JP4028461B2 - Method for evaluating delayed fracture characteristics and plating method performed at that time - Google Patents
Method for evaluating delayed fracture characteristics and plating method performed at that time Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP4028461B2 JP4028461B2 JP2003298604A JP2003298604A JP4028461B2 JP 4028461 B2 JP4028461 B2 JP 4028461B2 JP 2003298604 A JP2003298604 A JP 2003298604A JP 2003298604 A JP2003298604 A JP 2003298604A JP 4028461 B2 JP4028461 B2 JP 4028461B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- hydrogen
- steel
- plating
- delayed fracture
- fracture characteristics
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Investigating And Analyzing Materials By Characteristic Methods (AREA)
- Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)
- Electroplating Methods And Accessories (AREA)
Description
この発明は、環境および人体への悪影響が軽減され、鋼中への水素の封入能力が優れ、しかも、従来法に比べて多くの限界拡散性水素量の同定が可能となる、遅れ破壊特性の評価方法およびその際行なうめっき方法に関するものである。 This invention has delayed fracture characteristics that reduce adverse effects on the environment and the human body, have an excellent ability to encapsulate hydrogen in steel, and can identify a larger amount of critical diffusible hydrogen than conventional methods. The present invention relates to an evaluation method and a plating method performed at that time.
遅れ破壊の評価方法として、限界拡散性水素量を用いることが有効であることは広く知られている。例えば、特許文献1や特許文献2に記載されているように、限界拡散性水素量を用いた鋼材の耐遅れ破壊特性の評価が、耐遅れ破壊特性に優れた材料開発に結び付けられている。
It is widely known that it is effective to use a critical diffusible hydrogen amount as a method for evaluating delayed fracture. For example, as described in
この限界拡散性水素量は、上記特許文献1および特許文献2に記載されているように、種々の量の水素を鋼材に含有させた後、遅れ破壊試験中に鋼材から水素が放出されることを防止するために、鋼材にカドミウムめっきを施し、その後、大気中で定荷重試験を行い、鋼材が破断に至るまでの時間を測定することによって同定される。
As described in
しかし、限界拡散性水素量の同定に必要不可欠な要素である、遅れ破壊試験中の鋼材からの水素放出の防止手段として、カドミウムめっきが用いられており、このカドミウムは、環境に多大な負荷を与え、かつ、人体へ著しい悪影響を及ぼすという問題が指摘されていた。 However, cadmium plating is used as a means of preventing hydrogen release from steel during delayed fracture testing, which is an indispensable element for identifying the critical diffusible hydrogen content, and this cadmium has a great impact on the environment. It has been pointed out that the problem of giving and severely adversely affecting the human body.
この問題に対処するため、非特許文献1に示されているように、カドミウムめっきの代替として、環境および人体への悪影響が軽減される亜鉛めっきが提案された。しかし、非特許文献1には、硫酸亜鉛浴を用いて亜鉛めっきをすることのみが開示され、そのめっき浴の組成およびめっき条件の詳細な開示が無い。従って、限界拡散性水素量を同定するために必要となる充分な鋼中水素封入能力を提供する適切なめっき浴組成およびめっき条件を求めることが困難である。
In order to cope with this problem, as shown in
しかも、上記のカドミウムめっきおよび硫酸亜鉛浴による亜鉛めっきを活用して限界拡散性水素量を同定した試験では、特許文献2の表2に示されているように、最大でも2.10mass ppmの限界拡散性水素量が求められた例しかなく、本発明者らによる検討では、これらの従来手法では、鋼材の限界拡散性水素量が2.10mass ppmより多い場合には、遅れ破壊試験中に鋼材から水素が放出してしまい、その鋼材の限界拡散性水素量を同定することができないことが分かった。 Moreover, in the test for identifying the limit diffusible hydrogen amount by utilizing the above cadmium plating and zinc plating by a zinc sulfate bath, as shown in Table 2 of Patent Document 2, the limit is 2.10 mass ppm at the maximum. There are only examples in which the amount of diffusible hydrogen has been obtained, and in the studies by the present inventors, in these conventional methods, when the critical diffusible hydrogen amount of the steel material is greater than 2.10 mass ppm, the steel material is subjected to the delayed fracture test. It was found that hydrogen was released from the steel and the critical diffusible hydrogen content of the steel material could not be identified.
上述したように、従来の技術は、次のような問題があった。限界拡散性水素量の同定に必要不可欠な要素である、水素放出防止に用いられるめっきについて、カドミウムの扱いが可能である特殊な施設や、めっき浴組成やめっき条件に関する特殊なノウハウを持った機関でのみしか実施できず、しかも、2.10mass ppmを超える限界拡散性水素量の同定ができなかった。 As described above, the conventional technique has the following problems. A special facility capable of handling cadmium and an organization with special know-how regarding plating bath composition and plating conditions for plating used to prevent hydrogen release, which is an indispensable element for identifying the critical diffusible hydrogen content In addition, the critical diffusible hydrogen amount exceeding 2.10 mass ppm could not be identified.
従って、この発明は、上述した問題を解決するためになされたものであり、その目的とするところは、環境および人体への悪影響が軽減され、鋼中への水素の封入能力が優れ、しかも、従来法に比べて多くの限界拡散性水素量の同定が可能となる、遅れ破壊特性の評価方法およびその際行なうめっき方法を提供することにある。 Therefore, the present invention has been made to solve the above-described problems, and the object thereof is to reduce the adverse effects on the environment and the human body, and to have an excellent ability to enclose hydrogen in steel, An object of the present invention is to provide a method for evaluating delayed fracture characteristics and a plating method performed at that time, which can identify a larger amount of critical diffusible hydrogen than conventional methods.
本願発明者等は、従来技術の上記問題点を解決すべく、めっき浴組成およびめっき条件に関して詳細に調べた。その結果、塩化アンモン浴を用いた亜鉛めっきによって、従来技術であるカドミウムめっきと比較して環境および人体への悪影響が軽減され、かつカドミウムめっきや硫酸亜鉛浴を用いた亜鉛めっきよりも鋼中水素封入能力が優れるという知見を得た。 In order to solve the above-described problems of the prior art, the inventors of the present application investigated in detail the plating bath composition and plating conditions. As a result, zinc plating using an ammonium chloride bath reduces adverse effects on the environment and the human body compared to cadmium plating, which is a conventional technique, and hydrogen in steel than zinc plating using a cadmium plating or zinc sulfate bath. The knowledge that the encapsulation ability is excellent was obtained.
この発明は、上述の知見に基づいてなされたものであって、下記を特徴とするものである。 The present invention has been made on the basis of the above-mentioned findings, and is characterized by the following.
請求項1記載の発明は、鋼材に拡散性水素を含有させ、限界拡散性水素量を測定することによって、前記鋼材の遅れ破壊特性を評価する遅れ破壊特性の評価方法において、前記限界拡散性水素量の測定中に前記鋼材から水素が放出されることを防止するために、塩化亜鉛、塩化アンモニウム、光沢剤を含有する塩化アンモン浴を用いて、前記鋼材に亜鉛めっきを施すことに特徴を有するものである。
The invention according to
請求項2記載の発明は、請求項1記載の発明において、塩化アンモン浴は、塩化亜鉛の含有量が20〜70g/L、塩化アンモニウムの含有量が140〜230g/L、光沢剤の含有量が15〜50mL/Lであることに特徴を有するものである。
The invention according to claim 2 is the invention according to
請求項3記載の発明は、請求項1または2記載の発明において、塩化アンモン浴の浴温は、10〜45℃であることに特徴を有するものである。
The invention described in
請求項4記載の発明は、請求項1から3の何れか1つに記載の発明において、塩化アンモン浴のpHは、5.0〜6.5であることに特徴を有するものである。
The invention described in claim 4 is characterized in that, in the invention described in any one of
請求項5記載の発明は、請求項1から4の何れか1つに記載の発明において、亜鉛めっき時の陰極電流密度は、0.3〜6A/dm2であることに特徴を有するものである。
The invention according to claim 5 is characterized in that, in the invention according to any one of
請求項6記載の発明は、請求項1から5の何れか1つに記載の発明において、めっき時間は、1分以上であることに特徴を有するものである。
The invention described in claim 6 is characterized in that, in the invention described in any one of
請求項7記載の発明は、鋼材に拡散性水素を含有させ、限界拡散性水素量を測定することによって、前記鋼材の遅れ破壊特性を評価する際に、前記鋼材からの水素の放出を防止するために、塩化亜鉛、塩化アンモニウム、光沢剤を含有する塩化アンモン浴を用いて、前記鋼材に亜鉛めっきを施すことに特徴を有するものである。 The invention according to claim 7 prevents the release of hydrogen from the steel material when evaluating the delayed fracture characteristics of the steel material by making the steel material contain diffusible hydrogen and measuring the amount of critical diffusible hydrogen. Therefore, the steel material is characterized by being galvanized using an ammonium chloride bath containing zinc chloride, ammonium chloride, and a brightener.
この発明によれば、従来のカドミウムめっきを用いた遅れ破壊の評価方法と比べて、環境および人体へ及ぼす悪影響が軽減され、かつ、従来技術であるカドミウムめっきや硫酸亜鉛浴による亜鉛めっきを用いた遅れ破壊の評価方法では同定不可能であった2.10mass ppmより多くの限界拡散性水素量が同定可能となり、さらに、低ひずみ速度試験法による限界拡散性水素量の同定が可能となるので、定荷重試験法に比べて、短時間で評価でき、しかも用意するサンプル数も少なくて済むといった有用な効果がもたらされる。 According to this invention, compared with the conventional method for evaluating delayed fracture using cadmium plating, adverse effects on the environment and the human body are reduced, and cadmium plating and zinc plating using a zinc sulfate bath, which are conventional techniques, are used. More limit diffusible hydrogen amounts than 2.10 mass ppm, which could not be identified by the delayed fracture evaluation method, can be identified, and further, limit diffusible hydrogen amounts can be identified by the low strain rate test method. Compared with the constant load test method, it is possible to evaluate in a short time and to bring a useful effect that only a small number of samples are prepared.
次に、この発明におけるめっき浴組成の限定理由について述べる。 Next, the reason for limiting the plating bath composition in this invention will be described.
(塩化亜鉛)
塩化亜鉛は、亜鉛めっきの主成分である金属亜鉛を提供するために添加するが、20g/L未満では、陰極電流効率が低下し、鋼材全面に緻密なめっきが形成されず、鋼中水素の封入能力を失う。一方、70g/Lを超えると、均一電着性が劣化し、鋼材全面に緻密なめっきを付与することができなくなり、鋼中水素の封入能力を失う。従って、塩化亜鉛の添加量は、20〜70g/L、より好ましくは、30〜60g/Lに限定した。
(Zinc chloride)
Zinc chloride is added to provide zinc metal, which is the main component of galvanization. However, if it is less than 20 g / L, the cathode current efficiency is lowered, dense plating is not formed on the entire surface of the steel material, and hydrogen in the steel is reduced. Loss the encapsulation ability. On the other hand, when it exceeds 70 g / L, the throwing power deteriorates, it becomes impossible to give a dense plating to the entire surface of the steel material, and the ability to enclose hydrogen in steel is lost. Therefore, the amount of zinc chloride added is limited to 20 to 70 g / L, more preferably 30 to 60 g / L.
(塩化アンモニウム)
塩化アンモニウムは、適当な均一電着性と陰極電流効率を与え、鋼材全面に緻密なめっきを付与するために添加するが、140g/L未満では、めっきが緻密とならずに粗雑となるため、鋼中水素の封入能力を失う。一方、230g/Lを超えると、陰極電流効率が低下し、めっきが緻密とならないため、鋼中水素の封入能力を失う。従って、塩化アンモニウムの添加量は、140〜230g/L、より好ましくは、150〜220g/Lに限定した。
(Ammonium chloride)
Ammonium chloride is added to give appropriate uniform electrodeposition and cathodic current efficiency and to give a dense plating on the entire surface of the steel material. However, if it is less than 140 g / L, the plating becomes coarse without being dense, Loss the ability to contain hydrogen in steel. On the other hand, if it exceeds 230 g / L, the cathode current efficiency decreases and the plating does not become dense, so that the ability to enclose hydrogen in steel is lost. Therefore, the amount of ammonium chloride added is limited to 140 to 230 g / L, more preferably 150 to 220 g / L.
(光沢剤)
光沢剤は、主として均一電着性を向上させるために添加するが、15mL/L未満では、均一電着性に劣り、全面に緻密なめっきを付与させることができないため、鋼中水素の封入能力を失う。一方、50mL/Lを超えた場合も、均一電着性に劣り、全面に緻密なめっきを付与させることができないため、鋼中水素の封入能力を失う。従って、光沢剤の添加量は、15〜50mL/L、より好ましくは、25〜40mL/Lに限定した。
(Brightener)
The brightener is added mainly to improve the throwing power. However, if it is less than 15 mL / L, the throwing power is inferior and it is impossible to give dense plating on the entire surface. Lose. On the other hand, even when it exceeds 50 mL / L, the ability to enclose hydrogen in steel is lost because it is inferior in throwing power and cannot be provided with dense plating on the entire surface. Therefore, the addition amount of the brightener is limited to 15 to 50 mL / L, more preferably 25 to 40 mL / L.
次に、この発明のめっき条件の限定理由について述べる。 Next, the reason for limiting the plating conditions of the present invention will be described.
(浴温)
浴温は、主として緻密な亜鉛めっきを作成するために管理するが、10℃未満では、亜鉛めっき中にピットが発生し、鋼中水素の封入能力を失う。一方、45℃を超えた場合も、亜鉛めっき中にピットが発生し、鋼中水素の封入能力を失う。従って、浴温は、10〜45℃、より好ましくは、20〜35℃に限定した。
(Bath temperature)
The bath temperature is controlled mainly to produce a dense galvanizing, but if it is less than 10 ° C., pits are generated during the galvanizing and the ability to enclose hydrogen in the steel is lost. On the other hand, even when the temperature exceeds 45 ° C., pits are generated during galvanization, and the ability to enclose hydrogen in steel is lost. Accordingly, the bath temperature is limited to 10 to 45 ° C, more preferably 20 to 35 ° C.
(pH)
pHは、主として緻密な亜鉛めっきを作成するために管理するが、5.0未満では、亜鉛めっき中にピットが発生し、鋼中水素の封入能力を失う。一方、6.5を超えた場合も、亜鉛めっき中にピットが発生し、鋼中水素の封入能力を失う。従って、pHは、5.0〜6.5、より好ましくは5.5〜6.2に限定した。
(PH)
The pH is controlled mainly to produce a dense galvanizing, but if it is less than 5.0, pits are generated in the galvanizing and the ability to enclose hydrogen in steel is lost. On the other hand, when it exceeds 6.5, pits are generated during galvanization, and the ability to enclose hydrogen in steel is lost. Accordingly, the pH is limited to 5.0 to 6.5, more preferably 5.5 to 6.2.
(陰極電流密度)
陰極電流密度は、主として緻密な亜鉛めっきを作成するために管理するが、0.3A/dm2未満の場合は、亜鉛めっき中にピットが発生し、鋼中水素の封入能力を失う。一方、6A/dm2を超えた場合も、亜鉛めっき中にピットが発生し、鋼中水素の封入能力を失う。従って、めっき時の陰極電流密度を0.3〜6A/dm2、より好ましくは、0.5〜5A/dm2に限定した。
(Cathode current density)
Cathode current density is managed mainly to produce a dense galvanizing, but when it is less than 0.3 A / dm 2 , pits are generated during galvanizing, and the ability to enclose hydrogen in steel is lost. On the other hand, when it exceeds 6 A / dm 2 , pits are generated during galvanization and the ability to enclose hydrogen in steel is lost. Accordingly, the cathode current density during the plating 0.3~6A / dm 2, more preferably, is limited to 0.5~5A / dm 2.
(めっき時間)
めっき時間は、水素封入のために必要な厚さのめっきを作成するために管理するが、1分未満ではめっき厚さが薄いため、充分な時間、水素を封入することができない。従って、めっき時間は、1分以上に限定した。
(Plating time)
The plating time is controlled in order to produce a plating having a thickness necessary for hydrogen encapsulation, but since the plating thickness is thin in less than 1 minute, hydrogen cannot be encapsulated for a sufficient time. Therefore, the plating time was limited to 1 minute or more.
次に、この発明を実施例によって、さらに説明する。 Next, the present invention will be further described with reference to examples.
580MPa級調質鋼材から試験片を切り取り、陰極水素チャージによって各試験片(本発明例No.1〜10、比較例11〜24)に水素を導入後、表1に示す組成のめっき浴およびめっき条件下で各試験片に亜鉛めっきを施し、めっき直後またはめっき終了から150時間経過後にめっきを剥離し、ただちに昇温脱離式水素分析試験を行い、そして、各試験片中の拡散性水素量をガスクロマトグラフによって測定した。この結果を同表に示す。 A test piece was cut from a 580 MPa grade tempered steel, and hydrogen was introduced into each test piece (Example Nos. 1 to 10 and Comparative Examples 11 to 24) by cathodic hydrogen charging. Each test piece was galvanized under the conditions, and the plating was peeled off immediately after plating or after 150 hours had elapsed from the end of plating, immediately followed by a thermal desorption hydrogen analysis test, and the amount of diffusible hydrogen in each test piece Was measured by gas chromatography. The results are shown in the same table.
拡散性水素量は、図1に例として示す昇温脱離式水素分析試験から得られる水素放出曲線にて、室温から300℃までに放出される水素量とした。めっきによる鋼中水素の封入能力は、めっき直後の水素量に対して、めっき終了から150時間経過後も90%以上の水素を保持している場合に合格として判断した。なお、光沢剤は、塩化アンモン浴用として、アサヒジンコール(登録商標)NR−1、NR−2(上村工業株式会社製)を使用した。 The amount of diffusible hydrogen was the amount of hydrogen released from room temperature to 300 ° C. in the hydrogen release curve obtained from the temperature programmed desorption hydrogen analysis test shown as an example in FIG. The ability to enclose hydrogen in steel by plating was judged as acceptable when 90% or more of hydrogen was retained after 150 hours from the end of plating with respect to the amount of hydrogen immediately after plating. As the brightener, Asahi Zincol (registered trademark) NR-1 and NR-2 (manufactured by Uemura Kogyo Co., Ltd.) were used for the ammonium chloride bath.
表1から明らかなように、この発明によりめっきをした本発明例No.1〜10は、何れも十分な量の水素が封入されていた。 As is apparent from Table 1, Example No. of the present invention plated by this invention. All of 1 to 10 were filled with a sufficient amount of hydrogen.
これに対して、比較例No.11〜24は、何れも、水素の封入量が本発明例に比べて少なかった。 In contrast, Comparative Example No. In all of Nos. 11 to 24, the amount of hydrogen enclosed was smaller than that of the example of the present invention.
すなわち、塩化亜鉛濃度が本発明範囲の下限値未満である比較例No.11、および、塩化亜鉛濃度が本発明範囲の上限値を超える比較例No.12は、何れも、水素の封入量が少なかった。 That is, the comparative example No. in which the zinc chloride concentration is less than the lower limit of the range of the present invention. 11 and Comparative Example No. 1 in which the zinc chloride concentration exceeds the upper limit of the range of the present invention. No. 12 had a small amount of hydrogen enclosed.
塩化アンモニウム濃度が本発明範囲の下限値未満である比較例No.13、および、塩化アンモニウム濃度が本発明範囲の上限値を超える比較例No.14は、何れも、水素の封入量が少なかった。 Comparative Example No. Ammonium chloride concentration is less than the lower limit of the range of the present invention. 13 and Comparative Example No. in which the ammonium chloride concentration exceeds the upper limit of the range of the present invention. No. 14 had a small amount of hydrogen enclosed.
光沢剤濃度が本発明範囲の下限値未満である比較例No.15、および、光沢剤濃度が本発明範囲の上限値を超える比較例16は、何れも、水素の封入量が少なかった。 Comparative Example No. in which the brightener concentration is less than the lower limit of the range of the present invention. 15 and Comparative Example 16 in which the brightener concentration exceeded the upper limit of the range of the present invention all had a small amount of hydrogen.
浴温が本発明範囲の下限値未満である比較例No.17、および、浴温が本発明範囲の上限値を超える比較例No.18は、何れも、水素の封入量が少なかった。 Comparative example No. whose bath temperature is less than the lower limit of the range of the present invention. 17 and comparative example No. in which the bath temperature exceeds the upper limit of the range of the present invention. No. 18 had a small amount of hydrogen enclosed.
pHが本発明範囲の下限値未満である比較例No.19、および、pHが本発明範囲の上限値を超える比較例20は、何れも、水素の封入量が少なかった。 Comparative Example No. whose pH is less than the lower limit of the range of the present invention. 19 and Comparative Example 20 in which the pH exceeded the upper limit of the range of the present invention each had a small amount of hydrogen enclosed.
陰極電流密度が本発明範囲の下限値未満である比較例No.21、および、陰極電流密度が本発明範囲の上限値を超える比較例No.22は、何れも、水素の封入量が少なかった。 Comparative Example No. whose cathode current density is less than the lower limit of the range of the present invention. 21 and Comparative Example No. in which the cathode current density exceeds the upper limit of the range of the present invention. No. 22 had a small amount of hydrogen enclosed.
めっき時間が本発明範囲の下限値未満である比較例No.23および24は、何れも、水素の封入量が少なかった。 Comparative Example No. in which the plating time is less than the lower limit of the range of the present invention. In both Nos. 23 and 24, the amount of hydrogen enclosed was small.
次に、図2、図3および図4に、この発明によって、表1のNo.3のめっき浴組成およびめっき条件下で580MPa級調質鋼の限界拡散性水素量を同定した結果を示す。図2は、定荷重試験法による場合であり、種々の量の水素を含有させたサンプル(試験片)にめっき後、引張強さの80%の引張応力を負荷して、荷重負荷開始から破断までの時間を測定し、荷重負荷開始から100時間以上遅れ破壊を生じない上限の拡散性水素量を限界拡散性水素量とした。図3は、図2の定荷重試験法において、引張強さの90%の引張応力を負荷した場合である。図4は、低ひずみ速度試験法(SSRT法:Slow Strain Rate Technique)による場合であり、種々の量の水素を含有させたサンプルにめっき後、クロスヘッドスピードが1×10-3mm/分の低ひずみ速度で引張応力を負荷して、破断応力を測定し、その破断応力に対応する拡散性水素量をその破断応力に対応する限界拡散性水素量とした。 Next, FIG. 2, FIG. 3 and FIG. The result of having identified the limit diffusible hydrogen amount of 580MPa grade tempered steel under the plating bath composition of 3 and plating conditions is shown. Fig. 2 shows the case of the constant load test method. After plating a sample (test piece) containing various amounts of hydrogen, a tensile stress of 80% of the tensile strength was applied, and fracture occurred from the start of load application. The amount of diffusible hydrogen at the upper limit at which no delayed fracture occurs for 100 hours or more from the start of loading is defined as the limit diffusible hydrogen amount. FIG. 3 shows a case where a tensile stress of 90% of the tensile strength is applied in the constant load test method of FIG. FIG. 4 shows a case by a low strain rate test method (SSRT method: Slow Strain Rate Technique). After plating a sample containing various amounts of hydrogen, the crosshead speed is 1 × 10 −3 mm / min. The tensile stress was applied at a low strain rate, the breaking stress was measured, and the amount of diffusible hydrogen corresponding to the breaking stress was defined as the limit diffusible hydrogen amount corresponding to the breaking stress.
この結果、図2、図3に示す定荷重試験法および図4に示す低ひずみ速度試験法の何れでも限界拡散性水素量の同定が可能であることが分かった。また、低ひずみ速度試験法での引張強さの80%または90%に対応する限界拡散性水素量は、それぞれ定荷重試験法での引張強さの80%または90%の値と一致する。このことから、封入水素量の異なる数多くのサンプルを用意し、長時間かけて測定する必要がある定荷重試験法に代えて、短時間で測定が行なえ、しかもサンプル数も少なくて済む、より迅速簡便な限界拡散性水素量の評価法として低ひずみ速度試験法を用いることが可能となることが分かった。 As a result, it was found that the critical diffusible hydrogen content can be identified by any of the constant load test method shown in FIGS. 2 and 3 and the low strain rate test method shown in FIG. Further, the critical diffusible hydrogen amount corresponding to 80% or 90% of the tensile strength in the low strain rate test method corresponds to the value of 80% or 90% of the tensile strength in the constant load test method, respectively. For this reason, many samples with different amounts of hydrogen can be prepared, and instead of the constant load test method, which requires measurement over a long period of time, measurement can be performed in a short time and the number of samples can be reduced more quickly. It was found that the low strain rate test method can be used as a simple method for evaluating the limit diffusible hydrogen content.
Claims (7)
前記限界拡散性水素量の測定中に前記鋼材から水素が放出されることを防止するために、塩化亜鉛、塩化アンモニウム、光沢剤を含有する塩化アンモン浴を用いて、前記鋼材に亜鉛めっきを施すことを特徴とする、遅れ破壊特性の評価方法。 In the method for evaluating delayed fracture characteristics of evaluating the delayed fracture characteristics of the steel by including diffusible hydrogen in the steel and measuring the critical diffusible hydrogen content,
In order to prevent hydrogen from being released from the steel during the measurement of the critical diffusible hydrogen content, the steel is galvanized using an ammonium chloride bath containing zinc chloride, ammonium chloride and a brightener. A method for evaluating delayed fracture characteristics.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2003298604A JP4028461B2 (en) | 2003-08-22 | 2003-08-22 | Method for evaluating delayed fracture characteristics and plating method performed at that time |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2003298604A JP4028461B2 (en) | 2003-08-22 | 2003-08-22 | Method for evaluating delayed fracture characteristics and plating method performed at that time |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2005069815A JP2005069815A (en) | 2005-03-17 |
| JP4028461B2 true JP4028461B2 (en) | 2007-12-26 |
Family
ID=34404062
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2003298604A Expired - Lifetime JP4028461B2 (en) | 2003-08-22 | 2003-08-22 | Method for evaluating delayed fracture characteristics and plating method performed at that time |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP4028461B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP4872407B2 (en) * | 2006-03-30 | 2012-02-08 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | Zinc plating solution, galvanizing method, and evaluation method for hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility of steel |
| JP5079375B2 (en) * | 2007-04-12 | 2012-11-21 | 新日本製鐵株式会社 | Surface treatment method for hydrogen embrittlement resistance evaluation test piece |
| JP5821586B2 (en) * | 2011-12-05 | 2015-11-24 | 新日鐵住金株式会社 | Evaluation method of delayed fracture characteristics of high strength steel sheet |
| US20150219549A1 (en) | 2012-10-03 | 2015-08-06 | Jfe Steel Corporation | Apparatus that measures the amount of hydrogen penetrated into metal |
-
2003
- 2003-08-22 JP JP2003298604A patent/JP4028461B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2005069815A (en) | 2005-03-17 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Kannan et al. | Stress corrosion cracking of rare-earth containing magnesium alloys ZE41, QE22 and Elektron 21 (EV31A) compared with AZ80 | |
| Barton et al. | Accelerated corrosion and embrittlement of high-strength bridge wire | |
| Ebtehaj et al. | The influence of chloride-chromate solution composition on the stress corrosion cracking of a Mg Al alloy | |
| Tiyyagura et al. | Degradation behavior of metastable β Ti-15-3 alloy for fastener applications | |
| JP6287917B2 (en) | Method for evaluating delayed fracture characteristics of metal material and metal material | |
| Sekhar et al. | Hardness-yield strength relation of Al-Mg-Si alloys | |
| JP2017187441A (en) | Method for evaluating delayed fracture of metal material | |
| JP6973193B2 (en) | Hydrogen embrittlement resistance evaluation method | |
| JP4028461B2 (en) | Method for evaluating delayed fracture characteristics and plating method performed at that time | |
| JP6128102B2 (en) | Method for evaluating delayed fracture characteristics of metal material and metal material | |
| JP6693130B2 (en) | Method for evaluating hydrogen embrittlement resistance | |
| JP5079375B2 (en) | Surface treatment method for hydrogen embrittlement resistance evaluation test piece | |
| Barjesteh et al. | Correlation between platinum–aluminide coating features and tensile behavior of nickel‐based superalloy Rene® 80 | |
| JP2009069007A (en) | Evaluation method for hydrogen embrittlement of thin steel sheet | |
| Andrei et al. | DC and AC polarisation study on magnesium alloys Influence of the mechanical deformation | |
| JP2001264240A (en) | Method for evaluating hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility of steel and steel excellent in hydrogen embrittlement resistance | |
| NO841261L (en) | DENTAL Alloy Based on Base Metals | |
| JP2008203218A (en) | Method for evaluating delayed fracture resistance of high-strength molten zinc plated steel plate | |
| Avdeev et al. | Protection of chromium-nickel steel in hydrochloric acid solution by a substituted triazole | |
| JP5774503B2 (en) | Method for evaluating delayed fracture characteristics of PC steel | |
| Davó et al. | Stress corrosion cracking of B13, a new high strength aluminium lithium alloy | |
| JP4872407B2 (en) | Zinc plating solution, galvanizing method, and evaluation method for hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility of steel | |
| Chauke et al. | Corrosion behaviour of the anodised A356 aluminium alloy produced by the rheo-high pressure die casting process | |
| JP4519680B2 (en) | Accelerated testing method for stress corrosion cracking | |
| Conde et al. | Stress corrosion cracking behaviour of 8090 Al–Li alloy at 313 K. The effect of grain structure |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20060224 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20070802 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20071009 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20071011 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101019 Year of fee payment: 3 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 4028461 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101019 Year of fee payment: 3 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111019 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111019 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121019 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121019 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131019 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| EXPY | Cancellation because of completion of term |