JP6043217B2 - How to change the destination by judging the quality of the sour steel slab - Google Patents
How to change the destination by judging the quality of the sour steel slab Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP6043217B2 JP6043217B2 JP2013047089A JP2013047089A JP6043217B2 JP 6043217 B2 JP6043217 B2 JP 6043217B2 JP 2013047089 A JP2013047089 A JP 2013047089A JP 2013047089 A JP2013047089 A JP 2013047089A JP 6043217 B2 JP6043217 B2 JP 6043217B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- hic
- slab
- maximum
- thickness
- range
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims description 49
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 title claims description 49
- 238000005204 segregation Methods 0.000 claims description 154
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 claims description 78
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 70
- 238000005266 casting Methods 0.000 claims description 54
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 41
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 claims description 33
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 22
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000009749 continuous casting Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 241000406668 Loxodonta cyclotis Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 46
- 238000005336 cracking Methods 0.000 description 19
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 16
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 11
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 11
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000007654 immersion Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000007711 solidification Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000008023 solidification Effects 0.000 description 5
- UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrogen Chemical compound [H][H] UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- ORTQZVOHEJQUHG-UHFFFAOYSA-L copper(II) chloride Chemical compound Cl[Cu]Cl ORTQZVOHEJQUHG-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 4
- 229910052739 hydrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 239000001257 hydrogen Substances 0.000 description 4
- VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N methane Chemical compound C VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- RWSOTUBLDIXVET-UHFFFAOYSA-N Dihydrogen sulfide Chemical compound S RWSOTUBLDIXVET-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000005452 bending Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004453 electron probe microanalysis Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229910000037 hydrogen sulfide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 230000005856 abnormality Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000498 cooling water Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229960003280 cupric chloride Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 210000001787 dendrite Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003345 natural gas Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000003921 oil Substances 0.000 description 2
- OXNIZHLAWKMVMX-UHFFFAOYSA-N picric acid Chemical compound OC1=C([N+]([O-])=O)C=C([N+]([O-])=O)C=C1[N+]([O-])=O OXNIZHLAWKMVMX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000000644 propagated effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000002436 steel type Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000004094 surface-active agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- UCKMPCXJQFINFW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulphide Chemical compound [S-2] UCKMPCXJQFINFW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000996 additive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002485 combustion reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004993 emission spectroscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012467 final product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000012447 hatching Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002844 melting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008018 melting Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003208 petroleum Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052698 phosphorus Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000002250 progressing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007670 refining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004611 spectroscopical analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003887 surface segregation Methods 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Continuous Casting (AREA)
Description
本発明は、スラブの内部品質からHIC性を評価する方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a method for evaluating HIC properties from the internal quality of a slab.
石油や天然ガスには硫化水素が含まれるため、これらの輸送に用いられる鋼材(以下、耐サワー鋼と称する。)は常に硫化水素雰囲気下にある。このような雰囲気では、水素が鋼材中に進入・拡散し、鋼材中の介在物に集積・ガス化する。その結果、鋼材に内圧が加わることにより介在物の周辺に微細な亀裂が発生し、これが硬化相に沿って伝播することで水素誘起割れ(以下、HICと称する。)が発生する。そこで、耐サワー鋼には優れた耐HIC性が要求される。 Since petroleum sulfide and natural gas contain hydrogen sulfide, the steel materials (hereinafter referred to as sour-resistant steel) used for transportation of these oils are always in a hydrogen sulfide atmosphere. In such an atmosphere, hydrogen enters and diffuses into the steel material and accumulates and gasifies into inclusions in the steel material. As a result, when an internal pressure is applied to the steel material, fine cracks are generated around the inclusions, which propagate along the hardened phase, thereby generating hydrogen-induced cracking (hereinafter referred to as HIC). Therefore, the sour-resistant steel is required to have excellent HIC resistance.
HICは、鋳造時に生じた介在物及び硬化相が生成する中心偏析や内部割れ部を起点として発生することが知られている。そこで、従来から、中心偏析や内部割れの発生を抑制する技術(鋳造方法)が提案されている(特許文献1〜6参照)。 It is known that HIC is generated starting from the center segregation and internal cracks generated by inclusions and a hardened phase generated during casting. Therefore, conventionally, a technique (casting method) for suppressing the occurrence of center segregation and internal cracks has been proposed (see Patent Documents 1 to 6).
しかしながら、上記方法を実施しても、操業異常が発生した場合、例えば、ロール間隔のズレ、浸漬ノズルの詰まり、及び浸漬ノズルから注入される溶鋼の偏流、鋳造速度の変更等が生じた場合は、上記の効果が得られず、鋳片に程度の悪い中心偏析や内部割れが生じることがある。これらの欠陥が製品に残存するとHICが発生するため、通常、出荷前の製品(鋼材)に対してHIC試験を行うことにより、HIC発生の有無を確認している。 However, even if the above method is carried out, if an operation abnormality occurs, for example, if the gap between rolls is clogged, the immersion nozzle is clogged, the molten steel injected from the immersion nozzle is drifted, the casting speed is changed, etc. The above effects cannot be obtained, and the center segregation and internal cracks may be caused in the slab. Since HIC occurs when these defects remain in the product, the presence or absence of HIC is usually confirmed by performing an HIC test on the product (steel material) before shipment.
しかし、HIC試験では結果が判明するまでに数週間を必要とする。また、HICが発生すると、その製品を耐サワー鋼として出荷できないため、再溶製し、製造した製品に対して新たにHIC試験を行う必要がある。そうすると、製造期間が長期化し、納期遅れ等の原因となる。 However, the HIC test requires several weeks before the results are known. In addition, when HIC occurs, the product cannot be shipped as sour-resistant steel, so it is necessary to perform a new HIC test on the product that has been remelted and manufactured. If it does so, a manufacturing period will become long and it will become a cause, such as a delivery-date delay.
そこで、HIC試験を行うことなく、鋳片の段階でHIC性を評価できると、HICが発生し、再溶製が必要となる場合に、圧延→サンプル調整→HIC試験の工程を省略できる。また、再溶製が必要でない場合は、鋳造後のサンプル調整→HIC試験を省略できるため、製造開始から出荷までの期間を大幅に短縮できる。HICは、上述したように、中心偏析や内部割れを起点として発生するため、鋳片の段階で中心偏析や内部割れを評価できると、その評価結果に基づいてHIC性を評価できると考えられる。 Therefore, if the HIC property can be evaluated at the slab stage without performing the HIC test, the process of rolling → sample adjustment → HIC test can be omitted when HIC occurs and remelting is required. Moreover, when remelting is not necessary, since the sample adjustment after casting → HIC test can be omitted, the period from the start of production to shipment can be greatly shortened. As described above, HIC occurs starting from center segregation and internal cracks. Therefore, if center segregation and internal cracks can be evaluated at the stage of the slab, it is considered that HIC properties can be evaluated based on the evaluation results.
このような方法として、特許文献7には、鋳片の段階で内部割れを評価する方法が開示されている。特許文献7では、内部割れの評価結果からHCR操業の可否を判断している。 As such a method, Patent Document 7 discloses a method of evaluating internal cracks at the stage of a slab. In Patent Document 7, whether or not the HCR operation is possible is determined from the evaluation result of the internal crack.
ところで、耐サワー鋼で問題となる内部割れは非常に小さい微細な割れであるが、特許文献7では、HCR操業で問題となる内部割れ(割れ長さが10[mm]以上の大きな割れ)を評価している。そのため、特許文献7の方法では、耐サワー鋼で問題となる微細な内部割れを見逃すことがあり、鋳片の段階で、内部割れが原因のHIC性を正確に評価することができない。 By the way, the internal cracks that are a problem in sour-resistant steel are very small fine cracks. However, in Patent Document 7, an internal crack that is a problem in HCR operation (a large crack having a crack length of 10 mm or more). I am evaluating. Therefore, in the method of Patent Document 7, a fine internal crack that causes a problem in sour-resistant steel may be missed, and the HIC property caused by the internal crack cannot be accurately evaluated at the stage of the slab.
また、特許文献7には中心偏析の評価方法について記載されていないため、鋳片の段階で、中心偏析が原因のHIC性を評価することができないと考えられる。 Further, since Patent Document 7 does not describe a method for evaluating the center segregation, it is considered that the HIC property caused by the center segregation cannot be evaluated at the slab stage.
そこで、本発明の目的は、HIC試験を行うことなく、鋳片の内部品質からHIC性を評価する方法を提供する。 Then, the objective of this invention provides the method of evaluating HIC property from the internal quality of a slab, without performing a HIC test.
本発明は、連続鋳造機で鋳造した厚みDのスラブを耐サワー鋼に充当可能かの判定を行う品質判定方法であり、
異なる鋳造条件で鋳造した複数のスラブにおいて、スラブの幅方向両端から幅D/2の第1の範囲に存在する内部割れの最大開孔厚みを測定する第1開孔厚み測定工程と、
異なる鋳造条件で鋳造した複数のスラブにおいて、前記スラブの幅方向両端からD/2を除く幅W−Dの第2の範囲を幅方向に1又は複数の所定の区間に区切った場合に、前記所定の区間のそれぞれにおいて、厚み中心部で偏析粒の最大径及び所定の径以上の偏析粒の個数密度を測定する第1偏析粒測定工程と、
前記第1開孔厚み測定工程及び前記第1偏析粒測定工程のスラブと同一の条件で鋳造された複数のスラブを圧延して製造した鋼材に対して、前記第1の範囲及び前記第2の範囲の1又は複数の所定の区間に対応する領域でそれぞれHIC試験を実施する試験工程と、
前記第1開孔厚み測定工程で得た複数の最大開孔厚みと、前記試験工程における前記第1の範囲に対応する領域の複数の試験結果とから、HICが発生しない最大開孔厚みの閾値を決定する閾値決定工程と、
前記第1偏析粒測定工程で得た複数の偏析粒の最大径及び前記所定の径以上の偏析粒の複数の個数密度と、前記試験工程における前記第2の範囲の1又は複数の所定の区間に対応する領域の複数の試験結果とから、HICが発生する偏析粒の最大径及び前記所定の径以上の偏析粒の個数密度の範囲を決定するHIC発生範囲決定工程と、
判定対象のスラブの幅方向両端から幅D/2の範囲に存在する内部割れの最大開孔厚みを測定する第2開孔厚み測定工程と、
判定対象のスラブの幅方向両端からD/2を除く幅W−Dの範囲において、この範囲を幅方向に1又は複数の所定の区間に区切った場合に、前記所定の区間のそれぞれにおいて、厚み中心部で偏析粒の最大径及び前記所定の径以上の偏析粒の個数密度を測定する第2偏析粒測定工程と、
前記第2開孔厚み測定工程で得た前記最大開孔厚みと前記閾値決定工程で決定した最大開孔厚みの閾値とを比較し、前記第2偏析粒測定工程で得た前記偏析粒の最大径及び前記所定の径以上の偏析粒の個数密度と前記HIC発生範囲決定工程で決定したHICが発生する偏析粒の最大径及び前記所定の径以上の偏析粒の個数密度の範囲とを比較し、前記第2開孔厚み測定工程で得た前記最大開孔厚みが前記閾値決定工程で決定した最大開孔厚みの閾値を上回っているとき及び前記第2偏析粒測定工程で得た前記偏析粒の最大径及び前記所定の径以上の偏析粒の個数密度が前記HIC発生範囲決定工程で決定したHICが発生する偏析粒の最大径及び前記所定の径以上の偏析粒の個数密度の範囲にあるときの少なくとも一方を満たす場合は判定対象のスラブの向け先を耐サワー鋼以外の製品へ変更する変更工程とを備えている。
The present invention is a quality determination method for determining whether a slab of thickness D cast by a continuous casting machine can be applied to sour-resistant steel,
In a plurality of slabs cast under different casting conditions, a first opening thickness measurement step for measuring the maximum opening thickness of an internal crack existing in a first range of width D / 2 from both ends in the width direction of the slab;
A plurality of slabs cast by different casting conditions, when separated in the second 1 range in the width direction or a plurality of predetermined section width W-D from both ends in the width direction except for D / 2 of the slab, In each of the predetermined sections, a first segregated grain measuring step of measuring the number density of segregated grains having a maximum diameter of the segregated grains and a predetermined diameter or more at a thickness center portion;
For the steel material produced by rolling a plurality of slabs cast under the same conditions as the slabs in the first hole thickness measurement step and the first segregated grain measurement step, the first range and the second range A test process for performing an HIC test in each of the areas corresponding to one or more predetermined sections of the range;
Based on the plurality of maximum opening thicknesses obtained in the first opening thickness measurement step and the plurality of test results in the region corresponding to the first range in the test step, the threshold value of the maximum opening thickness at which no HIC is generated. A threshold value determining step for determining
Wherein the first polarized析粒measuring a plurality of number density of the plurality of maximum diameter of the polarized析粒and polarization析粒on the predetermined diameter or less obtained in step, one or more predetermined section of the second range in the test step and a plurality of test results of the region corresponding to the HIC generation range determination step of determining the maximum diameter and the scope of the number density of polarized析粒on the predetermined size or less polarized析粒that HIC is generated,
A second hole thickness measurement step for measuring the maximum hole thickness of an internal crack existing in the range of width D / 2 from both ends in the width direction of the slab to be determined;
In the range of width WD excluding D / 2 from both ends in the width direction of the slab to be determined, when this range is divided into one or more predetermined sections in the width direction, the thickness in each of the predetermined sections a second polarization析粒measuring step of measuring the maximum diameter and the number density of polarized析粒on the predetermined size or less polarized析粒in the center,
The maximum aperture thickness obtained in the second aperture thickness measurement step is compared with the threshold value of the maximum aperture thickness determined in the threshold determination step, and the maximum of the segregated particles obtained in the second segregation particle measurement step. diameter and then compared with the maximum diameter and the scope of the number density of polarized析粒on the predetermined size or less polarized析粒that HIC was determined by the number density and the HIC generation range determining step of polarization析粒occurs on the predetermined size or less The segregated particles obtained when the maximum pore thickness obtained in the second pore thickness measurement step exceeds the threshold value of the maximum pore thickness determined in the threshold value determination step and in the second segregation particle measurement step. maximum diameter and number density of polarized析粒on said predetermined diameter or less is in the maximum diameter and the scope of the number density of polarized析粒on the predetermined size or less polarized析粒that HIC was determined by the HIC generation range determining step occurs in If you meet at least one of the times And a changing step of changing towards destination elephant slab to products other than sour steel.
このように、本発明では、HIC性の評価に「内部割れの開孔厚み」と「偏析粒の最大径及び個数密度」を用いている。これらにより、鋳片の内部品質(内部割れ及び中心偏析の偏析度)を正確に評価できるため、HIC試験を行うことなく、鋳片の段階でHIC性を評価できる。そして、その評価結果に基づいて鋳片の用途を決定できる。これにより、数週間を要するHIC試験を省略できるため、製造開始から出荷までの期間を大幅に短縮することができる。 As described above, in the present invention, “opening thickness of internal cracks” and “maximum diameter and number density of segregated grains” are used for evaluation of HIC properties. By these, since the internal quality (segregation degree of an internal crack and center segregation) of a slab can be evaluated correctly, HIC property can be evaluated in the stage of a slab, without performing a HIC test. And the use of a slab can be determined based on the evaluation result. Thereby, since the HIC test which requires several weeks can be omitted, the period from the start of production to shipment can be greatly shortened.
本発明によると、HIC試験を行うことなく、鋳片の内部品質からHIC性を評価できる。そして、この評価結果から鋳片の段階で鋼材の用途を決定できるため、製造開始から出荷までの期間を大幅に短縮することができる。 According to the present invention, the HIC property can be evaluated from the internal quality of the slab without performing the HIC test. And since the use of a steel material can be determined in the stage of a slab from this evaluation result, the period from a manufacture start to shipment can be shortened significantly.
以下、本発明の好適な実施形態について、図面を参照しつつ説明する。 Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
ここでは、本発明の一実施形態である判定方法について、図1〜図8を参照しつつ説明する。なお、図3,5では断面を示すハッチングを省略している。 Here, a determination method according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS. In FIGS. 3 and 5, hatching indicating a cross section is omitted.
〔連続鋳造機〕
連続鋳造機100は、図1に示すように、垂直曲げ型連続鋳造機であって、タンディッシュ1と、タンディッシュ1の底部に取り付けられた浸漬ノズル2と、浸漬ノズル2の下部が配置された鋳型3と、鋳型3の直下から鋳造経路Qに沿って設けられた複数のロール4と、鋳造方向に隣り合うロール4,4間に配置された冷却ノズル5とを備えている。タンディッシュ1には、二次精錬で成分調整が行われた溶鋼6が取鍋(図示省略)から供給されている。鋳型3には、平面視において略矩形状の開口が形成されており、スラブ(厚みD×幅Wの鋳片)が鋳造可能である。
[Continuous casting machine]
As shown in FIG. 1, the continuous casting machine 100 is a vertical bending type continuous casting machine, in which a tundish 1, an immersion nozzle 2 attached to the bottom of the tundish 1, and a lower part of the immersion nozzle 2 are arranged. The casting mold 3, a plurality of rolls 4 provided along the casting path Q from directly below the casting mold 3, and a cooling nozzle 5 disposed between the rolls 4 adjacent to each other in the casting direction. The tundish 1 is supplied with a molten steel 6 whose components have been adjusted by secondary refining from a ladle (not shown). The mold 3 is formed with a substantially rectangular opening in plan view, and a slab (thickness D × width W cast piece) can be cast.
鋳造経路Qは、垂直方向に延在した垂直部と、垂直部から緩やかに湾曲した曲げ部と、曲げ部から水平方向に延在した水平部とを有する。 The casting path Q has a vertical portion extending in the vertical direction, a bent portion gently curved from the vertical portion, and a horizontal portion extending in the horizontal direction from the bent portion.
鋳造を行うときは、タンディッシュ1内の溶鋼6を、浸漬ノズル2を介して鋳型3内に注入する。溶鋼6は、鋳型3内で冷却され、凝固シェルが形成しながら下方へ引き抜かれ、内部まで凝固することにより、スラブ(鋳片)が鋳造される。その後、スラブは、圧延処理等が施されることにより鋼板となり、耐サワー鋼(耐水素誘起割れ鋼)やその他の製品に充当される。 When casting is performed, the molten steel 6 in the tundish 1 is injected into the mold 3 through the immersion nozzle 2. The molten steel 6 is cooled in the mold 3, drawn downward while forming a solidified shell, and solidified to the inside, whereby a slab (slab) is cast. Thereafter, the slab is subjected to a rolling process or the like to become a steel plate, which is applied to sour-resistant steel (hydrogen-resistant induced cracking steel) and other products.
耐サワー鋼には、上述したように、優れた耐HIC性(耐水素誘起割れ性)が要求される。HICは、鋼材中のMnSやTi(C,N)、Nb(C,N)等の介在物が存在する位置(偏析部)を起点に発生し、硬化相に沿って伝播する。偏析はスラブの内部割れ部や中心偏析部に存在し、偏析度が高いほどHICが発生しやすいことがわかっている(特開2007−136496号参照)。 As described above, the sour steel is required to have excellent HIC resistance (hydrogen induced cracking resistance). HIC is generated starting from a position (segregation part) where inclusions such as MnS, Ti (C, N), and Nb (C, N) are present in the steel, and propagates along the hardening phase. It is known that segregation is present in the internal crack portion and the center segregation portion of the slab, and that the higher the degree of segregation, the more likely HIC is generated (see Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2007-136396).
そこで、本発明では、内部割れ及び中心偏析の偏析度を調査し、これらを基に鋳片の段階でHIC性を評価する。 Therefore, in the present invention, the degree of segregation of internal cracks and center segregation is investigated, and HIC properties are evaluated at the slab stage based on these.
なお、2次デンドライト樹間(ミクロ偏析)にも偏析が存在するが、2次デンドライト樹間は非常に小さいため、HICの原因となる介在物や硬化組織が生成しない。そのため、上記偏析を起点にHICは発生しないと考えられる。 In addition, although segregation exists also between secondary dendrite trees (micro segregation), since the secondary dendrite trees are very small, inclusions and hardened structures that cause HIC are not generated. Therefore, it is considered that HIC does not occur starting from the segregation.
また、内部割れには「水平割れ」と「その他の内部割れ」とが有り、これらはロール間バルジングや冷却水のアンバランスや矯正通過時の変形が原因となって生じる。「水平割れ」は、図4に示すように、スラブの幅方向で幅端部からD/2の範囲に存在する割れであり、スラブ幅方向及び鋳造方向に伝播した割れである。一方、「その他の内部割れ」は、スラブ全幅に存在する割れであり、スラブ厚み方向及びスラブ幅方向、またはスラブ厚み方向及びスラブ鋳造方向に伝播した割れである。そのため、「水平割れ」は圧延によって伸展するが、「その他の内部割れ」は圧延によって縮小する。したがって、HICが発生した場合、「水平割れ」ではHICが伝播・伸展し易いが、「その他の内部割れ」ではHICが伝播・伸展しないため、品質上、問題とならない。
また、HIC試験を実施したところ、「水平割れ」発生部ではHICが発生する場合があったが、「その他の内部割れ」発生部ではHICが発生しなかった。そこで、本発明では、内部割れのうち「水平割れ」のみを調査する。
Further, the internal cracks include “horizontal cracks” and “other internal cracks”, which are caused by bulging between rolls, unbalance of cooling water, and deformation during correction. As shown in FIG. 4, the “horizontal crack” is a crack that exists in the range of D / 2 from the width end in the width direction of the slab, and is a crack that has propagated in the slab width direction and the casting direction. On the other hand, the “other internal cracks” are cracks existing in the entire width of the slab, and are cracks propagated in the slab thickness direction and the slab width direction, or in the slab thickness direction and the slab casting direction. Therefore, “horizontal cracks” are extended by rolling, while “other internal cracks” are reduced by rolling. Therefore, when HIC occurs, HIC easily propagates and extends in “horizontal cracking”, but HIC does not propagate and extend in “other internal cracks”, so there is no problem in quality.
Further, when the HIC test was performed, HIC sometimes occurred in the “horizontal crack” occurrence portion, but no HIC occurred in the “other internal crack” occurrence portion. Therefore, in the present invention, only “horizontal cracks” among the internal cracks are examined.
以下では、本発明の判定方法について、図2のフローチャートに沿って詳細に説明する。 Below, the determination method of this invention is demonstrated in detail along the flowchart of FIG.
〔判定方法〕
鋳造後のスラブを、鋳造方向に対して垂直な方向に切断し(図3参照)、切断面で内部品質(水平割れ及び中心偏析の偏析度)を調査する。
[Judgment method]
The slab after casting is cut in a direction perpendicular to the casting direction (see FIG. 3), and the internal quality (the degree of segregation of horizontal cracks and center segregation) is examined on the cut surface.
水平割れが発生する位置は、鋳造方向よりも鋳片幅方向及び厚み方向にばらつきが生じやすい。また、中心偏析のレベル(偏析粒径、所定の粒径以上の偏析粒の個数)は鋳片幅方向にばらつき、幅方向の特定の部位で悪化している場合がある。そこで、鋳造方向に対して垂直な切断面を調査対象とすることにより、水平割れ及び中心偏析が最も悪化している部位を調査できる。 The position where the horizontal crack occurs is more likely to vary in the slab width direction and the thickness direction than in the casting direction. In addition, the level of center segregation (segregation grain size, the number of segregation grains having a predetermined grain size or more) may vary in the width direction of the slab and deteriorate at a specific portion in the width direction. Therefore, by using a cut surface perpendicular to the casting direction as an object of investigation, it is possible to investigate a portion where horizontal cracking and center segregation are most deteriorated.
また、上記スラブは、耐サワー鋼と同様な鋼種(成分)とする。鋼種が異なると添加元素の濃度が変わるため、偏析部の介在物量や硬化相が変化するためである。 The slab is made of the same steel type (component) as the sour-resistant steel. This is because when the steel type is different, the concentration of the additive element changes, so that the amount of inclusions in the segregation part and the hardening phase change.
次に、スラブ切断面で(図3参照)、幅方向両端から幅D/2の範囲の領域R1,R2に存在する水平割れの最大開孔厚みt1,t2を測定する(図2のS1,第1開孔厚み測定工程)。ここで、最大開孔厚みt1は領域R1での最大開孔厚みであり、最大開孔厚みt2は領域R2での最大開孔厚みである。 Next, on the slab cut surface (see FIG. 3), the maximum opening thicknesses t 1 and t 2 of horizontal cracks existing in the regions R 1 and R 2 in the range of the width D / 2 from both ends in the width direction are measured (FIG. 3). 2 S1, first hole thickness measuring step). Here, the maximum aperture thickness t 1 is the maximum aperture thickness in the region R 1 , and the maximum aperture thickness t 2 is the maximum aperture thickness in the region R 2 .
水平割れは、スラブの幅方向両端(狭面)から幅方向中央に向かって凝固が進行する過程で発生する。領域R1,R2(第1の範囲)では、狭面側(短辺側)の冷却の影響を受け、凝固が幅方向中央に向かって進行する。一方、幅方向両端からD/2を除いた幅W−Dの領域R3(第2の範囲)では、狭面側(短辺側)の冷却が殆ど影響しないため、幅方向に凝固が殆ど進行しない。そのため、水平割れは領域R1,R2で発生すると考えられる。そこで、ステップS2では、領域R1,R2で水平割れを調査する。ここで、各領域R1,R2に2つ以上の水平割れが存在する場合は、各領域R1,R2の最大の開孔厚みを最大開孔厚みt1,t2とする。例えば、領域R1に2つ以上の水平割れが存在する場合は、最も大きな開孔を有する水平割れの最も開孔している部分(開孔厚みが最も厚い部分)の開孔厚みを測定し、その開孔厚みを最大開孔厚みt1とする。 Horizontal cracking occurs in the process of solidification progressing from both ends (narrow surfaces) in the width direction of the slab toward the center in the width direction. In the regions R 1 and R 2 (first range), solidification proceeds toward the center in the width direction under the influence of cooling on the narrow surface side (short side). On the other hand, in the region R 3 (second range) having a width WD excluding D / 2 from both ends in the width direction, the cooling on the narrow surface side (short side) has little influence, so that the solidification hardly occurs in the width direction. Does not progress. For this reason, it is considered that horizontal cracks occur in the regions R 1 and R 2 . Therefore, in step S2, horizontal cracks are examined in the regions R 1 and R 2 . Here, each region R 1, if two or more horizontal cracking R 2 in is present, the maximum aperture thickness of each region R 1, R 2 and maximum opening thickness t 1, t 2. For example, if there are two or more horizontal cracks in the region R 1 measures the opening thickness of the most aperture to which part of the horizontal cracks (thickest portion opening thickness) having the largest openings The opening thickness is defined as a maximum opening thickness t 1 .
また、本発明では、「水平割れ」の偏析度を「開孔厚み(最大開孔厚み)」から評価している。「水平割れ」とは、凝固時に、固液界面で発生する割れであり、デンドライト樹間に濃化溶鋼が進入して生じた偏析線を伴っている。程度が悪い場合は、偏析線に沿って開孔している。そして、「偏析度」と「開孔厚み(開孔幅)」には相関関係があり、「開孔厚み」が大きいほど「偏析度」が高い傾向がある。HICは「偏析度」が高いほど発生しやすいため、「開孔厚み」が大きいほどHICが発生しやすく、開孔厚みによってHIC発生の有無を判断できることを見出した。そこで、本発明では、「開孔厚み」を基にHIC性を評価する。 In the present invention, the degree of segregation of “horizontal cracking” is evaluated from “opening thickness (maximum opening thickness)”. A “horizontal crack” is a crack that occurs at the solid-liquid interface during solidification, and is accompanied by a segregation line that is formed when the concentrated molten steel enters between dendritic trees. When the degree is bad, holes are formed along the segregation line. There is a correlation between “degree of segregation” and “opening thickness (opening width)”, and the larger the “opening thickness”, the higher the “segregation degree”. It was found that HIC is more likely to occur as the “degree of segregation” is higher, so that the HIC is more likely to occur as the “opening thickness” is larger, and the presence or absence of HIC can be determined by the opening thickness. Therefore, in the present invention, the HIC property is evaluated based on the “opening thickness”.
なお、「開孔厚み」が数10[μm]程度である微細な水平割れは、圧延時に圧着されるため、製品段階でUT欠陥とならないが、HIC発生の原因となる。そうすると、HICは、開孔が原因で発生するのでなく、偏析度が高いことが原因で発生すると考えられる。 A fine horizontal crack having an “opening thickness” of about several tens [μm] is pressed during rolling and does not become a UT defect at the product stage, but causes HIC. Then, it is considered that HIC is generated not because of the opening, but because of the high degree of segregation.
次に、スラブ切断面において(図3参照)、幅方向両端からD/2を除いた幅W−Dの領域R3で中心偏析の偏析度(「最大偏析粒径(偏析粒の最大径)」と「所定の径以上の偏析粒の個数密度」)を調査する(図2のS2、第1偏析粒測定工程)。なお、以下において、「所定の径以上の偏析粒の個数密度」を単に「偏析粒の個数密度」又は「個数密度」と呼ぶことがある。 Next, (see Fig. 3) in the slab cut surface segregation ratio of center segregation in the region R 3 of the width W-D, except for the D / 2 from both ends in the width direction ( "up polarized析粒diameter (maximum diameter of the polarized析粒) And “number density of segregated grains having a predetermined diameter or more”) (S2 in FIG. 2, first segregated grain measuring step). In the following, “number density of segregated grains having a predetermined diameter or more” may be simply referred to as “number density of segregated grains” or “number density”.
中心偏析は最終凝固部に生成する欠陥である。図3に示すように、領域R1,R2は広面側及び狭面側から冷却されるが、領域R3は、主に広面側だけから冷却される。そのため、領域R3では、広面から厚み中心に向かって凝固が進行し、厚み中心部が最終凝固部となる。したがって、中心偏析は領域R3の厚み中心部近傍に発生する。そこで、ステップS2では、領域R3の厚み中心部近傍で中心偏析の偏析度を調査する。 Center segregation is a defect generated in the final solidified part. As shown in FIG. 3, the regions R 1 and R 2 are cooled from the wide surface side and the narrow surface side, but the region R 3 is mainly cooled only from the wide surface side. Therefore, in the region R 3, solidification proceeds toward the thickness center from broad surface, the thickness center portion is the final solidified portion. Thus, the central segregation occurs in the thickness center portion near the region R 3. Therefore, in step S2, to investigate the segregation ratio of the center segregation in the thickness center portion near the region R 3.
また、本発明では、中心偏析の偏析度を「最大偏析粒径」及び「所定の径以上の偏析粒の個数密度」から評価している。偏析度の調査方法には種々の方法があるが、「偏析粒径」と「偏析度」には相関関係があり、「偏析粒径」が大きいほど「偏析度」が高い傾向がある(参考文献:日本鋼管技報No.121 (1988))。「偏析度」が高いほどHICが発生しやすいため、「偏析粒径」が大きいほどHICが発生しやすいといえる。 In the present invention, the segregation degree of the center segregation is evaluated from “maximum segregation particle diameter” and “number density of segregation grains having a predetermined diameter or more”. There are various methods for investigating the degree of segregation, but there is a correlation between “segregation particle size” and “segregation degree”. The larger the “segregation particle size”, the higher the “segregation degree” (reference) Document: Nippon Steel Pipe Technical Report No. 121 (1988)). As the “segregation degree” is higher, HIC is more likely to occur. Therefore, it can be said that the larger the “segregation particle diameter” is, the easier it is to generate HIC.
また、「所定の径以上の偏析粒の個数密度」と「最大偏析粒径」にも相関関係があり、「個数密度」が多いほど「最大偏析粒径」は大きい傾向がある(参考文献:CAMP-ISIJ Vol.2(1989) p,1150)。上述したように、「偏析粒径」が大きいほど「偏析度」が高い傾向があることから、「個数密度」が多いほど、「偏析度」が高い、つまり、HICが発生しやすいといえる。 In addition, there is a correlation between "number density of segregated grains having a predetermined diameter or more" and "maximum segregated particle diameter", and "maximum segregated particle diameter" tends to increase as the "number density" increases (references: CAMP-ISIJ Vol.2 (1989) p, 1150). As described above, since the “segregation degree” tends to be higher as the “segregation particle size” is larger, it can be said that as the “number density” is larger, the “segregation degree” is higher, that is, HIC is more likely to occur.
以上から、「最大偏析粒径」及び「偏析粒の個数密度」によって「偏析度」を評価できると考えられる。また、「偏析粒径」及び「個数密度」は目視で測定できるため、簡易に且つ短時間で偏析度を調査できる。そこで、本発明では、「最大偏析粒径」及び「偏析粒の個数密度」を基にHIC性を評価する。 From the above, it is considered that the “degree of segregation” can be evaluated by the “maximum segregation particle diameter” and the “number density of segregation grains”. In addition, since the “segregated particle diameter” and “number density” can be measured visually, the degree of segregation can be investigated easily and in a short time. Therefore, in the present invention, the HIC property is evaluated based on the “maximum segregated particle diameter” and the “number density of segregated grains”.
ここで、「最大偏析粒径」及び「偏析粒の個数密度」の測定方法の一例を、図3を参照しつつ説明する。 Here, an example of a method for measuring “maximum segregated particle diameter” and “number density of segregated grains” will be described with reference to FIG.
図3(a)に示すように、領域R3を幅方向にn個の所定の区間r1,r2,r3・・・
rnに区切り(nは1以上の自然数)、各区間の厚み中心部で「最大偏析粒径」及び「個数密度」を測定する。ここで、所定の区間r1,r2,r3・・・rnは、それぞれ、幅W1×厚みD1の長方形状の領域である。(図3(b)参照)。また、「所定の径以上の偏析粒の個数密度」は、以下の式から算出される。
区間r1に所定の径以上の偏析粒がN個存在する場合(図3(b)参照)、
区間r1の「所定の径以上の偏析粒の個数密度」=N/(W1×D1)
As shown in FIG. 3A, the region R 3 is divided into n predetermined sections r 1 , r 2 , r 3 ... In the width direction.
Divide into r n (n is a natural number of 1 or more), and measure “maximum segregation particle size” and “number density” at the center of thickness in each section. Here, the predetermined interval r 1, r 2, r 3 ··· r n are each rectangular region having a width W 1 × a thickness D 1. (See FIG. 3B). The “number density of segregated grains having a predetermined diameter or more” is calculated from the following equation.
When N segregated grains having a predetermined diameter or more exist in the section r 1 (see FIG. 3B),
“Number density of segregated grains having a predetermined diameter or more” in the section r 1 = N / (W 1 × D 1 )
次に、ステップS1及びステップS2で調査したスラブと同一の鋳造条件で鋳造したスラブを耐サワー鋼用の圧延条件(圧延開始表面温度、圧延終了表面温度、最終製品厚み等)で圧延し、製品(鋼材)を製造する。そして、製品に対してHIC試験を行い(図2のS3)、HIC発生の有無を調べる(HIC性の評価)。 Next, the slab cast under the same casting conditions as the slab investigated in step S1 and step S2 is rolled under rolling conditions for rolling sour steel (rolling start surface temperature, rolling end surface temperature, final product thickness, etc.) (Steel) is manufactured. Then, an HIC test is performed on the product (S3 in FIG. 2), and the presence or absence of HIC generation is examined (evaluation of HIC properties).
ここで、「同一の鋳造条件」とは、i)鋳造速度が一定であること、ii)ノズル詰まり等の操業異常が発生していないこと、iii)冷却条件やロール隙間が同じであること等である。これらの操業因子は水平割れ及び中心偏析に大きな影響を与えるため、これらの因子が変化するとHIC性の評価が異なる。後述する閾値決定工程では(S4)、ステップS1及びステップS2で得た偏析度とステップS3で得たHIC試験結果とを対応させるため、これらのHIC性が異なると閾値を決定することができない。そこで、同一の鋳造条件としている。なお、「同一の鋳造条件で鋳造したスラブ」には、ステップS1及びステップS2で調査したスラブが含まれる。 Here, “same casting conditions” means i) that the casting speed is constant, ii) that there is no operational abnormality such as nozzle clogging, iii) that the cooling conditions and roll gap are the same, etc. It is. Since these operating factors have a large effect on horizontal cracking and center segregation, the evaluation of HIC properties differs when these factors change. In the threshold value determination step described later (S4), the segregation degree obtained in step S1 and step S2 and the HIC test result obtained in step S3 are made to correspond to each other. Therefore, if these HIC properties are different, the threshold value cannot be determined. Therefore, the same casting conditions are used. The “slab cast under the same casting conditions” includes the slab investigated in step S1 and step S2.
また、HIC試験は、スラブの領域R1,R2,R3に対応する領域(製品領域)でそれぞれ実施する(図3参照)。そして、ステップS2で領域R3を幅方向にn個の所定の区間r1,r2,r3・・・rnに区切った場合は、区間r1,r2,r3・・・rnに対応する領域(製品領域)でそれぞれHIC試験を実施する。 In addition, the HIC test is performed in the regions (product regions) corresponding to the slab regions R 1 , R 2 , and R 3 (see FIG. 3). When the region R 3 is divided into n predetermined sections r 1 , r 2 , r 3 ... R n in the width direction in step S2, the sections r 1 , r 2 , r 3 . Each HIC test is performed in the area corresponding to n (product area).
例えば、スラブを鋳造方向に圧延した場合(圧延方向が鋳造方向である場合)は、図5(a)に示すように、圧延前後で幅が変化しないため、スラブの幅W=製品の幅Wである。この場合、「(スラブ)領域R1,R2に対応する領域」は「製品の幅方向両端から幅D/2の範囲の領域R11,R12」であり、「(スラブ)領域R3に対応する領域」は「製品の幅方向両端からD/2を除く幅W−Dの範囲の領域R13」である。 For example, when the slab is rolled in the casting direction (when the rolling direction is the casting direction), as shown in FIG. 5A, the width does not change before and after rolling, so the slab width W = the product width W. It is. In this case, “regions corresponding to (slab) regions R 1 , R 2 ” are “regions R 11 , R 12 within a range of width D / 2 from both ends in the width direction of the product”, and “(slab) region R 3 The “region corresponding to” is “region R 13 in the range of width WD excluding D / 2 from both ends in the width direction of the product”.
また、「(スラブ)領域R3の区間r1,r2,r3・・・rnに対応する領域」は、製品の領域R13を幅方向にn個の所定の区間に区切った場合の「所定の区間r11,r12,r13・・・rn1」にそれぞれ対応する。ここで、所定の区間r11,r12,r13・・・rn1は、幅W1×厚みD1の長方形状の領域である。 Also, "(slab) sections r 1, r 2, r 3 ··· r n the region corresponding to the region R 3" when separated regions R 13 of the product in the width direction into n predetermined section Corresponding to “predetermined sections r 11 , r 12 , r 13 ... R n1 ”. Here, the predetermined sections r 11 , r 12 , r 13 ... R n1 are rectangular regions of width W 1 × thickness D 1 .
一方、スラブを幅方向に圧延した場合(圧延方向に幅方向が含まれる場合)は、図5(b)に示すように、圧延前後で幅が変化するため、スラブの幅W<製品の幅Waとなる。この場合、スラブの領域R1,R2,R3に対応する領域R21,R22,R23は圧延比(製品の幅Wa/スラブの幅W)によって決まる。また、「(スラブ)領域R3の区間r1,r2,r3・・・rnに対応する領域」も、圧延比Wa/Wによって定まる「区間r21,r22,r23・・・rn2」となる。 On the other hand, when the slab is rolled in the width direction (when the width direction is included in the rolling direction), as shown in FIG. 5B, the width changes before and after rolling, so the slab width W <the product width. Wa. In this case, the regions R 21 , R 22 , R 23 corresponding to the slab regions R 1 , R 2 , R 3 are determined by the rolling ratio (product width Wa / slab width W). Also, "(slab) sections r 1 of region R 3, r 2, r 3 ··· region corresponding to r n" is also determined by the rolling ratio Wa / W "interval r 21, r 22, r 23 ··・ R n2 ”.
次に、図2のフローチャートに戻って、『ステップS1で得た「最大開孔厚みt1,t2」』と『ステップS3で得た「評価結果」(HIC性)』とから、内部割れが原因のHIC性に関する(HICが発生しない)「最大開孔厚みの閾値(tθ)」を決定する(S4、閾値決定工程)。 Next, referring back to the flowchart of FIG. 2, an internal crack is obtained from “the maximum opening thickness t 1 , t 2 ” obtained in step S 1 and “the evaluation result” (HIC property) obtained in step S 3. The “maximum aperture thickness threshold value (t θ )” relating to the HIC property caused by (no HIC occurs) is determined (S4, threshold determination step).
このとき、スラブと製品で互いに対応する領域で得られた結果を対応させる。
例えば、スラブを鋳造方向に圧延した場合(図5(a)参照)、
ステップS3(HIC試験)の結果が、製品領域R11では「HIC発生有」、領域R12では「HIC発生無」であるとき、
i)開孔厚みt1(スラブ領域R1の開孔厚み)のときに「HIC発生有」(製品領域R11の結果)
i)開孔厚みt2(スラブ領域R2の開孔厚み)のときに「HIC発生無」(製品領域R12の結果)
とする。
At this time, the results obtained in the areas corresponding to each other in the slab and the product are made to correspond.
For example, when the slab is rolled in the casting direction (see FIG. 5A),
When Step S3 (HIC test) results, in the product region R 11 "HIC generation Yes", it is in the region R 12 "HIC generated no",
i) “HIC occurs” at the opening thickness t 1 (opening thickness of slab region R 1 ) (result of product region R 11 )
i) “No HIC generation” at the opening thickness t 2 (opening thickness of the slab region R 2 ) (result of the product region R 12 )
And
また、スラブを幅方向に圧延した場合は(図5(b)参照)、
ステップS3(HIC試験)の結果が、製品領域R21では「HIC発生有り」、領域R12では「HIC発生無し」であるとき、
i)開孔厚みt1(スラブ領域R1の開孔厚み)のときに「HIC発生有」(製品領域R21の結果)
i)開孔厚みt2(スラブ領域R2の開孔厚み)のときに「HIC発生無」(製品領域R22の結果)
とする。
Moreover, when rolling a slab in the width direction (refer FIG.5 (b)),
When the result of step S3 (HIC test) is “HIC generated” in the product region R 21 and “HIC not generated” in the region R 12 ,
i) “HIC occurs” at the opening thickness t 1 (opening thickness of slab region R 1 ) (result of product region R 21 )
i) “No HIC generation” at the opening thickness t 2 (opening thickness of the slab region R 2 ) (result of the product region R 22 )
And
上記の複数の結果から、HIC発生有無の境界となる開孔厚みの閾値tθを決定する。本実施形態では、HICが発生しない最大の開孔厚みを「閾値tθ」としている。 A plurality of results of the determines the threshold t theta apertures thickness bounding the HIC occurrence or non-occurrence. In the present embodiment, the maximum opening thickness at which no HIC is generated is defined as “threshold value t θ ”.
次に、図2のフローチャートに戻って、『ステップS2で得た「最大偏析粒径」及び「個数密度」』と『ステップS3で得た「評価結果」(HIC性)』とから、HIC性に関する(HICが発生するか否かを決める)「最大偏析粒径及び個数密度の閾値関数fθ(d,m)」を決定する(S4)。中心偏析の偏析度は「最大偏析粒径」及び「偏析粒の個数密度」によって評価できることから、中心偏析が原因のHICが発生するか否かの境界となる値(閾値)は最大偏析粒径及び個数密度の関数で表される。 Next, returning to the flowchart of FIG. 2, from the “maximum segregation particle size” and “number density” obtained in step S2 ”and“ evaluation result ”(HIC property) obtained in step S3, the HIC property is obtained. “Determines whether or not HIC occurs” is determined (threshold function f θ (d, m) of maximum segregation particle size and number density) (S4). Since the degree of segregation of center segregation can be evaluated by “maximum segregation grain size” and “number density of segregation grains”, the value (threshold) that serves as a boundary on whether or not HIC occurs due to center segregation is the maximum segregation grain size. And a function of number density.
このときも、スラブと製品で互いに対応する領域で得られた結果を対応させる。
例えば、スラブを鋳造方向に圧延した場合(図5(a)参照)、
ステップS3(HIC試験)の結果が、製品領域r11では「HIC発生有」、領域r12では「HIC発生有」、・・・、領域rn1では「HIC発生無」であるとき、
i)最大偏析粒径d1、個数密度m1(スラブ領域r1の最大偏析粒径、個数密度)のときに「HIC発生有」(製品領域r11の結果)
ii)最大偏析粒径d2、個数密度m2(スラブ領域r2の最大偏析粒径、個数密度)のときに「HIC発生有」(製品領域r12の結果)・・・
iii)最大偏析粒径dn、個数密度mn(スラブ領域rnの最大偏析粒径、個数密度)のときに「HIC発生無」(製品領域rn1の結果)
とする。
Also at this time, the results obtained in the areas corresponding to each other in the slab and the product are made to correspond.
For example, when the slab is rolled in the casting direction (see FIG. 5A),
When Step S3 (HIC test) results, in the product region r 11 "HIC generation Yes", in the region r 12 "HIC generation Yes", ..., is in the region r n1 "HIC generated no",
i) “HIC is present” when the maximum segregation particle diameter d 1 and number density m 1 (maximum segregation particle diameter and number density of slab region r 1 ) (result of product region r 11 )
ii) “HIC is present” when the maximum segregation particle size d 2 and number density m 2 (maximum segregation particle size and number density of slab region r 2 ) (result of product region r 12 )
iii) maximum deviation析粒diameter d n, the number density m n (maximum deviation析粒size of the slab region r n, number density) "HIC generated no" (the result of the product region r n1 at)
And
また、スラブを幅方向に圧延した場合(図5(b)参照)、
ステップS3(HIC試験)の結果が、製品領域r21では「HIC発生有」、領域r22では「HIC発生有」、・・・、領域rn2では「HIC発生無」であるとき、
i)最大偏析粒径d1、個数密度m1(スラブ領域r1の最大偏析粒径、個数密度)のときに「HIC発生有」(製品領域r21の結果)
ii)最大偏析粒径d2、個数密度m2(スラブ領域r2の最大偏析粒径、個数密度)のときに「HIC発生有」(製品領域r22の結果)・・・
iii)最大偏析粒径dn、個数密度mn(スラブ領域rnの最大偏析粒径、個数密度)のときに「HIC発生無」(製品領域rn2の結果)
とする。
Moreover, when rolling a slab in the width direction (refer FIG.5 (b)),
When the result of step S3 (HIC test) is “HIC occurs” in the product region r 21 , “HIC occurs” in the region r 22 ,..., “HIC does not occur” in the region r n2 ,
i) “HIC is present” when the maximum segregation particle size d 1 and number density m 1 (maximum segregation particle size and number density of slab region r 1 ) (result of product region r 21 )
ii) “HIC is present” when the maximum segregation particle size d 2 and number density m 2 (maximum segregation particle size and number density of slab region r 2 ) (result of product region r 22 ).
iii) maximum deviation析粒diameter d n, the number density m n (maximum deviation析粒size of the slab region r n, number density) "HIC generated no" (the result of the product region r n2 when)
And
上記の複数の結果から、HIC発生有無の境界となる最大偏析粒径及び個数密度の閾値関数fθ(d,m)を決定する。ここで、閾値関数fθ(d,m)とは、最大偏析粒径d及び個数密度mから決まる、HICが発生するか否かを判定する閾値となる関数である。そして、閾値関数fθ(d,m)から、「HICが発生する最大偏析粒径及び個数密度の範囲」(HIC発生範囲)と「HICが発生しない最大偏析粒径及び個数密度の範囲」(HIC不発生範囲)を決定する(図2のS5、HIC発生範囲決定工程)。 Based on the above results, the threshold function f θ (d, m) of the maximum segregation particle size and number density, which becomes the boundary of whether or not HIC occurs, is determined. Here, the threshold function f θ (d, m) is a function serving as a threshold for determining whether or not HIC occurs, which is determined from the maximum segregated particle diameter d and the number density m. Then, from the threshold function f θ (d, m), “maximum segregation particle size and number density range where HIC occurs” (HIC generation range) and “maximum segregation particle size and number density range where HIC does not occur” ( HIC non-occurrence range) is determined (S5 in FIG. 2, HIC occurrence range determination step).
以上のように、ステップS1〜S4から、「開孔厚みの閾値tθ」と「最大偏析粒径及び個数密度の閾値関数fθ(d,m)」とを決定する。また、「最大偏析粒径及び個数密度の閾値関数fθ(d,m)」から、「HICが発生する最大偏析粒径及び個数密度の範囲」(HIC発生範囲)と「HICが発生しない最大偏析粒径及び個数密度の範囲」(HICが発生しない範囲)を決定する(ステップS5)。 As described above, the “thickness threshold value t θ ” and the “maximum segregation particle size and number density threshold function f θ (d, m)” are determined from steps S1 to S4. Further, from the “maximum segregation particle size and number density threshold function f θ (d, m)”, “maximum segregation particle size and number density range where HIC occurs” (HIC generation range) and “maximum where no HIC occurs” The “range of segregated particle size and number density” (range in which no HIC occurs) is determined (step S5).
次に、判定対象のスラブのHIC性を評価する。 Next, the HIC property of the judgment target slab is evaluated.
判定対象のスラブを鋳造方向に対して垂直な方向に切断し、切断面において(図3参照)、幅方向両端から幅D/2の範囲(領域R1,R2)で水平割れが存在するかを調べる(図2に示すS6)。水平割れが存在する場合は(S6:YES)、幅D/2の範囲で水平割れの「最大開孔厚みt」を測定する(S7、第2開孔厚み測定工程)。なお、幅D/2の範囲に2つ以上の水平割れが存在する場合は、ステップS1と同様に、最も大きな開孔を有する水平割れの最も開孔している部分(開孔厚みが最も厚い部分)の開孔厚みを最大開孔厚みtとする。 A slab to be judged is cut in a direction perpendicular to the casting direction, and a horizontal crack exists in the cut surface (see FIG. 3) in the range of width D / 2 from both ends in the width direction (regions R 1 and R 2 ). (S6 shown in FIG. 2). When the horizontal crack exists (S6: YES), the “maximum hole thickness t” of the horizontal crack is measured in the range of the width D / 2 (S7, second hole thickness measuring step). In addition, when two or more horizontal cracks exist in the range of the width D / 2, as in step S1, the most open part of the horizontal crack having the largest opening (the thickness of the hole is the thickest). The opening thickness of the portion) is defined as the maximum opening thickness t.
そして、「開孔厚みt」とステップS4で決定した「閾値(tθ)」とを比較し、開孔厚みt>閾値tθである場合は(S8:YES)、水平割れ部の偏析度が高いため、水平割れが原因のHICが発生すると判断する。このようなスラブを耐サワー鋼に充当することはできないため、判定対象のスラブを耐サワー鋼以外の製品へ向け先を変更する(S9、変更工程)。 Then, the “opening thickness t” is compared with the “threshold (t θ )” determined in step S4. If the opening thickness t> the threshold t θ (S8: YES), the segregation degree of the horizontal crack portion Therefore, it is determined that HIC caused by horizontal cracking occurs. Since such a slab cannot be applied to sour-resistant steel, the destination of the judgment target slab is changed to a product other than the sour-resistant steel (S9, changing step).
一方、開孔厚みt≦閾値tθである場合は(S8:NO)、水平割れ部の偏析度が低いため、水平割れが原因のHICが発生しないと判断する。また、ステップS6に戻って、スラブ切断面の領域R1,R2に水平割れが存在しない場合も(S6:NO)、水平割れ部の偏析度が低いため、水平割れが原因のHICが発生しないと判断する。 On the other hand, if the opening thickness t ≦ threshold t theta is (S8: NO), due to the low segregation ratio of horizontal cracking unit, it determines a horizontal crack HIC caused does not occur. Further, returning to step S6, even when there is no horizontal crack in the slab cut surface regions R 1 and R 2 (S6: NO), the segregation degree of the horizontal crack portion is low, so that HIC occurs due to the horizontal crack. Judge not to.
しかし、中心偏析が原因のHICが発生する可能性があるため、ステップS10に移行して、判定対象のスラブ切断面の幅方向両端からD/2を除く幅W−Dの範囲(領域R3)において(図3参照)、厚み中心部で「最大偏析粒径d」と「所定の径以上の偏析粒の個数密度m」を測定する(S10、第2偏析粒測定工程)。 However, since there is a possibility that HIC due to center segregation may occur, the process proceeds to step S10, and the range of the width WD excluding D / 2 from both ends in the width direction of the slab cut surface to be determined (region R 3 ) (See FIG. 3), “maximum segregation particle diameter d” and “number density m of segregation grains having a predetermined diameter or more” are measured at the thickness center (S10, second segregation grain measurement step).
ここで、「所定の径以上の偏析粒の個数密度m」の「所定の径」は、ステップS2の「所定の径以上の偏析粒の個数密度m1」の「所定の径」と同一の径である。例えば、ステップS2の「所定の径」を直径1.2[mm]とした場合は、ステップS10の「所定の径」を直径1.2[mm]とする。 Here, the “predetermined diameter” of the “number density m of segregated grains having a predetermined diameter or more” is the same as the “predetermined diameter” of the “number density of segregated grains having a predetermined diameter or more m 1 ” in step S 2. Is the diameter. For example, when the “predetermined diameter” in step S2 is 1.2 [mm], the “predetermined diameter” in step S10 is 1.2 [mm].
また、ステップS2で、スラブの領域R3を幅方向にn個の所定の区間r1,r2,r3・・・rnに区切った場合は(図3,5参照)、ステップS10でも、領域R3を幅方向にn個の所定の区間r1,r2,r3・・・rnに区切り、各区間の厚み中心部で「最大偏析粒径d」と「個数密度m」を測定する。この場合、ステップS10の「所定の区間」は、ステップS2の「所定の区間」と同じ区間(幅W1×厚みD1の長方形状の領域)とする。 If the slab region R 3 is divided into n predetermined sections r 1 , r 2 , r 3 ... Rn in the width direction in step S2 (see FIGS. 3 and 5), also in step S10 the region R 3 in the width direction separated into n predetermined interval r 1, r 2, r 3 ··· r n, a thickness center portion of each section "maximum polarization析粒diameter d""number density m" Measure. In this case, the “predetermined section” in step S10 is the same section as the “predetermined section” in step S2 (rectangular region of width W 1 × thickness D 1 ).
次に、判定対象スラブ(各区間)の「最大偏析粒径d」及び「個数密度m」と、閾値dθ,mθから決定した「HIC発生範囲」とを比較し、「最大偏析粒径d」及び「個数密度m」が「HIC発生範囲」にある場合は(S11:YES)、中心偏析部の偏析度が高いため、中心偏析が原因のHICが発生すると判断する。また、スラブの領域R3を幅方向にn個の所定の区間r1,r2,r3・・・rnに区切った場合は(図3参照)、最大偏析粒径d>閾値dθである区間が1つでもあるとき(S11:YES)、中心偏析が原因のHICが発生すると判断し、判定対象のスラブを耐サワー鋼以外の製品へ向け先を変更する(S9)。 Next, the “maximum segregation particle size d” and “number density m” of the judgment target slab (each section) are compared with the “HIC generation range” determined from the threshold values d θ and m θ , When “d” and “number density m” are in the “HIC generation range” (S11: YES), the segregation degree of the center segregation portion is high, and it is determined that HIC is caused by center segregation. When the slab region R 3 is divided into n predetermined sections r 1 , r 2 , r 3 ... Rn in the width direction (see FIG. 3), the maximum segregated particle diameter d> threshold value d θ. When there is at least one section (S11: YES), it is determined that HIC is caused by center segregation, and the destination of the determination target slab is changed to a product other than sour steel (S9).
一方、判定対象スラブ(各区間)の「最大偏析粒径d」及び「個数密度m」が「HIC発生範囲」にない場合は(S11:NO)、「最大偏析粒径d」及び「個数密度m」が「HIC不発生範囲」にあると判断する。この場合は、中心偏析部の偏析度が低いため、中心偏析が原因のHICは発生しないと判断し、判定対象のスラブを耐サワー鋼へ充当する(S12)。 On the other hand, when the “maximum segregation particle size d” and “number density m” of the judgment target slab (each section) are not in the “HIC generation range” (S11: NO), “maximum segregation particle size d” and “number density” m ”is determined to be in the“ HIC non-occurrence range ”. In this case, since the segregation degree of the center segregation portion is low, it is determined that HIC due to center segregation does not occur, and the determination target slab is applied to sour-resistant steel (S12).
また、スラブの領域R3を幅方向にn個の所定の区間r1,r2,r3・・・rnに区切った場合は(図3参照)、n個の全区間で「最大偏析粒径d」及び「個数密度m」が「HIC発生範囲」にないときは(S11:NO)、領域R3の全範囲で「最大偏析粒径d」及び「個数密度m」が「HIC不発生範囲」にあるため、中心偏析が原因のHICは発生しないと判断し、判定対象のスラブを耐サワー鋼へ充当する(S12)。 When the slab region R 3 is divided into n predetermined sections r 1 , r 2 , r 3 ... Rn in the width direction (see FIG. 3), the “maximum segregation” is applied to all the n sections. when the particle diameter d "and" number density m "is not in the" HIC generation range "(S11: nO), the entire range of the region R 3" maximum polarization析粒diameter d "and" number density m "is" HIC not Since it is in the “occurrence range”, it is determined that HIC due to center segregation does not occur, and the determination target slab is applied to the sour-resistant steel (S12).
このように、本実施形態では、HIC性の評価に「内部割れの開孔厚み」と「最大偏析粒径及び個数密度」を用いている。これらにより、鋳片の内部品質(内部割れ及び中心偏析の偏析度)を正確に評価できるため、HIC試験を行うことなく、スラブの段階でHIC性を評価できる。そして、この評価結果から製品の用途を決定できる。これにより、数週間を要するHIC試験を省略して製品を出荷できるため、製造期間を大幅に短縮することができる。 As described above, in this embodiment, the “opening thickness of the internal crack” and the “maximum segregation particle size and number density” are used for the evaluation of the HIC property. As a result, the internal quality of the slab (the degree of segregation of internal cracks and center segregation) can be accurately evaluated, so that the HIC property can be evaluated at the slab stage without performing the HIC test. And the use of a product can be determined from this evaluation result. As a result, the product can be shipped without an HIC test that takes several weeks, so that the manufacturing period can be greatly shortened.
また、本実施形態では、中心偏析の偏析度を「最大偏析粒径及び個数密度」によって評価している。偏析度の評価方法にはEPMAや燃焼赤外線吸収法が知られているが、これらの方法では、(1)設備導入が必要となり、(2)複数の偏析を測定するために長時間を要し、また、(3)分析者の確保が必要となる。これに対し、本発明では、スラブの凝固組織を目視観察するだけで「最大偏析粒径及び個数密度」を測定できるため、簡易に且つ短時間で偏析度を評価できる。 In the present embodiment, the degree of segregation of center segregation is evaluated by “maximum segregation particle size and number density”. EPMA and combustion infrared absorption methods are known as methods for evaluating the degree of segregation, but these methods require (1) the introduction of equipment and (2) a long time to measure multiple segregations. (3) It is necessary to secure analysts. On the other hand, in the present invention, since the “maximum segregation particle size and number density” can be measured simply by visually observing the solidified structure of the slab, the degree of segregation can be evaluated easily and in a short time.
なお、本実施形態では、HICが発生すると判断した場合、スラブを耐サワー鋼以外の製品へ向け先を変更したが、耐サワー鋼向けに鋳造したスラブは、その他のラインパイプ材に充当可能な品質である。特に、耐サワー鋼で要求される水平割れ及び中心偏析レベルはその他のラインパイプ材で要求される水平割れ及び中心偏析レベルに比べて厳格であるため、上記判定で偏析度が高い(水平割れ又は中心偏析が原因でHICが発生する)と判断しても、その他のラインパイプ材に充当可能な良好な品質である。 In this embodiment, when it is determined that HIC occurs, the destination of the slab is changed to a product other than the sour-resistant steel, but the slab cast for the sour-resistant steel can be applied to other line pipe materials. Quality. In particular, the level of horizontal cracking and center segregation required for sour-resistant steel is stricter than the level of horizontal cracking and center segregation required for other line pipe materials. Even if it is determined that HIC occurs due to center segregation), it is of good quality that can be applied to other line pipe materials.
また、閾値の決定(S1〜S4)には、複数のスラブの測定結果及び試験結果を用いることが好ましい。複数のスラブの測定結果及び試験結果を用いることによって、より正確な閾値を得ることができ、HIC発生有無の誤判定を減らすことができる。 Moreover, it is preferable to use the measurement results and test results of a plurality of slabs for determining the threshold values (S1 to S4). By using the measurement results and test results of a plurality of slabs, it is possible to obtain a more accurate threshold value and reduce the erroneous determination of whether or not HIC has occurred.
〔スラブの調査断面数〕
内部品質やHIC性の調査は、スラブや製品の1断面から評価してもよく、2断面以上から評価してもよい。以下に、同一チャージのスラブにおいて複数断面を調査した結果(例1,2)を説明する。ここで、例1は、同一チャージの2断面を調査した例(後述する「実施例15」(表1参照))であり、例2は、同一チャージの3断面を調査した例(後述する「実施例2」(表1参照))である。
[Number of slab cross sections]
The investigation of internal quality and HIC property may be evaluated from one section of a slab or product, or may be evaluated from two or more sections. The results (Examples 1 and 2) of examining a plurality of cross sections in the slab having the same charge will be described below. Here, Example 1 is an example in which two cross sections of the same charge are examined (“Example 15” (see Table 1 described later)), and Example 2 is an example in which three cross sections of the same charge are investigated (described later in “ Example 2 "(see Table 1)).
<開孔厚みとHIC性>
図6に示すように、例1では、2断面のいずれも開孔厚みが0[mm]であり、また、HIC試験で水平割れ部を起点としたHICが発生しなかった。
また、例2では、3断面の開孔厚みが0.72[mm],0.73[mm],0.71[mm]であり、略同じ厚みであった。また、全ての断面で水平割れ部を起点にHICが発生した。
このように、同一チャージでは、断面が異なっても略同じ結果が得られた。
また、1断面だけを調査した場合も(50チャージ)、誤判定がなく、正確な評価ができることがわかった。
<Opening thickness and HIC properties>
As shown in FIG. 6, in Example 1, the aperture thickness was 0 [mm] in both cross sections, and no HIC was generated starting from the horizontal crack in the HIC test.
Moreover, in Example 2, the aperture thickness of the three cross sections was 0.72 [mm], 0.73 [mm], and 0.71 [mm], which were substantially the same thickness. Further, HIC occurred from the horizontal cracks in all the cross sections.
As described above, in the same charge, substantially the same result was obtained even if the cross sections were different.
In addition, when only one cross section was examined (50 charges), it was found that there was no misjudgment and accurate evaluation was possible.
<最大偏析粒径及び個数密度とHIC性>
図7に示すように、例1では、2断面の最大偏析粒径が1.12[mm]、1.15[mm]であり、個数密度はいずれも0[個/m2]であった。そして、HIC試験では、いずれの断面でも中心偏析部を起点としたHICが発生しなかった。
また、例2では、3断面の最大偏析粒径が2.45[mm]、2.42[mm]、2.48[mm]であり、個数密度は全て2000[個/m2]であった。そして、全ての断面で中心偏析部を起点にHICが発生した。
このように、同一チャージでは、断面が異なっても略同じ結果が得られた。
また、1断面だけを調査した場合も(50チャージ)、誤判定がなく、正確な評価ができることがわかった。
<Maximum segregation particle size, number density and HIC properties>
As shown in FIG. 7, in Example 1, the maximum segregation particle diameters of the two cross sections were 1.12 [mm] and 1.15 [mm], and the number density was 0 [pieces / m 2 ]. . In the HIC test, no HIC starting from the center segregation portion was generated in any cross section.
In Example 2, the maximum segregation particle size of the three cross sections was 2.45 [mm], 2.42 [mm], 2.48 [mm], and the number density was all 2000 [pieces / m 2 ]. It was. In all the cross sections, HIC was generated starting from the central segregation part.
As described above, in the same charge, substantially the same result was obtained even if the cross sections were different.
In addition, when only one cross section was examined (50 charges), it was found that there was no misjudgment and accurate evaluation was possible.
以上のように、同一チャージでは、各断面で略同じ結果が得られた。また、1断面を調査した場合も正確な評価が得られた。よって、調査断面数は、1断面でもよく、2断面以上でもよいことがわかった。 As described above, in the same charge, substantially the same result was obtained in each cross section. An accurate evaluation was also obtained when a cross section was examined. Therefore, it was found that the number of cross sections to be investigated may be one or two or more.
〔スラブの調査位置〕
スラブの調査位置(調査面)は、定常部であることが好ましいが、非定常部でもよい。ここで、「非定常部」とは、鋳造条件の変化時に鋳造された部分であり、鋳造初期(鋳造速度の上昇時)や鋳造末期(鋳造速度の下降時)に鋳造された部分等が挙げられる。非定常部で調査する場合は、図8に示すように、HIC試験を実施する部位に隣接した部分とすることが好ましい。このような部分はHIC試験結果と同様なHIC性を示すため、より正確な評価を行うことができる。
[Slab survey location]
The investigation position (survey surface) of the slab is preferably a stationary part, but may be an unsteady part. Here, the “unsteady part” is a part cast when the casting conditions are changed, such as a part cast at the beginning of casting (when the casting speed is increased) or at the end of casting (when the casting speed is lowered). It is done. When investigating in the unsteady part, as shown in FIG. 8, it is preferable to use a part adjacent to the site where the HIC test is performed. Since such a portion shows the same HIC property as the HIC test result, more accurate evaluation can be performed.
次に、本発明の判定方法を用いた実施例を説明する。表1及び図9,10には、閾値を決定するための実験条件及び実験結果を示している。 Next, examples using the determination method of the present invention will be described. Table 1 and FIGS. 9 and 10 show experimental conditions and experimental results for determining the threshold.
<鋳造>
表1に示す鋳造条件で、垂直曲げ連続鋳造機を用いてスラブを鋳造した。そして、スラブの全長が10〜15[m]である位置(定常部)でスラブを切断した。ここで、定常部とは、下記の条件を満たす部位である。
1)鋳造速度が一定である。
2)浸漬ノズル詰まり等の操業以上が発生していない。
3)冷却条件が変化していない。
4)ロール隙間が変化していない。
また、閾値を決定するため21チャージを鋳造した。そして、21チャージで水平割れを調査し、7チャージで中心偏析を調査した。
<Casting>
Under the casting conditions shown in Table 1, a slab was cast using a vertical bending continuous casting machine. And the slab was cut | disconnected in the position (stationary part) where the full length of a slab is 10-15 [m]. Here, the stationary part is a part that satisfies the following conditions.
1) The casting speed is constant.
2) No more operation such as clogging of immersion nozzle has occurred.
3) Cooling conditions have not changed.
4) The roll gap has not changed.
Also, 21 charges were cast to determine the threshold. And the horizontal crack was investigated by 21 charges, and center segregation was investigated by 7 charges.
次に、表1に示す条件を説明する。
(タンディッシュ内溶鋼の成分)
C,Mn,Nb,P,Caの濃度を発光分光分析法によって測定した。S濃度は低いため、発光分光分析法による測定が困難であった。そこで、S濃度の測定に燃焼−赤外線吸収法を用いた。
(鋳造条件)
・比水量
比水量=(鋳型直下から連鋳機最終ロールまでの単位時間当たりの全二次冷却水量[l/min.])/(単位時間当たりの鋳造鋳片重量[kg/min.])
・鋳造速度
鋳片の引抜き速度[m/min.]であり、鋳片に接触するロール(メジャーロール)の直径(周長)と回転速度(単位時間当たりの回転数)から算出した。
(圧延条件)
・圧延終了表面温度
圧延終了時の鋼板の表面温度[℃]であり、放射温度計で測定した。
・冷却開始表面温度
圧延後の冷却開始時の鋼板の表面温度[℃]であり、放射温度計で測定した。
・冷却速度
圧延後の冷却時の平均表面冷却速度[℃/S]である。
Next, the conditions shown in Table 1 will be described.
(Components of molten steel in tundish)
The concentrations of C, Mn, Nb, P, and Ca were measured by emission spectroscopy. Since the S concentration was low, it was difficult to measure by emission spectroscopic analysis. Therefore, the combustion-infrared absorption method was used for measuring the S concentration.
(Casting conditions)
-Specific water amount Specific water amount = (Total secondary cooling water amount per unit time from directly under the mold to the final roll of the continuous casting machine [l / min.]) / (Cast slab weight per unit time [kg / min.])
-Casting speed It is the drawing speed [m / min.] Of the slab, and was calculated from the diameter (peripheral length) of the roll (major roll) contacting the slab and the rotational speed (number of rotations per unit time).
(Rolling conditions)
-Rolling end surface temperature It is the surface temperature [° C] of the steel sheet at the end of rolling, and was measured with a radiation thermometer.
-Cooling start surface temperature It is the surface temperature [° C] of the steel sheet at the start of cooling after rolling, and was measured with a radiation thermometer.
Cooling rate This is the average surface cooling rate [° C./S] during cooling after rolling.
<水平割れの調査>
下記の順に作業を行った。
(1)スラブ切断面の幅方向両端からD/2の範囲を#800まで研磨した。
(2)研磨面をピクリン酸(20g/L)、塩化第二銅(5g/L)及び表面活性剤(60ml/L)で腐食した。
(3)腐食面を目視で確認し、水平割れが存在する部分を40mm×70mmの大きさに切り出した。
(4)切り出した試料をバフ研磨し、1μm以下の粗さに仕上げた。
(5)EPMAを用いてビーム径20μmで試料中の水平割れ部のMn偏析度をライン分析した(Cmax(Mn))。
(6)鋳造時に測定したタンディッシュ内溶鋼のMn濃度(C0(Mn))とCmax(Mn)から、Cmax(Mn)/C0(Mn)を算出した。
(7)EPMAを実施した部分の水平割れを顕微鏡(20倍〜50倍)で観察し、開孔厚みを測定した。
<Investigation of horizontal cracking>
Work was done in the following order.
(1) The range of D / 2 from the both ends in the width direction of the slab cut surface was polished to # 800.
(2) The polished surface was corroded with picric acid (20 g / L), cupric chloride (5 g / L) and a surfactant (60 ml / L).
(3) The corroded surface was visually confirmed, and a portion where a horizontal crack was present was cut into a size of 40 mm × 70 mm.
(4) The cut sample was buffed and finished to a roughness of 1 μm or less.
(5) Line analysis was performed on the Mn segregation degree of the horizontal crack portion in the sample with a beam diameter of 20 μm using EPMA (C max (Mn)).
(6) C max (Mn) / C 0 (Mn) was calculated from the Mn concentration (C 0 (Mn)) and C max (Mn) of the molten steel in the tundish measured during casting.
(7) Horizontal cracks in the portion where EPMA was performed were observed with a microscope (20 to 50 times), and the thickness of the hole was measured.
<中心偏析の調査>
下記の順に作業を行った。
(1)スラブ切断面の幅方向両端からD/2を除く幅W−Dの範囲を#800まで研磨した。
(2)研磨面をピクリン酸(20g/L)、塩化第二銅(5g/L)及び表面活性剤(60ml/L)で腐食した。
(3)最大偏析粒径を下記の方法によって算出した。
(a)スラブの幅方向両端からD/2を除く幅W−Dの範囲を幅方向に110mmの区間に区切り、各区間で、厚み中央から±15mmの範囲に存在する偏析粒の長径a及び短径bを、直尺を用いて目視で測定した。
(b)偏析粒の円相当径(粒径)dsを下記の式から算出した。
π×a/2×b/2(楕円面積)=π×(ds/2)2
ds=(a×b)0.5
(c)全区間の粒径dsのうち最大の粒径dsmaxを最大偏析粒径(偏析粒の最大径)とした。
(4)所定の径以上の偏析粒の個数密度を下記の方法によって算出した。
(a)スラブの幅方向両端からD/2を除く幅W−Dの範囲を幅方向に110[mm]の区間に区切り、各区間において、厚み中央から±15[mm]の範囲に存在する偏析粒(直径1.2[mm]の円より大きい偏析粒)の個数を目視で数えた。
ここで、偏析粒が直径1.2[mm]の円より大きいか否かは、偏析粒に直径1.2[mm]の円を印刷した透明なシートを重ねることによって確認した。
(b)各区間の個数密度を下記の式から算出した。
個数密度=個数/1つの区間の面積
=個数/(0.11[m]×0.03[m])
<Investigation of central segregation>
Work was done in the following order.
(1) The width WD range excluding D / 2 from both ends in the width direction of the slab cut surface was polished to # 800.
(2) The polished surface was corroded with picric acid (20 g / L), cupric chloride (5 g / L) and a surfactant (60 ml / L).
(3) The maximum segregation particle size was calculated by the following method.
(a) The range of width WD excluding D / 2 from both ends in the width direction of the slab is divided into sections of 110 mm in the width direction, and the major axis a of the segregated grains existing in the range of ± 15 mm from the thickness center in each section The minor axis b was measured visually using a straight scale.
(b) The equivalent circle diameter (particle diameter) ds of the segregated grains was calculated from the following formula.
π × a / 2 × b / 2 (elliptical area) = π × (ds / 2) 2
ds = (a × b) 0.5
(c) The maximum particle size ds max out of the particle size ds of all sections was defined as the maximum segregated particle size (the maximum diameter of the segregated particles).
(4) The number density of segregated grains having a predetermined diameter or more was calculated by the following method.
(a) A range of width WD excluding D / 2 from both ends in the width direction of the slab is divided into sections of 110 [mm] in the width direction, and each section exists in a range of ± 15 [mm] from the thickness center. The number of segregated grains (segregated grains larger than a circle having a diameter of 1.2 [mm]) was visually counted.
Here, whether or not the segregated grains were larger than a circle having a diameter of 1.2 [mm] was confirmed by superimposing a transparent sheet on which the circle having a diameter of 1.2 [mm] was printed on the segregated grains.
(b) The number density of each section was calculated from the following formula.
Number density = number / area of one section
= Number / (0.11 [m] × 0.03 [m])
<圧延条件>
スラブを鋳造方向に圧延し、スラブ厚み280[mm]が45[mm]になるまで圧延した。なお、スラブ幅方向には圧延を実施しなかった。
<Rolling conditions>
The slab was rolled in the casting direction until the slab thickness 280 [mm] reached 45 [mm]. Note that rolling was not performed in the slab width direction.
<HIC試験>
(a)圧延後の製品を幅方向に110mmの区間に区切り、各区間から幅110[mm]×厚み20[mm]×鋳造方向に30[mm]のサンプルを切り出した。
(b)各サンプルにHIC試験を実施した。HIC試験はNACE standard TM0284−2003に規定される方法に従って実施した。
(c)HIC試験後、サンプルを3箇所で切断し、各断面(3断面)を顕微鏡で観察し、割れの有無を確認した。
<HIC test>
(a) The product after rolling was divided into sections of 110 mm in the width direction, and samples of width 110 [mm] × thickness 20 [mm] × 30 [mm] in the casting direction were cut out from each section.
(b) An HIC test was performed on each sample. The HIC test was performed according to the method specified in NACE standard TM0284-2003.
(c) After the HIC test, the sample was cut at three locations, and each cross section (three cross sections) was observed with a microscope to check for cracks.
これらの結果を表1及び図9,10に示す。図9には、「開孔厚み」及び「Cmax(Mn)/(Co(Mn))」とHIC性の関係を示している。また、図10には、「最大偏析粒」及び「所定の径以上の偏析粒の個数密度」とHIC性の関係を示している。 These results are shown in Table 1 and FIGS. FIG. 9 shows the relationship between “opening thickness” and “C max (Mn) / (Co (Mn))” and the HIC property. FIG. 10 shows the relationship between “maximum segregated grains” and “number density of segregated grains having a predetermined diameter or more” and the HIC property.
<閾値の決定>
図9から、開孔厚み≦0.054[mm]の場合はHICが発生しなかったが、開孔厚み>0.054[mm]の場合はHICが発生する場合があった。そこで、開孔厚みの閾値を0.054[mm]とした(tθ=0.054[mm])。なお、開孔していない水平割れ(開孔厚み=0[mm])では、HICが発生しなかった。
上記閾値から判定対象のスラブにおいて、
(a)開孔厚み≦0.054[mm]の場合はHICが発生しないと判断する。
(b)開孔厚み>0.054[mm]の場合はHICが発生すると判断する。
<Determination of threshold>
From FIG. 9, HIC did not occur when the hole thickness ≦ 0.054 [mm], but HIC sometimes occurred when the hole thickness> 0.054 [mm]. Therefore, the threshold value of the opening thickness was set to 0.054 [mm] (t θ = 0.054 [mm]). Note that no HIC occurred in horizontal cracks (opening thickness = 0 [mm]) that were not open.
In the slab to be judged from the above threshold,
(a) When the hole thickness ≦ 0.054 [mm], it is determined that no HIC occurs.
(b) When the hole thickness is> 0.054 [mm], it is determined that HIC occurs.
また、図10から、
i)最大偏析粒径≦1.30[mm]の場合は、HICが発生しなかった。
ii)1.30[mm]<最大偏析粒径<1.86[mm]の場合は、HICが発生する場合と発生しない場合とが混在した。この範囲では、HICが発生するか否かの境界をy=−4166.67×x+8083.33で表すことができ、
y≦−4166.67×x+8083.33ではHICが発生しないが、
y>−4166.67×x+8083.33ではHICが発生することがわかった。
ここで、xは「最大偏析粒径」であり、yは「直径1.2mmの円より大きい偏析粒の個数密度」である。
iii)最大偏析粒径≧1.86[mm]の場合は、HICが発生した。
From FIG.
i) When the maximum segregated particle size ≦ 1.30 [mm], no HIC was generated.
ii) In the case of 1.30 [mm] <maximum segregation particle size <1.86 [mm], a case where HIC occurred and a case where HIC did not occur were mixed. In this range, the boundary of whether or not HIC occurs can be expressed as y = −4166.67 × x + 8083.33,
When y ≦ −4166.67 × x + 8083.33, no HIC occurs,
It was found that HIC occurred when y> −4166.67 × x + 8083.33.
Here, x is “maximum segregation particle diameter”, and y is “number density of segregation grains larger than a circle having a diameter of 1.2 mm”.
iii) When the maximum segregation particle size ≧ 1.86 [mm], HIC was generated.
そこで、最大偏析粒径及び個数密度(直径1.2mmの円より大きい偏析粒の個数密度)の閾値関数を下記とした。
・x=1.30[mm]
・y=−4166.67×x+8083.33(1.30[mm]<x<1.86[mm])
・x=1.86[mm]
そして、
i)HIC発生範囲を下記の2つの範囲とし、
・1.30[mm]<x<1.86[mm]且つy>−4166.67×x+8083.33
・x≧1.86[mm](yは全ての値を含む)
ii)HIC不発生範囲を下記の2つの範囲とした。
・x≦1.30[mm](yは全ての値を含む)
・1.30[mm]<x<1.86[mm]且つy≦−4166.67×x+8083.33
上記から、判定対象のスラブにおいて、
(a)x≦1.30[mm]では、yの値に関わらず、HICが発生しないと判断する。
(b)1.30[mm]<x<1.86[mm]では、
y≦−4166.67×x+8083.33の場合は、HICが発生しないと判断し、
y>−4166.67×x+8083.33の場合は、HICが発生すると判断する。
(c)x≧1.86[mm]では、yの値に関わらず、HICが発生すると判断する。
Therefore, the threshold function of the maximum segregated particle diameter and number density (number density of segregated grains larger than a circle having a diameter of 1.2 mm) was set as follows.
・ X = 1.30 [mm]
・ Y = −4166.67 × x + 8083.33 (1.30 [mm] <x <1.86 [mm])
・ X = 1.86 [mm]
And
i) The HIC generation range is the following two ranges,
1.30 [mm] <x <1.86 [mm] and y> −4166.67 × x + 8083.33
X ≧ 1.86 [mm] (y includes all values)
ii) The HIC non-occurrence range was set to the following two ranges.
・ X ≦ 1.30 [mm] (y includes all values)
1.30 [mm] <x <1.86 [mm] and y ≦ −4166.67 × x + 8083.33
From the above, in the slab to be judged,
(a) When x ≦ 1.30 [mm], it is determined that no HIC occurs regardless of the value of y.
(b) For 1.30 [mm] <x <1.86 [mm],
If y ≦ −4166.67 × x + 8083.33, it is determined that no HIC occurs,
When y> −4166.67 × x + 8083.33, it is determined that HIC occurs.
(c) When x ≧ 1.86 [mm], it is determined that HIC occurs regardless of the value of y.
そして、上記の閾値とHIC発生範囲及びHIC不発生範囲を用いて判定対象のスラブのHIC性を評価した。この結果を表2に示す。 And the HIC property of the judgment object slab was evaluated using the threshold value, the HIC occurrence range, and the HIC non-occurrence range. The results are shown in Table 2.
ここで、表2での調査方法及び評価方法について説明する。
<水平割れ>
(a)判定対象のスラブ切断面の幅方向両端から幅D/2の範囲をフライス加工し、染色浸透探傷試験(JIS Z2343)を実施した。
(b)水平割れが検出されなかった場合は(割れ無)、開孔厚みが検出下限以下(10μ[m]程度以下)と判断した。この厚みは閾値0.054[mm]以下であるため、水平割れが原因のHICが発生しないと判断した(試験a,c)。
(c)水平割れが検出された場合は(割れ有)、開孔していた部位をバフ研磨し、研磨面を20倍〜50倍の顕微鏡で観察して開孔厚みを測定した(試験b,d,e)。
試験bでは、開孔厚みが0.04[mm](<閾値0.054[mm])であったため、水平割れが原因のHICが発生しないと判断した。
一方、試験d,eでは、開孔厚みが0.11[mm],0.16[mm](>閾値0.054[mm])であったため、水平割れが原因のHICが発生すると判断した。
Here, the investigation method and the evaluation method in Table 2 will be described.
<Horizontal cracking>
(a) The range of width D / 2 from both ends in the width direction of the slab cut surface to be judged was milled, and a dye penetration test (JIS Z2343) was performed.
(b) When horizontal cracks were not detected (no cracks), it was determined that the aperture thickness was below the detection lower limit (less than about 10 μ [m]). Since this thickness is equal to or less than the threshold value 0.054 [mm], it was determined that no HIC caused by horizontal cracking occurred (tests a and c).
(c) When a horizontal crack was detected (with cracks), the holed portion was buffed and the polished surface was observed with a 20 to 50 times microscope to measure the hole thickness (test b). , d, e).
In test b, since the hole thickness was 0.04 [mm] (<threshold 0.054 [mm]), it was determined that no HIC caused by horizontal cracking occurred.
On the other hand, in tests d and e, the hole thicknesses were 0.11 [mm] and 0.16 [mm] (> threshold value 0.054 [mm]), so it was determined that HIC occurred due to horizontal cracking. .
<中心偏析>
・試験a
全区間で最も大きい最大偏析粒径は1.41[mm]であり、最大の個数密度(直径1.2mmの円より大きい偏析粒の個数密度)は1000[個/m2](<閾値2208.33)であり、HIC不発生範囲にある。そこで、中心偏析が原因のHICが発生しないと判断した。
・試験b
全区間で最も大きい最大偏析粒径は1.36[mm]であり、最大の個数密度(直径1.2mmの円より大きい偏析粒の個数密度)は1333[個/m2](<閾値2416.67)であり、HIC不発生範囲にある。そこで、中心偏析が原因のHICが発生しないと判断した。
・試験c
全区間で最も大きい最大偏析粒径は2.52[mm](>閾値1.86)であり、最大の個数密度(直径1.2mmの円より大きい偏析粒の個数密度)は2000[個/m2]であり、HIC発生範囲にある。そこで、中心偏析が原因のHICが発生すると判断した。
・試験d
全区間で最も大きい最大偏析粒径は1.15[mm](<閾値1.30)であり、最大の個数密度(直径1.2mmの円より大きい偏析粒の個数密度)は0[個/m2]であり、HIC不発生範囲にある。そこで、中心偏析が原因のHICが発生しないと判断した。
・試験e
全区間で最も大きい最大偏析粒径は2.75[mm](>閾値1.86)であり、最大の個数密度(直径1.2mmの円より大きい偏析粒の個数密度)は3000[個/m2]であり、HIC発生範囲にある。そこで、中心偏析が原因のHICが発生すると判断した。
<Center segregation>
・ Test a
The largest maximum segregation particle diameter in all sections is 1.41 [mm], and the maximum number density (number density of segregation grains larger than a circle having a diameter of 1.2 mm) is 1000 [pieces / m 2 ] (<threshold value 2208). .33), which is within the HIC non-occurrence range. Therefore, it was determined that no HIC caused by center segregation occurred.
・ Test b
The largest maximum segregation particle diameter in all sections is 1.36 [mm], and the maximum number density (number density of segregation grains larger than a circle having a diameter of 1.2 mm) is 1333 [pieces / m 2 ] (<threshold 2416). .67) and is in the HIC non-occurrence range. Therefore, it was determined that no HIC caused by center segregation occurred.
・ Test c
The largest maximum segregation particle diameter in all sections is 2.52 [mm] (> threshold value 1.86), and the maximum number density (number density of segregated grains larger than a circle having a diameter of 1.2 mm) is 2000 [pieces / piece. m 2 ], which is within the HIC generation range. Therefore, it was determined that HIC caused by center segregation occurred.
・ Test d
The largest maximum segregation particle diameter in all sections is 1.15 [mm] (<threshold value 1.30), and the maximum number density (number density of segregated grains larger than a circle having a diameter of 1.2 mm) is 0 [piece / m 2 ] and is in the HIC non-occurrence range. Therefore, it was determined that no HIC caused by center segregation occurred.
・ Test e
The largest maximum segregation particle diameter in all sections is 2.75 [mm] (> threshold value 1.86), and the maximum number density (number density of segregation grains larger than a circle having a diameter of 1.2 mm) is 3000 [pieces / m 2 ], which is within the HIC generation range. Therefore, it was determined that HIC caused by center segregation occurred.
上記結果から、実験No.a,bでは、HICが発生しないと判断し、製品を耐サワー鋼へ充当した(向け先を変更無し)。また、確認のため、HIC試験を実施すると、HICが発生しなかった。このように、判定結果は試験結果と同じ結果となった。 From the above results, in Experiment Nos. A and b, it was determined that no HIC was generated, and the product was applied to sour-resistant steel (the destination was not changed). Moreover, when the HIC test was conducted for confirmation, no HIC was generated. Thus, the determination result was the same as the test result.
一方、実験No.c〜eでは、HICが発生すると判断し、製品の向け先をラインパイプ向けのX60へ変更した。
また、確認のため、HIC試験を実施すると、
(i)実験No.cではスラブの幅方向両端からD/2を除く幅W-Dの範囲(中心偏析調査範囲)でHICが発生し、
(ii)実験No.dではスラブの幅方向両端から幅D/2の範囲(水平割れ調査範囲)でHICが発生し、
(iii)実験No.eではスラブの幅D/2の範囲(水平割れ調査範囲)及び幅W-Dの範囲(中心偏析調査範囲)で共にHICが発生した。
このように、判定結果は試験結果と同じ結果となった。なお、製品の向け先を変更しても、製品特性に問題はなかった。
On the other hand, in Experiment Nos. C to e, it was determined that HIC occurred, and the product destination was changed to X60 for the line pipe.
For confirmation, when the HIC test is performed,
(i) In experiment No. c, HIC occurred in the range of width WD (center segregation investigation range) excluding D / 2 from both ends in the width direction of the slab,
(ii) In Experiment No. d, HIC was generated in the range of width D / 2 (horizontal crack investigation range) from both ends in the width direction of the slab,
(iii) In Experiment No. e, HIC was generated in both the range of slab width D / 2 (horizontal cracking investigation range) and width WD (central segregation investigation range).
Thus, the determination result was the same as the test result. Even if the product destination was changed, there was no problem in the product characteristics.
そして、実験No.a,bでは、鋳造開始から出荷までの期間(鋳造→圧延→出荷)が19日であった。これに対し、HIC試験によってHIC性を評価する方法では、鋳造開始から出荷までの期間(鋳造→圧延→HIC試験→出荷)が28日と長期間を要した。本実施例では、HIC試験を省略できたため、鋳造開始から出荷までの期間を28日→19日へ大幅に短縮できた。 In Experiment Nos. A and b, the period from casting start to shipment (casting → rolling → shipment) was 19 days. On the other hand, in the method of evaluating the HIC property by the HIC test, the period from casting start to shipment (casting → rolling → HIC test → shipment) required a long period of 28 days. In this example, since the HIC test could be omitted, the period from the start of casting to shipment could be greatly shortened from 28 days to 19 days.
また、実験No.c〜eにおいて、スラブの段階で再溶製を開始したところ、鋳造開始から耐サワー鋼の出荷までの期間(鋳造→再溶製→圧延→出荷)が54日であった。これに対し、HIC試験で製品のHIC性を評価する方法では、HIC試験を行った後に再溶製を開始したため、鋳造開始から耐サワー鋼の出荷までの期間(鋳造→圧延→HIC試験→再溶製→圧延→HIC試験→出荷)が72日と長期間を要した。このように、本実施例では、圧延及びHIC試験を省略できたため、鋳造開始から出荷までの期間を72日→54日へ大幅に短縮できた。 In Experiment Nos. C to e, when remelting was started at the slab stage, the period from casting start to shipment of sour-resistant steel (casting → remelting → rolling → shipping) was 54 days. . On the other hand, in the method of evaluating the HIC property of the product by the HIC test, since the remelting was started after the HIC test, the period from the start of casting to the shipment of sour-resistant steel (casting → rolling → HIC test → restarting Melting → rolling → HIC test → shipping) took 72 days. Thus, in this example, since the rolling and HIC tests could be omitted, the period from the start of casting to shipment could be greatly shortened from 72 days to 54 days.
以上のように、本発明の判定方法を利用すると、HIC試験を行うことなく、鋳片の段階でHIC性を評価できたため、製造リードタイムを大幅に短縮できた。 As described above, when the determination method of the present invention is used, the HIC property can be evaluated at the slab stage without performing the HIC test, so that the manufacturing lead time can be greatly shortened.
また、別の試験で50チャージを鋳造し、各チャージのHIC性を評価したところ、47チャージではHICが発生しないと判断し、残りの3チャージのスラブではHICが発生すると判断した。その後、確認のため、HIC試験を行うと、上記の47チャージではHICが発生せず、残りの3チャージではHICが発生した。このように、本発明による判定結果は、HIC試験結果と同一の結果であり、本発明の判定方法は精度が高いといえる。また、残りの3チャージで製造した製品をHIC性が要求されないラインパイプ材へ充当したが、品質上の問題が生じなかった。 Further, when 50 charges were cast in another test and the HIC property of each charge was evaluated, it was determined that no HIC was generated at 47 charges, and HIC was determined to be generated at the remaining three charge slabs. After that, when the HIC test was performed for confirmation, HIC did not occur in the above 47 charges, and HIC occurred in the remaining 3 charges. Thus, the determination result according to the present invention is the same result as the HIC test result, and it can be said that the determination method of the present invention has high accuracy. Moreover, although the product manufactured with the remaining 3 charges was applied to the line pipe material in which HIC property is not requested | required, the problem on quality did not arise.
以上、本発明の実施形態について図面に基づいて説明したが、具体的な構成は、これらの実施形態に限定されるものでないと考えられるべきである。本発明の範囲は上記した説明ではなくて特許請求の範囲によって示され、特許請求の範囲と均等の意味及び範囲内でのすべての変更が含まれる。 As mentioned above, although embodiment of this invention was described based on drawing, it should be thought that a specific structure is not limited to these embodiment. The scope of the present invention is defined by the terms of the claims, rather than the description above, and includes all modifications within the scope and meaning equivalent to the terms of the claims.
例えば、上述の実施形態及び実施例では、図2に示すように、先ず、水平割れの「開孔厚み」を測定し、その後「最大偏析粒径」及び「個数密度」を測定したが(S1→S2、S6〜S10)、これらの順序を変更してもよい。例えば、「最大偏析粒径」及び「個数密度」を測定した後に、水平割れの「開孔厚み」を測定してもよい(S2→S1等)。また、水平割れの「開孔厚み」、「最大偏析粒径」及び「個数密度」の測定を同時期に行ってもよい。 For example, in the above-described embodiment and example, as shown in FIG. 2, first, the “opening thickness” of the horizontal crack was measured, and then the “maximum segregation particle size” and “number density” were measured (S1 → S2, S6 to S10), the order of these may be changed. For example, after measuring “maximum segregation particle diameter” and “number density”, “opening thickness” of horizontal cracks may be measured (S2 → S1, etc.). Further, measurement of “opening thickness”, “maximum segregation particle size” and “number density” of horizontal cracks may be performed at the same time.
さらに、上述の実施形態では、判定対象のスラブのHIC性を評価するときに(図2に)、先ず、水平割れの「開孔厚みt」と閾値tθとを比較し、その後、『「最大偏析粒径d」及び「個数密度m」』と『閾値dθ,mθから決定した「HIC発生範囲」』とを比較したが(S6→S7→S8→S10→S11)、これらの順序を変更してもよい。例えば、「最大偏析粒径d」及び「個数密度m」と「HIC発生範囲」とを比較した後に、「開孔厚みt」と閾値tθとを比較してもよい(S10→S11→S6→S7→S8)。 Furthermore, in the above-described embodiment, when evaluating the HIC property of the judgment target slab (in FIG. 2), first, the “opening thickness t” of the horizontal crack is compared with the threshold value t θ, and then “ The maximum segregation particle size d ”and“ number density m ”” were compared with “HIC generation range” determined from threshold values d θ and m θ (S6 → S7 → S8 → S10 → S11). May be changed. For example, after comparing “maximum segregation particle diameter d” and “number density m” with “HIC generation range”, “hole thickness t” may be compared with threshold t θ (S10 → S11 → S6). → S7 → S8).
また、上述の実施形態では、判定対象のスラブのHIC性を評価するとき(図2参照)、ステップS6で水平割れの「開孔厚み」の有無を確認したが、ステップS6を省略してもよい。例えば、「開孔厚み」が無い場合は開孔厚みt=0とし、t=0と閾値tθを比較してもよい。 Further, in the above-described embodiment, when evaluating the HIC property of the determination target slab (see FIG. 2), the presence / absence of the “opening thickness” of the horizontal crack is confirmed in step S6, but step S6 may be omitted. Good. For example, the opening thickness t = 0 when "opening Thickness" is not, may compare the t = 0 and the threshold t theta.
さらに、上述の実施形態及び実施例では、「所定の径以上の偏析粒の個数密度」を「直径12[mm]以上の偏析粒の個数密度」としたが、所定の径は12[mm]に限定されず、変更可能である。 Furthermore, in the above-described embodiments and examples, “number density of segregated grains having a predetermined diameter or more” is set to “number density of segregating grains having a diameter of 12 [mm] or more”, but the predetermined diameter is 12 [mm]. It is not limited to and can be changed.
加えて、上述の実施形態では、「最大偏析粒径」及び「個数密度」を測定するときに、図3,5では、スラブの幅方向両端からD/2を除く幅W−Dの範囲(領域R3)を幅方向に2個以上の所定の区間r1,r2,r3・・・rnに区切った場合を図示したが、領域R3を1つの区間としてもよい。 In addition, in the above-described embodiment, when the “maximum segregation particle size” and the “number density” are measured, in FIGS. 3 and 5, the range of the width WD excluding D / 2 from both ends in the width direction of the slab ( It has been shown a case where region R 3) was separated in the width direction into two or more predetermined interval r 1, r 2, r 3 ··· r n, the region R 3 may be one section.
また、「開孔厚み」、「最大偏析粒径」及び「個数密度」の測定方法は、上述の実施例で説明した方法に限定されず、その他の方法を用いてもよい。 Moreover, the measuring method of "opening thickness", "maximum segregation particle size", and "number density" is not limited to the method described in the above-described embodiment, and other methods may be used.
さらに、上述の実施形態及び実施例では、垂直曲げ型連続鋳造鋳造機したスラブについて説明したが、本発明の判定方法は、他の構成の鋳造鋳造機で鋳造したスラブにも適用可能である。 Furthermore, in the above-described embodiments and examples, the slab obtained by the vertical bending type continuous casting caster has been described. However, the determination method of the present invention can also be applied to a slab cast by a casting caster having another configuration.
本発明は、HIC試験を行うことなく、スラブの段階でHIC性を評価できることから、硫化水素を含む石油や天然ガスを輸送するために用いられる鋼板向けのスラブの品質判定方法に利用することができる。 Since this invention can evaluate HIC property in the stage of a slab, without performing an HIC test, it can utilize for the quality judgment method of the slab for the steel plates used in order to transport oil and natural gas containing hydrogen sulfide. it can.
1 タンディッシュ
2 浸漬ノズル
3 鋳型
4 ロール
5 冷却ノズル
6 溶鋼
100 連続鋳造機
R1,R2 領域(第1の範囲)
R3 領域(第2の範囲)
1 tundish 2 immersion nozzle 3 mold 4 roll 5 cooling nozzles 6 the molten steel 100 caster R 1, R 2 region (first range)
R 3 region (second range)
Claims (1)
異なる鋳造条件で鋳造した複数のスラブにおいて、スラブの幅方向両端から幅D/2の第1の範囲に存在する内部割れの最大開孔厚みを測定する第1開孔厚み測定工程と、
異なる鋳造条件で鋳造した複数のスラブにおいて、前記スラブの幅方向両端からD/2を除く幅W−Dの第2の範囲を幅方向に1又は複数の所定の区間に区切った場合に、前記所定の区間のそれぞれにおいて、厚み中心部で偏析粒の最大径及び所定の径以上の偏析粒の個数密度を測定する第1偏析粒測定工程と、
前記第1開孔厚み測定工程及び前記第1偏析粒測定工程のスラブと同一の条件で鋳造された複数のスラブを圧延して製造した鋼材に対して、前記第1の範囲及び前記第2の範囲の1又は複数の所定の区間に対応する領域でそれぞれHIC試験を実施する試験工程と、
前記第1開孔厚み測定工程で得た複数の最大開孔厚みと、前記試験工程における前記第1の範囲に対応する領域の複数の試験結果とから、HICが発生しない最大開孔厚みの閾値を決定する閾値決定工程と、
前記第1偏析粒測定工程で得た複数の偏析粒の最大径及び前記所定の径以上の偏析粒の複数の個数密度と、前記試験工程における前記第2の範囲の1又は複数の所定の区間に対応する領域の複数の試験結果とから、HICが発生する偏析粒の最大径及び前記所定の径以上の偏析粒の個数密度の範囲を決定するHIC発生範囲決定工程と、
判定対象のスラブの幅方向両端から幅D/2の範囲に存在する内部割れの最大開孔厚みを測定する第2開孔厚み測定工程と、
判定対象のスラブの幅方向両端からD/2を除く幅W−Dの範囲において、この範囲を幅方向に1又は複数の所定の区間に区切った場合に、前記所定の区間のそれぞれにおいて、厚み中心部で偏析粒の最大径及び前記所定の径以上の偏析粒の個数密度を測定する第2偏析粒測定工程と、
前記第2開孔厚み測定工程で得た前記最大開孔厚みと前記閾値決定工程で決定した最大開孔厚みの閾値とを比較し、前記第2偏析粒測定工程で得た前記偏析粒の最大径及び前記所定の径以上の偏析粒の個数密度と前記HIC発生範囲決定工程で決定したHICが発生する偏析粒の最大径及び前記所定の径以上の偏析粒の個数密度の範囲とを比較し、前記第2開孔厚み測定工程で得た前記最大開孔厚みが前記閾値決定工程で決定した最大開孔厚みの閾値を上回っているとき及び前記第2偏析粒測定工程で得た前記偏析粒の最大径及び前記所定の径以上の偏析粒の個数密度が前記HIC発生範囲決定工程で決定したHICが発生する偏析粒の最大径及び前記所定の径以上の偏析粒の個数密度の範囲にあるときの少なくとも一方を満たす場合は判定対象のスラブの向け先を耐サワー鋼以外の製品へ変更する変更工程と
を備えていることを特徴とする耐サワー鋼スラブの品質判定による向け先変更方法。 A quality judgment method for judging whether a slab of thickness D cast by a continuous casting machine can be applied to sour steel,
In a plurality of slabs cast under different casting conditions, a first opening thickness measurement step for measuring the maximum opening thickness of an internal crack existing in a first range of width D / 2 from both ends in the width direction of the slab;
In a plurality of slabs cast under different casting conditions, when the second range of the width WD excluding D / 2 from both ends in the width direction of the slab is divided into one or more predetermined sections in the width direction, In each of the predetermined sections, a first segregated particle measuring step for measuring the maximum diameter of the segregated particles and the number density of the segregated particles having a predetermined diameter or more at the center of the thickness;
For the steel material produced by rolling a plurality of slabs cast under the same conditions as the slabs in the first hole thickness measurement step and the first segregated grain measurement step, the first range and the second range A test process for performing an HIC test in each of the areas corresponding to one or more predetermined sections of the range;
Based on the plurality of maximum opening thicknesses obtained in the first opening thickness measurement step and the plurality of test results in the region corresponding to the first range in the test step, the threshold value of the maximum opening thickness at which no HIC is generated. A threshold value determining step for determining
Wherein the first polarized析粒measuring a plurality of number density of the plurality of maximum diameter of the polarized析粒and polarization析粒on the predetermined diameter or less obtained in step, one or more predetermined section of the second range in the test step and a plurality of test results of the region corresponding to the HIC generation range determination step of determining the maximum diameter and the scope of the number density of polarized析粒on the predetermined size or less polarized析粒that HIC is generated,
A second hole thickness measurement step for measuring the maximum hole thickness of an internal crack existing in the range of width D / 2 from both ends in the width direction of the slab to be determined;
In the range of width WD excluding D / 2 from both ends in the width direction of the slab to be determined, when this range is divided into one or more predetermined sections in the width direction, the thickness in each of the predetermined sections a second polarization析粒measuring step of measuring the maximum diameter and the number density of polarized析粒on the predetermined size or less polarized析粒in the center,
The maximum aperture thickness obtained in the second aperture thickness measurement step is compared with the threshold value of the maximum aperture thickness determined in the threshold determination step, and the maximum of the segregated particles obtained in the second segregation particle measurement step. diameter and then compared with the maximum diameter and the scope of the number density of polarized析粒on the predetermined size or less polarized析粒that HIC was determined by the number density and the HIC generation range determining step of polarization析粒occurs on the predetermined size or less The segregated particles obtained when the maximum pore thickness obtained in the second pore thickness measurement step exceeds the threshold value of the maximum pore thickness determined in the threshold value determination step and in the second segregation particle measurement step. maximum diameter and number density of polarized析粒on said predetermined diameter or less is in the maximum diameter and the scope of the number density of polarized析粒on the predetermined size or less polarized析粒that HIC was determined by the HIC generation range determining step occurs in If you meet at least one of the times Toward destination change process according to the quality determination of the sour steel slab, characterized in that it comprises a changing step of changing the directed destination elephant slab to products other than sour steel.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2013047089A JP6043217B2 (en) | 2013-03-08 | 2013-03-08 | How to change the destination by judging the quality of the sour steel slab |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2013047089A JP6043217B2 (en) | 2013-03-08 | 2013-03-08 | How to change the destination by judging the quality of the sour steel slab |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2014172074A JP2014172074A (en) | 2014-09-22 |
| JP6043217B2 true JP6043217B2 (en) | 2016-12-14 |
Family
ID=51693903
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2013047089A Expired - Fee Related JP6043217B2 (en) | 2013-03-08 | 2013-03-08 | How to change the destination by judging the quality of the sour steel slab |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP6043217B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP6584912B2 (en) * | 2014-12-26 | 2019-10-02 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | Steel plate and line pipe steel pipe with excellent hydrogen-induced crack resistance |
Family Cites Families (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH069733B2 (en) * | 1986-07-11 | 1994-02-09 | 新日本製鐵株式会社 | Judgment method of steel slab excellent in hydrogen-induced cracking resistance |
| JP4453558B2 (en) * | 2005-01-19 | 2010-04-21 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | Quality judgment method for continuous cast slabs |
| JP5320791B2 (en) * | 2008-03-28 | 2013-10-23 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | Center segregation evaluation method |
| JP2014077642A (en) * | 2012-10-09 | 2014-05-01 | Jfe Steel Corp | Estimation method of hic sensitivity of steel material and manufacturing method of high strength thick steel plate for line pipe superior in anti hic performance using the same |
-
2013
- 2013-03-08 JP JP2013047089A patent/JP6043217B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2014172074A (en) | 2014-09-22 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP6341082B2 (en) | Judgment method of brittle crack propagation stop property of high strength thick steel plate | |
| JP6584912B2 (en) | Steel plate and line pipe steel pipe with excellent hydrogen-induced crack resistance | |
| EP3239333A1 (en) | Steel plate having excellent toughness and resistance to hydrogen-induced cracking, and steel pipe for line pipe | |
| JP2014173892A (en) | METHOD OF DETERMINING QUALITY OF SOUR-RESISTANT STEEL SLAB USING Ca CONCENTRATION ANALYSIS RESULTS AT DIFFERENT PLATE THICKNESS POSITIONS IN THE SLAB | |
| JP2014005534A (en) | Steel material having excellent hic resistance and its production method | |
| JP2014077642A (en) | Estimation method of hic sensitivity of steel material and manufacturing method of high strength thick steel plate for line pipe superior in anti hic performance using the same | |
| KR20170083158A (en) | Thick-walled high-strength sour-resistant line pipe | |
| JP2016125139A (en) | Steel sheet and steel pipe for line pipe excellent in hydrogen-induced crack resistance | |
| JP6126503B2 (en) | Redirecting method based on quality judgment of sour line pipe steel slabs | |
| JP6043217B2 (en) | How to change the destination by judging the quality of the sour steel slab | |
| JP2016125137A (en) | Steel sheet and steel pipe for line pipe excellent in hydrogen-induced crack resistance | |
| JP6032166B2 (en) | Method for estimating hydrogen-resistant cracking characteristics of calcium-added steel | |
| JP5417830B2 (en) | Steel quality control method and steel production method | |
| JP2013250113A (en) | Determination method for hic resistance performance of steel material | |
| JP5707666B2 (en) | Steel quality control method | |
| WO2016104528A1 (en) | Steel plate having excellent toughness and resistance to hydrogen-induced cracking, and steel pipe for line pipe | |
| JP2014173893A (en) | METHOD OF DETERMINING QUALITY OF SOUR-RESISTANT SLAB USING Ca CONCENTRATION ANALYSIS RESULT AT PLATE THICKNESS POSITION WITHIN SPECIFIC RANGE IN THE SLAB | |
| WO2016104527A1 (en) | Steel plate having excellent hydrogen-induced cracking resistance and steel pipe for line pipe | |
| JP7779401B2 (en) | Slab determination method, slab manufacturing method, and steel plate manufacturing method | |
| JP5071025B2 (en) | Method for evaluating high temperature embrittlement of continuous cast slab and continuous casting method of steel | |
| JP7636672B2 (en) | Evaluation method for hydrogen-induced cracking resistance of steel | |
| JP7761161B2 (en) | METHOD FOR DETERMINING QUALITY AND DESTINATION OF CONTINUOUSLY CAST BLADES, METHOD FOR DETERMINING CONTINUOUS CASTING CONDITIONS, AND METHOD FOR CONTINUOUSLY CASTING STEEL | |
| JP7819717B2 (en) | METHOD FOR DETERMINING PRODUCT QUALITY, METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE QUALITY OF CONTINUOUSLY CAST BLADES AND DETERMINING THE DESTINATION, METHOD FOR DETERMINING CONTINUOUS CASTING CONDITIONS, AND METHOD FOR CONTINUOUSLY CASTING STEEL | |
| JP2010286263A (en) | Judgment method of surface condition of steel surface defects | |
| WO2016104529A1 (en) | Steel plate having excellent resistance to hydrogen-induced cracking, and steel pipe for line pipe |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20150901 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20160727 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20160809 |
|
| RD02 | Notification of acceptance of power of attorney |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7422 Effective date: 20160913 |
|
| A521 | Written amendment |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20160914 |
|
| RD04 | Notification of resignation of power of attorney |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7424 Effective date: 20160914 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20161108 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20161111 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 6043217 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
| LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |