JPS5854704B2 - Network pseudo fault detection method for electronic exchanges - Google Patents
Network pseudo fault detection method for electronic exchangesInfo
- Publication number
- JPS5854704B2 JPS5854704B2 JP9789378A JP9789378A JPS5854704B2 JP S5854704 B2 JPS5854704 B2 JP S5854704B2 JP 9789378 A JP9789378 A JP 9789378A JP 9789378 A JP9789378 A JP 9789378A JP S5854704 B2 JPS5854704 B2 JP S5854704B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- network
- continuity
- subscriber
- time
- hook
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04M—TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
- H04M3/00—Automatic or semi-automatic exchanges
- H04M3/22—Arrangements for supervision, monitoring or testing
- H04M3/26—Arrangements for supervision, monitoring or testing with means for applying test signals or for measuring
- H04M3/28—Automatic routine testing ; Fault testing; Installation testing; Test methods, test equipment or test arrangements therefor
- H04M3/32—Automatic routine testing ; Fault testing; Installation testing; Test methods, test equipment or test arrangements therefor for lines between exchanges
- H04M3/323—Automatic routine testing ; Fault testing; Installation testing; Test methods, test equipment or test arrangements therefor for lines between exchanges for the arrangements providing the connection (test connection, test call, call simulation)
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Monitoring And Testing Of Exchanges (AREA)
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】
本発明は加入者がオンフック・オフフックを繰返すとき
発生する交換機ネットワークの疑似障害を検知する方式
に関する。DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a method for detecting a pseudo failure in a switching network that occurs when a subscriber repeatedly goes on-hook and off-hook.
従来の電子交換機においては第1図に示す検査手段によ
り加入者線・ネットワークの障害を検知していた。In conventional electronic exchanges, faults in subscriber lines and networks are detected by inspection means shown in FIG.
即ち加入者SUBが送受話器をオフフックしたとき、ラ
インリレーLRがそれを知り、図示しない中央制御装置
はネットワークNWを介してトランクTRKとの接続を
行なうためトランクTRKのA点において第1の検査手
段5CN1を動作して導通状態を検査する。That is, when the subscriber SUB takes the handset off-hook, the line relay LR knows this, and the central control unit (not shown) performs a first inspection at point A of the trunk TRK in order to establish a connection with the trunk TRK via the network NW. Operate 5CN1 to check continuity.
加入者線と交換機ネットワークとを含むパスの導通状態
を行なうが、この検査を開始したとき往々にして加入者
SUBがオンフックを行なってしまうことがあり、その
とき検査は不導通という結果を出す。The continuity of the path including the subscriber line and the exchange network is checked, but often when this test is started the subscriber SUB goes on-hook, in which case the test returns a non-continuity result.
そのためトランクTRKのA点における検査を何回か繰
返し、なお不導通が続くときネットワークNWに障害発
生の恐れがあるため、中央制御装置は第2の制御手段5
CN2を動作させる。Therefore, if the inspection at point A of the trunk TRK is repeated several times and the disconnection continues, there is a risk that a failure will occur in the network NW.
Operate CN2.
ラインリレーLRのネットワーク側8点を切断した上で
、加入者SUB側を見て加入者線の導通状態を検査する
。After disconnecting 8 points on the network side of line relay LR, the continuity state of the subscriber line is checked by looking at the subscriber SUB side.
このとき加入者SUBがオンフックのままであれば加入
者線不導通となり、発呼途中放棄のためオンフックした
ことが判断できるが、前述のオンフックに引続き再びオ
フフックをすることがあり、そのときは加入者線導通状
態良好と判断し、障害はネットワークNW内にあるとい
う結論になる。At this time, if the subscriber SUB remains on-hook, the subscriber line is disconnected, and it can be determined that the subscriber has gone on-hook to abandon the call, but it may go off-hook again following the above-mentioned on-hook, and in that case, the subscriber It is determined that the communication line is in good continuity, and the conclusion is that the fault is within the network NW.
このように加入者のオンフックとオフフックの動作の繰
返しがダイヤル番号忘れ等のため無意識に行なわれると
、交換機接続のためのハードウェアによる検査過程のタ
イミングと合致することがあって、障害が発生してなく
ても障害発生を保守者に警報することがあった。If a subscriber repeats on-hook and off-hook operations in this way unconsciously due to forgetting the dialed number, etc., the timing may coincide with the testing process by the hardware for connecting to the exchange, and a failure may occur. In some cases, maintenance personnel were alerted to the occurrence of a failure even when the system was not installed.
第2図は第1図の動作タイミングチャートを示している
。FIG. 2 shows an operation timing chart of FIG. 1.
時刻t。は当初の加入者発呼のためオフフックした時、
tlは途中放棄によるオンフックの時、T1は加入者と
トランクの接続パスをハード的に作る時間、t2はトラ
ンク監視リレーの検査開始時刻、T2は検査時間、t3
は加入者線について検査のためネツI・ワーク回路の切
断を行ない第2の検査手段の動作開始時刻、T3はその
ハード動作時間、t4は加入者の再度のオフフック時刻
、t5は加入者線導通@食開始時刻、T4はその判断時
間を示している。Time t. goes off-hook for the original subscriber call,
tl is on-hook due to premature abandonment, T1 is the time to create a connection path between the subscriber and the trunk in hardware, t2 is the trunk monitoring relay inspection start time, T2 is the inspection time, t3
is the start time of the second inspection means after disconnecting the network I/work circuit for inspection of the subscriber line, T3 is the hard operation time, t4 is the off-hook time of the subscriber again, and t5 is the subscriber line continuity. @Eclipse start time, T4 indicates the judgment time.
加入者の習性により時刻tl乃至t4の間が1乃至1.
2秒の場合が多くこのとき第1図の検査手段の動作タイ
ミングと合致し易い。Depending on the subscriber's habits, the period from time tl to t4 is 1 to 1.
In many cases, the time is 2 seconds, and in this case, it is easy to match the operation timing of the inspection means shown in FIG.
本発明の目的は前述の欠点を改善し1.交換機のネット
ワーク疑似障害が発生したときは交換機接続動作を続行
できる疑似障害検知方式を提供することにある。The purpose of the present invention is to improve the above-mentioned drawbacks and to:1. An object of the present invention is to provide a method for detecting a pseudo-failure that can continue the switching connection operation when a network pseudo-fault occurs in an exchange.
以下本発明の実施例について説明する。Examples of the present invention will be described below.
第3図は本発明におけるタイミングチャートを示す。FIG. 3 shows a timing chart in the present invention.
第3図において時刻t3までの動作は第2図の場合と同
じである。In FIG. 3, the operation up to time t3 is the same as in FIG. 2.
時刻t5において加入者線導通状態の検査を行ない正常
であった場合は、引続き時刻t5において第1図のB点
の接続を行ない、A点において第1の検査手段の動作を
再度行なう。At time t5, the continuity state of the subscriber line is inspected and if it is found to be normal, the connection at point B in FIG. 1 is subsequently made at time t5, and the operation of the first inspection means is performed again at point A.
そのとき導通状態が正常であれば、ネットワークNWに
は異常がなく、時間T2において障害ありと判断したこ
とは疑似障害であったことを知る。If the conduction state is normal at that time, it is known that there is no abnormality in the network NW, and that the failure determined at time T2 was a pseudo failure.
したがって交換機における接続動作を続行すれば良く、
ネットワーク障害発生であると警報を発する必要はない
。Therefore, all you have to do is continue the connection operation at the exchange.
There is no need to issue an alarm when a network failure occurs.
若し第1の検査手段の再度の動作において不良であれば
ネットワークNWの真の障害であると判断する。If the first test means fails again in its operation, it is determined that there is a real failure in the network NW.
なお第3図のT3の時間は第1の検査手段の再度の検査
判断時間をいう。Note that the time T3 in FIG. 3 refers to the re-inspection judgment time of the first inspection means.
このようにして本発明によれば加入者が無意識的に繰返
したオンフック・オフフックの操作により交換機ネット
ワークが障害発生でないときも、障害であると判断する
ようなことがなくなる。In this way, according to the present invention, even when there is no fault in the exchange network due to unconsciously repeated on-hook/off-hook operations by the subscriber, it is no longer determined that there is a fault.
第1図は電子交換機における検査手段の接続を説明する
図、第2図は第1図の動作タイミングチャート、第3図
は本発明の動作タイミングチャートを示す。
SUB・・・−・・加入者、NW・・・・・・ネットワ
ーク、TRK・・・・・・トランク LR・・・・・・
ラインリレーSCN・・・・・・検査手段。FIG. 1 is a diagram for explaining the connection of inspection means in an electronic exchange, FIG. 2 is an operation timing chart of FIG. 1, and FIG. 3 is an operation timing chart of the present invention. SUB------Subscriber, NW---Network, TRK---Trunk LR------
Line relay SCN...Inspection means.
Claims (1)
状態を検査する第1の検査手段と、加入者線のみの導通
状態を検査する第2の検査手段とを具備し、第1・第2
の検査手段を順次に動作させることにより前記ネットワ
ークの障害を検知する方式において、前記第1の検査手
段により導通不良、第2の検査手段により導通正常であ
った場合、引続き更に第1の検査手段を動作させ導通正
常であるときはネットワーク疑似障害であるとし、交換
機接続動作を継続させることを特徴とする電子交換機の
ネットワーク疑似障害検知方式。1 comprising a first testing means for testing the continuity state of a path including a subscriber line and an exchange network; and a second testing means for testing the continuity state of only the subscriber line;
In the method of detecting a fault in the network by sequentially operating the test means, if the first test means shows poor continuity and the second test means shows normal continuity, then the first test means is sequentially operated. A method for detecting network pseudo faults in an electronic exchange, characterized in that when the switch is activated and continuity is normal, it is assumed to be a network pseudo fault, and the switch connection operation is continued.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP9789378A JPS5854704B2 (en) | 1978-08-11 | 1978-08-11 | Network pseudo fault detection method for electronic exchanges |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP9789378A JPS5854704B2 (en) | 1978-08-11 | 1978-08-11 | Network pseudo fault detection method for electronic exchanges |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPS5525242A JPS5525242A (en) | 1980-02-22 |
| JPS5854704B2 true JPS5854704B2 (en) | 1983-12-06 |
Family
ID=14204423
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP9789378A Expired JPS5854704B2 (en) | 1978-08-11 | 1978-08-11 | Network pseudo fault detection method for electronic exchanges |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPS5854704B2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS61160102A (en) * | 1984-12-29 | 1986-07-19 | Nishihara Environ Sanit Res Corp | Process control device |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH01289333A (en) * | 1988-05-17 | 1989-11-21 | Fujitsu Ltd | Call processing at fault |
-
1978
- 1978-08-11 JP JP9789378A patent/JPS5854704B2/en not_active Expired
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS61160102A (en) * | 1984-12-29 | 1986-07-19 | Nishihara Environ Sanit Res Corp | Process control device |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPS5525242A (en) | 1980-02-22 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JPS5854704B2 (en) | Network pseudo fault detection method for electronic exchanges | |
| US3551601A (en) | Equipment for automatically retrying customer dialed calls | |
| JPH01235447A (en) | Wire terminal equipment | |
| US6304655B1 (en) | Signal capture for telecommunications switch | |
| JP2729101B2 (en) | Automatic diagnostic test method for speech coding equipment | |
| JP2823983B2 (en) | Test switching circuit of automatic reporting device | |
| JPH02260946A (en) | Back-up system | |
| JPS6351427B2 (en) | ||
| JP3636899B2 (en) | Abnormality monitoring device | |
| JPH0531983B2 (en) | ||
| JPS62130050A (en) | Diagnostic system while operating exchange subscriber circuit | |
| JPS5923506B2 (en) | Fault isolation detection method | |
| JPH0678351A (en) | Telephone exchange | |
| JPS6216077B2 (en) | ||
| JPS5856304B2 (en) | Subscriber cable pair identification method | |
| JPS63299648A (en) | Interoffice trunk circuit test system | |
| JPS6314554A (en) | Faulty call obstacle detecting system | |
| JPS63283263A (en) | System for detecting ac fault contact | |
| JPS60120643A (en) | Practical testing system of telephone exchange | |
| KR970058138A (en) | How to detect the extension subscriber status of private exchange | |
| JPH02309855A (en) | Inter-station test channel connection system | |
| JPS6145910B2 (en) | ||
| JPS6159583B2 (en) | ||
| JPH01157657A (en) | System for alternating test for remote exchange | |
| JPH0221187B2 (en) |