Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP7643106B2 - Cutting Tools - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP7643106B2 - Cutting Tools - Google Patents

Cutting Tools Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP7643106B2
JP7643106B2 JP2021043171A JP2021043171A JP7643106B2 JP 7643106 B2 JP7643106 B2 JP 7643106B2 JP 2021043171 A JP2021043171 A JP 2021043171A JP 2021043171 A JP2021043171 A JP 2021043171A JP 7643106 B2 JP7643106 B2 JP 7643106B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
cutting tool
cutting
less
mass
cutting edge
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2021043171A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2022142906A (en
Inventor
龍 市川
佳祐 河原
誠 五十嵐
一樹 岡田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mitsubishi Materials Corp
Original Assignee
Mitsubishi Materials Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mitsubishi Materials Corp filed Critical Mitsubishi Materials Corp
Priority to JP2021043171A priority Critical patent/JP7643106B2/en
Publication of JP2022142906A publication Critical patent/JP2022142906A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP7643106B2 publication Critical patent/JP7643106B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Cutting Tools, Boring Holders, And Turrets (AREA)
  • Powder Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Manufacture Of Alloys Or Alloy Compounds (AREA)

Description

本発明は、超硬合金(WC基焼結合金)を用いた切削工具に関するものである。 The present invention relates to cutting tools using cemented carbide (WC-based sintered alloy).

超硬合金は、機械的強度、耐熱疲労性等に優れるため、金属の切削工具として用いられている。そして、この切削工具の使用条件は、切削加工の高能率化により厳しいものとなっており、切削工具にはより一層の耐久性が求められている。 Cemented carbide alloys are used as metal cutting tools because of their excellent mechanical strength and thermal fatigue resistance. The conditions under which these cutting tools are used are becoming more severe due to the increasing efficiency of cutting processes, and cutting tools are required to have even greater durability.

そのため、切削工具に使用される超硬合金に対して、耐久性を向上させるべく種々の提案がなされている。この提案の中には、硬度、靭性、耐折損性の向上を目的として結合相の結晶粒を制御するものがある。 For this reason, various proposals have been made to improve the durability of the cemented carbide alloys used in cutting tools. Among these proposals is one that involves controlling the crystal grains of the binder phase in order to improve hardness, toughness, and breakage resistance.

例えば、特許文献1には、Coの結晶構造が0≦I(Co・hcp)/I(Co・fcc)≦0.1(I(Co・hcp)はhcp構造のCoの(101)面におけるX線回折強度で、I(Co・fcc)はfcc構造のCoの(111)面におけるX線回折強度である)を満たし、さらに、Coの格子定数が3.570以上である超硬合金が記載され、該超硬合金は靭性と強度、特に衝撃強度とが両立しているとされている。 For example, Patent Document 1 describes a cemented carbide whose Co crystal structure satisfies 0≦I(Co·hcp)/I(Co·fcc)≦0.1 (I(Co·hcp) is the X-ray diffraction intensity on the (101) plane of Co with the hcp structure, and I(Co·fcc) is the X-ray diffraction intensity on the (111) plane of Co with the fcc structure) and whose Co lattice constant is 3.570 or more, and which is said to have both toughness and strength, especially impact strength.

また、例えば、特許文献2には、WC、TiC、TiNおよびTiCNから選択された少なくとも1種からなる硬質相と、鉄族金属からなる結合相とを具え、前記結合相が、硬質相粉末の3倍以上の平均粒径を有する結合相粉末で通電加圧焼結されて形成され、通電加圧焼結を行う焼結装置の加圧軸と平行な硬質合金の断面においてアスペクト比が5~20となる扁平な形状で、加圧軸と垂直な方向に伸びるように配列に方向性を有している結合相組織を含む超硬合金が記載され、該超硬合金は高靱性で硬度や強度も優れているとされている。 For example, Patent Document 2 describes a cemented carbide containing a hard phase consisting of at least one selected from WC, TiC, TiN, and TiCN, and a binder phase consisting of an iron-group metal, the binder phase being formed by electric current pressure sintering using binder phase powder having an average particle size at least three times that of the hard phase powder, the binder phase having a flat shape with an aspect ratio of 5 to 20 in a cross section of the hard alloy parallel to the pressure axis of a sintering device performing electric current pressure sintering, and a binder phase structure having a directional arrangement extending in a direction perpendicular to the pressure axis, and the cemented carbide is said to have high toughness and excellent hardness and strength.

さらに、例えば、特許文献3には、WCの平均粒径が0.8μm以下である微粒超硬合金において、結合相粒の平均粒径が200μm以下である超硬合金が記載され、該超硬合金は耐折損性が優れているとされている。 For example, Patent Document 3 describes a fine-grained cemented carbide alloy in which the average grain size of WC is 0.8 μm or less, and the average grain size of the binder phase grains is 200 μm or less, and the cemented carbide alloy is said to have excellent resistance to breakage.

特許第4537501号公報Patent No. 4537501 特許第4177467号公報Patent No. 4177467 特開2004-346370号公報JP 2004-346370 A

本発明者の検討によれば、前記特許文献1~3に記載された超硬合金を、チタン合金やステンレス鋼等の難削材の切削工具として用いたとき、耐塑性変形性、耐チッピング性が十分でないことが判明した。 According to the inventor's investigations, it was found that when the cemented carbide alloys described in Patent Documents 1 to 3 are used as cutting tools for hard-to-cut materials such as titanium alloys and stainless steel, they do not have sufficient resistance to plastic deformation or chipping.

本発明は、このような状況を鑑みてなされたものであって、チタン合金やステンレス鋼等の難削材の切削加工に供しても、刃先の耐塑性変形性、耐チッピング性が向上し、耐久性の優れた切削工具を提供することを目的とする。 The present invention was made in consideration of these circumstances, and aims to provide a cutting tool with excellent durability, with improved resistance to plastic deformation and chipping at the cutting edge, even when used to cut difficult-to-cut materials such as titanium alloys and stainless steel.

本発明者は、前記目的を達成する切削工具を得るべく、鋭意検討を行った。その結果、切削工具を構成する超硬合金において、その組成を所定のものとし、かつ、複数の結晶から構成される結合相を所定の割合で有する領域が切削工具表面の近傍に存在すると、刃先の耐塑性変形性、耐チッピング性を有し、耐久性の優れた切削工具を得ることができるとの知見を得た。 The inventors conducted extensive research to obtain a cutting tool that would achieve the above-mentioned objective. As a result, they discovered that if the cemented carbide constituting the cutting tool has a predetermined composition and a region having a predetermined proportion of a bonding phase composed of multiple crystals is present near the surface of the cutting tool, it is possible to obtain a cutting tool that has excellent durability and has resistance to plastic deformation and chipping at the cutting edge.

本発明は、この知見に基づくものであって、次のとおりのものである。
「(1)CoとNiのいずれか1種または2種を4.0~15.0質量%、
Crを0.5質量%以下、
VCを0.5質量%以下、
TaC、NbC、TiC、ZrCおよびHfCのいずれか1種または2種以上を12.0質量%以下含み、
残部がWCおよび不可避的不純物からなり、
前記WCの平均粒径が0.5~4.0μmであって、
結合相におけるKAM値が1未満の測定点の割合が、表面から10μm離れた内部までの表面領域では70%以上、前記表面から15~25μm離れた内部領域では60%以下である、
ことを特徴とする切削工具。
(2)切刃に表面被覆層を有することを特徴とする前記(1)に記載の切削工具。」
The present invention is based on this finding and is as follows.
"(1) 4.0 to 15.0 mass% of either Co or Ni,
0.5% by mass or less of Cr 3 C 2 ,
VC at 0.5% by mass or less,
Contains 12.0 mass% or less of any one or more of TaC, NbC, TiC, ZrC and HfC;
The balance is WC and unavoidable impurities;
The average grain size of the WC is 0.5 to 4.0 μm,
The ratio of measurement points in the bonding phase having a KAM value of less than 1 is 70% or more in a surface region from the surface to an interior region 10 μm away, and 60% or less in an interior region 15 to 25 μm away from the surface.
A cutting tool characterized by:
(2) The cutting tool according to (1) above, characterized in that the cutting edge has a surface coating layer.

本発明の切削工具は、耐塑性変形性と耐チッピング性に優れ、チタン合金やステンレス鋼等の難削材の切削加工に供しても優れた耐久性を発揮する。 The cutting tool of the present invention has excellent resistance to plastic deformation and chipping, and exhibits excellent durability even when used to cut difficult-to-cut materials such as titanium alloys and stainless steel.

KAM値の測定領域を示す模式図である。FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing a measurement area of the KAM value. KAM値の測定方法の概略説明図である。FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating a method for measuring a KAM value. 切刃の逃げ面塑性変形量の一例を示す模式図である。なお、上図(すくい面)は平面図、下図(切刃側逃げ面)は側面図である。1 is a schematic diagram showing an example of the amount of plastic deformation on the flank of a cutting edge, in which the upper figure (the rake face) is a plan view and the lower figure (the flank on the cutting edge side) is a side view.

以下、本発明の実施形態に係る切削工具、特に、インサートとして用いられる場合を中心に説明する。
なお、明細書、特許請求の範囲において、数値範囲を「M~N」(M、Nは共に数値)を用いて表現する場合、その範囲は上限(N)および下限(M)の数値を含むものとする。
Hereinafter, a cutting tool according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described, particularly when used as an insert.
In the specification and claims, when a numerical range is expressed using "M to N" (where M and N are both numerical values), the range is intended to include the upper limit (N) and lower limit (M) numerical values.

1.組成
本実施形態の切削工具の組成は、
CoとNiのいずれか1種または2種を4.0~15.0質量%、
Crを0.5質量%以下、
VCを0.5質量%以下、
TaC、NbC、TiC、ZrCおよびHfCのいずれか1種または2種以上を12.0質量%以下含み、
残部がWCおよび不可避的不純物からなる。
以下、順に説明する。
1. Composition The composition of the cutting tool of the present embodiment is
One or both of Co and Ni are 4.0 to 15.0 mass%;
0.5% by mass or less of Cr 3 C 2 ,
VC at 0.5% by mass or less,
Contains 12.0 mass% or less of any one or more of TaC, NbC, TiC, ZrC and HfC;
The balance consists of WC and unavoidable impurities.
The following explains each in order.

(1)CoとNi
CoとNiのいずれか1種または2種の含有割合は4.0~15.0質量%であることが好ましい。その理由は、4.0質量%未満では、耐チッピング性や耐欠損性が十分でなく、一方、15.0質量%以上では、耐塑性変形性および耐摩耗性が不十分となるためである。
CoとNiは、主に結合相に存在し、結合相の主成分、すなわち、結合相を形成するすべての成分に対して、CoとNiのいずれか1種または2種が50質量%以上を占めている。
(1) Co and Ni
The content of either one or both of Co and Ni is preferably 4.0 to 15.0 mass %. The reason is that if it is less than 4.0 mass %, chipping resistance and fracture resistance are insufficient, while if it is 15.0 mass % or more, plastic deformation resistance and wear resistance are insufficient.
Co and Ni are mainly present in the binder phase, and either one or both of Co and Ni account for 50 mass % or more of the main components of the binder phase, that is, all the components forming the binder phase.

結合相は、Cr、Ta、Nb、Ti、Zr、Hf、Vの1種または2種以上を含んでいてもよい。これら元素が結合相中に存在するときは、結合相に固溶した状態であると推定される。さらに、結合相中には、硬質相の成分であるWやC、その他の不可避的不純物が含まれていてもよい。 The binder phase may contain one or more of Cr, Ta, Nb, Ti, Zr, Hf, and V. When these elements are present in the binder phase, they are presumed to be in a solid solution state in the binder phase. Furthermore, the binder phase may contain W and C, which are components of the hard phase, and other unavoidable impurities.

(2)Cr
切削工具の耐塑性変形性を向上させるため、Crを含有させることが好ましい(Crの含有は必須ではない)。その含有割合は切削工具全体に対して、Crで換算して0.5質量%以下が好ましい。
( 2 ) Cr3C2
In order to improve the plastic deformation resistance of the cutting tool, it is preferable to contain Cr (although the inclusion of Cr is not essential). The content of Cr is preferably 0.5 mass% or less calculated as Cr3C2 with respect to the entire cutting tool.

(3)VC
切削工具の耐塑性変形性を向上させるため、Vを含有させることが好ましい(Vの含有は必須ではない)。その含有割合は切削工具全体に対して、VCで換算して0.5質量%以下が好ましい。
(3) Virtual Currency
In order to improve the plastic deformation resistance of the cutting tool, it is preferable to contain V (although the inclusion of V is not essential). The content of V is preferably 0.5 mass % or less, calculated as VC, based on the entire cutting tool.

(4)TaC、NbC、TiC、ZrCおよびHfC
TaC、NbC、TiC、ZrCおよびHfCのいずれか1種または2種以上は、γ相を形成する。γ相は存在しなくてもよいが、存在する場合の含有割合は、M(金属原子)とCが1:1で結合した炭化物と仮定して、MCにより示される化合物の1種または2種以上が切削工具全体に対して、最大で12.0質量%含まれることが好ましい。その理由は、12.0質量%を超えると、切削工具の耐摩耗性が不十分となり、また、切削工具内部で凝集体が生じやすく、欠損発生の起点となるためである。
(4) TaC, NbC, TiC, ZrC and HfC
Any one or more of TaC, NbC, TiC, ZrC and HfC form a γ phase. The γ phase does not have to exist, but when it does exist, it is preferable that the content ratio of one or more of the compounds represented by MC is up to 12.0 mass% based on the entire cutting tool, assuming that the carbide is a carbide in which M (metal atom) and C are bonded in a 1:1 ratio. The reason is that if it exceeds 12.0 mass%, the wear resistance of the cutting tool becomes insufficient, and aggregates are easily generated inside the cutting tool, which becomes the starting point of chipping.

(5)WC
WCは硬質相の主成分である。硬質相には、製造過程で不可避的に混入する不可避不純物が含まれていてもよい。
(5) World Cup
WC is the main component of the hard phase. The hard phase may contain unavoidable impurities that are inevitably mixed in during the manufacturing process.

また、WCの平均粒径は、0.5~4.0μmが好ましい。その理由は、0.5μm未満であると、硬質相同士の滑りが生じて耐塑性変形性や耐欠損性が十分ではなく、一方、4.0μmを超えると、十分な耐摩耗性が得られないためである。WCの平均粒径は、1.0.~3.0μmがより好ましい。 The average grain size of WC is preferably 0.5 to 4.0 μm. This is because if it is less than 0.5 μm, slippage occurs between the hard phases, resulting in insufficient resistance to plastic deformation and chipping, while if it exceeds 4.0 μm, sufficient wear resistance cannot be obtained. The average grain size of WC is more preferably 1.0 to 3.0 μm.

WCの平均粒径は、ピクセルサイズにて観察し、画像解析によって、少なくとも4000個の各硬質相の面積を求め、その面積に等しい円の直径を算出して平均したものである。 The average grain size of WC was determined by observing at pixel size, determining the area of at least 4,000 hard phases by image analysis, and averaging the diameters of circles equal to the areas.

具体的には、例えば、1視野:30μm×70μm、ピクセルサイズ:40nm×40nmとし、切削工具の表面(後述する)から30μmまでの深さの領域を断面観察したときに、当該領域にWC粒子数、結合相数がそれぞれ4000個以上となるように、かつ、1観察視野あたりに切削工具表面を60~70μm含むようにして、例えば、1000倍の倍率で複数視野(5以上)を観察する。 Specifically, for example, one field of view is 30 μm x 70 μm, pixel size is 40 nm x 40 nm, and when a cross-section of a region from the surface of the cutting tool (described later) to a depth of 30 μm is observed, the number of WC particles and the number of bonding phases in the region are each 4000 or more, and each observation field of view includes 60 to 70 μm of the cutting tool surface. For example, multiple fields of view (5 or more) are observed at a magnification of 1000 times.

(6)不可避的不純物
前記のように、硬質相、結合相は製造過程で不可避的に混入する不純物を含んでいてもよく、その量は切削工具全体を100質量%として外数として0.3質量%以下が好ましい。
(6) Inevitable Impurities As described above, the hard phase and the binder phase may contain impurities that are inevitably mixed in during the manufacturing process. The amount of impurities is preferably 0.3% by mass or less, with the total mass of the cutting tool being 100% by mass.

2.結合相の組織
図1に模式的に示すように、結合相におけるKAM値が1未満の測定点の割合が、切削工具の表面から10μm離れた内部までの切削工具の表面領域(O)では70%以上、表面から15~25μm離れた切削工具の内部領域(I)では60%未満であることが好ましい。
ここで、KAM値とは、局所方位差平均値とも呼ばれるものである。
2. Structure of the binder phase As shown in FIG. 1, the ratio of measurement points in the binder phase having a KAM value of less than 1 is preferably 70% or more in the surface region (O) of the cutting tool extending from the surface of the cutting tool to the interior at a distance of 10 μm, and less than 60% in the interior region (I) of the cutting tool extending from 15 to 25 μm from the surface.
Here, the KAM value is also called the local orientation difference average value.

結合相におけるKAM値が、切削工具の表面から離れた領域毎に、このような値をとることによって耐欠損性や耐塑性変形性が向上する。 By having the KAM value in the binder phase take such values in each region away from the surface of the cutting tool, the chipping resistance and plastic deformation resistance are improved.

ここで、KAM値は、以下のようにして測定する。 Here, the KAM value is measured as follows:

(1)結晶粒界の画定
電子線後方散乱解析装置を用いて、縦断面(後述する)において、切削工具の表面からその内部に向かって、例えば、幅が100μm、縦が測定する領域(表面から10μm離れた領域、表面から15~25μm離れた)の観察視野を設定し40nm間隔で測定を行う。観察視野は5視野以上とする。観察視野において、測定点(ピクセル)は、離散的に存在するが、隣接する測定点の間の中間までの領域(正六角形が例示できる)をその測定点の測定結果により代表させる。この測定点のうち、隣接するもの同士で5度以上の方位差があるとき、前記中間までの領域を粒界と定義する。
(1) Definition of grain boundaries Using an electron beam backscattering analyzer, an observation field of view is set in a longitudinal section (described later) from the surface of the cutting tool toward the inside, for example, 100 μm wide and the region to be measured (region 10 μm away from the surface, 15 to 25 μm away from the surface), and measurements are taken at 40 nm intervals. The observation field is 5 or more. In the observation field, the measurement points (pixels) are present discretely, but the region up to the middle between adjacent measurement points (a regular hexagon can be exemplified) is represented by the measurement results of the measurement points. When there is an orientation difference of 5 degrees or more between adjacent measurement points among these measurement points, the region up to the middle is defined as the grain boundary.

ただし、隣接する測定点の全てと5度以上の方位差がある、または、隣接する測定点がない単独で存在する測定点は、結晶粒とは扱わず、2測定点以上が連結しているものを測定点と扱う。 However, if a measurement point has an orientation difference of 5 degrees or more from all of its adjacent measurement points, or if it exists alone with no adjacent measurement points, it is not treated as a crystal grain; instead, a measurement point is treated as a group of two or more measurement points that are connected.

(2)KAM値の測定
そして、結晶粒内の隣接する2ピクセルの方位差の平均値を求め、これをKAM(Kernel Average Misorientation)値と定義する。
一般的にピクセルiにおけるKAM値を数式で表す場合、測定領域を正六角形に区分して解析すると、注目点(注目する測定点、ピクセル)を取囲む最大6つの測定点間の方位差の平均として下記数1式によって表現できる。なお、[数1]中のmは測定点iと同一結晶粒内で隣接するピクセル数、αk、iはピクセルiと隣接するピクセルkとの方位差を表す。つまり、図2に示される注目点UにおけるKAM値を数式で表すと測定対象となるピクセルは1~6の6点となるため下記[数2]で求めることができ、注目点VにおけるKAM値は測定対象となるピクセルは1、2の2点となるため下記[数3]で求めることができる。
(2) Measurement of KAM Value Then, the average value of the orientation difference between two adjacent pixels in a crystal grain is calculated and defined as the KAM (Kernel Average Misorientation) value.
Generally, when expressing the KAM value at pixel i by a formula, if the measurement area is divided into a regular hexagon and analyzed, it can be expressed as the average of the orientation differences between up to six measurement points surrounding the point of interest (the measurement point of interest, pixel) by the following formula 1. In addition, m in [Formula 1] represents the number of pixels adjacent to the measurement point i in the same crystal grain, and α k,i represents the orientation difference between pixel i and adjacent pixel k. In other words, when expressing the KAM value at the attention point U shown in Figure 2 by a formula, the pixels to be measured are 6 points 1 to 6, so it can be obtained by the following [Formula 2], and the KAM value at the attention point V is the pixels to be measured are 2 points 1 and 2, so it can be obtained by the following [Formula 3].

Figure 0007643106000001
Figure 0007643106000001

Figure 0007643106000002
Figure 0007643106000002

Figure 0007643106000003
Figure 0007643106000003

なお、特許請求の範囲、明細書において、切削工具の表面とは、100倍~200倍の観察倍率で、横500~1000μm×縦400μm~800μmの観察視野で観察したときの、縦断面における切削工具表面の一番深い谷とその次に深い谷を結んだ線をいう。例えば、切削工具の表面から10μm離れるとは、この線の垂線上に工具内部に向かって10μm離れていることをいう。 In the claims and specification, the surface of a cutting tool refers to a line connecting the deepest valley and the second deepest valley on the cutting tool surface in a longitudinal section when observed at a magnification of 100 to 200 times and with a field of view of 500 to 1000 μm horizontal by 400 to 800 μm vertical. For example, being 10 μm away from the surface of a cutting tool means being 10 μm away from the perpendicular line of this line toward the inside of the tool.

縦断面とは、切削工具がインサートであるとき、その表面の凹凸を無視して、切削工具の表面が水平面であると扱ったときの切削工具表面に垂直な方向の断面であって、この垂直な方向は前述の垂線の方向と必ずしも一致しない。また、切削工具が、ドリルのような中心軸を持つものは、縦断面は、この軸に垂直な断面をいう。 When the cutting tool is an insert, a longitudinal section is a section perpendicular to the surface of the cutting tool when the surface is treated as a horizontal plane, ignoring any unevenness on the surface, and this perpendicular direction does not necessarily coincide with the direction of the perpendicular line mentioned above. Also, when the cutting tool has a central axis, such as a drill, the longitudinal section is a section perpendicular to this axis.

3.表面被覆層
本実施形態の切削工具は、そのままでも、前述の目的を達成することができるが、切刃を含む切削工具の表面に表面被覆層を設けてもよい。表面被覆層を設けると、より確実に前述の目的を達成することができる。なお、表面被覆層には、特段の制約はなく、公知のものを適宜用いることができる。
3. Surface Coating Layer The cutting tool of the present embodiment can achieve the above-mentioned object as it is, but a surface coating layer may be provided on the surface of the cutting tool including the cutting edge. By providing a surface coating layer, the above-mentioned object can be achieved more reliably. There are no particular restrictions on the surface coating layer, and any known surface coating layer can be used as appropriate.

次に、実施例により本発明を具体的に説明するが、本発明はこの実施例に限定されるものではない。 Next, the present invention will be specifically explained using examples, but the present invention is not limited to these examples.

1.原料粉末と配合
まず、焼結用の粉末として、表1に示す平均粒径(d50)が0.5~4.0μmのWC粉末、および、平均粒径(d50)が、いずれも、1.0~4.0μmの範囲内のCo粉末、Ni粉末、Cr粉末、TaC粉末、NbC粉末、TiC粉末、ZrC粉末、HfC粉末、VC粉末を用意した。
1. Blending with raw material powder First, as powders for sintering, WC powder with an average particle size (d50) of 0.5 to 4.0 μm, and Co powder, Ni powder, Cr 3 C 2 powder, TaC powder, NbC powder, TiC powder, ZrC powder, HfC powder, and VC powder with an average particle size (d50) of 1.0 to 4.0 μm shown in Table 1 were prepared.

2.成形体の作成
次に、これらの粉末を、表1に示す配合組成となるように配合して、焼結用粉末を作製し、ボールミルで72時間湿式混合し、スプレードライヤーにより乾燥した後、100MPaの圧力で、ANSI呼び記号CNMG432MSの形状を得るべくプレス成形して圧粉成形体を作製した。
2. Preparation of a green body Next, these powders were mixed to obtain the composition shown in Table 1 to prepare a powder for sintering, which was then wet-mixed in a ball mill for 72 hours and dried using a spray dryer. After that, the powder was pressed at a pressure of 100 MPa to obtain the shape of the ANSI designation CNMG432MS to prepare a green body.

3.焼結
続いて、これらの圧粉成形体を、所定の温度で所定時間保持する本焼結工程を行った。本実施例では、表2に示す条件、すなわち、0.1Pa以下の真空雰囲気中、1350~1450℃の保持温度範囲まで加熱し、該保持温度で60~120分保持を行った。
3. Sintering Next, the powder compacts were subjected to a sintering process in which they were held at a predetermined temperature for a predetermined time. In this example, the conditions shown in Table 2 were used, that is, the compacts were heated to a holding temperature range of 1350 to 1450°C in a vacuum atmosphere of 0.1 Pa or less, and held at the holding temperature for 60 to 120 minutes.

4.第1ブラスト処理(ドライブラスト処理)
砥粒として超硬造粒粉末(超硬合金の作製時に使用したものと同一の造粒粉末)を用い、表2に示す条件で処理した。表2に示す条件は、概ね次のとおりであった。
砥粒サイズ: 直径100~200μm
ブラスト圧力: 0.35~0.40MPa
投射時間: 15~20秒
投射角度: 切削工具表面の法線に対して35~55度
切削工具表面の法線とは、切削工具の表面の凹凸を無視して、切削工具の表面が水平面であると扱ったときの切削工具表面の法線をいい、前述の垂線とは必ずしも一致しない。
4. First blasting treatment (dry blasting treatment)
The abrasive grains used were granulated cemented carbide powder (the same granulated powder as that used in producing the cemented carbide alloy), and the treatment was carried out under the conditions shown in Table 2. The conditions shown in Table 2 were roughly as follows:
Abrasive grain size: diameter 100-200 μm
Blasting pressure: 0.35-0.40MPa
Projection time: 15 to 20 seconds Projection angle: 35 to 55 degrees to the normal line of the cutting tool surface
The normal line to the cutting tool surface refers to the normal line to the cutting tool surface when the cutting tool surface is treated as a horizontal plane, ignoring any irregularities on the cutting tool surface, and does not necessarily coincide with the perpendicular line described above.

5.熱処理
0.1Pa以下の真空雰囲気中で、表2に示すように700~1000℃で5~50時間保持した。
5. Heat Treatment The samples were held in a vacuum atmosphere of 0.1 Pa or less at 700 to 1000° C. for 5 to 50 hours as shown in Table 2.

6.第2ブラスト処理(ウエットブラスト処理)
ブラスト処理液として、Al砥粒を含んだ水を用いて、表2に示す条件で処理した。表2に示す条件は、概ね次のとおりであった。
メディア(砥粒)サイズ: 170~500(メッシュ)
メディア濃度: 15~60質量%
ブラスト圧力: 0.10~0.15MPa
投射時間: 6~60秒
投射角度: 切削工具表面の法線に対して35~55度
切削工具表面の法線とは、切削工具の表面の凹凸を無視して、切削工具の表面が水平面であると扱ったときの切削工具表面の法線をいい、前述の垂線とは必ずしも一致しない。
6. Second blasting treatment (wet blasting treatment)
The blasting liquid was water containing Al 2 O 3 abrasive grains, and the treatment was carried out under the conditions shown in Table 2. The conditions shown in Table 2 were roughly as follows.
Media (abrasive grain) size: 170-500 (mesh)
Media concentration: 15 to 60% by mass
Blasting pressure: 0.10-0.15MPa
Projection time: 6 to 60 seconds Projection angle: 35 to 55 degrees to the normal line of the cutting tool surface
The normal line to the cutting tool surface refers to the normal line to the cutting tool surface when the cutting tool surface is treated as a horizontal plane, ignoring any irregularities on the cutting tool surface, and does not necessarily coincide with the perpendicular line described above.

前記4.~6.の処理回数が各2回となるように、これらの処理を繰り返した。 These processes were repeated so that each of steps 4 to 6 was performed twice.

7.後処理
次に、機械加工、研削加工を行い、CNMG432MSの形状に整え、表3に示す切削工具1~10(以下、実施例1~10という)を作製した。
7. Post-treatment Next, machining and grinding were carried out to shape the CNMG432MS, and cutting tools 1 to 10 shown in Table 3 (hereinafter referred to as Examples 1 to 10) were produced.

比較のために、比較例の切削工具1’~7’(以下、比較例1’~7’という)を製造した。
その製造工程は、実施例1~10の製造工程において、第1回ブラスト処理工程および熱処理工程、第2回ブラスト処理工程を省略したもの(表2では、各工程条件が「-」で記載されているもの)、あるいは、前述の製造条件を外れた表2に示す第1回ブラスト処理工程、あるいは熱処理工程を行ったものである。
For comparison, cutting tools 1' to 7' of comparative examples (hereinafter referred to as Comparative Examples 1' to 7') were manufactured.
The manufacturing process is one in which the first blasting process, heat treatment process, and second blasting process are omitted from the manufacturing processes of Examples 1 to 10 (in Table 2, the conditions for each process are marked with "-"), or one in which the first blasting process or heat treatment process shown in Table 2 was carried out outside the manufacturing conditions described above.

すなわち、表1に示す配合組成に配合した焼結用粉末を、ボールミルで72時間湿式混合し、スプレードライヤーにより乾燥した後、100MPaの圧力でプレス成形してCNMG432MSの形状の圧粉成形体を作製し、表2に示す条件、すなわち、加熱温度:1350℃以上1450℃以下、かつ、加熱保持時間:60~120分、0.1Pa以下の真空雰囲気の条件で本焼結し、第1回ブラスト処理を行うものは、ブラスト圧力:0.10~0.20MPa、投射時間:15~20秒、投射角度:工具表面の法線に対して35~55度の条件で行い、熱処理工程を行うものは、加熱温度:400~850℃、かつ、加熱保持時間:10~50時間、0.1Pa以下の真空雰囲気で行い、第2回ブラスト処理を行うものは、メディア(砥粒):Al砥粒、メディアサイズ:230~500(メッシュ)、ブラスト圧力:0.10~0.15MPa、投射時間:6~60秒、投射角度:工具表面の法線に対して35~55度の条件で行い、これを機械加工、研削加工し、CNMG432MSインサート形状の表4に示す比較例工具1’~7’を作製した。 That is, the powder for sintering, which was blended according to the blending composition shown in Table 1, was wet mixed in a ball mill for 72 hours, dried by a spray dryer, and then pressed under a pressure of 100 MPa to produce a green compact having the shape of CNMG432MS. The green compact was then sintered under the conditions shown in Table 2, namely, a heating temperature of 1350° C. to 1450° C., a heating holding time of 60 to 120 minutes, and a vacuum atmosphere of 0.1 Pa or less. The first blasting treatment was performed under the conditions of a blasting pressure of 0.10 to 0.20 MPa, a projection time of 15 to 20 seconds, and a projection angle of 35 to 55 degrees relative to the normal line of the tool surface. The heat treatment step was performed under the conditions of a heating temperature of 400 to 850° C., a heating holding time of 10 to 50 hours, and a vacuum atmosphere of 0.1 Pa or less. The second blasting treatment was performed under the conditions of a media (abrasive grains): Al 2 O The blasting was performed under the conditions of 3 abrasive grains, media size: 230 to 500 (mesh), blast pressure: 0.10 to 0.15 MPa, projection time: 6 to 60 seconds, projection angle: 35 to 55 degrees relative to the normal to the tool surface, and the resultant was machined and ground to produce comparative example tools 1' to 7' shown in Table 4, which have a CNMG432MS insert shape.

実施例1~10および比較例1’~7’の切削工具について、前述の観察視野をもとに、成分組成、WCの平均粒径、を求め、結果を表3、表4に示す。なお、不可避的不純物の含有割合は、前述の好ましい範囲にあったことを確認している。 For the cutting tools of Examples 1 to 10 and Comparative Examples 1' to 7', the component composition and average grain size of WC were determined based on the above-mentioned observation field, and the results are shown in Tables 3 and 4. It was confirmed that the content ratio of unavoidable impurities was within the above-mentioned preferable range.

Figure 0007643106000004
Figure 0007643106000004

Figure 0007643106000005
Figure 0007643106000005

Figure 0007643106000006
Figure 0007643106000006

Figure 0007643106000007
Figure 0007643106000007

次に、前記実施例1~10および比較例1’~7’の表面に、表5に示す平均層厚の硬質被覆層をCVD法で被覆形成した。 Next, a hard coating layer with the average thickness shown in Table 5 was formed on the surfaces of Examples 1 to 10 and Comparative Examples 1' to 7' by CVD.

Figure 0007643106000008
Figure 0007643106000008

実施例1~10および比較例1’~7’対し、以下の切削試験を行い、切刃の逃げ面塑性変形量を測定するとともに、切れ刃の損耗状態を観察した。 The following cutting tests were conducted on Examples 1 to 10 and Comparative Examples 1' to 7' to measure the amount of plastic deformation on the flank of the cutting edge and to observe the state of wear on the cutting edge.

以下の切削試験では、切刃の逃げ面塑性変形量として次のものを採用した。すなわち、切削前の変形していない切刃稜線を基準とし、切削によって切刃稜線が押し込まれて変形した量を切刃の逃げ面塑性変形量とした。 In the following cutting tests, the following was used as the amount of plastic deformation on the flank of the cutting edge. In other words, the undeformed cutting edge ridge before cutting was used as the reference, and the amount of deformation caused by the cutting edge ridge being pressed in by cutting was used as the amount of plastic deformation on the flank of the cutting edge.

具体的には、図3に示すように、工具の主切刃側逃げ面(12)について、切刃から十分離れた位置で切刃(13)側逃げ面(12)とすくい面(11)が交差する稜線上に線分を引き、同線分を切刃部方向に延伸し、延伸した線分(15)と切刃部稜線間の距離(延伸した線分の垂直方向)が最も離れている部分を測定し、これを切刃の逃げ面塑性変形量(14)とした。また、切削時間終了後に切刃の損耗状態を観察した。
表6に、その切削試験の結果を示す。
Specifically, as shown in Fig. 3, for the flank (12) of the main cutting edge of the tool, a line was drawn on the ridge where the flank (12) on the cutting edge (13) side and the rake face (11) intersect at a position sufficiently away from the cutting edge, and the line was extended in the direction of the cutting edge, and the distance between the extended line (15) and the ridge of the cutting edge (perpendicular to the extended line) was measured at the farthest point, which was defined as the amount of plastic deformation (14) of the flank of the cutting edge. In addition, the wear state of the cutting edge was observed after the cutting time was completed.
Table 6 shows the results of the cutting tests.

Ti―6Al―4V合金丸棒の湿式外径旋削加工(直径200mm)
被削材:Ti―6Al―4V合金
切削速度:70m/min
切り込み:1.0mm
送り:0.16mm/rev
切削時間:5分
Wet external diameter turning of Ti-6Al-4V alloy round bar (diameter 200 mm)
Work material: Ti-6Al-4V alloy Cutting speed: 70m/min
Cut: 1.0 mm
Feed: 0.16 mm/rev
Cutting time: 5 minutes

Figure 0007643106000009
Figure 0007643106000009

また、前述の被覆層を有していない前記本発明1~4、比較例1’~4’に対して、以下の切削試験を行い、切刃の逃げ面塑性変形量を測定するとともに、切れ刃の損耗状態を観察した。
表7に、その切削試験の結果を示す。
Further, the following cutting test was carried out on the above-mentioned Inventions 1 to 4 and Comparative Examples 1' to 4' not having the above-mentioned coating layer, and the amount of plastic deformation on the flank of the cutting edge was measured, and the state of wear of the cutting edge was observed.
Table 7 shows the results of the cutting tests.

JIS・SUS304丸棒の湿式外径旋削加工(直径200mm)
被削材:JIS・SUS304
切削速度:50m/min、
切り込み:1.0mm、
送り:0.11mm/rev、
切削時間:5分、
湿式水溶性切削油使用。
Wet external diameter turning of JIS/SUS304 round bar (diameter 200 mm)
Work material: JIS/SUS304
Cutting speed: 50m/min,
Cut: 1.0 mm,
Feed: 0.11 mm/rev.
Cutting time: 5 minutes,
Uses wet water-soluble cutting oil.

Figure 0007643106000010
Figure 0007643106000010

表6および表7に示される試験結果によれば、実施例は、いずれも、寿命に影響を及ぼす重度のチッピングを発生することなく、優れた耐塑性変形性を発揮する。これに対して、比較例は、所定の切削時間において工具の塑性変形が大きく、一部のサンプルで刃先に欠損を生じた。すなわち、実施例は、結合相におけるKAM値が1未満の測定点の割合が、表面から10μm離れた内部までの表面領域では70%以上、表面から15~25μm離れた内部領域では70%以下であるために、高い耐塑性変形性および耐チッピング性を有する。 According to the test results shown in Tables 6 and 7, all of the Examples exhibit excellent resistance to plastic deformation without causing severe chipping that would affect the tool's life. In contrast, the Comparative Examples showed significant plastic deformation of the tool at a given cutting time, with some samples suffering from chipping at the cutting edge. In other words, the Examples have high resistance to plastic deformation and chipping, since the proportion of measurement points in the binder phase with a KAM value of less than 1 is 70% or more in the surface region up to 10 μm from the surface, and 70% or less in the internal region 15 to 25 μm from the surface.

1~6 結晶粒の番号
11 すくい面
12 切刃側逃げ面
13 切刃
14 逃げ面の組成変形量
15 逃げ面とすくい面の交差する稜線を延伸した線分
O 切削工具の表面領域
I 切削工具の内部領域
B 粒界
P 測定点(ピクセル)
U 注目点
V 注目点
1 to 6: crystal grain number 11: rake face 12: cutting edge side flank 13: cutting edge 14: amount of composition deformation of flank face 15: line segment O extending the ridge where the flank face and the rake face intersect; surface region I of the cutting tool; internal region B of the cutting tool; grain boundary P: measurement point (pixel)
U: Attention point V: Attention point

Claims (2)

CoとNiのいずれか1種または2種を4.0~15.0質量%、
Crを0.5質量%以下、
VCを0.5質量%以下、
TaC、NbC、TiC、ZrCおよびHfCのいずれか1種または2種以上を12.0質量%以下含み、
残部がWCおよび不可避的不純物からなり、
前記WCの平均粒径が0.5~4.0μmであって、
結合相におけるKAM値が1未満の測定点の割合が、表面から10μm離れた内部までの表面領域では70%以上、前記表面から15~25μm離れた内部領域で60%以下である、
ことを特徴とする切削工具。
One or both of Co and Ni are 4.0 to 15.0 mass%;
0.5% by mass or less of Cr 3 C 2 ,
VC at 0.5% by mass or less,
Contains 12.0 mass% or less of any one or more of TaC, NbC, TiC, ZrC and HfC;
The balance is WC and unavoidable impurities;
The average grain size of the WC is 0.5 to 4.0 μm,
The ratio of measurement points in the bonding phase having a KAM value of less than 1 is 70% or more in a surface region up to a distance of 10 μm from the surface, and 60% or less in an inner region 15 to 25 μm away from the surface.
A cutting tool characterized by:
切刃に表面被覆層を有することを特徴とする請求項1に記載の切削工具。 The cutting tool according to claim 1, characterized in that the cutting edge has a surface coating layer.
JP2021043171A 2021-03-17 2021-03-17 Cutting Tools Active JP7643106B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2021043171A JP7643106B2 (en) 2021-03-17 2021-03-17 Cutting Tools

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2021043171A JP7643106B2 (en) 2021-03-17 2021-03-17 Cutting Tools

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2022142906A JP2022142906A (en) 2022-10-03
JP7643106B2 true JP7643106B2 (en) 2025-03-11

Family

ID=83453872

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2021043171A Active JP7643106B2 (en) 2021-03-17 2021-03-17 Cutting Tools

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7643106B2 (en)

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2015508716A (en) 2012-02-29 2015-03-23 サンドビック インテレクチュアル プロパティー アクティエボラーグ Coated cutting tools
WO2017057266A1 (en) 2015-09-29 2017-04-06 京セラ株式会社 Bar stock and cutting tool
JP2019063899A (en) 2017-09-29 2019-04-25 三菱マテリアル株式会社 Surface-coated cutting tool having excellent defect resistance
JP2019107720A (en) 2017-12-18 2019-07-04 株式会社タンガロイ Coated cutting tool

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2015508716A (en) 2012-02-29 2015-03-23 サンドビック インテレクチュアル プロパティー アクティエボラーグ Coated cutting tools
WO2017057266A1 (en) 2015-09-29 2017-04-06 京セラ株式会社 Bar stock and cutting tool
JP2019063899A (en) 2017-09-29 2019-04-25 三菱マテリアル株式会社 Surface-coated cutting tool having excellent defect resistance
JP2019107720A (en) 2017-12-18 2019-07-04 株式会社タンガロイ Coated cutting tool

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2022142906A (en) 2022-10-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6459106B1 (en) Cemented carbide and cutting tools
JP6953674B2 (en) Cemented Carbide and Cutting Tools
KR20120041265A (en) Super hard alloy and cutting tool using same
JP7388431B2 (en) Cemented carbide and cutting tools containing it as a base material
JP6443207B2 (en) Cemented carbide and cutting tools
WO2015156005A1 (en) Cermet and cutting tool
JP7517483B2 (en) Cemented carbide and cutting tools containing it as a substrate
JP7732449B2 (en) WC-based cemented carbide cutting tools
JP7392423B2 (en) Cemented carbide and cutting tools containing it as a base material
WO2024203158A1 (en) Cemented carbide for cutting tool and cutting tool using same
JP7643106B2 (en) Cutting Tools
JP7654641B2 (en) Sintered polycrystalline cubic boron nitride material
JP7161677B2 (en) WC-Based Cemented Carbide Cutting Tool and Surface-Coated WC-Based Cemented Carbide Cutting Tool with Excellent Fracture Resistance
JP7587205B2 (en) Cutting Tools
WO2017150533A1 (en) Surface coated cutting tool in which hard coating layer exhibits excellent wear resistance and chipping resistance, and manufacturing method for same
JP7473871B2 (en) WC-based cemented carbide cutting tool with excellent wear resistance and chipping resistance and surface-coated WC-based cemented carbide cutting tool
JP7453616B2 (en) surface coated cutting tools
JP6912685B2 (en) Cubic boron nitride sintered body
JP7209216B2 (en) WC-based cemented carbide cutting tools and surface-coated WC-based cemented carbide cutting tools with excellent plastic deformation resistance and chipping resistance
JP2022147103A (en) Cutting tool
KR20240051212A (en) Cubic boron nitride sintered body
JP7643089B2 (en) Cutting Tools
JP7643079B2 (en) Cutting Tools
JP7346751B1 (en) Cubic boron nitride sintered body
WO2022085161A1 (en) Diamond sintered body, and tool comprising diamond sintered body

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20240209

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20241008

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20241113

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20250128

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20250210

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 7643106

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150