JP6664050B2 - Game system, game device, and program - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention relates to a game system, a game device, a control method, and a program.

  There is a score system that uses a score obtained by quantifying the degree of achievement of a game based on play as a play result of a game played by a user. Further, there is a ranking system that totals the scores for each user and performs ranking (for example, Patent Document 1).

  Since the score used in the ranking system can represent only the play result of the game, it was not possible to convey the impression generated by the user achieving the score. Therefore, a system that allows a user to enter a comment so that the user's impressions can be described has appeared. Since comments are expected to input the user's impressions, some are realized by, for example, free word input.

JP 2003-144775 A

  However, inputting a free word takes a considerable amount of time, so that a comment may not be satisfactorily input in a game such as an amusement game in which time restrictions are severe. Therefore, a system for displaying a comment prepared in advance according to the game situation has been devised. However, there are cases where the user has a variety of feelings for the game situation, and the comment expected by the user may not be displayed.

  It is an object of some aspects of the present invention to provide a game system, a game device, a control method, and a program that allow a user to easily input an appropriate comment according to a game situation.

  Another aspect of the present invention has another object to provide a game system, a game device, a control method, and a program that can achieve the effects described in the embodiments described below.

  In order to solve the above-described problems, one embodiment of the present invention provides a comparison target specifying unit that specifies a game situation to be compared, a game situation of a user who has played a game, and the comparison target specifying unit that specifies the game situation. A comment candidate presenting unit that presents a candidate for a comment on the game situation of the user based on the game situation to be compared.

  Further, one aspect of the present invention is a comparison target specifying unit that specifies a game situation to be compared, a game situation of a user who has played a game, and a game situation to be compared that is specified by the comparison target specifying unit. And a comment candidate presenting unit that presents a candidate for a comment on the game situation of the user based on the comment.

  One aspect of the present invention is a comparison target specifying step of specifying a game situation to be compared, a game situation of a user who played a game, and a game situation to be compared specified by the comparison target specifying step. And a comment candidate presenting step of presenting a candidate for a comment on the game situation of the user based on the above.

  One aspect of the present invention is a comparison target specifying step of specifying a game situation to be compared, a game situation of a user who played a game, and a game situation to be compared specified by the comparison target specifying step. And a comment candidate presenting step of presenting a candidate for a comment on the game situation of the user on the basis of the above.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a game system according to a first embodiment. FIG. 6 is a view showing a display example of ranking according to the first embodiment. FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating an example of a schematic configuration of a center server according to the first embodiment. The figure which shows the data example of a user information table. The figure which shows the example of data of the self-ranking information table. The figure which shows the example of data of the whole ranking information table. FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of a hardware configuration of the game device according to the first embodiment. FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing an example of the configuration of the game device according to the first embodiment. The figure which shows the data example of the comment candidate table for self rankings. The figure which shows the data example of the comment candidate table for whole rankings. 5 is a flowchart illustrating an example of comment processing in ranking display according to the first embodiment. The figure which shows the data example of the comment candidate table for self-ranking concerning 2nd Embodiment. 9 is a flowchart illustrating an example of comment processing in ranking display according to the second embodiment. FIG. 13 is a view showing an example of data of an icon table according to the third embodiment. The figure which shows the example of data of the comment candidate table for self-ranking concerning 3rd Embodiment. The figure which shows the example of data of the comment candidate table for self-ranking concerning 4th Embodiment. The figure which shows the example of data of the icon table concerning 5th Embodiment. The image figure which shows the range of the color of the icon displayed as a candidate of a comment. The figure which shows the example of data of the comment candidate table for self-ranking concerning 6th Embodiment. The figure which shows another example of data of the comment candidate table for self-ranking concerning 6th Embodiment.

Hereinafter, an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
[First Embodiment]
First, an outline of the game system according to the present embodiment will be described.
FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a configuration of a game system 1 according to the present embodiment. The game system 1 includes a computer device including a game device 10 (game device 10-1, game device 10-2, game device 10-3,...) And a center server 30. These computer devices are connected via a network NW, and can transmit and receive information to and from each other. Since the game device 10-1, the game device 10-2, and the game device 10-3 have the same configuration, descriptions such as "-1" and "-2" are omitted unless particularly distinguished. The game device 10 will be described. Here, three game devices 10 are illustrated, but any number of game devices 10 may be connected to the center server 30.

  The network NW is an information communication network including a WAN (Wide Area Network), a LAN (Local Area Network), and the like. The WAN is, for example, a mobile phone network, a PHS (Personal Handy-phone System) network, a PSTN (Public Switched Telephone Network; public switched telephone network), a dedicated communication network, a VPN (Virtual Private Network), and the like.

  The game apparatus 10 is, for example, a so-called arcade game installed in a game facility such as a game center or an amusement park. The game device 10 executes, for example, a music game whose score is determined based on the position and operation timing indicated on the play screen of the game in time with the music, and the position and operation timing of the operation button pressed by the user. I do. In this music game, a difficulty level is set for each music piece, and a score obtained by quantifying the degree of achievement of the game based on the difficulty level of the music piece to be played and the ratio of the accuracy of the user's operation to the instruction (for example, Score) is determined as a play result. Here, the play is, for example, a user's action that is a target of the user's play result. Further, in this music game, points are given to the user according to the score, and when a predetermined number of points are accumulated, the rank of the user is raised. When the rank rises, a privilege according to the rank is given, for example, a new song playable by the user is lifted. Further, in this music game, a competitive play in which a user competes with one or more other users is also possible. Competitive play competes against an opponent based on a play result (for example, a score for each song or a total score of a plurality of songs).

  In addition, the game device 10 displays, as play results of the music game, a ranking in which play results (for example, scores) are totaled for each user. This ranking is one of the motivations for the user to play the game. The ranking includes a self ranking in which scores are ranked for each user, and an overall ranking in which scores are ranked for each user. The overall ranking may be a ranking for all users who played the game, or a ranking for some users such as a specific region, affiliation, a specific event participant, etc. Is also good. For example, a national ranking, a prefectural ranking, a ranking by region (region, city, etc.), a group ranking, a XX competition ranking, and the like may be used. Further, the ranking may be a ranking in a spatially divided range such as an in-store ranking, or a ranking in a temporally divided range such as a monthly or weekly ranking. Further, the ranking may be a comparison with a previously set rival user or friend user.

[Example of ranking display]
FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a display example of the ranking according to the present embodiment. The illustrated ranking screen G10 is a display example of a screen on which a play result of the play is displayed when the play is completed. The ranking screen G10 is displayed in a ranking format so that the user can know the superiority or inferiority of the play result played this time in the ranking. Is displayed. For example, on the ranking screen G10, title information K10 (in this case, “play result of Mr. XX”) indicating the content of this screen is displayed. Further, on the ranking screen G10, a display tab TAB1 for displaying the self ranking and a display tab TAB2 for displaying the overall ranking are displayed. By the user's operation (for example, tap operation) on this tab, the ranking of the selected one of the display of the self-ranking and the display of the overall ranking is displayed. For example, when displaying the ranking screen G10, the game device 10 may first display the self-ranking, and may switch to the display of the overall ranking when the user operates the display tab TAB2. Further, when displaying ranking screen G10, game device 10 may first display the overall ranking, and may switch to the display of self-ranking when there is a user operation on display tab TAB1. In the case where the ranking screen G10 is displayed for the second time or later, the game device 10 may first display the ranking displayed last time.

  In the illustrated example, the self-ranking is displayed, and ranking labels K11, K12, K13,... Are displayed. Each of the rank labels K11, K12, K13,... Displays information (first, second, third,...) Indicating each rank and information indicating each score. For example, the rank label K11 displays “1” as information indicating a rank and “182500” as information indicating a score. Here, the rank label K11 is the current play result of this user, and is displayed in an emphasized manner so as to be distinguishable from other rank labels (rank labels of past play results). For example, the ranking label of the current play result is displayed in a mode in which one or more of the frame thickness, character size, display brightness, display color, etc. is different from other ranking labels Is highlighted. In the example shown in the figure, the score displayed on the ranking label K11 is the top score in the user's play. Therefore, it is determined that the current play result has updated its own score (its own high score). Is shown.

  In addition, a comment CT1 and a comment CT2 are displayed on the order label K12 and the order label K13, respectively. The comment CT1 and the comment CT2 are comments input when the user has acquired the scores described in the respective rank labels K12 and K13. The comment represents, for example, the emotion, feeling, thought, opinion, and the like of the user, and is, for example, a display-like expression such as a text or an icon. In the present embodiment, the user can select a comment to be input for the played score from comment candidates.

  The game device 10 presents a candidate for a comment on the game situation of the user based on the game situation of the user who played the game and the game situation to be compared. The game situation is, for example, a parameter (for example, a score) representing a play result. For example, the game device 10 presents comment candidates for the score of the user based on the score of the user who played the game and the score to be compared. In the case of self-ranking, the score to be compared is a past score of the user himself / herself, for example, his / her own high score or a previous (one previous) score. On the other hand, in the case of the overall ranking, the score to be compared is the score of another user, for example, the high score of another specific user (for example, the score of the first place in the overall ranking). As described above, the game device 10 can present the user with a suitable comment candidate according to the score by comparing the score played by the user with the score to be compared and presenting the candidate for the comment. The process of presenting the comment candidate will be described later in detail.

  Here, a comment for the current score has not been input, and a comment input button BT10 is displayed on the ranking label K11. The comment input button BT10 is displayed as an operator for inputting a comment for the score. When the user operates the comment input button BT10 (for example, tap operation), a comment candidate screen G20 on which comment candidates are presented is displayed. The comment candidate screen G20 may be displayed so as to overlap the ranking screen G10, or may be switched from the ranking screen G10 and displayed.

  On the comment candidate screen G20, a plurality of comment candidates that the user who gave the score would like to input are displayed. Here, an example is shown in which comment candidates F11, F12, and F13 are displayed as comment candidates, but the number of comment candidates is not limited to three. Each of the comment candidates F11, F12, and F13 is displayed as a selectable operation element. The user can select a comment by operating (for example, tapping) any one of the comment candidates F11, F12, and F13. When any one of the comment candidates F11, F12, and F13 is selected, the game device 10 ends the display of the comment candidate screen G20, displays the ranking screen G10, and displays the selected comment candidate on the ranking label K11. A comment is displayed instead of the comment input button BT10.

In addition, the game device 10 may be configured to be able to correct the erroneously input comment when the user erroneously selects an unintended comment from the comment candidates and erroneously inputs the comment. For example, when the user selects a comment on the comment candidate screen G20, the comment displayed instead of the comment input button BT10 may be displayed as an operator for displaying the comment candidate screen G20. Thus, the user can reselect and correct the comment by performing an operation (for example, a tap operation) on the erroneously input comment.
Further, the game device 10 may be capable of changing a comment input in the past. For example, the comment CT1 and the comment CT2 may be displayed as operators for displaying the comment candidate screen G20. Thus, the user can reselect a comment by performing an operation (for example, a tap operation) on a comment input in the past.

  In the ranking screen G10, comments (for example, comments CT1 and CT2) for comments input in the past with respect to rank labels (for example, rank labels K12 and K13) other than the rank label K11 of the current score are displayed. It does not have to be displayed.

  Note that the comment candidate may be presented to the user without the user's operation. For example, the comment input button BT10 may not be displayed on the ranking screen G10, and the display of comment candidates may be included in this screen.

  When the overall ranking is displayed on the ranking screen G10, for example, information indicating the overall ranking is displayed in the title information K10. In the case of the overall ranking, each of the ranking labels K11, K12, K13,..., In addition to the information shown in FIG. 2, information indicating the user who gave each score (for example, a nickname) Is displayed.

[Configuration of Center Server 30]
Next, the configuration of the center server 30 will be described.
FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating an example of a schematic configuration of the center server 30 according to the present embodiment. The center server 30 includes a server control unit 310, a server communication unit 32, and a server storage unit 33. The server control unit 310 includes a CPU (Central Processing Unit) functioning as a control center of the center server 30, and controls each unit of the center server 30. For example, the server control unit 310 includes a user information acquisition unit 311 and a ranking information processing unit 312.

  The user information acquisition unit 311 acquires user information from the game device 10 via the server communication unit 32, and causes the server storage unit 33 to store the acquired user information. Here, the user information includes a user name, a nickname of the user, play data played on the game device 10 by the user, and the like.

  Upon receiving a request for ranking information from the game device 10 via the server communication unit 32, the ranking information processing unit 312 generates self-ranking information indicating a self-ranking or overall ranking information indicating an overall ranking, and Send. Specifically, the ranking information processing unit 312 generates self ranking information or overall ranking information based on play data of a specific user stored in the server storage unit 33 or play data of each of a plurality of users. Then, the generated ranking information is stored in the server storage unit 33. Then, the ranking information processing unit 312 transmits the generated self ranking information or the overall ranking information to the game device 10 via the server communication unit 32.

  The server communication unit 32 includes, for example, a plurality of Ethernet (registered trademark) ports and a plurality of digital input / output ports such as a plurality of USB (Universal Serial Bus), and is connected to the game device 10 connected via the network NW. Perform communication.

  The server storage unit 33 includes an HDD (Hard Disk Drive), an SSD (Solid State Drive), an EEPROM (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory), a ROM (Read-Only Memory, etc.), and a ROM (Read-Only Memory, etc.). It stores various information processed by the device 10, a game screen, a game control program, and the like.

  For example, the server storage unit 33 stores user information acquired from the game device 10 by the server control unit 310, ranking information generated by the server control unit 310, and the like. The server storage unit 33 is not limited to one built in the center server 30, but may be an external storage device connected via a digital input / output port such as a USB. For example, the server storage unit 33 includes a user information storage unit 331 and a ranking information storage unit 332.

  The user information storage unit 331 stores user information of a user who uses the game device 10. FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating a data example of the user information table TBL331 stored in the user information storage unit 331. The user information table TBL331 stores, as user information, a user ID, a user name, a nickname, and play data in association with each other. The user ID is identification information for identifying a user. The user name is the name of the user. The nickname is the nickname of the user and is displayed as information representing the user in the game.

  The play data is information about the user's play. For example, the play data includes a rank, the number of plays, a high score, a score history (score 1, score 2,...), And the like. The rank is the rank of the user. The play count is the number of times the user has played this game. The high score is the highest score that the user has played this game. The score history is a history including a part or all of the score of the user playing the game. The high score and each score in the score history are also stored in association with the play date and time when the score was issued.

  The ranking information storage unit 332 stores the self ranking information and the overall ranking information generated by the server control unit 310. FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating a data example of the self-ranking information table TBL3321 stored in the ranking information storage unit 332. In the self-ranking information table TBL3321, a user ID, a nickname, a rank, a score, and a comment are stored in association with each other as self-ranking information for each user. That is, the self-ranking information table TBL3321 stores, for each user, self-ranking information in which scores played in this game are sorted and ranked in descending order of the score. The comment is a comment input by the user with the game device 10 for each score. The ranking information processing unit 312 acquires the comment input for the score of the self ranking in the game device 10 via the server communication unit 32, and stores the comment in the self ranking information table TBL3321. If a comment has not been input, “null” is stored as the comment in the self-ranking information table TBL3321.

  FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of data of the overall ranking information table TBL3322 stored in the ranking information storage unit 332. The ranking, the user ID, the nickname, the high score, and the comment are stored in the overall ranking information table TBL3322 in association with each other as the overall ranking information. That is, the overall ranking information table TBL3322 stores overall ranking information in which high scores for each user who plays this game are sorted and ranked in descending order of the score. The comment is a comment input by each user on the game device 10 for each score, similarly to the self ranking information table TBL3321. The ranking information processing unit 312 acquires the comment input for the score of the overall ranking in the game device 10 via the server communication unit 32, and stores the comment in the overall ranking information table TBL3322.

  The self-ranking information table TBL3321 and the overall ranking information table TBL3322 may further store the play date and time of each score in association with each other.

[Configuration of the game device 10]
Next, the configuration of the game device 10 will be described. First, the hardware configuration of the game device 10 will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating an example of a hardware configuration of the game device 10 according to the present embodiment. The game device 10 includes a CPU 11, a communication unit 12, a storage unit 13, an input unit 14, a display unit 15, and a sound output unit 16.

  The CPU 11 executes various programs stored in the storage unit 13 and controls each unit of the game device 10. The communication unit 12 includes, for example, a plurality of Ethernet (registered trademark) ports, a plurality of digital input / output ports such as USB, and the like, and communicates with another device connected via a network.

The storage unit 13 includes, for example, an HDD, an SSD, an EEPROM, a ROM, and a RAM, and stores various information processed by the game apparatus 10, a game screen, a game control program, and the like.
The input unit 14 includes input devices such as buttons and a touch panel, and receives an operation input by a user. For example, the input unit 14 is a touch panel arranged on a display screen of the display unit 15 and receives a user's operation input on a game screen (a menu screen, a play screen, a ranking screen, or the like) displayed on the display unit 15.

The display unit 15 is a display that displays information such as images and text, and includes, for example, a liquid crystal display panel, an organic EL (ElectroLuminescence) display panel, and the like. For example, the display unit 15 displays a game screen such as a menu screen, a play screen, a ranking screen (for example, a ranking screen G10 shown in FIG. 2).
The sound output unit 16 is configured to include a speaker, and outputs music selected as music to be played in the game, various sound effects, and the like.

  Next, a functional configuration of the game device 10 will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 8 is a block diagram illustrating an example of a configuration of the game device 10 according to the present embodiment. The game device 10 includes a game control unit 110 as a functional configuration realized by the CPU 11 executing a game control program stored in the storage unit 13. The game control unit 110 controls each unit of the game device 10 and communicates with the center server 30 via the communication unit 12 to transmit and receive various information. The storage unit 13 stores a game control program and various information used in the game. For example, the storage unit 13 includes a ranking information storage unit 131 and a comment candidate storage unit 132.

  The ranking information storage unit 131 stores the ranking information generated by the center server 30. For example, the ranking information storage unit 131 stores self-ranking information or overall ranking information acquired from the center server 30 by the game control unit 110 via the communication unit 12.

  The comment candidate storage unit 132 stores comment candidates to be input for the score played by the user. For example, the comment candidates stored in the comment candidate storage unit 132 are comment candidates (for example, comment candidates F11, F12, and F13) displayed on the comment candidate screen G20 shown in FIG. Is determined on the basis of the game situation and the game situation to be compared. Here, an example will be described in which a candidate for a comment for a score played by the user is determined based on a relationship between the score and a score to be compared (for example, a magnitude relationship between scores).

  First, an example of a comment ranking candidate for self-ranking will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating an example of data of the self-ranking comment candidate table TBL1321 stored in the comment candidate storage unit 132. The self-ranking comment candidate table TBL1321 stores a comparison method, a comparison result, and a comment candidate in association with each other. The comparison method is a method of comparing the score of the user who has played the game with the score to be compared (here, the magnitude of the score is compared). Here, the score of the user who played the game is “score A”, and the score to be compared is “score B”. The score B is a score that the user has played in the past, and is, for example, a high score so far. The comparison result is a comparison result between the score A and the score B. The comment candidate is a comment candidate to be presented to the user.

  In the illustrated example, when the score A is larger than the score B, that is, when the current score A exceeds its own high score, the comment candidates are the text T11, the text T12, and the text T13. Each of the text T11, the text T12, and the text T13 is text information of a candidate for a comment that the user wants to input when his or her high score is updated (for example, “Score update!”). On the other hand, when the score A is equal to or less than the score B, that is, when the current score A does not exceed its own high score, the comment candidates are the text T21, the text T22, and the text T23. Each of the text T21, the text T22, and the text T23 is text information of a candidate for a comment that the user wants to input when his / her high score cannot be updated (for example, “do not update own score”). is there.

  Next, an example of a comment candidate for the overall ranking will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating a data example of the comment candidate table for overall ranking TBL1322 stored in the comment candidate storage unit 132. The overall ranking comment candidate table TBL1322 stores a comparison method, a comparison result, and a comment candidate in association with each other. The comparison method is a method of comparing the score of the user who has played the game with the score to be compared (here, the magnitude of the score is compared). Here, the score of the user who played the game is “score A”, and the score to be compared is “score C”. The score C is the score of another user who has played the game, and is, for example, the previous high score of a specific other user. The specific other user is any one of the users who play the game except the user, and is, for example, the user who ranks first in the overall ranking. Note that the specific other user may be any user such as its own rival user. In addition, which user to use as the specific other user may be determined by controlling the game, may be determined based on the intention of the user, or may be determined based on both the control of the game and the intention of the user. May be determined based on Here, a description will be given assuming that the specific other user is the first user in the overall ranking. The comparison result is a comparison result between the score A and the score C. The comment candidate is a comment candidate to be presented to the user.

  In the illustrated example, when the score A is larger than the score C, that is, when the current score A exceeds the high score of the user who ranks first in the overall ranking, the candidates for the comment are the text T31, the text T32, and the text T33. . Each of the text T31, the text T32, and the text T33 is text information of a candidate for a comment that the user wants to input when the score of the first overall ranking is updated (for example, “update the overall ranking score!”). is there. On the other hand, when the score A is equal to or less than the score C, that is, when the current score A does not exceed the high score of the user who ranks first in the overall ranking, the comment candidates are the text T41, the text T42, and the text T43. Each of the text T41, the text T42, and the text T43 is text information of a candidate for a comment that the user wants to input when the score of the first place in the overall ranking cannot be updated (for example, “not update the overall ranking score”). Etc.).

  Note that the number of comment candidates shown in FIGS. 9 and 10 is an example, and is not limited to this. 9 and 10, the comparison result is divided into a case where the score A is larger than the score B (or score C) and a case where the score A is equal to or smaller than the score B (or score C). Not something. For example, when the score A is larger than the score B (or score C), when the score A is the same as the score B (or score C), and when the score A is smaller than the score B (or score C), Good.

  Returning to FIG. 8, the game control unit 110 will be described in detail. The game control unit 110 includes an input receiving unit 111, a play control unit 112, a display control unit 113, a ranking processing unit 114, and a comment processing unit 120. The input receiving unit 111 receives an instruction based on a user's operation input to the input unit 14. For example, the input receiving unit 111 receives an instruction related to play, an instruction to input a comment, and the like based on a user's operation input to the input unit 14. Here, the instruction to input a comment is, for example, an instruction to select one of the comment candidates on the comment candidate screen G20 shown in FIG.

  The play control unit 112 controls game play based on an instruction received by the input receiving unit 111 by a user's operation input to the input unit 14. For example, the play control unit 112 generates a play screen corresponding to the game and causes the display unit 15 to display the play screen via the display control unit 113. When the play ends, the play control unit 112 transfers the play result of the play to the ranking processing unit 114. The play result is associated with the user ID of the user who played the game and play data such as a play date and a score. The display control unit 113 causes the display unit 15 to display a game play screen, a ranking screen (for example, the ranking screen G10 in FIG. 2), a comment candidate screen (for example, the comment candidate screen G20 in FIG. 2), and the like.

  The ranking processing unit 114 performs a process for displaying the ranking on the display unit 15 based on the play result of the user. For example, the ranking processing unit 114 includes a ranking information requesting unit 115, a ranking information obtaining unit 116, and a ranking information presenting unit 117.

  Upon acquiring the play result of the user who played the game from the play control unit 112, the ranking information requesting unit 115 requests the center server 30 for ranking information based on the play result. For example, the ranking information requesting unit 115 transmits, to the center server 30 via the communication unit 12, ranking request information in which the user ID is associated with play data such as a play date and time and a score based on the acquired play result. .

  In the center server 30, when the ranking information processing unit 312 acquires the ranking request information from the game device 10 via the server communication unit 32, the ranking information processing unit 312 updates the play data of the user information table TBL331 based on the acquired ranking request information. Specifically, the ranking information processing unit 312 updates play data of the user ID stored in the user information table TBL331 based on the user ID and play data associated with the acquired ranking request information. . Then, ranking information processing section 312 generates self-ranking information and overall ranking information based on updated user information table TBL331, and transmits the generated self-ranking information and overall ranking information to game device 10 via server communication section 32.

  The ranking information acquisition unit 116 acquires, via the communication unit 12, the self ranking information and the overall ranking information transmitted from the center server 30 in response to the ranking information request unit 115 transmitting the ranking request information. For example, the ranking information acquisition unit 116 acquires, from the center server 30, self ranking information associated with the user ID associated with the ranking request information in the self ranking information table TBL3321 in FIG. In addition, the ranking information acquisition unit 116 acquires from the center server 30 the overall ranking information indicated by the overall ranking information table TBL3322 in FIG. Then, the ranking information acquisition unit 116 causes the ranking information storage unit 131 to store the acquired self ranking information and the overall ranking information. Here, the ranking information acquiring unit 116 may acquire a part of the self ranking information and the entire ranking information stored in the center server 30 or may acquire all of the ranking information.

  The ranking information presenting unit 117 generates a ranking screen (for example, the ranking screen G10 in FIG. 2) indicating a user's play result based on the self-ranking information and the overall ranking information acquired by the ranking information acquiring unit 116. Then, the ranking information presentation unit 117 causes the display unit 15 to display the generated ranking screen via the display control unit 113.

  For example, the ranking information presentation unit 117 determines that the score associated with the ranking request information transmitted by the ranking information requesting unit 115 (that is, the score that the user has played this time) is another score (for example, the past score of the user, The ranking screen is generated so as to be distinguishable from other scores (for example, to stand out more than other scores).

  The comment processing unit 120 performs a comment input process for the score played by the user. For example, the comment processing unit 120 includes a comparison target specifying unit 121, a comparison processing unit 122, a comment candidate presentation unit 123, and a comment determination unit 124.

  The user accepts an operation (for example, an operation on the comment input button BT10 in FIG. 2) on the ranking screen (for example, the ranking screen G10 in FIG. 2) displayed on the display unit 15, and the input receiving unit 111 receives an instruction to input a comment. Then, the comparison target specifying unit 121 specifies a game situation to be compared with the game situation of the user who played the game. For example, in the case of a comment input in the self-ranking, the comparison target specifying unit 121 specifies a game situation to be compared from the past game situations of the user who played the game. As an example, the comparison target specifying unit 121 refers to the self-ranking information stored in the ranking information storage unit 131 and specifies the high score of the user who played the game so far as the game situation to be compared. .

  On the other hand, in the case of a comment input in the overall ranking, the comparison target specifying unit 121 specifies a game situation to be compared from among the game situations of other users who played the game. As an example, the comparison target specifying unit 121 refers to the overall ranking information stored in the ranking information storage unit 131, and obtains a high score of another user who played the game (for example, a user who ranked first in the overall ranking). Is determined as the game situation to be compared.

  The comparison target specifying unit 121 may specify a score of an arbitrary user (for example, a high score of a rival user) as a game situation to be compared. In addition, the comparison target specifying unit 121 may automatically determine the game situation to be compared in the game control, may determine the game situation based on the user's intention, or may control the game control and the user's intention. And may be determined based on both.

  The comparison processing unit 122 compares the game situation of the user who has played the game with the comparison target game situation identified by the comparison subject identification unit 121. For example, the comparison processing unit 122 refers to the self ranking information or the overall ranking information stored in the ranking information storage unit 131, and compares the score of the user who has played the game with the comparison target identified by the comparison target identification unit 121. Compare with the score you want. As an example, the magnitude relation between the score of the user who played the game and the score to be compared is compared.

  When the score to be compared is not stored in the ranking information storage unit 131, the comparison processing unit 122 may obtain the score to be compared by inquiring the center server 30. The case where the score to be compared is not stored in the ranking information storage unit 131 means that the self-ranking information and the overall ranking information stored in the ranking information storage unit 131 are stored in the self-ranking information stored in the center server 30. And a part of the overall ranking information, and the score to be compared is not included in the part.

  The comment candidate presenting unit 123 presents comment candidates for the game situation of the user based on the game situation of the user who played the game and the game situation to be compared identified by the comparison object identifying unit 121. Specifically, the comment candidate presenting unit 123 refers to the self-ranking comment candidate table TBL1321 or the overall ranking comment candidate table TBL1322, and determines a comment candidate based on the comparison result by the comparison processing unit 122. A comment candidate screen (for example, the comment candidate screen G20 in FIG. 2) on which the candidate for the comment is displayed is generated. Then, the comment candidate presentation unit 123 causes the display unit 15 to display the generated comment candidate screen via the display control unit 113.

  For example, the comment candidate presenting unit 123 presents a comment candidate for the user's score based on the score of the user who played the game and the score to be compared which is specified by the comparison target specifying unit 121. As an example, the comment candidate presenting unit 123 presents comment candidates for the score of the user based on the magnitude relationship between the score of the user who played the game and the score to be compared.

  The comment determination unit 124 determines a comment candidate selected by the user from among the comment candidates presented by the comment candidate presentation unit 123 as a comment to be input for the user's game situation (e.g., score). For example, when the input receiving unit 111 receives an instruction to select one of the comment candidates on the comment candidate screen (for example, the comment candidate screen G20 in FIG. 2) displayed on the display unit 15, the comment determination unit 124 The selected comment candidate is determined as a comment to be input by the user. Then, the comment determination unit 124 compares the determined comment with the corresponding comment of the self-ranking information or the overall ranking information stored in the ranking information storage unit 131 (the user ID of the user, and the score input by the user for the comment). As the comment associated with the.

  When the self-ranking information or the overall ranking information stored in the ranking information storage unit 131 is updated by the comment determination unit 124, the ranking information presenting unit 117 displays a ranking screen based on the updated self-ranking information or the overall ranking information. For example, a ranking screen G10 in FIG. 2 is generated and displayed on the display unit 15 via the display control unit 113.

  Further, when the comment determining unit 124 updates the self-ranking information or the overall ranking information stored in the ranking information storage unit 131, based on the updated self-ranking information or the overall ranking information, the update information including at least the updated information is updated. Is transmitted to the center server 30 via the communication unit 12. The ranking information processing unit 312 of the center server 30 updates the self ranking information table TBL3321 or the overall ranking information table TBL3322 stored in the ranking information storage unit 332 based on the update information transmitted from the game device 10. As described above, when a comment is input on the game device 10, the comment is displayed on the ranking screen displayed on the display unit 15 and is reflected on the ranking information stored in the center server 30.

[Comment processing operation in ranking display]
Next, with reference to FIG. 11, an operation of comment processing in ranking display executed by the game control unit 110 according to the present embodiment will be described. FIG. 11 is a flowchart illustrating an example of comment processing in ranking display according to the present embodiment. Here, a description will be given of processing performed after the end of the running game in the game device 10.

  When the play of the game ends (step S100), the game control unit 110 ranks the user ID of the user based on the play result of the user and the play date such as the play date and time and the score in association with each other. The request information is transmitted to the center server 30 via the communication unit 12 (Step S102).

  Here, when acquiring the ranking request information from the game device 10, the center server 30 updates the play data of the user information table TBL331 based on the acquired ranking request information. Then, center server 30 generates self-ranking information and overall ranking information based on updated user information table TBL331, and transmits the generated ranking information and game device 10 to game device 10.

  Next, the game control unit 110 acquires the self ranking information and the overall ranking information transmitted from the center server 30 via the communication unit 12 in response to the transmission of the ranking request information. Then, the game control unit 110 causes the ranking information storage unit 131 to store the acquired self ranking information and the overall ranking information. In addition, the game control unit 110 generates a ranking screen (for example, the ranking screen G10 in FIG. 2) indicating the self ranking or the overall ranking based on the acquired self ranking information and the overall ranking information, and causes the display unit 15 to display the ranking screen. (Step S104).

  When displaying the ranking screen on the display unit 15, the game control unit 110 determines whether or not the user has performed an operation for inputting a comment on the ranking screen (for example, an operation on the comment input button BT10 in FIG. 2), that is, inputs a comment. It is determined whether or not an instruction to perform is received (step S106).

  When it is determined that the instruction to input the comment has not been received (step S106: NO), the game control unit 110 determines whether or not an operation to end the display of the ranking screen has been performed, that is, ends the display of the ranking screen. It is determined whether an instruction has been received (step S108). When determining that the instruction to end the display of the ranking screen has not been received (step S108: NO), the game control unit 110 returns the process to step S106, and displays the ranking screen and an instruction to input a comment. The determination of whether or not it has been received is continued. On the other hand, when determining that the instruction to end the display of the ranking screen has been received (step S108: YES), the game control unit 110 displays the ranking screen without performing the comment input processing (steps S110 to S132). The process ends.

  Here, the operation to end the display of the ranking screen is, for example, a user operation (for example, a tap operation) on an end button (not shown) displayed on the ranking screen. For example, when the user operates an end button (not shown) displayed on the ranking screen, the game control unit 110 receives an instruction to end the display of the ranking screen. On the other hand, when the user has not operated an end button (not shown) displayed on the ranking screen, the game control unit 110 does not accept an instruction to end the display of the ranking screen. Note that the game control unit 110 may end the display after a preset time has elapsed from the start of displaying the ranking screen, regardless of the operation of the user.

  When it is determined in step S106 that an instruction to input a comment has been received (step S106: YES), the game control unit 110 specifies a game situation to be compared with the game situation of the user who played the game. Here, a description will be given assuming that the user performs an operation of inputting a comment in the self-ranking (for example, an operation on the comment input button BT10 in FIG. 2). When it is determined that an instruction to input a comment has been received (step S106: YES), the game control unit 110 specifies a high score so far of the user who played the game as a score to be compared (step S110). . Specifically, the game control unit 110 refers to the self-ranking information stored in the ranking information storage unit 131, and specifies the high score so far of the user who played the game as a score to be compared. .

  Next, the game control unit 110 compares the score of the user who has played the game with the specified score to be compared. Specifically, the game control unit 110 refers to the self-ranking information stored in the ranking information storage unit 131 and compares the score of the user who played the game (score A shown in FIG. 9) with the comparison target. The magnitude relationship with the score (score B shown in FIG. 9) is compared (step S112). When the score to be compared is not stored in the ranking information storage unit 131, the comparison processing unit 122 queries the center server 30 for the score to be compared and acquires the score.

  In step S112, it is assumed that it is determined that the score of the user who played the game (score A) is larger than the score to be compared (score B) (step S112: YES). In this case, the game control unit 110 refers to the self-ranking comment candidate table TBL1321, and displays the text T11, the text T12, and the text T13 (for example, “Score update!” Or the like) as comment candidates. A candidate screen (for example, the comment candidate screen G20 in FIG. 2) is displayed on the display unit 15 (step S114).

On the other hand, it is assumed that it is determined in step S112 that the score of the user who played the game (score A) is equal to or less than the score to be compared (score B) (step S112: NO ). In this case, the game control unit 110 refers to the self-ranking comment candidate table TBL1321, and displays the text T21, the text T22, and the text T23 (for example, “not updated self-score” or the like) as comment candidates. A comment candidate screen (for example, the comment candidate screen G20 in FIG. 2) is displayed on the display unit 15 (step S116).

  Next, when receiving an instruction to select one of the comment candidates on the comment candidate screen (for example, the comment candidate screen G20 in FIG. 2) displayed on the display unit 15 (Step S130), The selected comment candidate is determined as a comment to be input by the user (step S132).

  Then, the game control unit 110 updates the ranking information based on the determined comment (Step S134). Specifically, the game control unit 110 compares the determined comment with the corresponding comment of the self-ranking information stored in the ranking information storage unit 131 (the user ID of the user and the score input by the user for the comment). Associated comment). When updating the self-ranking information stored in the ranking information storage unit 131, the game control unit 110 generates and displays a ranking screen (for example, the ranking screen G10 in FIG. 2) based on the updated self-ranking information. It is displayed on the unit 15. When the game control unit 110 updates the self-ranking information stored in the ranking information storage unit 131, the game control unit 110 transmits update information including at least the updated information via the communication unit 12 based on the updated self-ranking information. To the center server 30. The center server 30 updates the self ranking information table TBL3321 stored in the ranking information storage unit 332 based on the update information transmitted from the game device 10.

  Next, the game control unit 110 determines whether or not an operation to end the display of the ranking screen has been performed, that is, whether or not an instruction to end the display of the ranking screen has been received (step S136). If it is determined that the instruction to end the display of the ranking screen has not been received (step S136: NO), the game control unit 110 determines whether the display of the ranking screen and the instruction to end the display of the ranking screen have been received. And the determination of is continued. On the other hand, when determining that the instruction to end the display of the ranking screen has been received (step S136: YES), the game control unit 110 ends the display of the ranking screen.

[Summary of First Embodiment]
As described above, in the game system 1 according to the present embodiment, the game device 10 includes the comparison target specifying unit 121 and the comment candidate presenting unit 123. The comparison target specifying unit 121 specifies a game situation to be compared. The comment candidate presenting unit 123 presents comment candidates for the game situation of the user based on the game situation of the user who played the game and the game situation to be compared identified by the comparison object identifying unit 121.

  Thereby, the game system 1 can present a comment candidate that the user wants to input according to the comparison result of comparing the game situation played by the user with the game situation to be compared. The user can easily input an appropriate comment. For example, the game system 1 can guess a comment of a text representing the emotional expression of the user according to the game situation, and set the comment as a comment candidate. Therefore, the user can easily select a comment suitable for his / her emotion from the comment candidates as a comment to be input.

For example, the game situation is a score (an example of a score) obtained by the user according to the play of the game. The comment candidate presenting unit 123 presents a comment candidate for the user's score based on the score of the user who played the game and the score to be compared.
As described above, the game system 1 presents comment candidates according to the comparison result obtained by comparing the user's score with the comparison target score, so that the user can easily input an appropriate comment according to the score. .

Specifically, the comment candidate presenting unit 123 presents, for example, comment candidates for the score of the user based on the magnitude relationship between the score of the user who played the game (an example of the score) and the score to be compared. .
Thereby, since the game system 1 presents comment candidates according to the priority of the score to be compared, it is possible to present an appropriate comment according to the priority of the score played by the user this time.

For example, the comparison target specifying unit 121 specifies a game situation to be compared from among past scores (an example of a game situation) of the user who played the game.
Thus, the game system 1 compares the score played by the user this time with the user's own past score, guesses the emotion of the user's score, and presents a candidate for a comment that the user wants to input. be able to. Therefore, for example, when presenting a comment candidate to be input to the self ranking, the game system 1 can select and present an appropriate comment candidate depending on where the score played by the user this time is located in the self ranking. it can.

  For example, the past score of the user is the high score of the user so far. The game system 1 can determine whether or not the score played by the user this time has updated the self-score by comparing the user's previous high score with the comparison target, and whether the self-score has been updated. It is possible to present a comment candidate having a content according to whether or not the comment has been made.

  In addition, the past score of the user may be the previous score of the user. In this case, the game system 1 can determine whether the score played by the user this time has updated the previous score by comparing the score with the previous score of the user. It is possible to present a comment candidate having contents according to whether or not the previous score has been updated.

Further, the comparison target specifying unit 121 specifies a score to be a comparison target from scores (an example of a game situation) of other users who have played the game.
Thus, the game system 1 compares the score played by the user this time with the score of another user who played the game, thereby inferring the emotion of the user's score and selecting a comment candidate that the user would like to input. Can be presented. Therefore, for example, when presenting a comment candidate to be input to the overall ranking, the game system 1 can select and present an appropriate comment candidate depending on where the score played by the user this time is located in the overall ranking. it can.

  For example, the score to be compared among the scores of other users is the score of another user who has played the game, and is, for example, the high score of another specific user so far. The specific other user is any one of the users who play the game except the user, and is, for example, a user who ranks first in the overall ranking. The game system 1 can determine whether the score played by the user this time has updated the score of the first place in the overall ranking by comparing the high score of the user with the first place in the overall ranking with the comparison target. It is possible to present a candidate for a comment having a content according to whether or not the first-ranked score has been updated.

  The score to be compared among the scores of the other users is not limited to the high score of the user who ranks first in the overall ranking, and is, for example, the high score of another specific user in a rival relationship. Is also good. In the case of the game mode in which the user competes with another user, the score to be compared among the scores of the other users may be the score of the opponent in the competition. In this case, the game system 1 may present a comment candidate based on the comparison result between the user's score and the opponent's score, that is, the superiority (win / loss) between the user and the opponent. That is, instead of the score, the game system 1 may present the candidate for the comment based on the superiority or victory or defeat of the opponent. Note that, in the case of a battle, the game system 1 may use the past score of the opponent as a comparison target. For example, the latest score of the opponent user may be set as the comparison target. For example, in the case of a total of 10 matches, when the fifth match is over, the victory or defeat with the fourth opponent may be compared (for example, the player lost the game, but won the game again, etc.).

The game system 1 further includes an input reception unit 111 (an example of a reception unit) and a comment determination unit 124. The input receiving unit 111 receives an instruction to select any one of the comment candidates. The comment determination unit 124 determines a comment selected from the comment candidates according to the instruction received by the input reception unit 111 as a comment for the user's game situation (for example, score).
As described above, the game system 1 determines the comment selected from the comment candidates as the comment to be input by the user, so that the user can easily input an appropriate comment.

[Second embodiment]
Next, a second embodiment of the present invention will be described. Since the configuration of the game system 1 of the present embodiment is the same as that of the first embodiment, a characteristic process in the present embodiment will be described. In the first embodiment, the example in which the candidate for the comment for the score played by the user is determined based on the magnitude relation between the score and the score to be compared, but in the present embodiment, the score is An example in which a candidate for a comment is determined in consideration of the difference in score in addition to the magnitude relation of the above will be described.

  For example, the comparison processing unit 122 of the game control unit 110 compares the magnitude relationship and the difference between the score of the user who played the game and the score to be compared. Then, the comment candidate presenting unit 123 presents comment candidates for the score of the user based on the comparison result by the comparison processing unit 122. That is, the comment candidate presenting unit 123 presents comment candidates for the score of the user based on the magnitude relationship and difference between the score of the user who played the game and the score to be compared.

  FIG. 12 is a diagram illustrating a data example of the self-ranking comment candidate table TBL1323 according to the present embodiment. The self-ranking comment candidate table TBL1323 stores the comparison method and comparison result of the first comparison (comparison 1), the comparison method and comparison result of the second comparison (comparison 2), and comment candidates in association with each other. Have been. The comparison method and the comparison result of the first comparison (comparison 1) are the same as the comparison method and the comparison result by the magnitude comparison of the scores shown in FIG. 9 described in the first embodiment. The comparison method and the comparison result of the second comparison (comparison 2) are the comparison method based on the difference comparison of the scores taken into account in the present embodiment and the comparison result.

  The comparison result of the difference between the scores includes, for example, a case where the difference between the scores is large (large difference) and a case where the difference between the scores is small (small difference). For example, a case where the difference between the scores is large means a case where the difference between the scores (for example, the difference between score A and score B) is larger than a preset threshold. On the other hand, the case where the score difference is small refers to the case where the score difference (for example, the difference between score A and score B) is equal to or less than a preset threshold.

  In the example shown in the figure, if the score A is larger than the score B, that is, if the current score A exceeds its own high score, a comment candidate is first included in the text as in the example shown in FIG. T11, text T12, and text T13 are included. Further, a comment candidate is further added based on the difference between the score A and the score B. If the difference between score A and score B is large, text T14 is added to the comment candidate, and if the difference between score A and score B is small, text T15 is added to the comment candidate. That is, when the score A is larger than the score B and the difference is large, the comment candidates are the text T11, the text T12, the text T13, and the text T14. The text T14 is text information of a comment candidate that the user wants to input when the user's own high score is significantly updated (for example, “Self-significantly updated!”). On the other hand, when the score A is larger than the score B and the difference is small, the comment candidates are the text T11, the text T12, the text T13, and the text T15. The text T15 is text information of a comment candidate that the user wants to input when the user's own high score is slightly updated (for example, “Self-score is slightly updated!”).

  When the score A is equal to or smaller than the score B and the difference is large, the comment candidates are the text T21, the text T22, the text T23, and the text T24. The text T24 is text information (for example, “complete slump”) of a comment candidate that the user wants to input when the score falls significantly below his or her high score. On the other hand, when the score A is equal to or less than the score B and the difference is small, the comment candidates are the text T21, the text T22, the text T23, and the text T25. The text T25 is text information (for example, “Oshi!”) Of a comment candidate that the user wants to input when the user's own high score is slightly insufficient.

  Although the data example of the self-ranking comment candidate table TBL1323 in the case of the self-ranking has been described with reference to FIG. 12, in the case of the overall ranking, the comparison method and the comparison result of the first comparison (comparison 1) are also used. The same method can be applied by using a comment candidate table for overall ranking (not shown) in which the comparison method and comparison result of the second comparison (comparison 2) are associated with the comment candidates.

  Next, with reference to FIG. 13, an operation of a comment process in ranking display performed by the game device 10 according to the present embodiment will be described. FIG. 13 is a flowchart illustrating an example of comment processing in ranking display according to the present embodiment. In this figure, the processes in steps S100 to S110 shown in FIG. 11 are the same, and are not shown. In addition, since each processing of steps S1112, S1130, S1132, S1134, and S1136 shown in this drawing is the same as each processing of steps S112, S130, S132, S134, and S136 shown in FIG. 11, the description thereof is omitted.

  If it is determined in step S1112 that the score of the user who played the game (score A) is larger than the score to be compared (score B) (step S1112: YES), the game control unit 110 further reduces the score difference. It is determined whether it is larger (step S1118). When it is determined that the difference between the scores is large (step S1118: YES), the game control unit 110 refers to the self-ranking comment candidate table TBL1321, and as text candidates, the text T11, the text T12, the text T13, and the text. The display unit 15 displays a comment candidate screen (for example, the comment candidate screen G20 in FIG. 2) on which T14 (for example, “Self-significant update!”) Is displayed (Step S1120). Then, the game control unit 110 advances the process to step S1130.

  On the other hand, when it is determined that the difference between the scores is small (step S1118: NO), the game control unit 110 refers to the self-ranking comment candidate table TBL1321, and as a comment candidate, the text T11, the text T12, the text T13, Then, the display unit 15 displays a comment candidate screen (for example, the comment candidate screen G20 in FIG. 2) on which a text T15 (for example, “Self-score is updated slightly!”) Is displayed (step S1122). Then, the game control unit 110 advances the process to step S1130.

  If it is determined in step S1112 that the score of the user who played the game (score A) is equal to or smaller than the score to be compared (score B) (step S1112: NO), the game control unit 110 further sets the score It is determined whether or not the difference is large (step S1124). When it is determined that the score difference is large (step S1124: YES), the game control unit 110 refers to the self-ranking comment candidate table TBL1321, and as a comment candidate, the text T21, the text T22, the text T23, and the text A comment candidate screen (for example, comment candidate screen G20 in FIG. 2) displaying T24 (for example, “complete slump”) is displayed on display unit 15 (step S1126). Then, the game control unit 110 advances the process to step S1130.

  On the other hand, when it is determined that the difference between the scores is small (step S1124: NO), the game control unit 110 refers to the self-ranking comment candidate table TBL1321, and as text candidates, the text T21, the text T22, the text T23, Then, a comment candidate screen (eg, the comment candidate screen G20 in FIG. 2) on which the text T25 (eg, “Oshi!”) Is displayed is displayed on the display unit 15 (step S1128). Then, the game control unit 110 advances the process to step S1130.

[Summary of Second Embodiment]
As described above, in the game system 1 according to the present embodiment, the comment candidate presentation unit 123 determines the score of the user based on the magnitude relationship and the difference between the score of the user who played the game and the score to be compared. Suggest a comment for. Thereby, since the game system 1 presents not only the magnitude relation of the score but also the comment candidate corresponding to the difference of the score, it is possible to appropriately present the comment candidate that the user wants to input. . Therefore, the game system 1 allows the user to easily input an appropriate comment according to the game situation.

[Third embodiment]
Next, a third embodiment of the present invention will be described. Since the configuration of the game system 1 of the present embodiment is the same as that of the first embodiment, a characteristic process in the present embodiment will be described. In the first and second embodiments, the example in which the comment to be input is a text has been described. In the present embodiment, an example in which the comment to be input is an icon will be described.

  Hereinafter, an example of data of a comment candidate when a comment is input by an icon will be described. The comment candidate storage unit 132 stores data of a plurality of icons used as comment candidates. FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating a data example of the icon table TBL1324 according to the present embodiment. The icon table TBL1324 stores an icon ID and an icon in association with each other. The icon ID is identification information capable of identifying an icon. The icon stores the icon image or the file name of the separately stored icon image. In the following description, each of the icons whose icon IDs are M11, M12, M13, and M14 is also referred to as an icon M11, an icon M12, an icon M13, and an icon M14.

  When a comment is input as text, the emotional expression for the user's score is represented by the content of the text. When a comment is input as an icon, the emotional expression for the user's score is represented by the icon shape. In the illustrated example, the icon M11 is an icon in the shape of a face expressing a disappointing feeling, and the icon M12 is an icon in the shape of a face expressing an ordinary feeling. Further, the icon M13 is a face-shaped icon representing a slightly happy feeling, and the icon M14 is a face-shaped icon representing a very happy feeling. That is, in the order of the icon M11, the icon M12, the icon M13, and the icon M14, the side closer to the icon M11 indicates a disappointing feeling, and the side closer to the icon M14 indicates a more happy feeling.

  Further, the comment candidate storage unit 132 stores a comment candidate table that defines comment candidates (in this case, icon candidates) to be input for the score played by the user. Here, an example in the case of the self ranking will be described, but the same can be applied to the case of the overall ranking.

  FIG. 15 is a diagram illustrating a data example of the self-ranking comment candidate table TBL1325 according to the present embodiment. In the example shown in this figure, icon candidates for the score played by the user are determined based on the magnitude relationship between the score and the score to be compared. The self-ranking comment candidate table TBL1325 stores a comparison method, a comparison result, and a comment candidate in association with each other. The comparison method and the comparison result are the comparison method and the comparison result based on the magnitude comparison of the scores, as in the example shown in FIG. The comment candidate stores an icon ID that is a candidate for an icon to be presented to the user.

  In the example shown in FIG. 15, when the score A is larger than the score B, that is, when the current score A exceeds its own high score, the comment candidates are the icon M12, the icon M13, and the icon M14. . On the other hand, when the score A is equal to or less than the score B, that is, when the current score A does not exceed its own high score, the comment candidates are the icon M11, the icon M12, and the icon M13.

  The game control unit 110 (the comment candidate presentation unit 123) refers to the above-described icon table TBL1324 and the self-ranking comment candidate table TBL1325 to determine the magnitude relationship between the score of the user who played the game and the score to be compared. Based on the result, a candidate for a comment (here, a candidate for an icon) for the score of the user is presented. The comment processing in the ranking display executed by the game control unit 110 in this case is, for example, the processing shown in FIG. 11 except for the processing of step S114 and step S116, and the other processing is the same.

  For example, suppose that it is determined in step S112 shown in FIG. 11 that the score of the user who played the game (score A) is larger than the score to be compared (score B) (step S112: YES). In this case, the game control unit 110 refers to the icon table TBL1324 and the self-ranking comment candidate table TBL1325, and refers to a comment candidate screen (for example, FIG. 2) in which icons M12, M13, and M14 are displayed as comment candidates. Is displayed on the display unit 15 (processing in place of step S114 shown in FIG. 11).

  On the other hand, suppose that it is determined in step S112 shown in FIG. 11 that the score of the user who played the game (score A) is equal to or smaller than the score to be compared (score B) (step S112: YES). In this case, the game control unit 110 refers to the icon table TBL1324 and the self-ranking comment candidate table TBL1325, and refers to a comment candidate screen (for example, FIG. 2) in which icons M11, M12, and M13 are displayed as comment candidates. Is displayed on the display unit 15 (processing in place of step S116 shown in FIG. 11).

[Summary of Third Embodiment]
As described above, the game system 1 according to the present embodiment presents various icons having shapes representing emotional expressions as candidates for comments in accordance with the superiority or inferiority of the score to be compared, and thus the superiority or inferiority of the score played by the user this time. , The user can easily input an appropriate comment. For example, the user can easily select, from the icons presented as comment candidates, a comment for inputting an icon having a shape that matches his / her emotion.

[Fourth embodiment]
Next, a fourth embodiment of the present invention will be described. Since the configuration of the game system 1 of the present embodiment is the same as that of the first embodiment, a characteristic process in the present embodiment will be described. In the present embodiment, an example will be described in which a comment to be input is an icon, and a comment candidate is determined in consideration of a score difference in addition to a score magnitude relationship. Here, an example in the case of the self ranking will be described, but the same can be applied to the case of the overall ranking.

  FIG. 16 is a diagram illustrating a data example of the self-ranking comment candidate table TBL1326 according to the present embodiment. In the example shown in this figure, icon candidates are determined in consideration of the difference in score in addition to the magnitude relationship between the scores. The self-ranking comment candidate table TBL1326 stores the comparison method and comparison result of the first comparison (comparison 1), the comparison method and comparison result of the second comparison (comparison 2), and the comment candidates in association with each other. Have been. The comparison method and the comparison result of the first comparison (comparison 1) are the same as the comparison method and the comparison result based on the magnitude comparison of the scores shown in FIG. The comparison method and the comparison result of the second comparison (comparison 2) are a comparison method based on the difference comparison between the score A and the score B and the comparison result. The comment candidate stores an icon ID that is a candidate for an icon to be presented to the user. This icon ID is the icon ID set in the icon table TBL 1324 shown in FIG. 14 described in the third embodiment.

  In the example shown in FIG. 16, when the score A is larger than the score B and the difference is large, the comment candidates are the icon M12, the icon M13, and the icon M14. When the score A is larger than the score B and the difference is smaller, the comment candidates are the icon M12 and the icon M13. On the other hand, when the score A is equal to or smaller than the score B and the difference is large, the comment candidates are the icon M11 and the icon M12. When the score A is equal to or smaller than the score B and the difference is small, the comment candidates are the icon M11, the icon M12, and the icon M13.

  The game control unit 110 (the comment candidate presenting unit 123) refers to the above-described icon table TBL1324 and the self-ranking comment candidate table TBL1326, and determines the magnitude relationship between the score of the user who played the game and the score to be compared. Based on the difference, comment candidates (here, icon candidates) for the score of the user are presented. In this case, the comment processing in the ranking display executed by the game control unit 110 is, for example, the processing shown in FIG. 13 except for the processing of steps S1120, S1122, S1126, S1128, and step S116, and the other processing is the same.

  For example, in steps S1112 and S1118 shown in FIG. 13, it is determined that the score of the user who played the game (score A) is larger than the score to be compared (score B) and the difference between the scores is large (step S1112: YES, step S1118: YES). In this case, the game control unit 110 refers to the icon table TBL1324 and the self-ranking comment candidate table TBL1326, and refers to a comment candidate screen (for example, FIG. 2) in which icons M12, M13, and M14 are displayed as comment candidates. Is displayed on the display unit 15 (processing in place of step S1120 shown in FIG. 13).

  On the other hand, in steps S1112 and S1118 shown in FIG. 13, it is determined that the score of the user who played the game (score A) is larger than the score to be compared (score B) and the difference between the scores is small (step S1112: (YES, step S1118: NO). In this case, the game control unit 110 refers to the icon table TBL1324 and the self-ranking comment candidate table TBL1326, and refers to a comment candidate screen (for example, the comment candidate screen in FIG. 2) in which the icons M12 and M13 are displayed as comment candidates. G20) is displayed on the display unit 15 (processing in place of step S1122 shown in FIG. 13).

  Further, in steps S1112 and S1124 shown in FIG. 13, it is determined that the score of the user who played the game (score A) is equal to or smaller than the score to be compared (score B) and the difference between the scores is large (step S1112: NO, step S1124: YES). In this case, the game control unit 110 refers to the icon table TBL1324 and the self-ranking comment candidate table TBL1326, and refers to the comment candidate screen (for example, the comment candidate screen in FIG. 2) in which the icons M11 and M12 are displayed as comment candidates. G20) is displayed on the display unit 15 (processing in place of step S1126 shown in FIG. 13).

  On the other hand, in steps S1112 and S1124 shown in FIG. 13, it is determined that the score of the user who played the game (score A) is equal to or smaller than the score to be compared (score B) and the difference between the scores is small (step S1112: NO, step S1124: NO). In this case, the game control unit 110 refers to the icon table TBL1324 and the self-ranking comment candidate table TBL1326, and refers to a comment candidate screen (for example, FIG. 2) in which icons M11, M12, and M13 are displayed as comment candidates. Is displayed on the display unit 15 (processing in place of step S1128 shown in FIG. 13).

[Summary of Fourth Embodiment]
As described above, the game system 1 according to the present embodiment presents not only the magnitude relationship of scores but also various icons of colors representing emotional expressions as candidates for comments according to the difference between the scores. Can appropriately present a comment candidate that the user wants to input. For example, the user can easily select from among icons presented as comment candidates, a comment for inputting an icon of a color that matches his / her emotion.

[Fifth Embodiment]
Next, a fifth embodiment of the present invention will be described. Since the configuration of the game system 1 of the present embodiment is the same as that of the first embodiment, a characteristic process in the present embodiment will be described. This embodiment is an example in which the form of an icon as a comment to be input is different from those of the third and fourth embodiments. In the third and fourth embodiments, the mode in which the emotional expression with respect to the score of the user is represented by the shape of the icon has been described. In the present embodiment, the mode in which the emotional expression is represented by the color of the icon will be described.

  FIG. 17 is a diagram illustrating a data example of the icon table TBL1327 according to the present embodiment. The icon table TBL1327 stores an icon ID, an icon, and a color in association with each other. In the illustrated example, the icon stores an icon image having the same shape (or a file name of the separately stored icon image). Here, the icon stores an icon image of a face shape representing a normal feeling similar to the icon M12 shown in FIG.

  The color indicates the display color of the icon. If the icon image also includes color information, the icon ID and the icon may be stored in the icon table TBL1327 in association with each other. Here, the icon M21 (the icon whose icon ID is M21) is a black icon. The icon M22 (the icon whose icon ID is M22) is a blue icon. The icon M23 (the icon whose icon ID is M23) is an orange icon. The icon M24 (the icon whose icon ID is M24) is a red icon. That is, in the order of the icons M21, M22, M23, and M24, the icon M21 indicates a disappointing feeling, and the icon M24 indicates a happy feeling.

  That is, the icons M21, M22, M23, and M24 respectively correspond to the icons M11, M12, M13, and M14 shown in FIG. The game controller 110 replaces the icons M11, M12, M13, and M14 shown in FIG. 14 with the icons M21, M22, M23, and M24 shown in FIG. Can be displayed.

  Thereby, the game device 10 according to the present embodiment displays, as a comment candidate, an icon of a color that the user wants to input according to the comparison result between the score played by the user and the score to be compared. Can be. For example, the game device 10 displays icons of each color of blue, orange, and red as candidates for a comment when the user's score exceeds his or her previous high score, and displays the previous high score. If the number of comments does not exceed, icons of black, blue, and orange can be displayed.

That is, the game device 10 can specify and display the range of the color of the icon corresponding to the emotional expression as a comment candidate.
FIG. 18 is an image diagram showing a color range of an icon to be displayed as a comment candidate. For example, when the user's score does not exceed his / her high score (for example, when the score A is equal to or less than the score B), the comment candidates are the icon M21 (black), the icon M22 (blue), and the icon M23. (Orange) (the range of colors indicated by the arrow H1). On the other hand, when the user's score exceeds his or her previous high score (for example, when the score A is larger than the score B), the comment candidates are the icon M22 (blue), the icon M23 (orange), and the icon M24 ( Orange) (the range of colors indicated by the arrow H2). As described above, the game device 10 can specify the color range of the icon to be displayed as a comment candidate (that is, the color conversion range) according to the comparison result between the user's score and the score to be compared. it can.

  In the present embodiment, an example has been described in which the color range of the icon is specified from among the four colors (for example, the color range indicated by the arrow H1 and the color range indicated by the arrow H2). The game device 10 may be able to further finely adjust the color change in each range. For example, the game device 10 provides a slider for changing the color of the icon in the comment candidate screen, and performs an operation of moving the slider (for example, a slide operation of moving a finger along the slider) by the user. The color of the icon may be finely adjusted.

[Summary of Fifth Embodiment]
As described above, in the game system 1 according to the present embodiment, since various icons of colors representing emotional expressions are set as comment candidates according to the game situation, the user can easily make an appropriate comment according to the game situation. Can be entered. For example, the user can easily select from among icons presented as comment candidates, a comment for inputting an icon of a color that matches his / her emotion. Further, the user can easily select an icon of a color that matches his / her emotion as a comment to be input by changing the color of the icon presented as a comment candidate within a specified range.

[Sixth Embodiment]
Next, a sixth embodiment of the present invention will be described. Since the configuration of the game system 1 of the present embodiment is the same as that of the first embodiment, a characteristic process in the present embodiment will be described. In the first to fifth embodiments, as an example of the game situation, an example in which only a score is compared to determine a comment candidate is described. In the present embodiment, an example will be described in which a candidate for a comment is determined based on a plurality of game situations of a user who has played a game and a plurality of game situations to be compared. Here, an example will be described in which a score and an achievement time of the score are used as examples of the game situation, and a comment candidate is determined based on a difference between the score comparison and the achievement time.

  FIG. 19 is a diagram illustrating a data example of the self-ranking comment candidate table TBL1328 according to the present embodiment. In the self-ranking comment candidate table TBL1328, the comparison method and comparison result of the first comparison (comparison 1), the comparison method and comparison result of the second comparison (comparison 2), and comment candidates are stored in association with each other. Have been. The comparison method and the comparison result of the first comparison (comparison 1) are the same as the comparison method and the comparison result by the magnitude comparison of the scores shown in FIG. 9 described in the first embodiment. The comparison method and the comparison result of the second comparison (comparison 2) are a comparison method based on the difference in the achievement time and the comparison result.

  The comparison result of the difference between the achievement times includes, for example, a case where the difference between the achievement times is large (large difference) and a case where the difference between the achievement times is small (small difference). For example, a case where the difference between the achievement times is large means a case where the difference between the achievement times (for example, the difference between the play date and time of the score A and the play date and time of the score B) is larger than a preset threshold value. On the other hand, a case where the difference between the achievement times is small means a case where the difference between the achievement times (for example, the difference between the play date and time of the score A and the play date and time of the score B) is equal to or less than a preset threshold value. Here, the game control unit 110 can specify the play date and time of each score based on the play data in the user information table TBL331. When the play date and time of each score is associated with the self ranking information table TBL3321 and the overall ranking information table TBL3322, the game control unit 110 determines the play date and time of each score based on the self ranking information or the overall ranking information. May be specified.

  In the illustrated example, only the case where the score A is larger than the score B is illustrated. If the score A is larger than the score B, that is, if the current score A exceeds its own high score, a comment candidate first includes, as in the example shown in FIG. And text T13. Further, comment candidates are further added according to the difference in the achievement time. When the difference between the achievement times is large, the text T16 is added to the comment candidates, and when the difference between the achievement times is small, the text T17 is added to the comment candidates. That is, when the score A is larger than the score B and the difference in the achievement time is large, the comment candidates are the text T11, the text T12, the text T13, and the text T16. The text T16 is text information of a comment candidate that the user wants to input when it takes time to update his / her high score (for example, “update self score after a long absence!”). On the other hand, when the score A is larger than the score B and the difference in the achievement time is small, the comment candidates are the text T11, the text T12, the text T13, and the text T17. The text T17 is text information of a comment candidate that the user wants to input when the updating of his / her high score does not take much time (for example, “update self-score in quick succession!”).

  In the present embodiment, the comment to be input may be an icon. Here, as an icon that is a candidate for a comment, for example, an icon stored in the icon table TBL1324 shown in FIG. 14 (or the icon table TBL1327 shown in FIG. 17) can be used.

  FIG. 20 is a diagram illustrating a data example of the self-ranking comment candidate table TBL1329 when an icon ID is stored as a comment candidate. In the illustrated example, only the case where the score A is larger than the score B is illustrated. When the score A is larger than the score B and the difference between the achievement times is large, the comment candidates are the icons M12, M13, and M14 (or the icons M22, M23, and M24). When the score A is larger than the score B and the difference in the achievement time is small, the comment candidates are the icons M11, M12, and M13 (or the icons M21, M22, and M23).

[Summary of Sixth Embodiment]
As described above, in the game system 1 according to the present embodiment, the comment candidate presenting unit 123 determines whether or not the user has played the game based on the plurality of game situations and the plurality of game situations to be compared. Presents a comment candidate for the game situation. For example, the comment candidate presenting unit 123 presents not only the magnitude relation of the score but also a suitable comment candidate according to the difference in the achievement time of the score. As described above, the game system 1 determines comment candidates based on not only one game situation but also a plurality of game situations, and thus can appropriately present a comment candidate that the user wants to input. For example, when the user updates his or her high score, the game system 1 may use a text indicating that the achievement took time as a candidate for a comment as the difference in the achievement time is larger, or may make the user feel more happy. , And an icon representing a more happy emotion can be used as a comment candidate.

[Modification]
As described above, the embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail with reference to the drawings. However, the specific configuration is not limited to the above-described embodiments, and includes a design and the like within a range not departing from the gist of the present invention. For example, the components described in the first to sixth embodiments can be arbitrarily combined.

  In the above embodiment, the example of the comment by the text and the example of the comment by the icon have been described. However, the comment may be a combination of the text and the icon, or may be an image (such as a stamp) or a sound. .

  In the above-described embodiment, an example in which a comment can be input on the ranking screen has been described. However, the comment may be input before the ranking screen is displayed. For example, before the ranking screen is displayed, a comparison result (for example, ranking) with the game situation of the comparison target and a comment candidate based on the comparison result are displayed, and after selecting a comment, the ranking screen is displayed. Is also good. Note that the comparison result (for example, ranking) may not be displayed before the ranking screen is displayed, and for example, only a comment candidate may be displayed.

  In the first to fifth embodiments, a case where the game situation is a score will be described as an example of presenting a comment candidate based on the game situation of the user who played the game and the game situation to be compared. However, it is not limited to this. For example, the game situation may be any of a score (score, points, etc.) in the game, a win or loss, a progress of the game (rank, level, etc.), an item (number of items, etc.) given in the game, Furthermore, a game situation (date, time, achievement time, etc.) related when a score or an item is acquired, when a win or loss is determined, or when the progress of the game (rank, level, etc.) is changed may be included. . The game device 10 may include a comment candidate table in which comment candidates corresponding to the various game situations described above are stored. For example, the game device 10 may change comment candidates according to the rank (or level) of the user to be compared. As an example, the game device 10 may change a comment candidate according to the difference between the rank (or level) of the user to be compared and the difference. Further, the game situation may include a tendency of the user in the game, and a comment candidate may be presented according to a result of comparing the tendency of the user. The user's tendency may be, for example, the user's channel selection tendency in a music game. For example, the game device 10 presents a candidate for a comment that indicates whether or not the preference of the user and the other user is close by comparing the tendency of the user's channel selection with the tendency of the other user's channel selection. You may.

  Further, in the sixth embodiment, as an example of presenting comment candidates based on a plurality of game situations, an example based on two game situations of a score and an achievement time has been described, but the present invention is not limited to this. . For example, a plurality of game situations include the above-described points (scores, points, etc.), wins / losses, progress of the game (ranks, levels, etc.), items (number of items, etc.) provided in the game, and related game situations (date and time). , Achievement time, etc.), and not only two, but also three or more combinations. When presenting comment candidates based on a plurality of game situations, the game device 10 may present all of the comment candidates corresponding to each of the plurality of game situations. Only the comment candidates may be presented. For example, when presenting a candidate for a comment based on a rank and winning or losing, the game apparatus 10 simply declares a candidate for a comment according to the rank when winning against another user with a large difference in rank. It may be presented in preference to comment candidates according to the outcome.

Further, the server control unit 310 of the center server 30 illustrated in FIG. 3 may include the function of the comparison target specifying unit 121 illustrated in FIG. 8 instead of the game control unit 110 of the game device 10. That is, the center server 30 may specify a game situation to be compared. In this case, when the center server 30 acquires the game situation (for example, a play result such as a score) of the user who has played the game from the game device 10, the center server 30 identifies the game situation to be compared, and the identified game to be compared. The situation is transmitted to the game device 10. In this case, the game device 10 presents a candidate for a comment on the user's game situation based on the game situation of the user who played the game and the game situation to be compared transmitted from the center server 30.
Also, the functions of the comment processing unit 120 and the comment candidate storage unit 132 shown in FIG. 8 are replaced with the game control unit 110 and the storage unit 13 of the game device 10, and the server control unit 310 of the center server 30 shown in FIG. And the server storage unit 130 may be provided. That is, the center server 30 may determine not only a game situation to be compared but also a comment candidate.

In the above embodiment, the configuration in which the game apparatus 10 includes the display unit 15 for displaying the game screen has been described, but the present invention is not limited to this. The game device 10 may display the game screen on an external display device connected by wire or wirelessly.
Further, the game device 10 may be configured not to include the communication unit 12. For example, the game device 10 need not communicate with the center server 30 when not comparing the game situation of the user who played the game with the game situation of another user. For example, the game apparatus 10 stores play data of a user who has played a game, compares the current game situation of the user with past game situations, and executes a comment process of presenting a comment candidate. Is also good.

  Further, in the above-described embodiment, a music game has been described as an example, but the type of the game is not limited to this, and can be applied to various games.

  In the above-described embodiment, an example is described in which the game apparatus 10 is a so-called arcade game installed in a game facility such as a game center or an amusement park. However, the present invention is not limited to this. For example, the game device 10 (10A) may be a PC (Personal Computer), a tablet PC, a mobile phone such as a smartphone or a feature phone, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a home-use game machine, or the like. Good. In this case, the configuration of each unit included in the game device 10 may be configured in a form corresponding to each device.

  Note that part or all of the game control unit 110 may be realized as an integrated circuit of hardware such as an LSI (Large Scale Integration) or an ASIC (Application Specific Integrated Circuit).

  In addition, a program for realizing the functions of the game device 10 described above is recorded on a computer-readable recording medium, and the program recorded on the recording medium is read into a computer system and executed, whereby the game device 10 is executed. May be performed. Here, "to make the computer system read and execute the program recorded on the recording medium" includes installing the program in the computer system. Here, the “computer system” includes an OS and hardware such as peripheral devices. Further, the “computer system” may include a plurality of computer devices connected via a network including a communication line such as the Internet, a WAN, a LAN, and a dedicated line. The “computer-readable recording medium” refers to a portable medium such as a flexible disk, a magneto-optical disk, a ROM, and a CD-ROM, and a storage device such as a hard disk built in a computer system. As described above, the recording medium storing the program may be a non-transitory recording medium such as a CD-ROM. The recording medium also includes an internal or external recording medium accessible from the distribution server for distributing the program. The code of the program stored in the recording medium of the distribution server may be different from the code of the program in a format executable by the terminal device. That is, any format can be stored in the distribution server as long as it can be downloaded from the distribution server and installed in a form executable by the terminal device. The program may be divided into a plurality of programs, downloaded at different timings, and then combined by the terminal device, or the distribution server that distributes each of the divided programs may be different. Further, the “computer-readable recording medium” holds a program for a certain period of time, such as a volatile memory (RAM) in a computer system serving as a server or a client when the program is transmitted via a network. Shall be included. Further, the program may be for realizing a part of the functions described above. Furthermore, what can implement | achieve the function mentioned above in combination with the program already recorded on the computer system, and what is called a difference file (difference program) may be sufficient.

[Appendix]
From the above description, the present invention is grasped, for example, as follows. In order to facilitate understanding of the present invention, reference numerals in the accompanying drawings are added in parentheses for convenience, but the present invention is not limited to the illustrated embodiments.

  (Supplementary Note 1) The game system (1) according to an aspect of the present invention includes a comparison target specifying unit (121, S110) that specifies a game situation to be compared, a game situation of a user who played the game, A comment candidate presenting unit (123, S114, S116, S1120, S1122, S1126, S1128) for presenting a candidate for a comment on the game situation of the user based on the game situation to be compared identified by the target identifying unit; , Is provided.

  According to the configuration of Supplementary Note 1, the game system can present a candidate for a comment that the user wants to input according to a comparison result of comparing the game situation played by the user with the game situation to be compared, The user can easily input an appropriate comment according to the game situation.

  (Supplementary Note 2) One embodiment of the present invention is the game system according to Supplementary Note 1, wherein the receiving unit (111, S130, S1130) receives an instruction to select any one of the comment candidates. And a comment determination unit (124, S132, S1132) for determining a comment selected by the instruction received by the reception unit from among the comment candidates as a comment on the game situation of the user.

  According to the configuration of Supplementary Note 2, the game system determines the comment selected from the comment candidates as the comment to be input by the user, so that the user can easily input an appropriate comment.

  (Supplementary Note 3) One embodiment of the present invention is the game system according to Supplementary Note 1 or 2, wherein the comparison target specifying unit is configured to select, from among past game situations of a user who has played the game, The game situation to be compared is specified.

  According to the configuration of Supplementary Note 3, the game system compares the score played by the user this time with the past score of the user, thereby inferring the emotion to the score of the user and calculating the comment that the user wants to input. Candidates can be presented.

  (Supplementary Note 4) One embodiment of the present invention is the game system according to Supplementary Note 1 or 2, wherein the comparison target specifying unit is configured to select, from among game situations of other users who have played the game, The game situation to be compared is specified.

  According to the configuration of Supplementary Note 4, the game system seems to want to input the user by comparing the score played by the user this time with the score of another user who played the game, inferring the emotion of the user's score. Candidates for comments can be presented.

  (Supplementary Note 5) One embodiment of the present invention is the game system according to any one of Supplementary Note 1 to Supplementary Note 4, wherein the game situation is determined by a score obtained by a user according to the play of the game ( For example, the score), and the comment candidate presentation unit presents a comment candidate for the user's score based on the score of the user who played the game and the score to be compared.

  According to the configuration of Supplementary Note 5, since the game system presents comment candidates according to the comparison result of comparing the user's score with the score to be compared, the user easily inputs an appropriate comment according to the score. be able to.

  (Supplementary Note 6) One embodiment of the present invention is the game system according to Supplementary Note 5, wherein the comment candidate presentation unit (123, S114, S116) compares the score of a user who played the game with the score of the user who played the game. A candidate for a comment on the score of the user is presented based on the magnitude relationship with the target score.

  According to the configuration of Supplementary Note 6, the game system presents comment candidates according to the magnitude relationship with respect to the score to be compared. Therefore, the game system provides an appropriate comment according to the priority of the score played this time with respect to the score to be compared. Can be presented.

  (Supplementary Note 7) One embodiment of the present invention is the game system according to Supplementary Note 5 or 6, wherein the comment candidate presentation unit (123, S1120, S1122, S1126, S1128) plays the game. A comment candidate for the user's score is presented based on the magnitude relationship and difference between the user's score and the score to be compared.

  According to the configuration of Supplementary Note 7, the game system presents not only the magnitude relation of the score but also the comment candidate corresponding to the difference between the scores, and accordingly appropriately presents the comment candidate that the user wants to input. can do.

  (Supplementary Note 8) One embodiment of the present invention is the game system according to any one of Supplementary Notes 1 to 7, wherein the comment candidate presenting unit includes a plurality of game situations of a user who played the game. And presenting a candidate for a comment on the game situation of the user based on the plurality of game situations to be compared.

  According to the configuration of Supplementary Note 8, the game system determines comment candidates based on not only one game situation but also a plurality of game situations. Therefore, it is possible to appropriately present comment candidates that the user wants to input. it can.

  (Supplementary Note 9) The game device (10) according to an aspect of the present invention includes a comparison target specifying unit (121, S110) that specifies a game status to be compared, a game status of a user who played the game, A comment candidate presenting unit (123, S114, S116, S1120, S1122, S1126, S1128) for presenting a candidate for a comment on the game situation of the user based on the game situation to be compared identified by the comparison subject identifying unit. ).

  According to the configuration of Supplementary Note 9, the game device can present a comment candidate that the user wants to input according to a comparison result obtained by comparing the game situation played by the user with the game situation to be compared, The user can easily input an appropriate comment according to the game situation.

  (Supplementary Note 10) In a game control method according to an aspect of the present invention, a comparison target specifying step of specifying a game situation to be compared, a game situation of a user who played the game, and the comparison target specifying step are specified. A comment candidate presenting step of presenting a candidate for a comment on the game situation of the user based on the game situation to be compared.

  (Supplementary Note 11) The program according to an aspect of the present invention includes a comparison target specifying step of specifying a game situation to be compared, a game situation of a user who played a game, and the comparison specified by the comparison target specifying step. A comment candidate presenting step of presenting comment candidates for the user's game situation based on the target game situation.

  1 game system, 10 game devices, 11 CPU, 12 communication unit, 13 storage unit, 14 input unit, 15 display unit, 16 sound output unit, 30 center server, 32 server communication unit, 33 server storage unit, 110 game control unit , 111 input receiving unit, 112 play control unit, 113 display control unit, 114 ranking processing unit, 115 ranking information requesting unit, 116 ranking information obtaining unit, 117 ranking information presenting unit, 120 comment processing unit, 121 comparison target specifying unit, 122 comparison processing unit, 123 comment candidate presentation unit, 124 comment determination unit, 131 ranking information storage unit, 132 comment candidate storage unit, 310 server control unit, 311 user information acquisition unit, 312 ranking information processing unit

Claims (10)

A comparison target identifying section that identifies a game situation to be compared to the user game status of the pre-specified rank among the ranking ranks game situation of each of a plurality of users who have played the Gate arm,
A comment on the game situation of the first user based on a game situation of a first user who has played the game among the plurality of users and the game situation to be compared as specified by the comparison target specifying unit. A comment candidate presenting section for presenting candidates for
A game system comprising: The first user as the game situation to be compared in the game situation of a game played in the first time, a plurality of game when said first user himself played the game in the past than the first time point a comparison target identifying section which identify the game situation of some pre specific time of the situation,
And the game status of the first user who played the game in the first time, the comparison target identifying section is based on the game situation of the comparison target identified, the first in the first time point A comment candidate presentation unit that presents comment candidates for the game situation of the user,
A game system comprising: As a game situation to be compared with the game situation of the game played by the first user , the game situation is specified in advance as a rival user among other users except the first user among a plurality of users who played the game . A comparison target specifying unit that specifies a game situation of the game played by some users;
And the game status of the first user who played the game, based on the game situation of the comparison of the comparison target identifying section identified, displaying a list of comments on the game status of the first user Comment candidate presentation section,
A game system comprising: A receiving unit that receives an instruction to select any one of the comment candidates,
A comment determination unit that determines a comment selected by the instruction received by the reception unit from among the comment candidates as a comment on the game situation of the first user;
The game system according to any one of claims 1 to 3, further comprising: The game situation is a score obtained by the user according to the play of the game,
The comment candidate presentation unit,
Based on the score of the first user who played the game and the score to be compared, presenting a comment candidate for the score of the first user,
The game system according to any one of claims 1 to 4. The comment candidate presentation unit,
Presenting a candidate comment for the score of the first user based on a magnitude relationship between the score of the first user who played the game and the score to be compared;
The game system according to claim 5. The comment candidate presentation unit,
Presenting a comment candidate for the score of the first user based on a score and a difference between the score of the first user who played the game and the score to be compared,
The game system according to claim 5. The comment candidate presentation unit,
Based on the plurality of game situations of the first user who played the game and the plurality of game situations to be compared, presenting candidates for comments on the plurality of game situations of the first user,
The game system according to any one of claims 1 to 7. As a game situation to be compared with the game situation of the game played by the first user , the game situation is specified in advance as a rival user among other users except the first user among a plurality of users who played the game . A comparison target specifying unit that specifies a game situation of the game played by some users;
And the game status of the first user who played the game, based on the game situation of the comparison of the comparison target identifying section identified, displaying a list of comments on the game status of the first user Comment candidate presentation section,
A game device comprising: On the computer,
As a game situation to be compared with the game situation of the game played by the first user , the game situation is specified in advance as a rival user among other users except the first user among a plurality of users who played the game . A comparison target specifying step of specifying a game situation of the game played by some users;
Presenting a game status of the first user who played the game, based on the game situation of the comparison that is specified by the comparison object identification step, a candidate of the comments on the game status of the first user A comment candidate presentation step to be performed;
A program for executing

Images