Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP7587150B2 - Resistance spot welding method and manufacturing method for joint - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP7587150B2 - Resistance spot welding method and manufacturing method for joint - Google Patents

Resistance spot welding method and manufacturing method for joint Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP7587150B2
JP7587150B2 JP2021053809A JP2021053809A JP7587150B2 JP 7587150 B2 JP7587150 B2 JP 7587150B2 JP 2021053809 A JP2021053809 A JP 2021053809A JP 2021053809 A JP2021053809 A JP 2021053809A JP 7587150 B2 JP7587150 B2 JP 7587150B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
current
content
less
spot welding
steel
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2021053809A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2021154390A (en
Inventor
千智 吉永
真二 児玉
蒼紫 川合
高志 今村
松男 茅野
博紀 富士本
徹 岡田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Steel Corp filed Critical Nippon Steel Corp
Publication of JP2021154390A publication Critical patent/JP2021154390A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP7587150B2 publication Critical patent/JP7587150B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • Resistance Welding (AREA)
  • Heat Treatment Of Articles (AREA)

Description

本開示は、抵抗スポット溶接方法及び継手の製造方法に関する。 This disclosure relates to a resistance spot welding method and a method for manufacturing a joint.

車体の組立や部品の取付け等の工程においては主としてスポット溶接が使われている。
近年、自動車分野では、低燃費化やCO排出量削減を達成するための車体の軽量化や、衝突安全性を向上させるための車体の高剛性化がより求められており、その要求を満たすために、車体や部品等に高強度鋼板を使用するニーズが高まっている。
一方、高強度鋼板はその強度を達成するために母材の炭素当量が大きくなっており、スポット溶接では溶接部は加熱後直ちに急冷されるために、溶接部はマルテンサイト組織となり、溶接部及び熱影響部において硬度が上昇し、靭性が低下するようになる。
Spot welding is primarily used in processes such as assembling car bodies and attaching parts.
In recent years, in the automotive field, there has been an increasing demand for lighter vehicle bodies to achieve better fuel economy and reduced CO2 emissions, as well as for higher vehicle body rigidity to improve collision safety. To meet these demands, there is an increasing need to use high-strength steel plates for vehicle bodies, parts, etc.
On the other hand, in order to achieve high strength steel plate, the carbon equivalent of the base material is large, and in spot welding, the weld is heated and then immediately cooled rapidly, so the weld becomes a martensite structure, and the hardness of the weld and the heat-affected zone increases and the toughness decreases.

スポット溶接部の靭性を改善して継手強度を確保する方法として、本通電の後にさらに後加熱通電を行う方法が提案されている。
例えば、2段通電によるスポット溶接方法として、特許文献1には、炭素を0.15質量%以上含み、引張強さが980MPa以上である高強度鋼板を重ね合わせスポット溶接する方法であって、スポット溶接工程を、ナゲットを形成する第1通電工程、第1通電工程に続いて無通電とする冷却工程、冷却工程に続いてナゲットを軟化させる第2通電工程の3工程に分けて行い、その際、第1通電工程の電流をI、第2通電工程の電流をIとするとき、I/Iを0.5~0.8とし、さらに冷却工程の時間tc(sec)を、鋼板板厚H(mm)に応じて、tmin=0.2×Hで計算される0.8×tmin以上、2.5×tmin以下の範囲とし、また第2通電工程の通電時間t(sec)を、0.7×tmin以上、2.5×tmin以下の範囲とし、前記第1通電工程までの電極の加圧力よりも、前記冷却工程以降における電極の加圧力を大きくして溶接してスポット溶接継手を得るスポット溶接方法が開示されている。
As a method for improving the toughness of a spot weld and ensuring joint strength, a method of performing post-heating current application after main current application has been proposed.
For example, as a spot welding method using two-stage current application, Patent Document 1 describes a method of spot welding high-strength steel sheets containing 0.15 mass % or more of carbon and having a tensile strength of 980 MPa or more by overlapping and spot welding the sheets, in which the spot welding process is divided into three steps: a first current application process for forming a nugget, a cooling process in which no current is applied following the first current application process, and a second current application process for softening the nugget following the cooling process. In this case, when the current in the first current application process is I 1 and the current in the second current application process is I 2 , I 2 /I 1 is set to 0.5 to 0.8, and the time tc (sec) of the cooling process is set to a range of 0.8×tmin or more and 2.5×tmin or less, calculated by tmin=0.2×H 2 , depending on the steel sheet thickness H (mm ) . This spot welding method discloses a spot welding method in which (sec) is set in the range of 0.7 × tmin or more and 2.5 × tmin or less, and welding is performed by increasing the electrode pressure after the cooling step compared to the electrode pressure up to the first current application step to obtain a spot welded joint.

また、特許文献2には、3段通電によるスポット溶接方法として、2枚以上の鋼板を重ね合わせた板組を、一対の電極で狭持し、加圧しながら通電して接合する抵抗スポット溶接方法であって、電流値I(kA)で通電する主通電工程を行い、その後、焼き戻し後熱処理工程として、式(1)に示す冷却時間tct(ms)で冷却した後、式(2)に示す電流値I(kA)で、式(3)に示す通電時間t(ms)の間通電を行い、
800≦tct ・・・式(1)
0.5×I≦I≦I ・・・式(2)
500≦t ・・・式(3)
前記板組のうち少なくとも1枚の鋼板は、
0.08≦C≦0.3(質量%)、
0.1≦Si≦0.8(質量%)、
2.5≦Mn≦10.0(質量%)、
P≦0.1(質量%)
を含有し、残部Feおよび不可避的不純物からなる成分を有する抵抗スポット溶接方法が開示されている。
Patent Document 2 describes a three-stage current spot welding method in which a sheet set of two or more overlapping steel sheets is clamped between a pair of electrodes and joined by passing current while applying pressure, in which a main current passing step is performed in which current is passed at a current value I w (kA), and then, as a post-tempering heat treatment step, cooling is performed for a cooling time t ct (ms) shown in formula (1), and then current is passed at a current value I t (kA) shown in formula (2) for a current passing time t t (ms) shown in formula (3),
800≦t ct ...Formula (1)
0.5×I w ≦I t ≦I w ...Formula (2)
500≦t t ...Formula (3)
At least one steel plate of the plate set is
0.08≦C≦0.3 (mass%),
0.1≦Si≦0.8 (mass%),
2.5≦Mn≦10.0 (mass%),
P≦0.1 (mass%)
and the balance being Fe and unavoidable impurities.

国際公開第2014/060848号International Publication No. 2014/060848 国際公開第2019/156073号International Publication No. 2019/156073

スポット溶接に用いる鋼板の炭素量を高くすることで継手母材(鋼板)の高強度化を図ることができる。しかし、特許文献1の実施例では、C含有量が0.22%以下の鋼板が使用されており、さらにC含有量が高い鋼板を用い、継手強度(靭性)も高い継手を製造することが望ましい。
また、特許文献2では、C含有量が0.08~0.3%の鋼板を用いることを必須としており、比較例として、C含有量が0.3%を超える鋼板を用いて3段通電を行った場合には継手強度が低下することが記載されている。
Increasing the carbon content of the steel plate used for spot welding can increase the strength of the joint base material (steel plate). However, in the examples of Patent Document 1, a steel plate with a C content of 0.22% or less is used, and it is desirable to use a steel plate with a higher C content to manufacture a joint with high joint strength (toughness).
Furthermore, Patent Document 2 requires the use of steel plates having a C content of 0.08 to 0.3%, and describes, as a comparative example, that when a steel plate having a C content of more than 0.3% is used and three-stage current application is performed, the joint strength decreases.

本開示は、炭素量が0.3%を超える鋼板を含む板組を用いる場合でも、単通電による抵抗スポット溶接を行う場合に比べ、継手強度を大きく向上させることができる抵抗スポット溶接方法及び継手の製造方法を提供することを目的とする。 The present disclosure aims to provide a resistance spot welding method and a method for manufacturing a joint that can significantly improve joint strength compared to resistance spot welding using a single current, even when using a sheet assembly that includes steel sheets with a carbon content of more than 0.3%.

上記目的を達成するための本開示の要旨は次の通りである。
<1> 質量%で、C含有量が、0.30%超、0.70%以下である少なくとも1枚の鋼板を含む2枚以上の鋼板を重ね合わせた板組を、一対の電極で板厚方向に挟み込んで加圧しながら電流値I(kA)で通電する第1通電工程と、
前記第1通電工程後、16ms以上200ms以下の時間tc1を無通電とする第1無通電工程と、
前記第1無通電工程後、下記式(1)を満たす電流値I(kA)及び下記式(2)を満たす時間t(ms)で通電する第2通電工程と、
0.6≦I/I≦1.1 ・・・(1)
50≦t≦1000 ・・・(2)
前記第2通電工程後、下記式(3)及び下記式(4)を満たす時間tc2(ms)を無通電とする第2無通電工程と、
3.5×10-3×Ms-3.3×Ms+1100<tc2≦9000 ・・・(3)
Ms(℃)=561-474×[C]-33×[Mn]-17×[Ni]-17×[Cr]-21×[Mo] ・・・(4)
前記第2無通電工程後、下記式(5)を満たす電流値I(kA)及び下記式(6)を満たす時間t(ms)で通電する第3通電工程と、
0.4≦I/I≦1.0 ・・・(5)
200≦t ・・・(6)
を連続して行う、抵抗スポット溶接方法。
前記式(3)におけるMsは、前記式(4)において[元素名]内に前記板組を構成する鋼板に含まれる各元素の質量%を代入して算出されるMs点を意味する。但し、前記板組を構成する少なくとも2枚の鋼板の組成が異なる場合は、前記板組を構成する全ての鋼板について前記式(4)により鋼板ごとに算出したMs点に、それぞれ前記板組の総厚に対する各鋼板の板厚比を乗じた値の加重平均のMs点を式(3)に代入する。
<2> 前記板組のうち、前記少なくとも1枚の鋼板は、質量%で、
P含有量が0.010%未満、
である
<1>に記載の抵抗スポット溶接方法。
<3> 前記板組のうち、前記少なくとも1枚の鋼板は、質量%で、
P含有量が0.010%未満、
S含有量が0.0100%以下、
である
<1>に記載の抵抗スポット溶接方法。
<4> 前記板組のうち、前記少なくとも1枚の鋼板は、質量%で、
Si含有量が0.10%超、
P含有量が0.010%未満、
S含有量が0.0100%以下、
である
<1>に記載の抵抗スポット溶接方法。
<5> 前記板組のうち、前記少なくとも1枚の鋼板は、質量%で、
Si含有量が0.10%超、
Mn含有量が15.00%以下、
P含有量が0.010%未満、
S含有量が0.0100%以下、
である
<1>に記載の抵抗スポット溶接方法。
<6> <1>~<5>のいずれか1つに記載の抵抗スポット溶接方法を用いた継手の製造方法。
The gist of the present disclosure to achieve the above object is as follows.
<1> A first current-passing step of sandwiching a plate set obtained by stacking two or more steel plates including at least one steel plate having a C content, in mass%, of more than 0.30% and not more than 0.70% between a pair of electrodes in a plate thickness direction and applying pressure thereto at a current value I 1 (kA);
a first de-energization step in which, after the first energization step, no current is applied for a time tc1 of 16 ms or more and 200 ms or less;
a second current-passing step of passing a current at a current value I2 (kA) that satisfies the following formula (1) and for a time t2 (ms) that satisfies the following formula (2) after the first current-passing step;
0.6≦I 2 /I 1 ≦1.1 (1)
50≦ t2 ≦1000...(2)
a second de-energization step in which, after the second energization step, no current is applied for a time t c2 (ms) that satisfies the following formula (3) and the following formula (4);
3.5×10 −3 ×Ms 2 −3.3×Ms+1100<t c2 ≦9000 (3)
Ms(℃)=561-474×[C]-33×[Mn]-17×[Ni]-17×[Cr]-21×[Mo]...(4)
a third current-passing step in which, after the second current-passing step, a current is passed at a current value I 3 (kA) that satisfies the following formula (5) and for a time t 3 (ms) that satisfies the following formula (6);
0.4≦I 3 /I 1 ≦1.0 (5)
200≦t 3 ...(6)
A resistance spot welding method in which the above steps are performed continuously.
The Ms in the formula (3) means the Ms point calculated by substituting the mass% of each element contained in the steel plates constituting the plate assembly into [name of element] in the formula (4). However, when at least two steel plates constituting the plate assembly have different compositions, the Ms point calculated for each steel plate by the formula (4) for all steel plates constituting the plate assembly is multiplied by the plate thickness ratio of each steel plate to the total thickness of the plate assembly, and the weighted average Ms point is substituted into the formula (3).
<2> In the plate assembly, the at least one steel plate comprises, in mass%,
P content is less than 0.010%;
The resistance spot welding method according to <1>,
<3> In the plate assembly, the at least one steel plate comprises, in mass%,
P content is less than 0.010%;
S content is 0.0100% or less,
The resistance spot welding method according to <1>,
<4> In the plate assembly, the at least one steel plate comprises, in mass%,
The Si content is more than 0.10%,
P content is less than 0.010%;
S content is 0.0100% or less,
The resistance spot welding method according to <1>,
<5> In the plate assembly, the at least one steel plate comprises, in mass%,
The Si content is more than 0.10%,
Mn content is 15.00% or less,
P content is less than 0.010%;
S content is 0.0100% or less,
The resistance spot welding method according to <1>,
<6> A method for manufacturing a joint using the resistance spot welding method according to any one of <1> to <5>.

本開示によれば、炭素量が0.3%を超える鋼板を含む板組を用いる場合でも、単通電による抵抗スポット溶接を行う場合に比べ、継手強度を大きく向上させることができる抵抗スポット溶接方法及び継手の製造方法が提供される。 According to the present disclosure, a resistance spot welding method and a method for manufacturing a joint are provided that can significantly improve joint strength compared to resistance spot welding using a single current, even when using a sheet assembly that includes steel sheets with a carbon content of more than 0.3%.

重ね合わせた鋼板に行ったスポット溶接条件と継手のCTS(十字引張強さ)との関係を示す図である。FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the relationship between the spot welding conditions applied to overlapping steel plates and the CTS (cross tensile strength) of a joint. スポット溶接後のナゲット付近のSEM―EBSD解析画像であり、(A)は単通電のみ、(B)は単通電の後に第2通電を行った場合である。13A and 13B are SEM-EBSD analysis images of the vicinity of the nugget after spot welding, in which (A) is a single current flow only, and (B) is a case where a second current flow was performed after the single current flow. 本開示に係る抵抗スポット溶接方法における各工程における電流及び時間の一例を概略的に示す図である。FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an example of current and time in each step of the resistance spot welding method according to the present disclosure. 2枚の鋼板を重ね合わせた板組に対して抵抗スポット溶接を行った場合に形成されるナゲット及び熱影響部(HAZ)の一例を概略的に示す図である。FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an example of a nugget and a heat-affected zone (HAZ) formed when resistance spot welding is performed on a plate assembly in which two steel plates are overlapped. 鋼板の炭素量を変化させて単通電によってスポット溶接した場合のCTS(単通電CTS)と本開示による通電(3段通電)によってスポット溶接した場合のCTSを比較した図である。FIG. 11 is a diagram comparing CTS when spot welding is performed by single current while changing the carbon content of the steel plate (single current CTS) with CTS when spot welding is performed by current (three-stage current) according to the present disclosure. 単通電によってスポット溶接した場合のCTS(単通電CTS)に対して、本開示による通電(3段通電)によってスポット溶接した場合のCTSの上昇率を示す、図5を加工した図である。FIG. 6 is a processed view of FIG. 5 , showing the rate of increase in CTS when spot welding is performed by current application (three-stage current application) according to the present disclosure, relative to CTS when spot welding is performed by single current application (single current CTS).

以下、本開示の一例である実施形態について説明する。
なお、本開示において、各元素の含有量の「%」表示は「質量%」を意味する。また、本開示において、「~」を用いて表される数値範囲は、特に断りの無い限り、「~」の前後に記載される数値を下限値及び上限値として含む範囲を意味する。また、「~」の前後に記載される数値に「超」又は「未満」が付されている場合の数値範囲は、これら数値を下限値又は上限値として含まない範囲を意味する。
本開示に段階的に記載されている数値範囲において、ある段階的な数値範囲の上限値又は下限値は、他の段階的な記載の数値範囲の上限値又は下限値に置き換えてもよく、また、実施例に示されている値に置き換えてもよい。
また、「工程」との用語は、独立した工程だけではなく、他の工程と明確に区別できない場合であってもその工程の所期の目的が達成されれば、本用語に含まれる。
Hereinafter, an embodiment that is an example of the present disclosure will be described.
In this disclosure, the "%" designation for the content of each element means "mass %." In this disclosure, a numerical range expressed using "to" means a range that includes the numerical values written before and after "to" as the lower and upper limits, unless otherwise specified. In addition, when the numerical values written before and after "to" are followed by "greater than" or "less than," the numerical range does not include these numerical values as the lower or upper limit.
In the numerical ranges described in stages in this disclosure, the upper or lower limit of a certain numerical range may be replaced by the upper or lower limit of another numerical range described in stages, or may be replaced by a value shown in the examples.
In addition, the term "process" includes not only an independent process but also a process that cannot be clearly distinguished from other processes as long as the intended purpose of the process is achieved.

本発明者らは、鋼板のC量が0.30質量%超であっても抵抗スポット溶接を行った場合の継手強度(十字引張強さ:CTS)を向上できる方法を鋭意研究した。図1は、鋼板のC量が0.34%で、P量が、0.015%(通常P材)と0.0007%(極低P材)の2種類の鋼板を同じ種類の鋼板同士を2枚重ね合わせて、抵抗スポット溶接した継手のCTSとの関係を示している。なお、C量、P量以外の成分は、S:0.0008%、Si:0.25%、Mn:1.25%で共通である。また、「単通電」は板組にナゲットを形成する1回の通電による抵抗スポット溶接を行ったこと、「テンパー通電」は板組に対してナゲットを形成する単通電を行った後、ナゲットを軟化させる焼き鈍し処理に相当する後通電(テンパー通電)を行った(2段通電した)ことを意味する。3段通電は、ナゲットを形成する単通電の後に、テンパー通電よりも多い電流値の通電を行い、次いで、テンパー通電を行ったことを意味する。 The inventors have intensively studied a method for improving joint strength (cross tensile strength: CTS) when resistance spot welding is performed even when the C content of the steel sheet exceeds 0.30 mass%. Figure 1 shows the relationship between the CTS of a joint in which two types of steel sheets, each with a C content of 0.34% and a P content of 0.015% (normal P material) and 0.0007% (extremely low P material), are stacked together and resistance spot welded. The components other than the C and P contents are common to both types: S: 0.0008%, Si: 0.25%, and Mn: 1.25%. In addition, "single current" means that resistance spot welding was performed by passing a current once to form a nugget in the sheet assembly, and "temper current" means that a single current was passed through the sheet assembly to form a nugget, followed by a post-current (temper current) equivalent to an annealing process to soften the nugget (two-stage current). Three-stage current passing means that after a single current passing to form the nugget, a current value greater than the temper current is passed, and then the temper current is passed.

単通電継手とテンパー通電継手は、ともに、通常P材および極低P材を用いた。3段通電は、通常P材を用いたが、極低P材にテンパー通電を施した場合のCTSをはるかに超えた。極低P材は、偏析緩和の後通電をしなくてもCTSが高いので、この3段通電によるCTSの向上は、偏析緩和とテンパー通電による焼戻しの効果だけでは説明できないと、本発明者らは推測した。
そこで、本発明者らは、3段通電における2段目の通電の影響を調べるために、スポット溶接後の鋼板を板厚に垂直に切断、研磨し、金属組織を観察した。
Both the single current joint and the temper current joint were made of normal P material and extremely low P material. The three-stage current joint used normal P material, but the CTS far exceeded that of extremely low P material subjected to temper current. Since the extremely low P material has a high CTS even without current flow after segregation relaxation, the inventors speculated that the improvement in CTS by the three-stage current cannot be explained only by the effect of segregation relaxation and tempering by temper current.
Therefore, in order to investigate the influence of the second stage of current passing in the three-stage current passing, the inventors cut the steel sheet after spot welding perpendicular to the sheet thickness, polished it, and observed the metal structure.

図2は、スポット溶接した場合のナゲットおよびその付近についてSEM―EBSD解析をした画像である。(A)は単通電のみ行ったもの、(B)は、単通電の後に2段目の通電を0.1秒行ったものである(テンパー通電はしない)。(B)では、ナゲット内でナゲット端部付近(溶融境界付近)において、(A)においてはあまり見られない整粒がみられる。これは、一旦凝固したのちに再度加熱されδ変態し、再び冷却されγ変態をしたことによる粒径形状の変化と考えられるが、この整粒化によって靭性が向上し、CTSが向上したものと考えられる。 Figure 2 shows images of a SEM-EBSD analysis of a nugget and its vicinity after spot welding. (A) shows the result of only a single current, and (B) shows the result of a single current followed by a second current of 0.1 seconds (no tempering current). In (B), grain order can be seen near the edge of the nugget (near the fusion boundary) that is not seen much in (A). This is thought to be due to a change in grain shape caused by the grains being heated again after solidification, undergoing delta transformation, and then cooled again and undergoing gamma transformation. It is believed that this grain order improves toughness and CTS.

一般的に、C含有量を高くするほど鋼板の引張強度が高くなる反面、溶接部の靭性は低下して継手強度が低下するが、本発明者らは、C含有量が0.30%超の鋼板では、偏析緩和だけではなく、整粒化も重要と考えた。そして、C含有量が0.30%超、0.70%以下である鋼板を含む板組であっても、特定の条件でナゲットを形成する通電工程と、整粒化通電工程とテンパー通電工程を組み合わせた3段階の通電を行えば、CTS試験において、最も剥離方向の応力が負荷される部位(ナゲット内でナゲット境界付近)の靭性が向上し、継手強度を大幅に向上させることができることを見出した。 Generally, the higher the C content, the higher the tensile strength of the steel plate, but the toughness of the welded part decreases, resulting in a decrease in joint strength. However, the inventors of the present invention have found that for steel plates with a C content of more than 0.30%, not only segregation mitigation but also grain regulating is important. They have also found that even for plate assemblies that include steel plates with a C content of more than 0.30% and 0.70% or less, by conducting a three-stage current process that combines a current process for forming a nugget under specific conditions, a current process for grain regulating, and a current process for tempering, the toughness of the area where stress in the peeling direction is most applied in the CTS test (near the nugget boundary within the nugget) can be improved, and joint strength can be significantly improved.

すなわち、本開示に係る抵抗スポット溶接方法は、
質量%で、C含有量が、0.30%超、0.70%以下である少なくとも1枚の鋼板を含む2枚以上の鋼板を重ね合わせた板組を、一対の電極で板厚方向に挟み込んで加圧しながら電流値I(kA)で通電する第1通電工程と、
前記第1通電工程後、16ms以上200ms以下の時間tc1を無通電とする第1無通電工程と、
前記第1無通電工程後、下記式(1)を満たす電流値I(kA)及び下記式(2)を満たす時間t(ms)で通電する第2通電工程と、
0.6≦I/I≦1.1 ・・・(1)
50≦t≦1000 ・・・(2)
前記第2通電工程後、下記式(3)及び下記式(4)を満たす時間tc2(ms)を無通電とする第2無通電工程と、
3.5×10-3×Ms-3.3×Ms+1100<tc2≦9000 ・・・(3)
Ms(℃)=561-474×[C]-33×[Mn]-17×[Ni]-17×[Cr]-21×[Mo] ・・・(4)
前記第2無通電工程後、下記式(5)を満たす電流値I(kA)及び下記式(6)を満たす時間t(ms)で通電する第3通電工程と、
0.4≦I/I≦1.0 ・・・(5)
200≦t ・・・(6)
を連続して行う。
前記式(3)におけるMsは、前記式(4)において[元素名]内に前記板組を構成する鋼板に含まれる各元素の質量%を代入して算出されるMs点を意味する。但し、前記板組を構成する少なくとも2枚の鋼板の組成が異なる場合は、前記板組を構成する全ての鋼板について前記式(4)により鋼板ごとに算出したMs点に、それぞれ前記板組の総厚に対する各鋼板の板厚比を乗じた値の加重平均のMs点を式(3)に代入する。
That is, the resistance spot welding method according to the present disclosure includes:
a first current-passing step of sandwiching a plate set obtained by stacking two or more steel plates including at least one steel plate having a C content, in mass%, of more than 0.30% and not more than 0.70% between a pair of electrodes in a plate thickness direction and applying pressure thereto while passing a current I 1 (kA);
a first de-energization step in which, after the first energization step, no current is applied for a time tc1 of 16 ms or more and 200 ms or less;
a second current-passing step of passing a current at a current value I2 (kA) that satisfies the following formula (1) and for a time t2 (ms) that satisfies the following formula (2) after the first current-passing step;
0.6≦I 2 /I 1 ≦1.1 (1)
50≦ t2 ≦1000...(2)
a second de-energization step in which, after the second energization step, no current is applied for a time t c2 (ms) that satisfies the following formula (3) and the following formula (4);
3.5×10 −3 ×Ms 2 −3.3×Ms+1100<t c2 ≦9000 (3)
Ms(℃)=561-474×[C]-33×[Mn]-17×[Ni]-17×[Cr]-21×[Mo]...(4)
a third current-passing step in which, after the second current-passing step, a current is passed at a current value I 3 (kA) that satisfies the following formula (5) and for a time t 3 (ms) that satisfies the following formula (6);
0.4≦I 3 /I 1 ≦1.0 (5)
200≦t 3 ...(6)
This is done continuously.
The Ms in the formula (3) means the Ms point calculated by substituting the mass% of each element contained in the steel plates constituting the plate assembly into [name of element] in the formula (4). However, when at least two steel plates constituting the plate assembly have different compositions, the Ms point calculated for each steel plate by the formula (4) for all steel plates constituting the plate assembly is multiplied by the plate thickness ratio of each steel plate to the total thickness of the plate assembly, and the weighted average Ms point is substituted into the formula (3).

図3は、本開示に係る抵抗スポット溶接方法における各工程における電流及び時間の一例を概略的に示している。本開示に係る抵抗スポット溶接方法は、質量%で、C含有量が、0.30%超、0.70%以下である少なくとも1枚の鋼板を含む2枚以上の鋼板を重ね合わせた板組を用い、図3に示すように、第1通電工程、第1無通電工程、第2通電工程、第2無通電工程、及び第3通電工程を連続して、すなわち、他の工程を挟まずに続けて行う。以下、各工程について具体的に説明する。 Figure 3 shows an example of the current and time in each step of the resistance spot welding method according to the present disclosure. The resistance spot welding method according to the present disclosure uses a sheet assembly in which two or more steel sheets are overlapped, including at least one steel sheet having a C content, in mass %, of more than 0.30% and not more than 0.70%, and as shown in Figure 3, a first current flow step, a first non-current flow step, a second current flow step, a second non-current flow step, and a third current flow step are performed consecutively, i.e., without any other steps in between. Each step will be described in detail below.

[第1通電工程]
まず、第1通電工程として、質量%で、C含有量が、0.30%超、0.70%以下である少なくとも1枚の鋼板を含む2枚以上の鋼板を重ね合わせた板組を、一対の電極で板厚方向に挟み込んで加圧しながら電流値I(kA)で通電する。
[First current application step]
First, in the first current application step, a sheet assembly consisting of two or more overlapping steel sheets, including at least one steel sheet having a C content, in mass%, of more than 0.30% and not more than 0.70%, is sandwiched between a pair of electrodes in the sheet thickness direction and pressurized while a current value I1 (kA) is applied thereto.

第1通電工程ではスポット溶接によって板組を構成する全ての鋼板を接合するナゲットが形成されるように電流値I(kA)及び通電時間t(ms)を設定することが好ましい。図4は、2枚の鋼板を重ねた板組に対して第1通電工程を行った場合に形成されるナゲットの一例を概略的に示している。図4に示すように、鋼板1A、1Bを重ね合わせた板組を板厚方向に挟み込むように電極2A、2Bを押し当てた状態のまま、電極2Aと電極2Bの間で通電を行う。これにより鋼板1Aと鋼板1Bとの通電部にはナゲット13及び熱影響部(いわゆるHAZ)14が形成され、両鋼板が溶接される。
第1通電工程における電流値Iは所望のナゲット径が得られる電流値を用い、板組のうち最も薄い鋼板t(mm)とした場合、通電時間tは10t-5から10t+50cycle(50Hz)などとすればよい。ナゲット径は4√t以上を狙うのが継手強度、散り発生回避の観点からよい。ナゲット径はさらに望ましくは5√t以上である。このような5√t以上のナゲット径を、散りを発生させずに形成するためには、第1通電工程の前に1cycle~80cycle(50Hz)のアップスロープを設定することが望ましい。また、第1通電工程の前に、第1通電工程より低い電流値で2~80cycleのプレ通電を行っても良い。
なおアップスロープ通電を行う場合、アップスロープの終了時の電流値を第1通電工程における電流値I(kA)とし、第一通電工程の通電時間t(ms)にはアップスロープにかかる時間を含めない。
また、板組に対する電極2A、2Bの加圧力は、散り発生を抑え、かつ安定してナゲットが得られるように、例えば2000~8000Nが挙げられる。加圧力は溶接中に一定であっても、変化させても良い。
In the first current application step, it is preferable to set the current value I 1 (kA) and the current application time t 1 (ms) so that a nugget is formed by spot welding all the steel plates constituting the plate assembly. Fig. 4 shows an example of a nugget formed when the first current application step is performed on a plate assembly in which two steel plates are stacked. As shown in Fig. 4, current is applied between the electrodes 2A and 2B while the electrodes 2A and 2B are pressed against each other so as to sandwich the plate assembly in which the steel plates 1A and 1B are stacked in the plate thickness direction. As a result, a nugget 13 and a heat-affected zone (so-called HAZ) 14 are formed in the current application part between the steel plates 1A and 1B, and the two steel plates are welded.
In the first current application step, the current value I 1 is a current value at which the desired nugget diameter is obtained, and when the thinnest steel plate t (mm) in the sheet assembly is used, the current application time t 1 may be set to 10t-5 to 10t+50 cycles (50 Hz), etc. It is preferable to aim for a nugget diameter of 4√t or more from the viewpoint of joint strength and avoidance of splashing. The nugget diameter is more preferably 5√t or more. In order to form such a nugget diameter of 5√t or more without causing splashing, it is desirable to set an upslope of 1 cycle to 80 cycles (50 Hz) before the first current application step. In addition, before the first current application step, pre-current application of 2 to 80 cycles at a current value lower than that of the first current application step may be performed.
When upslope current is applied, the current value at the end of the upslope is set to the current value I 1 (kA) in the first current application step, and the current application time t 1 (ms) of the first current application step does not include the time required for the upslope.
The pressure of the electrodes 2A and 2B against the plate assembly is, for example, 2000 to 8000 N so as to suppress the occurrence of expulsion and to stably obtain nuggets. The pressure may be constant or may be changed during welding.

本開示に係る抵抗スポット溶接方法では、板組を構成する鋼板は、少なくとも1枚の鋼板が、質量%で、C含有量が0.30%超、0.70%以下であればよい。このような鋼板は、冷延鋼板、熱延鋼板、ホットスタンプ鋼板が挙げられる。特に、C含有量の高いホットスタンプ鋼板が望ましい。また、鋼板の表面は、非めっき、亜鉛系めっき、アルミ系めっきのいずれであっても良い。板組を構成する鋼板の枚数は2枚以上であれば特に限定されず、製造される継手の用途に応じて選択すればよい。
以下、本開示における板組においてC含有量が0.30%超、0.70%以下である鋼板(以下、単に「鋼板」と称する場合がある。)について説明する。
In the resistance spot welding method according to the present disclosure, at least one of the steel sheets constituting the sheet pair may have a C content of more than 0.30% and not more than 0.70% by mass. Examples of such steel sheets include cold-rolled steel sheets, hot-rolled steel sheets, and hot-stamped steel sheets. In particular, hot-stamped steel sheets with a high C content are preferable. The surface of the steel sheet may be unplated, zinc-based plated, or aluminum-based plated. The number of steel sheets constituting the sheet pair is not particularly limited as long as it is two or more, and may be selected according to the application of the joint to be manufactured.
Hereinafter, a steel plate having a C content of more than 0.30% and not more than 0.70% (hereinafter, may be simply referred to as a "steel plate") in a sheet assembly according to the present disclosure will be described.

C:0.30%超0.70%以下
Cは、鋼の焼入れ性を高め、強度向上に寄与する元素である。C含有量が0.3%以下の鋼板のみを重ねてスポット溶接を行う場合は、本開示に係る抵抗スポット溶接方法を適用せずとも継手強度の確保が可能なため、本開示に係る抵抗スポット溶接方法では、少なくとも1枚の鋼板のC含有量は0.30%超とする。好ましくは、0.31%以上、さらに好ましくは、0.33%以上、さらに好ましくは0.35%以上である。
ただし、C含有量が0.70%を超えると靱性が低下しすぎ、本開示に係る抵抗スポット溶接方法を適用しても依然低いCTSしか得られないため、C含有量は0.70%以下とする。C含有量は、好ましくは、0.55%以下、さらに好ましくは0.48%以下である。
C: more than 0.30% and not more than 0.70% C is an element that improves the hardenability of steel and contributes to improving strength. When spot welding is performed by stacking only steel plates with a C content of 0.3% or less, it is possible to ensure joint strength without applying the resistance spot welding method according to the present disclosure, so in the resistance spot welding method according to the present disclosure, the C content of at least one steel plate is made to be more than 0.30%. It is preferably 0.31% or more, more preferably 0.33% or more, and even more preferably 0.35% or more.
However, if the C content exceeds 0.70%, the toughness is too low and even if the resistance spot welding method according to the present disclosure is applied, only a low CTS is still obtained, so the C content is set to 0.70% or less, preferably 0.55% or less, and more preferably 0.48% or less.

図5は、鋼板の炭素量を変化させて単通電によってスポット溶接した場合のCTS(単通電CTS)と下記条件によってスポット溶接した場合のCTS(本発明通常条件CTS)を比較したグラフである。
第1通電工程/I:6800A、t:500ms
第1無通電工程/tc1:70ms
第2通電工程/I:5800A、t:250ms
第2無通電工程/tc2:700ms
第3通電工程/I:4000A、t:1300ms
FIG. 5 is a graph comparing the CTS when the carbon content of steel sheets is changed and spot welded by a single current (single current CTS) with the CTS when spot welding is performed under the following conditions (normal condition CTS of the present invention).
First energization step/I 1 : 6800A, t 1 : 500ms
1st non-current process/t c1 : 70ms
Second energization process/I 2 : 5800A, t 2 : 250ms
2nd non-current process/t c2 : 700ms
Third energization step/I 3 : 4000A, t 3 : 1300ms

また、図6は、単通電によってスポット溶接した場合のCTS(単通電CTS)に対して、本開示による通電によってスポット溶接した場合のCTS(本発明通常条件CTS)について、下記式によって求めた上昇率を示すグラフである。
上昇率[%]=[(本発明通常条件CTS-単通電CTS)/単通電CTS]×100[%]
FIG. 6 is a graph showing the rate of increase, calculated by the following formula, of the CTS when spot welding is performed by current application according to the present disclosure (invention normal condition CTS) relative to the CTS when spot welding is performed by single current application (single current CTS).
Rise rate [%] = [(normal condition CTS of the present invention - single current CTS) / single current CTS] x 100 [%]

図5及び図6に示されるように、C含有量が0.3%以下では、CTSの向上代が少なく(図6)、0.70%を超えるとそもそものCTSがかなり低くなってしまう(図5)。そのため、C含有量が0.3%超~0.7%の鋼板を含む板組に対して特定の条件で3段階通電を行うことでCTSを顕著に向上させることができる。 As shown in Figures 5 and 6, when the C content is 0.3% or less, there is little improvement in CTS (Figure 6), and when it exceeds 0.70%, the CTS becomes quite low to begin with (Figure 5). Therefore, by performing three-stage current application under specific conditions on sheet assemblies that include steel sheets with a C content of more than 0.3% to 0.7%, it is possible to significantly improve the CTS.

C以外の残部は、Fe及び不純物であってもよいし、Feの一部に代えて任意成分を含んでもよい。なお、不純物とは、鉱石、スクラップ等の原材料に含まれる成分、又は、製造の過程で混入する成分が例示され、意図的に鋼板に含有させたものではない成分を指す。以下、C及びFe以外の好ましい含有量について説明する。なお、以下に説明する成分は不純物又は任意成分であり、下限値は0%であってもよいし、0%超であってもよい。 The remainder other than C may be Fe and impurities, or may contain optional components in place of a portion of Fe. Note that impurities refer to components that are not intentionally included in the steel sheet, and are exemplified by components contained in raw materials such as ores and scraps, or components that are mixed in during the manufacturing process. Below, preferred contents of components other than C and Fe are explained. Note that the components explained below are impurities or optional components, and the lower limit may be 0% or may exceed 0%.

P:0.010%未満
Pは、不純物であり、脆化を起こす元素である。P含有量が0.010%以上になると、継手強度を得ることが難しいので、上限を0.010%未満とすることが好ましい。より好ましくは0.009%以下である。
なお、P含有量は少ないほど好ましいが、P含有量を下げるほど脱Pコストが上昇する。また、本開示に係る抵抗スポット溶接方法によれば、図1に示したように、通常のP含有量である鋼板を用いた場合でも、P含有量を極めて低くした鋼板を用いて通電によってナゲットを形成した後、テンパー通電を行った場合と同等以上にCTSを向上させることができる。そのため、鋼板のP含有量を大きく下げる必要はなく、P含有量の下限値は、0.0005%であってもよい。
P: less than 0.010% P is an impurity and an element that causes embrittlement. If the P content is 0.010% or more, it is difficult to obtain sufficient joint strength, so the upper limit is preferably set to less than 0.010%, and more preferably to 0.009% or less.
It should be noted that the lower the P content, the more preferable it is, but the lower the P content, the higher the dephosphorization cost. According to the resistance spot welding method of the present disclosure, as shown in Fig. 1, even when a steel sheet with a normal P content is used, the CTS can be improved to be equal to or higher than that when a nugget is formed by current application using a steel sheet with an extremely low P content, and then current application for tempering is performed. Therefore, it is not necessary to significantly lower the P content of the steel sheet, and the lower limit of the P content may be 0.0005%.

S:0.0100%以下
Sは、Pと同様に、不純物であり脆化を起こす元素である。また、Sは、鋼中で粗大なMnSを形成し、鋼の加工性を低下させるとともに継手強度も低下させる元素である。S含有量が0.0100%を超えると、所要の継手強度を得ることが難しく、また、鋼の加工性が低下するので、0.0100%以下とすることが望ましい。
なお、S含有量は少ないほど好ましいが、Pと同様の観点から、鋼板のS含有量の下限値は、0.0003%であってもよい。
S: 0.0100% or less S, like P, is an impurity and an element that causes embrittlement. In addition, S forms coarse MnS in steel, which reduces the workability of steel and also reduces joint strength. If the S content exceeds 0.0100%, it is difficult to obtain the required joint strength, and the workability of steel decreases, so it is preferable to keep the S content at 0.0100% or less.
In addition, the smaller the S content, the more preferable. From the same viewpoint as for P, the lower limit of the S content of the steel sheet may be 0.0003%.

