JPS5923506B2 - Fault isolation detection method - Google Patents
Fault isolation detection methodInfo
- Publication number
- JPS5923506B2 JPS5923506B2 JP15582977A JP15582977A JPS5923506B2 JP S5923506 B2 JPS5923506 B2 JP S5923506B2 JP 15582977 A JP15582977 A JP 15582977A JP 15582977 A JP15582977 A JP 15582977A JP S5923506 B2 JPS5923506 B2 JP S5923506B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- relay
- subscriber
- network
- failure
- current
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04Q—SELECTING
- H04Q1/00—Details of selecting apparatus or arrangements
- H04Q1/18—Electrical details
- H04Q1/20—Testing circuits or apparatus; Circuits or apparatus for detecting, indicating, or signalling faults or troubles
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Monitoring And Testing Of Exchanges (AREA)
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】
本発明民加入者線の障害とネットワークの障害とを切分
けて検出する障害分離検出方式に関するものである。DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a fault separation detection method for separately detecting a fault in a private subscriber line and a fault in a network.
電話交換システムに於いて、災害或は何らかの条件によ
り加入者線が不良になり、それによつて擬似発呼が同時
に多数発生する場合がある。In a telephone exchange system, a subscriber line may become defective due to a disaster or some other condition, which may cause a large number of pseudo calls to occur simultaneously.
このような擬似発呼及び一般の正常な発呼を交換機が検
出すると、加入者と発信レジスタトランクとをネットワ
ークを介して接続する制御が行なわれる。そめとき、通
話路導通試験が行なわれるもので、導通不良が検出され
ると、使用バス情報がタイプアウトされ、保守の為の記
録が行なわれる。従つて前述の如く擬似発呼が生じると
、加入者ループが完全に形成されていないことにより導
通不良と判定され、ネットワークの障害でもないの&ζ
使用バス情報がタイプアウトされ、保守上の混乱を招
くことになる。このような欠点を避ける為に、従来は発
信レジスタトランクにのみ、加入者線とネットワークと
の何れの障害であるかを判定する特別の構成を設けてい
るものであつた。When the exchange detects such pseudo calls and normal normal calls, it controls the connection between the subscriber and the calling register trunk via the network. When this happens, a communication line continuity test is performed, and if a continuity failure is detected, the bus information used is typed out and recorded for maintenance purposes. Therefore, when a pseudo call occurs as mentioned above, it is determined that there is a continuity failure because the subscriber loop is not completely formed, and it is not a network failure.
Bus information used is typed out, leading to confusion during maintenance. In order to avoid such drawbacks, conventionally only the originating register trunk has been provided with a special configuration for determining whether the fault is with the subscriber line or the network.
例えば第1図に示すように、加入者と加入者線とを含め
て抵抗Rsで示し、ネットワークNWを介して発信レジ
スタトランクORTとが接続されたとき、通話路導通試
験が行なわれる。なおLRは加入者回路のリレー、Aは
発信レジスタトランクORTのリレー、をは図示しない
制御リレーの接点、Rxは高抵抗であつて、通話路導通
試験時は接点をにより高抵抗Rxは短絡されている。そ
こで、一般に導通不良の判定は“リレーAの不動作・で
且つ・加入者回路のリレーLR動作・という論理によつ
て行なつている。For example, as shown in FIG. 1, when the subscriber and the subscriber line are represented by resistance Rs and are connected to the outgoing register trunk ORT via the network NW, a communication path continuity test is performed. In addition, LR is a relay of the subscriber circuit, A is a relay of the originating register trunk ORT, and Rx is a contact of a control relay (not shown), and the high resistance Rx is short-circuited by the contact during the communication path continuity test. ing. Therefore, the determination of poor continuity is generally made based on the logic that ``relay A is inoperative, and relay LR of the subscriber circuit is in operation.''
従つて、A線、B線のうちのB線に対応するネットワー
クNW上のfBの間で導通不良になると、A線側は通常
の導通状態のとき、A線側の電流IAが流れる為、リレ
ーLRの感動電流が流れないことになり、導通不良と判
定されないことになる。その為、リレーA不動作時に制
御リレーを動作させて接点をを開放して高抵抗Rxを挿
入し、電流IAを減少させて、高抵抗地気の検出を可能
する高感度回路構成とし、感動電流ILR・>1LR=
1−1Aとなるようにする。Therefore, if there is a conduction failure between fB on the network NW corresponding to the B line of the A line and the B line, the current IA on the A line side will flow when the A line side is in a normal conductive state. The current flowing through relay LR will not flow, and it will not be determined that there is a continuity failure. Therefore, when relay A is not operating, the control relay is operated, the contact is opened, and a high resistance Rx is inserted to reduce the current IA, creating a highly sensitive circuit configuration that enables detection of high resistance earth. Current ILR・>1LR=
Make it 1-1A.
その場合の電流1Aは高抵抗の挿入により無視し得る値
となるので、リレーLR動作、リレーA不動作の状態を
形成して導通不良を検出することができる。一方A線に
対応するネツトワークNW上のFA間で導通不良が発生
し、B線側が導通状態の場合には、リレーLRが動作す
るので、制御リレーの動作により接点tを開放するか否
かにかかわらず導通不良を検出することができる。In this case, the current of 1 A becomes a negligible value due to the insertion of a high resistance, so that it is possible to detect a continuity failure by forming a state in which relay LR is operating and relay A is not operating. On the other hand, if a continuity failure occurs between the FAs on the network NW corresponding to the A line and the B line is in a conductive state, the relay LR will operate, so whether or not the contact t is opened by the operation of the control relay is determined. It is possible to detect continuity defects regardless of the situation.
このように導通不良の判定は、発呼時に0RTに接続し
て導通試験を行なうものであるから、その0RTにのみ
制御回路と高抵抗の挿入回路とを設けており、このよう
な制御回路と高抵抗の挿入回路を有しない他のトランク
では導通試験を行なわない。In this way, a continuity test is performed by connecting to 0RT when a call is made to determine continuity, so a control circuit and a high-resistance insertion circuit are provided only for 0RT, and such a control circuit and Continuity tests are not performed on other trunks that do not have high resistance insertion circuits.
本発明は、前述の制御回路や高抵抗の挿入回路を必要と
せずに、加入渚線とネツトワークとの障害とを分離して
検出し得るようにすることを目的とし、特にネツトワー
ク障害の情報をタイプアウトする際眠加入者線の障害等
のネツトワークの障害でないのに、障害発生の如くタイ
プアウトされるのを防止することを目的とするものであ
る。The object of the present invention is to enable separate detection of faults between connected shore lines and networks without the need for the aforementioned control circuits or high-resistance insertion circuits. The purpose of this is to prevent information from being typed out as if a failure had occurred even though there is no network failure such as a failure in a sleepy subscriber line.
以下実施例について詳細に説明する。第2図は本発明の
実施例の要部説明図であり、第1図と同一符号は同一部
分を示し、CCは中央制御装置、1rはリレーLRの接
点、aはリレーAの接成 COはカツトオフリレ一の接
点であつて、接点1?R,aの状態は中央制御装置CC
の走査によつて読取られる。Examples will be described in detail below. FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram of the main parts of the embodiment of the present invention, where the same reference numerals as in FIG. is the first contact point of the cutoff relay, and is the first contact point? The state of R and a is determined by the central controller CC.
is read by scanning.
通話路導通試験の結果、導通不良と判定されると、接点
COをメークして加入者回路のリレーLRに電流が流れ
るようにする.そのとき、ネツトワーク側の図中1aの
流れるA線側の全抵抗をRalリレーLRを介して流れ
る電流1bの径路の抵抗をRbとし、加入者線の抵抗R
sとネツトワークNW(7)B線側の抵抗とカツトオフ
リレ一の接点COを介しで接続されいる抵抗とを含む全
抵抗をRとすると、実際の回路構成から導出される等価
回路は第3図に示すものとなる。ここで加入者側に流れ
るループ電流は、B,a●Rbl=E/〔R+一ーーー
±)〕となる。If the communication path continuity test results in poor continuity, contact CO is made to allow current to flow through relay LR in the subscriber circuit. At that time, the total resistance on the side of the A line 1a flowing through the network side in the figure is Ral, the resistance of the path of the current 1b flowing through the relay LR is Rb, and the resistance of the subscriber line R
s, network NW (7) If the total resistance including the resistance on the B line side and the resistance connected via the contact CO of the cut-off relay is R, then the equivalent circuit derived from the actual circuit configuration is shown in Figure 3. It will be as shown below. Here, the loop current flowing to the subscriber side is B,a●Rbl=E/[R+1--±)].
なおEは112.4−Rh電源電圧である。Note that E is the 112.4-Rh power supply voltage.
従つて各電流A,Ibは、で表わされる。従つて導通不
良ど判定されたとき、電流1bがリレーLRの感動電流
より大で、リレーLRが動作した場合は、加入者回路の
走査結果がオフフツク状態のとき、ネツトワークNWの
障害と判定される。Therefore, each current A, Ib is expressed by . Therefore, when it is determined that there is a continuity failure, if the current 1b is larger than the current of relay LR and relay LR operates, it is determined that there is a failure in the network NW when the scanning result of the subscriber circuit is in an off-hook state. Ru.
即ちネツトワークNWが導通不良で抵抗Raが大である
ことにより、電流1′bが大となるからである。即ち分
流電流値A,Ibと各リレーA,LRの感動電流値とを
比較することにより、障害が加入者線かネツトワークか
の何れに発生したかを検出することができる。又電流,
1aがリレーAの感動電流以下では、リレーAが不動作
であるが、このとき電流1bがリレーLRの感動電流以
下であると、リレーLRも動作しない。従つて、この場
合は加入者がオフフツクであると、加入者線障害である
と判定できるが、ネツトワークNWの障害検出対象から
外される。即ち加入者がオンフツクの状態と同じ状態と
みなすことができる。本発明に於いて着目すべき点は、
擬似発呼時、ネツトワークNWの通話路が形成されてい
ないときに、発呼検出するリレーLRの感動電流値が検
出閾値とほぼ等しいような場合に、0RTへ接続後の導
通試験では当然導通不良(一般に感動電流はリレーLR
よりリレーAの方が大きい)となり、ネツトワークNW
の障害と判定されるところを、カツトオフリレ一の接点
COによりリレーLRを接続して、そのリレーLRへ電
流を分流させることである。このようにして分流された
電流は、リレーLRの感動電流より小さいので、このリ
レーLRは不動作となり、加入者がオンフツク状態であ
るとみなすことができ(実際にオンフツクである場合が
多い)、少なくともネツトワークNWの障害とみなさな
いことになる。前述の如き障害分離検出は、接点A,f
rの状態を走査読取りにより中央制御装置CCのプログ
ラムで行なうことができる。前述の実施例は発呼検出に
より加入者と発信レジスタトランクとをネツトワークを
介して接続した場合、導通試験を行なつた結果、導通不
良と判定されたとき、加入者回路のリレーLRと発信レ
ジスタトランク0RTのリレーAとに電流が分流する回
路を形成し、導通不良でない側のリレーに多く電流が流
れることにより、加入者線とネツトワークとの何れlこ
障害が発生したかを検出するもので、従来例の如き制御
回路や高抵抗挿入回路を必要としないものである。That is, the current 1'b becomes large because the network NW has poor continuity and the resistance Ra is large. That is, by comparing the shunt current values A, Ib with the sensing current values of each relay A, LR, it is possible to detect whether a fault has occurred in the subscriber line or in the network. Also current,
When current 1a is below the moving current of relay A, relay A is inoperative, but at this time, when current 1b is below the moving current of relay LR, relay LR is also inoperative. Therefore, in this case, if the subscriber is off-hook, it can be determined that there is a subscriber line failure, but the subscriber is excluded from the failure detection target of the network NW. In other words, it can be considered that the subscriber is in the same state as on-hook. The points to be noted in the present invention are:
During a pseudo call, when the communication path of the network NW has not been formed and the current value of the relay LR that detects the call is almost equal to the detection threshold, the continuity test after connecting to 0RT will naturally detect continuity. Defective (Generally, touching current is relay LR
(relay A is larger than that), and the network NW
When a fault is detected in the cut-off relay, the relay LR is connected through the contact CO of the cut-off relay, and the current is shunted to the relay LR. Since the current shunted in this way is smaller than the current flowing through relay LR, this relay LR becomes inoperable, and it can be assumed that the subscriber is on-hook (which is actually on-hook in many cases); At least it will not be regarded as a failure of the network NW. Fault isolation detection as described above is performed using contacts A and f.
The state of r can be programmed in the central controller CC by scanning. In the above-mentioned embodiment, when a subscriber and a calling register trunk are connected via a network by detecting a call, when a continuity test is performed and it is determined that there is poor continuity, the relay LR in the subscriber circuit and the calling register trunk are connected to each other via a network. A circuit is formed in which current is shunted to relay A of the register trunk 0RT, and by allowing more current to flow to the relay on the side with no continuity failure, it is possible to detect whether a failure has occurred in the subscriber line or the network. This eliminates the need for a control circuit or a high-resistance insertion circuit as in the conventional example.
従つて発信レジスタトランク以外のトランクに接続され
た場合に於いても、導通不良となるときに、本発明を適
用して障害分離検出を行なわせることができる。以上説
明したように、本発明(夫通話路導通試験の結果、導通
不良と判定されたときに、加入者回路側(こ流れるルー
プ電流を、加入者回路のリレーLRと、トランクのリレ
ーAとに分流するように、加入者回路のリレーLRをカ
ツトオフリレ一の接点COを介して加入者側の線路に接
続して、加入者回烙のリレーLRが動作するか否かを識
別し、そのリレーLRが不動作のときはネツトワークN
Wの障害でなく、リレーLRが動作したときはネツトワ
ークNWの障害であるど判定するもので、加入者線障害
とネツトワークNW障害とを切分けて検出することがで
きる。Therefore, even when connected to a trunk other than the originating register trunk, the present invention can be applied to perform fault isolation detection when a continuity failure occurs. As explained above, the present invention (when it is determined that there is a continuity failure as a result of the main line continuity test), the loop current flowing on the subscriber circuit side (the loop current flowing in the subscriber circuit side) is transmitted to the relay LR of the subscriber circuit and the relay A of the trunk. Connect the relay LR of the subscriber circuit to the line on the subscriber side via the contact CO of the cut-off relay so that the current is shunted to the subscriber circuit, identify whether the relay LR of the subscriber circuit operates, and When LR is inactive, network N
When the relay LR operates instead of a fault in W, it is determined that the fault is in the network NW, and subscriber line faults and network NW faults can be detected separately.
従つて従来例のような制御回路や高抵抗挿入回路を必要
としないので、発信レジスタトランク以外の各種トラン
クに接続された場合に於いても、障害分離検出が可能と
なり、交換システムの運用上の信頼性を向上することが
できる。又障害分離検出は、中央制御装置CCのプログ
ラムで行なう以外に、クロスバ一交換機に於けるマーカ
のハード構成により行なうようにすることも可能である
。Therefore, there is no need for a control circuit or a high-resistance insertion circuit as in conventional systems, so fault isolation and detection is possible even when connected to various trunks other than the transmitting register trunk, which improves the operational efficiency of the switching system. Reliability can be improved. In addition to being carried out by the program of the central control unit CC, fault isolation detection can also be carried out by the hardware configuration of the marker in the crossbar exchange.
第1図は従来の加入者線障害とネツトワーク障害との分
離検出の説明図、第2図ぱ本発明の実施例の説明図、第
3図は第2図の等価回録である。FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram of conventional separation detection of subscriber line failures and network failures, FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram of an embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 3 is an equivalent reprint of FIG. 2.
Claims (1)
れたとき、通話路導通試験を行なう交換システムに於い
て、前記通話路導通試験の結果、導通不良と判定された
ときに、前記加入者側の線路に流れるループ電流を、加
入者回路のリレーと、前記トランクのリレーとに分流す
るように、前記加入者回路のリレーをカットオフリレー
の接点を介して前記加入者側の線路に接続し、前記加入
者回路のリレーが不動作のとき、前記ネットワークの障
害とせず、前記加入者回路のリレーが動作したときは前
記ネットワークの障害と判定することを特徴とする障害
分離検出方式。1. When a subscriber and a trunk are connected via a network, in a switching system that performs a call path continuity test, if a continuity failure is determined as a result of the call path continuity test, the subscriber's Connecting the relay of the subscriber circuit to the line on the subscriber side via a contact point of a cut-off relay so that the loop current flowing in the line is divided into the relay of the subscriber circuit and the relay of the trunk, A failure isolation detection method characterized in that when a relay in the subscriber circuit is inoperative, it is not determined to be a failure in the network, and when a relay in the subscriber circuit is activated, it is determined to be a failure in the network.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP15582977A JPS5923506B2 (en) | 1977-12-24 | 1977-12-24 | Fault isolation detection method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP15582977A JPS5923506B2 (en) | 1977-12-24 | 1977-12-24 | Fault isolation detection method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPS5488009A JPS5488009A (en) | 1979-07-12 |
| JPS5923506B2 true JPS5923506B2 (en) | 1984-06-02 |
Family
ID=15614395
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP15582977A Expired JPS5923506B2 (en) | 1977-12-24 | 1977-12-24 | Fault isolation detection method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPS5923506B2 (en) |
-
1977
- 1977-12-24 JP JP15582977A patent/JPS5923506B2/en not_active Expired
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPS5488009A (en) | 1979-07-12 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US3892928A (en) | Switching system equipped with line verification apparatus | |
| JPS5923506B2 (en) | Fault isolation detection method | |
| CN102332998A (en) | Method, device and system for positioning link fault | |
| Chadha et al. | Advanced mobile phone service: Mobile telephone switching office | |
| JPS5827708B2 (en) | Cut test circuit | |
| US3064090A (en) | Line testing circuit | |
| US2595388A (en) | Telephone conversation timing means | |
| JPS59111452A (en) | Subscriber line confirming and calling tester | |
| US3825698A (en) | Test-through circuit for telephone system voltage boosters | |
| JPH04122162A (en) | Self-diagnosis system for terminal system equipment | |
| JPS5854704B2 (en) | Network pseudo fault detection method for electronic exchanges | |
| JPH08163240A (en) | Private branch exchange | |
| US4278849A (en) | Test arrangement for automatic number identification systems | |
| JPS63283263A (en) | System for detecting ac fault contact | |
| JPH02105755A (en) | Ringing pre-trip testing system | |
| JP4502668B2 (en) | Telephone line switching system in the event of a failure to stop on-site telephone service | |
| JPH0233419Y2 (en) | ||
| JPS60130249A (en) | Device for diagnosing automatically subscriber line fault | |
| JPH02260946A (en) | Back-up system | |
| JPH0377466A (en) | Backup system for private line in digital multiplexer | |
| JPS5836062A (en) | Automatic restarting processing system | |
| JPH0313140A (en) | System for detecting fault in i interface circuit | |
| JPS5927539B2 (en) | Scanning device failure detection method | |
| JPH04130556A (en) | Terminal equipment | |
| JPS5817799A (en) | Sampling system |