Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP7401768B2 - Gas analysis method and gas analysis device - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP7401768B2 - Gas analysis method and gas analysis device - Google Patents

Gas analysis method and gas analysis device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP7401768B2
JP7401768B2 JP2020056417A JP2020056417A JP7401768B2 JP 7401768 B2 JP7401768 B2 JP 7401768B2 JP 2020056417 A JP2020056417 A JP 2020056417A JP 2020056417 A JP2020056417 A JP 2020056417A JP 7401768 B2 JP7401768 B2 JP 7401768B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
laser light
gas
measured
light receiving
estimated
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2020056417A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2021156701A (en
Inventor
明洋 坂本
翔太 菅原
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Steel Corp filed Critical Nippon Steel Corp
Priority to JP2020056417A priority Critical patent/JP7401768B2/en
Publication of JP2021156701A publication Critical patent/JP2021156701A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP7401768B2 publication Critical patent/JP7401768B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Waste-Gas Treatment And Other Accessory Devices For Furnaces (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analysing Materials By Optical Means (AREA)

Description

本発明は、500℃~2000℃の範囲の被測定ガスを内部に含む測定チャンバにおいて、被測定ガスの温度と濃度の空間内分布を分析するガス分析方法及びガス分析装置に関する。 The present invention relates to a gas analysis method and a gas analysis apparatus for analyzing the spatial distribution of the temperature and concentration of a gas to be measured in a measurement chamber containing the gas to be measured in the range of 500° C. to 2000° C.

鉄鋼製造工程で多用される燃焼加熱炉において、炉内の温度分布や物質濃度分布を定量的に監視する計測技術は、多量の燃料を消費する加熱炉の最適操業に直結する重要技術である。この温度分布や濃度分布の計測を実現する有望技術の1つとして、例えば非特許文献1には、CT-TDLAS(Computed Tomographic and Tunable Diode Laser Absorption Spectroscopy)が提案されている。 In combustion heating furnaces that are frequently used in the steel manufacturing process, measurement technology that quantitatively monitors the temperature distribution and material concentration distribution inside the furnace is an important technology that is directly linked to the optimal operation of heating furnaces that consume large amounts of fuel. As one promising technology for realizing the measurement of temperature distribution and concentration distribution, for example, CT-TDLAS (Computed Tomographic and Tunable Diode Laser Absorption Spectroscopy) is proposed in Non-Patent Document 1.

CT-TDLASの優れている点は、非接触で加熱炉内の状態を計測できることである。すなわち、炉外から炉内に向けて入射させたレーザ光を、反対側の炉外の受光部で計測し、スペクトル分析することで、レーザ光の光路積分値としての温度情報及び濃度情報を得ることができる(TDLAS技術)。さらに、このレーザ光の経路を格子状に構成することにより、炉内の平面あるいは空間における温度分布及び濃度分布を得ることができる(CT技術)。 The advantage of CT-TDLAS is that it can measure the state inside the heating furnace without contact. In other words, the laser beam that enters the furnace from outside the furnace is measured by the light receiving section outside the furnace on the opposite side, and the spectrum is analyzed to obtain temperature information and concentration information as the optical path integral value of the laser beam. (TDLAS technology). Furthermore, by configuring the path of this laser beam in a grid pattern, it is possible to obtain temperature distribution and concentration distribution in a plane or space within the furnace (CT technology).

神本崇博、出口祥啓ら著 第56回日本伝熱シンポジウム講演論文集(2019)G112-G125Takahiro Kamimoto, Yoshihiro Deguchi et al. 56th Japan Heat Transfer Symposium Proceedings (2019) G112-G125

しかしながら、非特許文献1に開示されているCT画像再構成アルゴリズムにおいては、次の問題があるために計算が不安定となり、また計算コストが過大なものとなっている。 However, the CT image reconstruction algorithm disclosed in Non-Patent Document 1 has the following problems, resulting in unstable calculations and excessive calculation costs.

第1に、非特許文献1に開示のCT画像再構成アルゴリズムでは、計測面上の温度分布T(x,y)及び濃度分布n(x,y)を双m次多項式で近似し、各定数係数を最適化計算の手法により決定するが、そのmの次数は14次と高次になっていることが問題である。すなわち、最適化すべき定数係数の数は2×(14+1)=450変数に及ぶため、最適化計算の探索初期値を適切に設定しないと、大域最適解に辿り着かなかったり、辿り着くまでに非常に時間が掛かったりするという問題がある。また高次多項式による近似では、一般にRunge現象と呼ばれる不安定な数値振動が発生するという数学的な問題も存在する。この数値振動を抑制するには、実用的にはm≦6程度の次数が望ましいが、この程度の次数では温度分布に多峰性があった場合に対応できない。また高次多項式では、各定数係数の桁数が異なるため計算が不安定になる。さらに高次多項式の定数係数には物理的な意味がないため、計算が不安定になった場合に、不安定の要因となる変数を特定し難い。 First, in the CT image reconstruction algorithm disclosed in Non-Patent Document 1, the temperature distribution T (x, y) and the concentration distribution n (x, y) on the measurement surface are approximated by bim-order polynomials, and each constant The coefficients are determined by an optimization calculation method, but the problem is that the order of m is as high as 14th order. In other words, the number of constant coefficients to be optimized is 2 x (14 + 1) 2 = 450 variables, so if the initial search value of the optimization calculation is not set appropriately, the global optimal solution may not be reached or it may take a long time until the global optimal solution is reached. The problem is that it takes a lot of time. In addition, approximation using high-order polynomials also presents a mathematical problem in that unstable numerical oscillations, generally referred to as the Runge phenomenon, occur. In order to suppress this numerical oscillation, it is practically desirable to use an order of about m≦6, but this order cannot cope with cases where the temperature distribution has multimodality. Furthermore, in a high-order polynomial, the number of digits of each constant coefficient is different, making calculations unstable. Furthermore, since the constant coefficients of a high-order polynomial have no physical meaning, if the calculation becomes unstable, it is difficult to identify the variable that causes the instability.

第2に、非特許文献1に開示のCT画像再構成アルゴリズムでは、上記の大域最適解に辿り着く時間を短縮するために、初期値データベースを構築し、データベースの一次結合から最適な探索初期値を選定するアルゴリズムを採用するが、この探索初期値の設定に問題がある。すなわち、探索初期値は例えばCFD(Computational Fluid Dynamics)計算で適切に設定することとしているが、このCFD計算自体に計算コストが掛かるうえ、CFD計算のための条件も手作業で適切に設定する必要がある。 Second, in the CT image reconstruction algorithm disclosed in Non-Patent Document 1, in order to shorten the time to arrive at the above-mentioned global optimal solution, an initial value database is constructed, and the optimal search initial value is determined from a linear combination of the databases. However, there is a problem with setting the initial value for this search. In other words, the initial search values are set appropriately by, for example, CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) calculations, but this CFD calculation itself requires calculation costs, and the conditions for CFD calculations also need to be appropriately set manually. There is.

本発明は、上記事情に鑑みてなされたものであり、CT-TDLASのCT画像再構成アルゴリズムにおいて、安定的な計算を実現するとともに、計算コストを低廉化させることを目的とする。 The present invention has been made in view of the above circumstances, and aims to realize stable calculations and reduce calculation costs in a CT image reconstruction algorithm for CT-TDLAS.

前記の目的を達成するため、本発明者は鋭意検討を行い、上記の第1の問題点と第2の問題点を同時に解決するCT画像再構成計算アルゴリズムを想到した。すなわち、測定面上の温度分布T(x,y)及び濃度分布n(x,y)として非特許文献1で開示されているアルゴリズムでは高次多項式で近似しているところを、離散格子状に温度分布T(x,y)及び濃度分布n(x,y)を仮定し、格子間を三次以下の多項式補間式により補間する。これにより、格子境界での連続性と一階微分連続性を保証し、連続的に滑らかな温度分布T(x,y)及び濃度分布n(x,y)を、数値振動を抑えた低次多項式で得ることができる。 In order to achieve the above object, the inventors of the present invention conducted extensive studies and came up with a CT image reconstruction calculation algorithm that simultaneously solves the first problem and the second problem. In other words, in the algorithm disclosed in Non-Patent Document 1, the temperature distribution T (x, y) and the concentration distribution n (x, y) on the measurement surface are approximated by a high-order polynomial, but they are approximated by a discrete grid. Assuming a temperature distribution T (x, y) and a concentration distribution n (x, y), interlattice intervals are interpolated using a polynomial interpolation formula of order three or less. This ensures continuity and first-order differential continuity at the lattice boundaries, creating a continuously smooth temperature distribution T (x, y) and concentration distribution n (x, y) with low order It can be obtained as a polynomial.

また、離散格子状に仮定する温度分布T(x,y)及び濃度分布n(x,y)について、適当な最適化計算により、測定値に最も近い値を選択することができる。さらに、仮定した格子間隔を段階的に狭めていくことにより、安定的に最適化計算の精度を高めることが可能となる。この手順により、最適解の十分近傍から探索を開始しなくても安定的かつ高速に最適解まで辿り着くことができる。 Further, for the temperature distribution T(x, y) and concentration distribution n(x, y) assumed to be in the form of a discrete grid, the values closest to the measured values can be selected by appropriate optimization calculations. Furthermore, by gradually narrowing the assumed lattice spacing, it is possible to stably improve the accuracy of optimization calculations. With this procedure, it is possible to reach the optimal solution stably and quickly without starting the search sufficiently close to the optimal solution.

本発明は、かかる知見に基づいてなされたものであり、500℃~2000℃の範囲の被測定ガスを内部に含む測定チャンバにおいて、前記被測定ガスの温度と濃度の空間内分布を分析するガス分析方法であって、レーザ入光部からレーザ受光部に向けてレーザ光を照射して、前記被測定ガス中に前記レーザ光を通過させ、前記レーザ受光部で受光した前記レーザ光の強度を測定する測定工程と、前記レーザ受光部におけるレーザ光強度の測定値に基づいて、前記被測定ガスの温度と濃度の空間内分布を算出する算出工程と、を有し、前記レーザ入光部と前記レーザ受光部の対が複数設けられ、前記算出工程は、前記被測定ガスの温度と濃度の推定値を、前記測定チャンバの内部空間内で離散的に推定する第1工程と、前記第1工程で離散的に推定された前記推定値の空間補間を三次以下の多項式補間式で行う第2工程と、前記第1工程で推定された前記推定値から算出されるレーザ光強度と、前記測定工程で測定された前記レーザ光強度の測定値との誤差を最小化するように、前記推定値を補正する繰返最適化の計算を行う第3工程と、前記第3工程で補正された前記推定値の空間内の点数を段階的に増加させ、前記被測定ガスの温度と濃度の空間内分布を算出する第4工程と、を有することを特徴としている。 The present invention has been made based on this knowledge, and is a gas analyzer for analyzing the spatial distribution of the temperature and concentration of the gas to be measured in a measurement chamber containing the gas to be measured in the range of 500°C to 2000°C. The analysis method comprises: irradiating a laser beam from a laser incident part toward a laser receiving part, passing the laser light into the gas to be measured, and measuring the intensity of the laser light received by the laser receiving part. and a calculation step of calculating the spatial distribution of the temperature and concentration of the gas to be measured based on the measured value of the laser light intensity in the laser light receiving part, A plurality of pairs of the laser light receiving sections are provided, and the calculation step includes a first step of discretely estimating the estimated values of the temperature and concentration of the gas to be measured within the internal space of the measurement chamber; a second step of performing spatial interpolation of the estimated value discretely estimated in the step using a polynomial interpolation formula of order three or less; a laser light intensity calculated from the estimated value estimated in the first step; and the measurement. a third step of performing an iterative optimization calculation to correct the estimated value so as to minimize the error with the measured value of the laser light intensity measured in the third step; The present invention is characterized by comprising a fourth step of increasing the number of points in the space of estimated values stepwise to calculate the spatial distribution of the temperature and concentration of the gas to be measured.

前記ガス分析方法において、前記レーザ入光部と前記レーザ受光部の対が8つ以上設けられ、前記レーザ入光部とレーザ受光部の間のレーザ光経路が、前記被測定ガス内で二次元メッシュ状になるよう構成されていてもよい。 In the gas analysis method, eight or more pairs of the laser entrance section and the laser reception section are provided, and the laser light path between the laser entrance section and the laser reception section is two-dimensional within the gas to be measured. It may be configured to have a mesh shape.

前記ガス分析方法において、前記第2工程において、前記三次以下の多項式補間式として、双三次畳込補間法を利用してもよい。 In the gas analysis method, in the second step, a bicubic convolutional interpolation method may be used as the polynomial interpolation formula of order three or less.

前記ガス分析方法において、前記第3工程において、前記繰返最適化の手順として、最小自乗法を利用してもよい。 In the gas analysis method, a least squares method may be used as the iterative optimization procedure in the third step.

前記ガス分析方法において、前記第4工程において、前記推定値の空間内の点数を段階的に増加させていく手順として、前記推定値の空間内の格子間隔を逐次的に2分割してもよい。 In the gas analysis method, in the fourth step, the grid interval in the estimated value space may be successively divided into two as a step of increasing the number of points in the estimated value space in stages. .

別な観点による本発明は、500℃~2000℃の範囲の被測定ガスを内部に含む測定チャンバにおいて、前記被測定ガスの温度と濃度の空間内分布を分析するガス分析装置であって、前記被測定ガス中にレーザ光を入光するレーザ入光部と、前記被測定ガス中を通過したレーザ光を受光するレーザ受光部と、前記レーザ受光部におけるレーザ光強度の測定値に基づいて、前記被測定ガスの温度と濃度の空間内分布を算出する算出部と、を有し、前記レーザ入光部と前記レーザ受光部の対が複数設けられ、前記算出部は、前記被測定ガスの温度と濃度の推定値を、前記測定チャンバの内部空間内で離散的に推定する第1工程と、前記第1工程で離散的に推定された前記推定値の空間補間を三次以下の多項式補間式で行う第2工程と、前記第1工程で推定された前記推定値から算出されるレーザ光強度と、前記レーザ受光部における前記レーザ光強度の測定値との誤差を最小化するように、前記推定値を補正する繰返最適化の計算を行う第3工程と、前記第3工程で補正された前記推定値の空間内の点数を段階的に増加させ、前記被測定ガスの温度と濃度の空間内分布を算出する第4工程と、を行うことを特徴としている。 The present invention according to another aspect is a gas analyzer for analyzing the spatial distribution of the temperature and concentration of the gas to be measured in a measurement chamber containing the gas to be measured in the range of 500° C. to 2000° C. A laser light entrance part that enters the laser light into the gas to be measured, a laser light receiving part that receives the laser light that has passed through the gas to be measured, and based on the measured value of the laser light intensity in the laser light receiving part, a calculation unit that calculates the spatial distribution of the temperature and concentration of the gas to be measured; a plurality of pairs of the laser light input unit and the laser reception unit are provided; A first step of discretely estimating estimated values of temperature and concentration within the internal space of the measurement chamber, and spatial interpolation of the estimated values discretely estimated in the first step using a polynomial interpolation formula of order three or less. The second step performed in the second step and the laser light intensity calculated from the estimated value estimated in the first step and the measured value of the laser light intensity at the laser receiver are minimized. A third step of performing an iterative optimization calculation to correct the estimated value, and stepwise increasing the number of points in the space of the estimated value corrected in the third step, and adjusting the temperature and concentration of the measured gas. A fourth step of calculating the spatial distribution is performed.

前記ガス分析装置において、前記レーザ入光部と前記レーザ受光部の対が8つ以上設けられ、前記レーザ入光部とレーザ受光部の間のレーザ光経路が、前記被測定ガス内で二次元メッシュ状になるよう構成されていてもよい。 In the gas analyzer, eight or more pairs of the laser entrance section and the laser reception section are provided, and the laser light path between the laser entrance section and the laser reception section is two-dimensional within the gas to be measured. It may be configured to have a mesh shape.

前記ガス分析装置において、前記算出部は、前記第2工程において、前記三次以下の多項式補間式として、双三次畳込補間法を利用してもよい。 In the gas analyzer, the calculation unit may use a bicubic convolution interpolation method as the polynomial interpolation formula of order three or less in the second step.

前記ガス分析装置において、前記算出部は、前記第3工程において、前記繰返最適化の手順として、最小自乗法を利用してもよい。 In the gas analyzer, the calculation unit may use a least squares method as the iterative optimization procedure in the third step.

前記ガス分析装置において、前記算出部は、前記第4工程において、前記推定値の空間内の点数を段階的に増加させていく手順として、前記推定値の空間内の格子間隔を逐次的に2分割してもよい。 In the gas analyzer, in the fourth step, the calculation unit sequentially increases the grid spacing in the estimated value space by 2 as a step of increasing the number of points in the estimated value space in stages. May be divided.

本発明によれば、CT-TDLASのCT画像再構成アルゴリズムにおいて、安定的な計算を実現するとともに、計算コストを低廉化させることができる。 According to the present invention, in the CT image reconstruction algorithm of CT-TDLAS, stable calculation can be realized and the calculation cost can be reduced.

本実施形態にかかるガス分析装置の構成の概略を示す説明図である。FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram schematically showing the configuration of a gas analyzer according to the present embodiment. 温度分布T(x,y)及び濃度分布n(x,y)を示す説明図である。It is an explanatory diagram showing temperature distribution T (x, y) and concentration distribution n (x, y). 温度分布T(x,y)及び濃度分布n(x,y)の推定値の空間内の点数を段階的に増加させる様子を示す説明図である。FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram showing how the number of points in the space of estimated values of temperature distribution T(x, y) and concentration distribution n(x, y) is increased in stages. 実施例における原画像を示す説明図である。It is an explanatory view showing an original image in an example. 実施例において吸光度の平均自乗誤差和の推移を示す説明図である。FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram showing the transition of the sum of mean square errors of absorbance in Examples. 実施例においてCT画像再構成計算アルゴリズムを用いて再構成された画像を示す説明図である。FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram showing an image reconstructed using a CT image reconstruction calculation algorithm in an example.

以下、本発明の実施形態について、図面を参照しながら説明する。なお、本明細書及び図面において、実質的に同一の機能構成を有する要素においては、同一の符号を付することにより重複説明を省略する。 Embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings. Note that in this specification and the drawings, elements having substantially the same functional configuration are designated by the same reference numerals and redundant explanation will be omitted.

<ガス分析装置>
先ず、本実施形態にかかるガス分析装置の構成について説明する。図1は、ガス分析装置の構成の概略を示す説明図である。
<Gas analyzer>
First, the configuration of the gas analyzer according to this embodiment will be explained. FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram showing an outline of the configuration of a gas analyzer.

図1に示すようにガス分析装置10は、測定チャンバ20の内部に含まれる被測定ガスの温度と濃度の空間内分布を測定して分析する装置である。測定チャンバ20は、例えば熱延加熱炉におけるチャンバであって、内部の被測定ガスは500℃~2000℃の範囲のガスである。この500℃~2000℃の範囲は、TDLASにおける測定限界にもほぼ一致している。 As shown in FIG. 1, the gas analyzer 10 is a device that measures and analyzes the spatial distribution of temperature and concentration of a gas to be measured contained within a measurement chamber 20. The measurement chamber 20 is, for example, a chamber in a hot rolling heating furnace, and the gas to be measured therein is a gas in the range of 500°C to 2000°C. This range of 500°C to 2000°C almost coincides with the measurement limit in TDLAS.

ガス分析装置10は、複数のレーザ入光部11と複数のレーザ受光部12を有している。レーザ入光部11は、測定チャンバ20の内部に向けてレーザ光を照射し、被測定ガス中にレーザ光を入光する。レーザ受光部12は、レーザ入光部11から照射され、被測定ガス中を通過したレーザ光を受光する。 The gas analyzer 10 has a plurality of laser light receiving sections 11 and a plurality of laser light receiving sections 12. The laser light entrance unit 11 irradiates the inside of the measurement chamber 20 with laser light, and enters the laser light into the gas to be measured. The laser light receiving section 12 receives the laser light irradiated from the laser light receiving section 11 and passed through the gas to be measured.

レーザ入光部11とレーザ受光部12は、測定チャンバ20を挟んで1対1の対に設けられている。レーザ入光部11とレーザ受光部12の対は、複数、本実施形態では16個設けられている。以下の説明においては、これら16個のレーザ入光部11とレーザ受光部12をそれぞれ、レーザ入光部11a~11pとレーザ受光部12a~12pという場合がある。レーザ入光部11a~11hとレーザ受光部12a~12hの対はそれぞれ、測定チャンバ20を挟んでX方向に対向して配置されている。レーザ入光部11i~11pとレーザ受光部12i~12pの対はそれぞれ、測定チャンバ20を挟んでY方向に対向して配置されている。そして、レーザ入光部11とレーザ受光部12のレーザ光経路が、測定チャンバ20の被測定ガス内で二次元メッシュになるように構成されている。 The laser light incident section 11 and the laser light receiving section 12 are provided in a one-to-one pair with the measurement chamber 20 in between. A plurality of pairs, 16 in this embodiment, of the laser light incident section 11 and the laser light receiving section 12 are provided. In the following description, these 16 laser light incident sections 11 and laser light receiving sections 12 may be referred to as laser light incident sections 11a to 11p and laser light receiving sections 12a to 12p, respectively. Each pair of laser light incident portions 11a to 11h and laser light receiving portions 12a to 12h are arranged to face each other in the X direction with the measurement chamber 20 in between. Each pair of laser light incident sections 11i to 11p and laser light receiving sections 12i to 12p are arranged to face each other in the Y direction with the measurement chamber 20 in between. The laser beam paths of the laser light incident section 11 and the laser light receiving section 12 are configured to form a two-dimensional mesh within the gas to be measured in the measurement chamber 20.

なお、レーザ入光部11とレーザ受光部12の対の数は、本実施形態に限定されないが、後述する計算の精度を向上させる観点から、例えば8つ以上が好ましい。また、本実施形態では、レーザ入光部11とレーザ受光部12は、レーザ光経路が被測定ガス内で二次元メッシュになるように構成されたがこれに限定されない。例えば、レーザ入光部11とレーザ受光部12は、レーザ光経路が45度でクロスするように構成されてもよい。 Note that the number of pairs of the laser light incident section 11 and the laser light receiving section 12 is not limited to this embodiment, but from the viewpoint of improving the accuracy of calculations described later, it is preferably eight or more, for example. Further, in the present embodiment, the laser light incident section 11 and the laser light receiving section 12 are configured so that the laser light path forms a two-dimensional mesh within the gas to be measured, but the invention is not limited to this. For example, the laser light incident section 11 and the laser light receiving section 12 may be configured such that their laser light paths intersect at 45 degrees.

ガス分析装置10は、レーザ受光部12で受光したレーザ光の強度(以下、「レーザ光強度」という。)の測定値に基づいて、被測定ガスの濃度と被測定ガスの温度と濃度の空間内分布を算出する算出部13を有している。算出部13は、例えばCPUやメモリ等を備えたコンピュータであり、プログラム格納部(図示せず)を有している。プログラム格納部には、ガス分析を行うための各種プログラムが格納されている。なお、レーザ受光部12と算出部13との通信は、特に限定されるものではないが、例えばインターネットや有線LAN、無線LANなどにより構成される。 The gas analyzer 10 determines the concentration of the gas to be measured and the space between the temperature and the concentration of the gas to be measured based on the measured value of the intensity of the laser light received by the laser light receiving unit 12 (hereinafter referred to as "laser light intensity"). It has a calculation unit 13 that calculates the inner distribution. The calculation unit 13 is, for example, a computer equipped with a CPU, a memory, etc., and has a program storage unit (not shown). The program storage section stores various programs for performing gas analysis. Note that communication between the laser light receiving section 12 and the calculation section 13 is not particularly limited, and may be configured, for example, by the Internet, a wired LAN, a wireless LAN, or the like.

<ガス分析方法>
次に、以上の実施形態のガス分析装置10を用いて、測定チャンバ20の内部の被測定ガスの温度と濃度の空間内分布を算出(分析)する方法、すなわちCT画像の再構成計算アルゴリズムについて説明する。
<Gas analysis method>
Next, a method for calculating (analyzing) the spatial distribution of the temperature and concentration of the gas to be measured inside the measurement chamber 20 using the gas analyzer 10 of the above embodiment, that is, a CT image reconstruction calculation algorithm will be described. explain.

[測定工程]
先ず、レーザ入光部11からレーザ受光部12に向けてレーザ光を照射して、測定チャンバ20の内部の被測定ガス中にレーザ光を通過させ、レーザ受光部12で受光したレーザ光の強度を測定する。レーザ受光部12a~12pにおける測定結果は、算出部13に出力される。
[Measurement process]
First, a laser beam is irradiated from the laser light receiving part 11 toward the laser receiving part 12, and the laser light is passed through the gas to be measured inside the measurement chamber 20, and the intensity of the laser light received by the laser receiving part 12 is measured. Measure. The measurement results at the laser light receiving sections 12a to 12p are output to the calculation section 13.

[算出工程]
次に、算出部13において、被測定ガスの温度と濃度の空間内分布を算出する工程について説明する。この算出工程は、次の第1工程~第4工程に分かれている。
[Calculation process]
Next, a process of calculating the spatial distribution of the temperature and concentration of the gas to be measured in the calculation unit 13 will be explained. This calculation process is divided into the following first to fourth steps.

(第1工程)
第1工程では、被測定ガスの温度と濃度の推定値を、測定チャンバ20の内部空間内で離散的に推定する。図1に示したようにレーザ入光部11とレーザ受光部12のレーザ光経路は、被測定ガス内で二次元メッシュになる。そして第1工程では、図2に示すようにレーザ光経路が二次元メッシュで表現された測定面において、温度分布T(x,y)及び濃度分布n(x,y)を離散格子状に推定する(図2中の白丸に対応)。
(1st step)
In the first step, estimated values of the temperature and concentration of the gas to be measured are discretely estimated within the internal space of the measurement chamber 20 . As shown in FIG. 1, the laser light path of the laser light incident part 11 and the laser light receiving part 12 forms a two-dimensional mesh within the gas to be measured. In the first step, the temperature distribution T(x, y) and concentration distribution n(x, y) are estimated in a discrete grid on the measurement surface where the laser beam path is expressed as a two-dimensional mesh as shown in Figure 2. (corresponds to the white circle in Figure 2).

(第2工程)
第2工程では、第1工程で離散的に推定された推定値の格子間を、双三次畳込補間法(BCI法:Bicubic Convolution Interpolation)を用いて補間する。具体的には、下記式(1)を用いて推定値を補間する。図2に示すように対象点(図2中の黒丸に対応)の近傍4×4=16点(図2中の白丸に対応)との距離から、各近傍点の値を三次式補完することにより、対象点の値を算出する。
(Second process)
In the second step, the lattices of the estimated values discretely estimated in the first step are interpolated using a bicubic convolution interpolation method (BCI method). Specifically, the estimated value is interpolated using the following equation (1). As shown in Figure 2, the value of each neighboring point is interpolated using a cubic formula based on the distance from the target point (corresponding to the black circle in Figure 2) to the neighboring 4 x 4 = 16 points (corresponding to the white circle in Figure 2). The value of the target point is calculated by:

Figure 0007401768000001
Figure 0007401768000001

このように温度分布T(x,y)及び濃度分布n(x,y)の格子間を双三次畳込補間法で補間することで、格子境界(ブロック境界)での連続性と一階微分連続性を保証し、連続的に滑らかな温度分布T(x,y)及び濃度分布n(x,y)を低次多項式で得ることができる。また、低次多項式であるため、Runge現象のような数値振動を抑えることでき、計算を高精度かつ安定的に行うことが可能となる。このような双三次畳込補間法を用いた効果については、例えば上田裕巳著「3次畳み込み補間に関する一考察」電子情報通信学会技術研究報告Vol.113,No.114,(2013),pp.7-14.においても報告されている。 By interpolating between the grids of the temperature distribution T (x, y) and the concentration distribution n (x, y) using the bicubic convolution interpolation method, continuity at the grid boundaries (block boundaries) and first-order differentiation can be achieved. Continuity is guaranteed, and a continuously smooth temperature distribution T(x, y) and concentration distribution n(x, y) can be obtained using low-order polynomials. Furthermore, since it is a low-order polynomial, numerical oscillations such as the Runge phenomenon can be suppressed, and calculations can be performed with high accuracy and stability. Regarding the effects of using such a bicubic convolutional interpolation method, see, for example, "A Study on Cubic Convolutional Interpolation" by Hiromi Ueda, IEICE Technical Report Vol. 113, No. 114, (2013), pp. 7-14. It has also been reported.

また、双三次畳込補間法を用いた場合、非特許文献1で開示されているアルゴリズムに対して次のような利点がある、すなわち、非特許文献1に開示のアルゴリズムにおいて最適化計算の対象は高次多項式の各定数係数であるのに対して、双三次畳込補間法では温度分布Tや濃度分布nといった物理係数を直截的に最適化対象としているため、データの見通しが良くデータ分析が容易になる。また高次多項式において各定数係数の桁数は大きく異なっていたが、双三次畳込補間法では上記式(1)に示すように最適化対象の係数の桁数をそろえることができ、計算を安定化させることができる。さらに高次多項式において1つの定数係数の修正は対象空間全体の分布状態に波及するが、双三次畳込補間法において1つの仮定値の修正の影響はその周辺の局所空間のみに限定されるため、より安定的に最適化計算を進行することができる。 In addition, when using the bicubic convolution interpolation method, there are the following advantages over the algorithm disclosed in Non-patent Document 1. Namely, in the algorithm disclosed in Non-Patent Document 1, the optimization calculation target are constant coefficients of a high-order polynomial, whereas in the bicubic convolution interpolation method, physical coefficients such as temperature distribution T and concentration distribution n are directly targeted for optimization. becomes easier. In addition, in high-order polynomials, the number of digits of each constant coefficient differs greatly, but with the bicubic convolution interpolation method, the number of digits of the coefficients to be optimized can be made the same as shown in equation (1) above, making calculations easier. It can be stabilized. Furthermore, in a high-order polynomial, the modification of one constant coefficient affects the distribution state of the entire target space, but in the bicubic convolution method, the influence of modification of one assumed value is limited only to the local space around it. , the optimization calculation can proceed more stably.

なお、本実施形態では、推定値の空間補間として双三次畳込補間法を用いたが、補間方法はこれに限定されない。例えば三次以下の多項式補間式を用いて、推定値を補間するのが好ましい。例えば、三次スプライン補間(Bicubic Spline補間)やNURBS(Non-Uniform Rational B-Spline)を用いてもよい。これらの方法を用いると、二次微分連続性まで保証するが、計算負荷が増大する。また例えば、双線形補間(Bilinear Interpolation)を用いてもよい。かかる場合、対象点の近傍2×2=4点との距離から、各近傍点の値を線形補間することにより対象点の値を算出する。この双線形補間を用いると、格子境界での連続性を保証し、計算負荷が小さくなるが、格子境界での一階微分連続性がなく、補間精度が悪い。したがって、計算負荷や補間精度を総合的に鑑みると、推定値の空間補間として双三次畳込補間法を用いるのが好ましい。 Note that in this embodiment, the bicubic convolution interpolation method is used as spatial interpolation of estimated values, but the interpolation method is not limited to this. For example, it is preferable to interpolate the estimated value using a polynomial interpolation formula of order three or less. For example, cubic spline interpolation (bicubic spline interpolation) or NURBS (Non-Uniform Rational B-Spline) may be used. When these methods are used, even second-order differential continuity is guaranteed, but the computational load increases. Alternatively, for example, bilinear interpolation may be used. In such a case, the value of the target point is calculated by linearly interpolating the value of each neighboring point from the distance to 2×2=4 points in the vicinity of the target point. When this bilinear interpolation is used, continuity at the grid boundaries is guaranteed and the calculation load is reduced, but there is no first-order differential continuity at the grid boundaries and the interpolation accuracy is poor. Therefore, in comprehensive consideration of calculation load and interpolation accuracy, it is preferable to use the bicubic convolutional interpolation method for spatial interpolation of estimated values.

(第3工程)
第3工程では、第1工程で推定された推定値から算出されるレーザ光強度と、測定工程で測定されたレーザ光強度の測定値との誤差を最小化するように、推定値を補正する繰返最適化の計算を行う。そして、離散格子状に推定された温度分布T(x,y)及び濃度分布n(x,y)の推定値について、測定値に最も近い値を選択することができる。
(3rd step)
In the third step, the estimated value is corrected so as to minimize the error between the laser light intensity calculated from the estimated value estimated in the first step and the measured value of the laser light intensity measured in the measurement step. Perform iterative optimization calculations. Then, for the estimated values of the temperature distribution T(x, y) and the concentration distribution n(x, y) estimated in the form of a discrete grid, the values closest to the measured values can be selected.

上述した繰返最適化の計算としては、例えば最小自乗法を利用する。本実施形態では、例えばネルダーミード法(Nelder-Mead method)などの、簡便な非線形シンプレックス法を用いる。なお、最適化計算の方法はこれに限定されない。例えば他にも共役勾配法、SA法(Simulated Annealing)、GA法(Genetic Algorithm)、SB法(Simulated Bifurcation)などを用いてもよい。 For example, the method of least squares is used for the iterative optimization calculation described above. In this embodiment, a simple nonlinear simplex method such as the Nelder-Mead method is used. Note that the optimization calculation method is not limited to this. For example, the conjugate gradient method, SA method (Simulated Annealing), GA method (Genetic Algorithm), SB method (Simulated Bifurcation), etc. may also be used.

(第4工程)
第4工程では、第3工程で補正された推定値の空間内の点数を段階的に増加させ、推定値の格子間隔を段階的に狭めていく。例えば図3に示すように推定値の空間内の格子間隔を1/2ずつ狭めていく。これにより、被測定ガスの温度と濃度の空間内分布を算出することができる。
(4th step)
In the fourth step, the number of points in the space of the estimated values corrected in the third step is increased in stages, and the lattice spacing of the estimated values is gradually narrowed. For example, as shown in FIG. 3, the grid spacing in the estimated value space is narrowed by 1/2. Thereby, the spatial distribution of the temperature and concentration of the gas to be measured can be calculated.

なお、推定値の空間内の数密度の逐次的増加は、本実施形態に限定されず、例えば格子間隔を3分割や5分割にしてもよい。但し、本実施形態のように推定値の格子間隔を逐次的に2分割すると、計算の効率がよい。 Note that the sequential increase in the number density in the estimated value space is not limited to this embodiment, and the grid interval may be divided into three or five, for example. However, if the lattice spacing of estimated values is successively divided into two as in this embodiment, calculation efficiency is improved.

ここで、非特許文献1に開示のアルゴリズムでは、初期値データベースを構築し、データベースの一次結合から最適な探索初期値を選定するアルゴリズムを採用するが、この探索初期値をCFD計算で設定するため、計算コストがかかり、計算作業も手作業になる。これに対して、本実施形態の第4工程では、領域分割数を逐次二分で増加させることで、安定的に最適化計算の精度を高めることが可能となる。そして、最適解の十分近傍から探索を開始しなくても安定的かつ高速に最適解まで辿り着けるため、上述した初期値データベースが不要となり、安定的な計算を実現し、計算コストを低廉化することができる。 Here, in the algorithm disclosed in Non-Patent Document 1, an algorithm is adopted in which an initial value database is constructed and an optimal search initial value is selected from a linear combination of the database, but since this search initial value is set by CFD calculation, , calculation costs are high, and calculation work must be done manually. On the other hand, in the fourth step of the present embodiment, by increasing the number of region divisions in half, it is possible to stably improve the accuracy of the optimization calculation. In addition, since the optimal solution can be reached stably and quickly without starting the search sufficiently close to the optimal solution, the above-mentioned initial value database is no longer required, realizing stable calculations and reducing calculation costs. be able to.

以上の実施形態によれば、第2工程において、測定平面上の温度分布T(x,y)及び濃度分布n(x,y)を、従来法では双m次多項式(m≒14)で近似していたところを双三次畳込補間法で近似することにより、高次多項式の数学的不安定性を解消することができる。さらに第4工程において、補間の分割幅を段階的に狭めていくことにより、初期値を設定する計算コストを削減することができる。したがって、CT-TDLASのCT画像再構成アルゴリズムにおいて、高速かつ安定的な計算を実現するとともに、計算コストを低廉化させることができる。 According to the above embodiment, in the second step, the temperature distribution T(x, y) and the concentration distribution n(x, y) on the measurement plane are approximated by a bim-order polynomial (m≒14) in the conventional method. The mathematical instability of high-order polynomials can be resolved by approximating this using bicubic convolution interpolation. Furthermore, in the fourth step, the calculation cost for setting the initial value can be reduced by gradually narrowing the interpolation division width. Therefore, in the CT image reconstruction algorithm of CT-TDLAS, high-speed and stable calculation can be realized, and the calculation cost can be reduced.

以上、本発明の実施形態について説明したが、本発明はかかる例に限定されない。当業者であれば、特許請求の範囲に記載された技術的思想の範疇内において、各種の変更例または修正例に想到しうることは明らかであり、それらについても当然に本発明の技術的範囲に属するものと了解される。 Although the embodiments of the present invention have been described above, the present invention is not limited to such examples. It is clear that those skilled in the art can come up with various changes or modifications within the scope of the technical idea described in the claims, and these naturally fall within the technical scope of the present invention. It is understood that it belongs to

本発明の効果(有効性)を検証するため、以下のとおり数値的な検証を実施した。 In order to verify the effect (effectiveness) of the present invention, numerical verification was performed as follows.

先ず、サンプルデータとして、図4に示すように矩形平面内に3つのピークをもつ吸光度分布を仮定する。それぞれのピーク1~3の高さと広がりは、下記式(2)に示す変形Gauss関数で連続値として与える。式(2)における各ピーク1~3の係数等は表1のとおりである。 First, as sample data, an absorbance distribution having three peaks in a rectangular plane as shown in FIG. 4 is assumed. The height and spread of each peak 1 to 3 are given as continuous values by a modified Gaussian function shown in equation (2) below. Table 1 shows the coefficients of each peak 1 to 3 in formula (2).

Figure 0007401768000002
Figure 0007401768000002

Figure 0007401768000003
Figure 0007401768000003

次に、図4に示した矩形平面内にレーザ光路を縦方向に8本、横方向に8本仮定し、それぞれのレーザ光路における経路平均吸光度(経路積分吸光度)を下記式(3)に示すTDLAS信号の理論式によって算出する。それぞれのレーザ光路の端点の座標と、算出した経路平均吸光度の一覧を表2に示す。 Next, assume that there are eight laser beam paths in the vertical direction and eight in the horizontal direction within the rectangular plane shown in FIG. 4, and the path average absorbance (path integrated absorbance) in each laser beam path is expressed by the following formula (3). Calculated using the theoretical formula for the TDLAS signal. Table 2 shows a list of the coordinates of the end points of each laser beam path and the calculated path average absorbance.

Figure 0007401768000004
Figure 0007401768000004

Figure 0007401768000005
Figure 0007401768000005

そして、表2に示した模擬CTデータから、図3及び以下に記述する試行的計算手段によって図4に示した原画像を再構成した。 Then, from the simulated CT data shown in Table 2, the original image shown in FIG. 4 was reconstructed by the trial calculation means described in FIG. 3 and below.

先ず、矩形平面を2×2のブロックに分割し、それぞれの小矩形の頂点における吸光度を仮定する。すなわち、合計9点の仮定値(上記実施形態における推定値)がこの段階で発生する。また矩形内の吸光度分布は上記式(1)に示す双三次畳込補間法で算出するものとする。 First, a rectangular plane is divided into 2×2 blocks, and the absorbance at the apex of each small rectangle is assumed. That is, a total of nine hypothetical values (estimated values in the above embodiment) are generated at this stage. Further, the absorbance distribution within the rectangle is calculated by the bicubic convolution interpolation method shown in the above equation (1).

次に、仮定した吸光度に基づき、上記レーザ光路上の経路平均吸光度を算出する。この値と表2のサンプルデータとの誤差を比較し、誤差が大きければ仮定値を修正する。ここでは、誤差として平均自乗誤差和を用いる。また仮定値の修正方法として、本実施例ではネルダーミード法(Nelder-Mead method)などの非線形シンプレックス法を用いたが、他にも上述したように共役勾配法、SA法、GA法、SB法などを用いてもよい。 Next, the path average absorbance on the laser beam path is calculated based on the assumed absorbance. The error between this value and the sample data in Table 2 is compared, and if the error is large, the assumed value is corrected. Here, the sum of mean square errors is used as the error. In addition, as a method for correcting assumed values, a nonlinear simplex method such as the Nelder-Mead method was used in this example, but there are also other methods such as the conjugate gradient method, SA method, GA method, SB method, etc. may also be used.

誤差が小さければ、矩形平面の分割数を2倍に増加し、新たに発生した小矩形頂点における吸光度を仮定値群に加え、上記サンプルデータとの誤差比較と仮定値の修正を繰り返す。 If the error is small, the number of divisions of the rectangular plane is doubled, the absorbance at the apex of the newly generated small rectangle is added to the assumed value group, and the error comparison with the sample data and correction of the assumed value are repeated.

上記の矩形平面の分割と吸光度仮定値の修正を繰り返し、矩形分割幅がレーザ光路同士の間隔の半分程度になった段階で計算を終了する。 The above-described division of the rectangular plane and modification of the assumed absorbance value are repeated, and the calculation is completed when the rectangular division width becomes approximately half the distance between the laser beam paths.

上述の繰返計算において、平均自乗誤差和の推移を図5に示す。図5の横軸は繰返計算のステップ(繰返計算の1計算が1ステップ)を示し、縦軸は平均自乗誤差和を示す。図5を参照すると、計算の進行に従って、自乗誤差和が小さくなっていくことが示されている。 FIG. 5 shows the transition of the sum of mean square errors in the above-mentioned iterative calculation. The horizontal axis of FIG. 5 shows the steps of iterative calculation (one calculation of the iterative calculation is one step), and the vertical axis shows the sum of mean square errors. Referring to FIG. 5, it is shown that the sum of squared errors becomes smaller as the calculation progresses.

また、繰返計算の最終段階のデータから再構成された画像を図6に示す。図4の原画像と類似した吸光度分布を再構成できていることが示されている。この吸光度分布から、ガス成分とレーザ波長に応じたモデル式を用いて、ガスの濃度と温度を推定することができる。 Further, FIG. 6 shows an image reconstructed from the data at the final stage of the iterative calculation. It is shown that an absorbance distribution similar to the original image in FIG. 4 can be reconstructed. From this absorbance distribution, the concentration and temperature of the gas can be estimated using a model equation depending on the gas component and laser wavelength.

ここで、従来の非特許文献1に開示のCT画像再構成アルゴリズム(CT-TDLAS)に対する、本発明の相違を表3にまとめる。従来法では、初期値を仮定する場合で1時間、仮定しない場合は手作業による試行が発生するために1週間程度の計算時間が必要だったものに対し、本発明のCT画像再構成計算アルゴリズムによれば初期値を仮定せずに1秒で計算が終了する。また、従来法において初期値を仮定する場合はCFD計算で計算条件を整える作業とCFD計算の時間が発生するため、通常1週間程度を要するに対し、本発明では初期値の設定は不要である。以上から、本発明のCT画像再構成計算アルゴリズムによれば、計算コストが著しく改善することが示される。 Table 3 summarizes the differences between the present invention and the conventional CT image reconstruction algorithm (CT-TDLAS) disclosed in Non-Patent Document 1. The conventional method required calculation time of 1 hour if the initial values were assumed, and about 1 week due to manual trials if no initial values were assumed, but the CT image reconstruction calculation algorithm of the present invention According to the method, the calculation can be completed in one second without assuming any initial values. In addition, when assuming an initial value in the conventional method, it usually takes about one week because it requires work to prepare calculation conditions in CFD calculation and time for CFD calculation, whereas in the present invention, setting of initial value is not necessary. From the above, it is shown that the CT image reconstruction calculation algorithm of the present invention significantly improves the calculation cost.

また、従来法の分布関数は双高次多項式であるのに対し、本発明の分布関数は双三次畳込補間である。そして、従来法の最適化変数は多項式の定数係数であるのに対し、本発明の最適化変数は温度及び濃度の物理量である。このため、本発明のCT画像再構成計算アルゴリズムによれば、データの見通しが良くデータ分析が容易になる。 Further, while the distribution function of the conventional method is a bihigh-order polynomial, the distribution function of the present invention is a bicubic convolutional interpolation. The optimization variables of the conventional method are constant coefficients of a polynomial, whereas the optimization variables of the present invention are physical quantities such as temperature and concentration. Therefore, according to the CT image reconstruction calculation algorithm of the present invention, data visibility is good and data analysis becomes easy.

Figure 0007401768000006
Figure 0007401768000006

本発明は、CT-TDLASのCT画像を再構成する際に有用である。 The present invention is useful when reconstructing CT images of CT-TDLAS.

10 ガス分析装置
11(11a~11p) レーザ入光部
12(12a~12p) レーザ受光部
13 算出部
20 測定チャンバ
10 Gas analyzer 11 (11a to 11p) Laser light incident section 12 (12a to 12p) Laser light receiving section 13 Calculation section 20 Measurement chamber

Claims (10)

500℃~2000℃の範囲の被測定ガスを内部に含む測定チャンバにおいて、前記被測定ガスの温度と濃度の空間内分布を分析するガス分析方法であって、
レーザ入光部からレーザ受光部に向けてレーザ光を照射して、前記被測定ガス中に前記レーザ光を通過させ、前記レーザ受光部で受光した前記レーザ光の強度を測定する測定工程と、
前記レーザ受光部におけるレーザ光強度の測定値に基づいて、前記被測定ガスの温度と濃度の空間内分布を算出する算出工程と、を有し、
前記レーザ入光部と前記レーザ受光部の対が複数設けられ、
前記算出工程は、
前記被測定ガスの温度と濃度の推定値を、前記測定チャンバの内部空間内で離散的に推定する第1工程と、
前記第1工程で離散的に推定された前記推定値の空間補間を三次以下の多項式補間式で行う第2工程と、
前記第1工程で推定された前記推定値から算出されるレーザ光強度と、前記測定工程で測定された前記レーザ光強度の測定値との誤差を最小化するように、前記推定値を補正する繰返最適化の計算を行う第3工程と、
前記第3工程で補正された前記推定値の空間内の点数を段階的に増加させ、前記被測定ガスの温度と濃度の空間内分布を算出する第4工程と、を有することを特徴とする、ガス分析方法。
A gas analysis method for analyzing the spatial distribution of the temperature and concentration of the gas to be measured in a measurement chamber containing the gas to be measured in the range of 500° C. to 2000° C.,
a measuring step of irradiating a laser beam from a laser light incident part toward a laser light receiving part, passing the laser light into the gas to be measured, and measuring the intensity of the laser light received by the laser light receiving part;
a calculation step of calculating the spatial distribution of the temperature and concentration of the gas to be measured based on the measured value of the laser light intensity in the laser light receiving section,
A plurality of pairs of the laser light incident part and the laser light receiving part are provided,
The calculation step is
A first step of discretely estimating the temperature and concentration of the gas to be measured within the internal space of the measurement chamber;
a second step of spatially interpolating the estimated values discretely estimated in the first step using a polynomial interpolation formula of order three or less;
Correcting the estimated value so as to minimize the error between the laser light intensity calculated from the estimated value estimated in the first step and the measured value of the laser light intensity measured in the measurement step. A third step of performing iterative optimization calculations;
A fourth step of calculating the spatial distribution of the temperature and concentration of the measured gas by increasing stepwise the number of points in the space of the estimated value corrected in the third step. , gas analysis methods.
前記レーザ入光部と前記レーザ受光部の対が8つ以上設けられ、
前記レーザ入光部とレーザ受光部の間のレーザ光経路が、前記被測定ガス内で二次元メッシュ状になるよう構成されたことを特徴とする、請求項1に記載のガス分析方法。
Eight or more pairs of the laser light incident part and the laser light receiving part are provided,
2. The gas analysis method according to claim 1, wherein the laser light path between the laser light incident part and the laser light receiving part is configured to form a two-dimensional mesh within the gas to be measured.
前記第2工程において、前記三次以下の多項式補間式として、双三次畳込補間法を利用することを特徴とする、請求項1又は2に記載のガス分析方法。 3. The gas analysis method according to claim 1, wherein in the second step, a bicubic convolutional interpolation method is used as the polynomial interpolation formula of order three or less. 前記第3工程において、前記繰返最適化の手順として、最小自乗法を利用することを特徴とする、請求項1~3のいずれか一項に記載のガス分析方法。 The gas analysis method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that in the third step, a least squares method is used as the iterative optimization procedure. 前記第4工程において、前記推定値の空間内の点数を段階的に増加させていく手順として、前記推定値の空間内の格子間隔を逐次的に2分割していくことを特徴とする、請求項1~4のいずれか一項に記載のガス分析方法。 In the fourth step, as a step of increasing the number of points in the estimated value space in stages, the grid interval in the estimated value space is successively divided into two. The gas analysis method according to any one of Items 1 to 4. 500℃~2000℃の範囲の被測定ガスを内部に含む測定チャンバにおいて、前記被測定ガスの温度と濃度の空間内分布を分析するガス分析装置であって、
前記被測定ガス中にレーザ光を入光するレーザ入光部と、
前記被測定ガス中を通過したレーザ光を受光するレーザ受光部と、
前記レーザ受光部におけるレーザ光強度の測定値に基づいて、前記被測定ガスの温度と濃度の空間内分布を算出する算出部と、を有し、
前記レーザ入光部と前記レーザ受光部の対が複数設けられ、
前記算出部は、
前記被測定ガスの温度と濃度の推定値を、前記測定チャンバの内部空間内で離散的に推定する第1工程と、
前記第1工程で離散的に推定された前記推定値の空間補間を三次以下の多項式補間式で行う第2工程と、
前記第1工程で推定された前記推定値から算出されるレーザ光強度と、前記レーザ受光部における前記レーザ光強度の測定値との誤差を最小化するように、前記推定値を補正する繰返最適化の計算を行う第3工程と、
前記第3工程で補正された前記推定値の空間内の点数を段階的に増加させ、前記被測定ガスの温度と濃度の空間内分布を算出する第4工程と、を行うことを特徴とする、ガス分析装置。
A gas analyzer for analyzing the spatial distribution of the temperature and concentration of the gas to be measured in a measurement chamber containing the gas to be measured in the range of 500° C. to 2000° C.,
a laser light input section that inputs a laser beam into the gas to be measured;
a laser light receiving section that receives the laser light that has passed through the gas to be measured;
a calculation unit that calculates the spatial distribution of the temperature and concentration of the gas to be measured based on the measured value of the laser light intensity in the laser light receiving unit;
A plurality of pairs of the laser light incident part and the laser light receiving part are provided,
The calculation unit is
A first step of discretely estimating the temperature and concentration of the gas to be measured within the internal space of the measurement chamber;
a second step of spatially interpolating the estimated values discretely estimated in the first step using a polynomial interpolation formula of order three or less;
Repeatedly correcting the estimated value so as to minimize the error between the laser light intensity calculated from the estimated value estimated in the first step and the measured value of the laser light intensity at the laser receiver. A third step of performing optimization calculations,
A fourth step of calculating the spatial distribution of temperature and concentration of the measured gas by increasing stepwise the number of points in the space of the estimated value corrected in the third step. , gas analyzer.
前記レーザ入光部と前記レーザ受光部の対が8つ以上設けられ、
前記レーザ入光部とレーザ受光部の間のレーザ光経路が、前記被測定ガス内で二次元メッシュ状になるよう構成されたことを特徴とする、請求項6に記載のガス分析装置。
Eight or more pairs of the laser light incident part and the laser light receiving part are provided,
7. The gas analyzer according to claim 6, wherein the laser light path between the laser light incident part and the laser light receiving part is configured to form a two-dimensional mesh within the gas to be measured.
前記算出部は、前記第2工程において、前記三次以下の多項式補間式として、双三次畳込補間法を利用することを特徴とする、請求項6又は7に記載のガス分析装置。 The gas analysis apparatus according to claim 6 or 7, wherein the calculation unit uses a bicubic convolutional interpolation method as the polynomial interpolation formula of order three or less in the second step. 前記算出部は、前記第3工程において、前記繰返最適化の手順として、最小自乗法を利用することを特徴とする、請求項6~8のいずれか一項に記載のガス分析装置。 9. The gas analysis apparatus according to claim 6, wherein the calculation unit uses a least squares method as the iterative optimization procedure in the third step. 前記算出部は、前記第4工程において、前記推定値の空間内の点数を段階的に増加させていく手順として、前記推定値の空間内の格子間隔を逐次的に2分割していくことを特徴とする、請求項6~9のいずれか一項に記載のガス分析装置。 In the fourth step, the calculation unit sequentially divides the grid interval in the estimated value space into two as a step of increasing the number of points in the estimated value space in stages. The gas analyzer according to any one of claims 6 to 9, characterized by:
JP2020056417A 2020-03-26 2020-03-26 Gas analysis method and gas analysis device Active JP7401768B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2020056417A JP7401768B2 (en) 2020-03-26 2020-03-26 Gas analysis method and gas analysis device

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2020056417A JP7401768B2 (en) 2020-03-26 2020-03-26 Gas analysis method and gas analysis device

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2021156701A JP2021156701A (en) 2021-10-07
JP7401768B2 true JP7401768B2 (en) 2023-12-20

Family

ID=77918057

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2020056417A Active JP7401768B2 (en) 2020-03-26 2020-03-26 Gas analysis method and gas analysis device

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7401768B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN118747807A (en) * 2024-06-07 2024-10-08 山东天泓环保工程有限公司 A method and system for analyzing gas distribution in a park based on deep learning

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2005287750A (en) 2004-03-31 2005-10-20 Konica Minolta Medical & Graphic Inc Medical image display method, medical image display device and program
JP2006350562A (en) 2005-06-14 2006-12-28 Sanyo Electric Co Ltd Image processor and image processing program
JP2015040747A (en) 2013-08-21 2015-03-02 国立大学法人徳島大学 Gas analyzing apparatus using laser light and gas analyzing method
JP2016186464A (en) 2015-03-27 2016-10-27 三菱重工業株式会社 Gas analyser, combustion facility control system, control support system and gas analysis method
WO2017119283A1 (en) 2016-01-06 2017-07-13 国立大学法人徳島大学 Gas analysis device using laser beam and gas analysis method

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0844863A (en) * 1994-07-27 1996-02-16 Dainippon Printing Co Ltd Image enlargement method

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2005287750A (en) 2004-03-31 2005-10-20 Konica Minolta Medical & Graphic Inc Medical image display method, medical image display device and program
JP2006350562A (en) 2005-06-14 2006-12-28 Sanyo Electric Co Ltd Image processor and image processing program
JP2015040747A (en) 2013-08-21 2015-03-02 国立大学法人徳島大学 Gas analyzing apparatus using laser light and gas analyzing method
JP2016186464A (en) 2015-03-27 2016-10-27 三菱重工業株式会社 Gas analyser, combustion facility control system, control support system and gas analysis method
WO2017119283A1 (en) 2016-01-06 2017-07-13 国立大学法人徳島大学 Gas analysis device using laser beam and gas analysis method

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
CT半導体レーザ吸収法を用いた高温域における2次元温度分布計測の特性評価,自動車技術会論文集,2014年11月,Vol.45, No6,971-976

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2021156701A (en) 2021-10-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Bellini et al. Astrometry and photometry with HST WFC3. II. Improved geometric-distortion corrections for 10 filters of the UVIS channel
US11359967B2 (en) Method for measuring actual temperature of flame by using all information of radiation spectrum and measurement system thereof
JP7401768B2 (en) Gas analysis method and gas analysis device
CN112729546B (en) Imaging spectrometer waveband PRNU characteristic correction method, system and equipment
Kim et al. Development of performance analysis model for central receiver system and its application to pattern-free heliostat layout optimization
CN106815878A (en) A kind of image rebuilding method based on the multispectral tomography of various visual angles
CN106896191A (en) A kind of regularization method for improving gas 2-d reconstruction computational efficiency
Mingyuan et al. An efficient regulation approach for tomographic reconstruction in combustion diagnostics based on TDLAS method
CN111965814B (en) Method for estimating error introduced by non-conjugate factor in GLAO system
CN114593833B (en) Phase recovery method
CN120630577B (en) Multi-degree-of-freedom programmable lighting system and method
Wang et al. Hybrid height and slope figuring method for grazing-incidence reflective optics
Yashchuk et al. Diaboloidal mirrors: Algebraic solution and surface shape approximations
Ströhle Assessment of the re-ordered wide band model for non-grey radiative transfer calculations in 3D enclosures
CN103047946B (en) An Image Reconstruction Method Based on Axisymmetric Parameter Distribution Based on Virtual Data
CN119270500B (en) Design method of diffractive optical elements based on automatic differentiation and free-form surface technology
Watkins et al. Heliostat aiming strategies for arbitrary flux profiles for high temperature gas-based receivers
CN114388073A (en) Flame multi-parameter transient measurement device and method based on parameter level set and frequency modulation laser
CN117572326B (en) Radiometric calibration method and device for microwave remote sensing instrument and computer storage medium
CN104297829A (en) Method for optimum design of planar variable-pitch grating
Zhang et al. Simultaneous measurement of gas distribution in a premixed flame using adaptive algebraic reconstruction technique based on the absorption spectrum
CN118549472B (en) A method and device for determining aberration of high-resolution transmission electron microscope images
Zhang et al. Analysis of defocus aberration characteristics on a typical passively confocal unstable resonator
CN117495125B (en) A method for predicting the wall temperature and scale generation distribution of high-temperature heating surfaces of coal-fired boilers
Martínez-Rodríguez et al. Aberration patterns in the optical testing surfaces using transport of intensity equation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20221104

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20230828

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20230905

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20231107

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20231120

R151 Written notification of patent or utility model registration

Ref document number: 7401768

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R151