「scope of action」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方 - Weblio英語例文検索

By allowing for GHG accounting of direct and indirect emissions by multiple companies in a value chain, scope 1, scope 2, and scope 3 accounting facilitates the simultaneous action of multiple entities to reduce emissions throughout society. 例文帳に追加

購入した製品の製造、購入した製品の輸送、販売した製品の使用バリューチェーン内の様々な事業者による直接／間接排出量のＧＨＧ算定を行うことによって、スコープ1、スコープ2 およびスコープ3 の算定が社会全体を通して排出量を削減する様々な事業者の同時進行の行動を促進する。 - 経済産業省

To provide a server which expands the scope of action of a player who plays a game exclusively in a specific parlor and encourages the player to actively visit other parlors the player has never visited before.例文帳に追加

特定の遊技店ばかりで遊技を行う遊技者等の行動範囲を広げ、行ったことのない遊技店へも積極的に足を運ぶように促すことが可能なサーバを提供すること。 - 特許庁

These menus put a limit on the menus including presence or absence of allergy of the user, liking for food decided by access log analysis in the past, and possibility that the user can buy at a store within a scope of his or her action to customize and introduce them.例文帳に追加

更にこれらのメニューは、ユーザのアレルギーの有無、及び過去のアクセスログ分析から決定される食の好み、及びユーザの行動範囲内にある店舗で購入可能であるメニューを絞り込んでカスタマイズして紹介する。 - 特許庁

In the NCPI, the measures of foreign countries within the scope of petitions were defined as “illicit commercial practices.” The TBR introduced the concept of “trade barriers” in its place. They are defined as “trade practices adopted or maintained by a third country in respect of which international trade rules establish a right of action.”例文帳に追加

申立の対象となる域外国の措置は、NCPI では「違法な商業慣行（illicit commercial practices）」とされていたが、TBR は「貿易に対する障害（obstacles to trade）」の概念を導入、「域外国が採用・維持している貿易慣行で、通商ルールがそれについて訴権を設定しているもの」と定義した。 - 経済産業省

(vi) Administrative Guidance: guidance, recommendations, advice, or other acts by which an Administrative Organ may seek, within the scope of its duties or affairs under its jurisdiction, certain action or inaction on the part of specified persons in order to realize administrative aims, where such acts are not Dispositions. 例文帳に追加

六　行政指導　行政機関がその任務又は所掌事務の範囲内において一定の行政目的を実現するため特定の者に一定の作為又は不作為を求める指導、勧告、助言その他の行為であって処分に該当しないものをいう。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Found out is the structure and control of a wheel for a barrier-free moving device for extending the scope of action of elderly people and lower limb handicapped people reducing the chances of walking out worrying slipping and falling on a hardened snow road and frozen road in winter and liable to fall gloomy, and assisting wheelchair users in positively joining society.例文帳に追加

冬期の圧雪路、凍結路における滑り転倒を恐れて出歩く機会を少なくして憂鬱に陥り易い高齢者や下肢障害者の行動範囲を広げ、車いす利用者の積極的な社会参加を支援する為のバリアフリーな移動装置用車輪の構造と制御を見出した。 - 特許庁

The mannose composition suppressing the absorption of mannose into intestinal canals, which has the mannose and a mannose intestinal canal absorption suppressing sugar to mannos as essential ingredient, and which is characterized in that the weight ratio of intestineal canal absorption suppressing sugar to the mannose is within a scope in which the occurrence of harmful germ infection suppressing action is maintained, is provided.例文帳に追加

マンノースとマンノースの腸管吸収抑制糖とを必須成分とし、腸管吸収抑制糖のマンノースに対する重量比がマンノースによる有害菌感染抑制作用の発現が保持される範囲内のものであることを特徴とするマンノースの腸管吸収が抑制されたマンノース組成物。 - 特許庁

(2) In cases where an attorney at law or registered foreign lawyer given an order in violation of the provisions set forth in the preceding paragraph participates in the practice of legal services beyond the scope of competence of the registered foreign lawyer who is his/her employer, he/she shall not be exempt from disciplinary action or other liability on the grounds that he/she has followed the order based on employment relations. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定に違反してされた命令を受けて、使用者である外国法事務弁護士が権限外法律事務を行うことに関与した弁護士又は外国法事務弁護士は、これが雇用関係に基づく業務上の命令に従つたものであることを理由として、懲戒その他の責任を免れることができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(8) With regard to the organizational meeting, the provisions of Article 11 shall apply mutatis mutandis; and with regard to an action for declaratory judgment on the nonexistence or invalidity of or an action for rescission of a resolution of the organizational meeting, Article 830, Article 831, Article 834 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (xvi) and item (xvii)), Article 835, paragraph (1), Article 836, paragraph (1) and paragraph (3), Article 837, Article 838, and Article 846 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Invalidity of or Action for Rescission of a Resolution of a Shareholders Meeting) (excluding the portions pertaining to company auditors in the case of a cooperative prescribed in Article 36-3, paragraph (4) of this Act whose articles of association provide that the scope of audits conducted by auditors shall be limited to those concerning accounting [hereinafter referred to as "cooperative limiting the audit authority"]) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis. 例文帳に追加

８　創立総会については、第十一条の規定を、創立総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについては、会社法第八百三十条、第八百三十一条、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十五条第一項、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項、第八百三十七条、第八百三十八条並びに第八百四十六条（株主総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴え）の規定（第三十六条の三第四項に規定する組合であつて、その監事の監査の範囲を会計に関するものに限定する旨を定款で定めた組合（以下「監査権限限定組合」という。）にあつては、監査役に係る部分を除く。）を準用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Like Section 301 of the US Trade Act, the TBR is intended to promote the opening of foreign markets, but differs in some aspects. First, its scope is limited to trade practices for which international trade rules establish a right of action. Second, there is no rigid time frame between the initiation of an investigation and a determination, and the EU is bound by the findings of the dispute settlement procedures. The EU regime seems more consistent with the DSU. We can hardly say that this regime itself constitutes a “unilateral measure” prohibited by the DSU. Because the philosophy of this scheme is somewhat similar to our “rule-based criteria,” it has some positive aspects. Nevertheless, since its scope is not limited to violations of the WTO Agreements, and the organizations to which dispute cases are referred are not limited to the WTO, it could violate the WTO Agreements if improperly applied. We believe that its practical application in the future needs to be monitored.例文帳に追加

TBR は、外国市場開放の促進を意図している点で米国通商法301条と共通するものの、WTO協定をはじめとする国際通商ルールに基づき申立を行うことが出来るような相手国の貿易政策・措置を対象としており、また調査開始から措置決定までの期間が特定されない点、さらに上記のように国際的な紛争解決手続の結果に拘束されるなど、よりWTO整合的となっており、DSU で禁止されている「一方的措置」に直接該当するとは言い難く、「ルール志向」という本報告書の精神にも合致する点は、むしろ積極的に評価すべきであるとも言える。 - 経済産業省

In addition, in terms of anti-counterfeit drug measures, product recalls and other distribution management rationalization measures, surveys of voluntary label items shall also be conducted to check their bar-coding status, application and other actions taken. Pharmaceutical companies shall be encouraged to take early action to implement this voluntary labelling on a per retail package basis and subsequent expansion of the scope of labelling shall be discussed. (Fiscal 2008 ~ )例文帳に追加

また、任意表示とされた項目についても、偽造医薬品対策や製品の迅速かつ確実な回収など流通管理の効率化の観点から、当該表示項目のバーコード表示の表示状況及び利用その他取組状況を確認把握するために併せて調査を行い、各製薬企業に対し販売包装単位での早期の取組を促すとともに、その後の表示範囲の拡大について検討する。（2008 年度～） - 厚生労働省

Morocco should continue to work on implementing its action plan to address these deficiencies, including by: (1) amending the penal code to extend the scope of the ML and FT offences (Recommendation 1 and Special Recommendation II); (2) amending relevant laws or regulations to address deficiencies in customer due diligence requirements (Recommendation 5); and (3) ensuring a fully operational and effectively functioning Financial Intelligence Unit (Recommendation 26). 例文帳に追加

同国は、①資金洗浄及びテロ資金供与罪の範囲を拡大するための刑法改正（勧告１及び特別勧告Ⅱ）、②顧客管理義務の欠陥に対応するための関連法又は規則の改正（勧告５）、③完全にかつ効果的に機能する金融情報機関の確保（勧告２６）を含む、資金洗浄・テロ資金供与対策上の欠陥に対応するためのアクションプランの実施への取り組みを継続すべきである。 - 財務省

“Non-violation,” which has been the subject of dispute settlement under GATT, refers to an action by a Member which, while not violating the TRIPS Agreement per se, infringes on the interest of other Members. The Doha Ministerial Declaration of 2001 called for the continued examination of this issue with a view to defining the scope and form of non-violation by the Fifth WTO Ministerial Conference. Although the General Council, in July 2004, decided to continue deliberations until the Sixth Ministerial Conference, work was not completed by the end of this period. It was decided in the Hong Kong Ministerial Conference of December 2005 that postponement of application would be extended to the Seventh WTO Ministerial Conference.例文帳に追加

協定上の義務には違反しないものの、他の加盟国の措置の結果として自国の利益が侵害されるため、GATT において紛争解決手段の対象とされているノン・バイオレーションについては、その範囲と形式についての検討作業を、2001年のドーハ閣僚宣言ではWTO第５回閣僚会議まで、2004年７月の一般理事会では第６回閣僚会議まで継続することとされたが、期限までに作業の終了には至らず、2005年12月の香港閣僚会議にて、適用猶予期限を次回のWTO第７回閣僚会議まで延長することが決定された。 - 経済産業省

(4) Any person who finds that an invention protected by a patent does not comply with the provisions of § 8 of this Act, may file an action in court against the proprietor of the patent for the revocation of the patent in part or in full. The proprietor of the patent may restrict the scope of patent protection in the course of proceedings in respect of the action if this will result in the invention complying with the provisions of § 8. A request for the making of a register entry together with a copy of the court judgment and, in the prescribed cases, information certifying payment of the state fee shall be filed with the Patent Office within one month after entry into force of the court judgment. Upon making amendments to the patent, the proprietor of the patent must file the description of the invention and patent claims amended pursuant to the court judgment with the Patent Office and pay the state fee for the making of amendments within three months from the date of the court judgment which has entered into force. (10.03.2004 entered into force 01.05.2004 - RT I 2004, 20, 141) 例文帳に追加

(4) 特許により保護されている発明が第8条の規定に合致していないと考える者は，特許所有者を相手として，特許の一部又は全部を取り消すための訴訟を提起することができる。特許所有者は，特許保護の範囲を減縮すれば発明が第8条の規定に合致するようになるときは，訴えに係る手続の過程で，その減縮をすることができる。登録簿への登録の請求書を，判決文の謄本及び，所定の事情においては，国の手数料の納付を証明する情報を添付して，判決が効力を生じてから1月以内に特許庁に提出しなければならない。特許の補正をするときは，特許所有者は，判決が効力を生じてから3月以内に，判決に従って補正した発明の説明及び特許クレームを特許庁に提出し，かつ，補正をするための国の手数料を納付しなければならない。(2004年3月10日。2004年5月1日施行－RT I 2004, 20, 141) - 特許庁

Article 242 (1) When a disposition ordering the business and property management by an Insurance Administrator has been issued under the provision of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article (hereinafter referred to as "Disposition Ordering Management" in this Subsection and Article 258, paragraph (2)), the right to represent an Insurance Company, etc., or Foreign Insurance Company, etc., that has received that disposition (hereinafter referred to as a "Company Being Managed"), execute its business, and manage and dispose of its property (in the case of the right to represent a Foreign Insurance Company, etc., limited to the scope pertaining to Insurance Business in Japan) shall be vested exclusively in an Insurance Administrator. The same shall apply to the rights of the directors and executive officers under the provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) and Article 828, paragraph (2) (Action for the Nullity of Acts Concerning Company Organization) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 30-15; Article 57, paragraph (6); Article 60-2, paragraph (5); and Article 171) and Article 831, paragraph (1) (Action to Rescind a Resolution of the Shareholders Meeting, etc.) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 41, paragraph (2) and Article 49, paragraph (2)) and the provisions of Article 84-2, paragraph (2) and Article 96-16, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act. 例文帳に追加

第二百四十二条　前条第一項の規定による保険管理人による業務及び財産の管理を命ずる処分（以下この款及び第二百五十八条第二項において「管理を命ずる処分」という。）があったときは、当該処分を受けた保険会社等又は外国保険会社等（以下「被管理会社」という。）を代表し、業務の執行並びに財産の管理及び処分を行う権利（外国保険会社等を代表する権利にあっては、日本における保険業に係る範囲に限る。）は、保険管理人に専属する。会社法第八百二十八条第一項及び第二項（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）（第三十条の十五、第五十七条第六項、第六十条の二第五項及び第百七十一条において準用する場合を含む。）並びに第八百三十一条第一項（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）（第四十一条第二項及び第四十九条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定並びに第八十四条の二第二項及び第九十六条の十六第二項の規定による取締役及び執行役の権利についても、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Articles 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the general meeting of members of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　会社法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、相互会社の社員総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人（保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項（同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Lawsuit for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the General Meeting of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, executive officer or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　会社法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、相互会社の総代会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人（保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項（同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The provisions of Article 67, paragraph (1) (Determination to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding the items in paragraph (2) and paragraphs (5) to (7) inclusive) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), Article 81, paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive (Minutes) and Article 316, paragraph (1) (Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the policyholders meeting; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of the policyholders meeting. In this case, the terms "incorporators", "shareholders at incorporation" and "Stock Company" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "converting Stock Company," "policyholders" and "Mutual Company," respectively; the term "in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "head office" in Article 74, paragraph (6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "shareholders" in Article 74, paragraph (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; and the terms "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including, where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, a person assuming the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), or, where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "policyholders, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, Policyholders, directors, executive officers or liquidators" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

３　会社法第六十七条第一項（創立総会の招集の決定）、第六十八条（第二項各号及び第五項から第七項までを除く。）（創立総会の招集の通知）、第七十条、第七十一条（創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等）、第七十四条から第七十六条まで（議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第七十八条から第八十条まで（発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議）、第八十一条第一項から第三項まで（議事録）及び第三百十六条第一項（株主総会に提出された資料等の調査）の規定は保険契約者総会について、同法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は保険契約者総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「発起人」とあるのは「組織変更をする株式会社」と、「設立時株主」とあるのは「保険契約者」と、「株式会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、同法第六十八条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第七十四条第六項中「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「保険契約者、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、保険契約者、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) The provisions of Article 67 (Determinations to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding items in paragraph (2)) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and Article 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 73, paragraph (4) (Resolutions of Organizational Meetings), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Means), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), and Article 81 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Organizational Meeting of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of a Mutual Company's Organizational Meeting, respectively. In this case, the terms "Shareholders at Incorporation" in those provisions (excluding Article 67, paragraph (2) and Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act), and "Shareholders at Incorporation (excluding Shareholders at Incorporation who may not exercise votes on all matters which may be resolved at Organizational Meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 71 inclusive.)" in Article 67, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "prospective members;" the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company to be incorporated is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company to be incorporated is a Stock Company other than a Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 68, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks;" the term "shall be in writing in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall be in writing;" the term "Article 27, item (v), or Article 59, paragraph (3), item (i)" in Article 68, paragraph (5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-7, paragraph (2), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act;" the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the shareholder meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is an Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in Article 831, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, auditors or liquidators (or, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees), or prospective members, directors at incorporation (referring to the directors at incorporation set forth in Article 30-10, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or company auditors at incorporation (referring to the company auditors at incorporation set forth in paragraph (1) of that Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) of a Mutual Company;" and the term" directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)) where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, and including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in the same paragraph of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors, liquidators, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation;", and any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

６　会社法第六十七条（創立総会の招集の決定）、第六十八条（第二項各号を除く。）（創立総会の招集の通知）、第七十条、第七十一条（創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等）、第七十三条第四項（創立総会の決議）、第七十四条から第七十六条まで（議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第七十八条から第八十条まで（発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議）及び第八十一条（第四項を除く。）（議事録）の規定は相互会社の創立総会について、同法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の創立総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定（同法第六十七条第二項及び第八百三十一条第一項を除く。）中「設立時株主」とあり、及び同法第六十七条第二項中「設立時株主（創立総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない設立時株主を除く。次条から第七十一条までにおいて同じ。）」とあるのは「社員になろうとする者」と、同法第六十八条第一項中「二週間（前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、設立しようとする株式会社が公開会社でない場合にあっては、一週間（当該設立しようとする株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間））」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同条第五項中「第二十七条第五号又は第五十九条第三項第一号」とあるのは「保険業法第三十条の七第二項第一号」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）又は社員になろうとする者、設立時取締役（保険業法第三十条の十第一項に規定する設立時取締役をいう。以下この項において同じ。）若しくは設立時監査役（同条第一項に規定する設立時監査役をいう。以下この項において同じ。）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役、清算人、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム