「commission on」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(16ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

(3) The provisions of Article 401, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-25, paragraph (2), and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases), Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cases where a Mutual Company has no executive officer or any vacancy in the number of executive officers prescribed by the articles of incorporation. In this case, any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

３　第五十三条の二十五第二項において準用する会社法第四百一条第二項から第四項までの規定並びに同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）、第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）及び第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、執行役が欠けた場合又は定款で定めた執行役の員数が欠けた場合について準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The General Partner shall be entitled to receive a commission, fee or other consideration (the “Deductible Fees”) from a Portfolio Company in connection with a Portfolio Investment, or the management or technical guidance or advice or other management support provided by the General Partner to a Portfolio Company. If the General Partner has received Deductible Fees, the management fee to be payable on the next payment date therefor shall be reduced by an amount equal to [__]% of such Deductible Fees (the “Management Fee Deduction”). [[If an Excuse/Exclusion clause is not included]Each Partner shall be relieved of its liability for the management fee payable on the payment date by its share of the Management Fee Deduction in proportion to its Interest Amount/[If an Excuse/Exclusion clause is included]Each Partner who made a contribution to a Portfolio Investment for such Portfolio Company shall be relieved of its liability for the management fee payable on the payment date by its share of the Management Fee Deduction in proportion to its Percentage Interest in respect of such Portfolio Investment]. If the total amount of the Management Fee payable on the payment date thereof is less than the Management Fee Deduction, the deduction shall be made from a management fee payable on each of the next and subsequent payment dates until the Management Fee Deduction is applied in full. 例文帳に追加

4. 無限責任組合員は、ポートフォリオ投資、又は無限責任組合員による経営若しくは技術の指導若しくは助言その他の経営支援に関連して、投資先事業者等から手数料又は報酬その他の対価（以下「控除対象手数料等」という。）を受領することができる。無限責任組合員が控除対象手数料等を受領したときは、当該控除対象手数料等の［ ］%に相当する額（以下「管理報酬控除額」という。）を、直後の管理報酬の支払日に支払われるべき管理報酬から減額するものとし、［【免除/除外条項を設けない場合】各組合員は、管理報酬控除額のうち、その持分金額/【免除/除外条項を設ける場合】当該投資先事業者等へのポートフォリオ投資に出資した各組合員は、管理報酬控除額のうち、当該ポートフォリオ投資に係る対象持分割合］に応じて按分した金額につき、当該支払日に支払われるべき管理報酬の負担を免れるものとする。なお、当該管理報酬の支払日において支払われるべき管理報酬の総額が管理報酬控除額を下回る場合には、管理報酬控除額の全額が控除されるまで、次回以降の各支払日において支払われるべき管理報酬より順次控除するものとする。 - 経済産業省

(2) In the cases set forth in the preceding paragraph, with regard to the amount of liability reserve for commodity trading to be accrued within three business years from the business year in which the license set forth in Article 190 of the Act (excluding a renewed license) was obtained, the phrase "the amount obtained by multiplying the transaction amounts of the transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (i) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (e)) in each business year by the Problematic Conduct Rate -- which means the proportion of the total sum of the payments made as a result of any Problematic Conduct [which means the Problematic Conduct prescribed in Article 112] in each business year starting within three years prior to the commencement of the relevant business year [excluding payments pertaining to transactions in cases where a Futures Commission Merchant receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market (excluding Commodity Clearing Transactions; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) from a Person with Specialized Knowledge and Experience (which means a person specified in Article 107; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) or receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market by using an Electronic Data Processing System (which means an Electronic Data Processing System connecting a computer used by the Futures Commodity Merchant and a computer [including the input/output devices] used by the customer through a telecommunications line; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) without carrying out solicitation]; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) to the total sum of the transaction amounts of the transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), items (i) to (iii) of the Act and the amount of the consideration for the transactions prescribed in item (iv) of the same paragraph (excluding the transaction amounts and the amount of the consideration for transactions in cases of transactions based on a person's own account and in cases where a Futures Commission Merchant receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market from a Person With Specialized Knowledge and Experience or receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market by using an Electronic Data Processing System without carrying out solicitation -- or the amount equivalent to 0.0001 percent of the transaction amounts, whichever amount is greater" in item (i) of the preceding paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount equivalent to 0.003 percent of the transaction amounts of the transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (i) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (e)) in each business year," the phrase "such larger amount" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "such equivalent amount," the phrase "double the Problematic Conduct Rate, or by 0.0002 percent, whichever rate is higher" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "0.006 percent," the phrase "an amount obtained by multiplying -- an amount calculated by dividing the amount that has been obtained by deducting the amount of liability reserve for commodity trading and the amounts listed in (b) to (h) from ten million yen by double the Problematic Conduct Rate, or by 0.0002 percent, whichever rate is higher (or, if said calculated amount exceeds the transaction amount in the relevant business year, such amount shall be the transaction amount in the relevant business year; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) -- by the Problematic Conduct Rate or an amount equivalent to 0.0001 percent of said calculated amount, whichever amount is greater" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "an amount equivalent to 0.003 percent of the amount calculated by dividing the amount that has been obtained by deducting the amount of liability reserve for commodity trading and the amounts listed in (b) to (h) from ten million yen by double the Problematic Conduct Rate, or by 0.0002 percent, whichever rate is higher (or, if said calculated amount exceeds the transaction amount in the relevant business year, such amount shall be the transaction amount in the relevant business year; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item)," the phrase "the amount obtained by multiplying the transaction amount of transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (iii) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (g)) in each business year by the Problematic Conduct Rate, or the amount equivalent to 0.0001 percent of said transaction amount, whichever amount is greater" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount equivalent to 0.003 percent of the transaction amount of transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (iii) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (g)) in each business year," and the phrase "the amount obtained by multiplying the total sum of the consideration for transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (iv) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (h)) in each business year by the Problematic Conduct Rate, or the amount equivalent to 0.001 percent of said total sum of the consideration, whichever amount is greater" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount equivalent to 0.03 percent of the total sum of the consideration for transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (iv) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (h)) in each business year." 例文帳に追加

２　前項の場合において、法第百九十条の許可（更新に係る許可を除く。）を受けた事業年度から三事業年度以内に積み立てられるべき商品取引責任準備金の金額は、同項第一号中「に事故率（当該事業年度開始日前三年以内に開始した各事業年度における事故（第百十二条に規定する事故をいう。）による支払額（商品取引員が、専門知識及び経験を有する者（第百七条で定める者をいう。以下この条において同じ。）から商品市場における取引等（商品清算取引を除く。以下この条において同じ。）の委託を受ける場合並びに電子情報処理組織（商品取引員の使用に係る電子計算機と、顧客の使用に係る電子計算機（入出力装置を含む。）とを電気通信回線で接続した電子情報処理組織をいう。以下この条において同じ。）を使用して勧誘を伴わずに商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合の取引に係る支払額を除く。）の合計額の、法第二条第八項第一号から第三号に規定する取引の取引金額と同項第四号に規定する取引の対価の額の合計額（自己の計算による取引並びに商品取引員が、専門知識及び経験を有する者から商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合並びに電子情報処理組織を使用して勧誘を伴わずに商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合の取引金額及び取引の対価の額を除く。）に占める割合をいう。以下この条において同じ。）を乗じた金額と取引金額の百万分の一に相当する金額とのいずれか大きい金額」とあるのは「の十万分の三に相当する金額」と、「当該いずれか大きい金額」とあるのは「当該相当する金額」と、「事故率に二を乗じて得た率と百万分の二とのいずれか大きい率」とあるのは「十万分の六」と、「に事故率を乗じた金額と当該除して計算した金額の百万分の一に相当する金額とのいずれか大きい金額」とあるのは「の十万分の三に相当する金額」と、「に事故率を乗じた金額と当該取引金額の百万分の一に相当する金額とのいずれか大きい金額」とあるのは「の十万分の三に相当する金額」と、「に事故率を乗じた金額と当該対価の額の合計額の十万分の一に相当する金額とのいずれか大きい金額」とあるのは、「の万分の三に相当する金額」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the Fair Trade Commission shall, if a hearing request regarding the payment order has been made (excluding the cases where the said hearing request is dismissed pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 1 of Article 66; the same shall apply in the following paragraph), promptly demand, after a decision on the said hearing request has been made, payment of the surcharge pertaining to the said payment order and if there is an arrearage charge pursuant to the provisions of the next paragraph, the arrearage charge, by serving a written demand designating a deadline therefor, excluding the cases where the said payment order is rescinded in its entirety pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 3 of Article 66; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where the said surcharge and arrearage charge are paid in their entirety by the date when a transcript of the written decision in regard to the hearing request regarding the said payment order was served. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定にかかわらず、納付命令について審判請求がされたとき（第六十六条第一項の規定により当該審判請求が却下された場合を除く。次項において同じ。）は、公正取引委員会は、当該審判請求に対する審決をした後、同条第三項の規定により当該納付命令の全部を取り消す場合を除き、速やかに督促状により期限を指定して当該納付命令に係る課徴金及び次項の規定による延滞金があるときはその延滞金の納付を督促しなければならない。ただし、当該納付命令についての審判請求に対する審決書の謄本が送達された日までに当該課徴金及び延滞金の全部が納付されたときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

ii) A juridical person in which a Recognized Futures Commission Merchant has a Controlling Interest (which means a relationship of holding voting rights that exceed fifty percent of the voting rights of All Shareholders, etc. of the other juridical person [including the voting rights of the shares or equity interest which cannot be asserted against the issuer pursuant to the provisions of Article 147, paragraph (1) or Article 148, paragraph (1) of the Act on Transfer of Bonds, Shares, etc. (including the cases where these provisions are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 228, paragraph (1), Article 235, paragraph (1), Article 239, paragraph (1) and Article 276 [limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)] of the same Act)], or a relationship specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry as that can substantially control business activities of said juridical person; the same shall apply in the following item 例文帳に追加

二　認定商品取引員が支配関係（他の法人の総株主等の議決権の百分の五十を超える議決権（社債、株式等の振替に関する法律第百四十七条第一項又は第百四十八条第一項（これらの規定を同法第二百二十八条第一項、第二百三十五条第一項、第二百三十九条第一項及び第二百七十六条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により発行者に対抗することができない株式又は持分に係る議決権を含む。）を保有している関係その他その法人の事業活動を実質的に支配することが可能なものとして主務省令で定める関係をいう。次号において同じ。）を有する法人 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 401, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive (Removal of Committee Members), Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases), Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the committee members of a company with Committees. In this case, the term "paragraph (1) of the preceding Article" in Article 401, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53-24, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　会社法第四百一条第二項から第四項まで（委員の解職等）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）、第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）及び第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、委員会設置会社の委員について準用する。この場合において、同法第四百一条第二項中「前条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の二十四第一項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The applicant shall have all the rights of a patentee under Sec. 76, of the IP CODE against any person who, without his authorization, exercised any of the rights conferred under Section 71 of said law in relation to the invention claimed in the published application, as if a patent has been granted for that invention: Provided, That the said person had: (a) Actual knowledge that the invention that he was using was the subject matter of a published application; or (b) Received written notice that the invention that he was using was the subject matter of a published application being identified in the said notice by its serial number: Provided, That the action may not be filed until after the grant of a patent on the published application and within four years from the commission of the acts complained of (Sec. 46, IP CODE).例文帳に追加

出願人は，公開された出願においてクレームしている発明について，IP法第71条に基づいて付与される権利の何れかを出願人の許可を得ないで行使した者に対しては，その発明について特許が付与されている場合と同様に，同法第76条に基づく特許権者の権利のすべてを有するものとする。ただし，その者が次の何れかに該当することを条件とする。 (a)その者が，自己が実施していた発明が公開された出願の主題であることを実際に知っていたこと (b)その者が，自己が実施していた発明が出願番号により特定される公開された出願の主題である旨の通知書を受領していたこと。ただし，訴訟は，公開された出願に特許が付与されるまで，かつ，訴の対象である行為がなされてから4年以内は提起することができない。(IP法第46条) - 特許庁

The items contained in the FSF's report for which a timetable or things like that has been set concern a diverse range of areas. As you mentioned in your question, there are themes that must be tackled by international organizations such as the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and IOSCO (International Organization of Securities Commission), within the framework of international cooperation and discussion. Also, there are items concerning which the supervisory authorities of individual countries should take action against the financial institutions they supervise or urge them to take action. 例文帳に追加

今回のＦＳＦの報告に盛り込まれ、かつ、今般のＧ７である程度工程表と申しましょうか、日程・スケジュールの感覚を含めた整理がなされた項目というのは、ある意味で非常に多岐にわたっておりまして、ご質問の中でございましたように、バーゼル銀行監督委員会であるとかＩＯＳＣＯであるといった国際機関においてまずは国際協調・議論の中で取り組んでいくというテーマもございますし、各国の監督当局が監督対象となっている金融機関に対応していく、求めていくという項目も含まれているということかと思います。ということで、各国監督当局としてやるべきことについては、今般のＦＳＦの報告を我が国国内用に翻訳をした上で粛々と対応を検討していくということでありましょうし、また国際機関における議論については、その議論・検討の場に積極的に参画していくということだと思います。 - 金融庁

(4) The Order Concerning Reports of Foreign Exchange Banks and Money Exchangers, the Export Trade Control Order, the Import Trade Control Order, the Foreign Exchange Control Order, or the Foreign Exchange Control Commission Rules, Ordinance of the Prime Minister's Office, Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance or Ordinance of the Ministry of International Trade and Industry based on the Cabinet Order Concerning Temporary Special Provisions of the Foreign Exchange Control Order, etc., upon Implementation of the Administrative Agreement under Article III of the Security Treaty between Japan and the United States of America, or an Ordinance of the Prime Minister's Office or Ordinance of the Ministry of International Trade and Industry, all of which are effective at the time of enforcement of this Cabinet Order and have not yet been revised, shall be effective, after the enforcement of this Cabinet Order, as the Order Concerning Reports of Foreign Exchange Banks and Money Exchangers, the Export Trade Control Order, the Import Trade Control Order, the Foreign Exchange Control Order, or the relevant ordinance of the competent ministry, Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance or Ordinance of the Ministry of International Trade and Industry based on the Cabinet Order Concerning Temporary Special Provisions of the Foreign Exchange Control Order, etc. upon Implementation of the Administrative Agreement under Article III of the Security Treaty between Japan and the United States of America, or an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance or Ordinance of the Ministry of International Trade and Industry, all of which have been revised. 例文帳に追加

４　この政令施行の際現に効力を有する改正前の外国為替銀行及び両替商の報告に関する政令、輸出貿易管理令、輸入貿易管理令、外国為替管理令又は日本国とアメリカ合衆国との間の安全保障条約第三条に基く行政協定の実施に伴う外国為替管理令等の臨時特例に関する政令に基く外国為替管理委員会規則若しくは総理府令、大蔵省令、通商産業省令又は総理府令、通商産業省令は、この政令施行後は、改正後の外国為替銀行及び両替商の報告に関する政令、輸出貿易管理令、輸入貿易管理令、外国為替管理令又は日本国とアメリカ合衆国との間の安全保障条約第三条に基く行政協定の実施に伴う外国為替管理令等の臨時特例に関する政令に基く相当の主務省令若しくは大蔵省令若しくは通商産業省令又は大蔵省令、通商産業省令としての効力を有するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The Order Concerning Reports of Foreign Exchange Banks and Money Exchangers, the Export Trade Control Order, the Import Trade Control Order, the Foreign Exchange Control Order, or the Foreign Exchange Control Commission Rules, Ordinance of the Prime Minister's Office, Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance or Ordinance of the Ministry of International Trade and Industry based on the Cabinet Order Concerning Temporary Special Provisions of the Foreign Exchange Control Order, etc., upon Implementation of the Administrative Agreement under Article III of the Security Treaty between Japan and the United States of America, or an Ordinance of the Prime Minister's Office or Ordinance of the Ministry of International Trade and Industry, all of which are effective at the time of enforcement of this Cabinet Order and have not yet been revised, shall be effective, after the enforcement of this Cabinet Order, as the Order Concerning Reports of Foreign Exchange Banks and Money Exchangers, the Export Trade Control Order, the Import Trade Control Order, the Foreign Exchange Control Order, or the relevant ordinance of the competent ministry, Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance or Ordinance of the Ministry of International Trade and Industry based on the Cabinet Order Concerning Temporary Special Provisions of the Foreign Exchange Control Order, etc. upon Implementation of the Administrative Agreement under Article III of the Security Treaty between Japan and the United States of America, or an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance or Ordinance of the Ministry of International Trade and Industry, all of which have been revised. 例文帳に追加

４　この政令施行の際現に効力を有する改正前の外国為替銀行及び両替商の報告に関する政令、輸出貿易管理令、輸入貿易管理令、外国為替管理令又は日本国とアメリカ合衆国との間の安全保障条約第三条に基く行政協定の実施に伴う外国為替管理令等の臨時特例に関する政令に基く外国為替管理委員会規則若しくは総理府令、大蔵省令、通商産業省令又は総理府令、通商産業省令は、この政令施行後は、改正後の外国為替銀行及び両替商の報告に関する政令、輸出貿易管理令、輸入貿易監理令、外国為替管理令又は日本国とアメリカ合衆国との間の安全保障条約第三条に基く行政協定の実施に伴う外国為替管理令等の臨時特例に関する政令に基く相当の主務省令若しくは大蔵省令若しくは通商産業省令又は大蔵省令、通商産業省令としての効力を有するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Every corporation whose total assets (meaning the amount of total assets appearing in the latest balance sheet; the same shall apply hereinafter) exceed the amount provided for in a Cabinet Order, which shall not be less than two billion yen, and whose total assets, coupled with total assets of subsidiaries of the said corporation, and a corporation in Japan which holds majority of voting rights of all stockholders of the said corporation (hereinafter referred to as "sum of the total assets"), exceed the amount provided for in a Cabinet Order, which shall not be less than ten billion yen (hereinafter referred to as "stockholding corporation" in this Article), in case that it acquires or holds the stocks (including the stocks held in monetary or security trust, where the stockholding corporation is a settlor or beneficiary and may exercise the voting rights or give instructions to the trustee regarding the exercise of such voting rights) of another corporation in Japan whose total assets exceed the amount provided for in a Cabinet Order, which shall not be less than one billion yen (hereinafter referred to as "issuing corporation" in this Article), so that the ratio of voting rights pertaining to the stocks acquired or held by the stockholding corporation to voting rights of all stockholders of the issuing corporation is to exceed the percentage figure provided for in a Cabinet Order (in the case that more than one percentage figures are provided for, any of such percentage figures pursuant to the provisions of such Cabinet Order), shall submit, pursuant to the provisions of the Rules of the Fair Trade Commission, a written report on such stocks within thirty days from the date of the relevant exceeding; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where the all the issued stocks of issuing corporation is acquired simultaneously with the incorporation, cases where a corporation engaged in banking or insurance business (excluding certain corporations engaged in insurance business as provided for in the Rules of the Fair Trade Commission; the same shall apply in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the next Article) acquires or holds stocks of other corporations in Japan (excluding those engaged in banking or insurance business and those as otherwise provided for in the Rules of the Fair Trade Commission; the same shall apply in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the next Article), or cases where a corporation engaged in securities business (excluding securities brokers) acquires or holds stocks in the course of its business. 例文帳に追加

２　会社であつて、その総資産の額（最終の貸借対照表による資産の合計金額をいう。以下同じ。）が二十億円を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める金額を超え、かつ、当該会社並びに当該会社の子会社及び当該会社の総株主の議決権の過半数を有する国内の会社の総資産の額を合計した額（以下「総資産合計額」という。）が百億円を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める金額を超えるもの（以下この条において「株式所有会社」という。）は、他の国内の会社であつてその総資産の額が十億円を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める金額を超えるもの（以下この項において「株式発行会社」という。）の株式を取得し、又は所有する場合（金銭又は有価証券の信託に係る株式について、自己が、委託者若しくは受益者となり議決権を行使することができる場合又は議決権の行使について受託者に指図を行うことができる場合を含む。）において、株式発行会社の総株主の議決権に占める株式所有会社の当該取得し、又は所有する株式に係る議決権の割合が、百分の十を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める数値（複数の数値を定めた場合にあつては、政令で定めるところにより、それぞれの数値）を超えることとなるときは、公正取引委員会規則で定めるところにより、その超えることとなつた日から三十日以内に、当該株式に関する報告書を公正取引委員会に提出しなければならない。ただし、株式発行会社の発行済の株式の全部をその設立と同時に取得する場合、銀行業又は保険業を営む会社が他の国内の会社（銀行業又は保険業を営む会社その他公正取引委員会規則で定める会社を除く。次条第一項及び第二項において同じ。）の株式を取得し、又は所有する場合及び証券業を営む会社（証券仲介業者を除く。）が業務として株式を取得し、又は所有する場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(a) the amount obtained by multiplying the transaction amounts of the transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (i) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (e)) in each business year by the Problematic Conduct Rate -- which means the proportion of the total sum of the payments made as a result of any Problematic Conduct [which means the Problematic Conduct prescribed in Article 112] in each business year starting within three years prior to the commencement of the relevant business year [excluding payments pertaining to transactions in cases where a Futures Commission Merchant receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market (excluding Commodity Clearing Transactions; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) from a Person With Specialized Knowledge and Experience (which means a person specified in Article 107; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) or receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market by using an Electronic Data Processing System (which means an Electronic Data Processing System connecting a computer used by the Futures Commodity Merchant and a computer [including the input/output devices] used by the customer through a telecommunications line; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) without carrying out solicitation]; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) to the total sum of the transaction amounts of the transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), items (i) to (iii) of the Act and the amount of the consideration for the transactions prescribed in item (iv) of the same paragraph (excluding the transaction amounts and the amount of the consideration for transactions in cases of transactions based on a person's own account and in cases where a Futures Commission Merchant receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market from a Person With Specialized Knowledge and Experience or receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market by using an Electronic Data Processing System without carrying out solicitation -- or the amount equivalent to 0.0001 percent of the transaction amounts, whichever amount is greater (in cases where the amount of liability reserve for commodity trading that has already been accrued [in cases where a specific amount of money is used under the provisions of Article 221, paragraph (2) of the Act, the amount after deducting said amount; the same shall apply in the following item] is less than ten million yen, the amount obtained by adding, to such larger amount, an amount obtained by multiplying -- an amount calculated by dividing the amount that has been obtained by deducting the amount of liability reserve for commodity trading and the amounts listed in (b) to (h) from ten million yen by double the Problematic Conduct Rate, or by 0.0002 percent, whichever rate is higher (or, if said calculated amount exceeds the transaction amount in the relevant business year, such amount shall be the transaction amount in the relevant business year; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) -- by the Problematic Conduct Rate or an amount equivalent to 0.0001 percent of said calculated amount, whichever amount is greater); 例文帳に追加

イ　各事業年度における法第二条第八項第一号に規定する取引（自己の計算による取引及びホに掲げる取引を除く。）の取引金額に事故率（当該事業年度開始日前三年以内に開始した各事業年度における事故（第百十二条に規定する事故をいう。）による支払額（商品取引員が、専門知識及び経験を有する者（第百七条で定める者をいう。以下この条において同じ。）から商品市場における取引等（商品清算取引を除く。以下この条において同じ。）の委託を受ける場合並びに電子情報処理組織（商品取引員の使用に係る電子計算機と、顧客の使用に係る電子計算機（入出力装置を含む。）とを電気通信回線で接続した電子情報処理組織をいう。以下この条において同じ。）を使用して勧誘を伴わずに商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合の取引に係る支払額を除く。）の合計額の、法第二条第八項第一号から第三号に規定する取引の取引金額と同項第四号に規定する取引の対価の額の合計額（自己の計算による取引並びに商品取引員が、専門知識及び経験を有する者から商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合並びに電子情報処理組織を使用して勧誘を伴わずに商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合の取引金額及び取引の対価の額を除く。）に占める割合をいう。以下この条において同じ。）を乗じた金額と取引金額の百万分の一に相当する金額とのいずれか大きい金額（既に積み立てられた商品取引責任準備金の金額（法第二百二十一条第二項の規定により使用された金額がある場合には、当該金額を控除した金額。次号において同じ。）が千万円に満たない場合には、当該いずれか大きい金額に、千万円から当該商品取引責任準備金の金額、及びロからチまでに掲げる金額を控除した金額を事故率に二を乗じて得た率と百万分の二とのいずれか大きい率で除して計算した金額（当該計算した金額が当該事業年度の取引金額を超える場合には、当該事業年度の当該取引金額。以下この号において同じ。）に事故率を乗じた金額と当該除して計算した金額の百万分の一に相当する金額とのいずれか大きい金額を加算した金額） - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

On the other hand, experts have pointed out various issues pertaining to the EU-ETS, including the following. ① Regarding the reduction targets of Phase I, there are problems in cap setting, such as moderate emissions allowances that lead to a price fall when the moderate allocation is realized. ② There are problems related to fairness and equity with respect to the cap. For example, during Phase I, in the process of creating national allocation plans that determine each country’s emissions cap, there were about 800 cases26 in all the EU countries wherein the companies sued their national governments over allocation methods and allocation amounts. Further, during Phase II, the former East European countries, such as Czech Republic, Latvia, Poland, Hungary, and Estonia, sued the European Commission over its strict demand on the allocation amount27. ③ There are concerns about “carbon leakage” and a loss of international competitiveness among the EU companies. For example, Jean-Louis Borloo, the French Minister of Ecology and Sustainable Development, expressed his concern about “carbon leakage,” which occurs when economic activities and plant locations move from the EU countries to countries with lesser or no environmental regulations. Secretary General Mr. Richmann of German Federation of Industry and Energy stated that in a situation wherein the competitors do not need to bear carbon costs, domestic industries cannot pass on the carbon costs to the international market. This would lead to not only loss of the labor market but also migration of the manufacturing bases, resulting in increased emissions outside of Europe.例文帳に追加

一方、EU-ETSに対しては、①第一約束期間の削減目標については、排出枠の設定が緩く、割当の緩さが判明した時点で価格が暴落するなど、キャップの設定に課題があったこと、②各国の排出上限量となる国別割当計画の策定過程において、割当方法及び割当量をめぐって、第一約束期間においては、企業が各国政府を提訴した事例がEU全体で800件程度あり、第二約束期間については、チェコ、ラトビア、ポーランド、ハンガリー、エストニア等旧東欧諸国が欧州委員会の要求する厳しい割当量を巡り、欧州委員会を相手に訴訟を起こしているなど、キャップの衡平性に課題があること、③フランスのボルローエコロジー・持続可能な開発整備相が、「EU域内から環境規制が緩いまたは無い他の地域に工場など移転する、いわゆる『炭素リーケージ』について懸念がある。」と表明し、ドイツの産業エネルギー連盟リヒマン事務総長が、「競争相手に炭素コストが生じなければ、産業界はこのコストを世界市場で転嫁できないので、労働市場が失われるだけではなく、生産拠点の移転もあり得るが、これは、欧州外での排出増加になる。」と発言しているなど、炭素リーケージ及び域内企業の国際競争力低下の懸念があること、等、様々な課題が指摘されている。 - 経済産業省

If a person sells, or exposes for sale, or has in his possession for sale or for any purpose of trade or manufacturer any goods or things to which a false trademark or a false trade description is applied or which, being required under section 108 to have applied to them an indication of the country or place in which they were made or produced or the name and address of the manufacturer or producer or the person for whom the goods are manufactured or produced are without the indication so require, he shall, unless the proves (a) that, having taken all reasonable precautions against committing an offence against this section, he had at the time of the commission of the alleged offence no reason to suspect the genuineness of the trademark or trade description or that any offence had been committed in respect of the goods; and (b) that, on demand by or on behalf of the prosecutor he gave all the information in his power with respect to the person from whom he obtained such goods or things; or (c) that otherwise he acted innocently, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to 2 (two) years, or with fine, or with both, and in case of a second or subsequent conviction, with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to 3 (three) years, or with fine, or with both. 例文帳に追加

不正な商標若しくは虚偽の商品表示を付して、又は、第108条の規定により付すことが求められる製造若しくは生産される国若しくは地域、又は製造者若しくは生産者又は商品がその者のために製造若しくは生産される者の名称及び住所を表示することなく、商品又は物品を販売する者、又は販売用の展示を行う者、又は販売目的、取引若しくは製造の目的で所持する者は、次に掲げる事項が証明されない限り、2年以下の禁固又は罰金若しくはこれを併科、再犯若しくは累犯はいずれの場合も3年以下の禁固又は罰金若しくはこれを併科する。(a)本条に定める侵害に対して合理的なすべての予防措置を講じており、侵害があったとされる時点で、当該商標若しくは商品表示の真実性を疑う、又は当該商品に関して何らかの違反があったことを疑う、どのような理由もなかったこと。(b)検察官の要求に応じて、又は検察官のために、当該商品又は物品の入手先である者について自己の権限が及ぶ限りすべての情報を提供したこと。(c)その他の点においても正直に行動したこと。 - 特許庁

(3) The provisions of paragraph (2) of Article 157, paragraph (2) of Article 158, Article 160, and paragraph (1) of Article 161 of this Act, and the provisions of paragraphs (3) and (4) of Article 14, paragraphs (1), (2), and (4) of Article 15, Article 21, paragraphs (1), (2), and 6 of Article 34, Articles 35 to 37 inclusive, Article 39, paragraphs (1) to (5) inclusive of Article 40, paragraph (1) of Article 41, Article 42, paragraphs (1) and (2) of Article 43, and Article 55 of the Administrative Appeal Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the reclaim for review. In this case, the term "Superintendent of the Regional Correction Headquarters" in Article 160 and paragraph (1) of Article 161 shall be read as "public safety commission" ; the term "warden of the penal institution" in paragraph (2) of Article 160 shall be read as "detention services manager" ; the phrase "upon request of the applicant of the request for review or ex officio" in paragraph (2) of Article 34 under said Act shall be read as "ex officio" ; and the phrase "by both posting the notice on a bulletin board and publishing in the official gazette or other official bulletin or in a newspaper at least once" in paragraph (3) of Article 42 of said Act shall be read as "by posting the notice on a bulletin board," and additional technicalities requiring alternative readings shall be provided for by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

３　第百五十七条第二項、第百五十八条第二項、第百六十条及び第百六十一条第一項並びに行政不服審査法第十四条第三項及び第四項、第十五条第一項、第二項及び第四項、第二十一条、第三十四条第一項、第二項及び第六項、第三十五条から第三十七条まで、第三十九条、第四十条第一項から第五項まで、第四十一条第一項、第四十二条、第四十三条第一項及び第二項並びに第五十五条の規定は、再審査の申請について準用する。この場合において、第百六十条及び第百六十一条第一項中「矯正管区の長」とあるのは「公安委員会」と、第百六十条第二項中「刑事施設の長」とあるのは「留置業務管理者」と、同法第三十四条第二項中「審査請求人の申立てにより又は職権で」とあるのは「職権で」と、同法第四十二条第三項中「掲示し、かつ、その旨を官報その他の公報又は新聞紙に少なくとも一回掲載して」とあるのは「掲示して」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 130 (1) The provision of Article 97-2, paragraph (2) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 199 of the Insurance Business Act revised by the provision of Article 22 (hereinafter referred to as "Current Insurance Business Act") of the Current Insurance Business Act shall not apply, for a period of one year counting from the Effective Date, to the investment of assets on behalf of one single person (referring to the one single person prescribed in Article 97-2, paragraph (2) of the Current Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply in the following paragraph) by an Insurance Company (referring to an Insurance Company as defined in Article 2, paragraph (2) of the Current Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) (including a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. (referring to a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. as defined in Article 2, paragraph (7) of the Current Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) or a Licensed Specified Juridical Person (referring to a Licensed Specified Juridical Person as defined in Article 223, paragraph (1) of the Current Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply hereinafter); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), where the amount of those assets prescribed in Article 97-2, paragraph (2) of the Current Insurance Business Act which are invested by the Insurance Company on behalf of that one single person exceeds, at the time when this Act enters into force, the amount calculated pursuant to the provision of that paragraph, provided that the Insurance Company notify thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission within three months from the Effective Date. 例文帳に追加

第百三十条　第二十二条の規定による改正後の保険業法（以下「新保険業法」という。）第九十七条の二第二項（新保険業法第百九十九条において準用する場合を含む。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に同一人（新保険業法第九十七条の二第二項に規定する同一人をいう。次項において同じ。）に対する同条第二項に規定する資産の運用の額が同項の規定により計算した額を超えている保険会社（新保険業法第二条第二項に規定する保険会社をいう。以下同じ。）（外国保険会社等（新保険業法第二条第七項に規定する外国保険会社等をいう。以下同じ。）及び免許特定法人（新保険業法第二百二十三条第一項に規定する免許特定法人をいう。以下同じ。）を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の当該同一人に対する当該資産の運用については、当該保険会社が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 63 (1) With respect to the permission or the approval on business commencement for a designated fishery, the provisions of paragraph (1), Article 34 (Restrictions or Conditions of Fishery Right), Article 35 (Notification of Absence from Work), paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of Article 37, paragraph (1), paragraph (2), paragraph (6) through paragraph (10) and paragraph (13) through paragraph (15) of Article 39 (Rescission of Fishery Right) and Article 12 (Measures for Fishery Employees) of the Aquatic Resources Conservation Act (Act No. 313 of 1951) shall apply mutatis mutandis. In this case, "the Governor concerned" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Minister"; "when granting a license, if he/she finds it necessary for ... other public interest" in paragraph (1), Article 34, with "when he/she finds it necessary for ...other public interest"; "fisheries adjustment" in paragraph (1), Article 39, with "the protection of reproduction of aquatic animals and plants, fisheries adjustment"; "the prefectural government concerned" in paragraph (6), paragraph (10) and paragraph (13) of the same Article, with "the national government"; "the Governor concerned, after he/she hears the opinions of the Sea-area Fisheries Adjustment Commission concerned" in paragraph (8) of the same Article, with "the Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Minister"; "paragraph (10), paragraph (2), Article 34 (Consultation with the Sea-area Fisheries Adjustment Commission) and paragraph (4), Article 37 (Hearing of Opinions)" in paragraph (14) of the same Article, with "paragraph (10)"; "the disposition for nonpayment of local tax" in paragraph (15) of the same Article, with "the disposition for nonpayment of national tax"; "paragraph (5), Article 10" in Article 12 of the same Act, with "paragraph (1), Article 39 of the Fisheries Act applied mutatis mutandis in Article 63 of the same Act"; and "the day of the public notice of paragraph (4) of the same Article," with "the day when the permission is rescinded." 例文帳に追加

第六十三条　指定漁業の許可又は起業の認可に関しては、第三十四条第一項（漁業権の制限又は条件）、第三十五条（休業の届出）、第三十七条第一項及び第二項、第三十九条第一項、第二項、第六項から第十項まで及び第十三項から第十五項まで（漁業権の取消し）並びに水産資源保護法（昭和二十六年法律第三百十三号）第十二条（漁業従事者に対する措置）の規定を準用する。この場合において、「都道府県知事」とあるのは「農林水産大臣」と、第三十四条第一項中「公益上必要があると認めるときは、免許をするにあたり、」とあるのは「公益上必要があると認めるときは、」と、第三十九条第一項中「漁業調整」とあるのは「水産動植物の繁殖保護、漁業調整」と、同条第六項、第十項及び第十三項中「都道府県」とあるのは「国」と、同条第八項中「都道府県知事が海区漁業調整委員会の意見を聴いて」とあるのは「農林水産大臣が」と、同条第十四項中「第十項、第三十四条第二項（海区漁業調整委員会への諮問）並びに第三十七条第四項（意見の聴取）」とあるのは「第十項」と、同条第十五項中「地方税の滞納処分」とあるのは「国税滞納処分」と、同法第十二条中「第十条第五項」とあるのは「漁業法第六十三条において準用する同法第三十九条第一項」と、「同条第四項の告示の日」とあるのは「その許可の取消しの日」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

When deliberating the circulation of securities and, at the same time, taxation on those financial instruments, we are planning to reflect on the past development involving, as you know, a wide variety of tax revisions, including the now-abolished securities transaction tax, that were formulated in the light of trends in a higher dimension, such as the shifts from saving to investment and from indirect finance to direct finance, and will also examine in a comprehensive fashion any potential impacts of tax revisions, which we will work on to reach a final conclusion in time for the tax system request deadline at the end of August. The FSA also intends to consider the current economic situation and the historical development in Japan, where indirect finance has traditionally been more prevalent than in the U.S., where direct finance is very dominant, while also attaching importance to smooth financial functions and simple and fair taxation, with the intention of officially submitting our request to the (Government) Tax Commission by the end of August following our comprehensive deliberations. 例文帳に追加

金融と税制というのは極めて大事ですし、同時に証券、あれは流通せねばなりませんから、同時にそういった金融商品に対する課税、あるいは昔は有価証券取引税という税金がございましたけれども、できるだけ証券、大きく言えば貯蓄から投資へというのは、間接金融から直接金融へというような大きな流れがございますので、そんなことを含めながらいろいろ税制改正を過去やってきた経緯があるということはご存じだと思いますが、なかなか税制を扱っただけではその所期の目的は、確かに効果はあるんでしょうけれども、達し得ないような部分もございますから、そういったことを総合的に勘案しながら、これは8月の末までに各省の税制要求というのは、最終的には出すということでございますから、そこら辺を踏まえて勘案しながら、また今の景気の状態、それから日本の置かれた、アメリカは非常に直接金融が多いのでございますが、日本は昔から伝統的に間接金融が多いというふうな長い間の歴史的経緯がございますから、そういったことを踏まえながら、なおかつ金融は円滑に機能するということが非常に大事でございまして、なおかつ税というものでございますから簡素公平ということも大事でございますから、そういったことを総合的に勘案しながら8月の末までにきちっと金融庁としては正式に税制調査会の方に出させていただきたいというふうに考えております。 - 金融庁

Article 220-3 The provisions of Articles 6 to 9 inclusive of the Act on Sales, etc. of Financial Products (Act No. 101 of 2000) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the conclusion of a Brokerage Contract by a Futures Commission Merchant. In this case, the term "preceding Article" in Article 6, paragraph (1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 218, paragraph (3) of the Commodity Exchange Act," the phrase "failing to explain important matters or making provision, etc. of conclusive evaluations" in Article 7 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "violating the provisions of Article 214 (limited to the part pertaining to item (i)) of the Commodity Exchange Act or failing to explain the matters listed in Article 217, paragraph (1), items (i) to (iii) inclusive of the same Act," the phrase "contract pertaining to the sale of said financial product" in Article 9, paragraph (2), item (i) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Brokerage Contract set forth in Article 214, item (ii) of the Commodity Exchange Act" and any other technical replacement shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第二百二十条の三　金融商品の販売等に関する法律（平成十二年法律第百一号）第六条から第九条までの規定は、商品取引員が行う受託契約の締結について準用する。この場合において、同法第六条第一項中「前条」とあるのは「商品取引所法第二百十八条第三項」と、同項及び同法第七条中「重要事項について説明をしなかったこと又は断定的判断の提供等を行ったこと」とあるのは「商品取引所法第二百十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）の規定に違反したこと又は同法第二百十七条第一項第一号から第三号までに掲げる事項について説明をしなかったこと」と、同法第九条第二項第一号中「当該金融商品の販売に係る契約」とあるのは「商品取引所法第二百十四条第二号の受託契約」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 62-3 If the case, at a refining facility, fabricating facility, reactor facility, spent fuel storage facility, reprocessing facility, waste burial facility or waste management facility, usage facility, etc., or facility pertaining to use of nuclear source material (hereinafter referred to as "refining facilities, etc."), an accident that has caused impairment to a human being (including an accident that may cause impairment to a human being), a malfunction of the refining facilities, etc., or another event specified in the Ordinance of the competent ministry (order issued by the minister prescribed respectively in those items in accordance with the classifications for licensee of nuclear energy activity, etc. listed in the following items (hereinafter referred to as "competent minister") (Cabinet Order in the case that a notification pursuant to the provision of Article 59 (5) was made); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) occurs, the licensee of nuclear energy activity, etc. shall, pursuant to the provision of the Ordinance of the competent ministry, report on the state of the event and any other matters specified in the Ordinance of the competent ministry to the competent minister (or prefectural public safety commission if a notification pursuant to said paragraph was made), without delay. 例文帳に追加

第六十二条の三　原子力事業者等（核原料物質使用者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）は、製錬施設、加工施設、原子炉施設、使用済燃料貯蔵施設、再処理施設、廃棄物埋設施設若しくは廃棄物管理施設、使用施設等又は核原料物質の使用に係る施設（以下この条において「製錬施設等」という。）に関し人の障害が発生した事故（人の障害が発生するおそれのある事故を含む。）、製錬施設等の故障その他の主務省令（次の各号に掲げる原子力事業者等の区分に応じ、当該各号に定める大臣（以下この条において「主務大臣」という。）の発する命令（第五十九条第五項の規定による届出をした場合については、内閣府令）をいう。以下この条において同じ。）で定める事象が生じたときは、主務省令で定めるところにより、遅滞なく、事象の状況その他の主務省令で定める事項を主務大臣（同項の規定による届出をした場合については、都道府県公安委員会）に報告しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The National Health and Family Planning Commission (NHFPC) of the People's Republic of China and the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) of Japan and the Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW) of the Republic of Korea(hereinafter referred to as "the Participants");Guided by their willingness to develop fruitful cooperation among the three countries in the field of public health security related to pandemic influenza and emerging/re-emerging infectious diseases of common concern (hereinafter referred to as "ERIDCC");Considering that the People's Republic of China, Japan and the Republic of Korea share a strong tradition in public health research and have a long history of collaboration in the public health field;Recognizing the importance of international cooperation to minimize damage on public health security and socio-economy caused by an outbreak of pandemic influenza and ERIDCC;Considering the need to pursue a pandemic influenza and ERIDCC-free area among the People's Republic of China, Japan and the Republic of Korea and to make common efforts to develop efficient ways to create such an area;Have reached common recognition:例文帳に追加

中華人民共和国衛生計画生育委員会、日本国厚生労働省、大韓民国保健福祉部（以下、「参加国」と称する）は、パンデミックインフルエンザや共通の課題である新興/再興感染症（以下、新興/再興感染症とする）に関連する保健及び医学の分野における各国間の有意義な協力を構築するという意志に導かれ、 中華人民共和国、日本国、大韓民国が、公衆衛生研究において強固な伝統を共有し、公衆衛生における協力の長い歴史を有することを考慮し、 パンデミックインフルエンザや新興/再興感染症による国民の健康危機及び社会経済への影響を最小限にするために国際的協力が重要であることを認識し、 中華人民共和国、日本国、大韓民国間のパンデミックインフルエンザと新興/再興感染症の無い地域を達成する必要性と、そのような地域を構築するための効果的な方法を創るための共通の努力の必要性を考慮し、 次の共通認識に達した。 - 厚生労働省

(4) The provisions of Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) and (4) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for the nullification of an Entity Conversion; the provision of Article 840 (Effect of Judgment of Nullity of Issue of New Shares) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judgment of nullity of an Entity Conversion accompanied by the issue of shares on Entity Conversion under Article 92; the provision of Article 844 (Effect of Judgment of Nullity of Share Exchange or Share Transfer) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judgment of nullity of an Entity Conversion accompanied by a share exchange on Entity Conversion or share transfer on Entity Conversion; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 878, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shareholder or member"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　会社法第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第三項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）及び第四項（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は組織変更の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百四十条（新株発行の無効判決の効力）の規定は第九十二条の規定による組織変更時発行株式の発行を伴う組織変更の無効判決について、同法第八百四十四条（株式交換又は株式移転の無効判決の効力）の規定は組織変更株式交換又は組織変更株式移転を伴う組織変更の無効判決について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第一項中「株主」とあるのは「株主又は社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

They must satisfy the following conditions: they must be Belgian and must be resident in Belgium; they must be at least 25 years old; they must not be prohibited or placed under guardianship; they must neither be in a state of prohibition within the meaning of Articles 31 to 34 of the Penal Code nor have been convicted in Belgium or abroad of any of the offenses specified in Royal Decree No. 22 of October 24, 1934, prohibiting certain convicted persons and bankrupts from exercising certain offices, professions or activities and giving the commercial courts authority to pronounce on such prohibitions, as amended by the Laws of March 14, 1962, March 16, 1972, and August 4, 1978; they must hold a Belgian diploma of university education or a Belgian diploma of higher education of the long type issued after at least four years of study in a scientific, technical or legal discipline; Diplomas issued abroad after at least four years of study, in the same disciplines, shall be authorized subject to their equivalence having been recognized beforehand by the relevant Belgian authorities; they must have exercised an activity in the field of patents for a period of time and subject to conditions laid down by the King; they must have passed an examination before the Commission referred to in Article 61 on the subject of industrial property, principally as regards patents, within two years at the latest of terminating the activities referred to in of this paragraph. 例文帳に追加

これらの者は次に掲げる条件を満たしていなければならない。ベルギー人であり，ベルギーの居住者でなければならない。少なくとも年齢25歳以上でなければならない。禁止され又は保護の下にある者であってはならない。刑法第31条から第34条までの意味における禁止状態にあってはならず，また，有罪判決を受けた者及び破産者のうちの一定の者に対し，一定の職務，職業又は活動に従事することを禁じており，また，商業裁判所に当該禁止を宣告する権限を付与している1962年3月14日法律，1972年3月16日法律及び1978年8月4日法律で改正された1934年10月24日勅令第22号に規定されている犯罪について，ベルギー又は外国で有罪の判決を受けた者であってはならない。ベルギーの大学卒業証書又は少なくとも4年間，科学，技術若しくは法律を研究した後に交付されるベルギーの長期型高等教育の卒業証書を保有していなければならない。上記と同一の学科を最低4年間研究した後に外国で発行された卒業証書は，予めベルギーの関連機関によってその同等性が承認されていることを条件として，許可されるものとする。国王の定める期間及び条件の下で，特許の分野の活動に従事していなければならない。(6)にいう活動の終了後遅くとも2年以内に，工業所有権の科目，主として特許に関して，第61条に述べる委員会の試験を合格していなければならない。 - 特許庁

(7) The provision of Article 107, paragraph (1) of the Current Insurance Business Act shall not apply, for a period of one year counting from the Effective Date, to the ownership of Shares, etc. (referring to Shares, etc. as defined in Article 2, paragraph (12) of the Current Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by an Insurance Company or any of its Subsidiary Companies in a domestic company (referring to a domestic company as defined in Article 107, paragraph (1) of the Current Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), where the Insurance Company or the Subsidiary Company owns, at the time when this Act enters into force, Shares, etc. in the domestic company in a total number that exceeds its shareholding threshold, etc. (referring to the shareholding threshold, etc. prescribed in Article 107, paragraph (1) of the Current Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), provided that the Insurance Company notify thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission within three months from the Effective Date. In this case, for the purpose of applying the provision of that Article to the ownership of Shares, etc. in the domestic company on and subsequent to the date, the Insurance Company or its Subsidiary Company shall be deemed to have acquired as at the date the Shares, etc. of the domestic company in excess of the shareholding threshold, etc. following the events prescribed in the main clause of paragraph (2) of that Article. 例文帳に追加

７　新保険業法第百七条第一項の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に国内の会社（同項に規定する国内の会社をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の株式等（新保険業法第二条第十二項に規定する株式等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を合算してその基準株式数等（新保険業法第百七条第一項に規定する基準株式数等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えて所有している保険会社又はその子会社による当該国内の会社の株式等の所有については、当該保険会社が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、同日後は、当該国内の会社の株式等の所有については、当該保険会社又はその子会社が同日において同条第二項本文に規定する事由により当該国内の会社の株式等を合算してその基準株式数等を超えて取得したものとみなして、同条の規定を適用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The provision of Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by a Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 2(11) of the New Banking Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), or by a Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 16-4(1) of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank Holding Company or the Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company (hereinafter collectively referred to as a "Bank Holding Company, etc." in this paragraph and Article 105 of these Supplementary Provisions) notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., or Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other compelling reason, and when the Bank Holding Company, etc. obtains an approval from the Prime Minister before that day, the Bank Holding Company, etc. shall be deemed to have obtained the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

３　新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項（新長期信用銀行法第十七条において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の額が合算して銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている新銀行法第二条第十一項に規定する銀行持株会社（以下この項において「銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等（新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）又は新長期信用銀行法第十六条の四第一項に規定する長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項において「長期信用銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行持株会社又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項及び附則第百五条において「銀行持株会社等」という。）が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行持株会社等が同日までに内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行持株会社等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provisions of Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff) and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for nullification of an Entity Conversion; the provision of Article 840 (Effect of Judgment of Nullity of Issue of New Shares) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judgment of nullity of an Entity Conversion accompanied by the solicitation of funds set forth in Article 78, paragraph (1); and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 878, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shareholder or member"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　会社法第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）及び第九百三十七条第三項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は組織変更の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百四十条（新株発行の無効判決の効力）の規定は第七十八条第一項の基金の募集を伴う組織変更の無効判決について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第一項中「株主」とあるのは「株主又は社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 to 840 inclusive (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission, Effect of Judgment of Nullity on Issue of New Shares), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (b)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim for the nullification of a solicitation of additional funds under paragraph (1) of the preceding Article; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators) of a Mutual Company;" any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

５　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力、新株発行の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は前条第一項の基金の募集の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第二号中「株主等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Articles 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the general meeting of members of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　会社法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、相互会社の社員総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人（保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項（同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Lawsuit for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the General Meeting of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, executive officer or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　会社法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、相互会社の総代会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人（保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項（同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 53-15 The provisions of Article 350 (Liability for Damages Caused by Acts of Directors), Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors), Article 354 to 357 inclusive (Apparent Representative Directors, Duty of Loyalty, Restrictions on Competition and Conflict of Interest Transactions, Director's Duty to Report), Article 358 (excluding paragraph (1), item (ii)) (Election of Inspector of Execution of Operation), Article 359 (Decision by Court to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 360, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Directors by Shareholders), Article 361 (Remuneration for Directors) and Article 365, paragraph (2) (Restrictions on Competition and Transactions with Companies with a Board of Directors) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) (Representatives of Companies), and Article 351 (Measures When Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors or representative director of a Mutual Company; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 356, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "board of directors"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "Shareholders who hold not less than three hundredths of the votes (or, in cases where a lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of all shareholders (excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at shareholders meetings)" in Article 358, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those persons, or nine (or any other smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives)"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "shareholders" in Article 359, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representatives)"; and the terms "shareholders having the shares" and "substantial detriment" in Article 360, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "irreparable damages," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第五十三条の十五　会社法第三百五十条（代表者の行為についての損害賠償責任）、第三百五十二条（取締役の職務を代行する者の権限）、第三百五十四条から第三百五十七条まで（表見代表取締役、忠実義務、競業及び利益相反取引の制限、取締役の報告義務）、第三百五十八条（第一項第二号を除く。）（業務の執行に関する検査役の選任）、第三百五十九条（裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定）、第三百六十条第一項（株主による取締役の行為の差止め）、第三百六十一条（取締役の報酬等）及び第三百六十五条第二項（競業及び取締役会設置会社との取引等の制限）の規定は相互会社の取締役について、同法第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項（株式会社の代表）並びに第三百五十一条（代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は相互会社の取締役又は代表取締役について、同法第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十六条第一項中「株主総会」とあるのは「取締役会」と、同法第三百五十八条第一項中「株主は」とあるのは「社員又は総代は」と、同項第一号中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）で六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続いて社員である者（総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の総代）」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第三百五十九条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、同法第三百六十条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「著しい損害」とあるのは「回復することができない損害」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 53-32 The provisions of Article 419 (excluding the second sentence of paragraph (2)) (Executive Officer's Duty to Report to Audit Committee Members), Article 421 (Apparent Representative Executive Officers) and Article 422, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Executive Officers by Shareholders) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the executive officers of a company with Committees; the provision of Article 420 (Representative Executive Officers) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative executive officer of a company with Committees; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the executive officers or representative executive officer of a company with Committees; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative executive officer of a company with Committees. In this case, the term "Article 355, Article 356 and Article 365, paragraph (2)" in the first sentence of Article 419, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 355, Article 356 and Article 365, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-15 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 357" in Article 419, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 357 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-15 of the Insurance Business Act"; the terms "Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5)," "Article 352" and "Article 401, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive" in Article 420, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-15 of the Insurance Business Act," "Article 352 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-15 of that Act" and "Article 401, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-25 of the Insurance Business Act," respectively; and the term "shareholders having the shares" in Article 422, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第五十三条の三十二　会社法第四百十九条（第二項後段を除く。）（執行役の監査委員に対する報告義務等）、第四百二十一条（表見代表執行役）及び第四百二十二条第一項（株主による執行役の行為の差止め）の規定は委員会設置会社の執行役について、同法第四百二十条（代表執行役）の規定は委員会設置会社の代表執行役について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は委員会設置会社の執行役又は代表執行役について、同法第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は委員会設置会社の代表執行役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第四百十九条第二項前段中「第三百五十五条、第三百五十六条及び第三百六十五条第二項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十五において準用する第三百五十五条、第三百五十六条及び第三百六十五条第二項」と、同条第三項中「第三百五十七条」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十五において準用する第三百五十七条」と、同法第四百二十条第三項中「第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十五において準用する第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項」と、「第三百五十二条」とあるのは「同法第五十三条の十五において準用する第三百五十二条」と、「第四百一条第二項から第四項まで」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の二十五第二項において準用する第四百一条第二項から第四項まで」と、同法第四百二十二条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 171 The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 843 (excluding paragraph (1), items (iii) and (iv), and the proviso to paragraph (2)) (Effect of Judgment Nullifying Merger), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (ii) and (iii)) and (4) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for the nullification of a merger under Article 159, paragraph (1); and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (5) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (xv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 843, paragraph (4) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "members, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), items (vii) and (viii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidator(s) (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidator(s)) of a Mutual Company"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百七十一条　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十三条（第一項第三号及び第四号並びに第二項ただし書を除く。）（合併の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第三項（第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。）及び第四項（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は第百五十九条第一項の合併の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第五項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第十五号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの条において準用する同法第八百四十三条第四項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第七号及び第八号中「社員等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The provisions of Article 67, paragraph (1) (Determination to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding the items in paragraph (2) and paragraphs (5) to (7) inclusive) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), Article 81, paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive (Minutes) and Article 316, paragraph (1) (Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the policyholders meeting; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of the policyholders meeting. In this case, the terms "incorporators", "shareholders at incorporation" and "Stock Company" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "converting Stock Company," "policyholders" and "Mutual Company," respectively; the term "in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "head office" in Article 74, paragraph (6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "shareholders" in Article 74, paragraph (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; and the terms "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including, where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, a person assuming the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), or, where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "policyholders, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, Policyholders, directors, executive officers or liquidators" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

３　会社法第六十七条第一項（創立総会の招集の決定）、第六十八条（第二項各号及び第五項から第七項までを除く。）（創立総会の招集の通知）、第七十条、第七十一条（創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等）、第七十四条から第七十六条まで（議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第七十八条から第八十条まで（発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議）、第八十一条第一項から第三項まで（議事録）及び第三百十六条第一項（株主総会に提出された資料等の調査）の規定は保険契約者総会について、同法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は保険契約者総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「発起人」とあるのは「組織変更をする株式会社」と、「設立時株主」とあるのは「保険契約者」と、「株式会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、同法第六十八条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第七十四条第六項中「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「保険契約者、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、保険契約者、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 183 (1) The provisions of Article 1-3 to Article 5 inclusive (Registry Office; Delegation of Affairs; Suspension of Affairs; Registrar; Disqualification of Registrar), Article 7 to Article 15 inclusive (Prohibition on Carrying Out of Registries and Other Documents; Loss and Restoration of Registries; Prevention of Loss of Registry, etc.; Issuance of Certificate of Registered Matters; Issuance of Documents Specifying Extract of Matters Registered; Inspection of Annexed Documents; Certificate of Seal Impression; Certification of Matters Required for Verification of Measures to Identify the Creator of Electromagnetic Records and Other Matters; Fees; Registration Upon Application by Party; Registration upon Commission), Article 17 to Article 27 inclusive (Method of Application for Registration; Document to Be Attached to Written Application; Electromagnetic Records to be Attached to Written Application; Submission of Seal Impression; Acceptance of Applications; Receipt; Order of Registration; Identity Confirmation by Registrar; Dismissal of Application; Registration to Be Made After Lapse of Period for Filing Action; Change in Administrative Zone, etc.; Prohibition on Registration of Identical Trade Name at Same Location), Article 33 (Cancellation of Registration of Trade Name), Article 34 (Registration of Trade Name of Company), Article 44 and Article 45 (Registration of Company's Manager), Article 46 (excluding paragraph (4)) (General Rules on Documents to be Attached), Article 47(1) (Registration of Incorporation), Article 48 to Article 55 inclusive (Registration to Be Made at Location of Branch Office; Registration of Relocation of Head Office; Registration of Change of Directors and Other Officers; Registration of Change of Person Who is to Temporarily Perform Duties of Accounting Auditors), Article 64 (Registration of Change Due to Share Option Issue), Article 71 (Registration of Dissolution), Article 73 to Article 75 inclusive (Registration of Liquidator; Registration of Change Related to Liquidator; Registration of Completion of Liquidation), and Article 132 to Article 148 inclusive (Correction; Application for Cancellation; Ex Officio Cancellation; Exclusion from Application of the Administrative Procedure Act; Exclusion from Application of the Act on Access Information Held by Administrative Organs; Exclusion from the Application of the Act on the Protection of Personal Information Held by Administrative Organs; Request for Review; Handling of Request for Review Case; Exclusion from Application of the Administrative Appeal Act; Delegation to Ordinance of the Ministry) of the Commercial Registration Act (Act No. 125 of 1963) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the registration of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrases "to Article 50 inclusive (including the cases where they are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 95, Article 111 and Article 118)" and "Article 51, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 52, Article 78, paragraphs (1) and (3), Article 82, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 83, Article 87, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 88, Article 91, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 92, Article 132" in Article 15 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "to Article 50 inclusive" and "Article 132," respectively, the phrase "a document evidencing authority delegated to a privately appointed agent or a transferor's written approval prescribed in Article 30, paragraph (2) or Article 31, paragraph (2)" in Article 24(vii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a document evidencing authority delegated to a privately appointed agent," the term "company registry" in Article 34(1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specific Purpose Company Registry," the phrase "the items of Article 930, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act" in Article 48(2) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the items of Article 930(2) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 22(4) of the Act on Securitization of Assets (hereinafter referred to as the 'Asset Securitization Act')," the phrase ", representative director or special director (in the case of a company with committees, a director, committee member, executive officer or representative executive officer)" in Article 54(1) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or representative director," the phrases "Article 333, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act" and "Article 337, paragraph (1) of said Act" in Article 54(2)(iii) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 71(1) of the Asset Securitization Act" and "Article 73(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," respectively, the phrase "Article 346, paragraph (4) of the Companies Act" in Article 55(1) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 76(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrases "Article 478, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Companies Act" and "Article 483, paragraph (4) of said Act" in Article 71(3) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 167(1)(i) of the Asset Securitization Act" and "Article 171(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," respectively, the phrase "Article 478, paragraph (1), item (ii) or (iii) of the Companies Act" in Article 73(2) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 167(1)(ii) or (iii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "Article 928, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Companies Act" in Article 73(3) and Article 74(1) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 928(1)(ii) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 179(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "Article 507, paragraph (3) of the Companies Act" in Article 75 of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 507(3) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 179(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加