「effect or」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(239ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

(3) In cases where a Stock Company-Type Financial Instruments Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger is a company with class shares, if the Shares, etc. delivered to members of the Membership-Type Financial Instruments Exchange Extinguished upon an Absorption-Type Merger are shares of the Stock Company-Type Financial Instruments Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger, the Absorption-Type Merger shall not come into effect without a resolution of a class shareholders meeting consisting of class shareholders of class shares set forth in Article 139(ii)(a) (limited to shares with restriction on transfer for which the provisions of the articles of incorporation set forth in Article 199(4) of the Companies Act do not exist) (if there are two or more classes of shares pertaining to such class shareholders, the respective class shareholders meeting consisting of class shareholders categorized by each class of said two or more classes of shares); provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where there are no shareholders who are entitled to exercise their voting rights at said class shareholders meeting. 例文帳に追加

３　吸収合併存続株式会社金融商品取引所が種類株式発行会社である場合において、吸収合併消滅会員金融商品取引所の会員に対して交付する株式等が吸収合併存続株式会社金融商品取引所の株式であるときは、吸収合併は、第百三十九条第二号イの種類の株式（譲渡制限株式であつて、会社法第百九十九条第四項の定款の定めがないものに限る。）の種類株主を構成員とする種類株主総会（当該種類株主に係る株式の種類が二以上ある場合にあつては、当該二以上の株式の種類別に区分された種類株主を構成員とする各種類株主総会）の決議がなければ、その効力を生じない。ただし、当該種類株主総会において議決権を行使することができる株主が存しない場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 271-2 (1) When the Company Being Managed intends to assign a revolving mortgage together with all of the claims it shall guarantee before the principal is established, through the assigning of property which will be carried out in conjunction with the assignment of insurance contracts to the Succeeding Insurance Company (referring to the Succeeding Insurance Company prescribed in Article 260, paragraph (6); the same shall apply in paragraph (5) and Article 271-2-3, paragraph (1), item (iii)), other insurance companies, or the corporation that will underwrite (referring to the Underwriting of Insurance Contract prescribed in Article 260, paragraph (9); the same shall apply in paragraph (5)) the insurance contracts of that Company Being Managed (hereinafter referred to as "Succeeding Insurance Company, etc." in this Article), that Company Being Managed and that Succeeding Insurance Company, etc. may give public notice to the effect that the revolving mortgagor with an objection shall raise its objections to that Company Being Managed with regard to the following matters within a certain period, or make the demand thereof: 例文帳に追加

第二百七十一条の二　被管理会社が承継保険会社（第二百六十条第六項に規定する承継保険会社をいう。第五項及び第二百七十一条の二の三第一項第三号において同じ。）その他の保険会社又は当該被管理会社の保険契約の引受け（第二百六十条第九項に規定する保険契約の引受けをいう。第五項において同じ。）をする機構（以下この条において「承継保険会社等」という。）に対する保険契約の移転とともにする財産の移転により元本の確定前に根抵当権をその担保すべき債権の全部とともに譲渡しようとするときは、当該被管理会社及び当該承継保険会社等は、次に掲げる事項について異議のある根抵当権設定者は当該被管理会社に対し一定の期間内に異議を述べるべき旨を公告し、又はこれを催告することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 78-2 (1) An appointment as service provider as set forth in the main clause of Article 42-2, paragraph (1) shall be provided, pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, based on the application of a person that provides community-based service (with regard to a business to provide Admission to a Community-Based Facility for Preventive Daily Long-Term Care of the Elderly Covered by Public Aid, an organizer of an Intensive Care Home for the Elderly as prescribed in Article 20-5 of the Public Aid for the Aged Act for which capacity of users are twenty-nine (29) or less), by type of Community-Based Service and Business Office of Community-Based Service Business pertaining to the type of said Community-Based Service (herein referred to as "Business Office" in this Section), and shall have an effect on the payment of an Allowance for Community-Based Long-Term Care Service or an Exceptional Allowance for Community-Based Long-Term Care Service to an Insured Person by Long-Term Care Insurance provided by a Municipality of which a mayor provided said appointment as service provider. 例文帳に追加

第七十八条の二　第四十二条の二第一項本文の指定は、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより、地域密着型サービス事業を行う者（地域密着型介護老人福祉施設入所者生活介護を行う事業にあっては、老人福祉法第二十条の五に規定する特別養護老人ホームであって、その入所定員が二十九人以下であるものの開設者）の申請により、地域密着型サービスの種類及び当該地域密着型サービスの種類に係る地域密着型サービス事業を行う事業所（以下この節において「事業所」という。）ごとに行い、当該指定をする市町村長がその長である市町村の行う介護保険の被保険者に対する地域密着型介護サービス費及び特例地域密着型介護サービス費の支給について、その効力を有する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 18 (1) When an order under Article 10, paragraph 1, item 2 has previously been issued and a repeated petition for an order under the same item has been filed on the grounds that the same fact of bodily harm or life threatening intimidation, etc. that was the ground for the petition for the issued order, the court shall issue the order in question only when finding it necessary to reissue the order under the same item, by taking into consideration the fact that the victim who intends to move from the domicile that the victim shares as his/her main home with his/her spouse is unable to complete the move from the domicile within two months from the day the issued order comes into effect due to cause imputable to the victim himself/herself, or other circumstances. However, the court may choose not to issue the order when finding that the issuance of the order will cause extreme hindrance to the spouse's daily life. 例文帳に追加

第十八条　第十条第一項第二号の規定による命令が発せられた後に当該発せられた命令の申立ての理由となった身体に対する暴力又は生命等に対する脅迫と同一の事実を理由とする同号の規定による命令の再度の申立てがあったときは、裁判所は、配偶者と共に生活の本拠としている住居から転居しようとする被害者がその責めに帰することのできない事由により当該発せられた命令の効力が生ずる日から起算して二月を経過する日までに当該住居からの転居を完了することができないことその他の同号の規定による命令を再度発する必要があると認めるべき事情があるときに限り、当該命令を発するものとする。ただし、当該命令を発することにより当該配偶者の生活に特に著しい支障を生ずると認めるときは、当該命令を発しないことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 31-2 (1) A person operating the business of manufacturing or importing any monitoring chemical substance, any Class II Specified Chemical Substance, any chemical substance that has been publicly notified pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (4) of Article 4 (including the cases in which it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (9) of Article 4-2 and the cases in which it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of Article 5-2), any new chemical substance to which the confirmation under item (v) of paragraph (1) of Article 3 or paragraph (4) of Article 4-2 pertains, or any chemical substance listed in the List of Existing Chemical Substances prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 2 of the Supplementary Provisions that has been publicly notified by the Minister of International Trade and Industry pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (4) of said Article (hereinafter referred to as a "substance subject to reporting") shall, when he/she has conducted tests pertaining to the items to be tested prescribed in paragraph (7) of Article 4 or pertaining to the studies of hazardous properties prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 5-4, paragraph (1) of Article 24, or paragraph (1) of Article 25-3 (including the cases in which knowledge equivalent to that which would be obtained from said tests [limited to knowledge that is not publicly known] has been obtained) with regard to the substance subject to reporting he/she has manufactured or imported and if he/she has obtained, as a result thereof, knowledge specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment as one indicating that the substance subject to reporting possesses the following properties, report to the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare, the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, and the Minister of the Environment to that effect and the details of said knowledge, pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the case where said person has obtained said knowledge as a result of a study of hazardous properties to which an instruction under the provisions of paragraph (1) of Article 5-4, paragraph (1) of Article 24, or paragraph (1) of Article 25-3 pertains and is reporting the details of said knowledge pursuant to these provisions: 例文帳に追加

第三十一条の二　監視化学物質、第二種特定化学物質、第四条第四項（第四条の二第九項において読み替えて準用する場合及び第五条の二第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により公示された化学物質、第三条第一項第五号若しくは第四条の二第四項の確認に係る新規化学物質又は附則第二条第四項の規定により通商産業大臣が公示した同条第一項に規定する既存化学物質名簿に記載されている化学物質（以下「報告対象物質」という。）の製造又は輸入の事業を営む者は、その製造又は輸入した報告対象物質について、第四条第七項に規定する試験の項目又は第五条の四第一項、第二十四条第一項若しくは第二十五条の三第一項に規定する有害性の調査の項目に係る試験を行つた場合（当該試験を行つたと同等の知見（公然と知られていないものに限る。）が得られた場合を含む。）であつて、報告対象物質が次に掲げる性状を有することを示す知見として厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定めるものが得られたときは、厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定めるところにより、その旨及び当該知見の内容を厚生労働大臣、経済産業大臣及び環境大臣に報告しなければならない。ただし、第五条の四第一項、第二十四条第一項又は第二十五条の三第一項の規定による指示に係る有害性の調査により当該知見が得られた場合において、これらの規定によりその内容を報告するときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

2. Where a final judgment establishes that the right to registration of a mark belongs to a person other than the applicant, such other person shall be entitled, if the registration has not yet been granted and within three months from the final judgment, at his own discretion, to: (a) take over the application for registration in his own name and assume the capacity of applicant in all respects; (b) file a new application for registration which, provided the mark it contains is substantially identical with that of the original application, shall have effect from the filing or priority date of the original application, which in any case shall cease to be effective; (c) obtain the rejection of the application.例文帳に追加

(2) 終局判決により，標章の登録に対する権利が出願人以外の者に属することが立証された場合には，登録が未だ与えられていないときであって，その終局判決から 3月以内に，その者は，自己の裁量により次のことをすることができる。 (a) 自己の名義で登録出願を引き継ぎ，すべての点において出願人の資格を引き受けること (b) 新たな登録出願をすること。その出願は，当該新たな出願に含まれる標章が最初の出願のそれと実質的に同一である場合に限り，最初の出願が効力を有さないことに関係なくその出願日又は優先日から効力を有するものとする。 (c) 当該出願の拒絶を受けること - 特許庁

Additionally, economic policies are also very weighty, which is why the "Basic Policy for a New Economic Stimulus Package" was announced on the 30th day of last month. The FSA understands that in this "Basic Policy," announced on August 30, financial support for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is listed as a specific measure intended to secure jobs, considering the grave economic condition due to the high yen and other factors that currently exist. The FSA will continue to watch the movements of exchange and stock markets and take steps to address given economic and financial conditions in a timely and appropriate fashion from the standpoint of whether or not our function – the financial intermediation function – is working to its full effect. 例文帳に追加

それから、経済対策、これも非常に大事なことでございますから、「基本方針」が先月30日に発表されましたが、金融庁としては、現下の円高等の厳しい経済情勢を踏まえて、8月30日に発表されました「経済対策の基本方針」において、雇用の確保を図るための具体的な施策としての中小企業金融支援、中小企業の金融支援が盛り込まれているというふうに承知いたしておりますし、金融庁といたしましても、引き続き為替株式市場の動向を注視するとともに、我々は金融仲介機能でございますから、十分に発揮されているかどうかとの観点から、経済金融情勢において適時適切に対応していきたいというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁

Where a person to whom a decision of the Controller under this section relates does not, within the period of 21 days beginning on the date of the decision, apply to the Court for cancellation of the decision, the Controller may apply ex parte to the Court for confirmation of the decision and, if the Controller so applies, the Court on the hearing of the application shall, unless it sees good reason to the contrary, declare accordingly and either (as the Court may consider proper) direct the Controller to erase the name of such person from the register or direct that during a specified period (beginning not earlier than seven days after the decision of the Court) registration of his name in the register shall not have effect. 例文帳に追加

本条に基づく長官の決定に関係する者が，その決定日に始まる21日の期間内に当該決定の取消を裁判所に申請しない場合は，長官は，一方的に裁判所に当該決定の確認を申請することができる。また，長官がその旨を申請する場合は，当該申請を審理するに当たり裁判所は，別段の十分な理由を認めない限り，これに従い宣言するものとし，かつ，(裁判所が適切とみなす場合)その者の名称の登録簿からの消去を長官に指示するか又は(裁判所の決定後7日を越える日に始まる)指定期間中，登録簿にある当該人の名称の登録が効力を有さない旨を指示するかの何れかを行う。 - 特許庁

Article 45 (1) In cases where, at the incorporation of a Stock Company, it issues shares of a class for which the matters listed in item (viii) of Article 108(1) are provided, if there are provisions in the articles of incorporation to the effect that a resolution of the Class Meeting is required with respect to the matters listed in the following items as the features of the shares of such class, the matters provided for in each of such items shall not become effective unless, in addition to the determination pursuant to the provisions of Article 40(1) or Article 43(1), there is a determination by a majority of the votes (limited to the votes with respect to the Shares Issued at Incorporation of such class) of the incorporators who subscribe for the Shares Issued at Incorporation of such class in accordance with the applicable provisions of the articles of incorporation: 例文帳に追加

第四十五条　株式会社の設立に際して第百八条第一項第八号に掲げる事項についての定めがある種類の株式を発行する場合において、当該種類の株式の内容として次の各号に掲げる事項について種類株主総会の決議があることを必要とする旨の定款の定めがあるときは、当該各号に定める事項は、定款の定めに従い、第四十条第一項又は第四十三条第一項の規定による決定のほか、当該種類の設立時発行株式を引き受けた発起人の議決権（当該種類の設立時発行株式についての議決権に限る。）の過半数をもってする決定がなければ、その効力を生じない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

iii) The fact that the amount of the transaction based on a Brokerage Contract (in the case of the transactions set forth in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (iv) of the Act, it shall be any transaction set forth in (a) to (c) inclusive of the same item which is closed by exercising the right under the same item) (such amount means an amount obtained by multiplying the value per transaction unit specified by the Commodity Exchange for each of the Listed Commodity Component Products or each Commodity Index pertaining to the Listed Commodity Index pertaining to said Brokerage Contract by the volume of transactions based on said Brokerage Contract) is extremely high in comparison with the amount of the Clearing Margin, etc. to be deposited by the customer for said transaction, and the ratio of said amount of transaction to the amount of said Clearing Margin, etc. (if said ratio cannot be calculated, a statement to that effect and the reason therefor 例文帳に追加

三　受託契約に基づく取引（法第二条第八項第四号に掲げる取引にあつては、同号の権利を行使することにより成立する同号イからハまでに掲げる取引）の額（当該受託契約に係る上場商品構成物品又は上場商品指数に係る商品指数ごとに商品取引所の定める取引単位当たりの価額に、当該受託契約に基づく取引の数量を乗じて得た額をいう。）が、当該取引について顧客が預託すべき取引証拠金等の額に比して著しく大きい旨及び当該取引の額の当該取引証拠金等の額に対する比率（当該比率を算出することができない場合にあつては、その旨及びその理由） - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 180 (1) The interest specified by a Cabinet Order prescribed in Article 138(vi) (Domestic Source Income) of the Act shall be the interest on the following claims for which the period between the day of their occurrence and the day on which the obligation shall be performed (for claims for which such period is scheduled to be extended substantially by the renewal of the period or in any other ways (hereinafter referred to as the "renewal, etc. of the period" in this paragraph), the said extended period; hereinafter referred to as the "performance period" in this paragraph) does not exceed six months (including claims during the original performance period before the renewal, etc. of the period in the case where the performance period of the claims, whose original performance period at the time of coming into effect did not exceed six months, has come to exceed six months by the renewal, etc. of the period): 例文帳に追加

第百八十条　法第百三十八条第六号（国内源泉所得）に規定する政令で定める利子は、次に掲げる債権のうち、その発生の日からその債務を履行すべき日までの期間（期間の更新その他の方法（以下この項において「期間の更新等」という。）により当該期間が実質的に延長されることが予定されているものについては、その延長された当該期間。以下この項において「履行期間」という。）が六月をこえないもの（その成立の際の履行期間が六月をこえなかつた当該債権について期間の更新等によりその履行期間が六月をこえることとなる場合のその期間の更新等が行なわれる前の履行期間における当該債権を含む。）の利子とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 240-2 (1) An Insurance Company (including a Foreign Insurance Company, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section, excluding Article 240-5 and Article 240-6) may report to the Prime Minister to the effect that it will modify the clause of its contract (hereinafter referred to as a "Modification of Contract Conditions" in this Section), such as a reduction in the amount of insurance claims and other modifications to contract clauses with regard to insurance contracts pertaining to that Insurance Company (excluding Contracts Exempt from Modification) in the case that there is a probability that the continuation of that Insurance Company's Insurance Business (In the case of Foreign Insurance Companies, etc., Insurance Business in Japan. Hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, Article 240-11, Article 241 and Article 262) will be difficult in the light of the state of its business or property. 例文帳に追加

第二百四十条の二　保険会社（外国保険会社等を含む。第二百四十条の五及び第二百四十条の六を除き、以下この節において同じ。）は、その業務又は財産の状況に照らしてその保険業（外国保険会社等にあっては、日本における保険業。以下この条、第二百四十条の十一、第二百四十一条及び第二百六十二条において同じ。）の継続が困難となる蓋然性がある場合には、内閣総理大臣に対し、当該保険会社に係る保険契約（変更対象外契約を除く。）について保険金額の削減その他の契約条項の変更（以下この節において「契約条件の変更」という。）を行う旨の申出をすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 211 (1) If, after the period for filing proofs of claims has expired and before the ordinary period for investigation has started, a petition is filed by the rehabilitation debtor, etc., the court shall make an order of simplified rehabilitation (meaning an order to the effect that proceedings for investigation and determination of rehabilitation claims shall not be performed; the same shall apply hereinafter). In this case, the rehabilitation debtor, etc. may file a petition only where a holder of filed rehabilitation claim who holds a claim that accounts for three-fifths or more of the value, as determined by the court, of total claims held by holders of filed rehabilitation claims has, in writing, consented to a proposed rehabilitation plan submitted by the rehabilitation debtor, etc. and also consented to not performing the proceedings for investigation and determination of rehabilitation claims provided for in Chapter IV, Section 3. 例文帳に追加

第二百十一条　裁判所は、債権届出期間の経過後一般調査期間の開始前において、再生債務者等の申立てがあったときは、簡易再生の決定（再生債権の調査及び確定の手続を経ない旨の決定をいう。以下同じ。）をする。この場合において、再生債務者等の申立ては、届出再生債権者の総債権について裁判所が評価した額の五分の三以上に当たる債権を有する届出再生債権者が、書面により、再生債務者等が提出した再生計画案について同意し、かつ、第四章第三節に定める再生債権の調査及び確定の手続を経ないことについて同意している場合に限り、することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 50 When a Foreign Bank Branch has given a notification under Article 49(1) due to falling under any of the categories set forth in Article 49(1)(iii) to (vi) inclusive (with regard to a notification pertaining to item (iii) of that paragraph, it shall be limited to a notification pertaining to a Merger resulting in extinction of the Foreign Bank to which said Foreign Bank Branch belongs, a company split resulting in succession of all of the business pertaining to said Foreign Bank Branch, or transfer of all of the business, and with regard to a notification pertaining to item (iv) of that paragraph, it shall exclude a notification pertaining to partial abolition of the Banking Business), the license from the Prime Minister set forth in Article 4(1) for the Foreign Bank to which to the Foreign Bank Branch that has given that notification belongs shall lose its effect. 例文帳に追加

第五十条　第四十九条第一項第三号から第六号までのいずれかに該当して同項の規定による届出（同項第三号に係る届出にあつては当該合併後当該外国銀行支店に係る外国銀行が消滅することとなる合併、当該外国銀行支店に係る事業の全部を承継させることとなる会社分割及び事業の全部の譲渡に係る届出に限るものとし、同項第四号に係る届出にあつては銀行業の一部の廃止に係る届出を除く。）があつたときは、当該届出をした外国銀行支店に係る外国銀行に対する第四条第一項の内閣総理大臣の免許は、効力を失う。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

In regard to provisions prohibiting reverse-engineering, the Fair Trade Commission issued a document entitled "Views on Software Licensing Agreements, etc. under the Antimonopoly Act . An Interim Report of the Study Group on Software and the Competition Policy." Specifically, provisions prohibiting reverse-engineering are considered invalid due to their deleterious effect on competition in the market under the following circumstances: (1) where it is necessary to obtain interface information concerning the applicable software in order to develop hardware or software which is compatible with the platform software such as operating systems; (2) the licensor has not provided the interface information; and (3) the performance of reverse-engineering by the licensee is an essential and unavoidable measure in order to develop software and hardware for the applicable software. 例文帳に追加

なお、リバースエンジニアリングを禁止する条項については、公正取引委員会より「ソフトウェアライセンス契約等に関する独占禁止法上の考え方―ソフトウェアと独占禁止法に関する研究会中間報告書―」が公表されており、具体的には、オペレーティングシステムなど、プラットフォーム機能を持つソフトウェアとインターオペラビリティを持つソフトウェアやハードウェアを開発するためには、①当該ソフトウェアのインターフェース情報が必要であり、②ライセンサがインターフェース情報を提供しておらず、③ライセンシーにとって，リバースエンジニアリングを行うことが、当該ソフトウェア向けにソフトウェアやハードウェアを開発するために必要不可欠な手段となっているような場合に、市場における公正な競争を阻害するおそれがある場合が該当する可能性がある。 - 経済産業省

(1) If a Partner who is a natural person dies, his/her heir may succeed to such Partner after providing the General Partner with a notice to the effect that such heir succeeds to such Partner’s status as a Partner within [three] months from death, together with materials as separately requested by the General Partner; provided, however, that if the General Partner reasonably determines that the heir falls under any category of Antisocial Forces or the General Partner would, by admitting the heir as a Partner, cease to satisfy the requirements prescribed in Article 63(1) of the FIEA, the General Partner may refuse the heir’s succession of such Partner’s status of a Partner. 例文帳に追加

1. 自然人である組合員が死亡し、その相続人が、無限責任組合員に対し、死亡後［3］ヶ月以内に無限責任組合員が別途要請する資料とともに被相続人の組合員たる地位を承継する旨を通知した場合、相続人は当該組合員の地位を承継することができる。但し、当該相続人が反社会的勢力に該当すると無限責任組合員が合理的に判断した場合又は当該相続人を組合員として認めることにより無限責任組合員が金融商品取引法第63 条第1 項に規定する要件を充足しないこととなる場合には、無限責任組合員は当該相続人による組合員の地位の承継を拒むことができる。 - 経済産業省

The matters specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 125, paragraph 1 of the Act shall be as follows: (i) the date on which entity conversion came into effect; (ii) the procedures taken by the Member Commodity Exchange implementing Entity Conversion pursuant to the provisions of Article 124 of the Act; (iii) matters concerning important rights and obligations which the Incorporated Commodity Exchange after Entity Conversion inherited from the Member Commodity Exchange implementing Entity Conversion through entity conversion; (iv) matters recorded in a written or Electromagnetic Record which the Member Commodity Exchange implementing entity conversion filed pursuant to the provisions of Article 123, paragraph 1 of the Act (excluding the contents of the entity conversion contract); (v) the date of the registration set forth in Article 134, paragraph 1 of the Act. 例文帳に追加

法第百二十五条第一項に規定する主務省令で定める事項は、次に掲げる事項とする。一組織変更の効力が生じた日 二組織変更をする会員商品取引所における法第百二十四条の規定による手続の経過 三組織変更により組織変更後株式会社商品取引所が組織変更をする会員商品取引所か ら承継した重要な権利義務に関する事項 四法第百二十三条第一項の規定により組織変更をする会員商品取引所が備え置いた書 面又は電磁的記録に記載又は記録がされた事項（組織変更契約の内容を除く。） 五法第百三十四条第一項の登記をした日 - 経済産業省

(7) The term "monopolistic situation" as used in this Act means circumstances in which each of the following market structures and negative effect in the market exist in any particular field of business where the aggregate total value (this term refers to the prices of the relevant goods less an amount equivalent to the amount of taxes levied directly on such goods) of goods of the same description (including goods capable of being supplied without making any material change to the facilities for, or kinds of, such business activities; hereinafter referred to as "particular goods" in this paragraph) and those of any other goods having an extremely similar function and utility thereto, which are supplied in Japan (excluding those exported), or the total value (this term refers to the prices of the relevant services less an amount equivalent to the amount of taxes levied on the recipient of such services with respect thereto) of services of the same description which are supplied in Japan, during the latest one-year period designated by a Cabinet Order, exceeds hundred billion yen: 例文帳に追加

７　この法律において「独占的状態」とは、同種の商品（当該同種の商品に係る通常の事業活動の施設又は態様に重要な変更を加えることなく供給することができる商品を含む。）（以下この項において「一定の商品」という。）並びにこれとその機能及び効用が著しく類似している他の商品で国内において供給されたもの（輸出されたものを除く。）の価額（当該商品に直接課される租税の額に相当する額を控除した額とする。）又は国内において供給された同種の役務の価額（当該役務の提供を受ける者に当該役務に関して課される租税の額に相当する額を控除した額とする。）の政令で定める最近の一年間における合計額が千億円を超える場合における当該一定の商品又は役務に係る一定の事業分野において、次に掲げる市場構造及び市場における弊害があることをいう。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 16 Articles 668 (joint ownership of partnership assets), 669 (responsibility of persons delaying in making cash contribution), 671 though 674 (mutatis mutandis application of provisions for entrustment, resignation or removal of an executor of business, partners' right of inspection of the state of business and assets and proportion in respect of distribution of profits and losses to partners), 676 (restriction on disposal of equity interest by partners and prohibition of split of partnership assets), 677 (prohibition of set-off by debtors to the partnership), 680 (expulsion), 681 (return of equity interest to withdrawing partners), 683 (request for dissolution by partners), 684 (non-retroactiveness of effect of termination), 687 (resignation or removal of partner liquidators) and 688 (authority of liquidators and method of distribution of remaining assets) of the Civil Code (Act No. 89 of 1896) shall apply mutatis mutandis with respect to a Partnership. 例文帳に追加

第十六条　組合については、民法（明治二十九年法律第八十九号）第六百六十八条（組合財産の共有）、第六百六十九条（金銭出資遅滞者の責任）、第六百七十一条から第六百七十四条まで（委任の規定の準用、業務執行者の辞任又は解任、組合員の業務及び財産の状況の検査権並びに組合員の損益分配の割合）、第六百七十六条（組合員の持分処分の制限及び組合財産分割の禁止）、第六百七十七条（組合債務者の相殺の禁止）、第六百八十条（除名）、第六百八十一条（脱退組合員の持分の払戻し）、第六百八十三条（組合員の解散請求）、第六百八十四条（解除の効力の不そ及）、第六百八十七条（組合員である清算人の辞任又は解任）及び第六百八十八条（清算人の職務権限及び残余財産の分割方法）の規定を準用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The provision of Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by a Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 2(11) of the New Banking Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), or by a Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 16-4(1) of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank Holding Company or the Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company (hereinafter collectively referred to as a "Bank Holding Company, etc." in this paragraph and Article 105 of these Supplementary Provisions) notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., or Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other compelling reason, and when the Bank Holding Company, etc. obtains an approval from the Prime Minister before that day, the Bank Holding Company, etc. shall be deemed to have obtained the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

３　新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項（新長期信用銀行法第十七条において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の額が合算して銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている新銀行法第二条第十一項に規定する銀行持株会社（以下この項において「銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等（新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）又は新長期信用銀行法第十六条の四第一項に規定する長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項において「長期信用銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行持株会社又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項及び附則第百五条において「銀行持株会社等」という。）が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行持株会社等が同日までに内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行持株会社等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) The provisions of Article 67 (Determinations to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding items in paragraph (2)) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and Article 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 73, paragraph (4) (Resolutions of Organizational Meetings), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Means), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), and Article 81 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Organizational Meeting of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of a Mutual Company's Organizational Meeting, respectively. In this case, the terms "Shareholders at Incorporation" in those provisions (excluding Article 67, paragraph (2) and Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act), and "Shareholders at Incorporation (excluding Shareholders at Incorporation who may not exercise votes on all matters which may be resolved at Organizational Meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 71 inclusive.)" in Article 67, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "prospective members;" the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company to be incorporated is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company to be incorporated is a Stock Company other than a Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 68, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks;" the term "shall be in writing in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall be in writing;" the term "Article 27, item (v), or Article 59, paragraph (3), item (i)" in Article 68, paragraph (5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-7, paragraph (2), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act;" the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the shareholder meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is an Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in Article 831, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, auditors or liquidators (or, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees), or prospective members, directors at incorporation (referring to the directors at incorporation set forth in Article 30-10, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or company auditors at incorporation (referring to the company auditors at incorporation set forth in paragraph (1) of that Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) of a Mutual Company;" and the term" directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)) where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, and including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in the same paragraph of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors, liquidators, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation;", and any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

６　会社法第六十七条（創立総会の招集の決定）、第六十八条（第二項各号を除く。）（創立総会の招集の通知）、第七十条、第七十一条（創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等）、第七十三条第四項（創立総会の決議）、第七十四条から第七十六条まで（議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第七十八条から第八十条まで（発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議）及び第八十一条（第四項を除く。）（議事録）の規定は相互会社の創立総会について、同法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の創立総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定（同法第六十七条第二項及び第八百三十一条第一項を除く。）中「設立時株主」とあり、及び同法第六十七条第二項中「設立時株主（創立総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない設立時株主を除く。次条から第七十一条までにおいて同じ。）」とあるのは「社員になろうとする者」と、同法第六十八条第一項中「二週間（前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、設立しようとする株式会社が公開会社でない場合にあっては、一週間（当該設立しようとする株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間））」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同条第五項中「第二十七条第五号又は第五十九条第三項第一号」とあるのは「保険業法第三十条の七第二項第一号」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）又は社員になろうとする者、設立時取締役（保険業法第三十条の十第一項に規定する設立時取締役をいう。以下この項において同じ。）若しくは設立時監査役（同条第一項に規定する設立時監査役をいう。以下この項において同じ。）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役、清算人、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The items specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 144-10, paragraph 2, item 3 of the Act shall be specified in the following items, according to classification of the cases specified in said items as on the earlier day between the day of the public notice set forth in the same paragraph and the day of the notice set forth in the same paragraph: (i) in the case where a Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger gave public notice with regard to a balance sheet - 103 - pertaining to the final business year or the substance thereof pursuant to the provisions of Article 440, paragraph 1 or paragraph 2 of the Company Act: what are listed as follows: (a) when the public notice was given in an official gazette, the date of the issuance of said official gazette and the page containing said public notice; (b) when the public notice was given in a daily newspaper which publishes matters on current events, the name and the date of the issuance of said daily newspaper and the page containing said public notice; (c) when the public notice was given by way of Electronic Public Notice, the matters listed in Article 911, paragraph 3, item 29 (a) of the Company Act; (ii) in the case where a Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger took measures prescribed in Article 440, paragraph 3 of the Company Act with regard to a balance sheet pertaining to the final business year: matters listed in Article 911, paragraph 3, item 27 of the Company Act; (iii) in the case where a Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger is a business corporation prescribed in Article 440, paragraph 4 of the Company Act, and when said business corporation submitted a securities report pursuant to the provisions of Article 24, paragraph 1 of the Securities Exchange Act: a statement to that effect; (iv) in the case where the final business year does not exist for a Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger: a statement to that effect; (v) in the case where a Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger is a clearing corporation: a statement to that effect; (vi) in the cases other than those listed in the preceding items: the contents of a - 104 - balance sheet pertaining to the final business year pursuant to the provisions of Part 6, Chapter 2 of the Company Calculation Rules. 例文帳に追加

法第百四十四条の十第二項第三号に規定する主務省令で定めるものは、同項の規定によ る公告の日又は同項の規定による催告の日のいずれか早い日における次の各号に定める場 合の区分に応じ、当該各号に定めるものとする。 一最終事業年度に係る貸借対照表又はその要旨につき吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引 所が会社法第四百四十条第一項又は第二項の規定により公告をしている場合次に掲 げるもの イ官報で公告をしているときは、当該官報の日付及び当該公告が掲載されている頁 ロ時事に関する事項を掲載する日刊新聞紙で公告をしているときは、当該日刊新聞 紙の名称、日付及び当該公告が掲載されている頁 ハ電子公告により公告をしているときは、会社法第九百十一条第三項第二十九号イ に掲げる事項 二最終事業年度に係る貸借対照表につき吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所が会社法第 四百四十条第三項に規定する措置を執っている場合会社法第九百十一条第三項第二 十七号に掲げる事項 三吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所が会社法第四百四十条第四項に規定する株式会社 である場合において、当該株式会社が証券取引法第二十四条第一項の規定により最終 事業年度に係る有価証券報告書を提出しているときその旨 四吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所につき最終事業年度がない場合その旨 五吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所が清算株式会社である場合その旨 六前各号に掲げる場合以外の場合会社計算規則第六編第二章の規定による最終事業 年度に係る貸借対照表の要旨の内容 - 経済産業省

Article 56 (1) The provisions of Articles 131(1), 131-2(1), 132 to 133-2, 134(1), 134(3), 134(4), 135 to 154, 155(1), 155(2), 156 to 158, 160(1), 160(2), 161, and 167 to 170 (effect of trial decision, request for trial, trial examiner, trial procedures in relation to litigation, and costs of trial) of the Patent Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a trial. In this case, the term "is made with respect to the grounds for the request as provided in item (iii) of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article in the course of filing a request for a trial other than a trial for Patent invalidation, or in the event that approval is granted by the chief trial examiner under the following paragraph" in Article131-2(1) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "is made with respect to the grounds for the request as provided in Article 131(1)(iii) of the Patent Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 56(1) of this Act in the course of filing a request for a trial other than a trial under Article 46(1) of the Trademark Act," the term "a trial for Patent invalidation and a trial for invalidation of the registration of extension of term" in Articles 132(1) and 167 of the Patent Act and the term "a trial for Patent invalidation or a trial for invalidation of the registration of extension of term" in Articles 145(1) and 169(1) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a trial under Article 46(1), 50(1), 51(1), 52-2(1), 53(1) or 53-2 of the Trademark Act," the term "a party in the case or an intervener in the case" in Article 139(i), (ii) and (v) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a party in the case, an intervener in the case or an opponent to the registration in the case", the term "a party in the case or an intervener in the case" in Article 139(iii) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a party in the case, an intervener in the case or an opponent to the registration in the case," the term "a trial against the examiner's decision of refusal" in Article 161 of the Patent Act and "a trial against an examiner's decision of refusal and a trial for correction" in Article 169(3) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a trial under Article 44(1) or 45(1) of the Trademark Act," and the term "the decision in another trial" in Article 168(1) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a decision on the opposition to registration or a trial decision in another trial." 例文帳に追加

第五十六条　特許法第百三十一条第一項、第百三十一条の二第一項、第百三十二条から第百三十三条の二まで、第百三十四条第一項、第三項及び第四項、第百三十五条から第百五十四条まで、第百五十五条第一項及び第二項、第百五十六条から第百五十八条まで、第百六十条第一項及び第二項、第百六十一条並びに第百六十七条から第百七十条まで（審決の効果、審判の請求、審判官、審判の手続、訴訟との関係及び審判における費用）の規定は、審判に準用する。この場合において、同法第百三十一条の二第一項中「特許無効審判以外の審判を請求する場合における同項第三号に掲げる請求の理由についてされるとき、又は次項の規定による審判長の許可があつたとき」とあるのは「商標法第四十六条第一項の審判以外の審判を請求する場合における同法第五十六条第一項において準用する特許法第百三十一条第一項第三号に掲げる請求の理由についてされるとき」と、同法第百三十二条第一項及び第百六十七条中「特許無効審判又は延長登録無効審判」とあり、並びに同法第百四十五条第一項及び第百六十九条第一項中「特許無効審判及び延長登録無効審判」とあるのは「商標法第四十六条第一項、第五十条第一項、第五十一条第一項、第五十二条の二第一項、第五十三条第一項又は第五十三条の二の審判」と、同法第百三十九条第一号、第二号及び第五号中「当事者若しくは参加人」とあるのは「当事者、参加人若しくは登録異議申立人」と、同条第三号中「当事者又は参加人」とあるのは「当事者、参加人又は登録異議申立人」と、同法第百六十一条中「拒絶査定不服審判」とあり、及び同法第百六十九条第三項中「拒絶査定不服審判及び訂正審判」とあるのは「商標法第四十四条第一項又は第四十五条第一項の審判」と、同法第百六十八条第一項中「他の審判の審決」とあるのは「登録異議の申立てについての決定若しくは他の審判の審決」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Sec.185 Fair Use of a Copyrighted Work 185.1. The fair use of a copyrighted work for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, research, and similar purposes is not an infringement of copyright. Decompilation, which is understood here to be the reproduction of the code and translation of the forms of the computer program to achieve the inter-operability of an independently created computer program with other programs may also constitute fair use. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use, the factors to be considered shall include: (a) The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for non-profit education purposes; (b) The nature of the copyrighted work; (c) The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (d) The effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.例文帳に追加

第185条 著作権を有する著作物の公正な使用 185.1批評，論評，事件の報道，教室での使用のための複数の複製を含む授業，学問，研究その他類似の目的のための著作権を有する著作物の公正な使用は，著作権の侵害ではない。独立して創作されたコンピュータ・プログラムと他のコンピュータ・プログラムとの間で適時情報交換することができることを達成するためのコンピュータ・プログラムの形式のコード及びトランスレ－ションの複製であると理解されるデコンピレ－ション(decompilation)も，公正な使用である。具体的な事件において公正な使用であるか否かを決定するに当って考慮すべき要因には，次のものを含む。 (a)使用の目的及び特性。使用が商業的性質のものであるか否か又は非営利の教育上の目的の使用であるか否かを含む。 (b)著作権を有する著作物の性質 (c)著作権を有する著作物全体との関連における使用される部分の意義及び実質的価値 (d)著作権を有する著作物の潜在的市場における使用の効果又は同著作物の価値 - 特許庁

In particular, the fact that economic and financial fields have become highly globalized is common knowledge to all of you, so globalized that even 100 million dollars can be moved in a flash by means of computers. In times like this, it is, put simply and as far as I see it, a challenge to humanity in the 21st century to deal with the question of how to democratically control the advancement of financial engineering, or the economic globalization and financial globalization, and we are indeed in the process of tackling it, but imposing excessively harsh regulations on markets might cause them to shrink. Government control may pose another issue in that process, but the lack of it, which means applying a laissez-faire or no-restriction approach, might impose one negative effect after another on manufacturing and other industries, as was the case in the economic recession two years ago. In that sense, unlike the 1929 Great Depression, what I think the recent crisis is making us face is a challenge to human wisdom. 例文帳に追加

特に、経済・金融の分野は非常にグローバル化したということは皆さん方よくご存じでございまして、たちまち1億ドルの金でもコンピュータの中を動くわけでございますから、そういった時代に、簡単に言えばそういった金融工学の発展、あるいは経済のグローバル化、金融のグローバル化と基本的に民主主義社会でございまして、ある意味で私はこれを民主的なコントロールをいかにしていくかということは、21世紀の大変人類的課題だと思っていますが、今はその最中でございまして、ご存じのようにマーケットですからあんまり規制とか強化をしますとこれは縮んでしまいますし、また国の管理が出てきますし、それかといってご存じのように2年前の今、自由放任といいますか、自由にやってきますと、皆さんもご存じのようにこの前の経済不況のように製造業にもほかにもどんどん悪い影響が来たわけでございますから、そういった意味で非常に私は1929年の大恐慌とは違って、今回の恐慌はやっぱり人類の英知が試されているというふうに思っています。 - 金融庁

Marks registered under Republic Act No. 166 shall remain in force and effect but shall be deemed to have been granted under the IP Code and shall be renewed within the time and manner provided for renewal of registration by these Regulations; provided, that marks whose registration have a remaining duration as of January 1, 1998 of more than six and one-half years shall be required to submit the declaration and evidence of actual use prescribed in these Regulations within one year following the tenth and fifteenth anniversaries of the registration or renewal registration under Republic Act No. 166; provided, further, that marks whose registrations have a remaining duration of six and one-half years or less may no longer be subject to the requirement of declaration and evidence of use but shall be renewed within the time and in the manner provided for renewal of registration by these Regulations and, upon renewal, shall be reclassified in accordance with the Nice Classification. The renewal shall be for a duration of ten years. Trade names and marks registered in the Supplemental Register under Republic Act No. 166 whose registration, including any renewal thereof, was subsisting as of January 1, 1998 shall remain in force but shall no longer be subject to renewal.例文帳に追加

共和国法律第166号に基づいて登録された標章は引き続き有効であるが，IP法に基づいて認められたものとみなされ，本規則が登録更新のために規定する期間内及び方法で更新される。ただし，1998年1月1日現在でその登録の残存期間が6年半より長い標章は，共和国法律第166号に基づく登録又は更新登録の10周年日及び15周年日から1年以内に，本規則に定める実際の使用の宣言書及び証拠を提出しなければならない。ただし，その登録の残存期間が6年半以内である標章は，もはや使用の宣言書及び証拠の要件の対象とされないが，本規則が登録更新のために規定する期間内及び方法で更新されるものとし，更新されれば，ニース分類に基づいて再分類される。更新は，10年とする。共和国法律第166号に基づいて補助登録簿に登録された商号及び標章であって，その登録が更新によるものを含め1998年1月1日時点で存続していたものは，引き続き有効であるが，もはや更新の対象ではない。 - 特許庁

Article 112 The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (v)) and (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (v)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (v)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836 to Article 839 inclusive (Order to Provide Security, Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments etc., Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment, Effect of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(d)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of the reduction to the Amount of Specified Capital or the Amount of Preferred Capital. In this case, the phrase "a Shareholder, etc." in Article 828(2)(v) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Members, director, company auditor, liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百十二条　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第五号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第五号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第五号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ニに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、特定資本金の額又は優先資本金の額の減少の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第五号中「株主等」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役、清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 138 (1) The provisions of Article 151 (excluding the items) (Effect of Pledge of Shares), Article 210 (Demanding Cessation of Issuance of Shares for Subscription), Article 212(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Liabilities of Persons Who Subscribed for Shares with Unfair Amount To Be Paid In), and Article 915(3) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Registration of a Change) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Specific Purpose Company's convertible Specified Bonds. In this case, the phrases "In cases where a Stock Company carries out any of the acts listed below," "such act," and "shareholders" in Article 151 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "In cases where the conversion of convertible Specified Bonds has been effected," "such conversion," and "convertible Specified Bondholders," respectively, the terms "shareholders" and "Article 199(1)" in Article 210 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members" and "Article 121(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," respectively, the phrase "laws and regulations or articles of incorporation" in Article 210(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "laws and regulations, articles of incorporation, or the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百三十八条　会社法第百五十一条（各号を除く。）（株式の質入れの効果）、第二百十条（募集株式の発行等をやめることの請求）、第二百十二条第一項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不公正な払込金額で株式を引き受けた者等の責任）及び第九百十五条第三項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（変更の登記）の規定は、特定目的会社の転換特定社債について準用する。この場合において、同法第百五十一条中「株式会社が次に掲げる行為をした場合」とあるのは「転換特定社債の転換がされた場合」と、「当該行為」とあるのは「当該転換」と、「株主」とあるのは「転換特定社債権者」と、同法第二百十条中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、「第百九十九条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十一条第一項」と、同条第一号中「法令又は定款」とあるのは「法令、資産流動化計画又は定款」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) An applicant for a design registration may convert his/her application (excluding applications for a design registration deemed, under Article 10-2(2) of the Design Act as applied mutatis mutandis under Article 13(5) of the Design Act, to have been filed at the time of the original patent application which was filed based on an application for a utility model registration under Article 46-2(1) of the Patent Act (including applications for a design registration deemed to have been filed at the time of filing of the original application for a design registration under Article 10-2(2) of the Design Act)) into an application for a utility model registration; provided, however, that this shall not apply after the expiration of 30 days from the date the certified copy of the examiner's initial decision to the effect that the application for a design registration is to be refused has been served or after the expiration of nine years and six months from the date of filing of the application for a design registration. 例文帳に追加

２　意匠登録出願人は、その意匠登録出願（意匠法第十三条第五項において準用する同法第十条の二第二項の規定により特許法第四十六条の二第一項の規定による実用新案登録に基づく特許出願の時にしたものとみなされる意匠登録出願（意匠法第十条の二第二項の規定により当該意匠登録出願の時にしたものとみなされるものを含む。）を除く。）を実用新案登録出願に変更することができる。ただし、その意匠登録出願について拒絶をすべき旨の最初の査定の謄本の送達があつた日から三十日を経過した後又はその意匠登録出願の日から九年六月を経過した後は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 283 (1) The interest specified by a Cabinet Order prescribed in Article 161(vi) (Domestic Source Income) of the Act shall be the interest on the following claims for which the period between the day of their occurrence and the day on which the obligation shall be performed (for claims for which such period is scheduled to be extended substantially by the renewal of the period or in other ways (hereinafter referred to as the "renewal, etc. of the period" in this paragraph), the said extended period; hereinafter referred to as the "performance period" in this paragraph) does not exceed six months (including claims during the original performance period before the renewal, etc. of the period in the case where the performance period of the claims, whose original performance period at the time of coming into effect did not exceed six months, has come to exceed six months by the renewal, etc. of the period): 例文帳に追加

第二百八十三条　法第百六十一条第六号（国内源泉所得）に規定する政令で定める利子は、次に掲げる債権のうち、その発生の日からその債務を履行すべき日までの期間（期間の更新その他の方法（以下この項において「期間の更新等」という。）により当該期間が実質的に延長されることが予定されているものについては、その延長された当該期間。以下この項において「履行期間」という。）が六月をこえないもの（その成立の際の履行期間が六月をこえなかつた当該債権について期間の更新等によりその履行期間が六月をこえることとなる場合のその期間の更新等が行なわれる前の履行期間における当該債権を含む。）の利子とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) When the rehabilitation debtor has submitted a proposed rehabilitation plan that specifies special clauses on home loan and it has resulted in any of the cases set forth in the items of paragraph (2), the provision of paragraph (2) shall also apply to an objection made in an investigation of rehabilitation claims, by the time specified in the respective items, by a rehabilitation creditor who holds a home loan claim prescribed in Article 198(1) and does not hold any rehabilitation claim except for said home loan claim or by a guarantee company that does not hold any rehabilitation claim except for a right of exoneration based on the guarantee for the debt for a home loan claim. In this case, the person who has made such objection shall not be subject to the effect of the relevant statements in the schedule of rehabilitation creditors that shall be the same as a final and binding judgment under the provisions of Article 104(3) and Article 180(2). 例文帳に追加

４　再生債務者により住宅資金特別条項を定めた再生計画案が提出され、かつ、第二項各号のいずれかに該当することとなったときは、当該各号に定める時までに第百九十八条第一項に規定する住宅資金貸付債権を有する再生債権者であって当該住宅資金貸付債権以外に再生債権を有しないもの又は保証会社であって住宅資金貸付債権に係る債務の保証に基づく求償権以外に再生債権を有しないものが再生債権の調査において述べた異議についても、第二項と同様とする。この場合においては、当該異議を述べた者には、第百四条第三項及び第百八十条第二項の規定による確定判決と同一の効力は、及ばない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(ii) In the case where a final and binding judgment etc. (hereinafter referred to as final judgment and those with the same effect, but excluding those listed in (a) to (c) below) has been given against the other qualified consumer organization with respect to the lawsuit etc. (hereinafter referred to as proceedings of lawsuit and petition for settlement, conciliation and arbitration) in connection with the demand for injunction and the contents of the demand and the business operator, etc. being the opposite party of the demand are the same with those of lawsuits, etc.; provided, however, this shall not apply to cases where certification as a qualified consumer organization provided in para. (1) of the following article has been rescinded with respect to said lawsuit, etc. relating to the said final and binding judgment for the reasons provided in item (iv) of para. (1) of Article 34, or it has been found that any of the reasons provided in item (iv) of para. (1) of the same article existed pursuant to para. (3) of the same article. 例文帳に追加

二　他の適格消費者団体を当事者とする差止請求に係る訴訟等（訴訟並びに和解の申立てに係る手続、調停及び仲裁をいう。以下同じ。）につき、既に確定判決等（確定判決及びこれと同一の効力を有するものをいい、次のイからハまでに掲げるものを除く　。以下同じ。）が存する場合において、請求の内容及び相手方である事業者等が同一である場合。ただし、当該他の適格消費者団体について、当該確定判決等に係る訴訟等の手続に関し、次条第一項の認定が第三十四条第一項第四号に掲げる事由により取り消され、又は同条第三項の規定により同条第一項第四号に掲げる事由があった旨の認定がされたときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(1) Until [________], the General Partner may, on behalf of all Partners, admit any person who is not the Partners listed in Exhibit 1 attached hereto (the “Existing Partners”) and permit Existing Partners to increase their Capital Commitments. In case of such an admission, the General Partner shall, on behalf of all Partners, enter into an admission agreement (or, with respect to the increase of the Capital Commitments, an amendment agreement to this Agreement; in this Article, the same applies) with such person on such terms and conditions and in such form as the General Partner in its discretion deems appropriate (which shall include a clause under which the New Partner consents to be bound by this Agreement). In the case of any increase of Capital Commitments, the General Partner shall, on behalf of all Partners, enter in o an amendment to this Agreement with such Existing Partners to that effect on such terms and conditions and in such form as the General Partner in its discretion deems appropriate. 例文帳に追加

1. 無限責任組合員は、［ ］年［ ］月［ ］日までの間に限り、全組合員を代理して、本契約添付別紙1 記載の組合員（以下「既存組合員」という。）以外の者を本組合に加入させること、及び、既存組合員による出資約束金額の増額を承認することができるものとする。かかる加入及び出資約束金額の増額に際しては、無限責任組合員は、これらの者との間で全組合員を代理してその裁量により適切と考える内容及び様式による加入契約（出資約束金額の増額の場合はその旨の本契約の変更契約。以下、本条において同じ。）を締結する（当該加入契約は、当該新規加入組合員が本契約に拘束されることに同意する旨の条項を含むものでなければならない。）。 - 経済産業省

Article 31-2 (1) A person engaged in the business of manufacturing or importing any chemical substance subject to monitoring, any Class II Specified Chemical Substance, any chemical substance of which the public has been notified pursuant to the provisions of Article 4, paragraph (4) (including where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 4-2, paragraph (9) and pursuant to Article 5-2, paragraph (2)), or any chemical substance in the list of existing chemical substances prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions of which the public has been notified by the Minister of International Trade and Industry pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (4) of said Article (hereinafter referred to as a "substance subject to reporting") shall report to the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare, the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, and the Minister of the Environment when he/she has conducted tests with regard to the substance subject to reporting under the items prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (7) or studies of hazardous properties prescribed in Article 5-4, paragraph (1), Article 24, paragraph (1) or Article 25-3, paragraph (1) (including cases in which information equivalent to that which would be obtained from said tests (limited to information that is not publicly known) has been obtained). When, as a result of said tests, the person obtains information specified by Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment indicating that the substance subject to reporting possesses the following properties, he/she shall report to that effect and give the details of such information, pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, and Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy; provided, however that this shall not apply where said person has obtained said information as a result of a study of hazardous properties to which an instruction under the provisions of Article 5-4, paragraph (1), Article 24, paragraph (1) or Article 25-3, paragraph (1) pertains, and where said person is reporting the details of said information pursuant to these provisions: 例文帳に追加

第三十一条の二　監視化学物質、第二種特定化学物質、第四条第四項（第四条の二第九項において読み替えて準用する場合及び第五条の二第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により公示された化学物質又は附則第二条第四項の規定により通商産業大臣が公示した同条第一項に規定する既存化学物質名簿に記載されている化学物質（以下「報告対象物質」という。）の製造又は輸入の事業を営む者は、その製造し、又は輸入した報告対象物質について、第四条第七項に規定する試験の項目又は第五条の四第一項、第二十四条第一項若しくは第二十五条の三第一項に規定する有害性の調査の項目に係る試験を行つた場合（当該試験を行つたと同等の知見（公然と知られていないものに限る。）が得られた場合を含む。）であつて、報告対象物質が次に掲げる性状を有することを示す知見として厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定めるものが得られたときは、厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定めるところにより、その旨及び当該知見の内容を厚生労働大臣、経済産業大臣及び環境大臣に報告しなければならない。ただし、第五条の四第一項、第二十四条第一項又は第二十五条の三第一項の規定による指示に係る有害性の調査により当該知見が得られた場合において、これらの規定によりその内容を報告するときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Concerning the patent fee, registration fee or other charge to be paid with respect to Patent Rights, etc. or the Rights to Receive Patent, etc. or the Patent Rights, etc. obtained based on the Right to Receive Patent, etc., these rights being owned by a Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agency (hereinafter referred to simply as "Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agency") and pertaining to research results related to technologies of said Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agency and having been assigned, prior to the date of partial enforcement, to a person who has received an accreditation pursuant to paragraph 1 of Article 13 of the Old Universities, etc. Technology Transfer Promotion Act (limited to persons who conduct the operation of transferring research results related to technologies of Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agencies prescribed in the same paragraph to private business operators who intend to utilize these research results; in the next paragraph referred to as "Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agency-Related Certified Business Operators "), the provisions of paragraph 2 and paragraph 3 in the same Article, the provisions of paragraph 4, paragraph 6 and paragraph 8 of Article 12 in the Old Universities, etc. Technology Transfer Promotion Act that apply mutatis mutandis to paragraph 2 of same Article, the provisions of paragraph 10 of Article 12 of the Old Universities, etc. Technology Transfer Promotion Act that apply mutatis mutandis to paragraph 3 of Article 13 of the Old Universities, etc. Technology Transfer Promotion Act, and paragraph 4, paragraph 6 and paragraph 8 of the same Article that apply mutatis mutandis to same paragraph shall remain in effect, even after the partial effective date. 例文帳に追加

２　旧大学等技術移転促進法第十三条第一項の認定を受けた者（同項に規定する試験研究独立行政法人（以下単に「試験研究独立行政法人」という。）における技術に関する研究成果についてその活用を行おうとする民間事業者に対し移転する事業を行う者に限る。次項において「試験研究独立行政法人関係認定事業者」という。）が一部施行日前に譲渡を受けた試験研究独立行政法人における技術に関する研究成果に係る当該試験研究独立行政法人が保有する特許権等若しくは特許を受ける権利等又はその特許を受ける権利等に基づいて取得した特許権等について納付すべき特許料若しくは登録料又は手数料については、同条第二項及び第三項の規定、同条第二項において準用する旧大学等技術移転促進法第十二条第四項、第六項及び第八項の規定並びに旧大学等技術移転促進法第十三条第三項において準用する旧大学等技術移転促進法第十二条第十項並びに同項において準用する同条第四項、第六項及び第八項の規定は、一部施行日後においても、なおその効力を有する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 5 (1) The Heads of Ministries and Agencies etc. shall, when there is a demand under the provisions of Article 3, paragraph 1 and paragraph 2, perform the necessary investigation if it is possible to impose disciplinary actions based on the National Public Service Act and the Local Public Service Act, upon the employees involved in said bid rigging etc. Such action shall mean dismissal, suspension of duties, a cut in salary, or warning and other sanctions in the case of specified corporations (excluding specified incorporated administrative agencies - meaning incorporated administrative agencies (stipulated under Article 2, paragraph 2 of the Act on General Rules for Incorporated Administrative Agencies (Act No. 103 of 1999); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) and excluding specified local incorporated administrative agencies - meaning specified local incorporated administrative agencies (stipulated under Article 2, paragraph 2 of the Act on Local Incorporated Administrative Agencies (Act No. 118 of 2003); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph). Provided, however, that the Heads of Ministries and Agencies, heads of specified incorporated administrative agencies or heads of specified local incorporated administrative agencies, in cases where they do not have the appointive power of the said employees (including cases where the appointive power of the said employees was assigned), it shall suffice if the notification was made to the person with appointive power (including the person who was assigned the appointive power of the said employees; hereinafter referred to as "appointer") to the effect that the demand under the provisions of Article 3, paragraph 1 or paragraph 2, was received. 例文帳に追加

第五条　各省各庁の長等は、第三条第一項又は第二項の規定による求めがあったときは、当該入札談合等関与行為を行った職員に対して懲戒処分（特定法人（特定独立行政法人（独立行政法人通則法（平成十一年法律第百三号）第二条第二項に規定する特定独立行政法人をいう。以下この項において同じ。）及び特定地方独立行政法人（地方独立行政法人法（平成十五年法律第百十八号）第二条第二項に規定する特定地方独立行政法人をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を除く。）にあっては、免職、停職、減給又は戒告の処分その他の制裁）をすることができるか否かについて必要な調査を行わなければならない。ただし、当該求めを受けた各省各庁の長、地方公共団体の長、特定独立行政法人の長又は特定地方独立行政法人の理事長が、当該職員の任命権を有しない場合（当該職員の任命権を委任した場合を含む。）は、当該職員の任命権を有する者（当該職員の任命権の委任を受けた者を含む。以下「任命権者」という。）に対し、第三条第一項又は第二項の規定による求めがあった旨を通知すれば足りる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

1) This Ordinance of the Ministry shall come into effect as from July 7, 2000; provided, however, that the following shall come into effect as from the date of promulgation: the revised provisions of Article 1, item (viii), item (ix), item (xi), item (xiv), item (xviii), item (xxi), item (xxii), item (xxiv), (a) and (c), item (xxvii) and item (xxxiii); the revised provisions of item (xxxiv) of the same Article (limited to the part in which "those that are 75 millimeters or more" in (a), 1. and (b), 2. of the same item is revised to "those that exceed 75 millimeters"); the revised provisions of item (xxxv), item (xxxvi), item (xxxviii), item (xl), item (xliv) and also item (lvii) of the same Article, Article 3, item (vii), (e), item (xvi), (a) and (g), item (xx) and item (xxii); the revised provisions of Article 6, item (i) (excluding the part in which "parallel processors" in (c), 3. of the same item is revised to "devices designed for parallel processors"); and the revised provisions of item (ii), (b), item (iv) and item (viii) of the same Article, Article 7, Article 8, Article 9, item (i), (a), Article 12, Article 13, item (v), Article 14, item (v) and item (vi), (a) and (d), Article 14-2, item (lxxiv), Article 19, Article 20 and Article 21; and the revised provisions of Article 25 (limited to the part in which paragraph (3), item (ii), (j) of the same Article is deleted and (k) is changed to (j) and (l) is changed to (k) 例文帳に追加

１　この省令は、平成十二年七月七日から施行する。ただし、第一条第八号、第九号、第十一号、第十四号、第十八号、第二十一号、第二十二号、第二十四号イ及びハ、第二十七号及び第三十三号の改正規定、同条第三十四号の改正規定（同号イ（一）及びロ（一）中「七五ミリメートル以上の」を「七五ミリメートルを超える」に改める部分に限る。）、同条第三十五号、第三十六号、第三十八号、第四十号、第四十四号並びに第五十七号、第三条第七号ホ、第十六号イ及びト、第二十号並びに第二十二号の改正規定、第六条第一号の改正規定（同号ハ（三）中「並列プロセッサ」を「並列プロセッサ用に設計したもの」に改める部分を除く。）、同条第二号ロ、第四号及び第八号、第七条、第八条、第九条第一号イ、第十二条、第十三条第五項、第十四条第五号並びに第六号イ及びニ、第十四条の二第七十四号、第十九条、第二十条並びに第二十一条の改正規定並びに第二十五条の改正規定（同条第三項第二号中ヌを削り、ルをヌとし、ヲをルとする部分に限る。）は、公布の日から施行する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

This means that we are struggling hard to make ends meet and, as everyone well realizes, international meetings have become extremely important in the world of finance since the Lehman crisis, because it is now indeed a very critical global issue to decide how to harmonize on an international scale a given country's domestic economic trends or the financial condition, or economic condition, that it has traditionally been situated in. Therefore, what has to be done on an international scale must be done properly in the form of policy coordination or as G20 initiatives, as otherwise no effect could be expected in an era of increasing globalization in finance or the economy that we live in now, and each country is equally struggling to achieve that end, which explains why there are so many international meetings. That is, as you see, the situation we have now, and I also happened to hear just yesterday in connection with this subject that our Office of International Affairs is in serious shortage of labor, a fact that stands in contrast to such critical importance of the FSA, to which a mere 22 billion yen is given as its budget, and the extremely significant role that financial policies play in an economy. As I have just said, though, now is a very important and delicate period of time both internationally and domestically and we are accordingly charged with a weighty responsibility. Seeing as the FSA is a public office with labor costs representing its main spending category, I did emphatically asked that attention should be paid to that point and, actually, similar comments were also made by the National Police Agency and the Ministry of Justice, both of them being ministries with a hefty payroll as well. In the case of the FSA, it is not really my particular intention to make a case to represent an interest of the FSA, but the fact still remains that it is in charge of a very important field. 例文帳に追加

ということで非常に苦労しておりますし、そういった皆様方もよくお分かりのように、金融というのはリーマン・ショック以来、国際的な会議というのは非常に重要でございまして、国内の景気の動向、あるいはその国が置かれた伝統的な金融の状態、あるいは経済の状態、それを国際的にどうハーモナイズするかということが非常に世界的な大事な問題でございまして、国際でやるべきところはきちっと協調政策、Ｇ20でやっていかねば、なかなかこういった金融のグローバル化、あるいは経済のグローバル化の時代に効果がございませんから、その辺を非常に苦労を各国やっておられるわけでございますから、国際会議というのは実は非常に多いのでございますし、ご存じ、その中で国際室の昨日もたまたま話を聞きますと、非常に国際室の人手が足らないという話を聞きまして、そういった非常に大事な金融庁、予算は220億で少ないのですけれども、極めて経済の中で果たす金融政策は大事でございまして、それが今も申し上げましたけれども、国際的にも国内的にも非常に大事な難しい時期でもございまして、それゆえに責任が重たいわけでございますが、そういった中で、なかなか人件費を主とした役所でございますから、そのことはぜひ考慮していただきたいということをこれは実は警察庁も法務省もそういうことを申されまして、これも人件費が多い省ですから、特に金融庁の場合は何も私は省益を代表して言う気はございませんが、現実にこれは非常に大事な分野でございます。 - 金融庁

Where the examiner intends to give a notice of reasons for refusal for a patent application under the preceding Article, and these reasons for refusal are the same as the reasons for refusal stated in the previous notice under the preceding Article (including its application mutatis mutandis under Article 159(2) (including its application mutatis mutandis under Article 174(1)) and Article 163 (2)) with regard to another patent application (limited to the case where both patent applications are deemed to have been filed simultaneously by applying the provision of Article 44(2) to either or both of them) (excluding such a notice of reasons for refusal of which the applicant of the patent application could have never known the content prior to the filing of a request for examination of the patent application), the examiner shall also give a notice to that effect. 例文帳に追加

審査官は、前条の規定により特許出願について拒絶の理由を通知しようとする場合において、当該拒絶の理由が、他の特許出願(当該特許出願と当該他の特許出願の少なくともいずれか一方に第四十四条第二項の規定が適用されたことにより当該特許出願と同時にされたこととなつているものに限る。)についての前条(第百五十九条第二項(第百七十四条第一項において準用する場合を含む。)及び第百六十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定による通知(当該特許出願についての出願審査の請求前に当該特許出願の出願人がその内容を知り得る状態になかつたものを除く。)に係る拒絶の理由と同一であるときは、その旨を併せて通知しなければならない。 - 特許庁

The main reason for the year-on-year decreases in profits in the two groups was their mergers. One of them is MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings, which developed from the Mitsui Sumitomo group of marine and fire insurers. The other one is NKSJ Holdings, which developed from Sompo Japan Insurance, or formerly Yasuda Fire & Marine Insurance. Their profits dropped because they posted merger-related costs. The group with increased profits is Tokyo Marine Holdings. Non-life insurers in the respective groups generally saw their profits from the insurance business drop due to increased insurance benefit payments resulting from a rise in car insurance policies, but they turned to profitability, thanks again to, above all, their securities dealing results as securities sales profit and impairment loss figures had a contributing effect on the surplus. 例文帳に追加

この要因としては、前年同期に比べて減益となった2グループにおいては、経営統合が要因であり、1社はMS&ADインシュアランスグループホールディングスでございまして、これは昔でいう三井住友系の海上火災（保険）でございます。それからもう１社はNKSJホールディングスで、これは安田財閥、安田火災（保険）が、損保ジャパンになりまして、今、NKSJホールディングスになっていますけれども、これは経営統合のための費用の計上が要因でございます。また増益となったのは、東京海上ホールディングスでございますが、各グループ内の損保会社において、自動車保険の増加による保険金支払負担の増加がマイナス要因となり、概ね保険本業の利益、保険引受利益は減益となったところでございますが、ここも概ね有価証券関係の損益、（内訳は）売却損益や減損が、黒字に改善したこと等が挙げられます。 - 金融庁

Article 27-3 (1) The person who is required under the main clause of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article to make Purchase, etc. of Share Certificates, etc. by means of Tender Offer provided for by Article 27-2(1) (hereinafter referred to as the "Tender Offer" in this Section) shall, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Order, make a public notice of the purpose of the Tender Offer, the price for Purchase, etc., the Number of Share Certificates, etc. Planned to be Purchased (meaning the number of shares in the case of share certificates, or the number of shares calculated by converting Securities other than share certificates into shares pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance in the case of Securities other than share certificates; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section), the period of Purchase, etc. and other matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance with regard to the Tender Offer. In this case, when the period of Purchase, etc. is shorter than the period specified by a Cabinet Order, to the effect that the period of Purchase, etc. may be extended under Article 27-10(3) shall be clearly indicated in the public notice. 例文帳に追加

第二十七条の三　前条第一項本文の規定により同項に規定する公開買付け（以下この節において「公開買付け」という。）によつて株券等の買付け等を行わなければならない者は、政令で定めるところにより、当該公開買付けについて、その目的、買付け等の価格、買付予定の株券等の数（株券については株式の数を、その他のものについては内閣府令で定めるところにより株式に換算した数をいう。以下この節において同じ。）、買付け等の期間その他の内閣府令で定める事項を公告しなければならない。この場合において、当該買付け等の期間が政令で定める期間より短いときは、第二十七条の十第三項の規定により当該買付け等の期間が延長されることがある旨を当該公告において明示しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 50-2 Where the examiner intends to give a notice of reasons for refusal for a patent application under the preceding Article, and these reasons for refusal are the same as the reasons for refusal stated in the previous notice under the preceding Article (including its application mutatis mutandis under Article 159(2) (including its application mutatis mutandis under Article 174(1)) and Article 163(2)) with regard to another patent application (limited to the case where both patent applications are deemed to have been filed simultaneously by applying the provision of Article 44(2) to either or both of them) (excluding such a notice of reasons for refusal of which the applicant of the patent application could have never known the content prior to the filing of a request for examination of the patent application), the examiner shall also give a notice to that effect. 例文帳に追加

第五十条の二　審査官は、前条の規定により特許出願について拒絶の理由を通知しようとする場合において、当該拒絶の理由が、他の特許出願（当該特許出願と当該他の特許出願の少なくともいずれか一方に第四十四条第二項の規定が適用されたことにより当該特許出願と同時にされたこととなつているものに限る。）についての前条（第百五十九条第二項（第百七十四条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）及び第百六十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による通知（当該特許出願についての出願審査の請求前に当該特許出願の出願人がその内容を知り得る状態になかつたものを除く。）に係る拒絶の理由と同一であるときは、その旨を併せて通知しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The resolution for approval under the preceding paragraph shall be made by at least a two-thirds majority of the votes of Preferred Equity Members attending the general meeting, where those Preferred Equity Members who are in attendance hold the majority of the total number of units of issued Preferred Equity pertaining to Preferred Equity Members who are likely to incur damages as a result of the changes to the articles of incorporation as referred to in that paragraph (in cases where said resolution is to be made at each general meeting for Preferred Equity Members who hold Preferred Equity which is categorized into two or more classes, the total number of units of issued Preferred Equity pertaining to Preferred Equity Members who are the members of the relevant general meeting of each such class). In this case, it shall not be precluded for the articles of incorporation to provide to the effect that the assent of at least a certain number of Preferred Equity Members is required, nor shall it be precluded for them to provide any other conditions in addition to the relevant conditions for a resolution. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定による承認の決議は、同項の定款の変更が損害を及ぼすおそれのある優先出資社員に係る発行済優先出資の総口数（当該決議が二以上の種類別に区分された優先出資に係る優先出資社員を構成員とする各総会において行われる場合には、当該種類別の各総会の構成員たる優先出資社員に係る発行済優先出資の口数）の過半数に当たる優先出資を有する優先出資社員が出席し、かつ、その議決権の三分の二以上に当たる多数をもって行わなければならない。この場合においては、当該決議の要件に加えて、一定の数以上の優先出資社員の賛成を要する旨その他の要件を定款で定めることを妨げない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 23-5 (1) Article 8 shall apply mutatis mutandis to effectuation of a Shelf Registration Statement. In this case, the term "the statement submitted under Article 5(1) (or, if the matters referred to in the proviso to Article 5(1) are not stated in the statement, the amendment submitted under the preceding Article in relation to said matters; hereinafter the same shall apply in the following paragraph)" in Article 8(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Shelf Registration Statement as provided for in Article 23-3(1) (hereinafter referred to as a "Shelf Registration Statement" in this Article to Article 23)"; the terms "the amendment is submitted under the preceding Article" and "the statement set forth Article 5(1)" in Article 8(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Amended Shelf Registration Statement submitted under Article 23-4" and "the Shelf Registration Statement," respectively; and, the terms "the statement set forth in Article 5(1) and other documents set forth in Article 5(6) or the preceding Article" and "the person who submitted the statement and the other documents" in Article 8(3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Amended Shelf Registration Statement submitted under Article 23-4 before the day when the Shelf Registration Statement, documents attached thereto and the Shelf Registration as defined in Article 23-3(3) (hereinafter referred to as a "Shelf Registration" in this Article to Article 23) come into effect" and "the person who submitted these documents," respectively. 例文帳に追加

第二十三条の五　第八条の規定は、発行登録の効力の発生について準用する。この場合において、同条第一項中「第五条第一項の規定による届出書（同項ただし書に規定する事項の記載がない場合には、当該事項に係る前条の規定による訂正届出書。次項において同じ。）」とあるのは「第二十三条の三第一項に規定する発行登録書（以下第二十三条までにおいて「発行登録書」という。）」と、同条第二項中「前条の規定による訂正届出書」とあるのは「第二十三条の四の規定による訂正発行登録書」と、「第五条第一項の規定による届出書」とあるのは「発行登録書」と、同条第三項中「第五条第一項及び第六項若しくは前条の規定による届出書類」とあるのは「発行登録書及びその添付書類又は第二十三条の三第三項に規定する発行登録（以下第二十三条までにおいて「発行登録」という。）が効力を生ずることとなる日前において提出される第二十三条の四の規定による訂正発行登録書」と、「当該届出書類の届出者」とあるのは「これらの書類の提出者」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(7) The provision of Article 16-3(1) of the New Banking Act shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to holding of Shares, etc. (meaning Shares, etc. as defined by Article 2(7) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) of a domestic company (meaning domestic company as defined by Article 16-3(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by a Bank and/or its Subsidiary Companies of which the total number exceeds the Threshold on Holding of Shares, etc. (meaning the Threshold on Holding of Shares, etc. as defined by Article 16-3(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, the provision of Article 16-3 of the New Banking Act shall apply to such holding of Shares, etc. in the Domestic Company by deeming that the Bank and/or the Subsidiary Companies acquire, on that day, the Shares, etc. in the Domestic Company in excess of the Threshold on Holding of Shares, etc. by a cause provided by the main clause of Article 16-3(2) of the New Banking Act. 例文帳に追加

７　新銀行法第十六条の三第一項の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に国内の会社（同項に規定する国内の会社をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の株式等（新銀行法第二条第七項に規定する株式等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を合算してその基準株式数等（新銀行法第十六条の三第一項に規定する基準株式数等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えて所有している銀行又はその子会社による当該国内の会社の株式等の所有については、当該銀行が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、同日後は、当該国内の会社の株式等の所有については、当該銀行又はその子会社が同日において同条第二項本文に規定する事由により当該国内の会社の株式等を合算してその基準株式数等を超えて取得したものとみなして、同条の規定を適用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム