「examination」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(260ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

(2) The provisions of paragraphs (2) to (6) of Article 178 (time limit for institution of action, etc.), 179 to 180-2 (appropriate party as defendant, notification of institution of action, opinion of the Commissioner of the Patent Office in litigations annulling a trial decision), 181(1) and 181(5) (rescission of trial decision or ruling) and 182 (delivery of original copy of judgment) of the Patent Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the actions under the preceding paragraph. In this case, the term "the trial" in Article 178(2) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the examination or trial of the opposition to registration in the trial," the term "a trial for patent invalidation or a trial for invalidation of the registration of extension of the term" in Article 179 of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a trial under Article 46(1), 50(1), 51(1), 52-2(1), 53(1) or 53-2 of the Trademark Act." 例文帳に追加

２　特許法第百七十八条第二項から第六項まで（出訴期間等）、第百七十九条から第百八十条の二まで（被告適格、出訴の通知及び審決取消訴訟における特許庁長官の意見）、第百八十一条第一項及び第五項（審決又は決定の取消し）並びに第百八十二条（裁判の正本の送付）の規定は、前項の訴えに準用する。この場合において、同法第百七十八条第二項中「当該審判」とあるのは「当該登録異議の申立てについての審理、審判」と、同法第百七十九条中「特許無効審判若しくは延長登録無効審判」とあるのは「商標法第四十六条第一項、第五十条第一項、第五十一条第一項、第五十二条の二第一項、第五十三条第一項若しくは第五十三条の二の審判」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(13) With regard to the application of the provisions of Article 10 of the Pneumoconiosis Act, where a person carrying out a dispatching undertaking is a business operator and has conducted a pneumoconiosis examination for workers under dispatching, the term "The business operator" in the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "A person carrying out a dispatching undertaking prescribed in paragraph (3) of Article 44 of the Act for Securing Proper Operation of Worker Dispatching Undertakings and Improved Working Conditions for Dispatched Workers (hereinafter referred to as "the Worker Dispatching Act") (hereinafter such undertaking shall be referred to simply as a "dispatching undertaking")"; and the term "in paragraph (1) or (2) of Article 66 of the Industrial Safety and Health Act" shall be deemed to be replaced with "in paragraph (1) or (2) of Article 66 of the Industrial Safety and Health Act in the case of a person carrying out a dispatching undertaking and in paragraph (2) of Article 66 of the Industrial Safety and Health Act in the case of a person carrying out a client undertaking prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 44 of the Worker Dispatching Act". 例文帳に追加

１３　派遣元の事業を行う者が事業者に該当する場合であつてその者が派遣中の労働者に対してじん肺健康診断を行つたときにおけるじん肺法第十条の規定の適用については、同条中「事業者は、」とあるのは「労働者派遣事業の適正な運営の確保及び派遣労働者の就業条件の整備等に関する法律（以下「労働者派遣法」という。）第四十四条第三項に規定する派遣元の事業（以下単に「派遣元の事業」という。）を行う者が」と、「労働安全衛生法第六十六条第一項又は第二項の」とあるのは「派遣元の事業を行う者にあつては労働安全衛生法第六十六条第一項又は第二項の、労働者派遣法第四十四条第一項に規定する派遣先の事業を行う者にあつては労働安全衛生法第六十六条第二項の」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

According to Article 6.10, as a general rule, the authorities will determine a dumping margin for each known exporter or producer concerned of the product under investigation. In cases where the number of exporters, producers, importers or type of products involved is so large as to make such a determination impracticable, the authorities may limit their examination “…either to a reasonable number of interested parties or products by using samples which are statistically valid on the basis of information available to the authorities at the time of the selection, or to the largest percentage of the volume of the exports from the country in question which can reasonably be investigated…”. 例文帳に追加

ＡＤ協定６．１０条によると、調査当局は、原則として、個々の知られている、調査対象産品にかかる輸出者、または生産者のそれぞれについてダンピングマージンを個別に決定すべきとされている。他方、輸出者、生産者、輸入者、製品の種類の数がその決定を行うことが実現可能でないほど多い場合には、調査当局は、その検討の対象を合理的な数の利害関係者を有する者または産品に制限し、（その制限を行うにあたっては標本抽出の際に当局が利用することができる情報に基づいて統計上有効な標本を使用する。）、または関係国からの輸出のうち合理的に調査することができる範囲で最大の量に制限することができると規定されている。　 "合理的な数"及び"合理的に調査することができる範囲で最大の量の割合"について明確化し、基準を設けるべきこと。また、標本抽出を採用する際の状況についても明確化すべきことを問題として提起。 - 経済産業省

(2) Any person who unlawfully uses a trademark or an appellation of origin or a sign that is confusingly similar to it shall be bound: - to discontinue their use and to compensate the trademark owner or the owner of the right to use the appellation of origin for the amount of the prejudice caused; - to destroy the manufactured representation of the trademark or of the appellation of origin, to remove from a product, its packaging, headed forms or other documentation the unlawfully used trademark or appellation of origin, as well as a sign that is confusingly similar to them. Where this requirement cannot be met, the goods in question shall be destroyed under procedure provided for by the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The performance by Kazpatent of legal acts provided for in this Law including the receipt of applications for registration of a trademark, applications for registration and grant of the right to use the appellation of origin, carrying out examination, issue of certificates and any other acts giving rise to rights and obligations for participating parties, shall, under legislation in force, be subject to payment of fees to Kazpatent.例文帳に追加

(2) 何人も、本法の要件に違反して、保護を受ける商標若しくは原産地名称または誤認混同するほどそれに類似している標章を不正に使用する者は、カザフスタン共和国の法規に基づいて制裁を受けるものとする。 何人も、商標若しくは原産地名称または混乱を招くほどそれに類似する標章を不正に使用するものは、次に掲げる責任を負うものとする。 － 当該使用を中止し、侵害から生じた損失を商標権者または原産地名称使用権の所有者に賠償する － 製造した商標または原産地名称の複製を廃棄し、製品、包装、見出し様式または他の書類から不正に使用した商標または原産地名称を取り除くものとする。誤認混同するほどそれに類似している標章も同様とする。 この要求に応じない場合、本件の商品はカザフスタン共和国の法令で規定されている手続に基づいて廃棄されるものとする。 - 特許庁

(1) The description shall first state the title of the invention as appearing in the request and shall - (a) specify the technical field to which the invention relates; and (b) indicate the background art which, as far as known to the applicant, can be regarded as useful for the understanding, searching and examination of the invention, and, preferably, cite the documents reflecting such art; and (c) disclose the invention in such terms that it can be understood and state its advantageous effects, if any, with reference to the background art; and (d) briefly describe the figures in the drawings, if any; and (e) set forth at least one mode contemplated by the applicant for carrying out the invention and this shall be done in terms of examples, where appropriate, and with reference to the drawings, if any; and (f) indicate explicitly, when it is not obvious from the description or nature of the invention, the way in which the invention is industrially applicable and the way in which it can be made and used, or, if it can only be used, the way in which it can be used.例文帳に追加

(1) 明細書においては，願書に記載されている発明の名称を記載し，かつ (a) 発明が関係する技術分野を明記し， (b) 出願人の知る限りで発明の理解，調査及び審査に役立つと考えられる背景技術を表示し，また，望ましくは当該技術を示す書類を引用し， (c) 理解可能な用語により発明を開示し，また，存在する場合は発明の利点について背景技術に言及しつつ記載し， (d) 存在する場合は図面中の図について簡潔に説明し， (e) 発明を実施するために出願人が考えた少なくとも1の方法を記載し，その場合は，該当するときは実例に基づいて，また，存在する場合は図面に言及して記載するものとし，かつ (f) 明細書又は発明の内容からそれが自明でない場合は，発明を産業上利用できる方法，並びに発明を製造及び使用できる方法，又は使用のみ可能な場合は使用できる方法を明瞭に表示するものとする。 - 特許庁

(3) In determining the state of the art, any information relating to an invention is not taken into consideration, provided that a corresponding request is submitted, if such information is disclosed by a person who is entitled to the patent pursuant to § 12 of this Act or another person with the knowledge of the said person within twelve months before the filing date of the first patent application or registration application of a utility model containing the invention in the Republic of Estonia or abroad. The request shall be filed together with the patent application or not later than two months before the publication of the patent application pursuant to § 24. If another person acquired the information unlawfully or the information was published unlawfully or without the knowledge of the person who has the right to apply for the patent, the request may be filed in the course of the examination of the patent application orin case the patent is contested. Evidence supporting the request shall be appended to the request. 例文帳に追加

(3) 技術水準を決定する場合に，その旨の請求が提出されたときは，ある発明に関する情報を考慮に入れないものとする。ただし，前記の発明を含む最初の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願のエストニア共和国又は外国における出願日前12月以内に，第12条により特許についての権利を有する者によって，又は当該人が認識していることを前提として他人によって，当該情報が開示されていることを条件とする。前記の請求は，特許出願と同時に又は第24条による特許出願公開の少なくとも2月前に行わなければならない。他人が当該情報を不法に取得したか又は当該情報が不法に公表されたか若しくは特許出願権を有する者が公表を認識していなかったときは，請求は，特許出願の審査の過程で又は特許について係争が生じたときに行うことができる。請求書には，それを裏付ける証拠を添付しなければならない。 - 特許庁

(5) If the Patent Office finds that the subject of the invention cannot be protected by a patent pursuant to the provisions of §§ 6 and 7 of this Act or the subject matter of the invention as expressed in the patent claims does not comply, when compared to the state of the art, with the criteria of patentability established in § 8 of this Act or the applicant fails to separate an invention which violates the requirement of unity from the patent application by the due date set pursuant to subsection 9(3) of this Act or that the form or contents of the patent application documents do not comply with the requirements relating to form and contents established on the basis of subsection 19(4) of this Act or if the applicant fails to make the corrections or amendments or provide the explanations or submit the translations requested pursuant to subsection (2) or to submit the copies of decisions requested pursuant to subsection (3) of this section, the Patent Office shall terminate the examination of the patent application, make a decision to reject the patent application and shall notify the applicant thereof in writing. 例文帳に追加

(5) 特許庁は，発明の主題が第6条及び第7条の規定により特許による保護を受けることができず若しくは特許クレームに表示されている発明の内容が技術水準と比較したときに第8条に定めた特許性の基準を遵守しておらず若しくは出願人が第9条(3)により定めた日までに単一性の要件に違反する発明を特許出願から分離せず若しくは特許出願書類の様式及び内容が第19条(4)に基づいて定めた様式及び内容に関する要件を遵守していないと認定した場合又は出願人が訂正若しくは補正をせず若しくは説明を提示せず若しくは(2)により請求された翻訳文を提出せず若しくは(3)により請求された決定書謄本を提出しなかった場合は，特許出願の審査を終結させ，特許出願を拒絶する決定をし，出願人にその旨を書面で通知しなければならない。 - 特許庁

(5) The description shall first state the title of the invention as appearing in the request and shall -- (a) specify the technical field to which the invention relates; (b) indicate the background art which, as far as it is known to the applicant, can be regarded as useful for the understanding, searching and examination of the invention; (c) disclose the invention as claimed in such terms that the technical problem, even if not expressly stated as such, and its solution can be understood, and shall state the advantageous effects, if any, of the invention with reference to the background art; (d) briefly describe the figures in the drawings, if any; (e) set forth at least one mode for carrying out the invention claimed, with examples where appropriate, and with reference to the drawings, if any; and (f) indicate explicitly, when it is not otherwise obvious from the description or the nature of the invention, the way or ways in which the invention satisfies the condition in section 13(1)(c) of being capable of industrial application.例文帳に追加

(5) 特許出願書類に含む発明の説明は，その冒頭に発明の名称を記載し，次の各号に従うものとする。 (a) 当該発明が関係する技術分野を明記すること (b) 出願人の知る限りにおいて，当該発明の理解，調査及び審査に有用であるとみなすことができる背景技術を明記すること (c) 技術的課題について，そのように明示していない場合を含め，課題及びその解決方法を理解することができるような表現で，クレームする発明を開示すること，並びに，もしあれば，当該発明の有利な効果をその背景技術との関連で述べること (d) もしあれば，図面中の図について簡潔に説明すること (e) クレームする発明を実施するための態様について，適宜実施例を挙げ，かつ，もしあれば図面を引用して，少なくとも1以上記述すること，及び (f) 当該発明が産業上の利用可能性に関する第13条(1)(c)の条件を満たす方法が，当該発明の説明又は内容から明白でない場合は，明確に表示すること - 特許庁

Article 105-4 (1) In litigation concerning the infringement of a patent right or exclusive license, where there is prima-facie evidence of the fact that trade secrets (refers to trade secrets as provided in Article 2(6) of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act (Act No. 47 of 1993), the same shall apply hereinafter) possessed by a party satisfy all of the following paragraphs, the court may, upon a motion of the party, order by a ruling that the parties, etc., attorneys or assistants shall neither use the trade secrets for any purpose other than those for the proceedings of the litigation nor disclose the trade secrets to any person other than those who receive the order regarding the trade secrets under this provision; provided, however, that this shall not apply where the parties, etc., attorneys or assistants have, prior to the filing of the motion, already obtained or been in the possession of the trade secrets by a method other than by reading of the briefs under item (i) or through the examination or disclosure of evidence under the said item: 例文帳に追加

第百五条の四　裁判所は、特許権又は専用実施権の侵害に係る訴訟において、その当事者が保有する営業秘密（不正競争防止法（平成五年法律第四十七号）第二条第六項に規定する営業秘密をいう。以下同じ。）について、次に掲げる事由のいずれにも該当することにつき疎明があつた場合には、当事者の申立てにより、決定で、当事者等、訴訟代理人又は補佐人に対し、当該営業秘密を当該訴訟の追行の目的以外の目的で使用し、又は当該営業秘密に係るこの項の規定による命令を受けた者以外の者に開示してはならない旨を命ずることができる。ただし、その申立ての時までに当事者等、訴訟代理人又は補佐人が第一号に規定する準備書面の閲読又は同号に規定する証拠の取調べ若しくは開示以外の方法により当該営業秘密を取得し、又は保有していた場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 105-7 (1) When a party, etc., to litigation concerning the infringement of a patent right or exclusive license is to be examined as a party to the litigation, as its statutory representative or as a witness, with regard to matters that will be a basis for the determination of the existence or non-existence of the said infringement, and such matters are trade secrets possessed by a party, the court may, by a ruling, elect to hold closed examinations of such matters where the court, upon the unanimous consent of all judges, finds that the parties, etc. will be unable to make sufficient statements regarding the matters due to the obvious fact that making statements regarding the matters at an open examination will significantly interfere with the business activities of the party based on such trade secrets and that, without such statements, a proper decision on the fact of the existence or non-existence of the infringement of a patent right or exclusive license that ought to be made based on the said matters may not be made based solely on other evidence. 例文帳に追加

第百五条の七　特許権又は専用実施権の侵害に係る訴訟における当事者等が、その侵害の有無についての判断の基礎となる事項であつて当事者の保有する営業秘密に該当するものについて、当事者本人若しくは法定代理人又は証人として尋問を受ける場合においては、裁判所は、裁判官の全員一致により、その当事者等が公開の法廷で当該事項について陳述をすることにより当該営業秘密に基づく当事者の事業活動に著しい支障を生ずることが明らかであることから当該事項について十分な陳述をすることができず、かつ、当該陳述を欠くことにより他の証拠のみによつては当該事項を判断の基礎とすべき特許権又は専用実施権の侵害の有無についての適正な裁判をすることができないと認めるときは、決定で、当該事項の尋問を公開しないで行うことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 190 Articles 98(2), 99 to 103, 105, 106, 107(1) (excluding items (ii) and (iii)), 107(3) and 109 (Service) of the Code of Civil Procedure shall apply mutatis mutandis to the service of documents as provided in this Act or Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry under the preceding Article. In this case, the term "a court clerk" in Articles 98(2) and 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure shall be deemed to be replaced with "an official designated by the Commissioner of the Patent Office or a trial clerk", the term "mail or court enforcement officer" in Article 99(1) of the said Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "mail", the term "where ... the court clerk" in Article 107(1) of the said Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "where ... and where documents concerning the examination are to be served, an official designated by the Commissioner of the Patent Office or a trial clerk" and the term "Supreme Court Rules" in Article 107(1) of the said Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry". 例文帳に追加

第百九十条　民事訴訟法第九十八条第二項、第九十九条から第百三条まで、第百五条、第百六条、第百七条第一項（第二号及び第三号を除く。）及び第三項並びに第百九条（送達）の規定は、この法律又は前条の経済産業省令で定める書類の送達に準用する。この場合において、同法第九十八条第二項及び第百条中「裁判所書記官」とあるのは「特許庁長官の指定する職員又は審判書記官」と、同法第九十九条第一項中「郵便又は執行官」とあるのは「郵便」と、同法第百七条第一項中「場合には、裁判所書記官」とあるのは「場合及び審査に関する書類を送達すべき場合には、特許庁長官の指定する職員又は審判書記官」と、「最高裁判所規則」とあるのは「経済産業省令」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 13 (1) In a lawsuit for the infringement of business interests by unfair competition, where a party, etc. is to be examined as a party itself or a legal representative or as a witness with regard to a matter that serves as the basis for determining the presence or absence of the infringement and falls under a trade secret held by the party, and when the court, by the unanimous consent of the judges, finds that the party, etc. is unable to give sufficient statements regarding the matter because it is clear that giving statements regarding the matter in open court will significantly hinder the party's business activities that are based on the trade secret, and that, without said statements by the party, the court is unable to make an appropriate decision on the presence or absence of infringement on business interests by unfair competition which should be made based on the determination of said matter, it may conduct the examination on the matter in camera by means of a ruling. 例文帳に追加

第十三条　不正競争による営業上の利益の侵害に係る訴訟における当事者等が、その侵害の有無についての判断の基礎となる事項であって当事者の保有する営業秘密に該当するものについて、当事者本人若しくは法定代理人又は証人として尋問を受ける場合においては、裁判所は、裁判官の全員一致により、その当事者等が公開の法廷で当該事項について陳述をすることにより当該営業秘密に基づく当事者の事業活動に著しい支障を生ずることが明らかであることから当該事項について十分な陳述をすることができず、かつ、当該陳述を欠くことにより他の証拠のみによっては当該事項を判断の基礎とすべき不正競争による営業上の利益の侵害の有無についての適正な裁判をすることができないと認めるときは、決定で、当該事項の尋問を公開しないで行うことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 40 (1) In litigation pertaining to the infringement of a breeder's right or an exclusive exploitation right, where there is prima-facie evidence of the fact that trade secrets (refers to trade secrets as provided in Article 2 (6) of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act (Act No. 47 of 1993), the same shall apply hereinafter) possessed by a party satisfy all of the following conditions, the court may, upon the motion of the party, order by a ruling that the parties, etc., counsels or assistant in courts shall neither use the trade secrets for any purpose other than those for the proceedings of the litigation nor disclose the trade secrets to any person other than those who receive the order regarding the trade secrets under this provision. However, this shall not apply where the parties, etc., counsels or assistant in courts have, prior to the filing of the motion, already obtained or been in the possession of the trade secrets by a method other than by reading of the briefs under item (i) or through the examination or disclosure of evidence under the said item. 例文帳に追加

第四十条　裁判所は、育成者権又は専用利用権の侵害に係る訴訟において、その当事者が保有する営業秘密（不正競争防止法（平成五年法律第四十七号）第二条第六項に規定する営業秘密をいう。以下同じ。）について、次に掲げる事由のいずれにも該当することにつき疎明があった場合には、当事者の申立てにより、決定で、当事者等、訴訟代理人又は補佐人に対し、当該営業秘密を当該訴訟の追行の目的以外の目的で使用し、又は当該営業秘密に係るこの項の規定による命令を受けた者以外の者に開示してはならない旨を命ずることができる。ただし、その申立ての時までに当事者等、訴訟代理人又は補佐人が第一号に規定する準備書面の閲読又は同号に規定する証拠の取調べ若しくは開示以外の方法により当該営業秘密を取得し、又は保有していた場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 43 (1) When a party, etc., to litigation pertaining to the infringement of a patent right or exclusive exploitation right is to be examined as a party to the litigation, its statutory representative or a witness, with pertaining to matters that will be a basis for the determination of the existence or non-existence of the said infringement, and such matters are trade secrets possessed by a party, the court may, by a ruling, elect to hold closed examinations of such matters where the court, upon the unanimous consent of all judges, finds that the parties, etc. will be unable to make sufficient statements regarding the matters due to the obvious fact that making statements regarding the matters at an open examination will significantly interfere with the business activities of the party based on such trade secrets and that, without such statements, a proper decision on the fact of the existence or non-existence of the infringement of a patent right or exclusive exploitation right that ought to be made based on the said matters may not be made based solely on other evidence. 例文帳に追加

第四十三条　育成者権又は専用利用権の侵害に係る訴訟における当事者等が、その侵害の有無についての判断の基礎となる事項であって当事者の保有する営業秘密に該当するものについて、当事者本人若しくは法定代理人又は証人として尋問を受ける場合においては、裁判所は、裁判官の全員一致により、その当事者等が公開の法廷で当該事項について陳述をすることにより当該営業秘密に基づく当事者の事業活動に著しい支障を生ずることが明らかであることから当該事項について十分な陳述をすることができず、かつ、当該陳述を欠くことにより他の証拠のみによっては当該事項を判断の基礎とすべき育成者権又は専用利用権の侵害の有無についての適正な裁判をすることができないと認めるときは、決定で、当該事項の尋問を公開しないで行うことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Articles 6 to 9, 11 to 16, 17(3) and 17(4), 18 to 24 and 194 (procedures) of the Patent Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application for trademark registration, an application for defensive mark registration, any petitions or any other procedures pertaining to trademark registration or defensive mark registration. In this case, the portion "file a request for the examination of an application" in Article 6(1)(i) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "file an opposition to registration," the portion "an adverse party files a petition for a trial or retrial" in Article 7(4) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "an opposition to registration in relation to the trademark right or the right based on defensive mark registration is filed or a trial or retrial is filed by an adverse party," the portion "trial against an examiner's decision of refusal" in Article 9 of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "trial under Article 44(1) or 45(1) of the Trademark Act," the portion "trial against an examiner's decision of refusal" in Article 14 of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "trial under Article 44(1) or 45(1) of the Trademark Act," the portion "(ii) where the procedures do not comply with the formal requirements provided by this Act or an order thereunder" in Article 17(3) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "(ii) where the procedures do not comply with the formal requirements provided by this Act or an order thereunder; (ii)-2 where, pertaining to the procedures, the registration fee under Article 40(2) of the Trademark Act or the registration fee (including the registration surcharge due and payable pursuant to Article 43(1) or 43(2) of the Trademark Act) payable at the time of application for registration of renewal pursuant to Article 41-2(2) of the Trademark Act is not paid," the portion "not amendable" in Article 18-2(1) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "not amendable (except cases filing under any of the items in Article 5-2(1) of the Trademark Act (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 68(1) of the Trademark Act))," the term "trial" in Article 23(1) and 24 of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "examination and decision on an opposition to registration, trial" and the term "trial" in Article 194(1) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "opposition to registration, trial." 例文帳に追加

２　特許法第六条から第九条まで、第十一条から第十六条まで、第十七条第三項及び第四項、第十八条から第二十四条まで並びに第百九十四条（手続）の規定は、商標登録出願、防護標章登録出願、請求その他商標登録又は防護標章登録に関する手続に準用する。この場合において、同法第六条第一項第一号中「出願審査の請求」とあるのは「登録異議の申立て」と、同法第七条第四項中「相手方が請求した審判又は再審」とあるのは「その商標権若しくは防護標章登録に基づく権利に係る登録異議の申立て又は相手方が請求した審判若しくは再審」と、同法第九条中「拒絶査定不服審判」とあるのは「商標法第四十四条第一項若しくは第四十五条第一項の審判」と、同法第十四条中「拒絶査定不服審判」とあるのは「商標法第四十四条第一項又は第四十五条第一項の審判」と、同法第十七条第三項中「二　手続がこの法律又はこの法律に基づく命令で定める方式に違反しているとき。」とあるのは「二　手続がこの法律又はこの法律に基づく命令で定める方式に違反しているとき。二の二　手続について商標法第四十条第二項の規定による登録料又は同法第四十一条の二第二項の規定により更新登録の申請と同時に納付すべき登録料（商標法第四十三条第一項又は第二項の規定により納付すべき割増登録料を含む。）を納付しないとき。」と、同法第十八条の二第一項中「できないもの」とあるのは「できないもの（商標法第五条の二第一項各号（同法第六十八条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）に該当するものを除く。）」と、同法第二十三条第一項及び第二十四条中「審判」とあるのは「登録異議の申立てについての審理及び決定、審判」と、同法第百九十四条第一項中「審判」とあるのは「登録異議の申立て、審判」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(1) The description shall: (a) Specify the technical field to which the invention relates; (b) Indicate the background art which, as far as known to the applicant, can be regarded as useful for understanding the invention, for drawing up the search report and for the examination, and, preferably, cite the documents reflecting such art; (c) Disclose the invention, as claimed, in such terms that the technical problem (even if not expressly stated as such) and its solution can be understood, and state any advantageous effects of the invention with reference to the background art; (d) Briefly describe the figures in the drawings, if any; (e) When there are drawings, there shall be a brief description of the several views of the drawings and the detailed description of the invention shall refer to its different parts, as shown in the views, by use of reference letters or numerals (preferably the latter); (f) Describe in detail at least one way of carrying out the invention claimed using examples where appropriate and referring to the drawings, if any; and (g) Indicate explicitly, when it is not obvious from the description or nature of the invention, the way in which the invention is capable of exploitation in industry.例文帳に追加

(1)明細書は，次の通りとする。 (a)発明の関連する技術分野を明記する。 (b)発明の理解，調査報告の作成及び審査に有用であるとみられる背景技術を出願人が知る限り示し，かつ，当該技術を示す書類を引用するのが望ましい。 (c)技術的課題(それなりに明白に記載していなくても)及びその解決を理解することが可能な用語を用いて，主張する発明を開示し，かつ，背景技術の引用により発明の有利な効果を記載する。 (d)(もしあれば)図面中の図について簡単に説明する。 (e)図面がある場合は，図面の複数の図の簡単な説明を入れ，かつ，発明の詳細な説明では，図に示した発明のそれぞれの部分について，参照文字又は数字(後者が望ましい)を用いて言及する。 (f)適切な場合は例を用いて，もしあれば図面を参照して，主張する発明を実施する方法の少なくとも1を詳細に説明する。 (g)発明の説明又は内容から自明でない場合は，発明を産業で利用することができる方法を明白に示す。 - 特許庁

(2) When the applicant can credibly show that he has been prevented by exceptional circumstances from submitting in due time the declarations prescribed in subsection (1), the Patent Office shall grant said applicant a reasonable extension of the time limit. The time limit should not be prolonged beyond the date of issuance of the decision to grant a patent. If by this date the aforesaid preventative circumstances still exist, the Patent Office shall grant another extension. Six months before expiration of the time limit, the Patent Office shall notify the patentee that the patent will lapse if he does not submit the prescribed declarations within six months of service of the notification. Up to the time of the decision to grant a patent, the contents of an application may be amended on condition that the scope of the subject matter of the application is not extended; however, until a request for examination is filed (Section 44), only the correction of obvious mistakes, the removal of defects pointed out by the Examining Section or amendments to claims shall be admissible. No rights may be derived from amendments which extend the scope of the subject matter of the application. 例文帳に追加

(2) 出願人が，(1)に規定された宣言を適時に提出することを異常な事情によって妨げられた旨を，納得させるように証明することができるときは，特許庁は，出願人に対して適正な期間延長を許可しなければならない。この期間延長は，特許付与の決定の発出日を超えてはならない。この日まで阻害事由が継続しているときは，特許庁は，追加の延長を許可する。その期限の到来より 6月前に，特許庁は，特許所有者に対し，特許所有者がその通知の送達から 6月以内に所定の宣言を提出しないときは，特許は消滅する旨を通告する。 特許を付与すべき旨の決定が行われるときまでは，出願の内容は，出願の対象の範囲を拡大しないことを条件として，補正することができる。ただし，審査請求(第 44条)が提出されるまでは，明白な誤りの訂正，審査課によって指摘された不備の除去又はクレームの補正のみが容認される。出願の対象の範囲を拡大する補正からは，如何なる権利も導き出すことができない。 - 特許庁

(3) In addition to the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs, regarding the application of the provisions of Article 5 of the New Act to a person who, prior to the effective date of this Act, served in a position as set forth in item (ii), paragraph (1) of Article 6 of the Old Act, the period of time he/she serves in such a position and the period of time between the effective date of this Act and March 31, 2008 during which he/she serves in a corresponding position (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as the "Transitional Tenure Period") may be added to the following: the period of time he/she serves in a position stipulated in item (i) of said Article after acquiring the qualification to become a legal apprentice; the period of time he/she works at a job stipulated in item (ii) of said Article after acquiring the qualification to become a legal apprentice; and the period of time he/she serves in a position stipulated in item (iii) of Article 5 of the New Act after passing the examination set forth in paragraph (3) of Article 18 of the Public Prosecutor's Office Act (includes the period of time that may be added pursuant to item (iv) of said Article; hereinafter, referred to in this paragraph as the "Tenure, etc. Period"). In such case, the relevant transitional Tenure Period shall be deemed to be included in the Tenure, etc. Period and the provisions of the New Act shall be applied. 例文帳に追加

３　前二項に規定するもののほか、この法律の施行の日前に旧法第六条第一項第二号に規定する職に在った者についての新法第五条の規定の適用については、当該職に在った期間及びこの法律の施行の日から平成二十年三月三十一日までの間におけるこれに相当する職に在った期間（以下この項において「経過在職期間」という。）は、司法修習生となる資格を得た後に同条第一号に規定する職に在った期間、司法修習生となる資格を得た後に同条第二号に規定する職務に従事した期間又は検察庁法第十八条第三項に規定する考試を経た後に新法第五条第三号に規定する職に在った期間（同条第四号において通算する場合におけるこれらの期間を含む。以下この項において「在職等期間」という。）に通算することができる。この場合において、当該経過在職期間は、その通算に係る在職等期間とみなして新法の規定を適用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(12) A person designated by the International Atomic Energy Agency or a person designated by the government of the State supplying international controlled material may, under the attendance of an official designated by the Minister of MEXT (including an official of the Ministry of METI or Ministry of MLIT who conducts safeguards inspections pursuant to the provision of Article 74 -2 (1) or on-site inspections pursuant to the provision of paragraph (2) of said Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in the following paragraph, paragraph (17) and paragraph (18)) or a safeguards inspector who conducts safeguards inspections pursuant to the provision of Article 61-23-7 (2), and within the scope provided in international agreements, enter the office, factory or place of activity of any international controlled material user, any person provided in each of the items in Article 61-3 (1) in the case that any of said items are applicable or any person provided in paragraph (5), (6), (8) or (9) of said Article, inspect books, documents and any other necessary property, and question the people concerned or request the submission of nuclear source material, nuclear fuel material or any other necessary samples, limited to the minimum amount necessary for examination. 例文帳に追加

１２　国際原子力機関の指定する者又は国際規制物資の供給当事国政府の指定する者は、文部科学大臣の指定するその職員（第七十四条の二第一項の規定により保障措置検査を行い、又は同条第二項の規定により立入検査を行う経済産業省又は国土交通省の職員を含む。次項、第十七項及び第十八項において同じ。）又は第六十一条の二十三の七第二項の規定により保障措置検査を行う保障措置検査員の立会いの下に、国際約束で定める範囲内において、国際規制物資使用者、第六十一条の三第一項各号のいずれかに該当する場合における当該各号に規定する者又は同条第五項、第六項、第八項若しくは第九項に規定する者の事務所又は工場若しくは事業所に立ち入り、帳簿、書類その他必要な物件を検査し、関係者に質問し、又は試験のため必要な最小限度の量に限り、核原料物質、核燃料物質その他の必要な試料を収去することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 114-6 (1) In a lawsuit pertaining to an infringement on the moral rights of author, copyright, right of publication, moral rights of performer or neighboring right, the court may, upon petition of a party, issue an order, in the form of a decision, to any other party, etc., trial counsel or assistant in court to a party or legal counsel, that trade secrets (means "trade secrets" as provided for in Article 2, paragraph (6) of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act (Act No. 47 of 1993); the same shall apply hereinafter) in the possession of the [petitioning] party shall not be used for purposes other than those in furtherance of said lawsuit and shall not be disclosed to persons other than those against whom an order pertaining to such trade secrets has been issued pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph, where a prima facie showing has been made that each of the reasons listed below applies; provided, however, that the foregoing shall not apply where, at the time of such petition, the party, etc. [against which the petitioned order is sought to be issued], trial counsel [against which the petitioned order is sought to be issued] or assistant in court [against which the petitioned order is sought to be issued] had already acquired or possessed such trade secrets by means other than through inspection of the briefs as provided for in item (i) or the examination of evidence or the disclosure provided for in that item. 例文帳に追加

第百十四条の六　裁判所は、著作者人格権、著作権、出版権、実演家人格権又は著作隣接権の侵害に係る訴訟において、その当事者が保有する営業秘密（不正競争防止法（平成五年法律第四十七号）第二条第六項に規定する営業秘密をいう。以下同じ。）について、次に掲げる事由のいずれにも該当することにつき疎明があつた場合には、当事者の申立てにより、決定で、当事者等、訴訟代理人又は補佐人に対し、当該営業秘密を当該訴訟の追行の目的以外の目的で使用し、又は当該営業秘密に係るこの項の規定による命令を受けた者以外の者に開示してはならない旨を命ずることができる。ただし、その申立ての時までに当事者等、訴訟代理人又は補佐人が第一号に規定する準備書面の閲読又は同号に規定する証拠の取調べ若しくは開示以外の方法により当該営業秘密を取得し、又は保有していた場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 42 paragraph (2) to (4) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the application of the preceding paragraph. In this case, where it says "one copy" within paragraph (2) of the Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "one copy (except for the applicant for exemption from all theory examination subjects)", "one copy of photograph and a photocopy of the document pursuant to Article 47" shall be deemed to be replaced with "a photocopy of the document pursuant to Article 47", "an applicant for competence certification" in paragraph (4) of the Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "an applicant for change of rating on competence certification (only applicable to an applicant for change of rating on competence certification where the required flight experience or other experiences are different from the flight experience or other experiences required for the grant of his/her existing competence certification)", and "the abstract of his/her family register or a certificate of entry in the family register or a copy of the resident register which states his/her permanent domicile (or in the case of a foreigner, a certificate from a consul of his/her country which certifies his/her nationality, full name, date of birth and sex (in the case of a person who is unable to submit a certificate from a consul from his/her country, a document which certifies those matters issued by a competent authority), also applicable hereafter) and a document which proves that the applicant possesses the flight and other aeronautical experience listed in Appended Table 2" shall be deemed to be replaced with "flight and other aeronautical experience listed in Appended Table 2". 例文帳に追加

２　第四十二条第二項から第四項までの規定は、前項の申請について準用する。この場合において、同条第二項中「一葉」とあるのは「一葉（学科試験全科目免除申請者を除く。）」と、同条第三項中「写真一葉及び第四十七条の文書の写し」とあるのは「第四十七条の文書の写し」と、同条第四項中「技能証明を申請する者」とあるのは「技能証明の限定の変更を申請する者（現に有する技能証明を受けるのに必要な飛行経歴その他の経歴と同一でない飛行経歴その他の経歴が必要とされている技能証明の限定の変更を申請する者に限る。）」と、「戸籍抄本若しくは戸籍記載事項証明書又は本籍の記載のある住民票の写し（外国人にあつては、国籍、氏名、出生の年月日及び性別を証する本国領事官の証明書（本国領事官の証明書を提出できない者にあつては、権限ある機関が発行するこれらの事項を証明する書類）。以下同じ。）及び別表第二に掲げる飛行経歴その他の経歴」とあるのは「別表第二に掲げる飛行経歴その他の経歴」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(7) A person deemed to be a business operator employing workers under dispatching under the provisions of paragraph (1) shall, when he/she has conducted a pneumoconiosis examination for the workers under dispatching or when he/she has received documents certifying the results of pneumoconiosis examinations and other documents submitted by the workers under dispatching under the provisions of the proviso to Article 11 of the Pneumoconiosis Act as applied under the provisions of paragraph (1), prepare documents stating the results of the pneumoconiosis examinations concerned based on the records prepared under the provisions of paragraph (1) of Article 17 of the same Act as applied under the provisions of paragraph (1) pertaining to the workers under dispatching concerned, pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, and shall, when he/she has received notification under the provisions of paragraph (1) of Article 14 of the same Act (including cases where these provisions are applied mutatis mutandis under paragraph (3) of Article 15, paragraph (2) of Article 16 and paragraph (2) of Article 16-2 of the same Act) as applied under the provisions of paragraph (1), prepare documents stating the contents of the notification concerned, pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, and, without delay, send those documents to the person carrying out the dispatching undertaking concerned. 例文帳に追加

７　第一項の規定により派遣中の労働者を使用する事業者とみなされた者は、当該派遣中の労働者に対してじん肺健康診断を行つたとき又は同項の規定により適用されるじん肺法第十一条ただし書の規定により当該派遣中の労働者からじん肺健康診断の結果を証明する書面その他の書面の提出を受けたときにあつては、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより、当該派遣中の労働者に係る同項の規定により適用される同法第十七条第一項の規定により作成した記録に基づいて当該じん肺健康診断の結果を記載した書面を作成し、第一項の規定により適用される同法第十四条第一項（同法第十五条第三項、第十六条第二項及び第十六条の二第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による通知を受けたときにあつては、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより、当該通知の内容を記載した書面を作成し、遅滞なく、当該派遣元の事業を行う者に送付しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(9) The provisions of paragraph 4 through those of the preceding paragraph shall apply mutatis mutandis to: the right to receive the registration of a utility model pertaining to research results regarding technology of a Specified Research and Development Institute assigned by the State to a Certified Business Operator; utility model rights obtained based on the right to receive the registration of a utility model pertaining to research results regarding technology of a Specified Research and Development Institutes assigned by the State to a Certified Business Operator; and utility model rights pertaining to the research results regarding technology of a Specified Research and Development Institute assigned to a Certified Business Operator by the State rights, to the extent that those rights belong to said Certified Business Operator. In this case, "paragraph 2 of Article 107 of the Patent Act (Act No. 121 of 1959)" in paragraph 4 shall read "paragraph 2 of Article 31 of the Utility Model Act (Act No. 123 of 1959)" ; "paragraph 4 of Article 195 of the Patent Act" in paragraph 5 shall read "paragraph 3 of Article 54 of the Utility Model Act" ; "paragraph 1 or paragraph 2 of Article 195 of the Patent Act" in paragraph 6 shall read "paragraph 1 or paragraph 2 of Article 54 of the Utility Model Act" ; "fee to request an application examination" shall read "fee to request a utility model technology evaluation" ; and "paragraph 5 of the same Article" shall read "paragraph 4 of the same Article." 例文帳に追加

９　第四項から前項までの規定は、認定事業者が国から譲渡を受けた特定試験研究機関における技術に関する研究成果に係る実用新案登録を受ける権利、認定事業者が国から譲渡を受けた特定試験研究機関における技術に関する研究成果に係る実用新案登録を受ける権利に基づいて取得した実用新案権及び認定事業者が国から譲渡を受けた特定試験研究機関における技術に関する研究成果に係る実用新案権であって当該認定事業者に属するものに準用する。この場合において、第四項中「特許法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十一号）第百七条第二項」とあるのは「実用新案法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十三号）第三十一条第二項」と、第五項中「特許法第百九十五条第四項」とあるのは「実用新案法第五十四条第三項」と、第六項中「特許法第百九十五条第一項又は第二項」とあるのは「実用新案法第五十四条第一項又は第二項」と、「出願審査の請求の手数料」とあるのは「実用新案技術評価の請求の手数料」と、「同条第五項」とあるのは「同条第四項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 216 The provisions of Article 1-3 to 5 inclusive (Registry Office, Delegation of Duties, Suspension of Duties, Registrar, Disqualification of Registrar), Article 7 to 15 inclusive (Prohibition of Taking out Registry, Loss and Restoration of Registry, Prevention of Loss of Registry, Delivery of Certificate of Registered Matters, etc., Delivery of Document Containing Description of Registered Matters, Inspection of Annexed Documents, Seal Registration Certificate, Certification of Necessary Matters for Checking Measures to Indicate Preparer of Electromagnetic Record, Fees, Principle of Application by Party concerned, Registration by Commission), Article 17, paragraphs (1), (2) and (4) (Method of Application for Registration), Article 18 to 19-2 inclusive (Documents to be Attached to Written Application, Electromagnetic Record to be Attached to Written Application), Article 20, paragraphs (1) and (2) (Submission of Seal), Article 21 to 23-2 inclusive (Reception, Receipt, Order of Registration, Identification by Registrar), Article 24 (excluding items (xi) and (xii)) (Dismissal of Application), Article 25 to 27 inclusive (Registration after Expiration of Period for Filing Complaint, Modification of Administrative Boundaries, etc., Prohibition of Registration of Same Trade Name at Same Location), Article 33 (Deletion of Registration of Trade Name), Articles 44 and 45 (Registration of Company Managers), Articles 51 and 52 (Registration of Relocation of Head Office), Article 128 (Applicant), Article 129 (Registration of Foreign Company), Article 130, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Registration of Change), and Article 132 to 148 inclusive (Correction, Application for Deletion, Deletion without any Party's Request, Exclusion from Application of Administrative Procedure Act, Exclusion from Application of Act on Access to Information Held by Administrative Organs, Application for Examination, Treatment of Cases of Application for Examination, Exclusion from Application from Administrative Appeal Act, Delegation to Ordinance of the Ministry) of the Commercial Registration Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a registration regarding a Foreign Mutual Company. In this case, the term "or the matters to be described in a written application pursuant to the provision of the preceding paragraph" in Article 17, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "preceding two paragraphs" in Article 17, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "that paragraph"; the term "head office" in Article 51, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "office in Japan"; the term "a foreign company under Article 933, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act" in Article 129, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the establishment of an office of a Foreign Mutual Company"; the term "the company has designated its representative person in Japan or established a business office in Japan" in Article 129, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the company has established an office in Japan"; and the terms "for registration under the preceding two paragraphs," "registration has been made under the preceding two paragraphs" and "documents set forth in the preceding two paragraphs" in Article 130, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "for registration under the preceding paragraph," "registration has been made under that paragraph" and "document set forth in that paragraph," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第二百十六条　商業登記法第一条の三から第五条まで（登記所、事務の委任、事務の停止、登記官、登記官の除斥）、第七条から第十五条まで（登記簿等の持出禁止、登記簿の滅失と回復、登記簿等の滅失防止、登記事項証明書の交付等、登記事項の概要を記載した書面の交付、附属書類の閲覧、印鑑証明、電磁的記録の作成者を示す措置の確認に必要な事項等の証明、手数料、当事者申請主義、嘱託による登記）、第十七条第一項、第二項及び第四項（登記申請の方式）、第十八条から第十九条の二まで（申請書の添付書面、申請書に添付すべき電磁的記録）、第二十条第一項及び第二項（印鑑の提出）、第二十一条から第二十三条の二まで（受付、受領証、登記の順序、登記官による本人確認）、第二十四条（第十一号及び第十二号を除く。）（申請の却下）、第二十五条から第二十七条まで（提訴期間経過後の登記、行政区画等の変更、同一の所在場所における同一の商号の登記の禁止）、第三十三条（商号の登記の抹消）、第四十四条、第四十五条（会社の支配人の登記）、第五十一条、第五十二条（本店移転の登記）、第百二十八条（申請人）、第百二十九条（外国会社の登記）、第百三十条第一項及び第三項（変更の登記）並びに第百三十二条から第百四十八条まで（更正、抹消の申請、職権抹消、行政手続法の適用除外、行政機関の保有する情報の公開に関する法律の適用除外、行政機関の保有する個人情報の保護に関する法律の適用除外、審査請求、審査請求事件の処理、行政不服審査法の適用除外、省令への委任）の規定は、外国相互会社に関する登記について準用する。この場合において、同法第十七条第四項中「事項又は前項の規定により申請書に記載すべき事項」とあるのは「事項」と、「前二項」とあるのは「同項」と、同法第五十一条第一項中「本店」とあるのは「日本国内の事務所」と、同法第百二十九条第一項中「会社法第九百三十三条第一項の規定による外国会社」とあるのは「外国相互会社の事務所の設置」と、同条第三項中「日本における代表者を定めた旨又は日本に営業所」とあるのは「日本国内に事務所」と、同法第百三十条第三項中「前二項の登記の」とあるのは「第一項の登記の」と、「既に前二項」とあるのは「既に同項」と、「、前二項」とあるのは「、同項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(a) The application shall be published in the IPO Gazette together with a search document established by or on behalf of the Office citing any document or documents that reflect prior art, after the expiration of eighteen months(18) from the filing date or priority date. However, the applicant may request for the early publication of his application provided that the: 1. applicant submits a written waiver of the a) abovementioned 18-month period, and b) establishment of a search report; 2. publication shall not be earlier than six (6) months from filing date; and 3. required fee for early publication is paid in full. (b) The application will not be published if it has been finally refused or withdrawn or deemed to be withdrawn before the termination of the technical preparation for publication. (c) The application to be published shall contain the bibliographic data, any drawing as filed and the abstract. (d) The Office shall communicate to the applicant the date and other information regarding the publication of the application and draw his attention to the period within which the request for substantive examination must be filed. (e) After publication of a patent application, any interested party may inspect the application documents filed with the Office. (f) The Director General, subject to the approval of the Secretary of Trade and Industry, may prohibit or restrict the publication of an application, if in his opinion, to do so would be prejudicial to the national security and interests of the Republic of the Philippines. (Sec. 44, IP CODE)例文帳に追加

(a)出願は，出願日又は優先日から18月が経過した後に，庁により又は庁のために作成された調査書類であって，先行技術の記載がある文献を引用したものと共に，IPO公報において公開する。 ただし，次の条件で，出願人はその出願を早期公開するよう申請することができる。 (1)出願人が書面により次に掲げるものを放棄すること (a)上記の18月の期間，及び (b)調査報告の作成。 (2)出願日から6月より早期の公開でないこと，及び (3)早期公開の手数料が全額納付されていること。 (b)出願は，公開のための技術的な準備が終了する前に最終的に拒絶されたか又は取り下げられたか若しくは取り下げられたものとみなされる場合は，公開されない。 (c)公開される出願には，書誌事項，提出された図面，及び要約が含まれる。 (d)庁は，出願の公開に関して日付その他の情報を出願人に通知すると共に，実体審査請求を行わなければならない期間について注意を喚起する。 (e)特許出願の公開の後，利害関係人は，庁に提出された出願書類を閲覧することができる。 (f)長官は，出願を公開することがフィリピン共和国の国家の安全及び利益を害することになると認める場合は，通商産業大臣の承認を得ることを条件として，出願の公開を禁止し又は制限することができる。(IP法第44条) - 特許庁

They must satisfy the following conditions: they must be Belgian and must be resident in Belgium; they must be at least 25 years old; they must not be prohibited or placed under guardianship; they must neither be in a state of prohibition within the meaning of Articles 31 to 34 of the Penal Code nor have been convicted in Belgium or abroad of any of the offenses specified in Royal Decree No. 22 of October 24, 1934, prohibiting certain convicted persons and bankrupts from exercising certain offices, professions or activities and giving the commercial courts authority to pronounce on such prohibitions, as amended by the Laws of March 14, 1962, March 16, 1972, and August 4, 1978; they must hold a Belgian diploma of university education or a Belgian diploma of higher education of the long type issued after at least four years of study in a scientific, technical or legal discipline; Diplomas issued abroad after at least four years of study, in the same disciplines, shall be authorized subject to their equivalence having been recognized beforehand by the relevant Belgian authorities; they must have exercised an activity in the field of patents for a period of time and subject to conditions laid down by the King; they must have passed an examination before the Commission referred to in Article 61 on the subject of industrial property, principally as regards patents, within two years at the latest of terminating the activities referred to in of this paragraph. 例文帳に追加

これらの者は次に掲げる条件を満たしていなければならない。ベルギー人であり，ベルギーの居住者でなければならない。少なくとも年齢25歳以上でなければならない。禁止され又は保護の下にある者であってはならない。刑法第31条から第34条までの意味における禁止状態にあってはならず，また，有罪判決を受けた者及び破産者のうちの一定の者に対し，一定の職務，職業又は活動に従事することを禁じており，また，商業裁判所に当該禁止を宣告する権限を付与している1962年3月14日法律，1972年3月16日法律及び1978年8月4日法律で改正された1934年10月24日勅令第22号に規定されている犯罪について，ベルギー又は外国で有罪の判決を受けた者であってはならない。ベルギーの大学卒業証書又は少なくとも4年間，科学，技術若しくは法律を研究した後に交付されるベルギーの長期型高等教育の卒業証書を保有していなければならない。上記と同一の学科を最低4年間研究した後に外国で発行された卒業証書は，予めベルギーの関連機関によってその同等性が承認されていることを条件として，許可されるものとする。国王の定める期間及び条件の下で，特許の分野の活動に従事していなければならない。(6)にいう活動の終了後遅くとも2年以内に，工業所有権の科目，主として特許に関して，第61条に述べる委員会の試験を合格していなければならない。 - 特許庁

Article 256 The provisions of Articles 58 and 59, paragraph (1) of Article 200, and Articles 201 to 203 inclusive, and the provisions of Articles 64 and 65 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the coast guard detainees and the measures toward the coast guard detainees by the coast guard detention services managers respectively. In this case, the terms "a Ministry of Justice Ordinance" in Articles 59 and 64, and "a Cabinet Office Ordinance" in paragraphs (1) and (3) of Article 202 and Article 203 shall be both read as "an Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism" ; The terms "penal institution" in Article 59 and "detention facility" in paragraph (1) of Article 200 and paragraph (1) of Article 202 shall be both read as "coast guard detention facility" ; the phrases "inside the penal institution" and "medical examination pursuant to the provision of Article 61 or the medical treatment pursuant to the provision of Article 62" in Article 64 shall be read as "inside the coast guard detention facility" and "medical treatment pursuant to the provision of Article 201 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 256" respectively; the phrase "outside the penal institution" in paragraph (2) of Article 65 shall be read as "outside the coast guard detention facility" ; the term "detention services manager" in paragraph (1) of Article 200 and Articles 201 to 203 inclusive shall be read as "coast guard detention services manager" ; and the term "detention officers" in paragraph (1) of Article 200 and the term "a staff member who engages in the affairs of the detention " in paragraph (2) under Article 202 shall be read as "coast guard detention officer" respectively. 例文帳に追加

第二百五十六条　第五十八条、第五十九条、第二百条第一項及び第二百一条から第二百三条までの規定は海上保安被留置者について、第六十四条及び第六十五条の規定は海上保安留置業務管理者による海上保安被留置者に対する措置について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第五十九条及び第六十四条中「法務省令」とあり、並びに第二百二条第一項及び第三項並びに第二百三条中「内閣府令」とあるのは「国土交通省令」と、第五十九条中「刑事施設」とあり、並びに第二百条第一項及び第二百二条第一項中「留置施設」とあるのは「海上保安留置施設」と、第六十四条中「刑事施設内」とあるのは「海上保安留置施設内」と、「第六十一条の規定による健康診断又は第六十二条」とあるのは「第二百五十六条において準用する第二百一条」と、第六十五条第二項中「刑事施設の外」とあるのは「海上保安留置施設の外」と、第二百条第一項及び第二百一条から第二百三条までの規定中「留置業務管理者」とあるのは「海上保安留置業務管理者」と、第二百条第一項中「留置担当官」とあり、及び第二百二条第二項中「留置業務に従事する職員」とあるのは「海上保安留置担当官」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 68 (1) The Minister of MEXT, Minister of METI, Minister of MLIT or prefectural public safety commission may, within the limit necessary for enforcing this Act (for the Minister of MEXT, Minister of METI and Minister of MLIT, the provisions of this Act in accordance with the classifications for licensee of nuclear energy activity, etc. listed in each of the items in Article 64 (3) (Minister of MEXT for nuclear source material users, international controlled material users, persons provided in each of the items in Article 61-3 (1) in the case that any of said items are applicable, persons provided in paragraphs (5), (6), (8) and (9) of said Article and international specified activities implementers, notwithstanding said classifications in each of the items in Article 64 (3)); for a prefectural public safety commission, the provision of Article 59 (6)), allow an official (police official in the case of a prefectural public safety commission) to enter the office, factory or place of activity of any licensee of nuclear energy activity, etc. (including nuclear source material users, international controlled material users, persons provided in each of the items in Article 61-3 (1) in the case that any of said items are applicable, persons provided in paragraphs (5), (6), (8) and (9) of said Article and international specified activities implementers), inspect books, documents and any other necessary property, and question the people concerned or request the submission of nuclear source material, nuclear fuel material or any other necessary samples, limited to the minimum amount necessary for examination. 例文帳に追加

第六十八条　文部科学大臣、経済産業大臣、国土交通大臣又は都道府県公安委員会は、この法律（文部科学大臣、経済産業大臣又は国土交通大臣にあつては第六十四条第三項各号に掲げる原子力事業者等の区分（核原料物質使用者、国際規制物資使用者、第六十一条の三第一項各号のいずれかに該当する場合における当該各号に規定する者、同条第五項、第六項、第八項及び第九項に規定する者並びに国際特定活動実施者については、第六十四条第三項各号の当該区分にかかわらず、文部科学大臣とする。）に応じこの法律の規定、都道府県公安委員会にあつては第五十九条第六項の規定）の施行に必要な限度において、その職員（都道府県公安委員会にあつては、警察職員）に、原子力事業者等（核原料物質使用者、国際規制物資使用者、第六十一条の三第一項各号のいずれかに該当する場合における当該各号に規定する者、同条第五項、第六項、第八項及び第九項に規定する者並びに国際特定活動実施者を含む。）の事務所又は工場若しくは事業所に立ち入り、帳簿、書類その他必要な物件を検査させ、関係者に質問させ、又は試験のため必要な最小限度の量に限り、核原料物質、核燃料物質その他の必要な試料を収去させることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

In the course of examination the Patent Office shall: refuse to recognize the subject matter of the application as an invention, in particular where the Office reveals that it does not concern any tangible creation susceptible of application, determined by means of technical features relating to its structure or composition, nor any particular technical way in which it affects a material, nor new use of a substance comprised in the state of the art; (ii)refuse to recognize the subject matter of the application as a new invention, where it may prove that all the technical features of the technical solution or of a variation of the technical solution contained in the application, taken together, are comprised in the state of the art and are not characterized by the production of unexpected effects; recognize the claimed invention that meets the criterion of novelty as a technical solution not involving an inventive step, where the Office may cite those documents from the state of the art, on the basis of which it may reasonably claim that the invention's capability of being carried out or applied is clearly implied by that state of the art, when taking into account average skills of a person skilled in the art; refuse to recognize the subject matter of the application as a technical solution susceptible of industrial application, in particular when it finds that it is infeasible for that solution to be used for manufacturing of the product or for the claimed process to be used in a technical sense.例文帳に追加

特許庁は，審査の過程において次のことを行う。 特に出願の主題が，構造又は構成に関する技術的特徴から判断して，出願可能な実体的な創造物に関係しておらず，また物質に作用する特定の技術的方法にも，技術水準に含まれる物質の新たな用途にも関係していないことを庁が明らかにした場合は，発明としての出願の主題の認容を拒絶する。出願に含まれる，技術的解決方法又はその変種の技術的特徴のすべてが，全体として技術水準に含まれており，かつ，予期できない効果の出現によって特徴付けられていないことを特許庁が証明することができる場合は，出願の主題を新たな発明として認容することを拒絶する。特許庁が技術水準から書類を引用することができ，その書類を基礎として特許庁が，当該技術の熟練者の平均的熟練度を考慮に入れたときに，発明が実施され又は利用される可能性が当該技術水準に明瞭に示されていることを合理的に主張することができる場合は，新規性の基準に適合するクレームされた発明を，進歩性を含まない技術的解決方法として認容する。 特に，製品の製造のために当該解決方法が実施されること又はクレームされた方法が技術的な意味で実施されることが不可能であることを特許庁が認めたときは，出願の主題を産業上の利用可能性のある技術的解決方法として認容することを拒絶する。 - 特許庁

Article 67 The provisions of Part VII, Chapter IV, Section 1 (excluding Article 907) (General provisions) of the Companies Act, and the provisions of Article 1-3 to 5 inclusive (Registry Office, Delegation of Duties, Suspension of Duties, Registrar, Disqualification of Registrar), Article 7 to 15 inclusive (Prohibition of Taking out Registry, etc., Loss and Restoration of Registry, Prevention of Loss of Registry, etc., Delivery, etc. of Certificate of Registered Matters,, Delivery of Document Containing Description of Registered Matters, Inspection of Annexed Documents, Seal Registration Certificate, Certification of Necessary Matters, etc. for Checking Measures to Indicate Preparer of Electromagnetic Record, Fees, Principle of Application by Party Concerned, Registration by Commission), Article 17 to 27 inclusive (Method of Application for Registration, Documents to Be Attached to Written Application, Electromagnetic Record to be Attached to Written Application, Submission of Seal, Reception, Receipt, Order of Registration, Identification by Registrar, Dismissal of Application, Registration After Expiration of Period for Filing Complaint, Modification of Administrative Boundaries, etc., Prohibition of Registration of Same Trade Name at Same Location), Article 31 (Registration of Discharge in Assigning Operation or business), Article 33 (Deletion of Registration of Trade Name), Article 44 to 46 inclusive (Registration of Company Managers, General Rules for Attached Documents), Article 47, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Registration of Incorporation), Article 48 to 55 inclusive (Registration at Location of Branch Offices, Registration of Relocation of Head Office, Registration of Change of Directors, etc., Registration of Change of Persons to Temporarily Carry Out Duties of Accounting Auditor), and Article 132 to 148 inclusive (Correction, Application for Deletion, Deletion Without any Party's Request, Exclusion from Application of Administrative Procedure Act, Exclusion from Application of Act on Access to Information Held by Administrative Organs, Exclusion from Application of Act on Protection of Personal Information Held by Administrative Organs, Application for Examination, Treatment of Cases of Application for Examination, Exclusion from Application from Administrative Appeal Act, Delegation to Ordinance of the Ministry) of the Commercial Registration Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a registration regarding a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "trade name," "business office (or, in a company, head office; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)" and "business office pertaining to" in Article 27 of the latter Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "trade name or name," "principal office" and "principal office pertaining to," respectively; the term "shareholders meeting or class shareholders meeting" in Article 46, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "General Meeting of members (or General Meeting, where the company has such meeting)"; the terms "Article 319, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 325 of the Companies Act) or Article 370 (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 490, paragraph (5) of that Act) of the Companies Act" and "shareholders meeting or class shareholder meeting" in Article 46, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 319, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 41, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act, or Article 370 of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-16 or 180-15 of the Insurance Business Act" and "General Meeting of members", respectively; the term "Article 416, paragraph (4) of the Companies Act" in Article 46, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53-30, paragraph (4) of the Insurance Business Act"; and the terms "head office" and "branch offices" in the provisions of Article 48 to 53 inclusive of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office" and "secondary offices," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第六十七条　会社法第七編第四章第一節（第九百七条を除く。）（総則）の規定並びに商業登記法第一条の三から第五条まで（登記所、事務の委任、事務の停止、登記官、登記官の除斥）、第七条から第十五条まで（登記簿等の持出禁止、登記簿の滅失と回復、登記簿等の滅失防止、登記事項証明書の交付等、登記事項の概要を記載した書面の交付、附属書類の閲覧、印鑑証明、電磁的記録の作成者を示す措置の確認に必要な事項等の証明、手数料、当事者申請主義、嘱託による登記）、第十七条から第二十七条まで（登記申請の方式、申請書の添付書面、申請書に添付すべき電磁的記録、印鑑の提出、受付、受領証、登記の順序、登記官による本人確認、申請の却下、提訴期間経過後の登記、行政区画等の変更、同一の所在場所における同一の商号の登記の禁止）、第三十一条（営業又は事業の譲渡の際の免責の登記）、第三十三条（商号の登記の抹消）、第四十四条から第四十六条まで（会社の支配人の登記、添付書面の通則）、第四十七条第一項及び第三項（設立の登記）、第四十八条から第五十五条まで（支店所在地における登記、本店移転の登記、取締役等の変更の登記、一時会計監査人の職務を行うべき者の変更の登記）並びに第百三十二条から第百四十八条まで（更正、抹消の申請、職権抹消、行政手続法の適用除外、行政機関の保有する情報の公開に関する法律の適用除外、行政機関の保有する個人情報の保護に関する法律の適用除外、審査請求、審査請求事件の処理、行政不服審査法の適用除外、省令への委任）の規定は、相互会社に関する登記について準用する。この場合において、同法第二十七条中「商号」とあるのは「商号又は名称」と、「営業所（会社にあつては、本店。以下この条において同じ。）」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、「係る営業所」とあるのは「係る主たる事務所」と、同法第四十六条第二項中「株主総会若しくは種類株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会（総代会を設けているときは、総代会）」と、同条第三項中「会社法第三百十九条第一項（同法第三百二十五条において準用する場合を含む。）又は第三百七十条（同法第四百九十条第五項において準用する場合を含む。）」とあるのは「保険業法第四十一条第一項において準用する会社法第三百十九条第一項又は保険業法第五十三条の十六若しくは第百八十条の十五において準用する会社法第三百七十条」と、「株主総会若しくは種類株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同条第四項中「会社法第四百十六条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十第四項」と、同法第四十八条から第五十三条までの規定中「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、「支店」とあるのは「従たる事務所」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(viii) When intending to give approval for pharmaceutical products, quasi-pharmaceutical products , or medical instruments for the purpose of use for animals (hereinafter referred to as "veterinary medicine, etc.") in accordance with the provisions of Article 14, paragraph (1) of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act or the provisions of the said paragraph applied, with the necessary replacements, in accordance with the provisions of Article 83, paragraph (1) of the said Act, when intending to give approval for veterinary medicine, etc. in accordance with the provisions of Article 14-3, paragraph (1) of the said Act (including cases where it applies mutatis mutandis in Article 20, paragraph (1) of the said Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) or the provisions of the said paragraph applied, with the necessary replacements, in accordance with the provisions of Article 83, paragraph (1) of the said Act, when intending to conduct a re-examination of veterinary medicine, etc. in accordance with the provisions of Article 14-4, paragraph (1) of the said Act (including cases where it applies mutatis mutandis in Article 19-4, the same shall apply hereinafter) or the provisions of the said paragraph applied, with the necessary replacements, in accordance with the provisions of Article 83, paragraph (1) of the said Act, when intending to conduct re-assessment of veterinary medicine, etc. in accordance with the provisions of Article 14-6, paragraph (1) of the said Act (including cases where it applies mutatis mutandis in Article 19-4 of the said Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) or the provisions of the said paragraph applied, with the necessary replacements, in accordance with the provisions of Article 83, paragraph (1) of the said Act, when intending to give approval for veterinary medicine, etc. in accordance with the provisions of Article 19-2, paragraph (1) of the said Act or the provisions of the said paragraph applied, with the necessary replacements, in accordance with the provisions of Article 83, paragraph (1) of the said Act, or when intending to enact, amend, or abolish the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Ordinance provided in Article 83-5, paragraph (1) of the said Act or the provisions of Article 14, paragraph (2), item (iii) of the said Act applied, with the necessary replacements, in accordance with the provisions of Article 83, paragraph (1) of the said Act. 例文帳に追加

八　薬事法第十四条第一項若しくは同法第八十三条第一項の規定により読み替えて適用される同法第十四条第一項の規定による動物のために使用されることが目的とされている医薬品、医薬部外品若しくは医療機器（以下「動物用医薬品等」という。）についての承認をしようとするとき、同法第十四条の三第一項（同法第二十条第一項において準用する場合を含む。以下同じ。）若しくは同法第八十三条第一項の規定により読み替えて適用される同法第十四条の三第一項の規定による動物用医薬品等についての承認をしようとするとき、同法第十四条の四第一項（同法第十九条の四において準用する場合を含む。以下同じ。）若しくは同法第八十三条第一項の規定により読み替えて適用される同法第十四条の四第一項の規定による動物用医薬品等についての再審査を行おうとするとき、同法第十四条の六第一項（同法第十九条の四において準用する場合を含む。以下同じ。）若しくは同法第八十三条第一項の規定により読み替えて適用される同法第十四条の六第一項の規定による動物用医薬品等についての再評価を行おうとするとき、同法第十九条の二第一項若しくは第八十三条第一項の規定により読み替えて適用される同法第十九条の二第一項の規定による動物用医薬品等についての承認をしようとするとき、又は同法第八十三条第一項の規定により読み替えて適用される同法第十四条第二項第二号若しくは第八十三条の五第一項の農林水産省令を制定し、若しくは改廃しようとするとき。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 171-3 The provisions prescribed under Article 50-3, Article 50-4, Article 50-5, Article 50-6, Article 50-7, paragraph (2) of the Article 50-8, Article 50-10 and Article 50-11 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the training facility of aircraft dispatchers pursuant to the provision of paragraph (4) of the Article 29 of the Act applied mutatis mutandis in compliance with paragraph (4) of the Article 78 of the Act. In this case, the provision "application for designation of airman training facility (Form No. 19-4)" under paragraph (1) of the Article 50-3 shall be interpreted as "application for designation of aircraft dispatchers training facility (Form No. 29-2)"; the provision "restriction of paragraph (1), paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the Article 25 of the Act, restriction pertaining to the alteration of paragraph (1) of the Article 29-2 of the Act, certification of aeronautical English speaking competence under paragraph (1) of the Article 33 of the Act, certification of instrumental navigation under paragraph (1) of the Article 34 of the Act or the courses stipulated for each subject of basic techniques in maintenance pertaining to the competence test for the qualification of first class aircraft maintenance technician, second class aircraft maintenance technician, first class aircraft line maintenance technician, second class aircraft line maintenance technician and aircraft overhaul technician prescribed in Attachment 3" under paragraph (1) of the Article 50-3 shall be interpreted as "the courses pertaining to the aircraft dispatcher competence examination prescribed under paragraph (1) of the Article 78 of the Act"; the provision "the examinations under paragraph (1) of the Article 29 of the Act (including the cases where the provisions shall apply mutatis mutandis in compliance with Article 29-2 paragraph (2) of the Act, paragraph (3) of the Article 33 of the Act or paragraph (3) of the Article 34 of the Act)" under paragraph (1) of the Article 50-4, (a) shall be interpreted as "examinations under paragraph (1) of the Article 29 applied mutatis mutandis in compliance with paragraph (4) of the Article 78 of the Act"; the provision "paragraph (4) of the Article 29 of the Act" under paragraph (1) of the Article 50-6 shall be interpreted as "paragraph (4) of the Article 29 of the Act applied mutatis mutandis in compliance with paragraph (4) of the Article 78 of the Act"; the provision "designation statement of airman training facility (Form 19-5)" under Article 50-7 shall be interpreted as "designation statement of aircraft dispatchers training facility (Form 29-3)"; the term "preceding paragraph" in paragraph (2) of the Article 50-8 shall be interpreted as "competence examiner"; the provision "paragraph (5) of the Article 50-2" under Article 50-10 shall be interpreted as "item (vi) of the paragraph (1) of the Article 168"; the provision "paragraphs (3) and (4) of the Article 50-2" shall be interpreted as "Article 170-6". 例文帳に追加

第百七十一条の三　第五十条の三、第五十条の四、第五十条の五、第五十条の六第一項、第五十条の七、第五十条の八第二項、第五十条の十及び第五十条の十一の規定は、法第七十八条第四項において準用する法第二十九条第四項の規定による運航管理者の養成施設について準用する。この場合において、第五十条の三第一項中「航空従事者養成施設指定申請書（第十九号の四様式）」とあるのは「運航管理者養成施設指定申請書（第二十九号の二様式）」と、同条第三項第二号中「法第二十五条第一項、第二項及び第三項の限定、法第二十九条の二第一項の変更に係る限定、法第三十三条第一項の航空英語能力証明、法第三十四条第一項の計器飛行証明又は別表第三の一等航空整備士、二等航空整備士、一等航空運航整備士、二等航空運航整備士及び航空工場整備士の資格についての技能証明に係る整備の基本技術の科目の別ごとに定める過程」とあるのは「法第七十八条第一項の運航管理者技能検定に係る過程」と、第五十条の四第一号イ中「法第二十九条第一項（法第二十九条の二第二項、法第三十三条第三項又は法第三十四条第三項において準用する場合を含む。）の試験」とあるのは「法第七十八条第四項において準用する法第二十九条第一項の試験」と、第五十条の六第一項中「法第二十九条第四項」とあるのは「法第七十八条第四項において準用する法第二十九条第四項」と、第五十条の七中「航空従事者養成施設指定書（第十九号の五様式）」とあるのは「運航管理者養成施設指定書（第二十九号の三様式）」と、第五十条の八第二項中「前項」とあるのは「技能審査員」と、第五十条の十中「第五十条の二第五項」とあるのは「第百六十八条第一項第六号」と、「第五十条の二第三項及び第四項」とあるのは「第百七十条の六」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 76-16 The provisions of Article 31, paragraph (1), Article 33, Article 40, Article 42 and Article 44 to Article 49 inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to registered training agencies. In this case, the term "the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry" in Article 31, paragraph (1), Article 44, Article 45, paragraph (1), Article 46, Article 48 and Article 49 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism", the phrase "the items of Article 23 (excluding item (iii); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph)" in Article 31, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the items of paragraph (1) of Article 76-12", the term "the examination affairs" in Article 33, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the building investigation training affairs", the term "an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry" in the same Article, Article 45, paragraph (2), Article 46 and Article 47, paragraph (2), items (iii) and (iv) shall be deemed to be replaced with "an Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism", the term "Article 49" in Article 40, item (ii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 49 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 76-16", the term "the preceding three Articles" in Article 42, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 76-11, Article 76-12, and Article 40 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 76-16", the term "an investigation for verification" in Article 44 to Article 46 inclusive, Article 48 and Article 49 shall be deemed to be replaced with "building investigation training", the term "operational rules for investigation services" in Article 45 (including the title) shall be deemed to be replaced with "operational rules for building investigation training", the term "investigation" in the title of Article 46 shall be deemed to be replaced with "building investigation training", the phrase "A specified business operator or specified chain business operator" in Article 47, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "first-class architect, etc.", the phrase "Article 43, paragraph (1) or paragraph (2)" in Article 48 shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 76-13", the phrase "Article 40, item (i) or item (iii)" in Article 49, item (i) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 40, item (i) or item (iii) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 76-16", the phrase "Article 43, paragraph (3), Article 44, Article 45, paragraph (1), Article 46, Article 47, paragraph (1), or Article 33 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 51" in Article 49, item (ii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 33, Article 44, Article 45, paragraph (1), Article 46 or Article 47, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 76-16", the phrase "the items of paragraph (2) of Article 47" in Article 49, item (iii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the items of paragraph (2) of Article 47 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 76-16", the phrase "the preceding Article, or Article 31, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 51" in Article 49, item (iv) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 31, paragraph (1) or the preceding Article as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 76-16". 例文帳に追加

第七十六条の十六　第三十一条第一項、第三十三条、第四十条、第四十二条及び第四十四条から第四十九条までの規定は、登録講習機関に準用する。この場合において、第三十一条第一項、第四十四条、第四十五条第一項、第四十六条、第四十八条及び第四十九条中「経済産業大臣」とあるのは「国土交通大臣」と、第三十一条第一項中「第二十三条各号（第三号を除く。以下この項において同じ。）」とあるのは「第七十六条の十二第一項各号」と、第三十三条第一項中「試験事務」とあるのは「建築物調査講習の業務」と、同条、第四十五条第二項、第四十六条並びに第四十七条第二項第三号及び第四号中「経済産業省令」とあるのは「国土交通省令」と、第四十条第二号中「第四十九条」とあるのは「第七十六条の十六において準用する第四十九条」と、第四十二条第二項中「前三条」とあるのは「第七十六条の十一、第七十六条の十二及び第七十六条の十六において準用する第四十条」と、第四十四条から第四十六条まで、第四十八条及び第四十九条中「確認調査」とあるのは「建築物調査講習」と、第四十五条（見出しを含む。）中「調査業務規程」とあるのは「建築物調査講習業務規程」と、第四十六条の見出し中「調査」とあるのは「建築物調査講習」と、第四十七条第二項中「特定事業者又は特定連鎖化事業者」とあるのは「一級建築士等」と、第四十八条中「第四十三条第一項又は第二項」とあるのは「第七十六条の十三」と、第四十九条第一号中「第四十条第一号又は第三号」とあるのは「第七十六条の十六において準用する第四十条第一号又は第三号」と、同条第二号中「第四十三条第三項、第四十四条、第四十五条第一項、第四十六条、第四十七条第一項又は第五十一条において準用する第三十三条」とあるのは「第七十六条の十六において準用する第三十三条、第四十四条、第四十五条第一項、第四十六条又は第四十七条第一項」と、同条第三号中「第四十七条第二項各号」とあるのは「第七十六条の十六において準用する第四十七条第二項各号」と、同条第四号中「前条又は第五十一条において準用する第三十一条第一項」とあるのは「第七十六条の十六において準用する第三十一条第一項又は前条」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The Governor in Council may make rules or regulations (a) respecting the form and contents of applications for patents; (b) respecting the form of the Register of Patents and of the indexes thereto; (c) respecting the registration of assignments, transmissions, disclaimers, judgments or other documents relating to any patent; (d) respecting the form and contents of any certificate issued pursuant to this Act; (e) prescribing the fees or the manner of determining the fees that may be charged in respect of the filing of applications for patents or the taking of other proceedings under this Act or under any rule or regulation made pursuant to this Act, or in respect of any services or the use of any facilities provided thereunder by the Commissioner or any person employed in the Patent Office; (f) prescribing the fees or the manner of determining the fees that shall be paid to maintain in effect an application for a patent or to maintain the rights accorded by a patent; (g) respecting the payment of any prescribed fees including the time when and the manner in which such fees shall be paid, the additional fees that may be charged for the late payment of such fees and the circumstances in which any fees previously paid may be refunded in whole or in part; (h) for carrying into effect the terms of any treaty, convention, arrangement or engagement that subsists between Canada and any other country; (i) for carrying into effect, notwithstanding anything in this Act, the Patent Cooperation Treaty done at Washington on June 19, 1970, including any amendments, modifications and revisions made from time to time to which Canada is a party; (j) respecting the entry on, the maintenance of and the removal from the register of patent agents of the names of persons and firms, including the qualifications that must be met and the conditions that must be fulfilled by a person or firm before the name of the person or firm is entered thereon and to maintain the name of the person or firm on the register; (j.1) respecting the submission of documents, information or fees under section 8.1, including (i) the documents, information or fees that may be submitted in electronic or other form under that section, (ii) the persons or classes of persons by whom they may be submitted, and (iii) the time at which they are deemed to be received by the Commissioner; (j.2) respecting the entering or recording of any document or information under section 8.2; (j.3) prescribing the manner in which an application for a patent may be withdrawn and, for the purposes of subsections 10(4) and (5), prescribing the date, or the manner of determining the date, on or before which a request for priority or an application for a patent must be withdrawn; (j.4) respecting requests for priority, including (i) the period within which priority must be requested, (ii) the manner in which and period within which the Commissioner must be informed of the matters referred to in subsection 28.4(2), (iii) the documentation that must be filed in support of requests for priority, and (iv) the withdrawal of requests for priority; (j.5) respecting the time within which requests for examination must be made and prescribed fees must be paid under subsection 35(1); (j.6) respecting the deposit of biological material for the purposes of section 38.1; (j.7) respecting the manner in which amendments may be made to specifications or drawings furnished as part of an application for a patent; (j.8) authorizing the Commissioner to extend, subject to any prescribed terms and conditions, the time fixed by or under this Act for doing anything where the Commissioner is satisfied that the circumstances justify the extension; (k) prescribing any other matter that by any provision of this Act is to be prescribed; and (l) generally, for carrying into effect the objects and purposes of this Act or for ensuring the due administration thereof by the Commissioner and other officers and employees of the Patent Office. 例文帳に追加

総督は次の事項に関し規則を制定することができる: (a) 特許出願の様式及び記載事項 (b) 特許登録簿及びその索引の様式に関する事項 (c) 特許権に関する譲渡，移転，権利の部分放棄，判決又はその他の書類の登録に関する事項 (d) 本法律により発行する証明書の様式及びその記載事項 (e) 本法律又は本法律に基づいて制定された規則に従って特許出願の提出若しくは他の手続を取ることに関し，又は長官若しくは特許庁において雇用された者により提供される役務若しくは施設の利用に関し課される手数料又はその決定方法に関する事項 (f) 特許出願を維持するため若しくは特許付与により得られた権利を維持するための手数料又はその決定方法に関する事項 (g) 時期及び方法を含む所定の手数料の納付，かかる手数料の追納の場合に課する追加手数料，並びに既に納付した手数料の全部又は一部を還付する場合の状況に関する事項 (h) カナダと他の国との間に存在する条約，協定，取決め又は約定の条件の実施に関する事項 (i) 本法律中の如何なる規定にも拘らず，随時の改正，修正及び変更を含めて，1970年6月19日にワシントンで作成され，カナダが締約国である特許協力条約の実施に関する事項 (j) 特許代理人登録簿における個人及び事務所の名称の記入，維持，抹消に関する事項。これには登録簿に個人又は事務所の名称を記入し維持する前にその個人又は事務所が満たさなければならない資格及び条件に関する事項を含む。 (j.1) 第8.1条に基づく書類，情報又は手数料の提出に関する事項。これには次のものを含む。 (i) 同条に基づいて電子的又は他の方式で提出することができる書類，情報又は手数料 (ii) かかる提出をすることのできる者及びこれに類する者，及び (iii) 長官が受領したとみなす時点 (j.2) 第8.2条に基づいて書類又は情報を記入又は記録することに関する事項 (j.3) 特許出願を取り下げる方法を規定する事項，及び第10条(4)及び(5)の適用上，優先権主張若しくは特許出願の取下をその日以前に行うべき日又はその日を決定する方法を規定する事項 (j.4) 次のものを含む優先権主張に関する事項 (i) 優先権主張をすべき期間 (ii) 第28.4条(2)にいう事項を長官に届け出る方式及び期間 (iii) 優先権主張を支持するために提出すべき書類，及び (iv) 優先権主張の取下 (j.5) 第35条(1)に基づいて出願審査の請求及びその所定の手数料の納付をすべき時期に関する事項 (j.6) 第38.1条の適用上，生物材料の寄託に関する事項 (j.7) 特許出願の一部として提出された明細書又は図面の補正の方法に関する事項 (j.8) 状況により正当化されると長官が納得した場合は，所定の条件に従うことを条件として，本法律により又はそれに基づいて何らかの事柄をするために定められた時期を延長する権限を長官に付与することに関する事項 (k) 本法律の何れかの条項に従って規定すべきその他の事項を規定することに関する事項，及び (l) 本法律の目的を達成するため，又は長官及びその他の特許庁の職員が本法律を適切に施行するのを確保するために必要な一般的事項 - 特許庁

(3) If the ratio between the amount of the insurance benefits pertaining to employment injury provided for in the Industrial Accident Insurance Act (excluding the lump sum compensation for surviving family paid in case of Article 16-6, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Industrial Accident Insurance Act, the insurance benefits pertaining to persons afflicted with a disease caused as a result of having been engaged in a specific job or occupation for a long period which is specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (limited to the persons specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare for each type of the businesses specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, taking into consideration of the service period in respect of such business, etc.) (hereinafter referred to as the "insurance benefits pertaining to persons afflicted with a specific disease" in this paragraph and in Article 20, paragraph (1)), and the insurance benefits pertaining to persons deemed as entitled to receive the insurance benefit pursuant to the provision of Article 36, paragraph (1) of the Industrial Accident Insurance Act (hereinafter referred to as the "insured of Class III special enrollment")) in respect of any business falling under any of the following items during each insurance year of three consecutive insurance years and in respect of which business three years or more have passed, since the establishment of the insurance relation of industrial accident insurance, as of March 31 of the last insurance year of such consecutive three insurance years (hereinafter referred to as the "reference date" in this paragraph), the payment of which has been made during such consecutive three insurance years (or, in case of insurance benefits paid as pension or otherwise specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, the amount thereof shall be calculated pursuant to the provisions of the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; the same shall apply in Article 20, paragraph (1)), plus the amount of the payments made as the services listed in Article 29, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Industrial Accident Insurance Act which pertain to employment injury and which are specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (or, in case of payments other than those paid as lump sum payments, the amount thereof shall be calculated pursuant to the provisions of the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare) on one hand, and the amount obtained by multiplying the aggregate of the amount of the general insurance premiums (or, in case of the businesses set forth in paragraph (1), item (i), the amount of the portion corresponding to the industrial accident insurance rate prescribed in the preceding paragraph (or, if such rate has been increased or decreased pursuant to the provision of such paragraph, such increased or decreased rate)) after deducting the amount of the portion corresponding to the off-the-job injury rate (meaning the rate prescribed by the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare by taking into consideration of the injury rate pertaining to commuting injury and the amount of the costs required for the benefit for second medical examination, etc. during the past three years in respect of all businesses to which the Industrial Accident Insurance Act is applied, and other circumstances; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and in Article 20, paragraph (1)) plus the amount of the Class I special enrollment insurance premiums after deducting the amount of the portion corresponding to the special enrollment off-the-job injury rate (meaning the off-the-job injury rate after deducting the rate determined by the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare set forth in Article 13; the same shall apply in each item of Article 20, paragraph (1) and in Article 20, paragraph (2)), by the rate specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare by taking into consideration of the costs required for the insurance benefits paid as pension concerning employment injury, the costs required for the insurance benefits pertaining to persons afflicted with a specific disease, and other circumstances (in Article 20, paragraph (1), item (i) referred to as the "Class I adjustment rate") on the other hand, exceeds eighty-five one-hundredth (85/100), or is seventy-five one-hundredth (75/100) or less, then the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare may acknowledge the rate calculated by increasing or decreasing the industrial accident insurance rate prescribed in the preceding paragraph in respect of such business less the off-the-job injury rate, by the rate specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare within the scope of forty one-hundredth (40/100), as the industrial accident insurance rate for the insurance year two years following the insurance year in which the reference date of such business is included. 例文帳に追加

３　厚生労働大臣は、連続する三保険年度中の各保険年度において次の各号のいずれかに該当する事業であつて当該連続する三保険年度中の最後の保険年度に属する三月三十一日（以下この項において「基準日」という。）において労災保険に係る保険関係が成立した後三年以上経過したものについての当該連続する三保険年度の間における労災保険法の規定による業務災害に関する保険給付（労災保険法第十六条の六第一項第二号の場合に支給される遺族補償一時金、特定の業務に長期間従事することにより発生する疾病であつて厚生労働省令で定めるものにかかつた者（厚生労働省令で定める事業の種類ごとに、当該事業における就労期間等を考慮して厚生労働省令で定める者に限る。）に係る保険給付（以下この項及び第二十条第一項において「特定疾病にかかつた者に係る保険給付」という。）及び労災保険法第三十六条第一項の規定により保険給付を受けることができることとされた者（以下「第三種特別加入者」という。）に係る保険給付を除く。）の額（年金たる保険給付その他厚生労働省令で定める保険給付については、その額は、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより算定するものとする。第二十条第一項において同じ。）に労災保険法第二十九条第一項第二号に掲げる事業として支給が行われた給付金のうち業務災害に係るもので厚生労働省令で定めるものの額（一時金として支給された給付金以外のものについては、その額は、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより算定するものとする。）を加えた額と一般保険料の額（第一項第一号の事業については、前項の規定による労災保険率（その率がこの項の規定により引き上げ又は引き下げられたときは、その引き上げ又は引き下げられた率）に応ずる部分の額）から非業務災害率（労災保険法の適用を受けるすべての事業の過去三年間の通勤災害に係る災害率及び二次健康診断等給付に要した費用の額その他の事情を考慮して厚生労働大臣の定める率をいう。以下この項及び第二十条第一項において同じ。）に応ずる部分の額を減じた額に第一種特別加入保険料の額から特別加入非業務災害率（非業務災害率から第十三条の厚生労働大臣の定める率を減じた率をいう。第二十条第一項各号及び第二項において同じ。）に応ずる部分の額を減じた額を加えた額に業務災害に関する年金たる保険給付に要する費用、特定疾病にかかつた者に係る保険給付に要する費用その他の事情を考慮して厚生労働省令で定める率（第二十条第一項第一号において「第一種調整率」という。）を乗じて得た額との割合が百分の八十五を超え、又は百分の七十五以下である場合には、当該事業についての前項の規定による労災保険率から非業務災害率を減じた率を百分の四十の範囲内において厚生労働省令で定める率だけ引き上げ又は引き下げた率に非業務災害率を加えた率を、当該事業についての基準日の属する保険年度の次の次の保険年度の労災保険率とすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 76-10 The provisions of Article 30, paragraph (1), Article 31, paragraph (1), Article 33, Article 40 and Article 42 to Article 50 inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to registered building investigation bodies. In this case, the phrase "(including examiners; hereinafter the same shall apply in the following paragraph)" in Article 30, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "(including expert investigators)", the term "the examination affairs" in the same paragraph and Article 33, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the building investigation affairs", the term "the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry" in Article 31, paragraph (1), Article 44, Article 45, paragraph (1), Article 46 and Article 48 to Article 50 inclusive shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism", the phrase "the items of Article 23 (excluding item (iii); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph)" in Article 31, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the items of paragraph (1) of Article 76-8", the term "an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry" in Article 33, Article 43, paragraphs (2) and (3) and Article 45, paragraph (2), Article 46 and Article 47, paragraph (2), items (iii) and (iv) shall be deemed to be replaced with "an Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism", the term "Article 49" in Article 40, item (ii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 49 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 76-10", the term "the preceding three Articles" in Article 42, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 76-7, Article 76-8, and Article 40 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 76-10", the term "an investigation for verification" in Article 43 to Article 46 inclusive, Article 48, Article 49 and Article 50, item (iii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "a building investigation", the phrase "factories, etc. which belong to" in Article 43, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "buildings pertaining to", the term "operational rules for investigation services" in Article 45 (including the title) shall be deemed to be replaced with "operational rules for building investigation services", the phrase "A specified business operator or specified chain business operator" in Article 47, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "a person who filed an application pursuant to Article 75, paragraph (1) or Article 75-2, paragraph (1)", the phrase "Article 43, paragraph (1) or paragraph (2)" in Article 48 shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 43, paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 76-10", the phrase "Article 40, item (i) or item (iii)" in Article 49, item (i) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 40, item (i) or item (iii) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 76-10", the phrase "Article 43, paragraph (3), Article 44, Article 45, paragraph (1), Article 46, Article 47, paragraph (1), or Article 33 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 51" in Article 49, item (ii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 33, Article 43, paragraph (3), Article 44, Article 45, paragraph (1), Article 46 or Article 47, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 76-10", the phrase "the items of paragraph (2) of Article 47" in Article 49, item (iii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the items of paragraph (2) of Article 47 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 76-10", the phrase "the preceding Article, or Article 31, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 51" in Article 49, item (iv) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 31, paragraph (1) or the preceding Article as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 76-10", the phrase "Article 44 or Article 46" in Article 50, item (ii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 44 or Article 46 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 76-10" and the term "the preceding Article" in Article 50, item (iii) shall be deemed to be replace with "the preceding Article as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 76-10". 例文帳に追加

第七十六条の十　第三十条第一項、第三十一条第一項、第三十三条、第四十条及び第四十二条から第五十条までの規定は、登録建築物調査機関に準用する。この場合において、第三十条第一項中「（試験員を含む。次項において同じ。）」とあるのは「（調査員を含む。）」と、同項及び第三十三条第一項中「試験事務」とあるのは「建築物調査の業務」と、第三十一条第一項、第四十四条、第四十五条第一項、第四十六条及び第四十八条から第五十条までの規定中「経済産業大臣」とあるのは「国土交通大臣」と、第三十一条第一項中「第二十三条各号（第三号を除く。以下この項において同じ。）」とあるのは「第七十六条の八第一項各号」と、第三十三条、第四十三条第二項及び第三項、第四十五条第二項、第四十六条並びに第四十七条第二項第三号及び第四号中「経済産業省令」とあるのは「国土交通省令」と、第四十条第二号中「第四十九条」とあるのは「第七十六条の十において準用する第四十九条」と、第四十二条第二項中「前三条」とあるのは「第七十六条の七、第七十六条の八及び第七十六条の十において準用する第四十条」と、第四十三条から第四十六条まで、第四十八条、第四十九条及び第五十条第三号中「確認調査」とあるのは「建築物調査」と、第四十三条第三項中「が設置している工場等」とあるのは「に係る建築物」と、第四十五条（見出しを含む。）中「調査業務規程」とあるのは「建築物調査業務規程」と、第四十七条第二項中「特定事業者又は特定連鎖化事業者」とあるのは「第七十五条第一項又は第七十五条の二第一項の規定による届出をした者」と、第四十八条中「第四十三条第一項又は第二項」とあるのは「第七十六条の十において準用する第四十三条第一項又は第二項」と、第四十九条第一号中「第四十条第一号又は第三号」とあるのは「第七十六条の十において準用する第四十条第一号又は第三号」と、同条第二号中「第四十三条第三項、第四十四条、第四十五条第一項、第四十六条、第四十七条第一項又は第五十一条において準用する第三十三条」とあるのは「第七十六条の十において準用する第三十三条、第四十三条第三項、第四十四条、第四十五条第一項、第四十六条又は第四十七条第一項」と、同条第三号中「第四十七条第二項各号」とあるのは「第七十六条の十において準用する第四十七条第二項各号」と、同条第四号中「前条又は第五十一条において準用する第三十一条第一項」とあるのは「第七十六条の十において準用する第三十一条第一項又は前条」と、第五十条第二号中「第四十四条又は第四十六条」とあるのは「第七十六条の十において準用する第四十四条又は第四十六条」と、同条第三号中「前条」とあるのは「第七十六条の十において準用する前条」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 333 (1) In the case where an incorporator of an Insurance Company, etc., director at the time of its incorporation, executive officer at the time of its incorporation, company auditor at the time of its incorporation, director, executive officer, accounting advisor or a member who shall carry out its duties, company auditor, accounting auditor or a member who shall carry out its duties, liquidator, commissioned company prescribed in Article 144, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-30, paragraph (2)), insurance administrator, insurance inspector, liquidator representative set forth in Article 525, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 184), supervising committee member set forth in Article 527, paragraph (1) of the same Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 184), examination committee member set forth in Article 533 of the same Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 184), acting director, executive officer, company auditor or liquidator who has been appointed pursuant to the provisional disposition order prescribed in Article 56 of the Civil Provisional Relief Act, any person who shall carry out the duties of a temporary director, accounting advisor, company auditor, representative director, committee member, executive officer or representative executive officer prescribed in Article 322, paragraph (1), item (vi) or Article 960, paragraph (1), item (v) of the Companies Act, any person who shall carry out the duties of a temporary liquidator or Representative Liquidator prescribed in Article 322, paragraph (2), item (iii) or Article 960, paragraph (2), item (iii) of the same Act, any person who shall carry out the duties of a temporary accounting auditor prescribed in Article 328, paragraph (1), item (iii) or Article 967, paragraph (1), item (iii) of the same Act, inspector, administrator of shareholder registry, administrator of bond registry, bond administrator, bond administrator who is succeeding the affairs, representative bondholder, resolution executor or manager, a Representative Person in Japan of a foreign Insurance Company, etc, liquidator, commissioned company prescribed in Article 144, paragraph (1), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 211, insurance administrator, insurance inspector or manager, any person who represents a license Specified Juridical Person and subscription member in Japan, any person who has concluded a contract set forth in Article 190, paragraph (3) with a Foreign Insurance Company, etc., any person who has concluded a contract set forth in Article 223, paragraph (3) with a license Specified Juridical Person or any person who has concluded a contract set forth in Article 272-5, paragraph (3) with a small sum short-term insurer, officer of Policyholders protection corporation, Large Holder of Insurance Voting Rights (when the Large Holder of Insurance Voting Rights is a juridical person (including organizations that are not juridical persons listed in Article 2-2, paragraph (1), item (i); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph except for items (lxv) and (lxxi)), its director, executive officer, accounting advisor or a member who shall carry out its duties, company auditor, representative person, manager, member who executes the business, or liquidator, including former large holders of insurance voting rights in the case where large holders of insurance voting rights are no longer large holders of insurance voting rights), insurance major shareholder or Short Term Insurance Major Shareholder (when the insurance major shareholder or Short Term Insurance Major Shareholder is a juridical person, its director, executive officer, accounting advisor or a member who shall carry out its duties, company auditor, representative person, manager, member who executes the business, or liquidator, including former insurance major shareholders or Major Shareholder of Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider in the case where Major Shareholders of Insurance Company or Short Term Insurance Major Shareholders are no longer Major Shareholders of Insurance Company or Major Shareholder of Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider), Specified Major Shareholder or specified Major Shareholders of Insurance Company (when the Specified Major Shareholder or specified Major Shareholders of Insurance Company is a juridical person, its director, executive officer, accounting advisor or a member who shall carry out its duties, company auditor, representative person, manager, member who executes the business, or liquidator, including former Specified Major Shareholders or specified Major Shareholders of Insurance Company in the case where Specified Major Shareholders or specified Major Shareholders of Insurance Company are no longer holders of the voting rights of an Insurance Company, etc. which amount to not less than the Major Shareholder Threshold), the director, executive officer, accounting advisor or a member who shall carry out its duties, company auditor, manager or liquidator of an Insurance Holding Company or Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Holding Company (including former insurance holding companies or Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Holding Companies in the case where insurance holding companies or Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Holding Companies are no longer insurance holding companies or Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Holding Companies), or the director, executive officer, accounting advisor or a member who shall carry out its duties, company auditor, manager, member who executes the business or liquidator of a Specified Holding Company or specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Holding Company (including former specified holding companies or specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Holding Companies in the case where specified holding companies or specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Holding Companies are no longer holding companies of which an Insurance Company, etc. is a Subsidiary Company) falls under any of the following items, he/she shall be punished by a non-penal fine of not more than one million yen; provided, however, that this shall not apply when a punishment shall be given for the act: 例文帳に追加