「prevention of」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(353ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

Article 216 The provisions of Article 1-3 to 5 inclusive (Registry Office, Delegation of Duties, Suspension of Duties, Registrar, Disqualification of Registrar), Article 7 to 15 inclusive (Prohibition of Taking out Registry, Loss and Restoration of Registry, Prevention of Loss of Registry, Delivery of Certificate of Registered Matters, etc., Delivery of Document Containing Description of Registered Matters, Inspection of Annexed Documents, Seal Registration Certificate, Certification of Necessary Matters for Checking Measures to Indicate Preparer of Electromagnetic Record, Fees, Principle of Application by Party concerned, Registration by Commission), Article 17, paragraphs (1), (2) and (4) (Method of Application for Registration), Article 18 to 19-2 inclusive (Documents to be Attached to Written Application, Electromagnetic Record to be Attached to Written Application), Article 20, paragraphs (1) and (2) (Submission of Seal), Article 21 to 23-2 inclusive (Reception, Receipt, Order of Registration, Identification by Registrar), Article 24 (excluding items (xi) and (xii)) (Dismissal of Application), Article 25 to 27 inclusive (Registration after Expiration of Period for Filing Complaint, Modification of Administrative Boundaries, etc., Prohibition of Registration of Same Trade Name at Same Location), Article 33 (Deletion of Registration of Trade Name), Articles 44 and 45 (Registration of Company Managers), Articles 51 and 52 (Registration of Relocation of Head Office), Article 128 (Applicant), Article 129 (Registration of Foreign Company), Article 130, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Registration of Change), and Article 132 to 148 inclusive (Correction, Application for Deletion, Deletion without any Party's Request, Exclusion from Application of Administrative Procedure Act, Exclusion from Application of Act on Access to Information Held by Administrative Organs, Application for Examination, Treatment of Cases of Application for Examination, Exclusion from Application from Administrative Appeal Act, Delegation to Ordinance of the Ministry) of the Commercial Registration Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a registration regarding a Foreign Mutual Company. In this case, the term "or the matters to be described in a written application pursuant to the provision of the preceding paragraph" in Article 17, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "preceding two paragraphs" in Article 17, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "that paragraph"; the term "head office" in Article 51, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "office in Japan"; the term "a foreign company under Article 933, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act" in Article 129, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the establishment of an office of a Foreign Mutual Company"; the term "the company has designated its representative person in Japan or established a business office in Japan" in Article 129, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the company has established an office in Japan"; and the terms "for registration under the preceding two paragraphs," "registration has been made under the preceding two paragraphs" and "documents set forth in the preceding two paragraphs" in Article 130, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "for registration under the preceding paragraph," "registration has been made under that paragraph" and "document set forth in that paragraph," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第二百十六条　商業登記法第一条の三から第五条まで（登記所、事務の委任、事務の停止、登記官、登記官の除斥）、第七条から第十五条まで（登記簿等の持出禁止、登記簿の滅失と回復、登記簿等の滅失防止、登記事項証明書の交付等、登記事項の概要を記載した書面の交付、附属書類の閲覧、印鑑証明、電磁的記録の作成者を示す措置の確認に必要な事項等の証明、手数料、当事者申請主義、嘱託による登記）、第十七条第一項、第二項及び第四項（登記申請の方式）、第十八条から第十九条の二まで（申請書の添付書面、申請書に添付すべき電磁的記録）、第二十条第一項及び第二項（印鑑の提出）、第二十一条から第二十三条の二まで（受付、受領証、登記の順序、登記官による本人確認）、第二十四条（第十一号及び第十二号を除く。）（申請の却下）、第二十五条から第二十七条まで（提訴期間経過後の登記、行政区画等の変更、同一の所在場所における同一の商号の登記の禁止）、第三十三条（商号の登記の抹消）、第四十四条、第四十五条（会社の支配人の登記）、第五十一条、第五十二条（本店移転の登記）、第百二十八条（申請人）、第百二十九条（外国会社の登記）、第百三十条第一項及び第三項（変更の登記）並びに第百三十二条から第百四十八条まで（更正、抹消の申請、職権抹消、行政手続法の適用除外、行政機関の保有する情報の公開に関する法律の適用除外、行政機関の保有する個人情報の保護に関する法律の適用除外、審査請求、審査請求事件の処理、行政不服審査法の適用除外、省令への委任）の規定は、外国相互会社に関する登記について準用する。この場合において、同法第十七条第四項中「事項又は前項の規定により申請書に記載すべき事項」とあるのは「事項」と、「前二項」とあるのは「同項」と、同法第五十一条第一項中「本店」とあるのは「日本国内の事務所」と、同法第百二十九条第一項中「会社法第九百三十三条第一項の規定による外国会社」とあるのは「外国相互会社の事務所の設置」と、同条第三項中「日本における代表者を定めた旨又は日本に営業所」とあるのは「日本国内に事務所」と、同法第百三十条第三項中「前二項の登記の」とあるのは「第一項の登記の」と、「既に前二項」とあるのは「既に同項」と、「、前二項」とあるのは「、同項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(v) A person who has been sentenced to pay a fine (including a punishment under the laws and regulations of a foreign state equivalent thereto) for having violated the provisions of this Act, the Trust Act, the Trust Business Act, the Act on Concurrent Operation of Trust Business by a Financial Institution, the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, the Commodity Exchange Act (Act No. 239 of 1950), the Building Lots and Buildings Transaction Business Act, the Act Regulating the Receipt of Contributions, Receipt of Deposits, and Interest Rates, etc. (Act No. 195 of 1954), the Installment Sales Act (Act No. 159 of 1961), the Act on Assumption of Entrustment, etc. of Futures Trading in the Foreign Commodities Market (Act No.65 of 1982), the Money Lending Business Act (Act No. 32 of 1983), the Act on Deposit, etc. Transaction Agreements of Specified Commodities, etc. (Act No. 62 of 1986), the Act on Regulation of Business Pertaining to Commodity Investment (Act No. 66 of 1991), the Real Estate Specified Joint Enterprise Act (Act No. 77 of 1994), the Act on Securitization of Assets (Act No. 105 of 1998), the Act on Issuance, etc. of Bonds for Financial Corporations' Loan Business (Act No. 32 of 1999), the Companies Act, or the Act on General Incorporated Associations and General Incorporated Foundations (Act No. 48 of 2006), for having violated the provisions of the laws and regulations of a foreign state equivalent to those Acts, or for having committed a crime prescribed in Article 255, Article 256, Article 258 through Article 260, and Article 262 of the Civil Rehabilitation Act (Act No. 225 of 1999), Article 65, Article 66, Article 68, and Article 69 of the Act on Recognition and Assistance for Foreign Insolvency Procedures (Act No. 129 of 2000), Article 265, Article 266, Article 268 through Article 272, and Article 274 of the Bankruptcy Act (Act No. 75 of 2004), Article 204, Article 206, Article 208, Article 208-3, Article 222, and Article 247 of the Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1907), the Act on the Punishment of Violent Acts (Act No. 60 of 1926), Article 46, Article 47, Article 49, and Article 50 of the Act on Prevention of Illegal Acts by Organized Crime Group Members (Act No. 77 of 1991), and for whom five years have yet to elapse since the day on which the execution of sentence was complete or since the sentence has become no longer applicable. 例文帳に追加

