JP6796830B2 - Method for quantifying the degree of microbial damage - Google Patents
Method for quantifying the degree of microbial damage Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP6796830B2 JP6796830B2 JP2016089343A JP2016089343A JP6796830B2 JP 6796830 B2 JP6796830 B2 JP 6796830B2 JP 2016089343 A JP2016089343 A JP 2016089343A JP 2016089343 A JP2016089343 A JP 2016089343A JP 6796830 B2 JP6796830 B2 JP 6796830B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- degree
- damage
- control treatment
- microbial control
- time
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
Description
本発明は、遺伝子手法を用いて微生物の損傷度を定量化する方法に関するものである。 The present invention relates to a method for quantifying the degree of microbial damage using a genetic technique.
微生物、特に有害微生物に対しては、そのリスクを低減するために加熱やpH調整など様々な微生物制御(殺菌を含む)が行われている。その際、微生物制御処理が不十分である場合に、微生物はストレスを受けた損傷菌として生残する可能性が指摘されている。このような損傷菌が食品などの製品を汚染した場合には、健常菌とは異なる挙動を示すと推察され、製品の安全性や保存性の評価を行うためには、損傷菌の挙動を考慮することが必要になる。 Various microbial controls (including sterilization) such as heating and pH adjustment are performed on microorganisms, especially harmful microorganisms, in order to reduce the risk. At that time, it has been pointed out that if the microbial control treatment is insufficient, the microorganisms may survive as stressed damaged bacteria. When such damaged bacteria contaminate products such as foods, it is presumed that they behave differently from healthy bacteria, and in order to evaluate the safety and storage stability of the product, the behavior of the damaged bacteria is considered. It is necessary to do.
下記特許文献1の従来技術には、飲食品中の微生物数の増殖を、健常菌に対する損傷菌の誘導期の延長時間を考慮して予測する方法が記載されており、デジタル顕微鏡方式細菌検査装置を利用したコロニーカウント法によって、損傷菌の損傷回復に要する時間を求めることが示されている。
The prior art of
微生物汚染された食品などの製品に対して、加熱やpH調整などの微生物制御処理を施す場合には、微生物制御処理による製品自体の品質低下を考慮する必要がある。例えば、微生物汚染された食品を加熱処理する場合、有害微生物を完全に死滅させるためには、高い加熱温度で加熱時間を充分にとればよいが、それでは食品自体の風味や食感を損なうことになる。すなわち、微生物制御処理の度合いと製品の品質維持はトレードオフの関係にあり、品質維持と安全性の両方を考慮して、微生物制御処理の度合いを適切に決めることが必要になる。この際に、微生物制御処理の度合いと生残する損傷菌の挙動を定量化して把握することができれば、品質維持を確保するために微生物制御処理を必要最小限行った場合に、その微生物制御処理により担保される安全性を見極める上で有効な指標になる。 When a product such as a food product contaminated with microorganisms is subjected to a microbial control treatment such as heating or pH adjustment, it is necessary to consider the deterioration of the quality of the product itself due to the microbial control treatment. For example, in the case of heat treatment of food contaminated with microorganisms, in order to completely kill harmful microorganisms, it is sufficient to take a sufficient heating time at a high heating temperature, but this will impair the flavor and texture of the food itself. Become. That is, there is a trade-off relationship between the degree of microbial control treatment and product quality maintenance, and it is necessary to appropriately determine the degree of microbial control treatment in consideration of both quality maintenance and safety. At this time, if the degree of microbial control treatment and the behavior of the surviving damaged bacteria can be quantified and grasped, the microbial control treatment will be performed when the microbial control treatment is performed to the minimum necessary to ensure quality maintenance. It will be an effective index to determine the safety guaranteed by.
これに対して、前述した従来技術によると、損傷菌の微生物数の増殖を予測することは可能であっても、微生物制御処理(例えば、加熱処理)の度合いによる損傷菌の増殖速度の違いを直接的に求めることができず、微生物制御処理により担保される安全性を見極める有効な指標として活用することができない。 On the other hand, according to the above-mentioned conventional technique, although it is possible to predict the growth of the number of damaged bacteria, the difference in the growth rate of the damaged bacteria depending on the degree of microbial control treatment (for example, heat treatment) can be determined. It cannot be obtained directly and cannot be used as an effective index for determining the safety guaranteed by microbial control treatment.
また、前述した従来技術では、デジタル顕微鏡方式細菌検査装置を利用したコロニーカウント法によって、損傷菌の菌数を計測するので、多くの雑菌や夾雑物が存在する食品や環境サンプルの中から標的菌のみを抽出して菌数を計測することが困難である。そのため、サルモネラや腸管出血性大腸菌O157などの有害微生物を特定して、微生物制御処理の度合いと損傷菌の挙動の関係を精度良く定量的に把握することができない問題がある。選択培地を使用することも考えられるが、選択培地を使用した場合、損傷菌がコロニーを形成せず検出できないことから、前述した従来技術では特定微生物の損傷菌を計測することができない。 Further, in the above-mentioned conventional technique, the number of damaged bacteria is measured by a colony counting method using a digital microscope type bacterial inspection device, so that the target bacteria are selected from foods and environmental samples in which many germs and impurities are present. It is difficult to extract only and measure the number of bacteria. Therefore, there is a problem that it is not possible to identify harmful microorganisms such as Salmonella and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157 and accurately and quantitatively grasp the relationship between the degree of microbial control treatment and the behavior of damaged bacteria. Although it is conceivable to use a selective medium, when the selective medium is used, the damaged bacteria do not form colonies and cannot be detected. Therefore, the damaged bacteria of the specific microorganism cannot be measured by the above-mentioned conventional technique.
本発明は、このような問題に対処することを課題とするものである。すなわち、本発明は、雑菌や夾雑物が存在する食品などの検体から標的菌を特定して微生物の損傷度を定量化すること、微生物制御処理の度合いと損傷菌の挙動との関係を定量的に把握すること、これによって、製品の品質維持を確保するために微生物制御処理を必要最小限行った場合に、その微生物処理の度合いにより担保される安全性を見極める指標を得ること、などが本発明の課題である。 An object of the present invention is to deal with such a problem. That is, the present invention quantifies the degree of microbial damage by identifying the target bacterium from a sample such as a food containing various bacteria and impurities, and quantitatively determines the relationship between the degree of microbial control treatment and the behavior of the damaged bacterium. By doing so, when the minimum necessary microbial control treatment is performed to ensure the quality maintenance of the product, it is possible to obtain an index to determine the safety guaranteed by the degree of the microbial treatment. It is a subject of the invention.
このような課題を解決するために、本発明による微生物の損傷度定量方法は、以下の構成を具備するものである。 In order to solve such a problem, the method for quantifying the degree of damage to microorganisms according to the present invention has the following constitution.
標的菌が存在する検体に対して、設定された度合いの微生物制御処理を施し、その後に培養して、培養時間が異なる前記検体における標的菌の菌数を標的菌遺伝子定量手法によりモニタリングし、
培養時間の経時変化によって増殖する標的菌の菌数が対数増殖期に移行するまでの時間を増殖遅延時間として求め、および、最大比増殖速度を求め、当該増殖遅延時間によって、設定された度合いの前記微生物制御処理による標的菌の損傷度を第1の損傷度として求め、および、当該最大比増殖速度によって、設定された度合いの前記微生物制御処理による標的菌の損傷度を第2の損傷度として求め、設定された度合いの前記微生物制御処理による標的菌の損傷度を第1の損傷度を一つの次元変数とし、第2の損傷度を別の次元変数とし、
前記微生物制御処理について、その度合いを2次元以上の多次元変数として、前記標的菌が存在する製品に設定された度合いの前記微生物制御処理を施した場合の製品自体の品質低下を考慮して安全性を見極める指標となる損傷度を得ることを特徴とする微生物の損傷度定量方法。
A sample in which the target bacterium is present is subjected to a set degree of microbial control treatment, and then cultured, and the number of the target bacterium in the sample having a different culture time is monitored by the target bacterium gene quantification method.
The time required for the number of target bacteria to grow due to the change in culture time to shift to the logarithmic growth phase is determined as the growth delay time, and the maximum specific growth rate is obtained, and the degree of degree set by the growth delay time is determined. The degree of damage to the target bacterium by the microbial control treatment is determined as the first degree of damage, and the degree of damage to the target bacterium by the microbial control treatment set by the maximum specific growth rate is set as the second degree of damage. The degree of damage to the target bacterium by the microbial control treatment obtained and set is set as one dimensional variable with the first degree of damage as one dimensional variable and the second degree of damage as another dimensional variable.
It is safe to consider the deterioration of the quality of the product itself when the degree of the microbial control treatment is set as a multidimensional variable of two or more dimensions and the degree of the microbial control treatment is set to the product in which the target bacterium is present. A method for quantifying the degree of damage of a microorganism, which comprises obtaining the degree of damage that is an index for determining the sex .
このような構成を備える本発明によると、雑菌や夾雑物が存在する食品などの検体から標的菌を特定して微生物の損傷度を定量化することができる。微生物制御処理の度合い毎の微生物の損傷度を求めることで、微生物制御処理の度合いと損傷菌の挙動との関係を定量的に把握することができる。また、様々な微生物制御処理の種類毎での損傷度を比較することができる(例えば、加熱温度Tにおける損傷度と塩分濃度N%における損傷度との関係など)。これによって、製品の品質維持を確保するために微生物制御処理を必要最小限行った場合に、その微生物制御処理により担保される安全性を見極める指標を得ることができる。 According to the present invention having such a configuration, it is possible to identify the target bacteria from a sample such as a food containing various bacteria and impurities and quantify the degree of damage of the microorganisms. By obtaining the degree of microbial damage for each degree of microbial control treatment, the relationship between the degree of microbial control treatment and the behavior of damaged bacteria can be quantitatively grasped. In addition, the degree of damage for each type of various microbial control treatments can be compared (for example, the relationship between the degree of damage at the heating temperature T and the degree of damage at the salt concentration N%). As a result, when the microbial control treatment is performed to the minimum necessary to ensure the quality maintenance of the product, it is possible to obtain an index for determining the safety guaranteed by the microbial control treatment.
以下、図面を参照して本発明の実施形態を説明する。図1は、本発明の実施形態に係る微生物の損傷度定量方法のフローを示している。この方法では、先ず、微生物を含む検体をサンプリングする(図1:S1)。ここでの検体は、損傷度の評価対象となっている標的菌が所定菌数存在するものであり、これに対して、設定された度合いの微生物制御処理(例えば、加熱処理、pH調整、NaCl処理など)が施される(図1:S2)。微生物制御処理の度合いとは、損傷の軽重に影響する処理パラメータであり、例えば、加熱処理の場合には、加熱時間の長短や加熱温度の高低がこれに対応する。 Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 shows a flow of a method for quantifying the degree of damage of microorganisms according to an embodiment of the present invention. In this method, first, a sample containing a microorganism is sampled (FIG. 1: S1). The sample here has a predetermined number of target bacteria to be evaluated for the degree of damage, whereas the sample has a set degree of microbial control treatment (for example, heat treatment, pH adjustment, NaCl). Processing, etc.) is performed (Fig. 1: S2). The degree of microbial control treatment is a treatment parameter that affects the severity of damage. For example, in the case of heat treatment, the length of the heating time and the height of the heating temperature correspond to this.
加熱処理などの微生物制御処理が施された検体は、そのままもしくは適切な前培養培地中等で培養される(図1:S3)。培養が開始されると、培養時間が異なる検体に対して、標的菌遺伝子定量手法により、標的菌の菌数をモニタリングする。そして、そのモニタリング結果から、微生物制御処理後に増殖した標的菌の菌数が培養時間毎に求められる(図1:S4)。この際の培養温度は対象微生物の損傷回復に適した温度であれば良い。 Specimens that have undergone microbial control treatment such as heat treatment are cultured as they are or in an appropriate preculture medium (FIG. 1: S3). When culturing is started, the number of target bacterium is monitored by the target bacterium gene quantification method for samples having different culture times. Then, from the monitoring result, the number of target bacteria grown after the microbial control treatment is determined for each culture time (FIG. 1: S4). The culture temperature at this time may be any temperature suitable for recovery from damage of the target microorganism.
本発明においては、標的菌の菌数のモニタリングを、遺伝子定量手法によって行う。すなわち、培養中の検体から核酸を抽出して、標的菌の遺伝子数を定量することで菌数をモニタリングする。ここで用いられる遺伝子定量手法は、リアルタイムPCR法を基軸にした方法、エマルジョンPCR法など、各種の手法を採用することができる。また、核酸の抽出方法も、既存のカラムによる抽出法をはじめとして、遺伝子手法に活用できる程度の通常の核酸抽出法であればどのような抽出法であっても構わない。 In the present invention, the number of target bacteria is monitored by a gene quantification method. That is, the number of bacteria is monitored by extracting nucleic acid from the sample being cultured and quantifying the number of genes of the target bacterium. As the gene quantification method used here, various methods such as a method based on the real-time PCR method and an emulsion PCR method can be adopted. Further, the nucleic acid extraction method may be any ordinary nucleic acid extraction method that can be utilized in the gene method, including the extraction method using an existing column.
具体的には、培養継続中に一定時間毎に検体から全核酸を抽出し、標的菌の遺伝子量を定量PCR法などにより計測する。そして、遺伝子量と菌数との相関関係から菌数を求める。これによって、図2に示すように、培養時間の経過に伴って増殖する標的菌の増殖曲線が得られる(図1:S5)。 Specifically, all nucleic acids are extracted from the sample at regular intervals during the continuation of culture, and the gene amount of the target bacterium is measured by a quantitative PCR method or the like. Then, the number of bacteria is obtained from the correlation between the amount of gene and the number of bacteria. As a result, as shown in FIG. 2, a growth curve of the target bacterium that grows with the lapse of the culture time is obtained (FIG. 1: S5).
このようにして、標的菌に微生物制御処理による損傷を与えた後の増殖曲線が得られると、図2に示すように、標的菌の菌数が対数増殖期に移行するまでの時間として増殖遅延時間が算出できる(図1:S6)。増殖遅延時間の算出には、DMfitなどに代表される従来の微生物増殖曲線フィッティングソフト等やアルゴリズム・通常の微生物学的知見による計算式などにより、パラメーターとして求めることができる。微生物制御処理が標的菌に与える損傷は、その後の増殖に及ぼす影響度としてマクロ的に捉えることができるので、増殖遅延時間は微生物制御処理による損傷度を定量的に表したものと言える。 In this way, when a growth curve is obtained after the target bacterium is damaged by the microbial control treatment, as shown in FIG. 2, the growth is delayed as the time until the number of the target bacterium shifts to the logarithmic growth phase. The time can be calculated (Fig. 1: S6). The growth delay time can be calculated as a parameter by using conventional microbial growth curve fitting software such as DMfit, an algorithm, or a calculation formula based on ordinary microbiological knowledge. Since the damage caused by the microbial control treatment to the target bacteria can be macroscopically grasped as the degree of influence on the subsequent growth, it can be said that the growth delay time quantitatively represents the degree of damage caused by the microbial control treatment.
このような工程よると、培養時間毎の標的菌の菌数を遺伝子定量手法によって計測することで、雑菌や夾雑物が混入する検体であっても、安全性を評価する上で必要となる標的菌(サルモネラや腸管出血性大腸菌O157など)に着目して、増殖遅延時間を求めることができる。このようにして求めた増殖遅延時間が短いということは、加えられた微生物制御処理の度合いによる損傷度が低いことを意味し、標的菌の増殖を抑えた状態での保存期間が短くなることを定量的に示しており、増殖遅延時間が長いといこうとは、加えられた微生物制御処理の度合いによる損傷度が高いことを意味し、標的菌の増殖を抑えた状態での保存期間が長くとれることを定量的に示している。 According to such a process, by measuring the number of target bacteria for each culture time by a gene quantification method, even a sample contaminated with various bacteria and impurities is a target necessary for evaluating the safety. The growth delay time can be determined by focusing on the fungus (Salmonella, enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157, etc.). The short growth delay time obtained in this way means that the degree of damage due to the degree of the added microbial control treatment is low, and the storage period in a state where the growth of the target bacterium is suppressed is shortened. Quantitatively, a long growth delay time means that the degree of damage due to the degree of microbial control treatment applied is high, and the storage period in a state where the growth of the target bacterium is suppressed can be long. This is shown quantitatively.
微生物制御処理の度合いと損傷度との関係を定量的に把握するためには、図3に示すように、前述した工程S1〜S6に、微生物制御処理の度合いを変更する工程(図3:S7)を加えて、変更された微生物制御処理の度合い毎に前述した工程S1〜S6を繰り返す。これによると、微生物制御処理の度合いを変更した場合に、それによって損傷度がどの程度になるかを増殖遅延時間によって定量的に把握することができる。 In order to quantitatively grasp the relationship between the degree of microbial control treatment and the degree of damage, as shown in FIG. 3, a step of changing the degree of microbial control treatment in steps S1 to S6 described above (FIG. 3: S7). ) Is added, and the above-mentioned steps S1 to S6 are repeated for each degree of the changed microbial control treatment. According to this, when the degree of the microbial control treatment is changed, the degree of damage caused by the change can be quantitatively grasped by the growth delay time.
図4は、微生物制御処理として加熱処理を施し、微生物制御処理の度合いとして加熱時間を変更した例であり、図3に示したフローにより、加熱時間毎の増殖遅延時間を求めている。 FIG. 4 shows an example in which heat treatment is performed as the microbial control treatment and the heating time is changed as the degree of the microbial control treatment, and the growth delay time for each heating time is obtained from the flow shown in FIG.
この例では、先ず、設定菌数(初発菌数)の標的菌が接種された検体を、加熱損傷が無い状態で培養して、標的菌遺伝子数を定量することで標的菌の菌数を計測し、標的菌が対数増殖期に移行するまでの培養時間を求め、これを基準増殖時間T0としている。実施例では、健常な標的菌を104となるように接種した検体を培養して、対数増殖期に移行するまでの培養時間を基準増殖時間T0とする。 In this example, first, a sample inoculated with a target bacterium having a set number of bacteria (initial number of bacteria) is cultured without heat damage, and the number of target bacterium genes is quantified to measure the number of target bacterium. Then, the culture time until the target bacterium shifts to the logarithmic growth phase is obtained, and this is set as the reference growth time T0. In the embodiment, a normal target bacteria by culturing the inoculated sample so that 10 4, and reference growth time T0 culture time to transition to the logarithmic growth phase.
次に、設定菌数(初発菌数)の標的菌が接種された検体に対して、加熱時間F1(実施例では12min)の加熱処理を施し、その後に培養して、標的菌遺伝子数を定量することで標的菌の菌数を計測し、標的菌の菌数が対数増殖期に到達するまでの培養時間を求め、この培養時間を増殖遅延時間T1としている。 Next, the sample inoculated with the target bacteria of the set number of bacteria (initial number of bacteria) is heat-treated for a heating time of F1 (12 min in the example), and then cultured to quantify the number of target bacteria genes. By doing so, the number of target bacteria is measured, the culture time until the number of target bacteria reaches the logarithmic growth phase is determined, and this culture time is defined as the growth delay time T1.
図4に示した例では、加熱時間(微生物制御処理の度合い)を第1段階から第4段階(加熱時間F1,F2,F3,F4)に変化させ、各段階での増殖遅延時間T1,T2,T3,T4を求めている。加熱時間は、例えば、F2=F1×2、F3=F1×3、F4=F1×4のように示すことができる。 In the example shown in FIG. 4, the heating time (degree of microbial control treatment) is changed from the first stage to the fourth stage (heating time F1, F2, F3, F4), and the growth delay time T1, T2 at each stage. , T3, T4 are required. The heating time can be shown, for example, as F2 = F1 × 2, F3 = F1 × 3, F4 = F1 × 4.
また、増殖遅延時間の算出において、DMfitなどに代表される従来の微生物増殖曲線フィッティングソフト等やアルゴリズム・通常の微生物学的知見による計算式などにより、最大比増殖速度を求めることも可能で、この値から必要に応じて、既存の文献に従い(Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering 67:132-134. 1989)計測して得られた増殖遅延時間をより正確に補正することも可能である。 In addition, in calculating the growth delay time, it is also possible to obtain the maximum specific growth rate by using conventional microbial growth curve fitting software such as DMfit, algorithms, and calculation formulas based on ordinary microbiological knowledge. It is also possible to more accurately correct the growth delay time obtained by measuring the values according to the existing literature (Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering 67: 132-134. 1989), if necessary.
このように、基準増殖時間T0を求めることで、この基準増殖時間T0と各段階で得られた増殖遅延時間T1〜T4との差分によって、各段階の加熱時間による損傷度を標準的に定量化することができる。すなわち、各段階の加熱時間による損傷度k1〜k4を増殖遅延時間T1〜T4と基準増殖時間T0との差分で表すと、k1=T1−T0,k2=T2−T0,k3=T3−T0,k4=T4−T0となる。 In this way, by obtaining the reference growth time T0, the degree of damage due to the heating time of each stage is quantified as standard by the difference between the reference growth time T0 and the growth delay times T1 to T4 obtained in each stage. can do. That is, when the degree of damage k1 to k4 due to the heating time of each stage is expressed by the difference between the growth delay time T1 to T4 and the reference growth time T0, k1 = T1-T0, k2 = T2-T0, k3 = T3-T0, k4 = T4-T0.
図4に示すように、加熱処理が加えられた検体中の標的菌の菌数は、加熱時間の程度に応じて減少するが、損傷菌として残存し、その後の保存時間(培養時間)の時間経過による増殖で再び初発菌数に達する。その間の増殖過程は損傷状態の回復に当たると考えられ、損傷状態の回復に要する保存時間(培養時間)は、加熱時間の長短(加えるダメージの大小)に応じて異なる値になる。よって、前述した増殖遅延時間T1〜T4或いは損傷度k1〜k4は、加熱時間の長短に応じた損傷菌の損傷程度を定量的に表している。 As shown in FIG. 4, the number of target bacteria in the heat-treated sample decreases depending on the degree of heating time, but remains as damaged bacteria, and the time of the subsequent storage time (culture time). The initial number of bacteria is reached again by proliferation over time. The growth process during that period is considered to correspond to the recovery of the damaged state, and the storage time (culture time) required for the recovery of the damaged state has a different value depending on the length of the heating time (the amount of damage applied). Therefore, the growth delay times T1 to T4 or the degree of damage k1 to k4 described above quantitatively represent the degree of damage of the damaged bacteria according to the length of the heating time.
図5は、特定の微生物制御処理の度合いに対する損傷度のプロファイル例を示している。図示の横軸は、加熱時間(微生物制御処理の度合い)を示し、縦軸は、損傷度(増殖遅延時間)を示している。図において、加熱時間を過剰に高めた場合には、増殖遅延時間が得られない状態(加熱後の増殖がみられない死滅状態)になるが、そこまでに至るまでの加熱時間が、損傷度評価範囲になる。損傷度評価範囲においては、加熱時間(微生物制御処理の度合い)を設定した場合に、それによる損傷度がどの程度になるかを定量的に評価することができる。 FIG. 5 shows an example profile of the degree of damage to a specific degree of microbial control treatment. The horizontal axis in the figure shows the heating time (degree of microbial control treatment), and the vertical axis shows the degree of damage (growth delay time). In the figure, when the heating time is excessively increased, the growth delay time cannot be obtained (a dead state in which no growth is observed after heating), but the heating time up to that point is the degree of damage. It becomes the evaluation range. In the damage degree evaluation range, when the heating time (degree of microbial control treatment) is set, it is possible to quantitatively evaluate how much the damage degree is due to it.
このような損傷度のプロファイルは、標的菌の種類や加える微生物制御処理の仕方によって特有の曲線を示す。このプロファイルは、食品などの品質を維持するために、微生物制御処理の度合いをある程度抑えた場合に、処理の後の安全な保存期間を損傷度(増殖遅延時間)との関係でどの程度に定めればよいか、などの指標になる。 Such a damage profile shows a unique curve depending on the type of target bacterium and the method of microbial control treatment to be added. This profile defines the safe storage period after treatment in relation to the degree of damage (growth delay time) when the degree of microbial control treatment is suppressed to some extent in order to maintain the quality of foods and the like. It becomes an index such as whether it should be done.
図6は、微生物制御処理の度合いが多次元変数である場合の損傷度のプロファイルを示している。図示の例では、微生物制御処理が加熱処理であり、その度合いが加熱時間(Heating time(sec))と加熱温度(Temperature(℃))の2次元変数である。このような損傷度のプロファイルによると、加熱時間と加熱温度を組み合わせた加熱処理に対して、各変数の設定と損傷度(増殖遅延時間)との関係を可視化することができ、食品などの品質と安全性の両方を考慮した微生物制御処理をどのように調整すべきかの効果的な指標になる。 FIG. 6 shows a profile of the degree of damage when the degree of microbial control treatment is a multidimensional variable. In the illustrated example, the microbial control treatment is a heat treatment, and the degree thereof is a two-dimensional variable of a heating time (Heating time (sec)) and a heating temperature (Temperature (° C.)). According to such a damage degree profile, it is possible to visualize the relationship between the setting of each variable and the damage degree (growth delay time) for the heat treatment that combines the heating time and the heating temperature, and the quality of foods and the like. It is an effective indicator of how to adjust the microbial control treatment considering both safety and safety.
また、前述したように、標的菌遺伝子定量手法によるモニタリングで得られる増殖曲線(図1,図2:S5)からは、DMfitなどの既存のソフトウェアを用いて、最大比増殖速度を求めることができる。この最大比増殖速度は、前述した増殖遅延時間と共に、微生物制御処理の度合いによる損傷度の程度を定量化する有効なパラメータとなる。 Further, as described above, the maximum specific growth rate can be determined from the growth curve (FIGS. 1, FIG. 2: S5) obtained by monitoring by the target bacterium gene quantification method using existing software such as DMfit. .. This maximum specific growth rate, together with the above-mentioned growth delay time, is an effective parameter for quantifying the degree of damage depending on the degree of microbial control treatment.
図7は、標的菌である腸管出血性大腸菌O157に対して、微生物制御処理として、pH3.0の培地に曝露する処理を施した場合の例であって、微生物制御処理後の増殖曲線から算出される最大比増殖速度を求めた例である。図示のグラフは、横軸にpH3.0の培地に曝露した時間(曝露時間:微生物制御処理の度合い)を取り、縦軸に最大比増殖速度をとっている。ここで、最大比増殖速度が大きいということは、損傷度が低いことを意味しており、最大比増殖側道が小さいということは、損傷度が高いことを意味している。図示の例では、曝露時間(Hr)が40時間を過ぎると最大比増殖速度はゼロになり、標的菌である腸管出血性大腸菌O157は死滅した状態になるが、曝露時間が36時間を過ぎると最大比増殖速度は急激に低下する。このように、最大比増殖速度は、前述した増殖遅延時間と共に、損傷度を定量化する際の有効な指標になる。 FIG. 7 shows an example in which enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157, which is a target bacterium, is exposed to a medium of pH 3.0 as a microbial control treatment, and is calculated from the growth curve after the microbial control treatment. This is an example of determining the maximum specific growth rate to be achieved. In the graph shown, the horizontal axis represents the time of exposure to the medium of pH 3.0 (exposure time: degree of microbial control treatment), and the vertical axis represents the maximum specific growth rate. Here, a large maximum specific growth rate means a low degree of damage, and a small maximum specific growth side road means a high degree of damage. In the illustrated example, the maximum specific growth rate becomes zero when the exposure time (Hr) exceeds 40 hours, and the target bacterium, enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157, becomes dead, but when the exposure time exceeds 36 hours. The maximum specific growth rate drops sharply. As described above, the maximum specific growth rate, together with the above-mentioned growth delay time, is an effective index for quantifying the degree of damage.
以上説明したように、本発明によると、雑菌や夾雑物が存在する食品などの検体から標的菌を特定して、微生物制御処理の度合いに対する標的菌の損傷度を定量的に把握することができる。そして、所定の微生物制御処理を施した場合の損傷菌の回復を定量的に把握することできるので、安全性を確保するために最低限必要とされる微生物制御処理の度合いとその後の保管期間を、客観的なデータに基づいて、詳細に決定することができる。 As described above, according to the present invention, it is possible to identify a target bacterium from a sample such as a food containing various germs and impurities, and quantitatively grasp the degree of damage to the target bacterium with respect to the degree of microbial control treatment. .. Then, since it is possible to quantitatively grasp the recovery of damaged bacteria when a predetermined microbial control treatment is applied, the minimum degree of microbial control treatment required to ensure safety and the subsequent storage period can be determined. , Can be determined in detail based on objective data.
Claims (5)
培養時間の経時変化によって増殖する標的菌の菌数が対数増殖期に移行するまでの時間を増殖遅延時間として求め、および、最大比増殖速度を求め、当該増殖遅延時間によって、設定された度合いの前記微生物制御処理による標的菌の損傷度を第1の損傷度として求め、および、当該最大比増殖速度によって、設定された度合いの前記微生物制御処理による標的菌の損傷度を第2の損傷度として求め、設定された度合いの前記微生物制御処理による標的菌の損傷度を第1の損傷度を一つの次元変数とし、第2の損傷度を別の次元変数とし、
前記微生物制御処理について、その度合いを2次元以上の多次元変数として、前記標的菌が存在する製品に設定された度合いの前記微生物制御処理を施した場合の製品自体の品質低下を考慮して安全性を見極める指標となる損傷度を得ることを特徴とする微生物の損傷度定量方法。 A sample in which the target bacterium is present is subjected to a set degree of microbial control treatment, and then cultured, and the number of the target bacterium in the sample having a different culture time is monitored by the target bacterium gene quantification method.
The time required for the number of target bacteria to grow due to the change in culture time to shift to the logarithmic growth phase is determined as the growth delay time, and the maximum specific growth rate is obtained, and the degree of degree set by the growth delay time is determined. The degree of damage to the target bacterium by the microbial control treatment is determined as the first degree of damage, and the degree of damage to the target bacterium by the microbial control treatment set by the maximum specific growth rate is set as the second degree of damage. The degree of damage to the target bacterium by the determined and set degree of the microbial control treatment is defined as the first degree of damage as one dimensional variable and the second degree of damage as another dimensional variable.
It is safe to consider the deterioration of the quality of the product itself when the degree of the microbial control treatment is set as a multidimensional variable of two or more dimensions and the degree of the microbial control treatment is set to the product in which the target bacterium is present. A method for quantifying the degree of damage of a microorganism, which comprises obtaining the degree of damage that is an index for determining the sex .
前記基準増殖時間と前記増殖遅延時間との差分によって、前記損傷度を定めることを特徴とする請求項1〜4のいずれか1項に記載された微生物の損傷度定量方法。
The culture time until the number of target bacteria reaches the logarithmic growth phase after culturing the sample not subjected to the microbial control treatment is set as the reference growth time.
The method for quantifying the degree of damage of a microorganism according to any one of claims 1 to 4 , wherein the degree of damage is determined by the difference between the reference growth time and the growth delay time.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2016089343A JP6796830B2 (en) | 2016-04-27 | 2016-04-27 | Method for quantifying the degree of microbial damage |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2016089343A JP6796830B2 (en) | 2016-04-27 | 2016-04-27 | Method for quantifying the degree of microbial damage |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2017195822A JP2017195822A (en) | 2017-11-02 |
| JP6796830B2 true JP6796830B2 (en) | 2020-12-09 |
Family
ID=60236624
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2016089343A Active JP6796830B2 (en) | 2016-04-27 | 2016-04-27 | Method for quantifying the degree of microbial damage |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP6796830B2 (en) |
Family Cites Families (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP1707638B1 (en) * | 2003-12-26 | 2017-11-29 | Prima Meat Packers, Ltd. | Method of multiplex microorganism detection |
-
2016
- 2016-04-27 JP JP2016089343A patent/JP6796830B2/en active Active
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2017195822A (en) | 2017-11-02 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Swinnen et al. | Predictive modelling of the microbial lag phase: a review | |
| Cocolin et al. | Zooming into food-associated microbial consortia: a ‘cultural’evolution | |
| Rossetti et al. | Grana Padano cheese whey starters: microbial composition and strain distribution | |
| Møller et al. | Histamine forming behaviour of bacterial isolates from aged cheese | |
| Schvartzman et al. | Modelling the fate of Listeria monocytogenes during manufacture and ripening of smeared cheese made with pasteurised or raw milk | |
| Gougouli et al. | Development and application of predictive models for fungal growth as tools to improve quality control in yogurt production | |
| Mamlouk et al. | Quantification of viable Brochothrix thermosphacta in cooked shrimp and salmon by real-time PCR | |
| Desfossés-Foucault et al. | Dynamics and rRNA transcriptional activity of lactococci and lactobacilli during Cheddar cheese ripening | |
| Dong et al. | A genetic diversity study of antifungal Lactobacillus plantarum isolates | |
| Schvartzman et al. | Effect of pH and water activity on the growth limits of Listeria monocytogenes in a cheese matrix at two contamination levels | |
| EP3928321A1 (en) | Machine learning quantification of target organisms using nucleic acid amplification assays | |
| Amato et al. | Microbial composition of defect smear–a problem evolving during foil-prepacked storage of red-smear cheeses | |
| JP6796830B2 (en) | Method for quantifying the degree of microbial damage | |
| JP5456219B1 (en) | Method for predicting the growth of the number of microorganisms in food and drink | |
| Tsai et al. | Development of shortened enrichment methods for detection of Salmonella Typhimurium spiked in milk | |
| Niven et al. | A novel method for measuring lag times in division of individual bacterial cells using image analysis | |
| Kanagawa et al. | Evaluation of petrifilm lactic acid bacteria plates for counting lactic acid bacteria in food | |
| Pogačić et al. | Methods for culture-independent identification of lactic acid bacteria in dairy products. | |
| Spanu et al. | Comparison of post-lethality thermal treatment conditions on the reduction of Listeria monocytogenes and sensory properties of vacuum packed ricotta salata cheese | |
| CN117804637B (en) | Baking temperature intelligent monitoring method for deep processing of traditional Chinese medicinal materials | |
| Aguirre et al. | Improvement in the lag phase estimation of individual cells that have survived mild heat treatment | |
| Te Giffel et al. | Control of milk processing based on rapid detection of micro-organisms | |
| Ranieri et al. | Tracking and eliminating sporeformers in dairy systems | |
| HK1201882B (en) | Method for predicting proliferation of microbial count | |
| Priego et al. | Bactometer system versus traditional methods for monitoring bacteria populations in salchichon during its ripening process |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A80 | Written request to apply exceptions to lack of novelty of invention |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A80 Effective date: 20160513 |
|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20190204 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20191024 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20191112 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20191227 |
|
| A02 | Decision of refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02 Effective date: 20200512 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20200716 |
|
| C60 | Trial request (containing other claim documents, opposition documents) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: C60 Effective date: 20200716 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A821 Effective date: 20200717 |
|
| A911 | Transfer to examiner for re-examination before appeal (zenchi) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A911 Effective date: 20200812 |
|
| C21 | Notice of transfer of a case for reconsideration by examiners before appeal proceedings |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: C21 Effective date: 20200818 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20201027 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20201105 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 6796830 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |