「have no information」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(3ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

In 2006, discussions were held at meetings of the TRIPS Council and under the auspices of the WTO Deputy Director-General. Some developing countries, such as India, Brazil and Peru, argue that the TRIPS Agreement should be amended to include a disclosure requirement of source and country of origin of genetic resources, prior informed consent to the use of genetic resources and provisions evidencing fair and equitable benefit sharing in order to obligate disclosure of such information in patent applications. To the contrary, Japan, the US and other countries find no conflict between the TRIPS Agreement and the CBD, and believe that it is possible to apply the two agreements in a mutually supportive manner. Therefore, there is a large gap between those countries that believe that amendment of the TRIPS Agreement is unnecessary in order to achieve the purpose of the CBD and those countries that believe it is necessary. Discussions have not converged yet.例文帳に追加

2006年には、TRIPS 理事会、WTO事務局次長主催の協議の場等において議論が行われたが、遺伝資源等の出所や原産国、遺伝資源等の利用にかかる事前の同意、及び公正かつ衡平な利益配分の証拠につき、特許出願中に開示を義務づけるため、TRIPS 協定を改正するよう求めるインド、ブラジル、ペルー等の諸国と、我が国、米国等、TRIPS 協定とCBD は抵触なく、相互補完的に履行可能であり、CBD の目的を達成するに当たってTRIPS 協定の改正は不要とする諸国との間に意見の隔たりが大きく、議論の収束には至っていない。 - 経済産業省

Article 42 (1) Where a ruling under Article 92 (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure (Act No. 109 of 1996) was rendered pertaining to the record of litigation in which a protective order was issued (excluding litigation in which all protective orders have been rescinded), where a party to whom the protective order was not issued in the litigation requests inspection etc. of a part of the record in which the confidential information is contained, etc. under the said Article, immediately after the filing of the request, the court clerk shall notify the party who filed the motion under the said Article (excluding the person who filed the request, the same in paragraph (3)) of the fact that the said request has been filed. 例文帳に追加

第四十二条　秘密保持命令が発せられた訴訟（すべての秘密保持命令が取り消された訴訟を除く。）に係る訴訟記録につき、民事訴訟法（平成八年法律第百九号）第九十二条第一項の決定があった場合において、当事者から同項に規定する秘密記載部分の閲覧等の請求があり、かつ、その請求の手続を行った者が当該訴訟において秘密保持命令を受けていない者であるときは、裁判所書記官は、同項の申立てをした当事者（その請求をした者を除く。第三項において同じ。）に対し、その請求後直ちに、その請求があった旨を通知しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Tokyo District Court judgment dated June 14, 2005 (p.135 of Hanrei Jiho No. 1917) states that, "However, the actual method of use of self-identifying information is diverse varies, for analysis of whether or not it should constitute an infringement of rights and remedies thereto, the interests of both parties must be specifically balanced in view of the conflicting interests such as the freedom of expression and commercial activities, and so emphasis should not be placed too much on the predominance of moral rights. More specifically, the contents and nature, the purpose and method of use of self-identifying information, and the significance of damages incurred by the individuals there from should be comprehensively examined." This case argues that, for determining whether or not the publicity rights have been infringed, such publicity rights should be specifically balanced with a broader range of rights, not limited to the freedom of expression, while the King Crimson Case focused solely on the "freedom of expression" as the only conflicting interest. 例文帳に追加

東京地裁平成１７年６月１４日判決・判時１９１７号１３５頁は、「しかしながら、実際に生じ得る個人の同一性に関する情報の使用の態様は千差万別であるから、権利侵害の成否及びその救済方法の検討に当たっては、人格権の支配権たる性格を過度に強調することなく、表現の自由や経済活動の自由などの対立利益をも考慮した個別的利益衡量が不可欠であり、使用された個人の同一性に関する情報の内容・性質、使用目的、使用態様、これにより個人に与える損害の程度等を総合的に勘案して判断する必要があるものと解される。」と述べ、パブリシティ権侵害の成否の判断において、キングクリムゾン高裁判決が「表現の自由」のみを対立利益としていたのに対し、表現の自由の場合に限定しない、より一般的な個別的な利益衡量が必要であることを認めている。 - 経済産業省

(10) The person in charge of handling custody and payment prescribed in Article 6(7) of the Act (hereinafter referred to as the "person in charge of handling custody and payment" through to paragraph (15)) shall, on each occasion of receiving the delivery of interest on specified foreign-issued company bonds, of which the person is entrusted with custody, in the course of the intermediary services, etc. for the receipt of such interest, no later than the day preceding the day on which the person is to receive the delivery, give a notice pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (7) of the said Article (hereinafter referred to as a "notice" through to paragraph (12)) to provide interest recipient information prescribed in paragraph (7) of the said Article (hereinafter referred to as "interest recipient information" through to paragraph (16)) which pertains to the interest to be delivered thereto to the person who pays the interest (in the case where the interest is delivered via any other person in charge of handling payment with whom the said person in charge of handling custody and payment has further entrusted custody, a notice shall be given to the person who pays the interest via such other person in charge of handling payment). In this case, if the person in charge of handling custody and payment receives the delivery of interest on the said specified foreign-issued company bonds, for the first time, on or after the day on which 40 days have elapsed since the day on which the said specified foreign-issued company bonds were issued, the notice of interest recipient information pertaining to the interest to be delivered thereto shall be given on or after the said day on which the 40-day period has expired. 例文帳に追加

１０　法第六条第七項に規定する保管支払取扱者（以下第十五項までにおいて「保管支払取扱者」という。）は、その保管の委託を受けている特定民間国外債の利子の受領の媒介等に基づきその利子の交付を受ける都度、その交付を受けるべき日の前日までに、その交付を受ける利子に係る同条第七項に規定する利子受領者情報（以下第十六項までにおいて「利子受領者情報」という。）をその利子の支払をする者に対し（その利子の交付が、当該保管支払取扱者が保管の再委託をしている他の支払の取扱者を通じて行われる場合には、当該他の支払の取扱者を経由してその利子の支払をする者に対し）同条第七項の規定による通知（以下第十二項までにおいて「通知」という。）をしなければならない。この場合において、最初に当該特定民間国外債の利子の交付を受ける日が、当該特定民間国外債の発行をした日以後四十日を経過する日後であるときは、その交付を受ける利子に係る利子受領者情報の通知は、同日以後にしなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(21) The person in charge of handling custody and payment prescribed in Article 6, paragraph (7) of the Act (hereinafter referred to as the "person in charge of handling custody and payment" through to paragraph (26)) shall, on each occasion of receiving the delivery of interest from specified foreign private bonds, of which the person is entrusted with custody, in the course of the intermediary services, etc. for the receipt of such interest, no later than the day preceding the day on which the person is to receive the delivery, give notice pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (7) of said Article (hereinafter referred to as "notice" through to paragraph (23)) to provide the interest recipient information prescribed in paragraph (7) of said Article (hereinafter referred to as "interest recipient information" through to paragraph (27)) for the interest to be delivered thereto to the person who pays the interest (in the case where the interest is delivered via any other person in charge of handling payment with whom said person in charge of handling custody and payment has further entrusted custody, notice shall be given to the person who pays the interest via such other person in charge of handling payment). In this case, if the person in charge of handling custody and payment receives the delivery of interest from said specified foreign private bonds, for the first time, on or after the day on which 40 days have elapsed since the day on which said specified foreign private bonds were issued, the notice of the interest recipient information for the interest to be delivered thereto shall be given on or after said day on which the 40-day period has expired. 例文帳に追加

２１　法第六条第七項に規定する保管支払取扱者（以下第二十六項までにおいて「保管支払取扱者」という。）は、その保管の委託を受けている特定民間国外債の利子の受領の媒介等に基づきその利子の交付を受ける都度、その交付を受けるべき日の前日までに、その交付を受ける利子に係る同条第七項に規定する利子受領者情報（以下第二十七項までにおいて「利子受領者情報」という。）をその利子の支払をする者に対し（その利子の交付が、当該保管支払取扱者が保管の再委託をしている他の支払の取扱者を通じて行われる場合には、当該他の支払の取扱者を経由してその利子の支払をする者に対し）同条第七項の規定による通知（以下第二十三項までにおいて「通知」という。）をしなければならない。この場合において、最初に当該特定民間国外債の利子の交付を受ける日が、当該特定民間国外債の発行をした日以後四十日を経過する日後であるときは、その交付を受ける利子に係る利子受領者情報の通知は、同日以後にしなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

I will look into the fine details later, but basically, government offices are financed by taxes, and have authority based on the Constitution and laws, as a matter of course. The Cabinet is formed as a result of election by the people; then the Prime Minister comes forth, who appoints the Minister for Financial Services according to the Constitution. As this is an extremely democratic government office, it is common sense from my point of view to properly keep or publicly disclose the minutes regarding financial regulation and supervision which have a huge impact in ordinary circumstances as a basic rule, given that an executive branch of government is basically in the public domain. From what I have heard, minutes of seven or eight meetings were disclosed to the public after it was said that this would be done initially, but information on the progress in the interim was not disclosed at all. I think this is extremely odd in view of the rules of the executive branch of government. Basically, from the viewpoint of common sense, it is odd as a government in an open democratic nation that there are no minutes, especially on such a matter that has later had a significant impact on banking regulation and supervision, given the rules of government offices. 例文帳に追加

私、より細かいことまでは後から勉強しますけれども、基本的にお役所というのは税金で成り立っておりまして、当然憲法、法律による権限がございまして、当然国民の選挙によって内閣ができて、総理大臣が出てきて、その総理大臣は憲法に従って金融担当大臣を任命するわけですから、これは極めて民主的な役所であるわけですから、私の常識としては、基本的にやはり行政というのは公のことですから、普通であれば非常に影響の大きい金融行政というのはきちんとやはり議事録を残す、あるいはきちんと皆様方に公表するということが基本的なルールだと思っておりますけれども、何か聞いたところによると、最初だけやりますといって、7、8回（議事録の公表を）やったのですか、途中の経過は一切公表しなかったという話を聞きますし、私自身、非常にこれは何か行政のルールとして大変おかしいことだなというふうに私は思っておりまして、もう一回きちんと、法律的な話等々はまた詰めて、私は法律家ではございませんけれども、基本的にごく常識的に考えて、本当に役所のルールとして、開かれた民主主義国家における政府として、ましてや非常に後から銀行行政に関して大きな影響を与えた話でございますから、私は（議事録がないという事は）いかがなものかなと思っております。 - 金融庁

If a person sells, or exposes for sale, or has in his possession for sale or for any purpose of trade or manufacturer any goods or things to which a false trademark or a false trade description is applied or which, being required under section 108 to have applied to them an indication of the country or place in which they were made or produced or the name and address of the manufacturer or producer or the person for whom the goods are manufactured or produced are without the indication so require, he shall, unless the proves (a) that, having taken all reasonable precautions against committing an offence against this section, he had at the time of the commission of the alleged offence no reason to suspect the genuineness of the trademark or trade description or that any offence had been committed in respect of the goods; and (b) that, on demand by or on behalf of the prosecutor he gave all the information in his power with respect to the person from whom he obtained such goods or things; or (c) that otherwise he acted innocently, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to 2 (two) years, or with fine, or with both, and in case of a second or subsequent conviction, with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to 3 (three) years, or with fine, or with both. 例文帳に追加

不正な商標若しくは虚偽の商品表示を付して、又は、第108条の規定により付すことが求められる製造若しくは生産される国若しくは地域、又は製造者若しくは生産者又は商品がその者のために製造若しくは生産される者の名称及び住所を表示することなく、商品又は物品を販売する者、又は販売用の展示を行う者、又は販売目的、取引若しくは製造の目的で所持する者は、次に掲げる事項が証明されない限り、2年以下の禁固又は罰金若しくはこれを併科、再犯若しくは累犯はいずれの場合も3年以下の禁固又は罰金若しくはこれを併科する。(a)本条に定める侵害に対して合理的なすべての予防措置を講じており、侵害があったとされる時点で、当該商標若しくは商品表示の真実性を疑う、又は当該商品に関して何らかの違反があったことを疑う、どのような理由もなかったこと。(b)検察官の要求に応じて、又は検察官のために、当該商品又は物品の入手先である者について自己の権限が及ぶ限りすべての情報を提供したこと。(c)その他の点においても正直に行動したこと。 - 特許庁

8. For the purposes of this Article: a) the term “principal class of shares” means the class or classes of shares of a company which in the aggregate represent a majority of the voting power of the company; b) the term “shares” shall include depository receipts of shares or trust certificates of shares; c) the term “recognised stock exchange” means: (i) any stock exchange established by a Financial Instruments Exchange or an approved-type financial instruments firms association under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law (Law No. 25 of 1948) of Japan; (ii) any regulated market established in the Netherlands subject to regulation by the Authority for the Financial Markets (or its successor) under a license as meant in paragraph 1 of Article 5:26 of the Act on Financial Supervision (or its successor) of the Netherlands; (iii) the Irish Stock Exchange, the London Stock Exchange, the Swiss Stock Exchange and the stock exchanges of Brussels, Dusseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Hong Kong, Johannesburg, Lisbon, Luxembourg, Madrid, Mexico, Milan, New York, Paris, Seoul, Singapore, Stockholm, Sydney, Toronto and Vienna and the NASDAQ System; and (iv) any other stock exchange which the competent authorities of the Contracting States agree to recognise for the purposes of this Article; d) the term “equivalent beneficiary” means: (i) a resident of a state that has a convention for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion between that state and the Contracting State from which the benefits of this Convention are claimed such that: (aa) that convention contains provisions for effective exchange of information; (bb) that resident is a qualified person under the limitation on benefits provisions in that convention or, when there are no such provisions in that convention, would be a qualified person when that convention is read as including provisions corresponding to paragraph 2; and (cc) with respect to an item of income referred to in paragraph 3 of Article 10, paragraph 3 of Article 11 or Article 12, 13 or 20 that resident would be entitled under that convention to a rate of tax with respect to the particular class of income for which the benefits are being claimed under this Convention that is at least as low as the rate applicable under this Convention; or (ii) a qualified person by reason of subparagraph a), b), c) or d) of paragraph 2; e) the term “associated enterprises” means enterprises which have a relationship with each other as described in subparagraph a) or b) of paragraph 1 of Article 9; and f) the term “gross income” means the total revenues derived by an enterprise from its business, less the direct costs of obtaining such revenues.例文帳に追加

８この条の規定の適用上、(a)「主たる種類の株式」とは、合計して法人の議決権の過半数を占める一又は二以上の種類の株式をいう。(b)「株式」には、株式の預託証券又は株式の信託受益証券を含む。(c)「公認の有価証券市場」とは、次のものをいう。(i)日本国の金融商品取引法（昭和二十三年法律第二十五号）に基づき設立された金融商品取引所又は認可金融商品取引業協会により設立された有価証券市場(ii)オランダの金融監督に関する法律第五条の二十六１（又は同法を承継する法律の関連規定）に規定する許可に基づき金融市場庁（又は同庁を承継する当局）による規制に従ってオランダにおいて設立された有価証券市場(iii)アイルランド証券取引所、ロンドン証券取引所、スイス証券取引所、ブリュッセル証券取引所、デュッセルドルフ証券取引所、フランクフルト証券取引所、ハンブルク証券取引所、香港証券取引所、ヨハネスブルク証券取引所、リスボン証券取引所、ルクセンブルク証券取引所、マドリード証券取引所、メキシコ証券取引所、ミラノ証券取引所、ニューヨーク証券取引所、パリ証券取引所、ソウル証券取引所、シンガポール証券取引所、ストックホルム証券取引所、シドニー証券取引所、トロント証券取引所、ウィーン証券取引所及びナスダック市場(iv)この条の規定の適用上、両締約国の権限のある当局が公認の有価証券市場として合意するその他の有価証券市場(d)「同等受益者」とは、次の(i)又は(ii)に規定するいずれかの者をいう。(i)この条約の特典が要求される締約国との間に租税に関する二重課税の回避及び脱税の防止のための条約（以下この条において「租税条約」という。）を有している国の居住者であって、次の(aa)から(cc)までに掲げる要件を満たすもの(aa)租税条約が実効的な情報の交換に関する規定を有すること。(bb)当該居住者が、租税条約における特典の制限に関する規定に基づき適格者に該当すること又は租税条約に当該規定がない場合には、租税条約に２の規定に相当する規定が含まれているとしたならば、当該居住者がその規定により適格者に該当するであろうとみられること。(cc)第十条３、第十一条３、第十二条、第十三条又は前条に定める所得に関し、当該居住者が、この条約の特典が要求されるこれらの規定に定める所得について租税条約の適用を受けたとしたならば、この条約に規定する税率以下の税率の適用を受けるであろうとみられること。(ii)２(a)から(d)までに掲げる適格者(e)「関連企業」とは、第九条１(a)又は(b)に規定する関係を有する企業をいう。(f)「総所得」とは、企業がその事業から取得する総収入の額から当該収入を得るために直接に要した費用の額を差し引いた残額をいう。 - 財務省