Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JPS6129982B2 - - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JPS6129982B2 - - Google Patents

Info

Publication number
JPS6129982B2
JPS6129982B2 JP11123677A JP11123677A JPS6129982B2 JP S6129982 B2 JPS6129982 B2 JP S6129982B2 JP 11123677 A JP11123677 A JP 11123677A JP 11123677 A JP11123677 A JP 11123677A JP S6129982 B2 JPS6129982 B2 JP S6129982B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
parts
weight
resin
styrene
composition
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
JP11123677A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS5445359A (en
Inventor
Akira Ikeda
Akira Kamya
Hideji Tsuchikawa
Seiichi Nochimori
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JSR Corp
Original Assignee
Japan Synthetic Rubber Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Japan Synthetic Rubber Co Ltd filed Critical Japan Synthetic Rubber Co Ltd
Priority to JP11123677A priority Critical patent/JPS5445359A/en
Publication of JPS5445359A publication Critical patent/JPS5445359A/en
Publication of JPS6129982B2 publication Critical patent/JPS6129982B2/ja
Granted legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Compositions Of Macromolecular Compounds (AREA)
  • Graft Or Block Polymers (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】[Detailed description of the invention]

本発明は、スチレン系樹脂と芳香族ポリカーボ
ネート樹脂とを配合してなる耐衝撃性及び成形加
工性が優れたポリカーボネート樹脂組成物に関す
る。 スチレン系樹脂と芳香族ポリカーボネート樹脂
との組成物は、一般的に前者の耐熱性、耐衝撃性
及び機械的特性を改良し、また後者の成形加工性
及び耐衝撃性を向上させることを目的として種々
検討されている。しかしながら両者の相溶性及び
流動性の差が大きいために、広範囲の成形領域に
おいて加工性及び耐衝撃性を高度に保持すること
がはなはだ困難であり、当該分野においてこれら
の諸性質を効果的に複合付与した樹脂を開発する
ことが重要な課題となつている。 スチレン系樹脂とポリカーボネート樹脂との組
成物の例として、ポリカーボネート樹脂にハイイ
ンパクトポリスチレン(ブタジエン−スチレン共
重合体)をブレンドする(英国特許第854475
号)、ABS樹脂、(アクリロニトリル−ブタジエ
ン−スチレングラフト共重合体)をブレンドする
(特公昭38−15225)、スチレン−ブタジエン共重
合体にスチレン及びメタクリル酸メチルをグラフ
ト共重合した重合体をブレンドする(特公昭39−
71)、スチレン−ブタジエン共重合体にスチレ
ン、メタクリル酸メチル及びアクリロニトリルを
グラフト共重合した重合体をブレンドする(特公
昭42−11496)等を挙げることができる。 しかし、これらは主としてポリカーボネート樹
脂の加工性(流動性)を改良することを目的とし
たものであり、ポリカーボネート樹脂の本来の性
質を保持しつつ、かつ、大幅な耐衝撃性の向上を
意図したものではない。また、ポリカーボネート
樹脂にゴム含有量の高いABS樹脂をブレンドす
る(特公昭48−12170)方法では、ポリカーボネ
ート樹脂の機械的性質は改良されるが、流動性は
向上しない。 一方、ポリカーボネート樹脂とスチレン系樹脂
は相溶性があまり良くならないために、均一にブ
レンドすることが大きな技術的課題とされてい
る。 従来から、ポリカーボネート樹脂の海にスチレ
ン系樹脂の島を均一に分散させた場合、耐衝撃性
が大幅に高くなることが見出されている(プラス
チツクスVol.21、No.11)。しかし、この準安定性
な平衡状態がくずれると相分離を起こし、同時に
耐衝撃性は極端に低下する。これには、両ポリマ
ーの本来の性質からくる相溶性及び流動性の差が
起因している。従つて広範囲の温度領域では、ス
チレン系樹脂の特性を生かした成形加工性の向上
と、耐衝撃性の付与とを同時に満足させること
は、はなはだ困難である。 本発明者らは、上記の難点を解決すべく、鋭意
検討を重ねた結果、粒子径の大きい、溶媒(トル
エン)不溶分(ゲル)を含有するゴム重合体のラ
テツクスを使用し、スチレンを主体とする単量体
をグラフト共重合させて、特定のグラフト率にし
たスチレン系樹脂をポリカーボネート樹脂にブレ
ンドした組成物が、予期しない程の優れた耐衝撃
性及び成形加工性を有する事実を見出し、この知
見に基づいて本発明を達成した。 即ち本発明は、ポリカーボネート樹脂(A)95〜50
重量部と、平均粒径が0.4μm以上で、40〜80重
量%が溶媒(トルエン)に不溶であるゴム状重合
体のラテツクス15〜60重量部(固形分換算)の存
在下に、90重量%以上がスチレンである単量体85
〜40重量部をグラフト重合し、 グラフト率(%)=ジメチルホルムアミド不溶分量(g)−ゴム状重合体量(g)/ゴム状重合体量(g)×10
0 で定義されるグラフト率が50〜120%であるスチ
レン系樹脂(B)5〜50重量部とよりなる高耐衝撃
性、高加工性ポリカーボネート樹脂組成物であ
る。 本発明によれば成形品の耐衝撃性及び広範囲の
温度領域で成形加工性を著しく改良したポリカー
ボネート樹脂を主体とする熱可塑性樹脂組成物を
提供することができる。 本発明に用いられるゴム状重合体はポリブタエ
ン、スチレン−ブタジエン共重合ゴム、アクリロ
ニトリル−ブタジエン共重合ゴム、ポリイソプレ
ンなどであり、乳化重合法で得られるラテツクス
あるいは再乳化法で製造したラテツクスが使用さ
れる。 本発明の組成物に優れた耐衝撃性を付与させる
ためには、ゴム状重合体の性状、即ち粒径及びゲ
ル量に自ずと限界があつて、しかもゴム状重合体
を基体とするグラフト共重合体が、特定のグラフ
ト率を有することが必要である。 スチレン系樹脂の製造においては、ゴム状重合
体ラテツクスの平均粒子径は0.4μm(4000Å)
以上であることが必要である。平均粒子径が大き
いほどスチレン系樹脂及び組成物の耐衝撃強度は
高くなるが、2μm以上になるとラテツクスの安
定性が低下し、乳化グラフト重合がやや困難にな
り、また組成物の成形加工性が低下するので、
0.4〜1.0μm程度の平均粒子径のゴム状重合体ラ
テツクスが好ましい。0.4μm未満では実用上耐
衝撃性の優れた組成物は得られない。 ラテツクス中のゴム状重合体はその40〜80重量
%が溶媒(トルエン)に不溶(ゲル)でなければ
ならない。不溶分が40重量%未満あるいは80重量
%を超えると満足な衝撃強度が得られにくくな
る。 ゴム状重合体ラテツクス15〜60重量部(固形分
として)に90重量%以上がスチレンである単量体
85〜40重量部を加え、ラジカル重合開始剤により
グラフト重合する。ゴム状重合体が15重量部未満
では組成物の耐衝撃性の向上が十分でなく、また
60重量部を超えるとスチレン系樹脂がゴム質とな
り、ポリカーボネート樹脂との相溶性の低下をき
たし、かつ加工性を損う。組成物の特性により安
定に発揮するにはスチレン系樹脂中のゴム状重合
体の量は30〜50重量部が好ましい。 スチレン以外の単量体としては、α−メチルス
チレン、ビニルトルエン、p−クロルスチレン、
2・4−ジブロムスチレンなどのスチレン誘導
体、メチルメタクリレート、メチルアクリレー
ト、アクリロニトリルなどのスチレンと共重合可
能な単量体の一種以上が用いられる。スチレンが
90重量%未満では組成物の加工性が悪化し、コス
トが上昇する等の面で好ましくない。 本発明の組成物の耐衝撃性を向上させるには、
スチレン系樹脂に関して、上述したグラフト率を
50〜120%にする必要がある。グラフト率が50%
未満あるいは120%を超えると満足な衝撃強度が
得られにくくなる。グラフト重合体の製造におけ
る重合方式は特に限定されない。ゴム状重合体ラ
テツクスとスチレンを主体とする単量体の全量を
添加して重合を開始しても、スチレンを主体とす
る単量体を連続的にあるいは分割して、あるいは
一部を仕込んで開始した後、残部を連続的に添加
して重合しても良い。最も好ましい方法はスチレ
ンを主体とする単量体の一部を仕込んで所定転化
率60〜90%まで重合した後、残部を連続的に加え
て重合を完結する方法である。またバツチ式でも
連続式でも良い。 本発明で使用されるポリカーボネート樹脂は、
主鎖に芳香族残部を有する芳香族ポリカーボネー
ト樹脂である。一般には2・2−ビス(4−オキ
シフエニル)アルカン系、ビス(4−オキシフエ
ニル)エーテル系、ビス(4−オキシフエニル)
スルホン、スルフイドまたはスルホキサイド系な
どのビスフエノール類からなる重合体もしくは共
重合体を使用するが、目的に応じてハロ置換され
たビスフエノール類を使用しても差付えない。 本発明組成物は、ポリカーボネート樹脂95〜50
重量部に対し、スチレン系樹脂5〜50重量部であ
る。スチレン系樹脂が、5重量部未満の場合は成
形加工性が悪く、成形領域が狭くなる。一方、50
重量部を超える場合は、成形加工性が向上するが
耐衝撃性及び機械的性質が低下するので好ましく
ない。 本組成物の特性を特に満足させるには、スチレ
ン系樹脂の量は10〜50重量部が好ましい。 本発明組成物の製造方法としては、一般的な混
合方法が用いられ、例えば加熱ロール、バンバリ
ーミキサー、押出機等による混融混合法が適用で
きる。 本発明の組成物は、熱安定剤、顔料、無機系充
填剤、難燃剤等の通常使用される種々の添加剤を
含有しても良い。 次に本発明を実施例によつて更に具体的に説明
する。または物性は次の方法に従つて測定した。 アイゾツト衝撃強度 ASTM D256試験法 1/4インチ、ノツチ付き、23℃測定 流動性(Q) 高化式フローテスター使用 荷重30Kg/cm2、ノズル径1mm〓×2mm、250℃測
定 熱変形温度 ASTM D648試験法、 荷重18.6Kg/cm2 ロツクウエル硬度 ASTM D785試験法 伸 び ASTM D638試験法 ゴム状重合体の溶媒不溶分 乾燥ゴム状重合体1
gを精秤して、トルエン100mlに溶解し、48時
間、室温で放置後の不溶分量を100メツシユの
合網で過し、その液20ml中の固形物を定量
し、下式により算出した。 不溶分(%)=(溶解前ゴム重量(g))−5×(液中の固形分(g))/(溶解前ゴム重量(g))×10
0 なお、実施例および比較例中の部および%は重
量基準である。 実施例 1 スチレン系樹脂の製造− 平均粒子径6250Å(溶媒(トルエン)不溶分68
%)のポリブタジエンラテツクス50部(固形分換
算)、スチレン20部、ロジン酸カリウム1.0部、水
酸化カリウム0.1部、ピロリン酸ソーダ0.2部、デ
キストローズ0.3部、硫酸第1鉄0.01部、水150部
を撹拌器付き反応器に仕込み、窒素置換した後70
℃に昇温し、ラジカル重合触媒としてクメンハイ
ドロパーオキサイド0.2部を添加し、1時間重合
反応を行う。その後、別途調整したスチレン30
部、ロジン酸カリウム1.5部、水酸化カリウム0.1
部、クメンハイドロパーオキサイド0.2部、水50
部からなる乳濁液を3時間にわたつて重合系に連
続添加する。その後更に1時間、ジヤケツト温度
を70℃に保ちながら反応を続け重合を終了する。
以上の方法で重合転化率は98%であつた。生成し
たラテツクスに老化防止剤として2・6−ジ−t
−ブチル−p−クレゾールを1.0部添加し、硫酸
2.0部を添加して加熱凝固し、過、水洗、乾燥
して粉末状の樹脂(a)を得た。 前記の方法でこの樹脂のグラフト率を測定した
ところ83%であつた。 実施例2、比較例1〜3 実施例1で得た樹脂(a)とポリカーボネート樹脂
(ユーピロンS−3000、三菱ガス化学製)とを押
出機(シリンダー温度240℃)で混合して表1に
示す割合の粒状組成物を得た。この組成物を乾燥
後、射出成形機(シリンダー温度250℃)を用い
て各種の試験片を成型し、物性を測定した。結果
を表1に示す。組成物の熱変形温度及び硬度はス
チレン系樹脂とポリカーボネート樹脂の比率によ
つて変化するが本発明の範囲内では実用上十分で
ある。伸びはスチレン系樹脂の比率が増すにつれ
てきわめて大きくなり、粘り強さが向上すること
を示している。アイゾツト衝撃強度及び流動性は
ポリカーボネート樹脂単品よりも高く、時に前者
に関して極めて優れていることが判る。 実施例 3 実施例1のポリブタジエンを40部に、そして連
続添加するスチレンを40部にすること以外は実施
例1と同様にして行つた。この方法での重合転化
率は97%であり、この樹脂(b)のグラフト率は74%
であつた。 実施例4、比較例4〜5 実施例3で得た樹脂(b)とポリカーボネート樹脂
(ユーピロンS−3000)を実施例2と同様の条件
で処理し物性を測定した結果を表2に示す。 ポリカーボネート樹脂に実施例3に記載したス
チレン系樹脂(b)を混合することにより、ポリカー
ボネート樹脂の成形加工性(流動性)及び耐衝撃
性が著しく改善されることが判る。 比較例 6〜8 実施例1のポリブタジエンを10部に、そして連
続添加するスチレンを70部にすること以外は実施
例1と同様にして行つた。この方法の重合転化率
は93%であり、この樹脂のグラフト率は155%で
あつた。この樹脂(C)とポリカーボネート樹脂(ユ
ーピロンS−3000)とを配合して組成物となし、
その物性を測定した。 表3に示されるように本発明の範囲以外の組成
物では、耐衝撃性が極めて悪く、その成形品はも
ろくて、実用上、不満足な結果を与える。 比較例 9〜11 実施例1のポリブタジエンを70部にそして連続
添加するスチレンを10部にすること以外、実施例
1と同様にして行い、樹脂(d)を得た。重合転化率
は97%であり、樹脂(d)のグラフト率は35%であつ
た。実施例2と同様にして組成物となし、その物
性を測定した結果を表3に併記する。 本組成物では流動性が極めて低く、そのために
成形品の表面状態が極めて悪くなる。またアイゾ
ツト衝撃強度の測定値のフレ幅が大きくなり、成
形品としては実用的でないことが判る。 比較例 12、13 ポリブタジエンとして平均粒子径2300Å(溶媒
(トルエン)不溶分75%)を用いて実施例3に準
じて樹脂(e)を製造した。この方法での重合転化率
は95%であり、樹脂(e)のグラフト率は100%であ
つた。実施例2と同様にして組成物となし、その
物性を測定した結果を表4に示す。 ポリカーボネート樹脂よりも耐衝撃性及び流動
性が向上しているが、本発明組成物(表2のb−
5、b−6)と比較して物性バランスが良くな
い。 b−5及び比較例12の組成物を用いて、射出成
形機のシリンダー温度を変えて成形し、アイゾツ
ト衝撃強度を測定した。結果を表5に示すが、本
発明組成物は比較例12と比較して、成形温度に対
する依存性が小さく安定した物性を与えることが
判る。 比較例 14、15 実施例1のポリブタジエンを10部、そして最初
に添加するスチレンを40部とし、連続添加するス
チレンを50部にして実施例1と同様にして行つ
た。この方法での転化率は91%であり、この樹脂
(f)のグラフト率は98%であつた。実施例2と同様
にして組成物となし、その物性を測定した結果を
表6に示す。 比較例 16、17 実施例1においてクメンハイドロパーオキサイ
ド成分の代りに、触媒として水溶性の過硫酸カリ
ウム0.8部を重合時に使用した。この方法による
重合転化率は93%であり、この樹脂(g)のグラ
フト率は38%であつた。実施例2と同様にして組
成物となし、その物性を測定した結果を表6に併
記する。
The present invention relates to a polycarbonate resin composition that is made by blending a styrene resin and an aromatic polycarbonate resin and has excellent impact resistance and moldability. Compositions of styrenic resin and aromatic polycarbonate resin are generally used to improve the heat resistance, impact resistance, and mechanical properties of the former, and to improve the moldability and impact resistance of the latter. Various methods are being considered. However, due to the large difference in compatibility and fluidity between the two, it is extremely difficult to maintain a high level of processability and impact resistance in a wide range of molding areas, and in this field it is difficult to effectively combine these properties. Developing resins with such properties has become an important issue. As an example of a composition of styrene resin and polycarbonate resin, high impact polystyrene (butadiene-styrene copolymer) is blended with polycarbonate resin (British Patent No. 854475).
No.), blending ABS resin (acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene graft copolymer) (Japanese Patent Publication No. 38-15225), blending a polymer obtained by graft copolymerizing styrene and methyl methacrylate with a styrene-butadiene copolymer. (Tokuko Showa 39-
71), blending a polymer obtained by graft copolymerizing styrene, methyl methacrylate, and acrylonitrile to a styrene-butadiene copolymer (Japanese Patent Publication No. 11496/1973). However, these are mainly aimed at improving the processability (flowability) of polycarbonate resin, and are intended to significantly improve impact resistance while retaining the original properties of polycarbonate resin. isn't it. Furthermore, in the method of blending ABS resin with a high rubber content with polycarbonate resin (Japanese Patent Publication No. 48-12170), the mechanical properties of the polycarbonate resin are improved, but the fluidity is not improved. On the other hand, since polycarbonate resins and styrene resins do not have very good compatibility, uniform blending is a major technical challenge. It has long been discovered that impact resistance can be significantly increased if islands of styrene resin are uniformly dispersed in a sea of polycarbonate resin (Plastics Vol. 21, No. 11). However, if this metastable equilibrium state is disrupted, phase separation occurs, and at the same time, impact resistance is extremely reduced. This is due to the difference in compatibility and fluidity resulting from the inherent properties of both polymers. Therefore, in a wide temperature range, it is extremely difficult to simultaneously improve moldability by taking advantage of the characteristics of styrenic resins and impart impact resistance. In order to solve the above-mentioned difficulties, the inventors of the present invention have made extensive studies and have developed a rubber polymer latex that has large particle diameters and contains solvent (toluene) insoluble matter (gel), and has a rubber polymer that is mainly composed of styrene. Discovered the fact that a composition obtained by blending a styrene resin with a specific grafting ratio into a polycarbonate resin by graft copolymerizing monomers thereof has unexpectedly excellent impact resistance and moldability, The present invention was achieved based on this knowledge. That is, the present invention uses polycarbonate resin (A) 95 to 50
90 parts by weight and 15 to 60 parts by weight (calculated as solid content) of a rubbery polymer latex with an average particle size of 0.4 μm or more and 40 to 80% by weight insoluble in a solvent (toluene). Monomers of which % or more is styrene85
~40 parts by weight was graft-polymerized, and graft ratio (%) = amount of dimethylformamide insoluble portion (g) - amount of rubbery polymer (g) / amount of rubbery polymer (g) x 10
This is a highly impact resistant and highly processable polycarbonate resin composition comprising 5 to 50 parts by weight of a styrene resin (B) having a graft ratio defined as 0 to 50 to 120%. According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a thermoplastic resin composition mainly composed of a polycarbonate resin, which significantly improves the impact resistance of molded articles and the moldability over a wide temperature range. The rubbery polymers used in the present invention include polybutaene, styrene-butadiene copolymer rubber, acrylonitrile-butadiene copolymer rubber, polyisoprene, etc. Latex obtained by emulsion polymerization method or latex produced by re-emulsification method is used. Ru. In order to impart excellent impact resistance to the composition of the present invention, there are naturally limits to the properties of the rubbery polymer, that is, the particle size and gel content, and the graft copolymer based on the rubbery polymer It is necessary that the coalescence has a certain grafting ratio. In the production of styrenic resins, the average particle diameter of rubbery polymer latex is 0.4 μm (4000 Å).
It is necessary that it is above. The larger the average particle size, the higher the impact strength of the styrenic resin and composition, but when it exceeds 2 μm, the stability of the latex decreases, emulsion graft polymerization becomes somewhat difficult, and the molding processability of the composition decreases. Because it decreases,
A rubbery polymer latex having an average particle size of about 0.4 to 1.0 μm is preferred. If it is less than 0.4 μm, a composition with excellent impact resistance cannot be obtained in practice. 40-80% by weight of the rubbery polymer in the latex must be insoluble (gel) in the solvent (toluene). If the insoluble content is less than 40% by weight or more than 80% by weight, it becomes difficult to obtain satisfactory impact strength. 15 to 60 parts by weight (as solid content) of rubbery polymer latex with a monomer of which 90% by weight or more is styrene.
Add 85 to 40 parts by weight and carry out graft polymerization using a radical polymerization initiator. If the rubbery polymer content is less than 15 parts by weight, the impact resistance of the composition will not be improved sufficiently, and
If it exceeds 60 parts by weight, the styrene resin becomes rubbery, resulting in decreased compatibility with polycarbonate resin and impairing processability. The amount of rubbery polymer in the styrenic resin is preferably 30 to 50 parts by weight in order to stably exhibit the properties of the composition. Monomers other than styrene include α-methylstyrene, vinyltoluene, p-chlorostyrene,
One or more types of monomers copolymerizable with styrene such as styrene derivatives such as 2,4-dibromustyrene, methyl methacrylate, methyl acrylate, and acrylonitrile are used. Styrene is
If it is less than 90% by weight, the processability of the composition will deteriorate and the cost will increase, which is undesirable. To improve the impact resistance of the composition of the present invention,
Regarding styrene resin, the above-mentioned graft rate is
It should be between 50 and 120%. Graft rate is 50%
If it is less than 120% or more than 120%, it becomes difficult to obtain satisfactory impact strength. The polymerization method for producing the graft polymer is not particularly limited. Even if polymerization is started by adding the rubber-like polymer latex and the entire amount of the styrene-based monomer, the styrene-based monomer may be added continuously, in portions, or in part. After initiation, the remainder may be added continuously for polymerization. The most preferred method is to charge a portion of the monomer mainly composed of styrene, polymerize to a predetermined conversion rate of 60 to 90%, and then continuously add the remaining portion to complete the polymerization. Also, a batch type or a continuous type may be used. The polycarbonate resin used in the present invention is
It is an aromatic polycarbonate resin having an aromatic residue in the main chain. Generally, 2,2-bis(4-oxyphenyl) alkanes, bis(4-oxyphenyl) ethers, bis(4-oxyphenyl)
Polymers or copolymers made of bisphenols such as sulfone, sulfide, or sulfoxide are used, but depending on the purpose, halo-substituted bisphenols may also be used. The composition of the present invention is composed of polycarbonate resin 95-50
The amount is 5 to 50 parts by weight of the styrene resin. When the amount of styrene resin is less than 5 parts by weight, moldability is poor and the molding area becomes narrow. On the other hand, 50
If the amount exceeds 1 part by weight, moldability improves, but impact resistance and mechanical properties deteriorate, which is not preferable. In order to particularly satisfy the properties of the present composition, the amount of styrenic resin is preferably 10 to 50 parts by weight. As a method for producing the composition of the present invention, a general mixing method can be used, for example, a melt mixing method using a heating roll, a Banbury mixer, an extruder, etc. can be applied. The compositions of the present invention may contain various commonly used additives such as heat stabilizers, pigments, inorganic fillers, flame retardants, and the like. Next, the present invention will be explained in more detail with reference to Examples. Alternatively, physical properties were measured according to the following method. Izotsu impact strength ASTM D256 test method 1/4 inch, notched, measured at 23°C Fluidity (Q) Koka type flow tester working load 30Kg/cm 2 , nozzle diameter 1 mm × 2 mm, measured at 250°C Heat distortion temperature ASTM D648 Test method, load 18.6Kg/cm 2 Rockwell hardness ASTM D785 test method Elongation ASTM D638 test method Solvent insoluble content of rubbery polymer Dry rubbery polymer 1
g was accurately weighed, dissolved in 100 ml of toluene, left to stand at room temperature for 48 hours, the amount of insoluble matter was filtered through a 100-mesh mesh, and the solid matter in 20 ml of the solution was determined and calculated using the formula below. Insoluble content (%) = (Rubber weight before dissolution (g)) - 5 x (solid content in liquid (g)) / (rubber weight before dissolution (g)) x 10
0 Note that parts and percentages in Examples and Comparative Examples are based on weight. Example 1 Production of styrenic resin - Average particle size 6250 Å (solvent (toluene) insoluble content 68
%) polybutadiene latex 50 parts (solid content equivalent), 20 parts styrene, potassium rosinate 1.0 part, potassium hydroxide 0.1 part, sodium pyrophosphate 0.2 part, dextrose 0.3 part, ferrous sulfate 0.01 part, water 150 parts 70% after putting into a reactor with a stirrer and purging with nitrogen.
The temperature is raised to 0.degree. C., 0.2 parts of cumene hydroperoxide is added as a radical polymerization catalyst, and the polymerization reaction is carried out for 1 hour. After that, separately adjusted styrene 30
parts, potassium rosinate 1.5 parts, potassium hydroxide 0.1 parts
part, cumene hydroperoxide 0.2 parts, water 50 parts
The emulsion consisting of 1.0 parts is continuously added to the polymerization system over a period of 3 hours. Thereafter, the reaction was continued for another hour while maintaining the jacket temperature at 70°C to complete the polymerization.
The polymerization conversion rate was 98% using the above method. 2,6-di-t is added to the produced latex as an anti-aging agent.
-Add 1.0 part of butyl-p-cresol, and add sulfuric acid.
2.0 parts was added and coagulated by heating, filtered, washed with water, and dried to obtain powdered resin (a). The grafting rate of this resin was measured by the method described above and was found to be 83%. Example 2, Comparative Examples 1 to 3 The resin (a) obtained in Example 1 and polycarbonate resin (Iupilon S-3000, manufactured by Mitsubishi Gas Chemical) were mixed in an extruder (cylinder temperature 240°C) and the mixture shown in Table 1 was prepared. A granular composition of the proportions indicated was obtained. After drying this composition, various test pieces were molded using an injection molding machine (cylinder temperature: 250°C) and their physical properties were measured. The results are shown in Table 1. The heat distortion temperature and hardness of the composition vary depending on the ratio of styrene resin to polycarbonate resin, but are practically sufficient within the scope of the present invention. The elongation becomes extremely large as the proportion of styrenic resin increases, indicating that the tenacity improves. The Izot impact strength and fluidity are higher than that of polycarbonate resin alone, and it is sometimes found that the former is extremely superior. Example 3 The same procedure as in Example 1 was carried out except that the polybutadiene used in Example 1 was changed to 40 parts, and the continuously added styrene was changed to 40 parts. The polymerization conversion rate in this method was 97%, and the grafting rate of this resin (b) was 74%.
It was hot. Example 4, Comparative Examples 4 to 5 The resin (b) obtained in Example 3 and the polycarbonate resin (Iupilon S-3000) were treated under the same conditions as in Example 2, and the physical properties were measured. Table 2 shows the results. It can be seen that by mixing the styrene resin (b) described in Example 3 with the polycarbonate resin, the moldability (fluidity) and impact resistance of the polycarbonate resin are significantly improved. Comparative Examples 6 to 8 The same procedure as in Example 1 was carried out except that the polybutadiene used in Example 1 was changed to 10 parts, and the continuously added styrene was changed to 70 parts. The polymerization conversion rate of this method was 93%, and the grafting rate of this resin was 155%. This resin (C) and polycarbonate resin (Iupilon S-3000) are blended to form a composition,
Its physical properties were measured. As shown in Table 3, compositions outside the scope of the present invention have extremely poor impact resistance, resulting in brittle molded articles, giving unsatisfactory results in practical use. Comparative Examples 9 to 11 Resin (d) was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the polybutadiene of Example 1 was changed to 70 parts and the continuously added styrene was changed to 10 parts. The polymerization conversion rate was 97%, and the grafting rate of resin (d) was 35%. A composition was prepared in the same manner as in Example 2, and its physical properties were measured. The results are also shown in Table 3. This composition has extremely low fluidity, resulting in extremely poor surface condition of the molded product. Moreover, the range of fluctuation in the measured value of the Izot impact strength is large, and it can be seen that it is not practical as a molded product. Comparative Examples 12 and 13 Resin (e) was produced according to Example 3 using polybutadiene with an average particle diameter of 2300 Å (solvent (toluene) insoluble content: 75%). The polymerization conversion rate in this method was 95%, and the grafting rate of resin (e) was 100%. A composition was prepared in the same manner as in Example 2, and its physical properties were measured. Table 4 shows the results. The composition of the present invention (b- in Table 2) has better impact resistance and fluidity than polycarbonate resin.
5, the physical property balance is not good compared to b-6). Using the compositions of b-5 and Comparative Example 12, molding was performed by changing the cylinder temperature of an injection molding machine, and the Izot impact strength was measured. The results are shown in Table 5, and it can be seen that compared to Comparative Example 12, the composition of the present invention has less dependence on molding temperature and provides stable physical properties. Comparative Examples 14 and 15 The same procedure as in Example 1 was carried out except that the polybutadiene of Example 1 was used in 10 parts, the styrene added initially was 40 parts, and the styrene added continuously was 50 parts. The conversion rate in this method was 91%, and this resin
The grafting rate of (f) was 98%. A composition was prepared in the same manner as in Example 2, and its physical properties were measured. Table 6 shows the results. Comparative Examples 16 and 17 In Example 1, instead of the cumene hydroperoxide component, 0.8 parts of water-soluble potassium persulfate was used as a catalyst during polymerization. The polymerization conversion rate by this method was 93%, and the grafting rate of this resin (g) was 38%. A composition was prepared in the same manner as in Example 2, and its physical properties were measured. The results are also shown in Table 6.

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】 比較例 18 実施例1において、ポリブタジエンラテツクス
と共に仕込む単量体をスチレン16部とアクリロニ
トリル4部とし、連続添加する単量体をスチレン
24部とアクリロニトリル6部とすること以外は実
施例1と同様にして行なつた。 この方法において重合転化率は96%であり、得
られた樹脂のグラフト率は78%であつた。 以下実施例2と同様にしてこの樹脂(h)とポリカ
ーボネート樹脂(ユーピロンS−3000)とを配合
して組成物となし、その試験結果を表7に示す。 これはグラフト単量体がスチレン80%であり、
実施例5(グラフト単量体のスチレン100%)と
比較して流動性が著しく低下することが判る。 実施例 5 実施例1のポリブタジエンを30部に、そして共
に仕込む単量体をスチレン28部とし、連続添加す
る単量体をスチレン42部とすること以外は実施例
1と同様にしてスチレン系樹脂の製造を行なつ
た。重合転化率97%、グラフト率101%であつ
た。 以下実施例2と同様にしてポリカーボネート樹
脂との組成物の物性を表7に示す。 比較例 19 実施例1において、ポリブタジエンとして平均
粒子径2300Å(溶媒(トルエン)不溶分75%)を
用いて、ポリブタジエンを30部、共に仕込む単量
体をスチレン18部とアクリロニトリル10部、連続
添加する単量体をスチレン27部とアクリロニトリ
ル15部とすること(グラフト単量体のスチレン64
%)以外は実施例1と同様にしてスチレン系樹脂
の製造を行なつた。重合転化率95%、グラフト率
は127%であつた。 以下実施例2と同様にして組成物の物性を表7
に示すが、本発明組成物(実施例2のa−2およ
び実施例5)と比較してアイゾツト衝撃強度が極
端に低下し良くない。 実施例6、比較例20〜22 実施例1において平均粒子径及び溶媒(トルエ
ン)不溶分の異なるポリブタジエンラテツクスを
用いること以外、実施例1と同様にして樹脂を
得、実施例2と同様に試験を行なつた。 得られた樹脂のグラフト率及び樹脂とポリカー
ボネート樹脂との組成物の物性を表8に示す。 比較例20の様にポリブタジエンラテツクスの平
均粒子径が本発明の範囲外の場合は衝撃強度が著
しく低下する。 また、比較例22の様にポリブタジエンラテツク
スの溶媒(トルエン)不溶分が本発明の範囲外で
高い場合も衝撃強度が著しく低下する。 一方、実施例6及び比較例21の組成物を用い
て、射出成形機のシリンダー温度270℃で成形
し、アイゾツト衝撃強度を測定した。実施例6は
33Kg・cm/cm、比較例21は18Kg・cm/cmであり、ポリ
ブタジエンラテツクスの溶媒(トルエン)不溶分
が本願発明の範囲外では衝撃強度が大きく低下
し、更に不溶分が少ない場合はその成形温度依存
性が極めて大きく、好ましいことが判る。
[Table] Comparative Example 18 In Example 1, the monomers charged together with the polybutadiene latex were 16 parts of styrene and 4 parts of acrylonitrile, and the monomers continuously added were styrene.
The same procedure as in Example 1 was carried out except that 24 parts of acrylonitrile and 6 parts of acrylonitrile were used. In this method, the polymerization conversion rate was 96%, and the grafting rate of the obtained resin was 78%. Thereafter, in the same manner as in Example 2, this resin (h) and a polycarbonate resin (Iupilon S-3000) were blended to prepare a composition, and the test results are shown in Table 7. The graft monomer is 80% styrene,
It can be seen that the fluidity is significantly reduced compared to Example 5 (100% styrene as the graft monomer). Example 5 A styrenic resin was prepared in the same manner as in Example 1, except that the polybutadiene of Example 1 was changed to 30 parts, the monomer to be added together was changed to 28 parts of styrene, and the monomer to be continuously added was changed to 42 parts of styrene. was manufactured. The polymerization conversion rate was 97% and the grafting rate was 101%. Table 7 shows the physical properties of the composition with polycarbonate resin in the same manner as in Example 2. Comparative Example 19 In Example 1, using polybutadiene with an average particle diameter of 2300 Å (solvent (toluene) insoluble content 75%), 30 parts of polybutadiene and the monomers to be charged together, 18 parts of styrene and 10 parts of acrylonitrile, were continuously added. The monomers are 27 parts of styrene and 15 parts of acrylonitrile (the graft monomer is 64 parts of styrene).
%) A styrenic resin was produced in the same manner as in Example 1 except for the following. The polymerization conversion rate was 95% and the grafting rate was 127%. Table 7 below shows the physical properties of the composition in the same manner as in Example 2.
However, compared to the compositions of the present invention (Example 2 a-2 and Example 5), the Izot impact strength is extremely lowered, which is not good. Example 6, Comparative Examples 20 to 22 A resin was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1, except that a polybutadiene latex with a different average particle diameter and solvent (toluene) insoluble content was used in Example 1, and a resin was obtained in the same manner as in Example 2. I conducted a test. Table 8 shows the graft ratio of the obtained resin and the physical properties of the composition of the resin and polycarbonate resin. When the average particle diameter of the polybutadiene latex is outside the range of the present invention, as in Comparative Example 20, the impact strength is significantly reduced. Furthermore, when the polybutadiene latex has a high solvent (toluene) insoluble content outside the range of the present invention, as in Comparative Example 22, the impact strength is significantly reduced. On the other hand, the compositions of Example 6 and Comparative Example 21 were molded at a cylinder temperature of 270°C in an injection molding machine, and the Izot impact strength was measured. Example 6 is
33Kg・cm/cm, Comparative Example 21 is 18Kg・cm/cm, and if the solvent (toluene) insoluble content of the polybutadiene latex is outside the scope of the present invention, the impact strength will decrease significantly, and if the insoluble content is further reduced, the impact strength will decrease. It can be seen that the molding temperature dependence is extremely large, which is preferable.

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】 比較例 23 実施例1において、ポリブタジエンラテツクス
35部、スチレン20部を最初に添加し、連続添加す
るスチレンを45部、添加する時間を10時間に変
え、実施例1と同様の方法で重合を行ないグラフ
ト率127%のスチレン系樹脂(l)を得た。 表9に示した割合の組成物を実施例2の方法を
用いて評価を行ない同表の結果を得た。 グラフト率が本発明の範囲を超えると、衝撃強
度が低下するので好ましくない。 実施例 7 実施例1において、溶媒(トルエン)不溶分45
%、平均粒子径6100Åのポリブタジエンラテツク
スを用い、実施例1と同様の方法によりグラフト
率89%のスチレン系樹脂(m)を得た。 表9に示した割合の組成物を実施例2の方法を
用いて評価を行ない同表の結果を得た。 実施例 8 実施例1の乳濁液の添付時間を1時間に変え
て、実施例1と同様の方法によりグラフト率55%
のスチレン系樹脂(n)を得た。 表9に示した組成割合の組成物を実施例2の方
法を用いて評価を行ない同表の結果を得た。
[Table] Comparative Example 23 In Example 1, polybutadiene latex
Polymerization was carried out in the same manner as in Example 1 by adding 35 parts of styrene and 20 parts of styrene first, then changing the continuous addition of 45 parts of styrene to the addition time of 10 hours to obtain a styrene resin (l) with a grafting rate of 127%. ) was obtained. Compositions having the proportions shown in Table 9 were evaluated using the method of Example 2, and the results shown in the table were obtained. If the grafting ratio exceeds the range of the present invention, the impact strength will decrease, which is not preferable. Example 7 In Example 1, the solvent (toluene) insoluble matter was 45
A styrenic resin (m) with a graft ratio of 89% was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 using polybutadiene latex with an average particle diameter of 6100 Å. Compositions having the proportions shown in Table 9 were evaluated using the method of Example 2, and the results shown in the table were obtained. Example 8 A grafting rate of 55% was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the emulsion application time in Example 1 was changed to 1 hour.
A styrene resin (n) was obtained. Compositions having the composition ratios shown in Table 9 were evaluated using the method of Example 2, and the results shown in the table were obtained.

【表】【table】

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】 1 ポリカーボネート樹脂(A)95〜50重量部と、平
均粒径が0.4μm以上で、40〜80重量%が溶媒
(トルエン)に不溶であるゴム状重合体のラテツ
クス15〜60重量部(固形分換算)の存在下に、90
重量%以上がスチレンである単量体85〜40重量部
をグラフト重合し、 グラフト率(%)=ジメチルホルムアミド不溶分量(g)−ゴム状重合体量(g)/ゴム状重合体量(g)×10
0 で定義されるグラフト率が50〜120%であるスチ
レン系樹脂(B)5〜50重量部とよりなる高耐衝撃性
高加工性ポリカーボネート樹脂組成物。 2 スチレン系樹脂(B)がゴム状重合体30〜50重量
部の存在下にスチレン系単量体70〜50重量部をグ
ラフト重合し、組成物がスチレン系樹脂(B)を10〜
50重量部含む特許請求の範囲第1項記載の組成
物。
[Scope of Claims] 1. 95 to 50 parts by weight of polycarbonate resin (A) and 15 to 15 parts by weight of a rubbery polymer latex having an average particle size of 0.4 μm or more and 40 to 80% by weight being insoluble in a solvent (toluene). In the presence of 60 parts by weight (calculated as solids), 90
Graft polymerization of 85 to 40 parts by weight of a monomer whose weight% or more is styrene is carried out, and the graft ratio (%) = amount of dimethylformamide insoluble portion (g) - amount of rubbery polymer (g) / amount of rubbery polymer (g) )×10
A highly impact resistant and highly processable polycarbonate resin composition comprising 5 to 50 parts by weight of a styrenic resin (B) having a graft ratio of 50 to 120%. 2 Styrenic resin (B) is graft-polymerized with 70 to 50 parts by weight of a styrenic monomer in the presence of 30 to 50 parts by weight of a rubbery polymer, and the composition is
A composition according to claim 1 containing 50 parts by weight.
JP11123677A 1977-09-17 1977-09-17 Polycarbonate resin composition Granted JPS5445359A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP11123677A JPS5445359A (en) 1977-09-17 1977-09-17 Polycarbonate resin composition

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP11123677A JPS5445359A (en) 1977-09-17 1977-09-17 Polycarbonate resin composition

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS5445359A JPS5445359A (en) 1979-04-10
JPS6129982B2 true JPS6129982B2 (en) 1986-07-10

Family

ID=14556012

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP11123677A Granted JPS5445359A (en) 1977-09-17 1977-09-17 Polycarbonate resin composition

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS5445359A (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3738143A1 (en) * 1987-11-10 1989-05-18 Bayer Ag USE OF REDOX GRAFT POLYMERISATS FOR IMPROVING THE GAS RESISTANCE OF THERMOPLASTIC, AROMATIC POLYCARBONATE AND / OR POLYESTERCARBONATE MOLDING MATERIALS
US6066686A (en) * 1996-07-05 2000-05-23 Daicel Chemical Industries, Ltd. Polycarbonate compositions

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS5445359A (en) 1979-04-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3642949A (en) Impact resistant high heat distortion composition
US4668737A (en) Graft polymers having a mat surface
JPH06248160A (en) Flame-retardant desin composition
KR900006041B1 (en) Dispersed Multicomponent Gel-containing Copolymer
JPS6346106B2 (en)
JPH068374B2 (en) Thermoplastic resin composition
KR960004684B1 (en) Thermoplastic resin composition
JPH0260912A (en) Styrenic copolymer modified with block copolymer rubber
JPS58129043A (en) Thermoplastic resin composition
US3300545A (en) Blends of polystyrene and a graft copolymer of a styrene-methyl methacrylate type mixture on a rubbery polymer of a conjugated 1, 3-diene
EP0264721A2 (en) Thermoplastic resin composition
CA1218484A (en) Polymer alloys having a mat surface
JPH02272050A (en) Transparent thermoplastic resin composition
US5274032A (en) Polymer alloys
JP2524367B2 (en) ABS molding composition with low residual butadiene content
JPS6129982B2 (en)
JPS61101547A (en) Resin composition
JP2701245B2 (en) Thermoplastic mixture
EP0522205A1 (en) Flame retardant resin composition
GB2080815A (en) Compatibilization of polystyrene and pvc
JPH05194676A (en) Rubber modified aromatic vinyl-based copolymer resin and its production
JP3386532B2 (en) Thermoplastic resin composition
JPH04220409A (en) Copolymer resin and thermoplastic resin composition containing the same
JP3032557B2 (en) Polycarbonate resin composition
JPS60108457A (en) Transparent impact-resistant resin composition