JPS632938B2 - - Google Patents
Info
- Publication number
- JPS632938B2 JPS632938B2 JP58238824A JP23882483A JPS632938B2 JP S632938 B2 JPS632938 B2 JP S632938B2 JP 58238824 A JP58238824 A JP 58238824A JP 23882483 A JP23882483 A JP 23882483A JP S632938 B2 JPS632938 B2 JP S632938B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- catalyst
- reaction
- nickel
- nickel oxide
- platinum group
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Landscapes
- Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
- Low-Molecular Organic Synthesis Reactions Using Catalysts (AREA)
- Industrial Gases (AREA)
Description
[産業上の利用分野]
本発明は一酸化炭素含有ガスのメタン化法に関
し、更に詳しくは、高濃度の一酸化炭素ガスを含
有する石炭ガス化ガス、重質油ガス化ガスを効率
よくメタン化する固定触媒層として、酸化ニツケ
ルを含む触媒層を用いたメタン化法に関する。
[従来の技術]
最近のエネルギー事情からみると、重質油や石
炭をガス化して得られる高濃度一酸化炭素ガスを
メタン化し、代替天然ガスを得る方法は非常に有
望なプロセスである。近年、石炭ガス化ガスから
のメタン合成については多くの報告が発表されて
いる。特に米国においては本格的な研究が行なわ
れており、日本でもサンシヤイン計画の一翼とし
て高カロリーガス化を目的としたプロジエクトが
組まれている。
このメタン合成反応は、大きな反応熱の発生を
伴う反応であり、その反応熱をエネルギー源とし
て有効に利用することは、メタン合成プロセスの
経済性という点から非常に重要である。この反応
熱を有効に利用するには高温で反応を行なわせる
のが最も好ましいが、メタン合成反応に通常用い
られる触媒をこのような高濃度一酸化炭素ガスで
使用すると熱や雰囲気中のスチームによるシンタ
リングおよび炭素質の生成等の原因で触媒が著し
く劣化することが知られている。
更に触媒上で炭素原子が結合して生成する炭素
質は時には反応管の閉塞を引き起し、反応継続を
物理的に不可能としてしまう。
例えば、現在一般に汎用されている通常のニツ
ケル系のメタネーシヨン触媒をこのようなプロセ
スに用いると、初期活性が高すぎるため非常に高
い発熱による触媒の活性劣化や装置上の除熱が問
題となる。そのため触媒を希釈して充填したり原
料ガスの供給量を少なくする等の操作が必要とな
る。これらの方法は技術的、経済的に問題があ
る。また、数%から数10%の範囲で触媒に含有さ
れているニツケル量を減じて初期活性を下げるこ
とも考えられるが、ニツケル含有量をある量以下
に低減させると、初期活性の著しい低下を招き、
触媒性能が低下してしまう。
このような問題点を解決すべく従来より数多く
提案されている方法は、高熱反応を回避すべく常
に反応熱を除去し、触媒層の温度制御を維持する
ことにあつた。しかしこの方法は、触媒層におい
て反応熱の除去と反応速度が平衡を保てないこと
から、触媒層に温度分布が生じ、触媒層の低温
部、特に約450℃以下の触媒層においては、Ni
(CO)4を生成し、触媒の活性が著しく劣化すると
いう欠点がある〔ダブリユ エム シエン(W.
M.SHEN)、ジヤーナル オブ カタリシス
(Journal of Catalysis)、68、152―165(1981)〕。
すなわち、触媒層の反応器入口部分(上層部)で
メタン化反応が行なわれる際に、触媒層の下層部
(下流部)は反応による温度上昇が少ないので、
ニツケルは一酸化炭素ガス濃度が低濃度でもNi
(CO)4を生成してしまい、触媒層の上層部の触媒
が劣化を起し、下層部でメタン化反応する際に、
下層部のニツケル触媒は既に劣化してしまつてい
るという欠点がある。
現在、上記した通常のニツケル触媒に加えて、
一酸化炭素からのメタン合成用の触媒として用い
られているのは、例えば、
(a) Ru、Pt、Pd、Ir、Rh等の白金族触媒、
(b) 流動触媒層に用いるRu/Ni触媒(0.5重量%
Ru―10重量%Ni―Al2O3、1.0重量%Ru―10重
量%Ni―Al2O3)
〔Tucci、ER、ハイドロカーボン プロセ
スイング(Hydrocarbon Processing)107―
112、1980―4〕、
等の触媒である。
これらの触媒も上記したニツケル触媒と同様に
高濃度の一酸化炭素含有ガスをメタン化するメタ
ン化触媒としては種々の欠点を有している。
すなわち、ルテニウム等の白金族元素は高価な
ので単独で用いると経済性の面で非常に問題があ
り、また耐イオウ性に劣る。
[発明が解決しようとする問題点]
本発明はこのような欠点を解決すべくなされた
もので、一酸化炭素含有ガスを効率良くメタン化
するメタン化法を提供することを目的とする。
[問題点を解決するための手段および作用]
本発明者らは、この目的に沿つて検討の結果、
一酸化炭素含有ガスをメタン化する反応器を外部
冷却型とし、この反応器中の触媒層を固定層と
し、かつ触媒層が酸化ニツケルを含む触媒層、特
に酸化ニツケルと白金族元素からなる触媒層を用
いた場合に上記目的が充分達成されることを見出
し本発明に到達した。
すなわち本発明のメタン化法とは、一酸化炭素
含有ガスをメタン化するに際し、
(a) 外部冷却型反応器の反応器入口側の触媒がニ
ツケル還元触媒または白金族元素触媒、その下
層部の触媒が酸化ニツケル触媒からなる固定触
媒層を用いたことを特徴とするメタン化法、も
しくは、
(b) 外部冷却型反応器の固定触媒層として白金族
元素触媒と酸化ニツケル触媒の粉体を機械的に
混合したものを用いたことを特徴とするメタン
化法である。
本発明のメタン化法に用いられるガスとは、一
酸化炭素ガスを含有していれば特に制限されない
が、好ましくは一酸化炭素ガスを高濃度で含有す
る石炭ガス化ガス、重質油ガス化ガスが用いられ
る。
本発明においては、この一酸化炭素含有ガスを
外部冷却型反応器の固定触媒層に導入してメタン
化を行なう。このメタン化反応における反応器入
口温度は、触媒の活性を保持するといつた観点か
ら450℃以下、好ましくは200〜420℃とすること
が望ましい。
反応器の固定触媒層は酸化ニツケルを含む触媒
層であることが必要であり、この酸化ニツケルは
450℃以下では還元しないように高温処理等の処
理を行なつて調製される。この場合に酸化ニツケ
ルは担体と反応して一部がNiAl2O4を生成して難
還元性となる。
このような低温で難還元性の酸化ニツケルを含
む触媒層の好ましいものとしては、酸化ニツケル
と還元ニツケルとからなる触媒層または酸化ニツ
ケルと白金族元素からなる触媒層である。酸化ニ
ツケルと還元ニツケルを組合わせて用いる場合に
は、固定触媒層の上層部にニツケル還元触媒を配
置し、その下層部に酸化ニツケル触媒を配置する
ことが望ましい。また、酸化ニツケルと白金族元
素を組合わせて用いる場合には、固定触媒層の上
層部に白金族元素触媒を配置し、その下層部に酸
化ニツケル触媒を配置することが望ましい。ま
た、酸化ニツケル触媒と白金族元素触媒を併用す
る場合には、酸化ニツケル触媒と白金族元素触媒
の粉体を機械的に混合したものを充填して触媒層
としたものを用いてもよい。本発明においては、
白金族元素とニツケルの化学的または物理的な相
互作用により、特別の特性を引き出すものではな
く、個々の特性を充分に発揮できれば良いので混
合方法は特に制限されない。
本発明において、さらに好ましい固定触媒層と
しては白金族元素0.005重量%以上、酸化ニツケ
ル0.05〜30重量%および無機耐熱性担体とからな
る触媒を用いた触媒層である。ここに言う無機耐
熱性担体とは、無機質の耐熱性に優れた担体で、
例えばシリカ、アルミナ等が例示され、このうち
特に望ましい担体はγ―アルミナである。このア
ルミナ等の担体は、白金族元素、酸化ニツケルを
担持前に予めアルカリ金属、アルカリ土類金属を
少量添加することが好ましく、このことによりメ
タン化反応における触媒の耐熱性を向上させ、炭
素析出が抑制される。本発明において、白金族元
素の添加量が0.005重量%以上と少量でも良いの
は、この量でも一酸化炭素のメタン化反応が起こ
り、酸化ニツケルが還元される程度の発熱があれ
ば良いからである。
本発明において、担体に白金族元素と酸化ニツ
ケルを担持する方法は任意であり、浸漬、共沈、
混練等の通常の方法が採用される。また、白金族
元素と酸化ニツケルを担体に担持する順序も任意
であり、担体に白金族元素を担持した後、酸化ニ
ツケルを担持しても、担体に酸化ニツケルを担持
した後、白金族元素を担持しても良い。また、両
者を同時に担体に担持させても良い。
次に本発明のメタン化法の反応を、固定触媒層
として上層部に白金族元素触媒、下層部に酸化ニ
ツケル触媒を配置した場合を例にとり説明する。
外部冷却型反応器に450℃以下の温度で導入され
た一酸化炭素含有ガスは、先ず触媒層上層部での
みメタン化反応する。この場合には触媒層下層部
の低温部分では酸化ニツケルが未だ還元されない
ためにNi(CO)4は生成せず、上層部の白金族元
素触媒のみが活性種となる。この白金族元素触媒
は水素ガス、一酸化炭素ガスにより低温で還元さ
れ、ニツケルと比べるとカルボニルを作りにく
く、反応開始の役を果し、酸化ニツケルをニツケ
ルに還元する温度まで反応温度を上げれば良い。
従つて、白金族元素触媒の充填量は、反応開始直
後にガス入口部の触媒層の酸化ニツケルが還元さ
れる程度の反応熱を引き出す量で良い。触媒層ガ
ス入口部の白金族元素触媒によるメタン化反応に
よつて温度が上昇するに従い、入口部の酸化ニツ
ケルが還元されてニツケルとなり活性化し、メタ
ン反応に関与する。そしてガス入口部のニツケル
触媒の劣化に伴ない、下流側の酸化ニツケルが還
元されて活性化しメタン化反応に関与する。この
ように本発明のメタン化法においては、触媒層に
おける反応が徐々に下方に移動し、すべての触媒
が反応に関与し、反応に関与する前に触媒が劣化
するような不都合は生じない。
[実施例]
以下、本発明を実施例および比較例に基づき具
体的に説明する。
比較例 1
アルミナ担体にニツケルを担持した触媒A(ニ
ツケル含有量10wt%)20c.c.を内径16mmのステン
レス製反応管に充填し、水素ガス気流中、500℃、
3時間還元処理を行なつた。触媒層には3mmφの
サーモウエルが入つており触媒層各部の温度を測
定できるようにした。還元処理後250℃に温度を
下げ、圧力10Kg/cm2・G、水素ガス流量60/
hr、一酸化炭素ガス流量20/hr、
GHSV4000hr-1で反応を行なつた時のCO転化率
と経時変化の関係を第1図に示した。また、この
場合の触媒層の温度プロフイールを第2図に示し
た。さらに140時間経過後のCO転化率を第1表に
示した。
この比較例1はニツケル触媒の予備還元処理を
行ない、全触媒層を還元状態にした後に、メタン
化反応させた低温におけるニツケル触媒の活性を
示すものであるが、第1図から予備処理すると劣
化が著しく速いことがわかつた。この劣化は主に
Ni(CO)4またはNi3Cの生成によるものと思われ
る。
比較例 2
0.5wt%の市販のルテニウム―アルミナ触媒を
アルミナで粉砕、混合、希釈して調製したルテニ
ウム0.025wt%の触媒Bを比較例1と同様に20c.c.
反応管に充填した。
その後、温度250℃、圧力10Kg/cm2・Gで水素
ガス流量60/hr、一酸化炭素ガス流量20/
hr、GHSV4000hr-1でメタン化反応させた時の
CO転化率と経時変化の関係を第1図に示した。
さらに140時間経過後のCO転化率を第1表に示し
た。なお、この場合には比較例1のように反応前
に予め還元処理は行なわなかつた。
この比較例2はルテニウム0.025wt%含有触媒
を用いて反応させた時の活性を示したものである
が、第1図からルテニウム単独では活性劣化が速
いことがわかつた。つまり、ルテニウム0.025wt
%含有触媒では反応開始するのには十分である
が、長時間の反応に対しては量的に不十分であ
り、比較例1のごとき還元ニツケルを用いた場合
とは異なつた劣化が生じるものと思われる。
実施例 1
比較例1で用いた触媒Aと比較例2で触媒Bの
調製に用いた0.5wt%の市販のルテニウム―アル
ミナ触媒を粉砕後混合して、ルテニウム含有量
0.025wt%、ニツケル含有量9.5wt%に調製した触
媒Cを比較例1と同様に20c.c.反応管に充填した。
その後、温度250℃、圧力10Kg/cm2・Gで水素
ガス流量60/hr、一酸化炭素ガス流量20/
hr、GHSV4000hr-1で反応させた時のCO転化率
と経時変化の関係を第1図に示した。また、この
時の触媒層の温度プロフイールを第3図に示し
た。さらに140時間経過後のCO転化率を第1表に
示した。なお、比較例2と同様に反応前に予め還
元処理は行なわなかつた。
第1図に示されるように、140時間経過しても
活性劣化は認められず、触媒A、触媒Bのような
単独で反応させた場合に比べ非常に安定している
ことがわかる。また、第3図から、反応開始後の
1時間では反応熱によつて触媒層入口部(上層
部)のみ発熱が起きており入口部の酸化ニツケル
はこの発熱によつて還元される。触媒層下層部の
低温部の酸化ニツケルは還元されておらず比較例
1のような劣化は起きない。400時間後では、ピ
ークがそのまま平行移動しており、発熱は層の中
央部で生じていることがわかる。
実施例 2
触媒A(ニツケル含有量10wt%)4c.c.を水素ガ
ス気流中500℃、3時間還元処理を行なつた後、
窒素ガス気流中で室温まで冷却した。
その後、発熱に注意しながら微量の空気を窒素
ガス中に入れて数時間安定化処理した。この還元
安定化処理した触媒A1c.c.をガス入口部に充填し、
その下層部に還元処理をしない酸化物状態の触媒
A19c.c.を充填した。比較例2と同様に反応前の予
備還元処理をしないで反応した。この反応の140
時間後のCO転化率を第1表に示した。
実施例 3
比較例2で用いた0.025wt%のルテニウム触媒
Bを1c.c.だけガス入口部に充填し、その下層部に
酸化物状態の触媒A19c.c.を充填した。実施例2と
同様に反応前の予備還元をしないで反応した。こ
の反応の140時間後のCO転化率を第1表に示し
た。
[Industrial Application Field] The present invention relates to a method for methanating carbon monoxide-containing gas, and more specifically, to efficiently converting coal gasification gas or heavy oil gasification gas containing high concentration carbon monoxide gas into methane. This invention relates to a methanation method using a catalyst layer containing nickel oxide as a fixed catalyst layer. [Prior Art] In view of the recent energy situation, a method of obtaining alternative natural gas by converting highly concentrated carbon monoxide gas obtained by gasifying heavy oil or coal into methane is a very promising process. In recent years, many reports have been published on methane synthesis from coal gasification gas. Particularly in the United States, full-scale research is being carried out, and in Japan, a project aimed at producing high-calorie gas is being set up as part of the Sunshine Plan. This methane synthesis reaction is a reaction accompanied by the generation of a large amount of reaction heat, and it is very important from the economical point of view of the methane synthesis process to effectively utilize the reaction heat as an energy source. In order to make effective use of this reaction heat, it is most preferable to carry out the reaction at a high temperature, but if the catalyst normally used for methane synthesis reaction is used with such a high concentration of carbon monoxide gas, it will be affected by heat and steam in the atmosphere. It is known that the catalyst deteriorates significantly due to causes such as sintering and carbonaceous formation. Furthermore, carbonaceous matter produced by bonding of carbon atoms on the catalyst sometimes causes clogging of the reaction tube, making it physically impossible to continue the reaction. For example, if an ordinary nickel-based methanation catalyst, which is currently in general use, is used in such a process, the initial activity is too high, causing problems such as deterioration of catalyst activity and heat removal from the equipment due to extremely high heat generation. Therefore, operations such as diluting the catalyst and filling it or reducing the amount of raw material gas supplied are required. These methods are technically and economically problematic. It is also possible to lower the initial activity by reducing the amount of nickel contained in the catalyst in the range of several percent to several tens of percent, but if the nickel content is reduced below a certain amount, the initial activity will drop significantly. Invitation,
Catalyst performance deteriorates. In order to solve these problems, many conventional methods have been proposed to constantly remove reaction heat and maintain temperature control of the catalyst layer in order to avoid high-temperature reactions. However, in this method, the removal of reaction heat and the reaction rate cannot be kept in equilibrium in the catalyst layer, so a temperature distribution occurs in the catalyst layer, and Ni
(CO) 4 is produced and the activity of the catalyst is significantly degraded [Double M. Chien (W.
M.SHEN), Journal of Catalysis, 68, 152-165 (1981)].
In other words, when the methanation reaction is carried out at the reactor inlet part (upper part) of the catalyst layer, the temperature rise due to the reaction is small in the lower part (downstream part) of the catalyst bed, so
Nickel retains Ni even when the concentration of carbon monoxide gas is low.
(CO) 4 is generated, the catalyst in the upper layer of the catalyst layer deteriorates, and when the methanation reaction occurs in the lower layer,
The disadvantage is that the nickel catalyst in the lower layer has already deteriorated. Currently, in addition to the normal nickel catalysts mentioned above,
Catalysts used for methane synthesis from carbon monoxide include (a) platinum group catalysts such as Ru, Pt, Pd, Ir, and Rh, and (b) Ru/Ni catalysts used in fluidized catalyst beds. (0.5% by weight
Ru—10% by weight Ni—Al 2 O 3 , 1.0% by weight Ru—10% by weight Ni—Al 2 O 3 ) [Tucci, ER, Hydrocarbon Processing 107—
112, 1980-4], etc. Like the above-mentioned nickel catalyst, these catalysts have various drawbacks as methanation catalysts for methanating gas containing high concentration of carbon monoxide. That is, since platinum group elements such as ruthenium are expensive, their use alone poses a serious problem in terms of economic efficiency, and they also have poor sulfur resistance. [Problems to be Solved by the Invention] The present invention has been made to solve these drawbacks, and an object of the present invention is to provide a methanation method that efficiently methanizes carbon monoxide-containing gas. [Means and effects for solving the problem] As a result of studies in line with this purpose, the present inventors found that
The reactor for methanating carbon monoxide-containing gas is an externally cooled type, and the catalyst layer in the reactor is a fixed bed, and the catalyst layer contains nickel oxide, especially a catalyst made of nickel oxide and a platinum group element. The present inventors have discovered that the above object can be fully achieved when a layer is used, and have thus arrived at the present invention. In other words, the methanation method of the present invention is such that when carbon monoxide-containing gas is methanated, (a) the catalyst on the reactor inlet side of the externally cooled reactor is a nickel reduction catalyst or a platinum group element catalyst; Methanation method characterized by using a fixed catalyst bed consisting of a nickel oxide catalyst, or (b) methanation method characterized by using a fixed catalyst bed consisting of a nickel oxide catalyst; This methanation method is characterized by using a mixture of The gas used in the methanation method of the present invention is not particularly limited as long as it contains carbon monoxide gas, but preferably coal gasification gas or heavy oil gasification gas containing carbon monoxide gas at a high concentration. Gas is used. In the present invention, this carbon monoxide-containing gas is introduced into a fixed catalyst bed of an externally cooled reactor to perform methanation. The reactor inlet temperature in this methanation reaction is desirably 450°C or less, preferably 200 to 420°C, from the viewpoint of maintaining the activity of the catalyst. The fixed catalyst layer of the reactor needs to be a catalyst layer containing nickel oxide, and this nickel oxide is
It is prepared by performing treatments such as high temperature treatment to prevent reduction at temperatures below 450°C. In this case, nickel oxide reacts with the carrier and a portion of it forms NiAl 2 O 4 , making it difficult to reduce. Preferred catalyst layers containing nickel oxide, which is difficult to reduce at low temperatures, are catalyst layers made of nickel oxide and reduced nickel, or catalyst layers made of nickel oxide and platinum group elements. When using a combination of nickel oxide and reduced nickel, it is desirable to arrange the nickel reduction catalyst in the upper layer of the fixed catalyst layer and the nickel oxide catalyst in the lower layer. Further, when using a combination of nickel oxide and a platinum group element, it is desirable to arrange the platinum group element catalyst in the upper layer of the fixed catalyst layer and the nickel oxide catalyst in the lower layer. Further, when a nickel oxide catalyst and a platinum group element catalyst are used together, a catalyst layer filled with a mechanical mixture of powders of a nickel oxide catalyst and a platinum group element catalyst may be used. In the present invention,
The mixing method is not particularly limited, as long as the chemical or physical interaction between the platinum group element and nickel does not bring out any special properties, and the individual properties can be fully exhibited. In the present invention, a more preferable fixed catalyst layer is a catalyst layer using a catalyst comprising 0.005% by weight or more of a platinum group element, 0.05 to 30% by weight of nickel oxide, and an inorganic heat-resistant carrier. The inorganic heat-resistant carrier mentioned here is an inorganic carrier with excellent heat resistance.
For example, silica, alumina, etc. are exemplified, and among these, γ-alumina is particularly desirable. It is preferable to add a small amount of alkali metal or alkaline earth metal to the carrier such as alumina before supporting the platinum group element or nickel oxide. is suppressed. In the present invention, the reason why the addition amount of the platinum group element can be as small as 0.005% by weight or more is because the methanation reaction of carbon monoxide occurs even with this amount, and it is sufficient to generate enough heat to reduce the nickel oxide. be. In the present invention, any method can be used to support the platinum group element and nickel oxide on the carrier, including immersion, coprecipitation,
Conventional methods such as kneading are employed. Furthermore, the order in which the platinum group element and nickel oxide are supported on the carrier is arbitrary. It may be carried. Further, both may be supported on the carrier at the same time. Next, the reaction of the methanation method of the present invention will be explained by taking as an example a case where a platinum group element catalyst is arranged in the upper layer and a nickel oxide catalyst is arranged in the lower layer as fixed catalyst layers.
Carbon monoxide-containing gas introduced into the externally cooled reactor at a temperature of 450°C or lower first undergoes a methanation reaction only in the upper layer of the catalyst layer. In this case, since nickel oxide is not yet reduced in the low-temperature portion of the lower layer of the catalyst layer, Ni(CO) 4 is not generated, and only the platinum group element catalyst in the upper layer becomes an active species. This platinum group element catalyst is reduced by hydrogen gas and carbon monoxide gas at low temperatures, and compared to nickel, it is difficult to produce carbonyl, and it plays the role of starting the reaction, and if the reaction temperature is raised to the temperature at which nickel oxide is reduced to nickel. good.
Therefore, the loading amount of the platinum group element catalyst may be such as to draw out the reaction heat to the extent that the nickel oxide in the catalyst layer at the gas inlet is reduced immediately after the start of the reaction. As the temperature rises due to the methanation reaction by the platinum group element catalyst at the gas inlet of the catalyst layer, the nickel oxide at the inlet is reduced to nickel, activated, and participates in the methane reaction. As the nickel catalyst at the gas inlet deteriorates, nickel oxide on the downstream side is reduced and activated to participate in the methanation reaction. As described above, in the methanation method of the present invention, the reaction in the catalyst layer gradually moves downward, all the catalysts participate in the reaction, and there is no inconvenience that the catalyst deteriorates before participating in the reaction. [Examples] The present invention will be specifically described below based on Examples and Comparative Examples. Comparative Example 1 A stainless steel reaction tube with an inner diameter of 16 mm was filled with 20 c.c. of catalyst A (nickel content 10 wt%) in which nickel was supported on an alumina carrier, and the mixture was heated at 500°C in a hydrogen gas stream.
Reduction treatment was carried out for 3 hours. A thermowell with a diameter of 3 mm was installed in the catalyst layer, allowing the temperature of each part of the catalyst layer to be measured. After reduction treatment, the temperature was lowered to 250℃, the pressure was 10Kg/ cm2・G, and the hydrogen gas flow rate was 60/
hr, carbon monoxide gas flow rate 20/hr,
Figure 1 shows the relationship between the CO conversion rate and the change over time when the reaction was carried out at GHSV 4000 hr -1 . Moreover, the temperature profile of the catalyst layer in this case is shown in FIG. Furthermore, the CO conversion rate after 140 hours is shown in Table 1. Comparative Example 1 shows the activity of the nickel catalyst at a low temperature where the nickel catalyst was pre-reduced to bring all the catalyst layers into a reduced state and then subjected to a methanation reaction. was found to be significantly faster. This deterioration is mainly
This seems to be due to the formation of Ni(CO) 4 or Ni3C . Comparative Example 2 Catalyst B containing 0.025 wt % of ruthenium prepared by crushing, mixing and diluting 0.5 wt % of a commercially available ruthenium-alumina catalyst with alumina was added to 20 c.c. in the same manner as in Comparative Example 1.
The reaction tube was filled. After that, at a temperature of 250℃ and a pressure of 10Kg/ cm2・G, hydrogen gas flow rate was 60/hr and carbon monoxide gas flow rate was 20/hr.
hr, when methanation reaction was carried out at GHSV4000hr -1
Figure 1 shows the relationship between CO conversion rate and changes over time.
Furthermore, the CO conversion rate after 140 hours is shown in Table 1. In this case, unlike Comparative Example 1, reduction treatment was not performed before the reaction. Comparative Example 2 shows the activity when the reaction was carried out using a catalyst containing 0.025 wt% ruthenium, but it was found from FIG. 1 that the activity deteriorated quickly when ruthenium was used alone. That is, Ruthenium 0.025wt
% containing catalyst is sufficient to start the reaction, but is quantitatively insufficient for long-term reaction, and causes a different deterioration than when reduced nickel is used as in Comparative Example 1. I think that the. Example 1 Catalyst A used in Comparative Example 1 and 0.5 wt% commercially available ruthenium-alumina catalyst used in the preparation of Catalyst B in Comparative Example 2 were ground and mixed to determine the ruthenium content.
Catalyst C prepared to have a nickel content of 0.025 wt% and a nickel content of 9.5 wt% was packed into a 20 c.c. reaction tube in the same manner as in Comparative Example 1. After that, at a temperature of 250℃ and a pressure of 10Kg/ cm2・G, hydrogen gas flow rate was 60/hr and carbon monoxide gas flow rate was 20/hr.
Figure 1 shows the relationship between the CO conversion rate and the change over time when the reaction was carried out at GHSV 4000 hr -1 . Moreover, the temperature profile of the catalyst layer at this time is shown in FIG. Furthermore, the CO conversion rate after 140 hours is shown in Table 1. Note that, as in Comparative Example 2, no reduction treatment was performed before the reaction. As shown in FIG. 1, no deterioration in activity was observed even after 140 hours had passed, indicating that the reaction was much more stable than when catalysts A and B were reacted alone. Moreover, from FIG. 3, heat is generated only at the inlet portion (upper layer portion) of the catalyst layer due to the heat of reaction during one hour after the start of the reaction, and the nickel oxide at the inlet portion is reduced by this heat generation. The nickel oxide in the lower temperature part of the catalyst layer was not reduced and did not deteriorate as in Comparative Example 1. After 400 hours, the peak continues to shift in parallel, indicating that heat generation occurs in the center of the layer. Example 2 After reducing 4 c.c. of catalyst A (nickel content 10 wt%) at 500°C in a hydrogen gas stream for 3 hours,
It was cooled to room temperature in a nitrogen gas stream. Thereafter, a small amount of air was introduced into the nitrogen gas to stabilize the material for several hours while being careful not to generate heat. Fill the gas inlet with this reduction-stabilized catalyst A1c.c.
Catalyst in oxide state without reduction treatment in its lower layer
Filled with A19c.c. As in Comparative Example 2, the reaction was carried out without performing preliminary reduction treatment before the reaction. 140 for this reaction
The CO conversion after hours is shown in Table 1. Example 3 1 c.c. of 0.025 wt % ruthenium catalyst B used in Comparative Example 2 was filled in the gas inlet, and 19 c.c. of oxide catalyst A was filled in the lower layer. The reaction was carried out in the same manner as in Example 2 without performing preliminary reduction before the reaction. The CO conversion after 140 hours of this reaction is shown in Table 1.
【表】
[発明の効果]
以上説明したごとく本発明のメタン化法にあつ
ては下記のごとき効果を奏する。
:煩雑なニツケル触媒の還元が不要となる上
に、還元に必要な水素ガス、熱エネルギー等が
不要になり、経済的利点が大きい。
:触媒の寿命が大幅に延長されるため、これま
で実用化できなかつた高濃度一酸化炭素含有ガ
スのメタン合成プロセスの実現化が可能とな
る。
:白金族元素触媒単独では価格が高くなるの
と、耐イオウ性が小さい等の欠点を有するが、
本発明では白金族元素の添加量は非常に少量で
すみ、しかも単独の時と比べて多量のニツケル
と共存させることによつて耐イオウ性も大きく
することができる。
:ニツケル触媒のみでは不可能な低温でも運転
できるため、運転費が安くなり、反応器の材質
も特殊なものを必要とせず、装置も安価に建設
できる。
:低温で反応させることができるために平衡上
メタンリツチな高カロリーガスを得るのに有利
で、仕上げのメタネーターを必要としない。[Table] [Effects of the Invention] As explained above, the methanation method of the present invention has the following effects. : Not only does the complicated reduction of a nickel catalyst become unnecessary, but also the hydrogen gas, thermal energy, etc. necessary for the reduction are no longer required, which has great economic advantages. : Since the life of the catalyst is significantly extended, it becomes possible to realize a methane synthesis process using gas containing high concentrations of carbon monoxide, which has not been practical until now. :Platinum group element catalyst alone has disadvantages such as high price and low sulfur resistance, but
In the present invention, the amount of platinum group elements added can be extremely small, and the sulfur resistance can also be increased by coexisting with a larger amount of nickel than when platinum group elements are added alone. : Since it can be operated at low temperatures that cannot be achieved with nickel catalysts alone, operating costs are low, no special reactor materials are required, and the equipment can be constructed at low cost. : Because the reaction can be carried out at low temperatures, it is advantageous in obtaining high-calorie gas that is rich in methane in equilibrium, and does not require a finishing methanator.
第1図は比較例1〜2および実施例1における
反応時間(hr)とCO転化率(%)との関係を示
すグラフ、第2図は比較例1における反応開始後
1時間および20時間後触媒層の温度プロフイール
を示すグラフ、および第3図は実施例1における
反応開始後1時間および400時間後触媒層の温度
プロフイールを示すグラフ。
Figure 1 is a graph showing the relationship between reaction time (hr) and CO conversion rate (%) in Comparative Examples 1 to 2 and Example 1, and Figure 2 is a graph 1 hour and 20 hours after the start of the reaction in Comparative Example 1. FIG. 3 is a graph showing the temperature profile of the catalyst layer, and FIG. 3 is a graph showing the temperature profile of the catalyst layer 1 hour and 400 hours after the start of the reaction in Example 1.
Claims (1)
外部冷却型反応器の反応器入口側の触媒がニツケ
ル還元触媒または白金族元素触媒、その下層部の
触媒が酸化ニツケル触媒からなる固定触媒層を用
いたことを特徴とするメタン化法。 2 一酸化炭素含有ガスをメタン化するに際し、
外部冷却型反応器の固定触媒層として白金族元素
触媒と酸化ニツケル触媒の粉体を機械的に混合し
たものを用いたことを特徴とするメタン化法。[Claims] 1. In methanating carbon monoxide-containing gas,
A methanation method characterized in that the catalyst on the inlet side of the externally cooled reactor is a nickel reduction catalyst or a platinum group element catalyst, and the catalyst in the lower layer is a fixed catalyst layer consisting of a nickel oxide catalyst. 2 When converting carbon monoxide-containing gas to methanation,
A methanation method characterized by using a mechanical mixture of powders of a platinum group element catalyst and a nickel oxide catalyst as a fixed catalyst layer in an externally cooled reactor.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP58238824A JPS60130532A (en) | 1983-12-20 | 1983-12-20 | Methanizing and methanizing catalyst |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP58238824A JPS60130532A (en) | 1983-12-20 | 1983-12-20 | Methanizing and methanizing catalyst |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPS60130532A JPS60130532A (en) | 1985-07-12 |
| JPS632938B2 true JPS632938B2 (en) | 1988-01-21 |
Family
ID=17035813
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP58238824A Granted JPS60130532A (en) | 1983-12-20 | 1983-12-20 | Methanizing and methanizing catalyst |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPS60130532A (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104399491B (en) * | 2014-12-04 | 2017-05-31 | 广州博能能源科技有限公司 | A kind of high temperature resistant methanation catalyst and preparation method thereof |
| JP2023172767A (en) * | 2022-05-24 | 2023-12-06 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | Processing method for methanation catalyst, method for producing methane, and methanation catalyst |
Family Cites Families (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GB1505254A (en) * | 1974-07-03 | 1978-03-30 | Haldor Topsoe As | Catalyst and process for preparing methane rich gas |
-
1983
- 1983-12-20 JP JP58238824A patent/JPS60130532A/en active Granted
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPS60130532A (en) | 1985-07-12 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Choudhary et al. | CO-free fuel processing for fuel cell applications | |
| JP2761609B2 (en) | An improved method for the conversion of methane to synthesis gas. | |
| US6747066B2 (en) | Selective removal of oxygen from syngas | |
| Tomishige et al. | Catalytic performance and carbon deposition behavior of a NiO− MgO solid solution in methane reforming with carbon dioxide under pressurized conditions | |
| CN102083745B (en) | Process for operating HTS reactor | |
| AU2003204567B2 (en) | Stabilized nickel-containing catalysts and process for production of syngas | |
| Seshan et al. | Carbon dioxide reforming of methane in the presence of nickel and platinum catalysts supported on ZrO2 | |
| KR100612956B1 (en) | High Performance Water Gas Conversion Catalyst and Its Manufacturing Method | |
| EP3464173B1 (en) | Catalyst for low temperature ethanol steam reforming and related process | |
| JP2004238282A (en) | Synthesis gas processing method and processing catalyst | |
| Shao et al. | Recent advances in the catalysts for hydrogen production via ethanol steam reforming | |
| JP4273211B2 (en) | Method for producing dimethyl ether from biomass | |
| JPH05208801A (en) | Method for producing synthesis gas from methane-containing gas and carbon dioxide-containing gas | |
| JPS632938B2 (en) | ||
| Kong et al. | Development of a combined catalyst and sorbent for the water gas shift reaction | |
| JP3975271B2 (en) | Biomass gasification method and catalyst used therefor | |
| JP2006111477A5 (en) | ||
| KR100732538B1 (en) | Process for producing hydrogen directly from hydrocarbon using catalyst | |
| JP4377699B2 (en) | Synthesis gas production catalyst and synthesis gas production method using the same | |
| JPH04331704A (en) | Method for producing synthesis gas containing carbon monoxide and hydrogen | |
| JP5242086B2 (en) | Hydrogen production ethanol reforming catalyst and hydrogen production method | |
| KR20230072594A (en) | A method for preparing a catalyst for steam refomring methane gas containing sulfur and a method for producing hydrogen using a catalyst prepared thereby | |
| JP4377700B2 (en) | Synthesis gas production catalyst and synthesis gas production method using the same | |
| TWI501920B (en) | Production method and apparatus for hydrogen | |
| US20050169835A1 (en) | Process for the treatment of methane/carbon dioxide mixtures |