五　この法律、信託法、信託業法、金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律、金融商品取引法、商品取引所法（昭和二十五年法律第二百三十九号）、宅地建物取引業法、出資の受入れ、預り金及び金利等の取締りに関する法律（昭和二十九年法律第百九十五号）、割賦販売法（昭和三十六年法律第百五十九号）、海外商品市場における先物取引の受託等に関する法律（昭和五十七年法律第六十五号）、貸金業法（昭和五十八年法律第三十二号）、特定商品等の預託等取引契約に関する法律（昭和六十一年法律第六十二号）、商品投資に係る事業の規制に関する法律（平成三年法律第六十六号）、不動産特定共同事業法（平成六年法律第七十七号）、資産の流動化に関する法律（平成十年法律第百五号）、金融業者の貸付業務のための社債の発行等に関する法律（平成十一年法律第三十二号）、会社法若しくは一般社団法人及び一般財団法人に関する法律（平成十八年法律第四十八号）若しくはこれらに相当する外国の法令の規定に違反し、又は民事再生法（平成十一年法律第二百二十五号）第二百五十五条、第二百五十六条、第二百五十八条から第二百六十条まで若しくは第二百六十二条の罪、外国倒産処理手続の承認援助に関する法律（平成十二年法律第百二十九号）第六十五条、第六十六条、第六十八条若しくは第六十九条の罪、破産法（平成十六年法律第七十五号）第二百六十五条、第二百六十六条、第二百六十八条から第二百七十二条まで若しくは第二百七十四条の罪、刑法（明治四十年法律第四十五号）第二百四条、第二百六条、第二百八条、第二百八条の三、第二百二十二条若しくは第二百四十七条の罪、暴力行為等処罰に関する法律（大正十五年法律第六十号）の罪若しくは暴力団員による不当な行為の防止等に関する法律（平成三年法律第七十七号）第四十六条、第四十七条、第四十九条若しくは第五十条の罪を犯し、罰金の刑（これに相当する外国の法令による刑を含む。）に処せられ、その刑の執行を終わり、又はその刑の執行を受けることがなくなつた日から五年を経過しない者 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) When a Designated In-Home Service Provider as prescribed in Article 41, paragraph (1) of this Act; a Designated Community-Based Service Provider as prescribed in Article 42-2, paragraph (1); a Designated In-Home Long-Term Care Support Provider as prescribed in Article 46, paragraph (1); a Facility Covered by Long-Term Care Insurance; a Designated Provider of a Preventive Service to Long-Term Care as prescribed in Article 53, paragraph (1); a Designated Provider of Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care as prescribed in Article 54-2, paragraph (1); or a Designated Provider of Support for Prevention of Long-Term Care as prescribed in Article 58, paragraph (1) (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Designated In-Home Service Provider, etc." in this paragraph) receives a payment pursuant to the provisions of Article 41, paragraph (6), Article 42-2, paragraph (6), Article 46, paragraph (4), Article 48, paragraph (4), Article 51-2, paragraph (4), Article 53, paragraph (4), Article 54-2, paragraph (6), Article 58, paragraph (4), or Article 61-2, paragraph (4) by deception or other wrongful act, a Municipality may require said Designated In-Home Service Provider, etc., to return the amount paid, or to pay the amount obtained by multiplying 40 percent of the principal amount to be returned. 例文帳に追加

