JP4781179B2 - Evacuation Safety Verification Method Using Approximate Equation of Smoke Outflow - Google Patents
Evacuation Safety Verification Method Using Approximate Equation of Smoke Outflow Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP4781179B2 JP4781179B2 JP2006181205A JP2006181205A JP4781179B2 JP 4781179 B2 JP4781179 B2 JP 4781179B2 JP 2006181205 A JP2006181205 A JP 2006181205A JP 2006181205 A JP2006181205 A JP 2006181205A JP 4781179 B2 JP4781179 B2 JP 4781179B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- smoke
- room
- evacuation
- calculation
- amount
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
- 239000000779 smoke Substances 0.000 title claims description 123
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 33
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 title claims description 29
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 49
- 230000007935 neutral effect Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009510 drug design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001771 impaired effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Landscapes
- Building Environments (AREA)
Description
本発明は、煙流出量の近似式を用いた避難安全検証法に関する。 The present invention relates to an evacuation safety verification method using an approximate expression of smoke outflow.
近年、建物内に火災時の避難経路を確保するために避難安全検証法が制定された。同法には、主として次の計算方法について規定している。
(a)火災室から室外へ避難できることを確認するための居室避難計算
(b)火災室を含む検証階から避難できることを確認するための階避難計算
(a)では、検証階の各居室毎に、居室からの避難を終了する時間(=避難開始時間+歩行時間+出口通過時間)と、煙が所定の高さ(床面から1.8m)に降りる迄の煙等降下時間とをそれぞれ計算し、前者が後者より短ければ避難の安全性が検証される。
In recent years, the Evacuation Safety Verification Act has been enacted in order to secure an evacuation route in the event of a fire in a building. The law mainly stipulates the following calculation methods.
(a) Room evacuation calculation to confirm that the fire room can be evacuated outside
(b) Floor evacuation calculation to confirm that it is possible to evacuate from the verification floor including the fire room
In (a), for each room on the verification floor, the time to finish evacuation from the room (= evacuation start time + walking time + exit passage time) and the predetermined height (1.8m from the floor) The smoke descent time until it gets down to each is calculated, and if the former is shorter than the latter, the safety of evacuation is verified.
(b)では、想定する火災室毎に、検証階に居る全員が避難階段へ避難するまでの階避難終了時間と、煙が避難経路内で所定高さへ降りるまでの煙等下降時間とをそれぞれ計算し、前者が後者よりも短ければ階からの避難の安全性が検証される。 In (b), for each assumed fire room, the floor evacuation end time until everyone on the verification floor evacuates to the evacuation stairs and the smoke descent time until smoke falls to a predetermined height in the evacuation route are shown. Each is calculated, and if the former is shorter than the latter, the safety of evacuation from the floor is verified.
ここで室内での煙等降下時間は次の数式4で、また階内での煙等降下時間は、任意の火災室から避難する際に通過する全室に関して次の数式5で計算した数値の合計の最大値である。但し、Aroomは居室床面積、Hroomは平均天井高さ、Vsは煙等発生量、Veは有効排煙量,Hlim,は限界煙層高さである。
[数式4]ts=Aroom×(Hroom−1.8)/max(Vs−Ve,0.01)
[数式5]ts=Aroom×(Hroom−Hlim)/max(Vs−Ve,0.01)
これら数式4及び数式5の計算上、火災室でのVsは現実に当該室内で発生した煙等の量を計算すれば良いが、階避難計算において火災室に連なる各室でのVsは、火元側から各室への煙の流出量で計算する必要がある。この煙流出量に関して旧建設省の告示は次のように定めている(非特許文献1)。この方法は、一種の近似であって、要するに煙の流出量と開口面積とが比例するとしたものである。
Here, the smoke fall time in the room is expressed by the following formula 4, and the smoke fall time in the floor is a numerical value calculated by the following
[Formula 4] ts = A room × (H room −1.8) / max (Vs−Ve, 0.01)
[Formula 5] ts = A room × (H room −H lim ) / max (Vs−Ve, 0.01)
In the calculation of Equation 4 and
[数式2]
dmout/dt=(2/3)αB×(Htop−Ho)3/2√(2gρs|ρs−ρa|)
[数式3]
dmin/dt=(2/3)αB×(Ho−Hs)3/2√(2gρa|ρs−ρa|)+αBHs×(Ho−Hs)1/2√(2gρa|ρs−ρa|)
この2式を解くときには、Hoの適当な初期値を代入して、mout及びminの一次解を計算し、これら解より中性帯上方からの煙の流出量moutと中性帯下方からのエアの流入量minとをそれぞれ求め、前者が大であるときには中性帯の高さを所定幅ΔHだけ上げ、後者が大であるときには、中性帯の高さをΔHだけを下げる。そして新たな中性帯の高さに基づいて、mout=minとなるまで逐次計算を繰り返す。
[Formula 2]
dm out / dt = (2/3) αB × (H top −H o ) 3/2 √ (2gρ s | ρ s −ρ a |)
[Formula 3]
dm in / dt = (2/3) αB × (H o −H s ) 3/2 √ (2gρ a | ρ s −ρ a |) + αBH s × (H o −H s ) 1/2 √ (2 gρ a | ρ s -ρ a |)
The when solving the two equations, by substituting an appropriate initial value of H o, to calculate the primary solution of m out and m in, runoff m out and the neutral zone of the smoke from the neutral zone above the these solutions seeking the air inflow m in from below, respectively, raising by a predetermined width ΔH height neutral zone when the former is larger, when the latter is large, only ΔH height neutral bands Lower. Then, based on the height of the new neutral zone, repeat the sequential calculation until m out = m in.
