| 意味 | 例文 (59件) |
Private Monopolizationの部分一致の例文一覧と使い方
該当件数 : 59件
Does the Customer Explanation Manager, in accordance with internal rules concerning the representations used in materials for advertisement and solicitation (hereinafter referred to as the “Advertisements, etc.”), etc., subject the Advertisements etc. of Transactions and products to legal checks, etc. in advance and verify that there is no violation of the Banking Law, the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law, the Act Against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations and the notification thereof, the Act concerning Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade and other relevant Laws as well as rules established by voluntary regulatory organizations and that the Advertisements etc. provide appropriate and sufficient explanations to customers, or does the Customer Explanation Manager have a person in charge of screening of Advertisements, etc. conduct such checks? 例文帳に追加
顧客説明管理責任者は、広告及び勧誘に用いる資料等における表示（以下「広告等」という。）に関する内部規程等に従い、取引又は商品に関する広告等について事前にリーガル・チェック等を受け、銀行法、金融商品取引法、私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律及びその告示、不当景品類及び不当表示防止法その他の関係法令及び自主規制機関の規則等に反しないものとなっているか、また顧客に対する説明として十分かつ適切なものとなっているか確認し、又は広告審査担当者等に確認させる態勢を整備しているか。 - 金融庁
Does the Customer Explanation Manager, in accordance with internal rules concerning the representations used in materials for advertisement and solicitation (hereinafter referred to as the "Advertisements, etc."), etc., subject the Advertisements etc. of Transactions and products to legal checks, etc. in advance and verify that there is no violation of the Banking Law8, the Securities and Exchange Law, the Act Against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations and the notification thereof, the Act concerning Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade and other relevant Laws as well as rules established by voluntary regulatory organizations and that the Advertisements etc. provide appropriate and sufficient explanations to customers, or does the Customer Explanation Manager have a person in charge of screening of Advertisements, etc. conduct such checks?例文帳に追加
顧客説明管理責任者は、広告及び勧誘に用いる資料等における表示（以下「広告等」という。）に関する内部規程等に従い、取引又は商品に関する広告等について事前にリーガル・チェック等を受け、銀行法 11、金融商品取引法、私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律及びその告示、不当景品類及び不当表示防止法その他の関係法令及び自主規制機関の規則等に反しないものとなっているか、また顧客に対する説明として十分かつ適切なものとなっているか確認し、又は広告審査担当者等に確認させる態勢を整備しているか。 - 金融庁
(5) The provisions of Article 7 (Elimination measures) (1) and (2) (including cases applicable mutatis mutandis under Article 8-2 (Elimination measures against trade associations) (2) and Article 20 (Elimination measures against unfair trade practices) (2)), Article 8-2 (1) and (3), Article 20 (1), Article 70-13 (Urgent temporary suspension order or change or rescission thereof by court) (1) and Article 74 (Accusation and report on non-prosecution) of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade shall not be applied to the fair competition code that has been authorized under paragraph (1), and to such acts of entrepreneurs or a trade association as have been done in accordance therewith. 例文帳に追加
５ 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律第七条第一項及び第二項（排除措置）（第八条の二第二項（事業者団体による既往の違反行為に対する措置）及び第二十条第二項（既往の不公正な取引方法に対する措置）において準用する場合を含む。）、第八条の二第一項及び第三項（事業者団体に対する排除措置）、第二十条第一項（不公正な取引方法に係る排除措置）、第七十条の十三第一項（裁判所の緊急停止命令又はその変更・取消し）並びに第七十四条（告発・不起訴処分の報告）の規定は、第一項の認定を受けた公正競争規約及びこれに基づいてする事業者又は事業者団体の行為には、適用しない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(4) The term "bid rigging etc." in this Act shall mean, in respect of conclusion of agreements by the government, local governments or specified corporations (hereinafter referred to as "government, etc.") for the sale and purchase, lease, contract, etc., with a counter party to be chosen by auction or other competitive means (hereinafter referred to as "bidding, etc."), the acts in violation of the provision of Article 3 or Article 8, paragraph 1, item 1 of the Act on the Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (Act No. 54 of 1947), through such practices that a entrepreneur wishing to participate in the bidding decides in conjunction with other entrepreneurs the successful bidder or the successful bid price, or the trade association makes an entrepreneur wishing to participate in the said bidding do the said acts. 例文帳に追加
４ この法律において「入札談合等」とは、国、地方公共団体又は特定法人（以下「国等」という。）が入札、競り売りその他競争により相手方を選定する方法（以下「入札等」という。）により行う売買、貸借、請負その他の契約の締結に関し、当該入札に参加しようとする事業者が他の事業者と共同して落札すべき者若しくは落札すべき価格を決定し、又は事業者団体が当該入札に参加しようとする事業者に当該行為を行わせること等により、私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律（昭和二十二年法律第五十四号）第三条又は第八条第一項第一号の規定に違反する行為をいう。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(4) With regard to a case for which the oral argument of the second instance or the first instance at a high court has been concluded, a case for which the oral argument of the second instance at a district court has been concluded, or a case for which an agreement has been made on not appealing to a high court against a judgment by a summary court or a judgment of the first instance by a district court, while reserving the right to appeal to the Supreme Court, prior to the enforcement of this Act, the provisions then in force shall remain applicable, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 393, paragraph (3), Article 394, Articles 397 to 399-3 and Article 409-2, paragraph (2) of the New Act and the provisions revising Article 88 of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade and Article 108 of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act. 例文帳に追加
４ この法律の施行前に、高等裁判所の第二審又は第一審の口頭弁論が終結した事件、地方裁判所の第二審の口頭弁論が終結した事件及び簡易裁判所の判決又は地方裁判所の第一審の判決に対して上告をする権利を留保して控訴をしない旨の合意をした事件については、新法第三百九十三条第三項、第三百九十四条、第三百九十七条から第三百九十九条ノ三まで及び第四百九条ノ二第二項の規定並びに私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律第八十八条及び中小企業等協同組合法第百八条の改正規定にかかわらず、なお従前の例による。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(2) Violation as provided for in the preceding Paragraph shall be deemed as violation of Article 19 (Prohibition of unfair trade practices) of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (in the case where trade associations induce entrepreneurs to employ such acts as falls under the said violation, such acts as falls under unfair trade practices as provided for in the Article 8 (1) (v) of the said Act (Prohibition of unfair trade practices by trade associations)), and a cease and desist order under this Act shall be deemed as a cease and desist order under the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade, for the purpose of applying the provisions of Article 8-2 (Elimination measures against trade associations), Article 20 (Elimination measures against unfair trade practices), Article 25 (Absolute liability), Article 26 (Restriction on exercise of the right to claim for damages in court, prescription) and provisions of Section 2 (Procedures) of Chapter VIII (Excluding Article 46, Article 49 (3) through (5) inclusive, Article 50, Article 51, Article 53, Article 55 (2), (5) and (6), Article 59 (2), Article 65, Article 67, Article 69 (3), Article 70-2 (4), Article 70-9 through 70-11 inclusive, and Article 70-12 (1)). In this case, in Article 49 (1), the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "the written (cease and desist) order"; and the term "the measures necessary to eliminate the violation or to ensure that the violation is eliminated" shall be replaced with "the matters necessary to cease such an act, or to prevent the resurgence of the said act, or to take any other matters including public notice of the matters relating to the implementation of such measures"; in paragraph (2) of the said Article, the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "a written cease and desist order"; in Paragraph (6) of the said Article, the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "the cease and desist order," and the term "sixty days" shall be replaced with "thirty days"; in Article 70-15 the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "the cease and desist order"; and in Article 70-21, the term "Chapter III" shall be replaced with "Chapter III (Excluding Article 13 (1) and Section 3). 例文帳に追加
２ 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律第八条の二（排除措置）、第二十条（不公正な取引方法に係る排除措置）、第二十五条（無過失損害賠償責任）、第二十六条（損害賠償請求権の裁判上の主張の制限、消滅時効）及び第八章第二節（手続）（第四十六条、第四十九条第三項から第五項まで、第五十条、第五十一条、第五十三条、第五十五条第二項、第五項及び第六項、第五十九条第二項、第六十五条、第六十七条、第六十九条第三項、第七十条の二第四項、第七十条の九から第七十条の十一まで並びに第七十条の十二第一項を除く。）の規定の適用については、前項に規定する違反行為は同法第十九条（不公正な取引方法の禁止）の規定に違反する行為（事業者団体が事業者に当該行為に該当する行為をさせるようにする場合にあつては、同法第八条第一項第五号（事業者団体による不公正な取引方法の禁止）の不公正な取引方法に該当する行為）と、排除命令は排除措置命令とみなす。この場合において、同法第四十九条第一項（排除措置命令）中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、「違反行為を排除し、又は違反行為が排除されたことを確保するために必要な措置」とあるのは「その行為の差止め若しくはその行為が再び行われることを防止するために必要な事項又はこれらの実施に関連する公示その他必要な事項」と、同条第二項中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、同条第六項中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、「六十日」とあるのは「三十日」と、同法第七十条の十五（事件記録の閲覧・謄写又は排除措置命令書等の謄抄本の交付）中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、同法第七十条の二十一（行政手続法の適用除外）中「第三章」とあるのは「第三章（第十三条第一項及び第三節を除く。）」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 4 With regard to the application of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (hereinafter referred to as "Antimonopoly Act") to an act committed prior to the enforcement of the provisions of Article 4 by a business cooperative, fire mutual aid cooperative, or credit cooperative set forth in Article 7, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act after the revision by the provisions of Article 4 (hereinafter referred to as "New Act" in this Article) which is not a business cooperative, fire mutual aid cooperative, or credit cooperative set forth in Article 7, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act prior to the revision by the provisions of Article 4 (hereinafter referred to as "Old Act" in this Article) or by a federation of cooperatives composed of cooperatives set forth in Article 7, paragraph (1), item (i) or item (ii) of the New Act which is not a federation of cooperatives composed of cooperatives set forth in Article 7, paragraph (1), item (i) or item (ii) of the Old Act, the provisions then in force shall remain applicable. 例文帳に追加
第四条 第四条の規定による改正後の中小企業等協同組合法（以下この条において「新法」という。）第七条第一項第一号に掲げる事業協同組合、火災共済協同組合若しくは信用協同組合であって第四条の規定による改正前の中小企業等協同組合法（以下この条において「旧法」という。）第七条第一項第一号に掲げる事業協同組合、火災共済協同組合若しくは信用協同組合でないもの又は新法第七条第一項第一号若しくは第二号に掲げる組合をもって組織する協同組合連合会であって旧法第七条第一項第一号若しくは第二号に掲げる組合をもって組織する協同組合連合会でないものの行為で第四条の規定の施行前にあったものに対する私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律（以下「私的独占禁止法」という。）の適用については、なお従前の例による。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(2) The provisions of the preceding paragraph shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases in which an entrepreneur effects private monopolization (limited to that arising from the control of the business activities of other entrepreneurs) that falls under any of the following items with respect to goods or services supplied by the said other entrepreneurs (hereinafter referred to as "controlled entrepreneurs" in this paragraph). In this case, the term "the sales amount of the relevant goods or services calculated pursuant to the method provided for by a Cabinet Order (in the case that the said act is pertaining to the receipt of supply of goods or services, the purchase amount of the relevant goods or services calculated pursuant to the method provided for by a Cabinet Order)" in the preceding paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "the sales amount of the relevant goods or services supplied by the said entrepreneur to the controlled entrepreneurs (including goods or services necessary for supply by the said controlled entrepreneurs of the said goods or services in any particular field of trade pertaining to the said act) and of the said goods or services supplied by the said entrepreneur in the said particular field of trade (excluding those supplied to the said controlled entrepreneurs) calculated pursuant to the method provided for by a Cabinet Order", and the term "(three percent in case of retail business, or two percent in case of wholesale business)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "(three percent in the case that the said entrepreneur engages in retail business or two percent in the case that the said entrepreneur engages in wholesale business)". 例文帳に追加
２ 前項の規定は、事業者が、私的独占（他の事業者の事業活動を支配することによるものに限る。）で、当該他の事業者（以下この項において「被支配事業者」という。）が供給する商品又は役務について、次の各号のいずれかに該当するものをした場合に準用する。この場合において、前項中「当該商品又は役務の政令で定める方法により算定した売上額（当該行為が商品又は役務の供給を受けることに係るものである場合は、当該商品又は役務の政令で定める方法により算定した購入額）」とあるのは「当該事業者が被支配事業者に供給した当該商品又は役務（当該被支配事業者が当該行為に係る一定の取引分野において当該商品又は役務を供給するために必要な商品又は役務を含む。）及び当該一定の取引分野において当該事業者が供給した当該商品又は役務（当該被支配事業者に供給したものを除く。）の政令で定める方法により算定した売上額」と、「（小売業については百分の三、卸売業については百分の二とする。）」とあるのは「（当該事業者が小売業を営む場合は百分の三、卸売業を営む場合は百分の二とする。）」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 56-2 (1) When the Prime Minister finds it necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors, he/she may order a Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc., a person who conducts transactions with the Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc., a Bank, etc., the majority of whose Voting Rights Held by All the Shareholders, etc. are held by the Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc. (excluding Registered Financial Institutions) (hereinafter such a Bank, etc. shall be referred to as a "Subsidiary Specified Juridical Person" in this paragraph), a Holding Company (meaning holding companies prescribed in Article 9(5)(i) of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) which holds the Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc. as its Subsidiary Company (meaning subsidiary companies prescribed in Article 29-4(3); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), or a person who received entrustment of business from the Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc. to submit reports or materials that will be helpful for understanding the business or property of the Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc. (with regard to said Subsidiary Specified Juridical Person, limited to reports or materials that will be helpful for understanding the property of the Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc. (excluding Registered Financial Institutions)), or have the officials inspect the status of the business or property, or the books and documents or other articles of the Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc., the Subsidiary Specified Juridical Person, the Holding Company which holds the Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc. as its Subsidiary Company, or the person who received entrustment of business from the Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc. (with regard to the Subsidiary Specified Juridical Persons, the inspection shall be limited to what is necessary to understand the property of the Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc. (excluding Registered Financial Institutions), and with regard to the Holding Company which holds the Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc. as its Subsidiary Company, or the person who received entrustment of business from the Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc., the inspection shall be limited to what is necessary to understand the business or property of the Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc.). 例文帳に追加
第五十六条の二 内閣総理大臣は、公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当であると認めるときは、金融商品取引業者等、これと取引をする者、当該金融商品取引業者等（登録金融機関を除く。）がその総株主等の議決権の過半数を保有する銀行等（以下この項において「子特定法人」という。）、当該金融商品取引業者等を子会社（第二十九条の四第三項に規定する子会社をいう。以下この条において同じ。）とする持株会社（私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律第九条第五項第一号に規定する持株会社をいう。以下この条において同じ。）若しくは当該金融商品取引業者等から業務の委託を受けた者に対し当該金融商品取引業者等の業務若しくは財産に関し参考となるべき報告若しくは資料（当該子特定法人にあつては、当該金融商品取引業者等（登録金融機関を除く。）の財産に関し参考となるべき報告又は資料に限る。）の提出を命じ、又は当該職員に当該金融商品取引業者等、当該子特定法人、当該金融商品取引業者等を子会社とする持株会社若しくは当該金融商品取引業者等から業務の委託を受けた者の業務若しくは財産の状況若しくは帳簿書類その他の物件の検査（当該子特定法人にあつては当該金融商品取引業者等（登録金融機関を除く。）の財産に関し必要な検査に、当該金融商品取引業者等を子会社とする持株会社又は当該金融商品取引業者等から業務の委託を受けた者にあつては当該金融商品取引業者等の業務又は財産に関し必要な検査に限る。）をさせることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
| 意味 | 例文 (59件) |
|
ログイン |
Weblio会員(無料)になると
|
|
ログイン |
Weblio会員(無料)になると
|