JP6512014B2 - Evaluation method of stability of excavated wall - Google Patents
Evaluation method of stability of excavated wall Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP6512014B2 JP6512014B2 JP2015147666A JP2015147666A JP6512014B2 JP 6512014 B2 JP6512014 B2 JP 6512014B2 JP 2015147666 A JP2015147666 A JP 2015147666A JP 2015147666 A JP2015147666 A JP 2015147666A JP 6512014 B2 JP6512014 B2 JP 6512014B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- ground
- modulus
- young
- stability
- wall surface
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims description 13
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 38
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims description 30
- 230000000704 physical effect Effects 0.000 claims description 25
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 13
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 12
- 239000003381 stabilizer Substances 0.000 description 9
- 238000009412 basement excavation Methods 0.000 description 8
- 239000003673 groundwater Substances 0.000 description 8
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000005755 formation reaction Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000010191 image analysis Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002940 Newton-Raphson method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000000853 adhesive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001070 adhesive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006866 deterioration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009751 slip forming Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000013097 stability assessment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000087 stabilizing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Bulkheads Adapted To Foundation Construction (AREA)
Description
本発明は、既設地中構造物に近接する掘削壁面の安定性評価方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a method for evaluating the stability of an excavated wall close to an existing underground structure.
従来より、地中連続壁や場所打ち杭等の施工に開削を伴う地中構造物を構築するにあたり、掘削溝や杭孔等における掘削壁面の安定性を評価する手法の1つとして、任意の斜面形状、土質の不均質性、間隙水圧の存在など多様な条件下の斜面の安全率を精度よく算出することの可能な、せん断強度低減有限要素法(SSR−FEM)が採用されている。 2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, when constructing an underground structure with open cut in construction such as underground continuous wall or cast-in-place pile, any one of methods to evaluate the stability of the excavated wall surface in excavated ditch or pile hole etc. The shear strength reduction finite element method (SSR-FEM) is adopted, which can accurately calculate the safety factor of slope under various conditions such as slope shape, soil heterogeneity, existence of pore water pressure.
せん断強度低減有限要素法は、非特許文献1にて開示されているように、すべり面を仮定せずに、かつ極限平衡法に基づく安全率の概念と矛盾しない系全体の安全率を求めることができる手法である。また、掘削壁面近傍の地表面に既設構造物や施工機械などの荷重が作用する際においても、これら上載荷重を条件に含めた上で掘削壁面の安定性を評価することが可能な手法である。 As described in Non-Patent Document 1, shear strength reduction finite element method is to find the safety factor of the entire system consistent with the concept of the safety factor based on the limit equilibrium method without assuming the slip surface. Is a method that can In addition, even when loads from existing structures and construction machines act on the ground surface in the vicinity of the excavated wall surface, it is a method that can evaluate the stability of the excavated wall surface while including these upper loading loads as conditions. .
しかし、例えば構築しようとする地中連続壁に近接して既設の基礎構造物が存在する場合、施工中における掘削壁面の安定性を上記のせん断強度低減有限要素法にて評価しようとすると、掘削壁面から連続するすべり面が形成される前に、既設の基礎構造物と地盤との間に先行して破壊機構が形成される等して計算が発散してしまい、精度よく掘削壁面の安定性を評価することが困難であった。 However, for example, when there is an existing foundation structure in proximity to the underground continuous wall to be constructed, if the stability of the excavated wall during the construction is to be evaluated by the above shear strength reducing finite element method, excavating Before the sliding surface that is continuous from the wall surface is formed, the fracture mechanism is formed in advance between the existing foundation structure and the ground, and the calculation diverges, and the stability of the excavated wall surface with accuracy. It was difficult to assess the
一方で、既設の基礎構造物近傍にて地盤掘削を行うと、周辺地盤や基礎構造物に影響を及ぼす可能性が高いが、これらの影響による周辺地盤の変形や基礎構造物の支持機能への影響等をせん断強度低減有限要素法にて評価することができなかった。 On the other hand, if the ground is excavated in the vicinity of the existing foundation structure, there is a high possibility that the surrounding ground and the foundation structure will be affected. However, these effects affect the deformation of the surrounding ground and the supporting function of the foundation structure. It was not possible to evaluate the effects etc. by the shear strength reduction finite element method.
本発明は、かかる課題に鑑みなされたものであって、その主な目的は、既設地中構造物に近接して掘削壁面が存在する場合において、せん断強度低減有限要素法を用いて、掘削壁面の安定性評価と、地盤掘削による周辺地盤および既設地中構造物への影響評価の両者を実施することの可能な、掘削壁面の安定性評価方法を提供することである。 The present invention has been made in view of such problems, and its main object is to use the shear strength reduction finite element method in the case where the excavated wall exists in proximity to the existing underground structure. The purpose is to provide a method for evaluating the stability of the excavated wall which can carry out both the stability assessment of the above and the impact assessment on the surrounding ground and the existing underground structure by the ground excavation.
かかる目的を達成するため本発明の掘削壁面の安定性評価方法は、既設地中構造物、およびこれに近接する掘削壁面を含む解析対象エリアに有限要素法に基づく解析モデルを設定し、前記掘削壁面の安定性をせん断強度低減有限要素法にて評価する、掘削壁面の安定性評価方法であって、前記解析モデルの、前記既設地中構造物をなす要素に接触する地盤をなす要素を、物性値調整要素として置き換え、該物性値調整要素に、前記既設地中構造物のヤング率より小さい値に調整した調整ヤング率を付与し、前記既設地中構造物と前記地盤との境界を表現することを特徴とする。 In order to achieve the above object, the stability evaluation method of the excavated wall surface according to the present invention sets an analysis model based on the finite element method in an analysis target area including the existing underground structure and the excavated wall adjacent to this. It is a stability evaluation method of excavated wall surface which evaluates stability of a wall surface by a shear strength reduction finite element method, which is an element forming the ground in contact with an element forming the existing underground structure in the analysis model, It substitutes as a physical property value adjustment element, gives the adjustment Young's modulus adjusted to a value smaller than the Young's modulus of the existing underground structure to the physical property value adjustment element, and expresses the boundary between the existing underground structure and the ground. It is characterized by
また、本発明の掘削壁面の安定性評価方法は、前記調整ヤング率が、前記既設地中構造物のヤング率と、前記物性値調整要素と隣接する前記地盤をなす要素に付与したヤング率との間に位置する値に調整されること特徴とする。 Further, in the stability evaluation method of the excavated wall surface according to the present invention, the adjustment Young's modulus includes the Young's modulus of the existing underground structure and the Young's modulus applied to an element forming the ground adjacent to the physical property value adjustment element. Is adjusted to a value located between.
本発明によれば、既設地中構造物に隣接して掘削壁面が位置する場合に、地盤と既設地中構造物との境界を、調整ヤング率を付与した物性値調整要素にてモデル化した解析モデルを用いて解析することで、地盤と既設地中構造物の剛性差が大きいことに起因する破壊機構が、解析モデルの他のエリアに生じる破壊機構よりも先行して形成されることがなく、掘削壁面近傍の地盤に対して実挙動に近いすべり面を形成することができる。 According to the present invention, when the excavated wall surface is located adjacent to the existing underground structure, the boundary between the ground and the existing underground structure is modeled by the physical property value adjustment element to which the adjusted Young's modulus is applied. By performing analysis using an analysis model, the failure mechanism resulting from the large difference in rigidity between the ground and the existing underground structure may be formed prior to the failure mechanism that occurs in other areas of the analysis model Instead, it is possible to form a sliding surface close to the actual behavior for the ground near the excavated wall.
これにより、掘削壁面の安定性を、既設地中構造物が掘削壁面に及ぼす影響を加味した上で、高い精度で評価することが可能になるとともに、地中掘削が周辺地盤や既設地中構造物に与える影響を評価することも可能となる。 As a result, it becomes possible to evaluate the stability of the excavated wall surface with high accuracy while taking into consideration the influence of the existing underground structure on the excavated wall surface, and underground excavation is carried out in the surrounding ground or existing underground construction It will also be possible to assess the impact on things.
以下、本発明の掘削壁面の安定性評価方法を、図1〜図5を用いて説明する。
本実施の形態では、図1で示すように、地中連続壁1構築予定の対象エリアに、既設構造物2を支持する基礎杭3が存在する場合を事例に挙げて説明する。なお、構築しようとする新設地中構造物は、必ずしも地中連続壁1に限定されるものではなく、例えば、場所打ち杭など、施工に掘削を伴う構造物であれば、いずれの新設地中構造物を採用してもよい。また、既設地中構造物についても、必ずしも基礎杭3に限定されるものではなく、その他の基礎構造物や土留め壁等の対策工等、いずれの既設地中構造物を採用してもよい。
Hereafter, the stability evaluation method of the excavation wall surface of this invention is demonstrated using FIGS. 1-5.
In the present embodiment, as shown in FIG. 1, a case where a foundation pile 3 supporting an existing structure 2 exists in a target area planned to be constructed in the underground continuous wall 1 will be described as an example. In addition, the new underground structure to be built is not necessarily limited to the underground continuous wall 1, for example, if it is a structure with excavating in construction such as cast-in-place piles, any new underground A structure may be adopted. In addition, the existing underground structure is not necessarily limited to the foundation pile 3, and any existing underground structure may be adopted, such as measures for other foundation structures, earth retaining walls, etc. .
掘削壁面の安定性評価方法は、基礎杭3等の既設地中構造物の近傍に、地中連続壁1等の施工に掘削を伴う新設地中構造物を構築する場合において、新設地中構造物の施工段階で構築される掘削壁面1aの安定性評価と、地盤掘削による周辺地盤の変形や基礎杭3の支持機能の低下等、既設地中構造物への影響をせん断強度低減有限要素法(SSR−FEM)にて評価する方法である。そして、このせん断強度低減有限要素法を採用するにあたり、本実施の形態では、3次元弾塑性地盤解析プログラムGA3Dを採用している。 The method of evaluating the stability of the excavated wall surface is to construct a new underground structure in the case of constructing a new underground structure involving excavation in construction of the underground continuous wall 1 etc. in the vicinity of the existing underground structure such as the foundation pile 3 etc. Evaluation of the stability of the excavated wall 1a constructed at the construction stage of the construction and the influence on the existing underground structures such as deformation of the surrounding ground and deterioration of the support function of the foundation pile 3 due to ground excavating shear strength reduction finite element method (SSR-FEM) is a method of evaluation. And in adopting this shear strength reduction finite element method, a three-dimensional elastic-plastic ground analysis program GA3D is adopted in this embodiment.
GA3Dは、地盤FEM解析の分野では広く知られた周知のプログラムであるため詳細は省略するが、降伏基準にMohr-Coulomb式、塑性ポテンシャルにDrucker-Prager式を用いた非関連流れ測に基づく弾完全塑性モデルであって、非線形方程式の解法として増分法に修正Newton-Raphson法を組み合わせた混合法を用いている。 GA3D is a well-known program widely known in the field of ground FEM analysis, so details are omitted, but it is based on non-relevant flow measurement using Mohr-Coulomb formula as yield standard and Drucker-Prager formula as plastic potential. It is a complete plasticity model, and uses a mixed method in which the modified Newton-Raphson method is combined with the incremental method as the solution method of the nonlinear equation.
入力物性値は、少なくとも地層条件、各地層に対応する土質条件(ヤング率Es、ポアソン比ν,粘着率c,内部摩擦角φ,ダイレタンシー角ψ,単位体積重量γ等)、地下水位、安定液水位、ガイドウォール1bの有無(有りの場合には、厚さ、地表面からの深さ、材料定数(ヤング率、粘着力))、掘削壁面1aの近傍地表面に荷重が作用する構造物の有無(有りの場合には、分布荷重の座標、単位面積当たりの荷重)、掘削壁面1aの近傍地表面に作用する線荷重の有無(有りの場合には集中荷重の作用位置と大きさ)、である。なお、地盤のヤング率Esは、例えば砂質土で2000N(kN/m2)程度、粘性土で4000N(kN/m2)程度である。ここで、Nは、標準貫入試験によるN値を指す)。 The input physical property values include at least formation conditions, soil conditions corresponding to each layer (Young's modulus Es, Poisson's ratio ,, adhesion ratio c, internal friction angle φ, dilatancy angle ψ, unit volume weight γ, etc.), groundwater level, stabilizer Water level, presence or absence of guide wall 1b (in the case of thickness, depth from ground surface, material constant (Young's modulus, adhesive force)), structure of the structure where load acts on the ground surface near excavated wall surface 1a Presence (in the case of presence, coordinates of distributed load, load per unit area), presence or absence of line load acting on ground surface near excavated wall surface 1a (in case of presence position and magnitude of concentrated load), It is. Incidentally, the Young's modulus Es of the ground, for example in sandy soil 2000N (kN / m 2) approximately, is about 4000N (kN / m 2) in cohesive soil. Here, N refers to the N value by a standard penetration test).
解析モデル4を設定する範囲としては、一般に、構築しようとする新設地中構造物が地中連続壁1である場合には、その長さをLとしたとき、X軸方向を地中連続壁1の長さLの2倍以上、Y軸方向を地中連続壁1の長さL以下、Z軸方向には地中連続壁1の掘削深さ以上が採用される。なお、解析モデル4の設定方法は、必ずしもこれに限定されるものではなく、X方向に発生するすべり面を形成することのできる範囲であれば、いずれに設定してもよい。 In the case where the new underground structure to be constructed is the underground continuous wall 1 as a range in which the analytical model 4 is set, when the length is L, the X axis direction is the underground continuous wall The length L of 1 or more is twice or more, the Y-axis direction is equal to or less than the length L of the underground continuous wall 1, and the Z-axis direction is equal to or more than the digging depth of the underground continuous wall 1. In addition, the setting method of the analysis model 4 is not necessarily limited to this, and as long as it is a range which can form the slide surface which generate | occur | produces to a X direction, you may set it to any.
また、解析モデル4のメッシュ分割方法は、解析目的に応じて適宜分割幅や分割数を調整すればよい。なお、本実施の形態では、図2で示すように、掘削壁面1aからX軸方向に間隔を徐々に広げて分割、Y軸方向は均等分割、Z軸方向は、掘削壁面1aにおいてはらみ出しが生じる可能性のある高さ範囲と地下水位5の近傍の高さ範囲を細かく分割し、その他の高さ範囲を均等分割する等して、挙動を把握したい範囲を細かく分割する構成としている。 Further, in the mesh division method of the analysis model 4, the division width and the number of divisions may be appropriately adjusted according to the purpose of analysis. In the present embodiment, as shown in FIG. 2, the interval is gradually extended from the excavated wall surface 1a in the X-axis direction and divided, the Y-axis direction is equally divided, and in the Z-axis direction, the overhang is projected on the excavated wall surface 1a. The height range that may occur and the height range near the groundwater level 5 are finely divided, and the other height ranges are equally divided, etc., so that the range in which the behavior is desired to be grasped is finely divided.
ところで、本実施の形態では、先にも述べたように、地中連続壁1の構築予定エリア近傍に、既設構造物2を支持する基礎杭3が存在している。このため、基礎杭3の位置、径、深さ、本数、配置間隔等の実測値から、解析モデル4における掘削壁面1aからX方向の距離を決定してソリッド要素によりモデル化し、基礎杭3の物性値(ヤング率E,ポアソン比ν等)を入力する。なお、基礎杭3のヤング率Eは、例えば鋼管造で2.1×108(kN/m2)程度、コンクリート造で2.1×107(kN/m2)程度である。 By the way, in this embodiment, as stated above, the foundation pile 3 which supports the existing structure 2 exists in the vicinity of the planned construction area of the underground continuous wall 1. For this reason, the distance in the X direction from the excavated wall surface 1a in the analysis model 4 is determined from measured values such as the position, diameter, depth, number and arrangement interval of the foundation pile 3, and modeling is performed using solid elements. Physical property values (Young's modulus E, Poisson's ratio 等, etc.) are input. The Young's modulus E of the foundation pile 3 is, for example, about 2.1 × 10 8 (kN / m 2 ) in steel pipe construction and about 2.1 × 10 7 (kN / m 2 ) in concrete construction.
また、本実施の形態では、地下水位5以浅の地盤を上載荷重として置き換え、解析モデル4の地下水位5と等しい面5aの全面に分布荷重として作用させる。ただし、本実施の形態においては、上述のモデル化によって解析を実施した。しかし、モデル化の方法は、この方法限りでない。さらに、既設構造物2の荷重は、基礎杭3各々に集中荷重として作用させる。なお、既設構造物2の荷重は、4本の基礎杭3で囲まれる範囲に分布荷重として作用するものと仮定してもよい。 Further, in the present embodiment, a ground shallower than the underground water level 5 is replaced as the upper load, and the distributed load is applied to the entire surface 5 a equal to the underground water level 5 of the analysis model 4. However, in the present embodiment, analysis is performed by the above-described modeling. However, the method of modeling is not limited to this method. Furthermore, the load of the existing structure 2 is applied to each of the foundation piles 3 as a concentrated load. The load of the existing structure 2 may be assumed to act as a distributed load in the range surrounded by the four foundation piles 3.
こうして設定した解析モデル4に対して、地中連続壁1内における安定液6の水位を段階的に低下させ、水位を低下させたステージごとに、せん断強度低減法(SSR)による全体安全率Fの算出とすべり面の推定を行う。なお、解析結果として、節点変位、要素のひずみ、要素の応力等、有限要素法にて一般的に得られるアウトプットは当然のこと、基礎杭3の部材力および部材に生じるひずみを把握することも可能である。 With respect to the analysis model 4 set in this way, the water level of the stabilizer 6 in the underground continuous wall 1 is lowered stepwise and the water level is lowered at each stage. Overall safety factor F by shear strength reduction method (SSR) Calculation of and estimation of slip surface. In addition, as a result of analysis, it is natural to understand the output generally obtained by the finite element method, such as nodal displacement, element strain, element stress, etc., grasp the member force of the foundation pile 3 and strain generated in the member Is also possible.
具体的な解析手順は、地盤のせん断強度パラメーターのc’とφ’を仮想的に低減係数frでcr’とφr’に低減し、低減係数frを徐々に大きくすることで仮想的なせん断強度を低下させ、降伏域が掘削壁面1aから地下水位5と等しい面5aまで連続的に連なるすべり面を形成させる。そして、すべり面が形成される直前の低減係数frを全体安全率Fとするものである。なお、一般的には、低減係数frを0.01ずつ大きくする。 A concrete analysis procedure virtually reduces the shear strength parameter c 'and' 'of the ground to cr' and rr 'with a reduction factor fr, and increases the reduction factor fr gradually to virtually shear strength To form a continuous sliding surface from the excavated wall surface 1 a to the surface 5 a equal to the groundwater level 5. Then, the reduction factor fr immediately before the slip surface is formed is taken as the overall safety factor F. Generally, the reduction coefficient fr is increased by 0.01.
ところで、上記の解析モデル4では、基礎杭3と地盤との剛性差が大きいことが一因となり、掘削壁面1aから地下水位5と等しい面5aまで連続的に連なるすべり面が形成される前に、基礎杭3と地盤との境界に先行して降伏域が連続し破壊機構が形成される現象が起きやすい。 By the way, in the above analysis model 4, before the slip surface which continues continuously from the excavated wall surface 1a to the surface 5a equal to the groundwater level 5 is formed due to the large difference in rigidity between the foundation pile 3 and the ground. A phenomenon is likely to occur in which the yield zone is continuous and the fracture mechanism is formed prior to the boundary between the foundation pile 3 and the ground.
このような、地盤と地中構造物のように物性値が大きく異なる要素が隣り合う場合において、有限要素法では一般に、これらの境界を表現するべくモデル化する手法として、両者の間に薄層要素を設ける方法、両者の間をバネでつなぐ方法、インターフェース要素を設ける方法等、様々な方法が提案されている。これに対して、本実施の形態ではこれら地盤と基礎杭3の相互作用問題に対して、物性値調整要素7を設けることで対応する点が大きな特徴である。 In the case where elements with greatly different physical property values such as the ground and the underground structure are adjacent to each other, the finite element method generally has a thin layer between the two as a modeling method to express these boundaries. Various methods have been proposed such as a method of providing an element, a method of connecting the two with a spring, and a method of providing an interface element. On the other hand, the point which corresponds by providing the physical-property value adjustment element 7 with respect to the interaction problem of these grounds and the foundation pile 3 in this embodiment is the big characteristics.
つまり、図3の解析モデル4の断面図で示すように、地盤をなす要素4bのうち、基礎杭3をなす要素4aと接触する地盤をなす要素4bを物性値調整要素7と置き換え、この物性値調整要素7に調整ヤング率を入力することで、基礎杭3と地盤との境界が先行して破壊する現象を抑止する。ここで、物性値調整要素7に入力する調整ヤング率は、基礎杭3と地盤の剛性差を小さくすることを目的としていることから、基礎杭3のヤング率Eと、物性値調整要素7と隣接する地盤をなす要素4bに付与されているヤング率Esとの間に位置する値となるように調整されている。 That is, as shown by the cross-sectional view of the analysis model 4 in FIG. 3, among the elements 4b forming the ground, the element 4b forming the ground in contact with the element 4a forming the foundation pile 3 is replaced with the physical property value adjusting element 7, By inputting the adjustment Young's modulus to the value adjustment element 7, the phenomenon that the boundary between the foundation pile 3 and the ground breaks in advance is suppressed. Here, the adjustment Young's modulus input to the physical property value adjustment element 7 is intended to reduce the difference in rigidity between the foundation pile 3 and the ground, so the Young's modulus E of the foundation pile 3 and the physical property value adjustment element 7 It is adjusted to be a value located between the Young's modulus Es applied to the element 4b forming the adjacent ground.
そして、好ましくは、基礎杭3をなす要素4aと地盤をなす要素4bの剛性差に起因する破壊機構が、解析モデル4の他のエリアに生じる破壊機構よりも先行して形成されることがなく、かつ、掘削壁面1aから地下水位5と等しい面5aまで連続的に連なるすべり面が精度よく形成されるよう、最適な数値を調整するとよい。 And preferably, the failure mechanism due to the difference in rigidity between the element 4a forming the foundation pile 3 and the element 4b forming the ground is not formed prior to the failure mechanisms occurring in other areas of the analysis model 4 And it is good to adjust an optimal numerical value so that the sliding surface which continues in a row continuously from the excavation wall surface 1a to the surface 5a equal to the groundwater level 5 may be formed precisely.
なお、解析対象の地盤に複数の地層が存在する場合には、地盤のヤング率Esが地層ごとで異なることから、複数の物性値調整要素7各々と隣接する地盤をなす要素4bに付与されているヤング率Esもそれぞれ異なる場合が想定される。この場合には、物性値調整要素7ごとで、基礎杭3のヤング率Eより小さく、物性値調整要素7と隣接する地盤のヤング率Esより大きい値であって、最適な数値に調整した値を調整ヤング率として算定し、これを付与するとよい。ただし、算定した調整ヤング率が複数の物性値調整要素7ごとで似通っている場合には、算定した調整ヤング率の中で選択した1つの調整ヤング率を代表値として、これをすべての物性値調整要素7に入力してもよい。 In addition, when a plurality of formations exist in the ground of analysis object, since Young's modulus Es of a ground differs for every formation, it is given to element 4b which makes a ground adjacent to each of a plurality of physical property value adjustment elements 7 It is assumed that there are different Young's modulus Es. In this case, the physical property value adjustment element 7 is a value smaller than the Young's modulus E of the foundation pile 3 and larger than the Young's modulus Es of the ground adjacent to the physical property value adjustment element 7 and adjusted to an optimal value. Calculate as the adjusted Young's modulus, and give this. However, in the case where the calculated adjusted Young's modulus is similar for each of the plurality of physical property value adjusting elements 7, all the physical property values are represented by using one adjusted Young's modulus selected in the calculated adjusted Young's modulus as a representative value. It may be input to the adjustment element 7.
また、解析対象の地盤に複数の地層が存在する場合であっても、地盤条件が比較的良い場合(例えば、各地層のN値が30以上の場合)には、基礎杭3のヤング率Eの例えば1/100、地盤条件が比較的悪い場合(例えば、各地層のN値が30未満の場合)には、基礎杭3のヤング率Eの例えば1/1000という具合に、基礎杭3のヤング率Eを基準にしてこれより小さく、物性値調整要素7と隣接する地盤のヤング率Esより大きい値となるように調整ヤング率を決定し、この調整ヤング率を基礎杭3の外周を覆う物性値調整要素7すべてに入力してもよい。 In addition, even when there are multiple formations in the analysis target ground, if the ground conditions are relatively good (for example, when the N value of each layer is 30 or more), Young's modulus E of the foundation pile 3 For example, if the ground condition is relatively poor (for example, if the N value of each layer is less than 30), the Young's modulus E of the foundation pile 3 is, for example, 1/1000 of that of the foundation pile 3 The adjustment Young's modulus is determined to be smaller than this based on the Young's modulus E and larger than the Young's modulus Es of the ground adjacent to the physical property value adjustment element 7, and the adjustment Young's modulus covers the outer periphery of the foundation pile 3 It may be input to all of the physical property value adjustment elements 7.
さらに、本実施の形態では解析モデル4において、物性値調整要素7を他の地盤をなす要素4bより薄層に形成し、地盤に占める物性値調整要素7の幅を小さくしているが、必ずしもこれに限定するものではなく、他の地盤をなす要素4bと同じ厚さの要素としてもよい。 Furthermore, in the present embodiment, in the analysis model 4, the physical property value adjustment element 7 is formed in a thinner layer than the other ground elements 4b, and the width of the physical property value adjustment element 7 in the ground is made smaller. The invention is not limited to this, and it may be an element having the same thickness as that of the other ground element 4b.
上記の物性値調整要素7を取り入れた解析モデル4を用いた解析結果を、図4に示す。図4(a)は、安定液6の水位がG.L.に等しい場合であり、安定液6の水位を段階的に低下させたものを図4(b)から図4(d)に示している。 The analysis result using the analysis model 4 incorporating the above-mentioned physical property value adjustment element 7 is shown in FIG. FIG. 4 (a) shows that the water level of the stabilizer 6 is G.I. L. The case where the water level of the stabilizing solution 6 is lowered stepwise is shown in FIG. 4 (b) to FIG. 4 (d).
これを見ると、安定液6の水位がG.L.と等しい場合には、掘削壁面1aから地下水位5と等しい面5aまで連続的に連なる第1のすべり面8が形成されているものの、基礎杭3の周囲には降伏域が形成されておらず、基礎杭3が存在することによる地盤壁面1aの安定性への影響、地盤掘削による周辺地盤の変形および基礎杭3の支持機能への影響は、いずれも認められない。しかし、安定液6の水位が低下するにつれて、基礎杭3の周辺に降伏域9が発生して支持機能へ影響を与えるようになり、安定液6の水位がG.L.より0.9m低い図4(d)では、基礎杭3近傍に生じた降伏域9が連続して掘削壁面1aに向かって連なり、第2のすべり面10を形成しようとしている様子がわかる。 Looking at this, the water level of the stabilizer 6 is G.I. L. In the case where the first slide surface 8 is continuously formed continuously from the excavated wall surface 1a to the surface 5a equal to the groundwater level 5, no yield zone is formed around the foundation pile 3 The influence of the presence of the foundation pile 3 on the stability of the ground wall surface 1a, the deformation of the surrounding ground due to ground excavation, and the influence of the support function of the foundation pile 3 are not recognized. However, as the water level of the stabilizer 6 decreases, a yield zone 9 is generated around the foundation pile 3 to affect the support function, and the water level of the stabilizer 6 is G.I. L. In FIG. 4 (d), which is 0.9 m lower than the above, it can be seen that the yield regions 9 generated in the vicinity of the foundation pile 3 are continuously connected toward the excavated wall surface 1a to form the second sliding surface 10.
これは、図5で示す遠心模型実験においても認められる現象である。遠心模型実験では、図5(a)の写真で示すように、地盤中に複数のターゲット11を均等配置し、地盤内水位を一定に保持した状態で、安定液を段階的に低下させている。そして、図5(b)の画像解析図で示すように、安定液の水位の変化に応じて変動するターゲット11の動きを画像解析し、その結果からすべり面を推定したものである。 This is a phenomenon observed also in the centrifugal model experiment shown in FIG. In the centrifugal model test, as shown in the photograph in FIG. 5 (a), the stabilizer is lowered stepwise while the plurality of targets 11 are evenly arranged in the ground and the water level in the ground is kept constant. . Then, as shown in the image analysis diagram of FIG. 5B, the movement of the target 11 that fluctuates according to the change in the water level of the stabilizer is image-analyzed, and the slip plane is estimated from the result.
図5(b)の画像解析結果には、基礎杭3によらない第1のすべり面8と、基礎杭3近傍から掘削壁面1aへ向かって伸びる2つ目のすべり面10が形成されており、これら2つのすべり面は、本実施の形態における掘削壁面の安定性評価方法による解析結果と対応している。したがって、本実施の形態において掘削壁面の安定性評価方法は、掘削壁面1aの安定性を、基礎杭3が掘削壁面1aに及ぼす影響を加味した上で、高い精度で評価することが可能であるとともに、地中掘削が周辺地盤や基礎杭3の支持機構に与える影響を評価することも可能である。 In the image analysis result of FIG. 5 (b), a first slide surface 8 not formed by the foundation pile 3 and a second slide surface 10 extending from the vicinity of the foundation pile 3 toward the excavated wall surface 1 a are formed. These two slide surfaces correspond to the analysis result by the stability evaluation method of the excavated wall surface in the present embodiment. Therefore, in the present embodiment, the method of evaluating the stability of the excavated wall surface can evaluate the stability of the excavated wall surface 1a with high accuracy in consideration of the influence of the foundation pile 3 on the excavated wall surface 1a. At the same time, it is also possible to evaluate the influence of underground excavation on the surrounding ground and the support mechanism of the foundation pile 3.
なお、本発明の掘削壁面の安定性評価方法は、上記実施形態に限定されるものではなく、本発明の趣旨を逸脱しない範囲で種々の変更が可能である。 In addition, the stability evaluation method of the excavation wall surface of this invention is not limited to the said embodiment, A various change is possible in the range which does not deviate from the meaning of this invention.
1 地中連続壁
1a 掘削壁面
2 既設構造物
3 基礎杭
4 解析モデル
4a 杭をなす要素
4b 地盤をなす要素
5 地下水位
5a 地下水と等しい面
6 安定液
7 物性値調整要素
8 第1のすべり面
9 降伏域
10 第2のすべり面
11 ターゲット
Reference Signs List 1 underground continuous wall 1a excavated wall 2 existing structure 3 foundation pile 4 analysis model 4a pile element 4b ground element 5 groundwater level 5 surface equal to groundwater 6 stabilizer 7 property value adjustment element 8 first slip surface 9 Yield region 10 Second sliding surface 11 Target
Claims (2)
前記解析モデルの、前記既設地中構造物をなす要素に接触する地盤をなす要素を、物性値調整要素として置き換え、
該物性値調整要素に、前記既設地中構造物のヤング率より小さい値に調整した調整ヤング率を付与し、前記既設地中構造物と前記地盤との境界を表現することを特徴とする掘削壁面の安定性評価方法。 An excavated wall surface in which an analysis model based on the finite element method is set in an analysis target area including an existing underground structure and an excavated wall surface adjacent thereto, and the stability of the excavated wall surface is evaluated by a shear strength reduced finite element method Stability evaluation method of
Replace the element forming the ground in contact with the element forming the existing underground structure in the analysis model as a physical property value adjustment element,
An excavating characterized in that an adjusted Young's modulus adjusted to a value smaller than a Young's modulus of the existing underground structure is given to the physical property value adjusting element to express the boundary between the existing underground structure and the ground. Wall stability evaluation method.
前記調整ヤング率が、前記既設地中構造物のヤング率と、前記物性値調整要素と隣接する前記地盤をなす要素に付与したヤング率との間に位置する値に調整されること特徴とする掘削壁面の安定性評価方法。 In the stability evaluation method of the excavated wall according to claim 1,
The adjusted Young's modulus is adjusted to a value located between the Young's modulus of the existing underground structure and the Young's modulus applied to an element forming the ground adjacent to the physical property value adjustment element. Evaluation method of stability of excavated wall.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2015147666A JP6512014B2 (en) | 2015-07-27 | 2015-07-27 | Evaluation method of stability of excavated wall |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2015147666A JP6512014B2 (en) | 2015-07-27 | 2015-07-27 | Evaluation method of stability of excavated wall |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2017025654A JP2017025654A (en) | 2017-02-02 |
| JP6512014B2 true JP6512014B2 (en) | 2019-05-15 |
Family
ID=57949161
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2015147666A Active JP6512014B2 (en) | 2015-07-27 | 2015-07-27 | Evaluation method of stability of excavated wall |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP6512014B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN107630474B (en) * | 2017-08-17 | 2019-09-03 | 青岛理工大学 | A Dynamic Measurement Method of Anti-sliding Durability of Slope Anti-sliding Pile |
| JP7089891B2 (en) * | 2018-02-19 | 2022-06-23 | 清水建設株式会社 | Freezing expansion analysis method of the ground |
| CN110439041A (en) * | 2019-07-12 | 2019-11-12 | 同济大学 | A kind of simulator of excavation of foundation pit |
| CN110487643B (en) * | 2019-07-26 | 2020-12-11 | 南京航空航天大学 | A kind of micron fiber shear strength test method |
| CN111368358B (en) * | 2020-01-06 | 2024-01-19 | 中铁二局集团有限公司 | Method for calculating groove wall stability of limited-width soil mass underground diaphragm wall |
| CN113343335B (en) * | 2021-05-31 | 2023-04-14 | 石家庄铁道大学 | Evaluation method of mechanical effect of urban underground space network expansion |
Family Cites Families (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS54144706A (en) * | 1978-05-01 | 1979-11-12 | Kawasaki Steel Co | Method of construction of stopping of hill with deep ground |
| JP3353273B2 (en) * | 2001-05-09 | 2002-12-03 | パシフィックコンサルタンツ株式会社 | Method for setting horizontal ground reaction force coefficient on the back side and method for setting minimum earth pressure used in simulation equipment for excavation work |
| JP3876655B2 (en) * | 2001-07-10 | 2007-02-07 | 株式会社大林組 | Deformation prediction method and program for excavation bottom ground |
-
2015
- 2015-07-27 JP JP2015147666A patent/JP6512014B2/en active Active
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2017025654A (en) | 2017-02-02 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP6512014B2 (en) | Evaluation method of stability of excavated wall | |
| Abdelouhab et al. | Numerical analysis of the behaviour of mechanically stabilized earth walls reinforced with different types of strips | |
| Bilgin | Numerical studies of anchored sheet pile wall behavior constructed in cut and fill conditions | |
| Tjie-Liong | Common mistakes on the application of Plaxis 2D in analyzing excavation problems | |
| Lee | Three-dimensional numerical analyses of the response of a single pile and pile groups to tunnelling in weak weathered rock | |
| Hosseinpour et al. | A comparative study for the performance of encased granular columns | |
| Lee et al. | Undrained stability of surface strip footings above voids | |
| Sukmak et al. | Numerical parametric study on behavior of bearing reinforcement earth walls with different backfill material properties | |
| Alejano et al. | Stability of granite drystone masonry retaining walls: II. Relevant parameters and analytical and numerical studies of real walls | |
| Suksiripattanapong et al. | Numerical analysis of bearing reinforcement earth (BRE) wall | |
| JP6238043B2 (en) | Simple calculation method of residual deformation during liquefaction of soil-structure system | |
| CN108763833A (en) | A kind of computational methods for the foundation pit supporting pile amount of deflection considering earth resistance mutation | |
| Weerasekara et al. | A new approach for estimating internal stability of reinforced soil structures | |
| Heydinger et al. | Analysis of axial pile‐soil interaction in clay | |
| Mundell et al. | Limit-equilibrium assessment of drystone retaining structures | |
| Villalobos et al. | Observations from a parametric study of the seismic design of soil nailing | |
| Nip et al. | Back-analysis of laterally loaded bored piles | |
| Potts et al. | Finite-element study of arching behaviour in reinforced fills | |
| Law et al. | 3D numerical analysis and performance of deep excavations in Kenny Hill formation | |
| Lu et al. | Numerical and experimental analyses for bearing capacity of rigid strip footing subjected to eccentric load | |
| Fellenius | Analysis of results of an instrumented bidirectional-cell test | |
| Hoľko et al. | Comparison of numerical analyses with a static load test of a continuous flight auger pile | |
| Li et al. | Assessment of reinforced embankment stability over soft soils based on monitoring results | |
| Mortara | A simple model for sand–structure interface behaviour | |
| Hamza et al. | Subgrade reaction for closely spaced raft and isolated foundations on sand: case study |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20180620 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20190208 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20190312 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20190325 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 6512014 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |