Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP4926496B2 - Magnesium alloy for die casting with excellent heat resistance, castability and corrosion resistance - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP4926496B2 - Magnesium alloy for die casting with excellent heat resistance, castability and corrosion resistance - Google Patents

Magnesium alloy for die casting with excellent heat resistance, castability and corrosion resistance Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4926496B2
JP4926496B2 JP2006048960A JP2006048960A JP4926496B2 JP 4926496 B2 JP4926496 B2 JP 4926496B2 JP 2006048960 A JP2006048960 A JP 2006048960A JP 2006048960 A JP2006048960 A JP 2006048960A JP 4926496 B2 JP4926496 B2 JP 4926496B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
magnesium alloy
mass
compound
sample
casting
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2006048960A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2007224389A (en
Inventor
直久 西野
博之 川畑
清二 才川
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Toyota Central R&D Labs Inc
Aisin Corp
Original Assignee
Aisin Seiki Co Ltd
Toyota Central R&D Labs Inc
Aisin Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Aisin Seiki Co Ltd, Toyota Central R&D Labs Inc, Aisin Corp filed Critical Aisin Seiki Co Ltd
Priority to JP2006048960A priority Critical patent/JP4926496B2/en
Publication of JP2007224389A publication Critical patent/JP2007224389A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4926496B2 publication Critical patent/JP4926496B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Molds, Cores, And Manufacturing Methods Thereof (AREA)

Description

本発明は、ダイカスト鋳造等に用いられるダイカスト用マグネシウム合金に関する。   The present invention relates to a magnesium alloy for die casting used for die casting and the like.

耐熱性と鋳造性を両立させることを目的として、ダイカスト用耐熱マグネシウム合金や、種々のダイカスト用マグネシウム合金(特許文献1〜3)が提案されている。これらのダイカスト用マグネシウム合金はAlや希土類元素(R.E.)等を含有しており、耐熱性がある程度向上したため、マグネシウム合金の適用範囲の拡大に寄与した。しかし、より熱負荷の高い部品への適用と低コスト化のためには、汎用合金並のダイカスト鋳造性が求められている。上記ダイカスト用耐熱Mg合金においては、要求される耐熱性と、鋳造性とを十分にカバーできない。   For the purpose of achieving both heat resistance and castability, a heat-resistant magnesium alloy for die casting and various magnesium alloys for die casting (Patent Documents 1 to 3) have been proposed. These magnesium alloys for die casting contain Al, rare earth elements (RE), etc., and have improved heat resistance to some extent, contributing to the expansion of the application range of magnesium alloys. However, die castability comparable to that of general-purpose alloys is required for application to parts with higher heat load and cost reduction. The above heat-resistant Mg alloy for die casting cannot sufficiently cover the required heat resistance and castability.

ダイカスト用マグネシウム合金の最も大きな課題はダイカスト鋳造時の割れである。鋳造割れによる不良品の多発により製造コストアップにつながると同時に、微細な鋳造割れ欠陥により材料本来の耐熱性を発現することができない。従来技術では、この鋳造割れを十分に抑制することができない。そのため、優れた鋳造性と耐熱性を有し、更に耐食性に優れたダイカスト用マグネシウム合金の開発が望まれている。   The biggest problem with magnesium alloys for die casting is cracking during die casting. The occurrence of defective products due to casting cracks leads to an increase in manufacturing costs, and at the same time, the inherent heat resistance of the material cannot be expressed due to minute casting crack defects. In the prior art, this casting crack cannot be sufficiently suppressed. Therefore, development of a magnesium alloy for die casting having excellent castability and heat resistance and further excellent corrosion resistance is desired.

特開平9−291332号公報JP-A-9-291332 特開2001−316752号公報Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2001-316752 特開2002−129272号公報JP 2002-129272 A

本発明は、かかる従来の問題点に鑑みてなされたものであって、耐熱性、鋳造性、耐食性に優れたダイカスト用マグネシウム合金を提供しようとするものである。   The present invention has been made in view of such conventional problems, and an object of the present invention is to provide a magnesium alloy for die casting excellent in heat resistance, castability, and corrosion resistance.

本発明は、Al、希土類元素(以下、R.E.とする)、及びMnを含有する、耐熱性、鋳造性、耐食性に優れたマグネシウム合金であって、
上記Mnの含有量は0.05〜1.0質量%であり、
上記Alの含有量をa質量%、上記R.E.の含有量をb質量%とすると、a≧3.9、2.5≧b/a≧1.38、且つ31.3/a−4.3≧b/aであり、
残部が、Mg及び不可避不純物からなり、
定常部断面における所定の面積を100%とすると、所定面積内のMg−Al化合物の面積率が0.1%以下であることを特徴とするダイカスト用マグネシウム合金にある(請求項1)。
The present invention is a magnesium alloy containing Al, a rare earth element (hereinafter referred to as RE), and Mn and having excellent heat resistance, castability, and corrosion resistance,
The Mn content is 0.05 to 1.0 % by mass ,
The content of Al is a mass%, and the R.I. E. When the content of is b mass%, a ≧ 3.9 , 2.5 ≧ b / a ≧ 1.38 , and 31.3 / a-4.3 ≧ b / a,
The balance consists of Mg and inevitable impurities,
When the predetermined area in the cross section of the steady portion is 100%, the magnesium alloy for die casting is characterized in that the area ratio of the Mg—Al compound in the predetermined area is 0.1% or less (Claim 1).

本発明のダイカスト用マグネシウム合金(以下、適宜、マグネシウム合金)は、含有する成分とその含有量を適正化することにより、耐熱性、鋳造性、耐食性に優れたマグネシウム合金を得ることができる。   A magnesium alloy excellent in heat resistance, castability and corrosion resistance can be obtained by optimizing the components and the content of the magnesium alloy for die casting of the present invention (hereinafter appropriately referred to as a magnesium alloy).

即ち、上記マグネシウム合金は、Al、R.E.、及びMnを含有する。
上記Alは、上記マグネシウム合金において、鋳造性、耐食性を向上する効果を有する。
上記R.E.は、上記マグネシウム合金中に一部固溶するため、耐食性を大きく向上することができる。
That is, the magnesium alloy includes Al, R.I. E. And Mn.
The Al has the effect of improving castability and corrosion resistance in the magnesium alloy.
R. above. E. Is partly dissolved in the magnesium alloy, so that the corrosion resistance can be greatly improved.

また、AlとR.E.とが、熱的に安定なAl−R.E.系化合物を生成する。該Al−R.E.系化合物は、腐食の原因となるFeやNi等の不純物を化合物中に取り込むため、マグネシウム合金は、優れた耐食性を得ることができる。
また、上記Mnを含有することによって、耐食性を向上することができる。
Al and R.I. E. Are thermally stable Al-R. E. A system compound is produced. The Al-R. E. Since the system compound incorporates impurities such as Fe and Ni that cause corrosion into the compound, the magnesium alloy can obtain excellent corrosion resistance.
Moreover, corrosion resistance can be improved by containing said Mn.

また、上記Alの含有量をa質量%、上記R.E.の含有量をb質量%とすると、a≧3.9、2.5≧b/a≧1.38、且つ31.3/a−4.3≧b/aである。
上記範囲を満たすことで、Al及びR.E.の含有量は適正化される。この場合には、上記Al−R.E.系化合物の晶出の際にAlを消費し、熱的に不安定なMg−Al化合物(以下、β相)の晶出を抑制することができる。それ故、定常部断面における所定の面積を100%とすると、熱的に不安定なβ相の面積率が0.1%以下となり、優れた耐熱性を得ることができる。更に、上記β相の晶出が抑制されることで、マグネシウム合金は、擬二次元凝固を示す。そのため、固液共存温度範囲が小さくなり、凝固時の温度バランスが良好になるため、鋳造割れを抑制することができる。
In addition, the content of Al is a mass%, the R.I. E. When the content of b is b mass%, a ≧ 3.9 , 2.5 ≧ b / a ≧ 1.38 , and 31.3 / a-4.3 ≧ b / a.
By satisfying the above range, Al and R.I. E. The content of is optimized. In this case, the Al-R. E. Al is consumed during the crystallization of the system compound, and the crystallization of the thermally unstable Mg—Al compound (hereinafter referred to as “β phase”) can be suppressed. Therefore, when the predetermined area in the cross section of the steady portion is 100%, the area ratio of the thermally unstable β phase is 0.1% or less, and excellent heat resistance can be obtained. Furthermore, the magnesium alloy exhibits quasi-two-dimensional solidification by suppressing the crystallization of the β phase. Therefore, the solid-liquid coexistence temperature range becomes small and the temperature balance during solidification becomes good, so that casting cracks can be suppressed.

本発明のダイカスト用マグネシウム合金は、上述したように、Mnを含有し、その含有量が0.05〜1.0質量%である。
上記Mnの含有量が0.05質量%未満の場合には、マグネシウム合金の耐食性が低下するという問題があり、一方、上記Mnの含有量が1.0質量%を超える場合には、溶湯中でMnと、Alと、R.E.とが比重の大きな化合物を形成して沈降するため、スラッジの発生量を多くすると共に、合金中のAl量及びR.E.量を低下させるという問題がある。
As described above, the magnesium alloy for die casting of the present invention contains Mn, and its content is 0.05 to 1.0 % by mass .
When the Mn content is less than 0.05% by mass, there is a problem that the corrosion resistance of the magnesium alloy is lowered. On the other hand, when the Mn content exceeds 1.0% by mass, Mn, Al, R. E. Forms a compound with a large specific gravity and settles, so that the amount of sludge generated is increased, the amount of Al in the alloy and R.I. E. There is a problem of reducing the amount.

また、上記Alの含有量をa質量%、上記R.E.の含有量をb質量%とすると、a≧3.9、2.5≧b/a≧1.38、且つ31.3/a−4.3≧b/aである。
a<3.9の場合、には、Al含有による鋳造性向上効果を確保できないと共に、安定なAl−R.E.系化合物相の絶対量が不足して十分な耐熱性が得られないという問題がある。
上記Al−R.E.系化合物としては、例えば、Al2Ce化合物、Al11Ce3化合物、Al2La化合物、Al11La3化合物、Al2Nd化合物、Al11Nd3化合物、Al2Pr化合物、Al11Pr3化合物等が挙げられる。
In addition, the content of Al is a mass%, the R.I. E. When the content of b is b mass%, a ≧ 3.9 , 2.5 ≧ b / a ≧ 1.38 , and 31.3 / a-4.3 ≧ b / a.
In the case of a < 3.9, the effect of improving castability due to the Al content cannot be ensured, and stable Al—R. E. There is a problem that the absolute amount of the compound-based compound phase is insufficient and sufficient heat resistance cannot be obtained.
The above Al-R. E. Examples of the system compound include an Al 2 Ce compound, an Al 11 Ce 3 compound, an Al 2 La compound, an Al 11 La 3 compound, an Al 2 Nd compound, an Al 11 Nd 3 compound, an Al 2 Pr compound, and an Al 11 Pr 3 compound. Etc.

b/a>2.5、つまりb>2.5aの場合には、Mg−R.E.系化合物が相対的に増加するため、鋳造性が大きく低下すると共に、耐食性が損なわれるという問題がある。該Mg−R.E.系化合物としては、例えば、Mg9Ce化合物、Mg12Ce化合物、Mg3Ce化合物、Mg9La化合物、Mg12La化合物、Mg3La化合物、Mg9Pr化合物等がある。一方、b/a<1.38、つまり、b<1.38aの場合には、熱的に不安定なβ相が晶出するため、耐熱性が低下するという問題がある。また、b/a>31.3/a−4.3、つまりb>31.3−4.3aの場合には、スラッジ量が増加するのみであり、高Al、高R.E.のマグネシウム合金を得ることができないという問題がある。 When b / a> 2.5, that is, b> 2.5a, Mg—R. E. Since the amount of the system compound is relatively increased, there is a problem that the castability is greatly lowered and the corrosion resistance is impaired. The Mg-R. E. Examples of the system compound include an Mg 9 Ce compound, an Mg 12 Ce compound, an Mg 3 Ce compound, an Mg 9 La compound, an Mg 12 La compound, an Mg 3 La compound, and an Mg 9 Pr compound. On the other hand, in the case of b / a < 1.38 , that is, b < 1.38a , a thermally unstable β phase is crystallized, resulting in a problem that heat resistance is lowered. Further, when b / a> 31.3 / a-4.3, that is, b> 31.3-4.3a, only the amount of sludge increases, and high Al, high R.V. E. There is a problem that a magnesium alloy cannot be obtained.

また、残部が、Mg及び不可避不純物からなる。
本発明のダイカスト用マグネシウム合金における必須元素は、マグネシウムの他には、Al、R.E.、Mnである。その他の元素は基本的には不可避不純物として含まれる程度である。
The balance consists of Mg and inevitable impurities.
Essential elements in the magnesium alloy for die casting of the present invention include Al, R.I. E. , Mn. Other elements are basically contained as inevitable impurities.

また、定常部断面における所定の面積を100%とすると、Mg−Al化合物の面積率が0.1%以下である。
上記Mg−Al化合物しては、例えば、Mg17Al12化合物(β層)がある。
上記面積率が0.1%を超える場合には、熱的に不安定な上記β相により、マグネシウム合金の耐熱性が低下するという問題がある。
Further, when the predetermined area in the cross section of the stationary part is 100%, the area ratio of the Mg—Al compound is 0.1% or less.
Examples of the Mg—Al compound include an Mg 17 Al 12 compound (β layer).
When the area ratio exceeds 0.1%, there is a problem that the heat resistance of the magnesium alloy is lowered due to the thermally unstable β phase.

また、上記R.E.として50質量%以上がCeであるミッシュメタル(以下、Mmとする)を用いることが好ましい(請求項2)。
上記R.E.は高価な合金元素であるため、多量の添加はコストアップにつながる。そのため、安価なMmを用いることが経済的であり、有効である
In addition, the above R.I. E. At least 50 wt% is Ce der Ru misch metal (hereinafter referred to as Mm) as it is preferable to use (claim 2).
R. above. E. Is an expensive alloying element, so adding a large amount leads to an increase in cost. Therefore, it is economical and effective to use inexpensive Mm .

また、上記ダイカスト用マグネシウム合金は、更に、Sr:1.5質量%以下、Ca:1.0質量%以下、Si:1.0質量%以下、及びSn:2.0質量%以下から選ばれる1種又は2種以上を含有することが好ましい(請求項3)。
この場合には、上記Al−R.E.系化合物相と異なる相ではあるが、耐熱性に関して上記Al−R.E.系化合物相と同様の効果を示す相が形成されるため、耐熱性を向上することができる。
The magnesium alloy for die casting is further selected from Sr: 1.5 % by mass or less, Ca: 1.0 % by mass or less, Si: 1.0 % by mass or less, and Sn: 2.0 % by mass or less. It is preferable to contain 1 type (s) or 2 or more types (Claim 3).
In this case, the Al-R. E. Although it is a phase different from the system compound phase, the Al-R. E. Since a phase showing the same effect as the system compound phase is formed, the heat resistance can be improved.

上記Srを添加する場合には、更に、鋳物の耐食性を向上することができる。
上記Srの含有量が1.5質量%を超える場合には、晶出するMg−Sr系化合物が増加するため、鋳造性が大きく低下するおそれがある。
また、上記Caを添加する場合には、更に、溶湯の防燃効果を得ることができる。
上記Caの含有量が1.0質量%を超える場合には、晶出するMg−Ca系化合物が増加するため、鋳造性が大きく低下するおそれがある。
When the Sr is added, the corrosion resistance of the casting can be further improved.
When the Sr content exceeds 1.5% by mass, the Mg—Sr compound to be crystallized increases, and the castability may be greatly reduced.
Moreover, when adding said Ca, the flame-proof effect of a molten metal can be acquired further.
When the Ca content exceeds 1.0% by mass, the Mg—Ca-based compound to be crystallized increases, so that castability may be greatly reduced.

また、上記Si、Snを添加する場合には、更に、鋳造性を向上することができる。
上記Siの含有量が1.0質量%を超える場合には、溶湯中でSiとR.E.とが比重の大きな化合物を形成して沈降するため、合金中のR.E量を低下させるおそれがあり、上記Snの含有量が2.0質量%を超える場合には、溶湯中でSnとR.E.とが比重の大きな化合物を形成して沈降するため、合金中のR.E.量を低下させるおそれがある。
Moreover, when adding said Si and Sn, castability can be improved further.
When the Si content exceeds 1.0% by mass, Si and R.I. E. Form a compound having a large specific gravity and settle, so that R. If the Sn content exceeds 2.0% by mass, Sn and R.E may be reduced in the molten metal. E. Form a compound having a large specific gravity and settle, so that R. E. May reduce the amount.

また、晶出する化合物の定常部断面における合計面積を100%とすると、Al−R.E.系化合物の面積率が95%以上であることが好ましい(請求項4)。
上記Al−R.E.系化合物は熱的に安定であるため、マグネシウム合金の耐熱性を向上することができる。該Al−R.E.系化合物は、マグネシウム合金中の不純物を化合物内に取り込むため、ダイカスト用マグネシウム合金の耐食性を向上することができる。そのため、Al−R.E.系化合物の面積率が95%以上であることが好ましい。
上記Al−R.E.系化合物の面積率が95%未満の場合には、ダイカスト用マグネシウム合金の耐熱性及び耐食性が低下するおそれがある。
Further, assuming that the total area of the crystallized compound in the cross section of the stationary part is 100%, Al—R. E. It is preferable that the area ratio of the system compound is 95% or more.
The above Al-R. E. Since the system compound is thermally stable, the heat resistance of the magnesium alloy can be improved. The Al-R. E. Since the system compound incorporates impurities in the magnesium alloy into the compound, the corrosion resistance of the magnesium alloy for die casting can be improved. Therefore, Al-R. E. It is preferable that the area ratio of the compound is 95% or more.
The Al-R. E. If the area ratio of the system compound is less than 95%, the heat resistance and corrosion resistance of the magnesium alloy for die casting may be reduced.

また、上記Alの含有量をa質量%、上記R.E.の含有量をb質量%とすると、a≧3.9、2.3≧b/a≧1.38、且つ31.3/a−4.3≧b/aであることが好ましい(請求項5)。
この場合には、Al及びR.E.の含有量が更に適正化される。熱的に不安定なMg−Al化合物は晶出せず、熱的に安定なAl−R.E.系化合物が晶出し、優れた耐熱性を得ることができる。また、固液共存温度範囲が更に小さくなり、凝固時の温度バランスが良好になるため、鋳造割れを抑制することができる。
In addition, the content of Al is a mass%, the R.I. E. When the content of b is b mass%, it is preferable that a ≧ 3.9 , 2.3 ≧ b / a ≧ 1.38 , and 31.3 / a-4.3 ≧ b / a (claims) 5).
In this case, Al and R.I. E. The content of is further optimized. The thermally unstable Mg—Al compound does not crystallize, and the thermally stable Al—R. E. The system compound crystallizes, and excellent heat resistance can be obtained. Moreover, since the solid-liquid coexistence temperature range is further reduced and the temperature balance during solidification is improved, casting cracks can be suppressed.

b/a>2.3の場合には、Mg−R.E.系化合物が相対的に増加するため、鋳造性が低下するおそれがあり、一方、b/a<1.38の場合には、熱的に不安定なβ相が晶出、あるいは析出して、耐熱性が低下するおそれがある。 In the case of b / a> 2.3, Mg—R. E. Since the relative amount of the compound increases, castability may decrease. On the other hand, when b / a < 1.38 , a thermally unstable β phase is crystallized or precipitated, Heat resistance may be reduced.

(実施例1)
本発明のダイカスト用マグネシウム合金にかかる実施例について、説明する。
本例では、表1に示す組成のマグネシウム合金を用いて鋳造を行い、組成分析を行った。
上記鋳造は、まず、SUS430製溶解るつぼを用いて溶湯を準備した。純Mg(99.9%)インゴット、純Al(99.9%)インゴット、Mg−3.3Mn合金を上記るつぼに投入し、その後、炉において、防燃ガスとして少量のSF6ガスを吹き付けた状態で溶解を行い、溶湯温度が750℃に至るまで加熱した。更に、所定量のMm(52%Ce−25%La−16%Nd−6%Pr合金)を上記るつぼ内に投入して溶湯の攪拌を行った。溶湯温度を720℃とした後、炉中で30分間沈静保持した。その後、るつぼを炉から取り出し、堅型ダイカスト機を用いて鋳造を行い、ダイカスト鋳物を作製した。
Example 1
Examples of the magnesium alloy for die casting of the present invention will be described.
In this example, casting was performed using a magnesium alloy having the composition shown in Table 1, and a composition analysis was performed.
In the casting, first, a molten metal was prepared using a melting crucible made of SUS430. Pure Mg (99.9%) ingot, pure Al (99.9%) ingot, and Mg-3.3Mn alloy were put into the crucible, and then a small amount of SF 6 gas was sprayed as a flameproof gas in the furnace. It melt | dissolved in the state and heated until the molten metal temperature reached 750 degreeC. Further, a predetermined amount of Mm (52% Ce-25% La-16% Nd-6% Pr alloy) was put into the crucible and the molten metal was stirred. After the molten metal temperature was 720 ° C., the molten metal was kept calm for 30 minutes in the furnace. Thereafter, the crucible was taken out from the furnace and cast using a solid die casting machine to produce a die casting.

<鋳造条件>
射出速度:0.3m/s
射出圧力:28MPa
加圧時間:5s
金型温度:室温
射出溶湯温度:液相線温度+30℃
金型形状:20mm×20mm×48mm(以下、A形状)
<Casting conditions>
Injection speed: 0.3m / s
Injection pressure: 28MPa
Pressurization time: 5s
Mold temperature: Room temperature Injection melt temperature: Liquidus temperature + 30 ° C
Mold shape: 20mm x 20mm x 48mm (hereinafter A shape)

上記組成分析は、上記鋳造によって得られたダイカスト鋳物の一部から試料を削り出して、誘導プラズマ(ICP)発光分析により上記ダイカスト鋳物の組成分析を行った。結果を表1に示す。また、図1にダイカスト鋳物のAlとMm(Ce+La+Nd+Pr)の配合値と分析値との関係を示す。図1において、横軸はAl量、縦軸はMm量とし、配合値(○印)と、分析値(●印)とを示す。   In the composition analysis, a sample was cut out from a part of the die casting obtained by the casting, and the composition analysis of the die casting was performed by induction plasma (ICP) emission analysis. The results are shown in Table 1. Further, FIG. 1 shows the relationship between the analysis value and the blending value of Al and Mm (Ce + La + Nd + Pr) of the die cast casting. In FIG. 1, the horizontal axis represents the amount of Al, the vertical axis represents the amount of Mm, and shows the blending value (◯ mark) and the analysis value (● mark).

図1より知られるごとく、Al及びMmの配合量が破線Kを上回ると、AlとMmはAl−R.E.系化合物として晶出、沈降してるつぼ底にスラッジとして検出され、ダイカスト鋳物のAl及びMmの分析値は、配合量に比べて大きく低下した。これにより、Mg−Al−Mm−Mn合金は、図1に示した破線K(31.3/a−4.3=b/a、Alの含有量をa質量%、上記R.E.の含有量をb質量%とする)以上のAlとMmを加えてもスラッジ量が増加するのみであり、高Al、高Mmのマグネシウム合金鋳物を得られないことがわかる。   As is known from FIG. 1, when the blending amount of Al and Mm exceeds the broken line K, Al and Mm are Al—R. E. It was crystallized as a system compound, settled and detected as sludge at the bottom of the crucible, and the analytical values of Al and Mm in the die-casting were greatly reduced compared to the blending amount. Thereby, the Mg-Al-Mm-Mn alloy has a broken line K (31.3 / a-4.3 = b / a shown in FIG. It can be seen that the addition of Al and Mm (content of b mass%) or more only increases the amount of sludge, and a high Al, high Mm magnesium alloy casting cannot be obtained.

(実施例2)
本例は、表2に示す組成のマグネシウム合金を用いて鋳造を行い、組織観察、β相面積率、軸力保持率、鋳造性を測定した。
まず、上記実施例1と同様にして、表2に示す組成のマグネシウム合金を溶製して、上記A形状のダイカスト鋳物を作製した。得られたダイカスト鋳物の一部を切り出した試料について、組織観察を行い、組織写真によりβ相の面積を測定し、β相率(面積率)を算出した。
(Example 2)
In this example, casting was performed using a magnesium alloy having the composition shown in Table 2, and the structure observation, β phase area ratio, axial force retention, and castability were measured.
First, in the same manner as in Example 1, a magnesium alloy having the composition shown in Table 2 was melted to produce the A-shaped die casting. About the sample which cut out a part of obtained die-casting casting, structure | tissue observation was performed, the area of (beta) phase was measured with the structure | tissue photograph, and (beta) phase rate (area ratio) was computed.

図2に、試料E1〜試料E8及び試料C1〜試料C10のAl、Mmの含有量を示す。同図は、横軸にAlの含有量(a、質量%)、縦軸にMmの含有量(b、質量%)をとる。直線Lはa=2.5を示し、直線Mはb/a=2.5を示し、直線Nはb/a=1.5−2.5/aを示し、直線Oはb/a=31.3/a−4.3示す。また、図2において、符号P(○印)は本発明における実施例および参考例を示し、符号Q(×印)は本発明における比較例を示す。なお、上記○印のうち、参考例は、(Al量,Mm量)=(2.8,2)、(2.9,4.1)、(2.9,7.1)、(3.9,4.1)の座標の○印である。
また、A点は試料E5、B点は試料C4、C点は試料C7、D点は試料C8における点である。
FIG. 2 shows the contents of Al and Mm in Samples E1 to E8 and Samples C1 to C10. In the figure, the horizontal axis represents the Al content (a, mass%), and the vertical axis represents the Mm content (b, mass%). The straight line L represents a = 2.5, the straight line M represents b / a = 2.5, the straight line N represents b / a = 1.5−2.5 / a, and the straight line O represents b / a = 2.5. 31.3 / a-4.3 . Also, in FIG. 2, reference numeral P (○ mark) indicates the Examples and Reference Examples in the present invention, the code Q (× mark) shows a comparison example of the present invention. Of the above circles, the reference examples are (Al amount, Mm amount) = (2.8, 2), (2.9, 4.1), (2.9, 7.1), (3 ., 9, 4.1).
The point A is the sample E5, the point B is the sample C4, the point C is the sample C7, and the point D is the sample C8.

上記組織観察は、上記試料を研磨し、10%酢酸水溶液を用いてエッチングした後、走査電子顕微鏡(SEM)を用いて行った。晶出部位、晶出形態から化合物を分類した。エネルギー分散形X線分析装置(EDX)による分析も併せて行い、β相の確認を行った。   The structure observation was performed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) after the sample was polished and etched using a 10% aqueous acetic acid solution. The compounds were classified based on the crystallization site and crystallization form. Analysis by an energy dispersive X-ray analyzer (EDX) was also performed to confirm the β phase.

ダイカスト鋳物の組織の一例を図3〜図6に示す。
上記図3、図4、図5、図6はそれぞれ、試料E5(図2におけるA点)、試料C4(図2におけるB点)、試料C7(図2におけるC点)、試料E8(図2におけるD点)の組織の写真である。
An example of the structure of the die casting is shown in FIGS.
3, FIG. 4, FIG. 5 and FIG. 6 are sample E5 (point A in FIG. 2), sample C4 (point B in FIG. 2), sample C7 (point C in FIG. 2), sample E8 (FIG. 2), respectively. It is a photograph of the structure | tissue of (D point in).

図3より知られるごとく、本発明における実施例である試料E5は、化合物として、Al−R.E.系化合物3が観察された。
図4より知られるごとく、本発明の比較例である試料C4は、化合物としてAl−R.E.系化合物3、及びMg−R.E.系化合物4が観察された。
また、図5より知られるごとく、本発明の比較例である試料C7は、Al−R.E.系化合物3、及びMg−Al化合物5が観察された。
また、図6より知られるごとく、本発明の比較例である試料C8は、Al−R.E.系化合物3、及びMg−Al化合物5が観察された。
As can be seen from FIG. 3, sample E5, which is an example in the present invention, is composed of Al-R. E. System compound 3 was observed.
As can be seen from FIG. 4, sample C4, which is a comparative example of the present invention, has Al-R. E. Compound 3, and Mg-R. E. System compound 4 was observed.
Further, as is known from FIG. 5, sample C7, which is a comparative example of the present invention, is Al—R. E. System compound 3 and Mg—Al compound 5 were observed.
Further, as is known from FIG. 6, sample C8, which is a comparative example of the present invention, is Al—R. E. System compound 3 and Mg—Al compound 5 were observed.

次に、β相率の測定は、SEM及び光学顕微鏡を用いて組織写真を撮影し、画像解析ソフト(ImagePro)を用いてβ相の面積率(β相率)を求めた。β相率は5視野の平均値とした。結果を表2に示す。   Next, the β phase ratio was measured by taking a tissue photograph using an SEM and an optical microscope, and determining the area ratio of the β phase (β phase ratio) using image analysis software (ImagePro). The β phase ratio was an average value of 5 fields of view. The results are shown in Table 2.

次に、軸力保持試験について説明する。後述の条件で鋳造を行い、2本の棒状部位を有するU字型形状のマグネシウムダイカスト鋳物を作製した。そして、上記ダイカスト鋳物の一方の棒状部位から、外径20mm、内径(ボルト貫通穴)9mm、高さ約10mmのリング形状の試料11(図8参照)を切り出した。
<鋳造条件>
射出速度:(プランジャー移動速度)を0.3〜0.35m/s
射出圧力:28MPa
金型温度:室温〜40℃
Next, the axial force holding test will be described. Casting was performed under the conditions described below to produce a U-shaped magnesium die cast casting having two rod-shaped portions. Then, a ring-shaped sample 11 (see FIG. 8) having an outer diameter of 20 mm, an inner diameter (bolt through hole) of 9 mm, and a height of about 10 mm was cut out from one rod-shaped portion of the die cast casting.
<Casting conditions>
Injection speed: (plunger moving speed) 0.3 to 0.35 m / s
Injection pressure: 28MPa
Mold temperature: room temperature to 40 ° C

軸力の測定は、図8に示すように、試料11を、ボルト81に符合するようにネジをきったアルミニウム合金製のブロック83に、アルミニウム合金製のワッシャ82を介した状態で、鋼製のボルト81を用いて締結した。このときボルト81にかかる軸力(初期軸力)は8kNとする。軸力はボルト81に取り付けた歪ゲージ84を用いて測定した。この歪ゲージ84は、上記ボルト81の軸表面(表裏の二か所)に二枚取り付けた。そのゲージリード線85を、ボルト81の頭に設けた穴に通して外部へ引き出してある。   As shown in FIG. 8, the axial force is measured in a state in which the sample 11 is made of steel in a state in which an aluminum alloy washer 82 is inserted into an aluminum alloy block 83 that has been screwed so as to match the bolt 81. The bolt 81 was used. At this time, the axial force (initial axial force) applied to the bolt 81 is 8 kN. The axial force was measured using a strain gauge 84 attached to the bolt 81. Two strain gauges 84 were attached to the shaft surface (two places on the front and back sides) of the bolt 81. The gauge lead wire 85 is pulled out through a hole provided in the head of the bolt 81.

上記試料11を上記ブロック83に締結した状態のまま、175℃に設定した高温恒温槽内に挿入し、300時間保持した後、高温恒温槽より取り出し、室温まで冷却した。その後、ボルト81の軸力を再び測定し、これを残留軸力とした。上記初期軸力に対する残留軸力の割合を算出して、これを軸力保持率とした。軸力保持率は4〜10個の平均値として算出した。   While the sample 11 was fastened to the block 83, the sample 11 was inserted into a high-temperature thermostat set at 175 ° C., held for 300 hours, then taken out from the high-temperature thermostat and cooled to room temperature. Thereafter, the axial force of the bolt 81 was measured again, and this was taken as the residual axial force. The ratio of the residual axial force to the initial axial force was calculated and used as the axial force retention rate. The axial force retention was calculated as an average value of 4-10.

その後、算出した軸力保持率について、同様の軸力保持試験により求めたダイカスト用アルミニウム合金ADC12の軸力保持率を100としたときの割合(ADC12合金比)を算出し、耐熱性を評価した。評価が○のものを合格、評価が×のものを不合格とした。結果を表2に示す。
(評価基準)
○:軸力保持率の割合(ADC12合金比)が70を超えるもの
×:軸力保持率の割合(ADC12合金比)が70以下のもの
Thereafter, for the calculated axial force retention rate, the ratio (ADC12 alloy ratio) when the axial force retention rate of the aluminum alloy ADC12 for die casting obtained by the same axial force retention test was set to 100 was calculated, and the heat resistance was evaluated. . Those with an evaluation of ○ were accepted, and those with an evaluation of × were rejected. The results are shown in Table 2.
(Evaluation criteria)
○: Ratio of axial force retention ratio (ADC12 alloy ratio) exceeds 70 x: Ratio of axial force retention ratio (ADC12 alloy ratio) is 70 or less

次に、鋳造性について説明する。以下の条件で鋳造を行い、図7に示す形状(以下、B形状)のダイカスト鋳物を作製した。鋳造時にダイカスト鋳物に生じる割れの有無を観察し、鋳造性を評価した。結果を表2に示す。
<鋳造条件>
射出速度:1m/s
射出圧力:64MPa
加圧時間:5s
金型温度:200℃
射出溶湯温度:液相線温度+30℃
金型形状:厚みv(2mm)、幅w(50mm)、高さx(80mm)の板の上部に、厚みz(3mm)、幅w(50mm)、高さ(30mm)の肉厚部を有する形状
Next, castability will be described. Casting was performed under the following conditions to produce a die cast casting having a shape shown in FIG. 7 (hereinafter referred to as B shape). The castability was evaluated by observing the presence or absence of cracks generated in the die-cast casting during casting. The results are shown in Table 2.
<Casting conditions>
Injection speed: 1m / s
Injection pressure: 64 MPa
Pressurization time: 5s
Mold temperature: 200 ℃
Injection molten metal temperature: liquidus temperature + 30 ° C
Mold shape: Thickness part of thickness z (3mm), width w (50mm), height (30mm) on the top of the plate of thickness v (2mm), width w (50mm), height x (80mm) Shape

表2より知られるごとく、本発明の実施例である試料E5〜試料E8は、いずれの評価においても良好な結果を示した。なお、試料E1〜E4は参考例である。
本発明の比較例である試料C1及び試料C2は、Alの含有量が本発明の下限を下回るため、熱的に安定なAl−R.E.系化合物の晶出が不十分であり、軸力保持率が低下し、耐熱性が不合格であった。
As is known from Table 2, Sample E5 to Sample E8, which are examples of the present invention, showed good results in any evaluation. Samples E1 to E4 are reference examples.
Sample C1 and Sample C2, which are comparative examples of the present invention, have a Al content lower than the lower limit of the present invention, so that the thermally stable Al-R. E. Crystallization of the system compound was insufficient, the axial force retention decreased, and the heat resistance was unacceptable.

また、本発明の比較例である試料C3及び試料C4は、Alの含有量が本発明の下限を下回り、且つ、b/aが本発明の上限であるb/a=2.5を上回り、Mg−R.E.系化合物が生成し、鋳造時に割れが生じたため、鋳造性が不合格であった。
また、本発明の比較例である試料C5、試料C7、試料C9は、b/aが本発明の下限であるb/a=1.38を下回るため、熱的に不安定なβ相の晶出を抑制することができず、また、β相率が本発明の上限を上回るため、軸力保持率が低下し、耐熱性が不合格であった。
Samples C3 and C4, which are comparative examples of the present invention, have an Al content below the lower limit of the present invention, and b / a exceeds the upper limit of the present invention, b / a = 2.5, Mg-R. E. Since the compound was generated and cracking occurred during casting, the castability was unacceptable.
Samples C5, C7, and C9, which are comparative examples of the present invention, are thermally unstable β-phase crystals because b / a is lower than the lower limit of the present invention, b / a = 1.38. The output could not be suppressed, and the β phase ratio exceeded the upper limit of the present invention, so the axial force retention rate was reduced and the heat resistance was unacceptable.

また、本発明の比較例である試料C6は、b/aが本発明の上限であるb/a=2.5を上回り、Mg−R.E.系化合物が晶出し、鋳造時に割れが生じたため、鋳造性が不合格であった。
また、本発明の比較例である試料C8は、b/aが本発明の上限であるb/a=31.3/a−4.3を上回るため、熱的に不安定なβ相の晶出を抑制することができず、また、β相率が本発明の上限を上回り、軸力保持率が低下したため、耐熱性が不合格であった。
また、本発明の比較例である試料C10は、b/aが本発明の上限であるb/a=31.3/Al−4.3を上回るため、軸力保持率が低下し、耐熱性が不合格であった。
Sample C6, which is a comparative example of the present invention, has b / a higher than the upper limit of the present invention, b / a = 2.5, and Mg—R. E. Since the compound was crystallized and cracked during casting, the castability was unacceptable.
Sample C8, which is a comparative example of the present invention, has a b / a exceeding the upper limit of the present invention, b / a = 31.3 / a-4.3. The output could not be suppressed, and the β phase ratio exceeded the upper limit of the present invention, and the axial force retention rate decreased, so the heat resistance was unacceptable.
In addition, in the sample C10 which is a comparative example of the present invention, since b / a exceeds b / a = 31.3 / Al-4.3 which is the upper limit of the present invention, the axial force retention ratio is reduced, and the heat resistance Was rejected.

(実施例3)
本例は、表3〜表5に示す組成のマグネシウム合金を用いて鋳造を行い、実施例2と同様にして軸力保持率を測定し、耐熱性を評価した。
Al量、Mm量、SR量、Ca量、Si量、Sn量、Mn量を変えた、表3〜表5に示す組成のマグネシウム合金を、上記実施例1と同様にして溶製し、上記実施例1と同様の方法で形状Aのダイカスト鋳物を鋳造した。また、上記実施例2と同様の方法で軸力保持率を求め、耐熱性を評価した。結果を表3〜表5にあわせて示す。評価が○のものを合格、評価が×のものを不合格とする。
(評価基準)
○:軸力保持率の割合(ADC12比)が70を超えるもの
×:軸力保持率の割合(ADC12比)が70以下のもの
(Example 3)
In this example, casting was performed using a magnesium alloy having the composition shown in Tables 3 to 5, and the axial force retention was measured in the same manner as in Example 2 to evaluate the heat resistance.
A magnesium alloy having the composition shown in Tables 3 to 5 in which the Al amount, Mm amount, SR amount, Ca amount, Si amount, Sn amount, and Mn amount were changed was melted in the same manner as in Example 1 above. A die cast casting of shape A was cast in the same manner as in Example 1. Moreover, the axial force retention was obtained by the same method as in Example 2 above, and the heat resistance was evaluated. The results are shown in Tables 3 to 5. Those with an evaluation of ○ are passed, and those with an evaluation of × are rejected.
(Evaluation criteria)
○: Ratio of axial force retention (ADC12 ratio) exceeds 70 x: Ratio of axial force retention (ADC12 ratio) is 70 or less

表3〜表5より知られるごとく、試料E9〜試料E51は、いずれの評価においても、良好な結果を示した。なお、試料E9〜試料E51のうち、試料E9、試料E14、試料E19、試料E24、試料E29、試料E34、試料E39、試料E44、試料E49は参考例であり、残りの試料が本発明の実施例である。
本発明の比較例である試料C11、試料C12、及び試料C13は、b/aが本発明の下限であるb/a=1.5−2.5/aを下回るため、軸力保持率が低下し、耐熱性が不合格であった。
As can be understood from Tables 3 5, specimen E9~ sample E51 are in any of the evaluation showed good results. Of the samples E9 to E51, the sample E9, the sample E14, the sample E19, the sample E24, the sample E29, the sample E34, the sample E39, the sample E44, and the sample E49 are reference examples. It is an example.
Sample C11, Sample C12, and Sample C13, which are comparative examples of the present invention, have an axial force retention ratio of b / a below the lower limit of the present invention, b / a = 1.5-2.5 / a. The heat resistance decreased.

(実施例4)
本例は、表6に示す組成のマグネシウム合金を用いて鋳造を行い、腐食速度を測定した。
表6に示す、Al量、Mm量を変えた種々の組成のマグネシウム合金を、上記実施例1と同様にして溶製し、上記実施例2と同様の方法で、B形状のダイカスト鋳物を鋳造した。肉厚部分から、試験片を切り出して、以下の条件で、5%NaCl水溶液中への浸漬腐食試験を行い、腐食速度を求め、耐食性を評価した。
<浸漬腐食試験条件>
試験片形状:20mm×20mm×3mm
測定温度:24℃
測定時間:300h
Example 4
In this example, casting was performed using a magnesium alloy having the composition shown in Table 6, and the corrosion rate was measured.
Magnesium alloys having various compositions with different amounts of Al and Mm shown in Table 6 were melted in the same manner as in Example 1 above, and a B-shaped die casting was cast in the same manner as in Example 2 above. did. A test piece was cut out from the thick portion and subjected to an immersion corrosion test in a 5% NaCl aqueous solution under the following conditions to determine the corrosion rate and evaluate the corrosion resistance.
<Immersion corrosion test conditions>
Test piece shape: 20 mm × 20 mm × 3 mm
Measurement temperature: 24 ° C
Measurement time: 300h

具体的には、図9に示すごとく、5%NaCl水溶液93を入れたビーカ91に、試験片保持台92を配設し、試験片保持台92上に試料12を載置する。試験片12は、5%NaCl水溶液93中で、以下の式1で示す反応を起こし、水素94の発生を伴って、試料12の腐食が進行する。
式1:Mg+2H2O=Mg(OH)2+H2
Specifically, as shown in FIG. 9, a test piece holding base 92 is disposed on a beaker 91 containing a 5% NaCl aqueous solution 93, and the sample 12 is placed on the test piece holding base 92. The test piece 12 undergoes a reaction represented by the following formula 1 in a 5% NaCl aqueous solution 93, and the corrosion of the sample 12 proceeds with the generation of hydrogen 94.
Formula 1: Mg + 2H 2 O = Mg (OH) 2 + H 2

上記試験片保持台92上に漏斗95を載置し、漏斗95の径が小さい側が管内に入るように、活栓付きビュレット97をスタンド96で保持した。上記活栓付きビュレット97内に発生した水素94を捕集した。下記の式2より、腐食速度としてマグネシウムの腐食減量を算出し、耐食性を評価した。評価が○のものを合格、評価が×のものを不合格とした。
式2:Y=X×24.32/(22.4×103
(Y:溶出Mg量(g)、X:発生水素ガス量(mL))
A funnel 95 was placed on the test specimen holder 92, and the bullet 97 with a stopcock was held by a stand 96 so that the side having the smaller diameter of the funnel 95 entered the tube. Hydrogen 94 generated in the burette 97 with stopcock was collected. From the following formula 2, the corrosion weight loss of magnesium was calculated as the corrosion rate and the corrosion resistance was evaluated. Those with an evaluation of ○ were accepted, and those with an evaluation of × were rejected.
Formula 2: Y = X × 24.32 / (22.4 × 10 3 )
(Y: eluted Mg amount (g), X: generated hydrogen gas amount (mL))

(評価基準)
汎用ダイカスト合金AZ91D合金は、耐食性に優れており、実用上耐食性の問題はないとされていることから、同様の浸漬腐食試験により求めたAZ91D合金の腐食速度を評価の基準とした。
○:腐食速度がAZ91Dの腐食速度以下の場合
×:腐食速度がAZ91Dの腐食速度より大きい場合
結果を表6に示す。
(Evaluation criteria)
Since the general-purpose die-cast alloy AZ91D alloy is excellent in corrosion resistance and practically has no problem of corrosion resistance, the corrosion rate of the AZ91D alloy determined by the same immersion corrosion test was used as a criterion for evaluation.
○: When the corrosion rate is less than or equal to the corrosion rate of AZ91D ×: When the corrosion rate is greater than the corrosion rate of AZ91D The results are shown in Table 6.

表6より知られるごとく、試料E52〜試料E56は、いずれの評価においても、良好な結果を示した。なお、試料E52〜試料E56のうち、試料E52、試料E54は参考例であり、残りの試料が本発明の実施例である。
本発明の比較例である試料C14は、Alの含有量が本発明の下限を下回り、且つ、b/aが本発明の上限であるb/a=2.5を上回るため、耐食性が不合格であった。
本発明の比較例である試料C15は、b/aが本発明の上限であるb/a=2.5を上回るため、耐食性不合格であった。
As can be understood from Table 6, specimen E52~ sample E56 are in any of the evaluation showed good results. Of the samples E52 to E56, the sample E52 and the sample E54 are reference examples, and the remaining samples are examples of the present invention.
Sample C14, which is a comparative example of the present invention, has an Al content lower than the lower limit of the present invention, and b / a exceeds the upper limit of the present invention, b / a = 2.5. Met.
Sample C15, which is a comparative example of the present invention, failed in corrosion resistance because b / a exceeded b / a = 2.5, which is the upper limit of the present invention.

本発明の比較例である試料C16、試料C17、試料C18は、R.Eを含有していないため、耐食性が低下し、不合格であった。   Samples C16, C17, and C18, which are comparative examples of the present invention, are R.D. Since E was not contained, corrosion resistance fell and it was a failure.

実施例1における、Mg−Al−Mm合金のAl及びMmの配合量と鋳物のAl及びMmの分析値との関係を示すグラフ図。The graph figure which shows the relationship between the compounding quantity of Al and Mm of a Mg-Al-Mm alloy in Example 1, and the analytical value of Al and Mm of a casting. 実施例2における、AlとMmの含有量を示すグラフ図。The graph which shows content of Al and Mm in Example 2. FIG. 実施例2における、試料E5の組織を示す図。The figure which shows the structure | tissue of the sample E5 in Example 2. FIG. 実施例2における、試料C4の組織を示す図。The figure which shows the structure | tissue of the sample C4 in Example 2. FIG. 実施例2における、試料C7の組織を示す図。The figure which shows the structure | tissue of the sample C7 in Example 2. FIG. 実施例2における、試料C8の組織を示す図。The figure which shows the structure | tissue of the sample C8 in Example 2. FIG. 実施例2における、金型形状を示す説明図。Explanatory drawing which shows the metal mold | die shape in Example 2. FIG. 実施例2における、軸力保持試験を示す説明図Explanatory drawing which shows the axial force holding | maintenance test in Example 2. 実施例4における、浸漬腐食試験を示す説明図。Explanatory drawing which shows the immersion corrosion test in Example 4. FIG.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

2 マグネシウム
3 Al−R.E.系化合物
2 Magnesium 3 Al-R. E. Compounds

Claims (5)

Al、希土類元素(以下、R.E.とする)、及びMnを含有する、耐熱性、鋳造性、耐食性に優れたマグネシウム合金であって、
上記Mnの含有量は0.05〜1.0質量%であり、
上記Alの含有量をa質量%、上記R.E.の含有量をb質量%とすると、a≧3.9、2.5≧b/a≧1.38、且つ31.3/a−4.3≧b/aであり、
残部が、Mg及び不可避不純物からなり、
定常部断面における所定の面積を100%とすると、所定面積内のMg−Al化合物の面積率が0.1%以下であることを特徴とするダイカスト用マグネシウム合金。
A magnesium alloy containing Al, a rare earth element (hereinafter referred to as RE), and Mn and having excellent heat resistance, castability, and corrosion resistance,
The Mn content is 0.05 to 1.0 % by mass ,
The content of Al is a mass%, and the R.I. E. When the content of is b mass%, a ≧ 3.9 , 2.5 ≧ b / a ≧ 1.38 , and 31.3 / a-4.3 ≧ b / a,
The balance consists of Mg and inevitable impurities,
A magnesium alloy for die casting, wherein the area ratio of the Mg-Al compound in the predetermined area is 0.1% or less, assuming that the predetermined area in the cross section of the stationary part is 100%.
請求項1において、上記R.E.として50質量%以上がCeであるミッシュメタル(以下、Mmとする)を用いることを特徴とするダイカスト用マグネシウム合金。 The R.I. E. At least 50 mass% as the Ce der Ru misch metal (hereinafter referred to as Mm) die casting magnesium alloy, which comprises using a. 請求項1又は2において、更に、Sr:1.5質量%以下、Ca:1.0質量%以下、Si:1.0質量%以下、及びSn:2.0質量%以下から選ばれる1種又は2種以上を含有することを特徴とするダイカスト用マグネシウム合金。 In Claim 1 or 2, Furthermore, 1 type chosen from Sr: 1.5 mass% or less, Ca: 1.0 mass% or less, Si: 1.0 mass% or less, and Sn: 2.0 mass% or less Or the magnesium alloy for die-casting characterized by containing 2 or more types. 請求項1〜3のいずれか一項において、晶出する化合物の定常部断面における合計面積を100%とすると、Al−R.E.系化合物の面積率が95%以上であることを特徴とするダイカスト用マグネシウム合金。   In any one of Claims 1-3, when the total area in the stationary part cross section of the compound to crystallize is set to 100%, Al-R. E. A magnesium alloy for die casting, wherein the area ratio of the compound is 95% or more. 請求項1〜4のいずれか一項において、上記Alの含有量をa質量%、上記R.E.の含有量をb質量%とすると、a≧3.9、2.3≧b/a≧1.38、且つ31.3/a−4.3≧b/aであることを特徴とするダイカスト用マグネシウム合金。 In any one of Claims 1-4, content of the said Al is a mass%, said R.I. E. The die casting is characterized in that a ≧ 3.9 , 2.3 ≧ b / a ≧ 1.38 , and 31.3 / a-4.3 ≧ b / a when the content of b is mass%. Magnesium alloy.
JP2006048960A 2006-02-24 2006-02-24 Magnesium alloy for die casting with excellent heat resistance, castability and corrosion resistance Expired - Fee Related JP4926496B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006048960A JP4926496B2 (en) 2006-02-24 2006-02-24 Magnesium alloy for die casting with excellent heat resistance, castability and corrosion resistance

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006048960A JP4926496B2 (en) 2006-02-24 2006-02-24 Magnesium alloy for die casting with excellent heat resistance, castability and corrosion resistance

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2007224389A JP2007224389A (en) 2007-09-06
JP4926496B2 true JP4926496B2 (en) 2012-05-09

Family

ID=38546461

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2006048960A Expired - Fee Related JP4926496B2 (en) 2006-02-24 2006-02-24 Magnesium alloy for die casting with excellent heat resistance, castability and corrosion resistance

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4926496B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
PL1957221T3 (en) * 2005-11-10 2012-07-31 Magontec Gmbh A combination of casting process and alloy compositions resulting in cast parts with superior combination of elevated temperature creep properties, ductility and corrosion performance
WO2020054880A2 (en) * 2019-12-18 2020-03-19 一般社団法人日本マグネシウム協会 Flame retardant magnesium alloy with high toughness

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH05287430A (en) * 1992-04-07 1993-11-02 Honda Motor Co Ltd Mg alloy with high creep strength and high corrosion resistance
JP3737371B2 (en) * 2000-02-24 2006-01-18 三菱アルミニウム株式会社 Magnesium alloy for die casting
JP3916452B2 (en) * 2001-11-28 2007-05-16 株式会社豊田中央研究所 High corrosion resistance magnesium alloy and method for producing the same

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2007224389A (en) 2007-09-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5852580B2 (en) Flame retardant magnesium alloy having excellent mechanical properties and method for producing the same
AU2011233970B2 (en) Magnesium-based alloy with superior fluidity and hot-tearing resistance and manufacturing method thereof
JP5852585B2 (en) Magnesium alloy having excellent ignition resistance and mechanical properties and method for producing the same
WO2010146804A1 (en) Recycled magnesium alloy, process for producing the same, and magnesium alloy
EP1816223A1 (en) Magnesium alloy and casting
JP2005068550A (en) Heat-resistant magnesium alloy for casting with excellent heat resistance and castability
Zhang et al. Interface formation and strengthening mechanisms of Al/Mg bimetallic composite via compound casting with rare earth Ce introduction
US9085815B2 (en) Magnesium alloy for room temperature and manufacturing method thereof
JP2012126982A (en) Method for manufacturing heat-resistant magnesium alloy, heat-resistant magnesium alloy casting and method for manufacturing the same
KR20130012662A (en) High-strength high-ductility ignition-proof magnesium alloy
Rajeshkumar et al. Investigation on the microstructure, mechanical properties and corrosion behavior of Mg-Sb and Mg-Sb-Si alloys
Wang et al. Microstructure, tensile properties, and corrosion behavior of Die-cast Mg-7Al-1Ca-x Sn alloys
JPWO2013157653A1 (en) Magnesium alloy and manufacturing method thereof
JP4852082B2 (en) Magnesium alloy
Fu et al. Effects of minor Sr additions on the as-cast microstructure, fluidity and mechanical properties of Mg-4.2 Zn-1.7 RE-0.8 Zr-0.2 Ca (wt%) alloy
Yang et al. As-cast microstructures and mechanical properties of Mg-4Zn-xY-1Ca (x= 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0) magnesium alloys
ZHANG Effects of Ce, Y and Gd additions on as-cast microstructure and mechanical properties of Mg-3Sn-2Sr magnesium alloy
CHENG Effects of calcium addition on as-cast microstructure and mechanical properties of Mg-5Zn-5Sn alloy
Koltygin et al. Influence of Zr and Mn additions on microstructure and properties of Mg—2.5 wt% Cu—X wt% Zn (X= 2.5, 5 and 6.5) alloys
KR20120110818A (en) Mg-al-ca master alloys for mg alloys and manufacturing method thereof
JP4926496B2 (en) Magnesium alloy for die casting with excellent heat resistance, castability and corrosion resistance
US20030086811A1 (en) Creep resistant magnesium alloys with improved castability
JP6596236B2 (en) Heat-resistant magnesium alloy and method for producing the same
JP2008231488A (en) Magnesium alloy for plastic working and magnesium alloy plastic working member
JP2007270159A (en) Creep-resistant magnesium alloy

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20081002

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20110309

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20110405

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20110603

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20120207

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20120208

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20150217

Year of fee payment: 3

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees