Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JPS6347990B2 - - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JPS6347990B2 - - Google Patents

Info

Publication number
JPS6347990B2
JPS6347990B2 JP19373286A JP19373286A JPS6347990B2 JP S6347990 B2 JPS6347990 B2 JP S6347990B2 JP 19373286 A JP19373286 A JP 19373286A JP 19373286 A JP19373286 A JP 19373286A JP S6347990 B2 JPS6347990 B2 JP S6347990B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
brick
work
bricks
marker
pot
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
JP19373286A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS6349696A (en
Inventor
Tetsuo Sato
Wataru Takagi
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kobe Steel Ltd
Original Assignee
Kobe Steel Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kobe Steel Ltd filed Critical Kobe Steel Ltd
Priority to JP19373286A priority Critical patent/JPS6349696A/en
Publication of JPS6349696A publication Critical patent/JPS6349696A/en
Publication of JPS6347990B2 publication Critical patent/JPS6347990B2/ja
Granted legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Furnace Housings, Linings, Walls, And Ceilings (AREA)
  • Casting Support Devices, Ladles, And Melt Control Thereby (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】[Detailed description of the invention]

[産業上の利用分野] 本発明は、溶融金属収納鍋(以下単に鍋という
ことがある)におけるワーク煉瓦の残厚を、正確
に推定することができることによつていわゆる鍋
下しまでの処理回数(実質的な鍋寿命)を延長す
ることができるワーク煉瓦の残厚推定方法に関す
るものである。 尚上記「処理」としては、溶銑予備処理、精
錬、脱ガス、介在物の形態制御、一時的貯留等の
様に広範な意味で用いられるものであり、従つて
溶融金属収納器についても、予備処理炉、転炉、
VOD炉、AOD炉、RH又はDH脱ガス容器、混銑
車、取鍋、装入鍋等を包含するものである。 [従来の技術] 鍋のワーク煉瓦残厚を測定する方法としては、
遠赤外レーザーを用いる方法が汎用されている。
これは、ワーク煉瓦装着直後(新品段階)におけ
る鍋の内径Dpを遠赤外レーザーによつて予め求
めておき、一方何回か(n回とする)使用した後
における内径Doを遠赤外によつて求め、上記Dp
とDoとの差に基づいてワーク煉瓦の損耗進行状
況を把握し残厚を計算するものである。 [発明が解決しようとする問題点] 遠赤外レーザーによつて内径Doを正確に求め
る為には、鍋の温度を下げることによつて空気の
ゆらぎ(かげろう現象)を少なくしてやることが
必要である。ところが、上記鍋温度を低下させる
にはかなりの長時間を要するから、遠赤外レーザ
ー装置を用いて測定する場合は鍋操業の連続性を
妨げて生産性に重大な悪影響を与えると共に、せ
つかく高熱に高められている鍋をいつたん冷やし
た場合には、たとえ残厚が十分であつて未だ寿命
がきていないと判断されたとしても鍋の再予熱の
為に膨大な熱源を必要とし、熱経済的に見て採算
ベースに合わなくなる。この様な状況であるから
遠赤外によつて残厚を測定することはできれば回
避したいという気持になり、測定時期が先延ばし
になることが多く、残厚が少なくなつているのに
気付くのが遅れて大変危険であつたり、或いは残
厚測定を行なつた結果、残厚が残り少ないと分か
つたときは、再予熱して頑張るよりも新しい耐火
壁に張り換えた方が却つて得であるという風に判
断されることもあり、鍋の寿命がまだ終つていな
いのにその段階で寿命と判断し、実効寿命を短く
してしまつているといつた問題があつた。 従つて、殊更遠赤外レーザー法を用いなくて
も、鍋操業上支障のない精度の測定を可能とする
様な方法の開発が望まれる様になつてきている。
尚耐火壁の損耗が進んで来ると鍋内容積が拡大さ
れるので、湯面の低下程度を目視推測し、これに
よつておおよその残厚を推定するという方法もな
いではないが、各チヤージ毎の注湯量自体が一定
でない以上、湯面の低下原因を直ちに耐火壁の損
耗に結びつけることの誤りは容易に理解されると
ころである。 本発明はこうした事情を憂慮してなされたもの
であつて、目視であつても鍋のワーク煉瓦残厚を
正確に推定でき、これによつて鍋下しまでの処理
回数を実質的に増やすことのできる方法を提供し
ようとするものである。 [問題点を解決する為の手段] 本発明に係るワーク煉瓦残厚の推定方方法と
は、溶融金属収納鍋におけるワーク煉瓦の残厚を
推定する方法であつて、ワーク煉瓦の配列途中
に、該ワーク煉瓦よりも溶損速度の小さい標識煉
瓦を設け、標識煉瓦のワーク煉瓦からの突出量を
目視測定することによつて、ワーク煉瓦の残厚を
推定するところにその要旨が存在するものであ
る。 [作用] 本発明においては、第1図に示す如くワーク煉
瓦1の配列途中に該ワーク煉瓦1よりも溶損速度
の小さい標識煉瓦2が設けられる。この標識煉瓦
2の溶損速度は上記の如くワーク煉瓦1のそれよ
りも遅いので、例えば精錬回数を重ねているうち
にワーク煉瓦1の方が優先的に損耗し、上記標識
煉瓦2がワーク煉瓦1から突出した第2図の様な
状態になる。尚3はフリーボード、4はスラグラ
イン、5は底煉瓦、6は鉄皮である。本発明方法
は、この突出量ΔYを目視測定することによつて
ワーク煉瓦残厚を推定するところに特徴を有する
ものである。 但し上記推定に当たつては、標識煉瓦とワーク
煉瓦の損耗挙動差を正しく承知することが必要と
なる。即ち標識煉瓦が実質上損耗しないものなら
ば、上記ΔYがワーク煉瓦の損耗量をそのまま表
わしていることになるが、標識煉瓦も損耗してい
くことが避けられない場合は、予め単位チヤージ
数(例えば5回とか10回)当たりの標識煉瓦の平
均損耗量を承知しておき、ΔYにその損耗量をプ
ラスすればワーク煉瓦の損耗量が与えられる。ま
た標識煉瓦とワーク煉瓦の損耗量挙動差を予め承
知しておけば、ΔYをその挙動差によつて補正す
ることによりワーク煉瓦の損耗量を知ることがで
きる。こうしてワーク煉瓦の損耗量からワーク煉
瓦の残厚を推定するのである。 この様に残厚の正確な推定が可能となつたこと
によつて下記の如き利点が発揮される。 従来であれば鍋の寿命がくるかなり前であると
予想される鍋であつても、安全を見て即ち残厚に
かなりの余裕をもたせて、鍋下しをしていた。と
ころが、本発明の如く正確な残厚推定ができる様
になると、残厚に余裕をもたせる必要はないか
ら、残厚の限界近くまで鍋を使用することがで
き、結局鍋下しまでの精錬回数を増すことができ
る。 尚上記標識煉瓦の取り付け位置や個数について
は、特段の制限を受ける訳ではないが、下記の如
き様式を挙げることができる。 (1) 第3図aに示す様に、鍋7の円周方向に沿つ
て連続的に標識煉瓦2を配列する。尚標識煉瓦
2の設けられる高さについては特に制限はな
い。しかし上部に設ける方が目視し易いという
点で好ましい。 (2) 第3図bの如く標識煉瓦2とワーク煉瓦1を
交互に配列する。但しこれらの煉瓦は熱膨張係
数が互いに異なるので、精錬中にいわゆる目地
開きが生じ、場合によつては煉瓦が抜け落ちる
こともある。従つて第3図bの如く交互に配列
する場合にはこのことに注意しなければならな
い。 (3) 第3図cの如く2個の標識煉瓦2が互いに対
向する様に配列されていても良く、この場合は
標識煉瓦2が少なくてすむ。 (4) 第3図dの如く1箇所だけに設ける。この様
に1箇所であつても十分に目視測定の目安とな
る。 (5) 以上は標識煉瓦2の高さが一定である場合で
あつたが、高さを種々変化させて上記(1)〜(4)の
配列を行なうことを排除する訳ではない。 ところで上記標識煉瓦2及びワーク煉瓦1の材
質については特に制限はないが、標識煉瓦として
MgO−C、ワーク煉瓦としてAl2O3−Cを例示す
ることができる。 以上の様に本発明方法は、鍋下し時期判断の目
安として標識煉瓦を導入すると共に、該標識煉瓦
の突出長さを目視することによつて鍋下し時期判
断の正確化を達成したものである。ここに該鍋下
し時期判断の目安となる標識煉瓦突出量の求め方
及び鍋下し時期判断方法についてその一例を示す
と次の通りである。 (1) まず所望の精錬条件(精錬温度、精錬量、精
錬時間)におけるワーク煉瓦及び標識煉瓦の溶
損速度を夫々求めておく。尚ここではその値
を、ワーク煉瓦:a1〜a2mm/回、標識煉瓦:b1
〜b2mm/回とする。尚a1,b1は最小と考えられ
る値、a2,b2は最大と考えられる値である。但
しa2>a1>b2>b1とする。 (2) ワーク煉瓦及び標識煉瓦の精錬前における厚
みを夫々A及びB(但しB≧A)とすると、ワ
ーク煉瓦の残厚y1及び標識煉瓦の残厚y2は夫々
次の式で表わされる。 y1=A−(a1〜a2)n …… y2=B−(b1〜b2)n …… 但しnは精錬回数を示す。 尚第4図はこれらの関係を図示したものであ
る。 (3) ここでワーク煉瓦と標識煉瓦との残厚差ΔY
[ΔY=y2−y1=(B−A)+{(a1〜a2)−(b1
b2)}n]を計算してみると、これは、 [(B−A)+(a2−b1)n] 〜[(B−A)+(a1−b2)n] …… の範囲内の値であることが分かつた(なぜなら
y2=B−b1nとy1=A−a2nとの差が最小値、y2
=B−b2nとy1=A−a1nとの差が最大値である
から)。 (4) ところで鍋は、ワーク煉瓦の残厚が大略Cmm
に及んだときにその寿命に達し鍋下しの必要性
があるものと判断される。上記Cは経験上知得
されている値である。 (5) このCを、y1=A−a2n及びy1=A−a1nのy1
に代入すると、夫々 n=A−C/a2及びn=A−C/a1が得られる。 そしてこれらのnを前記式に代入すると、
残厚差ΔYの範囲として [(B−A)+a2−b1/a2(A−C)] 〜[(B−A)+a1−b2/a1(A−C)] …… が得られる。 (6) 即ち、残厚差ΔYが上記の範囲内となつた
時点で、ワーク煉瓦残厚はCmmとなるのであ
る。 従つて作業者としては、目視測定による残厚
差ΔYが上記の範囲内に達する迄は精錬作業
を続行しても良いとの判断を下すことができ
る。 以下実施例を挙げることによつて本発明方法を
具体的に説明するが、本発明方法は該実施例に限
定される性質のものではなく前・後の記載趣旨に
徴して適宜変更することができる。 [実施例] フリーボート:アルミナ煉瓦,スラグライン:
MgO−C,ワーク煉瓦:Al2O3−C,標識煉瓦:
MgO−C,底煉瓦:アルミナ煉瓦、使用前にお
けるワーク煉瓦の厚み:80mm,使用前における標
識煉瓦の厚み:90mmとして操業を行なつた。過去
の操業実積よりAl2O3及びMgO−Cの溶損速度は
夫々0.4〜0.6mm/回及び0.1〜0.3mm/回であるこ
とが分かつている。 上記操業において突出量が30〜35mm(鍋煉瓦は
残厚40〜50mm以下になると脱落する可能性があ
る。そこで煉瓦の使用限界が決まる。MgO−C
とAl2O3−C煉瓦の突出量差が30〜35mmになる
と、Al2O3−Cの残厚は50mmとなる)になる時点
を目安に操業を行なつたところ、従来ではせいぜ
い60回程度しか使用できないとされていた鍋を、
75回程度まで安全に使用することができ、鍋下し
までの精錬回数増加が達成された。結果の一例を
第1表に示す。
[Industrial Application Field] The present invention is capable of accurately estimating the remaining thickness of a work brick in a molten metal storage ladle (hereinafter simply referred to as a ladle), thereby reducing the number of processing times until the ladle is lowered. The present invention relates to a method for estimating the residual thickness of work bricks that can extend the life span of the workpiece brick (substantially the life of the pot). The above-mentioned "processing" is used in a wide range of meanings, such as molten metal pretreatment, refining, degassing, inclusion form control, and temporary storage. Processing furnace, converter,
This includes VOD furnaces, AOD furnaces, RH or DH degassing vessels, pig iron mixers, ladles, charging ladle, etc. [Prior art] The method for measuring the remaining thickness of the work brick in a pot is as follows:
A method using a far-infrared laser is widely used.
This is done by first determining the inner diameter D p of the pot immediately after installing the work brick (when it is new) using a far-infrared laser, and then determining the inner diameter D o after using it a number of times (referred to as n times) using a far-infrared laser. The above D p
Based on the difference between D o and D o , the wear progress of the work brick is determined and the remaining thickness is calculated. [Problem to be solved by the invention] In order to accurately determine the inner diameter D o using a far-infrared laser, it is necessary to reduce air fluctuations (hygiene phenomenon) by lowering the temperature of the pot. It is. However, since it takes a considerable amount of time to lower the temperature of the pot, when measuring using a far-infrared laser device, it interferes with the continuity of pot operation, has a serious negative impact on productivity, and is very time consuming. If a pot that has been heated to a high temperature is once cooled down, even if it is determined that the remaining thickness is sufficient and the pot has not yet reached the end of its life, a huge heat source is required to reheat the pot. From an economic point of view, it will no longer be profitable. Due to this situation, it is tempting to avoid measuring the residual thickness using far-infrared light if possible, and the timing of measurement is often postponed, and it is difficult to notice that the residual thickness is decreasing. If there is a delay and it is very dangerous, or if you measure the remaining thickness and find that there is not much remaining thickness, it is better to replace it with a new fireproof wall than to reheat and try again. There was a problem in that the pot was judged to have reached the end of its lifespan even though it had not yet reached its end, thereby shortening its effective lifespan. Therefore, it has become desirable to develop a method that enables accurate measurement without interfering with pot operation, especially without using the far-infrared laser method.
As the fireproof wall wears out, the volume inside the pot expands, so it is possible to visually estimate the level of drop in the molten metal level and use this to estimate the approximate remaining thickness. Since the amount of molten metal poured each time is not constant, it is easy to understand that it is wrong to immediately link the cause of the drop in the molten metal level to the wear and tear of the fireproof walls. The present invention has been developed in consideration of these circumstances, and it is possible to accurately estimate the remaining thickness of work bricks in a pot even by visual inspection, thereby substantially increasing the number of processing steps until the pot is lowered. The aim is to provide a method that allows for [Means for Solving the Problems] The method for estimating the residual thickness of work bricks according to the present invention is a method for estimating the residual thickness of work bricks in a molten metal storage ladle. The gist lies in estimating the remaining thickness of the work brick by providing a marker brick that has a lower erosion rate than the work brick and visually measuring the amount of protrusion of the marker brick from the work brick. be. [Function] In the present invention, as shown in FIG. 1, a marker brick 2 having a lower erosion rate than the work bricks 1 is provided in the middle of the arrangement of the work bricks 1. As mentioned above, the erosion rate of the marker brick 2 is slower than that of the work brick 1, so for example, as the number of refining operations increases, the work brick 1 wears out preferentially, and the marker brick 2 becomes the work brick. It will be in a state like that shown in Figure 2, protruding from 1. Note that 3 is a freeboard, 4 is a slag line, 5 is a bottom brick, and 6 is an iron skin. The method of the present invention is characterized in that the residual thickness of the workpiece brick is estimated by visually measuring the amount of protrusion ΔY. However, in making the above estimation, it is necessary to accurately understand the difference in wear behavior between the marker brick and the work brick. In other words, if the marker bricks do not wear out substantially, the above ΔY directly represents the amount of wear on the work bricks, but if it is unavoidable that the marker bricks also wear out, the unit charge number ( For example, if you know the average amount of wear on the marker bricks per 5 or 10 times, and add that amount to ΔY, you will get the amount of wear on the work bricks. Furthermore, if the difference in behavior of the wear amount between the marker brick and the work brick is known in advance, the amount of wear on the work brick can be known by correcting ΔY based on the difference in behavior. In this way, the remaining thickness of the work brick is estimated from the amount of wear on the work brick. By making it possible to accurately estimate the residual thickness in this way, the following advantages are exhibited. Conventionally, even if the pot is expected to reach the end of its lifespan, it has been used to lower the pot for safety reasons, that is, by allowing a considerable amount of leeway in the remaining thickness. However, when it becomes possible to accurately estimate the residual thickness as in the present invention, there is no need to allow for a margin in the residual thickness, and the ladle can be used close to the limit of the residual thickness, resulting in a reduction in the number of times of refining before the pan is lowered. can be increased. There are no particular restrictions on the mounting position or number of the marker bricks, but the following formats may be used. (1) As shown in FIG. 3a, the marker bricks 2 are arranged continuously along the circumferential direction of the pot 7. There is no particular restriction on the height at which the marker bricks 2 are provided. However, it is preferable to provide it at the top because it is easier to see visually. (2) Arrange marker bricks 2 and work bricks 1 alternately as shown in Figure 3b. However, since these bricks have different coefficients of thermal expansion, so-called joint openings may occur during smelting, and in some cases, bricks may fall out. Therefore, care must be taken when arranging them alternately as shown in FIG. 3b. (3) Two marker bricks 2 may be arranged so as to face each other as shown in FIG. 3c, and in this case, the number of marker bricks 2 can be reduced. (4) Provided at only one location as shown in Figure 3d. In this way, even one location is sufficient as a guide for visual measurement. (5) Although the above is a case in which the height of the marker bricks 2 is constant, it is not excluded that the heights may be variously changed to carry out the arrangement of the above (1) to (4). By the way, there are no particular restrictions on the materials of the marker brick 2 and work brick 1, but as marker bricks
Examples of MgO-C and work bricks include Al 2 O 3 -C. As described above, the method of the present invention introduces a marker brick as a guide for determining when it is time to lower the pot, and by visually observing the protruding length of the marker brick, it achieves accurate determination of when it is time to lower the pot. It is. An example of how to determine the amount of protrusion of the marker brick, which is a guideline for determining when to take down the pot, and how to determine when to take down the pot is as follows. (1) First, determine the erosion rates of the work brick and marker brick under the desired refining conditions (refining temperature, amount of refining, and refining time). Here, the values are: work brick: a 1 to a 2 mm/time, sign brick: b 1
~b 2 mm/times. Note that a 1 and b 1 are values considered to be minimum, and a 2 and b 2 are values considered to be maximum. However, a 2 > a 1 > b 2 > b 1 . (2) If the thickness of the work brick and marker brick before refining is A and B (however, B≧A), then the residual thickness y 1 of the work brick and the residual thickness y 2 of the marker brick are respectively expressed by the following formulas. . y1 =A-( a1 - a2 )n... y2 =B-( b1 - b2 )n...However, n indicates the number of times of refining. Incidentally, FIG. 4 illustrates these relationships. (3) Here, the residual thickness difference ΔY between the work brick and the marker brick
[ΔY= y2y1 =(B−A)+{( a1 ~ a2 )−( b1 ~
b 2 )}n], this is [(B-A)+(a 2 -b 1 )n] ~[(B-A)+(a 1 -b 2 )n]... … was found to be a value within the range (because
The difference between y 2 = B-b 1 n and y 1 = A-a 2 n is the minimum value, y 2
= B-b 2 n and y 1 = A-a 1 n because the difference is the maximum value). (4) By the way, the remaining thickness of the work brick for the pot is approximately Cmm.
It is determined that the pot has reached the end of its lifespan and needs to be removed. The above C is a value known from experience. (5) Let this C be y 1 = A-a 2 n and y 1 = A-a 1 n .
Substituting into , n=A-C/a 2 and n=A-C/a 1 are obtained, respectively. Then, by substituting these n into the above formula, we get
As the range of residual thickness difference ΔY: [(B-A)+a 2 -b 1 /a 2 (A-C)] ~ [(B-A)+a 1 -b 2 /a 1 (A-C)] ... is obtained. (6) That is, when the residual thickness difference ΔY falls within the above range, the work brick residual thickness becomes Cmm. Therefore, the operator can decide that it is okay to continue the refining work until the visually measured residual thickness difference ΔY falls within the above range. The method of the present invention will be specifically explained below by giving examples, but the method of the present invention is not limited to these examples and may be modified as appropriate in accordance with the purpose of the preceding and following descriptions. can. [Example] Free boat: Alumina brick, slag line:
MgO-C, work brick: Al 2 O 3 -C, marker brick:
The operation was carried out with MgO-C, bottom brick: alumina brick, thickness of work brick before use: 80 mm, and thickness of marker brick before use: 90 mm. From past operational results, it has been found that the erosion rates of Al 2 O 3 and MgO-C are 0.4 to 0.6 mm/time and 0.1 to 0.3 mm/time, respectively. In the above operation, if the protrusion amount is 30 to 35 mm (pot bricks may fall off when the remaining thickness is less than 40 to 50 mm. This determines the usage limit of the bricks. MgO-C
When the difference in protrusion between the Al 2 O 3 -C brick and the Al 2 O 3 -C brick becomes 30 to 35 mm, the residual thickness of the Al 2 O 3 -C becomes 50 mm. A pot that was said to be able to be used only once,
It can be safely used up to about 75 times, and the number of times it can be refined before being removed from the pot has been increased. An example of the results is shown in Table 1.

【表】 [発明の効果] 本発明は上述の如く構成されているので、目視
であつても鍋のワーク煉瓦残厚を正確に推定する
ことができ、これによつて鍋下しまでの処理回数
を増やすことのできるワーク煉瓦の残厚推定方法
を提供することができた。
[Table] [Effects of the Invention] Since the present invention is configured as described above, it is possible to accurately estimate the remaining thickness of the workpiece brick in the pot even by visual inspection, and thereby the processing up to the pot lowering can be easily estimated. We were able to provide a method for estimating the residual thickness of work bricks that can be repeated many times.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of drawings]

第1図は本発明方法の実施に用いられる鍋の断
面説明図、第2図はワーク煉瓦及び標識煉瓦の溶
損状態を示す断面説明図、第3図は鍋の水平方向
断面説明図であつて標識煉瓦の配列状態を示す
図、第4図は残厚と精錬回数の関係を示す図であ
る。 1……ワーク煉瓦、2……標識煉瓦、ΔY……
突出量。
FIG. 1 is an explanatory cross-sectional view of a ladle used in carrying out the method of the present invention, FIG. FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the arrangement of marked bricks, and FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the relationship between the remaining thickness and the number of refining operations. 1... Work brick, 2... Marker brick, ΔY...
Protrusion amount.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 1 溶融金属収納鍋におけるワーク煉瓦の残厚を
推定する方法であつて、ワーク煉瓦の配列途中
に、該ワーク煉瓦よりも溶損速度の小さい標識煉
瓦を設け、標識煉瓦のワーク煉瓦からの突出量を
目視測定することによつて、ワーク煉瓦の残厚を
推定することを特徴とする、溶融金属収納鍋にお
けるワーク煉瓦の残厚推定方法。
1 A method for estimating the remaining thickness of work bricks in a molten metal storage pot, in which a marker brick with a lower melting rate than the work bricks is provided in the middle of the arrangement of the work bricks, and the amount of protrusion of the marker brick from the work bricks is calculated. A method for estimating the residual thickness of a work brick in a molten metal storage pot, the method comprising estimating the residual thickness of the work brick by visually measuring the residual thickness of the work brick.
JP19373286A 1986-08-19 1986-08-19 Method of estimating residual thickness of work brick in molten-metal housing ladle Granted JPS6349696A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP19373286A JPS6349696A (en) 1986-08-19 1986-08-19 Method of estimating residual thickness of work brick in molten-metal housing ladle

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP19373286A JPS6349696A (en) 1986-08-19 1986-08-19 Method of estimating residual thickness of work brick in molten-metal housing ladle

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS6349696A JPS6349696A (en) 1988-03-02
JPS6347990B2 true JPS6347990B2 (en) 1988-09-27

Family

ID=16312886

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP19373286A Granted JPS6349696A (en) 1986-08-19 1986-08-19 Method of estimating residual thickness of work brick in molten-metal housing ladle

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS6349696A (en)

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS6349696A (en) 1988-03-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Mills et al. A review of slag splashing
JP2010189766A (en) Method for operating electric-resistant furnace
JP2016185552A (en) Management method of molten steel ladle
JPS6347990B2 (en)
JP4119620B2 (en) In-furnace situation estimation method for blast furnace
JP5299259B2 (en) Method for measuring and controlling molten steel temperature during secondary refining
JP5599358B2 (en) Management method of molten steel pan
JP2008116066A (en) Electric furnace operation method
JP3140799B2 (en) Control method of tapping temperature
JPH0894264A (en) Refractory residual thickness detecting method for electric furnace
EP0674011A1 (en) Method of controlling slag coating of a steel converter
US12172208B2 (en) Operation method of ladle refining treatment
EP1601941B1 (en) Submerged sensor in metallurgical vessel
JP5601185B2 (en) Operating method of RH vacuum degassing equipment
JP4285743B2 (en) Melting furnace temperature measuring device and monitoring device
JP7655908B2 (en) Fixed electric furnace operation method
JP2524933B2 (en) Control method of molten steel temperature in arc type electric furnace refining.
KR100362660B1 (en) How to Monitor Refractory Wear Condition in Refining Furnace
JPS6257427B2 (en)
JP7482658B2 (en) Method for supporting electric furnace operation and method for steelmaking using electric furnace
JPH08291313A (en) Slag coating effective thickness estimation method for refining vessels
JPH0216844B2 (en)
JPH08219897A (en) Judgment method of ladle heat storage
JPH068479Y2 (en) Molten metal container
Iyengar et al. Statistical analysis of BOF lining life