JP7399446B2 - Exercise support systems and programs - Google Patents

Description

The present invention relates to an exercise support system and program.

Patent Document 1 discloses a training support system that creates a training menu based on exercise information such as burned calories and physical information such as heart rate.

Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2017-148177

For example, a training menu may be created based on the user's target calorie consumption and the user's physical condition. However, in this case, the menu may be created without considering the actions that the user can perform.

An object of the present invention is to provide information regarding exercise based on the user's movements.

The invention according to claim 1 provides an acquisition means for acquiring an evaluation of a user's movement, and an acquisition means for acquiring an evaluation of a user's movement; output means for outputting exercise information indicating a name of an exercise whose relationship with a part used for the movement satisfies a predetermined first condition; There is a specific evaluation that is an evaluation, and among the plurality of movements, there is at least a specific movement whose relationship with the specific part satisfies the first condition, and the output means is configured to perform the specific evaluation specified from the specific evaluation. Limiting the output of the exercise information related to the specific exercise associated with the level whose relationship with the level of movement of the part does not satisfy a second condition defined regarding the user's aptitude for exercise, and determining the specific evaluation. outputting the exercise information related to the specific exercise associated with the level that satisfies the second condition with respect to the level of movement of the specific part specified from the above; There is a first movement and a second movement associated with a higher level than the first movement, and the specific evaluation includes at least the first evaluation and a second movement with a higher level of evaluation than the first movement. There is a high second evaluation, and the level identified from the first evaluation is such that the relationship with the level associated with the first movement satisfies the second condition and the level is associated with the second movement. The level associated with the second exercise does not satisfy the second condition, and the level identified from the second evaluation is an exercise whose relationship with the level associated with the second exercise satisfies the second condition. It is a support system.
The invention according to claim 2 provides an acquisition means for acquiring an evaluation of a user's movement, and an acquisition unit that acquires an evaluation of a user's movement, and the movement that is the target of the evaluation among a plurality of movements, each of which is associated with a predetermined level regarding the content of the movement. outputting means for outputting exercise information indicating the aptitude of the user for exercise whose relationship with the body parts used for the exercise satisfies a predetermined first condition; There is a specific evaluation that is an evaluation of a movement, and among the plurality of movements, there is at least a certain movement whose relationship with the specific part satisfies the first condition, and the level of the movement specified from the specific evaluation. The relationship with the level specified from the specific evaluation satisfies the second condition rather than the exercise information related to the specific exercise with which the level is associated. The exercise information related to the specific exercise with which the level is associated indicates that the aptitude is higher, and the specific exercise includes at least a first exercise and a higher aptitude than the first exercise. The specific evaluation includes at least a first evaluation and a second evaluation having a higher level of evaluation than the first evaluation, and the specific evaluation includes a second evaluation with a higher level of evaluation than the first evaluation. The level associated with the first movement satisfies the second condition, and the level associated with the second movement does not satisfy the second condition. , the level specified from the second evaluation is an exercise support system in which a relationship with the level associated with the second exercise satisfies the second condition .
The invention according to claim 3 provides an acquisition means for acquiring an evaluation of a user's movement, and the movement that is the target of the evaluation among a plurality of movements, each of which is associated with a predetermined level regarding the content of the movement. an output means for outputting exercise information indicating a priority of a proposed exercise based on the aptitude of the user for an exercise whose relationship with a body part used for the exercise satisfies a predetermined first condition; , there is at least a specific evaluation that is an evaluation of the movement of a specific part of the user, and among the plurality of exercises there is at least a specific exercise whose relationship with the specific part satisfies the first condition, and the specific evaluation The level specified from the specific evaluation is more important than the exercise information related to the specific exercise to which the level does not satisfy the predetermined second condition. The exercise information related to the specific exercise associated with the level that satisfies the second condition is given a higher priority, and the specific exercise includes at least the first exercise and the first exercise. , and a second exercise associated with a higher level than the first exercise, and the specific evaluation includes at least the first evaluation and a second evaluation whose evaluation level is higher than the first evaluation. The level identified from the first evaluation has a relationship with the level associated with the first movement that satisfies the second condition, and the level identified from the first evaluation satisfies the second condition. does not satisfy the second condition, and the level specified from the second evaluation is an exercise support system in which the relationship with the level associated with the second exercise satisfies the second condition. .
In the invention according to claim 4 , the first evaluation and the second evaluation are evaluations of a first motion of the specific part, and the evaluation for the user includes at least a first motion different from the first motion. There is further evaluation of two movements, and the output means outputs the exercise information in a manner according to the relationship between the level associated with the exercise, the evaluation of the first movement , and the evaluation of the second movement. 4. The exercise support system according to claim 1, wherein the exercise support system outputs the following .
The invention according to claim 5 is characterized in that the acquisition means acquires attribute information regarding attributes of the user, and the output means outputs the exercise information in a manner according to the attribute information . This is an exercise support system described in .
The invention according to claim 6 includes an acquisition means for acquiring an evaluation of a user's movement, and an output means for outputting information regarding exercise targeted at the user in a manner according to the evaluation, The evaluation includes at least a first evaluation that is an evaluation of a first movement of a specific part, and a second evaluation that is an evaluation of a second movement different from the first movement, and the first evaluation includes: , there is at least a first first evaluation and a second first evaluation having a higher evaluation level than the first first evaluation, and the second evaluation includes at least a first second evaluation. and a second second evaluation having a higher evaluation level than the first second evaluation, and the exercise includes at least a relationship with the body part used in the first movement and a second evaluation. There is a specific movement that satisfies predetermined conditions in relation to the parts used, and when the second first evaluation is acquired by the acquisition means, the output means is configured to perform an exercise related to the specific movement when the second first evaluation is acquired by the acquisition means. When information is output in a first manner and the acquisition means acquires the second first evaluation and the first second evaluation, the information regarding the specific exercise is output in a first manner different from the first aspect. This is an exercise support system that provides output in two ways .
The invention according to claim 7 provides a computer with a function of obtaining an evaluation of a user's movement, and a function of obtaining an evaluation target of a plurality of exercises, each of which is associated with a predetermined level regarding the content of the exercise. an output function that outputs exercise information indicating the name of an exercise whose relationship with a part used in the certain movement satisfies a predetermined first condition; There is a specific evaluation that is an evaluation of the movement of the user, and among the plurality of movements there is at least a specific movement whose relationship with the specific part satisfies the first condition, and the output function is specified from the specific evaluation. restricting the output of the exercise information related to the specific exercise associated with the level whose relationship with the level of movement of the specific part does not satisfy a second condition defined regarding the user's aptitude for exercise; outputting the exercise information related to the specific exercise associated with the level whose relationship with the level of movement of the specific part specified from the specific evaluation satisfies the second condition; There is at least a first exercise and a second exercise that is associated with a higher level than the first exercise, and the specific evaluation includes at least the first evaluation and the second exercise that is higher than the first exercise. There is a second evaluation in which the level is high, and the level specified from the first evaluation is such that the relationship with the level associated with the first movement satisfies the second condition, and the second evaluation has a high level. The level associated with the second movement does not satisfy the second condition, and the level identified from the second evaluation has a relationship with the level associated with the second movement that does not satisfy the second condition. It is a program that satisfies you .
The invention according to claim 8 provides a computer with a function of obtaining an evaluation of a user's movement, and a target of the evaluation among a plurality of exercises, each of which is associated with a predetermined level regarding the content of the exercise. an output function that outputs exercise information indicating the user's aptitude for exercise whose relationship with the body part used in the movement satisfies a predetermined first condition; There is a specific evaluation that is an evaluation of the movement of a specific part, and among the plurality of movements there is at least a certain movement whose relationship with the specific part satisfies the first condition, and the movement is specified from the specific evaluation. The relationship with the level specified from the specific evaluation is more important than the exercise information related to the specific exercise with which the level is associated which does not satisfy the predetermined second condition. The exercise information related to the specific exercise associated with the level that satisfies the condition is shown to have a higher aptitude, and the specific exercise includes at least a first exercise and more than the first exercise. There is a second exercise associated with a higher level, and the specific evaluation includes at least a first evaluation and a second evaluation whose evaluation level is higher than the first evaluation, and the specific evaluation includes at least a first evaluation and a second evaluation whose evaluation level is higher than the first evaluation. The level identified from the evaluation has a relationship with the level associated with the first exercise that satisfies the second condition, and a relationship with the level associated with the second exercise that satisfies the second condition. The level specified from the second evaluation is a program in which the relationship with the level associated with the second exercise satisfies the second condition .
The invention according to claim 9 provides a computer with a function of acquiring an evaluation of a user's movement, and a target of the evaluation among a plurality of exercises, each of which is associated with a predetermined level regarding the content of the exercise. an output function for outputting exercise information indicating a priority of a proposal for the exercise based on the user's aptitude for the exercise that satisfies a predetermined first condition in relation to the body part used for the movement; The evaluation includes at least a specific evaluation that is an evaluation of the movement of a specific part of the user, and the plurality of exercises includes at least a specific exercise whose relationship with the specific part satisfies the first condition, The relationship with the level of the movement specified from the specific evaluation does not satisfy a predetermined second condition.It is specified from the specific evaluation rather than the exercise information related to the specific exercise with which the level is associated. The exercise information related to the specific exercise associated with the level whose relationship with the level satisfies the second condition is shown to have a higher priority, and the specific exercise has at least the first and a second movement that is associated with a higher level than the first movement, and the specific evaluation includes at least a first evaluation and a second movement that has a higher level of evaluation than the first evaluation. There is a second evaluation, and the level identified from the first evaluation is such that the relationship with the level associated with the first movement satisfies the second condition and the level is associated with the second movement. The level identified from the second evaluation is a program in which the relationship with the level does not satisfy the second condition, and the level identified from the second evaluation is such that the relationship with the level associated with the second exercise satisfies the second condition. be.
In the invention according to claim 10 , the first evaluation and the second evaluation are evaluations of a first motion of the specific part, and the evaluation for the user includes at least a first motion different from the first motion. There is further evaluation of two movements, and the output function outputs the exercise information in a manner according to the relationship between the level associated with the exercise, the evaluation of the first movement , and the evaluation of the second movement. The program according to any one of claims 7 to 9, which outputs.
The invention according to claim 11 allows the computer to further realize a function of acquiring attribute information regarding the attributes of the user, and the output function is configured to perform the output function according to the relationship between the level associated with the exercise and the attribute information. 10. The program according to claim 9, wherein the exercise information is output in a manner according to the present invention.
The invention according to claim 12 allows a computer to realize a function of acquiring an evaluation of a user's movement, and an output function of outputting information regarding an exercise targeted at the user in a manner according to the evaluation. , the evaluation for the user includes at least a first evaluation that is an evaluation of a first movement of a specific part, and a second evaluation that is an evaluation of a second movement different from the first movement; The evaluation includes at least a first first evaluation and a second first evaluation having a higher evaluation level than the first first evaluation, and the second evaluation includes at least the first evaluation. There is a second evaluation and a second second evaluation having a higher level of evaluation than the first second evaluation, and the movement includes at least the relationship with the part used in the first movement and the second evaluation. 2. There is a specific movement that satisfies predetermined conditions in relation to the parts used in the movement, and the output function outputs information regarding the specific movement when the second first evaluation is obtained. is output in a first manner, and when the second first evaluation and the first second evaluation are obtained, information regarding the specific exercise is output in a second manner different from the first aspect. , is a program.

According to the present invention, it is possible to provide information regarding exercise based on the user's movements.

1 is a diagram showing an example of the overall configuration of a training support system according to the present embodiment. It is a diagram showing an example of the hardware configuration of a server device and a terminal. It is a diagram showing an example of a functional configuration of a server device. (a) is a diagram showing an example of an evaluation management table, (b) is a diagram showing an example of an attribute management table, and (c) is a diagram showing an example of an aptitude management table. . It is a flowchart showing the flow of training item determination processing. (a) is a diagram showing an evaluation management table when the user's movement performing a new warm-up item is evaluated, and (b) is a diagram showing the aptitude that has been updated in accordance with the update of the evaluation management table. It is a figure showing a management table. (a) is a diagram showing an evaluation management table when the user's movement performing a new warm-up item is evaluated, and (b) is a diagram showing the aptitude that has been updated in accordance with the update of the evaluation management table. It is a figure showing a management table. It is a figure showing a suggestion item display screen. It is a figure showing an item list display screen.

Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
<Training support system configuration>
FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an example of the overall configuration of a training support system 1 according to the present embodiment.
The training support system 1 according to the present embodiment is a system that supports a user in determining which training item to perform from among a plurality of training items (training items) each having different training content.
A training support system 1 as an example of an exercise support system includes a server device 10, a video camera 20, and a terminal 30. The server device 10, video camera 20, and terminal 30 are connected via a network.

The server device 10 determines training items suitable for each user.
The server device 10 acquires information regarding the movement of a specific part of the user. Additionally, the server device 10 analyzes the acquired information and evaluates the movement of a specific part of the user. Then, based on the evaluation results, a training item suitable for the user is determined from among the plurality of training items. Further, the server device 10 provides information on the determined training items to the terminal 30.
Specific sites include, for example, the head, cervical vertebrae, shoulders, thoracic vertebrae, rib cage, abdomen, lumbar vertebrae, arms, hands, thighs, legs, and the like. The specific site is not limited to the above sites, and may be any site on a human being.
Examples of the motion include dorsiflexion, pronation, supination, breathing, flexion, external rotation, internal rotation, extension, abduction, and adduction. The motion is not limited to the above example, and may be any motion performed by a human.

The server device 10 is realized by, for example, a computer. The server device 10 may be configured by a single computer, or may be realized by distributed processing by multiple computers. Further, the server device 10 may be realized on virtual hardware provided by cloud computing.

The video camera 20 photographs the user of the training support system 1. The video camera 20 of this embodiment is installed, for example, in a facility where a user exercises. In this embodiment, the user performs a warm-up as a preparatory exercise in order to determine training items suitable for the user. The video camera 20 takes a video of the user warming up.
Furthermore, in the present embodiment, the name of the warm-up item (warm-up item) that the user is performing in the video can be input to the video camera 20 as the title of the video captured by the video camera 20. The video camera 20 has a function of transmitting the captured video to the server device 10 via the network together with information on the names of the warm-up items. Note that information on the names of warm-up items will be referred to as name information below.

The terminal 30 has a display section 31 that displays information. Upon acquiring information from the server device 10, the terminal 30 displays the acquired information on the display unit 31. The terminal 30 also has an input unit (not shown) that allows information to be input by user operation. In this embodiment, for example, information regarding the user's attributes can be input to the terminal 30 by the user's operation, and the terminal 30 can transmit the input information to the server device 10.
Examples of the user attributes include the user's name, the user's age, the user's gender, the purpose of the user's training, the user's injury history, and the user's personality. Note that information regarding user attributes is hereinafter referred to as attribute information.

The terminal 30 is realized by, for example, a computer, a tablet information terminal, or other information processing device. Terminal 30 may be, for example, a smartphone. That is, the terminal 30 may be any type of terminal.

The type of network used to connect the server device 10, video camera 20, and terminal 30 is not particularly limited as long as it can transmit and receive data, and may be, for example, the Internet, LAN (Local Area Network), or WAN (Wide Area Network). Network) etc. The communication line used for transmitting and receiving data may be wired or wireless. Furthermore, a configuration may be adopted in which each device is connected via a plurality of networks or communication lines.

<Hardware configuration example>
FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of the hardware configuration of the server device 10 and the terminal 30.
As shown in FIG. 2, the server device 10 and the terminal 30 include a CPU (Central Processing Unit) 100a, which is a calculation means, and a memory 100c, which is a main storage means. Each device also includes, as external devices, a nonvolatile recording device 100g, a network interface 100f, a display mechanism 100d, an audio mechanism 100h, and an input device 100i such as a keyboard and a mouse.

The memory 100c and display mechanism 100d are connected to the CPU 100a via the system controller 100b. Further, the network interface 100f, the nonvolatile recording device 100g, the audio mechanism 100h, and the input device 100i are connected to the system controller 100b via the bridge controller 100e. Each component is connected by various buses such as a system bus and an input/output bus.

The nonvolatile recording device 100g stores programs for realizing each function. Then, this program is loaded into the memory 100c, and processes based on this program are executed by the CPU 100a, thereby realizing various functions. Examples of the nonvolatile recording device 100g include semiconductor memories such as SSDs (Solid State Drives) and magnetic disk devices such as HDDs (Hard Disk Drives).

<Functional configuration of server device>
Next, the functional configuration of the server device 10 will be explained.
FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of the functional configuration of the server device 10.
The server device 10 includes an information acquisition section 11 , a storage section 12 , an evaluation section 13 , an extraction section 14 , a determination section 15 , and an output control section 16 .

The information acquisition unit 11, which is an example of an acquisition unit, acquires a moving image and name information from the video camera 20. The information acquisition unit 11 also acquires attribute information from the terminal 30. The information acquisition unit 11 transmits the acquired video, name information, and attribute information to the storage unit 12.
The storage unit 12 stores the moving image, name information, and attribute information transmitted from the information acquisition unit 11. More specifically, the storage unit 12 stores the video and name information in association with attribute information regarding the target user. Note that the storage contents of the storage unit 12 will be detailed later.

The evaluation unit 13 evaluates the user's movements by analyzing the user's movements while warming up.
The evaluation unit 13 analyzes the video stored in the storage unit 12 and identifies the area where the user's body part is shown. As the parts to be identified, all predetermined parts may be identified, or only the parts used for evaluation may be identified.
Furthermore, the evaluation unit 13 specifies the body part shown in the identified area, and detects the motion of each specified part. As the motions to be detected, all predetermined motions may be detected, or only motions used for evaluation may be detected.

Furthermore, the evaluation unit 13 performs evaluation based on predetermined evaluation criteria according to the detected user's movement. This evaluation is an evaluation of the movement of a specific part of the user who is warming up. For example, when a user raises a leg, the evaluation criterion is that the hip joint of the raised leg is flexed by 90 degrees or more, and it is evaluated whether the user's motion satisfies the evaluation criterion. Can be mentioned. The evaluation unit 13 performs evaluation based on evaluation criteria determined for each warm-up item. The evaluation unit 13 identifies warm-up items from the name information stored in association with the video in the storage unit 12, and evaluates the movement of the specific body part of the user based on evaluation criteria corresponding to the identified warm-up items. . The evaluation results of the evaluation section 13 are stored in the storage section 12. Therefore, the storage unit 12 and the evaluation unit 13 can also be regarded as acquisition means for acquiring the evaluation results of the user's movement of a specific part.

The extraction unit 14 extracts a training item whose training content includes the motion that is the subject of evaluation by the evaluation unit 13 from among the plurality of training items.
Note that the targets to be extracted by the extraction unit 14 may include training items that are training contents that include motions related to the motion targeted for evaluation. The motion related to the motion to be evaluated includes, for example, a motion different from the motion to be evaluated, which is caused by a specific body part to be evaluated.

The determining unit 15 determines training items suitable for the user based on the evaluation results of the evaluating unit 13. The determining unit 15 determines, for each training item extracted by the extracting unit 14, whether the training item is suitable for the user.
For example, the determining unit 15 selects a training item that is a training content determined to be highly effective for the user to perform and can be implemented by the user, based on the evaluation result of the evaluation unit 13 for the movement of the specific part. Determine the training items that are suitable for the user.
Further, for example, the determining unit 15 may select a training item that is training content that is determined to have a high risk of injury to the user if performed by the user, based on the evaluation result of the evaluation unit 13 regarding the movement of the specific part. Decide on training items that are not suitable for you. Information on the training items determined by the determining unit 15 is stored in the storage unit 12.

Further, if there are a plurality of training items determined to be suitable for the user, the determining unit 15 determines the priority order of proposals for the plurality of training items. The determining unit 15 determines the priority order based on, for example, user attributes specified from attribute information. The determined priority information is stored in the storage unit 12.

The output control section 16, which is an example of an output means, causes the terminal 30 to output the information stored in the storage section 12. More specifically, by transmitting information to the terminal 30, the output control unit 16 causes the transmitted information to be displayed on the display unit 31 of the terminal 30, or outputs the transmitted information to the terminal 30 by voice. or

<Memory contents of the storage unit>
Next, the contents of the information stored in the storage unit 12 will be explained.
FIG. 4(a) is a diagram showing an example of an evaluation management table. Further, FIG. 4(b) is a diagram showing an example of an attribute management table. Further, FIG. 4(c) is a diagram showing an example of an aptitude management table.
The evaluation management table shown in FIG. 4A is a table for managing the evaluation results of the user's movement of a specific part. Further, the attribute management table shown in FIG. 4(b) is a table for managing attribute information. Further, the aptitude management table shown in FIG. 4(c) is a table for managing information regarding the user's aptitude for training items. An evaluation management table, an attribute management table, and an aptitude management table are all provided for each user. The illustrated evaluation management table, attribute management table, and aptitude management table all correspond to user "A".

In the evaluation management table shown in FIG. 4(a), the name of the warm-up item is shown in "warm-up item".
Further, "level" indicates the level of action required of the user to perform the "warm-up item". Examples of the level of movement include the number of movements, the range of movement, and the load placed on a specific part during the movement. In the illustrated example, "Level 1", "Level 2", and "Level 3" are provided, and the higher the level, the higher the level of behavior required of the user. That is, the higher the level, the higher the evaluation criteria for evaluation by the evaluation unit 13. Note that the levels are not limited to three levels, and may be two or less, or four or more.

Further, "movement" indicates the level of motion required of the user to perform the "warm-up item". The higher the value shown in "Movement", the higher the level of motion required of the user. In the illustrated example, "ankle joint dorsiflexion: 1" means that the level of "ankle joint dorsiflexion", which is a movement of a specific region, is "1".
“Evaluation” shows the evaluation results of the evaluation unit 13. “O” shown in “Evaluation” means that the evaluation unit 13 has determined that the user's actions in performing the “warming-up item” satisfy the evaluation criteria. Moreover, the "x" shown in "evaluation" means that the evaluation unit 13 has determined that the user's actions in performing the "warming-up item" do not satisfy the evaluation criteria.

In the attribute management table shown in FIG. 4(b), the age of the user is shown in "age". In the illustrated example, "25 years old" is shown as the age of user "A".
Furthermore, "gender" indicates the gender of the user. In the illustrated example, "male" is shown as the gender of user "A".
Moreover, the purpose of the user's training is shown in "Purpose". In the illustrated example, "strengthening leg muscles" is shown as the purpose of training for user "A".
Furthermore, the "history of injuries" shows the history of injuries sustained by the user in the past. In the illustrated example, a "shoulder" is shown, which is a part where user "A" sustained an injury in the past.
Furthermore, "personality" indicates the user's personality. In the illustrated example, "hard worker" is shown as the user's personality.

In the aptitude management table shown in FIG. 4(c), the name of the training item is shown in "Training item".
Further, "movement" indicates the level of motion required of the user to perform the "training item". The higher the value shown in "Movement", the higher the level of motion required of the user.

Further, “aptitude” indicates the user's aptitude for the “training item”.
“O” shown in “aptitude” means that the “training item” is suitable for the user. It should be noted that the “training items” determined by the determining unit 15 to be suitable for the user are marked with “O”.
"△" shown in "aptitude" means that it is a "training item" that is less suitable for the user than "〇". Note that "△" is indicated for "training items" that are not subject to determination by the determination unit 15.
The "x" shown in "aptitude" means that the "training item" is not suitable for the user. In other words, "×" shown in "aptitude" means that it is a "training item" that is less suitable for the user than "△". Note that "X" is indicated for "training items" that are determined by the determining unit 15 to be unsuitable for the user.

In addition, "Priority" shows the priority of proposals for "Training items" for which "Aptitude" is marked "○".

(Processing by evaluation section)
Next, the processing performed by the evaluation section 13 will be explained.
The evaluation unit 13 determines whether the movement of a specific part of the user performing the "warming-up item" shown in the evaluation management table (see FIG. 4(a)) satisfies the evaluation criteria. In the illustrated example, the ``ankle dorsiflexion'' of the user ``A'' who performs ``item A'' of ``level 1'' has been determined by the evaluation unit 13 to meet the evaluation criteria, and the ``evaluation'' is ``〇''. "It is shown. In this case, the evaluation unit 13 sets the level of "ankle joint dorsiflexion" of user "A" to "1". In addition, if "X" is shown in "Evaluation" in "Item A" of this "Level 1", that is, it is determined that "Ankle joint dorsiflexion" of "Level 1" by the user does not satisfy the evaluation criteria. In this case, the evaluation unit 13 sets the level of "ankle joint dorsiflexion" of user "A" to "0".

(Processing of extraction part)
Next, the processing performed by the extraction unit 14 will be explained.
The extraction unit 14 extracts “training items” related to the actions evaluated by the evaluation unit 13 from among the “training items” shown in the aptitude management table (see FIG. 4(c)). In the illustrated example, the extraction unit 14 determines that among the "training items" shown in the aptitude management table, "ankle dorsiflexion" is the movement in "item A" for which "evaluation" is shown in the evaluation management table. The included training items "1st item" to "5th item" are extracted.
Note that if there are a plurality of "warming-up items" for which "evaluation" is indicated in the evaluation management table, the extraction unit 14 extracts a "training item" for each "warming-up item."

(Processing of decision section)
Next, the processing performed by the determining unit 15 will be explained.
The determining unit 15 determines whether the “training item” extracted by the extracting unit 14 is suitable for the user, based on the “evaluation” shown in the evaluation management table. More specifically, the difference between the level of "movement" of a specific part specified from "evaluation" in the evaluation management table and the level of "movement" of the specific part in "training item" of the aptitude management table is determined in advance. If the training item is within the predetermined allowable range, the determining unit 15 determines that this "training item" is suitable for the user. This permissible range is a range that is determined to be highly effective and practicable by the user when the user performs the training shown in the training item. The allowable range may be any value, but in the following it is assumed that "2" is defined. In the illustrated example, the difference between the level "1" of "ankle dorsiflexion" of user "A" and the level "2" of "ankle dorsiflexion" in "first item" is "1", Since this is within the allowable range, the determining unit 15 determines this "first item" as a training item suitable for the user. That is, the "first item" is defined as a training item that is highly effective in strengthening the "ankle joints" when performed by the user "A" and can be performed by the user.

In addition, since the difference between the level "1" of user "A"'s "ankle joint dorsiflexion" and the "3" level of "ankle joint dorsiflexion" in the "second item" is "2", the determination unit Step 15 determines this "second item" as a training item suitable for the user. Similarly, the determining unit 15 selects a "third item" in which the difference between the level "1" of user "A"'s "ankle joint dorsiflexion" and the level of "ankle joint dorsiflexion" is within "2"; The "fourth item" is determined to be a training item suitable for user "A".
On the other hand, the difference between the level "1" of user "A"'s "ankle dorsiflexion" and the "4" level of "ankle dorsiflexion" in "5th item" is "3", which is within the acceptable range. Therefore, the determining unit 15 determines the "fifth item" as a training item that is not suitable for the user "A". That is, the "fifth item" is defined as a training item that has a high risk of causing injury to the "legs" if performed by the user "A".

For example, if the evaluation unit 13 determines that the motion of the user "A" performing "Item A" of "Level 2" in the evaluation management table satisfies the evaluation criteria, the evaluation unit 13 determines that the "ankle joint" of the user "A" satisfies the evaluation criteria. Set the level of "Dorsiflexion" to "2". In this case, the difference between the level "2" of the "ankle dorsiflexion" of the user "A" and the level "4" of the "ankle dorsiflexion" in the "fifth item" is "2", Since this falls within the allowable range, the determining unit 15 determines the "fifth item" as a training item suitable for the user "A".
In addition, in the "movements" of "1st item" to "4th item" in the aptitude management table, there are motions other than "ankle dorsiflexion" that have not been evaluated for user "A". include. Even in this case, the determining unit 15 determines the "first item" to "fourth item" as training items suitable for the user "A", as described above.

<Training item determination process>
Next, the flow of training item determination processing will be explained. The training item determination process is a process in which the server device 10 determines whether a training item is suitable for the user.
FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing the flow of training item determination processing.

The information acquisition unit 11 acquires a moving image from the video camera 20 (S101).
The evaluation unit 13 evaluates the motion of a specific part of the user shown in the video (S102).
The extraction unit 14 extracts training items related to the motion to be evaluated by the evaluation unit 13 (S103).
The determining unit 15 determines whether the training items extracted by the extracting unit 14 are suitable for the user based on the evaluation result of the evaluating unit 13 (S104).

The determining unit 15 determines whether there are a plurality of training items determined to be suitable for the user (S105).
If there are a plurality of training items (YES in S105), the determining unit 15 determines the priority order of proposals for the plurality of training items (S106).
If step 106 is completed, or if there are no training items suitable for the user (NO in S105), the output control unit 16 selects the training items determined by the determining unit 15 to be suitable for the user. The information is displayed on the display unit 31 of the terminal 30.

<Applicability when performing new warm-up items>
Next, a description will be given of the user's aptitude for a training item when the user newly performs a warm-up item.
FIG. 6(a) is a diagram showing an evaluation management table when the user's actions for performing a new warm-up item are evaluated. Further, FIG. 6(b) is a diagram showing the aptitude management table updated in response to the update of the evaluation management table.

In the example shown in FIG. 6(a), user "A" is newly performing "Item B" of "Level 1", and the "hip flexion" of the user performing this "Item B" does not meet the evaluation criteria. The evaluation unit 13 determines that, and "×" is shown in "Evaluation". In this case, the evaluation unit 13 sets the level of "hip joint flexion" of user "A" to "0".
The extraction unit 14 extracts “first item” to “fifth item” which are training items including “hip flexion” evaluated by the evaluation unit 13.
The difference between the "hip flexion" level "0" of user "A" and the "hip flexion" level "2" in the "first item" of the aptitude management table (see Figure 6(b)) is "2". Therefore, the determining unit 15 determines this "first item" as a training item suitable for the user.

On the other hand, the difference between the level ``0'' of user ``A'''s ``hip flexion'' and the level ``3'' of ``hip flexion'' in the ``second item'' is ``3,'' which is not within the acceptable range, so the decision is made. The unit 15 determines the "second item" as a training item that is not suitable for the user "A". In this case, the "suitability" of the "second item" is changed from "〇" (see FIG. 4(c)) to "×".
Similarly, the determining unit 15 selects the "fourth item" in which the difference between the level "0" of "hip flexion" of user "A" and the level of "hip flexion" is "3" or more, ” Deciding on training items that are not suitable.

Further, the determining unit 15 determines the priority order of proposals for the "first item" and the "third item" whose "suitability" is "○". Here, the determining unit 15 determines the priority order based on the "purpose" shown in the attribute management table (see FIG. 4(b)). More specifically, the determining unit 15 determines that the level of "ankle joint dorsiflexion" required of user "A" is "the first level" in order to achieve "strengthening of leg muscle strength" which is the objective of user "A". The ``3rd item'', which is higher than the ``1st item'', is given a higher priority than the ``1st item''. This is an example of setting a higher priority to a training item that has a greater effect on the user's "objective" when the user performs training.

Note that the information used by the determining unit 15 to determine the priority order is not limited to the "purpose".
For example, the determining unit 15 determines that the level of "ankle dorsiflexion" required for user "A" is "the highest level" based on the fact that "age" in the attribute management table of user "A" is lower than "40 years old". The "third item", which is higher than the "first item", may be given a higher priority than the "first item". This is based on the fact that if a user's "age" is lower than a predetermined age, they are less likely to get injured even if they train, so training items with a higher level of "movement" are given higher priority. This is an example of setting it high.
Further, for example, the determining unit 15 determines that the level of "ankle dorsiflexion" required of the user "A" is "based on the fact that the "personality" in the attribute management table of the user "A" is "hard worker". The "third item" which is higher than the "first item" may be given a higher priority than the "first item". This is an example of setting a higher priority for training items that require a higher level of "movement" based on the user's personality that prefers training items that require a higher level of "movement".

Next, a description will be given of the user's aptitude for the training item when the user performs a new warm-up item.
FIG. 7(a) is a diagram showing an evaluation management table when the user's actions for performing a new warm-up item are evaluated. Further, FIG. 7(b) is a diagram showing the aptitude management table updated in response to the update of the evaluation management table.

In the example shown in FIG. 7(a), the user "A" is performing a new "D item", and the evaluation unit determines that the "shoulder joint flexion" motion of the user performing this "D item" satisfies the evaluation criteria. It was judged as 13, and "〇" is shown in "Evaluation". In this case, the evaluation unit 13 sets the level of "shoulder joint flexion" of user "A" to "1".

The extraction unit 14 extracts “4th item”, “6th item”, and “7th item” which are training items including “shoulder joint flexion” evaluated by the evaluation unit 13.
The difference between the level ``1'' of user ``A'''s ``shoulder flexion'' and the level ``2'' of ``shoulder flexion'' in the ``6th item'' of the aptitude management table (see Figure 7(b)) is `` 1", the determining unit 15 determines the "sixth item" as a training item suitable for the user. Similarly, the determining unit 15 selects the "seventh item" in which the difference between the level "1" of user "A"'s "shoulder joint flexion" and the level of "shoulder joint flexion" is within "2". Determine the training items suitable for “A”.

Further, the difference between the level "1" of the "shoulder joint flexion" of the user "A" and the "3" level of the "shoulder joint flexion" in the "fourth item" is "2", which is within the allowable range. On the other hand, as mentioned above, the difference between the level "0" of "hip flexion" of user "A" and the level "3" of "hip flexion" in "4th item" is "3", which is within the acceptable range. do not have. In this case, the determining unit 15 determines the "fourth item" as a training item that is not suitable for the user "A".

Further, the determining unit 15 determines the priority order of proposals for the "first item", "third item", "sixth item", and "seventh item" whose "suitability" is "○". Here, the determining unit 15 determines the priority order based on the "injury history" shown in the attribute management table (see FIG. 4(b)). More specifically, based on the fact that user "A" has suffered a "shoulder" injury in the past, the determining unit 15 selects "sixth item" and "seventh item" in which "motion" includes shoulder motion. "Item" is given a lower priority than "First Item" and "Third Item" whose "Movement" does not include shoulder motion. This is based on the fact that the user has sustained an injury to a specific body part in the past, and training items that include movements that use this particular body part are given a lower priority than training items that do not include movements that use that body part. This is an example of what to do.

<Example of information display>
Next, an example of displaying information on the display unit 31 of the terminal 30 will be described.
FIG. 8 is a diagram showing the suggestion item display screen 40. The proposed item display screen 40 is a screen on which training items that are proposed to be implemented by the user are displayed.

The suggested item display screen 40 shows a user identification section 41, an item display section 42, and a list display button 43.
The user identification unit 41 shows the name of the user to whom the training item is proposed. In the illustrated example, the user identification unit 41 displays the text "The training items proposed to Mr. A are as follows."

The item display section 42 displays training items determined by the determination section 15 as suitable for the user. More specifically, among the training items determined by the determining unit 15 as suitable for the user, the three training items with the highest proposal priority are displayed in descending order of priority. In the illustrated example, "3rd item" is displayed as the training item with the highest priority, "1st item" is displayed as the training item with the next highest priority, and then the training item with the next highest priority. ``6th item'' is displayed. That is, training items based on the latest priority order determined by the determination unit 15 (see FIG. 7(b)) are displayed.

Here, for example, when the user selects the list display button 43, an item list display screen 50 is displayed on the display unit 31 of the terminal 30, as shown in FIG. The item list display screen 50 is a screen on which a list of all training items is displayed.
The item list display screen 50 shows a user identification section 51, an item list section 52, an aptitude explanation section 53, an attribute display button 54, and a suggestion screen display button 55.

The user identification section 51 shows the name of the user corresponding to the information displayed on the item list display screen 50. In the illustrated example, the user identification section 51 displays the text "Mr. A."
The item list section 52 displays each training item. Further, "aptitude" and "priority" are displayed in association with each training item. The information shown in "aptitude" and "priority" is the information shown in "aptitude" and "priority" in the aptitude management table (see FIG. 7(b)).
The aptitude explanation section 53 shows an explanation of the display contents of "aptitude" in the item list section 52. In the illustrated example, the aptitude explanation section 53 displays the following texts: "〇: Item with great effect,""△: Item that can be implemented," and "×: Item with high risk of injury." .

Here, for example, when the user selects the attribute display button 54, the attribute information shown in the attribute management table (see FIG. 4(b)) is displayed on the display unit 31 of the terminal 30.
Further, for example, when the user selects the suggestion screen display button 55, the suggestion item display screen 40 is displayed again on the display unit 31 of the terminal 30.

In this manner, in the present embodiment, training items suitable for the user are determined based on the evaluation results of the user's movements of specific parts. Then, as shown in FIG. 8, information on the determined training items is displayed on the display unit 31 of the terminal 30. Further, as shown in FIG. 9, the training items are displayed on the display unit 31 along with information regarding the user's aptitude for the training items. That is, in the present embodiment, the output control unit 16 outputs information regarding exercise targeted at the user in a manner according to the evaluation result.
In this case, information regarding exercise can be provided based on the user's movements.

In particular, in this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 8, the output control unit 16 outputs information on exercise items according to the evaluation results from among a plurality of exercise items each having different exercise content. Here, the exercise item is, for example, a training item.
In this case, it becomes possible to propose exercise items based on the user's movements.

Further, in this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 9, the output control unit 16 outputs information regarding the user's aptitude based on the evaluation results for a specific exercise. In particular, in the present embodiment, the output control unit 16 selects a specific exercise item that is an exercise that includes an operation that is the same as or related to the evaluation target operation, out of a plurality of exercise items that are different exercise contents. Output information regarding aptitude for exercise items.
In this case, for example, an instructor or a user who instructs the user's exercise can decide which exercise the user should perform based on information regarding aptitude for a specific exercise based on the user's movements.

In addition, in this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 7(b), based on the user's evaluation results of "ankle joint dorsiflexion" and "hip joint flexion", as shown in FIG. 7(b), The user's aptitude for "second item" including "ankle dorsiflexion" and "hip joint flexion" is determined. Then, as shown in FIG. 8, the determined aptitude information is displayed on the display unit 31 of the terminal 30. That is, in the present embodiment, the output control unit 16 outputs aptitude information based on the evaluation results of each of the user's multiple movements that are the same as or related to the movement included in the exercise in a specific exercise item. Output.

In particular, in this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 4(a), if the user performs only the warm-up items including "ankle joint dorsiflexion" and the evaluation for "ankle joint dorsiflexion" is "〇", , as shown in FIG. 4(c), the user's suitability for the “second item” is determined to be “〇”. In this case, the output control section 16 causes the display section 31 of the terminal 30 to display the "second item" together with "O" indicating suitability. On the other hand, as shown in FIG. 7(a), if the user performs a new warm-up item that includes "hip flexion" and the evaluation for this "hip flexion" is "x", FIG. 7(b) As shown, the user's suitability for the "second item" is determined to be "x". In this case, the output control unit 16 displays the "second item" together with an "x" indicating suitability, as shown in FIG.

That is, in this embodiment, the information regarding aptitude includes first aptitude information indicating a first aptitude and second aptitude information indicating a second aptitude lower in aptitude than the first aptitude. Then, the output control unit 16 outputs first aptitude information for a specific exercise item based on the first evaluation result for the first movement of the specific part of the user, and outputs first aptitude information for the specific exercise item, and Second aptitude information for a specific exercise item is output based on a second evaluation result that is lower than the first evaluation result for the two movements. Here, the first aptitude is, for example, aptitude “〇”. Further, the second aptitude is, for example, an aptitude "x". Further, the first motion is, for example, "ankle joint dorsiflexion". Further, the first evaluation result is, for example, an evaluation result of “〇” for the first action. Further, the second motion is, for example, "hip joint flexion." Further, the second evaluation result is, for example, an evaluation result of "x" for the second action.
In this case, it is possible to provide information regarding aptitude based on each of a plurality of user movements regarding a specific exercise item.

Further, in the present embodiment, the output control unit 16 outputs information regarding the priority of proposals of a plurality of exercise items, each of which is a different exercise content.
In this case, the instructor or the user can decide which exercise item the user will perform based on the information regarding the priority.

Furthermore, in this embodiment, the information acquisition unit 11 acquires attribute information regarding user attributes. Then, the output control unit 16 outputs information regarding the priority based on the attribute information.
In this case, it is possible to provide information regarding the priority of proposals for a plurality of exercise items based on the user's attributes.

Although the embodiments of the present invention have been described above, the technical scope of the present invention is not limited to the range described in the above embodiments. It is clear from the claims that various changes or improvements made to the above-described embodiments are also included within the technical scope of the present invention.

The display contents of the suggested item display screen 40 and the item list display screen 50 are not limited to the above examples. For example, the contents shown in the evaluation management table (see FIG. 7(a)) may be displayed on the proposed item display screen 40 and the item list display screen 50. Furthermore, the "action" information shown in the aptitude management table (see FIG. 7(b)) may be displayed on the proposed item display screen 40 and the item list display screen 50. Furthermore, the contents shown in the attribute management table (see FIG. 4(b)) may be displayed on the proposed item display screen 40 and the item list display screen 50.

Further, in this embodiment, the video camera 20 is used to photograph the user, but the photographing means used to photograph the user is not limited to the video camera 20.
For example, the terminal 30 having a photographing function may be used as the photographing means.

Further, in the present embodiment, the evaluation unit 13 evaluates one action of the user performing one warm-up item, but the evaluation unit 13 is not limited to this.
For example, the evaluation unit 13 may evaluate each of two or more movements of the user performing one warm-up item. In this case, the extraction unit 14 may extract training items related to each of the plurality of movements evaluated by the evaluation unit 13.

Further, although the evaluation unit 13 evaluates the movement of the specific part of the user as either "○" or "x", the evaluation unit 13 is not limited to this. The evaluation unit 13 may evaluate the movement of a specific part of the user into any one of three or more levels.
Further, in the case where the evaluation unit 13 evaluates a specific movement of a specific part of the user, if the user performs this specific movement again afterwards, the evaluation result of the evaluation unit 13 for this specific movement may be updated. .

Further, in this embodiment, the server device 10 evaluates the user's actions, but the present invention is not limited to this.
For example, an instructor may evaluate the user's behavior. In this case, for example, the instructor may input the evaluation results of the user's actions into the terminal 30, and the terminal 30 may transmit the input evaluation results to the server device 10.

Further, in the present embodiment, the determining unit 15 determines the priority order of proposals for a plurality of training items, but the present invention is not limited to this.
For example, the determining unit 15 may determine the priority of one of the multiple stages for each of the multiple training items.

Furthermore, in the present embodiment, the method by which the determining unit 15 determines the priority is not limited to the example described above.
For example, the determining unit 15 may set the priority of a training item that has a larger number of body parts that can benefit from the user's performance as higher than the priority of a training item that has a smaller number of body parts that can benefit from the user's performance. good.

Further, the determining unit 15 may determine the suitability level of the training item determined to be suitable for the user to any one of a plurality of stages.
Further, the display mode of the information displayed on the display unit 31 of the terminal 30 as information regarding the user's aptitude for the training item is not limited to the above example. For example, the training items may be displayed in a color that corresponds to the aptitude determined by the determination unit 15. That is, the information regarding aptitude may be displayed in any manner.

Furthermore, in the present embodiment, the determining unit 15 determines the suitability and priority of training items, but the targets of determination by the determining unit 15 are not limited to training items.
For example, the determining unit 15 may determine the suitability and priority order for exercise items and stretching items. Further, the determining unit 15 may determine the suitability and priority for other exercise items. That is, the object to be determined by the determination unit 15 may be an exercise item (exercise item).

Further, in this embodiment, the name of the exercise item is displayed as the exercise item displayed on the display unit 31 of the terminal 30, but the name is not limited thereto.
For example, the content of the exercise or the summary of the exercise may be displayed. That is, the exercise item also includes the content of the exercise and the outline of the exercise.

Further, in this embodiment, the server device 10 is configured to output information on exercise items suitable for the user, but the present invention is not limited to this.
For example, the terminal 30 may have the functions of the server device 10. In other words, the terminal 30 may have the functions of the information acquisition section 11, storage section 12, evaluation section 13, extraction section 14, determination section 15, output control section 16, etc. of the server device 10.

Further, a program for realizing an embodiment of the present invention can be stored in a computer-readable recording medium such as a magnetic recording medium (magnetic tape, magnetic disk, etc.), an optical recording medium (optical disk, etc.), a magneto-optical recording medium, a semiconductor memory, etc. It can be provided in a memorized state. It is also possible to provide the information using communication means such as the Internet.

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1...Training support system, 10...Server device, 11...Information acquisition part, 12...Storage part, 13...Evaluation part, 14...Extraction part, 15...Determination part, 16...Output control part, 20...Video camera, 30... terminal

Claims (12)

an acquisition means for acquiring an evaluation of the user's behavior;
Among a plurality of exercises, each of which is associated with a predetermined level regarding the content of the exercise, the name of the exercise that satisfies a predetermined first condition in relation to the part used in the movement that is the target of the evaluation. output means for outputting exercise information shown ;
Equipped with
The evaluation includes at least a specific evaluation that is an evaluation of the movement of a specific part of the user,
The plurality of movements include at least a specific movement whose relationship with the specific part satisfies the first condition,
The output means is
The exercise information related to the specific exercise with which the level is associated, in which the relationship with the level of movement of the specific part identified from the specific evaluation does not satisfy a second condition defined regarding the user's aptitude for exercise. limit the output of
outputting the exercise information related to the specific exercise associated with the level that satisfies the second condition in relation to the level of movement of the specific part specified from the specific evaluation;
The specific exercise includes at least a first exercise and a second exercise associated with a higher level than the first exercise,
The specific evaluation includes at least a first evaluation and a second evaluation having a higher level of evaluation than the first evaluation,
The level identified from the first evaluation is such that the relationship with the level associated with the first movement satisfies the second condition, and the relationship with the level associated with the second movement satisfies the second condition. If the second condition is not met,
The exercise support system wherein the level identified from the second evaluation has a relationship with the level associated with the second exercise that satisfies the second condition . an acquisition means for acquiring an evaluation of the user's behavior;
Among a plurality of exercises each associated with a predetermined level regarding the content of the exercise, the user responds to an exercise that satisfies a predetermined first condition in relation to the part used in the movement that is the subject of the evaluation. an output means for outputting exercise information indicating the aptitude of the person;
Equipped with
The evaluation includes at least a specific evaluation that is an evaluation of the movement of a specific part of the user,
The plurality of movements include at least a specific movement whose relationship with the specific part satisfies the first condition,
The relationship with the level of the movement specified from the specific evaluation does not satisfy a predetermined second condition.It is specified from the specific evaluation rather than the exercise information related to the specific exercise with which the level is associated. The exercise information related to the specific exercise associated with the level whose relationship with the level satisfies the second condition indicates that the aptitude is higher,
The specific exercise includes at least a first exercise and a second exercise associated with a higher level than the first exercise,
The specific evaluation includes at least a first evaluation and a second evaluation having a higher level of evaluation than the first evaluation,
The level identified from the first evaluation is such that the relationship with the level associated with the first movement satisfies the second condition, and the relationship with the level associated with the second movement satisfies the second condition. If the second condition is not met,
The exercise support system wherein the level identified from the second evaluation has a relationship with the level associated with the second exercise that satisfies the second condition . an acquisition means for acquiring an evaluation of the user's behavior;
Among a plurality of exercises each associated with a predetermined level regarding the content of the exercise, the user responds to an exercise that satisfies a predetermined first condition in relation to the part used in the movement that is the subject of the evaluation . output means for outputting exercise information indicating the priority of the proposed exercise based on the aptitude of the exercise;
Equipped with
The evaluation includes at least a specific evaluation that is an evaluation of the movement of a specific part of the user,
The plurality of movements include at least a specific movement whose relationship with the specific part satisfies the first condition,
The relationship with the level of the movement specified from the specific evaluation does not satisfy a predetermined second condition.It is specified from the specific evaluation rather than the exercise information related to the specific exercise with which the level is associated. The exercise information related to the specific exercise associated with the level whose relationship with the level satisfies the second condition is shown to have a higher priority,
The specific exercise includes at least a first exercise and a second exercise associated with a higher level than the first exercise,
The specific evaluation includes at least a first evaluation and a second evaluation having a higher level of evaluation than the first evaluation,
The level identified from the first evaluation is such that the relationship with the level associated with the first movement satisfies the second condition, and the relationship with the level associated with the second movement satisfies the second condition. If the second condition is not met,
The exercise support system wherein the level identified from the second evaluation has a relationship with the level associated with the second exercise that satisfies the second condition . The first evaluation and the second evaluation are evaluations of a first movement of the specific part,
The evaluation for the user further includes at least an evaluation of a second action different from the first action,
4. The output means outputs the exercise information in a manner according to a relationship between the level associated with the exercise, the evaluation of the first movement , and the evaluation of the second movement. The exercise support system described in any of the above . The acquisition means acquires attribute information regarding attributes of the user,
The exercise support system according to claim 3 , wherein the output means outputs the exercise information in a manner according to the attribute information. an acquisition means for acquiring an evaluation of the user's behavior;
output means for outputting information regarding exercise targeted at the user in a manner according to the evaluation;
Equipped with
The evaluation for the user includes at least a first evaluation that is an evaluation of a first movement of a specific part, and a second evaluation that is an evaluation of a second movement different from the first movement,
The first evaluation includes at least a first first evaluation and a second first evaluation having a higher evaluation level than the first first evaluation,
The second evaluation includes at least a first second evaluation and a second second evaluation having a higher evaluation level than the first second evaluation,
The exercise includes at least a specific exercise in which the relationship with the part used in the first movement and the relationship with the part used in the second movement satisfy predetermined conditions,
The output means is
When the second first evaluation is acquired by the acquisition means, outputting information regarding the specific exercise according to a first aspect;
An exercise support system that causes the acquisition means to output information regarding the specific exercise in a second manner different from the first aspect when the second first evaluation and the first second evaluation are acquired by the acquisition means. . to the computer,
A function to obtain evaluation of user behavior,
Among a plurality of exercises, each of which is associated with a predetermined level regarding the content of the exercise, the name of the exercise that satisfies a predetermined first condition in relation to the part used in the movement that is the target of the evaluation. an output function that outputs exercise information shown ;
Realize ,
The evaluation includes at least a specific evaluation that is an evaluation of the movement of a specific part of the user,
The plurality of movements include at least a specific movement whose relationship with the specific part satisfies the first condition,
The output function is
The exercise information related to the specific exercise with which the level is associated, in which the relationship with the level of movement of the specific part identified from the specific evaluation does not satisfy a second condition defined regarding the user's aptitude for exercise. limit the output of
outputting the exercise information related to the specific exercise associated with the level that satisfies the second condition in relation to the level of movement of the specific part specified from the specific evaluation;
The specific exercise includes at least a first exercise and a second exercise associated with a higher level than the first exercise,
The specific evaluation includes at least a first evaluation and a second evaluation having a higher level of evaluation than the first evaluation,
The level identified from the first evaluation is such that the relationship with the level associated with the first movement satisfies the second condition, and the relationship with the level associated with the second movement satisfies the second condition. If the second condition is not met,
The program , wherein the level identified from the second evaluation has a relationship with the level associated with the second exercise that satisfies the second condition. to the computer,
A function to obtain evaluation of user behavior,
Among a plurality of exercises each associated with a predetermined level regarding the content of the exercise, the user responds to an exercise that satisfies a predetermined first condition in relation to the part used in the movement that is the subject of the evaluation. an output function that outputs exercise information indicating the aptitude of the
Realize,
The evaluation includes at least a specific evaluation that is an evaluation of the movement of a specific part of the user,
The plurality of movements include at least a specific movement whose relationship with the specific part satisfies the first condition,
The relationship with the level of the movement specified from the specific evaluation does not satisfy a predetermined second condition.It is specified from the specific evaluation rather than the exercise information related to the specific exercise with which the level is associated. The exercise information related to the specific exercise associated with the level whose relationship with the level satisfies the second condition indicates that the aptitude is higher,
The specific exercise includes at least a first exercise and a second exercise associated with a higher level than the first exercise,
The specific evaluation includes at least a first evaluation and a second evaluation having a higher level of evaluation than the first evaluation,
The level identified from the first evaluation is such that the relationship with the level associated with the first movement satisfies the second condition, and the relationship with the level associated with the second movement satisfies the second condition. If the second condition is not met,
The program, wherein the level identified from the second evaluation has a relationship with the level associated with the second exercise that satisfies the second condition. to the computer,
A function to obtain evaluation of user behavior,
Among a plurality of exercises each associated with a predetermined level regarding the content of the exercise, the user responds to an exercise that satisfies a predetermined first condition in relation to the part used in the movement that is the subject of the evaluation. an output function that outputs exercise information indicating the priority of the proposed exercise based on the aptitude of the exercise;
Realize,
The evaluation includes at least a specific evaluation that is an evaluation of the movement of a specific part of the user,
The plurality of movements include at least a specific movement whose relationship with the specific part satisfies the first condition,
The relationship with the level of the movement specified from the specific evaluation does not satisfy a predetermined second condition.It is specified from the specific evaluation rather than the exercise information related to the specific exercise with which the level is associated. The exercise information related to the specific exercise associated with the level whose relationship with the level satisfies the second condition is shown to have a higher priority,
The specific exercise includes at least a first exercise and a second exercise associated with a higher level than the first exercise,
The specific evaluation includes at least a first evaluation and a second evaluation having a higher level of evaluation than the first evaluation,
The level identified from the first evaluation is such that the relationship with the level associated with the first movement satisfies the second condition, and the relationship with the level associated with the second movement satisfies the second condition. If the second condition is not met,
The program, wherein the level identified from the second evaluation has a relationship with the level associated with the second exercise that satisfies the second condition. The first evaluation and the second evaluation are evaluations of a first movement of the specific part,
The evaluation for the user further includes at least an evaluation of a second action different from the first action,
Claims 7 to 9, wherein the output function outputs the exercise information in a manner according to a relationship between the level associated with the exercise, the evaluation of the first movement , and the evaluation of the second movement. A program described in any of the above . to the computer,
Further realizing a function of acquiring attribute information regarding attributes of the user,
The program according to claim 9, wherein the output function outputs the exercise information in a manner according to a relationship between the level associated with the exercise and the attribute information. to the computer,
A function to obtain evaluation of user behavior,
an output function that outputs information regarding exercise targeted at the user in a manner according to the evaluation;
Realize,
The evaluation for the user includes at least a first evaluation that is an evaluation of a first movement of a specific part, and a second evaluation that is an evaluation of a second movement different from the first movement,
The first evaluation includes at least a first first evaluation and a second first evaluation having a higher evaluation level than the first first evaluation,
The second evaluation includes at least a first second evaluation and a second second evaluation having a higher evaluation level than the first second evaluation,
The exercise includes at least a specific exercise in which the relationship with the part used in the first movement and the relationship with the part used in the second movement satisfy predetermined conditions,
The output function is
When the second first evaluation is obtained, outputting information regarding the specific exercise according to the first aspect;
A program that outputs information regarding the specific exercise in a second manner different from the first aspect when the second first evaluation and the first second evaluation are acquired.