「In Action」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(312ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

We examined the governance system and the risk management system of the Incubator Bank of Japan through voluntary interviews, reporting orders, on-site inspections and other activities in relation to its business of purchasing debts from money lenders which had increased rapidly since 2008 and large loans which soared sharply since 2009. As the results of the on-site inspection launched in June 2009 identified serious problems including those in the credit risk management system relating to large loans and debt factoring operations, we issued a business suspension order and a business improvement order on May 27 and took action accordingly. That is what happened, and I do understand what have asked. As the Minister for Financial Services, I truly feel sorry for honest depositors for having had the “pay-off” scheme implemented. 例文帳に追加

大変きちんと時宜を得たご質問、またご意見でございまして、日本振興銀行に関しては、平成20年以降急増した貸金業者からの債権、買い取りビジネスや21年以降急に増加傾向が顕著だった大口融資に関して任意のヒアリング、報告徴求命令、立入検査等を通じて経営管理体制やリスク管理体制の状況について検証を行ってきたところでございますし、そうした中、平成21年6月開始の立入検査の結果において、大口融資や債権買取業務に関する信用リスク管理体制等に関して重大な問題が認められたため、先般5月27日に業務停止命令及び業務改善命令を発出し、対応を行ったものである。そういうことでございますけれども、今質問のことはよく分かっていますし、ペイオフをさせていただいたというのは、私は善良な預金者もおられたと思いまして、本当に担当大臣として、その人たちに対しては申しわけないというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁

Regarding geographical indications, the Doha Ministerial Declaration of 2001 (Paragraph 18) provided for: (i) negotiation of the establishment of a multilateral system for the notification and registration of geographical indications for wines and spirits within the framework of the new round (Built-in Agenda); and (ii) the granting of additional protection of Article 23 for geographical indications for products other than wines and spirits. The TRIPS Council was instructed to report its discussions to the Trade Negotiations Committee by the end of 2002. Following vigorous discussions, the Hong Kong Ministerial Declaration of December 2005 resolved to: (i) intensify negotiations regarding the establishment of a multilateral system for the notification and registration of geographical indications for wines and spirits so as to complete within the overall time-frame for the conclusion of the negotiations that was foreseen in the Doha Ministerial Declaration (Paragraph 29); and (ii) intensify the consultation process concerning the extension of the protection for geographical indications provided for in Article 23 of the TRIPS agreement to products other than wines and spirits, and take appropriate action by the General Council by July 31, 2006 at the latest (Paragraph 39).例文帳に追加

この地理的表示に関しては、2001年のドーハ閣僚宣言（パラグラフ18）において、（i）ワイン・スピリッツの地理的表示の多数国間通報登録制度創設につき新ラウンドの枠内で交渉を行うこと（ビルトイン・アジェンダ）、（ii）第23条に規定されている地理的表示の追加的保護の対象産品をワイン・スピリッツ以外の産品に拡大することにつき、2002年末までのTRIPS 理事会での議論の結果を貿易交渉委員会へ報告することが合意された。以後、精力的な議論が行われ、2005年12月の香港閣僚宣言において、（i）ワイン・スピリッツの地理的表示の多国間通報登録制度創設についてはドーハ閣僚宣言において予測された交渉終結の期間内に交渉を完了すべく交渉を強化すること（パラグラフ29）、（ii）追加的保護の対象産品をワイン・スピリッツ以外の産品に拡大することについては、協議プロセスを加速し、一般理事会は進展を検討し、遅くとも2006年７月31日までに適切な行動をとること（パラグラフ39）とされた。 - 経済産業省

Article 10 (1) When a nuclear emergency preparedness manager has been notified that a radiation dose above the limit specified by a Cabinet Order has been detected, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Order, near the border of an area where the nuclear site is located or has discovered such fact for him/herself, he/she shall, pursuant to the provisions of an ordinance of the competent ministry and the nuclear operator emergency action plan, immediately notify the competent minister, the competent prefectural governor, the competent mayor of a municipality and the related neighboring prefectural governors (in the case of the occurrence of an event pertaining to transport outside the nuclear site, the competent minister, and a prefectural governor and the mayor of a municipality who have jurisdiction over the place where said event has occurred) to that effect. In this case, the competent prefectural governor and the related neighboring prefectural governors shall notify the mayors of related surrounding municipalities to that effect. 例文帳に追加

第十条　原子力防災管理者は、原子力事業所の区域の境界付近において政令で定める基準以上の放射線量が政令で定めるところにより検出されたことその他の政令で定める事象の発生について通報を受け、又は自ら発見したときは、直ちに、主務省令及び原子力事業者防災業務計画の定めるところにより、その旨を主務大臣、所在都道府県知事、所在市町村長及び関係隣接都道府県知事（事業所外運搬に係る事象の発生の場合にあっては、主務大臣並びに当該事象が発生した場所を管轄する都道府県知事及び市町村長）に通報しなければならない。この場合において、所在都道府県知事及び関係隣接都道府県知事は、関係周辺市町村長にその旨を通報するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The provisions of Article 67, paragraph (1) (Determination to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding the items in paragraph (2) and paragraphs (5) to (7) inclusive) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), Article 81, paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive (Minutes) and Article 316, paragraph (1) (Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the policyholders meeting; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of the policyholders meeting. In this case, the terms "incorporators", "shareholders at incorporation" and "Stock Company" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "converting Stock Company," "policyholders" and "Mutual Company," respectively; the term "in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "head office" in Article 74, paragraph (6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "shareholders" in Article 74, paragraph (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; and the terms "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including, where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, a person assuming the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), or, where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "policyholders, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, Policyholders, directors, executive officers or liquidators" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

３　会社法第六十七条第一項（創立総会の招集の決定）、第六十八条（第二項各号及び第五項から第七項までを除く。）（創立総会の招集の通知）、第七十条、第七十一条（創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等）、第七十四条から第七十六条まで（議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第七十八条から第八十条まで（発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議）、第八十一条第一項から第三項まで（議事録）及び第三百十六条第一項（株主総会に提出された資料等の調査）の規定は保険契約者総会について、同法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は保険契約者総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「発起人」とあるのは「組織変更をする株式会社」と、「設立時株主」とあるのは「保険契約者」と、「株式会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、同法第六十八条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第七十四条第六項中「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「保険契約者、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、保険契約者、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(a) After final rejection or action, amendments may be made canceling claims or complying with any requirement of form which has been made, and amendments presenting rejected claims in better form for consideration on appeal may be admitted; but any proceedings relative thereto, shall not operate to relieve the application from its condition as subject to appeal or to save it from being considered withdrawn. (b) Should amendments touching the merits of the application be presented after final rejection, or after appeal has been taken, or when such amendment might not otherwise be proper, they may be admitted upon a showing of good and sufficient reasons why they are necessary and were not earlier presented.例文帳に追加

(a)最終拒絶又は処分の後，補正は，クレームを取り消すことにより，又は定められた方式要件を遵守することにより行うことができ，また，不服申立での検討対象として，拒絶されたクレームをより良好な形で提示する補正も認められる。ただし，これらに関する手続は，当該出願を不服申立の対象となっている状態から救済することにはならず，取り下げられたとみなされたことから回避させることにもならない。 (b)出願の実体的事項に係わる補正は，最終拒絶又は不服申立がなされた後に，又は通常そのような補正が不適とされるときに提示する場合は，これが必要であること，及びこれを以前に提示しなかったことの適切かつ十分な理由を示せば，認められることがある。 - 特許庁

(4) The Patent Court can reject means of attack or defense by one party or an amendment to a legal action or a defendant’s defense using an amended version of the patent that have been filed only after expiry of a time limit as stipulated herefor in subsection (2), and the Patent Court can render a decision without any further investigation if 1. considering the new submission would require postponement of the date for the hearing already scheduled and 2. said party has not provided sufficient grounds for the delay and 3. said party was instructed as to the consequences of not observing a time limit. The reasons given for the excuse will have to be credibly shown. 例文帳に追加

(4) 連邦特許裁判所は，1の当事者による攻撃若しくは防御(抗弁)の手段，又は法的訴えの補正，又は補正後の特許文言を使用して行われる被告の抗弁であって，(2)に定めた期限の到来後に提出されたものを却下することができ，また，次の事情においては，更なる調査を行うことなく，決定を下すことができる。来後に提出されたものを却下することができ，また，次の事情においては，更なる調査を行うことなく，決定を下すことができる。2. 関係当事者が十分な遅延理由を提出していない場合，及び3. 関係当事者が，期限不遵守の帰結についての指示を与えられていた場合提出される免責理由は，納得できるように証明されなければならない。 - 特許庁

(2) An amendment of a legal action or, in proceedings to declare the nullity of a patent or a supplementary protection certificate, a defense with an amended version of the patent shall only then be admissible if 1. the adversary consents or the Federal Court of Justice considers the amendment of the requests to be expedient and 2. the amended requests can be based on facts which the Federal Court of Justice shall have to use as a basis for its hearing and decision on the appeal pursuant to Section 117. 例文帳に追加

(2) 法的訴えの修正，又は，特許若しくは補充的保護証明書の無効を宣言するための手続においては，修正された特許文言による防御は，次の条件が満たされる場合に限り，容認される。 1. 相手方が承諾するか，又は連邦最高裁判所が，請求の修正は適宜であると判断すること，及び 2. 請求の修正は，連邦最高裁判所が第 117条による控訴に関する聴聞及び決定の基礎として使用すべき事実を根拠とすることができること 民事訴訟法第 529条，第 530条及び第 531条は，控訴裁判所による審査の範囲，並びに，攻撃及び防御に関する後に提出される，拒絶される，及び新たな手段に対して準用される。第112条が，民事訴訟法第 520条に代替する。 - 特許庁

Yemen should continue to work on implementing its action plan to address these deficiencies, including by: (1) adequately criminalising money laundering (Recommendation 1); (2) establishing and implementing adequate procedures to identify and freeze terrorist assets (Special Recommendation III); (3) issuing substantive guidance/instructions to reporting institutions with respect to their ML/FT obligations (Recommendation 25); (4) developing the monitoring and supervisory capacity of the financial sector supervisory authorities and the FIU, to ensuring compliance by financial institutions with their STR obligations, especially in relation to FT (Recommendation 23); and (5) ensuring a fully operational and effectively functioning Financial Intelligence Unit (Recommendation 26). 例文帳に追加

同国は、①資金洗浄の適切な犯罪化（勧告１）、②テロリスト資産を特定し凍結するための適切な手続きの構築及び履行（特別勧告Ⅲ）、③疑わしい取引の届出機関に対する、資金洗浄・テロ資金供与対策義務に関する実質的なガイダンス及び命令の発出（勧告２５）、④特にテロ資金供与に関する、金融機関の疑わしい取引の届出義務遵守を確保するための、金融セクターの監督当局及び金融情報機関の監視及び監督能力の発展（勧告２３）、⑤完全にかつ効果的に機能する金融情報機関の確保（勧告２６）を含む、資金洗浄・テロ資金供与対策上の欠陥に対応するためのアクションプランの実施への取り組みを継続すべきである。 - 財務省

Yemen should continue to work on implementing its action plan to address these deficiencies, including by: (1) issue regulations to implement AML law; (2) establishing and implementing adequate procedures to identify and freeze terrorist assets (Special Recommendation III); (3) issuing substantive guidance/instructions to reporting institutions with respect to their ML/FT obligations (Recommendation 25); (4) developing the monitoring and supervisory capacity of the financial sector supervisory authorities and the FIU, to ensure compliance by financial institutions with their STR obligations, especially in relation to FT (Recommendation 23); and (5) ensuring a fully operational and effectively functioning Financial Intelligence Unit (Recommendation 26). 例文帳に追加

同国は、①資金洗浄対策法の履行に関する規制の公布、②テロリスト資産を特定し凍結するための適切な手続きの構築及び履行（特別勧告Ⅲ）、③疑わしい取引の届出機関に対する、資金洗浄・テロ資金供与対策義務に関する実質的なガイダンス及び命令の発出（勧告２５）、④特にテロ資金供与に関する、金融機関の疑わしい取引の届出義務遵守を確保するための、金融セクターの監督当局及び金融情報機関の監視及び監督能力の発展（勧告２３）、⑤完全にかつ効果的に機能する金融情報機関の確保（勧告２６）を含む、資金洗浄・テロ資金供与対策上の欠陥に対応するためのアクションプランの実施への取り組みを継続すべきである。 - 財務省

In order to obtain clutch stroke amount set by the transfer torque setting means 53, a clutch stroke controlling means 8 for controlling the stroke amount of connecting of the clutch 1 controls the stroke amount of the clutch 1 to carry out connecting action of the clutch 1.例文帳に追加

アクセル開度検出手段９により検出されたアクセル開度に応じて目標トルクを設定する目標トルク設定手段５０によって設定された目標トルクを、車両の重量を推定する車重推定手段５１で推定された車重情報に応じて補正して補正目標トルクを設定する目標トルク補正手段５２と、目標トルク補正手段５２によって設定された補正目標トルクに応じて、エンジン４から変速機２への伝達トルクを断接させるクラッチ１のストローク量を設定する伝達トルク設定手段５３とを有し、伝達トルク設定手段５３により設定されたクラッチストローク量となるようにクラッチ１の接続のストローク量を制御するクラッチストローク制御手段８でクラッチ１のストローク量を制御してクラッチ１の接続動作を行う。 - 特許庁

(6) The provisions of Article 67 (Determinations to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding items in paragraph (2)) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and Article 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 73, paragraph (4) (Resolutions of Organizational Meetings), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Means), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), and Article 81 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Organizational Meeting of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of a Mutual Company's Organizational Meeting, respectively. In this case, the terms "Shareholders at Incorporation" in those provisions (excluding Article 67, paragraph (2) and Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act), and "Shareholders at Incorporation (excluding Shareholders at Incorporation who may not exercise votes on all matters which may be resolved at Organizational Meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 71 inclusive.)" in Article 67, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "prospective members;" the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company to be incorporated is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company to be incorporated is a Stock Company other than a Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 68, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks;" the term "shall be in writing in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall be in writing;" the term "Article 27, item (v), or Article 59, paragraph (3), item (i)" in Article 68, paragraph (5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-7, paragraph (2), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act;" the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the shareholder meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is an Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in Article 831, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, auditors or liquidators (or, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees), or prospective members, directors at incorporation (referring to the directors at incorporation set forth in Article 30-10, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or company auditors at incorporation (referring to the company auditors at incorporation set forth in paragraph (1) of that Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) of a Mutual Company;" and the term" directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)) where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, and including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in the same paragraph of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors, liquidators, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation;", and any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

６　会社法第六十七条（創立総会の招集の決定）、第六十八条（第二項各号を除く。）（創立総会の招集の通知）、第七十条、第七十一条（創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等）、第七十三条第四項（創立総会の決議）、第七十四条から第七十六条まで（議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第七十八条から第八十条まで（発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議）及び第八十一条（第四項を除く。）（議事録）の規定は相互会社の創立総会について、同法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の創立総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定（同法第六十七条第二項及び第八百三十一条第一項を除く。）中「設立時株主」とあり、及び同法第六十七条第二項中「設立時株主（創立総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない設立時株主を除く。次条から第七十一条までにおいて同じ。）」とあるのは「社員になろうとする者」と、同法第六十八条第一項中「二週間（前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、設立しようとする株式会社が公開会社でない場合にあっては、一週間（当該設立しようとする株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間））」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同条第五項中「第二十七条第五号又は第五十九条第三項第一号」とあるのは「保険業法第三十条の七第二項第一号」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）又は社員になろうとする者、設立時取締役（保険業法第三十条の十第一項に規定する設立時取締役をいう。以下この項において同じ。）若しくは設立時監査役（同条第一項に規定する設立時監査役をいう。以下この項において同じ。）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役、清算人、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) When a nuclear operator intends to prepare or revise a nuclear operator emergency action plan pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, it shall, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Order, confer in advance with a prefectural governor who has jurisdiction over the area where the relevant nuclear site is located (hereinafter referred to as the "competent prefectural governor"), the mayor of a municipality who has jurisdiction over said area (hereinafter referred to as the "competent mayor of a municipality") and the prefectural governors of the prefectures which include a municipality that neighbors a municipality including said area (excluding the competent prefectural governor; hereinafter referred to as the "related neighboring prefectural governors"). In this case, the competent prefectural governor and related neighboring prefectural governors shall hear the opinions of the mayors of related surrounding municipalities (which means the mayors of municipalities which have prepared a regional disaster prevention plan, etc. (excluding those listed in Article 2, item (x) (a) or (c) of the Basic Act on Disaster Control Measures) concerning nuclear disasters pertaining to said nuclear site with regard to the municipal area and fulfill other requirements specified by a Cabinet Order (excluding the competent mayor of a municipality); the same shall apply hereinafter ). 例文帳に追加

２　原子力事業者は、前項の規定により原子力事業者防災業務計画を作成し、又は修正しようとするときは、政令で定めるところにより、あらかじめ、当該原子力事業所の区域を管轄する都道府県知事（以下「所在都道府県知事」という。）、当該原子力事業所の区域を管轄する市町村長（以下「所在市町村長」という。）及び当該原子力事業所の区域をその区域に含む市町村に隣接する市町村を包括する都道府県の都道府県知事（所在都道府県知事を除く。以下「関係隣接都道府県知事」という。）に協議しなければならない。この場合において、所在都道府県知事及び関係隣接都道府県知事は、関係周辺市町村長（その区域につき当該原子力事業所に係る原子力災害に関する地域防災計画等（災害対策基本法第二条第十号イ又はハに掲げるものを除く。）が作成されていることその他の政令で定める要件に該当する市町村の市町村長（所在市町村長を除く。）をいう。以下同じ。）の意見を聴くものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

On the basis of the exclusive right of use, any of the holders shall be entitled to bring an action against any person who, in the course of trade: (a) uses the protected geographical indication or a denomination liable to create confusion with respect to products not originating in the defined geographical area; (b) uses the protected geographical indication with respect to products not included in the list of products, but similar to those and therefore takes unfair advantage of or infringes the repute of the protected geographical indication; (c) imitates or evokes in any manner whatsoever the protected geographical indication, even if the true origin of the product is indicated or if the protected name is translated or accompanied by various additions; (d) uses any false or misleading indication as to the provenance, origin, nature or essential characteristics of the product, no matter where it is indicated (e.g. on the packaging, advertising material or documents relating to the product concerned); (e) performs any other act liable to mislead the public as to the true origin of the product.例文帳に追加

何れの所有者も，使用の排他権に基づいて，業として次の行為をする何人に対しても訴訟を提起する権利を有する。 (a) 限定された区域の原産でない生産品に関して，保護されている地理的表示又は混同を生じさせる虞がある名称を使用すること (b) 生産品の一覧に含まれていないが，生産品に類似しており，したがって保護されている地理的表示の評判を不当に利用するか又は侵害する生産品に関して，保護されている地理的表示を使用すること (c) 生産品の真の原産地が表示されている場合であっても，又は保護されている名称が翻訳されているか若しくは種々の付加物を伴っている場合であっても，如何なる方法によるかを問わず，保護されている地理的表示を模倣するか又は再現すること (d) 生産品の出所，原産地，性質又は本質的な特徴に関して何らかの虚偽の又は誤認を生じさせる表示を使用すること。当該表示が何に(例えば当該生産品に係る包装，広告材料又は書類に)表示されているかを問わない。 (e) 生産品の真の原産地に関して，公衆に誤認を生じさせる虞があるその他の行為をすること - 特許庁

(4) The provisions of Article 90-2 and Article 91 of this Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where the organizer(s) call an Organizational Meeting; the provisions of Article 68, paragraph (5) through paragraph (7), the main clause of Article 72, paragraph (1), Article 73, paragraph (1) and paragraph (4), Article 74 through Article 83, and Article 93, paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Organizational Meeting of an Investment Corporation; and the provisions of Article 830, Article 831, Article 834 (limited to the part pertaining to item (xvi) and item (xvii)), Article 835, paragraph (1), Article 836, paragraph (1) and paragraph (3), Article 837, Article 838, Article 846, and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the part pertaining to sub-item (g) of item (i)) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment of absence or an invalidation of a resolution adopted at an Organizational Meeting of an Investment Corporation or an action seeking rescission of such resolution. In this case, the phrase "shall give public notice of the date of the Investors' meeting no later than two months prior to that date, and shall send notice thereof in writing to the Investors more than two weeks prior to that date" in Article 91, paragraph (1) of this Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall send notice of the date of the Investors' meeting no later than two weeks prior to that date," the phrase "item (v) of Article 27, or item (i) of Article 59(3)" in Article 68, paragraph (5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 67, paragraph (1), item (xvi) or Article 71, paragraph (4), item (i) of the Investment Corporations Act," the term "paragraph (1)" in Article 68, paragraph (7) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 91, paragraph (1) of the Investment Corporations Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 73, paragraph (4) of the Investment Corporations Act," the term "item (ii) of Article 67(1)" in Article 73, paragraph (4) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 90-2, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Investment Corporations Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 73, paragraph (4) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "Article 68(3)" in Article 74, paragraph (4) and Article 76, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 91, paragraph (2) of the Investment Corporations Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 73, paragraph (4) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "Article 67 and Article 68" in Article 80 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 90-2, paragraph (1) and Article 91, paragraph (1) through paragraph (3) of the Investment Corporations Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 73, paragraph (4) of the Investment Corporations Act," the term "the court" in Article 81, paragraph (4) and Article 82, paragraph (4) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Prime Minister," the phrase "The Directors at Incorporation" in Article 93, paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "The Corporate Officer(s) at Establishment and Supervisory Officers at Establishment," the terms "the preceding paragraph" in Article 93, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act and "paragraph (1)" in paragraph (3) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 73, paragraph (1) of the Investment Corporations Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　第九十条の二及び第九十一条の規定は設立企画人が創立総会を招集する場合について、会社法第六十八条第五項から第七項まで、第七十二条第一項本文、第七十三条第一項及び第四項、第七十四条から第八十三条まで並びに第九十三条第二項及び第三項の規定は投資法人の創立総会について、同法第八百三十条、第八百三十一条、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十五条第一項、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項、第八百三十七条、第八百三十八条、第八百四十六条並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）の規定は投資法人の創立総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第九十一条第一項中「二月前までに当該日を公告し、当該日の二週間」とあるのは「二週間」と、同法第六十八条第五項中「第二十七条第五号又は第五十九条第三項第一号」とあるのは「投資法人法第六十七条第一項第十六号又は第七十一条第四項第一号」と、同条第七項中「第一項」とあるのは「投資法人法第七十三条第四項において準用する投資法人法第九十一条第一項」と、同法第七十三条第四項中「第六十七条第一項第二号」とあるのは「投資法人法第七十三条第四項において準用する投資法人法第九十条の二第一項第二号」と、同法第七十四条第四項及び第七十六条第二項中「第六十八条第三項」とあるのは「投資法人法第七十三条第四項において準用する投資法人法第九十一条第二項」と、同法第八十条中「第六十七条及び第六十八条」とあるのは「投資法人法第七十三条第四項において準用する投資法人法第九十条の二第一項及び第九十一条第一項から第三項まで」と、同法第八十一条第四項及び第八十二条第四項中「裁判所」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣」と、同法第九十三条第二項及び第三項中「設立時取締役」とあるのは「設立時執行役員及び設立時監督役員」と、同条第二項中「前項」とあり、及び同条第三項中「第一項」とあるのは「投資法人法第七十三条第一項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

An entitled person whose invention has been applied for by a person not entitled to do so, or a person injured by usurpation, may demand that the patent applicant surrenders to him the right to the grant of a patent. If the application has already resulted in a patent, the entitled person may demand that the patentee assigns the patent to him. This right may only be asserted, subject to sentences 4 and 5, by legal action within two years of publication of the grant of the patent (Section 58(1)). Should the injured person have filed an opposition on the grounds of usurpation (Section 21(1), no. 3), said injured person may bring the legal action within one year of the final conclusion of the opposition proceedings. The third and fourth sentences shall not apply if the patentee did not act in good faith when obtaining the patent.A patent shall have the effect that the patentee alone shall be authorized to use the patented invention within the applicable laws. A third party not having the consent of the patentee shall be prohibited 1. from making, offering, putting on the market or using a product which is the subject matter of the patent, or from importing or possessing said product for such purposes; 2. from using a process which is the subject matter of the patent, or, when said third party knows or it is obvious from the circumstances that use of the process without the consent of the patentee is prohibited, from offering the process for use within the territory to which this Act applies; 3. from offering, putting on the market or using or importing or possessing for such purposes the product produced directly by a process which is the subject matter of the patent. 例文帳に追加

権利者であって，その発明についての非権利者によって出願がされたもの，又は窃取による被害者は，特許出願人に対し，特許付与を受ける権利を同人に譲渡するよう要求することができる。出願が既に特許を生じさせている場合は，権利者は，特許所有者が同人にその特許を譲渡するよう要求することができる。この権利は，第 4文及び第 5文に従うことを条件として，特許付与の公告(第 58条(1))から 2年以内に，訴訟によって主張することができる。被害者が窃取(第21条(1)3.)に基づく異議申立を提起しているときは，当該被害者は，その異議申立手続に関する最終的決着から 1年以内において訴訟を提起することができる。第 3文及び第 4文は，特許所有者が，特許の取得にあたって善意で行動していなかったときは適用されない。1. 特許の対象である製品を生産し，提供し，市販し若しくは使用し，又は当該目的のためにこれらの製品を輸入し若しくは保持すること 2. 特許の対象である方法を使用すること，又は特許所有者の同意を得ないでその方法を使用することが禁止されていることを当該第三者が知っているか若しくはそれが状況からみて明らかである場合に，本法の施行領域内での使用のために，その方法を提供すること3. 特許の対象である方法によって直接に得られた製品を提供し，市販し若しくは使用し，又は当該目的のために輸入し若しくは保持すること - 特許庁

Zimbabwe will work on implementing its action plan to address these deficiencies, including by: (1) adequately criminalising money laundering and terrorist financing (Recommendation I and Special Recommendation II); (2) establishing and implementing adequate procedures to identify and freeze terrorist assets (Special Recommendation III); (3) ensuring a fully operational and effectively functioning Financial Intelligence Unit (Recommendation 26); (4) ensuring financial institutions are aware of and comply with their obligations to file suspicious transaction reports in relation to ML and FT (Recommendation 13 and Special Recommendation IV); (5) enacting and implementing appropriate mutual legal assistance legislation (Special Recommendation V); and (6) implementing the 1999 International Convention for the Suppression of Financing of Terrorism (Special Recommendation I). 例文帳に追加

同国は、①資金洗浄及びテロ資金供与の適切な犯罪化（特別勧告Ⅰ及び特別勧告Ⅱ）、②テロリスト資産を特定し凍結するための適切な手続きの構築及び履行（特別勧告Ⅲ）、③完全にかつ効果的に機能する金融情報機関の確保（勧告２６）、④資金洗浄・テロ資金供与に関する適切な疑わしい取引の届出義務に対する金融機関の意識向上と遵守の確保（勧告１３及び特別勧告Ⅳ）、⑤適切な司法共助法制の実施の強化と履行（特別勧告Ⅴ）及び⑥1999年のテロリズムに対する資金供与の防止に関する国際条約を完全に実施するための法もしくはその他手段の改正及び実施（特別勧告Ⅰ）を含む、資金洗浄・テロ資金供与対策上の欠陥に対応するためのアクションプランの実施への取り組みを継続すべきである。 - 財務省

A financial institution with a sound financial condition and sufficient capital will be able to take risks properly. If the financial institution conducts appropriate risk management while taking risks, it will be able to limit the amount of non-performing loans, through quick action. If this approach works well, it will be able to take greater risks while maintaining sound financial conditions. The essence of relationship banking is providing advice and support for the management of borrowers in addition to extending loans, rather than merely increasing exposures. This combination of services may help to improve the business conditions of the borrower companies or stem the deterioration of the conditions. 例文帳に追加

財務の健全性がしっかりしていて、自己資本が十分にあるという状況の下では、当該金融機関は比較的的確なリスクテイクを行うことができるでしょうし、そのリスクテイクを行う際にきちんとしたリスク管理を維持しながら行うことによって、不良債権の発生を早め早めに手立てを講じることによって抑えることができるでしょうし、それがうまくいけば財務の健全性を維持しつつ、より大きなリスクテイクが行われることになる。ただエクスポージャーを増やすということだけではなくて、貸出が様々な経営上のアドバイスをしたりサポートしたりすることと組み合わされる、リレーションシップ・バンキングというのはまさにそういうところに真髄があろうかと思いますが、そういったことと組み合わされることによって融資先の企業の業況も改善する、あるいは悪化が食い止められるということがあろうかと思います。 - 金融庁

I have another question, which concerns “Immediate Actions by March 31, 2009” regarding the same item. The proposed actions include authorities’ efforts to ensure that financial institutions maintain adequate capital in amounts necessary to sustain confidence, and international standard setters’ efforts to set out strengthened capital requirements. The package of measures announced at the end of October by the government, including measures to stabilize the market, comprised a plan to introduce flexibility into the regulation of banks’ capital adequacy ratios, and I understand that the plan is already underway. Doesn’t this move run counter to the action plan, which seeks to maintain and secure adequate capital and set out strengthened capital requirements? 例文帳に追加

もう一点、同じ柱のところの紙でいうと、09年３月末までの当面の措置というところに、当局は金融機関が信認を維持するために十分な量の資本を維持することを確保すると云々、国際基準設定主体は云々、より厳しい資本要件を設定する、と書いてあるのですが、この間10月末に政府が発表しました、市場を安定化されるという金融の対策を含めた諸々の対策が出された中に、銀行の自己資本規制を弾力化させるという方針が盛り込まれて実際に動き出しているところだと思うのですが、そういう日本国内の対応と、ここのサミットで盛り込まれております十分の量の資本を維持すること、確保すること、より厳しい資本要件を設定するといった行動計画は矛盾しないのでしょうか。 - 金融庁

(8) The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) and (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Articles 837 to 840 inclusive (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation of New Share Issue), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(b)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of issuance of Specified Equity by a Specific Purpose Company after the formation thereof, and the provisions of Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Articles 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act; Supreme Court Rules; Mandatory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878(1) (Effects of a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a petition under Article 840(2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the phrase "within six months from the day on which the share issue became effective (or, for a Stock Company which is not a Public Company, within one year from the day on which the share issue became effective)" in Article 828(1)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "within one year," the term "Shareholder, etc." in paragraph (2)(ii) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "member, director, company auditor, or liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

８　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力、新株発行の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は特定目的会社の成立後における特定出資の発行の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第一項第二号中「六箇月以内（公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、株式の発行の効力が生じた日から一年以内）」とあるのは「一年以内」と、同条第二項第二号中「株主等」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) and (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Articles 837 to 840 inclusive (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation of New Share Issue), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(b)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of issuance of Preferred Equity by a Specific Purpose Company, and the provisions of Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Articles 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act; Supreme Court Rules; Mandatory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.), and Article 878(1) (Effects of a Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a petition under Article 840(2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the phrase "within six months from the day on which the share issue became effective (or, for a Stock Company which is not a Public Company, within one year from the day on which the share issue became effective)" in Article 828(1)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "within one year," the term "Shareholder, etc." in paragraph 2(ii) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "member, director, company auditor, or liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

６　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力、新株発行の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は特定目的会社の優先出資の発行の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第一項第二号中「六箇月以内（公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、株式の発行の効力が生じた日から一年以内）」とあるのは「一年以内」と、同条第二項第二号中「株主等」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 30-30 (1) The provisions of Article 50 of the Civil Code (Act No. 89 of 1896) and Article 600, Articles 614 through 619, Article 621 and Article 622 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to Legal Professional Corporations. The provisions of Articles 55 of the Civil Code and Article 581, Article 582, Article 585, paragraphs (1) and (4), Article 586, Article 593, Article 595, Article 596, Article 601, Article 605, Article 606, Article 609, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 611 (excluding the proviso to paragraph (1)) and Article 613 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a member of Legal Professional Corporations. The provisions of Articles 859 through 862 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an expulsion of a member of a Legal Professional Corporation or an action for nullifying the authority to execute activities for, or to represent, the Legal Professional Corporation. In such cases, "trade name" as used in Article 613 shall be read as "name" and "Article 594, paragraph (1) (including a case of mutatis mutandis application in Article 598, paragraph (2))" as used in Article 859, item (ii) shall be read as "Attorney Act (Act No. 205 of 1949) Article 30-19, paragraph (1) or (2)." 例文帳に追加

第三十条の三十　民法（明治二十九年法律第八十九号）第五十条並びに会社法第六百条、第六百十四条から第六百十九条まで、第六百二十一条及び第六百二十二条の規定は弁護士法人について、民法第五十五条並びに会社法第五百八十一条、第五百八十二条、第五百八十五条第一項及び第四項、第五百八十六条、第五百九十三条、第五百九十五条、第五百九十六条、第六百一条、第六百五条、第六百六条、第六百九条第一項及び第二項、第六百十一条（第一項ただし書を除く。）並びに第六百十三条の規定は弁護士法人の社員について、同法第八百五十九条から第八百六十二条までの規定は弁護士法人の社員の除名並びに業務を執行する権利及び代表権の消滅の訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第六百十三条中「商号」とあるのは「名称」と、同法第八百五十九条第二号中「第五百九十四条第一項（第五百九十八条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）」とあるのは「弁護士法（昭和二十四年法律第二百五号）第三十条の十九第一項又は第二項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 48, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 50-2, Article 53, Articles 55 to 57 inclusive, Article 59, Article 62-3 and Articles 66 to 68-3 inclusive of this Act and Article 361, Article 424, Article 430, Article 599 and Article 600 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liquidators of a Member Commodity Exchange, and the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847, paragraph (2), Article 849, paragraph (2), item (ii) and paragraph (5) and Article 851) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for pursuing the responsibilities of the liquidators of a Member Commodity Exchange. In this case, the phrase "an inventory of property, a balance sheet, profit and loss statement, business report and proposed appropriation of surplus or proposed appropriation of loss" in Article 66, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "an inventory of property, a balance sheet and business report," the term "paragraph (1) of the preceding Article" in Article 424 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53, paragraph (1) of the Commodity Exchange Act," the term "an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance" in Article 847, paragraphs (1) and (4) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "an ordinance of the competent ministry" and any other technical replacement shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　第四十八条第二項及び第三項、第五十条の二、第五十三条、第五十五条から第五十七条まで、第五十九条、第六十二条の三並びに第六十六条から第六十八条の三まで並びに会社法第三百六十一条、第四百二十四条、第四百三十条、第五百九十九条及び第六百条の規定は会員商品取引所の清算人について、同法第七編第二章第二節（第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第二項第二号及び第五項並びに第八百五十一条を除く。）の規定は会員商品取引所の清算人の責任を追及する訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第六十六条第一項中「財産目録、貸借対照表、損益計算書、業務報告書及び剰余金処分案又は損失処理案」とあるのは「財産目録、貸借対照表及び事務報告書」と、同法第四百二十四条中「前条第一項」とあるのは「商品取引所法第五十三条第一項」と、同法第八百四十七条第一項及び第四項中「法務省令」とあるのは「主務省令」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 48, paragraphs 2 and 3, Article 50-2, Article 53, Articles 55 to 57 inclusive, Article 59, Article 62-3 and Articles 66 to 68-3 inclusive of this Act and Article 361, Article 424, Article 430, Article 599 and Article 600 of the Company Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liquidators of a Member Commodity Exchange, and the provisions of Part 7, Chapter 2, Section 2 (excluding Article 847, paragraph 2, Article 849, paragraph 2, item 2 and paragraph 5 and Article 851) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for pursuing the responsibilities of the liquidators of a Member Commodity Exchange. In this case, the phrase "an inventory of property, a balance sheet, profit and loss statement, business report and proposed appropriation of surplus or proposed appropriation of loss" in Article 66, paragraph 1 shall be deemed to be replaced with "an inventory of property, a balance sheet and business report," the term "paragraph 1 of the preceding Article" in Article 424 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53, paragraph 1 of the Commodity Exchange Act," the term "an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance" in Article 847, paragraphs 1 and 4 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "an ordinance of the competent ministry" and any other technical replacement shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２ 第四十八条第二項及び第三項、第五十条の二、第五十三条、第五十五条から第五十七条まで、第五十九条、第六十二条の三並びに第六十六条から第六十八条の三まで並びに会社法第三百六十一条、第四百二十四条、第四百三十条、第五百九十九条及び第六百条の規定は会員商品取引所の清算人について、同法第七編第二章第二節（第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第二項第二号及び第五項並びに第八百五十一条を除く。）の規定は会員商品取引所の清算人の責任を追及する訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第六十六条第一項中「財産目録、貸借対照表、損益計算書、業務報告書及び剰余金処分案又は損失処理案」とあるのは「財産目録、貸借対照表及び事務報告書」と、同法第四百二十四条中「前条第一項」とあるのは「商品取引所法第五十三条第一項」と、同法第八百四十七条第一項及び第四項中「法務省令」とあるのは「主務省令」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 経済産業省

Where a person, by means of circulars, advertisements or otherwise, threatens a person with an action or proceeding for infringement of a trade mark which is registered, or alleged by the first mentioned person to be registered, or with some other like proceeding, a person aggrieved may, whether the person making the threats is or is not the registered proprietor or the registered user of the trade mark, bring a suit against the first mentioned person and may obtain a declaration to the effect that the threats are unjustifiable, and an injunction against the continuance of the threats and may recover such damages (if any) as he has sustained, unless the first mentioned person satisfies the court that the trade mark is registered and that the acts in respect of which the proceedings were threatened, constitute, or, if done, would constitute, an infringement of the trade mark. 例文帳に追加

何人かが，登録商標又はその者が登録されるべきと主張する商標について，回状，広告又はその他の方法により，侵害訴訟若しくは手続又はそれと同様の他の手続を取ると他人を脅迫したときは，被害者は，脅迫者がその商標の登録所有者又は登録使用者であるか否かを問わず，これに対して訴訟を提起し，脅迫が不当なものである旨の宣告及びその脅迫の続行に対する差止命令を得ることができ，かつ，その者が受けた(若しある場合)損害を回収することができる。ただし，最初に述べた者が，当該商標は登録を受けたものであること，及び訴訟をすると脅迫した行為の対象は商標侵害を構成しており，又はその行為がされるときは商標侵害を構成する筈であることを裁判所に納得させた場合は，この限りでない。 - 特許庁

(2) The provisions of the preceding paragraph shall also apply in cases where the abolition of Dispute Resolution, etc. of a Designated Dispute Resolution Organization has been authorized under Article 52-83, paragraph (1) or the designation under Article 52-62, paragraph (1) has been rescinded under Article 52-84, paragraph (1) and there is a Dispute Related to Banking Services for which Dispute Resolution Procedures had been implemented as of the day of authorization or rescission, when the Party to the Dispute Related to Banking Services that had filed an application for Dispute Resolution Procedures files an action for the claims which were the subject matter of the Dispute Resolution Procedures within one month from the day on which said Party received the notice under Article 52-83, paragraph (3) or Article 52-84, paragraph (3) or the day on which the Party came to know of the authorization or rescission whichever comes earlier. 例文帳に追加

２　指定紛争解決機関の紛争解決等業務の廃止が第五十二条の八十三第一項の規定により認可され、又は第五十二条の六十二第一項の規定による指定が第五十二条の八十四第一項の規定により取り消され、かつ、その認可又は取消しの日に紛争解決手続が実施されていた銀行業務関連紛争がある場合において、当該紛争解決手続の申立てをした当該銀行業務関連紛争の当事者が第五十二条の八十三第三項若しくは第五十二条の八十四第三項の規定による通知を受けた日又は当該認可若しくは取消しを知つた日のいずれか早い日から一月以内に当該紛争解決手続の目的となつた請求について訴えを提起したときも、前項と同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 102 (1) The provisions of Articles 828(1) (limited to the part pertaining to item (vi)) and paragraph (2) (limited to the part pertaining to item (vi)), Article 834 (limited to the part pertaining to item (vi)), Article 835(1), Articles 836 to 839 inclusive, Article 846 and Article 937(3) (limited to the part pertaining to item (i)) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of Entity Conversion of a Membership-Type Financial Instruments Exchange. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. or members, etc. of the company implementing entity conversion" in Article 828(2)(vi) of the that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Member, etc. (meaning members, president, board members, auditors or liquidators) of a Membership-Type Financial Instruments Exchange implementing entity conversion"; and the term "shareholders, etc., members, etc. of the company after Entity Conversion" in that item of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "shareholders, etc. (meaning shareholders, directors or liquidators (with regard to a company with board of company auditors, meaning shareholders, directors, company auditors or liquidators; and with regard to a company with committees, meaning shareholders, directors, executive officers or liquidators)) of a Membership-Type Financial Instruments Exchange after Entity Conversion,"; the term "the head office of each company" in Article 937(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the head office and branch offices of and the principal office and secondary offices of the Financial Instruments Exchange,"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百二条　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第六号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第六号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十四条（第六号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十五条第一項、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで、第八百四十六条並びに第九百三十七条第三項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）の規定は、会員金融商品取引所の組織変更の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第六号中「組織変更をする会社の株主等若しくは社員等」とあるのは「組織変更をする会員金融商品取引所の会員等（会員、理事長、理事、監事又は清算人をいう。）」と、「組織変更後の会社の株主等、社員等」とあるのは「組織変更後株式会社金融商品取引所の株主等（株主、取締役又は清算人（監査役会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、監査役又は清算人、委員会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、執行役又は清算人）をいう。）」と、同法第九百三十七条第三項中「各会社の本店」とあるのは「金融商品取引所の本店及び支店並びに主たる事務所及び従たる事務所」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(1) priority is given to the dispute settlement procedures under the relevant FTA (see, for example, NAFTA, which provides, in regard to any dispute arising from NAFTA or GATT or any related agreement, that if the respondent claims that its action is subject to the provisions on "Relation to Environmental and Conservation Agreements", "Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures" or "Standard-Related Measures," and requests that for the matter be considered under the NAFTA, the complainant may have recourse solely to the dispute settlement procedures under NAFTA (Article 2005, Paragraphs 3 and 4)); or (2) priority is given to the dispute settlement procedures under the WTO Agreement (or GATT) (See, for example, the EC - Chile FTA, which stipulates that when a case is disputable under the WTO Agreement, such case shall be referred to the dispute settlement procedures (Article 189, Paragraph 4(c)) under the WTO Agreement.例文帳に追加

① FTA 上の紛争解決手続が優先するとするも の ② WTO協定（又はGATT）上の紛争解決手続 が優先するとするもの ③申立国が自らWTO協定（又はGATT）上の 紛争解決手続とFTA 上の紛争解決手続のい ずれをも選択し得ることとしているもの ①の例としてはNAFTA がある。同協定は、 NAFTA 及びGATT またはその関連協定から生 じる紛争について、被申立国が当該案件は NAFTA 上の「環境及び省資源協定関連」規定、 または「衛生及び植物衛生措置」もしくは「規格関 連措置」に関連する規定の適用を受けると主張し、 当該案件をNAFTA に従って検討するよう要請 する場合は、申立国はNAFTA 上の手続のみ利用できる旨規定している（2005条３項、４項）。② の事例として、EC－チリは、紛争案件が WTO協定の対象にもなりうる場合には、当該案 件はWTOの紛争解決手続に付託されるとの包括 的なWTO優先手続を規定している（189条３項 ）。 - 経済産業省

(4) The provisions of Article 512 to Article 518 inclusive (Order to Suspend Other Procedures; Restrictions on Withdrawal of Petition for Commencement of Special Liquidation; Order to Commence Special Liquidation; Suspension of Other Procedures; Order to Suspend Procedures to Enforce Security Interest; Prohibition of Set-offs); the provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2, Subsection 2 to Subsection 10 inclusive (excluding Article 522(3), Article 530(2), and Article 536) (Supervision and Investigation by the Court; Liquidators; Supervisor; Investigators; Restrictions on Acts of Liquidating Stock Companies; Dispositions Necessary); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 4 (Action Concerning Special Liquidation); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 1 (excluding Article 868(2) to (5) inclusive and Article 870 to Article 874 inclusive) (General Provisions); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 3 (excluding Article 879, Article 882(2), and Article 896) (Special Provisions on the Procedures of Special Liquidation); and Article 938 (excluding paragraph (6)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Juridical Decision Concerning Special Liquidation) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the special liquidation of a Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation. In this case, the phrase "procedures to enforce the security interest that exists in the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company, procedures to enforce charge on whole company assets or compulsory execution procedures based on the general liens and other claims that have general priority that have already been enforced against the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company" in Article 516 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "procedures to exercise the security interest that exists in the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation or compulsory execution procedures based on claims for which there exists a general statutory lien or any other general priority that have already been enforced against the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation," the phrase "or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the voting rights of all shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)" in Article 522(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of the voting rights of all Specified Equity Members (excluding Specified Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a period) not less than three-hundredths of the voting rights (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of all Preferred Equity Members (excluding Preferred Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members), or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the total number of units of Specified Equity (excluding the Company's Own Specified Equity) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period) not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the units of issued Preferred Equity (excluding the Company's Own Preferred Equity)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　会社法第五百十二条から第五百十八条まで（他の手続の中止命令、特別清算開始の申立ての取下げの制限、特別清算開始の命令、他の手続の中止等、担保権の実行の手続等の中止命令、相殺の禁止）、第二編第九章第二節第二款から第十款まで（第五百二十二条第三項、第五百三十条第二項及び第五百三十六条を除く。）（裁判所による監督及び調査、清算人、監督委員、調査委員、清算株式会社の行為の制限等、清算の監督上必要な処分等、債権者集会、協定、特別清算の終了）、第七編第二章第四節（特別清算に関する訴え）、同編第三章第一節（第八百六十八条第二項から第五項まで及び第八百七十条から第八百七十四条までを除く。）（総則）、同章第三節（第八百七十九条、第八百八十二条第二項及び第八百九十六条を除く。）（特別清算の手続に関する特則）及び第九百三十八条（第六項を除く。）（特別清算に関する裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、清算特定目的会社の特別清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百十六条中「担保権の実行の手続、企業担保権の実行の手続又は清算株式会社の財産」とあるのは「担保権の実行の手続又は清算特定目的会社の財産」と、同法第五百二十二条第一項中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式（自己株式を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の数の株式を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主」とあるのは「総特定社員（社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない特定社員を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する特定社員若しくは総優先出資社員（社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない優先出資社員を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する優先出資社員又は特定出資（自己特定出資を除く。）の総口数の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の特定出資を有する特定社員又は発行済優先出資（自己優先出資を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の優先出資を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

If no appeal or motion for reconsideration is filed within the time provided in these Regulations, the Director shall forthwith cause the entry of the judgment or final order in the appropriate Register of the Office. The date of finality of the judgment or final order shall be deemed to be the date of its entry. The record shall contain the dispositive part of the judgment or final order and shall be signed by the Director, with a certificate that such judgment or final order has become final and executory. If no appeal or motion for reconsideration has been filed on time, the judgment or final order rendered by the Director or the Director General, as the case may be, becomes final and executory, and should immediately be caused to be entered by the Director. To ensure this action the prevailing party should file a motion for the entry (and execution, if proper) of the judgment. The date of entry is the starting point of the six months period for filing a petition of relief, as well as the five years period of prescription of judgments. This rule corrects the erroneous practice of entering the judgment or final order long after it had become final and executory. Even if the physical act of entering the judgment or final order is done after it had become final and executory, the date when it became final and executory shall be deemed the date of its entry.例文帳に追加

本規則に定める期間内に上訴又は再審理申立が提出されなかった場合は，局長は，直ちに，当該判決又は最終命令を庁の適切な登録簿に記入させる。判決又は最終命令の確定日は，その記入日とする。記録には，判決又は最終命令による決定の内容を記載し，局長が署名し，当該判決又は最終命令が確定した旨の証明書を添えるものとする。 期限内に上訴又は再審理申立がされなかった場合は，局長又は場合により長官が言い渡した判決又は最終命令が確定するものとし，局長は，直ちにこれを記入させなければならない。この処分を確実にするために，勝訴当事者は，判決の記入(及び適切な場合は執行)を申し立てる。記入日に，救済を求める申立のための6月間及び判決の時効に係る5年間が開始する。 本条規則は，判決又は最終命令が確定してからこれを記入するまでの期間が長くなるという誤った慣行を是正するものである。判決又は最終命令を記入するという物理的な行為がこれらの確定後になされるとしても，これらが確定した日をこれらの記入日とみなす。 - 特許庁

Article 69 (1) With regard to the dissolution and liquidation of a cooperative, the provisions of Article 475 (excluding item (i) and item (iii)), Article 476, Article 478, paragraph (2) and paragraph (4), Article 479, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) (limited to the portions other than those listed in the respective items), Article 481, Article 483, paragraph (4) and paragraph (5), Article 484, Article 485, Article 489, paragraph (4) and paragraph (5), Article 492, paragraphs (1) to (3), Articles 499 to 503, Article 507 (Liquidation of a Stock Company), Article 868, paragraph (1), Article 869, Article 870 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (ii) and item (iii)), Article 871, Article 872 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (iv)), Article 874 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (i) and item (iv)), Article 875, and Article 876 (Non-Contentious Cases) of the Companies Act and Article 40 (Judicial Decision for Appointment of a Person to Conduct Inspections) of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedure Act (Act No. 14 of 1898) shall apply mutatis mutandis; with regard to a liquidator of a cooperative, the provisions of Article 35-3, Article 35-4, Article 36-2, Article 36-3, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Articles 36-5 to 38-4 (excluding Article 36-7, paragraph (4)), Article 40 (excluding paragraph (1), paragraph (11), and paragraph (13)), Article 47, paragraphs (2) to (4), Article 48, and Article 53-2 of this Act, the provisions of Article 357, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act, paragraph (1) of the same Article as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing the terms pursuant to the provisions of Article 360, paragraph (3) of the same Act, and the provisions of Article 361, Article 381, paragraph (2), Article 382, the main clause of Article 383, paragraph (1), Article 383, paragraph (2) and paragraph (3), Articles 384 to 386, and Article 508 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis; with regard to an action to pursue the liability of a liquidator of a cooperative, the provisions of Part 7, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847, paragraph (2), Article 849, paragraph (2), item (ii) and paragraph (5), and Article 851, and excluding the portions pertaining to the company auditors in the case of a cooperative limiting the audit authority)(Action to Pursue the Liability, etc. of a Stock Company) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis; and with regard to a liquidator of a cooperative limiting the audit authority, the provisions of Article 353, Article 360, paragraph (1) and Article 364 of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis. In this case, the phrase "an inventory of property, a balance sheet, a profit and loss statement, and a plan for the appropriation of surplus or a plan for the disposal of losses" in Article 40, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "an inventory of property and a balance sheet," the term "a business report" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "an affairs written report," the term "business report" in paragraph (3), paragraphs (5) to (10), and paragraph (12), item (i) and item (iii) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "affairs written report," the term "the directors (or, for a Company with Board of Directors, to the board of directors)" in Article 382 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the board of liquidators," the term "the following shareholders" in the portions of Article 479, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act other than those listed in the respective items shall be deemed to be "a member who has obtained the consent of or more one-fifth of all partner," the term "Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice" in Article 384, Article 492, paragraph (1), Article 507, paragraph (1), and Article 847, paragraph (1) and paragraph (4) of the same Act shall be deemed to be "ordinance of the competent ministry," the phrase "give public notice in the official gazette" in Article 499, paragraph (1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "give public notice," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第六十九条　組合の解散及び清算については、会社法第四百七十五条（第一号及び第三号を除く。）、第四百七十六条、第四百七十八条第二項及び第四項、第四百七十九条第一項及び第二項（各号列記以外の部分に限る。）、第四百八十一条、第四百八十三条第四項及び第五項、第四百八十四条、第四百八十五条、第四百八十九条第四項及び第五項、第四百九十二条第一項から第三項まで、第四百九十九条から第五百三条まで、第五百七条（株式会社の清算）、第八百六十八条第一項、第八百六十九条、第八百七十条（第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十一条、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十五条並びに第八百七十六条（非訟）並びに非訟事件手続法（明治三十一年法律第十四号）第四十条（検査をすべき者の選任の裁判）の規定を、組合の清算人については、第三十五条の三、第三十五条の四、第三十六条の二、第三十六条の三第一項及び第二項、第三十六条の五から第三十八条の四まで（第三十六条の七第四項を除く。）、第四十条（第一項、第十一項及び第十三項を除く。）、第四十七条第二項から第四項まで、第四十八条並びに第五十三条の二並びに会社法第三百五十七条第一項、同法第三百六十条第三項の規定により読み替えて適用する同条第一項並びに同法第三百六十一条、第三百八十一条第二項、第三百八十二条、第三百八十三条第一項本文、第二項及び第三項、第三百八十四条から第三百八十六条まで並びに第五百八条の規定を、組合の清算人の責任を追及する訴えについては、同法第七編第二章第二節（第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第二項第二号及び第五項並びに第八百五十一条を除き、監査権限限定組合にあつては、監査役に係る部分を除く。）（株式会社における責任追及等の訴え）の規定を、監査権限限定組合の清算人については、同法第三百五十三条、第三百六十条第一項及び第三百六十四条の規定を準用する。この場合において、第四十条第二項中「財産目録、貸借対照表、損益計算書、剰余金処分案又は損失処理案」とあるのは「財産目録、貸借対照表」と、「事業報告書」とあるのは「事務報告書」と、同条第三項、第五項から第十項まで並びに第十二項第一号及び第三号中「事業報告書」とあるのは「事務報告書」と、同法第三百八十二条中「取締役（取締役会設置会社にあっては、取締役会）」とあるのは「清算人会」と、同法第四百七十九条第二項各号列記以外の部分中「次に掲げる株主」とあるのは「総組合員の五分の一以上の同意を得た組合員」と、同法第三百八十四条、第四百九十二条第一項、第五百七条第一項並びに第八百四十七条第一項及び第四項中「法務省令」とあるのは「主務省令」と、同法第四百九十九条第一項中「官報に公告し」とあるのは「公告し」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Lawsuit for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the General Meeting of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, executive officer or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　会社法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、相互会社の総代会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人（保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項（同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Sec.216 Remedies for Infringement 216.1. Any person infringing a right protected under this law shall be liable: (a) To an injunction restraining such infringement. The court may also order the defendant to desist from an infringement, among others, to prevent the entry into the channels of commerce of imported goods that involve an infringement, immediately after customs clearance of such goods. (b) Pay to the copyright proprietor or his assigns or heirs such actual damages, including legal costs and other expenses, as he may have incurred due to the infringement as well as the profits the infringer may have made due to such infringement, and in proving profits the plaintiff shall be required to prove sales only and the defendant shall be required to prove every element of cost which he claims, or, in lieu of actual damages and profits, such damages which to the court shall appear to be just and shall not be regarded as penalty. (c) Deliver under oath, for impounding during the pendency of the action, upon such terms and conditions as the court may prescribe, sales invoices and other documents evidencing sales, all articles and their packaging alleged to infringe a copyright and implements for making them. (d) Deliver under oath for destruction without any compensation all infringing copies or devices, as well as all plates, molds, or other means for making such infringing copies as the court may order. (e) Such other terms and conditions, including the payment of moral and exemplary damages, which the court may deem proper, wise and equitable and the destruction of infringing copies of the work even in the event of acquittal in a criminal case.例文帳に追加

216.1本法の規定により保護される権利を侵害する者は，次のことに対して応じる責任がある。 (a)その侵害を止めさせる差止命令。裁判所は，特に，侵害に係る輸入商品の取引の場への持込を防止するために，その商品の税関手続の直後に，被告に対して，侵害を止めることを命令することもできる。 (b)著作権者，その譲受人又はその相続人に対して，法的費用その他の支出を含み，それらの者が侵害により蒙った実際の損害，及び侵害者が侵害により得た利益を支払うこと利益を立証するに当たっては，原告は販売の事実を立証することのみ要求され，被告が要した費用の詳細を立証することを要求される。又は，実際の損害及び利益に代えて，裁判所にとって相応と認められ，かつ，罰金とはみなされない損害賠償を支払うこと (c)訴訟の係属の間における押収のために，裁判所が定める条件で，販売送り状その他販売を立証する文書，著作権を侵害すると申し立てられた物品及びその包装，並びにそれら物品を製作する器具を，宣誓して引き渡すこと (d)裁判所の命令に従い，補償しないで破棄するため，侵害する複製物又は装置，及び図版，鋳型その他侵害する複製物を製作する手段を，宣誓して引き渡すこと (e)刑事訴訟において無罪宣告があった場合であっても，裁判所が適切であり，賢明であり，かつ，衡平であるとみなすことができる教訓的かつ見せしめの損害賠償の支払，及び著作物を侵害する複製物の廃棄を含む，その他の条件 - 特許庁

(2) The provisions of Part IV, Chapter III (excluding Article 715) (Bondholders' Meeting), the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 7 (Action Seeking Rescission of Performance, etc. of a Bond-issuing Company), Article 868(3) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Prima Facie Showing), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (x) to item (xii) inclusive) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to Specified Bonds, Specified Bondholders, Specified Bond Certificates, Specified Bond Administrators, Specified Bonds registries, and Specified Bondholders Meetings in cases where a Specific Purpose Company issues Specified Bonds. In this case, the terms "Bond-issuing Company," "bearer bonds," and "representative bondholder" in said provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Company Issuing Specified Bonds," "Specified Bonds in bearer form," and "representative Specified Bondholder," the phrase "this Act" in Article 716 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Asset Securitization Act or the Asset Securitization Plan," the term "electromagnetic public notice" in Article 720(5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Electronic Public Notice (meaning electronic public notice as prescribed in Article 194(1)(iii) of the Asset Securitization Act)," the phrase "Bondholders' Meeting Reference Documents" in Article 721 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Reference Documents for a Specified Bondholders Meeting," the phrase "each item of Article 706(1)" in Article 724(2)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the items of Article 127(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "paragraph (1) of Article 706" in Article 724(2)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 707" in Article 729(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 707 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 127(8) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 676" in Article 733(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 122(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "paragraphs (1) through (3) of Article 705, and under Articles 708 and 709" in Article 737(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(1) to (3) inclusive of the Asset Securitization Act and the provisions of Article 708 and Article 709 of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 127(8) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 449" in Article 740(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 111 of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 702" in Article 740(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 126 of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "paragraph (1) of Article 705 (including cases where that paragraph is applied mutatis mutandis under paragraph (2) of Article 737)" in Article 741(3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 737(2) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 129(2) of the Asset Securitization Act) of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　会社法第四編第三章（第七百十五条を除く。）（社債権者集会）、第七編第二章第七節（社債発行会社の弁済等の取消しの訴え）、第八百六十八条第三項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第十号から第十二号までに係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十四条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、特定目的会社が特定社債を発行する場合における特定社債、特定社債権者、特定社債券、特定社債管理者、特定社債原簿又は特定社債権者集会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「社債発行会社」とあるのは「特定社債発行会社」と、「無記名社債」とあるのは「無記名特定社債」と、「代表社債権者」とあるのは「代表特定社債権者」と、同法第七百十六条中「この法律」とあるのは「資産流動化法又は資産流動化計画」と、同法第七百二十条第五項中「電子公告」とあるのは「電子公告（資産流動化法第百九十四条第一項第三号に規定する電子公告をいう。）」と、同法第七百二十一条中「社債権者集会参考書類」とあるのは「特定社債権者集会参考書類」と、同法第七百二十四条第二項第一号中「第七百六条第一項各号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第四項各号」と、同項第二号中「第七百六条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第四項」と、同法第七百二十九条第一項中「第七百七条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第八項において準用する第七百七条」と、同法第七百三十三条第一号中「第六百七十六条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十二条第一項」と、同法第七百三十七条第二項中「第七百五条第一項から第三項まで、第七百八条及び第七百九条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第一項から第三項まで並びに同条第八項において準用する第七百八条及び第七百九条」と、同法第七百四十条第一項中「第四百四十九条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百十一条」と、同条第二項中「第七百二条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十六条」と、同法第七百四十一条第三項中「第七百五条第一項（第七百三十七条第二項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第一項（資産流動化法第百二十九条第二項において準用する第七百三十七条第二項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 146 The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the parts pertaining to item (vii) and item (viii)) and paragraph (2) (limited to the parts pertaining to item (vii) and item (viii)), Article 834 (limited to the parts pertaining to item (vii) and item (viii)), Article 835(1), Articles 836 to 839 inclusive, Article 843 (excluding paragraph (1), item (iii) and item (iv) and the proviso to paragraph (2)), Article 846 and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the parts pertaining to item (ii) and item (iii)) and paragraph (4) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of merger under Article 136(1); and the provisions of Article 868(5), Article 870 (limited to the parts pertaining to item (xv)), the main clause of Article 871, Article 872 (limited to the part pertaining to item (iv)), the main clause of Article 873, Article 875 and Article 876 of said Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to filing of the motion under Article 843(4) of said Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "Shareholders, etc. or Members, etc." in Article 828(2)(vii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Member, etc. (meaning members, presidents, directors, auditors or liquidators; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item); the term "Shareholders, etc., Members, etc." in said item shall be deemed to be replaced with "Member, etc., Shareholders, etc. (meaning shareholders, directors or liquidators (with regard to a company with auditors, meaning shareholders, directors, auditors or liquidators; and with regard to a company with Committees, meaning shareholders, directors, executive officers or liquidators)); the term "Shareholders, etc. or Members, etc." in Article 828(2)(viii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Member, etc. (meaning members, presidents, directors, auditors or liquidators; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) or Shareholders, etc. (meaning shareholders, directors or liquidators (with regard to a company with auditors, meaning shareholders, directors, auditors or liquidators; and with regard to a company with Committees, shareholders, directors, executive officers or liquidators; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item); and the term "Shareholders, etc., Members, etc." in said item shall be deemed to be replaced with "Member, etc., Shareholders, etc."; and the term "the head office" in Article 937(3) of said Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the head office (with regard to a Membership-Type Financial Instruments Exchange, the principal office and secondary offices); and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百四十六条　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十四条（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十五条第一項、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで、第八百四十三条（第一項第三号及び第四号並びに第二項ただし書を除く。）、第八百四十六条並びに第九百三十七条第三項（第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。）及び第四項の規定は第百三十六条第一項の合併の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第五項、第八百七十条（第十五号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十一条本文、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十三条本文、第八百七十五条及び第八百七十六条の規定はこの条において準用する同法第八百四十三条第四項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第七号中「株主等若しくは社員等」とあるのは「会員等（会員、理事長、理事、監事又は清算人をいう。以下この号において同じ。）」と、「株主等、社員等」とあるのは「会員等、株主等（株主、取締役又は清算人（監査役会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、監査役又は清算人、委員会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、執行役又は清算人）をいう。）」と、同項第八号中「株主等若しくは社員等」とあるのは「会員等（会員、理事長、理事、監事又は清算人をいう。以下この号において同じ。）若しくは株主等（株主、取締役又は清算人（監査役会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、監査役又は清算人、委員会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、執行役又は清算人）をいう。以下この号において同じ。）」と、「株主等、社員等」とあるのは「会員等、株主等」と、同法第九百三十七条第三項中「本店」とあるのは「本店（会員金融商品取引所にあっては、主たる事務所及び従たる事務所）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the part pertaining to item (ii)) and paragraph (2) (limited to the part pertaining to item (ii)), Article 834 (limited to the part pertaining to item (ii)), Article 835, paragraph (1), Article 836, paragraph (1) and paragraph (3), Article 837 through Article 840, Article 846, and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the part pertaining to sub-item (b) of item (i)) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of the issue of Investment Equity after the establishment of an Investment Corporation, and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1), the main clause of Article 871, Article 872 (limited to the part pertaining to item (ii)), the main clause of Article 873, Article 875 through Article 877, and Article 878, paragraph (1) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the petition filed under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph, respectively. In this case, any necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十四条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十五条第一項、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで、第八百四十六条並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ロに係る部分に限る。）の規定は投資法人の成立後における投資口の発行の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項、第八百七十一条本文、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十三条本文、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで及び第八百七十八条第一項の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 150 The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the part pertaining to item (vii) and item (viii)) and paragraph (2) (limited to the part pertaining to item (vii) and item (viii)), Article 834 (limited to the part pertaining to item (vii) and item (viii)), Article 835, paragraph (1), Article 836 through Article 839, Article 843 (excluding paragraph (1), item (iii) and item (iv) and the proviso to paragraph (2)), Article 846, and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the part pertaining to item (ii) and item (iii)) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of the merger of Investment Corporations, and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (5), Article 870 (limited to the part pertaining to item (xv)), the main clause of Article 871, Article 872 (limited to the part pertaining to item (iv)), the main clause of Article 873, Article 875, and Article 876 of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the petition filed under Article 843, paragraph (4) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, any necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百五十条　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十四条（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十五条第一項、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで、第八百四十三条（第一項第三号及び第四号並びに第二項ただし書を除く。）、第八百四十六条並びに第九百三十七条第三項（第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。）の規定は投資法人の合併の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第五項、第八百七十条（第十五号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十一条本文、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十三条本文、第八百七十五条及び第八百七十六条の規定はこの条において準用する同法第八百四十三条第四項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 21 The provisions of Article 267 to 268-3 inclusive (Lawsuit to Hold Directors Accountable) of the Commercial Code as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 196 (Exemption from Liability of, and Representative Action against Incorporators) of said Code as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 30 of the Current Act shall apply to any lawsuit filed by members on or after the Effective Date under Article 267, paragraph (1) of the Commercial Code as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 196 of said Code as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 30 of the Current Act or under Article 267, paragraph (3) of the Commercial Code as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 196 of said Code as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 30 of the Current Act; with regard to any lawsuit filed by members before the Effective Date under Article 57, paragraph (1) of the Former Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 41 of the Former Act or under Article 267, paragraph (3) of the Commercial Code as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 57, paragraph (2) of the Former Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 41 of the Former Act, the provisions then in force shall remain applicable. 例文帳に追加

第二十一条　新法第三十条において準用する商法第百九十六条（発起人に対する責任の免除及び代表訴訟）において準用する同法第二百六十七条から第二百六十八条ノ三まで（取締役の責任を追及する訴え）の規定は、施行日以後に社員が新法第三十条において準用する商法第百九十六条において準用する同法第二百六十七条第一項の訴えの提起を請求する場合又は新法第三十条において準用する商法第百九十六条において準用する同法第二百六十七条第三項の訴えを提起する場合について適用し、施行日前に社員が旧法第四十一条において準用する旧法第五十七条第一項の訴えの提起を請求した場合又は旧法第四十一条において準用する旧法第五十七条第二項において準用する商法第二百六十七条第三項の訴えを提起した場合については、なお従前の例による。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(b) The filing of an objection to a disposition of execution by the executing court, a petition seeking permission for the appointment of an agent set forth in Article 13, paragraph (1) of the Civil Execution Act, an objection to a disposition concerning a petition for a grant of a certificate of execution, a petition for a judicial decision ordering a stay or a continuation of a compulsory execution or ordering a revocation of a disposition of execution under the provisions of Article 36, paragraph (1) or paragraph (3) of said Act, a petition for appointment of a special agent under the provisions of Article 41, paragraph (2) of said Act, an objection to a disposition by a court clerk under the provisions of Article 47, paragraph (4) or Article 49, paragraph (5) of said Act, a demand for liquidation distribution by the executing court, a petition for a temporary restraining order on a sale under the provisions of Article 55, paragraph (1) of said Act or for a revocation or change of such an order under the provisions of paragraph (5) of said Article, a petition for permission to pay rent on land, etc. in place of the obligor under the provisions of Article 56, paragraph (1) of said Act, an objection to a disposition by a court clerk under the provisions of Article 62, paragraph (3) or Article 64, paragraph (6) of said Act, a petition for a temporary restraining order for an obligee effecting a seizure who has made a purchase offer under the provisions of Article 68-2, paragraph (1) of said Act, a petition for a temporary restraining order for the highest purchase price offeror or the purchaser under the provisions of Article 77, paragraph (1) of said Act, an objection to a disposition by a court clerk under the provisions of Article 78, paragraph (6) of said Act, a petition for an order to deliver real property under the provisions of Article 83, paragraph (1) of said Act, a petition for an order to deliver the certificate of a vessel's nationality, etc. under the provisions of Article 115, paragraph (1) of said Act, a petition for the rescission of a compulsory auction procedure under the provisions of Article 117, paragraph (1) of said Act, a petition for permission for navigation of a vessel under the provisions of Article 118, paragraph (1) of said Act, a petition for an order to deliver seized property under the provisions of Article 127, paragraph (1) of said Act; an objection to a disposition of execution by a court clerk in the procedure of executing a claim relating to a small claim action, a demand on a court clerk for liquidation distribution during the process of executing a claim relating to a small claim action, a petition under the provisions of Article 167-15, paragraph (3) of said Act, a petition under the provisions of Article 172, paragraph (2) of said Act, a petition for a temporary restraining order prior to a commencement order for a secured real property auction under Article 187, paragraph (1) of said Act or for revocation of such an order under the provisions of Article 187, paragraph (4), or a petition for permission to commence an auction of movables as set forth in Article 190, paragraph (2) of said Act 例文帳に追加