Si:0.10%超
Siは、固溶強化により、鋼の強度を高める元素である。Si含有量が0.10%以下であると継手強度が低下してしまうため下限を0.10%超とすることが好ましい。より好ましくは0.80%超である。
一方、Si含有量が高過ぎると、加工性が低下するとともに継手強度も低下するので、上限を3.5%又は3.0%としてもよい。
Si: More than 0.10% Si is an element that increases the strength of steel by solid solution strengthening. If the Si content is 0.10% or less, the joint strength decreases, so the lower limit is preferably more than 0.10%. More preferably, it is more than 0.80%.
On the other hand, if the Si content is too high, the workability and the joint strength decrease, so the upper limit may be set to 3.5% or 3.0%.

Mn:15.00%以下
Mnは、鋼の強度を高める元素である。Mn含有量が15.00%を超えると、加工性が劣化するとともに継手強度も低下するので、上限を15.00%とすることが好ましい。鋼板の強度と加工性および継手強度をバランスよく確保するには、0.5~7.5%がより好ましい。さらに好ましくは、1.0~2.5%である。
Mn: 15.00% or less Mn is an element that increases the strength of steel. If the Mn content exceeds 15.00%, the workability and joint strength are deteriorated, so the upper limit is preferably set to 15.00%. In order to ensure a good balance between the strength, workability, and joint strength of the steel plate, 0.5 to 7.5% is more preferable. The content is further preferably 1.0 to 2.5%.

Al:3.00%以下
Alは、脱酸作用をなす元素であり、また、フェライトを安定化し、セメンタイトの析出を抑制する元素である。Alは、脱酸、及び、鋼組織の制御のため含有させるが、Alは酸化し易く、Al含有量が3.00%を超えると、介在物が増加して加工性が低下するとともに継手強度も低下するので、3.00%以下とすることが好ましい。加工性を確保する点で、より好ましい上限は1.2%である。
Al: 3.00% or less Al is an element that has a deoxidizing effect, stabilizes ferrite, and suppresses the precipitation of cementite. Al is contained for deoxidization and to control the steel structure, but Al is easily oxidized, and if the Al content exceeds 3.00%, inclusions increase, and the workability and joint strength decrease, so it is preferable to set the Al content at 3.00% or less. In terms of ensuring workability, a more preferable upper limit is 1.2%.

N:0.0100%以下
Nは、鋼板の強度を高める元素であるが、鋼中で粗大な窒化物を形成し、鋼の成形性を劣化させる作用をなす元素である。N含有量が0.0100%を超えると、鋼の成形性の劣化、継手強度の低下が顕著となるので、0.0100%以下とすることが望ましい。
なお、鋼板の清浄度を高める観点から、Nは、ゼロ%であってもよい。Nを低減する生産コストの観点から下限値は、0.0001%であってもよい。
N: 0.0100% or less N is an element that increases the strength of steel plate, but also forms coarse nitrides in steel, which acts to deteriorate the formability of steel. If the N content exceeds 0.0100%, the deterioration of the formability of steel and the decrease in joint strength become significant, so it is preferable to keep the N content at 0.0100% or less.
From the viewpoint of increasing the cleanliness of the steel sheet, the N content may be 0%. From the viewpoint of reducing the production cost of N, the lower limit may be 0.0001%.

Ti:0.30%以下
Tiは、析出物を形成し、鋼板組織を細粒とする元素であり、含有してもよい。含有効果を得るため、0.001%以上含有することが好ましい。より好ましくは0.01%以上である。一方、過剰に含有すると、製造性が低下し、加工時に割れが生じるだけでなく継手強度の低下も起こすので、0.30%を上限とすることが好ましく、より好ましくは0.20%以下である。
Ti: 0.30% or less Ti is an element that forms precipitates and makes the steel sheet structure fine-grained, and may be contained. In order to obtain the effect of containing, it is preferable to contain 0.001% or more. More preferably, it is 0.01% or more. On the other hand, if it is contained excessively, not only the manufacturability is reduced, cracks are generated during processing, but also the joint strength is reduced, so that the upper limit is preferably 0.30%, and more preferably 0.20% or less.

Nb:0.30%以下
Nbは、微細な炭窒化物を形成し結晶粒の粗大化を抑制する元素であり、含有してもよい。含有効果を得るため、0.001%以上含有することが好ましい。より好ましくは0.01%以上である。過剰に含有すると、靭性を阻害し製造困難になるだけでなく継手強度低下を引き起こすため、上限を0.30%とすることが好ましく、より好ましくは0.20%以下である。
Nb: 0.30% or less Nb is an element that forms fine carbonitrides and suppresses the coarsening of crystal grains, and may be contained. In order to obtain the effect of containing, it is preferable to contain 0.001% or more. More preferably, it is 0.01% or more. If contained excessively, it not only inhibits toughness and makes manufacturing difficult, but also causes a decrease in joint strength, so the upper limit is preferably 0.30%, and more preferably 0.20% or less.

V:0.30%以下
Vは、微細な炭窒化物を形成し結晶粒の粗大化を抑制する元素であり、含有してもよい。含有効果を得るため、0.001%以上含有することが好ましい。より好ましくは0.03%以上である。過剰に含有すると、靭性を阻害し製造困難になるだけでなく継手強度低下を引き起こすため、上限を0.30%とすることが好ましく、より好ましくは0.25%以下である。
V: 0.30% or less V is an element that forms fine carbonitrides and suppresses the coarsening of crystal grains, and may be contained. In order to obtain the effect of containing V, it is preferable to contain 0.001% or more. More preferably, it is 0.03% or more. If contained excessively, it not only inhibits toughness and makes manufacturing difficult, but also causes a decrease in joint strength, so the upper limit is preferably set to 0.30%, and more preferably 0.25% or less.

Cr:5.00%以下
Mo:2.00%以下
Cr及びMoは、鋼の強度の向上に寄与する元素であり、含有してもよい。含有効果を得るため、それぞれ0.001%以上含有することが好ましい。より好ましくは 0.05%以上である。ただし、Cr含有量が5.00%を超え、又はMo含有量が2.00%を超えると、酸洗時や熱間加工時に支障が生じることがあるだけでなく継手強度の低下を招くので、Cr含有量の上限は5.00%とすることが好ましく、Mo含有量の上限は2.00%とすることが好ましい。
Cr: 5.00% or less Mo: 2.00% or less Cr and Mo are elements that contribute to improving the strength of steel, and may be contained. In order to obtain the effect of containing them, it is preferable to contain them at 0.001% or more, respectively. More preferably, it is 0.05% or more. However, if the Cr content exceeds 5.00% or the Mo content exceeds 2.00%, not only may problems occur during pickling or hot working, but also the strength of the joint may decrease, so the upper limit of the Cr content is preferably 5.00% and the upper limit of the Mo content is preferably 2.00%.

Cu:2.00%以下
Ni:10.00%以下
Cu及びNiは、鋼の強度の向上に寄与する元素であり、含有してもよい。含有効果を得るため、それぞれ0.001%以上含有することが好ましい。より好ましくは 0.10%以上である。ただし、Cu含有量が2.00%を超え、Ni含有量が10.00%を超えると、酸洗時や熱間加工時に支障が生じることがあるだけでなく継手強度の低下を招くことがあるので、Cu含有量の上限は2.00%とすることが好ましく、Ni含有量の上限は10.00%とすることが好ましい。
Cu: 2.00% or less Ni: 10.00% or less Cu and Ni are elements that contribute to improving the strength of steel and may be contained. In order to obtain the effect of containing them, it is preferable to contain them at 0.001% or more, respectively. More preferably, it is 0.10% or more. However, if the Cu content exceeds 2.00% and the Ni content exceeds 10.00%, not only may problems occur during pickling and hot working, but also the joint strength may be reduced, so the upper limit of the Cu content is preferably 2.00% and the upper limit of the Ni content is preferably 10.00%.

Ca:0.0030%以下
REM:0.050%以下
Mg:0.05%以下
Zr:0.05%以下
Ca、REM(rare earth metal)、Mg、及びZrは、脱酸後の酸化物や、熱間圧延鋼板中に存在する硫化物を微細化し、成形性の向上に寄与する元素であり、含有してもよい。ただし、Caの含有量が0.0030%を超え、REMの含有量が0.050%を超え、Mg、又はZrの各含有量が0.05%を超えると、鋼の加工性が低下する。そのため、Ca含有量の上限を0.0030%とし、REM含有量の上限を0.050%とし、Mg、及びZrの各含有量の上限を0.05%とすることが好ましい。
なお、含有効果を得るため、Ca含有量は0.0005%以上、REMは0.001%以上、Mgは0.001%以上、Zrは0.001%以上とすることが好ましい。
Ca: 0.0030% or less REM: 0.050% or less Mg: 0.05% or less Zr: 0.05% or less Ca, REM (rare earth metal), Mg, and Zr are elements that refine oxides after deoxidation and sulfides present in hot-rolled steel sheets, and contribute to improving formability, and may be contained. However, if the Ca content exceeds 0.0030%, the REM content exceeds 0.050%, and each of the Mg and Zr contents exceeds 0.05%, the workability of the steel decreases. Therefore, it is preferable to set the upper limit of the Ca content to 0.0030%, the upper limit of the REM content to 0.050%, and the upper limit of each of the Mg and Zr contents to 0.05%.
In order to obtain the effects of each of these elements, it is preferable that the Ca content be 0.0005% or more, the REM content be 0.001% or more, the Mg content be 0.001% or more, and the Zr content be 0.001% or more.

なお、「REM」とはSc、Y、及びランタノイドの合計17元素の総称であり、REMの含有量はREMのうちの1種又は2種以上の元素の合計含有量を指す。また、REMについては一般的にミッシュメタルに含有される。このため、例えば、REMは、REMの合計含有量が上記の範囲となるように、ミッシュメタルの形で含有させてもよい。 Note that "REM" is a general term for Sc, Y, and lanthanides, a total of 17 elements, and the REM content refers to the total content of one or more REM elements. REM is generally contained in misch metal. For this reason, for example, REM may be contained in the form of misch metal so that the total REM content falls within the above range.

B:0.0200%以下
Bは、粒界に偏析して粒界強度を高める元素であり、含有してもよい。含有効果を得るため、0.0001%以上含有することが好ましく、より好ましくは0.0008%以上である。一方、過剰に含有すると靭性を阻害し製造困難になるだけでなく継手強度の低下を引き起こすため、上限を0.0200%とすることが好ましく、より好ましくは0.010%以下である。
B: 0.0200% or less B is an element that segregates at grain boundaries to increase grain boundary strength, and may be contained. In order to obtain the effect of containing B, it is preferable to contain 0.0001% or more, and more preferably 0.0008% or more. On the other hand, if it is contained excessively, it not only inhibits toughness and makes manufacturing difficult, but also causes a decrease in joint strength, so that the upper limit is preferably set to 0.0200%, and more preferably 0.010% or less.

本開示に係る抵抗スポット溶接方法では、2枚以上の鋼板を重ね合わせた板組のうち、少なくとも1枚の鋼板は、質量%で、C含有量が、0.30%超、0.70%以下であり、好ましくは上述した元素から所望の元素を選択し、上述した範囲内の組成を有する鋼板を用いる。
鋼板成分として、
C:0.30%超~0.70%、
Si:0.10%超、
Mn:15.00%以下、
P:0.010%未満、
S:0.0100%以下、
Al:3.00%以下、及び
N:0.0100%以下、を含み、
残部が鉄(Fe)および不純物からなる鋼板であってもよい。
上記成分組成の鋼板が、上記鉄(Fe)の一部に代えて、
Ti:0.30%以下、
Nb:0.30%以下、
V:0.30%以下、
Cr:5.00%以下、
Mo:2.00%以下、
Cu:2.00%以下、
Ni:10.00%以下、
Ca:0.0030%以下、
REM:0.050%以下、
Mg:0.05%以下、
Zr:0.05%以下、及び
B:0.0200%以下
の群から1種または2種以上の元素を含有してもよい。
板組を構成する全ての鋼板のC含有量が0.30%超、0.70%以下でもよいし、板組のうち一部の鋼板は、C含有量が0.30%以下又は0.70%超でもよい。
In the resistance spot welding method according to the present disclosure, of a sheet set in which two or more steel sheets are overlapped, at least one steel sheet has a C content, in mass%, of more than 0.30% and not more than 0.70%, and preferably a steel sheet having a composition within the above-mentioned range by selecting desired elements from the elements described above is used.
As steel sheet components,
C: more than 0.30% to 0.70%,
Si: more than 0.10%,
Mn: 15.00% or less,
P: less than 0.010%;
S: 0.0100% or less,
Al: 3.00% or less, and N: 0.0100% or less;
The balance of the steel plate may be iron (Fe) and impurities.
The steel sheet having the above-mentioned composition contains, in place of a part of the iron (Fe),
Ti: 0.30% or less,
Nb: 0.30% or less,
V: 0.30% or less,
Cr: 5.00% or less,
Mo: 2.00% or less,
Cu: 2.00% or less,
Ni: 10.00% or less,
Ca: 0.0030% or less,
REM: 0.050% or less,
Mg: 0.05% or less,
One or more elements selected from the group consisting of Zr: 0.05% or less and B: 0.0200% or less may be contained.
The C content of all of the steel plates constituting the sheet assembly may be more than 0.30% and 0.70% or less, or the C content of some of the steel plates in the sheet assembly may be 0.30% or less or more than 0.70%.

板組を構成する鋼板の板厚は特に限定されないが、例えば、0.5~3.5mmの板厚が挙げられる。
また、板組の総厚tも特に限定されないが、例えば、1.5~8.0mmが挙げられる。
The thickness of the steel plates constituting the plate assembly is not particularly limited, but may be, for example, 0.5 to 3.5 mm.
The total thickness t of the plate assembly is not particularly limited, but may be, for example, 1.5 to 8.0 mm.

[第1無通電工程]
第1通電工程後、16ms以上200ms以下の時間tc1を無通電とする。
無通電時間tc1が16ms未満では第2通電工程の前にナゲット端部が凝固しないおそれがある。一方、無通電時間tc1が200msを超えると、第2通電工程の前にナゲット端部が固まり過ぎるおそれがある。
ナゲット端部の凝固が不足した状態又は過度に凝固した状態での後通電(第2通電工程)を避け、ナゲット端部の凝固を適切に進めるために、第1通電工程後の無通電時間tc1は、16ms以上200ms以下とし、25ms以上160ms以下とすることが好ましく、30ms以上150ms以下とすることがより好ましい。
[First non-energized step]
After the first current application step, a time tc1 of 16 ms or more and 200 ms or less is set as a non-current application period.
If the current-free time tc1 is less than 16 ms, the nugget edge may not solidify before the second current-passing step. On the other hand, if the current-free time tc1 is more than 200 ms, the nugget edge may solidify too much before the second current-passing step.
In order to avoid post-current application (second current application step) when the nugget end is insufficiently or excessively solidified and to properly advance solidification of the nugget end, the current-free time tc1 after the first current application step is set to 16 ms or more and 200 ms or less, preferably 25 ms or more and 160 ms or less, and more preferably 30 ms or more and 150 ms or less.

[第2通電工程]
第2通電工程は、本発明者らが、鋼板のC量が0.3%超であっても、CTSを向上させることができることを発見した、重要な工程である。ナゲット内の溶融境界付近の結晶粒を整粒化し、CTS試験において、剥離方向に負荷される応力が最も高くなる部位の靭性を向上させる効果がある。
第1無通電工程後、下記式(1)を満たす電流値I(kA)及び下記式(2)を満たす時間t(ms)で通電する。
0.6≦I/I≦1.1 ・・・(1)
50≦t≦1000 ・・・(2)
第2通電工程では第1通電工程でできた溶融境界を越えずにナゲット中央部を溶融させてナゲット端部付近に適切な熱を入れるために、第1通電工程の電流値(I)に対する比(I/I)及び通電時間(t)がそれぞれ上記の式(1)及び式(2)を満たす条件で通電を行う。
第2通電工程は、結晶粒制御熱処理に相当し、上記の式(1)及び式(2)を満たす電流値I(kA)及び時間t(ms)で通電を行うことでナゲットの結晶粒が変化し、継手強度を向上させることができる。
/Iは0.75~1.05、tは200~600が好ましい。
[Second current application process]
The second current passing step is an important step that the inventors discovered can improve the CTS even if the C content of the steel sheet exceeds 0.3%. This step has the effect of regulating the grain size of the crystal grains near the fusion boundary in the nugget and improving the toughness of the portion where the stress applied in the peeling direction is the highest in the CTS test.
After the first de-energizing step, a current is applied at a current value I 2 (kA) that satisfies the following formula (1) and for a time t 2 (ms) that satisfies the following formula (2).
0.6≦I 2 /I 1 ≦1.1 (1)
50≦ t2 ≦1000...(2)
In the second current flow process, in order to melt the center of the nugget without crossing the fusion boundary created in the first current flow process and to supply appropriate heat near the end of the nugget, current is passed under conditions such that the ratio ( I2 / I1 ) to the current value ( I1 ) in the first current flow process and the current flow time ( t2 ) satisfy the above equations (1) and (2), respectively.
The second current flow process corresponds to a grain control heat treatment, and by passing a current I2 (kA) and a time t2 (ms) that satisfy the above formulas (1) and (2), the grains of the nugget are changed, thereby improving the joint strength.
It is preferable that I 2 /I 1 is 0.75 to 1.05, and t 2 is 200 to 600.

[第2無通電工程]
第2通電工程後、下記式(3)及び下記式(4)を満たす時間tc2(ms)を無通電とする。
3.5×10-3×Ms-3.3×Ms+1100<tc2≦9000 ・・・(3)
Ms(℃)=561-474×[C]-33×[Mn]-17×[Ni]-17×[Cr]-21×[Mo] ・・・(4)
式(3)におけるMsは、式(4)において[元素名]内に板組を構成する鋼板に含まれる各元素の質量%を代入して算出されるMs点を意味する。但し、板組を構成する少なくとも2枚の鋼板の組成が異なる場合は、板厚を考慮し、板組を構成する全ての鋼板について式(4)により鋼板ごとに算出したMs点に、それぞれ板組の総厚(全体の厚み)に対する各鋼板の板厚比を乗じた値の加重平均のMs点を式(3)に代入する。なお、式(4)における元素のうち、鋼板に含まれない元素についてはゼロを代入する。
[Second non-energized step]
After the second current application step, a time t c2 (ms) that satisfies the following formula (3) and the following formula (4) is set as a no-current application time.
3.5×10 −3 ×Ms 2 −3.3×Ms+1100<t c2 ≦9000 (3)
Ms(℃)=561-474×[C]-33×[Mn]-17×[Ni]-17×[Cr]-21×[Mo]...(4)
Ms in formula (3) means the Ms point calculated by substituting the mass% of each element contained in the steel plate constituting the plate assembly in [element name] in formula (4). However, when at least two steel plates constituting the plate assembly have different compositions, the plate thickness is taken into consideration, and the weighted average Ms point of the value obtained by multiplying the Ms point calculated for each steel plate by formula (4) for all steel plates constituting the plate assembly by the plate thickness ratio of each steel plate to the total thickness (total thickness) of the plate assembly is substituted into formula (3). Note that, for elements in formula (4) that are not contained in the steel plate, zero is substituted.

例えば、互いに組成が異なる3枚の鋼板α、β、γを重ね合わせた板組をスポット溶接する場合、各鋼板の組成から式(4)によって算出されるMs点(℃)をそれぞれMsα、Msβ、Msγ、各鋼板の板厚(mm)をそれぞれtα、tβ、tγ、板組の総厚をtとすると、この板組における各鋼板の板厚を考慮した加重平均のMs点(Msave)は以下のように算出される。
Msave=Msα×(tα/t)+Msβ×(tβ/t)+Msγ×(tγ/t)
For example, when spot welding a sheet assembly consisting of three overlapping steel plates α, β, and γ with different compositions, if the Ms point (°C) calculated from the composition of each steel plate using formula (4) is Ms α , Ms β , Ms γ , the sheet thicknesses (mm) of each steel plate are t α , t β , t γ , and the total thickness of the sheet assembly is t, the weighted average Ms point (Ms ave ) taking into account the sheet thicknesses of each steel plate in this sheet assembly is calculated as follows:
Ms ave = Ms α × (t α /t) + Ms β × (t β /t) + Ms γ × (t γ /t)

第2無通電工程では、次の第3通電工程においてナゲットおよびHAZの焼き戻しをするために溶接部全体の温度がMs点以下になる必要がある。よって、鋼の成分によって必要な時間が変わる。Ms点を上記式(4)で求めて溶接部全体の温度がMs点以下となるのに必要な時間を計算したところ、3.5×10-3×Ms-3.3×Ms+1100<tc2とする必要がある。
ただし、第2無通電時間tc2が9000msを超えると、十字引張における疲労強度が低下する場合がある。この理由として、第2無通電時間tc2に続く第3通電工程があるものの、溶接部に残留応力が強く残ってしまうことが考えられる。そのため、第2無通電時間tc2は9000ms以下である必要がある。
In the second non-energizing step, the temperature of the entire weld needs to be equal to or lower than the Ms point in order to temper the nugget and HAZ in the following third energizing step. Therefore, the required time varies depending on the steel composition. When the Ms point was found using the above formula (4) and the time required for the temperature of the entire weld to be equal to or lower than the Ms point was calculated, it was found that 3.5×10 −3 ×Ms 2 −3.3×Ms + 1100<t c2 was required.
However, if the second non-current-passing time tc2 exceeds 9000 ms, the fatigue strength in cross tension may decrease. The reason for this is thought to be that strong residual stress remains in the welded portion, even though there is a third current-passing step following the second non-current-passing time tc2 . Therefore, the second non-current-passing time tc2 needs to be 9000 ms or less.

[第3通電工程]
第2無通電工程後、下記式(5)を満たす電流値I(kA)及び下記式(6)を満たす時間t(ms)で通電する。
0.4≦I/I≦1.0 ・・・(5)
200≦t ・・・(6)
第3通電工程は、テンパー熱処理に相当し、電流値I及び通電時間tはMs点以下までに冷やされたナゲットを適切な焼戻し温度まで再加熱できればよい。実験の結果、第3通電工程の電流値(I)では、第1通電工程の電流値(I)に対する比(I/I)及び通電時間(t)が、それぞれ式(5)及び式(6)を満たす条件で通電することで、靭性を向上させることができる。
なお、第3通電工程における通電時間が長過ぎると生産性を落としてしまうため、5000ms以下とすることが好ましい。また、第3通電工程後にダウンスロープを設けてもよい。ダウンスロープにより、液体金属脆性の割れ低減、ブローホール低減、遅れ破壊の抑制の効果により溶接部の特性がさらに向上する。なお、ダウンスロープ通電を行う場合、ダウンスロープの開始時の電流値を第3通電工程における電流値I(kA)とし、第三通電工程の通電時間t(ms)にはダウンスロープにかかる時間を含めない。
第3通電工程の後は、加圧だけで通電しない、いわゆる保持時間を設けることが液体金属脆性の割れ抑制のために好ましい。保持時間は5cycle(50Hz)以上が望ましい。
[Third current application process]
After the second de-energizing step, a current is applied at a current value I 3 (kA) that satisfies the following formula (5) and for a time t 3 (ms) that satisfies the following formula (6).
0.4≦I 3 /I 1 ≦1.0 (5)
200≦t 3 ...(6)
The third current passing step corresponds to a tempering heat treatment, and the current value I3 and current passing time t3 may be set so as to reheat the nugget cooled to the Ms point or below to an appropriate tempering temperature. Experimental results have shown that the toughness can be improved by passing the current ( I3 ) in the third current passing step under conditions where the ratio ( I3 / I1 ) to the current value ( I1 ) in the first current passing step and the current passing time ( t3 ) satisfy the formulas (5) and (6), respectively.
If the current flow time in the third current flow step is too long, productivity will decrease, so it is preferable to set the current flow time to 5000 ms or less. A downslope may be provided after the third current flow step. The downslope further improves the characteristics of the welded portion by reducing cracking due to liquid metal embrittlement, reducing blowholes, and suppressing delayed fracture. When downslope current flow is performed, the current value at the start of the downslope is set to the current value I3 (kA) in the third current flow step, and the current flow time t3 (ms) of the third current flow step does not include the time required for the downslope.
After the third current application step, it is preferable to provide a so-called holding time during which pressure is applied but no current is applied in order to prevent cracking due to liquid metal embrittlement. The holding time is preferably 5 cycles (50 Hz) or more.

C含有量が、0.30%超、0.70%以下である少なくとも1枚の鋼板を含む2枚以上の鋼板を重ね合わせた板組に対し、上述した各工程からなる抵抗スポット溶接を行うことで、単通電で抵抗スポット溶接を行った場合に比べてCTSを大幅に向上させることができる。また、上記板組では単通電ではナゲット硬さに見合うTSS(引張せん断強さ)が得られない場合がある。本発明によれば、溶接部の靱性向上作用によりTSSも向上させることが可能である。さらに、溶接部の靭性向上と軟化の作用により、スポット溶接部の耐遅れ破壊特性も向上させることが可能である。
このような本開示に係る抵抗スポット溶接方法を適用する分野は特に限定されないが、例えば、車体の組立や部品の取付け等の工程に特に有効と考えられる。
By performing resistance spot welding consisting of the above-mentioned steps on a sheet assembly in which two or more steel sheets are overlapped, including at least one steel sheet having a C content of more than 0.30% and 0.70% or less, the CTS can be significantly improved compared to the case of performing resistance spot welding with a single current. In addition, in the sheet assembly, a TSS (tensile shear strength) that matches the nugget hardness may not be obtained with a single current. According to the present invention, the TSS can also be improved by improving the toughness of the welded portion. Furthermore, the delayed fracture resistance of the spot welded portion can also be improved by improving the toughness and softening the welded portion.
The field of application of the resistance spot welding method according to the present disclosure is not particularly limited, but it is believed to be particularly effective in processes such as vehicle body assembly and part installation.

以下、実施例によって本開示に係る抵抗スポット溶接方法及び継手の製造方法について説明する。尚、本開示に係る抵抗スポット溶接方法及び継手の製造方法はこれらの実施例に限定されるものではない。 The resistance spot welding method and joint manufacturing method according to the present disclosure will be described below using examples. Note that the resistance spot welding method and joint manufacturing method according to the present disclosure are not limited to these examples.

表1に示す組成を有する鋼板を用意し、表2に示す条件(板組、加圧力、通電条件など)で抵抗スポット溶接を行った。
表1において、P、S、Nは意図的に添加しなくても、成分分析は実施した。また、「<0.0002%」のように不等号による表記は、分析下限値未満であることを意味する。その他の元素は、意図的に添加しない場合、「-」を記載し、成分分析を実施していない。残部は、Fe及び不純物である。また、表1において、鋼板のC含有量が0.30%以下又は0.70%を超える値には下線を付した。なお、鋼板r及び鋼板sは、C含有量が0.30%以下であるが、鋼板のC含有量が0.30%超、0.70%以下の鋼板と組み合わせる発明例の板組に用いるために用意したものであり、下線は付していない。
Steel sheets having the compositions shown in Table 1 were prepared, and resistance spot welding was performed under the conditions shown in Table 2 (sheet assembly, pressure, current conditions, etc.).
In Table 1, even if P, S, and N were not intentionally added, the composition analysis was performed. Moreover, notations using inequality signs such as "<0.0002%" mean that the content is less than the analytical lower limit. If other elements are not intentionally added, "-" is written and the composition analysis was not performed. The balance is Fe and impurities. Moreover, in Table 1, values in which the C content of the steel plate is 0.30% or less or exceeds 0.70% are underlined. Note that steel plate r and steel plate s have a C content of 0.30% or less, but are prepared for use in the sheet assembly of the invention example in which the steel plate is combined with a steel plate having a C content of more than 0.30% and 0.70% or less, and are not underlined.

表2における下線は、本開示の要件を満たさないことを意味する。また、「式(3)の左辺」とは、「3.5×10-3×Ms-3.3×Ms+1100」によって算出される値を意味し、「単通電CTS」は、通電条件のうち第1通電(I,t)のみでサンプルを作製した場合のCTSを意味する。
この単通電CTSと比較して上昇率を取り、10%を超えるものを継手強度の向上効果があるものと判断した。
上昇率[%]=[(本開示の通電条件でのCTS-単通電のCTS)/単通電のCTS]×100
表2に示す条件のほか、No.43では第1通電工程の前に500msのアップスロープ通電を行い、また、No.44では第1通電工程の前に、電流6.7kA、通電時間500msのプレ通電を行った。
The underlines in Table 2 indicate that the requirements of the present disclosure are not met. Additionally, the "left side of formula (3)" refers to the value calculated by "3.5×10 −3 ×Ms 2 −3.3×Ms+1100," and the "single-current CTS" refers to the CTS when a sample is produced under only the first current flow (I 1 , t 1 ) among the current flow conditions.
The rate of increase was compared with the single current CTS, and any increase exceeding 10% was determined to have an effect of improving joint strength.
Rise rate [%]=[(CTS under the current-carrying conditions of the present disclosure−CTS with single current-carrying)/CTS with single current-carrying]×100
In addition to the conditions shown in Table 2, in No. 43, upslope current was applied for 500 ms before the first current application step, and in No. 44, pre-current was applied with a current of 6.7 kA for a current application time of 500 ms before the first current application step.


No.1、3~6、8~19、32~44では、少なくとも1枚の鋼板のC含有量が質量%で0.30%超0.70%以下である板組に対し、本開示の条件を満たす抵抗スポット溶接を行っており、いずれも単通電による抵抗スポット溶接を行った場合に比べ、CTSの上昇率が10%を超えていた。
一方、No.2、7、20~31では、本開示の条件を満たさないため、単通電による抵抗スポット溶接を行った場合に比べ、CTSの上昇率が10%に満たず、むしろCTSが低下したものもあった。
In Nos. 1, 3 to 6, 8 to 19, and 32 to 44, resistance spot welding satisfying the conditions of the present disclosure was performed on sheet assemblies in which the C content of at least one steel sheet was more than 0.30% and not more than 0.70% by mass, and in all cases, the increase rate of CTS exceeded 10% compared to the case of resistance spot welding using a single current.
On the other hand, in Nos. 2, 7, and 20 to 31, which do not satisfy the conditions of the present disclosure, the increase rate of CTS was less than 10% compared to the case where resistance spot welding was performed by single current, and in some cases the CTS actually decreased.

1A、1B 鋼板
2A、2B 電極
13 ナゲット
14 熱影響部(HAZ)
1A, 1B Steel plate 2A, 2B Electrode 13 Nugget 14 Heat affected zone (HAZ)

Claims (6)

質量%で、C含有量が、0.30%超、0.70%以下である少なくとも1枚の鋼板を含む2枚以上の鋼板を重ね合わせた板組を、一対の電極で板厚方向に挟み込んで加圧しながら電流値I(kA)で通電してナゲットを形成する第1通電工程と、
前記第1通電工程後、16ms以上200ms以下の時間tc1を無通電とする第1無通電工程と、
前記第1無通電工程後、下記式(1)を満たす電流値I(kA)及び下記式(2)を満たす時間t(ms)で通電する第2通電工程と、
0.6≦I/I≦1.1 ・・・(1)
50≦t≦1000 ・・・(2)
前記第2通電工程後、下記式(3)及び下記式(4)を満たす時間tc2(ms)を無通電とする第2無通電工程と、
3.5×10-3×Ms-3.3×Ms+1100<tc2≦9000 ・・・(3)
Ms(℃)=561-474×[C]-33×[Mn]-17×[Ni]-17×[Cr]-21×[Mo] ・・・(4)
前記第2無通電工程後、下記式(5)を満たす電流値I(kA)及び下記式(6)を満たす時間t(ms)で通電する第3通電工程と、
0.4≦I/I≦1.0 ・・・(5)
200≦t ・・・(6)
を連続して行う、抵抗スポット溶接方法。
前記式(3)におけるMsは、前記式(4)において[元素名]内に前記板組を構成する鋼板に含まれる各元素の質量%を代入して算出されるMs点を意味する。但し、前記板組を構成する少なくとも2枚の鋼板の組成が異なる場合は、前記板組を構成する全ての鋼板について前記式(4)により鋼板ごとに算出したMs点に、それぞれ前記板組の総厚に対する各鋼板の板厚比を乗じた値の加重平均のMs点を式(3)に代入する。
a first current application step of forming a nugget by sandwiching a sheet set of two or more steel sheets, including at least one steel sheet having a C content, in mass%, of more than 0.30% and not more than 0.70%, between a pair of electrodes in a sheet thickness direction and applying pressure thereto while passing a current I1 (kA);
a first de-energization step in which, after the first energization step, no current is applied for a time tc1 of 16 ms or more and 200 ms or less;
a second current-passing step of passing a current at a current value I2 (kA) that satisfies the following formula (1) and for a time t2 (ms) that satisfies the following formula (2) after the first current-passing step;
0.6≦I 2 /I 1 ≦1.1 (1)
50≦ t2 ≦1000...(2)
a second de-energization step in which, after the second energization step, no current is applied for a time t c2 (ms) that satisfies the following formula (3) and the following formula (4);
3.5×10 −3 ×Ms 2 −3.3×Ms+1100<t c2 ≦9000 (3)
Ms(℃)=561-474×[C]-33×[Mn]-17×[Ni]-17×[Cr]-21×[Mo]...(4)
a third current-passing step in which, after the second current-passing step, a current is passed at a current value I 3 (kA) that satisfies the following formula (5) and for a time t 3 (ms) that satisfies the following formula (6);
0.4≦I 3 /I 1 ≦1.0 (5)
200≦t 3 ...(6)
A resistance spot welding method in which the above steps are performed continuously.
The Ms in the formula (3) means the Ms point calculated by substituting the mass% of each element contained in the steel plates constituting the plate assembly into [name of element] in the formula (4). However, when at least two steel plates constituting the plate assembly have different compositions, the Ms point calculated for each steel plate by the formula (4) for all steel plates constituting the plate assembly is multiplied by the plate thickness ratio of each steel plate to the total thickness of the plate assembly, and the weighted average Ms point is substituted into the formula (3).
前記板組のうち、前記少なくとも1枚の鋼板は、質量%で、
P含有量が0.010%未満である、
請求項1に記載の抵抗スポット溶接方法。
Of the plate set, the at least one steel plate comprises, in mass%,
The P content is less than 0.010%.
2. The resistance spot welding method of claim 1.
前記板組のうち、前記少なくとも1枚の鋼板は、質量%で、
P含有量が0.010%未満、
S含有量が0.0100%以下、
である
請求項1に記載の抵抗スポット溶接方法。
Of the plate set, the at least one steel plate comprises, in mass%,
P content is less than 0.010%;
S content is 0.0100% or less,
The resistance spot welding method according to claim 1 .
前記板組のうち、前記少なくとも1枚の鋼板は、質量%で、
Si含有量が0.10%超、
P含有量が0.010%未満、
S含有量が0.0100%以下、
である
請求項1に記載の抵抗スポット溶接方法。
Of the plate set, the at least one steel plate comprises, in mass%,
The Si content is more than 0.10%,
P content is less than 0.010%;
S content is 0.0100% or less,
The resistance spot welding method according to claim 1 .
前記板組のうち、前記少なくとも1枚の鋼板は、質量%で、
Si含有量が0.10%超、
Mn含有量が15.00%以下、
P含有量が0.010%未満、
S含有量が0.0100%以下、
である
請求項1に記載の抵抗スポット溶接方法。
Of the plate set, the at least one steel plate comprises, in mass%,
The Si content is more than 0.10%,
Mn content is 15.00% or less,
P content is less than 0.010%;
S content is 0.0100% or less,
The resistance spot welding method according to claim 1 .
請求項1~請求項5のいずれか1項に記載の抵抗スポット溶接方法を用いた継手の製造方法。 A method for manufacturing a joint using the resistance spot welding method described in any one of claims 1 to 5.
JP2021053809A 2020-03-26 2021-03-26 Resistance spot welding method and manufacturing method for joint Active JP7587150B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2020056589 2020-03-26
JP2020056589 2020-03-26

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2021154390A JP2021154390A (en) 2021-10-07
JP7587150B2 true JP7587150B2 (en) 2024-11-20

Family

ID=77916564

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2021053809A Active JP7587150B2 (en) 2020-03-26 2021-03-26 Resistance spot welding method and manufacturing method for joint

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7587150B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2024111224A1 (en) * 2022-11-24 2024-05-30 Jfeスチール株式会社 Resistance spot welding method
EP4574324A4 (en) * 2022-11-24 2025-12-10 Jfe Steel Corp RESISTANCE SPOT WELDING PROCESS
JP7761554B2 (en) * 2022-12-19 2025-10-28 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Spot welding method and method for manufacturing welded joint

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2016055337A (en) 2014-09-11 2016-04-21 高周波熱錬株式会社 Welding method and welded structure
JP2016068142A (en) 2014-09-30 2016-05-09 新日鐵住金株式会社 Spot welding method

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3320515B2 (en) * 1993-09-01 2002-09-03 本田技研工業株式会社 Post-treatment method for spot welding

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2016055337A (en) 2014-09-11 2016-04-21 高周波熱錬株式会社 Welding method and welded structure
JP2016068142A (en) 2014-09-30 2016-05-09 新日鐵住金株式会社 Spot welding method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2021154390A (en) 2021-10-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3736076B1 (en) Resistance spot welding method, and method for producing resistance-spot-welded joint
JP6447752B2 (en) Automotive parts having resistance welds
JP7587150B2 (en) Resistance spot welding method and manufacturing method for joint
WO2017064817A1 (en) Spot welded joint and spot welding method
JP7453600B2 (en) Spot welded joints and method for manufacturing spot welded joints
JP7468825B1 (en) Method for manufacturing resistance spot welded joints
KR101629129B1 (en) Base material for high-toughness clad steel plate and method for producing said clad steel plate
WO2023063098A1 (en) Resistance spot-welded joint and resistance spot welding method therefor
EP4574324A1 (en) Resistance spot welding method
JP7705086B2 (en) Method for manufacturing spot welded joint and spot welded joint
WO2024127866A1 (en) Resistance spot-welded joint and resistance spot welding method therefor
JP2005213566A (en) High-strength thin steel sheet excellent in workability, surface properties and plate flatness and method for producing the same
JP5549618B2 (en) High strength steel plate for spot welding with a tensile strength of 980 MPa or more
JP2009127119A (en) Resistance welded steel sheet
KR101949025B1 (en) Cold rolled steel sheet for flux cored wire and method of manufacturing the same
JP4277660B2 (en) High strength thin steel sheet for welded joints excellent in press formability and welded joint using the same
WO2023021922A1 (en) Resistance spot welding joint and resistance spot welding method therefor
JP5070866B2 (en) Hot-rolled steel sheet and spot welded member
JP4277659B2 (en) High strength thin steel sheet for welded joints excellent in press formability and welded joint using the same
JP7480929B1 (en) Resistance spot welded joint and resistance spot welding method thereof
JP2005154807A (en) High strength thin steel sheet for welded joints excellent in press formability and welded joint using the same
WO2024225343A1 (en) Projection welded joint and manufacturing method therefor
JP2023145265A (en) Spot welded joints and method for manufacturing spot welded joints
WO2024111224A1 (en) Resistance spot welding method
JPS63310939A (en) Extra low carbon steel plate having good spot weldability

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20231120

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20240730

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20240731

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20240919

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20241008

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20241021

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 7587150

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150