３　市町村は、第四十一条第一項に規定する指定居宅サービス事業者、第四十二条の二第一項に規定する指定地域密着型サービス事業者、第四十六条第一項に規定する指定居宅介護支援事業者、介護保険施設、第五十三条第一項に規定する指定介護予防サービス事業者、第五十四条の二第一項に規定する指定地域密着型介護予防サービス事業者又は第五十八条第一項に規定する指定介護予防支援事業者（以下この項において「指定居宅サービス事業者等」という。）が、偽りその他不正の行為により第四十一条第六項、第四十二条の二第六項、第四十六条第四項、第四十八条第四項、第五十一条の二第四項、第五十三条第四項、第五十四条の二第六項、第五十八条第四項又は第六十一条の二第四項の規定による支払を受けたときは、当該指定居宅サービス事業者等に対し、その支払った額につき返還させるほか、その返還させる額に百分の四十を乗じて得た額を支払わせることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Further, the dissemination of false information detrimental to the reputation of another person's business may also constitute an unfair competition (Article 2 Paragraph 1 Item 14 of the same). In a case where the Plaintiffs (the Company (party P1) and its director (party P2)) filed a claim for compensation of damages etc. against the defendant (a Chinese company (party D1) and its agent in Japan (party D2)) on the ground that the D1, which was P1's competitor, indicated on D1's Japanese website as if P1 were an Japanese agent of the D1 and a link was set from D1's website to P1's website. Plaintiff alleged that the aforementioned acts committed by D1 and D2 disparaged P1's reputation and therefore constitute a joint tort. Further, such acts also amounts to unfair competition against P1 as defined in Article 2 Paragraph 1 Item 14 of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act (the "UCPA"). The court partially accepted the Plaintiffs' claim on the ground that D2 had at least provided data and materials for creating D1's website and D2 was also involved not only in creating such website but also in misrepresenting P1 in D1's website, thereby disseminating false information detrimental to the P1's reputation as referred to in Article 2 Paragraph 1 Item 14 of the ULPA. It was held that D1 and D2 are jointly liable to P2 for libel, defamation and infringement of name rights (Osaka District Court, July 26, 2007). 例文帳に追加

このようなリンクを張られた原告らが、上記中国法人及び当該法人の日本の代理店である被告による上記行為は原告らの名誉及び信用を毀損する共同不法行為を構成するとともに、原告会社との関係では不正競争防止法第２条第１項第１４号所定の不正競争行為に該当するなどとして、被告に対し、損害賠償等を求めた事案がある。この点、裁判所は、被告が、中国法人において本件ウェブページを作成するに当たり、少なくともそのためのデータや資料を提供するなどして、これに関与していたものであり、ひいては同法人が本件表示行為をするに当たって関与したものと認めるのが相当であり、被告は、本件表示行為について、原告会社との関係で社会的信用を害する虚偽の事実を流布するものであるとして、不正競争防止法第2条第1項第14号の不正競争行為であることを認め、原告個人との関係で名誉・信用毀損、氏名権侵害を認めて、同法人と共同不法行為責任を負うものというべきであるなどとして請求の一部を認めた（大阪地裁平成 19年7月26日判決）。 - 経済産業省

Article 205 (1) When a Certification Committee, Prefectural Certification Committee of Needed Long-Term Care, or Examination Committee for Benefit Expense, or member of a Certification Committee for Insurance, professional investigator of a Certification Committee for Insurance, Association, Officer, or personnel of a juridical person which is entrusted with affairs by an Association concerning an examination or payment as prescribed in Article 41, paragraph (9), Article 42-2, paragraph (8), Article 46, paragraph (6), Article 48, paragraph (6), Article 51-2, paragraph (7), Article 53, paragraph (6), Article 54-2, paragraph (8), Article 58, paragraph (6), or Article 61-2, paragraph (7), pursuant to the provisions of Article 41, paragraph (11) (including a case applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 42-2, paragraph (9), Article 46, paragraph (7), Article 48, paragraph (7), Article 51-2, paragraph (8), Article 53, paragraph (7), Article 54-2, paragraph (9), Article 58, paragraph (7), and Article 61-2, paragraph (8)), or a person that held said occupation divulges, without justifiable cause, any business confidential information or personal confidential information of a Designated In-Home Service Provider, Designated Community-Based Service Provider, Designated In-Home Long-Term Care Support Provider, an organizer of a Long-Term Care Insurance Facility, Designated Provider of Preventive Long-Term Care Service, Designated Provider of Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care, Designated Provider of Support for Prevention of Long-Term Care or a person that provided In-Home Service, etc., that said person has come to learn, shall be imprisoned with compulsory labor for less than one year or fined an amount not to exceed one million yen. 例文帳に追加

第二百五条　認定審査会、都道府県介護認定審査会、給付費審査委員会若しくは保険審査会の委員、保険審査会の専門調査員若しくは連合会若しくは連合会から第四十一条第十一項（第四十二条の二第九項、第四十六条第七項、第四十八条第七項、第五十一条の二第八項、第五十三条第七項、第五十四条の二第九項、第五十八条第七項及び第六十一条の二第八項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により第四十一条第九項、第四十二条の二第八項、第四十六条第六項、第四十八条第六項、第五十一条の二第七項、第五十三条第六項、第五十四条の二第八項、第五十八条第六項若しくは第六十一条の二第七項に規定する審査及び支払に関する事務の委託を受けた法人の役員若しくは職員又はこれらの職にあった者が、正当な理由なしに、職務上知り得た指定居宅サービス事業者、指定地域密着型サービス事業者、指定居宅介護支援事業者、介護保険施設の開設者、指定介護予防サービス事業者、指定地域密着型介護予防サービス事業者、指定介護予防支援事業者若しくは居宅サービス等を行った者の業務上の秘密又は個人の秘密を漏らしたときは、一年以下の懲役又は百万円以下の罰金に処する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) When a fire chief or fire station chief is unable to identify the owner, manager or possessor, who holds title, of an object that is found to be dangerous from a fire prevention perspective or an object that is found to be likely to hinder fire extinguishing activities, evacuation and other fire defense activities, and therefore unable to order these persons to take any necessary measures under the provision of the preceding paragraph, he/she may have his/her fire defense personnel take the measures listed in Article 3, paragraph (1), item (iii) or item (iv) with regard to said object, at the expense of said person. In this case, the fire and fire station chief shall, in advance, set a reasonable time limit and give public notice to the effect that such measures should be implemented by said time limit and that if the measures have not been implemented by said time limit, his/her fire defense personnel will implement the measures; provided, however, that this shall not apply when it is found that there is an urgent necessity. 例文帳に追加

２　消防長又は消防署長は、火災の予防に危険であると認める物件又は消火、避難その他の消防の活動に支障になると認める物件の所有者、管理者又は占有者で権原を有するものを確知することができないため、これらの者に対し、前項の規定による必要な措置をとるべきことを命ずることができないときは、それらの者の負担において、当該消防職員に、当該物件について第三条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる措置をとらせることができる。この場合においては、相当の期限を定めて、その措置を行うべき旨及びその期限までにその措置を行わないときは、当該消防職員がその措置を行うべき旨をあらかじめ公告しなければならない。ただし、緊急の必要があると認めるときはこの限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

A peek prevention film 17 is provided so as to cover the respective LEDs, and the respectively LEDs are visually recognized resctrictively only from the specified direction of a game machine front surface.例文帳に追加

メイン制御基板は図柄変動パターン情報と遊技モード情報とをサブ制御基板に出力し、該サブ制御基板は遊技盤上に設けられた画像表示器５に該図柄変動パターン情報と遊技モード情報に基いて図柄を変動表示すると共に、該遊技盤の片隅に点光源状のＬＥＤ１５ａ〜１５ｈ、１６ａ〜１６ｈを複数個非直線状に配置し、前記メイン制御基板から出力された図柄変動パターン情報と遊技モード情報に基き該各ＬＥＤを点灯または消灯させることにより該パチンコ遊技機の遊技状態が表示されるようにすると共に、のぞき見防止フィルム１７を該各ＬＥＤを覆うように設け、該各ＬＥＤが遊技機前面の特定方向からのみ限定的に視認されるようにした。 - 特許庁

We, the participants representing health, social welfare and labour sectors of the ASEAN plus 3 countries at the 11th ASEAN & Japan High Level Officials Meeting on Caring Societies (hereafter referred to as the Meeting) held in Tokyo, Japan, on 3-5 December 2013, which carried the theme “Active Aging”;Remembering that this year marks the 40th year since the relations between ASEAN and the Japanese Government began, and that we have kept cordial relationships throughout this time, aiming to further enhance our cooperations and build strategic partnerships in the future;Acknowledging with appreciation the initiative of the Government of Japan to convene the ASEAN-Japan High-level Officials Meeting on Caring Societies since 2003, particularly this 11th Meeting as an effective platform of information sharing and exchange of views on the health, social welfare and labour aspects of “Active Aging”;Also, acknowledging with appreciation the active initiatives by the Government of Japan for holding the “ASEAN-Japan Seminar, The Regional Cooperation for the Aging Society” in Jakarta this November, with hopes that these efforts will continue and promote further collaborations in the future;Noting that aging is progressing worldwide, and by 2050 the population of age 60 years and over will reach 2 billion;Recognizing that ASEAN countries will experience rapid aging in years to come, and face new challenges such as maintaining health, responding to welfare and social security needs, prevention of isolation and poverty of the elderly that require urgent attention;Considering that the current situation of aging in the health, labour and welfare sector and the promotion of measures related to aging in ASEAN countries vary, and that cultural and social backgrounds differ between ASEAN member states and Japan, therefore the current issues that are faced by each country may not be the same;Also, noting the results of the discussions made by the “Study Group for Japan’s International Contributions to Active Aging.”例文帳に追加

「Active Aging1」をテーマに2013年12月3日から5日まで東京において開催された第11回ASEAN・日本社会保障ハイレベル会合で、ASEAN+3各国の保健、社会福祉及び労働分野の参加者は、今年がASEAN日本友好40周年であり、我が国とASEAN各国の間でこれまでの友好的な関係を想起し、今後のさらなる協力関係の強化と戦略的なパートナーシップを目指し、ASEAN・日本社会保障ハイレベル会合を2003年より開催している日本政府のイニシアティブに感謝するとともに、第11回会合は、保健、社会福祉及び労働分野におけるActive Agingに関する情報共有と意見交換のための有効な場であることを認識し、また、本年11月に日本政府がジャカルタにおいてASEAN地域における高齢化に係る国際貢献に関する講演会（ASEAN-Japan Seminar, The Regional Cooperation for the Aging Society）が行われたことを評価しつつ、地域協力に関する努力の継続とさらなる連携の促進を期待し、世界の高齢化は急速に進行しており、2050年には60歳以上の人口が20億人に達することを留意し、ASEAN諸国においては今後急速に高齢化が進み、高齢者の健康保持や、福祉及び社会保障ニーズへの対応、高齢者の孤立・貧困防止などの対策が急務であることを認識し、保健・福祉・労働分野における高齢化の現状及び対策の推進に際して、ASEAN諸国は多様であり、また、ASEAN諸国と日本では置かれている状況や文化・社会的背景が異なること、それゆえ現在直面している課題が異なることを考慮し、さらに、｢国際的なActive Ageingにおける日本の貢献に関する検討会｣での議論成果に留意する。 - 厚生労働省

Article 13 (1) City plans stipulated for city planning areas (including those concerning out-of-area facilities; the same shall apply in the following paragraph) shall conform to the National Spatial Plan, the National Capital Region Development Plan, the Kinki Region Development Plan, the Chubu Region Development Plan, the Hokkaido Comprehensive Development Plan, the Okinawa Promotion Plan and any other plans based on Acts concerning national plans or regional plans (including pollution prevention plans if they have been stipulated for said cities; the same shall apply in paragraph (3)) and national plans for roads, rivers, railways, ports, airports and other facilities; and they must, in consideration of the said city's characteristics, uniformly and comprehensively stipulate matters concerning land use, urban facility construction and urban development projects required for the sound and orderly development of said cities in accordance with the following provisions. In such cases, consideration must be given to the improvement in preservation of the natural environment in said cities. 例文帳に追加

第十三条　都市計画区域について定められる都市計画（区域外都市施設に関するものを含む。次項において同じ。）は、国土形成計画、首都圏整備計画、近畿圏整備計画、中部圏開発整備計画、北海道総合開発計画、沖縄振興計画その他の国土計画又は地方計画に関する法律に基づく計画（当該都市について公害防止計画が定められているときは、当該公害防止計画を含む。第三項において同じ。）及び道路、河川、鉄道、港湾、空港等の施設に関する国の計画に適合するとともに、当該都市の特質を考慮して、次に掲げるところに従つて、土地利用、都市施設の整備及び市街地開発事業に関する事項で当該都市の健全な発展と秩序ある整備を図るため必要なものを、一体的かつ総合的に定めなければならない。この場合においては、当該都市における自然的環境の整備又は保全に配慮しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 183 (1) The provisions of Article 1-3 to Article 5 inclusive (Registry Office; Delegation of Affairs; Suspension of Affairs; Registrar; Disqualification of Registrar), Article 7 to Article 15 inclusive (Prohibition on Carrying Out of Registries and Other Documents; Loss and Restoration of Registries; Prevention of Loss of Registry, etc.; Issuance of Certificate of Registered Matters; Issuance of Documents Specifying Extract of Matters Registered; Inspection of Annexed Documents; Certificate of Seal Impression; Certification of Matters Required for Verification of Measures to Identify the Creator of Electromagnetic Records and Other Matters; Fees; Registration Upon Application by Party; Registration upon Commission), Article 17 to Article 27 inclusive (Method of Application for Registration; Document to Be Attached to Written Application; Electromagnetic Records to be Attached to Written Application; Submission of Seal Impression; Acceptance of Applications; Receipt; Order of Registration; Identity Confirmation by Registrar; Dismissal of Application; Registration to Be Made After Lapse of Period for Filing Action; Change in Administrative Zone, etc.; Prohibition on Registration of Identical Trade Name at Same Location), Article 33 (Cancellation of Registration of Trade Name), Article 34 (Registration of Trade Name of Company), Article 44 and Article 45 (Registration of Company's Manager), Article 46 (excluding paragraph (4)) (General Rules on Documents to be Attached), Article 47(1) (Registration of Incorporation), Article 48 to Article 55 inclusive (Registration to Be Made at Location of Branch Office; Registration of Relocation of Head Office; Registration of Change of Directors and Other Officers; Registration of Change of Person Who is to Temporarily Perform Duties of Accounting Auditors), Article 64 (Registration of Change Due to Share Option Issue), Article 71 (Registration of Dissolution), Article 73 to Article 75 inclusive (Registration of Liquidator; Registration of Change Related to Liquidator; Registration of Completion of Liquidation), and Article 132 to Article 148 inclusive (Correction; Application for Cancellation; Ex Officio Cancellation; Exclusion from Application of the Administrative Procedure Act; Exclusion from Application of the Act on Access Information Held by Administrative Organs; Exclusion from the Application of the Act on the Protection of Personal Information Held by Administrative Organs; Request for Review; Handling of Request for Review Case; Exclusion from Application of the Administrative Appeal Act; Delegation to Ordinance of the Ministry) of the Commercial Registration Act (Act No. 125 of 1963) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the registration of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrases "to Article 50 inclusive (including the cases where they are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 95, Article 111 and Article 118)" and "Article 51, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 52, Article 78, paragraphs (1) and (3), Article 82, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 83, Article 87, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 88, Article 91, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 92, Article 132" in Article 15 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "to Article 50 inclusive" and "Article 132," respectively, the phrase "a document evidencing authority delegated to a privately appointed agent or a transferor's written approval prescribed in Article 30, paragraph (2) or Article 31, paragraph (2)" in Article 24(vii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a document evidencing authority delegated to a privately appointed agent," the term "company registry" in Article 34(1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specific Purpose Company Registry," the phrase "the items of Article 930, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act" in Article 48(2) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the items of Article 930(2) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 22(4) of the Act on Securitization of Assets (hereinafter referred to as the 'Asset Securitization Act')," the phrase ", representative director or special director (in the case of a company with committees, a director, committee member, executive officer or representative executive officer)" in Article 54(1) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or representative director," the phrases "Article 333, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act" and "Article 337, paragraph (1) of said Act" in Article 54(2)(iii) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 71(1) of the Asset Securitization Act" and "Article 73(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," respectively, the phrase "Article 346, paragraph (4) of the Companies Act" in Article 55(1) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 76(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrases "Article 478, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Companies Act" and "Article 483, paragraph (4) of said Act" in Article 71(3) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 167(1)(i) of the Asset Securitization Act" and "Article 171(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," respectively, the phrase "Article 478, paragraph (1), item (ii) or (iii) of the Companies Act" in Article 73(2) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 167(1)(ii) or (iii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "Article 928, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Companies Act" in Article 73(3) and Article 74(1) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 928(1)(ii) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 179(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "Article 507, paragraph (3) of the Companies Act" in Article 75 of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 507(3) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 179(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百八十三条　商業登記法（昭和三十八年法律第百二十五号）第一条の三から第五条まで（登記所、事務の委任、事務の停止、登記官、登記官の除斥）、第七条から第十五条まで（登記簿等の持出禁止、登記簿の滅失と回復、登記簿等の滅失防止、登記事項証明書の交付等、登記事項の概要を記載した書面の交付、附属書類の閲覧、印鑑証明、電磁的記録の作成者を示す措置の確認に必要な事項等の証明、手数料、当事者申請主義、嘱託による登記）、第十七条から第二十七条まで（登記申請の方式、申請書の添付書面、申請書に添付すべき電磁的記録、印鑑の提出、受付、受領証、登記の順序、登記官による本人確認、申請の却下、提訴期間経過後の登記、行政区画等の変更、同一の所在場所における同一の商号の登記の禁止）、第三十三条（商号の登記の抹消）、第三十四条（会社の商号の登記）、第四十四条、第四十五条（会社の支配人の登記）、第四十六条（第四項を除く。）（添付書面の通則）、第四十七条第一項（設立の登記）、第四十八条から第五十五条まで（支店所在地における登記、本店移転の登記、取締役等の変更の登記、一時会計監査人の職務を行うべき者の変更の登記）、第六十四条（株主名簿管理人の設置による変更の登記）、第七十一条（解散の登記）、第七十三条から第七十五条まで（清算人の登記、清算人に関する変更の登記、清算結了の登記）及び第百三十二条から第百四十八条まで（更正、抹消の申請、職権抹消、行政手続法の適用除外、行政機関の保有する情報の公開に関する法律の適用除外、行政機関の保有する個人情報の保護に関する法律の適用除外、審査請求、審査請求事件の処理、行政不服審査法の適用除外、省令への委任）の規定は、特定目的会社に関する登記について準用する。この場合において、同法第十五条中「第五十条まで（第九十五条、第百十一条及び第百十八条において準用する場合を含む。）」とあるのは「第五十条まで」と、「第五十一条第一項及び第二項、第五十二条、第七十八条第一項及び第三項、第八十二条第二項及び第三項、第八十三条、第八十七条第一項及び第二項、第八十八条、第九十一条第一項及び第二項、第九十二条、第百三十二条並びに」とあるのは「第百三十二条及び」と、同法第二十四条第七号中「書面若しくは第三十条第二項若しくは第三十一条第二項に規定する譲渡人の承諾書」とあるのは「書面」と、同法第三十四条第一項中「会社の登記簿」とあるのは「特定目的会社登記簿」と、同法第四十八条第二項中「会社法第九百三十条第二項各号」とあるのは「資産の流動化に関する法律（以下「資産流動化法」という。）第二十二条第四項において準用する会社法第九百三十条第二項各号」と、同法第五十四条第一項中「取締役、監査役、代表取締役又は特別取締役（委員会設置会社にあつては、取締役、委員、執行役又は代表執行役）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は代表取締役」と、同条第二項第三号中「会社法第三百三十三条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第七十一条第一項」と、「同法第三百三十七条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第七十三条第一項」と、同法第五十五条第一項中「会社法第三百四十六条第四項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第七十六条第四項」と、同法第七十一条第三項中「会社法第四百七十八条第一項第一号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百六十七条第一項第一号」と、「同法第四百八十三条第四項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百七十一条第四項」と、同法第七十三条第二項中「会社法第四百七十八条第一項第二号又は第三号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百六十七条第一項第二号又は第三号」と、同条第三項及び同法第七十四条第一項中「会社法第九百二十八条第一項第二号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百七十九条第一項において準用する会社法第九百二十八条第一項第二号」と、同法第七十五条中「会社法第五百七条第三項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百七十九条第一項において準用する会社法第五百七条第三項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

8. For the purposes of this Article: a) the term “principal class of shares” means the class or classes of shares of a company which in the aggregate represent a majority of the voting power of the company; b) the term “shares” shall include depository receipts of shares or trust certificates of shares; c) the term “recognised stock exchange” means: (i) any stock exchange established by a Financial Instruments Exchange or an approved-type financial instruments firms association under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law (Law No. 25 of 1948) of Japan; (ii) any regulated market established in the Netherlands subject to regulation by the Authority for the Financial Markets (or its successor) under a license as meant in paragraph 1 of Article 5:26 of the Act on Financial Supervision (or its successor) of the Netherlands; (iii) the Irish Stock Exchange, the London Stock Exchange, the Swiss Stock Exchange and the stock exchanges of Brussels, Dusseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Hong Kong, Johannesburg, Lisbon, Luxembourg, Madrid, Mexico, Milan, New York, Paris, Seoul, Singapore, Stockholm, Sydney, Toronto and Vienna and the NASDAQ System; and (iv) any other stock exchange which the competent authorities of the Contracting States agree to recognise for the purposes of this Article; d) the term “equivalent beneficiary” means: (i) a resident of a state that has a convention for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion between that state and the Contracting State from which the benefits of this Convention are claimed such that: (aa) that convention contains provisions for effective exchange of information; (bb) that resident is a qualified person under the limitation on benefits provisions in that convention or, when there are no such provisions in that convention, would be a qualified person when that convention is read as including provisions corresponding to paragraph 2; and (cc) with respect to an item of income referred to in paragraph 3 of Article 10, paragraph 3 of Article 11 or Article 12, 13 or 20 that resident would be entitled under that convention to a rate of tax with respect to the particular class of income for which the benefits are being claimed under this Convention that is at least as low as the rate applicable under this Convention; or (ii) a qualified person by reason of subparagraph a), b), c) or d) of paragraph 2; e) the term “associated enterprises” means enterprises which have a relationship with each other as described in subparagraph a) or b) of paragraph 1 of Article 9; and f) the term “gross income” means the total revenues derived by an enterprise from its business, less the direct costs of obtaining such revenues.例文帳に追加

８この条の規定の適用上、(a)「主たる種類の株式」とは、合計して法人の議決権の過半数を占める一又は二以上の種類の株式をいう。(b)「株式」には、株式の預託証券又は株式の信託受益証券を含む。(c)「公認の有価証券市場」とは、次のものをいう。(i)日本国の金融商品取引法（昭和二十三年法律第二十五号）に基づき設立された金融商品取引所又は認可金融商品取引業協会により設立された有価証券市場(ii)オランダの金融監督に関する法律第五条の二十六１（又は同法を承継する法律の関連規定）に規定する許可に基づき金融市場庁（又は同庁を承継する当局）による規制に従ってオランダにおいて設立された有価証券市場(iii)アイルランド証券取引所、ロンドン証券取引所、スイス証券取引所、ブリュッセル証券取引所、デュッセルドルフ証券取引所、フランクフルト証券取引所、ハンブルク証券取引所、香港証券取引所、ヨハネスブルク証券取引所、リスボン証券取引所、ルクセンブルク証券取引所、マドリード証券取引所、メキシコ証券取引所、ミラノ証券取引所、ニューヨーク証券取引所、パリ証券取引所、ソウル証券取引所、シンガポール証券取引所、ストックホルム証券取引所、シドニー証券取引所、トロント証券取引所、ウィーン証券取引所及びナスダック市場(iv)この条の規定の適用上、両締約国の権限のある当局が公認の有価証券市場として合意するその他の有価証券市場(d)「同等受益者」とは、次の(i)又は(ii)に規定するいずれかの者をいう。(i)この条約の特典が要求される締約国との間に租税に関する二重課税の回避及び脱税の防止のための条約（以下この条において「租税条約」という。）を有している国の居住者であって、次の(aa)から(cc)までに掲げる要件を満たすもの(aa)租税条約が実効的な情報の交換に関する規定を有すること。(bb)当該居住者が、租税条約における特典の制限に関する規定に基づき適格者に該当すること又は租税条約に当該規定がない場合には、租税条約に２の規定に相当する規定が含まれているとしたならば、当該居住者がその規定により適格者に該当するであろうとみられること。(cc)第十条３、第十一条３、第十二条、第十三条又は前条に定める所得に関し、当該居住者が、この条約の特典が要求されるこれらの規定に定める所得について租税条約の適用を受けたとしたならば、この条約に規定する税率以下の税率の適用を受けるであろうとみられること。(ii)２(a)から(d)までに掲げる適格者(e)「関連企業」とは、第九条１(a)又は(b)に規定する関係を有する企業をいう。(f)「総所得」とは、企業がその事業から取得する総収入の額から当該収入を得るために直接に要した費用の額を差し引いた残額をいう。 - 財務省

Meanwhile, as I said just now, it cannot be denied that the company had a problem from the viewpoint of the need to establish proper information management and business operation systems suited to its business diversification and internationalization. In addition, it is desirable for the company to establish a system that will enable it to identify and take the necessary additional measures without any delay once its business has diversified and internationalized further in the future or when the market environment changes - namely, an enhanced level of internal control system that will enable dynamic responses. We issued a business improvement order to the company from this perspective, with a view to protecting the public interest and investors. We will require the company to implement the recurrence prevention measures steadily and effectively and, as I said earlier, to establish an internal control system that will enable it to respond quickly to changes in the market environment. 例文帳に追加

他方で、今も申し上げましたように同社の業務の多様化、国際化という点に着目した場合、これに即した適切な情報管理態勢、業務運営態勢という観点からは問題点がなかったとはいえないということ、また今後の業務の更なる多様化・国際化や、あるいは環境の変化といったものが生じたときに、これに応じて新たに必要となる追加的な措置を自ら特定し遅滞なく実施に移すための態勢、そういったいわばダイナミックな対応といった一段高い水準の内部管理態勢を構築していただくことが望ましいと、こういった点を踏まえまして、公益、または投資者保護の観点から同社に対して業務改善命令を発出したところでございまして、同社において今後、再発防止策の実効性をともなった着実な実施、あるいは今も申し上げた市場環境の変化に即応できる内部管理態勢の構築といったものを求めていくものであります。 - 金融庁

The ban was fully lifted in December 2007, with the sales of all insurance products approved as a result and, now that roughly three years have passed, the steps for prevention of harmful practices are slated to be changed as necessary on the basis of monitoring results and other information from the perspective of the protection and convenience of insurance policyholders, etc. However, I do not feel it appropriate to make a definite statement about any future orientation now. From what I heard, however, over-the-counter sales make up 1 percent of non-life insurance sales and approximately 6 percent of life insurance sales, which are the figures that I believe have been reported to me. Judging from those, it seems to me that the firewall or information on financing deals is protected fairly strictly. I recall the debate that took place in the past about the possible highly negative impact of the insurance sales by banks on the livelihood of sales agents marketing life insurance products but some regional banks are actually not engaged in life insurance sales. In the meantime, I hear that the three mega-banks are selling life insurance, but my guess is that it rather reflects their effort to have a full line of products, so to speak. The possibility of the insurance sales by banks posing a real threat to the life insurance industry, particularly the livelihood of life insurance sales agents, was a subject of a heated debate in the LDP as well. It turns out that more liberalization does help add more convenience for the people, as the results show: the over-the-counter sales by banks make up 6 percent of life insurance sales and 1 percent in non-life insurance sales. Let me also point out that it is extremely important to protect life insurance policyholders and that the greater the convenience for prospective policyholders, the more accessible life insurance becomes. I cannot give any definite word at this point in time – if I may be a little daring, however, I would say on the issue of the scheduled review after three years that the statistics look acceptable to me, but that is just my personal opinion. 例文帳に追加

平成19年12月、すべての保険商品の取扱いが認められて全面解禁したわけでございますが、弊害防止措置についてはモニタリング結果等を踏まえ、保険契約者等の保護や利便性の観点から概ね3年間経過しまして、所要の見直しを行うことにしておりますが、現在の方向性については、現在確たることは申し上げられないというふうに思っておりますが、たしか私が聞くところによりますと、窓口販売は損害保険だとたしか1％、それから生命保険だと6％ぐらいの数字ということをたしか報告いただいておりますので、ファイアーウォールといいますか、融資に関する情報がかなりきちんと私は厳格に守られているのではないかということを思っておりますし、一時こんなものを銀行で売られたら、生命保険を売って回る生保の募集員の方々の生活を非常に圧迫するというような論議も当時あったやに私は覚えておりますけれども、現実には地方銀行でも生命保険を売っていないところもございますし、それから、3メガバンクは売っているようでございますが、それもどちらかというと商品を揃えるというか、そういう色彩が強いのではないかというふうに私は思っておりまして、当時、銀行で窓販されるともう生命保険業界、特に生命保険の勧誘員の方の生活が本当に脅かされるというようなことを大変自由民主党でも当時議論の過程では噴出したのですが、結果としては、この生命保険が窓販6％、損保1％ということを見れば、この辺はやはりできるだけ自由にした方が国民の利便になるわけですから、それから、生命保険に入った人の保護というのは非常に大事でございまして、生命保険に入る人の利便性というか、便利な方がより生命保険に接することができるわけですから、そういったところを考えたら、まだ今の時点では確たることは申し上げられませんけれども、しかし、3年後に見直しを行うということでございますが、こういうことは少し一歩踏み込んだ発言になるのかもしれませんけれども、出てきた数字を見ると、妥当なところではないかなというふうに私は、ここは個人的意見ですけれども、思いますね。 - 金融庁