Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP5429768B2 - Fireproof design method for buildings and fireproof buildings - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP5429768B2 - Fireproof design method for buildings and fireproof buildings - Google Patents

Fireproof design method for buildings and fireproof buildings Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP5429768B2
JP5429768B2 JP2007283000A JP2007283000A JP5429768B2 JP 5429768 B2 JP5429768 B2 JP 5429768B2 JP 2007283000 A JP2007283000 A JP 2007283000A JP 2007283000 A JP2007283000 A JP 2007283000A JP 5429768 B2 JP5429768 B2 JP 5429768B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
fire
glass
room
time
duration
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2007283000A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2009108620A (en
Inventor
由華 道越
真太郎 道越
裕 小林
正寿 中村
均 栗岡
富夫 大内
圭一 宮本
秀明 桑名
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Taisei Corp
Kajima Corp
Original Assignee
Taisei Corp
Kajima Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Taisei Corp, Kajima Corp filed Critical Taisei Corp
Priority to JP2007283000A priority Critical patent/JP5429768B2/en
Publication of JP2009108620A publication Critical patent/JP2009108620A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5429768B2 publication Critical patent/JP5429768B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • Building Environments (AREA)

Description

ガラスを用いた防火設備を用いた建築物の耐火設計法及び該設計法にて構築した建築物に関する。   The present invention relates to a fire-resistant design method for buildings using fire prevention equipment using glass and a building constructed by the design method.

例えば、建築基準法施行令が定める、平成12年建設省告示第1433号の耐火性能検証法の手順は、まず火災室(単一室あるいは同時燃焼を想定する複数室)を設定し、屋内で発生する火災の継続時間を室ごとに算定する。しかる後に、火災室に面する主要構造部について、各々の主要構造部に要求される耐火性能(非損傷性・遮熱性・遮炎性)を保持できる限界時間、即ち保有耐火時間を部材単位に算定する。そして、主要構造部の保有耐火時間が火災継続時間以上であれば、性能が満たされると判断され、これらの検証を建築物を構成するすべての主要構造部について行うものである。   For example, the procedure of the fire resistance performance verification method of the Ministry of Construction Notification No. 1433 established by the Building Standards Law Enforcement Ordinance first sets up a fire room (single room or multiple rooms assuming simultaneous combustion) and indoors Calculate the duration of the fire that occurs. After that, for the main structural parts facing the fire room, the limit time that can maintain the fire resistance (non-damage, heat insulation, flame resistance) required for each main structure, that is, the possessed fire resistance time for each member Calculate. If the fireproof time of the main structural part is equal to or longer than the fire duration time, it is determined that the performance is satisfied, and these verifications are performed for all the main structural parts constituting the building.

そして、有効開口因子の算定において有効な開口は、次のa)及びb)の条件を満たすことが必要とされる。
a)火災時に破損するか、確実に開放されるもの。
b)外気との通気経路が確保されるもの。
上記a)の条件において、防火設備、すなわち網入ガラスや耐熱強化ガラス等のガラスを用いた防火装備を設けた開口部は、有効開口因子には算入しないこととされている。
2001年版耐火性能検証法の解説及び計算例とその解説、国土交通省住宅局建築指導課
An effective aperture in the calculation of the effective aperture factor is required to satisfy the following conditions a) and b).
a) It is damaged in the event of a fire or is reliably opened.
b) A ventilation path with outside air is secured.
Under the condition a), an opening provided with fire prevention equipment, that is, fire prevention equipment using glass such as netted glass or heat-resistant tempered glass is not included in the effective opening factor.
Explanation and calculation example of 2001 fire resistance performance verification method, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism

このように、上記耐火性能検証法(以下「告示検証法」という。)によれば、評価時にガラスを用いた防火設備は脱落しないとして取り扱うため、ガラスを用いた防火設備が設置されている室は外気からの流入空気量が少なくなり、燃焼が緩慢になり熱が篭る。そのため、火災継続時間は評価上長時間になり、評価対象室の部材には高い耐火性能が必要とされることから、耐火処理のための費用が高くなる。   As described above, according to the above fire resistance performance verification method (hereinafter referred to as “notification verification method”), fire prevention equipment using glass is handled as not falling off at the time of evaluation. Reduces the amount of inflow air from the outside air, slows down combustion and heats up. For this reason, the fire duration time is long for evaluation, and high fire resistance is required for the members in the evaluation target room, so that the cost for the fire resistance treatment is high.

本発明は、実際の火災においては網入ガラスや耐熱強化ガラス等のガラスを用いた防火装備が脱落することに着目して、上記の問題点を解決するためになされたもので、耐火処理のための費用を低減しつつ、必要とする耐火性能を得ることを目的としている。   The present invention was made in order to solve the above problems, focusing on the fact that fire protection equipment using glass such as netted glass and heat-resistant tempered glass is dropped in an actual fire. The objective is to obtain the required fire resistance performance while reducing the cost for the purpose.

請求項1に係る発明は、特定の火災室の外壁の開口部がガラスを用いた防火設備を有しているとき、当該火災室について、火災発生より前記ガラスを用いた防火設備が脱落するまでの時間を算定し、次いで前記ガラスを用いた防火設備脱落後の屋内火災の継続時間を算定した後、前記火災発生より前記ガラスを用いた防火設備が脱落するまでの時間と前記ガラスを用いた防火設備脱落後の屋内火災の継続時間とを合算して、前記特定の火災室の合算屋内火災継続時間を算定する一方、前記特定の火災室に面する部材の保有耐火時間を算定し、前記合算屋内火災継続時間が前記算定した保有耐火時間以下となるよう部材、耐火被覆厚さ、外壁の開口面積、内装材料等の室の諸条件を変更し適合させることとした。
請求項2に係る発明は、建築物の全ての火災室について、屋内火災継続時間が算定した保有耐火時間以下となるよう部材、耐火被覆厚さを適合させる建築物の耐火設計法において、特定の火災室の外壁の開口部がガラスを用いた防火設備を有しているとき、当該火災室について、火災温度上昇係数を算定し、火災発生より前記ガラスを用いた防火設備が脱落するまでの時間を算定し、前記ガラスを用いた防火設備が脱落した外壁の開口面積を再計算し、有効開口因子に算入して、ガラスを用いた防火設備脱落時の残可燃物の単位時間当たりの発熱量及びガラスを用いた防火設備脱落後の屋内火災の継続時間を算定した後、火災発生よりガラスを用いた防火設備が脱落するまでの時間とガラスを用いた防火設備脱落後の屋内火災の継続時間とを合算して、特定の火災室の合算屋内火災継続時間を算定する一方、特定の火災室に面する部材の保有耐火時間を算定し、合算屋内火災継続時間が算定した保有耐火時間以下となるよう部材、耐火被覆厚さ、外壁の開口面積、内装材料等の室の諸条件を変更し適合させることとした。
請求項3に係る発明は、外壁にガラスを用いた防火設備を備えた開口部を有する室が、請求項1乃至請求項2のいずれかに記載された前記耐火設計法に基づいて、耐火処理された建築物である。
When the opening part of the outer wall of a specific fire chamber has a fire prevention equipment using glass, the invention according to claim 1 until the fire prevention equipment using the glass falls off from the occurrence of a fire for the fire room. After calculating the duration of indoor fire after dropping the fire protection equipment using the glass, the time until the fire protection equipment using the glass dropped from the occurrence of the fire and the glass was used. Combined with the duration of the indoor fire after dropping off the fire prevention equipment, to calculate the total indoor fire duration of the specific fire room, while calculating the possessed fire resistance time of the member facing the specific fire room, The room conditions such as members, fireproof coating thickness, outer wall opening area, interior materials, etc. were changed and adapted so that the total indoor fire duration was less than the calculated fireproof time calculated above.
The invention according to claim 2 is a fireproof design method for a building in which all members of a building and fireproof coating thickness are adapted so that the indoor fire duration time is equal to or less than the calculated fireproof time for all fire rooms of the building. When the opening of the outer wall of the fire room has fire prevention equipment using glass, the fire temperature rise coefficient is calculated for the fire room, and the time from the occurrence of the fire until the fire prevention equipment using the glass falls off And recalculate the opening area of the outer wall from which the fire prevention equipment using the glass has fallen, and add it to the effective opening factor to calculate the calorific value per unit time of the residual combustible material when the fire prevention equipment using the glass drops. And after calculating the duration of indoor fire after dropping the fire protection equipment using glass, the time from the occurrence of the fire until the fire protection equipment using glass drops and the duration of the indoor fire after the fire protection equipment using glass is dropped And To calculate the total indoor fire duration of a specific fire room, while calculating the fire resistance time of a member facing a specific fire room, so that the total indoor fire duration is less than the calculated fire resistance time Various conditions of the room such as members, fireproof coating thickness, outer wall opening area, interior material, etc. were changed and adapted.
According to a third aspect of the present invention, a chamber having an opening provided with a fire prevention facility using glass on the outer wall is based on the fireproof design method according to any one of the first to second aspects. It is a built building.

請求項1に係る発明によれば、火災発生より前記ガラスを用いた防火設備が脱落するまでの時間と前記ガラスを用いた防火設備脱落後の屋内火災の継続時間とを合算して、前記特定の火災室の合算屋内火災継続時間を算定する一方、前記特定の火災室に面する部材の保有耐火時間を算定し、前記合算屋内火災継続時間が前記算定した保有耐火時間以下となるよう部材、耐火被覆厚さを適合させているから、実情に合った火災継続時間を算出することができ、屋内火災の継続時間を従来のものより短くすることができる。
その結果、前記特定の火災室に面する部材の保有耐火時間を算定し、前記合算屋内火災継続時間が前記算定した保有耐火時間以下となるよう部材、耐火被覆厚さを適合させればよいので、耐火被覆厚さや構造部材の寸法や強度を下げても適正な耐火性を保つことが可能となる。
請求項2に係る発明によれば、告示検証法に準拠した耐火設計法であるので、屋内火災継続時間を合理的、短時間に算定することができるから、請求項1に係る発明に比し、より簡便に耐火性を保つことが可能となる。
また、請求項3に係る発明によれば、建築物の構造部材の寸法や強度や耐火被覆の厚さを必要以上に上げる必要がないので、建築コストの低減や、有効面積の拡大が可能になる。
According to the invention of claim 1, the time until the fire prevention equipment using the glass drops after the occurrence of a fire and the duration of the indoor fire after the fire prevention equipment using the glass is dropped are combined to determine the specific Calculating the total indoor fire duration of the fire room of the other, calculating the possessed fire resistance time of the member facing the specific fire chamber, so that the total indoor fire duration time is equal to or less than the calculated retained fire time, Since the thickness of the fireproof coating is adapted, it is possible to calculate the fire duration that suits the actual situation, and the duration of the indoor fire can be made shorter than the conventional one.
As a result, it is only necessary to calculate the holding fire resistance time of the member facing the specific fire room and adapt the member and the fire protection coating thickness so that the total indoor fire duration time is equal to or less than the calculated holding fire resistance time. It is possible to maintain appropriate fire resistance even if the thickness of the fireproof coating and the size and strength of the structural member are lowered.
According to the invention according to claim 2, since it is a fireproof design method compliant with the notification verification method, the indoor fire duration time can be calculated reasonably and in a short period of time, compared with the invention according to claim 1. It becomes possible to keep fire resistance more easily.
Moreover, according to the invention which concerns on Claim 3, since it is not necessary to raise the dimension of the structural member of a building, the intensity | strength, and the thickness of a fireproof coating more than necessary, reduction of construction cost and expansion of an effective area are attained. Become.

請求項1に係る発明において、ガラスを用いた防火設備脱落前及び脱落後の火災継続時間を予測する手法としては、例えば、1層ゾーンモデル、火源とガラスの放射伝熱・対流熱伝達計算によるガラス温度予測などの予測手法を用いることが可能であるが、ここでは、耐火設計実績の最も豊富な上記の告示検証法の火災性状予測手法を用いることが、設計労務の省力化や法律的な根拠があることから有効である。   In the invention according to claim 1, as a method for predicting the fire duration before and after dropping of the fire protection equipment using glass, for example, a one-layer zone model, a radiant heat transfer / convection heat transfer calculation between a fire source and glass It is possible to use a prediction method such as glass temperature prediction based on the above. It is effective because there is a good basis.

先ず、火災室の床面積、天井高さ、内装材料、用途に応じた可燃物量、開口などの諸条件よりガラスを用いた防火設備が脱落する前の火災性状を予測し、ガラスを用いた防火設備が脱落する時間を算出する。
次いで、ガラスを用いた防火設備脱落後は、ガラスを用いた防火設備が火災により脱落することが予測される面積を開口(ただし、後述するように開口率をrとする。)として見込んで火災性状を再計算し、火災継続時間を算出する。
First of all, the fire properties before the glass fire prevention equipment falls off are predicted based on various conditions such as the floor area of the fire room, the ceiling height, the interior material, the amount of combustible material according to the application, and the opening, and fire prevention using glass. Calculate the time for the equipment to drop out.
Next, after the fire prevention equipment using glass is dropped, the fire is expected with the area where the fire prevention equipment using glass is expected to drop due to a fire (however, the opening ratio is assumed to be r as described later). Recalculate properties and calculate fire duration.

以下、本発明に係る実施例を図面に基づいて詳しく説明する。
図1は、告示検証法を使用した場合の計算フロー図、図2は、本実施例において、ガラスを用いた防火装備の1例として、網入ガラスが脱落しないとした場合の火災室温度を示す図、図3は、火災温度上昇係数αが460の室の火災室温度と網入ガラス脱落時間を示し、網入ガラスが脱落するときを丸印で示す図、図4は、網入ガラスが脱落したことを考慮したときとしないときの差に基づいて、火災継続時間が異なることを示す図、図5は、本発明を実施した集合住宅の室の平面概略図である。
Hereinafter, embodiments according to the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.
FIG. 1 is a calculation flow chart when the notification verification method is used, and FIG. 2 is an example of fire prevention equipment using glass in this embodiment. FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the fire chamber temperature and the time when the meshed glass is dropped, and FIG. 4 is a diagram showing when the meshed glass is dropped. FIG. FIG. 5 is a schematic plan view of a room of an apartment house in which the present invention is implemented. FIG. 5 is a diagram showing that the fire duration time is different based on the difference between when and when it is dropped.

以下、告示検証法を使用した場合の図1の計算フロー図に基づいて、実施例について説明する。
図1において使用される記号の意味について次に示す。
Qr 当該室内の可燃物の発熱量[MJ]
ql 当該室内の収納可燃物の床面積1m2あたりの発熱量[MJ/m2
Ar 当該室内の床面積[m2
qf 当該室の壁、床、天井の室内に面する部分の内装用建築材料の表面積1m2、厚さ1mmあたりの発熱量[MJ/m2/mm]
Af 当該室の内装用建築材料の種類ごとの各部分の表面積[m2
df 当該室の内装用建築材料の厚さ[mm]
fa 熱侵入係数[-]
qla 当該室の隣接室の収納可燃物の床面積1m2あたりの発熱量[MJ/m2
Ara 当該室内の隣接室の床面積[m2
qfa 当該室の隣接室の内装用建築材料の表面積1m2、厚さ1mmあたりの発熱量[MJ/m2/mm]
Afa 当該室の隣接室の内装用建築材料の種類ごとの各部分の表面積[m2
dfa 当該室の隣接室の内装用建築材料の厚さ[mm]
α 火災温度上昇係数[℃/分1/6
αaft 網入ガラス脱落後の火災温度上昇係数[℃/分1/6
qb 当該室内の可燃物の1秒あたりの発熱量[MW]
qb_aft 網入ガラス脱落後の当該室内の可燃物の1秒あたりの発熱量[MW]
χ 燃焼型支配因子[m1/2
χaft 網入ガラス脱落後の燃焼型支配因子[m1/2
Afuel 可燃物表面積[m2
Ac 当該室の壁、床、天井の部分ごとの表面積[m2
Ih 当該室の壁、床、天井の部分ごとの熱慣性[kWs1/2/m2/K]
fop 有効開口因子[m5/2
fop_aft 網入ガラス脱落後の有効開口因子[m5/2
tf 当該室における火災継続時間[分]
tf_fallout 網入ガラス脱落後の当該室における火災継続時間[分]
tfallout 網入ガラス脱落時間[分]
Aop 各開口部の面積[m2
Aop_aft 網入ガラス脱落後の各開口部の面積[m2
Hop 各開口部の上端から下端までの鉛直距離[m]
Hop_aft 網入ガラス脱落後の各開口部の上端から下端までの垂直距離[m]
r 網入ガラス脱落後の各開口部の高さ方向の開口比率 [-]
Qr_aft 網入ガラス脱落後の当該室内の可燃物の発熱量[MJ]
Hr 当該室の床から天井までの平均高さ [m]
Wop ガラス幅 [m]
tfr 屋内火災保有耐火時間[分]
Tf_crit 網入ガラス脱落時の火災室温度[℃]
Hereinafter, an embodiment will be described based on the calculation flow diagram of FIG. 1 when the notification verification method is used.
The meanings of the symbols used in FIG.
Q r Calorific value of combustible material in the room [MJ]
q l Calorific value per 1m 2 floor area of combustible materials stored in the room [MJ / m 2 ]
A r Floor area in the room [m 2 ]
q f The surface area of the interior building materials facing the walls, floors, and ceilings of the room concerned is 1 m 2 , and the heat generation per 1 mm thickness [MJ / m 2 / mm]
A f Surface area [m 2 ] of each part for each type of building material for the interior of the room
d f Thickness of building material for interior of the room [mm]
f a Thermal penetration coefficient [-]
q la Calorific value per 1m 2 floor area of combustible material stored in the adjacent room [MJ / m 2 ]
A ra Floor area of adjacent room in the room [m 2 ]
q fa The surface area of interior building materials in the room adjacent to the room is 1m 2 , and the heat generation per 1mm thickness [MJ / m 2 / mm]
A fa Surface area [m 2 ] of each part for each type of interior building material in the adjacent room
d fa Thickness of building material for interior of adjacent room [mm]
α Fire temperature rise coefficient [℃ / min 1/6 ]
α aft Fire temperature rise coefficient after falling into glass (° C / min 1/6 )
q b Calorific value per second of flammable material in the room [MW]
q b_aft Calorific value per second [MW] of combustibles in the room after dropping into the net
χ Combustion type governing factor [m 1/2 ]
χ aft Combustion type governing factor after falling into glass (m 1/2 )
A fuel surface area [m 2 ]
A c Surface area [m 2 ] for each wall, floor, and ceiling of the room
I h Thermal inertia for each wall, floor, and ceiling of the room [kWs 1/2 / m 2 / K]
f op effective aperture factor [m 5/2 ]
f op_aft Effective aperture factor [m 5/2 ] after dropping glass
t f Fire duration in the room [minutes]
t f_fallout Fire duration [in minutes] in the room after falling into the glass
t fallout netting glass falling time [minutes]
A op Area of each opening [m 2 ]
A op_aft Area of each opening after dropping into the net [m 2 ]
H op Vertical distance from top to bottom of each opening [m]
H op_aft Vertical distance [m] from the top to the bottom of each opening after dropping into the screen .
r Opening ratio in the height direction of each opening after netting glass is dropped [-]
Q r_aft Calorific value [MJ] of combustible materials in the room after dropping into the glass
H r Average height from floor to ceiling of the room [m]
W op glass width [m]
t fr Indoor fire holding time [min]
T f_crit Fire room temperature when netted glass is dropped [℃]

本実施例は、図5に示される集合住宅の住戸に本発明を適用するものである。
この室は床面積84.3m2、室高さ2.71mであり、図1の室条件設定の手順において、これらの値を含む室条件を設定する上で必要な値がコンピュータの入力手段によりに入力され、RAMに記憶される(手順1)。フロートガラス、網入ガラスなどの開口部の種類は手順1において入力する。
In this embodiment, the present invention is applied to the dwelling unit of the apartment house shown in FIG.
This room has a floor area of 84.3 m 2 and a room height of 2.71 m. In the room condition setting procedure shown in FIG. 1, the values necessary for setting the room conditions including these values are determined by the input means of the computer. And stored in the RAM (procedure 1). The type of opening such as float glass or netted glass is entered in step 1.

次に、手順2において、当該室の可燃物の総発熱量を次の式1にしたがって算出する。
なお、後述する式は全て上記RAMに記憶されており、演算手順はプログラム化されている。
Next, in procedure 2, the total calorific value of the combustible material in the room is calculated according to the following equation 1.
It should be noted that all the expressions described later are stored in the RAM, and the calculation procedure is programmed.

計算の結果、総発熱量99203MJとなる。総発熱量を算出したら、まずは網入ガラスが脱落する前の状態において、室の床面積、天井高さ、開口高さ、開口幅、可燃物、内装材料等から、燃焼型支配因子χと当該室内の可燃物の1秒あたりの発熱量qbを、次の式2の1、式3の1により算出する。
網入ガラスが脱落する前はAop、Hopはフロートガラスの開口のみを考慮して計算する。
As a result of the calculation, the total calorific value is 99203 MJ. After calculating the total calorific value, the combustion type control factor χ and the relevant factor are calculated from the floor area of the room, ceiling height, opening height, opening width, combustibles, interior materials, etc. The calorific value q b per second of the combustible material in the room is calculated by 1 of the following formula 2 and 1 of the formula 3.
A op and H op are calculated considering only the opening of the float glass before the netted glass falls off.

さらに、網入ガラス脱落前の火災温度上昇係数αと有効開口因子fopについて、次の式4の1、式5の1により算出する。 Further, the fire temperature increase coefficient α and the effective opening factor f op before dropping the netted glass are calculated by 1 of the following formula 4 and 1 of the formula 5.

計算の結果、燃焼型支配因子は、χ = max[0.0181, 0.0046] となり、当該室内の可燃物1秒あたりの発熱量は、qb=1.6×0.0181×428.6=12.4と算出される。
fopも同様に網入ガラスが脱落する前はフロートガラスの開口のみを考慮し、
ΣAcIh=426の場合、αは460になり火災室温度Tfは図2、図3のようになる。
As a result of the calculation, the combustion type controlling factor is χ = max [0.0181, 0.0046], and the calorific value per second of the combustible in the room is calculated as q b = 1.6 × 0.0181 × 428.6 = 12.4.
Similarly for f op, only the float glass opening is considered before the netted glass falls off.
When ΣA c I h = 426, α is 460, and the fire room temperature T f is as shown in FIGS.

手順5においては、コンピュータのCPUは、手順1においてRAMに記憶されたデータから、開口部の種類は網入ガラスが用いられたものか否かを判断する。
その結果、網入ガラスは用いられていないと判断したときは、手順13へジャンプして火災継続時間tfを算出する。
このときCPUは、網入ガラスが用いられていない室については、網入ガラスが脱落して開口面積が増えるようなことはないから、単純に式6の1を用いてtfを次のようにする。
tf=Qr/60qb 式6の1
手順14、15については後述する。
In step 5, the CPU of the computer determines from the data stored in the RAM in step 1 whether or not the type of the opening is made of netted glass.
As a result, when it is determined that no network entry glass is used jumps to step 13 to calculate a fire duration t f.
At this time the CPU, for chamber no net entrance glass is used, since the network input glasses never as opening area is increased to fall off, so the t f follows simply using one of formula 6 To.
t f = Q r / 60q b 1 in Equation 6
Procedures 14 and 15 will be described later.

上記手順5において、CPUが網入ガラスが用いられていると判断したときは、網入ガラスがどの時点で脱落するかを予測するために、次の手順6以降へ進む。
よく知られているように、火災室温度Tfは、温度上昇係数αを係数とする時間関数で表され、αの大きさにより決定付けられる。その式は次のとおりである。
Tf=αt1/6+20 式6
When the CPU determines that the meshed glass is used in the procedure 5, the process proceeds to the next procedure 6 and subsequent steps in order to predict when the meshed glass is dropped.
As is well known, the fire room temperature T f is represented by a time function having a temperature increase coefficient α as a coefficient, and is determined by the magnitude of α. The formula is as follows.
T f = αt 1/6 +20 Equation 6

本発明者らは、火災温度上昇係数αの値毎に網入ガラス等のガラスを用いた防火設備が脱落したときの火災室温度Tf_critについて実験的、解析的に求めたところ、ガラスを用いた防火設備が脱落するときの火災室温度は、温度上昇係数αに依拠するという知見を得た。
本発明はこの知見に基づいて創作されたもので、αの値毎にガラスを用いた防火設備脱落時間と炉内温度の関係について実験的に求め、これら値はデータベース化されている。
そして手順6では、火災温度上昇係数αと網入ガラスが脱落する耐火炉の炉内温度Tf_critの関係を利用することとしている。
すなわち、上記式4の1により、火災温度上昇係数αの値は求められているから、網入ガラス脱落時の火災室温度は前記データべースを検索して得られ、この温度に達する時間を上記式6にて求めればよい。
実験の結果、図3に示すように、αが460の場合には、6.8mm厚の網入ガラスが脱落する火災室温度Tf_critは843℃となることが究明されている。
The present inventors experimentally and analytically determined the fire room temperature T f_crit when the fire prevention equipment using glass such as netted glass dropped for each value of the fire temperature rise coefficient α. It was found that the temperature of the fire room when the fire prevention equipment dropped out depends on the temperature rise coefficient α.
The present invention was created on the basis of this finding, and for each value of α, the relationship between the fire-protection equipment drop-off time using glass and the temperature in the furnace was experimentally determined, and these values are stored in a database.
In the procedure 6, the relationship between the fire temperature rise coefficient α and the furnace temperature T f_crit of the refractory furnace where the net-filled glass falls off is used.
That is, since the value of the fire temperature increase coefficient α is obtained by 1 in the above equation 4, the fire room temperature when the netted glass is dropped is obtained by searching the database, and the time to reach this temperature. Can be obtained by the above-mentioned formula 6.
As a result of the experiment, as shown in FIG. 3, when α is 460, it has been investigated that the fire room temperature T f_crit at which the 6.8 mm-thick meshed glass falls off is 843 ° C.

[網入ガラス脱落時間の算定]
そこで、火災室温度が843℃になる網入ガラス脱落時間tfalloutを、次の式7
[Calculation of netted glass dropout time]
Therefore, the netting glass dropping time t fallout at which the fire room temperature reaches 843 ° C. is expressed by the following equation 7

により算出すると、(823/460)6=32.7(分)となる。 (823/460) 6 = 32.7 (minutes).

[網入ガラス脱落後の開口部面積]
手順8では、網入ガラスが脱落すると開口部面積が増加するので、次の式8にしたがって、開口部面積、開口部の上端から下端までの垂直距離を再度算出する。
Aop_aft=Wop×Hop_aft ただし、Hop_aft=Hop×r 式8
網入ガラス脱落後の開口部の上端から下端までの垂直距離Hop_aftを算出するにあたっては、係数rを掛けている。
この係数rは、網入ガラス全面積に対する脱落後の開口面積の割合が、実験により確認されているので、本実施例では安全をみて0.5としている。
なお、フロートガラスの場合は、ガラスが開口部全体に亘って脱落するのでr=1としている。
よって、網入ガラス脱落後の開口は、
開口1〜5 Hop_aft=1.0 Aop_aft=1.4×1.0
開口6 Hop_aft=1.0 Aop_aft=0.74×1.0
開口7、8、10 Hop_aft=1.8×0.5=0.9 Aop_aft=1.8×0.9
開口9 Hop_aft=1.8×0.5=0.9 Aop_aft=2.8×0.9
となる。
[Area of opening after netting glass is dropped]
In step 8, since the opening area increases when the meshed glass falls off, the opening area and the vertical distance from the upper end to the lower end of the opening are calculated again according to the following equation 8.
A op_aft = W op × H op_aft where H op_aft = H op × r Equation 8
In calculating the vertical distance Hop_aft from the upper end to the lower end of the opening after the netted glass is dropped, the coefficient r is multiplied.
Since the ratio of the opening area after dropping to the total area of the mesh-filled glass has been confirmed by experiments, the coefficient r is set to 0.5 in the present embodiment for safety.
In the case of float glass, r = 1 is set because the glass drops over the entire opening.
Therefore, the opening after dropping the net-filled glass is
Openings 1 to 5 H op_aft = 1.0 A op_aft = 1.4 × 1.0
Aperture 6 H op_aft = 1.0 A op_aft = 0.74 × 1.0
Aperture 7, 8, 10 H op_aft = 1.8 × 0.5 = 0.9 A op_aft = 1.8 × 0.9
Opening 9 H op_aft = 1.8 × 0.5 = 0.9 A op_aft = 2.8 × 0.9
It becomes.

[網入ガラス脱落後に燃焼する熱量]
網入ガラス脱落後に残っている可燃物の発熱量Qr_aftは、次の式9にて算出することができる。
[The amount of heat that burns after the netted glass falls off]
The calorific value Q r_aft of the combustible material remaining after the netted glass is dropped can be calculated by the following formula 9.

住戸の総発熱量99203MJから網入ガラスが脱落するまでに燃焼した熱量を差し引くと、
Qr_aft =99203−qb×tfallout×60=74909
となる。
When subtracting the amount of heat burned before the net-filled glass falls off from the total calorific value of housing units 99203MJ,
Q r_aft = 99203−q b × t fallout × 60 = 74909
It becomes.

[網入ガラス脱落後のχaft、qb_aft、tf_falloutの再計算]
網入ガラス脱落後においては、開口部面積が増えるので燃焼性状が変化する。
このため、手順10に進んで、網入ガラス脱落後の燃焼型因子χaftと、可燃物の燃焼による1秒あたりの発熱量qb_aftを、次の式2の2、式3の2にて再計算する。
[ Recalculation of χ aft , q b_aft , t f_fallout after netting glass is dropped]
After the net-filled glass is dropped, the opening area increases, so the combustion properties change.
For this reason, proceeding to the procedure 10, the combustion type factor χ aft after the net-filled glass is dropped and the calorific value q b_aft per second due to the combustion of the combustible material are expressed by the following Equation 2-2 and Equation 3-2 . Recalculate.

再計算の結果、 As a result of recalculation,

は、13.7/428.6=0.0320であるから、
χaftは max[0.0320, 0.0046] となり、qb_aftは1.6×0.0320×428.6=21.9 MWと計算される。
次いで手順11に進んで、αaftとfop_aftは、次の式5の2と式4の2により再計算され、
Because 13.7 / 428.6 = 0.0320,
χ aft is max [0.0320, 0.0046], and q b_aft is calculated as 1.6 × 0.0320 × 428.6 = 21.9 MW.
Next, proceeding to step 11, α aft and f op_aft are recalculated by 2 of the following equation 5 and 2 of equation 4,

その結果、fop_aft = max[13.7, 1.9830] As a result, f op_aft = max [13.7, 1.9830]

は、557 となる。
[脱落後の火災継続時間の計算]
さらに、網入ガラス脱落後の室内火災の継続時間tf_falloutを式10に基づいて算出する。
Becomes 557.
[Calculation of fire duration after dropping out]
Further, the duration time t f_fallout of the indoor fire after the netted glass is dropped is calculated based on Equation 10.

告示検証法の上記式3の2より網入ガラス脱落後のqb_aftは21.9MWであるので、
tf_fallout =74909/21.9/60=56.9分となる。
Since q b_aft after dropping the netted glass is 21.9 MW from the above formula 3-2 of the notification verification method,
t f_fallout = 74909 / 21.9 / 60 = 56.9 minutes.

手順12において、網入ガラスの脱落を考慮した火災継続時間 tf [分]について、次の式6の2に基づいて算定すると、 In step 12, the fire duration t f [min] taking into account the loss of netted glass is calculated based on Equation 6-2 below.

tf =tfallout+tf_fallout=89.6(分)と算出する。
一方、網入ガラスの脱落を考慮しない火災継続時間は、
tf=99203/12.386/60=133.5(分)である。
t f = t fallout + t f_fallout = 89.6 (minutes)
On the other hand, the fire duration that does not take into account the loss of netted glass,
t f = 99203 / 12.386 / 60 = 133.5 (minutes).

図4を参照して、本実施例の室内火災継続時間について説明する。
網入ガラスが用いられた建築物の耐火設計において、網入ガラスが火災時に脱落しないとした場合、火災温度上昇係数αは、実際の火災に比べ小さな値を示す結果、
温度上昇は図4の下側細線の右上がりの曲線に表されるように緩やかとなり、右側細破線の垂線で示されるように火災継続時間は130分を越える。
これに対して網入ガラスが火災時に脱落するとした場合は、脱落後の火災温度上昇係数αaftは、脱落しないとした場合に比し大きな値をとることとなり、温度上昇曲線は、図4の上側太線に示されるように急激となる。
この結果、火災継続時間は左側の太破線の垂線で示されるように90分を切り、大幅に短縮される。
With reference to FIG. 4, the indoor fire duration time of a present Example is demonstrated.
In the fireproof design of buildings using netted glass, if the netted glass does not fall off in the event of a fire, the fire temperature rise coefficient α is a smaller value than the actual fire,
The temperature rise becomes gradual as shown by the lower right curve of the lower fine line in FIG. 4, and the fire duration exceeds 130 minutes as shown by the vertical line of the right thin broken line.
On the other hand, if the netted glass is dropped in the event of a fire, the fire temperature rise coefficient α aft after dropping will be a larger value than if it was not dropped, and the temperature rise curve is as shown in FIG. It becomes abrupt as shown by the upper thick line.
As a result, the fire duration is greatly reduced by 90 minutes, as indicated by the bold broken line on the left.

[等価火災継続時間の算定]
ところで、耐火性能検証法で提示されている耐火構造として大臣認定を受けた部材を適用するために、標準加熱曲線による耐火試験で確認した耐火時間を室火災に補正する式を変換すると以下のようになる。
tf_ef=tf×(α/460)3/2
tf_ef:標準加熱曲線による火災継続時間(等価火災継続時間)[分]
上記の式を網入ガラスの脱落を考慮した式に変形すると下記のようになる。
tf_ef=tfallout×(α/460)3/2+ tf_fallout×(αaft /460)3/2
手順14において上記換算を行った結果、網入ガラスの脱落を考慮した場合はtf_ef=108.5分、考慮しない場合はtf_ef=133.5分となる。
網入ガラスの脱落を考慮しない場合には、2時間の耐火性能を持つ部材を使用することができない。
[Calculation of equivalent fire duration]
By the way, in order to apply the member approved by the Minister as the fireproof structure presented in the fireproof performance verification method, the formula for correcting the fireproof time confirmed in the fireproof test by the standard heating curve to the room fire is converted as follows: become.
t f_ef = t f × (α / 460) 3/2
t f_ef : Fire duration by the standard heating curve (equivalent fire duration) [min]
When the above formula is transformed into a formula that takes into account the dropping of the meshed glass, the following formula is obtained.
t f_ef = t fallout × (α / 460) 3/2 + t f_fallout × (α aft / 460) 3/2
As a result of performing the above conversion in the procedure 14, t f_ef = 108.5 minutes when dropping the netted glass is considered, and t f_ef = 133.5 minutes when not considering.
In the case where the dropout of the meshed glass is not taken into consideration, a member having a fire resistance performance of 2 hours cannot be used.

次に手順15において、網入ガラスの脱落を考慮した場合でも、tfがtfrを超過するときは、設計変更や耐火性能を付加させた部材の採用が必要になる。
このため、手順1の前に戻って、火災室の床面積、天井高さ、開口等の設計を変更したり、耐火性能を変更した部材を採用したり、内装材料、用途に応じた可燃物量等を変更するなどして、再度各手順において計算し直し、当該室の部材ごとの保有耐火時間が火災継続時間を上回るまで繰り返す。
ここで、等価火災継続時間に対応する耐火構造について、表1に示す。
Next, in the procedure 15, even when considering the omission of the meshed glass, if t f exceeds t fr , it is necessary to adopt a member to which a design change or fire resistance is added.
For this reason, go back to step 1, change the design of the floor area, ceiling height, opening, etc. of the fire room, adopt a member with changed fire resistance, and the amount of combustible material according to the interior material and application Recalculate each procedure again, etc., and repeat until the fire resistance time of each member in the room exceeds the fire duration.
Here, Table 1 shows the fireproof structure corresponding to the equivalent fire duration time.

本実施例においては、図4に示されるように、網入ガラスが脱落した後は開口部面積が増大し、火災温度上昇係数αが460から557にアップされ、火災室温度上昇速度が上がって火災継続時間が短くなる。
以上、網入ガラスの実施例について説明したが、耐熱強化ガラスについても同様の作用効果を奏することが可能である。
したがって、火災時の網入ガラスや耐熱強化ガラスを含むガラスを用いた防火設備の脱落による開口形成を考慮することで、実情に合った火災継続時間を算出することができる。そのため、対象室の耐火時間を短くすることが可能となり、耐火被覆の削減や床スラブのコストダウンなどを図ることが可能となる。
具体的には、図5に示された集合住宅の住戸における実施例においては、告示検証法によれば、火災継続時間が133.5分と算定され、3時間耐火としなければならないところ、本実施例では、それが108.5分と短縮され、2時間耐火とすればよいこととなる。
In this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 4, after the netted glass is dropped, the opening area is increased, the fire temperature increase coefficient α is increased from 460 to 557, and the fire chamber temperature increase rate is increased. Fire duration is shortened.
As mentioned above, although the Example of the mesh-filled glass was described, it is possible to show the same effect also about heat-resistant tempered glass.
Therefore, it is possible to calculate the fire duration time in accordance with the actual situation by taking into account the opening formation due to the dropout of the fire prevention equipment using the glass containing the glass or the heat-resistant tempered glass at the time of fire. Therefore, it becomes possible to shorten the fireproof time of the target room, and it is possible to reduce the fireproof coating and reduce the cost of the floor slab.
Specifically, in the example in the dwelling unit of the apartment house shown in FIG. 5, according to the notification verification method, the fire duration time is calculated to be 133.5 minutes, and it must be fireproof for 3 hours. In the embodiment, it is shortened to 108.5 minutes, and it may be fireproof for 2 hours.

図1は、告示検証法を使用した場合の計算フロー図である。FIG. 1 is a calculation flow chart when the notification verification method is used. 図2は、本実施例において、網入ガラスが脱落しないとした場合の火災室温度を示す図である。FIG. 2 is a diagram showing the temperature of the fire room when the netted glass is not dropped in this example. 図3は、αが460の室の火災室温度と火災継続時間を示し、網入ガラスが脱落するときを丸印で示す図である。FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the fire chamber temperature and the fire duration time of the room where α is 460, and the time when the meshed glass falls off is shown by a circle. 図4は、網入ガラスが脱落したことを考慮したときとしないときの差に基づいて、火災継続時間が異なることを示す図である。FIG. 4 is a diagram showing that the fire duration time is different based on the difference between when the netted glass is dropped and when it is not taken into consideration. 図5は、本発明を実施した集合住宅の室の平面図である。FIG. 5 is a plan view of a room of an apartment house embodying the present invention.

Claims (3)

特定の火災室の外壁の開口部がガラスを用いた防火設備を有しているとき、当該火災室について、火災発生より前記ガラスを用いた防火設備が脱落するまでの時間を算定し、次いで前記ガラスを用いた防火設備脱落後の屋内火災の継続時間を算定した後、前記火災発生より前記ガラスを用いた防火設備が脱落するまでの時間と前記ガラスを用いた防火設備脱落後の屋内火災の継続時間とを合算して、前記特定の火災室の合算屋内火災継続時間を算定する一方、前記特定の火災室に面する部材の保有耐火時間を算定し、前記合算屋内火災継続時間が前記算定した保有耐火時間以下となるよう部材、耐火被覆厚さ、外壁の開口面積、内装材料等の室の諸条件を変更し適合させることを特徴とする建築物の耐火設計法。 When the opening of the outer wall of a specific fire room has fire prevention equipment using glass, calculate the time from the occurrence of the fire until the fire prevention equipment using glass falls off for the fire room, and then After calculating the duration of the indoor fire after the glass fire prevention equipment is dropped, the time from the occurrence of the fire until the fire prevention equipment using the glass drops and the indoor fire after the fire prevention equipment using the glass is dropped. The total indoor fire duration time of the specific fire room is calculated by adding the duration time, while the fire resistance time of the member facing the specific fire room is calculated, and the total indoor fire duration time is calculated. A fire-resistant design method for a building, characterized by changing and adapting the conditions of the room such as the member, fire-resistant coating thickness, outer wall opening area, interior material, etc. so as to be less than the retained fire-resistant time. 特定の火災室の床面積、天井高さ、内装材料、用途に応じた可燃物量、外壁の開口面積などの諸条件を設定し、前記特定の火災室の可燃物の総発熱量を算定し、前記可燃物の単位時間当たりの発熱量と屋内火災の継続時間を算定し、前記特定の火災室に面する部材の保有耐火時間を算定して、前記屋内火災の継続時間が前記算定した保有耐火時間以下となるよう部材、耐火被覆厚さ、外壁の開口面積、内装材料等の室の諸条件を変更し適合させ、その後火災室を順次変更しながら、前記建築物の全ての火災室について、前記屋内火災継続時間が前記算定した保有耐火時間以下となるよう部材、耐火被覆厚さ、外壁の開口面積、内装材料等の室の諸条件を変更し適合させる建築物の耐火設計法において、 前記特定の火災室の外壁の開口部がガラスを用いた防火設備を有しているとき、当該火災室について、火災温度上昇係数を算定し、火災発生より前記ガラスを用いた防火設備が脱落するまでの時間を算定し、前記ガラスを用いた防火設備が脱落した外壁の開口面積を再計算し、有効開口因子に算入して、前記ガラスを用いた防火設備脱落時の残可燃物の単位時間当たりの発熱量及び前記ガラスを用いた防火設備脱落後の屋内火災の継続時間を算定した後、前記火災発生より前記ガラスを用いた防火設備が脱落するまでの時間と前記ガラスを用いた防火設備脱落後の屋内火災の継続時間とを合算して、前記特定の火災室の合算屋内火災継続時間を算定する一方、前記特定の火災室に面する部材の保有耐火時間を算定し、前記合算屋内火災継続時間が前記算定した保有耐火時間以下となるよう部材、耐火被覆厚さ、外壁の開口面積、内装材料等の室の諸条件を変更し適合させることを特徴とする建築物の耐火設計法。 Set various conditions such as floor area, ceiling height, interior material, amount of combustible material according to application, opening area of outer wall of specific fire room, calculate total calorific value of combustible material of the specific fire room, Calculate the calorific value per unit time of the combustible material and the duration of the indoor fire, calculate the retained fire resistance time of the member facing the specific fire room, and calculate the retained fire resistance of the indoor fire duration time For all the fire chambers of the building, changing and adapting the room conditions such as members, fireproof coating thickness, outer wall opening area, interior materials etc. In the fire-resistant design method of a building that changes and adapts the conditions of the room such as the member, the fire-resistant coating thickness, the opening area of the outer wall, and the interior material so that the indoor fire duration is equal to or less than the calculated retained fire-resistant time, The opening on the outer wall of a specific fire room is glassy The fire temperature rise coefficient is calculated for the fire room, and the time from the occurrence of the fire until the fire protection equipment using the glass falls off is used. Recalculate the opening area of the outer wall from which the fire prevention equipment had fallen off, and included it in the effective opening factor, and the amount of heat generated per unit time of the remaining combustible material when the fire prevention equipment using the glass was dropped and the fire prevention using the glass After calculating the duration of the indoor fire after the equipment is dropped, add the time from the occurrence of the fire until the fire protection equipment using the glass drops and the duration of the indoor fire after the fire protection equipment using the glass is dropped And calculating the total indoor fire duration of the specific fire room, while calculating the possessed fire resistance time of the member facing the specific fire chamber, the total indoor fire duration time is less than the calculated retained fire time And Yo member, refractory design method of a building, characterized in that the refractory coating thickness, open area of the outer wall, is adapted to change the conditions of the chamber, such as interior materials. 外壁にガラスを用いた防火設備を備えた開口部を有する室が、請求項1乃至請求項2のいずれかに記載された前記耐火設計法に基づいて、耐火処理された建築物。 The building which the room which has the opening part provided with the fire prevention equipment which used the glass for the outer wall was fire-proofed based on the said fire-proof design method described in any one of Claim 1 thru | or 2.
JP2007283000A 2007-10-31 2007-10-31 Fireproof design method for buildings and fireproof buildings Expired - Fee Related JP5429768B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2007283000A JP5429768B2 (en) 2007-10-31 2007-10-31 Fireproof design method for buildings and fireproof buildings

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2007283000A JP5429768B2 (en) 2007-10-31 2007-10-31 Fireproof design method for buildings and fireproof buildings

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2009108620A JP2009108620A (en) 2009-05-21
JP5429768B2 true JP5429768B2 (en) 2014-02-26

Family

ID=40777385

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2007283000A Expired - Fee Related JP5429768B2 (en) 2007-10-31 2007-10-31 Fireproof design method for buildings and fireproof buildings

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5429768B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5289235B2 (en) * 2009-08-24 2013-09-11 株式会社東芝 Operation method of brought-in combustible material management system for nuclear power plant and brought-in combustible material management system
JP5545760B2 (en) * 2011-01-19 2014-07-09 大成建設株式会社 Fireproof design method and building
KR101263372B1 (en) 2012-09-28 2013-05-21 한남대학교 산학협력단 Method for fire resistance design

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH09184372A (en) * 1995-12-28 1997-07-15 Furukawa Techno Material:Kk Fitting structure of double glazing unit
JP3239301B2 (en) * 1999-03-31 2001-12-17 サッポロ産機株式会社 Fire protection sash
JP2002117222A (en) * 2000-10-11 2002-04-19 Tokio Marine & Fire Insurance Co Ltd System for quantifying fire risk
JP4968653B2 (en) * 2003-05-12 2012-07-04 清水建設株式会社 Fire risk evaluation system and fire risk evaluation method
JP2007206974A (en) * 2006-02-01 2007-08-16 Takenaka Komuten Co Ltd Fire risk evaluation method and program for fire protection partition
JP2008262303A (en) * 2007-04-10 2008-10-30 Takenaka Komuten Co Ltd Fire risk evaluation device and fire risk evaluation program

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2009108620A (en) 2009-05-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Law et al. We need to talk about timber: fire safety design in tall buildings
Suzuki et al. Firebrands generated from a full-scale structure burning under well-controlled laboratory conditions
Chow Full‐scale burning tests on double‐skin façade fires
US10480793B2 (en) Combination outdoor fireplace and pizza oven
JP5429768B2 (en) Fireproof design method for buildings and fireproof buildings
Guillaume et al. Reconstruction of the Grenfell Tower fire–Part 4: Contribution to the understanding of fire propagation and behaviour during horizontal fire spread
Wang et al. Numerical modeling of compartment fires: Ventilation characteristics and limitation of Kawagoe’s law
Chu et al. Introducing an active opening strategy to mitigate large open-plan compartment fire development
Guillaume et al. Reconstruction of the Grenfell tower fire—Part 6—Numerical simulation of the Grenfell tower disaster: Contribution to the understanding of the tenability conditions inside the common areas of the tower
Leppänen et al. Experimental study on fire safety of chimneys in real use and actual site conditions
Maranghides et al. Structure separation experiments: shed burns without wind
Meacham et al. Shake table testing of a full-scale five-story building: post-earthquake fire performance
RU2610411C2 (en) Heating device
Quintiere¹ The Spread of Fire from a Compartment-A Review
Chu Fire behavior in modern buildings considering window glass fallout and active ventilation
Ni et al. Fire Performance of Green Wall–Glass Curtain Wall Systems: A CFD Study for Sustainable Building Safety
Leppanen Fire Safety of Metal Chimneys in Residential Homes in Finland
Drury Critical Temperature Relationships for the Performance-Based Design of Realistically-Restrained Steel Composite Floor Assemblies
Chow et al. Experimental Studies on Fire Spread Over Glass Fac¸ ade
Xia et al. Experimental and theoretical study of sudden ventilation change on fire dynamics of compartments with different types of glass
Dârmon The Fire Spread Outside of a Building
ES2264832B1 (en) PROVISION FOR THE FAST CONSUMPTION OF THE FUEL LOAD WITHIN THE REACH OF FIRE, AS WELL AS HOT FUMES AND GASES PRODUCED BY FIRE.
Zhang et al. Impact of Centralized Mechanical Smoke Exhaust and Make-Up Air System Design on Smoke Control Performance
CA2996777A1 (en) Combination outdoor fireplace and pizza oven
Bhattacharya et al. EFFECTS OF BUILDING FIRE WITH APPLICATION OF PREVENTION THROUGH DESIGN: A REVIEW.

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20100428

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20120201

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20120309

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20120427

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20130201

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20130319

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20131127

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20131127

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Ref document number: 5429768

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees