Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP5145933B2 - A device that evaluates standard housing land by regression analysis to eliminate "multi-collinearity" and interactive adjustment of price vs. price formation factors - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP5145933B2 - A device that evaluates standard housing land by regression analysis to eliminate "multi-collinearity" and interactive adjustment of price vs. price formation factors - Google Patents

A device that evaluates standard housing land by regression analysis to eliminate "multi-collinearity" and interactive adjustment of price vs. price formation factors Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP5145933B2
JP5145933B2 JP2007341733A JP2007341733A JP5145933B2 JP 5145933 B2 JP5145933 B2 JP 5145933B2 JP 2007341733 A JP2007341733 A JP 2007341733A JP 2007341733 A JP2007341733 A JP 2007341733A JP 5145933 B2 JP5145933 B2 JP 5145933B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
price
factor
value
land
regression
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2007341733A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2009140462A (en
Inventor
雅浩 白井
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to JP2007341733A priority Critical patent/JP5145933B2/en
Publication of JP2009140462A publication Critical patent/JP2009140462A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5145933B2 publication Critical patent/JP5145933B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Description

本発明は、多重共線性を解消する回帰分析の技術によって、標準宅地の適正な格差の評価及びその価格形成要因評定基準を決定する装置である。  The present invention is an apparatus for evaluating an appropriate disparity of a standard residential land and determining its price formation factor evaluation criteria by a regression analysis technique that eliminates multicollinearity.

宅地の鑑定評価の主要な方式である取引事例比較法は、近隣地域にある取引事例価格と価格形成要因による比較を行って対象地の価格を求める。しかし、宅地の売買取引の当事者は土地市場に精通しているとは言えず、また、個人の事情に左右されるため、成立した価格は宅地の適正と思われる価格から乖離する場合が多いので、取引事例価格に適正な価格格差を期待することはできない。  The transaction case comparison method, which is the main method of appraisal evaluation of residential land, obtains the price of the target site by comparing the transaction case price in the neighborhood with the price formation factor. However, the parties to buying and selling residential land are not familiar with the land market, and because it depends on individual circumstances, the established price often deviates from the price deemed appropriate for the residential land. Therefore, it is not possible to expect an appropriate price gap for the transaction case price.

価格格差評定基準として「土地価格比準表」が公表されており、更に、毎年地価公示法による地価公示、国土利用計画法施行令による地価調査が行われていて、評価の指針となっている。しかし、これらの公的評価は価格表示だけで、専門家である鑑定士の評価合議による価格という妥当性の担保があるものの、標準地相互の価格格差についての価格形成要因による客観的、合理的根拠が明示されていない。  The “land price comparison table” is published as a price disparity evaluation standard, and further, annual land price announcements by the Land Price Public Notice Act and land price surveys by the National Land Use Planning Act Enforcement Ordinance are being used as a guideline for evaluation. . However, these public evaluations are price indications only, and although there is a guarantee of the price as a result of an expert appraisal by an expert appraiser, it is objective and rational due to price formation factors regarding price differences between standard sites. The grounds are not specified.

価格格差の均衡は、宅地の価格形成要因に基づいて行われなければならないが、採用された要因の格差評定基準がどのようなものであっても、適当に操作することにより、それなりに価格格差序列を作ることができる。だから、価格形成要因に基づく価格格差評定基準によった評価というだけでは妥当性の保証はない。  The price disparity must be balanced based on the price formation factors of the residential land, but no matter what the disparity evaluation criteria of the adopted factors are, the price disparity as such can be adjusted appropriately. You can make an order. Therefore, there is no guarantee of validity just by the evaluation based on the price difference evaluation standard based on the price formation factor.

以上の事情から、宅地課税のための標準宅地評価のように、多様で、かつ、多数の宅地の適正な価格格差を求めるために、価格形成要因を説明変数とし、一次的に評価された価格を目的変数とする重回帰分析が行われる。  Based on the above circumstances, in order to determine the appropriate price gap between multiple and many residential land, as in the standard housing land evaluation for housing land taxation, the price formation factor is used as an explanatory variable, and the price that is primarily evaluated A multiple regression analysis with the objective variable is performed.

単筆の鑑定評価では、用途別に、各用途では種類別に価格形成要因の格差評定基準が使用される。しかし、広い範囲の多数の標準宅地評価では、一元的統一的価格格差を求めるために、単一の基準によることが望ましい。このため広い範囲に適応できる評定基準とこれを補完する手段が必要である。  In the appraisal of a single brush, the disparity rating standard for price formation factors is used for each application and for each application. However, in a large number of standard residential land evaluations, it is desirable to use a single standard in order to obtain a unified and unified price gap. For this reason, a rating standard that can be applied to a wide range and a means for complementing it are necessary.

重相関係数は、相互に相関関係にある説明変数が一つの集団全体として、目的変数をどの程度説明できるかを示すもので、重回帰式は個々の説明変数それぞれが独立して目的変数をどの程度説明できるかを目的としていない。  The multiple correlation coefficient indicates the extent to which the explanatory variables that are correlated with each other can explain the objective variable as a whole group. In the multiple regression equation, each explanatory variable independently represents the objective variable. It is not aimed at how much you can explain.

しかし、宅地の鑑定評価では、目的変数である地価に対して、個々の説明変数である価格形成要因にどの程度の説明力があるかを求めたい。ただ、社会現象である価格形成要因には相互に高い相関があるので、目的変数である地価を説明できる程度を示す各要因の偏回帰係数が鑑定評価の実務経験の数値から乖離する“多重共線性”問題が生じる。そして、説明変数の数が多く、更に、実用には、0.93程度の高い重相関係数が求められる標準宅地評価では、一層この傾向が強まる。その極端な例は、“幅員が広いほど地価が低い”といった理論、常識に反する偏回帰係数が求められることがある。  However, in appraisal evaluation of residential land, we would like to find out how much explanatory power the price formation factors, which are individual explanatory variables, have with respect to land prices, which are objective variables. However, since price formation factors, which are social phenomena, have a high correlation with each other, the multiple regression coefficient of each factor indicating the extent to which the land price that is the objective variable can be explained deviates from the value of practical experience of appraisal evaluation. "Linearity" problem arises. This tendency is further strengthened in standard residential land evaluation in which the number of explanatory variables is large and, in practice, a high multiple correlation coefficient of about 0.93 is required. An extreme example is a partial regression coefficient that is contrary to theories and common sense that “the wider the width, the lower the land price”.

“多重共線性”の解決には、高い相関係数の二つの説明変数のどちらかを省くやり方があるが、宅地の評価では理論、経験により選択された価格形成要因のどれかを省くことは、それが主要因であれば容認できることではない。また、相関行列の対角要素に一定数を加えて、安定的偏回帰係数とする次の論文の方法があるが、追加数値をどこで打ち切るか曖昧で、この点に批判がある。
Arthur E.Hoer and Robert W.Kennard “Ridge regression”
To solve “multicollinearity”, one of the two explanatory variables with a high correlation coefficient can be omitted. However, in the evaluation of residential land, it is not possible to omit one of the price formation factors selected by theory and experience. If that is the main factor, it is not acceptable. In addition, there is a method in the following paper that adds a certain number to the diagonal elements of the correlation matrix to obtain a stable partial regression coefficient.
Arthur E.M. Hoer and Robert W. Kennard “Ridge regression”

土地の効用を示す価格形成要因の評定基準は、地方、地域により、また、用途、により異なる。「土地価格比準表」にも、宅地、商業地、工業地、宅地見込地等の用途別に、宅地は更に優良、標準、混在、造成、農家集落、別荘地別に細分化して規定している。広範囲の標準宅地の全体的価格均衡を図るには単一の評定基準が好ましく、これを補完する手段が必要である。  The criteria for evaluating the price-forming factors that indicate the utility of land vary by region, region, and use. The “Land Price Ratio” also stipulates the residential land, commercial land, industrial land, prospective land, etc. according to the purpose of use, such as better, standard, mixed, creation, farm village, villa land. . A single grading standard is preferred and a means of complementing this is needed to achieve an overall price balance for a wide range of standard housing estates.

本発明は、市町全域を住、商、工の用途に、更に各用途を状況類似地域に区分した代表性のある標準宅地の価格を、それぞれの標準宅地の価格形成要因は街路条件等の大項目別に、説明力の大きい主要因と小さい従要因に分類し、従要因の細項目は経験的基準により求められた%単位の評定値の条件毎の合計値を、主要因は別に定められた評定基準による%単位の評定値を、その計測値と共にコンピュータに入力しデータベースを作成する手段、In the present invention, the price of standard residential land with representativeness that divides the entire municipality into residential, commercial, and industrial uses, and further divides each usage into situation-similar areas, and the price formation factor of each standard residential land is large, such as street conditions. Each item is classified into a main factor with a large explanatory power and a subordinate factor with a small explanatory power. A method for creating a database by inputting the rating value in% units based on the rating standard into the computer together with the measured value,
価格形成要因は大項目の条件毎に評定値の合計値に基準値である1を加えて、(1+合計値)とし、標準宅地毎に価格、条件別に対数をとる手段、The price formation factor is a means of adding 1 as the reference value to the total value of the rating value for each condition of the large item to (1 + total value), and taking a logarithm for each standard residential land price and condition,
対数とした価格を目的変数とし、対数とした条件毎の価格形成要因を説明変数とする重回帰分析で、変数を標準化して正規方程式の相関行列を作る手段、In the multiple regression analysis with the logarithmic price as the objective variable and the price formation factor for each logarithmic condition as the explanatory variable, a means to standardize the variable and create a correlation matrix of the normal equation,
相関行列の非対角要索rijを、i,j要因の価格に対する単相関係数Ri,Rjを利用して、rij(1−RiRj)と変更して、価格媒介の見かけの相関部分を除去し、rijの相関係数値を下げることにより、偏回帰係数biの数値を評価経験から予想する数値に近いRiの数値に近づけて、“多重共線性”を解消して、適切な価格形成要因の比重である偏回帰係数biを求め、これから目的変数である価格の対数を還元して回帰価格を求める手段、The non-diagonal search rij of the correlation matrix is changed to rij (1-RiRj) using the single correlation coefficients Ri and Rj for the prices of the i and j factors, and the apparent correlation part of price mediation is removed. By reducing the correlation coefficient value of rij, the numerical value of the partial regression coefficient bi is brought close to the numerical value of Ri that is expected from the evaluation experience, the “multicollinearity” is eliminated, and the appropriate price formation factor Means for obtaining a partial regression coefficient bi which is a specific gravity and calculating a regression price by reducing the logarithm of a price which is an objective variable;
設定価格と回帰価格の開差率及び全ての主要因を基準とした設定価格、回帰価格及び価格形成要因の数値昇順配列表を作成する手段を備えたことを特徴とする標準宅地を評価する装置に関する。A device for evaluating a standard residential land, characterized by comprising means for creating a numerical price ascending order list of the set price, regression price and price formation factor based on the opening rate of the set price and the regression price and all the main factors About.

価格を目的変数、価格形成要因を説明変数とする重回帰分析を行う。(2変数の例)
正規方程式から、変数を標準化して、相関行列の形式の正規方程式を求める。
変数の標準化:(変数−変数の平均)/変数の標準偏差

Figure 0005145933
ここで、
Ri :要因iの目的変数yに対する単相関係数
Rj :要因jの目的変数yに対する単相関係数
rij:相関行列の非対角要素 (i≠j)
bi :標準化後の係数 b’i :標準化前の係数
σy :目的変数yの標準偏差
σi :説明変数iの標準偏差
なお、標準化前後のb’i、biの関係は次のとおりである。
b’i=bi(σy/σi) (2)Perform multiple regression analysis with price as objective variable and price formation factor as explanatory variable. (Example of two variables)
From the normal equation, variables are standardized to obtain a normal equation in the form of a correlation matrix.
Standardization of variables: (variable-average of variables) / standard deviation of variables
Figure 0005145933
here,
Ri: Single correlation coefficient for objective variable y of factor i Rj: Single correlation coefficient for objective variable y of factor j rij: Non-diagonal element of correlation matrix (i ≠ j)
bi: coefficient after standardization b′i: coefficient before standardization σy: standard deviation of objective variable y σi: standard deviation of explanatory variable i The relationship between b′i and bi before and after standardization is as follows.
b′i = bi (σy / σi) (2)

説明変数は目的変数である地価を説明できる要因で、その説明力の高いものを選択される。その結果、この説明変数と地価との単相関係数は高くなるが、このため選択された説明変数相互の間に、本来の相関がないにもかかわらず、いわば地価を媒介として見かけの説明変数相互の相関が高くなる。この傾向は、説明変数と地価との単相関係数に比例すると考えられるので、この地価媒介の相関部分を除去するため次のような処理をする。
r’12 =r12(1−R1R2) (3)
よって、(3)式は次のようになる。

Figure 0005145933
この処理により、r’ijの数値が低く抑えられるので、“多重共線性”が解消される。The explanatory variable is a factor that can explain the land price that is the objective variable, and the explanatory variable is selected with high explanatory power. As a result, the single correlation coefficient between the explanatory variable and the land price becomes high. For this reason, although there is no original correlation between the selected explanatory variables, the apparent explanatory variable is mediated by the land price. Mutual correlation increases. Since this tendency is considered to be proportional to the single correlation coefficient between the explanatory variable and the land price, the following processing is performed to remove this land price-mediated correlation part.
r′12 = r12 (1-R1R2) (3)
Therefore, Equation (3) is as follows.
Figure 0005145933
By this processing, the numerical value of r′ij can be kept low, so that “multiple collinearity” is eliminated.

なお、この価格媒介の説明変数間の相関は、“多重共線性”のように説明変数相互に高い相関のある場合だけでなく、多少の相関があればそれだけの相関が生ずるので、説明変数間の相関の高低に拘わらずこの除去処理をシステムに取り入れる。  This correlation between explanatory variables for price mediation is not only in the case where there is a high correlation between explanatory variables such as “multicollinearity”, but if there is a slight correlation, that correlation will be generated. This removal process is incorporated into the system regardless of the level of correlation.

多様、かつ、多数の宅地の適正な価格を求める評価では、住、商、工の用途は別としても、同用途で形態の異なる多様の宅地が入り乱れて存在しているので、一元的な地域格差とするためには単一の評定基準でなければならないが、これを補完する調整手段が必要である。  In an evaluation that seeks reasonable prices for a variety of housing lots, there are various housing lots with different forms in the same usage, apart from the use of housing, commerce, and construction. In order to make a disparity, it must be a single evaluation standard, but an adjustment means to complement this is necessary.

次の手段により修補正を行う。
1 回帰線価格との開差率、及び主たる要因である幅員、中心地までの距離、環境等を基準とする数値の小なるものから、大なるものへと配列した多くの昇順配列表を作成する。
2 回帰線価格との開差率の配列では、例えば、+プラス、−マイナス10%以上の標準宅地(不適宅地)に色分け、ないし印をつける。
3 要因別配列表で、不適宅地の当該要因に対する特徴の吟味、及び個別の実地調査により、次のような項目について開差を解消するための修補正を行う。
イ 評定基準の修正
評定関数の訂正
評定ランク数の増減
評定数値の増減 (価格幅と評定値幅の対応の適否を含む)
ロ ランク評定の訂正
ハ 価格の訂正
ニ 価格形成要因の加除
The correction is made by the following means.
1. Create a number of ascending arrangements arranged from small numbers to large ones based on the opening ratio with the regression line price, the main factors such as width, distance to the center, environment, etc. To do.
2. In the arrangement of the opening rate with the regression line price, for example, + plus or minus minus 10% or more of standard residential land (unsuitable residential land) is color-coded or marked.
3 In the arrangement table by factor, the following items will be corrected and corrected by examining the characteristics of the unsuitable residential land for the factor and conducting individual field surveys.
Correction of rating standard
Correction of grade function
Increase or decrease the number of rating ranks
Increase / decrease of rating constant value (including suitability between price range and rating range)
(B) Correction of rank rating c Correction of price

相関行列の非対角要素であるrijから、目的変数媒介の相関部分を除去することにより、“多重共線性”が解消し、また、より広い地域に適応できる価格形成要因の評定基準を設定することができて、多数地点の地価格差が適切になるとともに、単筆の鑑定評価に対しても有効な基準となる。  By removing the objective variable-mediated correlation part from rij which is a non-diagonal element of the correlation matrix, "multi-collinearity" is eliminated, and pricing criteria for pricing factors that can be adapted to a wider area are set. This makes the difference in land prices at multiple points appropriate, and is also an effective standard for single-stroke appraisals.

図2関連
設定価格、価格形成要因評定値とその対数の表である。鑑定評価では比較の基準となる宅地を1として、対象地の効用がその何%上、ないしは下であるかを比較するので、評定式は(1+xi)の形となる。よって、多数地点の比較でも、次のような割合であって、差ではないので、線形式である回帰分析を適用する場合は変数を対数にする。
(y1/y2)=(1+x1)/(1+x2)
対数 log(y1/y2)=log(y1)−log(y2)
ここで、y1 :評価対象地
y2 :評価基準地
Fig. 2 is a table of set prices, price formation factor ratings, and their logarithms. In the appraisal evaluation, the residential land serving as a reference for comparison is set to 1, and the percentage of the utility of the target land is compared to the lower or higher, so the evaluation formula has the form (1 + xi). Therefore, even when comparing multiple points, the ratio is as follows and is not a difference. Therefore, when applying regression analysis in a linear format, the variable is made logarithm.
(Y1 / y2) = (1 + x1) / (1 + x2)
Logarithm log (y1 / y2) = log (y1) −log (y2)
Where y1: Evaluation target site
y2: Evaluation reference site

設定価格は通常の鑑定評価手法により求めたものを使用する。  The set price is obtained by the ordinary appraisal method.

図3関連
重回帰分析に適用される価格形成要因の格差評定基準は当初は経験的に設定する。ただし、調整作業を行うことにより、格差評定基準の不備を修正する。
Related to Figure 3 The inequality criteria for price formation factors applied to the multiple regression analysis are initially set empirically. However, adjustments will be made to correct deficiencies in disparity assessment standards.

多数地点の価格格差を求める重回帰分析は、単に評価の裏づけとなる価格形成要因の評定値を求めるだけでなく、価格そのもの及び評定基準の妥当性を検証するものである。  The multiple regression analysis to find the price difference at multiple points is not only to obtain the rating value of the price forming factor that supports the evaluation, but also to verify the validity of the price itself and the rating standard.

図4関連
重回帰分析の計算は、説明変数間の相関係数rijに対して、目的変数媒介の見せかけの相関部分を除去する以外は特に異ならない。
The calculation of the multiple regression analysis related to FIG. 4 is not particularly different from the correlation coefficient rij between the explanatory variables, except that the apparent correlation portion mediated by the objective variable is removed.

図5関連
回帰分析の計算により、価格形成要因による理論的性格の回帰価格が求められるが、これだけではどこを修補正すべきか、直ちには判断できない。また、この修補正は主要因全てについて網羅的に行う必要がある。
Relevant to Figure 5 Regression analysis calculations give a recurring price that has a theoretical character based on price-forming factors, but it is not possible to immediately determine where this should be corrected. In addition, this correction needs to be performed comprehensively for all the main factors.

図6関連
回帰価格、設定価格、価格形成要因についての価格開差率基準と中心地までの距離基準の昇順配列表である。この図の中心地までの距離基準では、遠隔地の回帰価格が設定価格より低いという特徴があり、評定基準について特に遠隔距離による下落率を小さくする修正を行う。特に集団としての不適事情の認められないものについては、回帰価格と設定価格の開差の大きいものから個別に調査し、修補正する。
FIG. 6 is an ascending arrangement table of price difference rate criteria and distance criteria to the center for regression price, set price, and price formation factor. The distance standard to the center of this figure has a feature that the return price of the remote area is lower than the set price, and the rating standard is particularly modified to reduce the rate of decline due to the remote distance. In particular, if there are no unacceptable circumstances as a group, we will investigate and correct each item with a large difference between the return price and the set price.

図7関連
価格対価格形成要因の対話的調整結果の表である。中心地までの距離評定基準の評点逓減率を大きく減少させたため、遠隔地の回帰価格の開差が改善された。また、回帰価格と設定価格の開差の大きな宅地について、個別に再吟味し、価格形成要因の環境要因と設定価格について、評定見直しを行ったため開差が改善され、重相関係数も最初の0.84から0.96に上昇した。
FIG. 7 is a table of interactive adjustment results of price vs. price formation factors. The reduction rate of the return price in the remote area has been improved because the rate reduction rate of the distance rating standard to the center has been greatly reduced. In addition, the housing land with a large difference between the return price and the set price was reviewed individually, and the environmental factors and the set price of the price formation factor were reviewed to improve the open range. It rose from 0.84 to 0.96.

“多重共線性”解消の重回帰分析と設定価格対価格形成要因の対話的調整フローチャート  Multiple regression analysis of "multicollinearity" cancellation and interactive adjustment flowchart of set price versus price formation factor 設定価格、価格形成要因評定値とその対数  Set price, price formation factor rating value and its logarithm 主要因価格格差評定基準  Main factor price inequality rating criteria 重回帰分析計算  Multiple regression analysis calculation 回帰価格  Return price 回帰価格開差率及び中心地距離基準の昇順配列表  Recurring price opening ratio and center distance standard ascending order 価格対価格形成要因の対話的調整結果  Results of interactive adjustment of price vs. price formation factors

Claims (1)

市町全域を住、商、工の用途に、更に各用途を状況類似地域に区分した代表性のある標準宅地の価格を、それぞれの標準宅地の価格形成要因は街路条件等の大項目別に、説明力の大きい主要因と小さい従要因に分類し、従要因の細項目は経験的基準により求められた%単位の評定値の条件毎の合計値を、主要因は別に定められた評定基準による%単位の評定値を、その計測値と共にコンピュータに入力しデータベースを作成する手段、
価格形成要因は大項目の条件毎に評定値の合計値に基準値である1を加えて、(1+合計値)とし、標準宅地毎に価格、条件別に対数をとる手段、
対数とした価格を目的変数とし、対数とした条件毎の価格形成要因を説明変数とする重回帰分析で、変数を標準化して正規方程式の相関行列を作る手段、
相関行列の非対角要素rijを、i,j要因の価格に対する単相関係数Ri,Rjを利用して、rij(1−RiRj)と変更して、価格媒介の見かけの相関部分を除去し、rijの相関係数値を下げることにより、偏回帰係数biの数値を評価経験から予想する数値に近いRiの数値に近づけて、“多重共線性”を解消して、適切な価格形成要因の比重である偏回帰係数biを求め、これから目的変数である価格の対数を還元して回帰価格を求める手段、
設定価格と回帰価格の開差率及び全ての主要因を基準とした設定価格、回帰価格及び価格形成要因の数値昇順配列表を作成する手段を備えたことを特徴とする標準宅地を評価する装置。
The price of standard residential land with representativeness that divides the entire municipality into residential, commercial, and industrial uses, and further divided each usage into situation-similar areas, and the price formation factors for each standard residential land are explained by major items such as street conditions The main factor is classified into a major factor and a minor minor factor, and the minor factor sub-item is the total value of each rating value obtained by empirical criteria for each condition, and the major factor is a percentage based on a separate rating criterion. A means to create a database by inputting the unit rating value together with the measured value into a computer,
The price formation factor is a means of adding 1 as the reference value to the total value of the rating value for each condition of the large item to (1 + total value), and taking a logarithm for each standard residential land price and condition,
In the multiple regression analysis with the logarithmic price as the objective variable and the price formation factor for each logarithmic condition as the explanatory variable, a means to standardize the variable and create a correlation matrix of the normal equation,
The off-diagonal element rij of the correlation matrix is changed to rij (1-RiRj) using the single correlation coefficient Ri, Rj for the price of the i, j factor to remove the apparent correlation part of the price medium. By reducing the correlation coefficient value of rij, the value of the partial regression coefficient bi is brought closer to the value of Ri that is expected from the evaluation experience, the “multicollinearity” is eliminated, and the specific gravity of the appropriate price formation factor Means for obtaining a partial regression coefficient bi and reducing the logarithm of the price as a target variable to obtain a regression price,
A device for evaluating a standard residential land, characterized by comprising means for creating a numerical price ascending order list of the set price, regression price and price formation factor based on the opening rate of the set price and the regression price and all the main factors .
JP2007341733A 2007-12-10 2007-12-10 A device that evaluates standard housing land by regression analysis to eliminate "multi-collinearity" and interactive adjustment of price vs. price formation factors Expired - Fee Related JP5145933B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2007341733A JP5145933B2 (en) 2007-12-10 2007-12-10 A device that evaluates standard housing land by regression analysis to eliminate "multi-collinearity" and interactive adjustment of price vs. price formation factors

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2007341733A JP5145933B2 (en) 2007-12-10 2007-12-10 A device that evaluates standard housing land by regression analysis to eliminate "multi-collinearity" and interactive adjustment of price vs. price formation factors

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2009140462A JP2009140462A (en) 2009-06-25
JP5145933B2 true JP5145933B2 (en) 2013-02-20

Family

ID=40870966

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2007341733A Expired - Fee Related JP5145933B2 (en) 2007-12-10 2007-12-10 A device that evaluates standard housing land by regression analysis to eliminate "multi-collinearity" and interactive adjustment of price vs. price formation factors

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5145933B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5120820B2 (en) * 2009-07-29 2013-01-16 雅浩 白井 Equipment that evaluates appropriate standard residential land by regression analysis that eliminates "multicollinearity"

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2009140462A (en) 2009-06-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Fregonara et al. Energy performance certificates in the Turin real estate market
Lorenz et al. Exploring the relationship between the sustainability of construction and market value: Theoretical basics and initial empirical results from the residential property sector
Davis et al. Modelling the effect of energy performance certificate rating on property value in the Belfast housing market
Faraia et al. Public versus private water utilities: empirical evidence for Brazilian companies
JP2020523657A (en) Method and system for evaluating vendors
US20150178866A1 (en) Method and system for aggregating and analyzing building permits
Donner et al. Forced sales and their impact on real estate prices
Salvo et al. Property prices index numbers and derived indices
Tomal The impact of macro factors on apartment prices in Polish counties: A two-stage quantile spatial regression approach
Liu et al. Enterprise system implementation and cash flow volatility
Bombardini et al. The increasing cost of buying American
Zhao et al. Usage and exposures at default of corporate credit lines: an empirical study
Bernardini Papalia et al. Trade costs in bilateral trade flows: Heterogeneity and zeroes in structural gravity models
Nugrahani et al. The effect of industry type, government pressure, and company size to disclosure of sustainability report
Can The impact of auditor qualifications on earnings management of companies listed on the Borsa Istanbul Industrial Index
JP5145933B2 (en) A device that evaluates standard housing land by regression analysis to eliminate "multi-collinearity" and interactive adjustment of price vs. price formation factors
Lopez et al. Air Pollution and Rent Prices: Evidence from Wildfire Smoke Plumes
Kim et al. Effect of anti-price gouging law on postdisaster recovery speed: Evidence from reconstruction in Virginia and Maryland after Hurricane Sandy
Filippova et al. Office market response to earthquake risk in New Zealand
Groves et al. Effectiveness of RCA institutions to limit local externalities: Using foreclosure data to test covenant effectiveness
Tilley Causes, effects and indicators of design and documentation deficiency
Levá et al. The assessment of forestry companies in the Czech Republic with focus on profitability.
Pless et al. The price-concentration relationship in early residential solar third-party markets
Faishal Ibrahim et al. Automated valuation model: an application to the public housing resale market in Singapore
DeFusco et al. Changes in the information efficiency of stock prices: Additional evidence

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20081217

A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20081222

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20090316

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20110125

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20110320

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20111004

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20111128

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20120130

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20120814

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20120920

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20121106

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20121112

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 5145933

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20151207

Year of fee payment: 3

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees