「Rescission」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(18ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

Article 50 (1) Where a registered trademark (including a trademark deemed identical from common sense perspective with the registered trademark, including a trademark consisting of characters identical with the registered trademark but in different fonts, a trademark that is written in different characters, Hiragana characters, Katakana characters, or Latin alphabetic characters, from the registered trademark but identical with the registered trademark in terms of pronunciation and concept, and a trademark consisting of figures that are considered identical in terms of appearance as those of the registered trademark; hereinafter the same shall apply in this article) has not been used in Japan in connection with any of the designated goods and designated services for three consecutive years or longer by the holder of trademark right, the exclusive right to use or non-exclusive right to use, any person may file a request for a trial for rescission of such trademark registration in connection with the relevant designated goods or designated services. 例文帳に追加

第五十条　継続して三年以上日本国内において商標権者、専用使用権者又は通常使用権者のいずれもが各指定商品又は指定役務についての登録商標（書体のみに変更を加えた同一の文字からなる商標、平仮名、片仮名及びローマ字の文字の表示を相互に変更するものであつて同一の称呼及び観念を生ずる商標、外観において同視される図形からなる商標その他の当該登録商標と社会通念上同一と認められる商標を含む。以下この条において同じ。）の使用をしていないときは、何人も、その指定商品又は指定役務に係る商標登録を取り消すことについて審判を請求することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(b) Notwithstanding the matter stated in (a), if the Purchasing Party had not withdrawn the application for or rescinded the sales contract on goods due to being misled by the seller's act of misrepresenting information concerning withdrawal of the application for or rescission of said sales contract in violation of the provision of Article 6(1) of the Act, or due to being disturbed by the seller's act of intimidating the Purchasing Party in violation of the provision of Paragraph (3) of the same article of the Act, said Purchasing Party shall be able to withdraw the application for or rescind the sales contract in writing for a period until eight days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 9(1)(i) of the Act that has been issued by the seller. 例文帳に追加

ロ　イに記載した事項にかかわらず、申込者等が、販売業者が法第六条第一項の規定に違反して商品の売買契約の申込みの撤回又はその売買契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより誤認をし、又は販売業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該販売業者が交付した法第九条第一項第一号の書面を当該申込者等が受領した日から起算して八日を経過するまでは、当該申込者等は、書面により当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行うことができること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(b) Notwithstanding the matter stated in (a), if the Purchasing Party had not withdrawn the application for or rescinded the sales contract on rights due to being misled by the seller's act of misrepresenting information concerning withdrawal of the application for or rescission of said sales contract in violation of the provision of Article 6(1) of the Act, or due to being disturbed by the seller's act of intimidating the Purchasing Party in violation of the provision of Paragraph (3) of the same article of the Act, said Purchasing Party shall be able to withdraw the application for or rescind the sales contract in writing for a period until eight days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 9(1)(i) of the Act that has been issued by the seller. 例文帳に追加

ロ　イに記載した事項にかかわらず、申込者等が、販売業者が法第六条第一項の規定に違反して権利の売買契約の申込みの撤回又はその売買契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより誤認をし、又は販売業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該販売業者が交付した法第九条第一項第一号の書面を当該申込者等が受領した日から起算して八日を経過するまでは、当該申込者等は、書面により当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行うことができること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(b) Notwithstanding the matter stated in (a), if the Purchasing Party had not withdrawn the application for or rescinded the Service Contract due to being misled by the Service Provider's act of misrepresenting information concerning withdrawal of the application for or rescission of said Service Contract in violation of the provision of Article 6(1) of the Act, or due to being disturbed by the Service Provider's act of intimidating the Purchasing Party in violation of the provision of Paragraph (3) of the same article of the Act, said Purchasing Party shall be able to withdraw the application for or rescind the Service Contract in writing for a period until eight days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 9(1)(i) of the Act that has been issued by the Service Provider. 例文帳に追加

ロ　イに記載した事項にかかわらず、申込者等が、役務提供事業者が法第六条第一項の規定に違反して役務提供契約の申込みの撤回又は役務提供契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより誤認をし、又は役務提供事業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該役務提供事業者が交付した法第九条第一項第一号の書面を当該申込者等が受領した日から起算して八日を経過するまでは、当該申込者等は、書面により当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行うことができること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(b) Notwithstanding the matter stated in (a), if the Purchasing Party had not withdrawn the application for or rescinded the sales contract on goods due to being misled by the seller's act of misrepresenting information concerning withdrawal of the application for or rescission of said sales contract in violation of the provision of Article 21(1) of the Act, or due to being disturbed by the seller's act of intimidating the Purchasing Party in violation of the provision of Paragraph (3) of the same article of the Act, said Purchasing Party shall be able to withdraw the application for or rescind the sales contract in writing for a period until eight days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 24(1)(i) of the Act that has been issued by the seller. 例文帳に追加

ロ　イに記載した事項にかかわらず、申込者等が、販売業者が法第二十一条第一項の規定に違反して商品の売買契約の申込みの撤回又はその売買契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより誤認をし、又は販売業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該販売業者が交付した法第二十四条第一項第一号の書面を当該申込者等が受領した日から起算して八日を経過するまでは、当該申込者等は、書面により当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行うことができること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(b) Notwithstanding the matter stated in (a), if the Purchasing Party had not withdrawn the application for or rescinded the sales contract on rights due to being misled by the seller's act of misrepresenting information concerning withdrawal of the application for or rescission of said sales contract in violation of the provision of Article 21(1) of the Act, or due to being disturbed by the seller's act of intimidating the Purchasing Party in violation of the provision of Paragraph (3) of the same article of the Act, said Purchasing Party shall be able to withdraw the application for or rescind the sales contract in writing for a period until eight days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 24(1)(i) of the Act that has been issued by the seller. 例文帳に追加

ロ　イに記載した事項にかかわらず、申込者等が、販売業者が法第二十一条第一項の規定に違反して権利の売買契約の申込みの撤回又はその売買契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより誤認をし、又は販売業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該販売業者が交付した法第二十四条第一項第一号の書面を当該申込者等が受領した日から起算して八日を経過するまでは、当該申込者等は、書面により当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行うことができること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(b) Notwithstanding the matter stated in (a), if the Purchasing Party had not withdrawn the application for or rescinded the Service Contract due to being misled by the Service Provider's act of misrepresenting information concerning withdrawal of the application for or rescission of said Service Contract in violation of the provision of Article 21(1) of the Act, or due to being disturbed by the Service Provider's act of intimidating the Purchasing Party in violation of the provision of Paragraph (3) of the same article of the Act, said Purchasing Party shall be able to withdraw the application for or rescind the Service Contract in writing for a period until eight days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 24(1)(i) of the Act that has been issued by the Service Provider. 例文帳に追加

ロ　イに記載した事項にかかわらず、申込者等が、役務提供事業者が法第二十一条第一項の規定に違反して役務提供契約の申込みの撤回又は役務提供契約の契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより誤認をし、又は役務提供事業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該役務提供事業者が交付した法第二十四条第一項第一号の書面を当該申込者等が受領した日から起算して八日を経過するまでは、当該申込者等は、書面により当該契約の申込みの撤回又は契約の解除を行うことができること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 1 The purpose of this Act is to protect the interests of consumers, and thereby contribute to the stabilization of and the improvement in the general welfare and life of the citizens and to the sound development of the national economy, in consideration of the discrepancy in quality and quantity of information and the negotiating power between consumers and business operators, by permitting a rescission of manifestation of intentions to offer or accept contracts made by consumers when they misunderstood or are distressed by certain acts of business operators, and nullifying any clauses, in part or in whole, that exempt the business operators from their liability for damages or otherwise that unfairly harm the interests of consumers, in addition to providing a right to qualified consumer organization to demand an injunction against business operators, etc. for the purpose of preventing the occurrence of or the spreading of damage to other consumers. 例文帳に追加

第一条　この法律は、消費者と事業者との間の情報の質及び量並びに交渉力の格差にかんがみ、事業者の一定の行為により消費者が誤認し、又は困惑した場合について契約の申込み又はその承諾の意思表示を取り消すことができることとするとともに、事業者の損害賠償の責任を免除する条項その他の消費者の利益を不当に害することとなる条項の全部又は一部を無効とするほか、消費者の被害の発生又は拡大を防止するため適格消費者団体が事業者等に対し差止請求をすることができることとすることにより、消費者の利益の擁護を図り、もって国民生活の安定向上と国民経済の健全な発展に寄与することを目的とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(i) If a Commodity Exchange has violated this Act, an order based on this Act or a disposition by the competent minister based on this Act (hereinafter referred to as "This Act, etc." in this Article, the following Article and Article 165) or its articles of incorporation or other rules or, in the case where, regardless of the fact that a Member, etc. has violated This Act, etc. or the articles of incorporation or other rules of said Commodity Exchange, said Commodity Exchange has failed to exercise its powers recognized pursuant to this Act, an order based on this Act or its articles of incorporation or other rules or has failed to take any other necessary measures for having said Member, etc. observe this Act or its articles of incorporation or other rules ―Rescission of the permission under Article 9 or a license under Article 78 or an order of suspension of the whole or a part of its business for a fixed period not exceeding one year 例文帳に追加

一この法律、この法律に基づく命令若しくはこの法律に基づいてする主務大臣の処分（以下この条、次条及び第百六十五条において「この法律等」という。）若しくは定款その他の規則に違反したとき、又は会員等がこの法律等若しくは当該商品取引所の定款その他の規則に違反した場合において、当該会員等に対しこの法律等若しくは定款その他の規則を遵守させるために当該商品取引所がこの法律、この法律に基づく命令若しくは定款その他の規則により認められた権能の行使その他必要な措置をすることを怠つたとき。第九条若しくは第七十八条の許可を取り消し、又は一年以内の期間を定めてその業務の全部若しくは一部の停止を命ずること。 - 経済産業省

Article 58 (1) Where a person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales concludes a Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract pertaining to the Business Opportunity Related Sales, the counterparty of the contract (limited to an individual who conducts business made available or mediated in relation to such Business Opportunity Related Sales at a place other than a Business Establishment, etc.; hereinafter referred to as the "Counterparty" in this article to Article 58-3) may rescind such Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract in writing, except when 20 days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 55 (2) (if the Counterparty had not rescinded the Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract pursuant to this paragraph by said time limit due to being misled by an act of the person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales of misrepresenting, in violation of the provision of Article 52 (1), information concerning rescission of a Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph, or due to being disturbed by an act of the person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales of intimidating the Counterparty in violation of the provision of Article 52 (2), it shall be when 20 days have passed from the date on which the Counterparty received a document, which has been issued by the person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and contains a notice to the effect that the Counterparty may rescind said Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph). In this case, the person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales may not claim damages or demand payment of a penalty pertaining to the rescission of the Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract. 例文帳に追加

第五十八条　業務提供誘引販売業を行う者がその業務提供誘引販売業に係る業務提供誘引販売契約を締結した場合におけるその業務提供誘引販売契約の相手方（その業務提供誘引販売業に関して提供され、又はあつせんされる業務を事業所等によらないで行う個人に限る。以下この条から第五十八条の三までにおいて「相手方」という。）は、第五十五条第二項の書面を受領した日から起算して二十日を経過したとき（相手方が、業務提供誘引販売業を行う者が第五十二条第一項の規定に違反してこの項の規定による業務提供誘引販売契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は業務提供誘引販売業を行う者が同条第二項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでにこの項の規定による業務提供誘引販売契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、相手方が、当該業務提供誘引販売業を行う者が経済産業省令で定めるところによりこの項の規定による当該業務提供誘引販売契約の解除を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して二十日を経過したとき）を除き、書面によりその業務提供誘引販売契約の解除を行うことができる。この場合において、その業務提供誘引販売業を行う者は、その業務提供誘引販売契約の解除に伴う損害賠償又は違約金の支払を請求することができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(1) deeds inter vivos, whether for valuable consideration or not, constituting, modifying or transferring personal or property rights of possession or guarantee rights in respect of national marks; (2)deeds of partition, company deeds, deed of settlement, deeds of release relative to the rights referred to in the preceding item; (3) judgments establishing the existence of the acts referred to in the preceding items, where such acts have not been previously registered. Judgments establishing the invalidity, annulment, termination, rescission, revocation of a registered act must be noted in the margin of the registration of the act to which they refer. Furthermore, judicial claims to obtain the judgments referred to in this Article may be registered; in such case, the effects of the registration of the judgment shall be retroactive to the date of registration of the judicial claim; (4) wills and acts proving the intestate succession and the judgments relative thereto.例文帳に追加

(i) 有価約因の有無を問わず，国内標章に関する所有の個人的権利若しくは財産権又は保証の権利を設定し，変更し又は移転する生存者間の証書 (ii) (i)にいう権利に関する分割の証書，会社の証書，贈与財産の証書及び放棄の証書 (iii) (ii)にいう証書が予め記録されていない場合には，その証書の存在を確立する判決記録された証書の無効，失効，取消，撤廃又は廃止を確立する判決は，それらが関係する証書の記録の余白に記載しなければならない。更に，本条にいう判決を受けることを目的とした法的請求を記録することができる。この場合，判決の記録の効力は，その法的請求の記録の日に遡及して生ずる。 (iv) 適法な遺言書を残さない相続を立証する遺言書及び証書並びにこれらに関連する判決第50条 - 特許庁

Article 11 (1) Where a settlor has created a trust with the knowledge that it would harm the settlor's creditor, the creditor may, irrespective of whether or not the trustee had knowledge of the fact that the creditor would be harmed, request the court for a rescission under the provisions of Article 424, paragraph (1) of the Civil Code (Act No. 89 of 1896), with the trustee as the defendant; provided, however, that this shall not apply where there are any beneficiaries at the time, all or some of who had no knowledge of the fact that the creditor would be harmed at the time when they became aware that they had been designated as beneficiaries (meaning being designated as an initial beneficiary or new beneficiary after a change in the provisions of the terms of trust or as a result of the exercise of the right to designate or change a beneficiary prescribed in Article 89, paragraph (1); the same shall apply hereinafter) or when they acquired beneficial interests. 例文帳に追加

第十一条　委託者がその債権者を害することを知って信託をした場合には、受託者が債権者を害すべき事実を知っていたか否かにかかわらず、債権者は、受託者を被告として、民法（明治二十九年法律第八十九号）第四百二十四条第一項の規定による取消しを裁判所に請求することができる。ただし、受益者が現に存する場合において、その受益者の全部又は一部が、受益者としての指定（信託行為の定めにより又は第八十九条第一項に規定する受益者指定権等の行使により受益者又は変更後の受益者として指定されることをいう。以下同じ。）を受けたことを知った時又は受益権を譲り受けた時において債権者を害すべき事実を知らなかったときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(ii) If a Commodity Exchange fails to open all or some of the Commodity Markets within three months from the day on which it became possible to open said Commodity Markets, if it has continuously suspended Futures Transactions (limited to those pertaining to transactions set forth in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (i) or (ii) in the case of a Commodity Market pertaining to a Listed Commodity and limited to those pertaining to transactions set forth in item (iii) of the same paragraph in the case of a Commodity Market pertaining to a Listed Commodity Index; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) on all or some of the Commodity Markets for three months or more or if Futures Transactions on all or some of the Commodity Markets no longer conform to the criteria set forth in Article 15, paragraph (1), item (i) or Article 80, paragraph (1), item (iii), without a justifiable reason- Rescission of the permission under Article 9, license under Article 78 or approval for an amendment to the articles of incorporation 例文帳に追加

二　正当な理由がないのに商品市場を開設することができることとなつた日から三月以内に全部若しくは一部の商品市場を開設しないとき、引き続き三月以上全部若しくは一部の商品市場における先物取引（上場商品に係る商品市場にあつては第二条第八項第一号又は第二号に掲げる取引、上場商品指数に係る商品市場にあつては同項第三号に掲げる取引に係るものに限る。以下この号において同じ。）を停止したとき、又は全部若しくは一部の商品市場における先物取引が第十五条第一項第一号若しくは第八十条第一項第三号に掲げる基準に適合しなくなつたとき。　第九条若しくは第七十八条の許可又は定款の変更の認可を取り消すこと。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 53-2 Where a registered trademark is a trademark pertaining to a right to a trademark (limited to a right equivalent to a trademark right) held by a person in a country of the Union to the Paris Convention, a member of the World Trade Organization or a Contracting Party to the Trademark Law Treaty or a trademark similar thereto, and the designated goods or designated services thereof are goods or services pertaining to the said right or goods or services similar thereto, and further, the application for trademark registration was filed without the approval of the person who has the right pertaining to the trademark, without a just cause, by his/her agent or representative or by his/her former agent or representative within one year prior to the filing date of the trademark registration, the person who has the right pertaining to the trademark may file a request for a trial for rescission of the trademark registration. 例文帳に追加

第五十三条の二　登録商標がパリ条約の同盟国、世界貿易機関の加盟国若しくは商標法条約の締約国において商標に関する権利（商標権に相当する権利に限る。）を有する者の当該権利に係る商標又はこれに類似する商標であつて当該権利に係る商品若しくは役務又はこれらに類似する商品若しくは役務を指定商品又は指定役務とするものであり、かつ、その商標登録出願が、正当な理由がないのに、その商標に関する権利を有する者の承諾を得ないでその代理人若しくは代表者又は当該商標登録出願の日前一年以内に代理人若しくは代表者であつた者によつてされたものであるときは、その商標に関する権利を有する者は、当該商標登録を取り消すことについて審判を請求することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) A qualified consumer organization shall specify in its article of incorporation or the article of endowment, to the effect that if a qualified consumer organization terminates the services involved in demand of an injunction or stops said services for reason of the expiration (except for expiration due to termination of services involved in demand of injunction) or rescission of certification provided in para. (1) of Article 13 and if a surplus (which means the amount in the fund set forth in the preceding paragraph) remains, such remaining surplus shall belong to either another qualified consumer organization (if a qualified consumer organization has succeeded the right to demand an injunction provided in the provision of Article 35, that qualified consumer organization) if such organization exists, or, if not, to such consumer organization that conforms to the requirements set forth in item (ii) of para. (3) of Article 13 and specified by the Prime Minister or to the National Treasury. 例文帳に追加

６　適格消費者団体は、その定款又は寄附行為において、差止請求関係業務を廃止し、又は第十三条第一項の認定の失効（差止請求関係業務の廃止によるものを除く。）若しくは取消しにより差止請求関係業務を終了した場合において、積立金（前項の規定により積み立てられた金額をいう。）に残余があるときは、その残余に相当する金額を、他の適格消費者団体（第三十五条の規定により差止請求権を承継した適格消費者団体がある場合にあっては、当該適格消費者団体）があるときは当該他の適格消費者団体に、これがないときは第十三条第三項第二号に掲げる要件に適合する消費者団体であって内閣総理大臣が指定するもの又は国に帰属させる旨を定めておかなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(ii) If a Commodity Exchange fails to open all or some of the Commodity Markets within three months from the day on which it became possible to open said Commodity Markets, if it has continuously suspended Futures Transactions (limited to those pertaining to transactions set forth in Article 2, paragraph 8, item 1 or 2 in the case of a Commodity Market pertaining to a Listed Commodity and limited to those pertaining to transactions set forth in item 3 of the same paragraph in the case of a Commodity Market pertaining to a Listed Commodity Index; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) on all or some of the Commodity Markets for three months or more or if Futures Transactions on all or some of the Commodity Markets no longer conform to the criteria set forth in Article 15, paragraph 1, item 1 or Article 80, paragraph 1, item 3, without a justifiable reason ―Rescission of the permission under Article 9, license under Article 78 or approval for an amendment of the articles of incorporation 例文帳に追加

二正当な理由がないのに商品市場を開設することができることとなつた日から三月以内に全部若しくは一部の商品市場を開設しないとき、引き続き三月以上全部若しくは一部の商品市場における先物取引（上場商品に係る商品市場にあつては第二条第八項第一号又は第二号に掲げる取引、上場商品指数に係る商品市場にあつては同項第三号に掲げる取引に係るものに限る。以下この号において同じ。）を停止したとき、又は全部若しくは一部の商品市場における先物取引が第十五条第一項第一号若しくは第八十条第一項第三号に掲げる基準に適合しなくなつたとき。第九条若しくは第七十八条の許可又は定款の変更の認可を取り消すこと。 - 経済産業省

Article 831 (1) In the cases listed in the following items, a Shareholder, etc. (or, in cases where the Shareholders Meeting, etc. set forth respectively in each such item is an Organizational Meeting or a Class Organizational Meetings, a Shareholder, etc., a Shareholder at Incorporation, a Director at Incorporation or a Company Auditor at Incorporation) may, within three months from the day of resolution of the Shareholders Meeting, etc., claim revocation of the resolution by filing an action. The same shall apply to a person who becomes a director, company auditor or liquidator (or, in cases where such resolution is a resolution of a shareholders meeting or Class Meeting, it shall include a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provisions of Article 346(1) (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479(4)), and in cases where such resolution is a resolution of an Organizational Meeting or Class Organizational Meeting, it shall include a Director at Incorporation or a Company Auditor at Incorporation) by rescission of such resolution: 例文帳に追加

第八百三十一条　次の各号に掲げる場合には、株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）は、株主総会等の決議の日から三箇月以内に、訴えをもって当該決議の取消しを請求することができる。当該決議の取消しにより取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）となる者も、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(ii) when the applicant for license is a person who had its license rescinded under the provisions of Article 148, Article 152(1), Article 156-17(1) or (2), Article 148 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 156-26, or Article 156-32(1), had its registration rescinded under the provisions of Article 52(1), Article 53(3) or Article 66-20(1), had its authorization rescinded under the provisions of Article 106-7(1), Article 106-21(1) or Article 106-28(1), or a person who has obtained license or registration (including permission or other administrative dispositions similar to said license or registration) of the same kind in a foreign state under the provision of laws and regulations of said foreign state equivalent to this Act and has had the license or registration rescinded, and for whom five years have not passed since the date of the rescission; 例文帳に追加

二　免許申請者が第百四十八条、第百五十二条第一項、第百五十六条の十七第一項若しくは第二項、第百五十六条の二十六において準用する第百四十八条若しくは第百五十六条の三十二第一項の規定により免許を取り消され、第五十二条第一項、第五十三条第三項若しくは第六十六条の二十第一項の規定により登録を取り消され、若しくは第百六条の七第一項、第百六条の二十一第一項若しくは第百六条の二十八第一項の規定により認可を取り消され、又はこの法律に相当する外国の法令の規定により当該外国において受けている同種類の免許若しくは登録（当該免許又は登録に類する許可その他の行政処分を含む。）を取り消され、その取消しの日から五年を経過するまでの者であるとき。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(iii) when the applicant for authorization is a person who has had its license rescinded under the provision of Article 148, Article 152(1), Article 156-17(1) or (2), Article 148 as applied mutatis mutandis under Article 156-26, or Article 156-32(1), has had its registration rescinded under the provision of Article 52(1), Article 53(3) or Article 66-20(1), has had its authorization rescinded under the provisions of Article 106-7(1), Article 106-21(1) or Article 106-28(1), or a person who had obtained license or registration (including permission or other administrative dispositions similar to said license or registration) of the same kind in a foreign state under the provision of laws and regulations of said foreign state equivalent to this Act and has had the license or registration rescinded, and for whom five years have not passed since the date of the rescission; 例文帳に追加

三　認可申請者が第百四十八条、第百五十二条第一項、第百五十六条の十七第一項若しくは第二項、第百五十六条の二十六において準用する第百四十八条若しくは第百五十六条の三十二第一項の規定により免許を取り消され、第五十二条第一項、第五十三条第三項若しくは第六十六条の二十第一項の規定により登録を取り消され、若しくは第百六条の七第一項、第百六条の二十一第一項若しくは第百六条の二十八第一項の規定により認可を取り消され、又はこの法律に相当する外国の法令の規定により当該外国において受けている同種類の免許若しくは登録（当該免許又は登録に類する許可その他の行政処分を含む。）を取り消され、その取消しの日から五年を経過するまでの者であるとき。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) A person who has been granted the trading qualification by a Commodity Exchange based on the provisions of paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be a Member, etc. within the scope of the purpose prescribed in the same paragraph with regard to application of the provisions of Article 101, paragraphs (1) to (4) inclusive, Article 103, Article 104, paragraphs (3) and (4), Article 108, paragraph (1), Articles 113 to 115 inclusive, Article 118, Article 157, Article 159, paragraph (1), Article 160, paragraph (1), Article 165, Article 179 and Article 188. In this case, the phrase "withdrawn from" in Article 113, paragraph (1) (including the case of its application mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 114 and Article 188) shall be deemed to be replaced with "lost the qualification to carry out transactions on" and the phrase "expulsion of" in Article 160, paragraph (1) and Article 165 shall be deemed to be replaced with "rescission of the qualification to carry out transactions of." 例文帳に追加

３　第一項の規定に基づき商品取引所により取引資格を与えられた者は、同項に規定する目的の範囲内において、第百一条第一項から第四項まで、第百三条、第百四条第三項及び第四項、第百八条第一項、第百十三条から第百十五条まで、第百十八条、第百五十七条、第百五十九条第一項、第百六十条第一項、第百六十五条、第百七十九条並びに第百八十八条の規定の適用については、会員等とみなす。この場合において、第百十三条第一項（第百十四条及び第百八十八条において準用する場合を含む。）中「から脱退した」とあるのは「において取引をすることができる資格を喪失した」と、第百六十条第一項及び第百六十五条中「の除名」とあるのは「の取引をすることができる資格の取消し」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) With regard to the application of the provisions of Article 24, paragraph (1), item (iii) and item (iv), Article 129, paragraph (1), item (v), item (viii) and paragraph (2), Article 136-6, paragraph (1), item (i), Article 136-8, item (ii), Article 136-9, paragraph (1), item (i), Article 136-28, paragraph (1), item (i), Article 136-32, paragraph (1), item (i), Article 136-43, paragraph (1), item (iv) and item (v), and Article 136-52 of the New Act to a person who has his/her License under the Former Act rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 52, paragraph (1) of the Former Act or Article 123 of the Former Act, said person shall be deemed to have had his/her License under the New Act rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 136-27, paragraph (1) of the New Act or Article 136-32, paragraph (1) of the New Act as on the day of said rescission. 例文帳に追加

５　旧法第五十二条第一項又は旧法第百二十三条の規定により旧法の許可を取り消された者についての新法第二十四条第一項第三号及び第四号、第百二十九条第一項第五号及び第八号並びに第二項、第百三十六条の六第一項第一号、第百三十六条の八第二号、第百三十六条の九第一項第一号、第百三十六条の二十八第一項第一号、第百三十六条の三十二第一項第一号、第百三十六条の四十三第一項第四号及び第五号並びに第百三十六条の五十二の規定の適用については、その者は、その取消しの日において、新法第百三十六条の二十七第一項又は新法第百三十六条の三十二第一項の規定により新法の許可を取り消されたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of paragraphs (2) to (6) of Article 178 (time limit for institution of action, etc.), 179 to 180-2 (appropriate party as defendant, notification of institution of action, opinion of the Commissioner of the Patent Office in litigations annulling a trial decision), 181(1) and 181(5) (rescission of trial decision or ruling) and 182 (delivery of original copy of judgment) of the Patent Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the actions under the preceding paragraph. In this case, the term "the trial" in Article 178(2) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the examination or trial of the opposition to registration in the trial," the term "a trial for patent invalidation or a trial for invalidation of the registration of extension of the term" in Article 179 of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a trial under Article 46(1), 50(1), 51(1), 52-2(1), 53(1) or 53-2 of the Trademark Act." 例文帳に追加

２　特許法第百七十八条第二項から第六項まで（出訴期間等）、第百七十九条から第百八十条の二まで（被告適格、出訴の通知及び審決取消訴訟における特許庁長官の意見）、第百八十一条第一項及び第五項（審決又は決定の取消し）並びに第百八十二条（裁判の正本の送付）の規定は、前項の訴えに準用する。この場合において、同法第百七十八条第二項中「当該審判」とあるのは「当該登録異議の申立てについての審理、審判」と、同法第百七十九条中「特許無効審判若しくは延長登録無効審判」とあるのは「商標法第四十六条第一項、第五十条第一項、第五十一条第一項、第五十二条の二第一項、第五十三条第一項若しくは第五十三条の二の審判」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(b) Statement that, notwithstanding the matter stated in (a), if the counterparty of the Business Opportunity Related Sales Transactions had not rescinded the contract due to being misled by the act of the person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales of misrepresenting information concerning rescission of the Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract in violation of the provision of Article 52(1) of the Act, or due to being disturbed by the act of the person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales of intimidating the counterparty of the Business Opportunity Related Sales Transactions in violation of the provision of Article 52(2) of the Act, the counterparty of the Business Opportunity Related Sales Transactions may rescind the contract in writing for a period until 20 days have passed from the date on which the counterparty of the Business Opportunity Related Sales Transactions received the document referred to in Article 58(1) of the Act, which has been issued by the person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales 例文帳に追加

ロ　イに記載した事項にかかわらず、業務提供誘引販売取引の相手方が、業務提供誘引販売業を行う者が法第五十二条第一項の規定に違反して業務提供誘引販売契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより誤認をし、又は業務提供誘引販売業を行う者が法第五十二条第二項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて業務提供誘引販売契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該業務提供誘引販売業を行う者が交付した法第五十八条第一項の書面を当該業務提供誘引販売取引の相手方が受領した日から起算して二十日を経過するまでは、当該業務提供誘引販売取引の相手方は、書面によりその契約の解除を行うことができること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) The provisions of Article 64 (Certificate of Deposit of Paid Monies) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Bank, etc. handling Performance of Contribution as set forth in paragraph (4), and the provisions of Article 211 (Restrictions on Invalidation or Rescission of Subscription) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to Preferred Equity for Subscription. In this case, the term "Article 57(1)" in Article 64(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 39(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "incorporators" in Article 64(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors," the phrase "Stock Company after formation" in paragraph (2) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specific Purpose Company," the term "Article 205" in Article 211(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 41(2) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 209" in Article 211(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 42(2) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "shareholder" in Article 211(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity Member," and the term "shares" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity." 例文帳に追加

６　会社法第六十四条（払込金の保管証明）の規定は第四項の出資の履行を取り扱う銀行等について、同法第二百十一条（引受けの無効又は取消しの制限）の規定は募集優先出資について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第六十四条第一項中「第五十七条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十九条第一項」と、「発起人」とあるのは「取締役」と、同条第二項中「成立後の株式会社」とあるのは「特定目的会社」と、同法第二百十一条第一項中「第二百五条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第四十一条第二項」と、同条第二項中「第二百九条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第四十二条第二項」と、「株主」とあるのは「優先出資社員」と、「株式」とあるのは「優先出資」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) A person who has been granted the trading qualification by a Commodity Exchange based on the provisions of paragraph 1 shall be deemed to be a Member, etc. within the scope of the purpose prescribed in the same paragraph with regard to application of the provisions of Article 101, paragraphs 1 to 4 inclusive, Article 103, Article 104, paragraphs 3 and 4, Article 108, paragraph 1, Articles 113 to 115 inclusive, Article 118, Article 157, Article 159, paragraph 1, Article 160, paragraph 1, Article 165, Article 179 and Article 188. In this case, the phrase "withdrawn from" in Article 113, paragraph 1 (including the case of its application mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 114 and Article 188) shall be deemed to be replaced with "lost the qualification to carry out transactions on" and the phrase "expulsion of" in Article 160, paragraph 1 and Article 165 shall be deemed to be replaced with "rescission of the qualification to carry out transactions of." 例文帳に追加

３ 第一項の規定に基づき商品取引所により取引資格を与えられた者は、同項に規定する目的の範囲内において、第百一条第一項から第四項まで、第百三条、第百四条第三項及び第四項、第百八条第一項、第百十三条から第百十五条まで、第百十八条、第百五十七条、第百五十九条第一項、第百六十条第一項、第百六十五条、第百七十九条並びに第百八十八条の規定の適用については、会員等とみなす。この場合において、第百十三条第一項（第百十四条及び第百八十八条において準用する場合を含む。）中「から脱退した」とあるのは「において取引をすることができる資格を喪失した」と、第百六十条第一項及び第百六十五条中「の除名」とあるのは「の取引をすることができる資格の取消し」とする。 - 経済産業省

(5) With regard to the application of the provisions of Article 24, paragraph 1, item 3 and item 4, Article 129, paragraph 1, item 5, item 8 and paragraph 2, Article 136-6, paragraph 1, item 1, Article 136-8, item 2, Article 136-9, paragraph 1, item 1, Article 136-28, paragraph 1, item 1, Article 136-32, paragraph 1, item 1, Article 136-43, paragraph 1, item 4 and item 5, and Article 136-52 of the New Act to a person who has his/her License under the Old Act rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 52, paragraph 1 of the Old Act or Article 123 of the Old Act, said person shall be deemed to have had his/her License under the New Act rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 136-27, paragraph 1 of the New Act or Article 136-32, paragraph 1 of the New Act as on the day of said rescission. 例文帳に追加

５ 旧法第五十二条第一項又は旧法第百二十三条の規定により旧法の許可を取り消された者についての新法第二十四条第一項第三号及び第四号、第百二十九条第一項第五号及び第八号並びに第二項、第百三十六条の六第一項第一号、第百三十六条の八第二号、第百三十六条の九第一項第一号、第百三十六条の二十八第一項第一号、第百三十六条の三十二第一項第一号、第百三十六条の四十三第一項第四号及び第五号並びに第百三十六条の五十二の規定の適用については、その者は、その取消しの日において、新法第百三十六条の二十七第一項又は新法第百三十六条の三十二第一項の規定により新法の許可を取り消されたものとみなす。 - 経済産業省

(d) in regard to a juridical person for which the renewal of a registration under Article 7(3) has been refused pursuant to the provisions of Article 10(1), whose license under Article 3 has been rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 44(1), whose registration under Article 7(1), Article 50-2(1), or Article 52(1) has been rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 45(1), for which the renewal of a registration under Article 7(3) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 50-2(2) has been refused pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (6) of that Article, for which the renewal of a registration under Article 7(3) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 54(2) has been refused pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (6) of that Article, whose license under Article 53(1) has been rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 59(1), whose registration under Article 54(1) has been rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 60(1), or whose registration under Article 67(1) has been rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 82(1), or in regard to a juridical person whose license under Article 3 of the Secured Bonds Trust Act has been rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 12 of that Act, whose authorization under Article 1(1) of the Act on Provision, etc. of Trust Business by Financial Institutions has been rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 10 of that Act, or whose license, registration, or authorization of the same kind which was obtained in a foreign state has been rescinded or for whom the renewal of said license, registration, or authorization has been refused pursuant to the provisions of laws and regulations of the foreign state that are equivalent to this Act, the Secured Bonds Trust Act, or the Act on Provision, etc. of Trust Business by Financial Institutions, a person who, within thirty days prior to the rescission, was a director or executive officer, accounting advisor, or a person equivalent thereto, or who was a representative of the relevant juridical person in Japan (which means a Representative in Japan as prescribed in Article 53(2)) and for whom five years have yet to elapse since the date of rescission; 例文帳に追加

ニ　第十条第一項の規定により第七条第三項の登録の更新を拒否され、第四十四条第一項の規定により第三条の免許を取り消され、第四十五条第一項の規定により第七条第一項の登録、第五十条の二第一項の登録若しくは第五十二条第一項の登録を取り消され、第五十条の二第六項の規定により同条第二項において準用する第七条第三項の登録の更新を拒否され、第五十四条第六項の規定により同条第二項において準用する第七条第三項の登録の更新を拒否され、第五十九条第一項の規定により第五十三条第一項の免許を取り消され、第六十条第一項の規定により第五十四条第一項の登録を取り消され、若しくは第八十二条第一項の規定により第六十七条第一項の登録を取り消された場合、担保付社債信託法第十二条の規定により同法第三条の免許を取り消された場合、若しくは金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第十条の規定により同法第一条第一項の認可を取り消された場合又はこの法律、担保付社債信託法若しくは金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律に相当する外国の法令の規定により当該外国において受けている同種類の免許、登録若しくは認可を取り消された場合、若しくは当該免許、登録若しくは認可の更新を拒否された場合において、その取消しの日前三十日以内にその法人の取締役若しくは執行役、会計参与若しくはこれらに準ずる者又は国内における代表者（第五十三条第二項に規定する国内における代表者をいう。）であった者でその取消しの日から五年を経過しない者 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(iv) when the applicant for a license is a company which has had its license under Article 80(1) rescinded under the provision of Article 148 or Article 152(1), has had its license under Article 156-2 rescinded under the provisions of Article 156-17(1) or (2), has had its license under paragraph (1) of the preceding Article rescinded under the provisions of Article 148 or 156-32(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the following Article, has had its registration under Article 29 rescinded under the provision of Article 52(1), Article 53(3) or Article 54, has had its registration under Article 66 rescinded under the provision of Article 66-20(1), or a company which had obtained license or registration (including permission or other administrative dispositions similar to said license or registration) of the same kind in a foreign state under the provision of laws and regulations of said foreign state equivalent to this Act and has had the license or registration rescinded, and for whom five years have not passed since the date of the rescission; 例文帳に追加

四　免許申請者が第百四十八条、第百五十二条第一項の規定により第八十条第一項の免許を取り消され、第百五十六条の十七第一項若しくは第二項の規定により第百五十六条の二の免許を取り消され、若しくは次条において準用する第百四十八条若しくは第百五十六条の三十二第一項の規定により前条第一項の免許を取り消され、又は第五十二条第一項、第五十三条第三項若しくは第五十四条の規定により第二十九条の登録を取り消され、若しくは第六十六条の二十第一項の規定により第六十六条の登録を取り消され、又はこの法律に相当する外国の法令の規定により当該外国において受けている同種類の免許若しくは登録（当該免許又は登録に類する許可その他の行政処分を含む。）を取り消され、その取消しの日から五年を経過するまでの会社であるとき。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 178 Those who have any objection against the following determinations may file applications for ruling with the Environmental Dispute Coordination Commission: permission prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 21 (including the case where it applies mutatis mutandis to paragraph (3) of Article 45; the same shall apply hereinafter); non-permission prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 21 because the case falls under the provision of Article 35 (including the case where it applies mutatis mutandis to paragraph (3) of Article 45; the same shall apply hereinafter); disposition of decrease of mining areas or mining lease areas, or rescission of mining right or mining lease right pursuant to the provision of Article 53 (including the case where it applies mutatis mutandis to Article 87); and permission or non-permission prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 106, or use or expropriation pursuant to the provision of the Compulsory Purchase of Land Act that is applied under the provision of paragraph (1) of Article 107. However, as for permission prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 21, such applications may be filed only in the case where the provision of Article 35 is violated. 例文帳に追加

第百七十八条　第二十一条第一項（第四十五条第三項において準用する場合を含む。以下同じ。）の許可、第三十五条（第四十五条第三項において準用する場合を含む。以下同じ。）に規定する場合に該当することを理由とする第二十一条第一項の不許可、第五十三条（第八十七条において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による鉱区若しくは租鉱区の減少の処分若しくは鉱業権若しくは租鉱権の取消し、第百六条第一項の許可若しくは不許可又は第百七条第一項の規定により適用される土地収用法の規定による土地の使用若しくは収用に関する裁決に不服がある者は、公害等調整委員会に対して裁定の申請をすることができる。ただし、第二十一条第一項の許可については、第三十五条の規定に違反することを理由とする場合に限る。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 60 (1) Where a trademark right pertaining to a rescinded or invalidated trademark registration has been restored by a retrial or, where the establishment of a trademark right with respect to an application for trademark registration refused by a trial decision has been registered through a retrial, and where a person, after the rescission decision or trial decision becomes final and binding but before the registration of a request for a retrial, uses the registered trademark or a trademark similar thereto in Japan in good faith in connection with the designated goods or designated services or in connection with goods or services similar thereto, and as a result, such trademark has become well known among consumers as that indicating goods or services pertaining to the business of the person at the time of registration of the filing of a request for a retrial, the person shall have the right to use the trademark in connection with such goods or services as far as the said person continuously uses the trademark for such goods or services. The same shall apply to those by whom such business is succeeded. 例文帳に追加

第六十条　取り消し、若しくは無効にした商標登録に係る商標権が再審により回復した場合、又は拒絶をすべき旨の審決があつた商標登録出願について再審により商標権の設定の登録があつた場合において、当該取消決定又は審決が確定した後再審の請求の登録前に善意に日本国内において当該指定商品若しくは指定役務又はこれらに類似する商品若しくは役務について当該登録商標又はこれに類似する商標の使用をした結果、再審の請求の登録の際現にその商標が自己の業務に係る商品又は役務を表示するものとして需要者の間に広く認識されているときは、その者は、継続してその商品又は役務についてその商標の使用をする場合は、その商品又は役務についてその商標の使用をする権利を有する。当該業務を承継した者についても、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(b) Statement that, notwithstanding the matter stated in (a), if the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor had not rescinded the contract pursuant to the provision of Article 40(1) of the Act due to the Supervisor's or the solicitor's act, in violation of the provision of Article 34(1) of the Act, or the general multilevel marketing distributor's act, in violation of Article 34(2) of the Act, of misrepresenting information concerning rescission of Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of Article 40(19 of the Act, or due to being disturbed by the Supervisor's, the solicitor's, or the general multilevel marketing distributor's act of intimidating the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor in violation of the provision of Article 34(3) of the Act, the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor may rescind the contract in writing for a period until 20 days have passed from the date on which the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor received the document referred to in Article 40(1) of the Act, which has been issued by the Supervisor, the solicitor, or the general multilevel marketing distributor pertaining to such Multilevel Marketing 例文帳に追加

ロ　イに記載した事項にかかわらず、連鎖販売加入者が、統括者若しくは勧誘者が法第三十四条第一項の規定に違反し若しくは一般連鎖販売業者が同条第二項の規定に違反して法第四十条第一項の規定による連鎖販売契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより誤認をし、又は統括者、勧誘者若しくは一般連鎖販売業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて法第四十条第一項の規定による当該契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、その連鎖販売業に係る統括者、勧誘者又は一般連鎖販売業者が交付した法第四十条第一項の書面を当該連鎖販売加入者が受領した日から起算して二十日を経過するまでは、当該連鎖販売加入者は、書面により当該契約の解除を行うことができること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(b) Statement that, notwithstanding the matter stated in (a), if the person who receives offer of Specified Continuous Services had not rescinded the Specified Continuous Service Contract pursuant to the provision of Article 48(1) of the Act due to being misled by the Service Provider's act of misrepresenting information concerning rescission of the Specified Continuous Service Contract pursuant to the provision of Article 48(1) of the Act, in violation of the provision of Article 44(1) of the Act, or due to being disturbed by the Service Provider's act of intimidating the person who receives offer of Specified Continuous Services in violation of the provision of Article 44(3) of the Act, the person who receives offer of Specified Continuous Services may rescind the Specified Continuous Service Contract in writing for a period until eight days have passed from the date on which the person who receives offer of Specified Continuous Services received the document referre+B2d to in Article 48(1) of the Act, which has been issued by the Service Provider 例文帳に追加

ロ　イに記載した事項にかかわらず、特定継続的役務の提供を受ける者が、役務提供事業者が法第四十四条第一項の規定に違反して法第四十八条第一項の規定による特定継続的役務提供契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより誤認をし、又は役務提供事業者が法第四十四条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて法第四十八条第一項の規定による特定継続的役務提供契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該役務提供事業者が交付した法第四十八条第一項の書面を当該特定継続的役務の提供を受ける者が受領した日から起算して八日を経過するまで　は、当該特定継続的役務の提供を受ける者は、書面により当該特定継続的役務提供契約の解除を行うことができること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(b) Statement that, notwithstanding the matter stated in (a), if the purchaser of the rights to receive offer of the Specified Continuous Services had not rescinded the Specified Continuous Service Contract pursuant to the provision of Article 48(1) of the Act due to being misled by the seller's act of misrepresenting information concerning rescission of the Specified Continuous Service Contract pursuant to the provision of Article 48(1) of the Act, in violation of the provision of Article 44(1) of the Act, or due to being disturbed by the seller's act of intimidating the purchaser of the rights to receive offer of the Specified Continuous Services in violation of the provision of Article 44(3) of the Act, the purchaser of the rights to receive offer of the Specified Continuous Services may rescind the Specified Continuous Service Contract in writing for a period until eight days have passed from the date on which the purchaser of the rights to receive offer of the Specified Continuous Services received the document referred to in Article 48(1) of the Act, which has been issued by the seller 例文帳に追加

ロ　イに記載した事項にかかわらず、特定継続的役務の提供を受ける権利を購入する者が、販売業者が法第四十四条第一項の規定に違反して法第四十八条第一項の規定による特定権利販売契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより誤認をし、又は販売業者が法第四十四条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて法第四十八条第一項の規定による特定権利販売契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該販売業者が交付した法第四十八条第一項の書面を当該特定継続的役務の提供を受ける権利を購入する者が受領した日から起算して八日を経過するまでは、当該特定継続的役務の提供を受ける権利を購入する者は、書面により当該特定権利販売契約の解除を行うことができること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(v) With respect to the establishment of the standards of judgment under Article 26, paragraph 1, the revision of the standards under paragraph 2 of the said Article, the recognition under Article 27, paragraph 1, the recognition of change under Article 28, paragraph 1, the rescission of recognition under Article 29, the opinions under Article 30, the guidance and advice under Article 32, the recommendation prescribed in Article 33, paragraph 1, the publication under Article 33, paragraph 2, the order under Article 33, paragraph 3, and the collection of reports and on-site inspection under Article 37, paragraph 3 and paragraph 4: the ministers who have jurisdiction, pursuant to the provision of Cabinet Order, over businesses of manufacturing, processing, repairing or selling the respective Specified Resources-Recycled Products or businesses of manufacturing, processing, repairing or selling the products specified by Cabinet Order under Article 26, paragraph 1 that use the respective Specified Resources-Recycled Products as parts, or the Minister of the Environment. 例文帳に追加

五　第二十六条第一項の規定による判断の基準となるべき事項の策定、同条第二項に規定する当該事項の改定、第二十七条第一項の規定による認定、第二十八条第一項の規定による変更の認定、第二十九条の規定による認定の取消し、第三十条の規定による意見、第三十二条に規定する指導及び助言、第三十三条第一項に規定する勧告、同条第二項の規定による公表、同条第三項の規定による命令並びに第三十七条第三項及び第四項の規定による報告の徴収及び立入検査に関する事項については、政令で定めるところにより、当該指定再資源化製品の製造、加工、修理若しくは販売の事業又は当該指定再資源化製品を部品として使用する第二十六条第一項の政令で定める製品の製造、加工、修理若しくは販売の事業を所管する大臣及び環境大臣 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(v) With respect to the establishment of the standards of judgment under Article 26, paragraph 1, the revision of the standards under paragraph 2 of the said Article, the recognition under Article 27, paragraph 1, the recognition of change under Article 28, paragraph 1, the rescission of recognition under Article 29, the opinions under Article 30, the guidance and advice under Article 32, the recommendation prescribed in Article 33, paragraph 1, the publication under Article 33, paragraph 2, the order under Article 33, paragraph 3, and the collection of reports and on-site inspection under Article 37, paragraph 3 and paragraph 4: the ministers who have jurisdiction, pursuant to the provision of Cabinet Order, over businesses of manufacturing, processing, repairing or selling the respective Specified Resources-Recycled Products or businesses of manufacturing, processing, repairing or selling the products specified by Cabinet Order under Article 26, paragraph 1 that use the respective Specified Resources-Recycled Products as parts, or the Minister of the Environment. 例文帳に追加

五 　第二十六条第一項の規定による判断の基準となるべき事項の策定、第二十六条第二項に規定する当該事項の改定、第二十七条第一項の規定による認定、第二十八条第一項の規定による変更の認定、第二十九条の規定による認定の取消し、第三十条の規定による意見、第三十二条に規定する指導及び助言、第三十三条第一項に規定する勧告、第三十三条第二項の規定による公表、第三十三条第三項の規定による命令並びに第三十七条第三項及び第四項の規定による報告の徴収及び立入検査に関する事項については、政令で定めるところにより、当該指定再資源化製品の製造、加工、修理若しくは販売の事業又は当該指定再資源化製品を部品として使用する第二十六条第一項の政令で定める製品の製造、加工、修理若しくは販売の事業を所管する大臣及び環境大臣 - 経済産業省

Article 40 (1) Where a person conducting Multilevel Marketing concludes a Multilevel Marketing Contract pertaining to the Multilevel Marketing, the counterparty of such Multilevel Marketing Contract (limited to an individual who sells or mediates sales of Goods or offers or mediates offers of services pertaining to such Multilevel Marketing by means other than through a Store, etc.; hereinafter referred to as a "New Multilevel Marketing Distributor") may rescind such Multilevel Marketing Contract in writing, except when 20 days have passed from the date on which the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor received the document referred to in Article 37 (2) (where the specified burden involved in such Multilevel Marketing Contract is the purchase of the Goods [excluding rights to use a facility or to receive offers of services; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item] to be resold and if the date of the first delivery of the Goods purchased based on such Multilevel Marketing Contract is after such date of receipt, it shall be such date of first delivery; the same shall apply in Article 41 (1)) (if the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor had not rescinded the Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to this paragraph by said time limit due to being misled by the Supervisor's or the solicitor's act, in violation of the provision of Article 34 (1), or the general multilevel marketing distributor's act, in violation of Article 34 (2), of misrepresenting information concerning rescission of Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph, or due to being disturbed by the Supervisor's, the solicitor's, or the general multilevel marketing distributor's act of intimidating the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor in violation of the provision of Article 34 (3), it shall be when 20 days have passed from the date on which the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor received a document, which has been issued by Supervisor, the solicitor, or the general multilevel marketing distributor pertaining to such Multilevel Marketing pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and contains a notice to the effect that the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor may rescind said Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph). In this case, the person conducting such Multilevel Marketing may not claim damages or demand payment of a penalty pertaining to the rescission of such Multilevel Marketing Contract. 例文帳に追加

第四十条　連鎖販売業を行う者がその連鎖販売業に係る連鎖販売契約を締結した場合におけるその連鎖販売契約の相手方（その連鎖販売業に係る商品の販売若しくはそのあつせん又は役務の提供若しくはそのあつせんを店舗等によらないで行う個人に限る。以下この章において「連鎖販売加入者」という。）は、第三十七条第二項の書面を受領した日（その連鎖販売契約に係る特定負担が再販売をする商品（施設を利用し及び役務の提供を受ける権利を除く。以下この項において同じ。）の購入についてのものである場合において、その連鎖販売契約に基づき購入したその商品につき最初の引渡しを受けた日がその受領した日後であるときは、その引渡しを受けた日。次条第一項において同じ。）から起算して二十日を経過したとき（連鎖販売加入者が、統括者若しくは勧誘者が第三十四条第一項の規定に違反し若しくは一般連鎖販売業者が同条第二項の規定に違反してこの項の規定による連鎖販売契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は統括者、勧誘者若しくは一般連鎖販売業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでにこの項の規定による連鎖販売契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該連鎖販売加入者が、その連鎖販売業に係る統括者、勧誘者又は一般連鎖販売業者が経済産業省令で定めるところによりこの項の規定による当該連鎖販売契約の解除を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して二十日を経過したとき）を除き、書面によりその連鎖販売契約の解除を行うことができる。この場合において、その連鎖販売業を行う者は、その連鎖販売契約の解除に伴う損害賠償又は違約金の支払を請求することができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Articles 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the general meeting of members of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　会社法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、相互会社の社員総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人（保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項（同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Lawsuit for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the General Meeting of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, executive officer or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　会社法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、相互会社の総代会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人（保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項（同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(i) when the Financial Instruments Exchange violates laws and regulations, a disposition given by government agencies based on laws and regulations, or the articles of incorporation or any other rules; or, despite the fact that a Member, etc. or an Issuer of Securities listed in a Financial Instruments Exchange has violated laws and regulations, a disposition given by government agencies under laws and regulations, or the Financial Instruments Exchange's articles of incorporation, operational rules, brokerage contract rules or any other rules (hereinafter referred to as "Laws and Regulations, etc." in this item), or has committed an act contrary to the fair and equitable principles of transactions specified in the articles of incorporation or any other rules, the Financial Instruments Exchange has failed to exercise its powers vested under this Act, an order given under this Act, or its articles of incorporation or any other rules, or to take any other necessary measures, for having such persons observe the Laws and Regulations, etc. or the fair and equitable principles of transactions: Rescission of the license granted under Article 80(1), issuance of an order of suspension of all or part of its business, specifying a period of suspension not exceeding one year, issuance of an order of change of its business or of prohibition of a part of its business, issuance of an order of dismissal of its Officers, or issuance of an order to take necessary measures specified in the articles of incorporation or any other rules; or 例文帳に追加

一　法令、法令に基づく行政官庁の処分若しくは定款その他の規則に違反したとき、又は会員等若しくは当該金融商品取引所に上場されている有価証券の発行者が法令、法令に基づく行政官庁の処分若しくは当該金融商品取引所の定款、業務規程、受託契約準則その他の規則（以下この号において「法令等」という。）に違反し、若しくは定款その他の規則に定める取引の信義則に背反する行為をしたにもかかわらず、これらの者に対し法令等若しくは当該取引の信義則を遵守させるために、この法律、この法律に基づく命令若しくは定款その他の規則により認められた権能を行使せずその他必要な措置をとることを怠つたとき　第八十条第一項の免許を取り消し、一年以内の期間を定めてその業務の全部若しくは一部の停止を命じ、その業務の変更若しくはその業務の一部の禁止を命じ、その役員の解任を命じ、又は定款その他の規則に定める必要な措置をとることを命ずること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(iii) when the Applicant for authorization is a person who has had his/her authorization granted under Article 155(1) rescinded under the provisions of Article 155-10(1), has had his/her registration made under Article 29 or 33-2 rescinded under the provisions of Article 52(1) or (4), Article 52-2(1) or (3), Article 53(3) or Article 54, has had his/her permission granted under Article 60(1) rescinded under the provisions of Article 60-8(1) or Article 60-9(1), or had his/her registration made under Article 66 rescinded under the provisions of Article 66-20(1), or a person who had obtained a registration or license (including permission or any other administrative dispositions similar to said registration or license) which is equivalent to either the registration under Article 29 or Article 66 or the license under Article 80(1), Article 156-2 or Article 156-24(1) in the state where its head office or principle office is located, and has had said registration or license rescinded and for whom five years have not passed since the date of the rescission; 例文帳に追加

三　認可申請者が第百五十五条の十第一項の規定により第百五十五条第一項の認可を取り消され、第五十二条第一項若しくは第四項、第五十二条の二第一項若しくは第三項、第五十三条第三項若しくは第五十四条の規定により第二十九条若しくは第三十三条の二の登録を取り消され、第六十条の八第一項若しくは第六十条の九第一項の規定により第六十条第一項の許可を取り消され、若しくは第六十六条の二十第一項の規定により第六十六条の登録を取り消され、又はその本店若しくは主たる事務所の所在する国において受けている第二十九条若しくは第六十六条の登録若しくは第八十条第一項、第百五十六条の二若しくは第百五十六条の二十四第一項の免許と同種類の登録若しくは免許（当該登録又は免許に類する許可その他の行政処分を含む。）を取り消され、その取消しの日から五年を経過するまでの者であるとき。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 63 The provisions of Article 830, Article 831, Article 834 (limited to the part pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)), Article 835, paragraph (1), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3), Article 837, Article 838, Article 846 and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the part pertaining to item (i) (e)) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for the declaration of nonexistence or nullity of a resolution of a general meeting of members or an action for the rescission of a resolution of a general meeting of members. In this case, the phrase "the head office (in the case prescribed in item (i) (e) where the matters listed in the respective items of Article 930, paragraph (2) have been registered according to said resolution, the head office and the branch office pertaining to said registration)" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "the principal office of the Member Commodity Exchange (in the case prescribed in item (i) (e) where the matters listed in the respective items of Article 24, paragraph (2) of the Commodity Exchange Act have been registered according to said resolution, the principal office and the secondary office pertaining to said registration)." 例文帳に追加

第六十三条　会社法第八百三十条、第八百三十一条、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十五条第一項、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項、第八百三十七条、第八百三十八条、第八百四十六条並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）の規定は、会員総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同項中「会社の本店（第一号トに規定する場合であって当該決議によって第九百三十条第二項各号に掲げる事項についての登記がされているときにあっては、本店及び当該登記に係る支店）」とあるのは、「会員商品取引所の主たる事務所（第一号トに規定する場合であって当該決議によって商品取引所法第二十四条第二項各号に掲げる事項についての登記がされているときにあっては、主たる事務所及び当該登記に係る従たる事務所）」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (v)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (v)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (v)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (d)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim for the nullification of a reduction of the reserve for redemption of funds. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (v) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators) of a Mutual Company"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

６　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第五号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第五号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第五号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ニに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、基金償却積立金の取崩しの無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第五号中「株主等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 112 The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (v)) and (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (v)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (v)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836 to Article 839 inclusive (Order to Provide Security, Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments etc., Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment, Effect of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(d)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of the reduction to the Amount of Specified Capital or the Amount of Preferred Capital. In this case, the phrase "a Shareholder, etc." in Article 828(2)(v) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Members, director, company auditor, liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百十二条　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第五号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第五号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第五号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ニに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、特定資本金の額又は優先資本金の額の減少の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第五号中「株主等」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役、清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The provisions of Article 830, Article 831, Article 834 (limited to the part pertaining to items 16 and 17), Article 835, paragraph 1, Article 836, paragraphs 1 and 3, Article 837, Article 838, Article 846 and Article 937, paragraph 1 (limited to the part pertaining to item 1 (e)) of the Company Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for the declaration of nonexistence or nullity of a resolution of a general meeting of members or an action for the rescission of a resolution of a general meeting of members. In this case, the phrase "the head office (in the case prescribed in item 1 (e) where the matters listed in the respective items of Article 930, paragraph 2 have been registered according to said resolution, the head office and the branch office pertaining to said registration)" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "the principal office of the Member Commodity Exchange (in the case prescribed in item 1 (e) where the matters listed in the respective items of Article 24, paragraph 2 of the Commodity Exchange Act have been registered according to said resolution, the principal office and the secondary office pertaining to said registration)." 例文帳に追加

会社法第八百三十条、第八百三十一条、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十五条第一項、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項、第八百三十七条、第八百三十八条、第八百四十六条並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）の規定は、会員総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同項中「会社の本店（第一号トに規定する場合であって当該決議によって第九百三十条第二項各号に掲げる事項についての登記がされているときにあっては、本店及び当該登記に係る支店）」とあるのは、「会員商品取引所 MemberCommodity Exchange の主たる事務所（第一号トに規定する場合であって当該決議によって商品取引所法第二十四条第二項各号に掲げる事項についての登記がされているときにあっては、主たる事務所及び当該登記に係る従たる事務所）」と読み替えるものとする。 - 経済産業省

(v) a juridical person for which the renewal of a registration under Article 7(3), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of the following Article, has been refused pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (6) of that Article, whose license under paragraph (1) has been rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 59(1), whose registration under paragraph (1) of the following Article has been rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 60(1), whose registration under Article 67(1) has been rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 82(1), whose license under Article 3 of the Secured Bonds Trust Act has been rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 12 of that Act, or whose authorization under Article 1(1) of the Act on Provision, etc. of Trust Business by Financial Institutions has been rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 10 of that Act, or whose license, registration, or authorization of the same kind (including permission or any other administrative disposition similar to said license, registration, or authorization) which has been obtained in the state in which its head office is located has been rescinded or to whom renewal of said license, registration, or authorization has been refused pursuant to the provisions of laws and regulations of that state that are equivalent to this Act, the Secured Bonds Trust Act, or the Act on Provision, etc. of Trust Business by Financial Institutions, and for whom five years have yet to elapse since the date of rescission (where a renewal has been refused, the day on which the disposition of refusal to renew was made); 例文帳に追加

五　次条第六項の規定により同条第二項において準用する第七条第三項の登録の更新を拒否され、第五十九条第一項の規定により第一項の免許を取り消され、第六十条第一項の規定により次条第一項の登録を取り消され、第八十二条第一項の規定により第六十七条第一項の登録を取り消され、担保付社債信託法第十二条の規定により同法第三条の免許を取り消され、若しくは金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第十条の規定により同法第一条第一項の認可を取り消され、又はその本店の所在する国において受けている同種類の免許、登録若しくは認可（当該免許、登録若しくは認可に類する許可その他の行政処分を含む。）をこの法律、担保付社債信託法若しくは金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律に相当する当該国の法令の規定により取り消され、若しくは当該免許、登録若しくは認可の更新を拒否され、その取消しの日（更新の拒否の場合にあっては、当該更新の拒否の処分がなされた日）から五年を経過しない法人 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム