JP7639787B2 - Method for estimating water immersion expansion ratio of slag, steel slag for roads and reinforced roadbed material and method for manufacturing same - Google Patents
Method for estimating water immersion expansion ratio of slag, steel slag for roads and reinforced roadbed material and method for manufacturing same Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP7639787B2 JP7639787B2 JP2022112908A JP2022112908A JP7639787B2 JP 7639787 B2 JP7639787 B2 JP 7639787B2 JP 2022112908 A JP2022112908 A JP 2022112908A JP 2022112908 A JP2022112908 A JP 2022112908A JP 7639787 B2 JP7639787 B2 JP 7639787B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- slag
- water immersion
- immersion expansion
- expansion ratio
- estimated
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Road Paving Structures (AREA)
Description
本発明は、製鉄所の副産物の一つであり、道路用路盤材に用いられる製鋼スラグなどの鉄鋼スラグの水浸膨張比を推定する方法および道路用鉄鋼スラグ、さらには鉄鋼スラグを使用した強化路盤材およびその製造方法に関するものである。 The present invention relates to a method for estimating the water immersion expansion ratio of steel slag, such as steelmaking slag, which is a by-product of steelworks and is used in road base materials, and to steel slag for roads, as well as reinforced road base materials using steel slag and methods for manufacturing the same.
アスファルト舗装の路盤は、路盤の安定性や耐久性を考慮したうえで使用する材料等が選定される。路盤材として用いられる材料は、各都道府県の土木共通仕様書や舗装再生便覧等において定められており、修正CBR等の各種特性を満たすことが求められている。 Materials used for the base of an asphalt pavement are selected taking into consideration the stability and durability of the base. Materials used for base courses are specified in the common civil engineering specifications and pavement recycling handbook of each prefecture, and are required to meet various characteristics such as modified CBR.
製鉄所の副産物として生成される製鋼スラグなどの鉄鋼スラグは、道路用路盤材の材料の一つであることは周知である。製鋼スラグ中には、精錬時の石灰分が未反応で一部残存している場合がある。その石灰分は水と水和することで体積膨張する。そのため、製鋼スラグを用いた路盤材はエージング処理を実施し、膨張安定化することがJIS A 5015:2018で規定されている。また、製鋼スラグの水浸膨張比(膨張特性)はJIS A 5015:2018付属書Bに記載の道路用鉄鋼スラグの水浸膨張試験方法によって測定される。水浸膨張試験は、製鋼スラグをモールドに突固めて行う。そして、80℃の温水に6時間保持した後、放冷する。この操作を1日1回で、10日間くり返し、ダイヤルゲージによる膨張量測定値から水浸膨張比(%)を算定する。 It is well known that steel slag, such as steel slag, which is generated as a by-product of steelworks, is one of the materials for roadbed materials. In steel slag, some lime from the refining process may remain unreacted. When hydrated with water, the lime expands in volume. For this reason, JIS A 5015:2018 stipulates that roadbed materials using steel slag must be aged to stabilize the expansion. In addition, the water immersion expansion ratio (expansion characteristics) of steel slag is measured by the water immersion expansion test method for steel slag for roads described in JIS A 5015:2018 Appendix B. The water immersion expansion test is performed by compacting the steel slag into a mold. Then, the slag is kept in 80°C hot water for 6 hours and then allowed to cool. This operation is repeated once a day for 10 days, and the water immersion expansion ratio (%) is calculated from the expansion amount measured by a dial gauge.
特許文献1に開示された技術は、異なる温度で膨張させた複数の製鋼スラグの水浸膨張曲線から単位温度あたりに上昇する水浸膨張速度の倍率、測定温度、推定温度を基に推定時間を算出し、推定時間および対数変換した水浸膨張比から成る勾配で膨張特性を判定するものである。
The technology disclosed in
また、路盤材の材料として用いるにあたっては、予め、エージング等の前処理を施し、その前処理が施された製鋼スラグにセメントを添加して安定処理混合物としているのが一般的であった。ところで、製鋼スラグを含む強化路盤材は、所望の強度や充填性、締固め性等の他に、製鋼スラグの膨張に起因した逆断層型の破壊を起こさないことが求められる。そのため従来は、一律に大きな安全率を設定して過剰な前処理を行っていた。製鋼スラグの膨張をどの程度まで抑制すれば逆断層型の破壊を回避できるかについては未だ解明されていないのが現状であった。なお、ここでいう、逆断層型の破壊とは、路盤材の固結後における製鋼スラグの膨張等によって路盤に水平方向の圧縮力が働いて路盤に断層が生じ、断層の一方側の路盤が他方側の路盤の上にのし上がることにより断層近傍において路盤が隆起する現象をいう。 When steel slag is used as a roadbed material, it is common to pre-treat it by aging or other methods, and then add cement to the pre-treated steel slag to make a stabilized mixture. However, reinforced roadbed materials containing steel slag are required to have the desired strength, filling properties, compaction properties, and other properties, as well as to avoid reverse fault type failures caused by the expansion of steel slag. For this reason, in the past, excessive pre-treatment was performed by setting a large safety factor across the board. It has not yet been clarified to what extent the expansion of steel slag needs to be suppressed in order to avoid reverse fault type failures. Note that the reverse fault type failure referred to here refers to a phenomenon in which a horizontal compressive force acts on the roadbed due to the expansion of steel slag after the roadbed material solidifies, causing a fault in the roadbed, and the roadbed on one side of the fault rises above the roadbed on the other side, causing the roadbed to rise near the fault.
路盤材に関連した先行技術として、たとえば、特許文献2、3には、未固結のソイルセメントから将来の発現強度を推定する方法が提案されている。また、特許文献4には、ソイルセメントの造成現場の施工条件かに応じた所定材令の圧縮強度を推定する方法が提案されている。さらに、特許文献5には、施工現場の管理および合理化の観点からコンクリートの充填性、締固め性等を評価する方法が提案されている。
As prior art related to roadbed materials, for example,
特許文献1のように、単位温度当たりに上昇する水浸膨張速度の倍率を求めるために製鋼スラグ各種でそれぞれ様々な温度で水浸膨張試験を事前に実施する必要があり、非常に負荷が大きいものであった。
As in
特許文献2~5では、路盤材の固結後の膨張による逆断層破壊を回避することまでは言及されていない。
本発明は、上記課題を解決し、簡便に推定温度、推定時間における水浸膨張比を精度よく推定する、スラグの水浸膨張比推定方法を提案し、道路用に好適な鉄鋼スラグを提供し、スラグの膨張に起因した逆断層型破壊を起こすことのない強化路盤材およびその製造方法を提案するところにある。 The present invention aims to solve the above problems, propose a method for estimating the water immersion expansion ratio of slag that easily and accurately estimates the water immersion expansion ratio at an estimated temperature and estimated time, provide steel slag suitable for roads, and propose a reinforced roadbed material and its manufacturing method that do not cause reverse fault-type failures caused by slag expansion.
上記課題を解決するための手段は以下のとおりである。
[1]道路用鉄鋼スラグの水浸膨張比の推定方法であって、前記スラグの水浸膨張試験を行って、所定の測定温度および測定時間における前記スラグの水浸膨張比を得て、所定の推定温度で前記スラグの水浸膨張試験を行った場合に所定の推定時間で前記水浸膨張比が得られるように推定する、スラグの水浸膨張比推定方法。
[2]前記スラグの水浸膨張試験の推定時間tを、下記(1)式を用いて推定する、請求項1に記載のスラグの水浸膨張比推定方法。
νは推定膨張速度(%/日)、
tは推定時間(日)、
ν0は測定膨張速度(%/日)、
t0は測定時間(日)、
eはネイピア数(-)、
Tは推定温度(K)、
T0は測定温度(K)である。
[3]前記スラグの水浸膨張試験を0.1~0.3MPaの雰囲気圧力で、かつ、水が液体として存在する温度範囲から選んだ前記測定温度で実施する、[1]または[2]に記載のスラグの水浸膨張比推定方法。
[4]
[1]または[2]に記載のスラグの水浸膨張比推定方法を用いて、常温(293K)における前記推定時間tが3652日における水浸膨張比を推定したとき、前記水浸膨張比が3.5%以下である、道路用鉄鋼スラグ。
[5]セメントとスラグとの混合物からなる強化路盤材であって、
該強化路盤材は、[1]または[2]に記載のスラグの水浸膨張比推定方法を用いて推定した前記スラグの水浸膨張比(%)が、セメント養生後における強化路盤材の圧縮試験における該強化路盤材の圧縮破壊に至る歪み率(%)よりも下回るものであることを特徴とする強化路盤材。
[6]
セメントとスラグとの混合物からなり、セメント養生後の強化路盤材に対して圧縮試験を行って該強化路盤材の圧縮破壊に至る歪み率(%)を求めるとともに、
[1]または[2]に記載のスラグの水浸膨張比推定方法を用いて前記スラグの水浸膨張比(%)を推定し、該スラグの水浸膨張比と該強化路盤材の圧縮破壊に至る歪み率とを比較し、該水浸膨張比が、該歪み率よりも下回る条件下でセメントを添加してスラグと混合する、強化路盤材の製造方法。
The means for solving the above problems are as follows.
[1] A method for estimating the water immersion expansion ratio of steel slag for road use, comprising: conducting a water immersion expansion test of the slag to obtain the water immersion expansion ratio of the slag at a specified measurement temperature and measurement time; and estimating that the water immersion expansion ratio will be obtained at a specified estimated time when a water immersion expansion test of the slag is conducted at a specified estimated temperature.
[2] A method for estimating the water immersion expansion ratio of slag as described in
ν is the estimated expansion rate (%/day),
t is the estimated time (days),
v is the measured expansion rate (%/day);
t0 is the measurement time (day);
e is Napier's constant (-),
T is the estimated temperature (K),
T0 is the measurement temperature (K).
[3] The method for estimating the water immersion expansion ratio of a slag according to [1] or [2], wherein the water immersion expansion test of the slag is carried out at an atmospheric pressure of 0.1 to 0.3 MPa and at a measurement temperature selected from a temperature range in which water exists as a liquid.
[4]
A steel slag for roads, the water immersion expansion ratio of which is 3.5% or less when the water immersion expansion ratio is estimated at room temperature (293 K) for an estimated time t of 3652 days using the method for estimating the water immersion expansion ratio of slag described in [1] or [2].
[5] A reinforced roadbed material consisting of a mixture of cement and slag,
The reinforced roadbed material is characterized in that the water immersion expansion ratio (%) of the slag estimated using the method for estimating the water immersion expansion ratio of slag described in [1] or [2] is lower than the strain rate (%) that leads to compressive failure of the reinforced roadbed material in a compression test of the reinforced roadbed material after cement curing.
[6]
A compression test is carried out on a reinforced roadbed material made of a mixture of cement and slag after cement curing to determine the strain rate (%) at which the reinforced roadbed material is subjected to compression failure.
A method for manufacturing a reinforced roadbed material, comprising: estimating the water immersion expansion ratio (%) of the slag using the method for estimating the water immersion expansion ratio of the slag described in [1] or [2]; comparing the water immersion expansion ratio of the slag with the strain rate at which the reinforced roadbed material will be compressed and broken; and adding cement and mixing it with the slag under conditions where the water immersion expansion ratio is lower than the strain rate.
本発明のスラグの水浸膨張比推定方法によれば、水浸膨張比推定式を、水浸膨張試験の測定膨張速度、測定時間、測定温度、推定温度、を変数として含んだ関数で表し、この関数を満たす水浸膨張比を算出する。これにより、推定温度、推定時間での水浸膨張比を精度よく推定することができる。そして、推定時間を短縮および延長した場合での水浸膨張比の推定が可能となる。この水浸膨張比推定方法を用いて、所定の水浸膨張性能を有する鉄鋼スラグを道路用に選択できる。 According to the method for estimating the water immersion expansion ratio of slag of the present invention, the water immersion expansion ratio estimation formula is expressed as a function that includes the measured expansion rate, measurement time, measured temperature, and estimated temperature of the water immersion expansion test as variables, and the water immersion expansion ratio that satisfies this function is calculated. This makes it possible to accurately estimate the water immersion expansion ratio at the estimated temperature and estimated time. It also makes it possible to estimate the water immersion expansion ratio when the estimated time is shortened and extended. Using this water immersion expansion ratio estimation method, steel slag with the specified water immersion expansion performance can be selected for road use.
本発明の強化路盤材およびその製造方法によれば、セメント養生後における強化路盤材の圧縮破壊に至る歪み率(%)を、スラグの膨張によるものとみなし、この歪み率(%)を、製鋼スラグの推定水浸膨張比(%)と比較し、該推定水浸膨張比(%)が歪み率(%)よりも下回るものすることにより、スラグの膨張を抑制でき、それによる強化路盤材の逆断層破壊を回避することができる。 According to the reinforced roadbed material and its manufacturing method of the present invention, the strain rate (%) that leads to compressive failure of the reinforced roadbed material after cement curing is considered to be due to the expansion of the slag, and this strain rate (%) is compared with the estimated water immersion expansion ratio (%) of the steelmaking slag. By making the estimated water immersion expansion ratio (%) lower than the strain rate (%), it is possible to suppress the expansion of the slag and avoid the resulting reverse fault failure of the reinforced roadbed material.
[スラグの水浸膨張比推定方法]
本発明の第1実施形態にかかるスラグの水浸膨張比推定方法は、水浸膨張比推定式を、水浸膨張試験の測定膨張速度、測定時間、測定温度、推定温度、推定時間を変数として含んだ関数で表し、この関数を満たす時間を算出するものである。
[Method for estimating the water immersion expansion ratio of slag]
The method for estimating the water immersion expansion ratio of slag according to the first embodiment of the present invention expresses the water immersion expansion ratio estimation formula as a function including the measured expansion rate, measurement time, measured temperature, estimated temperature, and estimated time of the water immersion expansion test as variables, and calculates the time that satisfies this function.
本実施形態において、道路用のスラグ路盤材を構成する鉄鋼スラグは、製鉄所内で発生するスラグであれば特に制限されるものではない。例えば、溶銑予備処理工程(脱珪、脱りん、脱硫)で発生する予備処理スラグ、転炉での脱炭工程で発生する転炉スラグ(脱炭スラグ)、電気炉での工程で発生する電気炉スラグ、二次精錬工程で発生する二次精錬スラグ、鋳造工程で発生する造塊スラグ等の各種のスラグを例示することができる。これらはその1種のみを単独で処理でき、2種以上を混合して処理することもできる。 In this embodiment, the steel slag that constitutes the slag roadbed material for roads is not particularly limited as long as it is slag generated in a steelworks. Examples of slag include pretreatment slag generated in the hot metal pretreatment process (desiliconization, dephosphorization, desulfurization), converter slag (decarburization slag) generated in the decarburization process in a converter, electric furnace slag generated in the electric furnace process, secondary refining slag generated in the secondary refining process, and ingot slag generated in the casting process. These can be treated alone or in a mixture of two or more types.
下記数式2の(1)式で示す関数の変数には、対象とするスラグ路盤材の水浸膨張試験の測定膨張速度(ν0)、測定温度(T0)、測定時間(t0)、推定温度(T)、推定時間(t)を含む。JIS A 5015:2018付属書Bに記載の道路用鉄鋼スラグの水浸膨張試験方法では、10日間の試験を行うが、本実施形態では任意に短縮、延長できる。また、試験温度も80℃を用いるが、任意に変更して試験してもよい。上記JISの試験では、80℃の温水に6時間保持したのち、放冷する。この操作を1日1回で10日間繰り返すが、連続して温度保持してもよい。 The variables of the function shown in the following formula (1) include the measured expansion rate (ν 0 ), the measured temperature (T 0 ), the measured time (t 0 ), the estimated temperature ( T ), and the estimated time (t) of the water immersion expansion test of the target slag roadbed material. In the water immersion expansion test method for steel slag for roads described in JIS A 5015:2018 Appendix B, the test is performed for 10 days, but in this embodiment, the test temperature can be shortened or extended as desired. In addition, the test temperature is 80°C, but it may be changed as desired for testing. In the above JIS test, the material is kept in 80°C hot water for 6 hours and then allowed to cool. This operation is repeated once a day for 10 days, but the temperature may be kept continuously.
上記(1)式中のνは水浸膨張試験の推定膨張速度であるが、測定膨張速度(ν0)の値を使用してもよく、単位は%/日である。推定温度(T)および測定温度(T0)は、水浸膨張試験の試験温度であり、水が液体として存在する大気圧下で273K≦T≦373Kの範囲とする。ただし、加圧下においては水が液体として存在する温度範囲とする。Vは水浸膨張比(%)である。 In the above formula (1), ν is the estimated expansion rate in the water immersion expansion test, but the measured expansion rate (ν 0 ) may also be used, and the unit is %/day. The estimated temperature (T) and the measured temperature (T 0 ) are the test temperatures in the water immersion expansion test, and are in the range of 273 K≦T≦373 K under atmospheric pressure at which water exists as a liquid. However, this is the temperature range in which water exists as a liquid under pressure. V is the water immersion expansion ratio (%).
ここで、水浸膨張試験の推定膨張速度(ν)を、測定膨張速度(ν0)の値と等しいものと置いて、測定した水浸膨張比(V)と等しくなる、推定温度(T)における推定時間(t)を推定する。(1)式を変形して、下記数式3の(1’)式が得られる。
Here, the estimated expansion rate (ν) in the water immersion expansion test is set equal to the measured expansion rate (ν 0 ), and the estimated time (t) at the estimated temperature (T) at which the estimated expansion rate becomes equal to the measured water immersion expansion ratio (V) is estimated. By modifying equation (1), the following equation (1′) of
なお、水浸膨張試験の測定温度(T0)は試験中に変動する場合があるので、水浸膨張試験の試験温度を連続測定して、積算温度を試験時間で除して、平均し、測定温度(T0)の実績値としてもよい。このようにして、所望の推定温度(T)および推定時間(t)の水浸膨張比を推定するために、所定の測定温度および所定の測定時間でスラグの水浸膨張試験を行い水浸膨張比を測定するものである。 Since the measurement temperature (T 0 ) of the water immersion expansion test may vary during the test, the test temperature of the water immersion expansion test may be continuously measured, and the integrated temperature may be divided by the test time, and the average may be used as the actual value of the measurement temperature (T 0 ). In this way, in order to estimate the water immersion expansion ratio at the desired estimated temperature (T) and estimated time (t), the water immersion expansion test of the slag is performed at a predetermined measurement temperature and a predetermined measurement time, and the water immersion expansion ratio is measured.
各種測定温度および測定時間で上記スラグの水浸膨張試験を実施した。表1に測定温度(T0)[K]、測定時間(t0)[日]で記載した。また、測定圧力(P0)[MPa]を併記した。上記関係式を用い、各試験ごとに推定温度(T)[K]における測定水浸膨張比(V)[%]と同じ推定水浸膨張比(Ve)[%]となるスラグの水浸膨張試験の推定時間(t)[日]を上記(1’)式で推定し、それぞれ記載した。推定温度(T)および推定時間(t)を用いて、同じスラグの水浸膨張試験を行った結果得られた実績水浸膨張比(Va)を併せて記載した。得られた結果を統計処理し、推定水浸膨張比(Ve)と実績水浸膨張比(Va)との誤差が3σ(標準偏差)以内の条件を記号○で、それ以外を記号×で判定した。 The above slag was subjected to water immersion expansion tests at various measurement temperatures and measurement times. Table 1 shows the measurement temperature (T 0 ) [K] and the measurement time (t 0 ) [days]. The measurement pressure (P 0 ) [MPa] is also shown. Using the above relational expression, the estimated time (t) [days] of the water immersion expansion test of the slag that would give the same estimated water immersion expansion ratio (Ve) [%] as the measured water immersion expansion ratio (V) [%] at the estimated temperature (T) [K] was estimated by the above formula (1') for each test and listed. The actual water immersion expansion ratio (Va) obtained as a result of performing the water immersion expansion test of the same slag using the estimated temperature (T) and estimated time (t) is also listed. The obtained results were statistically processed, and conditions in which the error between the estimated water immersion expansion ratio (Ve) and the actual water immersion expansion ratio (Va) was within 3σ (standard deviation) were judged with the symbol ○, and other conditions were judged with the symbol ×.
測定温度(T0)として、水が液体として存在する温度範囲とした試験No.1~24は、推定水浸膨張比(Ve)と実績水浸膨張比(Va)とがよく一致している。測定温度(T0)として、大気圧化で水が液体として存在しない温度域とした試験No.25~33は推定水浸膨張比(Ve)と実績水浸膨張比(Va)との誤差が大きい。 In Test Nos. 1 to 24, in which the measurement temperature (T 0 ) was set to a temperature range in which water exists as a liquid, the estimated water immersion expansion ratio (Ve) and the actual water immersion expansion ratio (Va) were in good agreement. In Test Nos. 25 to 33, in which the measurement temperature (T 0 ) was set to a temperature range in which water does not exist as a liquid at atmospheric pressure, the error between the estimated water immersion expansion ratio (Ve) and the actual water immersion expansion ratio (Va) was large.
[道路用鉄鋼スラグ]
本発明の第2実施形態としての道路用鉄鋼スラグは、第1の実施形態のスラグの水浸膨張比推定方法を用いて、常温(293K)における前記推定時間tが10年(3652日)における水浸膨張比Vを推定したとき、前記水浸膨張比Vが3.5%以下であることが必要である。この条件を満足することで路盤材に隆起が発生しない効果が得られる。水浸膨張比Vが3.5%を超えた場合には路盤材に隆起が発生するおそれがある。たとえば、上記表1の試験No.22~24から選ばれた1の測定温度(T0)および測定時間(t0)でスラグの水浸膨張試験を行い水浸膨張比Vを測定することで、常温(293K)における前記推定時間tが3652日における水浸膨張比Vを推定できる。
[Iron and steel slag for roads]
In the steel slag for road use as the second embodiment of the present invention, when the water immersion expansion ratio V at room temperature (293 K) is estimated using the method for estimating the water immersion expansion ratio of the slag according to the first embodiment, the water immersion expansion ratio V at the estimated time t of 10 years (3652 days) must be 3.5% or less. By satisfying this condition, it is possible to obtain an effect of preventing the roadbed material from being bulged. If the water immersion expansion ratio V exceeds 3.5%, there is a risk of the roadbed material being bulged. For example, the water immersion expansion ratio V at room temperature (293 K) when the estimated time t is 3652 days can be estimated by performing a water immersion expansion test of the slag at one measurement temperature (T 0 ) and measurement time (t 0 ) selected from Test Nos. 22 to 24 in Table 1 and measuring the water immersion expansion ratio V.
[強化路盤材]
本発明の第3実施形態は、強化路盤材において、第1実施形態のスラグの水浸膨張比推定方法を用いて推定した前記スラグの水浸膨張比(%)と、セメント養生後における強化路盤材の圧縮試験における該強化路盤材の圧縮破壊に至る歪み率(%)とを比較して評価するものである。常温(293K)および推定時間tが10年(3652日)における推定水浸膨張比(%)が圧縮破壊に至る歪み率(%)よりも下回る場合、固結後の材料の膨張に起因した逆断層型破壊を起こすのを回避することが可能と判断できる。これにより、将来的に逆断層型破壊を起こさないセメント添加量を設定できるという新規知見に基づいてなされたものである。
[Reinforced roadbed material]
The third embodiment of the present invention is a method for evaluating reinforced roadbed material by comparing the water immersion expansion ratio (%) of the slag estimated using the water immersion expansion ratio estimation method of the first embodiment with the strain rate (%) at which the reinforced roadbed material will be crushed in a compression test of the reinforced roadbed material after cement curing. If the estimated water immersion expansion ratio (%) at room temperature (293K) and an estimated time t of 10 years (3652 days) is lower than the strain rate (%) at which the reinforced roadbed material will be crushed, it can be determined that it is possible to avoid the occurrence of reverse fault type fracture caused by the expansion of the material after solidification. This is based on the novel finding that it is possible to set the amount of cement to be added that will not cause reverse fault type fracture in the future.
図1は、粒度が0~40mmに調整された、製鋼スラグを用い、その製鋼スラグに1.0~5.0mass%のセメントを添加、混合して突き固め(含水比は、セメントの28日間の固化に必要十分な含水比に調整)封かん養生を行った、直径100mm、高さ/直径比が1.27の供試体を複数作成し、得られた供試体の圧縮破壊時の歪み率(%)とセメント添加量(mass%)の関係を示した図であり、また、表2は、各供試体のセメント添加量(mass%)、各供試体の圧縮破壊時の歪み率(%)、製鋼スラグの推定水浸膨張比(%)、適用の可否の調査結果を示したものである。ここで、推定水浸膨張比は常温(293K)、常圧(大気圧)および推定時間tが10年(3652日)において推定したものである。 Figure 1 shows the relationship between the strain rate (%) at compressive failure and the amount of cement added (mass%) of several specimens with a diameter of 100 mm and a height/diameter ratio of 1.27, which were made by adding 1.0 to 5.0 mass% cement to steel slag adjusted to a grain size of 0 to 40 mm, mixing, compacting (the water content was adjusted to a water content sufficient for cement to solidify for 28 days), and sealing and curing. Table 2 shows the amount of cement added (mass%) of each specimen, the strain rate (%) of each specimen at compressive failure, the estimated water immersion expansion ratio (%) of steel slag, and the results of an investigation into applicability. Here, the estimated water immersion expansion ratio was estimated at room temperature (293 K), normal pressure (atmospheric pressure), and an estimated time t of 10 years (3652 days).
なお、この調査においては、製鋼スラグの粒度分布を、JIS A 1102:2014に従い測定し、測定された粒度を用いて相対粒度を作成し、各供試体で粒度差がでないように調整(スラグの最大粒径が供試体の直径の1/4以下となる相対粒度に調整)した。また、混合物の突き固めは、試験便覧のE011、F007に従って行い、圧縮試験での圧下速度は、0.2mm/minに設定した。また、圧縮破壊時の歪み率(%)は、圧縮試験結果より荷重・歪み曲線を作成し、荷重・歪み曲線における最大荷重の歪みを歪み率に換算して求めた。製鋼スラグの推定水浸膨張比(%)は、第1実施形態に示す所定の測定温度および所定の測定時間の水浸膨張試験から推定した。適用可否は、圧縮破壊時の歪み率(%)よりも製鋼スラグの推定水浸膨張比(%)が下回るものを〇で、とくに歪み率(%)と推定水浸膨張比(%)の差が0.2%以上のものは◎で表記し、圧縮破壊時の歪み率(%)よりも推定水浸膨張比(%)が上回るものを×で表記した。 In this investigation, the particle size distribution of the steel slag was measured according to JIS A 1102:2014, and the relative particle size was created using the measured particle size, and the particle size was adjusted so that there was no difference in particle size between each specimen (the maximum particle size of the slag was adjusted to 1/4 or less of the diameter of the specimen). The mixture was tamped according to E011 and F007 of the test manual, and the compression speed in the compression test was set to 0.2 mm/min. The strain rate (%) at the time of compression failure was calculated by creating a load-strain curve from the compression test results and converting the strain at the maximum load on the load-strain curve into a strain rate. The estimated water immersion expansion ratio (%) of the steel slag was estimated from the water immersion expansion test at the specified measurement temperature and for the specified measurement time shown in the first embodiment. Applicability was indicated by a circle if the estimated water immersion expansion ratio (%) of the steelmaking slag was lower than the strain rate (%) at the time of compressive failure, a double circle if the difference between the strain rate (%) and the estimated water immersion expansion ratio (%) was 0.2% or more, and an × if the estimated water immersion expansion ratio (%) was higher than the strain rate (%) at the time of compressive failure.
表2において試験No.1~3はセメント添加量を1.5mass%とした場合である。試験No.4~6はセメント添加量を3.5mass%とした場合である。試験No.7はセメント添加量を5.0mass%とした場合である。表2から明らかなように、発明例は推定水浸膨張比(%)が、いずれのものも圧縮破壊時の歪み率(%)よりも下回っている。したがって、適用可能であるという結果が得られた。これに対して、試験No.8~11は、推定水浸膨張比(%)が全て圧縮破壊時の歪み率(%)を上回るものであり、適用不可となった。 In Table 2, Test Nos. 1 to 3 are cases where the amount of cement added was 1.5 mass%. Test Nos. 4 to 6 are cases where the amount of cement added was 3.5 mass%. Test No. 7 is a case where the amount of cement added was 5.0 mass%. As is clear from Table 2, the estimated water immersion expansion ratio (%) of all of the invention examples is lower than the strain rate (%) at the time of compressive failure. Therefore, the results showed that the method is applicable. In contrast, the estimated water immersion expansion ratio (%) of all of Test Nos. 8 to 11 exceeded the strain rate (%) at the time of compressive failure, making them inapplicable.
本実施形態において圧縮試験における圧下速度は、0.1~1%/minの圧下速度で行うのが好ましいとしたが、その理由は、製鋼スラグが拘束状態で膨張する時の応力を意図的に起こすことができると考えられたからであり、そのためには、できるだけ圧下速度を小さくし、かつ圧縮破壊に至る歪み率(%)に影響を与えることがようにしなければないことが肝要であって、予備試験から図2に示すような結果が得られたからである。 In this embodiment, it is preferable to carry out the compression test at a reduction rate of 0.1 to 1%/min. The reason for this is that it is believed that the stress that occurs when the steelmaking slag expands in a restrained state can be intentionally generated. To achieve this, it is essential to make the reduction rate as small as possible while avoiding any effect on the strain rate (%) that leads to compressive failure. The results shown in Figure 2 were obtained from preliminary tests.
本実施形態においては、強化路盤材を、セメント養生後の強化路盤材に対して圧縮試験を行って該強化路盤材の圧縮破壊に至る歪み率を求めるとともに、該スラグの推定水浸膨比を求め、該スラグの推定水浸膨比と該路盤材の圧縮破壊に至る歪み率とを比較し、該推定水浸膨比が、該歪み率よりも下回る条件下でセメントを添加してスラグと混合することにより製造するが、そのためには、スラグの粒度は、0~40mmの範囲に調整されたものを用いるのが好ましく、添加するセメント量は、必要な路盤支持力に合わせて1~5mass%の範囲で決定するのが好ましく、スラグとセメントとの混合は、スラグを突き固め前日に調湿し、突き固め直前にセメントと混合することが、また、封かん養生は温度20℃、湿度98%という条件とするのが好ましい。 In this embodiment, the reinforced roadbed material is manufactured by performing a compression test on the reinforced roadbed material after cement curing to determine the strain rate at which the reinforced roadbed material will fail under compression, and by determining the estimated water swelling ratio of the slag. The estimated water swelling ratio of the slag is compared with the strain rate at which the roadbed material will fail under compression, and cement is added and mixed with the slag under conditions where the estimated water swelling ratio is lower than the strain rate. To achieve this, it is preferable to use slag with a particle size adjusted to the range of 0 to 40 mm, and the amount of cement added is preferably determined in the range of 1 to 5 mass% according to the required roadbed bearing capacity. The slag and cement are mixed by adjusting the humidity of the slag the day before compaction and mixing it with the cement immediately before compaction. It is also preferable to seal and cure the slag at a temperature of 20°C and a humidity of 98%.
本発明のスラグの水浸膨張比推定方法によれば、簡便に推定温度、推定時間における水浸膨張比を精度よく推定できる。その方法で推定することにより道路用に適した水浸膨張比の鉄鋼スラグを提供できる。
本発明の強化路盤材およびその製造方法によれば、逆断層型破壊を起こすことのない強化路盤材およびその製造方法が提供できる。
According to the method for estimating the water immersion expansion ratio of slag of the present invention, the water immersion expansion ratio at the estimated temperature and estimated time can be easily estimated with high accuracy. By estimating with this method, it is possible to provide steel slag with a water immersion expansion ratio suitable for road use.
According to the reinforced roadbed material and the manufacturing method thereof of the present invention, it is possible to provide a reinforced roadbed material that does not cause reverse fault type failure and a manufacturing method thereof.
Claims (5)
前記スラグの水浸膨張試験の推定時間tを、下記(1)式を用いて推定する、スラグの水浸膨張比推定方法。
νは推定膨張速度(%/日)、
tは推定時間(日)、
ν 0 は測定膨張速度(%/日)、
t 0 は測定時間(日)、
eはネイピア数(-)、
Tは推定温度(K)、
T 0 は測定温度(K)である。 A method for estimating the water immersion expansion ratio of a steel slag for road use, comprising: conducting a water immersion expansion test of the slag to obtain a water immersion expansion ratio of the slag at a predetermined measurement temperature and measurement time; and estimating that the water immersion expansion ratio will be obtained in a predetermined estimated time when the water immersion expansion test of the slag is conducted at a predetermined estimated temperature,
A method for estimating the water immersion expansion ratio of a slag, comprising estimating an estimated time t of the water immersion expansion test of the slag using the following formula (1) .
ν is the estimated expansion rate (%/day),
t is the estimated time (days),
v is the measured expansion rate (%/day);
t0 is the measurement time (days),
e is Napier's constant (-),
T is the estimated temperature (K),
T0 is the measurement temperature (K) .
該強化路盤材は、請求項1に記載のスラグの水浸膨張比推定方法を用いて推定した、常温(293K)および前記推定時間tが3652日における前記スラグの水浸膨張比(%)が、セメント養生後における強化路盤材の圧縮試験における該強化路盤材の圧縮破壊に至る歪み率(%)よりも下回るものであることを特徴とする強化路盤材。 A reinforced roadbed material consisting of a mixture of cement and slag,
The reinforced roadbed material is characterized in that the water immersion expansion ratio (%) of the slag at room temperature (293 K) and at an estimated time t of 3652 days, estimated using the method for estimating the water immersion expansion ratio of slag described in claim 1, is lower than the strain rate (%) that leads to compressive failure of the reinforced roadbed material in a compression test of the reinforced roadbed material after cement curing.
請求項1に記載のスラグの水浸膨張比推定方法を用いて、常温(293K)および前記推定時間tが3652日における前記スラグの水浸膨張比(%)を推定し、該スラグの水浸膨張比と該強化路盤材の圧縮破壊に至る歪み率とを比較し、該水浸膨張比が、該歪み率よりも下回る条件下でセメントを添加してスラグと混合する、強化路盤材の製造方法。 A compression test is carried out on a reinforced roadbed material made of a mixture of cement and slag after cement curing to determine the strain rate (%) at which the reinforced roadbed material is subjected to compression failure.
A method for manufacturing reinforced roadbed material, comprising : estimating the water immersion expansion ratio (%) of the slag at room temperature (293 K) and when the estimated time t is 3652 days using the method for estimating the water immersion expansion ratio of slag as described in claim 1; comparing the water immersion expansion ratio of the slag with the strain rate at which the reinforced roadbed material will undergo compressive failure; and adding cement and mixing it with the slag under conditions where the water immersion expansion ratio is lower than the strain rate.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2022112908A JP7639787B2 (en) | 2022-07-14 | 2022-07-14 | Method for estimating water immersion expansion ratio of slag, steel slag for roads and reinforced roadbed material and method for manufacturing same |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2022112908A JP7639787B2 (en) | 2022-07-14 | 2022-07-14 | Method for estimating water immersion expansion ratio of slag, steel slag for roads and reinforced roadbed material and method for manufacturing same |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2024011144A JP2024011144A (en) | 2024-01-25 |
| JP7639787B2 true JP7639787B2 (en) | 2025-03-05 |
Family
ID=89621703
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2022112908A Active JP7639787B2 (en) | 2022-07-14 | 2022-07-14 | Method for estimating water immersion expansion ratio of slag, steel slag for roads and reinforced roadbed material and method for manufacturing same |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP7639787B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN120831464B (en) * | 2025-09-16 | 2025-12-16 | 中冶建筑研究总院有限公司 | A method for evaluating the volumetric stability of steel slag based on hydrothermal cycling treatment |
Citations (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2004301531A (en) | 2003-03-28 | 2004-10-28 | Nippon Steel Corp | Method for determining expansion stability of solidified body containing steelmaking slag |
| JP2014111879A (en) | 2012-10-31 | 2014-06-19 | Japan Pile Corp | Method for estimating compression strength of soil cement |
| JP2015059325A (en) | 2013-09-18 | 2015-03-30 | ジャパンパイル株式会社 | Method for estimating the compressive strength of soil cement |
| JP2017166311A (en) | 2016-03-09 | 2017-09-21 | 新日鐵住金株式会社 | Method for estimating allowable production of ettringite and method for determining allowable sulfur content |
| JP2017223490A (en) | 2016-06-14 | 2017-12-21 | 前田建設工業株式会社 | Concrete workability evaluation method |
| JP2018025461A (en) | 2016-08-10 | 2018-02-15 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | Water immersion expansion determination method of steel making slag, and manufacturing method of slag roadbed material |
| JP2018135696A (en) | 2017-02-22 | 2018-08-30 | 清水建設株式会社 | Method for estimating strength characteristics of soil cement, estimation device, quality control method for solidified part during pile construction, quality control device |
Family Cites Families (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5187126A (en) * | 1988-07-29 | 1993-02-16 | Nippon Chemical Industrial Co., Ltd. | Slag treatment material |
| JPH07232940A (en) * | 1994-02-17 | 1995-09-05 | Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd | Rapid expansion determination method for converter slag |
| JP3582263B2 (en) * | 1996-11-21 | 2004-10-27 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | Hydrated product using steelmaking slag |
-
2022
- 2022-07-14 JP JP2022112908A patent/JP7639787B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2004301531A (en) | 2003-03-28 | 2004-10-28 | Nippon Steel Corp | Method for determining expansion stability of solidified body containing steelmaking slag |
| JP2014111879A (en) | 2012-10-31 | 2014-06-19 | Japan Pile Corp | Method for estimating compression strength of soil cement |
| JP2015059325A (en) | 2013-09-18 | 2015-03-30 | ジャパンパイル株式会社 | Method for estimating the compressive strength of soil cement |
| JP2017166311A (en) | 2016-03-09 | 2017-09-21 | 新日鐵住金株式会社 | Method for estimating allowable production of ettringite and method for determining allowable sulfur content |
| JP2017223490A (en) | 2016-06-14 | 2017-12-21 | 前田建設工業株式会社 | Concrete workability evaluation method |
| JP2018025461A (en) | 2016-08-10 | 2018-02-15 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | Water immersion expansion determination method of steel making slag, and manufacturing method of slag roadbed material |
| JP2018135696A (en) | 2017-02-22 | 2018-08-30 | 清水建設株式会社 | Method for estimating strength characteristics of soil cement, estimation device, quality control method for solidified part during pile construction, quality control device |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2024011144A (en) | 2024-01-25 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Tran et al. | Rectangular stress-block parameters for fly-ash and slag based geopolymer concrete | |
| Steenbergen et al. | Determining the in situ concrete strength of existing structures for assessing their structural safety | |
| Dang et al. | Measured Transfer Lengths of 0.7 in.(17.8 mm) Strands for Pretensioned Beams. | |
| Wei et al. | Thermal creep and relaxation of prestressing steel | |
| Jeng et al. | Performance of toughness indices for steel fiber reinforced shotcrete | |
| JP7639787B2 (en) | Method for estimating water immersion expansion ratio of slag, steel slag for roads and reinforced roadbed material and method for manufacturing same | |
| Marti-Vargas et al. | Size effect on strand bond and concrete strains at prestress transfer | |
| Sridhar et al. | Study on mechanical properties of hybrid fiber reinforced engineered cementitious composites | |
| Sulel et al. | Effect of reinforcement on early-age cracking in high strength concrete | |
| Carroll et al. | The use of Grade 300 prestressing strand in pretensioned, prestressed concrete beams. | |
| Sarsam et al. | Impact of moisture damage on rutting resistance, shear and tensile properties of asphalt pavement | |
| Barnett et al. | Fast-track construction with slag cement concrete: adiabatic strength development and strength prediction | |
| JP6866685B2 (en) | Method for estimating the allowable amount of ettringite and how to determine the allowable amount of sulfur | |
| Ganga et al. | Influence of expansive calcium sulfoaluminate cement in self-compacting concrete infilled rectangular steel tube columns under axial compression | |
| JP2011094302A (en) | Base course material and construction method of pavement | |
| JP7708010B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of reinforced roadbed material | |
| Persson | Quasi-instantaneous and long-term deformations of high performance concrete with sealed curing | |
| Wu et al. | Static and fatigue performance of the interface between the concrete slab and epoxy resin in CRTS II slab track: An experimental and comparative study | |
| Şengün | Effects of mixture design parameters and compaction methods on the properties of roller compacted concrete pavements | |
| Sagher | Shear strength of reinforced concrete beams made with recycled coarse aggregate | |
| Bhoem et al. | Performance of self-consolidating concrete in prestressed girders. | |
| Yin et al. | A case study: Assessing the sensitivity of the coefficient of thermal contraction of AC mixtures on thermal crack prediction | |
| KR20140097293A (en) | Filling material and ground-repairing method | |
| Andrawes et al. | Transfer and development length of prestressing tendons in full-scale AASHTO prestressed concrete girders using self-consolidating concrete | |
| Ralli et al. | Comparative evaluation of nonlinear FEA inverse analysis of tensile properties of UHPFRC |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20240226 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20241017 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20241105 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20241120 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20250121 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20250203 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 7639787 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |