JP7466922B2 - Asset management support system, asset management support method and program - Google Patents

Description

The present invention relates to an asset management support system, an asset management support method, and a program.

A facility management system for centrally managing various facilities owned by local governments and companies is known (for example, Patent Document 1). The system disclosed in Patent Document 1 is configured to store the facility name, the year of service commencement, and an evaluation value related to at least one value evaluation item for each managed facility, calculate the total score of the value evaluation score based on this evaluation value and the deterioration evaluation score of each facility in a specific year, and generate a list showing the priority of repair work by arranging each facility in order of the total score or the deterioration evaluation score. As a result, a mechanism is provided in which a list showing the priority of repair work is automatically presented by simply inputting known information such as the year of service commencement and the value evaluation value for the facilities to be managed, which does not require actual measurement. Therefore, even if the number of managed facilities is enormous, the manager can relatively easily obtain basic information for determining whether repair work is necessary and whether to continue or discard a specific facility (paragraph 0018 of Patent Document 1).

Facility reorganization support systems that can support facility reorganization plans by considering the functions possessed by each facility and the layout and configuration of each facility are also known (for example, Patent Document 2). The system disclosed in Patent Document 2 is configured to generate facility reorganization plan support information based on evaluation information of multiple facilities, and output any of the following based on the generated facility reorganization plan support information: information showing the locations of multiple facilities included in a specified area; information showing the composition ratio of facilities by function or by use; information showing the scale or size of multiple facilities; information showing the usage status of multiple facilities; and information showing the cost of multiple facilities. This allows facility managers to consider facility reorganization by considering the functions common to each facility and the layout and configuration of each facility (paragraph 0061 of Patent Document 2).

JP 2008-217655 A JP 2015-127858 A

In recent years, school facilities have been hit by a wave of deterioration, and the time has come for them to be replaced all at once. School facilities are places where children learn and live, and also important facilities that provide local residents with lifelong learning, cultural and sports activities, and serve as evacuation sites in the event of a disaster. For this reason, measures to combat the deterioration of school facilities are an important issue that cannot be postponed.

In light of this situation, local governments are considering plans to extend the life span of school facilities. However, while each local government needs to grasp the actual conditions of each school facility and reduce the total costs related to mid- to long-term maintenance and renewal, and to level out budgets, it is difficult to specifically consider how to improve the safety and functionality of many school facilities within a limited budget. In addition, with regard to the evaluation of the building's value and deterioration status calculated by the system disclosed in Patent Document 1 and the system disclosed in Patent Document 2, and the reorganization plan based on these evaluations, it is difficult to make a mid- to long-term reorganization plan set according to the budget amount of each local government, or to continuously consider the utilization of facilities individually and specifically, taking into account the actual conditions of the surrounding areas of the school facilities.

The present invention aims to provide an asset management support system, an asset management support method, and a program that can manage facilities in accordance with budgets and local conditions in order to solve at least one of the above problems.

In order to achieve the above-mentioned object, a first aspect of the asset management support system according to the present invention includes an information storage processing unit that links each item of the basic information of a facility, the facility ledger, and the fixed asset ledger, and accumulates and stores the information in a memory unit; a classification information acquisition unit that acquires multiple classification information that is the basis of type classification; a type classification processing unit that refers to the basic information of the facility, the facility ledger, and the fixed asset ledger stored in the memory unit, and classifies the facility into a type according to the classification information acquired by the classification information acquisition unit; a format storage processing unit that accumulates and stores a format having multiple items in the memory unit; and a type classification processing unit that accumulates and stores the type classification results by the type classification processing unit and the items of the format stored in the memory unit. The system has a calculation processing unit that extracts corresponding information from the basic information of the facility, the facility ledger, and the fixed asset ledger stored in the storage unit based on the item and performs calculation processing, and a screen information generating unit that generates display data based on a format stored in the storage unit using the type classification result by the type classification processing unit, the basic information of the facility, the facility ledger, and the fixed asset ledger stored in the storage unit, and the calculation processing result by the calculation processing unit, and the information storage processing unit links values that serve as review criteria for rebuilding the facility, which are input by a user who has referred to the display data generated and displayed by the screen information generating unit, to each item related to the facility and stores them in the storage unit.

Another aspect of the asset management support system according to the present invention is characterized in that the classification information acquisition unit acquires two pieces of classification information that form the basis of type classification and acquires the number of classifications in each of the two pieces of classification information, and the type classification processing unit classifies the facilities into types using a matrix based on the number of classifications in each of the two pieces of classification information.

Another aspect of the asset management support system according to the present invention is characterized in that the calculation processing unit calculates average values for a specified item of facilities classified into the same type by the type classification processing unit, and the format stored in the memory unit by the format storage processing unit is a format that the user refers to in order to set a value that serves as a review standard, and includes a format having multiple items including the average values calculated by the calculation processing unit.

In addition, one aspect of the asset management support method according to the present invention is an asset management support method for an asset management support system having an information storage processing unit that links and stores each item of basic information about a facility, a facility ledger, information about the usage status of the facility, and a fixed asset ledger in a memory unit, and stores the linked items in the memory unit, and stores a format having multiple items in the memory unit, the method including a classification information acquisition step for acquiring multiple classification information that is the basis of type classification, a type classification processing step for referring to the basic information about the facility, the facility ledger, and the fixed asset ledger stored in the memory unit, and classifying the facility into types according to the classification information acquired by processing in the classification information acquisition step, and a type classification result by processing in the type classification processing step and the information stored in the memory unit. The method includes a calculation processing step of extracting corresponding information from the basic information of the facility stored in the storage unit, the facility ledger, and the fixed asset ledger based on the items of the format, and executing calculation processing; a screen information generation step of generating display data based on the format stored in the storage unit using the type classification result from the processing in the type classification processing step, the basic information of the facility stored in the storage unit, the facility ledger, and the fixed asset ledger, and the calculation processing result from the processing in the calculation processing step; and a storage control step of linking values that serve as review criteria for rebuilding the facility, entered by a user who has referred to the display data generated and displayed by the processing in the screen information generation step, to each item related to the facility, and storing them in the storage unit.

In addition, one aspect of the program according to the present invention includes an information storage processing unit that causes a computer to link each item of the basic information of a facility, the facility ledger, and the fixed asset ledger and accumulate and store them in a memory unit; a classification information acquisition unit that acquires multiple classification information that is the basis of type classification; a type classification processing unit that refers to the basic information of the facility, the facility ledger, and the fixed asset ledger stored in the memory unit and classifies the facility into a type according to the classification information acquired by the classification information acquisition unit; a format storage processing unit that accumulates and stores a format having multiple items in the memory unit; and a type classification processing unit that performs a type classification based on the type classification results by the type classification processing unit and the items of the format stored in the memory unit. A program characterized by having a calculation processing unit that extracts corresponding information from the basic information, facility ledger, and fixed asset ledger of the facility stored in the storage unit and performs calculation processing based on the information stored in the storage unit, and a screen information generating unit that generates display data based on a format stored in the storage unit using the type classification result by the type classification processing unit, the basic information, facility ledger, and fixed asset ledger of the facility stored in the storage unit, and the calculation processing result by the calculation processing unit, and the information storage processing unit associates values that serve as review standards for rebuilding the facility, entered by a user who has referred to the display data generated and displayed by the screen information generating unit, with each item related to the facility and stores them in the storage unit.

The present invention provides an asset management support system, an asset management support method, and a program that can manage facilities in accordance with budgets and local conditions.

1 is a diagram showing an overview of an asset management support system 1 which is an embodiment of an asset management support system, an asset management support method, and a program according to the present invention. 2 is a flowchart showing a facility management process executed by the asset management support device 4 shown in FIG. 1. This paper provides an overview of the longevity plan for school facilities using the asset management support system of this system. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a basic information sheet. FIG. 11 is a diagram showing an example of a building information list table. This is a bar graph showing the state of maintenance of school facilities by age and future maintenance and renewal costs. 13 is a flowchart showing a process for simply distinguishing between renovation and life extension. A figure showing an example of a building information list to which information regarding the soundness of the structural frame has been added. FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an example of inspection items based on the Building Standards Act. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a deterioration status survey form. FIG. 11 is a diagram showing an example of construction history and schedule information. FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating an example of evaluation criteria. It provides specific criteria for visually evaluating roofs and rooftops. It provides specific criteria for visually evaluating exterior walls. It provides specific evaluation criteria for interior finishes, electrical equipment, and mechanical equipment based on the number of years that have passed since the building was built. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a photograph of a deteriorated portion and detailed information. FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating an example of information indicating a deteriorated portion. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a matrix relating to the specifications and performance of each part of a facility. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a maintenance sheet. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a maintenance sheet. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a conversion table for converting the evaluation indexes of each part into evaluation points. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a cost allocation table for allocating costs to each part. FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating an example of calculation of the healthiness. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a building information list table to which information regarding deterioration status evaluation has been added. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a cost calculation condition entry table for calculating future maintenance and renewal costs (long life type). 26 is a bar graph showing future maintenance and renewal costs calculated based on various information entered in the cost calculation condition entry table shown in FIG. 25 . This is a diagram showing an image of the shift from a focus on renovation to one focused on extending the service life of buildings. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of facility development levels determined based on the setting of a financial constraint line. FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an example of a development plan table for individual facilities for the past five years. 30 is a bar graph showing the costs of development plans for individual facilities for the most recent five years, calculated based on the project costs entered into the individual facility development plan table for the most recent five years shown in FIG. 29 . This is a diagram showing an example of an implementation plan for maintenance content over the next five years. 32 is a bar graph showing an example of budget allocation for the next five years set based on the maintenance content shown in FIG. 31 . This is a diagram showing an example of a detailed implementation plan for the development content over the next five years. 1 is a bar graph showing the costs of life extension projects over the next 40 years. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of consideration of new policies and improvement measures for solving a problem. FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating an example of a simulation. This is a diagram to explain the relationship between the management classifications in the building information list, the school facilities register, and the fixed asset register. 13 is a diagram for explaining an example of a matching table between a school facilities register and a fixed asset register. FIG. FIG. 2 is a diagram for explaining the relationship between a facility layout plan of a building and a building information list. This shows a portion of the building information list table, with vertical columns consisting of "Basic building information," "Structural integrity," "Deterioration status other than the structure," and "Specifications/performance," and horizontal rows consisting of multiple buildings. This figure shows the state in which only the "Building Basic Information" item portion shown in Figure 40 is fixedly displayed and slid sideways, allowing the relationship between the "Building Basic Information" and "History" to be understood. This figure shows the state when only the "Building Basic Information" item shown in Figure 40 is fixedly displayed and slid sideways, allowing the relationship between the "Building Basic Information" and the "Annual Plan (Target Years/Repair and Renovation Cycle)" to be understood. This figure shows the state in which alternative plans for the "Annual Plan (Target Years/Repair and Renovation Cycle)" in the building information list shown in Figure 42 are displayed. This figure shows an example of a screen that is displayed when considering optimal solutions for future development by facility and building in the building information list shown in Figures 40 to 43. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing another example of items to be displayed in the building basic information and history section. FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of a functional configuration of a device for outputting a building information list. This is a diagram to explain long-life renovation that goes beyond simply understanding and restoring the deterioration state. FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of a different functional configuration of the asset management support system 1. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of information on a utilization consideration sheet. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of information on a utilization consideration sheet. FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of information indicating floor plans and usage details of each floor of a facility. FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of information indicating floor plans and usage details of each floor of a facility. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a composite graph showing a change in the number of students. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a list of type classification results for elementary schools in a specific municipality. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a list of type classification results for elementary schools in a specific municipality. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a format that can list the basic axes for classifying elementary schools in a given municipality and numerical values showing the characteristics of each type. FIG. 13 is a diagram for explaining type classification based on different type classification base axes. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a format for listing numerical values indicating characteristics for each type. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a format including items in which a user who has referred to the data can enter new numerical values or information. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a format that can list detailed information regarding changes in the number of students and classes in a high school. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a format corresponding to detailed information about a school building of type B. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a format corresponding to detailed information about a type B building structure. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a format corresponding to detailed information on campus area of Type B. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a format corresponding to detailed information on the ownership status of Type B classrooms. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a format in which a user of the client terminal 3 can enter a review target value. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a format in which an area reduction target value can be entered by a user of the client terminal 3. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a format in which a user of a client terminal 3 can enter a revised target value for school building area. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a format in which a user of a client terminal 3 can enter a review target value for the building area. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a format in which a user of a client terminal 3 can enter a revised target value for campus area. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a format in which a user of a client terminal 3 can enter revised target values for the number of rooms and the area per room. This is an example of a plan to rebuild part of a high school. 1 is a bar graph showing actual and forecast costs to date. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a format in which information about swimming pools is classified into types according to area information and displayed as items. 1 is a bar graph showing actual and forecast costs to date. This graph makes it possible to distinguish between the costs of repairs and renovations to address aging and the costs of improving the functionality and environment of school facilities. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a format for listing the numbers of elementary schools of types A to E. This is a line graph showing past trends and future forecast trends in the number of students in Type A elementary schools. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a format consisting of items of detailed information related to the number of students in a type A elementary school. This is a line graph showing past trends and future forecast trends in the number of students in Type B elementary schools. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a format consisting of items of detailed information related to the number of students in a type B elementary school. This is a line graph showing past trends and future forecast trends in the number of students in Type C elementary schools. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a format consisting of items of detailed information related to the number of students in a Type C elementary school. This graph shows past changes in the number of students and classes on a map of the corresponding municipality. FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an example of detailed information including the ownership status of buildings at a specific elementary school and the construction history of each building. This graph shows predicted changes in the number of students and classes on a map of the corresponding municipality. This is a diagram showing an example of a format for creating a review proposal for the rooms of a corresponding elementary school based on a detailed appropriate proposal for the rooms of the corresponding type. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a format for listing information about a specific elementary school and its neighboring local facilities. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a format for listing information about a specific elementary school and its neighboring local facilities. This is a diagram showing an example of a proposed improvement for classroom layout after renovation of an elementary school. This is a diagram showing an example of a proposed improvement for the layout of an elementary school building after renovation. 13 is a flowchart illustrating a process using type classification. 13 is a flowchart illustrating a process using type classification. 11 is a flowchart illustrating a type classification process 1. FIG. 13 is a diagram for explaining type classification based on a base axis of type classification including a condition indicating a change over time in the usage status of the facility. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a format corresponding to detailed information on the possession status of Type B' classrooms. This is an example of a plan to rebuild part of a high school. This is a graph showing the change in the number of high school students in a certain municipality. This is a diagram showing an example of a format for checking the building configuration and room configuration by school type and department. 1 is a diagram showing an example of a format showing classifications of high schools based on their size and information such as school building area and indoor gymnasium area based on those classifications. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a format for showing changes in student class size when classified based on the size of high schools. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a format for confirming regional changes of high schools in a given municipality. This is a diagram for explaining the case of creating a matrix and performing type classification using the size of high schools and changes in the number of student classes as the classification axis. This is a diagram for explaining the case of creating a matrix and performing type classification using the size of high schools and changes in the number of student classes as the classification axis. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a format indicating the results of type classification and the characteristics of each type. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a format showing detailed information about each school classified by type. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a format showing detailed information about each school classified by type. This is a diagram showing an example of a format that shows the correspondence between the population growth rate of municipalities within a municipality and the type classification results of high schools. 13 is a flowchart illustrating a type classification process 2. This is a diagram to explain information showing changes in the composition of students by department at the peak, at present, and in the future. This is a diagram to explain information extracted from the perspective of the entire municipality, such as the changes in the number of students and classes from peak times to the present, as well as the total floor area of owned buildings such as school buildings and gymnasiums. This is a diagram to explain information extracted from the perspective of each region of a municipality, including the changes in the number of students and classes from peak times to the present, as well as the total floor area of owned buildings such as school buildings and gymnasiums.

The following describes an embodiment of the present invention with reference to the drawings. Note that the following describes an example of an asset management support system 1, which is an embodiment of the asset management support system, asset management support method, and program of the present invention, but the present invention is not limited to the asset management support system 1.

<Overview of Asset Management Support System 1>
FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an overview of an asset management support system 1, which is an embodiment of the asset management support system, the asset management support method, and the program of the present invention. The asset management support system 1 is a system that supports the management and operation of facilities owned by, for example, a country, a local government, or a company in a specified area. By using the asset management support system 1, the actual situation of facilities owned by a country, a local government, or a company in a specified area can be grasped, and the specifications and performance required for each part of the facility can be secured while reducing the total cost related to mid- to long-term maintenance and leveling the budget, making it possible to consider not only rebuilding due to aging but also a life extension plan. In the following, the present invention will be described by taking the asset management support system 1 that supports the management and operation of school facilities as an example.

As shown in FIG. 1, the asset management support system 1 is connected to a client terminal 3 via a network 2. The asset management support system 1 includes an asset management support device 4, a communication device 5, and a storage device 6.

Network 2 is a transmission path for establishing communication between computers. Network 2 is generally implemented using communication cables, and TCP/IP (Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol) is used as the communication protocol. Note that the transmission path of network 2 is not limited to cables, and may be a wired or wireless general-purpose line or dedicated line, multiple wired or wireless networks, such as a LAN (Local Area Network), a WAN (Wide Area Network), or an IP (Internet Protocol) communication network such as the Internet, a public telephone network, or a mobile phone network, as long as the communication protocols between them are the same or compatible.

The client terminal 3 is a terminal that can be used by an asset manager or a person who investigates the deterioration of a building (hereinafter referred to as an operator). The client terminal 3 can input various processing requests (requests for displaying desired information, requests for registration, requests for search, etc.) or various data to the communication device 5 of the asset management support system 1 by the operator. A web browser is installed in the client terminal 3, and the client terminal 3 is configured to display data output from the communication device 5 on a display device such as a display. The client terminal 3 is a smartphone in the example of FIG. 1, but it may also be a portable device such as a notebook computer, a desktop computer, a dedicated mobile terminal, a mobile phone, or a PDA (Personal Digital Assistant). In other words, the client terminal 3 may be any device that can access the services provided by the asset management support device 4 via the network 2, issue various execution instructions, and display the information. Although only one client terminal 3 is shown in FIG. 1, there are, of course, multiple client terminals for each operator.

The asset management support device 4 stores various information supplied from the client terminal 3 in the storage device 6 described later, and acquires information from the storage device 6 described later in response to instructions from the client terminal 3 to execute various processes. The asset management support device 4 acquires information (deterioration status) indicating the actual state of the school facilities to be managed from the storage device 6, and determines a possible maintenance policy based on the upper limit of the total budget amount per year to be invested in the school facilities to be managed based on the medium- to long-term financial forecast (hereinafter simply referred to as the "financial constraint line"), and is a device that executes facility management processing to calculate future maintenance and renewal costs based on the determined maintenance policy and the current maintenance level. Therefore, the asset management support device 4 is pre-installed with a program for functioning as a web server, a program for functioning as an application server, and the like. As shown in FIG. 1, the asset management support device 4 has a screen information generation unit 11, an information storage processing unit 12, a deterioration status evaluation unit 13, a financial constraint line setting unit 14, a reference value setting unit 15, a maintenance policy determination unit 16, a business content setting unit 17, a part-specific identification unit 18, a part-specific cost calculation unit 19, a reference value update unit 20, an accounting linkage unit 21, and a simulation unit 22.

The screen information generating unit 11 generates data (e.g., HTML data or image data) for displaying a screen in response to a request from the client terminal 3, and transmits the data to the client terminal 3 via the communication device 5.

The information storage processing unit 12 stores various information related to the school facility, deterioration information on the structure of the school facility and major inspection parts other than the structure, etc. in the storage device 6. For example, in response to a request (information registration processing request) from the client terminal 3, the information storage processing unit 12 can store various information related to the school facility, deterioration information on the structure of the school facility and major inspection parts other than the structure, etc. in the storage device 6. The various information related to the school facility and deterioration information on the structure of the school facility and major inspection parts other than the structure stored in the storage device 6 will be described later using specific examples. The information storage processing unit 12 also stores information generated by the processing of each part of the asset management support device 4 in the storage device 6.

The deterioration status evaluation unit 13 can calculate the soundness, which is a value obtained by indexing the evaluation result of the deterioration status of the school facility, based on the deterioration information of the main inspection parts other than the structure of the school facility stored in the deterioration information storage unit 32 of the storage device 6 and information indicating an evaluation index for indexing the evaluation of the deterioration status. For example, the deterioration status evaluation unit 13 can index the evaluation of the deterioration status of the school facility and calculate the soundness in response to a request (request for evaluation of the deterioration status) from the client terminal 3. The soundness calculated by the deterioration status evaluation unit 13 is stored in the deterioration information storage unit 32 of the storage device 6 by the information storage processing unit 12. Details of the deterioration information of the main inspection parts other than the structure of the school facility and the soundness generated by the deterioration status evaluation unit 13 will be described later using specific examples.

The financial constraint line setting unit 14 sets a numerical value that will be the financial constraint line. For example, in response to a request from the client terminal 3 (a request for instructions to set a financial constraint line), the financial constraint line setting unit 14 can set a numerical value as the upper limit of the total budget amount per year to be allocated to the school facilities to be managed. Note that in the above explanation, the numerical value set as this financial constraint line is the upper limit of the total budget amount per year to be allocated to the school facilities to be managed, but it is not necessarily limited to the upper limit of the total budget amount per year, and it is of course possible to set any numerical value. For example, the financial constraint line setting unit 14 may be able to set the upper limit of the budget for each school facility as the financial constraint line.

The reference value setting unit 15 can set information on the current maintenance level including the specifications, performance, parts (e.g., roof, rooftop, exterior wall, interior finish, electrical equipment, mechanical equipment, etc.) of the school facility as well as the total cost as reference values based on the specification, performance, and cost information of each part of the school facility stored in the storage device 6 described later, and the information grasped by the deterioration status survey conducted periodically for each school facility and the evaluation information of the deterioration status. This allows the current facility maintenance level of the school facility to be grasped in conjunction with the deterioration information of the school facility stored in the deterioration information storage unit 32 of the storage device 6, i.e., the deterioration status survey of the actual facility, and can become a concrete judgment standard when carrying out repairs in the future. In addition, the reference value setting unit 15 can also set the facility maintenance level of each part (e.g., roof, rooftop, exterior wall, interior finish, electrical equipment, mechanical equipment) of each school facility within a range that does not exceed the numerical value that becomes the financial constraint line set by the financial constraint line setting unit 14. This makes it possible to grasp the facility maintenance level that can be maintained within the budget amount set as the financial constraint line. Details of the reference values and facility development levels set by the reference value setting unit 15 will be described later using specific examples.

The maintenance policy determination unit 16 performs compilation and analysis based on the basic building information included in the building information list stored in the storage device 6, which will be described later, and calculates the maintenance status by year of construction and future maintenance and renewal costs when renovating the facility. The maintenance policy determination unit 16 also calculates future maintenance and renewal costs when extending the lifespan of the facility based on the cost calculation conditions supplied from the client terminal 3 and the basic information of each school facility stored in the storage device 6. The maintenance policy determination unit 16 also determines a maintenance policy of either restoring the functionality of the school facility or improving the functionality of the school facility based on the standard values of the specifications, performance, and cost of the school facility set by the standard value setting unit 15, the soundness calculated by the deterioration status evaluation unit 13, and the numerical value that is the financial constraint line set by the financial constraint line setting unit 14. Details of the maintenance policy determined by the maintenance policy determination unit 16 will be described later using a concrete example.

The business content setting unit 17 identifies the repair contents for each part of the school facility in accordance with the maintenance policy determined by the maintenance policy determination unit 16, and calculates the repair costs for the facility for each specified period. Details of the repair costs calculated by the business content setting unit 17 will be described later using specific examples.

The part identification unit 18 can identify the repair contents for each part of the school facility based on the performance data described in the construction details sheet created during reconstruction or repair work on the school facility. When the part identification unit 18 is unable to identify the part based on the information contained in the performance data alone, it can appropriately supplement the information by referring to the storage device 6 described below so as to reach the part-by-part level.

The part-specific cost calculation unit 19 can calculate the part-specific costs and the component ratios of the costs based on the repair details for each part of each school facility identified by the part-specific identification unit 18.

The standard value update unit 20 can update the standard values of the specifications, performance, and cost of each school facility set by the standard value setting unit 15 based on the repair details of each school facility identified by the part identification unit 18 and the part-specific costs calculated by the part-specific cost calculation unit 19.

The accounting linkage unit 21 can link the costs of improving the functionality of school facilities to capital expenditures in the accounting, and can link the costs of restoring the functionality of school facilities to repair costs in the accounting.

The simulation unit 22 performs a simulation of either compartmentalized ownership, joint ownership, consolidation, etc. of facilities based on the conservation policy determined by the conservation policy determination unit 16, information on future population changes within a specified area, information on the utilization status of each facility, information on the function of each facility, or a combination of these pieces of information. Details of the simulation performed by the simulation unit 22 will be described later using a concrete example.

The asset management support device 4 is a general-purpose computer system, and is configured by connecting a CPU (Central Processing Unit), ROM (Read Only Memory), RAM (Random Access Memory), and storage means such as SSD (Solid State Drive) and HDD (Hard Disk Drive) to a bus (not shown). The SSD or HDD is a non-volatile storage device that stores an OS (Operating System) and a facility management program for implementing facility management processing. The CPU also refers to and updates data in the storage device 6, controls the communication device 5 to send and receive data to and from the client terminal 3 via the network 2, and controls facility management processing. In the asset management support device 4, the CPU loads the OS and facility management program stored in the SSD or HDD into the RAM and executes it. This allows the asset management support device 4 to perform various information processing such as facility management processing.

The asset management support device 4 does not have to be a single device, and may be processed by multiple distributed computers. The asset management support device 4 may also have the functionality of the client terminal 3.

The communication device 5 is connected to the asset management support device 4, receives instructions from the CPU of the asset management support device 4, and transmits and receives data to and from the client terminal 3 via the network 2. The communication device 5 also transmits requests from the client terminal 3 to the asset management support device 4. The hardware of the communication device 5 is composed of a LAN board, etc., and the software is composed of a device driver for communicating with the OS, etc., but the communication device 5 is not limited to these configurations.

The storage device 6 is a device that stores basic building information and deterioration information of the school facilities to be managed. The storage device 6 can also store reference values, which are information about the current maintenance level of the school facilities set by the asset management support device 4, maintenance history information, evaluation information, information about maintenance policies, and the like. As shown in FIG. 1, the storage device 6 is connected to the asset management support device 4, and includes a facility information storage unit 31, a deterioration information storage unit 32, an evaluation information storage unit 33, and a maintenance policy information storage unit 34.

The storage device 6 is configured with hardware such as an HDD or SSD, and software such as an RDBMS (Relational Database Management System), but is not limited to these configurations. The database held by the storage device 6 is not limited to a relational database, and may be a hierarchical database or a network database. The storage device 6 is preferably a non-volatile storage device such as a hard disk drive or flash memory. The storage device 6 does not need to be a single device, but may be a storage device distributed across multiple devices. In other words, the facility information storage unit 31, the deterioration information storage unit 32, the evaluation information storage unit 33, and the maintenance policy information storage unit 34 may be managed in a distributed manner across multiple storage devices. The storage device 6 may also be built into the asset management support device 4.

The information stored in the facility information storage unit 31 of the storage device 6 includes the school facility ledger, which is a ledger of the school's facilities, basic building information, and specification, performance, and cost information for each part of the school facility. The facility information storage unit 31 further stores information related to the facilities among the data generated by the processing of each part of the asset management support device 4.

The basic building information includes, for example, the name of a certain school facility, information indicating the size of the school facility, information indicating the location (area) of the school facility, information indicating the department in charge of the school facility, information indicating the name used in accounting for the school facility, information indicating the classification of the school facility (major classification, medium classification, minor classification, etc.), information indicating the construction year of the school facility, information indicating the site area of the school facility, information indicating the building area of the school facility, information indicating the total floor area of the school facility (total total floor area, total floor area by building, etc.), information indicating the structure of the school facility (reinforced concrete structure, light steel frame structure, wood structure, etc.), information indicating the number of floors of the school facility (two floors above ground, one floor below ground, etc.). Note that the basic building information may include information other than the above. Specific examples of the school facility register and basic building information will be described later using FIG. 4.

The specification, performance, and cost information includes information on the specification configuration, performance configuration, and cost of the five parts (roof, exterior wall, interior finish, electrical equipment, and mechanical equipment) that are classified for building a school facility. For example, the roof and roof of a certain school facility includes information indicating sheet waterproofing, the exterior wall of the school facility includes information indicating paint finish, tile covering, and aluminum sashes, the interior finish of the school facility includes information indicating mortar paint, the electrical equipment of the school facility includes information indicating electric lights and outlet equipment, and the mechanical equipment of the school facility includes information indicating water supply piping, hot water supply piping, drainage piping, and gas piping. These specification, performance, and cost information are recorded so that lower parts are included in higher parts in accordance with the hierarchical structure of the building. Note that the data structure that records lower parts in accordance with the hierarchical structure of the building so that they are included in higher parts, and the technology for allocating costs at the higher part level to lower parts are disclosed, for example, in JP 2009-116840, so detailed explanations will be omitted.

The information stored in the deterioration information storage unit 32 includes facility deterioration information and maintenance history information for the five parts that are categorized for building school facilities. The information stored in the deterioration information storage unit 32 also includes information on whether the corresponding school facility will be "renovated" or "extended in life" when calculating future maintenance and renewal costs, and information on the soundness of the structural frame, which is information used to determine the classification.

The facility deterioration information includes information on the deterioration status of the specification configuration and performance configuration of the five parts (roof/rooftop, exterior wall, interior finish, electrical equipment, and mechanical equipment) that are classified for building a school facility. The facility deterioration information is evaluated in four stages: generally good (A), partially deteriorated (B), extensively deteriorated (C), and urgent action required (D). For example, the roof/rooftop part of a certain school facility includes information indicating a rating of B, the exterior wall part of the school facility includes information indicating a rating of C, the interior finish part of the school facility includes information indicating a rating of C, the electrical equipment part of the school facility includes information indicating a rating of B, and the mechanical equipment part of the school facility includes information indicating a rating of B. The facility deterioration information also includes information indicating the soundness of the school facility calculated by the deterioration status evaluation unit 13. Note that the facility deterioration information may include information other than the above-mentioned information, and the evaluation stages are not limited to four stages.

The maintenance history information includes information on repairs and renovations that have been carried out on the five parts (roof/top, exterior walls, interior finishes, electrical equipment, and mechanical equipment) that are divided into categories for constructing school facilities. For example, it includes information indicating that the roof/top of a certain school facility was waterproofed in a certain year, and information indicating that the deterioration status was changed from a rating of C to a rating of B as a result of that renovation. Note that the maintenance history information may also include information other than that mentioned above.

The information stored in the evaluation information storage unit 33 includes information indicating evaluation indices for evaluating the deterioration state of five parts of the school facility on a four-point scale and quantifying it on a scale of 100 points. The information indicating the evaluation indices includes a conversion table for converting the evaluation indices of each part into evaluation points, such as information indicating that evaluation A is 100 points, information indicating that evaluation B is 75 points, information indicating that evaluation C is 40 points, and information indicating that evaluation D is 10 points. The information indicating the evaluation indices also includes a cost allocation table for allocating costs to each part. Note that the information indicating the evaluation indices may include information other than that described above, and the numerical values are not limited to these.

The information stored in the maintenance policy information storage unit 34 includes information on maintenance plans for extending the lifespan of school facilities. For example, information indicating rebuilding the facility, restoring the facility's functionality, and improving the facility's functionality is included, as well as detailed information on the maintenance level for each part. Note that the information indicating the maintenance plan may also include information other than the above, such as future maintenance and renewal costs calculated by the maintenance policy decision unit 16.

<Calculation method for future maintenance and renewal costs>
2 is a flow chart showing a facility management process executed by the asset management support device 4 shown in FIG. 1. In the following process, various instructions and requests from the client terminal 3 are transmitted to the asset management support device 4 by an operator operating the client terminal 3. Steps S1 to S10 described below are intended for the first time facility management process is performed, and steps S11 and after are intended for processes performed between the client terminal 3 and the asset management support device 4 when repair work or the like is performed. Therefore, steps S1 to S10 and steps S11 and after may be performed by different operators and client terminals 3.

START: Upon receiving an instruction from the client terminal 3, the asset management support device 4 starts the facility management process. Here, for example, it is assumed that the operator is about to use the client terminal 3 to input information about a certain school facility (basic information or deterioration survey information about the school facility).

Step S1: The information storage processing unit 12 of the asset management support device 4 acquires information corresponding to the building basic information described later using FIG. 5 as basic information of each school facility from the client terminal 3 via the network 2, as well as the specification, performance, and cost information of each part of each school facility, and stores them in the facility information storage unit 31 of the storage device 6. At this time, if there is a display request from the client terminal 3, the screen information generation unit 11 of the asset management support device 4 generates screen information showing the basic information of each school facility from the basic information of each school facility stored in step S1 and transmits it to the client terminal 3, thereby displaying a screen showing various basic information about each school facility on the display of the client terminal 3. This allows the operator of the client terminal 3 to easily grasp and manage the basic information of each school facility. Note that if the basic information of the school facility has already been stored in the facility information storage unit 31 of the storage device 6 or has already been acquired from an external source, the process proceeds to step S2.

Step S2: The information storage processing unit 12 acquires deterioration survey information for each school facility from the client terminal 3 via the network 2, and stores it in the deterioration information storage unit 32 of the storage device 6 as facility deterioration information. The facility deterioration information includes information indicating whether the corresponding school facility is estimated to be renovated or extended in lifespan, and in the case where the school facility is extended in lifespan, a four-level evaluation of (A), (B), (C), and (D) obtained as a result of the deterioration survey of each part of the facility. In addition, at this time, when a display request is made from the client terminal 3, the screen information generating unit 11 generates screen information showing the deterioration status of each school facility from the deterioration survey information of each school facility stored in step S2 and transmits it to the client terminal 3, thereby displaying a screen showing various deterioration statuses of each school facility on the display of the client terminal 3. This allows the operator of the client terminal 3 to easily grasp and manage the deterioration status of each school facility.

Step S3: The reference value setting unit 15 sets information on the current maintenance level of each part of each school facility, including the specifications, performance, and cost, as a reference value based on the basic information of each school facility stored in step S1 and the facility deterioration information stored in step S2. That is, the specification, performance, and cost information of each part of each school facility included in the basic information of each school facility stored in step S1 includes information indicating the maintenance level of each part, but does not include information on the deterioration state. In addition, the facility deterioration information stored in step S2 is information indicating the deterioration of each part, but does not include information on what specifications, performance, and cost each part is made up of. By correlating these through the processing of the reference value setting unit 15, information on the current maintenance level that allows the status of each part to be recognized from the perspective of both what specifications, performance, and cost each part of each school facility is made up of and what state of deterioration each part is in can be generated and set as a reference value.

Step S4: Based on the deterioration survey information stored in the deterioration information storage unit 32 in step S2, the deterioration status evaluation unit 13 calculates the healthiness of each school facility by indexing the evaluation results of the deterioration state of each part, i.e., the four-level evaluation of (A), (B), (C), and (D), and stores the calculated healthiness in association with the facility deterioration information in the deterioration information storage unit 32 of the storage device 6.

Step S5: The maintenance policy determination unit 16 acquires the cost calculation conditions from the client terminal 3 via the network 2. The cost calculation conditions include, for example, information such as past facility-related expenses, renovation update cycles, and renovation unit prices. Note that the cost calculation conditions may be set based on conditions other than those described above.

Step S6: The maintenance policy determination unit 16 calculates future maintenance and renewal costs based on the cost calculation conditions acquired in step S5 and the basic information of each school facility stored in step S1. At this time, if there is a display request from the client terminal 3, screen information showing the future maintenance and renewal costs for each school facility is generated from the future maintenance and renewal costs calculated in step S6 and sent to the client terminal 3, so that a screen showing the future maintenance and renewal costs for each school facility can be displayed on the display of the client terminal 3. This allows the operator of the client terminal 3 to easily grasp the future maintenance and renewal costs for each school facility.

Step S7: The financial constraint line setting unit 14 acquires information about the financial constraint line from the client terminal 3 via the network 2, and sets it as the upper limit of the total cost of all school facilities. If information about the financial constraint line has been acquired in advance, it is read from the storage device 6.

Step S8: The reference value setting unit 15 acquires information on the facility improvement level for each part of each school facility from the client terminal 3 via the network 2, and sets the information as the facility improvement level for each part of each school facility. Note that if information on the facility improvement level for each part has been acquired and set in advance, it is read from the storage device 6.

Step S9: The conservation policy decision unit 16 selects the facility development level available for each school facility within the financial constraint line set in step S7.

Step S10: The business content setting unit 17 identifies the repair contents for each school facility by part according to the facility maintenance level selected in step S9, and calculates the repair costs of the most recent maintenance plan for each school facility. If a display request is made from the client terminal 3 at this time, screen information showing the calculated repair costs of the most recent maintenance plan for each school facility is generated and sent to the client terminal 3. By the above steps S1 to S10, a screen showing the repair costs of the most recent maintenance plan for each school facility can be displayed on the display of the client terminal 3, and the operator of the client terminal 3 can easily grasp the repair costs of the most recent maintenance plan for each school facility. Next, the processing when a periodic deterioration survey is performed will be explained with reference to steps S11 and onwards.

Step S11: The part identification unit 18 determines whether or not performance data to be included in the construction details sheet created during reconstruction or repair work on school facilities has been input from the client terminal 3 via the network 2, and repeats the determination process until performance data is input.

Step S12: When it is determined that the actual data has been input in step S11, the part identification unit 18 identifies the repair contents by part of each school facility. The part cost calculation unit 19 calculates the cost by part and the component ratio of the cost by part of each school facility based on the repair contents by part of each school facility identified by the part identification unit 18. Also, at this time, when there is a display request from the client terminal 3, screen information showing the cost by part and the component ratio of the cost by part of each school facility is generated from the cost by part and the component ratio of the cost by part of each school facility calculated in step S12 and transmitted to the client terminal 3, so that a screen showing the cost by part and the component ratio of the cost by part of each school facility can be displayed on the display of the client terminal 3. This allows the operator of the client terminal 3 to easily grasp the cost by part and the component ratio of the cost by part of each school facility.

Step S13: The reference value update unit 20 updates the reference values, which are the current maintenance levels of the specifications, performance, and cost of each school facility set in step S3, based on the repair details of each school facility identified in step S12 and the costs for each part of each school facility. After that, the process returns to step S2, and the above-mentioned process is repeated.

<Specific examples of plans to extend the lifespan of school facilities>
FIG. 3 illustrates an outline of a school facility life extension plan supported by the asset management support system 1 of the present invention.

In order to extend the lifespan of school facilities, operators of local governments create a series of flows, including goal setting, understanding of the actual situation, setting of policies, and formulation and operation of a long-life plan. In goal setting, by understanding the background, purpose, planning period, and target facilities of the long-life plan for school facilities, it is possible to set the ideal state of the school facilities. In understanding of the actual situation, it is possible to understand the actual situation of the school facilities by investigating the actual situation of the operation and utilization status of the school facilities and the actual state of deterioration of the school facilities. In setting of policies, it is possible to set the maintenance level of the renovation, etc., and the items and methods of maintenance, etc., based on the basic policies, by deciding the basic policies, etc. of the renovation, etc., based on the policies of the size and layout plan of the school facilities. In formulating and operating the long-life plan, it is possible to propose the development and utilization of the information infrastructure, the development of the promotion system, etc., and follow-up, which will be the continuous operation policy of the long-life plan, by determining the prioritization and implementation plan of the renovation, etc., and examining the outlook for the cost of long-life and the effect of long-life. Operators of local governments carry out long-life plans according to this series of flows.

(How to grasp the whole picture of school facilities)
As a first step, the operator of the client terminal 3 performs an investigation 1 to organize information on the target building. For example, the basic information sheet shown in FIG. 4 is used for this investigation 1. The basic information sheet includes land information including information such as the property name, i.e., facility name, site area, ownership type, property management department, and land price, building information including information such as the building name, building floor area, number of floors, structure, and completion year of the facility, facility information including the facility name, occupied area, facility information, and management and operation information of the facility and surrounding facilities, and a remarks entry column. The basic information sheet may include other information. The operator of the client terminal 3 can input the building basic information obtained by the investigation 1 according to the format of the basic information sheet in FIG. 4, and transmit the information to the asset management support device 4 via the network 2. The information storage processing unit 12 of the asset management support device 4 stores the building basic information acquired from the client terminal 3 via the network 2 in the facility information storage unit 31 of the storage device 6. When the screen information generation unit 11 receives a request from the client terminal 3, it reads out the necessary information from the basic building information stored in the facility information storage unit 31 of the storage device 6 and the basic information of each school facility including the school facility register described later using Figure 5, creates data for displaying the building information list shown in Figure 5, and displays it on the display of the client terminal 3.

FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an example of the school facility ledger stored in the facility information storage unit 31 of the storage device 6 and a building information list generated by the screen information generation unit 11 based on the building basic information. As shown in FIG. 5, the corresponding items of the school facility ledger and the building information list are linked to each other. The building information list includes building basic information, and includes items such as serial number, school survey number, facility name, building name, building number, fixed asset ledger number, use classification including school type and building use, structure, number of floors, total floor area (m ² ), construction year including Gregorian and Japanese calendars, and construction year. Each item of the building basic information of the building information list is linked to each item of the school facility ledger, and when information is added or updated in either one by the operator of the client terminal 3, the content of the addition and update is reflected in the other. The school type and building use, which are use classifications of the building information list, are set in detail because they are linked to the graph series of the maintenance status by year of construction and the unit price setting of future maintenance and renewal costs described later. For example, school types are classified into kindergartens, elementary schools, junior high schools, compulsory education schools, high schools, secondary education schools, special needs schools, school lunch centers, etc., and building uses are classified into kindergarten buildings, school buildings, gymnasiums, dormitories, martial arts halls, other, school lunch centers, etc.

The maintenance policy decision unit 16 of the asset management support device 4 calculates the maintenance status by year of construction and future maintenance and renewal costs as a result of compilation and analysis based on the basic building information included in the building information list shown in Figure 5. This allows the operator of the client terminal 3 to grasp the overall situation of each school facility.

Figure 6 is a bar graph showing the maintenance status of school facilities by age and future maintenance and renewal costs. In the bar graph of maintenance status by age shown in Figure 6A, the total floor area of each school facility by age can be seen, and the ratio of each school facility by use can be visualized by the ratio of the patterns in each bar graph, making it easy to understand the actual age of each building use. In the bar graph showing future maintenance and renewal costs shown in Figure 6B, the total renovation costs for each year can be seen in the case of rebuilding less than 50 years old, and by entering facility-related expenses for the past few years, the average value can be compared with the average value of future maintenance and renewal costs. Figure 6C shows a table for entering the cost calculation conditions for future maintenance and renewal costs (conventional type), and the future maintenance and renewal costs (conventional type) shown in Figure 6B are calculated based on the renewal cycle, renovation unit price, and past facility-related expenses entered in these tables. Note that the bar graphs shown in Figures 6A and 6B are calculated using a conventional method and do not take into account the financial constraint line or the maintenance level for each part, but it is also possible to calculate using the conventional method in the asset management support device 4 and display it on the display of the client terminal 3.

(Method of assessing the deterioration status of school facilities)
In the second step, the operator of the client terminal 3 grasps the deterioration state of the school facilities by dividing the survey into Survey 2 to grasp the soundness of the structural framework and Survey 3 to grasp the deterioration state of the main inspection parts other than the framework. First, Survey 2 to grasp the soundness of the structural framework will be explained.

Fig. 7 is a flow chart showing an example of a judgment process for simply classifying whether to remodel the structural frame of a school facility or to extend its lifespan without remodeling. In the planning stage, it is judged whether the earthquake resistance standard of the school facility is the new earthquake resistance standard or not (S100), and if it is judged that the school facility is the new earthquake resistance standard, it is estimated as "long life" (S101). If the school facility is the old earthquake resistance standard and has not been earthquake-proofed or has not been judged to be earthquake-proof by earthquake resistance diagnosis (S102: NO), it is estimated as "earthquake reinforcement" (S103). If the school facility is the old earthquake resistance standard and has been earthquake-proofed or has been judged to be earthquake-proof by earthquake resistance diagnosis (S102: YES), and furthermore, if it is judged that the reinforced concrete structure has a concrete compressive strength of 13.5 N/ ^mm2 or less, or that the steel or steel structure is approximately 40 years old or more and has significant corrosion or deterioration (S104: YES), it is estimated as "investigation required" (S105) and estimated as "remodeling" (S106). Furthermore, if the school facility is built to the old earthquake resistance standards, has been reinforced against earthquakes or has been determined to be earthquake resistant through a seismic diagnosis (S102: YES), and is made of reinforced concrete with a concrete compressive strength of ^13.5 N/mm2 or less, or is made of steel or steel and is more than 40 years old and has not been determined to have significant corrosion or deterioration (S104: NO), then it will be estimated as having a "long life" (S101).

Next, at the construction implementation stage, inspectors conduct a detailed survey of the structure of school facilities that have been estimated as having a "long life" or requiring "remodeling." First, school facilities are divided into three categories: reinforced concrete, steel-reinforced concrete, steel frame, and wood. Inspectors investigate each structure by conducting on-site visual inspections and material tests, and evaluate the soundness of the structural framework according to the evaluation items for each category (S107). In addition to the structural framework inspection, inspectors make a comprehensive judgment from the standpoint of economy and educational functionality (S108), and ultimately decide whether to implement "extended life" or "remodeling" (S109, S110).

The operator of the client terminal 3, following the processing flow shown in FIG. 7, clarifies the classification of the structural body to be surveyed as "renovation" or "extended life" in the calculation of future maintenance and renewal costs, and inputs this classification and information that will be the basis for determining the classification as information regarding the soundness of the structural body in a predetermined format, and can transmit the information to the asset management support device 4 via the network 2. Note that these judgments can be made by displaying questions for each judgment on the screen of the client terminal 3 to the operator, who can answer with yes or no, or by allowing the operator to make the judgments himself using this flowchart and transmit only the judgment results of the final estimate from the client terminal 3 to the asset management support device 4. The information storage processing unit 12 of the asset management support device 4 stores the information regarding the soundness of the structural body acquired from the client terminal 3 via the network 2 in the deterioration information storage unit 32 of the storage device 6. In addition, when a display request is made from the client terminal 3, the screen information generating unit 11 reads out the necessary information stored in each part of the storage device 6, and based on this information, generates data for adding information on the soundness of the structural frame to the building information list shown in FIG. 5 and displaying it, and transmits it to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 for display. Specifically, a selection screen is displayed on the display of the client terminal 3 for each judgment shown in FIG. 7, and the operator's selection is transmitted to the asset management support device 4, thereby making it possible to judge the longevity of the building. The information storage processing unit 12 of the asset management support device 4 can record information on the soundness of the structural frame, which is the estimated classification of the longevity judgment of the corresponding school facility in the building information list, in the storage device 6. Then, the screen information generating unit 11 of the asset management support device 4 can generate a building information list to which information on the soundness of the structural frame recorded in the storage device 6 has been added, and transmit it to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 for display.

Fig. 8 is a diagram showing an example of a building information list to which information on the soundness of the structural frame has been added. As shown in Fig. 8, in addition to basic building information, the building information list includes items such as seismic safety including standards, diagnosis, and reinforcement, survey year, compressive strength (N/ ^mm2 ), and life extension assessment including trial calculation classification, and each item includes information on the soundness of the structural frame.

The operator of the client terminal 3 can input information regarding the soundness of the structural frame obtained by survey 2 in a prescribed format, and send that information to the asset management support device 4 via the network 2. The asset management support device 4 can create the building information list shown in Figure 8 based on the information regarding the soundness of the structural frame acquired and stored from the client terminal 3 via the network 2. Next, we will explain survey 3, which grasps the deterioration status of the main inspection parts other than the structural frame.

Figure 9 is a diagram showing an example of inspection items based on the Building Standards Act. As shown in Figure 9, the Building Standards Act prescribes standards for inspection cycles, inspection locations, and inspection items. For example, in the case of an inspection cycle of every three years or less, inspection items are prescribed for each location of a building (site and structure) (site and foundation, exterior of the building, rooftop and roof, interior of the building, evacuation facilities, etc.). In addition, in the case of an inspection cycle of every year or less, inspection items are prescribed for each location of elevators, fire protection equipment, and building equipment (excluding elevators) (ventilation equipment, smoke exhaust equipment, emergency lighting equipment, water supply equipment, and drainage equipment). In the figure, the inspection locations and inspection items enclosed in a thick frame indicate items linked to the deterioration status survey form described later using Figure 10.

The operator of the client terminal 3 investigates the deterioration status of the five parts (roof/top, exterior wall, interior finish, electrical equipment, and mechanical equipment) that are classified for building school facilities based on the Building Standards Act shown in Figure 9, and enters the evaluation details in the deterioration status survey form.

Figure 10 is a diagram showing an example of a deterioration status survey form. As shown in Figure 10, the deterioration status survey form, for example, for the roof/rooftop and exterior wall parts, has items such as specifications, construction history (year, construction content), deterioration status, special notes, and evaluation, and for the interior finish, electrical equipment, and mechanical equipment parts, has items such as repair/inspection items, repair/inspection year, special notes, and evaluation, and further has an item of soundness to comprehensively evaluate the deterioration status of the facility. Note that, for example, if the construction history/schedule information shown in Figure 11 is linked to each item of other information and stored in advance in the deterioration information storage unit 32, the screen information generation unit 11 can extract information corresponding to the year and construction content of the construction history from the information included in the construction history/schedule information stored in the deterioration information storage unit 32, and enter it in the construction history of the deterioration status survey form of Figure 10.

The operator of the client terminal 3 can visually inspect the roof, rooftop, and exterior walls, and can rate the interior finishes, electrical equipment, and mechanical equipment on a four-point scale of A, B, C, or D based on the number of years that have passed since the last complete renovation of the area.

Figure 12 shows an example of the evaluation criteria. Figure 10A shows the evaluation criteria when the roof, rooftop, and exterior wall parts are evaluated visually. Figure 10B shows the evaluation criteria when the interior finish, electrical equipment, and mechanical equipment are evaluated based on the number of years since the construction began. As shown in Figure 10A, the evaluation criteria for the roof, rooftop, and exterior walls are set as follows: Evaluation A indicates that the condition is generally good, Evaluation B indicates that the condition is partially deteriorated, Evaluation C indicates that the condition is extensively deteriorated, and Evaluation D indicates that an immediate response is required. As shown in Figure 10B, the evaluation criteria for the interior finish, electrical equipment, and mechanical equipment are set as follows: Evaluation A indicates that the condition is less than 20 years old, Evaluation B indicates that the condition is between 20 and 40 years old, Evaluation C indicates that the condition is 40 years old or more, and Evaluation D indicates that the condition has significant deterioration regardless of the number of years since the construction began.

Figures 13 to 15 are diagrams to explain the details of the evaluation criteria for the roof/top, exterior walls, interior finishes, electrical equipment, and mechanical equipment shown in Figure 12.

Figure 13 shows the specific criteria for visually evaluating roofs and rooftops. As shown in Figure 13, when the specifications are asphalt protective waterproofing, those that are only slightly dirty or have been renovated within the last 10 years are rated A, those with partial cracks, deterioration, poor drainage, or damaged joint sealant are rated B, those with widespread cracks, deterioration, poor drainage, sediment accumulation, weeds, damaged joint sealant, and leak marks on the top floor ceiling are rated C, and those with widespread damage, wide cracks, poor drainage, and multiple leaks on the top floor ceiling are rated D. If the specifications are asphalt exposed waterproofing, those that are only slightly dirty or have been renovated less than 10 years ago are rated A, those that have partial blistering, deterioration (wear) or poor drainage are rated B, those that have widespread cracks, deterioration (wear), poor drainage, sediment accumulation, weeds and there are traces of water leakage on the top floor ceiling are rated C, and those that have widespread breaks, damage, exposed base, wide cracks and multiple leaks on the top floor ceiling are rated D. If the specifications are sheet waterproofing, those that are only slightly dirty or have been renovated less than 10 years ago are rated A, those that have partial blistering, wrinkles, deterioration (wear) or poor drainage are rated B, those that have widespread cracks, wrinkles, holes, deterioration (wear), poor drainage, sediment accumulation, weeds and there are traces of water leakage on the top floor ceiling are rated C, and those that have widespread breaks, damage, exposed base and multiple leaks on the top floor ceiling are rated D. If the specifications are paint waterproofing, those that are only slightly dirty or have been renovated less than 10 years ago will be rated A, those that have partial blistering, wrinkles, deterioration (sponge-like) or poor drainage will be rated B, those that have widespread blistering, wrinkles, holes, deterioration (wear), poor drainage, sediment accumulation, or weeds and have traces of water leakage on the top floor ceiling will be rated C, and those that have widespread breaks, peeling, or exposed base and have multiple leaks on the top floor ceiling will be rated D. If the specifications are metal plates, those that are only slightly dirty or have been renovated within the last 10 years are rated A, those with partial paint peeling, rust, deterioration, cracks in the sealant, or rust on the metal fittings are rated B, those with widespread paint peeling, rust, deterioration, cracks in the sealant, rust on the mounting hardware, partial corrosion/damage, and signs of water leakage on the top floor ceiling are rated C, and those with widespread rust, peeling, corrosion, and damage to the mounting hardware and multiple leaks on the top floor ceiling are rated D.

Figure 14 shows the specific criteria for visually evaluating exterior walls. As shown in Figure 14, in the case of a painted finish, those that are only slightly dirty or have been renovated within the last 10 years are rated A, those with partial cracks, deterioration, lifting, or rust are rated B, those with widespread cracks, tortoiseshell cracks, deterioration, lifting, peeling, rust, and small-scale water leakage are rated C, and those with widespread spalling, cracking, and wide cracks, as well as puddles on the interior floor and multiple leaks are rated D. If the specifications are tile or stone, those that are only slightly dirty or have been renovated within the last 10 years are rated A, those with partial cracks, deterioration, lifting, bulges, rust, or cracks in the sealant are rated B, those with widespread cracks, deterioration, lifting, bulges, rust, or cracks in the sealant and small leaks are rated C, and those with widespread spalling, explosions, wide cracks, puddles on the interior floor, and multiple leaks are rated D. If the specifications are metal panels, those that are only slightly dirty or have been renovated within the last 10 years are rated A, those with partial rust, deterioration, or cracks in the sealant are rated B, those with widespread rust, deterioration, cracks in the sealant, rust on the mounting hardware, and small leaks are rated C, and those with widespread rust, corrosion, wobbling, or corrosion of the mounting hardware and puddles on the interior floor and multiple leaks are rated D. If the specification is a cement panel, it is graded A if it is only dirty or has been renovated within the last 10 years, grade B if there are partial cracks, deterioration, missing parts, or cracks in the sealant, grade C if there are widespread cracks, deterioration, cracks in the sealant, rust on the mounting hardware, and small water leaks, and grade D if there are defects, wobbling, corrosion of the mounting hardware, missing sealant, puddles on the interior floor, and multiple leaks. If the specification is a window (sash), it is graded A if it is only dirty or has been renovated within the last 10 years, grade B if there are partial deformations, deterioration, and hardened sealant, grade C if there are deformations, deterioration, rust, hardened sealant, and cracks overall, and grade D if there is corrosion, damage, poor opening and closing, and water leaks overall.

Figure 15 shows the specific evaluation criteria for interior finishes, electrical equipment, and mechanical equipment based on the number of years that have passed. Interior finishes, electrical equipment, and mechanical equipment are basically evaluated on a four-point scale based on the number of years that have passed, based on the history of repairs, renovations, and inspections, but if any of the phenomena shown in Figure 15 are found by visual inspection, they are also taken into consideration and evaluated comprehensively. As shown in Figure 15, if deterioration phenomena such as peeling of floor finishes, cracks in the floor, falling or peeling of ceiling materials, etc. are found over a wide area or in various places in the corresponding parts of the interior finish, the evaluation is lowered by one level. If deterioration phenomena are found in the corresponding parts of the electrical equipment that are greater than the number of years that have passed, it is judged to have a rating of C. If deterioration phenomena are found in the corresponding parts of the mechanical equipment that are greater than the number of years that have passed, it is judged to have a rating of C or D.

The operator of the client terminal 3 can evaluate the deterioration status of the five parts, namely the roof/top, exterior wall, interior finish, electrical equipment, and mechanical equipment, on a four-level scale of A, B, C, and D based on the evaluation criteria shown in Figs. 13 to 15, and fill in the deterioration status survey form shown in Fig. 10. The evaluation criteria shown in Figs. 13 to 15 may be sent from the asset management support device 4 and displayed on the client terminal 3 so that the operator can refer to them when making an on-site evaluation. The deterioration status survey form shown in Fig. 10 may also be filled out by the operator on paper and entered later on the client terminal 3, or information indicating the input items may be sent from the asset management support device 4 and displayed on the client terminal 3 so that the operator can enter the information as appropriate.

The operator of the client terminal 3 also supplies, via the network 2, photographs and detailed information of the deteriorated areas, as shown in FIG. 16, and information showing the deteriorated areas, as shown in FIG. 17, to the asset management support device 4.

In addition, when filling out the deterioration status survey form shown in FIG. 10, or at any other time, the operator of the client terminal 3 selects the corresponding specifications and performance of each part of the facility from the matrix of specifications and performance of each part of the facility shown in FIG. 18, and supplies this together with cost information related to those specifications and performance to the asset management support device 4 via the network 2.

In this way, the contents of the deterioration status survey form entered into the client terminal 3, i.e., the four-level evaluation results (A, B, C, D) of the deterioration status of the five parts, photos and detailed information of the deteriorated areas, information indicating the deteriorated areas, and information regarding the specifications, performance, and cost of each part of the facility, are supplied to the asset management support device 4 via the network 2.

Next, the information storage processing unit 12 of the asset management support device 4 stores the four-level evaluation results (A, B, C, D) of the deterioration status of the five parts, photos and detailed information of the deteriorated parts, and information indicating the deteriorated parts, transmitted from the client terminal 3, in the deterioration information storage unit 32 of the storage device 6. Furthermore, the information storage processing unit 12 of the asset management support device 4 stores the specification, performance, and cost information of each part of the facility transmitted from the client terminal 3 in the facility information storage unit 31 of the storage device 6. This information is linked to the facility name, the results of filling out the deterioration information questionnaire, detailed information on deterioration explained using Figures 16 and 17, information on the corresponding specifications and performance of each part, and cost information, and is stored in the deterioration information storage unit 32.

The maintenance management sheets shown in Figures 19 and 20 can be created for each facility from the information stored in the deterioration information storage unit 32 and facility information storage unit 31 of the storage device 6. The maintenance management sheet can include the property name, i.e., the facility name, segment code, deterioration information, construction history and schedule, inspection results, equipment-related issues, safety inspection results, and maintenance management status.

The deterioration status evaluation unit 13 then reads the four-level evaluation results (A, B, C, D) of the deterioration status of the five parts stored in the deterioration information storage unit 32 of the storage device 6, as well as a conversion table for converting the evaluation index of each part into evaluation points and a cost allocation table for allocating costs to each part stored in the evaluation information storage unit 33, and converts the evaluation results of the four-level evaluation of the five parts, roof/top, exterior wall, interior finish, electrical equipment, and mechanical equipment, into a numerical value out of 100 points, and calculates the healthiness of the school facilities as an index of the deterioration state based on the preset cost allocation of each part.

Figure 21 is a diagram showing an example of a conversion table for converting the evaluation indexes of each part stored in the evaluation information storage unit 33 of the storage device 6 into evaluation points. As shown in Figure 21, evaluation A is converted to 100 points, evaluation B is converted to 75 points, evaluation C is converted to 40 points, and evaluation D is converted to 10 points. Note that the conversion table shown in Figure 21 is merely an example, and the relationship between the evaluation and the evaluation points may be changed as appropriate.

Figure 22 is a diagram showing an example of a cost allocation table for allocating costs to each part stored in the evaluation information storage unit 33 of the storage device 6. The cost allocation for each part is set in advance with reference to the school building renovation ratio calculation table of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology's "Long Life Improvement Project". As shown in Figure 22, the roof and rooftop parts are allocated to 5.1, the exterior wall parts are allocated to 17.2, the interior finish parts are allocated to 22.4, the electrical equipment parts are allocated to 8.0, and the mechanical equipment parts are allocated to 7.3. Note that the cost allocation shown in Figure 22 was set with reference to the school building renovation ratio calculation table of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology's "Long Life Improvement Project", but it is merely an example, and it may be set to a different allocation depending on the type of building, or it may be set to any allocation.

The deterioration status evaluation unit 13 of the asset management support device 4 calculates the health level of each school facility by indexing the deterioration status based on the evaluation details of each part entered in the deterioration status survey form shown in FIG. 10, the evaluation point conversion table shown in FIG. 21, and the cost allocation table shown in FIG. 22.

Figure 23 is a diagram showing a schematic example of a calculation of the soundness. For example, in the deterioration status survey form shown in Figure 10, the roof and rooftop parts are given a rating of C, the exterior wall parts are given a rating of D, the interior finish parts are given a rating of B, the electrical equipment parts are given a rating of A, and the mechanical equipment parts are given a rating of C. The deterioration status evaluation unit 13 converts these evaluation contents into 40 points for the roof and rooftop parts, 10 points for the exterior wall parts, 75 points for the interior finish parts, 100 points for the electrical equipment parts, and 40 points for the mechanical equipment parts based on the conversion table shown in Figure 21. Next, the deterioration status evaluation unit 13 multiplies the evaluation points of each part by the cost allocation based on the cost allocation table shown in Figure 22, and divides the sum of these by the total value of the cost allocation to calculate the soundness quantified on a scale of 100 points. Information indicating the soundness calculated by the deterioration status evaluation unit 13 is stored in the deterioration information storage unit 32 of the storage device 6 by processing of the information storage processing unit 12.

The screen information generating unit 11 of the asset management support device 4 can read out the necessary information on the deterioration assessment and soundness of the main inspection parts other than the structure stored in the deterioration information storage unit 32 of the storage device 6 based on a request supplied from the client terminal 3 via the network 2, and create data for displaying a building information list table in which the deterioration assessment and soundness information have been added to the building information list table shown in Figure 8.

Figure 24 shows an example of a building information list to which information related to a deterioration status assessment has been added. As shown in Figure 24, in addition to basic building information and structural integrity, the building information list includes items such as the roof/top, exterior walls, interior finishes, electrical equipment, mechanical equipment, and soundness, and each item includes information related to a deterioration status assessment.

The operator of the client terminal 3 can input the evaluation of the deterioration status and soundness of the main inspection parts other than the structure obtained by the survey 3 in a specified format, and transmit the information to the asset management support device 4 via the network 2. The asset management support device 4 can calculate the soundness based on the evaluation of the deterioration status of the main inspection parts other than the structure obtained from the client terminal 3 via the network 2, and create the building information list shown in FIG. 24. In addition, the reference value setting unit 15 sets information on the current maintenance level, including the specifications, performance, and cost of each part of each school facility, as a reference value, based on the evaluation result of the deterioration status obtained as described above.

This allows the operator of the client terminal 3 to easily identify school facilities that may not be suitable for long-life renovation or that are in a state of advanced deterioration, based on the deterioration status evaluation included in the building information list shown in FIG. 24. For example, if the soundness level is less than 40 points, it is determined that it is desirable to prioritize measures such as long-life renovation. Furthermore, regardless of the soundness level score, areas rated C or D are determined to require repair or renovation. Note that soundness is taken into consideration when prioritizing buildings for renovation.

(Method of determining future maintenance and renewal costs)
In a third step, the asset management support device 4 calculates future maintenance and renewal costs (long life type) using the information supplied from the client terminal 3 in the first and second steps and stored in the memory device 6.

Figure 25 is a diagram showing an example of a cost calculation condition entry sheet for calculating future maintenance and renewal costs (longevity type). As shown in Figure 25, the operator of the client terminal 3 inputs the renewal cycle of reconstruction, the repair cycle for longevity renovation, the repair cycle for large-scale renovation, the implementation timing of part repairs, unit price setting, facility-related costs, etc. For example, for buildings that can be extended in life, the following are set: longevity renovation after 40 years of construction, large-scale renovation after 20 years and 60 years of construction, reconstruction after 80 years of construction, investigation required every 50 years, longevity renovation within the next 10 years, repair of parts rated D within the next 5 years, repair of parts rated C within the next 10 years, and for buildings that will undergo longevity renovations in the next 10 years, the amount equivalent to repair of parts rated A is deducted from the longevity renovation cost.

The operator of the client terminal 3 can input the renewal period of reconstruction, the renovation period for long life renovation, the renovation period for large-scale remodeling, the implementation time of part repair, unit price setting, facility-related costs, etc. into the cost calculation condition entry table shown in FIG. 25, and transmit the information to the asset management support device 4 via the network 2. The maintenance policy determination unit 16 of the asset management support device 4 acquires the cost calculation conditions from the client terminal 3. The maintenance policy determination unit 16 of the asset management support device 4 can calculate future maintenance and renewal costs (long life type) that aim to extend the life and reflect the deterioration status of main inspection parts other than the structure based on the cost calculation conditions acquired from the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and the evaluation of the information deterioration status stored in the deterioration information storage unit 32 of the storage device 6. The future maintenance and renewal costs (long life type) calculated by the maintenance policy determination unit 16 are stored in the maintenance policy information storage unit 34 by the processing of the information storage processing unit 12.

Figure 26 is a bar graph generated by the screen information generating unit 11 based on future maintenance and renewal costs calculated based on various information entered into the cost calculation condition entry table shown in Figure 25. The bar graph of future maintenance and renewal costs shown in Figure 26 shows the total repair costs for each year reflecting the deterioration state, aiming to extend the lifespan up to 80 years, and by entering facility-related expenses for the past few years, it is possible to compare the average value with the average future maintenance and renewal costs. The dotted line also shows the reduction effect achieved by shifting maintenance methods from the conventional type to the long-life type.

Figure 27 shows an image of the shift from a focus on renovation to a focus on extending life span. Figure 20A shows an image of a focus on renovation, and Figure 20B shows an image of extending life span. In Figures 20A and 20B, the horizontal axis shows the maintenance level in the year the building was completed and also shows a time series, and the vertical axis shows the costs related to repairs and renovations.

As shown in Figure 20A, in the case of a conventional renovation-centered model, functions and performance gradually deteriorate over time after a building is completed, and post-construction conservation repairs are carried out at prescribed intervals, temporarily improving functions and performance, but functions and performance gradually deteriorate again over time, and when it is determined that the function of the entire facility is significantly impaired, renovation is carried out. In other words, with a conventional renovation-centered model, as the deterioration of functions and performance is hardly addressed, usability becomes poor, and renovations are carried out every 40 to 50 years.

As shown in Figure 20B, in the case of long life, after a building is completed, its functions and performance gradually deteriorate with age, and preventive maintenance repairs (large-scale remodeling) are carried out at specified intervals to restore the functions and performance to the maintenance level at the time of completion. However, if the functions and performance gradually deteriorate again with age and it is determined that the function of the entire facility will be significantly impaired, long life repairs at about 60% of the cost of reconstruction can be carried out to improve the functions and performance above the maintenance level at the time of completion. Then, if the functions and performance gradually deteriorate again with age and it is determined that the function of the entire facility will be significantly impaired, large-scale remodeling is carried out to restore the functions and performance to the maintenance level at the time of long life repairs. In other words, with long life, the deterioration of functions and performance is restored at specified intervals to keep the building in good condition, and reconstruction is carried out at a cycle of 70 to 80 years, the useful life of the building structure.

(Method of formulating the latest development plan)
In the fourth step, the asset management support device 4 uses the building information list created in the first and second steps to consider the maintenance priority of each facility, and formulates a near-term maintenance plan based on the calculated future maintenance and renewal costs (long life type) in accordance with the budget situation.

The operator of the client terminal 3 can input a numerical value to be the financial constraint line based on the priorities for the development of individual facilities considered by each board of education, the budget situation, etc., and transmit this as information indicating the financial constraint line to the asset management support device 4 via the network 2. The financial constraint line setting unit 14 of the asset management support device 4 sets the financial constraint line of the school facilities to be managed from the information indicating the financial constraint line obtained from the client terminal 3 via the network 2. The reference value setting unit 15 can determine the facility development level for extending the facility's lifespan based on this financial constraint line.

Figure 28 is a diagram showing an example of facility improvement levels determined based on the setting of a financial constraint line. As shown in Figure 28, a school facility is divided into the following parts: the structure, the roof/rooftop, the exterior wall, the interior finish, the electrical equipment, and the mechanical equipment. The maintenance policy determination unit 16 determines a maintenance policy for functional recovery and functional improvement of the school facility. When the total cost allocation is set to 100, the maintenance policy determination unit 16 sets the cost allocation of roof renovation, exterior wall renovation, and equipment replacement for functional recovery in 20 years to, for example, 25 based on the numerical value of the financial constraint line, sets the cost allocation of roof renovation, exterior wall renovation, and equipment replacement for functional recovery in 40 years, and various learning, adaptation to forms, energy saving/disaster prevention, barrier-free, and longevity of the structure for functional improvement to, for example, 50 to 60, and sets the cost allocation of roof renovation, exterior wall renovation, and equipment replacement for functional recovery in 60 years to, for example, 25. The accounting linkage unit 21 links the cost of the functional improvement category of the repairs carried out for each part with capital expenditures, and links the cost of the functional recovery category with repair costs.

The reference value setting unit 15 acquires information on the facility maintenance level by part of each school facility from the client terminal 3 via the network 2, or reads out information on the facility maintenance level by part of each school facility that was previously transmitted from the client terminal 3 and stored in the maintenance policy information storage unit 34 of the storage device 6, and sets information on the current maintenance level including the specifications, performance, and cost of each part of each school facility as a reference value based on the basic information and facility deterioration information of each school facility. A plurality of facility maintenance levels can be set for performance that should be considered in extending the lifespan, and for example, a facility maintenance level of long-life renovation or energy-saving long-life renovation is set. In the facility maintenance levels of FIG. 28, the maintenance level marked with a circle among the maintenance levels of each part is the current maintenance level, and the position of the circle in the maintenance level frame indicates the deterioration ranks A to E. The maintenance policy determination unit 16 of the asset management support device 4 can select one of two facility maintenance levels, long-life renovation or energy-saving long-life renovation, based on the current maintenance level by part of the school facility set as the reference value, and the financial constraint line and cost-effectiveness. This allows the project content setting unit 17 to identify the repair contents for each part of the school facility according to the selected facility maintenance level, calculate the repair costs for the most recent equipment plan for each school facility from the difference between the current maintenance level for each part of the school facility and the selected facility maintenance level, and formulate a maintenance plan. The information storage processing unit 12 stores information about the formulated maintenance plan in the maintenance policy information storage unit 34 of the storage device 6.

For the facility maintenance level, several repair menus (specifications) are prepared for each part, and the construction method characteristics, cost, and effect of each repair menu are set. For example, for the exterior wall (insulation), repair menus of external insulation (insulation thickness 70 mm), internal insulation (insulation thickness 25 mm), and wood construction are prepared, and the construction method characteristics, cost, and effect of each are set in detail based on the performance data described in the construction details created during the reconstruction or repair work of the facility. The part-specific identification unit 18 identifies the repair contents for each part of each school facility based on these repair menus. The part-specific cost calculation unit 19 calculates the cost for each part of each school facility and the component ratio of the cost for each part based on the repair contents for each part of each school facility identified by the part-specific identification unit 18. Then, the standard value update unit 20 updates the standard value, which is the current maintenance level of the specifications, performance, and cost of each school facility, based on the repair contents for each school facility identified by the part-specific identification unit 18 and the cost for each part of each school facility calculated by the part-specific cost calculation unit 19.

Figure 29 is a diagram showing an example of a maintenance plan table for an individual facility for the past five years. In Figure 29, the vertical axis is divided by project name: facility maintenance costs, other facility maintenance costs, maintenance and repair costs, and utility and outsourcing costs. Facility maintenance costs are further divided into new construction and expansion projects, renovation projects, earthquake resistance projects, long life projects, large-scale renovations (deterioration), disaster prevention projects, toilet maintenance, air conditioning equipment, measures for disabled children, maintenance of special needs schools, and part repairs. The horizontal axis shows school names and project costs divided by fiscal year. By presenting it in this way, it is easy to see at a glance which project names include which school facilities and project costs.

The operator of the client terminal 3 can input the school name and project cost into the maintenance plan table shown in FIG. 29 while referring to the various data obtained by the above-mentioned processing, and send that information to the asset management support device 4 via the network 2. The asset management support device 4 stores the maintenance plan table information acquired from the client terminal 3 via the network 2 in the maintenance policy information storage unit 34 of the storage device 6. The asset management support device 4 can also calculate the cost of equipment plans for individual facilities for the past five years based on the information stored in the storage device 6.

In response to a request from the client terminal 3 supplied via the network 2, the screen information generating unit 11 of the asset management support device 4 can read the information obtained by the above-mentioned processing from the storage device 6 as appropriate, process it into the desired information, and transmit it to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 for display. FIG. 30 is a bar graph showing the cost of the individual facility maintenance plan for the last five years, calculated based on the project costs entered into the maintenance plan table for the individual facility for the last five years shown in FIG. 29, which was generated by the screen information generating unit 11. In the bar graph of the cost of the individual facility maintenance plan for the last five years shown in FIG. 30, the total cost of the maintenance plan for each year can be seen, and the proportion of the cost of the maintenance plan for each individual facility can be visualized by the proportion of the pattern in each bar graph, making it easy to understand the maintenance plan for each individual facility for each year.

It is desirable that the maintenance plan be decided by a whole-agency system including the financial and maintenance departments. The operator of the client terminal 3 can refer to various information stored in the storage device 6 as necessary, and create an implementation plan for the maintenance contents based on the bar graph showing the costs of the maintenance plan for the past five years, as shown in Figure 30, to ensure that the implementation plan is feasible based on the financial constraint line.

FIG. 31 is a diagram showing an example of an implementation plan of the maintenance contents for the next five years. As the maintenance standard, the long life renovation is performed for schools with good structural soundness, for example, three schools per year. Among the part renovations, for example, roof and rooftop renovations are performed for two schools per year, and exterior wall renovations are performed for four schools per year so that D-rated parts can be eliminated within five years. Among the part renovations, the response to the measures is set based on the past performance, for example, elevators are performed for one school per year, toilets for two schools per year, and sewage for one to two schools per year. Among the part renovations, the response to the renewal cycle that requires a large cost for equipment, etc. is set based on the past performance, for example, cubicles are performed for one school per year, and boilers for one school per year. Grounds are performed for one school per year. Repair costs and other expenses are set based on the past performance, for example, the repair cost is 500 yen/ ^m2 . The operator of the client terminal 3 transmits the information of the implementation plan of the maintenance contents for the next five years shown in FIG. 31 to the asset management support device 4 via the network 2. The information storage processing unit 12 of the asset management support device 4 stores information on the implementation plan for maintenance content for the next five years, acquired from the client terminal 3 via the network 2, in the maintenance policy information storage unit 34 of the storage device 6.

Figure 32 is a bar graph showing an example of budget allocation for the next five years generated by the screen information generating unit 11 based on the maintenance contents shown in Figure 31 stored in the maintenance policy information storage unit 34. The screen information generating unit 11 can transmit the bar graph of the budget allocation for the next five years shown in Figure 32 to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and display it. In the bar graph of the budget allocation for the next five years shown in Figure 32, the total cost of the maintenance plan for each year can be seen, and the proportion of the cost of each maintenance content can be visualized by the proportion of the pattern in each bar graph, making it easy to understand the budget allocation for each maintenance content for each year. The bar graph of the budget allocation for the next five years shown in Figure 32 is calculated based on the average investment expenses of 1.7 billion yen/year for the past five years and the maintenance plans for individual facilities for the most recent five years shown in Figure 29 and the maintenance contents shown in Figure 31. Similarly, the screen information generating unit 11 can generate a detailed implementation plan for the maintenance content for the next five years as shown in FIG. 33 based on the maintenance content shown in FIG. 31 stored in the maintenance policy information storing unit 34 and the cost information and facility information stored in each storing unit, and transmit it to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 for display.

In this way, by using the asset management support system 1, it is possible to easily formulate an implementation plan for the next five years by leveling out the investment expenses for the past five years, prioritizing repairs and the like using the maintenance content shown in FIG. 31, and formulating an implementation plan based on a budget allocation for the next five years as shown in FIG. 32. In addition, the screen information generating unit 11 of the asset management support device 4 can also create a table showing details of the implementation plan based on a budget allocation for the next five years as shown in FIG. 33, based on the maintenance content stored in the maintenance policy information storage unit 34. In this way, by using the asset management support system 1, it is possible to easily consider the outlook for costs of extending the life span and the effects of extending the life span.

Figure 34 is a bar graph showing the cost of the long life plan for the next 40 years. The bar graph of the cost of the long life plan for the next 40 years shown in Figure 34 is calculated based on the calculation results of future maintenance and renewal costs by the maintenance policy decision unit 16. The screen information generation unit 11 of the asset management support device 4 reads the calculation results of future maintenance and renewal costs stored in the storage device 6 in response to operation input from the client terminal 3 supplied via the network 2, processes them into desired information, and transmits them to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 to display the bar graph of Figure 34. For example, in the 40-year long life plan, if the total maintenance and renewal costs due to long life are leveled out to 123.6 billion yen, and the investment expenses are kept to 1.7 billion yen/year for the next five years (FY2016-FY2020), the amount will be 3.3 billion yen/year for the next 35 years from FY2021. It is also shown that the next 20 years will be centered on long life renovation, and the latter 20 years thereafter will be centered on reconstruction.

As shown in Figure 34, future maintenance and renewal costs for school facilities are expected to increase to about twice the investment costs of the past five years, even with the implementation of life-extension measures. There is a contradiction in that facility maintenance and renewal costs are increasing while the number of students is decreasing, and the nature of facility ownership, reduction of maintenance and renewal costs, and securing financial resources are major issues. Therefore, since there is a limit to what can be achieved by simply extending the life of individual school facilities (preservation plans), a multifaceted review of the layout, size, operation, utilization, etc. of school facilities is necessary to close the gap between the financial constraint line and costs, and a policy for a comprehensive effort toward optimization must be clarified.

Figure 35 is a diagram showing an example of a new policy and improvement measures for resolving issues. As shown in Figure 27A, new policies for resolving issues include responding to local conditions, reducing maintenance and renewal costs, and reviewing maintenance standards through public-private partnerships and the use of private funds, while improving the school facility environment through multi-purpose use. Then, in line with the new policies for resolving issues, as shown in Figure 27B, specific improvement measures are considered. In other words, specific improvement measures are considered by the simulation unit 22 by simulating the divisional ownership, sharing, or consolidation of school facilities based on information on future population changes within a specified area, information on the usage status of each facility, or information on the functions of each facility, or based on a combination of these pieces of information.

For example, schools could be used as local hubs, consolidating functions such as libraries and community centers in school facilities, allowing them to be used for multiple purposes, such as as a school during the day and as a local hub outside of school hours, or a combination with a private business through a public-private partnership (PPP) could be considered to utilize private funds and know-how to secure new sources of funding and to use the facility as a private facility outside of school hours. In addition, pools could be considered for sharing, and by using a private pool when it is time to renew them or by sharing the facility among several schools, it would be possible to secure funding and reduce maintenance costs.

Figure 36 is a diagram showing an example of a simulation based on a specific policy and formulation. As shown in Figure 36, when specific policies and measures such as reviewing standards, combining with other public systems, consolidating and sharing pools, and utilizing private funds are decided, a reorganization study is carried out in the region. The simulation unit 22 of the asset management support device 4 receives information on the results of the reorganization study from the client terminal 3 via the network 2, and recalculates the cost of the longevity plan for the next 40 years based on this information. As a result, it is determined that it is necessary to reduce maintenance and renewal costs or secure financial resources by taking measures that go beyond longevity. In order to fill the gap between the financial constraint line and the cost, the layout, size, operation, and utilization of school facilities are reviewed from various angles, and the specific processing for clarifying the policy of a comprehensive effort toward optimization will be described later using Figures 47 to 92.

＜Effects＞
As described above, the asset management support device 4 of the asset management support system 1 accumulates and stores basic information about a facility, accumulates and stores deterioration information about the facility, evaluates and indexes the deterioration state of the facility based on the stored deterioration information, sets information about the current maintenance level including the specifications, performance, and cost of the facility as a reference value based on the stored basic information about the facility and the deterioration information about the facility, sets a financial constraint line that is an upper limit of the cost to be invested in the facility, determines a maintenance policy of rebuilding the facility, restoring the function of the facility, or improving the function of the facility based on the reference value, the indexed deterioration state of the facility, and the financial constraint line, specifies the repair content of the facility by part in the case where the maintenance policy is followed, calculates the repair cost of the facility for each specified period, specifies the repair content by part of the facility based on performance data described in a construction breakdown created at the time of reconstruction work or repair work for the facility, calculates the cost by part and the component ratio of the cost by part based on the specified repair content by part of the facility, and updates the reference value based on the specified repair content by part of the facility and the calculated cost by part of the facility. This makes it possible to grasp the actual state of the facility and reflect the deterioration state. This allows future maintenance and renewal costs to be easily calculated. In addition, since the facility development level is set in accordance with the financial constraint line, future maintenance and renewal costs will not deviate, and the facility's long life can be optimally managed within the financial constraint line. In addition, by linking the cost required for improving functionality to capital expenditures and the cost required for recovering functionality to repair costs and accounting for them, it is possible to evaluate the facility from both the capital aspect and the management (maintenance) aspect of the facility based on actual data. Furthermore, as a further improvement study of the owned facilities, it is possible to review the maintenance plan by simulating from various perspectives such as sharing and consolidation of the facilities. In addition, the asset management support method executed by the asset management support device 4 and the program installed in the asset management support device 4 also include the same components as those of the above-mentioned asset management support device 4, so that it is possible to grasp the actual state of the facility and calculate future maintenance and renewal costs reflecting the deterioration state.

(Variation: Linkage with fixed asset ledger)
In the above embodiment, the relationship between the building information list including the building basic information and the school facility ledger has been described, but it may be configured to be linked with the fixed asset ledger in order to further link with the accounting field. The data of the fixed asset ledger is inputted at the client terminal 3, and is supplied to the asset management support device 4 via the network 2 and the communication device 5, and is linked with each item of the building basic information and the school facility ledger by the processing of the information storage processing unit 12, and is stored in the facility information storage unit 31 of the storage device 6. FIG. 37 is a diagram for explaining the relationship between the building information list, the school facility ledger, and the management classification of each of the fixed asset ledger. The fixed asset ledger is a ledger that is prepared as an auxiliary ledger for preparing financial documents in the local government accounting system, and is a ledger that records and manages the history of fixed assets from acquisition to disposal for each asset. When sorting out the target building based on the school facility ledger, by configuring it so that it can be matched with the fixed asset ledger, future data updates can be performed efficiently. In addition, if the numbers do not match due to different methods of calculating area between the school facilities register and the fixed asset register, it is preferable to clarify a rule such as unifying the numbers to use the area from either the school facilities register or the fixed asset register.

Figure 38 is a diagram for explaining an example of a matching table between the school facility ledger and the fixed asset ledger. In the fixed asset ledger, an increase is recorded when an extension or renovation is actually performed, so it is possible that the registration unit in the fixed asset ledger and the unit entered in the building information list do not have a one-to-one relationship (i.e., they do not match). This is because the fixed asset ledger allows for comparison with the actual object and records the unit of replacement or renewal. Therefore, it is preferable to associate and store all identifiers in the fixed asset ledger (fixed asset ledger numbers) corresponding to the building numbers, which are management categories in the school facility ledger, as shown in Figure 38. In addition, since the increase in the fixed asset ledger is recorded in this way and the repair costs of the increase can be calculated and understood from the above-mentioned performance data, the accounting linkage unit 21 of the asset management support device 4 can record the costs related to improving the functionality of the facility as capital expenditures, and the costs related to restoring the functionality of the facility as repair costs.

(Variation: Use of facility layout diagram)
In addition, it is preferable to organize the management classification of the building basic information and the school facility ledger using the facility layout diagram of the building. The data of the facility layout diagram of the building is inputted at the client terminal 3, and is supplied to the asset management support device 4 via the network 2 and the communication device 5. The data is linked to each item of the building basic information and the school facility ledger by the processing of the information storage processing unit 12, and is stored in the facility information storage unit 31 of the storage device 6. FIG. 39 is a diagram for explaining the relationship between the facility layout diagram of the building and the building information list. It is preferable to organize the school facility list as one building, collectively, buildings that are expected to be renovated or remodeled as a whole. This makes it possible to efficiently manage the future, such as the implementation of inspections and diagnoses, the formulation of maintenance plans, and the management of construction history. In the example shown in FIG. 39, for example, the building names are organized as follows: a single normal classroom building is school building 1, a building in which a normal classroom building and a special-normal classroom building are connected is school building 2, and a building building is a gymnasium. It is more preferable to change and manage the information recorded in the building information list with the organized building names.

(Variation: Building Information List)
Figures 40 to 43 are diagrams showing another example of the building information list shown in Figure 24, which allows the status of each building to be grasped at once. Note that the building information lists shown in Figures 40 to 43 are displayed on a screen, but they may also be output as data in a file format or printed out.

The building information list shown in FIG. 40 shows a part of the display, and displays vertical columns consisting of "basic building information", "soundness of structural frame", "deterioration status other than frame", and "specifications and performance", and horizontal rows consisting of multiple buildings. The building information list shown in FIG. 41 shows a state in which only the item part of "basic building information" shown in FIG. 40 is fixed and slid horizontally, showing a state in which the relationship between "basic building information" and "history" can be understood. Furthermore, the building information list shown in FIG. 42 shows a state in which only the item part of "basic building information" shown in FIG. 40 is fixed and slid horizontally, similar to FIG. 41, showing a state in which the relationship between "basic building information" and "annual plan (target years of condition/repair and renovation cycle)" can be understood. FIG. 43 is a diagram showing a state in which an alternative plan for "annual plan (target years of condition/repair and renovation cycle)" of the building information list shown in FIG. 42 is displayed. Each item and the building information list will be described in detail below.

The column of "basic building information" is an area for reading and displaying basic information of a building stored in the facility information storage unit 31. The column of "basic building information" includes, for example, the following items: "school type", "facility name", "display order", "building name", "building number", "structure", "number of floors", "total floor area ( ^m2 )", "construction year", and "years of construction". Information shown in the "school type" item is, for example, elementary school, junior high school, high school, etc. Information shown in the "facility name" item is, for example, individual school names such as Danjo Elementary School, Kohyoen Elementary School, Hinoguchi Elementary School, and Hiraki Elementary School. Information shown in the "display order" item is, for example, a numerical value that is conveniently assigned to the building constituting the building when the building is displayed. Information shown in the "building name" item is, for example, the name of each building of the building. Information shown in the "building number" item is a numerical value assigned to each building. Information shown in the "structure" item is the structure of the building, for example, reinforced concrete structure, steel reinforced concrete structure, reinforced concrete structure, steel frame structure, etc. The information shown in the "Number of floors" field is a number indicating the number of floors in the building. The "Total floor area ( ^m2 )" information is a number indicating the total floor area of the building. The "Year of construction" information is a number indicating the year each building was constructed. The year of construction includes a four-digit number indicating the Gregorian calendar year (for example, 1955) and an alphabet and number indicating the Japanese calendar year (for example, S30 for 1955). The "Age since construction" is a number indicating the number of years that have passed since construction.

The column "Structural frame soundness" is an area for reading and displaying information on the soundness of the structural frame stored in the deterioration information storage unit 32. The column "Structural frame soundness" further includes, for example, the items "earthquake-resistant safety" and "long life assessment". The item "earthquake-resistant safety" further includes the items "standard", "diagnosis", and "reinforcement". The item "standard" shows "old" or "new". "Old" indicates the earthquake resistance standard (old earthquake resistance standard) in the Building Standards Act up to May 31, 1981, and "New" indicates the earthquake resistance standard (new earthquake resistance standard) in the Building Standards Act after June 1, 1981. The earthquake resistance standard applied to each building is determined by the construction year of each building. In the "diagnosis" item, "Completed" is shown if an earthquake resistance diagnosis has already been performed, and it is blank if it has not been performed. In addition, "-" is shown if an earthquake resistance diagnosis is not required. Regarding whether or not to carry out a seismic diagnosis, if the item of the standard is "old", it is judged that it is necessary, and if it is "new", it is judged that it is not necessary. In the "reinforcement" item, "Completed" is displayed if the reinforcement work has been carried out, and if it has not been carried out, it is left blank. In addition, if the reinforcement work is not necessary, "-" is displayed. Whether or not to carry out the reinforcement work is determined based on the diagnosis result of the seismic diagnosis. The "longevity assessment" column further includes "survey year", "compressive strength (N/ ^mm2 )", and "trial calculation classification". In "survey year", information indicating the survey year in which the longevity assessment was carried out is displayed (H12 if the survey was conducted in 2000). In "compressive strength (N/ ^mm2 )", a numerical value indicating the compressive strength of the concrete measured during the survey for the longevity assessment is displayed. In "trial calculation classification", if the numerical value of the compressive strength (N/ ^mm2 ) is 13.5 or less, the word "investigation required" is displayed. In addition, although not shown in FIG. 40, the "longevity assessment" item may be further subdivided and displayed. For example, columns may be provided to indicate the concrete neutralization depth (mm), rebar cover thickness (mm), rebar corrosion degree, and notes (visual condition, etc.), and corresponding numerical values or information may be displayed.

The "Deterioration status of items other than the structure" column is an area where the evaluation information and evaluation indexes stored in the evaluation information storage unit 33 are read out and displayed. The "Deterioration status of items other than the structure" column further includes, for example, "Roof/rooftop", "Exterior wall", "Interior finish", "Electrical equipment", "Water supply and drainage sanitary equipment", "Heating and cooling equipment", and "Soundness (maximum 100 points)". Each item of "Roof/rooftop", "Exterior wall", "Interior finish", "Electrical equipment", "Water supply and drainage sanitary equipment", and "Heating and cooling equipment" is shown with an alphabet (four levels from A to D) corresponding to the deterioration status. "A" means generally in good condition, "B" means partially deteriorated, "C" means extensively deteriorated, and "D" means that immediate action is required. If the item is not subject to evaluation, "-" is shown. "Soundness (maximum 100 points)" shows a numerical value calculated based on the deterioration assessment of each part entered in the deterioration status survey form shown in FIG. 10, using the evaluation point conversion table shown in FIG. 21 and the cost allocation table shown in FIG. 22.

The "Specifications/Performance" column is an area that reads and displays the building specifications, performance, and cost information stored in the facility information storage unit 31. The "Specifications/Performance" column further includes, for example, "Roof specifications," "Exterior wall specifications," "Exterior openings," "In-house power generation equipment," "Solar panels," "Storage batteries," and "Air conditioning system." If there is information indicating specifications or performance that corresponds to each of these columns, the specification name and information regarding the performance are displayed within each item.

The "History" column is an area where maintenance history information stored in the deterioration information storage unit 32 is read out and displayed. The "History" column is further divided into columns for every 10 years, for example. In the example shown in FIG. 41, the 10-year column is further divided into columns for every year, and the cells are colored based on the type of work carried out in each year. The types of work include, for example, "new construction/extension," "renovation," "earthquake-resistant reinforcement," "large-scale full-scale renovation," "renovation of parts and portions," and "renovation to extend life (improvement of functionality)," and each of these can be shown with a different color.

The column "Annual Plan (Target Years of Condition/Repair and Renovation Cycle)" can be displayed based on information entered by the operator of the client terminal 3 via the cost calculation condition table for future maintenance and renewal costs (long life type) shown in FIG. 25. In the example shown in FIG. 42, the cells are colored according to whether the age of the existing building is less than 40 years old, 40 to 59 years old, or 60 to 79 years old. The column "Annual Plan (Target Years of Condition/Repair and Renovation Cycle)" is calculated and determined based on the values entered by the operator of the client terminal 3 in each item shown in the table shown in FIG. 25. In other words, if the operator of the client terminal 3 enters and sets the base year for calculating future maintenance and renewal costs, the renewal cycle in the case of renovation, the number of years for life extension, the construction period, etc., the cells in the column for the annual plan will be colored according to the input values. Therefore, it is easy to grasp the situation such as when renovation will be carried out for each building (each building) and how long the life extension can be achieved.

Figure 43 is a diagram showing the state in which an alternative plan for "Annual Plan (Target Years of Condition/Repair and Renovation Cycle)" in the building information list shown in Figure 42 is displayed. The building information list shown in Figure 43 is a list that is displayed when the renovation timing is reviewed based on the lifespan shown for each building and each building in the "Annual Plan (Target Years of Condition/Repair and Renovation Cycle)" shown in Figure 42 and the renovation cycle period is changed. For example, in the diagram shown in Figure 42, the method of renovating buildings to extend their lifespan is to renovate buildings in order from the oldest, but it can be seen that there is only about 20 years between the renovation and rebuilding. Therefore, as shown in Figure 43, by changing the method to renovate buildings suitable for long lifespan, the period until rebuilding becomes 30 years. Note that the method of changing from the display in Figure 42 to the display in Figure 43 may be, for example, to provide an item for setting the order of renovation in the cost calculation condition entry table shown in Figure 25 so that the person in charge can select it, or it may be configured so that the year of renovation can be changed by directly operating on the screen of this Figure 42. Furthermore, the information shown in FIG. 43 may be switched on the screen with the corresponding portion in FIG. 42, or may be connected horizontally so that they can be visually compared at the same time.

Figure 44 shows an example of a screen displayed when considering the optimal solution for future maintenance by facility and building in the building information list. As shown in the upper part of Figure 44, the "current state" and "improvement proposal" of the building information list are shown. The row displayed as "current state" indicates that the building can be used for up to 60 years if partial renovation is performed at the present time, and the row displayed as "improvement proposal" indicates that the building can be used for up to 80 years if medium-scale renovation is performed at the present time and then large-scale renovation is performed at a specified time in the future. Note that these displays may be displayed in parallel at the same time, or the screen may be configured so that the "current state" can be changed to "improvement proposal" by operating the displayed cell. When the screen is configured so that the "current state" can be changed to "improvement proposal", for example, when a cell showing partial renovation in the "current state" is selected, a separate screen interface that can be changed to large-scale renovation or medium-scale renovation may be displayed, or the renovation setting can be changed to partial renovation, medium-scale renovation, or large-scale renovation each time the cell is clicked.

As shown in the lower part of Figure 44, two schools in the building information list can be combined into one row to create an integrated elementary and junior high school when renovated. Alternatively, one of the two schools can be left unrenovated, and consolidated and combined into the other school, while also undergoing major renovations to improve its functionality. Note that these displays and operations can be configured on the screen of the client terminal 3 so that the person in charge can make these changes directly.

(Other examples of information to be displayed in the history and annual plan sections)
FIG. 45 is a diagram showing another example of items to be displayed in the building basic information and history section. The table shown in FIG. 45(1) displays only the building basic information and history section in the building information list tables shown in FIG. 40 to FIG. 44, and the color of the history cell is darker only during the period when Building A is used. The table shown in FIG. 45(2) has a column for displaying information (classification and quantity) of a desired facility instead of the column for building basic information, and displays the history information of the facility for each row of the facility. The table shown in FIG. 45(3) displays more detailed information (classification and name/specification and quantity) of the facility than the display of FIG. 45(2). Furthermore, the table shown in FIG. 45(4) has a column for accounting classification (expenses and cumulative total) instead of the column for building basic information, and displays the cost history for each building. The expenditure of this accounting classification can be further divided into capital expenditures and repair costs, and the cumulative asset value can also be displayed. That is, by adopting such a display mode, it is possible to display in detail the costs (numerical values) according to the classifications recorded in the accounting. In each table shown in FIG. 45, only the past history portion is displayed, but when a simulation or the like is performed, the annual plan portion may also be displayed. In addition, the screens shown in (1) to (4) may be switched to the table (2), the table (3), or the table (4) by clicking a button (not shown) that allows switching of the display in the screen showing the table (1), or the display method of any of (1) to (4) may be specified in a screen (not shown) that allows detailed conditions for displaying this list on the screen to be set. In this way, the building information list can be switched to not only basic information about the building, but also information about the facilities and information about the accounting, and these various viewpoints can be expressed as one hierarchical structure.

(Functional configuration of asset management support device 4A)
Fig. 46 is a diagram showing an example of the functional configuration of an asset management support device 4A for outputting the building information list shown in Fig. 40 to Fig. 45. Note that the same functions as those in the asset management support device 4 shown in Fig. 1 are designated by the same reference numerals, and the description of the functions will be omitted.

The asset management support device 4A has a screen information generation unit 11A, a first extraction unit 11B, and a second extraction unit 11C.

The screen information generating unit 11A can generate screen information for displaying the building information list shown in FIG. 40 to FIG. 45. Specifically, in response to an output request from a person operating the client terminal 3, the screen information generating unit 11A can extract desired information from the information stored in the facility information storage unit 31, the deterioration information storage unit 32, the evaluation information storage unit 33, and the maintenance policy information storage unit 34 of the storage device 6 using the first extraction unit 11B and the second extraction unit 11C described later, and generate screen information by calculating desired information based on the extracted information. The screen information generated by the screen information generating unit 11A can be transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2, and the building information list can be displayed on the display of the client terminal 3.

In response to an output request from the person in charge operating the client terminal 3, the first extraction unit 11B extracts information indicating the specifications, cost, performance, or deterioration status according to the equipment classification from the history column in the building list for each year or from the column indicating the future annual plan, and supplies the information to the screen information generation unit 11A.

In response to an output request from the person in charge operating the client terminal 3, the second extraction unit 11C extracts information indicating specifications, costs, performance, or deterioration status according to the accounting classification from the history column in the building list for each year or from the column indicating the future annual plan, and supplies the information to the screen information generation unit 11A.

As described above, the asset management support device 4A has a screen information generating unit 11A that generates a building information list based on information stored in the facility information storage unit 31 of the asset management support system 1, as described in FIGS. 40 to 46. The building list generated by the screen information generating unit 11A includes a row for each building or each building, a column showing past history, and a column showing future annual plans. This makes it possible to display a list of building information for each building or each building from the past to the future, based on the present, and to realize visualization of information about buildings. Note that the building list shown in FIGS. 40 to 46 includes a column showing past history and a column showing future annual plans, but it may also include either a column showing past history or a column showing future annual plans.

In addition, in the columns showing the past history of the asset management support system 1 described in Figs. 40 to 46, the types of construction work carried out in the past by building or wing (for example, new construction/extension, renovation, reconstruction, earthquake-resistance reinforcement, large-scale full renovation, part or partial renovation, long-life renovation, etc., as shown in Figs. 42 and 43) can be displayed in different colors or with different color intensities so that they can be visually distinguished, so that it is possible to grasp at a glance what types of construction work have been carried out in the past based on this building information list. Alternatively, in the columns showing the past history of the asset management support system 1 described in Figs. 40 to 46, the years of use (building life) by building or wing can be displayed in different colors or with different color intensities so that the specific periods are shown, so that the years of use in the past can be grasped at a glance based on this building information list.

In addition, in the columns showing future annual plans of the asset management support system 1 described in Figures 40 to 46, the sections of the specified years of use for each building or tower are similarly displayed so that they can be visually distinguished, so that it is possible to visually grasp what types of construction work are planned to be carried out in the future plans, and also visually grasp the specific period of use (building lifespan) for each building or tower, in the same way as the display of past history described above.

The asset management support system 1 described in Figures 40 to 46 also has a first extraction unit 11B that extracts information indicating the specifications, cost, performance, or deterioration status according to the equipment classification from the building equipment information, and this first extraction unit 11B can output information indicating the specifications, cost, performance, or deterioration status according to the equipment classification for each year in the history column in the building list or for each year in the column indicating the future annual plan in response to an output request from a user operating the client terminal 3, so that detailed information regarding the building's equipment, such as deterioration information, can be visually grasped over the past or future.

The asset management support system 1 described in Figures 40 to 46 also has a second extraction unit 11C that extracts costs according to accounting categories from the building cost information, and when extracting costs according to accounting categories, this second extraction unit 11C determines whether the costs are classified as capitalized amounts, fixed asset stock, or depreciation amounts, and can output numerical values based on the costs extracted based on that determination for each year in the history column in the building list or for each year in the column indicating future annual plans, so that costs according to accounting categories can be visually grasped over the past or future. Furthermore, when displayed by building or by building wing, costs according to accounting categories can be grasped in more detail.

(Comprehensive renovation efforts to extend service life and optimize facilities)
As explained using Figure 34, in a long-life renovation plan that focuses on grasping and restoring the deterioration state, if a discrepancy occurs between the financial constraint line and the cost, a multifaceted review is required that covers the layout and size of school facilities, as well as their operation and utilization, in order to close the discrepancy, and a comprehensive approach to optimization must be clarified. Therefore, with reference to Figure 47, we will explain long-life renovation that goes beyond grasping and restoring the deterioration state.

In Figure 47, the items for renovation are shown in the center, and the items to be considered in order to determine the items for renovation are shown on the left. First, the basics are to understand the deterioration state and restore the deterioration, that is, to restore the functionality. Then, in consideration of future changes in the number of students, it is necessary to change the layout of school facilities, accommodate expansions and reductions, and ensure flexibility in response to changes in the number of students and the number of classes. Also, in consideration of the future state of schools, such as responding to new learning environments, it is necessary to respond to the need for new functions such as media centers, small classrooms, and multipurpose halls. Also, in order to improve the maintenance level of facilities and improve their functionality, it is necessary to make the facilities energy-efficient, barrier-free, fully equipped with air conditioning, and install comfortable toilets. Furthermore, it is necessary to consider sharing special classrooms and swimming pools as a way of coordinating with facilities around the school, and to use school facilities as a base for the community. Here, we consider all of these contents and carry them out efficiently as long-life renovation in the broad sense.

In order to implement the long-life renovation in the broad sense described using FIG. 47 and to support comprehensive efforts toward optimization, for example, facilities such as schools managed by a certain administrative agency can be classified, organized, and analyzed according to the characteristics of the facilities, making it possible to obtain various information necessary to consider changes in the number of students, responses to new learning environments, improvements to the functionality of facilities, and cooperation with facilities around the school. FIG. 48 describes the functional configuration of the asset management support device 4B and storage device 6B of the asset management support system 1 that can provide support for implementing the long-life renovation in the broad sense described using FIG. 47. In FIG. 48, the same reference numerals are used for the same functions as the asset management support device 4 and storage device 6 shown in FIG. 1, or the asset management support device 4A and storage device 6 shown in FIG. 46, and detailed descriptions of those functions are omitted.

That is, the asset management support device 4B has the same functional configuration as the asset management support device 4A shown in FIG. 46, except that a screen information generating unit 11E is provided instead of the screen information generating unit 11A, and a third extracting unit 11D, a classification information acquiring unit 51, a type classification processing unit 52, and a calculation unit 53 are further provided. In addition, the storage device 6B has the same functional configuration as the storage device 6 shown in FIG. 1 and FIG. 46, except that a format storage unit 71 and a utilization study related information storage unit 72 are further provided.

In addition to the functions of the screen information generating unit 11 and the screen information generating unit 11A described above, the screen information generating unit 11E further has a function of generating data for displaying a screen corresponding to a request from the client terminal 3 transmitted via the network 2, using a format stored in the format storage unit 71 described later. Specifically, the screen information generating unit 11E reads out a format corresponding to the request from the client terminal 3 from the format storage unit 71, and controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data necessary for generating information corresponding to the read format from each part of the storage device 6B. The screen information generating unit 11E also commands the calculation unit 53 to calculate data necessary for generating information corresponding to the read format. The screen information generating unit 11E then generates data corresponding to the request from the client terminal 3 by inserting numerical values into the format using the supplied data, and transmits the data to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 for display.

The third extraction unit 11D uses a format stored in the format storage unit 71 described below to extract information required for the screen information generation unit 11E to generate data for displaying a screen in response to a request from the client terminal 3 from any one of the facility information storage unit 31, deterioration information storage unit 32, evaluation information storage unit 33, maintenance policy information storage unit 34, and utilization study related information storage unit 72 of the storage device 6B.

The classification information acquisition unit 51 acquires information necessary for type classification, such as the designation of the facility group to be classified, classification information that is the basis of type classification for classifying the facility group into types, and the content and thresholds of the classification, from the client terminal 3 via the network 2, and supplies it to the type classification processing unit 52. For example, the basic information for type classification can be the location or region, the school size, the number of classes, the history or prediction of changes in the school size and number of classes, the school type, whether it is an independent school or a branch school, the main process, etc. As for the school size, it may be classified using the range of the number of students or the number of classes. In addition, in high schools, etc., it is possible to classify the school type as high school or special needs school, whether it is full-time or part-time, whether the main subject is general, agricultural, industrial, fisheries, commerce, comprehensive, or other subjects. In addition, special needs schools can use classifications such as whether the type of disability they cater to is sensory disability, hearing impairment, intellectual disability, physical disability, poor health, other disability, or a combination of these. In addition, the number of classification information that serves as the basis for type classification is not regulated.

The type classification processing unit 52 classifies a predetermined group of facilities in response to a request from the client terminal 3 based on the classification information supplied from the classification information acquisition unit 51, and supplies the classification results to the information storage processing unit 12, where they are stored in the utilization study related information storage unit 72, and also to the screen information generation unit 11E and the calculation unit 53. For example, when the classification information acquisition unit 51 supplies three types of type classification axes, (1) region, (2) class size, and (3) predicted change in number of classes, along with the contents of each classification and threshold value, in order to classify elementary schools in a predetermined municipality, the type classification processing unit 52 first classifies elementary schools by the specified region, then classifies elementary schools by the specified range of class size within that classification, and further classifies elementary schools by the specified range of the predicted number of classes within that classification. These classifications are then separated, for example, into type A, type B, etc., and the classification results are supplied to the information storage processing unit 12, where they are stored in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72, and are also supplied to the screen information generation unit 11E and the calculation unit 53.

Based on a command from the screen information generating unit 11E, the calculation unit 53 generates data for the screen information generating unit 11E to display a screen in response to a request from the client terminal 3, and transmits the data to the client terminal 3 for display. In order to do so, the calculation unit 53 executes a predetermined calculation process based on various information stored in the storage device 6B and, if necessary, the type classification result supplied from the type classification processing unit 52, and supplies the calculation result to the screen information generating unit 11E.

For example, based on instructions from the screen information generation unit 11E, the calculation unit 53 refers to basic school information stored in the facility information storage unit 31 of the storage device 6, and calculates, for example, the difference between the number of students at the peak time (or when the school opens) and the current number of students, the difference between the current number of students and the expected number of students in the future, the total floor area per current student, the playground area per current student, the total floor area per student in the future, the playground area per student in the future, the total floor area per student at the peak time (or when the school opens), and the playground area per student at the peak time (or when the school opens), and supplies these to the screen information generation unit 11E. In addition, for example, the calculation unit 53 refers to the information stored in the facility information storage unit 31 of the storage device 6 based on commands from the screen information generation unit 11E and the type classification results supplied from the type classification processing unit 52, and calculates the maximum, minimum and average values of, for example, the current number of students, the number of classes, the predicted change in the number of classes (student) from the present to the future (number for the number of classes, % for the number of students), the predicted change in the number of classes (student) from the peak time (or when the school opened) to the present, the total floor area, the total floor area per person, the number of heads, the playground area, the playground area per person, etc. in the schools classified into each type, and supplies these values to the screen information generation unit 11E.

The format storage unit 71 generates data for displaying a screen in response to a request from the client terminal 3 using the screen information generation unit 11E, and stores various formats for displaying the screen.

The utilization study related information storage unit 72 stores, for example, information on utilization study sheets as shown in FIG. 49 and FIG. 50, and various information generated in response to requests from the client terminal 3. The utilization study sheet in FIG. 49 includes information such as the facility name, map information showing the layout of the facility and similar facilities, facility drawings, urban planning information, use restrictions, buildable area, and remarks. The utilization study sheet in FIG. 50 includes information such as the facility name, soundness of the building's framework and parts, basic information about the facility, and floor layout of each floor. The information included in these utilization study sheets is appropriately linked to each item such as the building information list, school facility ledger, fixed asset ledger, deterioration survey information, information about facilities, functions, and costs stored in each memory unit of the storage device 6B, and information generated in each unit of the asset management support device 4B. Needless to say, these utilization study sheets may also include other information.

As described above, the facility information storage unit 31 of the storage device 6B stores basic facility information, a school facility ledger, a fixed asset ledger, and other information, and further stores floor plans and usage information for each floor of each facility at the time of construction (or, for example, if the facility is a school, when the number of students was at its peak) as shown in FIG. 51, as well as current floor plans and usage information for each floor of each facility as shown in FIG. 52. The facility information storage unit 31 of the storage device 6B also stores address information for each facility and map information showing its location.

The conservation policy information storage unit 34 of the storage device 6B also stores information on the number of facility users in each facility and each local government, for example, when the facility is an elementary or junior high school, on the trend in the number of students and the trend in the number of classes in each elementary or junior high school. In response to a request from the client terminal 3, the screen information generating unit 11E generates composite graph data showing the trend in the number of students, for example, as shown in FIG. 53, based on the information showing the trend in the number of students in a given local government as a whole stored in the conservation policy information storage unit 34, and transmits the data to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 for display. The composite graph showing the trend in the number of students shown in FIG. 53 is composed of line graphs showing the total number of students, the total number of elementary school students, and the total number of junior high school students, and bar graphs showing the average number of classes per elementary school and the average number of classes per junior high school. At this time, the calculation unit 53 calculates the average number of classes per elementary school and the average number of classes per junior high school based on information indicating the changes in the number of classes at each elementary and junior high school stored in the conservation policy information storage unit 34, and supplies this to the screen information generation unit 11E. The operator of the client terminal 3 can refer to the composite graph in Figure 53 to confirm the changes in the number of students in a given municipality as a whole, analyze the changes, and, if necessary, predict future changes in the number of students.

In this way, the asset management support device 4B of the asset management support system 1 includes an information storage processing unit 12 that links each item of the basic information of the facility, the school facility ledger, and the fixed asset ledger, and accumulates and stores them in the storage device 6B, a classification information acquisition unit 51 that acquires multiple classification information that is the basis of type classification, a type classification processing unit 52 that refers to the basic information of the facility, the school facility ledger, and the fixed asset ledger stored in the storage device 6B, and classifies the facility into types according to the classification information acquired by the classification information acquisition unit 51, a format storage unit 71 that stores a format having multiple items, and a type The system has a calculation unit 53 that extracts corresponding information from the basic facility information, school facility ledger, and fixed asset ledger stored in the storage device 6B based on the type classification result by the type classification processing unit 52 and the format items stored in the format storage unit 71, and performs calculation processing; and a screen information generation unit 11E that generates display data based on the format stored in the storage device 6B using the type classification result by the type classification processing unit 52, the basic facility information, school facility ledger, and fixed asset ledger stored in the storage device 6B, and the calculation processing result by the calculation processing unit.

As a result, the asset management support device 4B can use the linked information to classify the facility into types and generate data in various formats using the type classification results. The operator of the client terminal 3 can refer to the data organized in the desired format in the asset management support device 4B. Therefore, the asset management support device 4B of the asset management support system 1 can provide support for planning for long-life renovations that go beyond grasping the deterioration status of facilities and restoring them.

Next, with reference to Figures 54 to 56, we will explain the type classification process executed by the type classification processing unit 52 and the screen information generated by the screen information generating unit 11E.

For example, when an operator of the client terminal 3 issues a command to classify elementary schools in a specific municipality into types, and the client terminal 3 transmits three types of information as the basis of type classification, (1) region, (2) class size, and (3) predicted changes in the number of classes, along with the contents of each classification and thresholds, to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2, the classification information acquisition unit 51 acquires this information via the communication device 5 and supplies it to the type classification processing unit 52.

The type classification processing unit 52 first classifies the elementary schools by the specified region, then classifies the elementary schools within that classification by the specified range of class size, and further classifies the elementary schools within that classification by the specified range of the predicted numerical value of the change in the number of classes. The type classification processing unit 52 then divides the classification results into, for example, type A, type B, etc., and supplies the names of the elementary schools classified into each type as classification results to the information storage processing unit 12, where they are stored in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72, and also supplied to the screen information generation unit 11E and the calculation unit 53.

When the operator of the client terminal 3 commands the display of a list of type classification results for elementary schools in a specified municipality, the screen information generating unit 11E reads out a format corresponding to the list of type classification results from the format storage unit 71, and controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format from each part of the storage device 6B. The screen information generating unit 11E also commands the calculation unit 53 to calculate data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format. For example, when each part of the storage device 6B does not contain information on "(area of a certain part) per child (at a certain time)", the screen information generating unit 11E controls the calculation unit 53 to obtain the numerical values of the number of children and (area of a certain part) stored in each part of the storage device 6B, and to calculate these numerical values.

Figures 54 and 55 show an example of a list of type classification results for elementary schools in a specified municipality, generated by the screen information generation unit 11E. Figures 54 and 55 show a display screen in which a portion of the list is scrolled to display, as there are too many items in the corresponding format to display all of the items on one screen. The list of type classification results for elementary schools in a specified municipality shown as an example in Figures 54 and 55 includes the names of elementary schools belonging to each type, and for each elementary school, information corresponding to each item in the format corresponding to the list of type classification results. Note that here, classification is done up to type D, but at the bottom of the list, information about elementary schools classified into other types is listed.

Next, FIG. 56 shows an example of a format that can list the basic axis of the type classification of elementary schools in a specified municipality and the numerical values indicating the characteristics of each type, generated by the screen information generating unit 11E. In the format shown in FIG. 56, the basic axis of the type classification is described along with the classification contents of (1) whether the region is northern or southern, (2) whether the class size is large, appropriate size, or small (here, a case where there is no elementary school corresponding to small size is illustrated), and (3) whether the predicted change in the number of classes is decreased or unchanged, whether there is a decreasing trend of 6 classes or more, whether there is no change, or whether there will be an increase again, and the number of schools included in each type is described. In addition, this format has columns for maximum values, minimum values, and average values as necessary, for each item as numerical values indicating the characteristics of each type. The screen information generating unit 11E controls the calculation unit 53 to calculate and obtain maximum values, minimum values, and average values from the information stored in each part of the storage device 6B, and can write them in the corresponding parts of the format.

The classification information acquisition unit 51 acquires information necessary for type classification from the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and supplies it to the type classification processing unit 52. The type classification processing unit 52 classifies the facilities into types based on the supplied information, for example, into type A, type B, etc., and supplies the classification results to the information storage processing unit 12, which stores the results in the utilization study related information storage unit 72, and also supplies the results to the screen information generation unit 11E and the calculation unit 53. The screen information generation unit 11E reads out a format corresponding to a request from the client terminal 3 from the format storage unit 71, and controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format from each unit of the storage device 6B. The screen information generation unit 11E also commands the calculation unit 53 to calculate data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format. Then, data such as that described using Figures 54 to 56 is generated, and the data can be transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed.

Next, using Figures 57 to 64, we will use an example to explain type classification based on different type classification axes, and support the process of establishing "review criteria for reconstruction" that serve as a model case for reconstruction based on the type classification.

First, using FIG. 57, type classification based on different type classification axes will be described. For example, when an operator of the client terminal 3 issues a command to classify high schools in a given municipality into types, the client terminal 3 transmits, via the network 2, the following basic axes for type classification: (1) whether the school type is a high school or a special needs school; if the school type is a high school, (2) whether the school is an independent school or a branch school; (3) whether the main course is full-time or part-time; (4) which is the main subject; and (5) the school size. If the school type is a special needs school, the following three types are supplied together with the contents and thresholds of each classification: (2) whether the school is a main school, a branch school, or a branch classroom; and (3) which type of disability is provided. The classification information acquisition unit 51 acquires this information via the communication device 5 and supplies it to the type classification processing unit 52.

The type classification processing unit 52 first classifies the school type as high school or special needs school. The type classification processing unit 52 classifies the school type classified as high school as independent school or branch school, further classifies within that classification as main course is full-time or part-time, further classifies within that classification by main department, and further classifies high schools within that classification by the specified range of school size. The type classification processing unit 52 also classifies the school type classified as special needs school as main school, branch school, or branch classroom, and further classifies within that classification by the type of disability that the corresponding special needs school mainly deals with. The type classification processing unit 52 then divides the classification results into, for example, type A, type B, ..., type M, and supplies the names of the high schools classified into each type as classification results to the information storage processing unit 12, where they are stored in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72, and also supplies them to the screen information generation unit 11E and the calculation unit 53.

Next, FIG. 58 shows an example of a format that can list the numerical values showing the characteristics of each type in types A to j classified as high schools according to the basic axis (1) of type classification, generated by the screen information generating unit 11E. In the format shown in FIG. 58, the classification contents are described, such as the basic axis of type classification explained using FIG. 57 and the specified contents, that is, (2) whether it is an independent school or a branch school, (3) whether the main course is full-time or part-time, (4) whether the main department is general, agricultural, fishery, industrial, commercial, or comprehensive, and (5) whether the school size is large, standard, or small, and the number of schools included in each type is described. In addition, this format has columns for maximum and minimum values and, if necessary, average values for each item such as the number of classes, the reduction rate of the number of classes, the number of students, the reduction rate of the number of students, and the area of the school building, building, and school grounds, as numerical values showing the characteristics of each type. The screen information generating unit 11E controls the calculation unit 53 to calculate and obtain maximum, minimum, and average values from the information stored in each part of the storage device 6B, and can enter these values in the corresponding parts of the format. The screen information generating unit 11E can transmit the data generated in this way to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and display it.

When a user who has referred to the data of FIG. 58 displayed on the client terminal 3 issues a command to display detailed information of a specific type, the screen information generating unit 11E reads out a format corresponding to the detailed information of the specific type from the format storage unit 71, and controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format from each unit of the storage device 6B. The screen information generating unit 11E also commands the calculation unit 53 to calculate data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format, and obtains the calculation result. The screen information generating unit 11E can transmit the data generated by inserting numerical values corresponding to each item of the format read from the format storage unit 71 to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and display it. These formats may include items into which a user who has referred to the data displayed on the client terminal 3 can enter new numerical values or information.

Referring to Figure 59, a format corresponding to detailed information of a specified type, which includes items in which a user who has referenced the data can enter new values or information, will be described. Figure 59 shows data that is generated by screen information generating unit 11E when a user who has referenced the data of Figure 58 displayed on client terminal 3 issues a command to display detailed information regarding the ownership of each building of a high school classified as Type B, for example, and is transmitted to client terminal 3 via network 2, and displayed data in which the user of client terminal 3 has entered new values or information.

The format corresponding to the detailed information on the ownership of buildings of a specific type includes the number of main, sub, and other school buildings included in the facilities, the number of practice buildings, the number of main, sub, and other buildings, the number of greenhouses, the average, minimum, and maximum number of parking spaces, and the number of schools with 25m pools and 50m pools. The screen information generating unit 11E controls the third extracting unit 11D to extract data necessary for generating information corresponding to the read format from each part of the storage device 6B, and instructs the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data necessary to generate the corresponding information. In addition, this format includes a blank "review criteria at the time of reconstruction" item in which the user of the client terminal 3 who has referred to this information can enter a new value that will be the "review criteria at the time of reconstruction" in each of these items. The data generated by the screen information generating unit 11E is transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed.

When the user of the client terminal 3 newly enters a numerical value that will be the "review criteria when rebuilding" and transmits it to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2, the information storage processing unit 12 links the numerical value that will be the "review criteria when rebuilding" entered by the user of the client terminal 3 with each item and stores it in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72.

It is also possible to specify multiple types and prepare formats that correspond to detailed information for those multiple types.

With reference to FIG. 60, an example of a format selected from the format storage unit 71 by the screen information generating unit 11E when a user who has referred to the data of FIG. 58 displayed on the client terminal 3 commands the display of detailed information on changes in the number of students and the number of classes in high schools classified as type B and type I, for example. In the format shown in FIG. 60, items of the average, minimum, and maximum values of the number of students and the number of classes in 2016 are prepared for full-time school, which is type B, and part-time school, which is type I, respectively, and items of the rate of decrease in the number of students and the number of classes from the time of opening to the present are prepared. The screen information generating unit 11E controls the third extracting unit 11D to extract data necessary for generating information corresponding to the read format from each part of the storage device 6B, and commands the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data necessary for generating the corresponding information. Note that if information necessary for calculating information corresponding to each item is insufficient, the written value may be set to "unknown" as shown in FIG. 60. The data generated by the screen information generating unit 11E is transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed.

Next, with reference to Figures 61 to 64, we will explain the formats that correspond to detailed information on school buildings, roof structures, campus areas, and classroom ownership status in Type B, and the establishment of "review criteria for reconstruction" using these formats.

Figure 61 shows an example of a format corresponding to detailed information about a school building of type B. When a user of the client terminal 3 issues a command to display detailed information about a school building of type B, the screen information generating unit 11E reads out the corresponding format from the format storage unit 71. The screen information generating unit 11E controls the third extracting unit 11D to extract data necessary for generating information corresponding to the read format from each part of the storage device 6B, and commands the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data necessary for generating the corresponding information. This format provides items for the average, minimum, and maximum values of the school building area and the average, minimum, and maximum values of the school building area per student in fiscal year 2016, and includes the respective numerical values for the main school building, sub-school building, and other school buildings owned by the 33 schools classified as type B, as well as items in which a user who refers to the data can enter new numerical values and information as "review criteria for rebuilding." In addition, in Figure 61, "-" is written in the parts where the information necessary for calculating the information corresponding to the items is missing. The data generated by the screen information generation unit 11E is sent to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed.

When the user of the client terminal 3 newly enters a numerical value that will be the "review criteria when rebuilding" and transmits it to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2, the information storage processing unit 12 links the numerical value that will be the "review criteria when rebuilding" entered by the user of the client terminal 3 with each item and stores it in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72.

Figure 62 shows an example of a format corresponding to detailed information about a type B building structure. When a user of the client terminal 3 commands the display of detailed information about a type B building structure, the screen information generating unit 11E reads out the corresponding format from the format storage unit 71. The screen information generating unit 11E controls the third extracting unit 11D to extract data necessary for generating information corresponding to the read format from each part of the storage device 6B, and commands the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data necessary for generating the corresponding information. This format provides items for the average, minimum, and maximum values of the building structure area, and includes the numerical values of the main, sub, and other building structures owned by the 33 schools classified as type B, as well as items in which a user who has referred to the data can enter new numerical values and information as "review criteria for rebuilding." The data generated by the screen information generating unit 11E is transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed.

When the user of the client terminal 3 newly enters a numerical value that will be the "review criteria when rebuilding" and transmits it to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2, the information storage processing unit 12 links the numerical value that will be the "review criteria when rebuilding" entered by the user of the client terminal 3 with each item and stores it in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72.

Figure 63 shows an example of a format corresponding to detailed information on the campus area of type B. When a user of the client terminal 3 issues a command to display detailed information on the campus area of type B, the screen information generating unit 11E reads out the corresponding format from the format storage unit 71. The screen information generating unit 11E controls the third extracting unit 11D to extract data necessary for generating information corresponding to the read format from each part of the storage unit 6B, and commands the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data necessary for generating the corresponding information. This format provides items for the average, minimum, and maximum area of the building site, the athletic field site, the experimental practice site, and the total campus area, as well as the average, minimum, and maximum area per full-time student in 2016, and includes the numerical values of each of the 33 schools classified as type B, as well as an item in which a user who refers to the data can enter new numerical values and information as a "review criterion for rebuilding." In addition, in Figure 63, "-" is written in the part where the information necessary for calculating the information corresponding to the item is missing. The data generated by the screen information generation unit 11E is sent to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed.

When the user of the client terminal 3 newly enters a numerical value that will be the "review criteria when rebuilding" and transmits it to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2, the information storage processing unit 12 links the numerical value that will be the "review criteria when rebuilding" entered by the user of the client terminal 3 with each item and stores it in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72.

Figure 64 shows an example of a format corresponding to detailed information on the possession status of type B classrooms. When a command is issued by a user of the client terminal 3 to display detailed information on the possession status of type B classrooms, the screen information generating unit 11E reads out the corresponding format from the format storage unit 71. The screen information generating unit 11E controls the third extracting unit 11D to extract data necessary for generating information corresponding to the read format from each part of the storage device 6B, and commands the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data necessary for generating the corresponding information. This format provides items for the average, minimum, and maximum number of classrooms held in each facility, and the average, minimum, and maximum area per room, and includes items in which a user who refers to the data can enter new values and information as "review criteria for rebuilding" for the number of rooms and the area per room. In Figure 64, "-" is written in the parts where the information necessary for calculating the information corresponding to the items is missing. The data generated by the screen information generation unit 11E is sent to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed.

When a user of the client terminal 3 newly enters numerical values for the number of rooms and the area per room that will be the "review criteria when rebuilding" and transmits them to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2, the information storage processing unit 12 links the numerical values that the user of the client terminal 3 entered as the "review criteria when rebuilding" to each item and stores them in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72.

As explained using Figures 61 to 64, the asset management support device 4B extracts information corresponding to a specified format from the information linked to and stored in each section of the storage device 6B, and performs calculations as necessary to generate data for displaying in a list, thereby enabling the user of the client terminal 3 to easily set a numerical value that will be the "review standard for rebuilding." In addition, the value set by the user of the client terminal 3 as the numerical value that will be the "review standard for rebuilding" is linked to each item of information stored in the storage device 6B and stored in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72.

The screen information generating unit 11E can also generate data corresponding to different formats using values established by the user of the client terminal 3 and stored in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72.

Next, referring to Figs. 65 to 70, examples of information generated based on a specified format using values established by the user of the client terminal 3 and stored in the utilization study related information storage unit 72 will be described. Each format in Figs. 65 to 69 focuses on a specific high school (indicated as XXX in Figs. 65 to 70) included in Type B, and makes it possible to compare the current state and future projections of that high school with the average, minimum and maximum values of the school buildings, roof structure, school grounds area and classroom ownership status of Type B, as well as information set as "review criteria for rebuilding". Furthermore, these formats allow the user of the client terminal 3 to enter review target values for the specific high school of interest based on the values set as "review criteria for rebuilding" in the corresponding type.

Figure 65 shows a format in which the user of the client terminal 3 can enter the target review value for a specific high school XXX by comparing the current value of the specific high school XXX with detailed information on the ownership of buildings in Type B described using Figure 59 and the "review criteria at the time of reconstruction" established by the user of the client terminal 3 and stored in the utilization study related information storage unit 72. The screen information generation unit 11E controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data required to generate information corresponding to the read format from each part of the storage device 6B, and instructs the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data required to generate the corresponding information. The data generated by the screen information generation unit 11E is transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed.

When a user of the client terminal 3 compares the detailed information regarding the ownership of the building in Type B described using FIG. 59 and the "review criteria at the time of reconstruction" established by the user of the client terminal 3 and stored in the utilization study related information storage unit 72 with the current value of a specified high school XXX, inputs the target review value for the specified high school XXX, and transmits it to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2, the information storage processing unit 12 links the numerical value that is the "review criteria at the time of reconstruction" for the specified high school XXX input by the user of the client terminal 3 with each item and stores it in the utilization study related information storage unit 72.

Figure 66 shows a format in which a user of a client terminal 3 can enter a target reduction value for the area of the school building of a specific high school XXX other than classrooms, based on the value of the required area per student set by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, by comparing detailed information on changes in the number of students and the number of classes at high schools classified as Type B and Type I described using Figure 60 with the current values of the specific high school XXX. The screen information generating unit 11E controls the third extracting unit 11D to extract data required to generate information corresponding to the read format from each part of the storage device 6B, and commands the calculating unit 53 to calculate the data required to generate the corresponding information. The data generated by the screen information generating unit 11E is transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed.

When a user of the client terminal 3 compares detailed information regarding changes in the number of students and the number of classes at high schools classified as Type B and Type I described using FIG. 66 with the current values of a specific high school XXX, inputs a target value for reducing the area of the school building other than classrooms at the specific high school XXX based on the value of the required area per student set by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and transmits it to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2, the information storage processing unit 12 links the target value for reducing the area of the school building other than classrooms at the specific high school XXX input by the user of the client terminal 3 with each item and stores it in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72.

Figure 67 shows a format in which a user of a client terminal 3 can enter detailed information about the type B school buildings described in Figure 61, namely, the average, minimum, and maximum school building area, the average, minimum, and maximum school building area per student in 2016, the "review standard for rebuilding" for the school building area per student, and the target review value for the school building area of a specific high school XXX by comparing it with the current value of the specific high school XXX. The screen information generating unit 11E controls the third extracting unit 11D to extract data required to generate information corresponding to the read format from each part of the storage device 6B, and commands the calculating unit 53 to calculate the data required to generate the corresponding information. The data generated by the screen information generating unit 11E is transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed.

When a user of the client terminal 3 compares detailed information about the type B school building area described using FIG. 67, i.e., the average, minimum, and maximum school building area, the average, minimum, and maximum school building area per student in 2016, the "review criteria for rebuilding" for school building area per student, and the current value for a specific high school XXX, inputs a review target value for the school building area for the specific high school XXX, and transmits it to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2, the information storage processing unit 12 links the review target value for the school building area for the specific high school XXX input by the user of the client terminal 3 with each item and stores it in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72.

Figure 68 shows a format in which a user of a client terminal 3 can enter detailed information about the type B building described in Figure 62, namely, the average, minimum and maximum building area values, the "review criteria for rebuilding" of the building area, and the target review value for the building area of a specified high school XXX, by comparing the current value of the specified high school XXX. The screen information generating unit 11E controls the third extracting unit 11D to extract data required to generate information corresponding to the read format from each part of the storage device 6B, and commands the calculating unit 53 to calculate the data required to generate the corresponding information. The data generated by the screen information generating unit 11E is transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed.

When a user of the client terminal 3 compares detailed information about the type B building area described using FIG. 68, i.e., the average, minimum and maximum building area values, the current building area value of a specified high school XXX, and the "review criteria for rebuilding" of the building area, inputs a review target value for the school building area of the specified high school XXX, and transmits it to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2, the information storage processing unit 12 links the review target value for the building area of the specified high school XXX input by the user of the client terminal 3 with each item and stores it in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72.

Figure 69 shows a format in which a user of a client terminal 3 can enter detailed information about the campus area of type B described with reference to Figure 63, i.e., the average, minimum, and maximum campus area, the average, minimum, and maximum campus area per full-time student in 2016, the "review criteria for rebuilding" of campus area, and the target review value for the campus area of a specific high school XXX, by comparing the current value of the specific high school XXX. The screen information generating unit 11E controls the third extracting unit 11D to extract data required to generate information corresponding to the read format from each part of the storage device 6B, and commands the calculating unit 53 to calculate the data required to generate the corresponding information. The data generated by the screen information generating unit 11E is transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed.

When a user of the client terminal 3 compares detailed information about the type B campus area described using FIG. 69, i.e., the average, minimum and maximum campus area, the average, minimum and maximum campus area per full-time student in 2016, the current campus area of the specified high school XXX, and the "review criteria for campus area at the time of reconstruction," inputs a review target value for the campus area of the specified high school XXX, and transmits it to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2, the information storage processing unit 12 links the review target value for the campus area of the specified high school XXX input by the user of the client terminal 3 to each item and stores it in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72.

Figure 70 shows a format in which a user of a client terminal 3 can enter detailed information about the possession status of type B classrooms described in Figure 64, i.e., the average, minimum, and maximum number of classrooms possessed by each high school, the average, minimum, and maximum area per room, the review criteria for the number of rooms and the area per room, and the target review value for the number of rooms and the area per room in a specified high school XXX by comparing the current value of the specified high school XXX. The screen information generating unit 11E controls the third extracting unit 11D to extract data required to generate information corresponding to the read format from each part of the storage device 6B, and commands the calculating unit 53 to calculate the data required to generate the corresponding information. The data generated by the screen information generating unit 11E is transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed.

When a user of the client terminal 3 compares detailed information about the ownership status of Type B classrooms described using FIG. 70, i.e., the average, minimum, and maximum number of classrooms owned by each high school, the average, minimum, and maximum area per room, the review criteria for the number of rooms and the area per room, and the current values of a specified high school XXX, inputs the review target values for the number of rooms and the area per room at the specified high school XXX, and transmits it to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2, the information storage processing unit 12 links the review target values for the number of rooms and the area per room at the specified high school XXX input by the user of the client terminal 3 to each item and stores them in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72.

As explained using Figures 65 to 70, the asset management support device 4B can insert values established by the user of the client terminal 3 and stored in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72 into the format stored in the format storage unit 71, transmit the values to the client terminal 3 via the network 2, and display them. This allows the user of the client terminal 3 to easily establish various target values for the reconstruction of a specific high school XXX by comparing the review criteria for the type classified in the type classification with the current values. For example, as shown in Figure 71, when rebuilding part of a high school, it becomes possible to make a plan that appropriately reduces surplus classrooms while ensuring the necessary number of classrooms.

In addition, when a part of a high school is to be rebuilt, the information on the deterioration status of the building structure, etc., linked to the relevant high school and stored in the facility information storage unit 31, can be used as a reference for deciding which building to rebuild. Specifically, when the client terminal 3 is instructed to display the name of the high school for which a rebuilding plan is to be made and the information on the deterioration status of the building structure, etc., of the high school, the screen information generating unit 11A controls the first extracting unit 11B and the second extracting unit 11C to display the building information list shown in Figures 40 to 45, extracts desired information from the information stored in the facility information storage unit 31, the deterioration information storage unit 32, the evaluation information storage unit 33, and the maintenance policy information storage unit 34 of the storage device 6, or calculates the desired information based on the extracted information to generate screen information, which can be transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed. When rebuilding a building, it is easier to reduce long-term maintenance costs by prioritizing rebuilding the most deteriorated parts. Therefore, the user of the client terminal 3 can easily consider which buildings should be rebuilt to reduce the costs required for managing and operating the facility by referring to the displayed information and, if necessary, instructing the simulation unit 22 to execute a simulation that recalculates the costs of future life extension plans.

Figure 72 is a bar graph showing the actual costs to date for rebuilding and renovating a high school managed by a specific local government, and the cost forecast calculated based on a future plan determined based on the revised target values obtained as explained using Figures 57 to 71. By appropriately reducing surplus classrooms when rebuilding part of a high school, it is possible to reduce the future costs for rebuilding and renovating the high school, for example, as shown in Figure 72, compared to a base plan in which surplus classrooms are not reduced.

However, if there is still a discrepancy between the financial constraint line and the planned costs, it is necessary to consider cooperation with facilities around the school, such as sharing special classrooms and swimming pools, and using school facilities as a local hub. Specifically, for example, it is necessary to consider whether facilities such as swimming pools can be shared and used by neighboring facilities. Figure 73 shows a format in which types are classified by district information, and each piece of information about swimming pools is displayed as an item.

For example, if an operator of the client terminal 3 issues a command to classify high schools in a specified municipality into types and the client terminal 3 specifies the district name as the base of the type classification via the network 2, the classification information acquisition unit 51 acquires information indicating that the district name is the base of the type classification via the communication device 5 and supplies it to the type classification processing unit 52. The type classification processing unit 52 classifies high schools in the specified municipality into types by district name, and supplies the names of the high schools classified into each type as classification results to the information storage processing unit 12, where they are stored in the utilization study related information storage unit 72, and also supplied to the screen information generation unit 11E and the calculation unit 53.

As shown in FIG. 73, the screen information generating unit 11E reads out from the format storage unit 71 a format that includes items such as the name of the school in each district, the representative department, the number of classes, the school size, the length of the pool, the number of lanes, the year the pool was installed, and the age of the pool, as well as an item in which the user of the client terminal 3 can enter whether or not the pool at each high school is scheduled to be renovated. Then, the screen information generating unit 11E controls the third extracting unit 11D to extract data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format from each part of the storage device 6B, and commands the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data necessary to generate the corresponding information. The data generated by the screen information generating unit 11E is transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed.

The user of client terminal 3 refers to the displayed data and determines which groups of high schools can share a pool based on the district, number of classes, and school size of each school, and determines which high school's pool would be best to renovate and which high school's pool would be best to remove based on the number of classes, school size, and the year the pool was installed or built, and enters whether or not each high school plans to renovate its pool in the corresponding field.

When the user of the client terminal 3 newly enters whether or not the swimming pools at each high school are planned to be renovated and transmits this to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2, the information storage processing unit 12 links the whether or not the swimming pools at each high school are planned to be renovated entered by the user of the client terminal 3 to each item and stores it in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72.

The simulation unit 22 uses the feasibility of planning to renovate the pool stored in the utilization study related information storage unit 72 to perform a simulation of the costs involved in renovating and repairing the pool if it is shared by multiple high schools, and stores the results in the utilization study related information storage unit 72, linking them to each item.

Figure 74 is a bar graph showing the actual costs to date for rebuilding and renovating high schools managed by local governments, and the cost forecast calculated when, in addition to appropriately reducing surplus classrooms when rebuilding part of a high school as explained using Figures 51 to 71, a plan is added to share school facilities such as swimming pools among multiple high schools as mentioned above. By adding a plan to share school facilities such as swimming pools among multiple high schools, for example, as shown in Figure 74, it is possible to reduce the future costs for rebuilding and renovating high schools even further than the case explained using Figure 72, compared to the base plan that does not reduce surplus classrooms.

In addition, the accounting linkage unit 21 can link the costs of improving the functionality of school facilities to capital expenditures in accounting, and can link the costs of restoring the functionality of school facilities to repair costs in accounting. Therefore, instead of the bar graph showing the costs described above, the screen information generation unit 11E can generate a graph that can distinguish between the costs of restoring the functionality of school facilities, i.e., repairs and updates as measures against aging, and the costs of improving the functionality and environment of school facilities, as shown in FIG. 75.

Next, referring to Figures 76 to 90, we will explain an example of creating a model case by establishing review criteria for reconstruction based on type classification, using an elementary school managed by a local government as an example, with the aim of responding flexibly even when the number of students increases or decreases.

For example, if an operator of the client terminal 3 issues a command to classify elementary schools in a specific municipality into types, and the client terminal 3 provides two items as the basis for type classification via the network 2, namely (1) the size of the number of classes in fiscal year 2017 and (2) a forecast of the trend in the number of students from fiscal year 2017 to fiscal year 2022, along with the details of each classification and thresholds, the classification information acquisition unit 51 acquires this information via the communication device 5 and provides it to the type classification processing unit 52.

The type classification processing unit 52 first classifies the class sizes into large, standard, and small. Within each classification, the type classification processing unit 52 classifies based on whether the number of students is likely to continue to increase, or will remain stable or decrease. The type classification processing unit 52 then divides the classification results into, for example, type A, type B, ..., and type E, and supplies the names of elementary schools classified into each type as classification results to the information storage processing unit 12, where they are stored in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72, and are also supplied to the screen information generation unit 11E and the calculation unit 53.

Figure 76 shows an example of a format that can list the two type classification axes generated by the screen information generating unit 11E and the number of elementary schools classified into types A to E based on these type classification axes. In this example, there is one elementary school classified as type A, which has large class sizes and a tendency for the number of students to continue to increase. There are six elementary schools classified as type B, which has large class sizes and a tendency for the number of students to remain stable or decrease. There are seven elementary schools classified as type C, which has standard class sizes and a tendency for the number of students to continue to increase. There are four elementary schools classified as type D, which has standard class sizes and a tendency for the number of students to remain stable or decrease. And there are two elementary schools classified as type E, which has small class sizes and a tendency for the number of students to continue to increase.

Next, Figure 77 shows a line graph showing the past and future trends in the number of students in elementary schools classified as Type A, which have large class sizes and a tendency for the number of students to continue to increase.

The screen information generating unit 11E reads out from the format storage unit 71 a format for creating a line graph showing the past trends and future trend predictions of the number of students, and controls the third extracting unit 11D to extract information showing the trends in the number of students at elementary schools classified as type A stored in the maintenance policy information storage unit 34 of the storage device 6B. The screen information generating unit 11E draws a line graph based on the numerical values showing the trends in the number of students at elementary schools classified as type A extracted from the maintenance policy information storage unit 34 for the format read out from the format storage unit 71, transmits the graph to the client terminal 3 via the network 2, and displays it. The user of the client terminal 3 can easily recognize that in elementary schools classified as type A, the number of students is minimized in the year indicated by the line α in FIG. 77, increases sharply from the year indicated by the line β in FIG. 77 to the year indicated by the line γ, and then decreases.

Next, Figure 78 shows an example of a format consisting of items of detailed information related to the number of students in an elementary school classified as Type A, where the class size is large and the number of students is likely to continue to increase.

The screen information generating unit 11E reads out a format from the format storage unit 71, which is composed of items such as the school name, total floor area, total floor area excluding gymnasium, construction year, years since construction, peak, minimum, current and future predicted values of the number of students, peak, minimum, current and future predicted values of the number of classes, a value indicating the change in the number of classes, the size of the school building and grounds and the area per student, the number of classrooms that can be used for other purposes, surplus, etc., and controls the third extracting unit 11D to extract detailed information related to the number of students at elementary schools classified as type A corresponding to each item of the format stored in each part of the storage device 6B. The screen information generating unit 11E also commands the calculating unit 53 to calculate the data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format, and obtains the calculation results. The screen information generating unit 11E inserts the numerical values extracted from each part of the storage device 6B or calculated by the calculation unit 53 into the format read from the format storage unit 71 to generate the data shown in FIG. 78, which is then sent to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 for display. The user of the client terminal 3 can easily recognize that in an elementary school classified as Type A, despite its aging, there is a possibility that the number of students will increase rapidly in the near future, resulting in a shortage of classrooms and resulting in a very small area per student.

Next, Figure 79 shows a line graph showing past and future predicted trends in the number of students in elementary schools classified as Type B, where class sizes are large and the number of students is stable or decreasing.

The screen information generating unit 11E reads out from the format storage unit 71 a format for creating a line graph showing the past trends and future trend predictions of the number of students, and controls the third extracting unit 11D to extract information showing the trends in the number of students at elementary schools classified as type B stored in the maintenance policy information storage unit 34 of the storage device 6B. The screen information generating unit 11E draws a line graph based on the numerical values showing the trends in the number of students at elementary schools classified as type B extracted from the maintenance policy information storage unit 34 for the format read out from the format storage unit 71, transmits the line graph to the client terminal 3 via the network 2, and displays it. The user of the client terminal 3 can easily recognize that in elementary schools classified as type B, the number of students is minimized in the year indicated by the line α in FIG. 79, the number of students increases or remains flat from the year indicated by the line α in FIG. 79 to the year indicated by the line β in FIG. 79, the number of students decreases or remains flat from the year indicated by the line β in FIG. 79 to the year indicated by the line γ in FIG. 79, and then the number of students decreases.

Next, Figure 80 shows an example of a format consisting of items of detailed information related to the number of students in an elementary school classified as Type B, where class sizes are standard and the number of students is stable or on a downward trend.

The screen information generating unit 11E reads out a format consisting of items such as the school name, total floor area, total floor area excluding gymnasium, construction year, years since construction, peak, minimum, current and future predicted values of the number of students, peak, minimum, current and future predicted values of the number of classes, a value indicating the change in the number of classes, the size of the school building and grounds and the area per student, the number of classrooms that can be used for other purposes, surplus, etc., from the format storage unit 71, and controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract detailed information related to the number of students at elementary schools classified as type B corresponding to each item of the format stored in each part of the storage device 6B. The screen information generating unit 11E also commands the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format, and obtains the calculation results. The screen information generating unit 11E inserts the numerical values extracted from each part of the storage device 6B or calculated by the calculation unit 53 into the format read from the format storage unit 71 to generate the data shown in FIG. 80, which is then sent to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed. The user of the client terminal 3 can easily recognize that elementary schools classified as Type B have aging buildings in each school, some have small playgrounds compared to the number of students, and there is a high possibility that spare classrooms will become available in the future.

Next, Figure 81 shows a line graph showing past and future forecast trends in the number of students in elementary schools classified as Type C, where class sizes are standard and the number of students is likely to continue to increase.

The screen information generating unit 11E reads out from the format storage unit 71 a format for creating a line graph showing the past trends and future trend predictions of the number of students, and controls the third extracting unit 11D to extract information showing the trends in the number of students at elementary schools classified as type C stored in the maintenance policy information storage unit 34 of the storage device 6B. The screen information generating unit 11E draws a line graph based on the numerical values showing the trends in the number of students at elementary schools classified as type C extracted from the maintenance policy information storage unit 34 for the format read out from the format storage unit 71, transmits the line graph to the client terminal 3 via the network 2, and displays it. The user of the client terminal 3 can easily recognize that in elementary schools classified as type C, the number of students is maximized in the year indicated by the line α in FIG. 81, decreases until the year indicated by the line β, and becomes minimum, and the number of students remains flat from the year indicated by the line β to the present indicated by the line γ, except for I Elementary School, which shows an increasing trend, but increases from the present indicated by the line γ to the year indicated by the line δ, and then decreases.

Next, Figure 82 shows an example of a format consisting of items of detailed information related to the number of students in an elementary school classified as Type C, where the class size is large and the number of students is stable or decreasing.

The screen information generating unit 11E reads out a format consisting of items such as the school name, total floor area, total floor area excluding gymnasium, construction year, years since construction, peak, minimum, current and future predicted values of the number of students, peak, minimum, current and future predicted values of the number of classes, a value indicating the change in the number of classes, the size of the school building and grounds and the area per student, the number of classrooms that can be used for other purposes, surplus, etc., from the format storage unit 71, and controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract detailed information related to the number of students at elementary schools classified as type C corresponding to each item of the format stored in each part of the storage device 6B. The screen information generating unit 11E also commands the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format, and obtains the calculation results. The screen information generating unit 11E generates the data shown in FIG. 82 by inserting the numerical values extracted from each part of the storage device 6B or calculated by the calculation unit 53 into the format read from the format storage unit 71, and transmits the data to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 for display. The user of the client terminal 3 can easily recognize that among the elementary schools classified as type C, there are schools that are aging and are predicted to have no room for classrooms in the future, yet have no room in the school grounds.

Next, Figure 83 shows the changes in the number of students and the number of classes in each elementary school from the time when the number of students was at its lowest to the present, on a map of the corresponding municipality.

When the user of the client terminal 3 instructs that the change in the number of students and the number of classes in each elementary school, in which the type classification described using FIG. 76 was performed, from the time when the number of students was at its minimum to the present be displayed on the map of the corresponding local government, the screen information generating unit 11E reads out from the format storage unit 71 a format for generating data based on the instruction from the client terminal 3. Then, the screen information generating unit 11E controls the third extracting unit 11D to extract the information of the utilization consideration sheet described using FIG. 49 stored in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72, the information on the number of classes in each elementary school stored in the facility information storage unit 31, the address information of each facility, the map information showing the location, and the information showing the change in the number of students in each elementary school stored in the conservation policy information storage unit 34. Furthermore, the screen information generating unit 11E instructs the calculation unit 53 to calculate the increase or decrease in the number of classes in each elementary school based on the information on the number of classes in each elementary school stored in the facility information storage unit 31, and acquires the calculation result. Then, based on each piece of acquired information, the screen information generating unit 11E generates map information that is color-coded based on the increase or decrease in the number of children, as shown in FIG. 83.

When the user of the client terminal 3 issues a command to display the ownership status of a specific elementary school building on the map described using FIG. 83 and detailed information including the construction history of each building, the screen information generating unit 11E reads out a format consisting of items corresponding to the ownership status of the elementary school building and detailed information including the construction history of each building from the format storage unit 71. The screen information generating unit 11E then controls the third extracting unit 11D to extract data necessary for generating information corresponding to the read format from each part of the storage device 6B, generates detailed information including the ownership status of a specific elementary school building and the construction history of each building as shown in FIG. 84, transmits the information to the client terminal 3 via the network 2, and displays it. The user of the client terminal 3 who refers to the data shown in the format of FIG. 84 can see that, for example, not much time has passed since the expansion of the southeast school building and the installation of air conditioning equipment in each school building were completed in this elementary school. Users of the client terminal 3 can refer to the ownership status and construction history of buildings at each elementary school and easily grasp which areas require urgent expansion or renovation and which areas do not require urgent construction. When rebuilding a building, it is easier to reduce long-term maintenance costs by prioritizing rebuilding the most deteriorated parts. Therefore, users of the client terminal 3 can easily consider which buildings can be rebuilt to reduce the costs required for managing and operating the facility by referring to the displayed information and, if necessary, instructing the simulation unit 22 to execute a simulation that recalculates the costs of future life extension plans.

Next, Figure 85 shows the predicted changes in the number of students and classes in each elementary school from the present to a certain point in the future, shown on a map of the corresponding municipality.

When the user of the client terminal 3 instructs that the predicted changes in the number of students and the number of classes from the present to a certain point in the future in each elementary school for which the type classification described using FIG. 76 has been performed be displayed on the map of the corresponding local government, the screen information generating unit 11E reads out from the format storage unit 71 a format for generating data based on the instruction from the client terminal 3. Then, the screen information generating unit 11E controls the third extracting unit 11D to extract the information on the utilization consideration sheet described using FIG. 49 stored in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72, the information on the number of classes in each elementary school stored in the facility information storage unit 31, the address information of each facility, the map information showing the location, and the information showing the change in the number of students in each elementary school stored in the conservation policy information storage unit 34. Furthermore, the screen information generating unit 11E instructs the calculation unit 53 to calculate the increase or decrease in the number of classes in each elementary school based on the information on the number of classes in each elementary school stored in the facility information storage unit 31, and acquires the calculation result. Then, based on each piece of acquired information, the screen information generating unit 11E generates map information that is color-coded based on the increase or decrease in the number of children, as shown in FIG. 85.

By comparing the data listed in the map information described using FIG. 83 with the data listed in the map information described using FIG. 85, the user of client terminal 3 can easily understand, for example, that areas where the number of students is predicted to change in the future are often completely different from the changes in each area in the past. Therefore, it can be easily understood that future plans to extend the lifespan of elementary schools managed by this local government cannot be achieved by continuing with measures that have been taken so far to deal with increases in the number of students, but that it is necessary to follow future predicted changes in the number of classes for students and to actively adopt measures such as cooperation and sharing with neighboring facilities.

In addition, even when measures such as cooperation with neighboring facilities, merging, consolidation, or sharing are adopted, it is easier to reduce long-term maintenance costs by prioritizing the abolition of the most deteriorated parts and merging or consolidating with other facilities. Therefore, when the client terminal 3 is instructed to display the name of the elementary school for which measures such as cooperation with neighboring facilities, merging, consolidation, or sharing are being considered, and the information on the deterioration status of the building structure of the elementary school, the screen information generating unit 11A controls the first extracting unit 11B and the second extracting unit 11C to display the building information list shown in Figures 40 to 45, extracts desired information from the information stored in the facility information storage unit 31, deterioration information storage unit 32, evaluation information storage unit 33, and maintenance policy information storage unit 34 of the storage device 6, or calculates desired information based on these extracted information to generate screen information, which can be transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed. The user of the client terminal 3 can refer to the displayed information and, if necessary, instruct the simulation unit 22 to execute a simulation to recalculate the costs of future life extension plans, and can easily consider which buildings should be rebuilt to reduce the costs required for managing and operating the facility.

In addition, by extracting deteriorated facilities, i.e., facilities that require a large cost for repair, from among the facilities managed and operated, it is possible to consider taking measures such as cooperation, merger, consolidation, or sharing with neighboring facilities in the area including the facility as a priority. For example, the screen information generating unit 11A controls the first extracting unit 11B and the second extracting unit 11C to read information such as the purpose of use and usage status of the corresponding facility from the information stored in the facility information storage unit 31, the deterioration information storage unit 32, the evaluation information storage unit 33, and the maintenance policy information storage unit 34 of the storage device 6, and extracts facilities with similar or identical purposes that are installed in the vicinity, reads various information of the extracted facilities, calculates the information or desired information based on the information, generates screen information, and transmits it to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displays it. The user of the client terminal 3 can refer to the displayed information and, if necessary, instruct the simulation unit 22 to execute a simulation to recalculate the costs of future life extension plans, and can easily consider which facilities should be prioritized for measures such as cooperation with neighboring facilities, merging, consolidation, or sharing in order to reduce the costs required for managing and operating the facilities.

Referring to Figure 86, we will explain the revision plan appropriate for a given elementary school, which is created by comparing the numerical value of the appropriate plan based on the type classification of that elementary school with the current value of that elementary school.

As explained using Figure 76, elementary schools managed by this local government are classified into types, and similarly to the above, appropriate plans for rebuilding for each type are established based on the type classification results. The user of the client terminal 3 commands the asset management support device 4B to generate various information, as explained using Figures 79 to 84. The user of the client terminal 3 uses the data generated, transmitted, and displayed by the asset management support device 4B as a reference to conduct various studies regarding renovations to extend the lifespan.

When the user of the client terminal 3 compares the breakdown of the detailed suitable proposals for the rooms of a type belonging to a specific elementary school among the elementary schools for which the type classification described using FIG. 76 has been performed, that is, the suitable proposals for the management rooms, classrooms, special classrooms, and other rooms, with the numerical values indicating the current state of the rooms owned by the corresponding elementary school, and commands the display of a format for creating a review proposal for the rooms of the corresponding elementary school, the screen information generating unit 11E reads out a format for generating data based on the command from the client terminal 3 from the format storage unit 71. Then, the screen information generating unit 11E controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data necessary for generating information corresponding to the read format from each part of the storage device 6B, and commands the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data necessary for generating the corresponding information. In addition, in this format, each item of the "review proposal" that is left blank so that the user of the client terminal 3 who has referred to this information can newly enter numerical values to create a review proposal for the rooms of the corresponding elementary school is prepared in advance. The data generated by the screen information generating unit 11E is transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed.

The data in Figure 86, in which the user of the client terminal 3 has newly entered the numerical values for each item of the "review plan," is sent to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2. The information storage processing unit 12 of the asset management support device 4B links the numerical values for each item of the "review plan" entered by the user of the client terminal 3 to each item and stores them in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72.

Next, referring to Figures 87 and 88, we will explain an example of a case in which collaboration with facilities around the school is considered, such as sharing special classrooms and swimming pools, or using school facilities as a local hub.

Figure 87 is a format for listing the contents of facilities owned by a specific elementary school and its neighboring local facilities and sports facilities, and information on their maintenance and operation, and Figure 88 is a format for showing the weekday and holiday utilization status of facilities owned by a specific elementary school and its neighboring local facilities and sports facilities. When the user of the client terminal 3 commands the display of these formats, the screen information generating unit 11E reads out a format for generating data based on the command from the client terminal 3 from the format storage unit 71. Then, the screen information generating unit 11E controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data necessary for generating information corresponding to the read format, that is, information such as the information of the utilization consideration sheet as described using Figures 49 and 50 stored in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72, from each part of the storage device 6B, and commands the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data necessary for generating the corresponding information. The data generated by the screen information generating unit 11E is transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed. The user of the client terminal 3 can refer to this information and consider facilities that can be shared with the corresponding elementary school.

The simulation unit 22 uses the results of the study by the user of the client terminal 3 on sharing between the elementary school and other facilities to perform a simulation of the costs involved in sharing, and stores the results in the utilization study related information storage unit 72, linking them to each item. When the user of the client terminal 3 commands the display of information such as costs obtained as a result of the simulation, the screen information generation unit 11E reads out a format for generating a bar graph showing the costs as described above from the format storage unit 71. The screen information generation unit 11E then controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data required to generate information desired by the user of the client terminal 3 from each part of the storage device 6B, commands the calculation unit 53 to calculate the data required to generate the corresponding information, generates the corresponding information, and transmits it to the client terminal 3 via the network 2.

Next, an example of classroom and building layout after renovation of an elementary school will be described with regard to a plan for long-life renovation that goes beyond grasping the deterioration state and restoring it. As described above, the facility information storage unit 31 stores floor plans and usage information for each floor of each facility at the time of construction (or, for example, if the facility is a school, when the number of students was at its peak), as shown in FIG. 51, and current floor plans and usage information for each floor of each facility, as shown in FIG. 52. A user of the client terminal 3 can instruct the asset management support device 4 to transmit the floor plans shown in FIG. 51 and FIG. 52 stored in the facility information storage unit 31, display these floor plans, and consider the classroom and building layout after renovation.

For example, as a result of the various considerations mentioned above, it is predicted that the number of classes will decrease in this elementary school in the future, and it will be explained that, taking into account the future of the school, it will be necessary to accommodate new functions such as small classrooms, multipurpose rooms, and classrooms for special needs classes. Furthermore, even during the actual renovation work, there must be no disruption to the operation of the elementary school.

Figures 89 and 90 show examples of improvement plans for classroom layout and school building layout after renovation of an elementary school, formulated by a user of the client terminal 3 with the support of the processing executed by the asset management support device 4B described above. Note that the floor plans of each floor in Figure 89 show the final school building and its classroom layout, and correspond to the south building and administration building in the school building layout diagram in Figure 90. As shown in the floor plans in Figures 51 and 52, the current school building layout consists of the south building, the west school building, the south building, and the administration building.

First, in the first phase of renovation, a temporary building will be constructed, and the functions of the administration building will be transferred to it so that there is no disruption to the operation of the elementary school even during the actual renovation work, after which renovations will be carried out to extend the lifespan of the administration building. At this time, the administration building will be equipped with a science room, home economics room, and art room, which require water supply and drainage systems.

Next, in the second phase of renovation, a temporary building will be added to ensure there are enough classrooms, after which the south building will be demolished and reconstruction work will be carried out. After that, the west side of the south building will be demolished and the land will be made available for other purposes, such as a playground.

After the longevity renovation of the administration building and the reconstruction of the south building are completed, classrooms for each grade will be arranged together as shown in Figure 89, and classrooms for small classes, a lunchroom that can be used as a multipurpose room, a playroom, classrooms for special needs classes, etc. will be arranged, improving the learning environment of the elementary school.

Next, the processing using type classification executed by the asset management support device 4B will be explained with reference to the flowcharts in Figures 91 and 92.

In step S31, the classification information acquisition unit 51 receives a specification of the facility group to be classified from the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and supplies it to the type classification processing unit 52.

In step S32, the classification information acquisition unit 51 acquires classification information that is the basis of type classification for classifying the facility group into types, as well as information necessary for performing type classification, such as the contents of the classification and thresholds, from the client terminal 3 via the network 2, and supplies this to the type classification processing unit 52.

In step S33, the type classification processing unit 52 executes the type classification process described below using FIG. 93 or FIG. 108.

In step S34, the screen information generating unit 11E receives a format specification instructed by the client terminal 3 to display based on information supplied from the client terminal 3 via the network 2, and reads it from the format storage unit 71.

In step S35, the screen information generating unit 11E controls the third extracting unit 11D to extract information necessary for generating information corresponding to the read format from each part of the storage device 6B. The third extracting unit 11D extracts information necessary for generating information corresponding to the format from each part of the storage device 6B in accordance with the control of the screen information generating unit 11E, and supplies the information to the screen information generating unit 11E.

In step S36, the screen information generating unit 11E instructs the calculation unit 53 to perform the calculation process required to generate information corresponding to the format. The calculation unit 53 performs the calculation process required to generate information corresponding to the format according to the control of the screen information generating unit 11E, and supplies the calculation result to the screen information generating unit 11E.

In step S37, the screen information generating unit 11E generates information corresponding to the format using the data supplied from the third extraction unit 11D and the calculation unit 53.

In step S38, the screen information generating unit 11E transmits information corresponding to the format generated in step S37 to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 for display.

In step S39, the information storage processing unit 12 determines whether or not information corresponding to the blanks in the transmitted format has been received based on the information transmitted from the client terminal 3 via the network 2. If it is determined in step S39 that information corresponding to the blanks in the transmitted format has not been received, the process is terminated.

If it is determined in step S39 that information corresponding to the blank spaces in the transmitted format has been received, in step S40, the information storage processing unit 12 links the information entered by the user of the client terminal 3, which is supplied from the client terminal 3 via the network 2, with the corresponding information in each part of the storage device 6B, stores it in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72, and the process ends.

By this processing, the asset management support device 4B can generate information corresponding to a specified format using information linked and stored in each part of the storage device 6B based on the command of the client terminal 3.

Next, with reference to the flowchart in FIG. 93, we will explain type classification process 1, which is a first example of the process executed in step S33 in FIG. 91.

In step S61, the type classification processing unit 52 sets n, which indicates the order of the base axis of the type classification to be processed, to n=1.

In step S62, the type classification processing unit 52 performs type classification for a specific facility group in response to a request from the client terminal 3, within each current classification, based on classification information that is the base axis of the nth type classification. That is, when n=1, the type classification processing unit 52 classifies all facility groups using the base axis of the first type classification, and when n≠1, it classifies each group that has already been classified using the base axis of the nth type classification.

In step S63, the type classification processing unit 52 determines whether classification according to all classification axes has been completed.

If it is determined in step S63 that classification using all of the classification axes has not been completed, in step S64, the type classification processing unit 52 sets n, which indicates the order of the type classification axes to be processed, to n=n+1, and the process returns to step S62, where the subsequent processes are repeated.

If it is determined in step S63 that classification based on all classification axes has been completed, in step S65, the type classification processing unit 52 assigns a classification name to the classification result, supplies the classification result to the information storage processing unit 12 for storage in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72, and also supplies the classification result to the screen information generation unit 11E and the calculation unit 53, and the process proceeds to step S34 in FIG. 91.

By performing such processing, detailed type classification based on multiple classification axes can be performed, for example, as described using Figures 54, 55, 57, or 76.

With reference to Figures 76 to 90, an example of creating a model case by establishing review criteria at the time of reconstruction, in which the base axis of type classification includes a forecast of future facility usage, that is, using an elementary school managed by a certain local government as an example, the base axis of type classification includes a forecast of the number of pupils from 2017 to 2022, allowing for flexible response even if the number of pupils increases or decreases, has been explained. However, the base axis of type classification can also include other conditions that indicate changes in facility usage over time, such as from a specific time in the past to the present, or from a peak in the number of pupils to the present, such as changes in the number of pupils or the number of classes.

In addition, it is possible to re-formulate an improvement plan that has already been formulated by changing or adding to the basis of the type classification. Furthermore, when formulating an improvement plan, not only can the review criteria for each type classification obtained by type classification be used as a reference to determine various review target values, but it is also possible to determine various review target values in consideration of future issues and functions that will be required for the facility in question.

Using Figures 94 to 96, we will explain how to formulate an improvement plan when the conditions showing the change in facility usage over time are included in the base axis of type classification, and various review target values are determined in consideration of the functions that will be required of the facility in the future.

Here, we will explain the part classified as a high school in the type classification axis (1) whether the school type is a high school or a special needs school, by taking as an example a case where a condition showing the change over time in facility usage status is newly included in the type classification axis when classifying high schools in the same municipality as the case explained using Figures 57 to 71. Also, in the relevant municipality, it is considered that in the future, a media center that combines the functions of a library, audiovisual room, computer room, etc., or that can be used interchangeably as a single unit, will be essential for high school education, and furthermore, in cases where there is a large surplus of land area, it is required to be able to consider future sale of the surplus land by efficiently arranging various facilities.

First, we explain the type classification when the condition showing the change in facility usage over time is newly included in the base axis of the type classification, and the results.

For example, when an operator of the client terminal 3 issues a command to classify high schools in the same municipality as in the case described with reference to Figures 57 to 71, the client terminal 3 transmits via the network 2 the following seven types of basic types of classification, including the five basic types of classification described with reference to Figure 57, namely (1) whether the school type is a high school or a special needs school, and if the school type is a high school, (2) whether the school is an independent school or a branch school, (3) whether the main course is full-time or part-time, (4) which is the main department, and (5) the school size, together with (6) the rate of increase or decrease in the number of students from the peak to the present, and (7) the number of classes from the peak to the present, along with the content and thresholds of each classification. The classification information acquisition unit 51 acquires this information via the communication device 5 and supplies it to the type classification processing unit 52.

The type classification processing unit 52 executes processing using type classification according to the processing described using the flowchart in FIG. 93. That is, the type classification processing unit 52 first classifies the school type as high school or special needs school, in the same manner as described using FIG. 57. The type classification processing unit 52 classifies the school type classified as high school as either an independent school or a branch school, and further classifies within that classification as to whether the main course is full-time or part-time, and further classifies within that classification by main department, and further classifies high schools within that classification by the specified range of school size. In addition, the type classification processing unit 52 classifies each classification by the specified range of the increase/decrease rate from the peak of the number of students to the present, and further classifies within each classification by the specified range of the increase/decrease in the number of classes from the peak to the present.

The type classification processing unit 52 classifies the classification results into 14 types, for example, as Type A, Type A', Type B, Type B', ..., Type J, and supplies the names of the high schools classified into each type as classification results to the information storage processing unit 12, where they are stored in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72, and are also supplied to the screen information generation unit 11E and the calculation unit 53.

Figure 94 shows an example of a format generated by the screen information generating unit 11E to list 14 types of classifications, from Type A to Type J, classified into high schools according to the type classification axis (1). In the format shown in Figure 94, the classification contents specified as the type classification axis, that is, (2) whether the school is an independent school or a branch school, (3) whether the main course is full-time or part-time, (4) whether the main department is general, agricultural, fishery, industrial, commercial, or comprehensive, (5) whether the school size is large, standard, or small, (6) the rate of increase or decrease in the number of students from the peak to the present, and (7) the increase or decrease in the number of classes from the peak to the present, are listed, and the number of schools included in each type is listed. In addition, this format lists, for example, the average number of students and the number of classes as values indicating the characteristics of each type. The screen information generating unit 11E controls the calculation unit 53 to calculate the average number of students and the number of classes from the information stored in each part of the memory device 6B, obtains the calculation results, and enters them in the corresponding parts of the format.

The screen information generating unit 11E can also control the calculation unit 53 to calculate the maximum or minimum number of students and number of classes, the maximum or minimum area of the school building, structure, and grounds, and average values as necessary, from the information stored in each part of the storage device 6B, and enter these in a format similar to that described using Figure 58. The screen information generating unit 11E can transmit the data generated in this way to the client terminal 3 via the network 2, and display it.

When a user who has referred to the data of FIG. 94 displayed on the client terminal 3 issues a command to display detailed information of a specific type, the screen information generating unit 11E reads out a format corresponding to the detailed information of the specific type from the format storage unit 71, and controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format from each unit of the storage device 6B. The screen information generating unit 11E also commands the calculation unit 53 to calculate data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format, and obtains the calculation result. The screen information generating unit 11E can transmit the data generated by inserting numerical values corresponding to each item of the format read from the format storage unit 71 to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and display it. These formats may include items into which a user who has referred to the data displayed on the client terminal 3 can enter new numerical values or information.

That is, the screen information generating unit 11E can generate information for supporting the process of establishing "review criteria for rebuilding" that will serve as a model case for rebuilding, using a format similar to that described using Figures 59 to 64, based on the new 14 types of classification results, for example, Type A, Type A', Type B, Type B', ..., and Type J, classified by the type classification processing unit 52. The screen information generating unit 11E can transmit the data generated in this way to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and display it.

Next, we will explain the process of supporting the establishment of "review criteria for reconstruction" that will serve as a model case for reconstruction in the case where a certain high school XXX, which was classified as Type B out of the 10 types of classifications described using Figures 57 to 71, is classified as Type B' in the 14-type classification explained using Figure 94, in which a condition indicating the change in facility usage over time has been added as a new axis, where (6) the rate of increase/decrease in the number of students from the peak to the present has decreased significantly, and (7) the number of classes has increased/decreased significantly from the peak to the present.

When the list data for the cases classified into Type A, Type A', Type B, Type B', ..., Type J, as described with reference to FIG. 94, is displayed on the client terminal 3, a user who refers to the data can, for example, command the display of detailed information for a specific type. For example, when a command is issued to display detailed information corresponding to Type B', the screen information generating unit 11E reads out the same format as that described with reference to FIG. 59 to FIG. 64 from the format storage unit 71, and controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data related to high schools classified into Type B', which is necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format, from each part of the storage device 6B. The screen information generating unit 11E also commands the calculation unit 53 to calculate data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format, and obtains the calculation result. The screen information generating unit 11E can transmit the data generated by inserting numerical values corresponding to each item of the format read from the format storage unit 71 to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and display it. As in the above-mentioned case, these formats include items into which a user who refers to the data displayed on the client terminal 3 can enter new numerical values or information.

In a manner similar to that described using Figures 59 to 64, the user of client terminal 3 can establish "review criteria for reconstruction" that will serve as a model case for the reconstruction of high schools corresponding to Type B'.

At this time, the user of the client terminal 3 can determine various review criteria by referring to values such as the average, minimum, and maximum values in type B' of the number of school buildings, number of students, number of classes, and area of school buildings and grounds obtained by type classification, and can also determine various review criteria in consideration of future issues and functions that will be required for the facility in question.

For example, a user of client terminal 3 can refer to detailed information data about the classroom ownership status of high schools classified as Type B', as shown in FIG. 95, in the same way as explained using FIG. 64. By checking the information shown in FIG. 95, a user of client terminal 3 can see that Type B' has a strong tendency to have surplus classrooms because the type classification axis (6) the rate of increase or decrease in the number of students from the peak to the present has decreased significantly, and the type classification axis (7) the increase or decrease in the number of classes from the peak to the present has also decreased significantly, and therefore each school has a large number of rooms allocated as preparation rooms for each subject.

In addition, if the relevant local government believes that a media center that combines the functions of a library, audiovisual room, computer room, etc., or that can be used interchangeably as a single unit, will be essential for high school education in the future, the user of client terminal 3 can refer to the detailed information data on the classroom ownership status in Figure 95 and, when establishing review criteria for the number and area of classrooms in high schools classified as Type B', establish review criteria for the number and area of each classroom that functions as a media center, such as a library or audiovisual room, so that they can function as a media center.

When the user of the client terminal 3 newly enters a numerical value that will be the "review criteria when rebuilding" for each item and transmits it to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2, the information storage processing unit 12 links the numerical value that the user of the client terminal 3 entered as the "review criteria when rebuilding" to each item and stores it in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72.

In this way, even if the base of the type classification is changed, the asset management support device 4B extracts information corresponding to a predetermined format from the information linked to each part of the storage device 6B and generates data for calculating and displaying the list as necessary, as in the case described with reference to Figures 59 to 64, and enables the user of the client terminal 3 to easily establish the numerical value that will be the "review standard at the time of reconstruction" for each type (here, type B'). In addition, at this time, the user of the client terminal 3 can not only determine various review standards by referring to the average value, minimum value, maximum value, etc. of each type obtained by type classification, but also determine various review standards in consideration of future issues and functions required for the facility. In addition, the value established by the user of the client terminal 3 as the numerical value that will be the "review standard at the time of reconstruction" is linked to each item of each information stored in the storage device 6B and stored in the utilization study related information storage unit 72.

Next, we will explain the process of supporting the establishment of review targets at the time of reconstruction for a specific high school XXX classified as Type B'.

The user of the client terminal 3 can set review targets for rebuilding a specific high school XXX included in type B' described using FIG. 95, for example, in the same manner as described using FIG. 65 to FIG. 70. That is, even if the base axis of the type classification is changed, the asset management support device 4B can insert values established by the user of the client terminal 3 and stored in the utilization review related information storage unit 72 into the format described using FIG. 65 to FIG. 70 stored in the format storage unit 71, transmit the values to the client terminal 3 via the network 2, and display them. This allows the user of the client terminal 3 to easily set various target values for rebuilding the high school XXX by comparing the review criteria for type B', one of the 14 types classified in the newly set type classification, with the current values of the high school XXX.

When the user of the client terminal 3 newly enters numerical values for each item that will be the review targets when rebuilding High School XXX and transmits them to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2, the information storage processing unit 12 links the numerical values entered by the user of the client terminal 3 that will be the review targets when rebuilding High School XXX to each item and stores them in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72.

Furthermore, in the relevant local governments, if there is a large surplus in site area, it is required to consolidate the surplus area by efficiently arranging various facilities, thereby expanding the area of playgrounds, etc., and to make it possible to consider selling the surplus site in the future. For example, by referring to data equivalent to that explained using FIG. 63, a user of client terminal 3 can easily recognize that if the current playground site area of High School XXX is large compared to the target value for review based on the standards, then it is necessary to consider selling the surplus site by efficiently arranging various facilities.

In this way, improvement plans that have already been formulated can be easily re-formulated by changing or adding the basis of the type classification, including conditions that indicate changes over time in facility usage, such as from a specific time in the past to the present, or from a peak in the number of students to the present. Furthermore, when formulating an improvement plan, not only can various review target values be determined with reference to the review criteria for each type classification obtained by type classification, but various review target values can also be determined in consideration of future issues and functions that will be required for the facility.

In this way, when rebuilding part of High School XXX, the asset management support device 4B can, for example, as shown in FIG. 96, not only reduce the surplus school building area of the facility, but also build a main school building 2 equipped with a media center, which is a function that will be required in the future, and, based on the issues under consideration, move the tennis court to the location of the sub-school building after demolishing it, thereby consolidating the playground and helping the user of the client terminal 3 easily formulate a new improvement plan in preparation for the future sale of the surplus land, etc.

In this way, by adding or changing the base axis of the type classification, high schools in the same municipality as in the case explained using FIG. 57 were classified into types, resulting in 14 types of classification, compared to the 10 types explained using FIG. 57. In addition, since a condition indicating the change in facility usage over time has been newly added to the base axis of this type classification, it is possible to perform type classification that takes into account the change in facility usage at present compared to, for example, when the facility was opened or at peak facility usage times. Therefore, by including a condition indicating the change in facility usage over time in the base axis of the type classification, the asset management support device 4B can support the formulation of improvement plans that focus on surplus or shortage parts of the facility that have arisen due to changes in facility usage over time.

Next, with reference to Figures 97 to 108, we will explain how to determine the base axis for type classification and different examples of type classification processing.

Figure 97 is a graph showing the change in the number of high school students in a certain municipality.

In this municipality, the total number of high school students has decreased by approximately 45% over the past 50 years. In particular, the rate of decline in agricultural courses has been over 80% over the past 50 years. Also, unlike 50 years ago, fisheries and general studies high schools have been established, and the number of schools has increased by two.

When maintaining and operating high schools managed by local governments, it is necessary to grasp the current situation as well as various factors of change from multiple perspectives. To do this, for example, it is necessary to confirm changes in the classification of school types, the classification of the size of these high schools, changes in the number of student classes, regional changes, and changes in the utilization status of each school.

In order to grasp the actual changes in school classification, it is necessary to clarify the configuration of buildings and rooms by school type and department. Figure 98 shows an example of a format for confirming the configuration of buildings and rooms by school type and department in a relevant municipality. In the format in Figure 98, school types are classified into high schools and special needs schools, and high schools are further classified into general high schools, agricultural high schools, fisheries high schools, industrial high schools, commercial high schools, and comprehensive high schools. In addition, the configuration of each building is classified into school building, laboratory building, building, bicycle parking lot, swimming pool and annex, greenhouse, and dormitory, and the type of rooms contained in each building can be displayed for each classification.

When a command is issued on the client terminal 3 to display data for confirming the building configuration and room configuration by department of a local government's high school, for which changes in the number of students have been explained using Figure 97, the screen information generation unit 11E reads out the format for generating the data shown in Figure 98 from the format storage unit 71, and controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data required for generating information corresponding to the read format, i.e., information indicating which buildings of each school contain which rooms, from each part of the storage device 6B. The screen information generation unit 11E can transmit the data generated by inserting information corresponding to each item of the format read out from the format storage unit 71 to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and display it.

Figure 99 shows an example of a format that shows classifications based on the size of high schools in a given municipality, and information such as school building area and indoor gymnasium area based on that classification. The format shown in Figure 99 can display maximum and minimum values as well as averages for the total school building area, school building area per student, number of buildings, total indoor gymnasium area, etc., when all high schools in the corresponding municipality are classified into three types based on size, i.e., number of students.

When classification conditions such as the size of high schools managed by the local government, which was described in FIG. 97 for the change in the number of students, i.e., the threshold for classification based on the current number of students, are input in the client terminal 3 and a command is issued to display information based on the classification results by school size, the classification information acquisition unit 51 acquires information necessary for type classification, such as the name of a specific local government designated as a group of facilities to be classified, the number of students (school size) used as the base for type classification of the group of facilities (high schools) managed and operated by the local government, and the content and threshold of the classification, from the client terminal 3 via the network 2, and supplies it to the type classification processing unit 52. The type classification processing unit 52 refers to the information stored in each unit of the storage device 6B and classifies high schools managed by a specific local government into three types using a specific threshold for the number of students. The type classification processing unit 52 supplies the classification results to the information storage processing unit 12, where they are stored in the utilization study related information storage unit 72, and also supplies them to the screen information generation unit 11E and the calculation unit 53.

Then, the screen information generating unit 11E reads out the format for generating the data shown in FIG. 99 from the format storage unit 71, and controls the third extracting unit 11D to extract data necessary for generating information corresponding to the read format, i.e., information indicating the total area of the school buildings, the school building area per person, the number of buildings, and the total area of the indoor gymnasium, from each part of the storage device 6B, and controls the calculating unit 53 to calculate the maximum and minimum values and average values of the total area of the school buildings, the school building area per person, the number of buildings, and the total area of the indoor gymnasium, for each classification. The screen information generating unit 11E then inserts the calculation results by the calculating unit 53 into the format read out from the format storage unit 71 to generate the data shown in FIG. 99, and transmits it to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displays it. From the data shown in FIG. 99, the user of the client terminal 3 can see that the surplus area is significantly larger in small schools, and that the average value is about twice that of large schools and standard-sized schools.

Next, in the same way as explained using Figure 99, Figure 100 shows an example of a format that shows the change in the number of student classes when high schools in the relevant municipality are classified based on their size. The format shown in Figure 100 can display the change in the number of classes from the peak time to the present, the maximum and minimum changes in the number of students from the present to the future (e.g., 10 years from now), as well as the average value and each rate of change when all high schools in the corresponding municipality are classified into three types based on size.

When a command is issued on the client terminal 3 to classify the high schools in a municipality by size as described for changes in student numbers using Figure 97, and to display the maximum and minimum values of the change in the number of classes from the peak time to the present, and the change in the number of students from the present to the future (e.g., 10 years from now), as well as the average value and the rate of change for each, the type classification processing unit 52 performs classification based on the size of the high schools as described using Figure 99, and supplies the classification results to the information storage processing unit 12, where they are stored in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72, and also to the screen information generation unit 11E and the calculation unit 53.

The screen information generating unit 11E reads out the format for generating the data shown in FIG. 100 from the format storage unit 71, and controls the third extracting unit 11D to extract data necessary for generating information corresponding to the read format, that is, information indicating the peak and current number of classes for each school, and the current and future predicted number of students, from each part of the storage device 6B, and controls the calculating unit 53 to calculate, for each classification, the maximum and minimum values of the change in the number of classes from the peak time to the present, and the change in the number of students from the present to the future, as well as the average value and the respective change rate. The screen information generating unit 11E inserts the calculation result by the calculating unit 53 into the format read out from the format storage unit 71 to generate the data shown in FIG. 100, and transmits it to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displays it. The user of the client terminal 3 can see from the data shown in FIG. 100 that the number of classes is expected to decrease significantly in small schools, and the number of students is also expected to decrease significantly.

Next, Figure 101 shows an example of a format for checking regional changes in high schools in a given municipality.

When a command is issued on the client terminal 3 to check the regional changes of high schools managed by the local government, as explained in FIG. 97, the screen information generating unit 11E reads out the format for generating the data shown in FIG. 101 from the format storage unit 71, i.e., map information, and controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data necessary for generating information corresponding to the read format, i.e., information indicating the location of high schools in the relevant local government and the number of students at each high school, from each part of the storage device 6B, and controls the calculation unit 53 to execute a calculation process for the installation range per school in each region, i.e., the value obtained by dividing the area of each region by the number of schools in each region. The screen information generating unit 11E then inserts the calculation result by the calculation unit 53 into the format read out from the format storage unit 71 to generate the data shown in FIG. 101, which can be transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed. From the data shown in FIG. 101, the user of the client terminal 3 can see that the installation range per high school is small only in the central prefecture region, which is significantly different from other regions.

In addition, with regard to changes in the utilization status of each school, it is necessary to clarify the gap between changes in utilization status and the status of ownership by overlaying the changes in the number of students and the changes in the curriculum with the utilization status of each room and the status of the buildings owned. For this purpose, for example, based on the school facilities register as explained using FIG. 5, various pieces of information that are linked to each other and stored in the facility information storage unit 31 of the storage device 6 can be used. It is also necessary to clarify the utilization status of each facility and the similar functions of each facility, and consider improvements such as sharing across departments. For this purpose, for example, the utilization consideration sheet as explained using FIG. 49 and FIG. 50 can be used.

As mentioned above, when maintaining and operating a high school managed by a local government, in addition to grasping the current situation, it is necessary to grasp various change factors from multiple perspectives. In other words, by using the most significant change among these change factors as the classification axis, it is possible to grasp various change factors from multiple perspectives. In this local government, as described above using Figure 99, there is a large difference in the surplus of school buildings, etc. depending on the size of the high school, and as explained using Figure 100, there is a significant difference in the change in the number of student classes depending on the size of the high school. Therefore, in the asset management support device 4B, these two change factors are used as the axis of type classification, and a matrix with each as the row and column can be created to perform type classification.

Referring to Figures 102 and 103, we will explain how to create a matrix to classify types based on the size of high schools and changes in the number of student classes.

Here, total floor area is used as the first axis of type classification. Specifically, a standard total floor area per student is set for each department, and the result of comparing the standard total floor area with the current total floor area per student is used as the condition for classification according to the first classification axis. The standard total floor area may be, for example, the average total floor area of the corresponding department, or any other value that is considered appropriate. Here, schools where the current total floor area per student divided by the standard total floor area by department is 1.1 or less are classified as Category I, schools where it is 1.1 to 1.5 are classified as Category II, schools where it is 1.5 to 2.5 are classified as Category III, and schools where it is 2.5 or more are classified as Category IV. In other words, schools in Category I have an appropriate total floor area, and schools in Category IV have a large excess of total floor area.

Here, the change in the number of students per class from the peak to the present is used as the second axis of type classification. At the peak, a class with 50 students was set to 1, and a value corresponding to the number of students per class at each school was calculated. At the present time, a class with 40 students was set to 1, and a value corresponding to the number of students per class at each school was calculated. Schools where the comparison of the peak and present values is 1.1 or more are classified as Category A, schools where it is 0.8 to 1.0 are classified as Category B, schools where it is 0.6 to 0.8 are classified as Category C, and schools where it is 0.6 or less are classified as Category D. In other words, it can be seen that schools in Categories A and B have experienced little change in the number of students, while schools in Category D have experienced a large rate of decline in the number of students.

In the client terminal 3, when an instruction is given to use the changes in the total floor area and the number of students per class as the base axes for the type classification of high schools in the corresponding municipality, and various necessary information such as the formula and thresholds for classification on each base axis for type classification, the number of classifications, and which classification is recognized as the appropriate value, and when an instruction is given to perform type classification processing using a matrix with the first classification base axis as the horizontal axis and the second classification base axis as the vertical axis and to display the results, the classification information acquisition unit 51 acquires from the client terminal 3 via the network 2 the information necessary for type classification, such as the name of a specific municipality designated as a facility group to be classified, the fact that the changes in the total floor area and the number of students per class are used as the base axes for type classification to classify the facility group, and the content of the classification, the necessary formulas, and thresholds for classification, and supplies this information to the type classification processing unit 52. The type classification processing unit 52 refers to the information stored in each unit of the storage device 6B and classifies high schools managed by a specific municipality into four types for each of the first classification base axis and the second classification base axis. The type classification processing unit 52 then supplies the classification results for each of the first and second classification axes to the information storage processing unit 12, where they are stored in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72, and also supplied to the screen information generation unit 11E.

The type classification processing unit 52 associates the high school name corresponding to the classification result with each cell in a matrix with the first classification axis as the horizontal axis and the second classification axis as the vertical axis, and performs type classification based on which cell of the matrix each high school belongs to. For example, in a matrix with the first classification axis as the horizontal axis and the second classification axis as the vertical axis, the type classification processing unit 52 can type classify cells in which both the first classification axis and the second classification axis are appropriate, that is, a group of high schools located in the upper left of the matrix with an appropriate relationship between the number of students and the total floor area, to a group of high schools located in the lower right of the matrix with a large surplus of total floor area relative to the number of students, as one group for each cell. Furthermore, the type classification processing unit 52 can, for example, classify schools associated with multiple cells in a matrix with the first classification axis as the horizontal axis and the second classification axis as the vertical axis into a number of types specified by the user of the client terminal 3 based on a predetermined rule, such as minimizing the variation in the number of schools included in one classification or minimizing the variation in the number of cells. The type classification processing unit 52 then supplies the type classification results to the information storage processing unit 12, where they are stored in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72, and also supplies them to the screen information generation unit 11E.

Then, the screen information generating unit 11E reads out from the format storage unit 71 a format for generating the data shown in FIG. 102, associates the high school names corresponding to the classification results with the cells of a matrix in which the horizontal axis represents the classification results in classification axis 1 supplied from the type classification processing unit 52 and the vertical axis represents the classification results in classification axis 2, generates data in which the school names and type classification results are entered in each cell in the matrix, and transmits the data to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 for display. A user of the client terminal 3 displaying the data shown in FIG. 102 can see that in high schools belonging to type classification (1), the total floor area is appropriate relative to the number of students, but that in high schools belonging to type classification (4) and type classification (5), the total floor area is excessive relative to the number of students and needs to be revised.

For example, the user of the client terminal 3 can also refer to the matrix to which each school is associated and specify the grouping of the type classification. The type classification processing unit 52 supplies the high school names corresponding to the classification results of the first classification axis and the second classification axis to the screen information generating unit 11E. The screen information generating unit 11E then reads out the format for generating the data shown in FIG. 103 from the format storage unit 71, and associates the high school names corresponding to the classification results with the cells of the matrix in which the horizontal axis represents the classification results of classification axis 1 and the vertical axis represents the classification results of classification axis 2 supplied from the type classification processing unit 52, generating data in which only the school name is entered in each cell in the matrix as shown in FIG. 103, and transmitting the data to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 for display.

The user of the client terminal 3 on which the data shown in FIG. 103 is displayed can refer to the data shown in FIG. 103 to perform type classification based on the appropriateness of the relationship between the number of students and the total floor area. In the data shown in FIG. 103, it can be seen that the relationship between the number of students and the total floor area is appropriate in the high school corresponding to the cell located in the upper left, and the surplus of the total floor area is large compared to the number of students in the high school corresponding to the cell located in the lower right. The user of the client terminal 3 can refer to the data shown in FIG. 103 and perform an operation input to classify the desired cell into the same type from the upper left cell of the matrix. The type classification result input by the user of the client terminal 3 is transmitted to the asset management support device 4B via the network 2 and stored in the utilization consideration related information storage unit 72 of the information storage processing unit 12.

Figure 104 shows the results of type classification and an example of a format showing the characteristics of each type.

When the display of the type classification results described with reference to Figs. 102 and 103 and the characteristics of each type is instructed in the client terminal 3, the screen information generating unit 11E reads out the format for generating the data shown in Fig. 104 from the format storage unit 71, and controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data necessary for generating information corresponding to the read format, i.e., the type classification results, the number of departments and school size included in each type, and information on the area occupied per student and the change in the number of students per class used as the basis of the type classification, from each part of the storage device 6B, and controls the calculation unit 53 to execute calculation processing of the number of classes in high schools classified into each type, the comparison value with the standard of the area occupied per student, and the maximum, minimum, and average values of the change in the number of students per class from the peak to the present. Then, the screen information generating unit 11E inserts the calculation result by the calculation unit 53 into the format read out from the format storage unit 71 to generate the data shown in Fig. 104, which can be transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed. The user of the client terminal 3 can check the type classification results and the characteristics of each type using the data shown in FIG. 104.

Figures 105 and 106 show examples of formats showing detailed information about each school classified by type.

When a command is given on the client terminal 3 to display detailed information about each school classified by the type classification described using Figures 102 and 103, the screen information generation unit 11E reads out from the format memory unit 71 a format for generating the data shown in Figures 105 and 106, and controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract from each part of the memory device 6B the data necessary to generate information corresponding to the read format, namely, the type classification results, information such as the names and regions of the high schools included in each type, whether they are independent schools or branch schools, and which is the main department, as soft factors of change, information on the number of students and the number of classes, and the numerical values used as base axis 2 of the type classification, as well as information such as the age of the building, area, number of buildings owned, and the numerical values used as base axis 1 of the type classification, as hard factors (conditions of the facility), and controls the calculation unit 53 to perform the calculation processing necessary to fill in the format for the high schools classified into each type. The screen information generating unit 11E then inserts the calculation results from the calculating unit 53 into the format read from the format storage unit 71 to generate the data shown in FIGS. 105 and 106, which can be transmitted to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 and displayed. From the data shown in FIGS. 105 and 106, the user of the client terminal 3 can easily see that high schools that belong to type classification (1), i.e., have an appropriate total floor area relative to the number of students, are concentrated in large schools in the central area of the prefecture, while many of the small schools in other areas have a large excess of total floor area relative to the number of students and need to be reviewed.

Figure 107 shows an example of a format that shows the correspondence between the population growth rate of cities, towns, and villages within a municipality and the results of classifying high schools by type.

When a command is issued on the client terminal 3 to display information showing the population increase/decrease rate of the municipalities in the municipality and the correspondence between each school classified by the type classification described with reference to Figures 102 and 103, the screen information generating unit 11E reads out the format for generating the data shown in Figure 107 from the format storage unit 71, and controls the third extraction unit 11D to extract data necessary for generating information corresponding to the read format, i.e., map information of the relevant municipality, population information of the municipalities in the municipality, type classification results, location information of high schools included in each type, etc., from each part of the storage device 6B. The screen information generating unit 11E also controls the calculation unit 53 to calculate the population increase/decrease rate of the municipalities in the municipality based on the population information read by controlling the third extraction unit 11D. Here, the population growth rate refers to, for example, the current population growth rate when the population at a certain point in the past is set to 100, the future population growth rate (a specified number of years later) when the population at a certain point in the past is set to 100, or the future population growth rate (a specified number of years later) when the current population is set to 100.

The screen information generating unit 11E can insert the information read by controlling the third extracting unit 11D and the calculation result by the calculating unit 53 into the format read from the format storing unit 71 to generate the data shown in FIG. 107, and transmit it to the client terminal 3 via the network 2 to display it. From the data shown in FIG. 107, the user of the client terminal 3 can see that high schools belonging to type classification (1), i.e., high schools with the most appropriate total floor area for the number of students, are concentrated in the central area of the prefecture, high schools belonging to type classification (2), i.e., high schools with the second most appropriate total floor area for the number of students, are concentrated in the northern area of the prefecture, and types (3) to (5) with a large surplus of total floor area for the number of students are distributed in other areas with low population growth rates, so that high schools classified as types (3) to (5) need to have their large surplus area reviewed.

Next, with reference to the flowchart in FIG. 108, we will explain type classification process 2, which is a second example of the process executed in step S33 in FIG. 91.

In step S81, the type classification processing unit 52 classifies a predetermined group of facilities into a predetermined number N using a first classification axis in response to a request from the client terminal 3. For example, in the type classification described with reference to Figures 102 and 103, the type classification processing unit 52 classifies a predetermined group of facilities into four groups using the first classification axis.

In step S82, the type classification processing unit 52 classifies the predetermined facility group into a predetermined number M using the second classification axis in response to a request from the client terminal 3. For example, in the type classification described with reference to Figures 102 and 103, the type classification processing unit 52 classifies the predetermined facility group into four using the second classification axis.

In step S83, the type classification processing unit 52 applies the classification results of steps S81 and S82 to the N x M matrix.

In step S84, the type classification processing unit 52 assigns a classification name to each of the N×M matrices based on a predetermined rule or user operation input, and the process proceeds to step S34 in FIG. 91. For example, in the type classification described with reference to FIGS. 102 and 103, the type classification processing unit 52 can perform type classification into a number specified by the user of the client terminal 3 based on a predetermined rule, such as to minimize variation in the number of schools included in one classification or to minimize variation in the number of cells in a matrix with the first classification axis as the horizontal axis and the second classification axis as the vertical axis, or to perform type classification based on the operation input of the user of the client terminal 3 on which the data shown in FIG. 103 is displayed.

By using this type of processing, it is possible to use two change factors that show significant changes and perform type classification using a matrix based on these as the classification axes.

The above-described process describes support for carrying out type classification based on detailed information about each facility, generating information necessary for facility maintenance and management using the facility's deterioration status and usage status, and planning measures such as facility renovation, reconstruction, reorganization, and sharing. In contrast, the asset management support device 4B can also provide support for maintaining and managing each facility in a high-performance state while keeping costs as low as possible from an overall perspective, in other words, a macro perspective, in order to plan measures such as facility renovation, reconstruction, reorganization, and sharing.

For example, in a high school managed and operated by a specific local government, the asset management support device 4B can obtain peak, current, and future changes in student composition by department from an overall local government perspective, as shown in FIG. 109, based on various information stored in each section of the memory device 6B.

For example, in a high school managed and operated by a specific local government, the asset management support device 4B can obtain the changes in the number of students and classes from the peak time to the present, as well as the total floor area of buildings owned by the school, such as school buildings and gymnasiums, from the overall perspective of the local government, as shown in FIG. 110, based on various information stored in each section of the memory device 6B.

For example, in a high school managed and operated by a specific local government, the asset management support device 4B can obtain the changes in the number of students and classes from the peak time to the present, as well as the total floor area of owned buildings such as school buildings and gymnasiums, from the perspective of each area of the local government, as shown in FIG. 111, based on various information stored in each part of the memory device 6B.

When generating information necessary for facility maintenance and management, or planning measures such as facility renovation, reconstruction, reorganization, and sharing based on the detailed current status of each school, the current status of the facilities is often based on the number of buildings and classrooms that were needed at the peak of the number of students, so when the number of students is declining, there is a strong tendency for there to be a lot of surplus area and surplus classrooms. For this reason, in measures calculated based on the detailed current status of each school, the calculated required costs may be high, or the planned content of facility functional improvement within available funds may be limited. Therefore, it is necessary to aim to optimize the calculation of costs related to these measures and to plan appropriate facility functional improvement within limited funds by calculating the appropriate scale of each school's buildings and number of classrooms based on the current number of students and future student numbers.

The asset management support device 4B can set calculation formulas for appropriate area and the like by department and size based on information from a macro perspective described using Figures 109 to 111. For example, the asset management support device 4B can establish calculation standard formulas for the site area of small, medium, and large schools using the number of students P and a specified constant, and calculate the appropriate amount of site area for the present and future. In other words, the asset management support device 4B can calculate, from a macro perspective, the number of schools, number of students, and number of schools in each area, as well as a guideline for the amount of facilities required in response to these changes.

In other words, the asset management support device 4B can calculate appropriate amounts for the site area, rooms, etc., required for the management and operation of a facility from both the results of various calculations performed by type classification processing using detailed information for each facility, and from calculation formulas obtained from a macro perspective. By comparing the values calculated from both these methods, the accuracy of the calculation of appropriate amounts can be improved, and support can be provided for the establishment of policies for the management and operation of facilities more reliably.

A part or all of the series of processes described in the embodiments of the present invention may be executed by hardware, or may be executed by software. Furthermore, the program executed by the computer may be a program in which the processes are executed chronologically according to the sequence described in this specification, or may be a program in which the processes are executed in parallel, or at the required timing, such as when called.

The present invention, for example, allows an organization that manages school facilities to easily grasp the deterioration status of the school facilities under its management, and calculates future maintenance and renewal costs according to the deterioration status and financial constraints, thereby supporting the management and operation of the facilities.

1...Asset management support system, 2...Network, 3...Client terminal, 4, 4A, 4B...Asset management support device, 5...Communication device, 6, 6B...Storage device, 11, 11A, 11E...Screen information generation unit, 11B...First extraction unit, 11C...Second extraction unit, 11D...Third extraction unit, 12...Information storage processing unit, 13...Deterioration status evaluation unit, 14...Financial constraint line setting unit, 15...Standard setting unit, 16...Maintenance policy decision unit, 17...Business content setting unit, 18...Part-specific identification unit, 19...Part-specific cost calculation unit, 20...Standard value update unit, 21...Accounting linkage unit, 22...Simulation unit, 31...Facility information storage unit, 32...Deterioration information storage unit, 33...Evaluation information storage unit, 34...Maintenance policy information storage unit, 51...Classification information acquisition unit, 52...Type classification processing unit, 53...Calculation unit, 71...Format storage unit, 72...Utilization consideration related information storage unit

Claims (5)

an information storage processing unit that links basic information of a plurality of facilities, a facility ledger, and each facility information of a fixed asset ledger and accumulates and stores the linked information in a storage unit;
a classification information acquisition unit that acquires a plurality of pieces of classification information, the classification information being basic information for classifying the plurality of facilities into a plurality of types , the classification information including any one of information indicating the location, size, or content of use of the facility;
a type classification processing unit that refers to basic information of the facilities, the facility register, and the fixed asset register stored in the storage unit, and classifies the plurality of facilities into the plurality of types in accordance with the classification information acquired by the classification information acquisition unit;
a format storage processing unit that accumulates and stores a format having a plurality of items in the storage unit;
a calculation processing unit that, when a user considers rebuilding a specific facility among the plurality of facilities, extracts information corresponding to the items of the format from the basic information of the facilities, the facility ledger, and the fixed asset ledger stored in the storage unit for all the facilities classified by the type classification processing unit into the same type as the specific facility, and calculates values that assist the user in setting values that will serve as review criteria for rebuilding the specific facility using the extracted information;
a screen information generating unit that generates display data based on the format stored in the storage unit by using the type classification result by the type classification processing unit, basic information on the facility stored in the storage unit, the facility ledger, the fixed asset ledger, and the calculation processing result by the calculation processing unit,
The asset management support system is characterized in that the information storage processing unit links the value that serves as a review standard for when rebuilding the facility, which is input by the user by referring to the calculation processing result by the calculation processing unit contained in the display data generated and displayed by the screen information generation unit, to each facility information and stores it in the memory unit. The asset management support system according to claim 1,
the classification information acquisition unit acquires two pieces of classification information that are bases for the type classification, and acquires the number of categories in each of the two pieces of classification information;
The asset management support system according to the present invention, wherein the type classification processing unit classifies the facilities into types using a matrix based on the number of classifications in each of the two pieces of classification information. 3. The asset management support system according to claim 1,
The calculation processing unit calculates an average value of a predetermined item of all the facilities classified into the same type by the type classification processing unit as a value that assists the user in setting the review criterion value,
An asset management support system characterized in that the format stored in the memory unit by the format storage processing unit is the format referenced by the user to set the value that serves as the review standard, and includes the format having a plurality of items including the average value calculated by the calculation processing unit. An asset management support method for an asset management support system having an information storage processing unit that links basic information on a plurality of facilities, a facility ledger, information on the usage status of the facilities, and facility information on a fixed asset ledger, and stores them in a storage unit, and also stores a format having a plurality of items in the storage unit,
a classification information acquiring step of acquiring a plurality of classification information, the classification information being basic information for classifying the plurality of facilities into a plurality of types, the classification information including any one of information indicating the location, size, or content of use of the facility;
a type classification processing step of classifying the plurality of facilities into the plurality of types according to the classification information acquired by processing in the classification information acquisition step, by referring to the basic information of the facilities, the facility register, and the fixed asset register stored in the storage unit ;
a calculation processing step of extracting information corresponding to the items of the format from the basic information of the facilities, the facility register, and the fixed asset register stored in the storage unit for all the facilities classified by the type classification processing unit into the same type as the predetermined facility when the user considers rebuilding a predetermined facility among the plurality of facilities, and using the extracted information, calculating values that will assist the user in setting values that will be the review criteria when rebuilding the predetermined facility ;
a screen information generating step of generating display data based on the format stored in the storage unit, using the type classification result obtained by the processing in the type classification processing step, the basic information of the facility stored in the storage unit, the facility ledger, and the information written in the fixed asset ledger, and the calculation result obtained by the processing in the calculation processing step;
and a storage control step of linking a value that serves as a review standard for when the facility is to be rebuilt, input by the user with reference to the calculation results obtained by the calculation processing step, which are included in the display data generated and displayed by the processing of the screen information generation step, to each facility information and storing it in the memory unit. A program for causing a computer to function as an asset management support system,
The computer,
an information storage processing unit that links basic information of a plurality of facilities, a facility ledger, and each facility information of a fixed asset ledger and accumulates and stores the linked information in a storage unit;
a classification information acquisition unit that acquires a plurality of pieces of classification information, the classification information being basic information for classifying the plurality of facilities into a plurality of types , the classification information including any one of information indicating the location, size, or content of use of the facility;
a type classification processing unit that refers to basic information of the facilities, the facility register, and the fixed asset register stored in the storage unit, and classifies the plurality of facilities into the plurality of types in accordance with the classification information acquired by the classification information acquisition unit;
a format storage processing unit that accumulates and stores a format having a plurality of items in the storage unit;
a calculation processing unit that, when a user considers rebuilding a specific facility among the plurality of facilities, extracts information corresponding to the items of the format from the basic information of the facilities, the facility ledger, and the fixed asset ledger stored in the storage unit for all the facilities classified by the type classification processing unit into the same type as the specific facility, and calculates values that assist the user in setting values that will serve as review criteria for rebuilding the specific facility using the extracted information;
using the type classification result by the type classification processing unit, the basic information of the facility stored in the storage unit, the facility ledger, the fixed asset ledger, and the calculation processing result by the calculation processing unit, the screen information generating unit functions as a screen information generating unit that generates display data based on the format stored in the storage unit and a screen information generating unit that generates data;
The information storage processing unit is a program characterized in that the information storage processing unit links a value that serves as a review standard for when rebuilding the facility, which is input by the user by referring to the calculation processing result by the calculation processing unit contained in the display data generated and displayed by the screen information generation unit, to each facility information and stores it in the memory unit.

Images