Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP7089891B2 - Freezing expansion analysis method of the ground - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP7089891B2 - Freezing expansion analysis method of the ground - Google Patents

Freezing expansion analysis method of the ground Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP7089891B2
JP7089891B2 JP2018027236A JP2018027236A JP7089891B2 JP 7089891 B2 JP7089891 B2 JP 7089891B2 JP 2018027236 A JP2018027236 A JP 2018027236A JP 2018027236 A JP2018027236 A JP 2018027236A JP 7089891 B2 JP7089891 B2 JP 7089891B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
ground
expansion
contact surface
analysis
freezing
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2018027236A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2019143332A (en
Inventor
伸司 小林
幸男 矢部
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Shimizu Corp
Original Assignee
Shimizu Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Shimizu Corp filed Critical Shimizu Corp
Priority to JP2018027236A priority Critical patent/JP7089891B2/en
Publication of JP2019143332A publication Critical patent/JP2019143332A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP7089891B2 publication Critical patent/JP7089891B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Investigation Of Foundation Soil And Reinforcement Of Foundation Soil By Compacting Or Drainage (AREA)

Description

本発明は、凍結工法の適用時の地盤の膨張(応力状態)を解析する方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a method for analyzing the expansion (stress state) of the ground when the freezing method is applied.

従来、地盤の安定化、防水層の形成などを図る防護工として、耐力壁や止水壁を凍土壁によって形成する凍結工法が用いられている(例えば、特許文献1参照)。 Conventionally, as a protective work for stabilizing the ground and forming a waterproof layer, a freezing method in which a bearing wall or a waterproof wall is formed by a frozen soil wall has been used (see, for example, Patent Document 1).

一方、凍結工法においては、凍結膨張による変位により凍土壁外面の土圧が増加することがある。この応力増加は凍結膨張圧と呼ばれ、また、立坑などの構造物への付加応力は凍結土圧と称される。これらを予測する慣用式としては高志(1972年)の円筒理論式があり、他にFEM解析を用いた予測手法もある。 On the other hand, in the freezing method, the earth pressure on the outer surface of the frozen soil wall may increase due to the displacement due to freezing expansion. This increase in stress is called freeze expansion pressure, and the additional stress on structures such as shafts is called frozen earth pressure. As an idiomatic formula for predicting these, there is a cylindrical theoretical formula of Takashi (1972), and there is also a prediction method using FEM analysis.

特開2005-264717号公報Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2005-264717

しかしながら、高志の円筒理論式は凍土壁を円筒近似し凍土壁外面の凍結膨張変位・膨張圧を予測するものであり、円筒形状以外の凍土への適用は困難である。さらに、初期地圧の影響や掘削に伴う地山応力の変化を適切に評価することができない。 However, Takashi's cylindrical theoretical formula approximates the frozen soil wall to a cylinder and predicts the freezing expansion displacement and expansion pressure of the outer surface of the frozen soil wall, and it is difficult to apply it to frozen soil other than the cylindrical shape. Furthermore, it is not possible to properly evaluate the effects of initial earth pressure and changes in ground stress due to excavation.

一方、FEM解析では、複雑な凍土形状に対応し逐次解析が可能であるが、凍結膨張率の小さい砂質土と大きい粘性土が存在する場合、地質の境界に過大な応力が集中する結果となるため、凍結膨張圧の算出や凍土設計には使用されていない。 On the other hand, in FEM analysis, sequential analysis is possible for complicated frozen soil shapes, but when sandy soil with a small freezing expansion coefficient and cohesive soil with a large freezing expansion rate are present, excessive stress is concentrated at the boundary of the geology. Therefore, it is not used for calculating the freezing expansion pressure or designing frozen soil.

本発明は、上記事情に鑑み、凍結工法の適用時の地盤の膨張(応力状態)を精度よく求めることを可能にする地盤の凍結膨張解析方法を提供することを目的とする。 In view of the above circumstances, it is an object of the present invention to provide a method for analyzing the freezing and expanding of the ground, which makes it possible to accurately obtain the expansion (stress state) of the ground when the freezing method is applied.

上記の目的を達するために、この発明は以下の手段を提供している。 In order to achieve the above object, the present invention provides the following means.

本発明の地盤の凍結膨張解析方法は、凍結膨張率が相対的に小さい砂質土層と相対的に大きい粘性土層が存在する地盤に対して凍結工法を適用した際の地盤の応力状態を求めるための地盤の凍結膨張解析方法であって、前記砂質土層及び前記粘性土層よりも変形係数及びせん断剛性が低い接触面要素を前記砂質土層と前記粘性土層の境界に設けて解析モデルを作成し、前記接触面要素は、凍土範囲のみでなく地山側まで延長し、解析は、初期応力解析ステップ、凍結膨張ステップ、および掘削ステップの各施工工程それぞれに対して順に行うようにし、各ステップにおいて、最大主応力、最小主応力、安全率を求めるようにしたことを特徴とする。
The method for analyzing freezing expansion of the ground of the present invention determines the stress state of the ground when the freezing method is applied to the ground having a sandy soil layer having a relatively small freezing expansion ratio and a cohesive soil layer having a relatively large freezing expansion ratio. This is a method for analyzing freezing and expansion of the ground for obtaining, and a contact surface element having a lower deformation coefficient and shear rigidity than the sandy soil layer and the cohesive soil layer is provided at the boundary between the sandy soil layer and the cohesive soil layer. The contact surface element is extended not only to the frozen soil range but also to the ground side, and the analysis is performed in order for each construction step of the initial stress analysis step, the freeze expansion step, and the excavation step. The feature is that the maximum principal stress, the minimum principal stress, and the safety factor are obtained in each step .

本発明の地盤の凍結膨張解析方法においては、複雑な凍土形状に対しても凍結膨張変位・膨張圧を精度よく予測することが可能になる。 In the freeze-expansion analysis method of the ground of the present invention, it is possible to accurately predict the freeze-expansion displacement / expansion pressure even for a complicated frozen soil shape.

また、初期地圧の影響や掘削に伴う地山応力の変化を適切に評価することができる。 In addition, the effects of initial earth pressure and changes in ground stress due to excavation can be appropriately evaluated.

さらに、凍土や地山の安定性を評価することができ、凍土設計に好適に用いることが可能になる。 Furthermore, the stability of frozen soil and the ground can be evaluated, and it can be suitably used for frozen soil design.

本発明の一実施形態に係る地盤の凍結膨張解析方法の説明に用いた図である。It is a figure used for the explanation of the freeze-expansion analysis method of the ground which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. 接触面要素なしと、接触面要素あり(本発明)の両ケースの解析モデルを示す図である。It is a figure which shows the analysis model of both the case without a contact surface element and with a contact surface element (the present invention). 接触面要素なしと、接触面要素あり(本発明)の両ケースの凍結膨張時における解析結果である。It is the analysis result at the time of freezing expansion of both cases with no contact surface element and with contact surface element (the present invention). 接触面要素なしと、接触面要素あり(本発明)の両ケースの掘削時における解析結果である。It is an analysis result at the time of excavation of both cases without a contact surface element and with a contact surface element (the present invention).

以下、図1から図4を参照し、本発明の一実施形態に係る地盤の凍結膨張解析方法について説明する。ここで、本実施形態では、凍結工法の適用時の地盤(凍土)の膨張(応力状態)を精度よく求めるための方法に関するものである。 Hereinafter, a method for analyzing freezing and expanding of ground according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS. 1 to 4. Here, the present embodiment relates to a method for accurately obtaining the expansion (stress state) of the ground (frozen soil) when the freezing method is applied.

具体的に、本実施形態の地盤の凍結膨張解析方法においては、図1に示すように、凍結膨張率が相対的に小さい砂質土(砂質土層)と相対的に大きい粘性土(粘性土層)が存在する場合に、水平方向の変形係数、及びせん断剛性を低減(例えば、1/100)した層厚の薄い要素(「接触面要素」)を地質境界に設けてモデル化してFEM解析(凍結膨張解析)を行うようにした。また、凍土範囲のみでなく地山側まで解析範囲を延長する。 Specifically, in the freeze-expansion analysis method of the ground of the present embodiment, as shown in FIG. 1, sandy soil (sandy soil layer) having a relatively small freeze-expansion rate and cohesive soil (viscosity) having a relatively large freeze-expansion rate. When there is a soil layer), a thin element (“contact surface element”) with a reduced horizontal deformation coefficient and shear rigidity (for example, 1/100) is provided at the geological boundary and modeled and FEM. Analysis (freeze expansion analysis) was performed. In addition, the analysis range will be extended not only to the frozen soil range but also to the ground side.

本実施形態の地盤の凍結膨張解析方法では、接触面要素の存在によって、鉛直方向で砂質土と粘性土は一体となって挙動するが、水平方向では、ずれが生じて引張応力がほとんど発生しないことになり、実際の挙動に近い予測が可能になる。 In the freeze-expansion analysis method of the ground of the present embodiment, the sandy soil and the cohesive soil behave as one in the vertical direction due to the presence of the contact surface element, but in the horizontal direction, a deviation occurs and almost all tensile stress is generated. This will not be the case, and it will be possible to make predictions that are close to the actual behavior.

言い換えれば、本実施形態の地盤の凍結膨張解析方法においては、地質境界に接触面要素を設けてモデル化することにより、実際の凍土造成時の「層境でのなじみ」、「凍土成長時のすべり」を反映することができ、すなわち、挙動が実際と近いものとなり、FEM解析で凍結膨張変位・膨張圧を精度よく予測することが可能になる。 In other words, in the freeze-expansion analysis method of the ground of the present embodiment, by providing a contact surface element at the geological boundary and modeling, "familiarity at the stratum boundary" at the time of actual frozen soil formation and "frozen soil growth at the time" "Slip" can be reflected, that is, the behavior becomes close to the actual one, and it becomes possible to accurately predict the freeze expansion displacement / expansion pressure by FEM analysis.

[実施例]
ここで、本実施形態の地盤の凍結膨張解析方法を用い、地中拡幅工事の地中立坑での3次元FEM逐次解析(掘削解析+凍結膨張解析)を行った実施例について説明する。
[Example]
Here, an example in which a three-dimensional FEM sequential analysis (excavation analysis + freeze-expansion analysis) is performed in an underground shaft for underground widening work using the ground freeze-expansion analysis method of the present embodiment will be described.

図2は解析モデルを示した図(図2(a):全体)であり、本実施例では、接触面要素なし(図2(b))と、接触面要素あり(図2(c):本発明)の両ケースについて解析を行い、比較によって本実施形態の地盤の凍結膨張解析方法の優位性を確認した。 FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an analysis model (FIG. 2 (a): overall), and in this embodiment, there is no contact surface element (FIG. 2 (b)) and there is a contact surface element (FIG. 2 (c) :. Both cases of the present invention) were analyzed, and the superiority of the ground freeze-expansion analysis method of the present embodiment was confirmed by comparison.

また、解析は、初期応力解析ステップ、凍結膨張ステップ、掘削ステップの施工工程それぞれに対して順に行った。 In addition, the analysis was performed in order for each of the construction steps of the initial stress analysis step, the freeze expansion step, and the excavation step.

図3は凍結膨張時の最大主応力、最小主応力、安全率を求めた結果であり、図3(a)、図3(c)、図3(e)が接触面要素なしの最大主応力、最小主応力、安全率をそれぞれ示し、図3(b)、図3(d)、図3(f)が接触面要素あり(本発明)の最大主応力、最小主応力、安全率をそれぞれ示している。 FIG. 3 shows the results of obtaining the maximum principal stress, the minimum principal stress, and the safety factor at the time of freeze expansion. FIGS. 3 (a), 3 (c), and 3 (e) show the maximum principal stress without a contact surface element. , Minimum principal stress and safety factor are shown, respectively, and FIGS. 3 (b), 3 (d) and 3 (f) show the maximum principal stress, minimum principal stress and safety factor with contact surface elements (in the present invention), respectively. Shows.

凍結膨張時の最大主応力の図3(a)、図3(b)を比較すると、接触面要素がない場合(図3(a))には層境(砂質土側)に過大な引張応力が発生しているのに対し、接触面要素がある場合(図3(b):本発明)には層境(砂質土側)の過大な引張応力が解消している。 Comparing FIGS. 3 (a) and 3 (b) of the maximum principal stress during freezing expansion, when there is no contact surface element (FIG. 3 (a)), excessive tension is applied to the layer boundary (sandy soil side). While stress is generated, when there is a contact surface element (FIG. 3 (b): the present invention), the excessive tensile stress at the layer boundary (sandy soil side) is eliminated.

凍結膨張時の最小主応力の図3(c)、図3(d)を比較すると、接触面要素がない場合(図3(c))には層境(粘性土側)に過大な圧縮応力が発生しているのに対し、接触面要素がある場合(図3(d):本発明)には層境(粘性土側)の過大な圧縮応力が解消している。 Comparing FIGS. 3 (c) and 3 (d) of the minimum principal stress during freeze expansion, when there is no contact surface element (FIG. 3 (c)), an excessive compressive stress is applied to the layer boundary (cohesive soil side). However, when there is a contact surface element (FIG. 3 (d): the present invention), the excessive compressive stress at the layer boundary (cohesive soil side) is eliminated.

凍結膨張時の安全率の図3(e)、図3(f)を比較すると、接触面要素がない場合(図3(e))には層境付近の安全率が極度に低下しているのに対し、接触面要素がある場合(図3(f):本発明)には安全率の極度の低下が解消している。 Comparing FIGS. 3 (e) and 3 (f) of the safety factor at the time of freeze expansion, the safety factor near the stratum boundary is extremely reduced when there is no contact surface element (FIG. 3 (e)). On the other hand, when there is a contact surface element (FIG. 3 (f): the present invention), the extreme decrease in the safety factor is eliminated.

次に、図4は掘削時の最大主応力、最小主応力、安全率を求めた結果であり、図4(a)、図4(c)、図4(e)が接触面要素なしの最大主応力、最小主応力、安全率をそれぞれ示し、図4(b)、図4(d)、図4(f)が接触面要素あり(本発明)の最大主応力、最小主応力、安全率をそれぞれ示している。 Next, FIG. 4 shows the results of obtaining the maximum principal stress, the minimum principal stress, and the safety factor at the time of excavation, and FIGS. 4 (a), 4 (c), and 4 (e) show the maximum without the contact surface element. The principal stress, the minimum principal stress, and the safety factor are shown, respectively. FIGS. 4 (b), 4 (d), and 4 (f) show the maximum principal stress, the minimum principal stress, and the safety factor with the contact surface element (the present invention). Are shown respectively.

掘削時の最大主応力の図4(a)、図4(b)を比較すると、凍結膨張時と同様、接触面要素がない場合(図4(a))には層境(砂質土側)に過大な引張応力が発生しているのに対し、接触面要素がある場合(図4(b):本発明)には層境(砂質土側)の過大な引張応力が解消している。 Comparing FIGS. 4 (a) and 4 (b) of the maximum principal stress during excavation, as in the case of freeze expansion, when there is no contact surface element (FIG. 4 (a)), there is a layer boundary (sandy soil side). ), While the excessive tensile stress at the layer boundary (sandy soil side) is eliminated when there is a contact surface element (Fig. 4 (b): present invention). There is.

凍結膨張時の最小主応力の図4(c)、図4(d)を比較すると、凍結膨張時と同様、接触面要素がない場合(図4(c))には層境(粘性土側)に過大な圧縮応力が発生しているのに対し、接触面要素がある場合(図4(d):本発明)には層境(粘性土側)の過大な圧縮応力が解消している。 Comparing FIGS. 4 (c) and 4 (d) of the minimum principal stress during freeze expansion, as in the case of freeze expansion, when there is no contact surface element (FIG. 4 (c)), there is a layer boundary (cohesive soil side). ), While the excessive compressive stress at the layer boundary (cohesive soil side) is eliminated when there is a contact surface element (FIG. 4 (d): present invention). ..

凍結膨張時の安全率の図4(e)、図4(f)を比較すると、凍結膨張時と同様、接触面要素がない場合(図4(e))には層境付近の安全率が極度に低下しているのに対し、接触面要素がある場合(図4(f):本発明)には安全率の極度の低下が解消している。 Comparing FIGS. 4 (e) and 4 (f) of the safety factor during freeze expansion, the safety factor near the layer boundary is higher when there is no contact surface element (FIG. 4 (e)) as in the case of freeze expansion. While it is extremely reduced, when there is a contact surface element (FIG. 4 (f): the present invention), the extremely reduced safety factor is eliminated.

よって、本実施形態の地盤の凍結膨張解析方法によれば、複雑な凍土形状に対しても凍結膨張変位・膨張圧を精度よく予測することが可能になる。 Therefore, according to the freeze-expansion analysis method of the ground of the present embodiment, it is possible to accurately predict the freeze-expansion displacement / expansion pressure even for a complicated frozen soil shape.

また、初期地圧の影響や掘削に伴う地山応力の変化を適切に評価することができる。 In addition, the effects of initial earth pressure and changes in ground stress due to excavation can be appropriately evaluated.

さらに、凍土や地山の安定性を評価することができ、凍土設計に好適に用いることが可能になる。 Furthermore, the stability of frozen soil and the ground can be evaluated, and it can be suitably used for frozen soil design.

以上、本発明による地盤の凍結膨張解析方法の一実施形態について説明したが、本発明は上記の一実施形態に限定されるものではなく、その趣旨を逸脱しない範囲で適宜変更可能である。 Although one embodiment of the ground freeze-expansion analysis method according to the present invention has been described above, the present invention is not limited to the above-mentioned one embodiment and can be appropriately changed without departing from the spirit of the present invention.

Claims (1)

凍結膨張率が相対的に小さい砂質土層と相対的に大きい粘性土層が存在する地盤に対して凍結工法を適用した際の地盤の応力状態を求めるための地盤の凍結膨張解析方法であって、
前記砂質土層及び前記粘性土層よりも変形係数及びせん断剛性が低い接触面要素を前記砂質土層と前記粘性土層の境界に設けて解析モデルを作成し、
前記接触面要素は、凍土範囲のみでなく地山側まで延長し、
解析は、初期応力解析ステップ、凍結膨張ステップ、および掘削ステップの各施工工程それぞれに対して順に行うようにし、
各ステップにおいて、最大主応力、最小主応力、安全率を求めるようにしたことを特徴とする地盤の凍結膨張解析方法。
This is a freezing expansion analysis method for the ground to obtain the stress state of the ground when the freezing method is applied to the ground where a sandy soil layer with a relatively small freezing expansion rate and a cohesive soil layer with a relatively large freezing expansion rate exist. hand,
An analysis model was created by providing a contact surface element having a deformation coefficient and shear rigidity lower than that of the sandy soil layer and the cohesive soil layer at the boundary between the sandy soil layer and the cohesive soil layer.
The contact surface element extends not only to the frozen soil range but also to the ground side.
The analysis should be performed in order for each construction process of the initial stress analysis step, the freeze expansion step, and the excavation step.
A method for analyzing freezing expansion of the ground, characterized in that the maximum principal stress, the minimum principal stress, and the safety factor are obtained in each step .
JP2018027236A 2018-02-19 2018-02-19 Freezing expansion analysis method of the ground Active JP7089891B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2018027236A JP7089891B2 (en) 2018-02-19 2018-02-19 Freezing expansion analysis method of the ground

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2018027236A JP7089891B2 (en) 2018-02-19 2018-02-19 Freezing expansion analysis method of the ground

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2019143332A JP2019143332A (en) 2019-08-29
JP7089891B2 true JP7089891B2 (en) 2022-06-23

Family

ID=67773153

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2018027236A Active JP7089891B2 (en) 2018-02-19 2018-02-19 Freezing expansion analysis method of the ground

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7089891B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP7269900B2 (en) * 2020-03-10 2023-05-09 大成建設株式会社 Structure design method

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003020649A (en) 2001-07-10 2003-01-24 Ohbayashi Corp Method and program for predicting deformation of excavated bottom part ground
JP2012255320A (en) 2011-06-10 2012-12-27 Kajima Corp Computerized construction device and computerized construction program
JP2017025654A (en) 2015-07-27 2017-02-02 株式会社大林組 Stability evaluation method of excavated wall surface
JP2017186858A (en) 2016-03-31 2017-10-12 清水建設株式会社 Calculation method of freezing expansion pressure of freezing method

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003020649A (en) 2001-07-10 2003-01-24 Ohbayashi Corp Method and program for predicting deformation of excavated bottom part ground
JP2012255320A (en) 2011-06-10 2012-12-27 Kajima Corp Computerized construction device and computerized construction program
JP2017025654A (en) 2015-07-27 2017-02-02 株式会社大林組 Stability evaluation method of excavated wall surface
JP2017186858A (en) 2016-03-31 2017-10-12 清水建設株式会社 Calculation method of freezing expansion pressure of freezing method

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
上田 保司, 生頼 孝博, 田村 武,"土の凍結線膨張率を取り込んだ3次元地盤変形解析",土木学会論文集C,日本,2007年09月,63巻,3号 ,p.835-847,https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejc.63.835

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2019143332A (en) 2019-08-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Bobet Analytical solutions for shallow tunnels in saturated ground
Sugimoto et al. Theoretical model of shield behavior during excavation. I: Theory
Wongsaroj et al. Modelling of long-term ground response to tunnelling under St James's Park, London
WO2001000962A1 (en) Cavity stability prediction method for wellbores
WO2017078674A1 (en) Three-dimensional geomechanical modeling of casing deformation for hydraulic fracturing treatment design
CN113435636B (en) A dynamic prediction method for the sinking process of surface points in coal mining subsidence
EP3315775B1 (en) Real-time pump diagnositc algorithms and application thereof
JP2020021198A (en) Stability evaluation method of foundation and computer program for stability evaluation of foundation
Khanal et al. Numerical study of mine site specific multiseam mining and its impact on surface subsidence and chain pillar stress
Zhu et al. 3D mechanical modeling of soil orthogonal cutting under a single reamer cutter based on Drucker–Prager criterion
Liu et al. Finite element implementation of strain-hardening Drucker–Prager plasticity model with application to tunnel excavation
Baryakh et al. Sinkhole formation mechanism
JP7089891B2 (en) Freezing expansion analysis method of the ground
Novozhenin et al. New method of surface settlement prediction for saint-petersburg metro escalator tunnels excavated by EPB TBM
Poisel et al. Landslide caused damages in a gallery
US20170204706A1 (en) Hydrocarbon production method comprising a productivity index of the wells subject to thermal effect
Fukuda et al. The deformation modes of rock slopes due to excavation in mountain-type mines
Tarasov et al. Deformation and failure of concrete lining in vertical shaft at intersections with horizontal tunnels
Baryakh et al. Prediction of the intensive surface subsidences in mining potash series
Law et al. 3D numerical analysis and performance of deep excavations in Kenny Hill formation
Ferla et al. Finite-element analysis of thermal-induced stresses around a cased injection well
JP2000027185A (en) Estimation method of ground constant
US20060041411A1 (en) Method of designing and drilling systems made using rock mechanics models
JP2009062794A (en) Improved ground and ground improvement method
JP7103046B2 (en) Ground analysis method based on multidimensional consolidation theory

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20201217

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20211119

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20211207

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20220119

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20220524

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20220613

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 7089891

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150