Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP6718323B2 - Refractory manufacturing method that reuses used refractories - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP6718323B2 - Refractory manufacturing method that reuses used refractories - Google Patents

Refractory manufacturing method that reuses used refractories Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP6718323B2
JP6718323B2 JP2016129950A JP2016129950A JP6718323B2 JP 6718323 B2 JP6718323 B2 JP 6718323B2 JP 2016129950 A JP2016129950 A JP 2016129950A JP 2016129950 A JP2016129950 A JP 2016129950A JP 6718323 B2 JP6718323 B2 JP 6718323B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
refractory
raw material
dismantling
cao
debris
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2016129950A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2018002529A (en
Inventor
中村 善幸
善幸 中村
久宏 松永
久宏 松永
桑山 道弘
道弘 桑山
尚士 冨谷
尚士 冨谷
鳥越 淳志
淳志 鳥越
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Shinagawa Refractories Co Ltd
JFE Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Shinagawa Refractories Co Ltd
JFE Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Shinagawa Refractories Co Ltd, JFE Steel Corp filed Critical Shinagawa Refractories Co Ltd
Priority to JP2016129950A priority Critical patent/JP6718323B2/en
Publication of JP2018002529A publication Critical patent/JP2018002529A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP6718323B2 publication Critical patent/JP6718323B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P10/00Technologies related to metal processing
    • Y02P10/20Recycling

Landscapes

  • Processing Of Solid Wastes (AREA)
  • Compositions Of Oxide Ceramics (AREA)
  • Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)

Description

本発明は、製鉄工場等で発生した使用済みの耐火物を再利用した耐火物の製造方法に関するものである。 TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to a method for manufacturing a refractory material by reusing a used refractory material generated in a steel factory or the like.

製鉄所で使用される転炉や電気炉等の精錬炉、取鍋や樋等の付帯設備には、耐火レンガや不定形耐火物等の耐火物が内張されている。この内張耐火物は、溶融金属やスラグによって溶損するため、残存厚みが薄くなった時点で新しい耐火物に張り替えられる。一方、張り替えによって発生した使用済み耐火物は、地金などを含んだスラグが表面に付着したり、内部に浸潤したりしているために再利用することが困難であることから、従来ではその殆どが廃棄されていた。 Refractory materials such as refractory bricks and unshaped refractory materials are lined in refining furnaces such as converters and electric furnaces used in steelworks, and incidental equipment such as ladle and gutters. This refractory lining is melted by molten metal or slag, so that it is replaced with a new refractory when the remaining thickness becomes thin. On the other hand, the used refractory generated by refilling is difficult to reuse because slag containing metal etc. adheres to the surface or infiltrates inside, so that it is Most were discarded.

近年、資源の有効利用と原料費削減のために、使用済み耐火物を再利用することが求められているが、上記のように使用済み耐火物にはスラグが混入しており、その混入量が多いと使用済み耐火物を再利用した耐火物の耐用性を低下させるため、スラグ混入が少ない使用済み耐火物を選別して再利用する必要がある。しかし、従来、使用済み耐火物からスラグの混入(付着、浸潤)が少ない部分を選別しようとすると、その作業の大半は人手作業となるため、多大な手間と時間がかかり、大量の使用済み耐火物を処理することは事実上困難である。また、目視によりスラグの混入(付着、浸潤)の有無や程度を正確に判定すること自体も容易ではない。 In recent years, it has been required to reuse used refractories in order to effectively use resources and reduce raw material costs, but as mentioned above, used refractories contain slag, and the amount of contamination If the amount is large, the durability of the refractory that is reused from the used refractory is reduced, so it is necessary to select and reuse the used refractory that contains less slag. However, in the past, when trying to select a portion of a used refractory material with a small amount of slag (adhesion, infiltration), most of the work is manual work, which requires a lot of labor and time, and a large amount of used refractory material. It is virtually difficult to process things. In addition, it is not easy to accurately determine the presence or absence and the degree of slag inclusion (adhesion, infiltration) by visual observation.

特許文献1には、使用済耐火物に対して一次磁力選別を行って地金を除去した後、破砕して篩い分けし、さらに粒度毎に一次磁力選別よりも大きな磁力で二次磁力選別を行って磁性体と非磁性体に分別し、さらに必要に応じて、選別された非磁性体の使用済耐火物について、色彩選別装置を用いてスラグ浸潤層の有無を色彩で識別し、スラグ浸潤層がないものとスラグ浸潤層が存在するものとに分別するようにした使用済耐火物の処理方法が示されている。 In patent document 1, after performing primary magnetic force sorting on a used refractory to remove the metal, it is crushed and sieved, and secondary magnetic force sorting is performed for each grain size with a magnetic force larger than the primary magnetic force sorting. The used non-magnetic material is separated into magnetic and non-magnetic materials, and if necessary, the used refractory of the selected non-magnetic material is colored by a color sorter to identify the presence or absence of a slag infiltration layer, and slag infiltration is performed. A method for treating used refractories is shown, in which the layers are separated from those without a layer and those with a slag infiltrated layer.

特開2003−88845号公報JP, 2003-88845, A

しかし、特許文献1の方法は、磁力選別や色彩選別のための特殊な機器が必要であるため設備費が高くなる問題がある。また、特許文献1に示されるような特殊な高磁力選別と色彩選別を組み合わせて実施するなど、選別処理を行わなければ、スラグの混入が少ない使用済み耐火物を精度よく選別することは難しい。
したがって本発明の目的は、以上のような従来技術の課題を解決し、使用済み耐火物の解体屑を原料として、安定した耐用性を有する耐火物を効率的かつ安価に製造することができる製造方法を提供することにある。
However, the method of Patent Document 1 has a problem that the equipment cost increases because a special device for magnetic force selection and color selection is required. In addition, it is difficult to accurately sort used refractories with a small amount of slag mixed in, if a sorting process is not performed, such as performing a combination of special high magnetic force sorting and color sorting as shown in Patent Document 1.
Therefore, an object of the present invention is to solve the problems of the conventional techniques as described above, and to manufacture a refractory having stable durability efficiently and inexpensively, using scraps of used refractories as raw materials. To provide a method.

本発明者らは、上記の課題を解決できる技術を見出すべく詳細な検討を行った結果、耐火物原料としてCaOを配合しないで製造された耐火物であって、使用済みとなった耐火物については、そのCaO含有量でスラグ混入量を推定することができ、したがって、この使用済み耐火物を原料の少なくとも一部として耐火物を製造するに当たっては、耐火物原料のCaO含有量を指標としてスラグ混入量を管理することにより、安定した耐用性を有する耐火物を製造できることを見出した。
本発明は、このような知見に基づきなされたもので、以下を要旨とするものである。
The present inventors have conducted a detailed study to find a technique capable of solving the above problems, and as a result, a refractory manufactured without adding CaO as a refractory raw material Can estimate the amount of slag mixed with its CaO content. Therefore, when manufacturing a refractory using this used refractory as at least a part of the raw material, the slag content is determined using the CaO content of the refractory raw material as an index. It has been found that a refractory material having stable durability can be manufactured by controlling the mixed amount.
The present invention has been made on the basis of such findings, and has the following gist.

[1]耐火物原料としてCaO(但し、耐火物原料中に不可避不純物として含まれるCaOを除く)を配合しないで耐火物を製造する方法において、
耐火物原料としてCaO(但し、耐火物原料中に不可避不純物として含まれるCaOを除く)を配合しないで製造された耐火物であって、使用済みとなった耐火物の解体屑を、耐火物原料の少なくとも一部として耐火物を製造するに当たり、
付着異物と不要材質部分を除去する分別解体を施して得られた解体屑(a)についてCaO含有量を測定し、このCaO含有量と耐火物原料中での解体屑(a)の配合割合に基づき、解体屑(a)のなかから、製造される耐火物のCaO含有量が2.5質量%以下となるようなCaO含有量の解体屑(a)を選別し、この解体屑(a)を耐火物原料として用いることを特徴とする使用済み耐火物を再利用した耐火物の製造方法。
[2]上記[1]の製造方法において、付着異物と不要材質部分を除去する分別解体を施して得られた解体屑(a)を破砕して磁気選別による地金除去を行った後、粉砕し、次いで分級して粒度別の解体屑(a)とし、前記粉砕後の解体屑(a)又は前記分級後の解体屑(a)についてCaO含有量を測定し、このCaO含有量と耐火物原料中での解体屑(a)の配合割合に基づき、解体屑(a)の選別を行うことを特徴とする使用済み耐火物を再利用した耐火物の製造方法。
[1] In a method for producing a refractory without mixing CaO as a refractory raw material (excluding CaO contained as an unavoidable impurity in the refractory raw material),
A refractory manufactured by not mixing CaO as a refractory raw material (excluding CaO contained in the refractory raw material as an unavoidable impurity), and dismantling scrap of a used refractory is used as a refractory raw material. In manufacturing refractory as at least part of
The CaO content was measured for the dismantled scraps (a 0 ) obtained by performing the disassembly to remove the adhered foreign matter and the unnecessary material portion, and the CaO content and the mixing ratio of the dismantled scraps (a) in the refractory raw material Based on the above, the dismantling scraps (a 0 ) are selected from the dismantling scraps (a 0 ) so as to have a CaO content of 2.5% by mass or less. A method for manufacturing a refractory material that reuses a used refractory material, characterized in that a) is used as a refractory material.
[2] In the manufacturing method of the above-mentioned [1], after disassembling debris (a 0 ) obtained by carrying out a separate dismantling to remove adhered foreign matters and unnecessary material parts, and crushing the metal by magnetic sorting, Pulverized and then classified to be disassembled scraps (a 0 ) for each particle size, and the CaO content of the disassembled scraps (a 0 ) after the crushing or the disassembled scraps (a 0 ) after the classification was measured. A method for manufacturing a refractory material that reuses a used refractory material, characterized by selecting the dismantled waste material (a) based on the amount and the mixing ratio of the dismantled waste material (a) in the raw material of the refractory material.

[3]耐火物原料としてCaO(但し、耐火物原料中に不可避不純物として含まれるCaOを除く)を配合しないで耐火物を製造する方法において、
耐火物原料としてCaO(但し、耐火物原料中に不可避不純物として含まれるCaOを除く)を配合しないで製造された耐火物であって、使用済みとなった耐火物の解体屑を、耐火物原料の少なくとも一部として耐火物を製造するに当たり、
付着異物と不要材質部分を除去する分別解体を施して得られた解体屑(a)についてCaO含有量を測定し、このCaO含有量に基づき、製造される耐火物のCaO含有量が2.5質量%以下となるような、耐火物原料中での解体屑(a)の配合割合を求め、この配合割合の解体屑(a)を耐火物原料として用いることを特徴とする使用済み耐火物を再利用した耐火物の製造方法。
[4]上記[3]の製造方法において、付着異物と不要材質部分を除去する分別解体を施して得られた解体屑(a)を破砕して磁気選別による地金除去を行った後、粉砕し、次いで分級して粒度別の解体屑(a)とし、前記粉砕後の解体屑(a)又は前記分級後の解体屑(a)についてCaO含有量を測定し、このCaO含有量に基づき、耐火物原料中での解体屑(a)の配合割合を求めることを特徴とする使用済み耐火物を再利用した耐火物の製造方法。
[3] A method for producing a refractory without adding CaO as a refractory raw material (excluding CaO contained as an unavoidable impurity in the refractory raw material),
A refractory manufactured by not mixing CaO as a refractory raw material (excluding CaO contained in the refractory raw material as an unavoidable impurity), and dismantling scrap of a used refractory is used as a refractory raw material. In manufacturing refractory as at least part of
The CaO content of the dismantled scraps (a 0 ) obtained by performing the disassembly to remove the adhered foreign matter and the unnecessary material portion was measured, and based on the CaO content, the CaO content of the refractory product to be manufactured was 2. 5 wt% or less and comprising as to obtain the mixing ratio of the demolition debris in refractory raw material (a 0), spent, which comprises using the demolition debris of the proportion (a 0) as refractory material A method for manufacturing a refractory material by reusing the refractory material.
[4] In the manufacturing method of the above-mentioned [3], after demolition scraps (a 0 ) obtained by subjecting the disassembled wastes and the unnecessary material portions to the dismantling disintegration are crushed and the metal is removed by magnetic sorting, Pulverized and then classified to be disassembled scraps (a 0 ) for each particle size, and the CaO content of the disassembled scraps (a 0 ) after the crushing or the disassembled scraps (a 0 ) after the classification was measured. A method for manufacturing a refractory material that reuses a used refractory material, characterized in that a blending ratio of demolition scrap (a 0 ) in the refractory material is obtained based on the amount.

[5]上記[1]〜[4]のいずれかの製造方法において、耐火物原料中での解体屑(a)の配合割合を10〜80質量%とすることを特徴とする使用済み耐火物を再利用した耐火物の製造方法。
[6]上記[1]〜[5]のいずれかの製造方法において、解体屑(a)を仮置き場で仮置する際に、解体屑(a)を下記(i)又は(ii)の条件で仮置き・搬出することを特徴とする使用済み耐火物を再利用した耐火物の製造方法。
(i)解体屑(a)を仮置き場の地面に仮置きし、解体屑(a)を仮置き場から搬出する際には、地面に接触している解体屑部分が残るようにして、その上部の解体屑(a)のみを搬出する。
(ii)事前に仮置き場の地面に使用済み耐火物の解体屑からなる敷材を敷いておき、解体屑(a)を仮置き場の前記敷材上に仮置きし、解体屑(a)を仮置き場から搬出する際には、敷材上の解体屑(a)のみを搬出する。
[5] The used refractory material according to any one of the above-mentioned [1] to [4], characterized in that the mixing ratio of the demolition waste (a) in the refractory raw material is 10 to 80% by mass. A method for manufacturing a refractory material that is reused.
[6] In the manufacturing method according to any one of the above [1] to [5], when dismantling debris (a 0 ) is temporarily placed in a temporary storage space, demolition debris (a 0 ) is used as (i) or (ii) below. A method for manufacturing a refractory material that reuses used refractory material, which is characterized in that it is temporarily placed and carried out under the conditions described above.
(I) When dismantling debris (a 0 ) is temporarily placed on the ground in the temporary storage area, and when dismantling debris (a 0 ) is carried out from the temporary storage area, the dismantling debris portion in contact with the ground remains, Only the dismantled waste (a 0 ) above it is carried out.
(Ii) in advance, covered with litter consisting of demolition debris of spent refractory to ground temporary field, placed temporarily disassembling debris (a 0) on the litter storage site, demolition debris (a 0 ) Is removed from the temporary storage area, only the demolition debris (a 0 ) on the laying material is carried out.

本発明によれば、使用済み耐火物の解体屑を原料として、安定した耐用性を有する耐火物を製造することができる。本発明では、耐火物原料のCaO含有量を管理するだけでよいため、比較的簡易な分別解体(付着異物と不要材質部分を除去する分別解体)を施して回収された大量の使用済み耐火物(解体屑)を耐火物原料として簡便に再利用することができ、安定した耐用性を有する耐火物を効率的かつ安価に製造することができる。また、本発明で得られる耐火物は、耐用性の安定化によって、従来では使用済み耐火物を原料とした耐火物の適用が困難であった、再利用前と同じ使用部位や設備にも適用できる。この結果、使用済み耐火物の再利用適用範囲および再利用可能量が増大し、廃棄物の減少によって廃棄物処理費用が削減されるとともに、安価な耐火物原料としての使用済み耐火物の使用量が増加することにより、耐火物の製造コストも低減させることができる。 According to the present invention, it is possible to manufacture a refractory having a stable durability by using a scrap of a used refractory as a raw material. In the present invention, since it is only necessary to control the CaO content of the refractory raw material, a large amount of used refractories recovered by performing relatively simple separation disassembly (separation disassembly that removes adhered foreign matter and unnecessary material parts). (Demolition waste) can be easily reused as a refractory raw material, and a refractory having stable durability can be efficiently and inexpensively manufactured. Further, the refractory obtained in the present invention, due to the stabilization of durability, it was difficult to apply the refractory made from the used refractory as a raw material in the past. it can. As a result, the reuse application range and reusable amount of used refractories are increased, waste treatment costs are reduced due to the reduction of waste, and the amount of used refractory used as an inexpensive refractory raw material is reduced. As a result, the manufacturing cost of the refractory material can be reduced.

使用済み耐火物を耐火物原料に再利用して製造された耐火物について、CaO含有量と耐食性(侵食性指数)との関係を示すグラフGraph showing the relationship between CaO content and corrosion resistance (corrosion index) for refractories manufactured by reusing used refractories as raw materials for refractories

再利用対象の使用済み耐火物に対して、付着異物と不要材質部分を除去するために分別解体を行うが、耐火物表面に付着したり、耐火物の目地や亀裂などの隙間に入り込んだスラグや地金は、分別解体によっても不可避的に回収物に混入する。これらの地金やスラグは融点が1000〜1400℃と低く、さらにスラグは一度溶融しているプリメルト状態であるため、耐火物中に大量に混入した場合には耐火度の低下を引き起こし、少量の混入でも耐食性の低下が懸念される。 The used refractory to be reused is separated and disassembled to remove foreign matter and unnecessary material, but slag that adheres to the surface of the refractory or has entered the gaps such as joints and cracks of the refractory Metals and ingots are inevitably mixed in the collected materials even if they are separated and disassembled. These ingots and slags have a low melting point of 1000 to 1400° C., and since the slag is in a pre-melted state where it is once melted, it causes a decrease in refractory degree when mixed in a large amount in refractory, and a small amount. Even if mixed, there is concern that the corrosion resistance will decrease.

使用済み耐火物に混入しているスラグのうち地金や鉄分の多いスラグは、リサイクルの過程で一般に行われる磁選工程において大半が除去されるが、多くのスラグはそのまま耐火物中に残存してしまう。したがって、スラグの混入量を低く抑えるように管理することが、使用済み耐火物を耐火物原料として再利用する上で重要となる。
本発明者らは、使用済み耐火物中のスラグは単体での検出が難しいため、大量に使用する耐火物原料としての管理には、何らかの化学成分を指標とするべきであると考えた。
Of the slag mixed in the used refractory, most of the slag with a large amount of metal and iron is removed in the magnetic separation process generally performed in the recycling process, but many slag remains in the refractory as it is. I will end up. Therefore, it is important to control so that the amount of slag mixed is kept low in order to reuse the used refractory as a refractory raw material.
The present inventors considered that slag in used refractory is difficult to detect as a single substance, and therefore some chemical component should be used as an index for management as a refractory raw material used in a large amount.

一般に鉄鋼スラグの主成分はCaO、SiO、Al及び鉄分である。これらの成分のなかで、鉄分は上述のように磁選工程で大半が除去されるため、残る3つの主成分で管理することが考えられるが、鉄鋼スラグは精錬の対象物により異なる組成で生成され、特にSiOとAlの含有量の違いが大きいため、この2成分(SiO、Al)はスラグ混入量の管理には向かない。一方、CaOは一般にスラグ中に40質量%程度存在しており、その含有量は精錬の対象物による大きな違いがないため、使用済み耐火物のスラグ混入量を管理するための指標として好適であることが判った。 Main component of general steel slag CaO, a SiO 2, Al 2 O 3 and iron. Of these components, most of the iron content is removed in the magnetic separation process as described above, so it may be possible to manage with the remaining three main components, but steel slag is produced with different compositions depending on the refining target. In particular, since the difference between the contents of SiO 2 and Al 2 O 3 is large, these two components (SiO 2 , Al 2 O 3 ) are not suitable for controlling the amount of slag mixed. On the other hand, CaO is generally present in the slag in an amount of about 40% by mass, and since the content thereof does not differ greatly depending on the refining target, it is suitable as an index for managing the amount of slag mixed in the used refractory. I knew that.

ドロマイト系耐火物のように、原料としてCaOを配合する耐火物を再利用する場合は、耐火物由来のCaOであるかスラグ由来のCaOであるかの判別が困難であるため、CaOを使用済み耐火物のスラグ混入量を管理するための指標とすることは難しい。これに対して、マグネシアカーボン系耐火物、アルミナSiCカーボン系耐火物、アルミナ系耐火物などのような一般的な耐火物は、原料としてCaOを添加(配合)せず、原料中の不純物として最大0.5質量%程度のCaOを含むだけである。したがって、このような原料としてCaOを添加していない一般的な耐火物については、回収された使用済み耐火物中のCaO成分の増加はスラグの混入由来と考えてよい。よって、使用済み耐火物中のCaO成分を指標とすることで、リサイクル原料の品質(スラグ混入)管理が可能となる。 When a refractory containing CaO as a raw material is reused like a dolomite refractory, it is difficult to determine whether it is refractory-derived CaO or slag-derived CaO. It is difficult to use it as an index to control the amount of refractory slag mixed. On the other hand, general refractory materials such as magnesia carbon refractory, alumina SiC carbon refractory, and alumina refractory do not have CaO added (blended) as a raw material, It only contains about 0.5% by mass of CaO. Therefore, regarding a general refractory material to which CaO is not added as such a raw material, it can be considered that the increase of the CaO component in the recovered used refractory material originates from the inclusion of slag. Therefore, by using the CaO component in the used refractory as an index, it becomes possible to control the quality (mixing of slag) of the recycled raw material.

本発明者らの知見によれば、使用済み耐火物を耐火物原料に再利用して製造される耐火物のCaO含有量が2.5質量%を超えると、使用済み耐火物に混入したスラグに起因して耐火物の耐食性が急激に悪化し、安定した耐用性(耐食性)が得られなくなる。
このため本発明では、耐火物のCaO含有量を指標とし、製造される耐火物のCaO含有量が2.5質量%以下となるようにスラグ混入量を管理して耐火物を製造する。具体的には、本発明の第一の製造方法では、測定された使用済み耐火物のCaO含有量に基づき、製造される耐火物のCaO含有量が2.5質量%以下となるようなCaO含有量の使用済み耐火物(解体屑)を選別し、これを耐火物原料として用いる。また、本発明の第二の製造方法では、測定された使用済み耐火物のCaO含有量に基づき、製造される耐火物のCaO含有量が2.5質量%以下となるような、使用済み耐火物(解体屑)の配合割合を求め、この配合割合の使用済み耐火物(解体屑)を耐火物原料として用いる。
According to the knowledge of the present inventors, when the CaO content of the refractory produced by reusing the used refractory as a refractory raw material exceeds 2.5% by mass, the slag mixed in the used refractory is present. As a result, the corrosion resistance of the refractory material deteriorates rapidly and stable durability (corrosion resistance) cannot be obtained.
Therefore, in the present invention, the CaO content of the refractory is used as an index, and the refractory is manufactured by controlling the amount of slag mixed so that the CaO content of the manufactured refractory is 2.5 mass% or less. Specifically, in the first production method of the present invention, CaO content such that the CaO content of the manufactured refractory is 2.5% by mass or less based on the measured CaO content of the used refractory. Used refractories (demolition scraps) of the content are selected and used as a refractory raw material. Moreover, in the second manufacturing method of the present invention, the used refractory having a CaO content of 2.5% by mass or less is used, based on the measured CaO content of the used refractory. The compounding ratio of the waste (demolition waste) is determined, and the used refractory (dismantling waste) having this compounding ratio is used as a refractory raw material.

本発明は、スラグ由来のCaOの含有量をスラグ混入量の管理指標とするため、耐火物原料としてCaOを配合しないで耐火物を製造することが前提である。但し、耐火物原料中に不純物としてCaOが不可避的に含まれることは妨げない。通常、新規の耐火物原料(バージン原料)に不純物として含まれるCaOは最大でも0.5質量%程度である。
また、同様の理由で、本発明でリサイクル対象となるのは、耐火物原料としてCaOを配合しないで製造された耐火物(但し、上記と同様、耐火物原料中に不純物としてCaOが不可避的に含まれることは妨げない)であって、使用済みとなった耐火物である。本発明は、このような使用済み耐火物の解体屑を、耐火物原料の少なくとも一部として耐火物を製造する。
In the present invention, the content of CaO derived from slag is used as a management index for the amount of slag mixed, and therefore it is a premise that a refractory is manufactured without mixing CaO as a refractory raw material. However, it does not prevent inclusion of CaO as an impurity in the refractory raw material. Usually, CaO contained as an impurity in a new refractory raw material (virgin raw material) is about 0.5 mass% at the maximum.
Further, for the same reason, the target of recycling in the present invention is a refractory produced without mixing CaO as a refractory raw material (however, like the above, CaO is unavoidable as an impurity in the refractory raw material. It does not prevent inclusion) and is a used refractory. The present invention manufactures a refractory by using the scraps of such a used refractory as at least a part of the refractory raw material.

以下、本発明の第一の製造方法について説明する。
本発明の第一の製造方法では、使用済み耐火物に付着異物と不要材質部分を除去する分別解体を施して得られた解体屑aについてCaO含有量を測定し、このCaO含有量と耐火物原料中での解体屑aの配合割合に基づき、解体屑aのなかから、製造される耐火物のCaO含有量が2.5質量%以下となるようなCaO含有量の解体屑aを選別し、この解体屑aを耐火物原料として用いる。
Hereinafter, the first manufacturing method of the present invention will be described.
In the first manufacturing method of the present invention, the CaO content is measured with respect to dismantled scrap a 0 obtained by subjecting used refractory materials to a separated dismantling process for removing adhering foreign matters and unnecessary material portions, and the CaO content and fire resistance are measured. based on the mixing ratio of the demolition debris a in the object raw material, from among dismantled scrap a 0, the demolition debris a of CaO content, such as CaO content of the refractory material produced is 2.5 wt% or less It is selected, and the scraps a are used as a refractory raw material.

本発明において、再利用対象となる使用済み耐火物の解体屑aは、通常、使用済みの耐火物に対して、付着異物と不要材質部分を除去する比較的簡易な分別解体を施して得られたものである。
ここで、分別解体の対象となる使用済み耐火物は、鉄鋼製造プロセスにおいて生成するスラグと接するように使用された耐火物であり、したがって、主に精錬炉や取鍋などの容器に内張りされた使用済みの耐火物(劣化した耐火物部分)であるが、これに限定されるものではない。
In the present invention, demolition debris a 0 of the spent refractory to be reusable object is usually subjected respect spent refractory, a relatively simple fractionation dismantling for removing extraneous foreign material and unwanted material part obtained It has been done.
Here, the used refractory to be separated and dismantled is the refractory used to come into contact with the slag generated in the steel manufacturing process, and therefore it was mainly lined in vessels such as refining furnaces and ladle. Used refractory (degraded refractory part), but is not limited to this.

一般に使用済み耐火物の解体には、作業の安全性と能率面から重機を用いることが多い。重機による解体においても耐火物表面および容器上面の付着物除去は比較的容易に行うことが可能である。さらに、容器上方に再利用時に不要な材質がある場合は、その範囲まで解体を行うことができる。
使用済みの耐火物に付着異物と不要材質部分を除去する分別解体を施す場合、通常、最初に付着異物の除去を行い、次いで、不要材質部分の解体・除去を行い、しかる後、再利用対象となる耐火物の解体を行い、再利用対象となる解体屑aを回収する。
In general, heavy machinery is often used to dismantle used refractories in terms of work safety and efficiency. Even when dismantling with a heavy machine, it is possible to relatively easily remove the deposits on the refractory surface and the container upper surface. Furthermore, when there is unnecessary material above the container when it is reused, it is possible to dismantle up to that range.
When a used refractory is subjected to separate dismantling to remove adhered foreign matter and unnecessary material parts, usually the adhered foreign matter is first removed, then the unnecessary material parts are disassembled and removed, and then reused. The refractory to be used is dismantled, and the dismantled scrap a 0 to be reused is collected.

本発明で行われる分別解体とは、付着異物および不要材質部分の除去と再利用対象となる耐火物の回収を目的としたものであり、例えば、精錬炉や取鍋などの容器に内張りされた耐火物の場合には、付着異物と不要材質部分を除去した上で、稼動面のワーク耐火物とその背面の捨て張りれんがまたはパーマ耐火物を同時に解体し、全量回収を行う。
付着異物とは、凝固したスラグ(高炉スラグ、溶銑予備処理時に生成したスラグなど)や銑鉄、或いはそれらの混合物が、耐火物の表面や亀裂、目地などに付着したものである。この付着異物は、一般にペッカーなどの大型の重機で表面を砕き、除去する。耐火物の目地に食い込んで取れない場合は、耐火物ごと除去する場合もある。
The separation and disassembly performed in the present invention is intended to remove adhering foreign matters and unnecessary material parts and to collect refractory materials to be reused, and for example, it is lined in a container such as a refining furnace or a ladle. In the case of refractory materials, after removing the adhering foreign matter and unnecessary material parts, the work refractory material on the operating surface and the waste brick or perm refractory material on the back surface are dismantled at the same time, and the entire amount is recovered.
The adhered foreign matter is solidified slag (such as blast furnace slag and slag generated during hot metal pretreatment), pig iron, or a mixture thereof adhered to the surface, cracks, joints, etc. of the refractory. The adhered foreign matter is generally removed by crushing the surface with a large heavy machine such as a pecker. If it cannot be removed by cutting into the joints of the refractory, the refractory may be removed together.

また、不要材質部分とは、耐火物原料としての回収が不要な部分のことであり、例えば、回収対象の耐火物に対して材質系が異なっている耐火物部分、品位が大きく異なっている耐火物部分などが挙げられる。一般に、精錬炉や取鍋などの容器の場合には、壁や敷部はれんが(定形耐火物)で施工されるのに対して、容器上端や溶銑払い出し部は不定形耐火物で施工されている場合が多いが、この不定形耐火物が不要材質部分とされる場合がある。通常、本発明では、れんが(定形耐火物)を解体屑aとして回収し、不定形耐火物は不要材質部分として除去することが多い。また、溶銑に接触しない壁の上部では、溶銑の接触範囲とは異なる材質の耐火物(例えば、ハイアルミナれんがなど)を使用する場合が多いが、このような耐火物が不要材質部分とされる場合もある。この不要材質部分の解体・除去は、上述した付着異物除去に続いて行われ、ペッカーなどの大型の重機を用いて容器上端部から対象範囲を砕きながら解体し、解体屑は重機で掻き出したり、容器を反転させて外部へ排出する。 The unnecessary material part is a part that does not need to be recovered as a refractory raw material.For example, a refractory part whose material system is different from that of the refractory to be recovered, or a fireproof product whose quality is significantly different. The thing part etc. are mentioned. In general, in the case of vessels such as refining furnaces and ladles, the walls and floors are constructed with bricks (standard refractory), while the tops of the vessels and hot metal payouts are constructed with irregular refractories. In many cases, this irregular shaped refractory material may be an unnecessary material part. Generally, in the present invention, bricks (standard refractory materials) are often collected as demolition scraps a 0 , and irregular refractory materials are often removed as unnecessary material portions. In addition, in the upper part of the wall that does not come into contact with the hot metal, a refractory material different from the hot metal contact area is often used (for example, high alumina brick), but such refractory material is an unnecessary material part. In some cases. The dismantling and removal of this unnecessary material part is performed following the above-mentioned removal of adhered foreign substances, using a large heavy machine such as a pecker to dismantle while crushing the target range from the upper end of the container, scrapping scraps with a heavy machine, Invert the container and discharge to the outside.

この作業の際、除去された付着異物や不要材質部分の解体屑により、容器表面が覆われて死角が生じ、付着異物の除去が不完全な部分が生じる恐れがあるため、付着異物の除去の後に解体屑の排出を行うことが望ましく、より望ましくは付着異物除去および不要材質部分の解体時に、解体屑(付着異物や不要材質部分)の排出を複数回行うと、耐火物原料として再利用する解体屑aへの不純物混入を抑制することができる。
さらに、不要ワーク部分(不要材質部分)と再利用対象ワーク部分(再利用対象の耐火物)の境界部分に段差をつけるなど、解体時に両者が同時に崩れない工夫をすると解体屑aの回収率が向上する。また、容器全体を同じ系の材質(耐火物)で統一して全て回収対象とすることも、解体屑aの回収率向上に寄与する。
During this operation, the adhered foreign matter that has been removed or the scraps of the unnecessary material may cover the container surface and create a blind spot, which may result in incomplete removal of the adhered foreign matter. It is desirable to discharge the dismantling scraps later, and more desirably, when the dismantling scraps (adherent foreign substances and unnecessary material parts) are discharged multiple times during removal of adhered foreign materials and dismantling of unnecessary material parts, reuse as refractory raw material It is possible to prevent impurities from being mixed into the demolition waste a 0 .
In addition, recovery rate of dismantled scrap a 0 can be obtained by devising a step such as a step at the boundary between the unnecessary work part (unnecessary material part) and the reusable work part (refractory to be reused) so that both do not collapse at the same time during dismantling. Is improved. In addition, unifying all the containers with the same system material (refractory) and collecting all of them also contributes to the improvement of the recovery rate of the demolition waste a 0 .

上記のように付着異物および不要材質部分を除去した後、再利用対象となる耐火物を解体し、再利用対象となる使用済み耐火物の解体屑aを得る。再利用対象となる耐火物は、通常、ワーク部分の耐火物である。
解体時にパーマネント部分を残したい場合、ワーク部分の背面に捨て張りれんがを張ることが望ましい。捨て張りれんがの材質は、再利用する際に支障が出ないよう、ワーク部分と同じ材質か、ワーク部分の原料として含まれる材質にすることが望ましい。例えば、ワーク部分がアルミナ−ろう石−SiC−カーボンれんがの場合、ろう石れんがは原料として使用可能であるため、これを捨て張りれんがに使用すれば、再利用に支障がでない。
After removing the adhering foreign matter and the unnecessary material portion as described above, the refractory to be reused is dismantled to obtain dismantled scrap a 0 of the used refractory to be reused. The refractory to be reused is usually the refractory of the work part.
If you want to leave the permanent part at the time of disassembly, it is desirable to throw a brick on the back of the work part. The material of the discarded bricks is preferably the same as that of the work part or a material contained as a raw material of the work part so as not to cause any trouble when reused. For example, in the case where the work part is alumina-pyroxene-SiC-carbon brick, the pyrophyllite brick can be used as a raw material. Therefore, if this is used as a waste brick, there is no problem in reuse.

耐火物を解体して得られた解体屑aを容器から排出して回収する。この排出時に他の解体屑や地面のダスト・土砂(特に、製鉄所の地面の土砂や堆積したダストにはスラグ由来のCaOが多く含まれており、CaO濃度が高い)などが混入すると、製造される耐火物の不純物となるため、解体屑aは鉄板上やコンクリート等で養生された場所に排出するのが好ましい。また、解体の頻度が高い場合は、専用の排出場所を設けることが望ましい。 Dismantle scrap a 0 obtained by dismantling the refractory is discharged from the container and collected. If, during this discharge, other demolition debris, ground dust, and earth and sand (especially the earth and sand on the ground of the steel mill and accumulated dust contain a large amount of CaO derived from slag, and the CaO concentration is high), etc. Since it becomes an impurity of the refractory to be removed, it is preferable that the demolition scrap a 0 is discharged to a place cured on an iron plate or concrete. In addition, if the disassembly frequency is high, it is desirable to provide a dedicated discharge place.

次に、回収した解体屑aを破砕後、磁力選別により目地や亀裂に入りこんだ地金を除去する。地金除去設備は他の解体屑やスラグと同じ設備を共用する場合があり、地金除去時にこれらが不純物として混入する恐れがある。このため、回収した解体屑aを処理する前に、地金除去設備を空運転するか、清掃を行い、残存物を除去しておくことが望ましい。地金除去前の解体屑aの仮置き場を設置するなどして、一度に処理する量を多くすることも、不純物混入濃度の低下につながるため有効である。 Next, after crushing the recovered demolition waste a 0 , the metal that has entered the joints and cracks is removed by magnetic force selection. The metal removal equipment may share the same equipment as other demolition debris and slag, and these may be mixed as impurities during metal removal. For this reason, it is desirable that the metal removal equipment be idled or cleaned to remove the residual material before processing the recovered demolition waste a 0 . It is also effective to increase the amount to be treated at one time, for example, by installing a temporary storage place for dismantling scraps a 0 before removing the metal, because it leads to a decrease in the concentration of impurities.

地金を除去した解体屑aは、原料処理工場に送られ、ここで所望の粒度に粉砕した後、粒度毎に分級して管理し、耐火物原料とする。解体屑aの水分が多い場合は、原料化処理に乾燥工程を追加してもよい。さらに、原料化処理の前に、解体屑aを一旦仮置きし、複数ロットの解体屑aを混合した後に処理すると、材質成分のばらつきが小さくなり、原料として使用した耐火物の耐用安定化につながる。 The demolition scrap a 0 from which the metal has been removed is sent to a raw material processing factory, where it is crushed to a desired particle size and then classified and managed for each particle size to be used as a refractory raw material. When the demolition waste a 0 has a high water content, a drying step may be added to the raw material treatment. Furthermore, if the dismantling scrap a 0 is temporarily placed before the raw material treatment and mixed after processing multiple lots of dismantling scrap a 0 , the dispersion of the material components will be small and the refractory material used as the raw material will have stable stability. Lead to

地金除去前、地金除去後、或いは原料化工場で解体屑aの仮置きを行う場合、容器からの解体屑aの排出場所と同様に、地面のダストや土砂が混入すると製造される耐火物の不純物となるため、解体屑aは鉄板上やコンクリート等で養生された場所に排出(仮置き)するのがよい。また、解体の頻度が高い場合は、専用の排出場所(仮置き場所)を設けることが望ましい。一連の仮置き場で鉄板の設置やコンクリート養生ができない場合は、専用の仮置き場を準備し、解体屑aを下記(i)又は(ii)の条件で仮置き・搬出することにより、耐火物原料となる解体屑aに地面側から不純物が混入しないようにすることが好ましい。
(i)解体屑aを仮置き場の地面(表土など)に仮置きし、解体屑aを仮置き場から搬出する際には、地面に接触している解体屑部分が残るようにして、その上部の解体屑aのみを搬出する。
(ii)事前に仮置き場の地面(表土など)に使用済み耐火物の解体屑からなる敷材を敷いておき、解体屑aを仮置き場の前記敷材上に仮置きし、解体屑aを仮置き場から搬出する際には、敷材上の解体屑aのみを搬出する。
Before dismantling the metal, after removing the metal, or when temporarily disposing of the dismantling scraps a 0 at the material processing plant, it is produced when the dust and earth on the ground are mixed in, similar to the place where the dismantling scraps a 0 are discharged from the container. Since it becomes an impurity of refractory material, it is better to discharge (temporarily store) dismantling scrap a 0 to a place where it is cured on an iron plate or concrete. In addition, when the dismantling frequency is high, it is desirable to provide a dedicated discharge place (temporary storage place). If iron plates cannot be installed or concrete curing cannot be performed at a series of temporary storage sites, a special temporary storage site is prepared, and dismantling scrap a 0 is temporarily stored and carried out under the conditions of (i) or (ii) below. It is preferable to prevent impurities from being mixed into the demolition waste a 0 as a raw material from the ground side.
(I) When dismantling debris a 0 is temporarily placed on the ground (such as topsoil) in the temporary storage area, and when dismantling debris a 0 is carried out from the temporary storage area, the dismantling debris portion in contact with the ground remains, Only the dismantled waste a 0 above it is carried out.
(Ii) A laying material consisting of dismantled scraps of used refractories is laid in advance on the ground (topsoil etc.) of the temporary storage area, and dismantling waste a 0 is temporarily placed on the laying material of the temporary storage area to dismantle the waste material a. When carrying out 0 from the temporary storage area, only the demolition waste a 0 on the flooring material is carried out.

本発明において、解体屑aについてのCaO含有量の測定(成分分析)と、これに基づく解体屑a(耐火物原料となる解体屑)の選別は任意の段階で行うことができる。すなわち、分別解体を経て回収された解体屑aは、破砕して磁気選別による地金除去を行った後、所望の粒度に粉砕し、次いで分級して粒度別の解体屑とするが、このような一連の作業工程のいずれかの段階(例えば、解体屑aの地金除去前、地金除去後、粉砕後、分級後のいずれかの段階)で解体屑aのCaO含有量の測定(成分分析)とこれに基づく解体屑aの選別を行うことができる。 In the present invention, the measurement of the CaO content of the dismantling scrap a 0 (component analysis) and the selection of the dismantling scrap a (the dismantling scrap as the refractory raw material) based on this can be performed at any stage. That is, the dismantled scraps a 0 recovered through the separated dismantling are crushed to remove the metal by magnetic sorting, and then crushed to a desired particle size, and then classified to be disassembled scraps by particle size. The CaO content of the demolition debris a 0 at any stage (for example, before removal of the demolition debris a 0 of the ingot, after removal of the ingot, after grinding, or classification) The measurement (component analysis) and the disassembly scrap a based on the measurement can be performed.

なかでも、解体屑aの選別を効率的かつ精度よく行うという観点からは、地金除去後の解体屑aを所望の粒度に粉砕したものについて、或いは粉砕後に分級して粒度別の解体屑としたものについて、CaO含有量の測定(成分分析)と、これに基づく解体屑aの選別を行うことが好ましい。また、この場合、それ以前の任意の1つ以上の段階(例えば、解体屑aの地金除去前、地金除去後、粉砕後のうちの1つ以上の段階)でも解体屑aのCaO含有量を測定し、所定のCaO含有量を超える解体屑を分別し、解体屑aから取り除くようにしてもよい 。なお、解体屑aの化学成分分析は、原料管理のために一般的に行われているため、本発明による大幅な費用増は生じない。 Among them, from the viewpoint of efficiently and accurately selecting the dismantling scraps a, the dismantling scraps a 0 after removal of the metal are crushed to a desired particle size, or the dismantling scraps are classified after crushing and classified by particle size. It is preferable to measure the CaO content (component analysis) and sort the dismantled waste a based on the above. In this case, earlier any one or more stages (e.g., pre-bullion removal of demolition debris a 0, after bullion removed, one or more stages of the post-grinding) even dismantling scrap a 0 The CaO content may be measured, and demolition debris exceeding a predetermined CaO content may be separated and removed from the demolition debris a 0 . Since the chemical composition analysis of the demolition waste a 0 is generally performed for raw material management, the cost of the present invention does not increase significantly.

本発明において、解体屑aのなかから解体屑aを選別するに当たっては、製造に使用する耐火物原料中での解体屑aの配合割合(或いは配合割合の上限)を予め決めておき、この解体屑aの配合割合と測定されたCaO含有量に基づき、解体屑aのなかから、製造される耐火物のCaO含有量が2.5質量%以下となるようなCaO含有量の解体屑aを選別し、この解体屑aを耐火物原料として用いる。
本発明では、解体屑aを耐火物原料の全部又は一部として耐火物を製造する。解体屑aを耐火物原料の一部として耐火物を製造する場合には、残りの耐火物原料としては、添加成分としてCaOを配合しない新規の耐火物原料(バージン原料)が用いられる。
In the present invention, when selecting the dismantling scrap a from the dismantling scrap a 0 , the blending ratio (or the upper limit of the blending ratio) of the dismantling scrap a in the refractory raw material used for manufacturing is determined in advance, Based on the mixing ratio of the dismantling scrap a and the measured CaO content, the dismantling scrap having a CaO content such that the CaO content of the refractory produced from the dismantling scrap a 0 is 2.5% by mass or less. The a is selected, and the dismantled waste a is used as a refractory raw material.
In the present invention, the refractory is manufactured by using the dismantling scrap a as all or a part of the refractory raw material. When the refractory is manufactured by using the demolition waste a as a part of the refractory raw material, as the remaining refractory raw material, a novel refractory raw material (virgin raw material) containing no CaO as an additive component is used.

一般に、添加成分としてCaOを配合しない新規の耐火物原料(バージン原料)のCaO含有量は0.5質量%以下である。したがって、例えば、解体屑aの配合割合を50質量%、残りをバージン原料とする場合、解体屑aのCaOが4.5質量%以下であれば、製造される耐火物のCaO含有量を2.5質量%以下にすることができるので、解体屑aのなかから、CaO含有量が4.5質量%以下の解体屑aを選別し、この解体屑aを耐火物原料として用いる。また、解体屑aの配合割合を60質量%、残りをバージン原料とする場合、解体屑aのCaOが3.8質量%以下であれば、製造される耐火物のCaO含有量を2.5質量%以下にすることができるので、解体屑aのなかから、CaO含有量が3.8質量%以下の解体屑aを選別し、この解体屑aを耐火物原料として用いる。 In general, the novel refractory raw material (virgin raw material) not containing CaO as an additive component has a CaO content of 0.5% by mass or less. Therefore, for example, when the mixing ratio of the dismantling waste a is 50 mass% and the rest is the virgin raw material and the CaO of the dismantling waste a is 4.5 mass% or less, the CaO content of the refractory product to be produced is 2 Since it can be 0.5% by mass or less, the dismantling scrap a 0 having a CaO content of 4.5% by mass or less is selected from the dismantling scrap a 0 , and the dismantling scrap a is used as a refractory raw material. Moreover, when the mixing ratio of the dismantling waste a is 60 mass% and the rest is a virgin raw material and the CaO of the dismantling waste a is 3.8 mass% or less, the CaO content of the refractory product to be produced is 2.5. Since the content can be made less than or equal to mass %, the disassembly waste a 0 having a CaO content of 3.8 mass% or less is selected from the disassembly waste a 0 , and this disassembly waste a is used as a refractory raw material.

耐火物原料中での解体屑aの配合割合に特別な制限はないが、10質量%未満では使用済み耐火物の再利用率が低下し、一方、成形するために超微粉や粘土等のバージン原料が少なくとも20質量%程度は配合された方がよいため、一般には解体屑aの配合割合は10〜80質量%とすることが好ましい。上述したように、一般に、添加成分としてCaOを配合しない新規の耐火物原料(バージン原料)のCaO含有量は0.5質量%以下であるので、解体屑aの配合割合を上限の80質量%とする場合、解体屑aのCaO含有量が3.0質量%以下であれば、製造される耐火物のCaO含有量を2.5質量%以下にすることができる。 There is no particular limitation on the blending ratio of the dismantling scrap a in the refractory raw material, but if it is less than 10% by mass, the reuse ratio of the used refractory will be reduced, while the virgin such as ultrafine powder and clay for molding is required. At least about 20% by mass of the raw material should be mixed, so that it is generally preferable that the disassembly scrap a is mixed in a proportion of 10 to 80% by mass. As described above, in general, the CaO content of the new refractory raw material (virgin raw material) in which CaO is not added as an additive component is 0.5% by mass or less, so the blending ratio of the dismantling waste a is 80% by mass as the upper limit. In that case, if the CaO content of the demolition waste a is 3.0% by mass or less, the CaO content of the refractory product to be manufactured can be 2.5% by mass or less.

使用済み耐火物を耐火物原料に再利用して製造される耐火物のCaO含有量が2.5質量%を超えると、使用済み耐火物に混入したスラグによる耐火物の耐食性が急激に悪化し、安定した耐用性(耐食性)が得られなくなるが、解体屑aは上述のようにしてCaO含有量を指標に選別されたものであるため、本発明によれば、CaO含有量が2.5質量%以下のスラグ混入が少ない耐火物を製造することができる。 If the CaO content of the refractory produced by reusing the used refractory as a refractory raw material exceeds 2.5 mass%, the corrosion resistance of the refractory due to the slag mixed in the used refractory will deteriorate sharply. , Stable durability (corrosion resistance) can not be obtained, but since the dismantling waste a is selected with the CaO content as an index as described above, according to the present invention, the CaO content is 2.5. It is possible to manufacture a refractory having a small amount of slag of less than mass%.

以下、本発明の第二の製造方法について説明する。
本発明の第二の製造方法では、付着異物と不要材質部分を除去する分別解体を施して得られた解体屑aについてCaO含有量を測定し、このCaO含有量に基づき、製造される耐火物のCaO含有量が2.5質量%以下となるような、耐火物原料中での解体屑aの配合割合を求め、この配合割合の解体屑aを耐火物原料として用いる。
この第二の製造方法において、再利用対象となる使用済み耐火物の詳細、分別解体の方法、解体屑aの回収方法、原料化するまでの処理方法などは、さきに説明した本発明の第一の製造方法と同様である。
Hereinafter, the second manufacturing method of the present invention will be described.
In the second production method of the present invention, the CaO content is measured with respect to the dismantled scrap a 0 obtained by subjecting the disassembled waste a 0 to remove adhered foreign matters and unnecessary material parts, and the fire resistance produced based on this CaO content is measured. such as CaO content of the object is 2.5 wt% or less, determined the proportion of the demolition debris a 0 in the refractory raw material, used demolition debris a 0 for this proportion as a refractory material.
In this second manufacturing method, the details of the used refractory to be reused, the method of separating and dismantling, the method of recovering dismantled scrap a 0 , the method of processing until it is made into a raw material, etc. are the same as those of the present invention described above. This is the same as the first manufacturing method.

本発明において、解体屑aについてのCaO含有量の測定(成分分析)は任意の段階で行うことができる。すなわち、分別解体を経て回収された解体屑aは、破砕して磁気選別による地金除去を行った後、所望の粒度に粉砕し、次いで分級して粒度別の解体屑とするが、このような一連の作業工程のいずれかの段階(例えば、解体屑aの地金除去前、地金除去後、粉砕後、分級後のいずれかの段階)で解体屑aのCaO含有量の測定(成分分析)を行うことができる。なかでも、地金除去後の解体屑aを所望の粒度に粉砕したものについて、或いは粉砕後に粒度毎に分級したものについて、CaO含有量の測定(成分分析)を行うことが好ましい。 In the present invention, the measurement (component analysis) of the CaO content of the demolition waste a 0 can be performed at any stage. That is, the dismantled scraps a 0 recovered through the separated dismantling are crushed to remove the metal by magnetic sorting, and then crushed to a desired particle size, and then classified to be disassembled scraps by particle size. The CaO content of the demolition debris a 0 at any stage (for example, before removal of the demolition debris a 0 of the ingot, after removal of the ingot, after grinding, or after classification) Measurement (component analysis) can be performed. Among them, it is preferable to measure the CaO content (component analysis) for the crushed demolition waste a 0 after removing the metal to a desired particle size, or for the crushed particles classified according to particle size.

このCaO含有量に基づき、製造される耐火物のCaO含有量が2.5質量%以下となるような、耐火物原料中での解体屑aの配合割合を求め、この配合割合の解体屑aを耐火物原料として用いる。
本発明の第二の製造方法でも、解体屑aを耐火物原料の全部又は一部として耐火物を製造する。解体屑aを耐火物原料の一部として耐火物を製造する場合には、残りの耐火物原料としては、添加成分としてCaOを配合しない新規の耐火物原料(バージン原料)が用いられる。なお、耐火物原料中での解体屑aの配合割合につては、さきに述べた第一の製造方法と同様である。
Based on this CaO content, the compounding ratio of the dismantling scrap a 0 in the refractory raw material such that the CaO content of the manufactured refractory is 2.5% by mass or less is obtained, and the dismantling scrap of this compounding ratio is obtained. a 0 is used as a refractory raw material.
Also in the second manufacturing method of the present invention, the refractory is manufactured by using the dismantling waste a as the whole or a part of the refractory raw material. When the refractory is manufactured by using the demolition waste a as a part of the refractory raw material, as the remaining refractory raw material, a novel refractory raw material (virgin raw material) containing no CaO as an additive component is used. The mixing ratio of the demolition waste a in the refractory raw material is the same as that of the first manufacturing method described above.

一般に、添加成分としてCaOを配合しない新規の耐火物原料(バージン原料)のCaO含有量は0.5質量%以下である。したがって、例えば、解体屑aのCaO含有量が4.5質量%の場合、解体屑aの配合割合を50質量%以下、残りをバージン原料とすれば、製造される耐火物のCaO含有量を2.5質量%以下にすることができるので、そのような配合割合で解体屑aを耐火物原料として用いる。また、解体屑aのCaO含有量が3.8質量%の場合、解体屑aの配合割合を60質量%以下、残りをバージン原料とすれば、製造される耐火物のCaO含有量を2.5質量%以下にすることができるので、そのような配合割合で解体屑aを耐火物原料として用いる。 In general, the novel refractory raw material (virgin raw material) not containing CaO as an additive component has a CaO content of 0.5% by mass or less. Therefore, for example, when the CaO content of the dismantling waste a is 4.5% by mass, if the mixing ratio of the dismantling waste a is 50% by mass or less and the rest is the virgin raw material, the CaO content of the refractory to be manufactured is Since the content can be 2.5% by mass or less, the demolition waste a is used as a refractory raw material in such a mixing ratio. When the CaO content of the demolition waste a is 3.8% by mass, the CaO content of the refractory to be produced is 2. If the mixing ratio of the demolition debris a is 60% by mass or less and the rest is the virgin raw material. Since it can be 5% by mass or less, the scrap a is used as a refractory raw material in such a mixing ratio.

使用済み耐火物を耐火物原料に再利用して製造される耐火物のCaO含有量が2.5質量%を超えると、使用済み耐火物に混入したスラグによる耐火物の耐食性が急激に悪化し、安定した耐用性(耐食性)が得られなくなるが、解体屑aの配合割合は、上述のようにしてCaO含有量を指標に決められるものであるため、本発明によれば、CaO含有量が2.5質量%以下のスラグ混入が少ない耐火物を製造することができる。 If the CaO content of the refractory produced by reusing the used refractory as a refractory raw material exceeds 2.5 mass%, the corrosion resistance of the refractory due to the slag mixed in the used refractory will deteriorate sharply. However, stable durability (corrosion resistance) cannot be obtained, but the mixing ratio of the dismantling waste a is determined by the CaO content as an index as described above. Therefore, according to the present invention, the CaO content is A refractory containing less than 2.5 mass% of slag can be manufactured.

以上のようにして解体屑aを原料として製造される耐火物は、新規の耐火物原料(バージン原料)のみで製造される耐火物に対し、耐用低下が使用に支障ない範囲に抑えられ、安定した耐用性を発揮できる。この耐火物は、耐用性の安定化によって、従来では使用済み耐火物を原料とした耐火物の適用が困難であった、再利用前と同じ使用部位や設備にも適用できる。この結果、使用済み耐火物の再利用適用範囲および再利用可能量が増大し、廃棄物の減少によって廃棄物処理費用が削減されるとともに、安価な耐火物原料としての使用済み耐火物使用量が増加することにより、耐火物の製造コストも削減できる。また、この耐火物は、通常、不焼成れんがなどの定形耐火物として用いられるが、不定形耐火物として用いることもできる。 Refractory produced from dismantling scrap a as a raw material as described above is stable compared to refractory produced only from new refractory raw material (virgin raw material), with reduced service life within a range that does not hinder use. The durability can be demonstrated. This refractory can be applied to the same parts and equipment as before reuse, where it was difficult to apply the refractory using the used refractory as a raw material due to stabilization of durability. As a result, the reuse application range and reusable amount of used refractories are increased, the waste treatment cost is reduced due to the reduction of waste, and the amount of used refractory used as an inexpensive refractory raw material is reduced. By increasing the number, the refractory manufacturing cost can be reduced. Further, this refractory is usually used as a fixed refractory such as unfired brick, but it can also be used as an irregular refractory.

製鉄工場で使用されている溶銑容器の修理時に発生する使用済み耐火物を耐火物原料として再利用した。当該溶銑容器のワーク部分には、アルミナ−ろう石−SiC−カーボンれんがが使用され、パーマネント部分と捨て張りれんがには、ろう石れんがが使用されている。また、溶銑容器上部にはアルマグキャスタブルが施工されている。この溶銑容器の修理時に分別解体を行った。まず、付着異物を重機で壊し、続いて上部のキャスタブル(不要材質部分)を解体した。これらの解体屑を排出した後、残りのワーク部分と捨て張りれんがを同時に解体し、その解体屑aを鉄板敷きの地面に排出し、回収した。この回収された解体屑aは、耐火物原料として再利用されるものであり、以下「回収解体屑a」という。 Used refractories generated during repair of hot metal containers used in steel mills were reused as refractory raw materials. Alumina-pyroxene-SiC-carbon brick is used for the work part of the hot metal container, and pyroxene brick is used for the permanent part and the waste brick. An Almag castable is installed on the upper part of the hot metal container. When the hot metal container was repaired, it was separated and disassembled. First, the adhered foreign matter was broken with a heavy machine, and then the castable upper part (unnecessary material part) was disassembled. After these pieces of demolition waste were discharged, the rest of the work piece and the discarded bricks were dismantled at the same time, and the demolition waste a 0 was discharged to the ground of the iron plate and collected. The recovered demolition debris a 0 is reused as a refractory raw material and is hereinafter referred to as “recovered demolition debris a 0 ”.

回収解体屑aを40mm以下程度の粒径に粉砕し、磁力選別機により地金を除去した後、隣接する2箇所の仮置き場にて表土上に直接仮置きした。この2箇所の仮置き場から回収解体屑aを搬出する際に、一方の仮置き場では、不純物混入防止策として、表土に接触している回収解体屑部分(表土面から厚さ200mm程度の回収解体屑)が残るようにして、その上部の回収解体屑aのみを搬出し(表1中の「不純物混入防止対策:あり」の場合)、他方の仮置き場では、表土上の全ての回収解体屑aを搬出した(表1中の「不純物混入防止対策:なし」の場合)。
比較例に用いるため、分別解体を行わない解体屑も回収した。これは土木工事用に使用する目的でコーンクラッシャーによって40mm以下程度の粒径に粉砕し、磁力選別機により地金を除去した後に保管していたものである。
The recovered demolition waste a 0 was crushed to a particle size of about 40 mm or less, and after the metal was removed by a magnetic separator, it was temporarily placed directly on the topsoil at two adjacent temporary storage sites. When carrying out the recovered demolition scraps a 0 from these two temporary storage sites, at one temporary storage site, as a measure to prevent contamination of impurities, the recovered demolition waste parts (collecting a thickness of about 200 mm from the surface soil surface) Dismantled waste) is left so that only the collected dismantled waste a 0 is carried out (in the case of “measures for preventing contamination of impurities: Yes” in Table 1), and in the other temporary storage area, all of the recovered soil is recovered. Dismantled waste a 0 was carried out (in the case of “Measures to prevent impurity contamination: None” in Table 1).
Since it was used for a comparative example, demolition debris that had not been separately disassembled was also collected. This was stored after being crushed to a particle size of about 40 mm or less by a cone crusher for the purpose of being used for civil engineering work and removing the metal by a magnetic separator.

回収解体屑a(比較例に用いるために回収された解体屑も含む。)を乾燥させた後、ジョークラッシャーとディスクミルを用いて最大粒径3mm以下に粉砕した。粉砕後の回収解体屑aは、それぞれ縮分し、サンプルを採取した後、所定の篩目で分級した。
回収解体屑aから採取したサンプルの化学成分を分析してCaO含有量を求め、本発明例では、このCaO含有量と耐火物原料中での解体屑aの配合率(30質量%、50質量%、70質量%)に基づき、製造される耐火物のCaO含有量が2.5質量%以下となるようなCaO含有量の解体屑aを選別し、この解体屑aを耐火物原料として用いた。
After the recovered dismantled scraps a 0 (including the dismantled scraps collected for use in the comparative example) was dried, it was crushed to a maximum particle size of 3 mm or less using a jaw crusher and a disc mill. The recovered demolition waste a 0 after crushing was respectively shrunk, and samples were collected and then classified with a predetermined sieve mesh.
The chemical components of the sample collected from the recovered demolition waste a 0 were analyzed to determine the CaO content. In the present invention example, the CaO content and the compounding ratio of the demolition debris a in the refractory raw material (30 mass%, 50 Mass%, 70% by mass), dismantling scrap a having a CaO content such that the CaO content of the manufactured refractory is 2.5% by mass or less is selected, and this dismantling scrap a is used as a refractory raw material. Using.

耐火物原料中での解体屑aの配合率を30質量%、50質量%及び70質量%とし、解体屑aを新規の耐火物原料(バージン原料)に配合し、新たにアルミナ−ろう石−SiC−カーボン不焼成れんがを製造した。この際、比較材としたバージン原料のみを使用したれんがの組成値であるアルミナ(Al)50質量%、シリカ(SiO)30質量%を目標にしてれんがを製造した。新規の耐火物原料は、アルミナ源としてバンド頁岩を、シリカ源としてろう石を使用した。また、黒鉛およびSiCは、解体屑aからの持ち込み量で不足する量を補填使用した。 The blending ratio of the dismantling scrap a in the refractory raw material was set to 30% by mass, 50% by mass, and 70% by mass, and the dismantling scrap a was blended with a new refractory raw material (virgin raw material) to newly prepare alumina-fused stone- A SiC-carbon unfired brick was produced. At this time, a brick was manufactured aiming at 50% by mass of alumina (Al 2 O 3 ) and 30% by mass of silica (SiO 2 ), which are composition values of the brick using only the virgin raw material as the comparative material. The new refractory raw materials used band shale as the alumina source and pyrophyllite as the silica source. Further, graphite and SiC were used to make up for the insufficient amount brought in from the dismantling waste a.

製造された各れんがの耐熱スポーリング性と耐食性を、以下のように評価した。
耐熱スポーリング性の評価試験では、1500℃に加熱されたアルゴンガス雰囲気の横型電気炉内に各れんがの試料を装入し、炉内雰囲気温度が1500℃に回復した後、15分保持し、その後、試料を15℃に保った冷水中に浸漬させるサイクルを10回繰り返した。評価は試験中の亀裂発生状況を観察するによって行ったが、10回の繰り返し中にどのサンプルも亀裂が発生せず、差は見られなかった。
The heat spalling resistance and corrosion resistance of each manufactured brick were evaluated as follows.
In the heat spalling resistance evaluation test, each brick sample was placed in a horizontal electric furnace heated to 1500° C. in an argon gas atmosphere, and after the furnace atmospheric temperature was restored to 1500° C., the sample was held for 15 minutes. Then, the cycle of immersing the sample in cold water kept at 15° C. was repeated 10 times. The evaluation was performed by observing the state of crack generation during the test, but no crack was observed in any of the samples during 10 repetitions, and no difference was observed.

耐食性の評価では、回転ドラム試験機を利用した侵食試験を行った。侵食試験には、CaOとSiOとの比が2.2となるよう調合した合成スラグを用いた。また、このスラグのFeOとMnOの含有量の合計値が17質量%となるよう調合を行った。侵食試験は、回転ドラム試験機に内張りした試料を回転させながらバーナーにより加熱し、試験温度1500℃に到達した後に合成スラグを投入し、3時間保持して行った。評価には、試験前後の試料の厚み変化を測定し、比較材であるバージン原料のみを使用したれんがの厚み変化を100とした侵食性指数を用いた。試験は各試料について2回ずつ行い、その平均値から侵食性指数を求めた。この試験結果を、れんが製造条件とともに表1に示す。 For the evaluation of corrosion resistance, an erosion test using a rotating drum tester was performed. For the erosion test, a synthetic slag prepared so that the ratio of CaO and SiO 2 was 2.2 was used. Further, the slag was blended so that the total content of FeO and MnO was 17% by mass. The erosion test was carried out by heating the sample lined in the rotary drum tester with a burner while rotating it, and after reaching a test temperature of 1500° C., adding synthetic slag and holding for 3 hours. For the evaluation, the change in thickness of the sample before and after the test was measured, and the erosion index was used, where the change in thickness of the brick using only the virgin raw material as the comparative material was 100. The test was performed twice for each sample, and the erosion index was calculated from the average value. The test results are shown in Table 1 together with the brick manufacturing conditions.

Figure 0006718323
Figure 0006718323

図1は、本実施例で製造されたれんがについて、CaO含有量と耐食性(侵食性指数)との関係をまとめたものであり、れんが中のCaO含有量が2.5質量%を超えると急激に侵食性指数が高くなり、耐食性が著しく悪化するのに対して、れんが中のCaO含有量が2.5質量%以下であれば、良好な耐食性が得られている。
また、比較例1と本発明例1との比較、比較例2と本発明例2との比較、および比較例3と本発明例3との比較から、分別解体を行うことにより、回収解体屑中のCaO含有量を低くできることが判る。また、本発明例1と本発明例4との比較、本発明例2と本発明例5との比較、および本発明例3と本発明例6との比較から、不純物混入防止策を採ることにより、CaO含有量をさらに低くできることが判る。
以上の試験結果から、分別解体で得られた回収解体屑を耐火物原料に用いるに際し、耐火物原料のCaO含有量を管理し、CaO含有量が2.5質量%以下となるような条件で不焼成れんがを製造することにより、耐熱スポーリング性が良好で、耐用性(耐食性)も安定した不焼成れんが製造できることが判る。
FIG. 1 summarizes the relationship between the CaO content and the corrosion resistance (corrosion index) of the bricks manufactured in this example, and when the CaO content in the bricks exceeds 2.5% by mass, the relationship between the CaO content and the corrosion resistance is rapidly increased. On the other hand, while the erosion index becomes high and the corrosion resistance is remarkably deteriorated, when the CaO content in the brick is 2.5% by mass or less, good corrosion resistance is obtained.
Further, from the comparison between Comparative Example 1 and Example 1 of the present invention, the comparison between Comparative Example 2 and Example 2 of the present invention, and the comparison between Comparative Example 3 and Example 3 of the present invention, by carrying out separation and demolition, recovered demolition waste It can be seen that the CaO content in the inside can be lowered. Further, measures for preventing contamination of impurities are taken from the comparison between Inventive Example 1 and Inventive Example 4, the Inventive Example 2 and Inventive Example 5, and the Inventive Example 3 and Inventive Example 6. Thus, it can be seen that the CaO content can be further reduced.
From the above test results, when using the recovered demolition scraps obtained by fractional dismantling as the refractory raw material, the CaO content of the refractory raw material is controlled under the conditions such that the CaO content is 2.5% by mass or less. It can be seen that, by producing the unfired brick, it is possible to produce the unfired brick which has good heat spalling resistance and stable durability (corrosion resistance).

Claims (6)

耐火物原料としてCaO(但し、耐火物原料中に不可避不純物として含まれるCaOを除く)を配合しないで耐火物を製造する方法において、
耐火物原料としてCaO(但し、耐火物原料中に不可避不純物として含まれるCaOを除く)を配合しないで製造された耐火物であって、使用済みとなった耐火物の解体屑を、耐火物原料の少なくとも一部として耐火物を製造するに当たり、
付着異物と不要材質部分を除去する分別解体を施して得られた解体屑(a)についてCaO含有量を測定し、このCaO含有量と耐火物原料中での解体屑(a)の配合割合に基づき、解体屑(a)のなかから、製造される耐火物のCaO含有量が2.5質量%以下となるようなCaO含有量の解体屑(a)を選別し、この解体屑(a)を耐火物原料として用いることを特徴とする使用済み耐火物を再利用した耐火物の製造方法。
In a method for producing a refractory without adding CaO as a refractory raw material (excluding CaO contained as an unavoidable impurity in the refractory raw material),
A refractory manufactured by not mixing CaO as a refractory raw material (excluding CaO contained in the refractory raw material as an unavoidable impurity), and dismantling scrap of a used refractory is used as a refractory raw material. In manufacturing refractory as at least part of
The CaO content was measured for the dismantled scraps (a 0 ) obtained by performing the disassembly to remove the adhered foreign matter and the unnecessary material portion, and the CaO content and the mixing ratio of the dismantled scraps (a) in the refractory raw material Based on the above, the dismantling scraps (a 0 ) are selected from the dismantling scraps (a 0 ) so as to have a CaO content of 2.5% by mass or less. A method for manufacturing a refractory material that reuses a used refractory material, characterized in that a) is used as a refractory material.
付着異物と不要材質部分を除去する分別解体を施して得られた解体屑(a)を破砕して磁気選別による地金除去を行った後、粉砕し、次いで分級して粒度別の解体屑(a)とし、
前記粉砕後の解体屑(a)又は前記分級後の解体屑(a)についてCaO含有量を測定し、このCaO含有量と耐火物原料中での解体屑(a)の配合割合に基づき、解体屑(a)の選別を行うことを特徴とする請求項1に記載の使用済み耐火物を再利用した耐火物の製造方法。
Dismantled scraps (a 0 ) obtained by performing a separate dismantling to remove adhered foreign matters and unnecessary material parts are crushed to remove the metal by magnetic sorting, and then crushed and then classified to be disassembled scraps by particle size (A 0 ),
Wherein the demolition waste after pulverization (a 0) or demolition debris after the classification (a 0) to measure the content of CaO, based on the proportion of the demolition debris (a) in the CaO content and refractory raw material The method for manufacturing a refractory material that reuses the used refractory material according to claim 1, wherein the dismantling waste (a) is selected.
耐火物原料としてCaO(但し、耐火物原料中に不可避不純物として含まれるCaOを除く)を配合しないで耐火物を製造する方法において、
耐火物原料としてCaO(但し、耐火物原料中に不可避不純物として含まれるCaOを除く)を配合しないで製造された耐火物であって、使用済みとなった耐火物の解体屑を、耐火物原料の少なくとも一部として耐火物を製造するに当たり、
付着異物と不要材質部分を除去する分別解体を施して得られた解体屑(a)についてCaO含有量を測定し、このCaO含有量に基づき、製造される耐火物のCaO含有量が2.5質量%以下となるような、耐火物原料中での解体屑(a)の配合割合を求め、この配合割合の解体屑(a)を耐火物原料として用いることを特徴とする使用済み耐火物を再利用した耐火物の製造方法。
In a method for producing a refractory without adding CaO as a refractory raw material (excluding CaO contained as an unavoidable impurity in the refractory raw material),
A refractory manufactured by not mixing CaO as a refractory raw material (excluding CaO contained in the refractory raw material as an unavoidable impurity), and dismantling scrap of a used refractory is used as a refractory raw material. In manufacturing refractory as at least part of
The CaO content of the dismantled scraps (a 0 ) obtained by performing the disassembly to remove the adhered foreign matter and the unnecessary material portion was measured, and based on the CaO content, the CaO content of the refractory product to be manufactured was 2. 5 wt% or less and comprising as to obtain the mixing ratio of the demolition debris in refractory raw material (a 0), spent, which comprises using the demolition debris of the proportion (a 0) as refractory material A method for manufacturing a refractory material by reusing the refractory material.
付着異物と不要材質部分を除去する分別解体を施して得られた解体屑(a)を破砕して磁気選別による地金除去を行った後、粉砕し、次いで分級して粒度別の解体屑(a)とし、
前記粉砕後の解体屑(a)又は前記分級後の解体屑(a)についてCaO含有量を測定し、このCaO含有量に基づき、耐火物原料中での解体屑(a)の配合割合を求めることを特徴とする請求項3に記載の使用済み耐火物を再利用した耐火物の製造方法。
Dismantled scraps (a 0 ) obtained by performing a separate dismantling to remove adhered foreign matters and unnecessary material parts are crushed to remove the metal by magnetic sorting, and then crushed and then classified to be disassembled scraps by particle size (A 0 ),
The demolition debris after pulverization (a 0) or demolition debris after the classification for (a 0) to measure the content of CaO, based on the CaO content, blending of demolition debris in refractory raw material (a 0) The method for producing a refractory material by reusing the used refractory material according to claim 3, wherein a ratio is obtained.
耐火物原料中での解体屑(a)の配合割合を10〜80質量%とすることを特徴とする請求項1〜4のいずれかに記載の使用済み耐火物を再利用した耐火物の製造方法。 The refractory material made by recycling the used refractory material according to any one of claims 1 to 4, characterized in that the blending ratio of the dismantling waste (a) in the refractory material is 10 to 80% by mass. Method. 解体屑(a)を仮置き場で仮置する際に、解体屑(a)を下記(i)又は(ii)の条件で仮置き・搬出することを特徴とする請求項1〜5のいずれかに記載の使用済み耐火物を再利用した耐火物の製造方法。
(i)解体屑(a)を仮置き場の地面に仮置きし、解体屑(a)を仮置き場から搬出する際には、地面に接触している解体屑部分が残るようにして、その上部の解体屑(a)のみを搬出する。
(ii)事前に仮置き場の地面に使用済み耐火物の解体屑からなる敷材を敷いておき、解体屑(a)を仮置き場の前記敷材上に仮置きし、解体屑(a)を仮置き場から搬出する際には、敷材上の解体屑(a)のみを搬出する。
When the dismantling debris (a 0 ) is temporarily placed in the temporary storage area, the dismantling debris (a 0 ) is temporarily placed and carried out under the following condition (i) or (ii). A method for manufacturing a refractory material by reusing the used refractory material according to any one of the claims.
(I) When dismantling debris (a 0 ) is temporarily placed on the ground in the temporary storage area, and when dismantling debris (a 0 ) is carried out from the temporary storage area, the dismantling debris portion in contact with the ground remains, Only the dismantled waste (a 0 ) above it is carried out.
(Ii) in advance, covered with litter consisting of demolition debris of spent refractory to ground temporary field, placed temporarily disassembling debris (a 0) on the litter storage site, demolition debris (a 0 ) Is removed from the temporary storage area, only the demolition debris (a 0 ) on the laying material is carried out.
JP2016129950A 2016-06-30 2016-06-30 Refractory manufacturing method that reuses used refractories Active JP6718323B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2016129950A JP6718323B2 (en) 2016-06-30 2016-06-30 Refractory manufacturing method that reuses used refractories

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2016129950A JP6718323B2 (en) 2016-06-30 2016-06-30 Refractory manufacturing method that reuses used refractories

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2018002529A JP2018002529A (en) 2018-01-11
JP6718323B2 true JP6718323B2 (en) 2020-07-08

Family

ID=60947630

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2016129950A Active JP6718323B2 (en) 2016-06-30 2016-06-30 Refractory manufacturing method that reuses used refractories

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6718323B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP7705368B2 (en) * 2022-07-12 2025-07-09 Jfeスチール株式会社 Refractory brick and its manufacturing method
JP7699570B2 (en) * 2022-11-16 2025-06-27 Jfeスチール株式会社 Method for producing refractory raw material and method for producing refractory for molten iron container

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS52115811A (en) * 1976-03-25 1977-09-28 Shinagawa Refractories Co Color selection of used refractories
JP4499940B2 (en) * 2001-03-05 2010-07-14 新日本製鐵株式会社 Disposal of used refractories
JP3704301B2 (en) * 2001-09-18 2005-10-12 新日本製鐵株式会社 Disposal of used refractories
JP4546934B2 (en) * 2006-02-01 2010-09-22 黒崎播磨株式会社 Manufacturing method of irregular refractories using refractories after use
JP5995315B2 (en) * 2012-09-04 2016-09-21 黒崎播磨株式会社 Irregular refractory
JP6357670B2 (en) * 2014-02-19 2018-07-18 Jfeスチール株式会社 Reusing used refractories
JP2017150042A (en) * 2016-02-25 2017-08-31 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Castable refractory used for mending of immersion tube for degassing by spray

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2018002529A (en) 2018-01-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6357670B2 (en) Reusing used refractories
US11964914B2 (en) Industrial solid waste based construction and technical ceramics
JP4077774B2 (en) Reusing used refractories
JP6718323B2 (en) Refractory manufacturing method that reuses used refractories
JP3704301B2 (en) Disposal of used refractories
JP5347317B2 (en) How to reuse used tundish refractories
US20230219852A1 (en) Elaboration of ceramic tiles made of industrial solid wastes
JP5663121B2 (en) Reusing used carbon-containing unfired brick
JP2012067373A (en) Apparatus for processing high-temperature slag
CN114163218A (en) Method for recycling waste magnesia carbon bricks
MX2007012034A (en) Method and apparatus for the recovery of the secondary metallurgy (lf) slag and its recycling in the steel production process by means of electric arc furnace.
JP5760266B2 (en) Mud material for molten metal
JP2003083683A (en) How to recycle refractories
JP7446220B2 (en) Methods for recycling ceramics, the recycled materials obtained thereby and the use of recycled materials to produce ceramics
JP2013147414A (en) Method for recycling carbon-containing neutral/acid refractory and method of manufacturing
Fischer et al. Prebaked anodes for aluminium electrolysis
US12595211B2 (en) Refractory lining design and separation via destructive hydration
JP7699570B2 (en) Method for producing refractory raw material and method for producing refractory for molten iron container
Takashima et al. Recent Improvement of Recycling Technology for Refractories
CN104550187A (en) Process method for recycling used refractory materials
Bennett et al. Industrial Applications for Spent Refractory Materials
Wilson Residues from aluminium dross recycling in cement
Þórðardóttir Aluminum production waste mapping-A case study of the Icelandic aluminum industry
TR2024008720T2 (en) REFRACTORY LINING DESIGN AND STEEL APPLICATION PROVIDING LOW REFRACTORY WASTE AND REFRACTORY BASED ON LOW ADDITIVE RECYCLED MAGNESIUM-CARBON AGGREGATE
TR2024008721T2 (en) REFRACTORY LINING DESIGN AND SEPARATION VIA DESTRUCTIVE HYDRATION

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20190625

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20200522

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20200609

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20200612

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 6718323

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350