非特許文献1の計算式Vs=2Aopは、近似法としてもかなり粗い近似であって、必要以上に流出量を多く見積もってしまうことになる。 The calculation formula Vs = 2Aop of Non-Patent Document 1 is a rough approximation as an approximation method, and the amount of outflow is estimated more than necessary.
非特許文献2の計算式は、逐次近似法であり、煙流出量を決定するために多くの計算を行う必要があった。
The calculation formula of Non-Patent
これら個々の計算の速度は計算機を使用すれば速くなるが、多くの計算を繰り返すために、中性帯の初期値や増分ΔHの設定次第では数値が上手く収束しないなどの不都合を生ずることがある。また、建物の設計においては、厳密な計算解を求めるのとは別に携帯式計算機などで簡易に近似解を求めることを必要とする場合があり、そうした場合に、非特許文献2の方法は複雑過ぎる。
The speed of each of these calculations can be increased by using a computer. However, since many calculations are repeated, there may be inconveniences such as the numerical value not converging properly depending on the initial value of the neutral zone and the increment ΔH. . In designing a building, it may be necessary to easily obtain an approximate solution by a portable computer or the like separately from obtaining an exact calculation solution. In such a case, the method of Non-Patent
本発明は、非特許文献1に示す建設省告示の計算式よりは正確な近似解が、一度の計算で簡単に得られ、なおかつ、安全性を確保することが可能な煙流出量の計算式を用いた避難安全検証法を提供する。 In the present invention, a more accurate approximate solution than the calculation formula of the Ministry of Construction notification shown in Non-Patent Document 1 can be easily obtained by a single calculation, and the calculation formula of the amount of smoke spillage that can ensure safety. Provide evacuation safety verification method using
第1の手段は、
建物内の任意階の火災室又はこれに連なる煙伝播室を計算の対象として、この被計算室から開口を介して隣エリアへ単位時間内に流れ出る煙流出量を計算し、
この煙流出量に基づいて隣エリア内で煙が天井から安全避難の障害となる高さに降下するまでの煙降下時間を算出し、
この煙降下時間を、隣エリアの外又は避難口へ避難するのに要する避難時間と比較して安全避難の可否を判定する避難安全検証法において、
被計算室Rの内部を、上側の煙層と下側の清浄な空気層とに分れるものとするとともに、この清浄空気層と隣エリアNの空気との間で空気密度の差がないものと仮定して、
被計算室Rから隣エリアNへ単位時間当たりに流出する煙の質量dmout/dtを次式で近似することを内容としている。
[数式1]
dmout/dt=(2/3)αB×(Htop−Hs)3/2√(2gρs|ρs−ρa|)
α:開口係数,B:開口幅,Htop:開口上端高さ,Hs:煙下端高さ,ρs:煙密度,ρa:空気密度
本手段は、従来の建設省告示の式Vs=2Aopに比べて煙層下端の高さHsを反映した煙流出量の近似式を提案している。本式を導くに当たり、図1において火災室の煙層下方の空気層と隣エリアの対応する高さの空気層との各密度が同じであるという仮定をおく。そうすると両空気層の間での圧力差は零になるから、空気の出入りは零となる。そして煙層内では、前述のδ(ΔP)/δz=g(ρs−ρa)の圧力勾配があるので、煙層の下端から開口上端へ向かって圧力が直接的に増加することとなる。そこで前述の数式2のHoをHsに置き換えて上記数式1を得る。
The first means is
Using the fire room on any floor in the building or the smoke propagation room connected to it as the object of calculation, calculate the amount of smoke that flows out from this room to the next area through the opening within the unit time,
Based on this amount of smoke spill, calculate the smoke fall time until smoke falls from the ceiling to the height that becomes an obstacle to safe evacuation in the adjacent area,
In the evacuation safety verification method for judging whether or not safe evacuation is possible by comparing this smoke fall time with the evacuation time required to evacuate to the outside of the adjacent area or to the evacuation exit
The inside of the calculation room R is divided into an upper smoke layer and a lower clean air layer, and there is no difference in air density between the clean air layer and the air in the adjacent area N Assuming
The content is to approximate the mass dm out / dt of smoke flowing out from the calculation room R to the adjacent area N per unit time by the following equation.
[Formula 1]
dm out / dt = (2/3) αB × (H top −H s ) 3/2 √ (2gρ s | ρ s −ρ a |)
α: Opening coefficient, B: Opening width, H top : Opening top height, H s : Smoke bottom height, ρ s : Smoke density, ρ a : Air density This means is the formula Vs = compared to 2Aop we propose an approximate expression of the smoke outflow reflecting the height H s of the smoke layer bottom. In deriving this formula, it is assumed in FIG. 1 that the density of the air layer below the smoke layer of the fire chamber and the air layer of the corresponding height in the adjacent area are the same. Then, the pressure difference between the two air layers becomes zero, so that the air enters and exits zero. In the smoke layer, there is a pressure gradient of δ (ΔP) / δz = g (ρ s −ρ a ), so that the pressure directly increases from the lower end of the smoke layer toward the upper end of the opening. . Therefore, the above formula 1 is obtained by replacing H o in the
この数式1の形だけをみれば、数式2に比べて変数を一個置き換えただけであるが、この置き換えは物理的に見れば自然なことではない。何故ならば図1を見ると判るように火災室から隣エリアへ一方的に煙が出ていくだけで還気流がなく、質量の保存則が成立していないからである。しかし、数式1の左辺をdmout/dt(Hs)、数式2の左辺をdmout/dt(Ho)とすると、Hs<Hoであるから、dmout/dt(Ho)<dmout/dt(Hs)が保証されているということが言える。避難安全検証法の如く人命に直接結び付く問題の計算では、全体として精度の高い近似法であっても、近似解が厳密解よりも危険な領域側へブレる可能性があれば役に立たない。そこで本手段では、空気モデルが現実の減少からある程度乖離したものとなっても、現実の煙流出量が超過することのない最小限の目安量を提案するようにしている。
If only the form of Equation 1 is viewed, only one variable is replaced as compared to
図3は、各煙層下端の高さHsをいろいろに変更して、一定の煙層の比重の変化に対するVsの大きさについて、煙流出量に関する非特許文献2の数式による厳密解を細線で、表1の建設省告示による簡易近似解を点線で、更に、本発明による近似解を太字でそれぞれ表したものである。本発明の近似解は、あらゆる比重の範囲において厳密解よりも大きいが、建設省告示の簡易近似解に比べると大幅に精度が上がっていることが判る。
FIG. 3 shows a thin line that represents the exact solution according to the mathematical expression of Non-Patent
本手段中、「被計算室」とは、煙流出量の計算を行う対象の室をいい、避難口に至るまでの避難用通路(例えば廊下)を含むものとする。特に避難安全検証法でいう火災室と煙伝播室とを含む。即ち、前述の階避難安全検証の場合には、火災室から隣室への煙流出量の他に、その隣室(煙伝播室)から更に次の室への煙流出量を順次計算していく必要があり、それら一連の各室について本発明の近似式(数式1)を適用できる。もっとも一連の室(又はエリア)の全部に本発明の計算方法を適用する必要はない。例えば火元に近い室に対してはより精密な計算方法を、火元から遠い室に対してはより粗い近似法を適用するようにしても良い。具体的には、火元に近い室には非特許文献2の厳密な計算方法を、火元から遠い室には本発明の数式1の近似法を適用しても良く、或いは火元に近い室には数式1の近似法を、火元から遠い室には、建設省告示の簡易近似式を適用しても良い。これに関しては後述する。
In this means, the “calculated room” refers to a room for which the smoke outflow amount is calculated, and includes an evacuation passage (for example, a corridor) leading to the evacuation exit. In particular, it includes fire rooms and smoke propagation rooms in the Evacuation Safety Verification Act. In other words, in the case of the above-mentioned floor evacuation safety verification, in addition to the amount of smoke spilled from the fire room to the next room, it is necessary to sequentially calculate the amount of smoke spilled from the next room (smoke propagation room) to the next room. The approximate expression (Formula 1) of the present invention can be applied to each of the series of chambers. However, it is not necessary to apply the calculation method of the present invention to the entire series of rooms (or areas). For example, a more precise calculation method may be applied to a room close to the fire source, and a coarser approximation method may be applied to a room far from the fire source. Specifically, the exact calculation method of
尚、本明細書で「流出質量」というときには、本発明の数式1或いは非特許文献2の連立計算式に関して、単位時間当たりに流出する煙の質量を指すものとする。また、煙の「流出量」というときには、その概念の中には、流出質量の他に、単位時間当たりに流出する煙の容量(流出容量)が含まれるものとする。
In the present specification, “outflow mass” refers to the mass of smoke flowing out per unit time with respect to Equation 1 of the present invention or the simultaneous calculation formula of
第2の手段は、第1の手段を有し、かつ
被計算室に複数の開口がある場合に、これら複数開口のうち、
同一の隣エリアに連続する複数の開口に関しては、これら一連の開口と等価の開口面積を有する一つの開口として計算し、
異なる隣エリアに連続する独立した開口に対して、各独立開口からの煙流出量を計算するに当たって、他の独立開口が存在しないものとして、その計算を行うことを内容としている。
The second means includes the first means, and when there are a plurality of openings in the calculation room, among these openings,
For a plurality of openings that are contiguous to the same adjacent area, calculate as one opening having an opening area equivalent to the series of openings,
In calculating the amount of smoke outflow from each independent opening for independent openings that are continuous in different adjacent areas, it is assumed that there are no other independent openings and that the calculation is performed.
本手段では、被計算室に複数の開口がある場合の計算方法を提案している。複数の開口が一つの隣エリアに連続しているときには、これらの開口と等価の単一の開口を有する場合と区別する必要がない。他方、複数の開口が異なる隣エリアに連続しているときには、どの隣エリアに煙が流れ込むかを一義的に決定することが困難であるため、一つの開口からの流出量を計算する際、他の開口がなかったものとして取り扱う。この扱いは、安全性を確立するために煙の流出量が現実よりも余分にあるものと見做すという点で、第1の手段と着想を共通するものである。火災室から避難口まで幾つもの避難経路に枝分かれしているときには、かなり余分に煙流出量を見込むことになるが、前述の図3に示す如く建設省告示の簡易近似式で計算する場合と比較すれば、本発明の近似式を使用したときには誤差が半分以下になるので、全体として計算の精度が大幅に改善される。 This means proposes a calculation method when there are a plurality of openings in the calculation target room. When a plurality of openings are contiguous with one adjacent area, it is not necessary to distinguish from the case of having a single opening equivalent to these openings. On the other hand, when multiple openings are connected to different adjacent areas, it is difficult to uniquely determine which adjacent area the smoke flows into, so when calculating the amount of outflow from one opening, Handle as if there was no opening. This treatment has the same idea as the first means in that it considers that the amount of smoke outflow is in excess of reality in order to establish safety. When branching into several evacuation routes from the fire room to the evacuation exit, the amount of smoke spillage is expected to be quite large. In this case, when the approximate expression of the present invention is used, the error is reduced to half or less, so that the accuracy of calculation is greatly improved as a whole.
「同一の隣エリアに連続する複数の開口」とは、室A→開口d1→エリアC、室A→d2→エリアCの如く、一つの室から直接同じエリアに連続するときのそれらの開口をいうものとする。室A→室B→エリアCの如く、間接的に同じエリアに接続する場合は含まない。 “A plurality of openings that are continuous in the same adjacent area” means that the room A → the opening d 1 → the area C, the room A → d 2 → the area C, and the like when they are directly connected to the same area from one room It shall be an opening. It does not include the case where it is indirectly connected to the same area, such as room A → room B → area C.
第3の手段は、第1の手段又は第2の手段を有し、かつ
火災室から煙伝播室への煙の流出量を計算し、次に煙伝播室から隣のエリアへの煙の流出量を計算する場合に、火災室からの煙の流出質量を前記数式1により計算し、また煙伝播室からの煙流出量を次の数式2及び数式3によって計算することを特徴としている。
[数式2]
dmout/dt=(2/3)αB×(Htop−Ho)3/2√(2gρs|ρs−ρa|)
[数式3]
dmin/dt=(2/3)αB×(Ho−Hs)3/2√(2gρa|ρs−ρa|)+αBHs×(Ho−Hs)1/2√(2gρa|ρs−ρa|)
但しはHtop開口上端高さ、Hsは煙下端高さ、Hoは煙伝播室と隣エリアとの空気の圧力の差が零となる中性帯の高さ、moutは火災室からの煙の流出量、minは隣室からの空気の流入量、αは開口係数,Bは開口幅である。
The third means has the first means or the second means, and calculates the amount of smoke flow from the fire chamber to the smoke propagation chamber, and then the smoke flow from the smoke propagation chamber to the adjacent area. When calculating the quantity, the mass of smoke flowing out from the fire chamber is calculated by the above-mentioned equation 1, and the amount of smoke flowing out from the smoke propagation chamber is calculated by the following
[Formula 2]
dm out / dt = (2/3) αB × (H top −H o ) 3/2 √ (2gρ s | ρ s −ρ a |)
[Formula 3]
dm in / dt = (2/3) αB × (H o −H s ) 3/2 √ (2gρ a | ρ s −ρ a |) + αBH s × (H o −H s ) 1/2 √ (2 gρ a | ρ s -ρ a |)
However the H top open top height, H s smoke lower height, H o smoke propagation chamber and neutral zone difference in pressure of the air is zero the adjacent area height, m out from the fire chamber runoff smoke, m in the inflow of air from the adjacent room, alpha opening coefficient, B is the aperture width.
本手段では、正確な計算方法と簡易な計算方法との組み合わせを提案している。前述の階避難安全検証では、火元側から煙が伝播する各室・エリアに関して煙降下時間を計算するため、火元付近の室からの煙の流出量の誤差が大きいと、その後の各伝播室での計算で誤差が重複することとなり、全体としての計算の信頼性を損なう可能性がある。他方、伝播室の数が多いと、その全てに関して正確な計算を行うのは必ずしも合理的ではない。そこで火元からの遠近に応じて計算の精度にメリハリをつけるようにすることができる。 In this means, a combination of an accurate calculation method and a simple calculation method is proposed. In the above-mentioned floor evacuation safety verification, smoke fall time is calculated for each room / area where smoke propagates from the fire side, so if there is a large error in the amount of smoke flowing out of the room near the fire, each subsequent propagation Errors in the calculation in the room overlap, and the reliability of the calculation as a whole may be impaired. On the other hand, when the number of propagation chambers is large, it is not always reasonable to perform accurate calculations for all of them. Therefore, the accuracy of calculation can be sharpened according to the distance from the fire source.
第1の手段に係る発明によれば次の効果を奏する。
○建設省告示の計算式Vs=2Aopなどに比べて、精度が高い近似解が得られる。
○非特許文献2の逐次近似法に比べて一度の計算で解が求まるので簡単である。
○原理的に煙流出量の近似解が現実の流出量を下回ることが保証されているので、人命優先の原則を徹底しつつ合理的な設計を行うことができる。
The invention according to the first means has the following effects.
○ An approximate solution with higher accuracy can be obtained compared to the calculation formula Vs = 2Aop of the Ministry of Construction notification.
○ Compared to the successive approximation method of
○ In principle, it is guaranteed that the approximate solution of smoke spillage is lower than the actual spillage, so rational design can be performed while thoroughly implementing the principle of human life priority.
第2の手段に係る発明によれば、被計算室に異なる隣エリアへ連続する複数の開口が存在する場合に、それら各開口からの煙流出量の計算に際して、他の開口が存在しないものとして、換言すれば安全のために開口の数を少なく見積もる方式において、従来の計算式Vs=2Aopなどもより正確に各開口からの流出量を近似できるようにしたから、全体としての誤差を大幅に改善できる。 According to the invention relating to the second means, when there are a plurality of continuous openings to different adjacent areas in the calculation room, it is assumed that no other openings exist when calculating the smoke outflow amount from each of the openings. In other words, in the method of estimating the number of openings to be small for safety, the conventional calculation formula Vs = 2Aop and the like can more accurately approximate the outflow amount from each opening. Can improve.
第3の手段に係る発明によれば、火災室から煙伝播室への煙の流出量を、より厳密な数式1の近似式を用いて、またその煙伝播室から隣エリアへの煙の流出量を、より簡易な数式○の近似式を用いて計算するようにしたので、一連の計算操作の中心となる重要な部分を正確に、また末葉的部分を簡素にメリハリをつけて計算することができる。 According to the invention relating to the third means, the amount of smoke flowing out from the fire chamber to the smoke propagation chamber is calculated using the more approximate expression of Equation 1, and the smoke outflow from the smoke propagation chamber to the adjacent area. Since the quantity is calculated using an approximate expression of simpler formula ○, the important part that is the center of a series of calculation operations is accurately calculated, and the leafy part is simply calculated with sharpness. Can do.
図1〜図3は、本発明に係る避難安全検証法の説明図である。図1は本発明方法の原理を示す図であり、図2は、この方法を適用する検証階の平面図である。図1において、Rは被計算室であり、Nは隣エリアである。 1 to 3 are explanatory diagrams of an evacuation safety verification method according to the present invention. FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the principle of the method of the present invention, and FIG. 2 is a plan view of a verification floor to which this method is applied. In FIG. 1, R is a calculation room and N is an adjacent area.
まず本発明方法のうち従来公知の部分を図面に基づいて簡単に説明する。 First, heretofore known portions of the method of the present invention will be briefly described with reference to the drawings.
上記の検証法は、前述の如く居室避難安全検証と階避難安全検証という各行程を含む。この他に全館避難安全検証という行程があるが、本発明の要旨とは関連が少ないので説明を省略する。居室避難安全検証では、図2に示す検証階にある各室を火災室と仮定して、各火災室毎に避難終了時間と、煙等降下時間とを計算する。全ての検証室において前者が後者より短ければ避難の安全性が確認される。避難終了時間及び煙等降下時間の計算方法は避難安全検証法に詳細に規定されているので、説明を省略する。次に、階避難安全検証では、検証階の各室を火災室として、各火災室から避難口までの避難に要する階避難時間と、階煙等降下時間とを計算し、階煙等降下時間のうち最も短いものと比べて、何れかの火災室からの階避難時間が長いと、当該階からの避難の安全性は確保されないものとする。 The verification method includes the steps of room evacuation safety verification and floor evacuation safety verification as described above. In addition to this, there is a process of evacuation safety verification for the entire building, but the description is omitted because it is not related to the gist of the present invention. In the room evacuation safety verification, assuming that each room on the verification floor shown in FIG. 2 is a fire room, the evacuation end time and smoke descent time are calculated for each fire room. In all verification rooms, if the former is shorter than the latter, the safety of evacuation is confirmed. The calculation method of the evacuation end time and smoke descent time is stipulated in detail in the evacuation safety verification method, and thus the description thereof is omitted. Next, in the floor evacuation safety verification, each room on the verification floor is a fire room, and the floor evacuation time required for evacuation from each fire room to the evacuation exit and the floor smoke fall time are calculated. If the floor evacuation time from any fire room is long compared to the shortest of these, the safety of evacuation from that floor is not secured.
本発明では、前述の階煙等降下時間の計算に当たって、火元に近い側から遠い側への煙の流出量を計算する。計算の方法は、被計算室毎に、前述の数式1に、被計算室の開口係数α、開口幅B、開口上端高さHtop、煙層下端高さHs、煙密度ρs、空気密度ρaを代入すれば良い。 In the present invention, when calculating the above-mentioned smoke fall time, the amount of smoke flowing out from the side closer to the fire source is calculated. The calculation method is as follows. For each room to be calculated, the above equation 1 is applied to the opening coefficient α, the opening width B, the opening upper end height H top , the smoke layer lower end height H s , the smoke density ρ s , and the air. it is sufficient to assign the density ρ a.
ここで開口係数は、一般に0.6〜0.7の範囲で適宜決定する。また、煙下端高さ及び煙密度は公知の方法で求めればよい。具体的には、煙下端高さは、火源の発熱量と火源面積とその時点での煙下端高さから煙発生量を求め、そこから火災室の排煙量を引くことにより、火災室に存する煙量を求め、これを床面積で割ることにより求めることが出来る。煙密度はパスカルの原理により353/煙温度(K)で求めることができる。煙温度は火源の発熱量から排煙で持ち出される熱量と天井や壁から逃げていく熱量を引き、それを火災室に存する煙量と空気の比熱(1.0kJ/kg)で割ることにより求めることが出来る。もちろん、これ以外の方法で求めた値を用いても差し支えない。 Here, the opening coefficient is generally appropriately determined in the range of 0.6 to 0.7. Moreover, what is necessary is just to obtain | require smoke lower end height and smoke density by a well-known method. Specifically, the smoke lower end height is calculated by calculating the amount of smoke generated from the calorific value of the fire source, the area of the fire source and the smoke lower end height at that time, and subtracting the amount of smoke discharged from the fire room from that. It can be obtained by determining the amount of smoke present in the room and dividing this by the floor area. The smoke density can be determined by the Pascal principle at 353 / smoke temperature (K). The smoke temperature is obtained by subtracting the amount of heat that is taken out of the fire source from the calorific value of the fire source and the amount of heat that escapes from the ceiling and walls, and dividing it by the amount of smoke present in the fire room and the specific heat of the air (1.0 kJ / kg) I can do it. Of course, values obtained by other methods may be used.
図2のうち会議室8は開口d9及び開口d10を介して廊下10に連続しているが、この場合には、これら両開口と等価である単一の開口を有している。両開口の高さが同じであるときには、高さが同じで両開口の巾の和と等しい開口巾を有する開口を考えればよい。また、事務室1は、開口d1及び開口d2を介して前室3及び前室4に連続しているが、これら前室3及び前室4は相互に独立した室である。このような場合には、d1からの煙流出量の計算においては、開口d2がないものとして、また、d1からの煙流出量の計算においては、開口d2がないものとしてそれぞれ計算すればよい。 While meeting room 8 of FIG. 2 is continuous to the corridor 10 through the opening d 9 and the opening d 10, in this case, has a single opening is equivalent to these two openings. When the heights of both openings are the same, an opening having the same height and an opening width equal to the sum of the widths of both openings may be considered. Furthermore, office 1 is continuous to the front chamber 3 and the front chamber 4 through the opening d 1 and the opening d 2, these front chamber 3 and the front chamber 4 is a separate chamber to each other. In such a case, in the smoke outflow calculated from d 1, that there is no opening d 2, also in the smoke outflow calculated from d 1, respectively calculated as there is no opening d 2 do it.
図3は、各方法で計算した煙流出量である。同図によれば、上記方法によって、厳密解よりも大きく厳密解に沿った近似解が得られた。尚、この近似解を、より厳密解に近づけるためには、前述の数式1に適当なパラメータを入れて補正を行えば良いように思われるが、そうすると、厳密解よりも常に大きい解が求まるという本発明の最も重要な効果が失われてしまう。従って数式1の通りに適用するのがよいということになる。 FIG. 3 shows the smoke outflow calculated by each method. According to the figure, an approximate solution that is larger than the exact solution and along the exact solution was obtained by the above method. In order to make this approximate solution closer to the strict solution, it seems that correction should be made by adding an appropriate parameter to the above-mentioned equation 1, but in that case, a solution that is always larger than the strict solution is obtained. The most important effect of the present invention is lost. Therefore, it is better to apply as shown in Equation 1.
R…被計算室 N…隣エリア R ... Calculated room N ... Neighboring area
Claims (3)
この煙流出量に基づいて隣エリア内で煙が天井から安全避難の障害となる高さに降下するまでの煙降下時間を算出し、
この煙降下時間を、隣エリアの外又は避難口へ避難するのに要する避難時間と比較して安全避難の可否を判定する避難安全検証法において、
被計算室Rの内部を、上側の煙層と下側の清浄な空気層とに分れるものとするとともに、この清浄空気層と隣エリアNの空気との間で空気密度の差がないものと仮定して、
被計算室Rから隣エリアNへ単位時間当たりに流出する煙の質量dmout/dtを次式で近似することを内容とする、煙流出量の近似式を用いた避難安全検証法。
[数式1]
dmout/dt=(2/3)αB×(Htop−Hs)3/2√(2gρs|ρs−ρa|)
α:開口係数,B:開口幅,Htop:開口上端高さ,Hs:煙下端高さ,ρs:煙密度,ρa:空気密度 Using the fire room on any floor in the building or the smoke propagation room connected to it as the object of calculation, calculate the amount of smoke that flows out from this room to the next area through the opening within the unit time,
Based on this amount of smoke spill, calculate the smoke fall time until smoke falls from the ceiling to the height that becomes an obstacle to safe evacuation in the adjacent area,
In the evacuation safety verification method for judging whether or not safe evacuation is possible by comparing this smoke fall time with the evacuation time required to evacuate to the outside of the adjacent area or to the evacuation exit
The inside of the calculation room R is divided into an upper smoke layer and a lower clean air layer, and there is no difference in air density between the clean air layer and the air in the adjacent area N Assuming
An evacuation safety verification method using an approximate expression of smoke outflow, which includes approximating the mass dm out / dt of smoke flowing out from the calculation room R to the adjacent area N per unit time by the following expression.
[Formula 1]
dm out / dt = (2/3) αB × (H top −H s ) 3/2 √ (2gρ s | ρ s −ρ a |)
α: aperture coefficient, B: aperture width, H top : aperture top height, H s : smoke bottom height, ρ s : smoke density, ρ a : air density
同一の隣エリアに連続する複数の開口に関しては、これら一連の開口と等価の開口面積を有する一つの開口として計算し、
異なる隣エリアに連続する独立した開口に対して、各独立開口からの煙流出量を計算するに当たって、他の独立開口が存在しないものとして、その計算を行うことを内容とする、請求項1記載の、煙流出量の近似式を用いた避難安全検証法。 If there are multiple openings in the calculation room, of these multiple openings,
For a plurality of openings that are contiguous to the same adjacent area, calculate as one opening having an opening area equivalent to the series of openings,
The content of performing calculation on the assumption that there are no other independent openings in calculating the amount of smoke outflow from each independent opening for independent openings continuous in different adjacent areas. The evacuation safety verification method using the approximate expression of smoke outflow.
[数式2]
dmout/dt=(2/3)αB×(Htop−Ho)3/2√(2gρs|ρs−ρa|)
[数式3]
dmin/dt=(2/3)αB×(Ho−Hs)3/2√(2gρa|ρs−ρa|)+αBHs×(Ho−Hs)1/2√(2gρa|ρs−ρa|)
但しはHtop開口上端高さ、Hsは煙下端高さ、Hoは煙伝播室と隣エリアとの空気の圧力の差が零となる中性帯の高さ、moutは火災室からの煙の流出量、minは隣室からの空気の流入量、αは開口係数,Bは開口幅である。
When calculating the amount of smoke outflow from the fire chamber to the smoke propagation chamber and then calculating the amount of smoke outflow from the smoke propagation chamber to the adjacent area, The evacuation safety verification method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the calculation is performed and the amount of smoke outflow from the smoke propagation chamber is calculated by the following formulas 2 and 3.
[Formula 2]
dm out / dt = (2/3) αB × (H top −H o ) 3/2 √ (2gρ s | ρ s −ρ a |)
[Formula 3]
dm in / dt = (2/3) αB × (H o −H s ) 3/2 √ (2gρ a | ρ s −ρ a |) + αBH s × (H o −H s ) 1/2 √ (2 gρ a | ρ s -ρ a |)
However the H top open top height, H s smoke lower height, H o smoke propagation chamber and neutral zone difference in pressure of the air is zero the adjacent area height, m out from the fire chamber runoff smoke, m in the inflow of air from the adjacent room, alpha opening coefficient, B is the aperture width.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2006181205A JP4781179B2 (en) | 2006-06-30 | 2006-06-30 | Evacuation Safety Verification Method Using Approximate Equation of Smoke Outflow |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2006181205A JP4781179B2 (en) | 2006-06-30 | 2006-06-30 | Evacuation Safety Verification Method Using Approximate Equation of Smoke Outflow |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2008009839A JP2008009839A (en) | 2008-01-17 |
| JP4781179B2 true JP4781179B2 (en) | 2011-09-28 |
Family
ID=39067967
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2006181205A Expired - Fee Related JP4781179B2 (en) | 2006-06-30 | 2006-06-30 | Evacuation Safety Verification Method Using Approximate Equation of Smoke Outflow |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP4781179B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP5060377B2 (en) * | 2008-04-23 | 2012-10-31 | 鹿島建設株式会社 | Method and system for calculating smoke layer fall time |
| JP5233446B2 (en) * | 2008-07-02 | 2013-07-10 | 株式会社大林組 | Method of calculating the lower end height of the smoke layer, method of calculating the elapsed time from the occurrence of a fire until the lower end height of the smoke layer reaches a predetermined height, an evaluation method of evacuation safety performance in case of fire of a building, these calculation methods or Program for executing evaluation method and calculation system |
| JP5233448B2 (en) * | 2008-07-02 | 2013-07-10 | 株式会社大林組 | Calculation method of smoke layer bottom height, evaluation method of evacuation safety performance in case of fire of building, program for executing this calculation method or evaluation method, and calculation system of smoke layer bottom height |
-
2006
- 2006-06-30 JP JP2006181205A patent/JP4781179B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2008009839A (en) | 2008-01-17 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP4781179B2 (en) | Evacuation Safety Verification Method Using Approximate Equation of Smoke Outflow | |
| CN110503257A (en) | An MSC-based method for emergency escape path planning for sea personnel | |
| US20080248450A1 (en) | Method for modeling smoke propagation | |
| JP2007334683A (en) | Planning method, planning system, and planning program of facility for safe evacuation of building | |
| Lui et al. | Constructal design of evacuation from a three-dimensional living space | |
| Isenhour et al. | Verification of a pedestrian simulation tool using the NIST recommended test cases | |
| CN118428569A (en) | A method and system for dynamic emergency evacuation of ship personnel | |
| CN108733881B (en) | Treatment method for dealing with sudden indoor air pollution of public building | |
| JP4372457B2 (en) | Evacuation time calculation device | |
| JP2007128377A (en) | Evacuee Behavior Prediction Device and Evacuee Behavior Prediction Method | |
| JP2006301475A (en) | Underground space flood/evacuation simulation system | |
| JP4187688B2 (en) | Air conditioning control system using natural ventilation by train wind | |
| KR20150105664A (en) | An Structure of Building with Smart Exhausting Control System | |
| CN206236364U (en) | A kind of fire test device for subway elevated station and underground station transferring passage | |
| CN110017000A (en) | Escape stair under a kind of landscape landform | |
| JP5577380B2 (en) | Road tunnel ventilation device combining exhaust fan and jet fan and ventilation method thereof | |
| JP6754517B2 (en) | Road tunnel ventilation control device | |
| JP2012219524A (en) | Road tunnel ventilation control device | |
| Xu et al. | Feasibility analysis on natural ventilation scheme for large underground spaces based on the top cover design | |
| KR20180072321A (en) | Controlling System for Fire Preventing Shutter | |
| CN106128286B (en) | Fire test device and method for transfer passage of subway elevated station and underground station | |
| KR101086118B1 (en) | Cross-flow tunnel ventilation method using air supply duct for both supply and exhaust | |
| JP5060377B2 (en) | Method and system for calculating smoke layer fall time | |
| JP5233446B2 (en) | Method of calculating the lower end height of the smoke layer, method of calculating the elapsed time from the occurrence of a fire until the lower end height of the smoke layer reaches a predetermined height, an evaluation method of evacuation safety performance in case of fire of a building, these calculation methods or Program for executing evaluation method and calculation system | |
| JP5484246B2 (en) | Calculation method of parental room ratio in the room in the building |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20090326 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20110621 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20110629 |
|
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20110705 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140715 Year of fee payment: 3 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
| LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |