in considerationの部分一致の例文一覧と使い方
該当件数 : 7860件
(5) The term "Major Shareholder" set forth in paragraph (2)(ix) and (x) shall mean a person who holds not less than twenty-hundredths (in cases where there is any fact specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as a one that is presumed to have a material influence on decisions about the company's finances and business policies, fifteen-hundredths) of the voting rights (including those pertaining to shares which cannot be asserted against an issuer pursuant to the provisions of Article 147(1) or Article 148(1) of the Act on Transfer of Bonds, Shares, etc. (Act No. 75 of 2001), and excluding those specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance which have been specified in consideration of the condition of holding or other circumstances; hereinafter referred to as "Subject Voting Rights" in this Article and Article 17(1)) of all shareholders or investors of the company (for a stock company, excluding voting rights for shares which can be exercised only for part of the matters that can be resolved at a shareholder's meeting, but including voting rights for shares which are deemed to be held pursuant to the provisions of Article 879(3) of the Companies Act,; the same shall apply hereinafter). 例文帳に追加
５ 第二項第九号及び第十号の「主要株主」とは、会社の総株主又は総出資者の議決権（株式会社にあっては、株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株式についての議決権を除き、会社法第八百七十九条第三項の規定により議決権を有するものとみなされる株式についての議決権を含む。以下同じ。）の百分の二十（会社の財務及び営業の方針の決定に対して重要な影響を与えることが推測される事実として内閣府令で定める事実がある場合には、百分の十五）以上の数の議決権（社債、株式等の振替に関する法律（平成十三年法律第七十五号）第百四十七条第一項又は第百四十八条第一項の規定により発行者に対抗することができない株式に係る議決権を含み、保有の態様その他の事情を勘案して内閣府令で定めるものを除く。以下この条及び第十七条第一項において「対象議決権」という。）を保有している者をいう。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 40-4 (1) Where an affiliated foreign company related to any of the following residents, which falls under the category of affiliated foreign company specified by a Cabinet Order as a company whose tax burden to be imposed on its income earned in a state or territory where its head office or principal office is located is significantly lower than the tax burden to be imposed on the income of a corporation in Japan (hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as a "specified foreign subsidiary company, etc."), in each business year (meaning a business year prescribed in Article 2(2)(xix); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) beginning on or after April 1, 1978, retains as part of the amount of undistributed income, pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order, any amount that is adjusted, with respect to the said amount of undistributed income, based on the tax amount pertaining to the said amount of undistributed income and the amount of dividend of surplus, dividend of profit or distribution of surplus prescribed in Article 23(1)(i) of the Corporation Tax Act (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph and the next paragraph as "dividend of surplus, etc.") (such adjusted amount hereinafter referred to in this Article as "eligible retained income"), the amount equivalent to the part of eligible retained income which is calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of income corresponding to the number of shares, etc. of the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. held by the resident through direct and/or indirect ownership, while taking into consideration the contents of the claim (meaning a claim to demand dividend of surplus, etc., distribution of property and any other economic benefit; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the next paragraph) vested in such shares, etc. (meaning shares or capital contributions; the same shall apply in this paragraph and the next paragraph) (such part of eligible retained income hereinafter referred to as "taxable retained income" in the next Article) shall be deemed to be the resident's income categorized as miscellaneous income, and included in his/her gross income in the calculation of the amount of his/her miscellaneous income for the year that includes the day on which two months have elapsed since the day following the last day of the relevant business year: 例文帳に追加
第四十条の四 次に掲げる居住者に係る外国関係会社のうち、本店又は主たる事務所の所在する国又は地域におけるその所得に対して課される税の負担が本邦における法人の所得に対して課される税の負担に比して著しく低いものとして政令で定める外国関係会社に該当するもの（以下この款において「特定外国子会社等」という。）が、昭和五十三年四月一日以後に開始する各事業年度（第二条第二項第十九号に規定する事業年度をいう。以下この条において同じ。）において、その未処分所得の金額から留保したものとして、政令で定めるところにより、当該未処分所得の金額につき当該未処分所得の金額に係る税額及び法人税法第二十三条第一項第一号に規定する剰余金の配当、利益の配当又は剰余金の分配（以下この項及び次項において「剰余金の配当等」という。）の額に関する調整を加えた金額（以下この条において「適用対象留保金額」という。）を有する場合には、その適用対象留保金額のうちその者の有する当該特定外国子会社等の直接及び間接保有の株式等の数に対応するものとしてその株式等（株式又は出資をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の請求権（剰余金の配当等、財産の分配その他の経済的な利益の給付を請求する権利をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の内容を勘案して政令で定めるところにより計算した金額（次条において「課税対象留保金額」という。）に相当する金額は、その者の雑所得に係る収入金額とみなして当該各事業年度終了の日の翌日から二月を経過する日の属する年分のその者の雑所得の金額の計算上、総収入金額に算入する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
I visited Washington and talked with Treasury Undersecretary for International Affairs Brainard, as I mentioned several times, and I also talked with the U.S.Ambassador to Japan. The recently enacted postal bill provides for measures necessary for ensuring equal competitive terms for the two postal financial institutions and other financial institutions. The “necessary measures” are the requirements that consideration should be given to ensure fair competitive terms for other financial institutions when Japan Post Insurance notifies the authorities of a plan to start a new business after the disposal of half of the government-held shares, and that the privatization committee should be notified and express opinions to relevant ministers as needed, as is made clear in the new law. Finally, if equal competitive terms are not ensured, the minister in charge will issue a supervisory order. 例文帳に追加
前は法律が少し変わっていましたが、私自身がワシントンに行きまして、ブレイナード財務次官にお話をしたというお話は何回かさせて頂いたと思いますし、また、東京の（駐日）大使にもお話しをしましたが、先日成立した郵政法案には、金融2社と他の金融機関との対等な競争条件の確保のために必要な措置が盛り込まれており、「必要な措置を盛り込まれており」というのは、いまさっき言いましたように、2分の1の株式を処分した後も届出プラス他の金融機関への適正な競争条件の配慮義務、それから民営化委員会への通知、必要に応じ関係各大臣への意見を言うこととか、民営化委員会がそういったことをきちんと法律上明記して通知することが可能でございます。 それから対等な競争条件でなければ、最後には主務大臣による監督上の命令を出す（ことになります）。 - 金融庁
Regarding the capital adequacy ratio, which was mentioned in the first question, the rule change means there will be two sets of capital adequacy ratios, one based on the previous rules and the other based on the new rules. Some people have expressed concern that the new rules may bring about unintended results. For example, banks confident of their financial positions may stress their soundness by revealing their capital adequacy ratio based on the previous standard when announcing their financial results. If this happens - this may be a perverse hypothesis - a bank which does not reveal a ratio based on the previous standard could raise suspicions that it may have a problem. Regarding such concerns, could you tell me what matters you have taken into consideration in reaching the decision to introduce the new rules? 例文帳に追加
最初の質問に関連した自己資本比率のことなのですけれども、意地悪な推測と言っては変ですけれども、いわゆる今回の見直しによって、自己資本比率が、これまでのものと、新しい基準で出来たものと二つある形になるのですけれども、例えば、自分の財務体制に自信があるところは、「従来の基準でやってもこれだけあるのです」というようなことを決算の時に言ったりすることによって自分の健全性をアピールすることを考えると、そういうことをしないところはちょっとおかしいのではないかという、あらぬというか、本来の目的とは違うような効果が、結果として出てきてしまうのではないかというような懸念も一部指摘されているようではあるのですが、そのあたりの検討というか、議論というのは、これまでどういうことを踏まえて今回の結論に至ったのか聞かせていただけますでしょうか - 金融庁
That is what the strong yen does, and that is the kind of recession we are in. As I just mentioned, 99.7 percent of companies in Japan are SMEs, and more than 40 million people in fact work at SMEs. In that sense, I believe the SME Financing Facilitation Act is timely legislation. It is temporary legislation that is due to expire at the end of March, after covering the calendar year end and the fiscal year end-the end of the accounting term-twice. I have been told that it was made temporary legislation with a two-year timeframe based on the expectation that the economy would recover by then. Regrettably, however, the economy is currently in such a state. The deadline is fast approaching for us to take these circumstances into consideration, take a positive approach, and make the decision to postpone its expiration. 例文帳に追加
それを実は思って帰ってきたわけでございますが、それが円高ということでございまして、そういった不況でもございますし、また今さっき申しましたように、日本の企業のうち99.7％が中小企業でございまして、4,000万人以上の人が実は中小企業で働いておられるわけでございますから、そういった意味で、中小企業金融円滑化法案というのは、本当に私は時宜にかなった、これは、年末と年度末・決算期（を）2回（含む）ということで、時限立法で3月いっぱいで、そこまでに景気がよくなればということで2年間の時限立法にさせていただけたという話は聞いておりますけれども、なかなか残念ながら、今景気がこういう状態ですから、しっかりそのことを視野に入れつつ、やはり中小企業は経済の太宗を占めると、なかなか大企業であれば、すぐ海外に工場を移したり等々、いろいろできるわけでございますけれども、中小企業はなかなか海外に移転する中小企業もあるのでございますけれども、なかなかそうはいかないところもございますから、そういったことを勘案しながら、しっかり前向きに、この決断をせねばならない時期が、延長せねばならない時期がだんだんだんだん迫りつつあるのかなというふうにも思っております。 - 金融庁
Article 52-4 (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 52-2-11, paragraph (1), among Banks, Financial Instruments Specialists (limited to those that engage in Securities Services), trust companies (limited to those that have obtained a license set forth in Article 3 or Article 53, paragraph (1) of the Trust Business Act) and any other persons specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance, where those who have notified the Prime Minister of a Reference Date hold voting rights for a purpose other than to control the business activities of the Bank or Bank Holding Company that has issued the shares related to said voting rights (excluding the case where the Proportion of Voting Rights Held has exceeded the number specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance and any case specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance by taking into consideration the manner in which they are held and other circumstances; hereinafter referred to as "Voting Rights Subject to Special Provisions" in this Article), their Written Notices of Voting Rights Held in the Bank shall be submitted to the Prime Minister stating matters that relate to the holding status of those voting rights as of the Reference Date on which the Proportion of Voting Rights Held exceeded five hundredths for the first time and that are specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance, by the 15th day of the month following the month containing said Reference Date, pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Office Ordinance. 例文帳に追加
第五十二条の四 銀行、金融商品取引業者（有価証券関連業を営む者に限る。）、信託会社（信託業法第三条又は第五十三条第一項の免許を受けたものに限る。）その他の内閣府令で定める者のうち基準日を内閣総理大臣に届け出た者が保有する議決権で当該議決権に係る株式の発行者である銀行又は銀行持株会社の営業活動を支配することを保有の目的としないもの（議決権保有割合が内閣府令で定める数を超えた場合及び保有の態様その他の事情を勘案して内閣府令で定める場合を除く。以下この条において「特例対象議決権」という。）に係る銀行議決権保有届出書は、第五十二条の二の十一第一項の規定にかかわらず、議決権保有割合が初めて百分の五を超える数となつた基準日における当該議決権の保有状況に関する事項であつて、内閣府令で定めるものを記載したものを、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該基準日の属する月の翌月十五日までに、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 66-6 (1) Where an affiliated foreign company related to any of the following domestic corporations, which falls under the category of affiliated foreign company specified by a Cabinet Order as a company whose tax burden to be imposed on its income earned in a state or territory where its head office or principal office is located is significantly lower than the tax burden to be imposed on the income of a corporation in Japan (hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as a "specified foreign subsidiary company, etc."), in each business year beginning on or after April 1, 1978, retains as part of the amount of undistributed income, pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order, any amount that is adjusted, with respect to the said amount of undistributed income, based on the tax amount pertaining to the said amount of undistributed income and the amount of dividend of surplus, dividend of profit or distribution of surplus prescribed in Article 23(1)(i) of the Corporation Tax Act (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph and the next paragraph as "dividend of surplus, etc.") (such adjusted amount hereinafter referred to in this Article as "eligible retained income"), the amount equivalent to the part of eligible retained income which is calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of income corresponding to the number of shares, etc. of the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. held by the domestic corporation through direct and/or indirect ownership, while taking into consideration the contents of the claim (meaning a claim to demand dividend of surplus, etc., distribution of property and any other economic benefit; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the next paragraph) vested in such shares, etc. (meaning shares or capital contributions; the same shall apply in this paragraph and the next paragraph) (such part of eligible retained income hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as "taxable retained income") shall be deemed to be the amount of the domestic corporation's profit, and included in its gross profit in the calculation of the amount of its income for the business year that includes the day on which two months have elapsed since the day following the last day of the relevant business year: 例文帳に追加
第六十六条の六 次に掲げる内国法人に係る外国関係会社のうち、本店又は主たる事務所の所在する国又は地域におけるその所得に対して課される税の負担が本邦における法人の所得に対して課される税の負担に比して著しく低いものとして政令で定める外国関係会社に該当するもの（以下この款において「特定外国子会社等」という。）が、昭和五十三年四月一日以後に開始する各事業年度において、その未処分所得の金額から留保したものとして、政令で定めるところにより、当該未処分所得の金額につき当該未処分所得の金額に係る税額及び法人税法第二十三条第一項第一号に規定する剰余金の配当、利益の配当又は剰余金の分配（以下この項及び次項において「剰余金の配当等」という。）の額に関する調整を加えた金額（以下この条において「適用対象留保金額」という。）を有する場合には、その適用対象留保金額のうちその内国法人の有する当該特定外国子会社等の直接及び間接保有の株式等の数に対応するものとしてその株式等（株式又は出資をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の請求権（剰余金の配当等、財産の分配その他の経済的な利益の給付を請求する権利をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の内容を勘案して政令で定めるところにより計算した金額（以下この款において「課税対象留保金額」という。）に相当する金額は、その内国法人の収益の額とみなして当該各事業年度終了の日の翌日から二月を経過する日を含むその内国法人の各事業年度の所得の金額の計算上、益金の額に算入する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(3) In determining the state of the art, any information relating to an invention is not taken into consideration, provided that a corresponding request is submitted, if such information is disclosed by a person who is entitled to the patent pursuant to § 12 of this Act or another person with the knowledge of the said person within twelve months before the filing date of the first patent application or registration application of a utility model containing the invention in the Republic of Estonia or abroad. The request shall be filed together with the patent application or not later than two months before the publication of the patent application pursuant to § 24. If another person acquired the information unlawfully or the information was published unlawfully or without the knowledge of the person who has the right to apply for the patent, the request may be filed in the course of the examination of the patent application orin case the patent is contested. Evidence supporting the request shall be appended to the request. 例文帳に追加
(3) 技術水準を決定する場合に，その旨の請求が提出されたときは，ある発明に関する情報を考慮に入れないものとする。ただし，前記の発明を含む最初の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願のエストニア共和国又は外国における出願日前12月以内に，第12条により特許についての権利を有する者によって，又は当該人が認識していることを前提として他人によって，当該情報が開示されていることを条件とする。前記の請求は，特許出願と同時に又は第24条による特許出願公開の少なくとも2月前に行わなければならない。他人が当該情報を不法に取得したか又は当該情報が不法に公表されたか若しくは特許出願権を有する者が公表を認識していなかったときは，請求は，特許出願の審査の過程で又は特許について係争が生じたときに行うことができる。請求書には，それを裏付ける証拠を添付しなければならない。 - 特許庁
(8) To accelerate the patent granting procedure, the Federal Minister of Justice shall be empowered to direct by statutory order that 1. the search for the publications specified in subsection (1) be assigned to a division of the Patent Office other than the Examining Section (Section 27(1)) or to another national or international institution, either as a whole or for certain technical fields or certain languages, provided that the institution concerned appears competent to search for publications to be taken into consideration; 2. the Patent Office shall provide foreign or international authorities with data from the files of patent applications for reciprocal information on the results of examination procedures and searches of the state of the art when the applications concerned relate to inventions for which the grant of a patent has also been applied to such foreign or international authorities; 3. the examination of patent applications according to Section 42 and the supervision of fees and time limits shall be transferred in whole or in part to divisions of the Patent Office other than the Examining Sections or Patent Divisions (Section 27(1)). 例文帳に追加
(8) 連邦法務大臣は，特許付与手続を促進するために，法定命令によって，次の事項を指示する権限を有する。1. (1)に明記した刊行物についての調査を，全面的に又は一定の技術分野若しくは一定の言語に関して，特許庁の審査課(第 27条(1))以外の部課，又は他の国内若しくは国際の機関に，それらが外見上，考慮に入れるべき刊行物を調査する権限を有することを条件として，任せること 2. 特許庁が外国又は国際の機関に対し，審査手続の結果及び技術水準の調査に関する相互情報のために，特許出願ファイルの資料を提供すること，ただし，それに係る出願が，当該外国又は国際の機関に対して特許付与を求めて出願されている発明に関連していることを条件とする。3. 第 42条による特許出願の審査，並びに手数料及び期限の監督を，全面的又は部分的に特許庁の審査課又は特許部(第 27条(1))以外の部課に任せること - 特許庁
(a) After final rejection or action, amendments may be made canceling claims or complying with any requirement of form which has been made, and amendments presenting rejected claims in better form for consideration on appeal may be admitted; but any proceedings relative thereto, shall not operate to relieve the application from its condition as subject to appeal or to save it from being considered withdrawn. (b) Should amendments touching the merits of the application be presented after final rejection, or after appeal has been taken, or when such amendment might not otherwise be proper, they may be admitted upon a showing of good and sufficient reasons why they are necessary and were not earlier presented.例文帳に追加
(a)最終拒絶又は処分の後，補正は，クレームを取り消すことにより，又は定められた方式要件を遵守することにより行うことができ，また，不服申立での検討対象として，拒絶されたクレームをより良好な形で提示する補正も認められる。ただし，これらに関する手続は，当該出願を不服申立の対象となっている状態から救済することにはならず，取り下げられたとみなされたことから回避させることにもならない。 (b)出願の実体的事項に係わる補正は，最終拒絶又は不服申立がなされた後に，又は通常そのような補正が不適とされるときに提示する場合は，これが必要であること，及びこれを以前に提示しなかったことの適切かつ十分な理由を示せば，認められることがある。 - 特許庁
According to a report that I have received, there are over 110,000 depositors, of which roughly 3 percent have more than 10 million yen and 1 percent have more than 11 million yen in deposit. While I find it truly regrettable for those depositors, this is basically how the banking system works after all and the flat amount coverage is indeed a basic rule that applies for the purpose of financial institution failure resolution. As full coverage is therefore rather an exception, we took into consideration various circumstances that I have just referred to, and reached a judgment that it is more appropriate to apply the general rule fairly and squarely. 例文帳に追加
大体、私のところへの報告によりますと、11万人超の預金者がおられるということでございますが、1,000万円以上の方は大体3％だという報告をいただいておりますし、1,100万円以上の方は1％だということでございますので、こういった方々には本当に申しわけないと思うわけでございますけれども、基本的にやはり銀行制度というのは、長い間の経験を踏まえてそういったことでございますから、定額保護というのは金融破綻の再生のため、まさにこれが原則でございますから、むしろ全額保護というのは例外でございますから、そういった意味で本則のほうを、いろいろ申し上げました事情を勘案してきちんと適用させていただくのが適当であろうと判断させていただいたわけでございます。 - 金融庁
The requests were issued under the title "Regarding Anti-Disaster Financial Measures Concerning the 2008 the Iwate-Miyagi Inland Earthquake." They included requests that financial institutions allow depositors who have lost deposit certificates and passbooks to withdraw deposits after confirming their identity, and that they accept premature cancellations of time deposits and the like depending on the circumstances of depositors and provide loans with such deposits as collateral. There was also a request that, in consideration of the damage done by the earthquake and emergency fund needs, financial institutions promptly take appropriate measures to accommodate the earthquake victims, such as opening an office for consultations concerning loans, simplifying loan screening procedures, speeding up the provision of loans and accepting debt moratorium. 例文帳に追加
文書のタイトルは「『平成20年岩手・宮城内陸地震』にかかる災害に対する金融上の措置について」ということでございまして、主だった内容を申し上げますと、一つには、「預金証書、通帳等を紛失した場合でも預金者であることを確認して払戻しに応じること」、二つ目に、「事情によっては定期預金、定期積金等の期限前払戻しに応じること、またこれを担保とする貸付にも応じること」、三つ目に、「災害の状況、応急資金の需要等を勘案して、融資相談所の開設、審査手続きの簡便化、貸出の迅速化、貸出金の返済猶予など、被災者の方々の便宜を考慮した適時的確な措置を講じること」という内容でございます。 - 金融庁
Article 66-5 (1) The employer shall, by taking into consideration of the opinion of the physician or dentist under the provisions of the preceding Article, and when it is deemed necessary, take measures including changing the location of work, changing the work content, shortening the working hours or reducing the frequency of night work, along with conducting working environment measurement, installing or improving facilities or equipment, reporting the opinion of the said physician or dentist to the Health Committee or the Safety and Health Committee, or the Committee for the Improvement of Establishing Working Hours, etc. (provided for in paragraph (1) of Article 7 of the Act on Special Measures Concerning the Improvement of Establishing Working Hours, etc. (Act No. 90 of 2002); hereinafter the same), and other appropriate measures, considering circumstances of the said worker. 例文帳に追加
第六十六条の五 事業者は、前条の規定による医師又は歯科医師の意見を勘案し、その必要があると認めるときは、当該労働者の実情を考慮して、就業場所の変更、作業の転換、労働時間の短縮、深夜業の回数の減少等の措置を講ずるほか、作業環境測定の実施、施設又は設備の設置又は整備、当該医師又は歯科医師の意見の衛生委員会若しくは安全衛生委員会又は労働時間等設定改善委員会（労働時間等の設定の改善に関する特別措置法（平成四年法律第九十号）第七条第一項に規定する労働時間等設定改善委員会をいう。以下同じ。）への報告その他の適切な措置を講じなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
One consideration regarding the "model providing pseudo regular software" is, where a person offering such program modifies a trial version into a pseudo regular version by oneself, whether this act will constitute an infringement of the rights of adaptation ("hon-an ken" in Japanese) (Article 27 of the Copyright Law). On this issue, it may appear reasonable to argue that such act is not an infringement of the rights of adaptation because the fundamental function of the software is, aside from the processing routine discriminating the trial version, not modified at all, and therefore the modification to software takes on no creativity. On the other hand, however, one can also reasonably argue that such model infringes the rights of adaptation, considering the changes made to the creative portion of the work when the trial version is compared with the regular version. 例文帳に追加
まず、疑似完全版提供型のうち、提供者自らが制限版を疑似完全版に改変している場合、翻案権（著作権法第２７条）を侵害しないかが問題となる。この点については、一部が改変されているとはいえ、ソフトウェアとして本来的に予定されている部分には何ら改変がなされていないうえ、改変部分は制限版か否かを判定している処理部分を無効にしているだけであり、何ら創作的な改変はなされておらず翻案権侵害を構成しないとも考えられるが、他方で、いわばソフトウェア全体を制限版から完全版へ改変するものであるから、創作性に変更がないとはいえないとして、翻案権侵害を構成するとも考えられる 。 - 経済産業省
(i) The method which uses, as the amount of consideration for a foreign affiliated transaction, the amount calculated by deeming that the income, which arises from a business pertaining to a foreign affiliated transaction set forth in Article 68-88(6) of the Act for the business year including the date on which the said foreign affiliated transaction was conducted, based on financial statements containing the consolidated status of property and profits and losses of a corporate group which includes the said consolidated corporation and a foreign affiliated person (meaning a foreign affiliated person prescribed in paragraph (1) of the said Article) pertaining to the said foreign affiliated transaction conducted by the said consolidated corporation (where the income arising from the said business is not recorded separately from the income arising from other businesses in the said financial statements, the income arising from businesses including the said business; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item), or for any other period equivalent thereto, is to be attributed to such persons, in accordance with the factors sufficient to estimate the amount of expenses or the value of fixed assets that such persons have spent or used for conducting the said foreign affiliated transaction (where the amount of expenses or the value of fixed assets spent or used for the said business is not recorded separately from the amount of expenses or the value of fixed assets spent or used for other businesses in the said financial statements, the amount of expenses or the value of fixed assets spent or used for businesses including the said business) or any other levels of such persons' contribution to the said income 例文帳に追加
一 法第六十八条の八十八第六項の連結法人及び当該連結法人の同項の国外関連取引に係る国外関連者（同条第一項に規定する国外関連者をいう。）の属する企業集団の財産及び損益の状況を連結して記載した計算書類による当該国外関連取引が行われた日を含む事業年度又はこれに準ずる期間の当該国外関連取引に係る事業に係る所得（当該計算書類において当該事業に係る所得が他の事業に係る所得と区分されていない場合には、当該事業を含む事業に係る所得とする。以下この号において同じ。）が、これらの者が支出した当該国外関連取引に係る事業に係る費用の額、使用した固定資産の価額（当該計算書類において当該事業に係る費用の額又は固定資産の価額が他の事業に係る費用の額又は固定資産の価額と区分されていない場合には、当該事業を含む事業に係る費用の額又は固定資産の価額とする。）その他これらの者が当該所得の発生に寄与した程度を推測するに足りる要因に応じてこれらの者に帰属するものとして計算した金額をもつて当該国外関連取引の対価の額とする方法 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(1) In the case where the acquisition costs of the entire property that a Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger acquired by succession as the result of an Incorporation-Type Merger (which refers to an Incorporation-Type Merger prescribed in Article 141 of the Act; the same shall apply hereinafter until Article 60-11) (hereinafter referred to as the "Property subject to an Incorporation-Type Merger") (excluding the property of a Member Commodity Exchange acquired through an Incorporation-Type Merger [which means a single Member Commodity Exchange in the case where the book value immediately prior to an Incorporation-Type Merger for the property held by such single Member Commodity Exchange should be used as the book value of the Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger for said property; hereinafter the same shall apply]; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), the acquisition costs of such property are to be measured by a method calculating the current market value of the consideration of the Incorporation-Type Merger and other current market values of said Property subject to an Incorporation-Type Merger, the amounts set forth in the following items for the Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger shall be the amounts set forth in said respective items; provided, however, that this provision shall not apply if it is determined that such amounts are to be prescribed pursuant to the provisions of the following paragraph by the Incorporation-Type Merger contract: 例文帳に追加
１ 新設合併（法第百四十一条の新設合併をいう。以下第六十条の十一までにおいて同 じ。）により新設合併設立会員商品取引所が承継する財産（以下「新設合併対象財産」 という。）（新設合併取得会員商品取引所（新設合併消滅会員商品取引所のうち、一の会 員商品取引所の有する財産に付された新設合併直前の帳簿価額を当該財産に付すべき新 設合併設立会員商品取引所における帳簿価額とすべき場合における当該一の会員商品取 引所をいう。以下同じ。）の財産を除く。以下この条において同じ。）の全部の取得原価 を新設合併対価（新設合併に際して新設合併設立会員商品取引所が新設合併消滅会員商 品取引所の会員に対して交付する財産をいう。以下この条において同じ。）の時価その 他当該新設合併対象財産の時価を適切に算定する方法をもって測定することとすべき場 合において、新設合併設立会員商品取引所の次の各号に掲げる額は、当該各号に定める 額とする。ただし、新設合併契約により次項の規定によるものと定めたときは、この限 りでない。 - 経済産業省
(3) In addition to distribution of funds prescribed in the preceding paragraph, if the General Partner reasonably determines that it is beneficial for the Partners to receive an in kind distribution of Portfolio Securities (including non-money consideration acquired by the Partnership from the Disposition of Portfolio Securities, in kind dividends or share splits) (the day of such determination being referred to as the “Reference Date”), the General Partner may, promptly after the Reference Date, distribute in kind to the Partners and any Withdrawing Partners their respective pro rata shares of the Portfolio Securities equivalent to the balance of the total amount of Value at the Time of Distribution of the Portfolio Securities after the deduction of (x) the total amount of costs and expenses, if any, and taxes and other public duties, if any, required for the distribution and (y) the amount of any incentive fee, if any, pursuant to paragraph (4) of this Article (which is, in the case where such incentive fee is paid in kind by the Portfolio Securities, the total amount of the Value at the Time of Distribution of such Portfolio Securities), in proportion to (a) in the case of a Partner, their respective Interest Amount or (b) in the case of a Withdrawing Partner, their respective Interest Amount at the time of the withdrawal of such Withdrawing Partner, to the extent allowed by Article 30. The General Partner may sell a portion of the Portfolio Securities that are to be distributed in order to pay costs, expenses, taxes and other public duties required for such distribution and to pay such incentive fee. In such case, the General Partner shall distribute to the Partners and any Withdrawing Partners the Portfolio Securities remaining after deducting the Portfolio Securities so sold or to be so sold. If the Portfolio Securities are not Marketable Securities, the General Partner shall send a document stating (i) the proposed in kind distribution and the reason therefor, (ii) a statement of Portfolio Securities to be distributed in kind, (iii) an assessment of the Value at the Time of Distribution as of the Reference Date and(iv) other matters as required to determine the appropriateness of the proposed distribution in kind, and shall be required to obtain an approval of the Limited Partners holding a Number of Partnership Units equal to [ ]% or more of the aggregate Number of Partnership Units of all of the Limited Partners. Article 49(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to distribution by the General Partner pursuant to this paragraph. 例文帳に追加
3. 前項に規定する金銭の分配のほか、無限責任組合員は、投資証券等（投資証券等に係る処分等、現物配当、株式分割等により本組合が取得したもののうち金銭以外のものを含む。）を現物で分配することが組合員の利益に適うと合理的に判断する場合（かかる判断がなされた日を「現物分配基準日」という。）、組合員及び脱退組合員に対し、現物分配基準日後速やかに、当該投資証券等の分配時評価額の総額から、分配に要する諸費用（もしあれば）及び公租公課（もしあれば）の合計額を控除した上、本条第4 項に従い成功報酬（もしあれば）の額（成功報酬を投資証券等の現物で支払う場合には、当該投資証券等の分配時評価額の総額）を控除した残額に相当する当該投資証券等を、第30 条により認められる範囲において、組合員についてはその持分金額、脱退組合員については当該脱退組合員の脱退当時の持分金額の各金額に応じ按分をした上、それぞれ現物により分配することができるものとする。無限責任組合員は、分配に要する諸費用及び公租公課並びに成功報酬の支払いにあてるため、分配される投資証券等の一部を売却することができるものとし、かかる場合、当該売却に係る投資証券等を控除した後の当該投資証券等を組合員及び脱退組合員に対し分配するものとする。当該投資証券等が市場性のある有価証券ではない場合、無限責任組合員は、(ⅰ)現物分配を行う旨及びその理由、(ⅱ)現物分配する投資証券等の明細、(ⅲ)その現物分配基準日における分配時評価額の案、並びに(ⅳ)その他その適否を判断する上で必要な事項を記載した書面を送付した上、総有限責任組合員の出資口数の合計の［ ］分の［ ］以上に相当する出資口数を有する有限責任組合員の承認を取得しなければならないものとする。なお、第49 条第1 項は、本項に基づき無限責任組合員が行う分配に準用する。 - 経済産業省
(1) If the Registrar decides to cause the patent to be re-examined -- (a) the Registrar shall direct the applicant for revocation of the patent to file Patents Form 36 requesting re-examination of the patent, together with the prescribed re-examination fee and any security for the costs or expenses of the proceedings specified by the Registrar, within 2 months from the date of the direction, and if the applicant fails to do so within that period he shall be deemed to have abandoned his application; (b) the Examiner shall during re-examination take into consideration the statement by the applicant, any amendment of the specification of the patent, the counter-statement by the proprietor of the patent and any evidence filed under rule 80 and shall recommend whether or not the patent should be revoked on any of the grounds specified in the application for revocation, and shall notify the Registrar of the conclusions in the re-examination report stating fully the reasons for such conclusions.例文帳に追加
(1) 登録官が特許につき再審査を行わせる旨を決定する場合において， (a) 登録官は，特許取消の申請人に対し，当該特許の再審査を請求する特許様式36を，これに所定の再審査手数料及び登録官が指定する手続費用又は経費に対する保証金を添えて当該指示の日付から2月以内に，提出するよう指示するものとし，申請人が当該期間内にそうしないときは，申請人は，その申請を放棄したものとみなされ， (b) 審査官は，再審査を行う間，申請人の陳述書，特許明細書の補正書，特許所有者の反対陳述書及び規則80に基づいて提出された証拠を考慮に入れ，かつ，取消申請書に記載された何れかの理由により当該特許を取り消すべきであるか否かについて勧告を行うと同時に，当該再審査報告の結論についてその詳細な理由とともに登録官に通知する。 - 特許庁
Article 86 (1) No person may acquire or possess voting rights (excluding the voting rights of the shares which cannot be exercised for all matters that are subject to a resolution at a general meeting of shareholders and including the voting rights of the shares for which the shareholder is deemed to have voting rights pursuant to the provisions of Article 879, paragraph (3) of the Companies Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article and the following Article) exceeding five percent of the voting rights of all shareholders of a Incorporated Commodity Exchange (including the voting rights of the shares which cannot be asserted against the issuer pursuant to the provisions of Article 147, paragraph (1) or Article 148, paragraph (1) of the Act on Transfer of Bonds, Shares, etc. [Act No. 75 of 2001] and excluding those specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry by taking into consideration the mode of acquisition or possession or any other relevant circumstances; hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Voting Rights" in this Article). 例文帳に追加
第八十六条 何人も、株式会社商品取引所の総株主の議決権（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株式についての議決権を除き、会社法第八百七十九条第三項の規定により議決権を有するものとみなされる株式についての議決権を含む。以下この条及び次条において同じ。）の百分の五を超える議決権（社債、株式等の振替に関する法律（平成十三年法律第七十五号）第百四十七条第一項又は第百四十八条第一項の規定により発行者に対抗することができない株式に係る議決権を含み、取得又は保有の態様その他の事情を勘案して主務省令で定めるものを除く。以下この条において「対象議決権」という。）を取得し、又は保有してはならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 275-2 (1) Where, with regard to an action to make a claim for payment of money, the defendant does not deny the facts alleged by the plaintiff at oral argument or does not advance any allegations or evidence, the court, when it finds it appropriate while taking into consideration the defendant's financial resources and any other circumstances concerned, after hearing opinions of the plaintiff, may make an order to the effect that the defendant should make a payment of money pertaining to said claim, while stipulating in the order a provision concerning the period for payment of the money pertaining to said claim or a provision authorizing installment payment with regard to such payment of money, both of which shall be within five years from the expiration of the period set forth in paragraph (3), or simultaneously stipulating a provision to the effect that if the defendant has made a payment pursuant to the provision concerning the period or has made a payment without losing, pursuant to the provision of the following paragraph, the benefit of time under the provision authorizing installment payment, he/she shall be exempted from the obligation to pay any delay damages accrued after the filing of the action. 例文帳に追加
第二百七十五条の二 金銭の支払の請求を目的とする訴えについては、裁判所は、被告が口頭弁論において原告の主張した事実を争わず、その他何らの防御の方法をも提出しない場合において、被告の資力その他の事情を考慮して相当であると認めるときは、原告の意見を聴いて、第三項の期間の経過時から五年を超えない範囲内において、当該請求に係る金銭の支払について、その時期の定め若しくは分割払の定めをし、又はこれと併せて、その時期の定めに従い支払をしたとき、若しくはその分割払の定めによる期限の利益を次項の規定による定めにより失うことなく支払をしたときは訴え提起後の遅延損害金の支払義務を免除する旨の定めをして、当該請求に係る金銭の支払を命ずる決定をすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(1) No person may acquire or possess voting rights (excluding the voting rights of the shares of stock which cannot be exercised for all matters that are subject to a resolution at a general meeting of shareholders and including the voting rights of the shares of stock for which the shareholder is deemed to have voting rights pursuant to the provisions of Article 879, paragraph 3 of the Company Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article and the following Article) exceeding five percent of the voting rights of all shareholders of a Incorporated Commodity Exchange (including the voting rights of the shares of stock which cannot be asserted against the issuer pursuant to the provisions of Article 147, paragraph 1 or Article 148, paragraph 1 of the Act on Transfer of Bonds, Shares, etc. [Act No. 75 of 2001] and excluding those specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry by taking into consideration the mode of acquisition or possession or any other relevant circumstances; hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Voting Rights" in this Article). 例文帳に追加
１ 何人も、株式会社商品取引所の総株主の議決権（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株式についての議決権を除き、会社法第八百七十九条第三項の規定により議決権を有するものとみなされる株式についての議決権を含む。以下この条及び次条において同じ。）の百分の五を超える議決権（社債、株式等の振替に関する法律（平成十三年法律第七十五号）第百四十七条第一項又は第百四十八条第一項の規定により発行者に対抗することができない株式に係る議決権を含み、取得又は保有の態様その他の事情を勘案して主務省令で定めるものを除く。以下この条において「対象議決権」という。）を取得し、又は保有してはならない。 - 経済産業省
Having gone off on a tangent a bit, let's get back: This is a temporary measure, legislation that expires at the end of March 2011 to cover the calendar year end and the fiscal year end twice when there is greater demand for funds among SMEs. As to whether or not we will postpone the expiration of the Act, we will take all factors into consideration, such as the improvement status of the Japanese economy and cash flows of SMEs and the prospects for next fiscal year onwards, and the progress made in financial institutions' financial facilitation efforts, conduct interviews with various parties as just pointed out, and conduct studies by taking into account the possibility of the postponement of its expiration, as I stated previously. As the yen is strong at the moment, the situation is extremely tough especially for SMEs. As I stated earlier, the SME Financing Facilitation Act was created based on projections that the economy should recover substantially in about two years, so with this in mind, we will conduct studies while considering the postponement of its expiration as a possibility. 例文帳に追加
少し話が横にいきましたけれども、これは臨時の措置でございまして、私は何度も申しましたように、中小企業等の資金需要が高まる年末、年度末の2回ずつ含めることができるように、来年3月末までの時限法としているところでございますが、同法の期間を延長するかどうかについては、今後、我が国経済及び中小企業との資金繰りの改善状況や来年度以降の見通し、金融機関の金融円滑化に向けた取り組みの進捗状況などを総合的に勘案し、色々なところからヒアリング、今お話がございました、ご指摘があったようにさせていただきまして、延長を視野に入れつつ、今後検討していきたいと、この前の答弁どおりでございます。今、円高でございまして、非常に中小企業は特に厳しいわけでございますから、先般も申し上げましたように、大体2年ぐらい経ったら経済が結構回復するのではないかという予測のもとで、中小企業金融円滑化法案をつくらせていただきましたが、そういったことも視野に入れつつ、延長を視野に入れつつ、今後検討してまいりたいというふうに思っています。 - 金融庁
Article 1 The purpose of this Act is, with regard to the oceans, to stipulate the basic principles, to clarify the responsibilities of the State, the local governments, business operators and the citizens as well as to formulate the basic plan with regard to the oceans and other basic matters with regard to the measures on the oceans, by establishing the Headquarters for Ocean Policy in order to promote measures with regard to the oceans comprehensively and systematically, through contributing to the sound development of the economy and society of our State and to improve the stability of the lives of citizenry as well as to contribute to the coexistence of the oceans and mankind, in consideration of the fact that the oceans, occupying broad portion of the globe, is an indispensable factor for maintaining the lives of the living beings including mankind, and the fact that it is important to realize a new oceanic State in harmonization of the peaceful and positive development and use of the oceans with the conservation of the marine environment, under the international cooperation, as our State surrounded by the oceans, based on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and other international agreements as well as on the international efforts on the realization of the sustainable development and use of the oceans. 例文帳に追加
第一条 この法律は、地球の広範な部分を占める海洋が人類をはじめとする生物の生命を維持する上で不可欠な要素であるとともに、海に囲まれた我が国において、海洋法に関する国際連合条約その他の国際約束に基づき、並びに海洋の持続可能な開発及び利用を実現するための国際的な取組の中で、我が国が国際的協調の下に、海洋の平和的かつ積極的な開発及び利用と海洋環境の保全との調和を図る新たな海洋立国を実現することが重要であることにかんがみ、海洋に関し、基本理念を定め、国、地方公共団体、事業者及び国民の責務を明らかにし、並びに海洋に関する基本的な計画の策定その他海洋に関する施策の基本となる事項を定めるとともに、総合海洋政策本部を設置することにより、海洋に関する施策を総合的かつ計画的に推進し、もって我が国の経済社会の健全な発展及び国民生活の安定向上を図るとともに、海洋と人類の共生に貢献することを目的とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(2) By extending the appropriate assistance, etc. under a given circumstance while giving due consideration to the voluntary efforts of employers or other persons concerned, the State and prefectures shall endeavor to encourage the promotion and enrichment of vocational training and vocational ability tests carried out by employers or other persons concerned, assistance extended by employers to ensure that workers have opportunities to receive educational training on the job or vocational ability tests voluntarily, and other measures taken by employers to facilitate the voluntary development of workers and the improvement of their vocational abilities(*) in line with their vocational life planning, as well as endeavor to provide vocational training for workers who intend to change their jobs and other persons who need special assistance for the development and improvement of their vocational abilities(*), to provide the vocational training required in light of the situation of vocational training provided by employers and employers' organizations, to extend assistance to facilitate the voluntary development of workers and the improvement of their vocational abilities(*) in line with their vocational life planning, and to carry out trade skill tests smoothly. 例文帳に追加
２ 国及び都道府県は、事業主その他の関係者の自主的な努力を尊重しつつ、その実情に応じて必要な援助等を行うことにより事業主その他の関係者の行う職業訓練及び職業能力検定の振興並びにこれらの内容の充実並びに労働者が自ら職業に関する教育訓練又は職業能力検定を受ける機会を確保するために事業主の行う援助その他労働者が職業生活設計に即して自発的な職業能力の開発及び向上を図ることを容易にするために事業主の講ずる措置等の奨励に努めるとともに、職業を転換しようとする労働者その他職業能力の開発及び向上について特に援助を必要とする者に対する職業訓練の実施、事業主、事業主の団体等により行われる職業訓練の状況等にかんがみ必要とされる職業訓練の実施、労働者が職業生活設計に即して自発的な職業能力の開発及び向上を図ることを容易にするための援助、技能検定の円滑な実施等に努めなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(2) When the seller or the Service Provider makes full indication of the money that should be borne by the purchaser or the service recipient, the seller or the Service Provider may partially omit indication of the matters specified in Article 11(1)(ii) to (v) (excluding the matters listed in Article 8(1)(iii), (iv), and (vi) to (x)). However, this shall not apply to the time of payment of the charge for the goods or the rights or the consideration for the services where the money pertaining to the sales contract or the Service Contract has been fully or partially paid prior to the delivery of the goods, transfer of the rights, or the offer of the services, to the matters listed in Article 11(1)(iii) of the Act where the seller or the Service Provider does not deliver the goods, transfer the rights, or offer the services pertaining to the application without delay after receiving an application for a sales contract or a Service Contract, and to the matters concerning the liability of the seller where the seller does not bear the liability when the goods have a hidden defect. 例文帳に追加
２ 購入者又は役務の提供を受ける者の負担すべき金銭の全部を表示する場合は、法第十一条第一項第二号から第五号までに定める事項（第八条第一項第三号、第四号及び第六号から第十号までに掲げる事項を除く。）の一部を表示しないことができる。ただし、売買契約又は役務提供契約に係る金銭の全部又は一部の支払が商品の引渡し若しくは権利の移転又は役務の提供前である場合にあつては商品若しくは権利の代金又は役務の対価の支払時期、売買契約又は役務提供契約の申込みを受けた後遅滞なく当該申込みに係る商品を送付しない場合若しくは権利を移転しない場合又は役務を提供しない場合にあつては法第十一条第一項第三号に掲げる事項及び商品に隠れた瑕疵がある場合に販売業者がその責任を負わない場合にあつては販売業者の責任に関する事項についてはこの限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 34 (1) Where the holder of a breeder's right or of an exclusive exploitation right claims, against a person who has intentionally or negligently infringed his/her breeder's right or exclusive exploitation right, compensation for damages caused to him/her by the infringement, if the person has transferred the propagating material, the harvested material or the processed products which is the component of the act of infringement, the amount of damage suffered by the holder of the breeder's right or the holder of the exclusive exploitation right may be presumed, within the limit attainable by the holder of the breeder's right or the holder of the exclusive exploitation right in consideration of his/her capability to exploit such propagating material, harvested material or processed products, to be the amount given by multiplying the quantity of the propagating material, the harvested material or the processed products transferred by the person (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as the "transferred quantity") by the profit per unit of the propagating material, the harvested material or the processed products which would have been sold by the holder of the breeder's right or the holder of the exclusive exploitation right if there had been no such an act of infringement. However, if there exists any circumstance under which the holder of the breeder's right or the holder of the exclusive exploitation right may not be able to sell the transferred quantity in whole or in part, the amount corresponding to the quantity which would not have been sold due to such a circumstance shall be deducted. 例文帳に追加
第三十四条 育成者権者又は専用利用権者が故意又は過失により自己の育成者権又は専用利用権を侵害した者に対しその侵害により自己が受けた損害の賠償を請求する場合において、その者がその侵害の行為を組成した種苗、収穫物又は加工品を譲渡したときは、その譲渡した種苗、収穫物又は加工品の数量（以下この項において「譲渡数量」という。）に、育成者権者又は専用利用権者がその侵害の行為がなければ販売することができた種苗、収穫物又は加工品の単位数量当たりの利益の額を乗じて得た額を、育成者権者又は専用利用権者の利用の能力に応じた額を超えない限度において、育成者権者又は専用利用権者が受けた損害の額とすることができる。ただし、譲渡数量の全部又は一部に相当する数量を育成者権者又は専用利用権者が販売することができないとする事情があるときは、当該事情に相当する数量に応じた額を控除するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Many countries agree with this argument but think that the strengthening of regulation should be discussed after the global financial system has been normalized. We have to give consideration to two points. One is whether or not the strengthening of capital adequacy regulation will lead to a credit crunch. The other is whether we can secure an international agreement that suits the circumstances of the Japanese financial sector. As conclusions concerning these matters will be reached by December, Japan also wants to actively participate in the working-level debates — I understand that the FSA (Financial Services Agency) Commissioner will visit Basel soon — that are intended to lay down common global rules. 例文帳に追加
多くの国が、それはそうかもしれないけれども今の時期にどうかなと、まず世界的な金融が正常化した後にそういうことを議論すべきではないかと、多くの国がそういう意見でございまして、私ども２つ考えなきゃいけないことがあって、１つはそういうものをやることが信用収縮につながらないかということが１点、それからそういうものを国際会議で決めて日本の金融界の実情とマッチするような合意が得られるかどうか、両面を考えなければいけないわけですから、これは12月までの結論なので、金融庁長官もバーゼルに近々行かれるようですから、そういう事務的な話し合いも積み重ねながら、世界的な共通ルールを作る話ですから、日本としても積極的に参加したいということだろうと思っています - 金融庁
Article 1 The purpose of this Act is to strengthen nuclear disaster control measures, in cooperation with the Act on Regulation of Nuclear Source Materials, Nuclear Fuel Materials and Reactors (Act No. 166 of 1957; hereinafter referred to as the "Reactor Regulation Act"), the Basic Act on Disaster Control Measures (Act No. 223 of 1961) and other Acts concerning nuclear disaster prevention, by providing special measures for the obligations, etc. of nuclear operators concerning nuclear disaster prevention, the issuance of a declaration of a nuclear emergency situation and the establishment, etc. of nuclear emergency response headquarters, and the implementation of emergency response measures and other matters relating to a nuclear disaster, taking into consideration the particularity of a nuclear disaster, thereby protecting the lives, bodies and properties of citizens from a nuclear disaster. 例文帳に追加
第一条 この法律は、原子力災害の特殊性にかんがみ、原子力災害の予防に関する原子力事業者の義務等、原子力緊急事態宣言の発出及び原子力災害対策本部の設置等並びに緊急事態応急対策の実施その他原子力災害に関する事項について特別の措置を定めることにより、核原料物質、核燃料物質及び原子炉の規制に関する法律（昭和三十二年法律第百六十六号。以下「規制法」という。）、災害対策基本法（昭和三十六年法律第二百二十三号）その他原子力災害の防止に関する法律と相まって、原子力災害に対する対策の強化を図り、もって原子力災害から国民の生命、身体及び財産を保護することを目的とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 49 (1) When an officer, employee or Expert Advisor of a qualified consumer organization receives or has a third party receive (including said qualified consumer organization) money or other property benefits, whether it be donation, grant or other remuneration from the opposite person pertaining to the injunction demanded by the qualified consumer organization, in consideration for not exercising or not having exercised the right to demand an injunction, waiving or having waived the right to demand an injunction, entering or having entered into settlement related to the demand of an injunction with a Business Operator, etc. or terminating or having terminated court proceedings or other proceedings pertaining to the demand of an injunction for other reasons, they shall be punished by imprisonment with work for not more than 3 years or by a fine of not more than three million yen (3,000,000 yen). 例文帳に追加
第四十九条 適格消費者団体の役員、職員又は専門委員が、適格消費者団体の差止請求に係る相手方から、寄附金、賛助金その他名目のいかんを問わず、当該適格消費者団体においてその差止請求権の行使をしないこと若しくはしなかったこと、その差止請求権の放棄をすること若しくはしたこと、事業者等との間でその差止請求に係る和解をすること若しくはしたこと又はその差止請求に係る訴訟その他の手続を他の事由により終了させること若しくは終了させたことの報酬として、金銭その他の財産上の利益を受け、又は第三者（当該適格消費者団体を含む。）に受けさせたときは、三年以下の懲役又は三百万円以下の罰金に処する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Even a case where a financial institution does not literally meet the requirement of a check item should not be regarded as inappropriate if the arrangements and procedures put in place by the institution are reasonable from the viewpoint of securing of the soundness and appropriateness of its business and are thus deemed as effectively meeting the requirement or as sufficient in light of the institution's scale and nature. For example, if a financial institution does not have a division described in the checklists of each system, the inspector should review, with due consideration for the institution's scale and nature, whether its organization is structured in a way to enable the execution of necessary functions and a check-and-balance system. In this regard, it is necessary for inspectors to sufficiently conduct hearings from and exchange opinions with financial institutions on the occasion of on-site inspections. 例文帳に追加
なお、他のチェックリストと同様、当該チェックリストの各チェック項目の水準の達成が金融機関に直ちに義務付けられるものではない。当該チェックリストの適用に当たっては、金融機関の規模や特性を十分に踏まえ、機械的・画一的な運用に陥らないよう配慮する必要がある。また、金融機関が経営判断で決すべき個別の与信判断の是非には介入しないよう留意する必要がある。したがって、当該チェックリストのチェック項目に記述されている字義どおりの対応が金融機関においてなされていない場合であっても、金融機関の業務の健全性及び適切性の観点からみて、金融機関の行っている対応が合理的なものであり、さらに、チェック項目に記述されているものと同様の効果がある、あるいは金融機関の規模や特性に応じた十分なものである、と認められるのであれば、不適切とするものではない。また、当該チェックリストにおける「金融円滑化管理方針」、「金融円滑化管理規程」、「金融円滑化マニュアル」は、必ずしも明確に記載されるべき項目を全て包含する統一的な方針等を策定する必要はなく、複数の部門等において定められる複数の方針等において、定められていればよいことに留意する必要がある。さらに、当該チェックリストにおける「金融円滑化管理責任者」が信用リスク理等他の部門の職員（管理者を含む。）を兼務することがあることに留意する必要がある。 - 金融庁
(4) The General Partner shall be entitled to receive a commission, fee or other consideration (the “Deductible Fees”) from a Portfolio Company in connection with a Portfolio Investment, or the management or technical guidance or advice or other management support provided by the General Partner to a Portfolio Company. If the General Partner has received Deductible Fees, the management fee to be payable on the next payment date therefor shall be reduced by an amount equal to [__]% of such Deductible Fees (the “Management Fee Deduction”). [[If an Excuse/Exclusion clause is not included]Each Partner shall be relieved of its liability for the management fee payable on the payment date by its share of the Management Fee Deduction in proportion to its Interest Amount/[If an Excuse/Exclusion clause is included]Each Partner who made a contribution to a Portfolio Investment for such Portfolio Company shall be relieved of its liability for the management fee payable on the payment date by its share of the Management Fee Deduction in proportion to its Percentage Interest in respect of such Portfolio Investment]. If the total amount of the Management Fee payable on the payment date thereof is less than the Management Fee Deduction, the deduction shall be made from a management fee payable on each of the next and subsequent payment dates until the Management Fee Deduction is applied in full. 例文帳に追加
4. 無限責任組合員は、ポートフォリオ投資、又は無限責任組合員による経営若しくは技術の指導若しくは助言その他の経営支援に関連して、投資先事業者等から手数料又は報酬その他の対価（以下「控除対象手数料等」という。）を受領することができる。無限責任組合員が控除対象手数料等を受領したときは、当該控除対象手数料等の［ ］%に相当する額（以下「管理報酬控除額」という。）を、直後の管理報酬の支払日に支払われるべき管理報酬から減額するものとし、［【免除/除外条項を設けない場合】各組合員は、管理報酬控除額のうち、その持分金額/【免除/除外条項を設ける場合】当該投資先事業者等へのポートフォリオ投資に出資した各組合員は、管理報酬控除額のうち、当該ポートフォリオ投資に係る対象持分割合］に応じて按分した金額につき、当該支払日に支払われるべき管理報酬の負担を免れるものとする。なお、当該管理報酬の支払日において支払われるべき管理報酬の総額が管理報酬控除額を下回る場合には、管理報酬控除額の全額が控除されるまで、次回以降の各支払日において支払われるべき管理報酬より順次控除するものとする。 - 経済産業省
(18) Where, in Japan on or after April, 1, 1999, a person (excluding the corporations listed in Appended Table 1 of the Corporation Tax Act and any other person specified by a Cabinet Order) receives, due to the redemption (including retirement by purchase; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) of specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc., payment of redemption money (or a consideration for the purchase in the case of retirement by purchase; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), or receives, due to interest payment pertaining to specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc. (limited to interest on coupon-only book-entry transfer national government bonds prescribed in paragraph (12); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), payment of interest, such person shall, upon receiving the redemption or interest payment, submit a written notice stating the person's name and address and any other matters specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance to the person in charge of handling payment of redemption money or interest (in the case where the said person in charge of handling payment is a foreign intermediary, submission shall be made via the said foreign intermediary (in the case where the said foreign intermediary is a foreign further indirect account management institution, and the said foreign intermediary makes entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc. through a foreign indirect account management institution, submission shall be made via the said foreign intermediary and the said foreign indirect account management institution; in the case where the said foreign intermediary is a foreign further indirect account management institution, and the said foreign intermediary makes entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc. through another foreign further indirect account management institution, submission shall be made via [1] the said foreign intermediary, [2] such other foreign further indirect account management institution pertaining to the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc., and [3] the foreign indirect account management institution pertaining to the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc.) to the head of the business office, etc. of the specified book-entry transfer institution through which the said foreign intermediary (in the case where the said foreign intermediary is a foreign further indirect account management institution: the foreign indirect account management pertaining to the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc.) makes entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc.) In this case, the person who submits the said written notice shall present the person's identification document to the said person in charge of handling payment, and the said person in charge of handling payment shall confirm, by the said identification document, the person's name and address stated in the written notice. 例文帳に追加
１８ 平成十一年四月一日以後に国内において特定振替国債等の償還（買入消却を含む。以下この項において同じ。）又は利息（第十二項に規定する分離利息振替国債に係るものに限る。以下この条において同じ。）の支払によりその償還金（買入消却が行われる場合にあつては、その買入れの対価。以下この条において同じ。）又は利息の支払を受ける者（法人税法別表第一に掲げる法人その他の政令で定めるものを除く。）は、その者の氏名又は名称及び住所その他の財務省令で定める事項を記載した告知書を、その償還又は利息の支払を受ける際、その償還金又は利息の支払の取扱者に（当該支払の取扱者が外国仲介業者である場合には、当該外国仲介業者（当該外国仲介業者が外国再間接口座管理機関である場合において、当該外国仲介業者が外国間接口座管理機関において当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等を受けるときは当該外国仲介業者及び当該外国間接口座管理機関とし、当該外国仲介業者が他の外国再間接口座管理機関において当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等を受けるときは当該外国仲介業者、当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等に係る他の外国再間接口座管理機関及び当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等に係る外国間接口座管理機関とする。）を経由して当該外国仲介業者（当該外国仲介業者が外国再間接口座管理機関である場合には、当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等に係る外国間接口座管理機関）が当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等を受ける特定振替機関等の営業所等の長に）提出しなければならない。この場合において、当該告知書の提出をする者は、当該支払の取扱者にその者の確認書類を提示しなければならないものとし、当該支払の取扱者は、当該告知書に記載されている氏名又は名称及び住所を当該確認書類により確認しなければならないものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 165-2 (1) With regard to Partnerships, etc. (meaning partnerships established based on partnership contract provided in Article 667(1) of the Civil Code, Investment LPS provided in Article 2(2) of the Limited Partnership Act for Investment (hereinafter referred to as "Investment LPS" in this Article) or a Limited Liability Partnership provided in Article 2 of the Limited Liability Partnership Act (hereinafter referred to as "Limited Liability Partnership" in this Article), or other similar organizations specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) whose assets includes shares of a Listed Company, etc. which represent voting rights equal to or greater than 10 percent of the Voting Rights held by All of its Shareholders, etc. (hereinafter referred to as "Specified Partnerships, etc." in this Article), when one of the partners of Specified Partnerships, etc. (including persons specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as similar to a partner of Specified Partnerships, etc. under a Cabinet Office Ordinance; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) makes Purchase, etc. or Sales, etc. of Specified Securities, etc. of the Listed Company, etc. in relation to the assets of the Specified Partnerships, etc. (including the cases where the trustee of a trust of which all of the partners of the Specified Partnerships, etc. are the settlor or beneficiary makes Purchase, etc. or Sales, etc. of Specified Securities, etc. of the Listed Company, etc. as specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), the partner having executed the Purchase, etc. or Sales, etc. (including a partner specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as equivalent to such a partner specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) shall submit, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance, a report on the Sales and Purchase, etc. to the Prime Minister on or before the 15th day of the month following the month which includes the day of the Sales and Purchase, etc.; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the cases so specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance in consideration of the manner of the Purchase, etc. or Sales, etc. or other circumstances. 例文帳に追加
第百六十五条の二 組合等（民法第六百六十七条第一項に規定する組合契約によつて成立する組合、投資事業有限責任組合契約に関する法律第二条第二項に規定する投資事業有限責任組合（以下この条において「投資事業有限責任組合」という。）若しくは有限責任事業組合契約に関する法律第二条に規定する有限責任事業組合（以下この条において「有限責任事業組合」という。）又はこれらの組合に類似する団体で政令で定めるものをいう。以下この条において同じ。）のうち当該組合等の財産に属する株式に係る議決権が上場会社等の総株主等の議決権に占める割合が百分の十以上であるもの（以下この条において「特定組合等」という。）については、当該特定組合等の組合員（これに類するものとして内閣府令で定める者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）が当該特定組合等の財産に関して当該上場会社等の特定有価証券等に係る買付け等又は売付け等をした場合（当該特定組合等の組合員の全員が委託者又は受益者である信託の受託者が、当該上場会社等の特定有価証券等に係る買付け等又は売付け等をする場合であつて内閣府令で定める場合を含む。以下この条において同じ。）には、当該買付け等又は売付け等を執行した組合員（これに準ずるものとして内閣府令で定める組合員を含む。以下この条において同じ。）は、内閣府令で定めるところにより、その売買等に関する報告書を売買等があつた日の属する月の翌月十五日までに、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。ただし、買付け等又は売付け等の態様その他の事情を勘案して内閣府令で定める場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(2) The purchase under the preceding paragraph shall be made in such a way that the Right to Insurance Claim, etc. under the preceding paragraph is purchased based on the request of the creditor pertaining to the Right to Insurance Claim, etc., within the period during which all payments pertaining to the insurance contract are suspended, at the amount of the insurance claim of the Covered Insurance Contract and of other benefits, multiplied by the rate specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance and Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance by taking into consideration what is the kind of that Covered Insurance Contract, the expected interest rate, other content, the time when the insured event pertaining to that request took place, etc. (hereinafter referred to as "Purchase Amount"); provided, however, that the Participating Corporation shall, in the case that it called for the Right to Insurance Claim, etc. pertaining to the purchase and when the amount which was collected from the calling deducted by the amount specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance and Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance as the cost of said purchase exceeds the Purchase Amount pertaining to said purchase, pay this excess amount to the creditor pertaining to said Right to Insurance Claim, etc. 例文帳に追加
２ 前項の買取りは、保険契約に係る支払のすべてを停止している期間内に、前項の保険金請求権等を、その保険金請求権等に係る債権者の請求に基づいて、補償対象契約の保険金その他の給付金の額に当該補償対象契約の種類、予定利率その他の内容、当該請求に係る保険事故が発生した時期等を勘案して内閣府令・財務省令で定める率を乗じて得た額（以下「買取額」という。）で買い取ることにより行うものとする。ただし、加入機構は、その買取りに係る保険金請求権等の回収をした場合において、当該回収によって得た金額から当該買取りに要した費用として内閣府令・財務省令で定めるものの額を控除した金額が、当該買取りに係る買取額を超えるときは、その超える部分の金額を当該保険金請求権等に係る債権者に対して支払うものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(3) In a case when notification is issued pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) or paragraph (3) of the preceding Article (except for a case when a portion of an insurance premium of said fiscal year which is imposed upon a Primary Insured Person pertaining to said notification is collected by the method of special collection pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph) or when a notification is issued pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (4) to paragraph (6) of the same Article, a Municipality, when an Old Age, etc., Pension Benefit pertaining to said notification is paid to the Primary Insured Person pertaining to said notification during the period from the first day until September 30 of the following fiscal year, shall collect the prospective amount of an insurance premium that is divided by the number of payments (in a case when there are special reasons to determine said amount is inappropriate, it shall be the amount specified by a Municipality by taking into consideration the status of income and other circumstances) for the amount of said insurance premium pertaining to said payments by the method of special collection, pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. 例文帳に追加
３ 市町村は、前条第二項若しくは第三項の規定による通知が行われた場合（前項の規定により当該通知に係る第一号被保険者に対して課する当該年度の保険料の一部を特別徴収の方法によって徴収する場合を除く。）又は同条第四項から第六項までの規定による通知が行われた場合において、当該通知に係る第一号被保険者について、翌年度の初日から九月三十日までの間において当該通知に係る老齢等年金給付が支払われるときは、その支払に係る保険料額として、支払回数割保険料額の見込額（当該額によることが適当でないと認められる特別な事情がある場合においては、所得の状況その他の事情を勘案して市町村が定める額とする。）を、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより、特別徴収の方法によって徴収するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 33 (1) The term "Multilevel Marketing" as used in this chapter and Articles 66 (1) and 67 (1) shall mean sales of articles (such articles include rights to use a facility or to receive offer of services; the same shall apply hereinafter) (including mediation of such sales) or offer of services for value (including mediation of such offers) where the seller, the service provider, or their mediator induces a person to conduct resale of the articles that are the subject matter of sales (such articles are hereinafter referred to as the "Goods" in this chapter) (such resale means that the counterparty purchases and sells the Goods; the same shall apply hereinafter), consignment sale of the Goods (which means that the counterparty sells the Goods on consignment; the same shall apply hereinafter), or mediation of sales of the Goods, or induces a person to conduct offer of the same kind of services (which means that the counterparty offers services that are of the same kind as such services; the same shall apply hereinafter), or mediation of offers of such services by telling said person that he/she may receive a specified profit (all or part of the transaction fee provided by another person engaged in the resale, consignment sale, or mediation of sales of the Goods or another person engaged in offering the same kind of services, or mediation of offers of such services, or other profits that satisfy the requirements specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry; hereinafter the same shall apply in this chapter), and conducts with such person transactions pertaining to sales or mediation of sales of the Goods or offer or mediation of offers of the services that involve a specified burden (which means purchase of the Goods, payment of the consideration for the services, or provision of a transaction fee; hereinafter the same shall apply in this chapter) (such transactions include change in the terms of transactions; hereinafter referred to as the "Multilevel Marketing Transactions"). 例文帳に追加
第三十三条 この章並びに第六十六条第一項及び第六十七条第一項において「連鎖販売業」とは、物品（施設を利用し又は役務の提供を受ける権利を含む。以下同じ。）の販売（そのあつせんを含む。）又は有償で行う役務の提供（そのあつせんを含む。）の事業であつて、販売の目的物たる物品（以下この章において「商品」という。）の再販売（販売の相手方が商品を買い受けて販売することをいう。以下同じ。）、受託販売（販売の委託を受けて商品を販売することをいう。以下同じ。）若しくは販売のあつせんをする者又は同種役務の提供（その役務と同一の種類の役務の提供をすることをいう。以下同じ。）若しくはその役務の提供のあつせんをする者を特定利益（その商品の再販売、受託販売若しくは販売のあつせんをする他の者又は同種役務の提供若しくはその役務の提供のあつせんをする他の者が提供する取引料その他の経済産業省令で定める要件に該当する利益の全部又は一部をいう。以下この章において同じ。）を収受し得ることをもつて誘引し、その者と特定負担（その商品の購入若しくはその役務の対価の支払又は取引料の提供をいう。以下この章において同じ。）を伴うその商品の販売若しくはそのあつせん又は同種役務の提供若しくはその役務の提供のあつせんに係る取引（その取引条件の変更を含む。以下「連鎖販売取引」という。）をするものをいう。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 52-45-2 The provisions of Chapter III, Section 2, Subsection 1 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (excluding Articles 35 to 36-4 inclusive (Scope of Business activities of Persons Who Engage in Type I Financial Instruments Services or Investment Management, Scope of Subsidiary Business activities of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Services or Investment Advisory and Agency Services, Duty of Good Faith to Customers, Posting of Signs, Prohibition of Name Lending, Prohibition of Administration of Corporate Bonds), Article 37, paragraph (1), item (ii) (Regulation of Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify Conditions of Transactions in Advance), Article 37-3, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3, paragraph (3) (Delivery of Document prior to Conclusion of Contract), Article 37-5 (Delivery of Document Pertaining to Receipt of Security Deposit), Article 37-6, paragraphs (1) and (2), the proviso to Article 37-6, paragraph (4) and Article 37-6, paragraph (5) (Cancellation by Means of Document), Article 37-7 (Obligation to Conclude a Contract, etc. with a Designated Dispute Resolution Organization), Article 38, items (i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), the proviso to Article 39, paragraph (3) and Article 39, paragraph (5) (Prohibition of Compensation of Loss, etc.), Articles 40-2 to 40-5 inclusive (Best Execution Policy, Prohibition of Purchase and Sale, etc. Where Separate Management Is not Ensured, Limitation on Sale and Purchase, etc. of Securities for Professional Investors, Obligation of Notification in Relation to Securities for Professional Investors)) (General Rules) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to agency or intermediary for conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. by a Bank Agency. In this case, the term "Financial Instruments Business" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "agency or intermediation for the conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act"; the term "Act of Executing a Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act"; the term "Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction" in the aforementioned provisions (excluding Article 37-6, paragraph (3)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act"; the terms "wishes to conclude" in Article 37-3, paragraph (1) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "engages in agency or intermediation for the conclusion of"; the term "; provided" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "and shall, in order to contribute to the protection of Depositors, etc. (meaning Depositors, etc. as defined in Article 2, paragraph (5) of the Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), provide the customer with information on the contents of the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. and other information that would be helpful for the Depositors, etc. in advance, pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided"; the term "Financial Instruments Specialist, etc." in Article 37-3, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Principal Bank (meaning an Principal Bank as defined in Article 2, paragraph (16) of the Banking Act) for which the Bank Agent (meaning a Bank Agent as defined in Article 2, paragraph (15) of the Banking Act) is acting"; the terms "Where a Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction has been cancelled" and "the customer to pay damages or penalty for the cancellation of that Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction beyond the amount specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as the amount of fees, remuneration or any other Consideration payable by the customer with regard to that contract for Financial Instruments Transaction (referred to as a "Consideration" in the following paragraph) for the period until the cancellation of that Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction" in Article 37-6, paragraph (3) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "When a Financial Instruments Specialist has paid money to a Bank as damages or otherwise for cancellation of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. (meaning a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act; the same shall apply in Article 39) made" and "person who canceled the contract to pay money as damages or otherwise for the payment he/she has made to the Bank," respectively; the terms "purchase and sale or other transactions of Securities (excluding purchase and sale on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance and other transactions specified by Cabinet Order) or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article)," "the customer (in the case where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1, paragraph (1) of the Act on Engagement in Trust Business by a Financial Institution; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts purchase and sale of Securities or Derivative Transactions on the account of the person who sets a trust under a trust contract, including such person who sets the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)," "Securities or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Securities, etc." in this Article)" and "make up" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," "the customer," "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." and "make up, not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," respectively; the terms "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." and "Securities, etc." in Article 39, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (iii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." and "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," respectively; the term "make an addition" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition, not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc."; the term "make an addition" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (iii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition, not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc."; the term "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in Article 39, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc."; the term "that is specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause of" in Article 39, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "that may be a potential cause of"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加
第五十二条の四十五の二 金融商品取引法第三章第二節第一款（第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで（第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者の業務の範囲、第二種金融商品取引業又は投資助言・代理業のみを行う者の兼業の範囲、顧客に対する誠実義務、標識の掲示、名義貸しの禁止、社債の管理の禁止等）、第三十七条第一項第二号（広告等の規制）、第三十七条の二（取引態様の事前明示義務）、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項（契約締結前の書面の交付）、第三十七条の五（保証金の受領に係る書面の交付）、第三十七条の六第一項、第二項、第四項ただし書及び第五項（書面による解除）、第三十七条の七（指定紛争解決機関との契約締結義務等）、第三十八条第一号及び第二号並びに第三十八条の二（禁止行為）、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項（損失補てん等の禁止）並びに第四十条の二から第四十条の五まで（最良執行方針等、分別管理が確保されていない場合の売買等の禁止、特定投資家向け有価証券の売買等の制限、特定投資家向け有価証券に関する告知義務）を除く。）（通則）の規定は、銀行代理業者が行う銀行代理業に係る特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介の業務」と、「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約の締結」と、これらの規定（同法第三十七条の六第三項の規定を除く。）中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「を締結しようとするとき」とあるのは「の締結の代理又は媒介を行うとき」と、「交付しなければならない」とあるのは「交付するほか、預金者等（銀行法第二条第五項に規定する預金者等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の保護に資するため、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該特定預金等契約の内容その他預金者等に参考となるべき情報の提供を行わなければならない」と、同項第一号中「金融商品取引業者等」とあるのは「銀行代理業者（銀行法第二条第十五項に規定する銀行代理業者をいう。）の所属銀行（同条第十六項に規定する所属銀行をいう。）」と、同法第三十七条の六第三項中「金融商品取引契約の解除があつた場合には」とあるのは「特定預金等契約（銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約をいう。第三十九条において同じ。）の解除に伴い銀行に損害賠償その他の金銭の支払をした場合において」と、「金融商品取引契約の解除までの期間に相当する手数料、報酬その他の当該金融商品取引契約に関して顧客が支払うべき対価（次項において「対価」という。）の額として内閣府令で定める金額を超えて当該金融商品取引契約の解除」とあるのは「支払」と、「又は違約金の支払を」とあるのは「その他の金銭の支払を、解除をした者に対し、」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引（買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。）又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「顧客（信託会社等（信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。）が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）」とあるのは「顧客」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
As I said at the beginning of this press conference, we have until now made various institutional reforms, and some measures included in the reforms were forward-looking. The reform of the settlement system, the enactment of the Financial Instruments Exchange Act, and the Better Market Initiative may include world-leading measures. If such measures are found to be excessive, they will have to be reviewed. Given that the household and industrial sectors are closely related to the financial sector, we intend to debate how we should realize the development of both financing as the supporter of the household and industrial sectors and financing as an industry and achieve a positive cycle of these two functions complementing each other while taking into consideration the need to revitalize the Japanese economy and deal with the shrinking population of children and the aging of society. 例文帳に追加
冒頭申し上げましたけれども、私どもはこれまで様々な制度改革、それぞれの中には先々を展望したものもございます。決済改革、あるいは金融商品取引法、あるいはこの前の市場強化プランといったものも、ものによりましては世界に先駆けているのもあろうかと思います。そういったものの、仮に行き過ぎがあったとすれば、それは点検していく必要もございますけれども、全体として、日本全体としての経済の活力というのも、少子高齢化というものも考えながら、それも大事にしていくと、当然のことながら、一方で、これだけ家計と産業と金融というものの関わり合いがあるとすれば、その機能と、そういった更に積極的に活用するという、この機能の両立と好循環をどう目指していくか、そういったことにつきましては、庁内でも議論をしてきたいと思っているところであります。 - 金融庁
Banning exchanges of senior personnel is not the ultimate goal. As I already said, the "no-return rule" is a means to ensure that financial administration is flexibly conducted with a high level of professionalism and in line with its objectives. Therefore, it is important to take into consideration other factors that contribute to those objectives as well. I believe that the independence, neutrality and professionalism of financial administration are important elements that should never be ignored, so I think that measures that help to maintain these elements should be actively adopted. This is what I meant when I said earlier that the "no-return rule" will remain important, and attention should continue to be paid to that point. 例文帳に追加
そこの大きな狙いというものは、幹部級の交流をしないということそのものが最終目標ではなくて、先ほど来申し上げているように、金融行政が、その政策目標に忠実に、しかも機動的に、高い専門性を発揮しつつ、きちんと遂行される、そのための一つの工夫なわけですから、その目的に照らしたときに、ほかの様々なサポートをしてくれる要因と一緒に考えていくということが大事なのであって、私は、この金融行政の独立性・中立性・専門性、これは決して否定されてはいけない重要な要素であると思っておりますので、この点に資するための工夫はどんどんやっていったら良いと思いますし、先ほど、プリンシプル・ベースとしての「ノーリターンルール」というものについては、引き続き重要な心構えであって、今後とも留意すべきだと申し上げたのは、そういう意味でございます。 - 金融庁
(3) In addition to distribution of funds prescribed in the preceding paragraph, if the General Partner reasonably determines that it is beneficial for the Partners who have made contributions with respect to a Portfolio Investment to receive an in kind distribution of Portfolio Securities in respect of such Portfolio Investment (including non-money consideration acquired by the Partnership from a Disposition of, in kind dividends with respect to or share splits of Portfolio Securities) (the day of such determination being referred to as the “Reference Date”), the General Partner may, promptly after the Reference Date, distribute in kind to the Participating Interested Partners in respect of such Portfolio Investment their respective pro rata shares of the Portfolio Securities equivalent to the balance of the total amount of the Value at the Time of Distribution of the Portfolio Securities after the deduction of (x) the totalamount of costs and expenses, if any, and taxes and other public duties, if any, required for the distribution and (y) the amount of any incentive fee, if any, pursuant to paragraph (4) of this Article (in the case where such incentive fee is paid in kind by the Portfolio Securities, the total amount of the Value at the Time of Distribution of such Portfolio Securities), in proportion to their respective Percentage Interests (provided that, for a Withdrawing Partner, the distribution shall be based on its Percentage Interest at the time of its withdrawal), to the extent allowed by Article 30. The General Partner may sell a portion of the Portfolio Securities that are to be distributed in order to pay costs, expenses, taxes and other public duties required for such distribution and to pay such incentive fee. In such case, the General Partner shall distribute the Portfolio Securities remaining after deducting the Portfolio Securities so sold or to be so sold. If the Portfolio Securities are not Marketable Securities, the General Partner shall send a document stating (i) the proposed in kind distribution and the reason therefor, (ii) a statement of Portfolio Securities to be distributed in kind, (iii) an assessment of the Value at the Time of Distribution as of the Reference Date and (iv) other matters as required for determination of appropriateness of the proposed distribution in kind, and shall be required to obtain an approval of the Limited Partners holding interests equal to [ ]% or more of the total Percentage Interests of the Limited Partners who have made contributions to the Portfolio Investment. Article 49(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to distribution by the General Partner pursuant to this paragraph. 例文帳に追加
3. 前項に規定する金銭の分配のほか、無限責任組合員は、あるポートフォリオ投資に係る投資証券等（投資証券等に係る処分等、現物配当、株式分割等により本組合が取得したもののうち金銭以外のものを含む。）を現物で分配することが当該ポートフォリオ投資に関し出資をした組合員の利益に適うと合理的に判断する場合（かかる判断がなされた日を「現物分配基準日」という。）、当該ポートフォリオ投資に係る対象組合員等に対し、現物分配基準日後速やかに、当該投資証券等の分配時評価額の総額から、分配に要する諸費用（もしあれば）及び公租公課（もしあれば）の合計額を控除した上、本条第4 項に従い成功報酬（もしあれば）の額（成功報酬を投資証券等の現物で支払う場合には、当該投資証券等の分配時評価額の総額）を控除した残額に相当する当該投資証券等を、第30 条により認められる範囲において、対象持分割合（但し、脱退組合員については当該脱退組合員の脱退当時を基準とする。）に応じ按分をした割合により、それぞれ現物により分配するとができるものとする。無限責任組合員は、分配に要する諸費用及び公租公課並びに成功報酬の支払いにあてるため、分配される投資証券の一部を売却することができるものとし、かかる場合、当該売却に係る投資証券等を控除した後の当該投資証券等を対象組合員等に対し分配するものとする。当該投資証券等が市場性のある有価証券ではない場合、無限責任組合員は、(ⅰ)現物分配を行う旨及びその理由、(ⅱ)現物分配する投資証券等の明細、(ⅲ)その現物分配基準日における分配時評価額の案、並びに(ⅳ)その他その適否を判断する上で必要な事項を記載した書面を送付した上、当該ポートフォリオ投資に関し出資をした有限責任組合員の対象持割合の合計の［ ］分の［ ］以上に相当する持分を有する有限責任組合員の承認を取得しなければならないものとする。なお、第49 条第1 項は、本項の規定に基づき無限責任組合員が行う分配に準用する。 - 経済産業省
Article 52-4 (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 52-2(1), a Written Notice of Holding the Bank's Voting Rights pertaining to voting rights held by a Bank, Financial Instruments Business Operator (limited to one that conducts Securities-Related Business), trust company (limited to one that has obtained a license set forth in Article 3 or Article 53(1) of the Trust Business Act) or any other person specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance who has notified the Prime Minister of a Reference Date, where the purpose of holding such voting rights is not for controlling the business activities of the Bank or Bank Holding Company that has issued the shares relating to that voting rights (excluding the case where the Proportion of Voting Rights Held has exceeded the number specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance and any case specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance by taking into consideration the manner in which they are held and other circumstances; hereinafter referred to as "Voting Rights Subject to Special Provisions" in this Article) shall be submitted to the Prime Minister stating matters that relate to the status of holding that voting rights as of the Reference Date on which the Proportion of Voting Rights Held exceeded five hundredths for the first time and that are specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, by the fifteenth day of the month following the month containing said Reference Date, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance. 例文帳に追加
第五十二条の四 銀行、金融商品取引業者（有価証券関連業を営む者に限る。）、信託会社（信託業法第三条又は第五十三条第一項の免許を受けたものに限る。）その他の内閣府令で定める者のうち基準日を内閣総理大臣に届け出た者が保有する議決権で当該議決権に係る株式の発行者である銀行又は銀行持株会社の営業活動を支配することを保有の目的としないもの（議決権保有割合が内閣府令で定める数を超えた場合及び保有の態様その他の事情をして内閣府令で定める場合を除く。以下この条において「特例対象議決権」という。）に係る銀行議決権保有届出書は、第五十二条の二第一項の規定にかかわらず、議決権保有割合が初めて百分の五を超える数となつた基準日における当該議決権の保有状況に関する事項であつて、内閣府令で定めるものを記載したものを、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該基準日の属する月の翌月十五日までに、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(A) Trade name of the futures commission merchant; (B) The fact that the merchant is a futures commission merchant; (C) The breakdown and total amount of consideration payable by customers under whatever titles including but not limited to commission, remuneration and expenses in connection with the consignment contract or, alternatively, the maximum amounts thereof, or the outline of their calculation method (if it is impossible to indicate them, that fact and the reasons thereof); (D) In the case of transactions which require the customers to deposit a clearing margin, etc., the amount thereof and its calculation method; (E) If the transaction amount under the consignment contract is significantly larger than that of the clearing margin, etc. to be deposited by customers for the transaction, that fact, and the ratio of such transaction amount to such clearing margin, etc. (if such calculation is impossible, that fact and the reasons thereof); (F) The fact that transactions under the consignment contract involve a risk of loss incurred by customers due to the fluctuations in the commodity market and, furthermore, that the amount of such loss may exceed that of the clearing margin, etc., and the reasons thereof; and (G) If the futures commission merchant is a member of the Commodity Futures Association of Japan, that fact and the name of the specific association. 例文帳に追加
①商品取引員の商号②商品取引員である旨③手数料、報酬、費用その他いかなる名称によるかを問わず、受託契約に関して顧客が支払うべき対価の種類ごとの金額若しくはその上限額又はこれらの計算方法の概要及び当該金額の合計額若しくはその上限額又はこれらの計算方法の概要（これらの表示をすることができない場合にあっては、その旨及びその理由）④受託契約に関して顧客が預託すべき取引証拠金等がある場合にあっては、その額又は計算方法⑤受託契約に基づく取引が、当該取引について顧客が預託すべき取引証拠金等の額に比して著しく大きい旨及び当該取引の額の当該取引証拠金等の額に対する比率（当該比率を算出することができない場合にあっては、その旨及び理由）⑥商品市場における相場の変動により受託契約に基づく取引について顧客に損失が生ずることとなるおそれがあり、かつ、当該損失の額が取引証拠金等の額を上回ることとなるおそれがある旨及びその理由⑦商品取引員が商品先物取引協会に加入している場合にあっては、その旨及び当該商品先物取引協会の名称 - 経済産業省
I take it that you are asking about the proposed amendment to the Insurance Business Act that has been passed to the current session for continued deliberation. I assume that you are questioning the appropriateness of a mutual aid business of a public interest corporation or the arrangement in which a mutual aid business of a given public interest corporation is to be supervised by the former competent authorities, with an implication that the FSA should be responsible for supervision. Well, the fact is that the respective authorities, having the experience of supervising public interest corporations for a long time, are well-versed with specifics of their operation. On the subject of this Act, I believe that I named several examples the other day, such as the Japan Medical Association, which has always been supervised by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare since the Meiji era, including the years of supervision by its predecessor, the Health and Medical Bureau of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. While circumstances vary from authority to authority, they know very extensively about internal affairs of those corporations and have exercised thorough supervision and, in that sense, have a set of knowledge of their operation and other information accumulated in the course of the work of supervision in the past, which accordingly makes them presumably capable of delivering more fine-tuned supervision than the FSA would be. Since the most important thing is policyholder protection, we believe that, from such a perspective, having the former authorities supervise them is an appropriate way to go. It is also in comprehensive consideration of overall circumstances, including the fact that this exemption of the Act is a provisional step, that we find it appropriate to have the former authorities continue to supervise those corporations. 例文帳に追加
継続審議となっている保険業法の改正案のことだと思いますけれども、公益法人の共済事業あるいは旧主務官庁が監督することになっていますが、それはいかがなものかと、金融庁として監督すべきではないかという質問かと思いますけれども、公益法人というのは、それぞれの官庁が長い間、公益法人の監督をしてきたわけでございますから、その業務に関しては、各監督官庁が事情をよく知っており、この法律については、幾つかこの前も申し上げたと思いますが、例えば、日本医師会は確か明治以来、厚生省、当時の内務省衛生局が、ずっと監督官庁でございまして、各省色々ありますけれども、内部のことを非常によく知っており、各主務官庁がきめ細かい監督を行っていますから、そういった意味で、その業務に関する知見やこれまでの監督について蓄積している情報がございますので、金融庁に比べてより細かな監督を行うことができると考えられまして、契約者保護ということが一番大事ではございますが、そういった観点から（旧主務官庁が監督することが）適当というふうに考えております。そして、この法律の特例は当分の間という措置でございますので、そういったことを総合的に勘案して、引き続き旧主務官庁が監督することが適切だと考えております。 - 金融庁
Article 271-5 (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 271-3, paragraph (1), A Written Notice of Holding the Bank's Voting Rights pertaining to voting rights held by a Bank, Financial Instruments Business Operator (limited to one that conducts Securities-Related Business), trust company, or any other person specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance who has notified the Prime Minister of a Reference date, where the purpose of holding such voting rights is not for controlling the business activities of the Insurance Company or Insurance Holding Company that has issued the shares relating to that voting rights (excluding the case where the Proportion of Voting Rights Held has exceeded the number specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance and any case specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance by taking into consideration the manner in which they are held and other circumstances; hereinafter referred to as "Voting Rights Subject to Special Provisions" in this Act) shall be submitted to the Prime Minister by stating matters that relate to the status of holding that voting rights as of the Reference Date on which the Proportion of Voting Rights Held exceeded five hundredths for the first time and that are specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, by the fifteenth day of the month following the month containing said Reference Date, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance. 例文帳に追加
第二百七十一条の五 銀行、金融商品取引業者（有価証券関連業を行う者に限る。）、信託会社その他の内閣府令で定める者のうち基準日を内閣総理大臣に届け出た者が保有する議決権で当該議決権に係る株式の発行者である保険会社又は保険持株会社の事業活動を支配することを保有の目的としないもの（議決権保有割合が内閣府令で定める数を超えた場合及び保有の態様その他の事情を勘案して内閣府令で定める場合を除く。以下この条において「特例対象議決権」という。）に係る保険議決権保有届出書は、第二百七十一条の三第一項の規定にかかわらず、議決権保有割合が初めて百分の五を超える数となった基準日における当該議決権の保有状況に関する事項であって、内閣府令で定めるものを記載したものを、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該基準日の属する月の翌月十五日までに、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 27-26 (1) A Report of Possession of Large Volume pertaining to Share Certificates, etc. which are held by a Financial Instruments Business Operator (limited to those who conduct the Type I Financial Instruments Business under Article 28(1), or who conduct the Investment Management Business under paragraph (4) of the same Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), a bank or any other person specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance (limited to those who have notified the Reference Date specified in paragraph (3) to the Prime Minister) where the purpose of holding is not for effecting material changes in or giving material effect to the business activities of the issuer of said Share Certificates, etc., as specified by a Cabinet Order (referred to as "Act of Making Important Suggestion, etc." in paragraphs (4) and (5)) (excluding the cases where the Holding Ratio of Share Certificates, etc. exceeds the ratio specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, or other cases specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance by taking into consideration the manner of holding and other circumstances), or which are held by the State, local government or other person specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance (limited to those who have notified the Reference Date specified in paragraph (3) to the Prime Minister) (such Share Certificates, etc. are hereinafter collectively referred to as "Share Certificates, etc. Subject to Special Provisions" in this Article) shall, notwithstanding the provision of the main clause of Article 27-23(1), be submitted to the Prime Minister with a statement of the matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance with regard to the status of holding of said Share Certificates, etc. as of the Reference Date when the Holding Ratio of Share Certificates, etc. have exceeded 5% for the first time, within five days from said Reference Date, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance. 例文帳に追加
第二十七条の二十六 金融商品取引業者（第二十八条第一項に規定する第一種金融商品取引業を行う者又は同条第四項に規定する投資運用業を行う者に限る。以下この条において同じ。）、銀行その他の内閣府令で定める者（第三項に規定する基準日を内閣総理大臣に届け出た者に限る。）が保有する株券等で当該株券等の発行者の事業活動に重大な変更を加え、又は重大な影響を及ぼす行為として政令で定めるもの（第四項及び第五項において「重要提案行為等」という。）を行うことを保有の目的としないもの（株券等保有割合が内閣府令で定める数を超えた場合及び保有の態様その他の事情を勘案して内閣府令で定める場合を除く。）又は国、地方公共団体その他の内閣府令で定める者（第三項に規定する基準日を内閣総理大臣に届け出た者に限る。）が保有する株券等（以下この条において「特例対象株券等」という。）に係る大量保有報告書は、第二十七条の二十三第一項本文の規定にかかわらず、株券等保有割合が初めて百分の五を超えることとなつた基準日における当該株券等の保有状況に関する事項で内閣府令で定めるものを記載したものを、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該基準日から五日以内に、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 52-45-2 The provisions of Subsection 1 of Section 2 of Chapter III of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (excluding Article 35 to 36-4 inclusive (Scope of Businesses of Persons Who Engage in Type I Financial Instruments Business or Investment Management Business, Scope of Subsidiary Businesses of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Business or Investment Advisory and Agency Business, Duty of Good Faith to Customers, Posting of Signs, Prohibition of Name Lending, Prohibition of Administration of Bonds), Article 37(1)(ii) (Regulation of Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify Conditions of Transactions in Advance), Article 37-3(1)(ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3(3) (Delivery of Document prior to Conclusion of Contract), Article 37-5 (Delivery of Document Pertaining to Receipt of Security Deposit), Article 37-6(1) and (2), the proviso to Article 37-6 (4) and Article 37-6(5)(Cancellation by Means of Document), Article 38(i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), the proviso to Article 39(3) and Article 39(5) (Prohibition of Compensation of Loss, etc.), Article 40-2 (Best Execution Policy) and Article 40-3 (Prohibition of Sales and Purchase, etc. Where Separate Management Is not Ensured)) (General Rules) shall apply mutatis mutandis to agency or intermediary for conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. by a Bank Agency. In this case, the term "Financial Instruments Business" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "agency service or intermediary service for conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act,"; the term "Act of Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act,"; the term "Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions (excluding Article 37-6(3)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act,"; the terms "intends to conclude" in Article 37-3(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conducts agency service or intermediary service for conclusion of,"; the term "; provided" shall be deemed to be replaced with "and shall, in order to contribute to the protection of Depositors, etc. (meaning Depositors, etc. as defined in Article 2(5) of the Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), provide the customer in advance with information on the contents of the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. and other information that would be helpful for the Depositors, etc., pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided"; the term "Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc." in Article 37-3(1)(i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Principal Bank (meaning an Principal Bank as defined in Article 2(16) of the Banking Act) for which the Bank Agent (meaning a Bank Agent as defined in Article 2(15) of the Banking Act) is acting,"; the terms "Where a Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction has been cancelled" and "the customer to pay damages or penalty for the cancellation of that Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction beyond the amount designated by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as the amount of fees, remuneration or any other Consideration payable by the customer with regard to that contract for financial instruments transaction (referred to as "Consideration" in the following paragraph) for the period until the cancellation of that Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction" in Article 37-6(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "When he/she has paid money to a Bank as damages or otherwise for cancellation of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. (meaning a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act; the same shall apply in Article 39) made" and "person who canceled the contract to pay money as damages or otherwise for the payment he/she has made to the Bank," respectively; the terms "sales and purchase or any other transaction of Securities (excluding sales and purchase on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance or other transactions designated by a Cabinet Order) or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article)," "the customer (in the case where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1(1) of the Act on Securities Investment Trust and Securities Investment Corporations; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts sales and purchase of Securities or Derivative Transactions for the account of the person who sets a trust under a trust contract, including such person who sets the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)," "Securities or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Securities, etc." in this Article)" and "make up" in Article 39(1)(i) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," "the customer," "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." and "make up, not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," respectively; the terms "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." and "Securities, etc." in Article 39(1)(ii) and (iii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." and "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," respectively; the term "make an addition to the profit accrued to the customer from such Securities, etc." in Article 39(1)(ii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition to the profit accrued to the customer from the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc., not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.,"; the term "make an addition to the profit accrued to the customer from Such Securities, etc." in Article 39(1)(iii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition to the profit accrued to the customer from the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc., not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.,"; the term "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in Article 39(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.,"; the term "that is specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause of a dispute" in Article 39(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "that may become a cause of dispute,"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加
第五十二条の四十五の二 金融商品取引法第三章第二節第一款（第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで（第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者の業務の範囲、第二種金融商品取引業又は投資助言・代理業のみを行う者の兼業の範囲、顧客に対する誠実義務、標識の掲示、名義貸しの禁止及び社債の管理の禁止等）、第三十七条第一項第二号（広告等の規制）、第三十七条の二（取引態様の事前明示義務）、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項（契約締結前の書面の交付）、第三十七条の五（保証金の受領に係る書面の交付）、第三十七条の六第一項、第二項、第四項ただし書及び第五項（書面による解除）、第三十八条第一号及び第二号並びに第三十八条の二（禁止行為）、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項（損失補てん等の禁止）、第四十条の二（最良執行方針等）並びに第四十条の三（分別管理が確保されていない場合の売買等の禁止）を除く。）（通則）の規定は、銀行代理業者が行う特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介の業務」と、「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約の締結」と、これらの規定（同法第三十七条の六第三項の規定を除く。）中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「を締結しようとするとき」とあるのは「の締結の代理又は媒介を行うとき」と、「交付しなければならない」とあるのは「交付するほか、預金者等（銀行法第二条第五項に規定する預金者等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の保護に資するため、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該特定預金等契約の内容その他預金者等に参考となるべき情報の提供を行わなければならない」と、同項第一号中「金融商品取引業者等」とあるのは「銀行代理業者（銀行法第二条第十五項に規定する銀行代理業者をいう。）の所属銀行（同条第十六項に規定する所属銀行をいう。）」と、同法第三十七条の六第三項中「金融商品取引契約の解除があつた場合には」とあるのは「特定預金等契約（銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約をいう。第三十九条において同じ。）の解除に伴い銀行に損害賠償その他の金銭の支払をした場合において」と、「金融商品取引契約の解除までの期間に相当する手数料、報酬その他の当該金融商品取引契約に関して顧客が支払うべき対価（次項において「対価」という。）の額として内閣府令で定める金額を超えて当該金融商品取引契約の解除」とあるのは「支払」と、「又は違約金の支払を」とあるのは「その他の金銭の支払を、解除をした者に対し、」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引（買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。）又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「顧客（信託会社等（信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。）が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）」とあるのは「顧客」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 66-9-6 (1) Where, between a specially-related shareholder, etc. (meaning a person who falls under the category of specified shareholder, etc. as well as an individual and a corporation having a special relationship therewith as specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Subsection) and a specially-related domestic corporation, there is a relationship specified by a Cabinet Order as a relationship whereby the said specially-related shareholder, etc. indirectly holds shares, etc. (meaning shares or capital contributions; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the next paragraph) that account for 80 percent or more of the total number or total amount of issued shares of or capital contributions to the said specially-related domestic corporation (excluding the shares or capital contributions held by the corporation; hereinafter referred to in this paragraph and the next paragraph as "issued shares, etc.") (such relationship referred to in the next paragraph as a "specified relationship"), and a foreign corporation specified by a Cabinet Order as acting as an intermediary between the said specially-related shareholder, etc. and the said specially-related domestic corporation by way of the holding of the issued shares, etc. (hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as an "affiliated foreign corporation"), which falls under the category of affiliated foreign corporation specified by a Cabinet Order as a corporation whose tax burden to be imposed on its income earned in a state or territory where its head office or principal office is located is significantly lower than the tax burden to be imposed on the income of a corporation in Japan (hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as a "specified foreign corporation"), in each business year beginning on or after October 1, 2007, retains as part of the amount of undistributed income, pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order, any amount that is adjusted, with respect to the said amount of undistributed income, based on the tax amount pertaining to the said amount of undistributed income and the amount of dividend of surplus, dividend of profit or distribution of surplus prescribed in Article 23(1)(i) of the Corporation Tax Act (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as "dividend of surplus, etc.") (such adjusted amount hereinafter referred to in this Article as "eligible retained income"), the amount equivalent to the part of eligible retained income which is calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of income corresponding to the number of shares, etc. of the said specified foreign corporation held by the domestic corporation that is the said specially-related shareholder, etc. through direct and/or indirect ownership, while taking into consideration the contents of the claim (meaning a claim to demand dividend of surplus, etc., distribution of property and any other economic benefit) vested in such shares, etc. (such part of eligible retained income hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as "taxable retained income") shall be deemed to be the amount of profit of the domestic corporation that is the said specially-related shareholder, etc., and included in its gross profit in the calculation of the amount of its income for the business year that includes the day on which two months have elapsed since the day following the last day of the relevant business year. 例文帳に追加
第六十六条の九の六 特殊関係株主等（特定株主等に該当する者並びにこれらの者と政令で定める特殊の関係のある個人及び法人をいう。以下この款において同じ。）と特殊関係内国法人との間に当該特殊関係株主等が当該特殊関係内国法人の発行済株式又は出資（自己が有する自己の株式又は出資を除く。以下この項及び次項において「発行済株式等」という。）の総数又は総額の百分の八十以上の数又は金額の株式等（株式又は出資をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）を間接に保有する関係として政令で定める関係（次項において「特定関係」という。）がある場合において、当該特殊関係株主等と特殊関係内国法人との間に発行済株式等の保有を通じて介在するものとして政令で定める外国法人（以下この款において「外国関係法人」という。）のうち、本店又は主たる事務所の所在する国又は地域におけるその所得に対して課される税の負担が本邦における法人の所得に対して課される税の負担に比して著しく低いものとして政令で定める外国関係法人に該当するもの（以下この款において「特定外国法人」という。）が、平成十九年十月一日以後に開始する各事業年度において、その未処分所得の金額から留保したものとして、政令で定めるところにより、当該未処分所得の金額につき当該未処分所得の金額に係る税額及び法人税法第二十三条第一項第一号に規定する剰余金の配当、利益の配当又は剰余金の分配（以下この項において「剰余金の配当等」という。）の額に関する調整を加えた金額（以下この条において「適用対象留保金額」という。）を有するときは、その適用対象留保金額のうち当該特殊関係株主等である内国法人の有する当該特定外国法人の直接及び間接保有の株式等の数に対応するものとしてその株式等の請求権（剰余金の配当等、財産の分配その他の経済的な利益の給付を請求する権利をいう。）の内容を勘案して政令で定めるところにより計算した金額（以下この款において「課税対象留保金額」という。）に相当する金額は、当該特殊関係株主等である内国法人の収益の額とみなして当該各事業年度終了の日の翌日から二月を経過する日を含む当該内国法人の各事業年度の所得の金額の計算上、益金の額に算入する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 18 (1) When an order under Article 10, paragraph 1, item 2 has previously been issued and a repeated petition for an order under the same item has been filed on the grounds that the same fact of bodily harm or life threatening intimidation, etc. that was the ground for the petition for the issued order, the court shall issue the order in question only when finding it necessary to reissue the order under the same item, by taking into consideration the fact that the victim who intends to move from the domicile that the victim shares as his/her main home with his/her spouse is unable to complete the move from the domicile within two months from the day the issued order comes into effect due to cause imputable to the victim himself/herself, or other circumstances. However, the court may choose not to issue the order when finding that the issuance of the order will cause extreme hindrance to the spouse's daily life. 例文帳に追加
第十八条 第十条第一項第二号の規定による命令が発せられた後に当該発せられた命令の申立ての理由となった身体に対する暴力又は生命等に対する脅迫と同一の事実を理由とする同号の規定による命令の再度の申立てがあったときは、裁判所は、配偶者と共に生活の本拠としている住居から転居しようとする被害者がその責めに帰することのできない事由により当該発せられた命令の効力が生ずる日から起算して二月を経過する日までに当該住居からの転居を完了することができないことその他の同号の規定による命令を再度発する必要があると認めるべき事情があるときに限り、当該命令を発するものとする。ただし、当該命令を発することにより当該配偶者の生活に特に著しい支障を生ずると認めるときは、当該命令を発しないことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(i) Whether the securities company, etc. has formulated a conflict of interest management policy (referring to the policy prescribed in Article 70-3(1)(iii) of the FIB Cabinet Office Ordinance; the same shall apply hereinafter), while taking into consideration the contents, characteristics, scales, etc. of the securities company, etc. and its parent/subsidiary financial institutions, and whether such policy specifies the following matters: the types of transactions with the risk of conflict of interest; major examples and the identification process of such transactions; the methods of conflict of interest management (if conflict of interest management is conducted at different levels and to different extents, the content of and reasons for such difference); the conflict of interest management system (including the responsibility and independence of the person who controls the company-wide management system for identifying transactions involving the risk of conflict of interest and conducting conflict of interest management (hereinafter referred to as the “conflict of interest manager”), as well as the review system for the methods of identifying transactions involving the risk of conflict of interest and conducting conflict of interest management); and the scope of companies subject to conflict of interest management. 例文帳に追加
① 利益相反管理方針（金商業等府令第 70条の３第１項第３号に規定する方針をいう。以下同じ。）は、証券会社等及びその親金融機関等又は子金融機関等の業務の内容・特性・規模等を勘案した上で、利益相反のおそれのある取引の類型、主な取引例及び当該取引の特定のプロセス、利益相反管理の方法（利益相反管理の水準・深度に差異を設ける場合は、その内容及び理由を含む。）、利益相反管理体制（利益相反のおそれのある取引の特定及び利益相反管理に関する全社的な管理体制を統括する者（以下「利益相反管理統括者」という。）の職責及びその独立性並びに利益相反のおそれのある取引の特定及び利益相反管理の方法についての検証体制）並びに利益相反管理の対象となる会社の範囲を記載したものとなっているか。 - 金融庁
Article 40-10 (1) Where, between a specially-related shareholder, etc. (meaning a person who falls under the category of specified shareholder, etc. as well as an individual and a corporation having a special relationship therewith as specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Subsection) and a specially-related domestic corporation, there is a relationship specified by a Cabinet Order as a relationship whereby the said specially-related shareholder, etc. indirectly holds shares, etc. (meaning shares or capital contributions; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the next paragraph) that accounts for 80 percent or more of the total number or total amount of issued shares of or capital contributions to the said specially-related domestic corporation (excluding the shares or capital contributions held by the corporation; hereinafter referred to in this paragraph and the next paragraph as "issued shares, etc.") (such relationship referred to in the next paragraph as a "specified relationship"), and a foreign corporation specified by a Cabinet Order as acting as an intermediary between the said specially-related shareholder, etc. and the said specially-related domestic corporation by way of the holding of the issued shares, etc. (hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as an "affiliated foreign corporation"), which falls under the category of affiliated foreign corporation specified by a Cabinet Order as a corporation whose tax burden to be imposed on its income earned in a state or territory where its head office or principal office is located is significantly lower than the tax burden to be imposed on the income of a corporation in Japan (hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as a "specified foreign corporation"), in each business year (meaning a business year prescribed in Article 2(2)(xix); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) beginning on or after October 1, 2007, retains as part of the amount of undistributed income, pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order, any amount that is adjusted, with respect to the said amount of undistributed income, based on the tax amount pertaining to the said amount of undistributed income and the amount of dividend of surplus, dividend of profit or distribution of surplus prescribed in Article 23(1)(i) of the Corporation Tax Act (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as "dividend of surplus, etc.") (such adjusted amount hereinafter referred to in this Article as "eligible retained income"), the amount equivalent to the part of eligible retained income which is calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of income corresponding to the number of shares, etc. of the said specified foreign corporation held by the resident who is the said specially-related shareholder, etc. through direct and/or indirect ownership, while taking into consideration the contents of the claim (meaning a claim to demand dividend of surplus, etc., distribution of property and any other economic benefit) vested in such shares, etc. (such part of eligible retained income referred to in the next Article as "taxable retained income") shall be deemed to be the income of the resident who is the said specially-related shareholder, etc. categorized as miscellaneous income, and included in his/her gross income in the calculation of the amount of his/her miscellaneous income for the year that includes the day on which two months have elapsed since the day following the last day of the relevant business year: 例文帳に追加
第四十条の十 特殊関係株主等（特定株主等に該当する者並びにこれらの者と政令で定める特殊の関係のある個人及び法人をいう。以下この款において同じ。）と特殊関係内国法人との間に当該特殊関係株主等が当該特殊関係内国法人の発行済株式又は出資（自己が有する自己の株式又は出資を除く。以下この項及び次項において「発行済株式等」という。）の総数又は総額の百分の八十以上の数又は金額の株式等（株式又は出資をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）を間接に保有する関係として政令で定める関係（次項において「特定関係」という。）がある場合において、当該特殊関係株主等と特殊関係内国法人との間に発行済株式等の保有を通じて介在するものとして政令で定める外国法人（以下この款において「外国関係法人」という。）のうち、本店又は主たる事務所の所在する国又は地域におけるその所得に対して課される税の負担が本邦における法人の所得に対して課される税の負担に比して著しく低いものとして政令で定める外国関係法人に該当するもの（以下この款において「特定外国法人」という。）が、平成十九年十月一日以後に開始する各事業年度（第二条第二項第十九号に規定する事業年度をいう。以下この条において同じ。）において、その未処分所得の金額から留保したものとして、政令で定めるところにより、当該未処分所得の金額につき当該未処分所得の金額に係る税額及び法人税法第二十三条第一項第一号に規定する剰余金の配当、利益の配当又は剰余金の分配（以下この項において「剰余金の配当等」という。）の額に関する調整を加えた金額（以下この条において「適用対象留保金額」という。）を有するときは、その適用対象留保金額のうち当該特殊関係株主等である居住者の有する当該特定外国法人の直接及び間接保有の株式等の数に対応するものとしてその株式等の請求権（剰余金の配当等、財産の分配その他の経済的な利益の給付を請求する権利をいう。）の内容を勘案して政令で定めるところにより計算した金額（次条において「課税対象留保金額」という。）に相当する金額は、当該特殊関係株主等である居住者の雑所得に係る収入金額とみなして当該各事業年度終了の日の翌日から二月を経過する日の属する年分の当該居住者の雑所得の金額の計算上、総収入金額に算入する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
| ※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。 |
| Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved. |
| Copyright(C) 2025 金融庁 All Rights Reserved. |
| Copyright Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. All Rights Reserved. |
|
ログイン |
Weblio会員(無料)になると
|
|
ログイン |
Weblio会員(無料)になると
|