JP7015764B2 - Operation management system - Google Patents

Description

The present invention relates to an operation management system, and is suitable for application to, for example, an operation management system that manages a train operation on a first line and a train operation on a second line.

Conventionally, in the operation management system, when a train connects to another line at a connecting station, the operation management system obtains the implementation timetable information and the actual timetable information of the connecting train of each line, and at the connecting station from the estimated arrival time. Judges whether or not to connect to other lines, and connects to the train scheduled to be connected to other lines even if the train does not arrive at the connecting station as scheduled due to problems, train delays due to bad weather, etc. It can be determined whether or not it is possible (see Patent Document 1 and Patent Document 2).

Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2004-122900 Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2011-255766

According to the technique described in Patent Document 1 or Patent Document 2, when a train is delayed in connecting a train, the passenger can determine whether or not it is possible to transfer to the train to be connected. On the other hand, when it is determined that the connected train cannot be connected to the connected train, the commander needs to execute the timetable change request to the line of the connected train and the change depending on the situation. Alternatively, the technique described in Patent Document 2 has a problem that an error occurs in the change of the timetable of the connected train.

The present invention has been made in consideration of the above points, and an object of the present invention is to propose an operation management system capable of appropriately connecting trains.

In order to solve such a problem, the present invention includes a first operation management device for managing the operation of trains on the first line and a second operation management device for managing the operation of trains on the second line. A connecting train that is a train on a line that does not arrive as scheduled based on the timetable information of the train on the first line and the timetable information of the train on the second line. A processing unit for determining whether or not a connected train, which is a train on another line connected to the connecting train, can be connected at a predetermined station, and the processing unit includes the connected train and the connected train. When it is determined that the train cannot be connected at the predetermined station, the connected train is connected so that the stop time of the connected train and the stop time of the connected train overlap at the predetermined station for a predetermined time or more. The change timetable information is calculated based on the timetable information, and a timetable change question request is transmitted to the operation management device that manages the operation of the connected train among the first operation management device and the second operation management device. When the operation management device receives the timetable change inquiry request, it determines whether or not the approval to change the timetable information of the connected train has been given via the user interface unit, and determines that the approval has been given. , The operation of the connected train is managed according to the change timetable information.

In the above configuration, the operation management device determines whether or not the approval to change the timetable information of the connected train has been made, and if it is determined that the approval has been made, the operation management device manages the operation of the connected train according to the change timetable information. Therefore, for example, trains can be connected smoothly and accurately.

According to the present invention, a highly reliable operation management system can be realized.

It is a figure which shows an example of the structure which concerns on the operation management system by 1st Embodiment. It is an image diagram of the route in the operation management system according to the first embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the process which concerns on the connection by 1st Embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the structure which concerns on the operation management system by 2nd Embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the process which concerns on the connection by 2nd Embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the process which concerns on the connection by 3rd Embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the structure which concerns on the operation management system by 4th Embodiment.

Hereinafter, one embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.

(1) First Embodiment In FIG. 1, 100 indicates an operation management system according to the first embodiment as a whole. The operation management system 100 includes an integrated management device 110, a line A operation management device 120, and a line B operation management device 130.

The integrated management device 110 is a device for supporting connection between a train on line A and a train on line B (transfer at a predetermined station, transfer at a predetermined station, etc.). In the present embodiment, in the case where the train of line A and the train of line B are connected at a predetermined station (for example, the connection station 230 described later), the case where the train of line A is delayed is taken as an example. explain. In the following, the delayed train on line A will be referred to as a connecting train, and the train on line B connected to the connecting train will be referred to as a connected train. Further, a set of trains connected at a predetermined station is appropriately referred to as a connecting train pair.

The integrated management device 110 is a computer such as a server device, and includes a processing unit 111, a timetable information storage unit 112, and a communication control unit 113.

More specifically, the integrated management device 110 includes a CPU (Central Processing Unit), memories such as RAM (Random Access Memory), ROM (Read Only Memory), and HDD (Hard Disk Drive), and a communication device. Consists of.

The function of the integrated management device 110 (for example, the processing unit 111) may be realized by, for example, the CPU reading the program stored in the ROM into the RAM and executing it (software), or hardware such as a dedicated circuit. It may be realized by wear, or it may be realized by combining software and hardware. Further, a part of the functions of the integrated management device 110 may be realized by another computer capable of communicating with the integrated management device 110.

The processing unit 111, for example, delays a train, changes a train schedule, or the like based on the train schedule information of line A (an example of a first line) and the train schedule information of a line B (an example of a second line). It is determined whether or not the connecting train, which is a train on a line that does not arrive as scheduled, and the connected train, which is a train on another line connected to the connecting train, can be connected at a predetermined station. The specific processing of the processing unit 111 will be described later with reference to FIG.

The timetable information storage unit 112 stores, for example, the timetable information received from the line A operation management device 120 and the timetable information received from the line B operation management device 130. Here, the timetable information includes implementation timetable information, operation arrangement timetable information, actual timetable information, and the like. The implementation timetable information is the timetable information related to the daily operation plan (operation plan) created based on the basic plan. The operation arrangement timetable information is the timetable information when the implementation timetable information is changed by the operation arrangement. The actual timetable information is the timetable information indicating the operation record of the train.

The communication control unit 113 is composed of, for example, a NIC (Network Interface Card) and performs protocol control during communication with the line A operation management device 120 and protocol control during communication with the line B operation management device 130. Or something.

The line A operation management device 120 is a device for managing the operation of the train on the line A. The route A operation management device 120 is a computer such as a server device, and includes a processing unit 121, a timetable information storage unit 122, a communication control unit 123, and a user interface unit 124.

More specifically, the route A operation management device 120 includes a CPU, memories such as RAM, ROM, and HDD, a communication device, and a man machine. The man machine is a device that transmits between a human and a device, and is a liquid crystal display, a pointing device, a button, a lever, a meter, and the like.

The function of the route A operation management device 120 (for example, the processing unit 121) may be realized by, for example, the CPU reading the program stored in the ROM into the RAM (software), or a dedicated circuit or the like. It may be realized by the hardware of the above, or it may be realized by the combination of the software and the hardware. Further, a part of the functions of the route A operation management device 120 may be realized by another computer capable of communicating with the route A operation management device 120.

The timetable information storage unit 122 stores, for example, timetable information of trains on route A (implementation timetable information of connected trains, operation arrangement timetable information of connected trains, actual timetable information of connected trains, etc.).

The communication control unit 123 is composed of, for example, a NIC, and performs protocol control during communication with the integrated management device 110.

For example, the processing unit 121 reads the current timetable information and the actual timetable information of the connected train from the timetable information storage unit 122, and transmits the current timetable information and the actual timetable information to the integrated management device 110 via the communication control unit 123. When it is not necessary to distinguish between the implementation timetable information and the operation arrangement timetable information, it is appropriately referred to as the current timetable information.

The user interface unit 124, for example, makes a human understand the state of the machine (for example, information processed by the route A operation management device 120), or transmits a request of a human (for example, a commander) to the route A operation management device 120. To do.

The line B operation management device 130 is a device for managing the operation of the train on the line B. The route B operation management device 130 is a computer such as a server device, and includes a processing unit 131, a timetable information storage unit 132, a communication control unit 133, and a user interface unit 134.

More specifically, the route B operation management device 130 includes a CPU, memories such as RAM, ROM, and HDD, a communication device, and a man machine.

The function of the route B operation management device 130 (for example, the processing unit 131) may be realized by, for example, the CPU reading the program stored in the ROM into the RAM (software), or a dedicated circuit or the like. It may be realized by the hardware of the above, or it may be realized by the combination of the software and the hardware. Further, a part of the function of the route B operation management device 130 may be realized by another computer capable of communicating with the route B operation management device 130.

The timetable information storage unit 132 stores, for example, timetable information of trains on route B (implementation timetable information of connected trains, operation arrangement timetable information of connected trains, actual timetable information of connected trains, etc.).

The communication control unit 133 is composed of, for example, a NIC, and performs protocol control during communication with the integrated management device 110.

For example, the processing unit 131 reads the current timetable information and the actual timetable information of the connected train from the timetable information storage unit 132, and transmits the current timetable information and the actual timetable information to the integrated management device 110 via the communication control unit 133.

The user interface unit 134, for example, makes a human understand the state of the machine (for example, information processed by the route B operation management device 130), or transmits a request of a human (for example, a commander) to the route B operation management device 130. To do.

In the above-described configuration, when the integrated management device 110 receives the current timetable information and the actual timetable information of the connected train from the route A operation management device 120 via the communication control unit 113, the integrated management device 110 stores the current timetable information and the actual timetable information in the timetable information storage unit 112. Further, when the integrated management device 110 receives the current timetable information and the actual timetable information of the connected train from the line B operation management device 130, the integrated management device 110 stores them in the timetable information storage unit 112.

Further, the integrated management device 110 is based on the current timetable information and the actual timetable information of the connected train of the line A and the current timetable information and the actual timetable information of the connected train of the line B, and the change timetable information of the connected train ( (Diamond information) whose current timetable information has been changed in order to realize the connection is created and stored in the timetable information storage unit 112.

Further, when the integrated management device 110 creates the change timetable information of the connected train, the integrated management device 110 transmits a timetable change inquiry request to the route B operation management device 130. When the route B operation management device 130 receives the timetable change inquiry request, it notifies the user interface unit 134 of the timetable change inquiry request, and when the timetable change is approved via the user interface unit 134, the timetable change timetable of the connected train The information is acquired, and the current timetable information of the connected train of the timetable information storage unit 132 of the route B is rewritten.

The integrated management device 110 may be directly connected to the line A operation management device 120, or may be connected to the line A operation management device 120 via a network. Further, the integrated management device 110 may be directly connected to the line B operation management device 130, or may be connected to the line B operation management device 130 via a network.

FIG. 2 is an image diagram of a route in the operation management system 100. In FIG. 2, for example, it is shown that passengers on train 211 on line A210 and passengers on train 221 on line B220 can mutually transfer (transfer) to trains on other lines at the connecting station 230. .. It should be noted that the present embodiment is not limited to the form of the route shown in FIG.

FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of operation (processing related to connection) in each device (integrated management device 110, line A operation management device 120, line B operation management device 130) of the operation management system 100.

The line A operation management device 120 transfers the timetable information (current timetable information and actual timetable information) of each train related to the line A to the integrated management device 110 at a predetermined timing (for example, when arriving at a station for monitoring delay). When it reaches a predetermined position, it is transmitted (regularly) (step S301).

The line B operation management device 130 transfers the timetable information (current timetable information and actual timetable information) of each train related to the line B to the integrated management device 110 at a predetermined timing (for example, when arriving at a station for monitoring delay). When it reaches a predetermined position, it is transmitted (regularly) (step S302).

The integrated management device 110 determines the delay time of the connected train pair based on the current timetable information and the actual timetable received from the line A operation management device 120 and the current timetable information and the actual timetable received from the line B operation management device 130. Calculation is performed (step S303). The information of the connected train pair may be stored in advance in the integrated management device 110, or may be obtained from the implementation timetable of the line A operation management device 120 and the implementation timetable of the line B operation management device 130. ..

For example, the integrated management device 110 determines the delay time of the train 211 of the line A from the current timetable information and the actual timetable of the line A operation management device 120 for the train 211 of the line A and the train 221 of the line B, which are the connecting train pairs. The delay time of the train 221 on the route B is calculated from the current timetable information and the actual timetable of the line B operation management device 130. The integrated management device 110 may calculate the difference between the implementation timetable information and the actual timetable as the delay time, or may calculate the difference between the operation arrangement timetable information and the actual timetable as the delay time.

Subsequently, the integrated management device 110 determines whether or not the difference between the delay times is within a predetermined time (for example, the delay is 5 minutes) (step S304). If it is determined that the time is within the predetermined time, the integrated management device 110 shifts the process to step S305, and if it is determined that the time exceeds the predetermined time, the integrated management device 110 ends the process related to the connection. According to such a determination, when it is determined that the delay is large by a simple calculation, the process related to the connection can be terminated quickly. The present embodiment is not limited to the above-mentioned contents, and the determination in step S304 may be omitted.

Further, the present embodiment is not limited to the above-mentioned processing. For example, the integrated management device 110 determines whether or not the connecting train is the last train based on the timetable information, and when it is determined that the connecting train is the last train, the difference between the delay times is longer than the predetermined time. When the time (for example, 10 minutes) is exceeded, the process may be terminated without connecting the connecting train, and when the time is within a specific time, the process may be transferred to step S305.

In step S305, the integrated management device 110 calculates the estimated arrival time and the estimated departure time of each train of the connecting train pair. For example, the integrated management device 110 calculates the arrival prediction time based on the current timetable information and the delay time, and calculates the departure prediction time based on the current timetable information (stop time) and the arrival prediction time.

Subsequently, the integrated management device 110 determines whether or not the connection is possible based on the predicted arrival time and the predicted departure time of the connected train pair (step S306). When the integrated management device 110 determines that the connection is possible, the process related to the connection is terminated, and when it is determined that the connection is not possible, the integrated management device 110 shifts the process to step S307. For example, in the integrated management device 110, when the range of the estimated departure time of the train 221 (connected train) from the estimated arrival time of the train 211 (connecting train) to the connecting station 230 overlaps with a predetermined time (for example, 2 minutes) or more. , Judge that connection is possible.

Further, the present embodiment is not limited to the above-mentioned processing. For example, the integrated management device 110 determines whether or not the connecting train is the last train based on the timetable information, and if it is determined to be the last train, the estimated departure time of the connected train is determined from the estimated arrival time of the connecting train. When the ranges of are overlapped for a specific time (for example, 5 minutes) longer than a predetermined time, it may be determined that the connection is possible.

Subsequently, the integrated management device 110 calculates the change timetable information of the connected train based on the arrival prediction time and the departure prediction time of the connected train and the current timetable information and the actual timetable information of the connected train (step S307). .. For example, in the integrated management device 110, the stop time of the train 211 (connecting train) at the connecting station 230 and the stop time of the train 221 (connected train) at the connecting station 230 are a predetermined time (for example, 2 minutes) or more. Generate change timetable information for connected trains so that they overlap.

Subsequently, the integrated management device 110 transmits a timetable change inquiry request to the route B operation management device 130 (step S308).

The route B operation management device 130 performs a timetable change inquiry process (step S309). In the timetable change inquiry process, for example, the route B operation management device 130 asks the man machine (accepts approval of the timetable change via the user interface unit 134).

The present embodiment is not limited to the above-mentioned processing. For example, the integrated management device 110 may perform the process of step S308 and then the process of step S307. According to such a process, for example, the change timetable information can be generated while the timetable change inquiry process is being performed, so that the processing time can be shortened.

The route B operation management device 130 determines whether or not the timetable change is approved (step S310). If it is determined that the route B operation management device 130 is approved, the process is transferred to step S311. If it is determined that the route B operation management device 130 is not approved, the process related to the connection is terminated.

In step S311, the route B operation management device 130 acquires the change timetable information from the integrated management device 110.

Subsequently, the route B operation management device 130 performs a timetable change process of the connected train (step S312), and ends the process related to the connection. In the timetable change process, for example, the line B operation management device 130 updates the current timetable information of the train 221 (connected train) with the change timetable information, and manages the operation of the train 221 according to the change timetable information.

In this way, when the processing unit 111 determines that the connected train and the connected train cannot be connected at a predetermined station, the stop time of the connected train and the stop time of the connected train are a predetermined time at the predetermined station. The changed timetable information is calculated based on the timetable information of the connected train so as to overlap the above. Further, the processing unit 111 manages the operation of the connected train among the line A operation management device 120 (an example of the first operation management device) and the line B operation management device 130 (an example of the second operation management device). Send a timetable change question request to the operation management device. Upon receiving the timetable change inquiry request, the operation management device determines whether or not approval has been given to change the timetable information of the connected train via the user interface unit (user interface unit 124, user interface unit 134, etc.). If it is determined that the approval has been given, the operation of the connected train will be managed according to the change timetable information.

According to this embodiment, it is automatically determined whether or not the connected train pair can be connected, the approval question is automatically asked, and when the approval is made, the connected train is in accordance with the change timetable information. Since the operation is managed, trains can be connected smoothly and accurately.

In addition, by shortening the processing time until the approval request is made, the approval decision can be delayed, so that it is possible to avoid the situation where the timetable is further changed after the approval.

(2) Second Embodiment This embodiment is mainly different from the first embodiment in that the integrated management device 110 is not provided. In the present embodiment, the operation management device of a predetermined line is provided with the function of the integrated management device 110.

FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of the configuration related to the operation management system 400. The operation management system 400 includes a line A operation management device 410 and a line B operation management device 420. Hereinafter, a case where the processing performed by the integrated management device 110 is performed by the route A operation management device 410 will be described. The configuration of the route A operation management device 410 (processing unit 411, timetable information storage unit 412, communication control unit 413, user interface unit 414) is basically the configuration of the route A operation management device 120 (processing unit 121, Since it is the same as the timetable information storage unit 122, the communication control unit 123, and the user interface unit 124), the description thereof will be omitted. Further, the configuration of the route B operation management device 420 (processing unit 421, timetable information storage unit 422, communication control unit 423, user interface unit 424) is basically the configuration of the route B operation management device 130 (processing unit 131, Since it is the same as the timetable information storage unit 132, the communication control unit 133, and the user interface unit 134), the description thereof will be omitted.

FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an example of operation (processing related to connection) in each device (route A operation management device 410, route B operation management device 420) of the operation management system 400.

The route B operation management device 420 transmits the timetable information to the route A operation management device 410 at a predetermined timing (step S501).

Subsequently, the route A operation management device 410 performs the processes of steps S502 to S507. Since the processing of steps S502 to S507 is the same as the processing of steps S303 to S308, the description thereof will be omitted.

Subsequently, the route B operation management device 420 performs the processes of steps S508 to S511. Since the processing of steps S508 to S511 is the same as the processing of steps S309 to S312, the description thereof will be omitted.

According to the present embodiment, the line A operation management device 410 or the line B operation management device 420 automatically determines whether or not the connected train pair can be connected, and automatically asks for approval and approves. When the above is performed, the operation of the connected train is managed according to the change timetable information, so that the train can be connected smoothly and accurately without newly installing the integrated management device 110.

(3) Third embodiment The present embodiment is different from the first embodiment in that the train does not arrive as scheduled due to a delay in the train or a change in the timetable. The main difference is that the processing related to the connection is performed with this as an opportunity. In the present embodiment, the same reference numerals are used for the same configurations as those in the first embodiment, and the description thereof will be omitted as appropriate. In the following, a case where a delay occurs in the train on Route A will be described as an example.

FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an example of processing related to connection.

When the route A operation management device 120 determines that the train does not arrive as scheduled (for example, when it is determined that the delay time of the train exceeds a predetermined time based on the implementation timetable information and the actual timetable information). , The timetable information of the train (connecting train) of the line A is transmitted to the integrated management device 110 (step S601).

The integrated management device 110 extracts the connected train corresponding to the connecting train based on the timetable information of the train on the route B and the timetable information of the connecting train (step S602). For example, the integrated management device 110 extracts (identifies) the connected train corresponding to the connecting train based on the implementation timetable information of the train on the route B and the execution timetable information of the connecting train. The integrated management device 110 stores, for example, the implementation schedule information of the train on the route A and the implementation schedule information of the train on the route B in advance by batch processing at night.

The integrated management device 110 transmits the timetable information request of the connected train to the route B operation management device 130 (step S603).

The route B operation management device 130 transmits the timetable information of the connected train to the integrated management device 110 (step S604).

Hereinafter, the processes of steps S303 to S312 are performed, but since the processes are the same as those described in the first embodiment, the description thereof will be omitted.

As described above, the operation management system 100 controls the line A operation management device 120 for controlling the train on the line A (first line section) and the line B operation management for controlling the train on the line B (second line section). The device 130 is provided with an integrated management device 110 that refers to the timetable information of the line A operation management device 120 and the line B operation management device 130. The integrated management device 110 stores the timetable information of line A (an example of the first timetable information) and the timetable information of the line B (an example of the second timetable information), which is the operation plan of the trains of the line A and the line B. .. Further, the integrated management device 110 refers to the timetable information of the line A and the timetable information of the line B, and is a train of the line B at the connecting station which is a station capable of connecting between the line A and the line B. The connected trains that the train A can connect to are extracted. Further, the integrated management device 110 is a change timetable information which is the timetable information of the line B in which the estimated arrival time of the train of the line A to the connecting station and the estimated departure time of the connected train from the connecting station are set within a predetermined time. Is generated, and the generated change timetable information is transmitted to the route B operation management device 130. The line B operation management device 130 determines whether or not to allow the train to operate according to the changed timetable information, and as a result of the determination, if it is approved to operate the train according to the changed timetable information, the train of the line B Change the timetable information Change the timetable information according to the timetable information.

According to the present embodiment, since the processing related to the connection is performed without constantly monitoring the operation of the train on each line, it is possible to connect the train smoothly and accurately while suppressing the communication between the devices. It will be like.

(4) Fourth Embodiment This embodiment is mainly different from the first embodiment in that the train connection (timetable change) is broadcast (notified) at the station. Regarding the same configuration as that of the first embodiment, the same reference numerals are used and the description thereof will be omitted as appropriate.

FIG. 7 is a diagram showing an example of the configuration related to the operation management system 100. The operation management system 100 is communicably connected to the passenger information system 710. The passenger guidance device 710 is configured to be able to control the broadcasting at each station 720 provided on the line related to the operation management system 100.

FIG. 7A is a diagram showing an example of timetable information when the timetable change is approved. It is shown that the changed timetable 732 in which the current timetable 731 of the connected train is changed and the current timetable 733 of the connected train overlap (can be connected) for a predetermined time or more.

FIG. 7B is a diagram showing an example of timetable information when the timetable change is not approved. The current timetable 734 of the connected train is not updated to the changed timetable 735, indicating that the current timetable 734 and the current timetable 736 of the connecting train do not overlap (not connectable) for more than a predetermined time.

In the present embodiment, if it is determined in step S310 that the route B operation management device 130 is approved, the route B operation management device 130 transmits a guidance broadcast request to the effect that the connection is made to the passenger guidance device 710, and shifts the process to step S311. Upon receiving the guidance broadcast request indicating that the connection is to be made, the passenger guidance device 710 transmits an instruction to broadcast the connection to each station 720. At each station 720, it is broadcast that the connection will be made. If it is determined that the route B operation management device 130 has not been approved, the route B operation management device 130 transmits a guidance broadcast request to the effect that the connection is not made to the passenger guidance device 710, and ends the processing related to the connection. When the passenger guidance device 710 receives the guidance broadcast request that the connection is not made, it transmits an instruction to broadcast that the connection is not made to each station 720. At each station 720, it is broadcast that the connection will not be made. The above-mentioned processing may be performed by the integrated management device 110 instead of the route B operation management device 130.

According to this embodiment, since the broadcast to the effect that the train is connected or the broadcast to the effect that the train is not connected is performed at each station 720, the passenger immediately determines whether or not the train is connected. You will be able to judge. For example, when a passenger receives a broadcast that a train is not connected, he / she will be able to change the route and consider whether he / she can move to the target station.

(5) Other Embodiments In the above-described embodiment, the case where the present invention is applied to an operation management system has been described, but the present invention is not limited to this, and various other systems and devices are described. , Methods, can be widely applied to programs.

Further, in the above-described embodiment, in step S308, the case where the integrated management device 110 transmits the timetable change inquiry request to the route B operation management device 130 has been described, but the present invention is not limited to this, and in step S308, the present invention is not limited to this. , The integrated management device 110 may transmit the change timetable information calculated in step S307 to the route B operation management device 130 instead of the timetable change question request (the change timetable information also serves as a timetable change question request). It is also good.). Further, for example, in step S308, the integrated management device 110 may transmit the change timetable information calculated in step S307 and the timetable change inquiry request to the route B operation management device 130. Further, for example, in step S308, the integrated management device 110 may transmit the delay time calculated in step S303 and the timetable change inquiry request to the route B operation management device 130. Further, for example, in step S308, the integrated management device 110 may transmit the arrival prediction time and the departure prediction time calculated in step S305 and the timetable change inquiry request to the route B operation management device 130. By transmitting such information to the route B operation management device 130, the commander can accurately and quickly grasp and approve the situation.

Further, in the above-described embodiment, the case where the processing performed by the integrated management device 110 is performed by the route A operation management device 410 has been described, but the present invention is not limited to this, and the processing performed by the integrated management device 110 is not limited to this. May be performed by the route B operation management device 420.

In addition, the information such as programs, tables, and files that realize each function in the above description is a memory, a hard disk, a storage device such as an SSD (Solid State Drive), or a recording medium such as an IC card, an SD card, or a DVD. Can be placed in.

Further, the above-mentioned configuration may be appropriately changed, rearranged, combined, or omitted as long as it does not exceed the gist of the present invention.

According to the above-mentioned configuration, a highly reliable operation management system can be realized.

100 ... Operation management system, 110 ... Integrated management device, 120 ... Route A operation management device, 130 ... Route B operation management device.

Claims (3)

A train on the first line that is communicably connected to a first operation management device that manages the operation of trains on the first line and a second operation management device that manages the operation of trains on the second line. Equipped with an integrated management device that stores the implementation schedule information of the above and the implementation schedule information of the train on the second line.
When the first operation management device determines that there is a connecting train that is a train whose delay time exceeds a predetermined time based on the current timetable information and the actual timetable information, the current timetable information and the actual timetable of the connecting train. The timetable information is transmitted to the integrated management device,
The integrated management device identifies the connected train corresponding to the connected train based on the implementation timetable information of the connected train and the implementation timetable information of the second line, and the current timetable information of the specified connected train. And request the actual timetable information from the second operation management device,
The second operation management device transmits the current timetable information and the actual timetable information of the connected train to the integrated management device.
In the integrated management device, the connected train and the connected train are at a predetermined station based on the current timetable information and the actual timetable information of the connected train and the current timetable information and the actual timetable information of the connected train. If it is determined that the connection is not possible, the change timetable information of the connected train is calculated so that the stop time of the connected train and the stop time of the connected train overlap at the predetermined station for a predetermined time or more. , Send a timetable change question request to the second operation management device,
Upon receiving the timetable change inquiry request, the second operation management device determines whether or not approval has been given to change the current timetable information of the connected train via the user interface unit. When it is determined that the approval has been given, the changed timetable information is acquired from the integrated management device , the current timetable information is updated with the changed timetable information, and the operation of the connected train is performed according to the changed timetable information . to manage,
An operation management system characterized by this. The integrated management device determines whether or not the difference between the delay time of the connected train and the delay time of the connected train is within a predetermined time, and if it is determined that the difference is within the predetermined time, the integrated management device determines. Determining whether or not the connecting train and the connected train can be connected at the predetermined station.
The operation management system according to claim 1, wherein the operation management system is characterized in that. It is communicably connected to the passenger information system that controls the broadcasting of each station related to the first line and the second line.
When the second operation management device determines that the approval has been given, the second operation management device transmits an instruction to broadcast to the effect that the connecting train and the connected train are connected at the predetermined station to the passenger guidance device. If it is determined that the approval has not been given, an instruction to broadcast that the connecting train and the connected train are not connected at the predetermined station is transmitted to the passenger guidance device.
The operation management system according to claim 1, wherein the operation management system is characterized in that.

Images