするために、価格形成要因を説明変数とし、一次的に評価された価格を目的変数とする重回帰分析が行われる。  The evaluation of residential land must be based on price formation factors, but the basis for the evaluation is clarified when the appropriate price disparity is calculated for many and various residential land, as in the standard residential land evaluation for residential land taxation. In order to achieve this, a multiple regression analysis is performed using the price formation factor as an explanatory variable and the primarily evaluated price as an objective variable.

重回帰分析は、一団の説明変数が全体として、目的変数をどの程度説明できるかを求めるもので、個々の説明変数それぞれが独立して目的変数をどの程度説明できるかを目的としていない。  The multiple regression analysis is to find out how much the explanatory variables of the group can explain the objective variable as a whole, and does not aim at how much the individual explanatory variables can explain the objective variable independently.

しかし、宅地の鑑定評価では、目的変数である地価に対して、説明変数である個々の価格形成要因にどの程度の地価格差の説明力があるかが求められる。ただ、地価の重回帰分析では、正規方程式を構成する価格形成要因相互に高い相関のある場合が多く、地価を説明できる程度を示す各要因の偏回帰係数が、鑑定評価の実務経験による数値から乖離する“多重共線性”問題が生ずる。  However, in the appraisal evaluation of residential land, it is required how much the land price difference, which is an explanatory variable, has an explanatory power of the land price difference with respect to the land price which is the objective variable. However, in multiple regression analysis of land prices, there are many cases in which there is a high correlation between the price formation factors that make up the normal equation, and the partial regression coefficient of each factor that indicates the extent to which land prices can be explained is based on numerical values based on the experience of appraisal evaluation. A dissociating “multicollinearity” problem arises.

“多重共線性”の解決には、高い相関係数の二つの説明変数のどちらかを省くやり方があるが、理論、経験により選択された主要な価格形成要因であれば容認できることではない。また、相関行列の対角要素に一定数を加えて、安定的偏回帰係数を求める次の論文の方法があるが、機械的な操作であること、追加する数値をどこで打ち切るかの根拠が曖昧であることに批判がある。
Arthur E.Hoer and Robert W.Kennard
“Ridge regression”
The solution to “multicollinearity” is to omit one of the two explanatory variables with a high correlation coefficient, but it is not acceptable if it is the main price-forming factor selected by theory and experience. In addition, there is a method in the following paper to obtain a stable partial regression coefficient by adding a certain number to the diagonal elements of the correlation matrix, but it is a mechanical operation and the basis for where to stop adding the numerical value is ambiguous There are criticisms.
Arthur E.M. Hoer and Robert W. Kennard
“Ridge regression”

本発明は、The present invention
多数の標準地の価格形成要因毎の評定値合計(%単位)を基準値である1に加えて、(1+合計値)の評定値とし、これと標準地の設定価格をコンピュータに入力してデータベースを作成する手段、(価格をp、価格形成要因を街路a、接近b、環境cとする)Add the total value (%) for each price formation factor of many standard sites to the standard value of 1 to give a rating value of (1 + total value), and enter this and the standard site set price into the computer Means for creating a database (p is the price, the price formation factor is street a, approach b, environment c)
価格を目的変数、価格形成要因評定値を説明変数として、この対数をとり、目的変数の標準化変数Ap、説明変数の標準化変数Ai(i=a,b,c)を算定し、目的変数と説明変数、及び説明変数相互の相関係数Ri、rijを算定する手段、Taking the logarithm with the price as the objective variable and the price formation factor rating value as the explanatory variable, calculate the standardized variable Ap of the objective variable and the standardized variable Ai (i = a, b, c) of the explanatory variable, and explain the objective variable Means for calculating correlation coefficients Ri and rij between variables and explanatory variables;
個々の標準地のApを含むAiの3変数の全ての組合わせ(i=(p、a、b)、(p、a、c)、(p、b、c))について、正負符号が全て同じであるAp、Ai(同調性)を非同調性Ap’,Ai’とに区別する手段、For all combinations of three variables of Ai including Ap of each standard place (i = (p, a, b), (p, a, c), (p, b, c)) Means for distinguishing Ap, Ai (synchronization) being the same from asynchronous Ap ′, Ai ′;
同調性標準地について、例えば、3変数の組み合わせがAp、Aa、Abの場合、まず、ApとAaについて、その数値比較を行い、絶対値の低い数値を限度に、これを目的変数p媒介の同調部分としてAaから除去する手段、For example, if the combination of three variables is Ap, Aa, Ab, the numerical value comparison is first performed for Ap and Aa. Means to remove from Aa as a tuning part,
除去前の同調Aaの絶対値の総和と除去後の絶対値の総和の比率を求め、同調Aa、非同調Aa’の数値を均衡させるため、両者の除去前Aa数値に乗じて訂正Ataを求めるThe ratio of the sum of the absolute values of the tuning Aa before the removal and the sum of the absolute values after the removal is obtained, and in order to balance the values of the tuning Aa and the non-tuning Aa ', the correction Ata is obtained by multiplying both the values of the Aa before removal. 手段、means,
これと同様の計算をAp、Abについて行い、訂正Atbを求め、訂正Ataと訂正Atbを乗じて、要因a,bの相関係数rabを求める手段、Means for performing the same calculation for Ap and Ab, obtaining the correction Atb, multiplying the correction Ata and the correction Atb, and obtaining the correlation coefficient lab of the factors a and b,
前段の算定を他の全ての3変数の組み合わせについて行って、rac、rbcを求め、相関行列を作成して、重相関分析の正規方程式様式の3元連立方程式を作成する手段、Means for performing the previous calculation for all other three variable combinations, obtaining rac and rbc, creating a correlation matrix, and creating a ternary simultaneous equation in the normal equation format of multiple correlation analysis;
この3元連立方程式を解いて、各説明変数の偏回帰係数を求め、この偏回帰係数による目的変数の一次式から対数の回帰価格を求め、これを還元して目的変数の価格を求める手段、Means for solving the ternary simultaneous equations, obtaining a partial regression coefficient of each explanatory variable, obtaining a logarithmic regression price from a linear expression of the objective variable based on the partial regression coefficient, and reducing the logarithm to obtain a price of the objective variable;
求めた回帰価格を、初期設定価格の平均値、標準偏差と同じ水準にする手段Means to make the calculated regression price the same level as the average value and standard deviation of the default price
を備えたことを特徴とする標準宅地の最終価格を求める装置に関する。It is related with the apparatus which calculates | requires the final price of the standard residential land characterized by having provided.

重回帰分析の目的変数、説明変数に関する正規方程式を、相関行列で表示すれば次のようになる。(説明変数3の場合)

Figure 0005120820
ここで、
Ri :要因iの目的変数yに対する単相関係数
rij:相関行列における要因i,jの非対角要素 (i≠j,i、j=1〜3)
bi :変数標準化後のi要因の係数
なお、変数標準化前後のb’i、biの関係は次のとおりである。
b’i=bi(σy/σi) (2)
bi:標準化後の係数 b’i:標準化前の係数
σy:目的変数yの標準偏差
σi:説明変数iの標準偏差
(1)式の第一行は次のとおりである。
b1+b2・r12+b3・r23=R1 (3)
この式の意味するのは、右辺の要因1の目的変数yに対する単相関係数R1は、要因1の要因iに対する相関係数r1i(自己相関を含む)に、目的変数に対する要因iの説明能力度係数であるbiを乗じたものの総和であるということである。これは、yの説明に要因1以外の他の要因iが関わる場合は、要因1だけでなく、関わりのある他の説明変数iの作用が加わることを意味する。
biはRiに対する要因iの説明能力度比重であるので、第1行のr1iは要因1により生成されたi要因(このような意味での相関)と解され、また、その生成に見合う程度で要因1のyに対する説明を部分的に担っていると解される。
そして、この(3)式で、相関行列の対角要素である自己相関の1に比して、非対角要素であるr1iの数値の和が大きい場合には、これら2次的要因の作用で、b1の値はR1の数値から大きく離れ、多重共線性問題を生じさせる。If the normal equations related to the objective variable and explanatory variable of the multiple regression analysis are displayed as a correlation matrix, it becomes as follows. (In the case of explanatory variable 3)
Figure 0005120820
here,
Ri: single correlation coefficient for objective variable y of factor i rij: off-diagonal element of factors i, j in correlation matrix (i ≠ j, i, j = 1-3)
bi: coefficient of i factor after variable standardization The relationship between b′i and bi before and after variable standardization is as follows.
b′i = bi (σy / σi) (2)
bi: Coefficient after standardization b′i: Coefficient before standardization σy: Standard deviation of objective variable y σi: Standard deviation of explanatory variable i The first line of equation (1) is as follows.
b1 + b2 · r12 + b3 · r23 = R1 (3)
This equation means that the single correlation coefficient R1 for the objective variable y of the factor 1 on the right side is the explanatory coefficient of the factor i for the objective variable to the correlation coefficient r1i (including autocorrelation) for the factor i of the factor 1. That is, it is the sum of products multiplied by bi which is a degree coefficient. This means that when the factor i other than the factor 1 is involved in the explanation of y, not only the factor 1 but also other explanatory variables i that are related are added.
Since bi is the explanation ability degree specific gravity of the factor i with respect to Ri, r1i in the first row is interpreted as the i factor (correlation in this sense) generated by the factor 1, and is appropriate to the generation. It is understood that it is partially responsible for the explanation of factor 1 y.
If the sum of numerical values of r1i that is a non-diagonal element is larger than the autocorrelation 1 that is a diagonal element of the correlation matrix in the equation (3), the action of these secondary factors Thus, the value of b1 is far from the value of R1 and causes a multicollinearity problem.

説明変数3ケの重回帰分析で、目的変数yと説明変数xiの相関係数Ri、及び説明変数間の相関係数rijを算出するために、個々の標本αについて標準化変数Ayα及びAiαを計算し、それらを標本毎に対比すると、正負の符号、及び数値に高い同調性が認められる。
(煩雑さを避けるため、以後誤解をまねくとき以外は個々の標本であることを示すαを表示しない)
単相関係数Riは説明変数iが目的変数yをどれだけ説明できるかの度合い(この意味での相関)を示すが、他の説明変数とは無関係に求められたものである。他方、Riは目的変数yと説明変数xiの標準化変数Ay、Aiの符号、数値の同調度が高いほど数値が高くなる。yに対する説明能力が高いとして選択された説明変数i,jはi,j間自体の相関が低くても、Ayに対するAi,Ajの符号、数値の同調性が高ければ、これを媒介としてAi,Aj相互の符号、数値の同調性が高くなる。
このことから、重回帰分析の相関行列のrijには、要因i、jが直接的に相関している部分と、要因i、jの目的変数yに対する単相関係数Ri,Rjを媒介として、いわば、見せかけ的に相関を高める部分があるということになる。i,j要因の直接的相関は因果的根拠が明確であれば、何かの方法でこれを取り入れるべきであるが、なければ無視する。この目的変数媒介の見せかけの相関を除去すれば、rijの数値を抑えるので“多重共線性”の解消に繋がる。
In order to calculate the correlation coefficient Ri between the objective variable y and the explanatory variable xi and the correlation coefficient rij between the explanatory variables in the multiple regression analysis of 3 explanatory variables, the standardized variables Ayα and Aiα are calculated for each sample α. However, when they are compared for each sample, positive and negative signs and high synchrony are recognized in numerical values.
(In order to avoid complications, α is not displayed to indicate individual specimens except when misleading.)
The single correlation coefficient Ri indicates the degree to which the explanatory variable i can explain the objective variable y (correlation in this sense), but is obtained independently of other explanatory variables. On the other hand, the value of Ri increases as the degree of synchronization of the sign and numerical values of the standardized variables Ay and Ai of the objective variable y and the explanatory variable xi increases. The explanatory variables i and j selected as having high explanatory ability for y have a low correlation between i and j, but if the synchronism of the signs and values of Ai and Aj to Ay is high, Ai, Aj's mutual sign and numerical synchrony are enhanced.
From this, rij of the correlation matrix of the multiple regression analysis is mediated by the part where the factors i and j are directly correlated and the single correlation coefficients Ri and Rj for the objective variable y of the factors i and j. In other words, there is a part that increases the correlation in appearance. The direct correlation of the i and j factors should be incorporated in some way if the causal basis is clear, but ignored if the causal basis is clear. If the apparent correlation mediated by the objective variable is removed, the value of rij is suppressed, which leads to elimination of “multicollinearity”.

pが価格、a、b、c、が価格形成要因の街路、接近、環境の3条件とした場合、標準化変数Ap、Ai(i=a,b,c)についての同調性除去するには、正負符号の同調と数値の同調の2面について分析しなければならない。
符号の同調はApを含むAiの全ての3変数の組み合わせ(i(p,a,b),(p,a,c)、(p,b,c))について、正負符号が同じであるかを調べる。個々の標本のAp、Aiのそれぞれに+符号の場合は1,−符号の場合は−1として、それらの和が3及び−3である場合に3変数の正負符号が一致するので同調の1の数値を与える。
本発明の装置は、個々の標準地のApを含む要因Aiの3変数の全ての組み合わせ(i=(p,a,b)、(p,a,c)、(p,b,c))の正負符号が、全て同符号であるAi(同調性)を、どれかが異符号であるAi’(非同調性)と区別する手段を備える。
When p is a price, a, b, c are three conditions of a price forming factor, a street, an approach, and an environment, in order to remove the synchrony with respect to the standardized variables Ap, Ai (i = a, b, c), Two aspects of positive and negative sign tuning and numerical tuning must be analyzed.
The sign tuning is the same for all three combinations of Ai including Ap (i = (p, a, b), (p, a, c), (p, b, c)). Find out. Each of Ap and Ai of each sample is 1 in the case of + sign, and -1 in the case of-sign, and when the sum of them is 3 and -3, the sign of three variables coincides. Gives the number of.
The device according to the present invention has all combinations of three variables of factor Ai including Ap of each standard place (i = (p, a, b), (p, a, c), (p, b, c)). Are provided with means for distinguishing Ai (synchrony), which are all the same sign, from Ai ′ (nonsynchrony), which are all different signs.

数値の同調については、正負符号が同じである3変数の組み合わせの一つであるAp、Aa、Abの場合、まず目的変数Apと説明変数Aaを取り上げ、目的変数Apが媒介するAaの数値同調部分を、ApとAaの絶対値のどちらか低い数値を限度として除去する。
除去例
Ap Aa (同調部分) (固有部分)残余
0.3 0.3 0.3 0
0.2 0.5 0.2 0.3
−0.6 −0.4 −0.4 0
−0.1 −0.4 −0.1 −0.3
本発明の装置は、同調性標準地について、例えば、3変数の組み合せがAp、Aa、Abの場合、まず、ApとAaを取り上げて、その数値比較を行い、絶対値の低い数値を目的変数p媒介の同調部分としてAaから除去する手段を備える。
Regarding the tuning of numerical values, in the case of Ap, Aa, Ab, which is one of the combinations of three variables having the same sign, the objective variable Ap and the explanatory variable Aa are first taken up, and the numerical tuning of Aa mediated by the objective variable Ap is performed. The part is removed up to the lower of the absolute values of Ap and Aa.
Example of removal Ap Aa (tuned portion) (natural portion) residual 0.3 0.3 0.3 0
0.2 0.5 0.2 0.3
-0.6 -0.4 -0.4 0
-0.1 -0.4 -0.1 -0.3
For example, when the combination of three variables is Ap, Aa, and Ab, the apparatus of the present invention first takes Ap and Aa, compares the values, and sets a numerical value with a low absolute value as the target variable. Means are provided for removal from Aa as a p-mediated tuning moiety.

個々の標本のAp及びAaを対比すると、対応する数値にかなりの差があり、同調度が不安定であるので、全体として一定の同調性があるというに止まる。
よって、同調性ありとして選択された標本Aaについて、同調Aa、及び非同調Aa’の数値を均衡させるために、Ap媒介の同調性効果を除去した残余の部分(以後固有部分という)の絶対値の総和の、同調度除去前のAaの絶対値の総和に対する比率を求め、これを同調部分除去前の同調、非同調の標本Aa、Aa’に乗じて、除去後の標本Ai(以後訂正Atiという)とする。
Ap,Abについても上記の同じ計算を行い、訂正Atbを求める。
これまでの計算をApを含むAiの全ての3変数の組み合わせについて行って訂正Atiを求め、その相乗和を相関行列の非対角要素のrab,rac,rbcとして偏回帰係数を求め、回帰価格を算定する。
When Ap and Aa of individual samples are compared, there is a considerable difference in the corresponding numerical values, and the degree of tuning is unstable, so that there is only a certain degree of tuning as a whole.
Therefore, for the sample Aa selected as tuned, in order to balance the values of tuned Aa and unsynchronized Aa ′, the absolute value of the remaining part (hereinafter referred to as the eigen part) from which the Ap-mediated tuned effect has been removed. Is obtained by multiplying the tuned and non-tuned samples Aa and Aa ′ before removal of the tuned portion by the ratio of the absolute value of Aa before removal of the tuned degree, and multiplying them by the sample Ai after removal (corrected Ati) Said).
The same calculation as described above is performed for Ap and Ab to obtain a corrected Atb.
The calculation so far is performed for all three combinations of Ai including Ap to obtain correction Ati, and the partial regression coefficient is obtained using the synergistic sum of the non-diagonal elements lab, rac, and rbc of the correlation matrix, and the regression price Is calculated.

本発明の装置は、Ap,Aaの組み合わせで、同調性Aa,非同調性Aa’の数値を均衡させるため、除去前の同調性Aaの絶対値の総和に対する、除去後の絶対値の総和の比率を求め、同調、非同調の除去前Aa数値に乗じて訂正Ataを求める手段を備える。Since the apparatus of the present invention balances the numerical values of the synchrony Aa and the non-synchronization Aa ′ with the combination of Ap and Aa, the sum of the absolute values of the synchronism Aa before the removal is equal to the sum of the absolute values of the synchronism Aa before the removal. Means are provided for determining the ratio and multiplying the tuned / unsynchronized Aa value before removal to obtain the corrected Ata.
また、本発明の装置は、Ap、Aa及びAbの組み合わせについて、求めた訂正Ataと訂正Atbとを乗じて、相関行列の非対角要素rabを算定する手段を備える。Further, the apparatus of the present invention includes means for calculating a non-diagonal element lab of the correlation matrix by multiplying the obtained correction Ata and correction Atb for the combination of Ap, Aa, and Ab.

この計算により求められた回帰価格は、通常の重回帰分析計算とは別の計算であるため、初期設定価格の平均値、標準偏差の数値から大きく離れる場合があり、実務に適用できる設定価格の価格及び価格格差水準に補正するために、初期設定価格の平均値、標準偏差に等しくなる価格に訂正する。
本発明の装置は、同調部分除去後の相関行列によって求めた回帰価格を、初期設定価格の平均値、標準偏差と同じ水準にする最終価格を求める手段を備える。
Since the regression price obtained by this calculation is different from the normal multiple regression analysis calculation, it may be far from the average value of the default price and the standard deviation value. In order to correct the price and the price difference level, the average value of the initial setting price and the price equal to the standard deviation are corrected.
The apparatus of the present invention comprises means for obtaining a final price that makes the regression price obtained by the correlation matrix after removal of the tuning part the same level as the average value and standard deviation of the initial setting price.

上記手順は個々の標準地のAp,Aiに対するものであるが、やや煩雑である。
簡便法1はi要因の単相関係数Riの数値が高いほどAp,Aiの符号、数値の同調性は高いと考えられるので、Riを目的変数媒介の同調性相当分と見做し、Aiから一括除去したAi・(1−Ri)を同調性除去後のAiとし、各要因についての同じ計算から求めたAjとの相乗であるrij(1−Ri)(1−Rj)を相関行列の非対角要素として偏回帰係数を求める方法であり、また、簡便法2は価格形成要因間i,j間に理論的、経験的に有意の相関がなく、相関係数Ri,Rjの相関が高いため、要因i、jに目的変数媒介の同調性が強いと考えられるとき、相関係数rijを0として偏回帰係数を算定する方法がある。
The above procedure is for Ap and Ai of individual standard sites, but is somewhat complicated.
In the simplified method 1, the higher the numerical value of the i-factor single correlation coefficient Ri, the higher the sign and numerical values of Ap and Ai are considered to be synchronized. Ai · (1-Ri) collectively removed from A is defined as Ai after the synchrony removal, and rij (1-Ri) (1-Rj), which is synergistic with Aj obtained from the same calculation for each factor, is This is a method for obtaining a partial regression coefficient as a non-diagonal element. In addition, the simplified method 2 has no theoretically or empirically significant correlation between the price forming factors i and j, and the correlation between the correlation coefficients Ri and Rj is Therefore, there is a method for calculating the partial regression coefficient with the correlation coefficient rij as 0 when the factors i and j are considered to be strongly synchronized with the objective variable.

本発明の装置は、目的変数pと説明変数iの単相関係数Riを同調相当分として、Aiから一括除去して得られたAi(1−Ri)の各要因の相乗rij(1−Ri)(1−Rj)を非対角要素とする相関行列で偏回帰係数を算定する簡便法1の算定手段を備える。The apparatus of the present invention uses the single correlation coefficient Ri of the objective variable p and the explanatory variable i as a tuned equivalent, and synergistic rij (1-Ri) of each factor of Ai (1-Ri) obtained by batch removal from Ai. ) A simple method 1 calculating means for calculating a partial regression coefficient with a correlation matrix having (1-Rj) as a non-diagonal element is provided.
また、本発明の装置は、価格形成要因間に理論的、経験的に有意の相関がなく、また、単相関係数Ri,Rjが高い数値であるため、i、j要因相互にAp媒介の高い相関が考えられる場合、それらの説明変数の相関係数rijを0として偏回帰係数を求める簡便法2の算定手段を備える。In addition, since the device of the present invention has no theoretically or empirically significant correlation between the price forming factors, and the single correlation coefficients Ri and Rj are high numerical values, the i and j factors are mutually Ap-mediated. When a high correlation is considered, a simple method 2 calculating means for obtaining a partial regression coefficient by setting the correlation coefficient rij of these explanatory variables to 0 is provided.

相関行列の非対角要素であるrijの構成要素の標準化説明変数Ai、及びAjから、標準化目的変数Ap媒介の同調相関部分を除去することにより、“多重共線性”を解消して、価格形成要因の適切な価格説明度を示す偏回帰係数を求めることができ、また、回帰価格を初期設定価格の価格、価格格差水準とすることにより、鑑定評価実務に直結する合理的評価資料が求められる。  By eliminating the standardized objective variable Ap-mediated tuning correlation from the standardized explanatory variables Ai and Aj of the components of rij that are non-diagonal elements of the correlation matrix, "multicollinearity" is eliminated, and price formation It is possible to obtain a partial regression coefficient that shows an appropriate price explanation of the factors, and by using the regression price as the initial price price and the price disparity level, it is necessary to obtain rational evaluation materials that are directly linked to the appraisal practice. .

図2関連
設定価格、及び価格形成要因(街路、接近、環境)の評定値の表である。鑑定評価では比較の基準となる宅地を1として、対象地の効用がその何%上、ないしは下であるかを比較するので、評定式は(1+xi)の形となる。なお、設定価格は通常の鑑定評価手法により求めたものを使用する。
FIG. 2 is a table of set prices and rating values of price formation factors (street, approach, environment). In the appraisal evaluation, the residential land serving as a reference for comparison is set to 1, and the percentage of the utility of the target land is compared to the lower or higher, so the evaluation formula has the form (1 + xi). Note that the set price is obtained by a normal appraisal method.

図3関連
目的変数(価格)、説明変数(価格形成要因)の対数と、変数の標準化によるAp,Ai及びAiAj,Riの計算表である。標準地の比較は、次のような割合で、差ではないので、線形式である回帰分析を適用する場合は変数を対数にして計算する。
(p1/p2)=(1+x1)/(1+x2)
対数 log(p1/p2)=log(p1)−log(p2) (4)
p1:評価対象地
p2:評価基準地
なお、変数の標準化は次のとおりである。
Aiα=(Xiα−Xi平均)/σi (5)
ここで
Xiα:α標本のi要因評定値
σi:i要因の標準偏差
また、i,j要因の相関係数rij,i要因の目的変数pに対する単相関係数Riは次のとおりである。
rij=1/n×Σ{(Xiα−Xi平均)(Xjα−Xj平均)}/σiσj
=1/n×ΣAiαAjα
Ri =1/n×ΣAiαApα
FIG. 3 is a calculation table of Ap, Ai and AiAj, Ri by logarithm of objective variable (price) and explanatory variable (price formation factor) and standardization of variables. Since the comparison of standard sites is not the difference in the following ratio, when applying regression analysis which is a linear format, the calculation is performed with the logarithm of the variable.
(P1 / p2) = (1 + x1) / (1 + x2)
Logarithm log (p1 / p2) = log (p1) −log (p2) (4)
p1: Evaluation target site
p2: Evaluation standard site The standardization of variables is as follows.
Aiα = (Xiα−Xi average) / σi (5)
Here, Xiα: i factor evaluation value of α sample σi: standard deviation of i factor The correlation coefficient rij of i, j factor, and the single correlation coefficient Ri for the objective variable p of i factor are as follows.
rij = 1 / n × Σ {(Xiα−Xi average) (Xjα−Xj average)} / σiσj
= 1 / n × ΣAiαAjα
Ri = 1 / n × ΣAiαApα

図4関連
標準化変数Ap、Aiの同調性分析は、Apを含むAiの全ての3変数の組み合わせ(i:(p,a,b),(p、a、c)、(p、b、c))の正負符号が同じであるかを調べる。Ap、Aiのそれぞれに+符号の場合は1,−符号の場合は−1として、それらの和が3あるいは−3である場合に、3変数が一致するとして同調の1の数値を与える。
Related to FIG. 4 The synchrony analysis of standardized variables Ap and Ai is performed by combining all three variables of Ai including Ap (i: (p, a, b), (p, a, c), (p, b, c). Check if the sign of)) is the same. Each of Ap and Ai is given a value of 1 for tuning, assuming 1 for a + sign and -1 for a-sign, and 3 or -3 when the sum is 3 or -3.

図5及び図6
同調性標本のAaの同調部分除去は、Apと比較して,Ap,Aaの絶対値の低い数値を限度として,Aaの数値から除去する。除去後同調、非同調のAa数値の均衡を図るため、同調Aaの除去前の絶対値の和に対する除去後の絶対値の和の比率を同調、非同調を問わず除去前のAaに乗じて、訂正Ataを求める。
同様の計算で求めた訂正Atbと先の訂正Ataを乗じて要因a,bの相関係数rabを求める。この計算を全ての3変数の組み合わせについて行う。
5 and 6
The removal of the tuned portion of the Aa of the tuned sample is removed from the value of Aa up to a value having a lower absolute value of Ap and Aa compared to Ap. In order to balance the Aa values after tuning and non-tuning, the ratio of the sum of absolute values after removal to the sum of absolute values before removal of tuning Aa is multiplied by Aa before removal regardless of tuning or non-tuning. The correction Ata is obtained.
The correlation coefficient lab of the factors a and b is obtained by multiplying the correction Atb obtained by the same calculation and the previous correction Ata. This calculation is performed for all three variable combinations.

図7関連
前段で求めた除去後の相関係数rij(i、j=a,b,c)の相関行列で、偏回帰係数を求め、同調部分除去後の偏回帰係数を求める。
7 A partial regression coefficient is obtained from the correlation matrix of the correlation coefficient rij (i, j = a, b, c) after removal obtained in the previous stage, and a partial regression coefficient after removal of the tuning portion is obtained.

図8関連
同調部分除去後の回帰価格、相関係数を求める。求めた回帰価格を初期設定価格の価格、価格格差の水準に保持するために、設定価格の平均値、標準偏差と同じになる回帰価格に訂正する。
Related to Fig. 8: Calculate the regression price and correlation coefficient after removal of the tuning part. In order to keep the calculated regression price at the price of the initial setting price and the level of the price gap, the regression price is corrected to the regression price that is the same as the average value and standard deviation of the setting price.

図9関連
以上の“多重共線性”解消の回帰分析は、個々の標本について同調性部分を除去するが、やや煩雑である。簡便法1は、設定価格pと説明変数である価格形成要因iの単相関係数Riを目的変数媒介の同調相当分と見做し、要因iの標準化変数Aiから一括除去するAi・(1−Ri)を同調性除去後のAiとして、これの各要因の組み合わせの相乗和を相関行列の非対角要素のrijとし、偏回帰係数を求める計算である。
Relevant to FIG. 9 The regression analysis for eliminating the “multiple collinearity” described above removes the synchrony portion of each specimen, but is somewhat complicated. The simple method 1 considers the single correlation coefficient Ri of the price formation factor i, which is the set price p and the explanatory variable, as the equivalent of the synchronization of the objective variable, and removes it from the standardized variable Ai of the factor i at a time. This is a calculation for obtaining a partial regression coefficient, with -Ri) as Ai after the removal of synchrony and the synergistic sum of the combinations of these factors as rij of the off-diagonal elements of the correlation matrix.

図9関連
簡便法2は価格形成要因間に理論的、経験的に有意の相関がなく、相関係数Ri,Rjの相関が高いので、要因i、jに目的変数媒介の同調性が大であると考えられるとき、i、j要因の相関係数をrij=0として、偏回帰係数を求める計算である。
Relevant to Fig. 9 Since the simple method 2 has no theoretically or empirically significant correlation between the price formation factors and the correlation coefficients Ri and Rj are highly correlated, the factors i and j are highly synchronized with the objective variable. In this case, the partial regression coefficient is calculated by setting the correlation coefficient of the i and j factors to rij = 0.

“多重共線性”解消の重回帰分析フローチャ−トMultiple regression analysis flowchart to eliminate "multicollinearity" 目的変数(価格)及び説明変数(価格形成要因)のデータObjective variable (price) and explanatory variable (price formation factor) data 変数の対数と標準化(Aiα)及びAiAj,Riの計算Logarithm and standardization of variables (Aiα) and calculation of AiAj, Ri Apを含むAiの3変数の正負符号の同調性分析Synchrony analysis of positive and negative signs of three variables of Ai including Ap 正負符号同調の3変数(Ap,Aa,Ab)のAaからApとの数値同調部分を除去 −訂正Ataの算定−The numerical tuning part with Ap is removed from Aa of the three variables (Ap, Aa, Ab) of positive / negative sign tuning-Calculation of correction Ata- 正負符号同調の3変数(Ap,Aa,Ab)のAbからApとの数値同調部分を除去及びAa,Abの相関係数の算定 −訂正Ataとrabの算定−The numerical tuning part with Ap is removed from Ab of three variables (Ap, Aa, Ab) of positive / negative sign tuning and calculation of correlation coefficient of Aa, Ab-Calculation of corrected Ata and rab- 初期入力と同調部分除去後の偏回帰係数の算定Calculation of partial regression coefficient after initial input and tuning part removal 同調部分除去後の回帰価格、相関係数の算定、及び回帰価格を初期設定価格の平均値、標準偏差と同じ水準の価格に訂正Regression price after removal of tuned part, calculation of correlation coefficient, and correction of regression price to the same value as the average value and standard deviation of the default price 簡便法1,2による偏回帰係数の算定Calculation of partial regression coefficients using simplified methods 1 and 2

Claims (8)

多数の標準地の価格形成要因毎の評定値合計(%単位)を基準値である1に加えて、(1+合計値)の評定値とし、これと標準地の設定価格をコンピュータに入力してデータベースを作成する手段、(価格をp、価格形成要因を街路a、接近b、環境cとする)
価格を目的変数、価格形成要因評定値を説明変数として、この対数をとり、目的変数の標準化変数Ap、説明変数の標準化変数Ai(i=a,b,c)を算定し、目的変数と説明変数、及び説明変数相互の相関係数Ri、rijを算定する手段、
個々の標準地のApを含むAiの3変数の全ての組合わせ(i=(p、a、b)、(p、a、c)、(p、b、c))について、正負符号が全て同じであるAp、Ai(同調性)を非同調性Ap’,Ai’とに区別する手段、
同調性標準地について、例えば、3変数の組み合わせがAp、Aa、Abの場合、まず、ApとAaについて、その数値比較を行い、絶対値の低い数値を限度に、これを目的変数p媒介の同調部分としてAaから除去する手段、
除去前の同調Aaの絶対値の総和と除去後の絶対値の総和の比率を求め、同調Aa、非同調Aa’の数値を均衡させるため、両者の除去前Aa数値に乗じて訂正Ataを求める手段、
これと同様の計算をAp、Abについて行い、訂正Atbを求め、訂正Ataと訂正Atbを乗じて、要因a,bの相関係数rabを求める手段、
前段の算定を他の全ての3変数の組み合わせについて行って、rac、rbcを求め、相関行列を作成して、重相関分析の正規方程式様式の3元連立方程式を作成する手段、
この3元連立方程式を解いて、各説明変数の偏回帰係数を求め、この偏回帰係数による目的変数の一次式から対数の回帰価格を求め、これを還元して目的変数の価格を求める手段、
求めた回帰価格を、初期設定価格の平均値、標準偏差と同じ水準にする手段
を備えたことを特徴とする標準宅地の最終価格を求める装置。
Add the total value (%) for each price formation factor of many standard sites to the standard value of 1 to give a rating value of (1 + total value), and enter this and the standard site set price into the computer Means for creating a database (p is the price, the price formation factor is street a, approach b, environment c)
Taking the logarithm with the price as the objective variable and the price formation factor rating value as the explanatory variable, the standardized variable Ap of the objective variable and the standardized variable Ai (i = a, b, c) of the explanatory variable are calculated, and the objective variable and explanation Means for calculating correlation coefficients Ri and rij between variables and explanatory variables;
For all combinations of three variables of Ai including Ap of each standard place (i = (p, a, b), (p, a, c ), (p, b, c)) Means for distinguishing Ap, Ai (synchronization) being the same from asynchronous Ap ′, Ai ′;
For example, if the combination of three variables is Ap, Aa, Ab, the numerical value comparison is first performed for Ap and Aa. Means to remove from Aa as a tuning part,
The ratio of the sum of the absolute values of the tuning Aa before removal and the sum of the absolute values after removal is obtained, and in order to balance the numerical values of the tuning Aa and the non-tuning Aa ′, the correction Ata is obtained by multiplying both of the Aa values before removal. means,
Means for performing the same calculation for Ap and Ab, obtaining the correction Atb, multiplying the correction Ata and the correction Atb, and obtaining the correlation coefficient lab of the factors a and b,
Means for performing the previous calculation for all other three variable combinations, obtaining rac and rbc, creating a correlation matrix, and creating a ternary simultaneous equation in the normal equation format of multiple correlation analysis;
Means for solving the ternary simultaneous equations, obtaining a partial regression coefficient of each explanatory variable, obtaining a logarithmic regression price from a linear expression of the objective variable based on the partial regression coefficient, and reducing the logarithm to obtain a price of the objective variable;
Means to make the calculated regression price the same level as the average value and standard deviation of the default price
A device that calculates the final price of a standard residential land characterized by having
個々の標準地のApを含む要因Aiの3変数の全ての組み合わせ(i=(p、a、b)、(p,a、c)、(p、b、c))の正負符号が、全て同符号であるAi(同調性)を、どれかが異符号であるAi’(非同調性)と区別する手段を備えた請求項1に記載された装置The signs of all the combinations of the three variables of the factor Ai including Ap of each standard place (i = (p, a, b), (p, a, c), (p, b, c)) are all 2. An apparatus according to claim 1, comprising means for distinguishing Ai (tunability) of the same sign from Ai ′ (non-tunability) of which are different signs. 同調性標準地について、例えば、3変数の組み合せがAp、Aa、Abの場合、まず、ApとAaを取り上げて、その数値比較を行い、絶対値の低い数値を目的変数p媒介の同調部分としてAaから除去する手段を備えた請求項1に記載された装置For example, if the combination of three variables is Ap, Aa, Ab, for the synchronization standard place, first take Ap and Aa and compare their numerical values. The apparatus of claim 1 comprising means for removal from Aa. Ap,Aaの組み合わせで、同調性Aa,非同調性Aa’の数値を均衡させるため、除去前の同調性Aaの絶対値の総和に対する、除去後の絶対値の総和の比率を求め、同調、非同調の除去前Aa数値に乗じて訂正Ataを求める手段を備えた請求項1に記載された装置In order to balance the numerical values of the synchrony Aa and the non-synchronization Aa ′ with the combination of Ap and Aa, the ratio of the sum of the absolute values after the removal to the sum of the absolute values of the synchrony Aa before the removal is obtained, The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising means for multiplying the unsynchronized pre-removal Aa value to determine a corrected Ata. Ap、Aa及びAbの組み合わせについて、求めた訂正Ataと訂正Atbとを乗じて、相関行列の非対角要素rabを算定する手段を備えた請求項1に記載された装置The apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising means for calculating a non-diagonal element lab of the correlation matrix by multiplying the obtained correction Ata and the correction Atb for the combination of Ap, Aa, and Ab. 同調部分除去後の相関行列によって求めた回帰価格を、初期設定価格の平均値、標準偏差と同じ水準にする最終価格を求める手段を備えた請求項1に記載された装置The apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising means for obtaining a final price at which the regression price obtained by the correlation matrix after removal of the tuning part is the same level as the average value and standard deviation of the initial setting price. 目的変数pと説明変数iの単相関係数Riを同調相当分として、Aiから一括除去して得られたAi(1−Ri)の各要因の相乗rij(1−Ri)(1−Rj)を非対角要素とする相関行列で偏回帰係数を算定する簡便法1の算定手段を備えた請求項1に記載された装置。 A single correlation coefficient Ri between the objective variable p and the explanatory variable i is used as a tuned equivalent, and a synergistic rij (1-Ri) (1-Rj) of each factor of Ai (1-Ri) obtained by collectively removing from Ai. The apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising a simple method 1 calculating means for calculating a partial regression coefficient using a correlation matrix having a non-diagonal element as a diagonal element . 価格形成要因間に理論的、経験的に有意の相関がなく、また、単相関係数Ri,Rjが高い数値であるため、i、j要因相互にAp媒介の高い相関が考えられる場合、それらの説明変数の相関係数rijを0として偏回帰係数を求める簡便法2の算定手段を備えた請求項1に記載された装置If there is no theoretically or empirically significant correlation between price formation factors, and the single correlation coefficient Ri, Rj is a high value, if there is a high Ap-mediated correlation between i, j factors The apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising a calculating means of a simple method 2 for obtaining a partial regression coefficient with a correlation coefficient rij of the explanatory variable of 0 as 0.
JP2009190501A 2009-07-29 2009-07-29 Equipment that evaluates appropriate standard residential land by regression analysis that eliminates "multicollinearity" Expired - Fee Related JP5120820B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2009190501A JP5120820B2 (en) 2009-07-29 2009-07-29 Equipment that evaluates appropriate standard residential land by regression analysis that eliminates "multicollinearity"

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2009190501A JP5120820B2 (en) 2009-07-29 2009-07-29 Equipment that evaluates appropriate standard residential land by regression analysis that eliminates "multicollinearity"

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2011034542A JP2011034542A (en) 2011-02-17
JP5120820B2 true JP5120820B2 (en) 2013-01-16

Family

ID=43763512

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2009190501A Expired - Fee Related JP5120820B2 (en) 2009-07-29 2009-07-29 Equipment that evaluates appropriate standard residential land by regression analysis that eliminates "multicollinearity"

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5120820B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2013211012A (en) * 2013-02-12 2013-10-10 Masahiro Shirai Device for solution by applying multiple regression analysis of "multicollinearity" cancellation to analysis of relationship between sales amount as industrial effect and sales cost as cause

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR101257689B1 (en) 2013-01-04 2013-04-24 국방과학연구소 Apparatus and method for calculating explosive equation according gunpowder composition ratio
CN110781538B (en) * 2019-09-29 2024-01-19 天津大学 Windowing simulation algorithm based on field monitoring

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3301247B2 (en) * 1994-12-28 2002-07-15 株式会社豊田中央研究所 Method and apparatus for estimating true density of material, and method for estimating cavity amount of material
JP5145933B2 (en) * 2007-12-10 2013-02-20 雅浩 白井 A device that evaluates standard housing land by regression analysis to eliminate "multi-collinearity" and interactive adjustment of price vs. price formation factors

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2013211012A (en) * 2013-02-12 2013-10-10 Masahiro Shirai Device for solution by applying multiple regression analysis of "multicollinearity" cancellation to analysis of relationship between sales amount as industrial effect and sales cost as cause

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2011034542A (en) 2011-02-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Haskel et al. Public support for innovation, intangible investment and productivity growth in the UK market sector
CN111507822A (en) Enterprise risk assessment method based on feature engineering
CN113139191B (en) Statistical method for bug disposal repair priority
JP5120820B2 (en) Equipment that evaluates appropriate standard residential land by regression analysis that eliminates "multicollinearity"
Scofield Energy star building benchmarking scores: good idea, bad science
JP2022074315A (en) Integration apparatus, integration method, and integration program
CN110689382A (en) Information processing method and device, computer storage medium and terminal
Sarracino et al. Bias and efficiency loss in regression estimates due to duplicated observations: a Monte Carlo simulation
TW201224428A (en) A method computer program and system to analyze mass spectra
Nguyen et al. An analysis of trends in productivity and cost drivers over years
Hall et al. Institutions-growth spatial dependence: an empirical test
Cardoso et al. Assessing corporate risk: a PD model based on credit ratings
Celik Mechanism design with weaker incentive compatibility constraints
JP2009271564A (en) Measures analysis evaluation system and measures analysis evaluation program
Etuk et al. ARIMA fit to Nigerian unemployment data
Matas‐Mir et al. The effect of seasonal adjustment on the properties of business cycle regimes
Chantathaweewat The contagion effect: a case study of China and ASEAN countries
Constantinescu et al. Unemployment or credit: Which one holds the potential? Results for a small open economy with a low degree of financialization
Motlhasedi et al. The effects of mass media on corruption in South Africa: A MTAR-TEC persepctive
Joenssen Testing for benford's law: A monte carlo comparison of methods
Duarte On the relationship between quality assurance and productivity in software companies
JP5585921B2 (en) A device that uses multiple regression analysis to eliminate "multiple collinearity" to analyze the relationship between sales, etc., which are industrial achievements, and sales expenses, etc., as the cause.
Bekhradi et al. In vivo in Situ experimentation projects by innovative cleantech start-ups in Paris
Lockwood et al. Smoothing across time in repeated cross‐sectional data
Pødenphant et al. The Mixed Assessor Model and the multiplicative mixed model

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20111004

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20111128

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20120626

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20120726

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20121009

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20121015

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20151102

Year of fee payment: 3

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Ref document number: 5120820

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees