JP6123537B2 - Ultrasonic flaw detection method - Google Patents
Ultrasonic flaw detection method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP6123537B2 JP6123537B2 JP2013147585A JP2013147585A JP6123537B2 JP 6123537 B2 JP6123537 B2 JP 6123537B2 JP 2013147585 A JP2013147585 A JP 2013147585A JP 2013147585 A JP2013147585 A JP 2013147585A JP 6123537 B2 JP6123537 B2 JP 6123537B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- intensity
- reflected wave
- ultrasonic
- detection method
- flaw detection
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Landscapes
- Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
Description
本発明は超音波探傷方法に関し、特に鋼材の表面疵と表面直下の内部欠陥を確実に判別することが可能な超音波探傷方法に関するものである。 The present invention relates to an ultrasonic flaw detection method, and more particularly to an ultrasonic flaw detection method capable of reliably discriminating surface defects of steel materials and internal defects immediately below the surface.
この種の超音波探傷方法としては特許文献1に示すものが知られている。これは、丸材に対して斜角探触子を設けて、当該探触子からの超音波反射波が1つのピークを持つ時を表面欠陥(表面疵)とし、2つ以上のピークを持つ時を表皮下欠陥(表面直下の内部欠陥)とするものである。 As this kind of ultrasonic flaw detection method, the one shown in Patent Document 1 is known. This is when a bevel probe is provided for a round member, and when the ultrasonic reflected wave from the probe has one peak, a surface defect (surface defect) is assumed and there are two or more peaks. Are defined as epidermal defects (internal defects directly under the surface).
しかし上記従来の方法では、必ずしも2つのピークを明確に分離できない場合があるため、鋼材の表面疵と表面直下の内部欠陥の判別に確実性が無いという問題があった。 However, in the above conventional method, there is a case where the two peaks cannot always be clearly separated, so that there is a problem in that there is no certainty in discriminating the surface defect of the steel material and the internal defect directly under the surface.
そこで、本発明はこのような課題を解決するもので、鋼材の表面疵と表面直下の内部欠陥の判別を確実に行うことができる超音波探傷方法を提供することを目的とする。 Therefore, the present invention solves such problems, and an object of the present invention is to provide an ultrasonic flaw detection method capable of reliably discriminating between surface defects of steel materials and internal defects directly under the surface.
上記目的を達成するために、本第1発明では、鋼材(M)の断面内へ所定角度範囲の屈折角(θ)で超音波の横波ビーム(B)を入射させ、横波ビーム(B)の、前記鋼材(M)の周方向におけるスキャン位置を横軸に、各スキャン位置における超音波の反射波強度の時間変化を縦軸にとった強度分布を得て、当該強度分布中における反射波強度が一定以上の領域の面積の大小より、鋼材(M)に生じた表面疵(M1)と表面直下の内部欠陥(M2)を判別する。 In order to achieve the above object, according to the first aspect of the present invention, an ultrasonic transverse wave beam (B) is incident on the cross section of the steel material (M) at a refraction angle (θ) within a predetermined angular range, and the transverse wave beam (B) Obtaining an intensity distribution with the horizontal axis representing the scan position in the circumferential direction of the steel (M) and the vertical axis representing the time variation of the reflected wave intensity of the ultrasonic wave at each scan position, and the reflected wave intensity in the intensity distribution The surface defect (M1) generated in the steel material (M) and the internal defect (M2) immediately below the surface are discriminated based on the size of the area of a certain area or more.
本第1発明において、表面疵と内部欠陥から得られる反射波強度分布中の反射波強度が一定以上の領域の面積は、表面疵によるものの面積が内部欠陥によるものの面積よりも有意的に小さくなる。これにより、超音波反射波の強度のピークが明確に分離できない場合であっても、表面疵と内部欠陥を確実に判別することができる。 In the first invention, the area of the reflected wave intensity distribution in the reflected wave intensity distribution obtained from the surface defect and the internal defect has a significantly smaller area due to the surface defect than the area due to the internal defect. . As a result, even if the intensity peak of the ultrasonic reflected wave cannot be clearly separated, the surface defect and the internal defect can be reliably determined.
本第2発明では、前記強度分布に対して膨張処理と収縮処理を施す。 In the second invention, expansion processing and contraction processing are performed on the intensity distribution.
本第2発明においては、反射波強度が一定以上の領域が分離している場合にも当該領域の面積比較を良好に行うことができる。 In the second aspect of the present invention, even when regions having a reflected wave intensity of a certain level or more are separated, the area comparison of the regions can be performed satisfactorily.
上記カッコ内の符号は、後述する実施形態に記載の具体的手段との対応関係を示すものである。 The reference numerals in the parentheses indicate the correspondence with specific means described in the embodiments described later.
以上のように、本発明の超音波探傷方法によれば、鋼材の表面疵と表面直下の内部欠陥の判別を確実に行うことができる。 As described above, according to the ultrasonic flaw detection method of the present invention, it is possible to reliably discriminate between surface defects of steel materials and internal defects directly under the surface.
なお、以下に説明する実施形態はあくまで一例であり、本発明の要旨を逸脱しない範囲で当業者が行う種々の設計的改良も本発明の範囲に含まれる。以下、本発明方法の実施について説明する。 The embodiment described below is merely an example, and various design improvements made by those skilled in the art without departing from the gist of the present invention are also included in the scope of the present invention. Hereinafter, implementation of the method of the present invention will be described.
図1には丸棒鋼材Mの断面を示し、当該断面内には表面疵としてR0.2の半円溝M1が形成されるとともに、表面直下の内部欠陥としてφ0.4の円形横穴M2が形成されている。丸棒鋼材Mの外周面から所定距離離してアレイプローブ1が設けてある。アレイプローブ1は丸棒鋼材Mの外周面に向く超音波発振面11が丸棒鋼材Mの外周面とほぼ同心の円弧面となっている。なお、これら丸棒鋼材Mとアレイプローブ1は水中に設置されている。 FIG. 1 shows a cross section of a round steel bar M, in which a R0.2 semicircular groove M1 is formed as a surface flaw, and a φ0.4 circular horizontal hole M2 is formed as an internal defect immediately below the surface. Has been. The array probe 1 is provided at a predetermined distance from the outer peripheral surface of the round bar steel M. In the array probe 1, the ultrasonic oscillation surface 11 facing the outer peripheral surface of the round bar steel M is an arc surface substantially concentric with the outer peripheral surface of the round bar steel M. The round bar steel M and the array probe 1 are installed in water.
アレイプローブ1の必要数の超音波振動子(図示略)を駆動して、丸棒鋼材M内で横波屈折角θが40?45°になるように当該丸棒鋼材Mに進入してこれの反対側表面近くに収束するような超音波ビームBを発振する。必要数の超音波振動子の駆動を順次行うことによって、アレイプローブ1から出力される超音波ビームBを丸棒鋼材Mの周方向の所定範囲Wでスキャンするようにする。丸棒鋼材Mを適宜回転させるか、同種のアレイプローブ1を丸棒鋼材Mの全周に隣接させて複数設けることによって、丸棒鋼材Mの全周を上述のような超音波ビームBでスキャンすることができる。 The necessary number of ultrasonic transducers (not shown) of the array probe 1 are driven to enter the round bar steel M so that the transverse wave refraction angle θ is 40 to 45 ° within the round bar steel M. An ultrasonic beam B that converges near the opposite surface is oscillated. By sequentially driving the necessary number of ultrasonic transducers, the ultrasonic beam B output from the array probe 1 is scanned in a predetermined range W in the circumferential direction of the round bar steel M. The entire circumference of the round bar steel M is scanned with the ultrasonic beam B as described above by rotating the round bar steel M appropriately or by providing a plurality of the same type of array probes 1 adjacent to the whole circumference of the round bar steel M. can do.
発振された超音波ビームBは表面疵M1の部分では図2に示すように当該疵M1での直接反射R1と丸棒鋼材Mの表面での反射R2がほぼ同時であるため、アレイプローブ1で受信される反射波の強度は図3に示すように相対的に短い時間t1でのみ大きくなる。これに対して表面直下の内部欠陥M2の部分では、図4に示すように当該欠陥M2での直接反射R3と丸棒鋼材Mの表面での反射R4とは、反射R4が表面での反射となる分、反射R3より時間がかかるため、アレイプローブ1で受信される反射波の強度は図5に示すように、相対的に長い時間t2大きくなる。 As shown in FIG. 2, the oscillated ultrasonic beam B has a direct reflection R1 on the surface M1 and a reflection R2 on the surface of the round bar steel M, as shown in FIG. The intensity of the reflected wave received increases only at a relatively short time t1, as shown in FIG. On the other hand, in the portion of the internal defect M2 immediately below the surface, as shown in FIG. 4, the direct reflection R3 at the defect M2 and the reflection R4 at the surface of the round bar steel M are the reflection R4 and the reflection at the surface. Since it takes longer than the reflection R3, the intensity of the reflected wave received by the array probe 1 becomes larger for a relatively long time t2, as shown in FIG.
このような表面疵M1や内部欠陥M2に対して超音波ビームBを、上述のように丸棒鋼材Mの周方向へスキャンすると、アレイプローブ1から上記表面疵M1や内部欠陥M2への距離は超音波ビームBのスキャン位置で異なる。このため、超音波ビームBの円周方向へのスキャン位置を横軸にとり、時間を縦軸にとって、反射波の強度変化の分布図を描くと、図6、図8に示すように、表面疵M1や内部欠陥M2の存在によって反射強度が高くなった高輝度領域(各図中の白い部分)が、傾斜した線状に現れる。そして、この高輝度領域は表面疵M1の場合は相対的に細幅であり(図6)、内部欠陥M2の場合には相対的に広幅となる(図8)。これは、各分布図における、ある超音波ビームスキャン位置(図6のX位置、図8のY位置)での反射波強度変化を示す図7(1)、図9(1)は、それぞれ図3、図5に対応するものになることから当然である。 When the ultrasonic beam B is scanned in the circumferential direction of the round bar steel M as described above with respect to the surface defect M1 and the internal defect M2, the distance from the array probe 1 to the surface defect M1 and the internal defect M2 is as follows. It differs depending on the scanning position of the ultrasonic beam B. For this reason, when the scanning position of the ultrasonic beam B in the circumferential direction is taken on the horizontal axis and the time is taken on the vertical axis, the distribution map of the intensity change of the reflected wave is drawn as shown in FIGS. A high luminance region (white portion in each figure) in which the reflection intensity is high due to the presence of M1 and the internal defect M2 appears in an inclined line shape. The high brightness area is relatively narrow in the case of the surface defect M1 (FIG. 6) and relatively wide in the case of the internal defect M2 (FIG. 8). FIG. 7 (1) and FIG. 9 (1) showing the change in reflected wave intensity at a certain ultrasonic beam scan position (X position in FIG. 6, Y position in FIG. 8) in each distribution chart are respectively shown. 3 and will naturally correspond to FIG.
そこで、上記分布図に対して以下の処理を行って、処理して得られた分布図中の高輝度領域(反射波強度が一定以上の領域)の面積を算出する。なお、以下、図7(2)〜(5)は図6(2)〜(5)のX位置での反射波強度変化に対応しており、図9(2)〜(5)は図8(2)〜(5)のY位置での反射波強度変化に対応している。 Therefore, the following processing is performed on the above distribution map to calculate the area of a high luminance region (region where the reflected wave intensity is a certain level or more) in the distribution map obtained by processing. Hereinafter, FIGS. 7 (2) to (5) correspond to changes in reflected wave intensity at the X position in FIGS. 6 (2) to (5), and FIGS. 9 (2) to (5) are similar to FIG. This corresponds to the reflected wave intensity change at the Y position in (2) to (5).
図6および図8中の(2)は(1)における反射波の強度値(輝度値)を一定の閾値でカットしたもの。上記両図中の(3)は(2)の処理で得られた上記強度値に膨張処理を施して強度分布の切れ目を埋めたもの。上記両図中の(4)は(3)の処理で得られた上記強度値に収縮処理を施して膨張処理による過度な広がりを戻したもの。上記両図中の(5)は(4)の処理で得られた上記強度値をさらに一定の閾値でカットしたものである。 (2) in FIG. 6 and FIG. 8 is obtained by cutting the intensity value (luminance value) of the reflected wave in (1) with a certain threshold. (3) in both figures is obtained by performing expansion processing on the intensity value obtained in the processing of (2) to fill in the breaks in the intensity distribution. (4) in both figures is a result of applying the contraction process to the intensity value obtained in the process of (3) and returning the excessive spread by the expansion process. (5) in both figures is obtained by further cutting the intensity value obtained by the process (4) with a certain threshold value.
以上の処理によって得られた図6(5)、図8(5)の強度分布よりその高強度領域(各図の白い部分)の面積を算出すると、表面疵M1による反射波強度分布(図6(5))における高強度領域の面積は、表面直下の内部欠陥M2による反射波強度分布(図8(5))における高強度領域の面積の半分以下となる。これにより、上記反射波強度分布における高強度領域の面積の大小から、表面疵M1か内部欠陥M2かを確実に判定することができる。なお、上記実施形態では、丸棒鋼材を対象としたが、丸棒に限られるものではない。 When the area of the high-intensity region (white portion in each figure) is calculated from the intensity distributions of FIGS. 6 (5) and 8 (5) obtained by the above processing, the reflected wave intensity distribution (FIG. 6) due to the surface defect M1. The area of the high intensity region in (5)) is less than or equal to half the area of the high intensity region in the reflected wave intensity distribution (FIG. 8 (5)) due to the internal defect M2 directly below the surface. Accordingly, it is possible to reliably determine whether the surface defect M1 or the internal defect M2 from the size of the area of the high intensity region in the reflected wave intensity distribution. In addition, in the said embodiment, although the round bar steel material was made into object, it is not restricted to a round bar.
1…アレイプローブ、B…横波ビーム、M…丸棒鋼材、M1…表面疵、M2…内部欠陥。 DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Array probe, B ... Shear wave beam, M ... Round bar steel material, M1 ... Surface defect, M2 ... Internal defect.
Claims (2)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2013147585A JP6123537B2 (en) | 2013-07-16 | 2013-07-16 | Ultrasonic flaw detection method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2013147585A JP6123537B2 (en) | 2013-07-16 | 2013-07-16 | Ultrasonic flaw detection method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2015021738A JP2015021738A (en) | 2015-02-02 |
| JP6123537B2 true JP6123537B2 (en) | 2017-05-10 |
Family
ID=52486336
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2013147585A Active JP6123537B2 (en) | 2013-07-16 | 2013-07-16 | Ultrasonic flaw detection method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP6123537B2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR102648455B1 (en) * | 2019-03-13 | 2024-03-15 | 제이에프이 스틸 가부시키가이샤 | Ultrasonic flaw detection method, ultrasonic flaw detection device, steel manufacturing equipment, steel manufacturing method, and steel quality control method |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP7618963B2 (en) * | 2020-03-08 | 2025-01-22 | 大同特殊鋼株式会社 | Ultrasonic inspection method for round bar material |
Family Cites Families (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH05126808A (en) * | 1991-11-08 | 1993-05-21 | Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd | Ultrasonic flaw detection method |
| JPH08248011A (en) * | 1995-03-10 | 1996-09-27 | Nippon Kurauto Kureemaa Fuerusutaa Kk | Oblique ultrasonic inspection system |
| GB9510032D0 (en) * | 1995-05-18 | 1995-07-12 | Atomic Energy Authority Uk | Ultrasonic inspection |
| JPH09171005A (en) * | 1995-12-20 | 1997-06-30 | Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd | Defect type determination method by ultrasonic flaw detection |
| JPH1194809A (en) * | 1997-09-16 | 1999-04-09 | Hitachi Ltd | Method and apparatus for evaluating depth of hardened hardened layer |
| JP3746413B2 (en) * | 2000-05-17 | 2006-02-15 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Ultrasonic flaw detection result display method and ultrasonic flaw detection apparatus |
| JP2005087266A (en) * | 2003-09-12 | 2005-04-07 | Fuji Photo Film Co Ltd | Ultrasonic imaging equipment |
| JP5730644B2 (en) * | 2011-04-01 | 2015-06-10 | 株式会社Ihi検査計測 | Ultrasonic measurement method and apparatus for surface crack depth |
| JP5750989B2 (en) * | 2011-04-22 | 2015-07-22 | 大同特殊鋼株式会社 | Ultrasonic flaw detection method for round bars |
-
2013
- 2013-07-16 JP JP2013147585A patent/JP6123537B2/en active Active
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR102648455B1 (en) * | 2019-03-13 | 2024-03-15 | 제이에프이 스틸 가부시키가이샤 | Ultrasonic flaw detection method, ultrasonic flaw detection device, steel manufacturing equipment, steel manufacturing method, and steel quality control method |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2015021738A (en) | 2015-02-02 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA2679293C (en) | Ultrasonic flaw detection apparatus and ultrasonic flaw detection method for pipe | |
| JP4544240B2 (en) | Tubular ultrasonic inspection apparatus and ultrasonic inspection method | |
| CN103765205B (en) | The defect detection on ultrasonic basis of wheel | |
| US20170167852A1 (en) | Optical measuring method and measuring apparatus for external dimension | |
| JP3861833B2 (en) | Ultrasonic inspection method and apparatus | |
| JP6014525B2 (en) | Ultrasonic flaw detection probe and ultrasonic flaw detection method | |
| JP6123537B2 (en) | Ultrasonic flaw detection method | |
| JP6494369B2 (en) | Ultrasonic inspection equipment | |
| JP5357572B2 (en) | Appearance inspection method and appearance inspection apparatus | |
| JP5750989B2 (en) | Ultrasonic flaw detection method for round bars | |
| JP2009204368A (en) | Blade groove inspection method of turbine rotor | |
| JP2017207345A (en) | Calibration method of ultrasonic flaw detection | |
| JP2013156166A (en) | Ultrasonic flaw detection method | |
| CN118330023A (en) | Defect identification method, device, medium and detection system based on ultrasonic detection | |
| JP3731369B2 (en) | Ultrasonic flaw detection method for welded pipe | |
| JP6167706B2 (en) | Ultrasonic flaw detection method | |
| JP6248979B2 (en) | Steel material cleanliness evaluation method and cleanliness evaluation apparatus | |
| JP5843913B2 (en) | Inspection method | |
| JP4596325B2 (en) | Ultrasonic flaw detection method and apparatus for internally finned tube | |
| JP2019174231A (en) | Anchor-bolt ultrasonic flaw inspection device and inspection method | |
| JP2007309664A (en) | Ultrasonic flaw detector | |
| CN116698992A (en) | A comparison test block and its design method | |
| JP7798586B2 (en) | Ultrasonic flaw detection device and ultrasonic flaw detection method | |
| JP2006301178A (en) | Bending sensor and manufacturing method thereof | |
| JP2007093311A (en) | Ultrasonic flaw detection method |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20160525 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20170227 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20170307 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20170320 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 6123537 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |