Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP7246826B2 - Strength/Displacement Judgment Method and Strength/Displacement Judgment Program - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP7246826B2 - Strength/Displacement Judgment Method and Strength/Displacement Judgment Program - Google Patents

Strength/Displacement Judgment Method and Strength/Displacement Judgment Program Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP7246826B2
JP7246826B2 JP2018229389A JP2018229389A JP7246826B2 JP 7246826 B2 JP7246826 B2 JP 7246826B2 JP 2018229389 A JP2018229389 A JP 2018229389A JP 2018229389 A JP2018229389 A JP 2018229389A JP 7246826 B2 JP7246826 B2 JP 7246826B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
displacement
strength
determination
storage rack
graph
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2018229389A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2020091746A (en
Inventor
明紀 砂村
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Japan Radio Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Japan Radio Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Japan Radio Co Ltd filed Critical Japan Radio Co Ltd
Priority to JP2018229389A priority Critical patent/JP7246826B2/en
Publication of JP2020091746A publication Critical patent/JP2020091746A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP7246826B2 publication Critical patent/JP7246826B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Description

本発明は、収容架の任意の高さに任意の重量の機器を収容した場合に、所定の強度・変位を満たすか否かを判定する強度・変位判定方法および強度・変位判定プログラムに関する。 The present invention relates to a strength/displacement determination method and a strength/displacement determination program for determining whether a predetermined strength/displacement is satisfied when a device of any weight is accommodated at an arbitrary height of a storage rack.

ラックやキャビネットなどの収容架に各種の機器を収容する場合、その収容状態で所定の耐震強度などの強度・変位を満たすか否かを確認する必要がある。このような確認を行う場合、従来、機器の重量や収容高さが異なるごとに、応力や変位などが所定の許容値未満であるか否かを詳細に計算、解析していた。例えば、機器の重量が同じであっても、収容高さが異なる場合には、詳細な計算を行っていた。 When various types of equipment are stored in storage racks such as racks and cabinets, it is necessary to check whether or not the stored state satisfies a predetermined strength and displacement such as seismic strength. When performing such confirmation, conventionally, detailed calculations and analyzes have been made to determine whether or not the stress, displacement, etc. are less than a predetermined allowable value for each different weight and housing height of the device. For example, even if the weight of the equipment is the same, if the storage height is different, detailed calculations are performed.

また、重量などの条件の変化に対応し、建築物の実情にあった解析モデルにより、建築物の応答解析を行う建物耐震性評価システムが知られている(例えば、特許文献1参照。)。 There is also known a building seismic resistance evaluation system that performs response analysis of a building by using an analysis model that matches the actual situation of the building in response to changes in conditions such as weight (see, for example, Patent Document 1).

特開2014-16249号公報JP 2014-16249 A

しかしながら、従来、機器の重量や収容高さが異なるごとに、詳細な計算を行わなければならなかったため、時間と労力を要していた。しかも、多様な収容パターン(どの機器をどの高さに収容するかというパターン)を検討する場合、多くの収容パターンに対してそれぞれ詳細な計算を行わなければならず、多大な時間と労力を要していた。また、多くの計算を実施すれば、入力ミスや計算ミスが生じるおそれがある。一方、たとえ特許文献1に記載の建物耐震性評価システムを使用したとしても、各収容パターンに対して同様の評価を実施しなければならない。 However, conventionally, detailed calculations had to be performed for each different weight and housing height of the equipment, which required time and labor. Moreover, when considering various housing patterns (patterns of which devices are to be housed at what height), detailed calculations must be performed for each of the many housing patterns, requiring a great deal of time and effort. Was. In addition, if many calculations are performed, there is a risk of input errors or calculation errors. On the other hand, even if the building earthquake resistance evaluation system described in Patent Document 1 is used, the same evaluation must be performed for each accommodation pattern.

そこで本発明は、収容架に収容する機器の重量や収容高さが異なる場合であっても、所定の強度・変位を満たすか否かを容易かつ適正に判定可能にする、強度・変位判定方法および強度・変位判定プログラムを提供することを目的とする。 Therefore, the present invention provides a strength/displacement determination method that makes it possible to easily and properly determine whether a predetermined strength/displacement is satisfied even when the weight and height of the equipment stored in the storage rack are different. and to provide a strength/displacement determination program.

上記課題を解決するために、請求項に記載の発明は、複数の高さ位置に機器を収容可能な収容架に前記機器を収容した場合に、所定の強度・変位を満たすか否かを判定する強度・変位判定プログラムであって、コンピュータを、前記収容架に収容されるすべての機器の総重量と、該すべての機器を一体とみなした場合の重心の高さである総重心高さと、を座標軸とし、前記所定の強度・変位を満たすか否かの境界線を示す判定グラフを記憶するグラフ記憶手段と、前記収容架に収容するすべての機器の総重量と、該すべての機器の総重心高さとを算出する算出手段と、前記算出した値を前記判定グラフ上にプロットし、該値が前記境界線よりも小さいか否かによって前記所定の強度・変位を満たすか否かを判定する判定手段、として機能させることを特徴とする。 In order to solve the above-mentioned problems , the invention according to claim 1 determines whether or not predetermined strength and displacement are satisfied when the equipment is accommodated in a storage rack capable of accommodating the equipment at a plurality of height positions. A program for determining strength and displacement, in which a computer controls the total weight of all the devices housed in the storage rack and the height of the center of gravity when all the devices are regarded as a unit. , as a coordinate axis, a graph storage means for storing a judgment graph showing a boundary line indicating whether or not the predetermined strength and displacement are satisfied, the total weight of all the equipment to be accommodated in the storage rack, and the Calculation means for calculating the height of the total center of gravity, plotting the calculated value on the determination graph, and determining whether or not the predetermined strength/displacement is satisfied depending on whether or not the value is smaller than the boundary line It is characterized by functioning as determination means for

請求項に記載の発明は、請求項に記載の強度・変位判定プログラムにおいて、複数種の収容架に対する前記境界線が前記判定グラフに示され、前記判定手段は、前記算出した値を前記判定グラフ上にプロットし、前記算出した値よりも大きくかつ最も近い境界線の収容架を、最も適した収容架として選定する、ことを特徴とする。 The invention according to claim 2 is the strength/displacement determination program according to claim 1 , wherein the boundary line for a plurality of types of storage racks is shown in the determination graph, and the determination means determines the calculated value as the It is characterized by plotting it on a judgment graph and selecting a storage rack that is larger than the calculated value and closest to the boundary line as the most suitable storage rack.

請求項1に記載の発明によれば、収容架に収容するすべての機器の総重量と総重心高さとを算出し、算出した値を予め作成された判定グラフ上にプロットして、この値が境界線よりも小さいか否かによって所定の強度・変位を満たすか否かを判定すればよい。すなわち、比較的簡単に算出可能な総重量と総重心高さだけを算出して、その値を判定グラフ上にプロットするだけでよく、変位や応力などの詳細な計算を行う必要がない。このため、収容架に収容する機器の重量や収容高さが異なる場合であっても、所定の強度・変位を満たすか否かを容易かつ適正に判定することが可能となる。また、このような判定が自動で行われるため、より容易かつ適正に判定することが可能となる。 According to the first aspect of the invention, the total weight and the total center-of-gravity height of all the equipment to be accommodated in the rack are calculated, and the calculated values are plotted on a judgment graph prepared in advance. It may be determined whether or not the predetermined intensity/displacement is satisfied depending on whether or not it is smaller than the boundary line. That is, it is sufficient to calculate only the total weight and the total center-of-gravity height, which are relatively easily calculable, and plot the values on the determination graph, and there is no need to perform detailed calculations of displacement, stress, and the like. Therefore, even if the weight and height of the equipment to be housed in the housing rack are different, it is possible to easily and properly determine whether or not the predetermined strength and displacement are satisfied. In addition , since such determination is automatically performed, it is possible to make the determination more easily and appropriately.

請求項2に記載の発明によれば、算出した総重量と総重心高さとを、複数種の収容架に対する境界線が示された判定グラフ上にプロットし、算出した値よりも大きい境界線でかつ最も近い境界線の収容架を選定するだけで、適正な(強度に過不足がない)収容架を容易に選定することが可能となる。また、このような選定が自動で行われるため、より容易かつ適正に選定することが可能となる。

According to the invention of claim 2, the calculated total weight and total center-of-gravity height are plotted on a judgment graph showing boundary lines for a plurality of types of storage racks, and a boundary line larger than the calculated value is plotted. In addition, it is possible to easily select an appropriate storage rack (having sufficient strength) only by selecting the storage rack closest to the boundary line. Moreover , since such selection is automatically performed, it becomes possible to select more easily and appropriately.

この発明の実施の形態に係る強度・変位判定プログラムおよび強度・変位判定方法における判定グラフを示す図である。FIG. 4 is a diagram showing a determination graph in the strength/displacement determination program and strength/displacement determination method according to the embodiment of the present invention; この発明の実施の形態に係る強度・変位判定プログラムをインストールしたコンピュータの概略構成ブロック図である。1 is a schematic configuration block diagram of a computer installed with a strength/displacement determination program according to an embodiment of the present invention; FIG. 図2のコンピュータの算出部による算出方法を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the calculation method by the calculation part of the computer of FIG. 図2のコンピュータの算出部による算出結果を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the calculation result by the calculation part of the computer of FIG. 図2のコンピュータの判定部による判定方法を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the determination method by the determination part of the computer of FIG. この発明の実施の形態に係る強度・変位判定プログラムによる強度・変位判定方法を示すフローチャートである。4 is a flow chart showing a strength/displacement determination method by a strength/displacement determination program according to an embodiment of the present invention;

以下、この発明を図示の実施の形態に基づいて説明する。 BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION The present invention will be described below based on the illustrated embodiments.

図1~図6は、この発明の実施の形態を示し、図2は、この実施の形態に係る強度・変位判定プログラムをインストールしたコンピュータ1の概略構成ブロック図である。この強度・変位判定プログラムは、収容架2に機器(被収容体)3を収容した場合に、所定の強度・変位を満たすか否かを判定するプログラムであって、コンピュータを、グラフデータベース(グラフ記憶手段)13と、算出部(算出手段)14と、判定部(判定手段)15、として機能させる。 1 to 6 show an embodiment of the invention, and FIG. 2 is a schematic configuration block diagram of a computer 1 installed with a strength/displacement determination program according to this embodiment. This strength/displacement determination program is a program for determining whether or not a predetermined strength/displacement is satisfied when a device (object to be accommodated) 3 is accommodated in the storage rack 2. It functions as a storage means) 13 , a calculation part (calculation means) 14 , and a determination part (determination means) 15 .

ここで、収容架2は、金属製の自立するラックやキャビネットなどで、任意の複数の高さ位置に複数の機器3を収容可能となっている。また、この実施の形態で所定の強度(変位)とは、耐震に必要な強度であり、所定の加速度を上下左右に与えた場合の最大応力(変位)が、許容応力(変位)量以下であることを要するものとする。 Here, the storage rack 2 is a self-supporting rack or cabinet made of metal, and is capable of storing a plurality of devices 3 at a plurality of arbitrary height positions. In addition, the predetermined strength (displacement) in this embodiment is the strength required for earthquake resistance, and the maximum stress (displacement) when a predetermined acceleration is applied vertically and horizontally is less than the allowable stress (displacement) amount. shall require something.

図2に示す入力部11は、各種情報や指令を入力するためのインターフェイスであり、収容架2の種類・型式や機器3の種類・重量、収容高さなどが入力される。表示部12は、各種情報や画像を表示するディスプレイであり、後述する判定グラフGや判定部15による判定結果などを表示する。 The input unit 11 shown in FIG. 2 is an interface for inputting various kinds of information and commands, and inputs the type/model of the storage rack 2, the type/weight of the equipment 3, the storage height, and the like. The display unit 12 is a display that displays various types of information and images, and displays a determination graph G, which will be described later, a determination result by the determination unit 15, and the like.

グラフデータベース13は、判定グラフGを記憶するデータベースである。判定グラフGとは、図1に示すように、収容架2に収容されるすべての機器3の総重量と、このすべての機器3を一体とみなした場合の重心の高さである総重心高さと、を座標軸とし、所定の強度・変位を満たすか否かの境界線L1~L4を示すグラフである。すなわち、全機器3の総重量(装備総重量)を横軸とし、全機器3を一体とみなした場合の総重心高さを縦軸とした座標(重量vs重心高さの座標)上に、所定の強度・変位を満たす総重量と総重心高さの値と満たさない値との堺を示す境界線L1~L4が図示されたグラフである。 The graph database 13 is a database that stores the judgment graph G. FIG. The determination graph G is, as shown in FIG. 2 is a graph showing boundary lines L1 to L4 indicating whether or not a predetermined intensity/displacement is satisfied, with , and , as coordinate axes. That is, on the coordinates (coordinates of weight vs. center of gravity height) where the horizontal axis is the total weight (total equipment weight) of all the devices 3 and the vertical axis is the total height of the center of gravity when all the devices 3 are regarded as one unit, 4 is a graph showing boundary lines L1 to L4 indicating boundaries between values of total weight and total height of the center of gravity that satisfy predetermined strength and displacement and values that do not satisfy the predetermined strength and displacement.

この実施の形態では、複数の種類・型式、大きさの収容架2に対する境界線L1~L4が同じ判定グラフGに示されている。ここで、例えば、第1の境界線L1が最も大きく高強度な収容架2の境界線であり、第4の境界線L4が最も小さい収容架2の境界線である。また、この実施の形態では、総重量と総重心高さを対数表示すること、つまり両対数グラフにすることで、境界線L1~L4が直線となっている。このような境界線L1~L4は、予めCAE(Computer Aided Engineering)などで解析することで作成されている。 In this embodiment, the same determination graph G shows boundary lines L1 to L4 for storage racks 2 of a plurality of types, types, and sizes. Here, for example, the first boundary line L1 is the boundary line of the storage rack 2 that is the largest and has the highest strength, and the fourth boundary line L4 is the boundary line of the storage rack 2 that is the smallest. In this embodiment, the boundary lines L1 to L4 are straight lines by displaying the total weight and the total center-of-gravity height logarithmically, that is, by using a double logarithmic graph. Such boundary lines L1 to L4 are created in advance by analysis using CAE (Computer Aided Engineering) or the like.

算出部14は、中央処理部16で起動され、収容架2に収容するすべての機器3の総重量と、このすべての機器3の総重心高さとを算出するタスク・プログラムである。すなわち、入力部11で入力された機器3の種類・重量、収容高さに基づいて、総重量と総重心高さとを算出する。例えば、図3に示すように、第1の機器3の重量がm1で収容高さがh1、第2の機器3の重量がm2で収容高さがh2、第3の機器3の重量がm3で収容高さがh3とする。この場合、総重量Mと総重心高さh0を次の式に従って算出する。
総重量M=m1+m2+m3
総重心高さh0=(m1×h1+m2×h2+m3×h3)÷(m1+m2+m3)
この結果、図4に示すように、重量がMの機器3が、収容架2の収容高さh0の位置に収容されていると同視される。
The calculation unit 14 is a task program activated by the central processing unit 16 to calculate the total weight of all the equipment 3 accommodated in the rack 2 and the total height of the center of gravity of all the equipment 3 . That is, the total weight and the total center-of-gravity height are calculated based on the type, weight, and housing height of the device 3 input by the input unit 11 . For example, as shown in FIG. 3, the first device 31 has a weight of m1 and a housing height of h1, the second device 32 has a weight of m2 and a housing height of h2, and the third device 33 has a weight of m2 and a housing height of h2 . Assume that the weight is m3 and the storage height is h3. In this case, the total weight M and total center-of-gravity height h0 are calculated according to the following equations.
Gross weight M = m1 + m2 + m3
Total center of gravity height h0 = (m1 x h1 + m2 x h2 + m3 x h3) ÷ (m1 + m2 + m3)
As a result, as shown in FIG. 4, the device 30 having a weight of M is assumed to be housed in the housing rack 2 at the housing height h0.

判定部15は、中央処理部16で起動され、算出部14で算出した総重量と総重心高さの値を、グラフデータベース13の判定グラフG上にプロットし、この値が境界線Lよりも小さいか否かによって所定の強度・変位を満たすか否かを判定するタスク・プログラムである。すなわち、算出部14で算出した値を図5に示すような判定グラフG上にプロットし、境界線Lよりも小さいOK領域に位置するのか、境界線Lよりも大きいNG領域に位置するのかを判定する。例えば、図中白丸で示すように、総重量と総重心高さの値がOK領域に位置する場合には、所定の強度・変位を満たすと判定し、図中黒丸で示すように、総重量と総重心高さの値がNG領域に位置する場合には、所定の強度・変位を満たないと判定する。 The determination unit 15 is activated by the central processing unit 16 and plots the values of the total weight and the total center-of-gravity height calculated by the calculation unit 14 on the determination graph G of the graph database 13. It is a task program that determines whether or not a predetermined strength/displacement is satisfied depending on whether or not it is small. That is, the values calculated by the calculator 14 are plotted on a judgment graph G as shown in FIG. judge. For example, when the values of the total weight and the total center-of-gravity height are in the OK range, as indicated by the white circles in the figure, it is determined that the predetermined strength and displacement are satisfied. and the value of the total center-of-gravity height are in the NG region, it is determined that the predetermined strength and displacement are not satisfied.

また、判定部15は、算出部14で算出した総重量と総重心高さの値を判定グラフG上にプロットし、算出した値よりも大きくかつ最も近い境界線Lの収容架2を、最も適した収容架2として選定する。すなわち、図1に示すように、複数の種類・型式、大きさの収容架2に対する境界線L1~L4が判定グラフGに示されている場合、算出部14で算出した値よりも大きくかつ最も近い境界線L1~L4の収容架2を、強度に過不足がない最も適した収容架2として選定する。 In addition, the determination unit 15 plots the values of the total weight and the total center-of-gravity height calculated by the calculation unit 14 on the determination graph G, and selects the accommodation rack 2 having the boundary line L that is larger than and closest to the calculated value as the closest. A suitable storage rack 2 is selected. That is, as shown in FIG. 1, when boundary lines L1 to L4 for storage racks 2 of a plurality of types, types, and sizes are shown in the determination graph G, the value calculated by the calculation unit 14 is larger and the most The accommodation racks 2 on the near boundary lines L1 to L4 are selected as the most suitable accommodation racks 2 that are neither excessive nor deficient in strength.

例えば、算出部14で算出した値がP1の場合、P1よりも大きい境界線L1、L2のうち、P1に最も近い第2の境界線L2の収容架2を最も適した収容架2として選定する。同様に、算出部14で算出した値がP2の場合、第1の境界線L1の収容架2を最も適した収容架2として選定し、算出部14で算出した値がP3の場合、第3の境界線L3の収容架2を最も適した収容架2として選定する。 For example, when the value calculated by the calculation unit 14 is P1, the storage rack 2 of the second boundary line L2 closest to P1 among the boundary lines L1 and L2 larger than P1 is selected as the most suitable storage rack 2. . Similarly, when the value calculated by the calculation unit 14 is P2, the storage rack 2 on the first boundary line L1 is selected as the most suitable storage rack 2, and when the value calculated by the calculation unit 14 is P3, the third The storage rack 2 on the boundary line L3 of is selected as the most suitable storage rack 2 .

次に、このような強度・変位判定プログラムの作用および強度・変位判定プログラムによる強度・変位判定方法などについて、図6のフローチャートに従って説明する。 Next, the operation of such a strength/displacement determination program and the strength/displacement determination method by the strength/displacement determination program will be described with reference to the flow chart of FIG.

まず、収容架2の種類・型式や収容する機器3の種類・重量、収容高さなどのパラメータが、入力部11で入力されると(ステップS1)、算出部14によって全機器3の総重量と総重心高さとを算出する(ステップS2)。ここで、パラメータの入力方法として、重量や収容高さなどを数値で入力してもよいし、収容架2への機器3の収容状態を示す図面を入力したりしてもよい。また、第2の境界線L2の収容架2が指定、入力されたものとして、以下に説明する。 First, when parameters such as the type/model of the storage rack 2 and the type/weight and storage height of the equipment 3 to be stored are input by the input unit 11 (step S1), the calculation unit 14 calculates the total weight of all the equipment 3. and the total center-of-gravity height are calculated (step S2). Here, as a method of inputting the parameters, numerical values such as the weight and the storage height may be input, or a drawing showing the storage state of the equipment 3 in the storage rack 2 may be input. Further, the following description assumes that the storage rack 2 on the second boundary line L2 is designated and input.

次に、算出した総重量と総重心高さの値を、判定部15によって判定グラフG上にプロットし(ステップS3)、この値が指定された収容架2の第2の境界線L2よりも小さいか否か、つまり、所定の強度・変位を満たすか否かを判定する(ステップS4)。そして、所定の強度・変位を満たす場合(ステップS4で「Y」の場合)、第2の境界線L2の収容架2よりも小さい収容架2でも所定の強度・変位を満たすか否かを判定する(ステップS5)。つまり、算出した値よりも大きくかつ最も近い境界線L1~L4が、第2の境界線L2であるか否かを判定する。 Next, the values of the calculated total weight and total center-of-gravity height are plotted on the determination graph G by the determining unit 15 (step S3), and the values are plotted on the second boundary line L2 of the designated storage rack 2. It is determined whether or not it is small, that is, whether or not a predetermined strength/displacement is satisfied (step S4). If the predetermined strength/displacement is satisfied (“Y” in step S4), it is determined whether or not the storage rack 2 smaller than the storage rack 2 on the second boundary line L2 also satisfies the predetermined strength/displacement. (step S5). That is, it is determined whether or not the boundary lines L1 to L4 that are larger and closest to the calculated value are the second boundary line L2.

例えば、算出部14で算出した値がP1の場合、P1よりも大きくかつ最も近い境界線L1~L4は第2の境界線L2である。このため、第2の境界線L2の収容架2よりも小さい収容架2では所定の強度・変位を満たさないため(ステップS5で「N」のため)、指定された第2の境界線L2の収容架2が最も適している、という判定結果を表示部12に表示する(ステップS6)。また、算出部14で算出した値がP3の場合、P3よりも大きくかつ最も近い境界線L1~L4は第3の境界線L3である。このため、第2の境界線L2の収容架2よりも小さい収容架2でも所定の強度・変位を満たすため(ステップS5で「Y」のため)、指定された第2の境界線L2の収容架2で所定の強度・変位を満たすが、第3の境界線L3の収容架2が最も適している、という判定結果を表示部12に表示する(ステップS7)。 For example, when the value calculated by the calculator 14 is P1, the boundary lines L1 to L4 that are larger and closest to P1 are the second boundary line L2. Therefore, since the storage rack 2 smaller than the storage rack 2 of the second boundary line L2 does not satisfy the predetermined strength and displacement (because of "N" in step S5), the specified second boundary line L2 The judgment result that the storage rack 2 is the most suitable is displayed on the display unit 12 (step S6). Further, when the value calculated by the calculation unit 14 is P3, the boundary lines L1 to L4 that are larger and closest to P3 are the third boundary line L3. For this reason, in order to satisfy the predetermined strength and displacement even with the accommodation rack 2 smaller than the accommodation rack 2 of the second boundary line L2 (because of "Y" in step S5), the accommodation of the designated second boundary line L2 The display unit 12 displays the determination result that the rack 2 satisfies the predetermined strength and displacement, but the storage rack 2 on the third boundary line L3 is the most suitable (step S7).

一方、指定された収容架2では所定の強度・変位を満たさない場合(ステップS4で「N」の場合)、所定の強度・変位を満たす境界線L1~L4の収容架2を選出する(ステップS8)。すなわち、算出部14で算出した値よりも大きくかつ最も近い境界線L1~L4の収容架2を選出する。例えば、算出部14で算出した値がP2の場合、P2よりも大きくかつ最も近い第1の境界線L1の収容架2を選出する。そして、指定された第2の境界線L2の収容架2では所定の強度・変位を満たさず、第1の境界線L1の収容架2で所定の強度・変位を満たす、という判定結果を表示部12に表示する(ステップS9)。 On the other hand, if the designated storage rack 2 does not satisfy the predetermined strength/displacement ("N" in step S4), the storage racks 2 of boundary lines L1 to L4 that satisfy the predetermined strength/displacement are selected (step S8). That is, the storage racks 2 on the boundary lines L1 to L4 that are larger than and closest to the value calculated by the calculator 14 are selected. For example, if the value calculated by the calculator 14 is P2, the storage rack 2 on the first boundary line L1 that is larger than and closest to P2 is selected. Then, the display unit displays the determination result that the storage rack 2 on the specified second boundary line L2 does not satisfy the predetermined strength and displacement, and the storage rack 2 on the first boundary line L1 satisfies the predetermined strength and displacement. 12 (step S9).

以上のように、この強度・変位判定プログラムおよび強度・変位判定方法によれば、収容架2に収容するすべての機器3の総重量と総重心高さとを算出し、算出した値を予め作成された判定グラフG上にプロットして、この値が境界線Lよりも小さいか否かによって所定の強度・変位を満たすか否かを判定すればよい。すなわち、比較的簡単に算出可能な総重量と総重心高さだけを算出して、その値を判定グラフG上にプロットするだけでよく、変位や応力などの詳細な計算を行う必要がない。このため、収容架2に収容する機器3の重量や収容高さが異なる場合であっても、所定の強度・変位を満たすか否かを容易かつ適正に判定することが可能となる。しかも、強度・変位判定プログラムを使用することで、パラメータを入力するだけで、このような判定が自動で行われるため、より容易かつ適正に判定することが可能となる。 As described above, according to this strength/displacement determination program and strength/displacement determination method, the total weight and the total center-of-gravity height of all the devices 3 accommodated in the rack 2 are calculated, and the calculated values are prepared in advance. It may be determined whether or not the predetermined intensity/displacement is satisfied depending on whether or not this value is smaller than the boundary line L. That is, it suffices to calculate only the total weight and the total center-of-gravity height, which are relatively easily calculable, and plot the values on the determination graph G, without the need for detailed calculations of displacement, stress, and the like. Therefore, even if the equipment 3 accommodated in the accommodation rack 2 has different weights and accommodation heights, it is possible to easily and properly determine whether or not the predetermined strength and displacement are satisfied. Moreover, by using the strength/displacement determination program, such determination is automatically performed by simply inputting the parameters, making it possible to perform the determination more easily and appropriately.

また、算出した総重量と総重心高さとを、複数種の収容架2に対する境界線L1~L4が示された判定グラフG上にプロットし、算出した値よりも大きい境界線L1~L4でかつ最も近い境界線L1~L4の収容架2を選定するだけで、適正な(強度に過不足がない)収容架2を容易に選定することが可能となる。しかも、強度・変位判定プログラムを使用することで、パラメータを入力するだけで、このような選定が自動で行われるため、より容易かつ適正に選定することが可能となる。 In addition, the calculated total weight and total center of gravity height are plotted on a judgment graph G showing boundary lines L1 to L4 for a plurality of types of storage racks 2, and boundary lines L1 to L4 larger than the calculated value and Only by selecting the storage racks 2 of the nearest boundary lines L1 to L4, it is possible to easily select the storage racks 2 that are appropriate (the strength is neither too much nor too little). Moreover, by using the strength/displacement judging program, such selection is automatically performed only by inputting the parameters, making it possible to make the selection more easily and appropriately.

ここで、上記の実施の形態では、強度・変位判定プログラムを使用した強度・変位判定方法について説明したが、人手による強度・変位判定方法であってもよい。すなわち、判定グラフGを予め作成し、収容架2に収容するすべての機器3の総重量と総重心高さとを算出する。そして、算出した値を判定グラフG上にプロットし、この値が境界線Lよりも小さいか否かによって所定の強度・変位を満たすか否かを判定する。この際、判定グラフGに複数の境界線L1~L4が示されている場合に、算出した値よりも大きくかつ最も近い境界線L1~L4の収容架2を、最も適した収容架2として選定する。 Here, although the strength/displacement determination method using the strength/displacement determination program has been described in the above embodiment, the strength/displacement determination method may be a manual strength/displacement determination method. That is, the judgment graph G is created in advance, and the total weight and the total center-of-gravity height of all the devices 3 accommodated in the rack 2 are calculated. Then, the calculated value is plotted on the determination graph G, and whether or not the value is smaller than the boundary line L determines whether or not the predetermined strength/displacement is satisfied. At this time, when a plurality of boundary lines L1 to L4 are shown in the determination graph G, the storage rack 2 having the boundary lines L1 to L4 that are larger and closest to the calculated value is selected as the most suitable storage rack 2. do.

以上、この発明の実施の形態について説明したが、具体的な構成は、上記の実施の形態に限られるものではなく、この発明の要旨を逸脱しない範囲の設計の変更等があっても、この発明に含まれる。例えば、上記の実施の形態では、複数の境界線L1~L4をひとつの判定グラフGに示しているが、複数の判定グラフGに示してもよい。また、所定の強度・変位がある規定の耐震強度の場合について説明したが、規定が異なる複数の所定の強度・変位に対して適用してもよく、この場合、各規定に対して境界線を設ければよい。 Although the embodiments of the present invention have been described above, the specific configuration is not limited to the above-described embodiments. Included in the invention. For example, in the above embodiment, a plurality of boundary lines L1 to L4 are shown in one judgment graph G, but they may be shown in a plurality of judgment graphs G. FIG. In addition, although the case of prescribed seismic resistance with prescribed strength and displacement has been explained, it may be applied to multiple prescribed strengths and displacements with different regulations. should be provided.

1 コンピュータ
2 収容架
3 機器
13 グラフデータベース(グラフ記憶手段)
14 算出部(算出手段)
15 判定部(判定手段)
G 判定グラフ
L、L1~L4 境界線
P1~P3 算出した値
1 computer 2 storage rack 3 equipment 13 graph database (graph storage means)
14 calculation unit (calculation means)
15 Determination unit (determination means)
G Judgment graph L, L1 to L4 Boundary line P1 to P3 Calculated value

Claims (2)

複数の高さ位置に機器を収容可能な収容架に前記機器を収容した場合に、所定の強度・変位を満たすか否かを判定する強度・変位判定プログラムであって、コンピュータを、
前記収容架に収容されるすべての機器の総重量と、該すべての機器を一体とみなした場合の重心の高さである総重心高さと、を座標軸とし、前記所定の強度・変位を満たすか否かの境界線を示す判定グラフを記憶するグラフ記憶手段と、
前記収容架に収容するすべての機器の総重量と、該すべての機器の総重心高さとを算出する算出手段と、
前記算出した値を前記判定グラフ上にプロットし、該値が前記境界線よりも小さいか否かによって前記所定の強度・変位を満たすか否かを判定する判定手段、
として機能させることを特徴とする強度・変位判定プログラム。
A strength/displacement determination program for determining whether a predetermined strength/displacement is satisfied when the device is stored in a storage rack capable of storing the device at a plurality of height positions, the computer comprising:
Whether the predetermined strength and displacement are satisfied with the total weight of all the devices housed in the storage rack and the height of the center of gravity when all the devices are regarded as one as a coordinate axis. Graph storage means for storing a judgment graph showing the boundary line of whether or not
a calculation means for calculating the total weight of all the devices housed in the storage rack and the total center-of-gravity height of all the devices;
Determination means for plotting the calculated value on the determination graph and determining whether the predetermined intensity/displacement is satisfied based on whether the value is smaller than the boundary line;
A strength/displacement determination program characterized by functioning as
複数種の収容架に対する前記境界線が前記判定グラフに示され、
前記判定手段は、前記算出した値を前記判定グラフ上にプロットし、前記算出した値よりも大きくかつ最も近い境界線の収容架を、最も適した収容架として選定する、
ことを特徴とする請求項に記載の強度・変位判定プログラム。
The boundary lines for multiple types of storage racks are shown in the determination graph,
The determination means plots the calculated value on the determination graph, and selects the storage rack that is larger than the calculated value and closest to the boundary line as the most suitable storage rack.
The strength/displacement determination program according to claim 1 , characterized by:
JP2018229389A 2018-12-06 2018-12-06 Strength/Displacement Judgment Method and Strength/Displacement Judgment Program Active JP7246826B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2018229389A JP7246826B2 (en) 2018-12-06 2018-12-06 Strength/Displacement Judgment Method and Strength/Displacement Judgment Program

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2018229389A JP7246826B2 (en) 2018-12-06 2018-12-06 Strength/Displacement Judgment Method and Strength/Displacement Judgment Program

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2020091746A JP2020091746A (en) 2020-06-11
JP7246826B2 true JP7246826B2 (en) 2023-03-28

Family

ID=71013806

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2018229389A Active JP7246826B2 (en) 2018-12-06 2018-12-06 Strength/Displacement Judgment Method and Strength/Displacement Judgment Program

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7246826B2 (en)

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2002351934A (en) 2001-05-29 2002-12-06 Uchida Yoko Co Ltd Office equipment selection support method and apparatus
JP2009059221A (en) 2007-08-31 2009-03-19 Kozo Keikaku Engineering Inc Design simulation system, design simulation method, design simulation program, and recording medium
JP2009145994A (en) 2007-12-11 2009-07-02 Toshiba It Service Kk Rack seismic system
JP2009268509A (en) 2008-04-30 2009-11-19 Ohbayashi Corp Determining device of possibility of failure of fixed fitting, creating device of attaching plan of fixed fitting, determining method of possibility failure of fixed fitting, creating method of attaching plan of fixed fitting

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2002351934A (en) 2001-05-29 2002-12-06 Uchida Yoko Co Ltd Office equipment selection support method and apparatus
JP2009059221A (en) 2007-08-31 2009-03-19 Kozo Keikaku Engineering Inc Design simulation system, design simulation method, design simulation program, and recording medium
JP2009145994A (en) 2007-12-11 2009-07-02 Toshiba It Service Kk Rack seismic system
JP2009268509A (en) 2008-04-30 2009-11-19 Ohbayashi Corp Determining device of possibility of failure of fixed fitting, creating device of attaching plan of fixed fitting, determining method of possibility failure of fixed fitting, creating method of attaching plan of fixed fitting

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2020091746A (en) 2020-06-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN107481311B (en) 3D city model rendering method and device
US10207904B2 (en) Crane, particularly crawler crane or mobile crane
JP2006323538A (en) Anomaly monitoring system and anomaly monitoring method
CN109707365B (en) Method and device for displaying hole-forming animation of rotary drilling rig and rotary drilling rig
JP5197640B2 (en) Machining simulation apparatus and numerical control apparatus
JP7312637B2 (en) Crane planning support system
JP7477086B2 (en) Design Support Equipment
KR20120064130A (en) Construction process creation system and construction process creation method
KR20190090926A (en) Vitual Construction Simulation Method
JP2016197013A (en) Building damage intensity estimating system and method
JP2016177466A (en) Temporary scaffolding planning support system
JP2016020841A (en) Noises and/or vibrations monitoring method and monitoring system
JP6963275B2 (en) Building damage estimation system and method
JP7246826B2 (en) Strength/Displacement Judgment Method and Strength/Displacement Judgment Program
JP2016197014A (en) Building damage estimation system and method
CN116675116B (en) Crane design control method, device, computing equipment and storage medium
EP2631727B1 (en) Multivalue bar graph displays and methods of implementing same
JP6746348B2 (en) Method and device for identifying building stiffness of a building
JP6544989B2 (en) Plant construction process change impact assessment device
CN105814862B (en) The visual communication based on weight of the entry of process control objects is indicated in Process Control System
JP5179084B2 (en) Building structural margin setting support system
JP7297209B2 (en) Swing index value calculation method, sway index value calculation device, and sway index value calculation program
CN109728563B (en) Multi-set principle checking method and device for on-line checking of fixed value
KR20130070979A (en) Method for platform modeling
JP6987484B1 (en) Scaffolding material simple calculation system and scaffolding material simple calculation method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20211201

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20221208

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20221227

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20230215

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20230314

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20230314

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 7246826

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150