「commission to」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(45ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

Sec.84 Criminal Action for Repetition of Infringement If infringement is repeated by the infringer or by anyone in connivance with him after finality of the judgment of the court against the infringer, the offenders shall, without prejudice to the institution of a civil action for damages, be criminally liable therefor and, upon conviction, shall suffer imprisonment for the period of not less than six months but not more than three years and/or a fine of not less than one hundred thousand pesos (P 100,000) but not more than three hundred thousand pesos (P 300,000), at the discretion of the court. The criminal action herein provided shall prescribe in three years from date of the commission of the crime.例文帳に追加

第84条 侵害の反復に対する刑事訴訟 侵害者に不利な裁判所の判決の確定の後において侵害者又は侵害者と共謀する者が反復して侵害をする場合は，それらの者は，損害賠償のための民事訴訟の提起に影響することなく当該行為について刑事上の責任を有するものとし，有罪判決に基づいて，裁判所の裁量により，6月以上3年以内の懲役若しくは100,000ペソ以上300,000ペソ以下の罰金又はその両方に処せられる。本条に規定する刑事訴訟は，罪を犯した日から3年で時効とする。 - 特許庁

Article 9 (1) The Minister of Justice shall, when disposing an application for the certification under Article 5 or making a decision on an objection to the outcome of the application, consult in advance, where the applicant is a juridical person established directly under laws or a juridical person established by a special act of establishment under special laws, with the minister who has jurisdiction over the applicant, or where the applicant was established with permission or approval, with the minister who granted the permission or approval or with the National Public Safety Commission. 例文帳に追加

第九条　法務大臣は、第五条の認証の申請に対する処分をしようとする場合又は当該申請に対する処分についての異議申立てに対する決定をしようとする場合には、あらかじめ、申請者が法律により直接に設立された法人又は特別の法律により特別の設立行為をもって設立された法人であるときはこれらの法人を所管する大臣に、申請者が設立に関し許可又は認可を受けている法人であるときはその許可又は認可をした大臣又は国家公安委員会に、それぞれ協議しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(11) In the case where a Fisheries Cooperative Association or a Federation of Fisheries Cooperative Associations acquires a common fishery right for the class 1 common fishery or the class 5 common fishery, the Sea-area Fisheries Adjustment Commission concerned shall give necessary instructions pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1, Article 67, for appropriate exercise of said common fishery right in the relationship between the association or the federation and the fishermen (fishery managers or fishery employees as individuals; hereinafter the same shall apply) who have addresses in the district concerned and are not the partner. 例文帳に追加

１１　漁業協同組合又は漁業協同組合連合会が第一種共同漁業又は第五種共同漁業を内容とする共同漁業権を取得した場合においては、海区漁業調整委員会は、その漁業協同組合又は漁業協同組合連合会と関係地区内に住所を有する漁民（漁業者又は漁業従事者たる個人をいう。以下同じ。）であつてその組合員でないものとの関係において当該共同漁業権の行使を適切にするため、第六十七条第一項の規定に従い、必要な指示をするものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The Basic Guidelines shall be applied to inspections, etc. conducted by FSA and by Local Finance Bureaus under commission from the FSA Commissioner, under the Banking Law, Long-Term Credit Bank Law, Shinkin Bank Law, Law Concerning Financial Services by Cooperative Unions, Labor Credit Association Law, Agricultural Cooperative Association Law, Fishery Cooperative Law, Norinchukin Bank Law, Law Concerning Concurrent Operation of Trust Business by Financial Institutions, Deposit Insurance Law, Insurance Business Law, Securities and Exchange Law, Law Concerning Foreign Securities Firms, Law Concerning Investment Trusts and Investment Corporations and Law Concerning Investment Advisory Business. 例文帳に追加

本基本指針は、銀行法、長期信用銀行法、信用金庫法、協同組合による金融事業に関する法律、労働金庫法、農業協同組合法、水産業協同組合法、農林中央金庫法、金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律、預金保険法、保険業法、証券取引法、外国証券業者に関する法律、投資信託及び投資法人に関する法律並びに有価証券に係る投資顧問業の規制等に関する法律に基づき、金融庁及び金融庁長官から委任を受けて財務局が実施する検査等に対して適用する。 - 金融庁

At an unofficial meeting of the EU leaders in January 2012, the completion of a single market through steps including (i) simplification of accounting and public procurement rules,(ii) pursuit of electronic commerce and online dispute settlement, (iii) pursuit of cooperation in tax systems, and (iv) agreement on the EU patent/standard package by the end of June 2012 was proposed as an immediate priority task. In April 2012, in its recommendation concerning employment policies, the European Commission demanded the completion of a single market in the labor sector, for example, by enabling reception of unemployment benefits also in other countries in the area. Much attention will be paid to the future development of this area.例文帳に追加

2012年1月の非公式EU首脳会合では、（i）会計、公共調達ルールの簡素化、（ii）電子商取引、オンライン上での紛争処理の推進とEUの著作権制度の改善、（iii）税制面での協調推進、（iv）2012年6月末までのEU特許・標準パッケージの合意、などを通じた単一市場の完成が即時優先課題として打ち出されたほか、2012年4月には欧州委員会が雇用政策に関する提言の中で域内の他国でも失業手当の受給を可能とするなど労働分野での単一市場の完成も求めており、今後の展開が注目される。 - 経済産業省

(11) When a competent minister intends to grant approval under paragraph 7, item 3 or paragraph 8, item 3, he/she shall confirm that said short-term subordinated debts or long-term subordinated debts have not improved the Net Assets Regulation Ratio temporarily and intentionally, and review whether they meet any of the following criteria: (i) it is expected that said Futures Commission Merchant can maintain a sufficient Net Assets Regulation Ratio after making said Payment before Maturity, etc.; (ii) funds larger than the amount of said Payment before Maturity, etc. shall be raised. 例文帳に追加

１１ 主務大臣は、第七項第三号又は第八項第三号の承認をしようとするときは、当該短 期劣後債務又は当該長期劣後債務が純資産額規制比率を一時的かつ意図的に向上させた ものでないことを確認の上、次に掲げる基準のいずれかに適合するかどうかを審査しな ければならない。一当該期限前弁済等を行った後において当該商品取引員が十分な純資産額規制比率を 維持することができると見込まれること。二当該期限前弁済等の額以上の額の資本金調達を行うこと。 - 経済産業省

Article 30-15 The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) and paragraph (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Articles 837 to 839 inclusive (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Recession), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (a)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim seeking nullification of the incorporation of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (referring to shareholders, directors or liquidators (or, shareholders, directors, auditors or liquidators in a company with auditors, or shareholders, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section)" in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or members, directors, executive officers, or liquidators in a company with Committees)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第三十条の十五　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百三十九条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号イに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、相互会社の設立の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第一号中「株主等（株主、取締役又は清算人（監査役設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、監査役又は清算人、委員会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、執行役又は清算人）をいう。以下この節において同じ。）」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(iv) the method of having information broadcast through the broadcasting equipment of a general broadcaster, a Cable Television Broadcaster (which means the Cable Television Broadcaster set forth in Article 2, paragraph (4) of the Cable Television Broadcasting Act [Act No. 114 of 1972]), a person engaged in the business of Cable Radio Broadcasting (which means Cable Radio Broadcasting as set forth in Article 2 of the Act on Regulation on the Operation of Cable Radio Broadcasting Business [Act No. 135 of 1951]) or a person engaged in the business of Broadcasting Using Telecommunications Services (which means Broadcasting Using Telecommunications Services as set forth in Article 2, paragraph (1) of the Act on Broadcasting Using Telecommunications Services [Act No. 85 of 2001]), the method of having customers inspect, via telecommunications lines, the contents of information that is recorded onto a file in a computer used by a Futures Commission Merchant or a person who has accepted consignment of business pertaining to advertising, etc. conducted by the Futures Commission Merchant, or the method of indicating information to the public either indoors or outdoors on a constant basis or continuously for a certain period where the information is posted or indicated on a signboard, a billboard, a poster, a placard or an advertising pillar, advertising board, building or any other structure, etc., or a method similar thereto, in which case the following matters are clearly and accurately indicated and there is no indication that is significantly contradictory to facts or seriously misleading with regard to the profits forecast from conducting a Transaction on a Commodity Market, etc. and other matters specified in Article 100-6: 例文帳に追加

四　次に掲げる事項を明瞭かつ正確に表示し、かつ、商品市場における取引等を行うことによる利益の見込みその他第百条の六で定める事項について、著しく事実に相違するような表示をし、又は著しく人を誤認させるような表示をしていない、一般放送事業者、有線テレビジョン放送事業者（有線テレビジョン放送法（昭和四十七年法律第百十四号）第二条第四項の有線テレビジョン放送事業者をいう。）、有線ラジオ放送（有線ラジオ放送業務の運用の規正に関する法律（昭和二十六年法律第百三十五号）第二条の有線ラジオ放送をいう。）の業務を行う者及び電気通信役務利用放送（電気通信役務利用放送法（平成十三年法律第八十五号）第二条第一項の電気通信役務利用放送をいう。）の業務を行う者の放送設備により放送させる方法、商品取引員又は当該商品取引員が行う広告等に係る業務の委託を受けた者の使用に係る電子計算機に備えられたファイルに記録された情報の内容を電気通信回線を利用して顧客に閲覧させる方法並びに常時又は一定の期間継続して屋内又は屋外で公衆に表示させる方法であって、看板、立看板、はり紙及びはり札並びに広告塔、広告板、建物その他の工作物等に掲出させ、又は表示させるもの並びにこれらに類するもの - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 9 (1) Where a disposition is rendered under the provisions of Article 32, paragraph (1) or Article 51, paragraph (1) (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 51, paragraph (3)) against a debtor who is a juridical person, a court clerk shall, without delay and by his/her own authority, commission the registry office with jurisdiction over the location of the head office or principal office of the debtor to register the disposition; provided, however, that if the debtor is a foreign juridical person which is categorized as a foreign company, the registry office having jurisdiction over the place of domicile of its representative person for Japan (limited to one who has a domicile in Japan) (in the case of a foreign company that has business offices in Japan, the location of each such business office) shall be commissioned, and if the debtor is any other type of foreign juridical person, the registry office having jurisdiction over the location of each of its offices shall be commissioned. 例文帳に追加

第九条　法人である債務者について、第三十二条第一項又は第五十一条第一項（同条第三項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による処分があった場合には、裁判所書記官は、職権で、遅滞なく、当該処分の登記を債務者の本店又は主たる事務所の所在地を管轄する登記所に嘱託しなければならない。ただし、債務者が外国法人であるときは、外国会社にあっては日本における各代表者（日本に住所を有するものに限る。）の住所地（日本に営業所を設けた外国会社にあっては、当該各営業所の所在地）、その他の外国法人にあっては各事務所の所在地を管轄する登記所に嘱託しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) If information is given upon oath to a court that there is reasonable cause for suspecting that there is in any premises or conveyance — (a) any goods which are the subject of an offence under section 46, 47, 48, 49 or 52; (b) any material or article which has been used in the commission of an offence under section 46, 47, 48, 49 or 52; or (c) any document which is evidence that an offence under section 46, 47, 48, 49 or 52 has been committed, the court may issue, either unconditionally or subject to such conditions as the court thinks fit, a warrant authorising a police officer to enter and search the premises or conveyance for any goods, material, article or document referred to in the warrant, whether specifically or in any general category, and to seize any such goods, material, article or document found at the premises or conveyance.例文帳に追加

(3)次の場合，すなわち，(a)第46条，第47条，第48条，第49条又は第52条にいう犯罪の対象である商品，(b)第46条，第47条，第48条，第49条又は第52条にいう犯罪行為に使用された材料又は物品，又は (c)第46条，第47条，第48条，第49条又は第52条にいう犯罪が行われた証拠である書類が，構内又は輸送機関に存在することを疑う正当な理由があるという情報が裁判所に宣誓の上で提出された場合，裁判所は，無条件に又は裁判所が適切と認める条件に従い，警察官に権限を与える令状を発行することができ，それにより警察官は，令状にいう商品，材料，物品又は書類について，個別に又は全般的に，構内又は輸送機関に立ち入り捜索し，かつ，当該構内又は輸送機関で発見された当該商品，材料，物品又は書類を差押さえることができる。 - 特許庁

(5) A Labor Relations Commission may, in making examinations, etc., in accordance with the provisions of the preceding paragraphs (including cases to which the provisions of Article 19-13, paragraph 4 shall apply mutatis mutandis), have one or more than one public members carry out the procedures for examinations etc., in whole or in part (other than disposition under the provisions of Article 5, paragraph 1, Article 11, paragraph 1, Article 27-4, paragraph 1 (including cases to which the provisions of Article 27-17 shall apply mutatis mutandis); Article 27-7, paragraph 1 (including cases to which the provisions of Article 27-17 shall apply mutatis mutandis, other than parts where the parties concerned or witnesses give a statement or where the articles submitted are impounded); Article 27-10, paragraphs 2 and 4, and Article 27-12, paragraph 1 (including cases to which the provisions of Article 27-17 shall apply mutatis mutandis); and a motion under Article 27-20; the same shall apply to the following paragraph). 例文帳に追加

５　労働委員会は、前各項（第十九条の十三第四項の規定により準用する場合を含む。）の規定により審査等を行うときは、一人又は数人の公益委員に審査等の手続（第五条第一項、第十一条第一項、第二十七条の四第一項（第二十七条の十七の規定により準用する場合を含む。）、第二十七条の七第一項（当事者若しくは証人に陳述させ、又は提出された物件を留め置く部分を除き、第二十七条の十七の規定により準用する場合を含む。）、第二十七条の十第二項並びに同条第四項及び第二十七条の十二第一項（第二十七条の十七の規定により準用する場合を含む。）の規定による処分並びに第二十七条の二十の申立てを除く。次項において同じ。）の全部又は一部を行わせることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 130 (1) The provision of Article 97-2, paragraph (2) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 199 of the Insurance Business Act revised by the provision of Article 22 (hereinafter referred to as "Current Insurance Business Act") of the Current Insurance Business Act shall not apply, for a period of one year counting from the Effective Date, to the investment of assets on behalf of one single person (referring to the one single person prescribed in Article 97-2, paragraph (2) of the Current Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply in the following paragraph) by an Insurance Company (referring to an Insurance Company as defined in Article 2, paragraph (2) of the Current Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) (including a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. (referring to a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. as defined in Article 2, paragraph (7) of the Current Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) or a Licensed Specified Juridical Person (referring to a Licensed Specified Juridical Person as defined in Article 223, paragraph (1) of the Current Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply hereinafter); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), where the amount of those assets prescribed in Article 97-2, paragraph (2) of the Current Insurance Business Act which are invested by the Insurance Company on behalf of that one single person exceeds, at the time when this Act enters into force, the amount calculated pursuant to the provision of that paragraph, provided that the Insurance Company notify thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission within three months from the Effective Date. 例文帳に追加

第百三十条　第二十二条の規定による改正後の保険業法（以下「新保険業法」という。）第九十七条の二第二項（新保険業法第百九十九条において準用する場合を含む。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に同一人（新保険業法第九十七条の二第二項に規定する同一人をいう。次項において同じ。）に対する同条第二項に規定する資産の運用の額が同項の規定により計算した額を超えている保険会社（新保険業法第二条第二項に規定する保険会社をいう。以下同じ。）（外国保険会社等（新保険業法第二条第七項に規定する外国保険会社等をいう。以下同じ。）及び免許特定法人（新保険業法第二百二十三条第一項に規定する免許特定法人をいう。以下同じ。）を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の当該同一人に対する当該資産の運用については、当該保険会社が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 178 Those who have any objection against the following determinations may file applications for ruling with the Environmental Dispute Coordination Commission: permission prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 21 (including the case where it applies mutatis mutandis to paragraph (3) of Article 45; the same shall apply hereinafter); non-permission prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 21 because the case falls under the provision of Article 35 (including the case where it applies mutatis mutandis to paragraph (3) of Article 45; the same shall apply hereinafter); disposition of decrease of mining areas or mining lease areas, or rescission of mining right or mining lease right pursuant to the provision of Article 53 (including the case where it applies mutatis mutandis to Article 87); and permission or non-permission prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 106, or use or expropriation pursuant to the provision of the Compulsory Purchase of Land Act that is applied under the provision of paragraph (1) of Article 107. However, as for permission prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 21, such applications may be filed only in the case where the provision of Article 35 is violated. 例文帳に追加

第百七十八条　第二十一条第一項（第四十五条第三項において準用する場合を含む。以下同じ。）の許可、第三十五条（第四十五条第三項において準用する場合を含む。以下同じ。）に規定する場合に該当することを理由とする第二十一条第一項の不許可、第五十三条（第八十七条において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による鉱区若しくは租鉱区の減少の処分若しくは鉱業権若しくは租鉱権の取消し、第百六条第一項の許可若しくは不許可又は第百七条第一項の規定により適用される土地収用法の規定による土地の使用若しくは収用に関する裁決に不服がある者は、公害等調整委員会に対して裁定の申請をすることができる。ただし、第二十一条第一項の許可については、第三十五条の規定に違反することを理由とする場合に限る。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

I am aware that the Tax Commission determined in the primary assessment that it would not accept the request to extend the reduced tax rate for securities. At present, however, it is extremely important to overcome the recession due to deflation. 例文帳に追加

税制調査会の第一次結果では、証券の軽減税率の延長要望を認められないＤの判定を受けたということは当然知っておりますが、今は、デフレ不況を克服するということが非常に大事でして、若干円安になって、アメリカの景気も少し持ち直しつつあります。しかしそうはいっても、アメリカの雇用情勢もまだ厳しいですし、ヨーロッパの方も少し景気が上向きつつあるというふうな観測があって、昨日なんか非常に株価が上がったようでございますが、やはり株式、証券というものは資本主義においては、基本的なものでございますし、その中でストックが軽減税率でございますので、金融庁が言うということでなくて、政治家として、それはもう亀井党首も何回も記者会見でも言っておられると思いますが、10％の軽減税率、これは8年間ぐらい続けています論議ですが、これを今10％上げるというのは、その論議に水をかけるようなもので、それは議論のベクトルが逆でございます。 - 金融庁

(7) The provision of Article 107, paragraph (1) of the Current Insurance Business Act shall not apply, for a period of one year counting from the Effective Date, to the ownership of Shares, etc. (referring to Shares, etc. as defined in Article 2, paragraph (12) of the Current Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by an Insurance Company or any of its Subsidiary Companies in a domestic company (referring to a domestic company as defined in Article 107, paragraph (1) of the Current Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), where the Insurance Company or the Subsidiary Company owns, at the time when this Act enters into force, Shares, etc. in the domestic company in a total number that exceeds its shareholding threshold, etc. (referring to the shareholding threshold, etc. prescribed in Article 107, paragraph (1) of the Current Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), provided that the Insurance Company notify thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission within three months from the Effective Date. In this case, for the purpose of applying the provision of that Article to the ownership of Shares, etc. in the domestic company on and subsequent to the date, the Insurance Company or its Subsidiary Company shall be deemed to have acquired as at the date the Shares, etc. of the domestic company in excess of the shareholding threshold, etc. following the events prescribed in the main clause of paragraph (2) of that Article. 例文帳に追加

７　新保険業法第百七条第一項の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に国内の会社（同項に規定する国内の会社をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の株式等（新保険業法第二条第十二項に規定する株式等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を合算してその基準株式数等（新保険業法第百七条第一項に規定する基準株式数等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えて所有している保険会社又はその子会社による当該国内の会社の株式等の所有については、当該保険会社が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、同日後は、当該国内の会社の株式等の所有については、当該保険会社又はその子会社が同日において同条第二項本文に規定する事由により当該国内の会社の株式等を合算してその基準株式数等を超えて取得したものとみなして、同条の規定を適用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provisions of Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff) and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for nullification of an Entity Conversion; the provision of Article 840 (Effect of Judgment of Nullity of Issue of New Shares) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judgment of nullity of an Entity Conversion accompanied by the solicitation of funds set forth in Article 78, paragraph (1); and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 878, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shareholder or member"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　会社法第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）及び第九百三十七条第三項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は組織変更の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百四十条（新株発行の無効判決の効力）の規定は第七十八条第一項の基金の募集を伴う組織変更の無効判決について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第一項中「株主」とあるのは「株主又は社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

If a person sells, or exposes for sale, or has in his possession for sale or for any purpose of trade or manufacturer any goods or things to which a false trademark or a false trade description is applied or which, being required under section 108 to have applied to them an indication of the country or place in which they were made or produced or the name and address of the manufacturer or producer or the person for whom the goods are manufactured or produced are without the indication so require, he shall, unless the proves (a) that, having taken all reasonable precautions against committing an offence against this section, he had at the time of the commission of the alleged offence no reason to suspect the genuineness of the trademark or trade description or that any offence had been committed in respect of the goods; and (b) that, on demand by or on behalf of the prosecutor he gave all the information in his power with respect to the person from whom he obtained such goods or things; or (c) that otherwise he acted innocently, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to 2 (two) years, or with fine, or with both, and in case of a second or subsequent conviction, with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to 3 (three) years, or with fine, or with both. 例文帳に追加

不正な商標若しくは虚偽の商品表示を付して、又は、第108条の規定により付すことが求められる製造若しくは生産される国若しくは地域、又は製造者若しくは生産者又は商品がその者のために製造若しくは生産される者の名称及び住所を表示することなく、商品又は物品を販売する者、又は販売用の展示を行う者、又は販売目的、取引若しくは製造の目的で所持する者は、次に掲げる事項が証明されない限り、2年以下の禁固又は罰金若しくはこれを併科、再犯若しくは累犯はいずれの場合も3年以下の禁固又は罰金若しくはこれを併科する。(a)本条に定める侵害に対して合理的なすべての予防措置を講じており、侵害があったとされる時点で、当該商標若しくは商品表示の真実性を疑う、又は当該商品に関して何らかの違反があったことを疑う、どのような理由もなかったこと。(b)検察官の要求に応じて、又は検察官のために、当該商品又は物品の入手先である者について自己の権限が及ぶ限りすべての情報を提供したこと。(c)その他の点においても正直に行動したこと。 - 特許庁

I will talk about the personnel appointments first. As you know, the FSA (Financial Services Agency) has separate bureaus responsible for three functions, namely, planning of regulatory frameworks, inspection of financial institutions and monitoring of various market transactions-I think that the inspection and monitoring are very closely related - and supervision of financial institutions. I believe that it is increasingly important for these bureaus to enhance their cooperation and function in an integrated manner. In terms of organization, the FSA consists of the main body of the FSA in a narrow sense, which comprises the internal bureaus, and the Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission (SESC). Cooperation between the internal bureaus and the SESC is also becoming increasingly important. 例文帳に追加

まず今般の人事でございますけれども、金融庁はご案内のとおり、制度の企画立案、金融機関等への検査やマーケットにおける様々な取引の監視、－この検査と監視は非常に近いと思います、－そして金融機関等への監督と、大きく三つの機能をもった部門が存在しているわけですけれども、この三つの部門がますます連携を強化して、一体として機能するということが重要になってきているということだと思います。組織上、金融庁の内部部局、いわば狭義の金融庁本体と、証券取引等監視委員会という区分があるわけですけれども、内部部局と証券取引等監視委員会の連携の強化ということも一層強まっているということでございます。 - 金融庁

(2) In the cases set forth in the preceding paragraph, with regard to the amount of liability reserve for commodity trading to be accrued within three business years from the business year in which the license set forth in Article 190 of the Act (excluding a renewed license) was obtained, the phrase "the amount obtained by multiplying the transaction amounts of the transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (i) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (e)) in each business year by the Problematic Conduct Rate -- which means the proportion of the total sum of the payments made as a result of any Problematic Conduct [which means the Problematic Conduct prescribed in Article 112] in each business year starting within three years prior to the commencement of the relevant business year [excluding payments pertaining to transactions in cases where a Futures Commission Merchant receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market (excluding Commodity Clearing Transactions; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) from a Person with Specialized Knowledge and Experience (which means a person specified in Article 107; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) or receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market by using an Electronic Data Processing System (which means an Electronic Data Processing System connecting a computer used by the Futures Commodity Merchant and a computer [including the input/output devices] used by the customer through a telecommunications line; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) without carrying out solicitation]; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) to the total sum of the transaction amounts of the transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), items (i) to (iii) of the Act and the amount of the consideration for the transactions prescribed in item (iv) of the same paragraph (excluding the transaction amounts and the amount of the consideration for transactions in cases of transactions based on a person's own account and in cases where a Futures Commission Merchant receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market from a Person With Specialized Knowledge and Experience or receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market by using an Electronic Data Processing System without carrying out solicitation -- or the amount equivalent to 0.0001 percent of the transaction amounts, whichever amount is greater" in item (i) of the preceding paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount equivalent to 0.003 percent of the transaction amounts of the transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (i) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (e)) in each business year," the phrase "such larger amount" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "such equivalent amount," the phrase "double the Problematic Conduct Rate, or by 0.0002 percent, whichever rate is higher" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "0.006 percent," the phrase "an amount obtained by multiplying -- an amount calculated by dividing the amount that has been obtained by deducting the amount of liability reserve for commodity trading and the amounts listed in (b) to (h) from ten million yen by double the Problematic Conduct Rate, or by 0.0002 percent, whichever rate is higher (or, if said calculated amount exceeds the transaction amount in the relevant business year, such amount shall be the transaction amount in the relevant business year; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) -- by the Problematic Conduct Rate or an amount equivalent to 0.0001 percent of said calculated amount, whichever amount is greater" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "an amount equivalent to 0.003 percent of the amount calculated by dividing the amount that has been obtained by deducting the amount of liability reserve for commodity trading and the amounts listed in (b) to (h) from ten million yen by double the Problematic Conduct Rate, or by 0.0002 percent, whichever rate is higher (or, if said calculated amount exceeds the transaction amount in the relevant business year, such amount shall be the transaction amount in the relevant business year; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item)," the phrase "the amount obtained by multiplying the transaction amount of transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (iii) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (g)) in each business year by the Problematic Conduct Rate, or the amount equivalent to 0.0001 percent of said transaction amount, whichever amount is greater" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount equivalent to 0.003 percent of the transaction amount of transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (iii) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (g)) in each business year," and the phrase "the amount obtained by multiplying the total sum of the consideration for transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (iv) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (h)) in each business year by the Problematic Conduct Rate, or the amount equivalent to 0.001 percent of said total sum of the consideration, whichever amount is greater" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount equivalent to 0.03 percent of the total sum of the consideration for transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (iv) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (h)) in each business year." 例文帳に追加

２　前項の場合において、法第百九十条の許可（更新に係る許可を除く。）を受けた事業年度から三事業年度以内に積み立てられるべき商品取引責任準備金の金額は、同項第一号中「に事故率（当該事業年度開始日前三年以内に開始した各事業年度における事故（第百十二条に規定する事故をいう。）による支払額（商品取引員が、専門知識及び経験を有する者（第百七条で定める者をいう。以下この条において同じ。）から商品市場における取引等（商品清算取引を除く。以下この条において同じ。）の委託を受ける場合並びに電子情報処理組織（商品取引員の使用に係る電子計算機と、顧客の使用に係る電子計算機（入出力装置を含む。）とを電気通信回線で接続した電子情報処理組織をいう。以下この条において同じ。）を使用して勧誘を伴わずに商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合の取引に係る支払額を除く。）の合計額の、法第二条第八項第一号から第三号に規定する取引の取引金額と同項第四号に規定する取引の対価の額の合計額（自己の計算による取引並びに商品取引員が、専門知識及び経験を有する者から商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合並びに電子情報処理組織を使用して勧誘を伴わずに商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合の取引金額及び取引の対価の額を除く。）に占める割合をいう。以下この条において同じ。）を乗じた金額と取引金額の百万分の一に相当する金額とのいずれか大きい金額」とあるのは「の十万分の三に相当する金額」と、「当該いずれか大きい金額」とあるのは「当該相当する金額」と、「事故率に二を乗じて得た率と百万分の二とのいずれか大きい率」とあるのは「十万分の六」と、「に事故率を乗じた金額と当該除して計算した金額の百万分の一に相当する金額とのいずれか大きい金額」とあるのは「の十万分の三に相当する金額」と、「に事故率を乗じた金額と当該取引金額の百万分の一に相当する金額とのいずれか大きい金額」とあるのは「の十万分の三に相当する金額」と、「に事故率を乗じた金額と当該対価の額の合計額の十万分の一に相当する金額とのいずれか大きい金額」とあるのは、「の万分の三に相当する金額」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 to 840 inclusive (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission, Effect of Judgment of Nullity on Issue of New Shares), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (b)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim for the nullification of a solicitation of additional funds under paragraph (1) of the preceding Article; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators) of a Mutual Company;" any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

５　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力、新株発行の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は前条第一項の基金の募集の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第二号中「株主等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

On the other hand, experts have pointed out various issues pertaining to the EU-ETS, including the following. ① Regarding the reduction targets of Phase I, there are problems in cap setting, such as moderate emissions allowances that lead to a price fall when the moderate allocation is realized. ② There are problems related to fairness and equity with respect to the cap. For example, during Phase I, in the process of creating national allocation plans that determine each country’s emissions cap, there were about 800 cases26 in all the EU countries wherein the companies sued their national governments over allocation methods and allocation amounts. Further, during Phase II, the former East European countries, such as Czech Republic, Latvia, Poland, Hungary, and Estonia, sued the European Commission over its strict demand on the allocation amount27. ③ There are concerns about “carbon leakage” and a loss of international competitiveness among the EU companies. For example, Jean-Louis Borloo, the French Minister of Ecology and Sustainable Development, expressed his concern about “carbon leakage,” which occurs when economic activities and plant locations move from the EU countries to countries with lesser or no environmental regulations. Secretary General Mr. Richmann of German Federation of Industry and Energy stated that in a situation wherein the competitors do not need to bear carbon costs, domestic industries cannot pass on the carbon costs to the international market. This would lead to not only loss of the labor market but also migration of the manufacturing bases, resulting in increased emissions outside of Europe.例文帳に追加

一方、EU-ETSに対しては、①第一約束期間の削減目標については、排出枠の設定が緩く、割当の緩さが判明した時点で価格が暴落するなど、キャップの設定に課題があったこと、②各国の排出上限量となる国別割当計画の策定過程において、割当方法及び割当量をめぐって、第一約束期間においては、企業が各国政府を提訴した事例がEU全体で800件程度あり、第二約束期間については、チェコ、ラトビア、ポーランド、ハンガリー、エストニア等旧東欧諸国が欧州委員会の要求する厳しい割当量を巡り、欧州委員会を相手に訴訟を起こしているなど、キャップの衡平性に課題があること、③フランスのボルローエコロジー・持続可能な開発整備相が、「EU域内から環境規制が緩いまたは無い他の地域に工場など移転する、いわゆる『炭素リーケージ』について懸念がある。」と表明し、ドイツの産業エネルギー連盟リヒマン事務総長が、「競争相手に炭素コストが生じなければ、産業界はこのコストを世界市場で転嫁できないので、労働市場が失われるだけではなく、生産拠点の移転もあり得るが、これは、欧州外での排出増加になる。」と発言しているなど、炭素リーケージ及び域内企業の国際競争力低下の懸念があること、等、様々な課題が指摘されている。 - 経済産業省

Article 171 The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 843 (excluding paragraph (1), items (iii) and (iv), and the proviso to paragraph (2)) (Effect of Judgment Nullifying Merger), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (ii) and (iii)) and (4) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for the nullification of a merger under Article 159, paragraph (1); and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (5) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (xv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 843, paragraph (4) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "members, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), items (vii) and (viii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidator(s) (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidator(s)) of a Mutual Company"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百七十一条　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十三条（第一項第三号及び第四号並びに第二項ただし書を除く。）（合併の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第三項（第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。）及び第四項（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は第百五十九条第一項の合併の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第五項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第十五号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの条において準用する同法第八百四十三条第四項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第七号及び第八号中「社員等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The Commission may request that relevant ministers make a demand in accordance with the provisions of Article 13, paragraph (1) of the Incorporated Administrative Agency, National Institute of Health and Nutrition Act (Act No. 180 of 1999) or a request in accordance with the provisions of Article 12, paragraph (1) of the Incorporated Administrative Agency, Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center Act (Act No. 183 of 1999), Article 18, paragraph (1) of the Incorporated Administrative Agency, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization Act (Act No. 192 of 1999), Article 13, paragraph (1) of the Incorporated Administrative Agency, National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences Act (Act No. 194 of 1999), or Article 15, paragraph (1) of the Incorporated Administrative Agency, Fisheries Research Agency Act (Act No. 199 of 1999), if it is recognized to be necessary for coping with emergency situations that cause or are likely to cause serious damage to the ensuring of Food safety. 例文帳に追加

３　委員会は、食品の安全性の確保に関し重大な被害が生じ、又は生じるおそれがある緊急の事態に対処するため必要があると認めるときは、関係各大臣に対し、独立行政法人国立健康・栄養研究所法（平成十一年法律第百八十号）第十三条第一項の規定による求め又は独立行政法人農林水産消費安全技術センター法（平成十一年法律第百八十三号）第十二条第一項、独立行政法人農業・食品産業技術総合研究機構法（平成十一年法律第百九十二号）第十八条第一項、独立行政法人農業環境技術研究所法（平成十一年法律第百九十四号）第十三条第一項若しくは独立行政法人水産総合研究センター法（平成十一年法律第百九十九号）第十五条第一項の規定による要請をするよう求めることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 213 The provisions of Article 822, paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive (Liquidation of Property of Foreign Company in Japan), Part VII, Chapter I, Section 2 (Order for Prohibition of Continuous Transactions or Closure of Business Offices of Foreign Company), Part VII, Chapter III, Sections 1 (General Provisions), 4 (Special Provisions on Liquidation Proceedings for Foreign Company) and 5 (Special Provisions on Procedure for Order of Dissolution of Company, etc.), Article 937, paragraph (2) (Commission of Registration by Judicial decision), and Article 938, paragraph (6) (Commissioned Registration by Judgment Concerning Special Liquidations) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis where a Foreign Mutual Company has established a secondary office or other office in Japan. In this case, any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第二百十三条　会社法第八百二十二条第一項から第三項まで（日本にある外国会社の財産についての清算）、第七編第一章第二節（外国会社の取引継続禁止又は営業所閉鎖の命令）、同編第三章第一節（総則）、第四節（外国会社の清算の手続に関する特則）及び第五節（会社の解散命令等の手続に関する特則）、第九百三十七条第二項（裁判による登記の嘱託）並びに第九百三十八条第六項（特別清算に関する裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、外国相互会社が日本国内に従たる事務所その他の事務所を設けた場合について準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The General Partner shall be entitled to receive a commission, fee or other consideration (the “Deductible Fees”) from a Portfolio Company in connection with a Portfolio Investment, or the management or technical guidance or advice or other management support provided by the General Partner to a Portfolio Company. If the General Partner has received Deductible Fees, the management fee to be payable on the next payment date therefor shall be reduced by an amount equal to [__]% of such Deductible Fees (the “Management Fee Deduction”). [[If an Excuse/Exclusion clause is not included]Each Partner shall be relieved of its liability for the management fee payable on the payment date by its share of the Management Fee Deduction in proportion to its Interest Amount/[If an Excuse/Exclusion clause is included]Each Partner who made a contribution to a Portfolio Investment for such Portfolio Company shall be relieved of its liability for the management fee payable on the payment date by its share of the Management Fee Deduction in proportion to its Percentage Interest in respect of such Portfolio Investment]. If the total amount of the Management Fee payable on the payment date thereof is less than the Management Fee Deduction, the deduction shall be made from a management fee payable on each of the next and subsequent payment dates until the Management Fee Deduction is applied in full. 例文帳に追加

4. 無限責任組合員は、ポートフォリオ投資、又は無限責任組合員による経営若しくは技術の指導若しくは助言その他の経営支援に関連して、投資先事業者等から手数料又は報酬その他の対価（以下「控除対象手数料等」という。）を受領することができる。無限責任組合員が控除対象手数料等を受領したときは、当該控除対象手数料等の［ ］%に相当する額（以下「管理報酬控除額」という。）を、直後の管理報酬の支払日に支払われるべき管理報酬から減額するものとし、［【免除/除外条項を設けない場合】各組合員は、管理報酬控除額のうち、その持分金額/【免除/除外条項を設ける場合】当該投資先事業者等へのポートフォリオ投資に出資した各組合員は、管理報酬控除額のうち、当該ポートフォリオ投資に係る対象持分割合］に応じて按分した金額につき、当該支払日に支払われるべき管理報酬の負担を免れるものとする。なお、当該管理報酬の支払日において支払われるべき管理報酬の総額が管理報酬控除額を下回る場合には、管理報酬控除額の全額が控除されるまで、次回以降の各支払日において支払われるべき管理報酬より順次控除するものとする。 - 経済産業省

(3) The provisions of paragraph (2) of Article 157, paragraph (2) of Article 158, Article 160, paragraph (1) of Article 161, and paragraphs (1), (2), and (4) of Article 164 of this Act, and the provisions of paragraph (4) of Article 14, Articles 21, 36, and 39, and paragraph (1) of Article 41 of the Administrative Appeal Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the report pursuant to the provision of paragraph (1). In this case, the term "Superintendent of the Regional Correction Headquarters" in Article 160, paragraph (1) of Article 161, and paragraphs (1), (2), and (4) of Article 164 shall be read as "public safety commission" ; the term "warden of the penal institution" in paragraph (2) of Article 160 shall be read as "detention services manager" ; the phrase "paragraph (1) of the preceding Article" in paragraph (4) of Article 164 shall be read as "paragraph (1) of Article 231," and additional technicalities requiring alternative readings shall be provided for by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

３　第百五十七条第二項、第百五十八条第二項、第百六十条、第百六十一条第一項並びに第百六十四条第一項、第二項及び第四項並びに行政不服審査法第十四条第四項、第二十一条、第三十六条、第三十九条及び第四十一条第一項の規定は、第一項の規定による申告について準用する。この場合において、第百六十条、第百六十一条第一項並びに第百六十四条第一項、第二項及び第四項中「矯正管区の長」とあるのは「公安委員会」と、第百六十条第二項中「刑事施設の長」とあるのは「留置業務管理者」と、第百六十四条第四項中「前条第一項」とあるのは「第二百三十一条第一項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provisions of Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) and (4) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for the nullification of an Entity Conversion; the provision of Article 840 (Effect of Judgment of Nullity of Issue of New Shares) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judgment of nullity of an Entity Conversion accompanied by the issue of shares on Entity Conversion under Article 92; the provision of Article 844 (Effect of Judgment of Nullity of Share Exchange or Share Transfer) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judgment of nullity of an Entity Conversion accompanied by a share exchange on Entity Conversion or share transfer on Entity Conversion; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 878, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shareholder or member"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　会社法第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第三項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）及び第四項（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は組織変更の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百四十条（新株発行の無効判決の効力）の規定は第九十二条の規定による組織変更時発行株式の発行を伴う組織変更の無効判決について、同法第八百四十四条（株式交換又は株式移転の無効判決の効力）の規定は組織変更株式交換又は組織変更株式移転を伴う組織変更の無効判決について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第一項中「株主」とあるのは「株主又は社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 53-32 The provisions of Article 419 (excluding the second sentence of paragraph (2)) (Executive Officer's Duty to Report to Audit Committee Members), Article 421 (Apparent Representative Executive Officers) and Article 422, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Executive Officers by Shareholders) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the executive officers of a company with Committees; the provision of Article 420 (Representative Executive Officers) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative executive officer of a company with Committees; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the executive officers or representative executive officer of a company with Committees; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative executive officer of a company with Committees. In this case, the term "Article 355, Article 356 and Article 365, paragraph (2)" in the first sentence of Article 419, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 355, Article 356 and Article 365, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-15 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 357" in Article 419, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 357 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-15 of the Insurance Business Act"; the terms "Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5)," "Article 352" and "Article 401, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive" in Article 420, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-15 of the Insurance Business Act," "Article 352 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-15 of that Act" and "Article 401, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-25 of the Insurance Business Act," respectively; and the term "shareholders having the shares" in Article 422, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第五十三条の三十二　会社法第四百十九条（第二項後段を除く。）（執行役の監査委員に対する報告義務等）、第四百二十一条（表見代表執行役）及び第四百二十二条第一項（株主による執行役の行為の差止め）の規定は委員会設置会社の執行役について、同法第四百二十条（代表執行役）の規定は委員会設置会社の代表執行役について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は委員会設置会社の執行役又は代表執行役について、同法第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は委員会設置会社の代表執行役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第四百十九条第二項前段中「第三百五十五条、第三百五十六条及び第三百六十五条第二項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十五において準用する第三百五十五条、第三百五十六条及び第三百六十五条第二項」と、同条第三項中「第三百五十七条」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十五において準用する第三百五十七条」と、同法第四百二十条第三項中「第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十五において準用する第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項」と、「第三百五十二条」とあるのは「同法第五十三条の十五において準用する第三百五十二条」と、「第四百一条第二項から第四項まで」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の二十五第二項において準用する第四百一条第二項から第四項まで」と、同法第四百二十二条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(10) When a Futures Commission Merchant intends to receive approval under paragraph 7, item 3 or paragraph 8, item 3, he/she shall submit a written application for approval including the following matters to the competent ministry with a copy of contract or an equivalent document attached to it: (i) trade name; (ii) the date of receiving permission or the date of the renewal of permission; (iii) the amount of the Payment before Maturity, etc. (in the case where the amount is denominated in a foreign currency, the amount of the Payment before Maturity, etc. and the amount thereof in Japanese Yen); (iv) the amount of the current short-term subordinated debts or long-term subordinated debts and those after making the Payment before Maturity, etc. (in the case where the amount is denominated in foreign currency, the amount of the short-term subordinated debts or long-term subordinated debts and the amount thereof in Japanese Yen); (v) the reasons for the Payment before Maturity, etc.; (vi) the scheduled date of the Payment before Maturity, etc.; (vii) the financing methods and other concrete measures for maintaining the sufficient Net Assets Regulation Ratio (which means the Net Assets Regulation Ratio prescribed in Article 211, paragraph 1 of the Act; the same shall apply hereinafter); (viii) the estimated Net Assets Regulation Ratio after making the Payment before - 56 - Maturity, etc. 例文帳に追加

１０ 第七項第三号又は第八項第三号の承認を受けようとする商品取引員は、次に掲げる 事項を記載した承認申請書に契約書の写し又はこれに準ずる書類を添付して、主務大臣 に提出しなければならない。 一商号 二許可年月日又は許可更新年月日 三期限前弁済等の額（外貨建てである場合にあっては、期限前弁済等の額及びその円 換算額）四現在及び期限前弁済等を行った後の短期劣後債務又は長期劣後債務の額（外貨建て である場合にあっては、短期劣後債務又は長期劣後債務の額及びその円換算額）五期限前弁済等を行う理由 六期限前弁済等の予定日 七十分な純資産額規制比率（法第二百十一条第一項に規定する純資産額規制比率をい う。以下同じ。）を維持するための資本金調達その他の具体的措置の内容 八期限前弁済等を行った後の純資産額規制比率の推定値 - 経済産業省

Article 63 (1) With respect to the permission or the approval on business commencement for a designated fishery, the provisions of paragraph (1), Article 34 (Restrictions or Conditions of Fishery Right), Article 35 (Notification of Absence from Work), paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of Article 37, paragraph (1), paragraph (2), paragraph (6) through paragraph (10) and paragraph (13) through paragraph (15) of Article 39 (Rescission of Fishery Right) and Article 12 (Measures for Fishery Employees) of the Aquatic Resources Conservation Act (Act No. 313 of 1951) shall apply mutatis mutandis. In this case, "the Governor concerned" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Minister"; "when granting a license, if he/she finds it necessary for ... other public interest" in paragraph (1), Article 34, with "when he/she finds it necessary for ...other public interest"; "fisheries adjustment" in paragraph (1), Article 39, with "the protection of reproduction of aquatic animals and plants, fisheries adjustment"; "the prefectural government concerned" in paragraph (6), paragraph (10) and paragraph (13) of the same Article, with "the national government"; "the Governor concerned, after he/she hears the opinions of the Sea-area Fisheries Adjustment Commission concerned" in paragraph (8) of the same Article, with "the Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Minister"; "paragraph (10), paragraph (2), Article 34 (Consultation with the Sea-area Fisheries Adjustment Commission) and paragraph (4), Article 37 (Hearing of Opinions)" in paragraph (14) of the same Article, with "paragraph (10)"; "the disposition for nonpayment of local tax" in paragraph (15) of the same Article, with "the disposition for nonpayment of national tax"; "paragraph (5), Article 10" in Article 12 of the same Act, with "paragraph (1), Article 39 of the Fisheries Act applied mutatis mutandis in Article 63 of the same Act"; and "the day of the public notice of paragraph (4) of the same Article," with "the day when the permission is rescinded." 例文帳に追加

第六十三条　指定漁業の許可又は起業の認可に関しては、第三十四条第一項（漁業権の制限又は条件）、第三十五条（休業の届出）、第三十七条第一項及び第二項、第三十九条第一項、第二項、第六項から第十項まで及び第十三項から第十五項まで（漁業権の取消し）並びに水産資源保護法（昭和二十六年法律第三百十三号）第十二条（漁業従事者に対する措置）の規定を準用する。この場合において、「都道府県知事」とあるのは「農林水産大臣」と、第三十四条第一項中「公益上必要があると認めるときは、免許をするにあたり、」とあるのは「公益上必要があると認めるときは、」と、第三十九条第一項中「漁業調整」とあるのは「水産動植物の繁殖保護、漁業調整」と、同条第六項、第十項及び第十三項中「都道府県」とあるのは「国」と、同条第八項中「都道府県知事が海区漁業調整委員会の意見を聴いて」とあるのは「農林水産大臣が」と、同条第十四項中「第十項、第三十四条第二項（海区漁業調整委員会への諮問）並びに第三十七条第四項（意見の聴取）」とあるのは「第十項」と、同条第十五項中「地方税の滞納処分」とあるのは「国税滞納処分」と、同法第十二条中「第十条第五項」とあるのは「漁業法第六十三条において準用する同法第三十九条第一項」と、「同条第四項の告示の日」とあるのは「その許可の取消しの日」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The applicant shall have all the rights of a patentee under Sec. 76, of the IP CODE against any person who, without his authorization, exercised any of the rights conferred under Section 71 of said law in relation to the invention claimed in the published application, as if a patent has been granted for that invention: Provided, That the said person had: (a) Actual knowledge that the invention that he was using was the subject matter of a published application; or (b) Received written notice that the invention that he was using was the subject matter of a published application being identified in the said notice by its serial number: Provided, That the action may not be filed until after the grant of a patent on the published application and within four years from the commission of the acts complained of (Sec. 46, IP CODE).例文帳に追加

出願人は，公開された出願においてクレームしている発明について，IP法第71条に基づいて付与される権利の何れかを出願人の許可を得ないで行使した者に対しては，その発明について特許が付与されている場合と同様に，同法第76条に基づく特許権者の権利のすべてを有するものとする。ただし，その者が次の何れかに該当することを条件とする。 (a)その者が，自己が実施していた発明が公開された出願の主題であることを実際に知っていたこと (b)その者が，自己が実施していた発明が出願番号により特定される公開された出願の主題である旨の通知書を受領していたこと。ただし，訴訟は，公開された出願に特許が付与されるまで，かつ，訴の対象である行為がなされてから4年以内は提起することができない。(IP法第46条) - 特許庁

The items contained in the FSF's report for which a timetable or things like that has been set concern a diverse range of areas. As you mentioned in your question, there are themes that must be tackled by international organizations such as the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and IOSCO (International Organization of Securities Commission), within the framework of international cooperation and discussion. Also, there are items concerning which the supervisory authorities of individual countries should take action against the financial institutions they supervise or urge them to take action. 例文帳に追加

今回のＦＳＦの報告に盛り込まれ、かつ、今般のＧ７である程度工程表と申しましょうか、日程・スケジュールの感覚を含めた整理がなされた項目というのは、ある意味で非常に多岐にわたっておりまして、ご質問の中でございましたように、バーゼル銀行監督委員会であるとかＩＯＳＣＯであるといった国際機関においてまずは国際協調・議論の中で取り組んでいくというテーマもございますし、各国の監督当局が監督対象となっている金融機関に対応していく、求めていくという項目も含まれているということかと思います。ということで、各国監督当局としてやるべきことについては、今般のＦＳＦの報告を我が国国内用に翻訳をした上で粛々と対応を検討していくということでありましょうし、また国際機関における議論については、その議論・検討の場に積極的に参画していくということだと思います。 - 金融庁

As you just mentioned, many major banks posted a substantial increase in earnings for the April-June quarter. The financial results of all major banks and other financial institutions for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 became available to the public by last Friday, on July 30. As pointed out just now, the financial results of major banks for the quarter ended June 30 released to the public recently revealed that their gross financial margin—which, as you know, is the profit margin—decreased, whereas market-related revenue such as proceeds from selling and purchasing of government bonds and other such financial instruments increased, while service revenue such as sales commission of investment trusts recovered. In addition, credit-related expenses decreased, as relatively few large-scale corporate bankruptcies during the April-June quarter brought about the decrease in the allowance for doubtful accounts, write-offs and so forth. I believe these factors made a positive contribution, and by and large, resulted in an increase in net income on a year-on-year basis. 例文帳に追加

今ご指摘のように、主要行の4-6月期の決算、実は多くの大幅増益となったということでございますが、主要行等の平成22年度の6月期決算は先週の金曜日でございますが、7月30日までに出揃ったところでございますが、今もご指摘のように今般公表された主要行の6月期決算では、資金利益が落ち込む一方、これはご存じのように利ざやですね、落ち込む一方、投資信託の販売手数料など、役務収益が回復している中、国債等の売買といった市場関連収益の増加のほか、与信関連費用が減少したことにより、これはご存じのように大型の会社の倒産というのが比較的この期（4-6月期）少なかったし、まあ、そういったこともございまして、それからそういったことの貸倒引当金、それから償却等が減りましたので、そんなことがプラスに働いたのではないかと思っておりますけれども、最終的な利益は前年同月比ではおおむね増収となりました。 - 金融庁

For the purposes of this Article: (a) the term “disproportionate class of shares” means any class of shares of a company that is a resident of a Contracting State which is subject to terms or other arrangements that entitle the holders of that class of shares to a portion of the income of the company derived from the other Contracting State that is larger than the portion such holders would receive absent such terms or arrangements; (b) the term “recognized stock exchange” means: (i) any stock exchange established under the terms of the Securities and Exchange Law(Law No. 25 of 1948) of Japan; (ii) the NASDAQ System and any stock exchange registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as a national securities exchange under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of the United States; and (iii) any other stock exchange agreed upon by the competent authorities; and (c) the term “gross income” means the total revenues derived by a resident of a Contracting State from its business, less the direct costs of obtaining such revenues. 例文帳に追加

(a)「不均一分配株式」とは、一方の締約国の居住者である法人の株式で、その条件その他の取決め内容により、当該株式を所有する者が、当該条件その他の取決め内容が定められていないとした場合に比し、当該法人が他方の締約国において取得する所得の分配をより多く受ける権利を有するものをいう。(b)「公認の有価証券市場」とは、次のものをいう。(i)日本国の証券取引法（昭和二十三年法律第二十五号）に基づき設立された有価証券市場(ii)ナスダック市場及び合衆国の千九百三十四年証券取引法に基づき証券取引所として証券取引委員会に登録された有価証券市場(iii)その他の有価証券市場で両締約国の権限のある当局が合意するもの(c)「総所得」とは、一方の締約国の居住者がその事業から取得する総収入の額から当該収入を得るために直接に要した費用の額を差し引いた残額をいう。 - 財務省

Article 1-2 The total amount of assets calculated using the method provided by the rule of the Fair Trade Commission set out in paragraph 5, Article 9 of the Act shall be the total amount of assets in the final balance sheet of the company (or the balance sheet as of the incorporation of the company if the first business year after the incorporation thereof has not ended) or, in the event of an issue of shares for subscription, etc. pursuant to the provision of Article 199 of the Companies Act (Act No. 86 of 2005), an acquisition of shares resulting from an exercise of share options prescribed in item 21, paragraph 1, Article 2 of the Companies Act, an issue of company bonds, a share exchange, a merger, a split, an acquisition of business, a transfer of business or any other significant change to the assets of the company after the end of business year (or at the time of incorporation, if the first business year after the incorporation of the company has not ended) involved in the balance sheet, the amount calculated by adding or subtracting the change in the total asset amount resulting from the event. 例文帳に追加

第一条の二　法第九条第五項に規定する公正取引委員会規則で定める方法による資産の合計金額は、会社の最終の貸借対照表（当該会社がその設立後最初の事業年度を終了していない場合においては、当該会社の成立時の貸借対照表）による資産の合計金額とし、当該貸借対照表に係る事業年度終了の日（当該会社がその設立後最初の事業年度を終了していない場合においては、当該会社の成立時）後において会社法（平成十七年法律第八十六号）第百九十九条の規定による募集株式の発行等、同法第二条第一項第二十一号に規定する新株予約権の行使による株式の交付、社債の発行、株式交換、合併、分割、事業譲受、事業譲渡その他当該会社の資産に重要な変更があつた場合には、これらによる総資産の額の変動を加え又は除いた額とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

When deliberating the circulation of securities and, at the same time, taxation on those financial instruments, we are planning to reflect on the past development involving, as you know, a wide variety of tax revisions, including the now-abolished securities transaction tax, that were formulated in the light of trends in a higher dimension, such as the shifts from saving to investment and from indirect finance to direct finance, and will also examine in a comprehensive fashion any potential impacts of tax revisions, which we will work on to reach a final conclusion in time for the tax system request deadline at the end of August. The FSA also intends to consider the current economic situation and the historical development in Japan, where indirect finance has traditionally been more prevalent than in the U.S., where direct finance is very dominant, while also attaching importance to smooth financial functions and simple and fair taxation, with the intention of officially submitting our request to the (Government) Tax Commission by the end of August following our comprehensive deliberations. 例文帳に追加

金融と税制というのは極めて大事ですし、同時に証券、あれは流通せねばなりませんから、同時にそういった金融商品に対する課税、あるいは昔は有価証券取引税という税金がございましたけれども、できるだけ証券、大きく言えば貯蓄から投資へというのは、間接金融から直接金融へというような大きな流れがございますので、そんなことを含めながらいろいろ税制改正を過去やってきた経緯があるということはご存じだと思いますが、なかなか税制を扱っただけではその所期の目的は、確かに効果はあるんでしょうけれども、達し得ないような部分もございますから、そういったことを総合的に勘案しながら、これは8月の末までに各省の税制要求というのは、最終的には出すということでございますから、そこら辺を踏まえて勘案しながら、また今の景気の状態、それから日本の置かれた、アメリカは非常に直接金融が多いのでございますが、日本は昔から伝統的に間接金融が多いというふうな長い間の歴史的経緯がございますから、そういったことを踏まえながら、なおかつ金融は円滑に機能するということが非常に大事でございまして、なおかつ税というものでございますから簡素公平ということも大事でございますから、そういったことを総合的に勘案しながら8月の末までにきちっと金融庁としては正式に税制調査会の方に出させていただきたいというふうに考えております。 - 金融庁

They must satisfy the following conditions: they must be Belgian and must be resident in Belgium; they must be at least 25 years old; they must not be prohibited or placed under guardianship; they must neither be in a state of prohibition within the meaning of Articles 31 to 34 of the Penal Code nor have been convicted in Belgium or abroad of any of the offenses specified in Royal Decree No. 22 of October 24, 1934, prohibiting certain convicted persons and bankrupts from exercising certain offices, professions or activities and giving the commercial courts authority to pronounce on such prohibitions, as amended by the Laws of March 14, 1962, March 16, 1972, and August 4, 1978; they must hold a Belgian diploma of university education or a Belgian diploma of higher education of the long type issued after at least four years of study in a scientific, technical or legal discipline; Diplomas issued abroad after at least four years of study, in the same disciplines, shall be authorized subject to their equivalence having been recognized beforehand by the relevant Belgian authorities; they must have exercised an activity in the field of patents for a period of time and subject to conditions laid down by the King; they must have passed an examination before the Commission referred to in Article 61 on the subject of industrial property, principally as regards patents, within two years at the latest of terminating the activities referred to in of this paragraph. 例文帳に追加

これらの者は次に掲げる条件を満たしていなければならない。ベルギー人であり，ベルギーの居住者でなければならない。少なくとも年齢25歳以上でなければならない。禁止され又は保護の下にある者であってはならない。刑法第31条から第34条までの意味における禁止状態にあってはならず，また，有罪判決を受けた者及び破産者のうちの一定の者に対し，一定の職務，職業又は活動に従事することを禁じており，また，商業裁判所に当該禁止を宣告する権限を付与している1962年3月14日法律，1972年3月16日法律及び1978年8月4日法律で改正された1934年10月24日勅令第22号に規定されている犯罪について，ベルギー又は外国で有罪の判決を受けた者であってはならない。ベルギーの大学卒業証書又は少なくとも4年間，科学，技術若しくは法律を研究した後に交付されるベルギーの長期型高等教育の卒業証書を保有していなければならない。上記と同一の学科を最低4年間研究した後に外国で発行された卒業証書は，予めベルギーの関連機関によってその同等性が承認されていることを条件として，許可されるものとする。国王の定める期間及び条件の下で，特許の分野の活動に従事していなければならない。(6)にいう活動の終了後遅くとも2年以内に，工業所有権の科目，主として特許に関して，第61条に述べる委員会の試験を合格していなければならない。 - 特許庁

(A) Trade name of the firm; (B) The fact that the firm is a financial instruments firm15 and its registration number; (C) The breakdown and total of the commission, trust charge, expenses and other consideration (except the consideration for securities or rights relating to derivatives, etc.) payable by customers for the relevant transactions, the maximum amount thereof, or its calculation method; (D) In the case of transactions that require the deposit of consignment guarantee money, the amount thereof and its calculation method; (E) If there is a risk of loss exceeding the amount of consignment guarantee money in a derivatives transaction, etc., that fact and the ratio of the transaction amount of such derivative transaction, etc. to the amount of consignment guarantee money (if calculation of such ratio is impossible, that fact and the reasons thereof); (F) If there is a risk of loss arising directly from such indicators as the interest rate, exchange rates or stock index, such indicators and the fact that fluctuation thereof may result in loss, and the reasons thereof; (G) If there is a risk of loss as referred to in the preceding item that exceeds the amount of consignment guarantee money, the indicator(s) which may directly lead to such loss, the fact that there is a risk of such loss, and the reasons thereof; (H) In regard to over-the-counter derivative transactions such as foreign exchange margin trading, where there is a difference between the selling price and buying price indicated by a financial instruments firm, etc., that fact; (I) Disadvantageous facts for customers in relation to other important matters; and (J) If the firm is a member of the Financial Instruments Firms Association, that fact and the name of the specific association. 例文帳に追加

①業者の商号②金融商品取引業者等である旨及び登録番号③手数料、信託報酬、費用その他顧客が当該取引につき支払うべき対価（有価証券の対価やデリバティブなどの権利の対価を除く）の種類ごと及び合計の金額、金額の上限又は計算方法④委託保証金を預託すべき取引については委託保証金の額又はその計算方法⑤デリバティブ取引等で損失が委託保証金を上回る可能性がある場合には、その旨及び当該デリバティブ取引等の額の委託保証金に対する比率（計算できない場合にはその旨及びその理由）⑥金利、為替相場、株価指数等の指標を直接の原因として損失が生じるおそれがある場合には、当該指標とその変動により損失が生じるおそれがある旨及びその理由⑦前号の損失が委託保証金の額を上回るおそれがある場合には、かかる損失のおそれを生じさせる直接の原因となる指標、かかる損失が生じるおそれがある旨及びその理由⑧外国為替証拠金取引のような店頭デリバティブ取引について、金融商品取引業者等が表示する金融商品の売付け価格と買付け価格に差がある場合にはその旨⑨その他重要な事項について顧客の不利益となる事実⑩業者が金融商品取引業協会に加盟している場合にはその旨及び協会名 - 経済産業省

(3) The provisions of paragraph (2) of Article 157, paragraph (2) of Article 158, Article 160, and paragraph (1) of Article 161 of this Act, and the provisions of paragraphs (3) and (4) of Article 14, paragraphs (1), (2), and (4) of Article 15, Article 21, paragraphs (1), (2), and 6 of Article 34, Articles 35 to 37 inclusive, Article 39, paragraphs (1) to (5) inclusive of Article 40, paragraph (1) of Article 41, Article 42, paragraphs (1) and (2) of Article 43, and Article 55 of the Administrative Appeal Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the reclaim for review. In this case, the term "Superintendent of the Regional Correction Headquarters" in Article 160 and paragraph (1) of Article 161 shall be read as "public safety commission" ; the term "warden of the penal institution" in paragraph (2) of Article 160 shall be read as "detention services manager" ; the phrase "upon request of the applicant of the request for review or ex officio" in paragraph (2) of Article 34 under said Act shall be read as "ex officio" ; and the phrase "by both posting the notice on a bulletin board and publishing in the official gazette or other official bulletin or in a newspaper at least once" in paragraph (3) of Article 42 of said Act shall be read as "by posting the notice on a bulletin board," and additional technicalities requiring alternative readings shall be provided for by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

３　第百五十七条第二項、第百五十八条第二項、第百六十条及び第百六十一条第一項並びに行政不服審査法第十四条第三項及び第四項、第十五条第一項、第二項及び第四項、第二十一条、第三十四条第一項、第二項及び第六項、第三十五条から第三十七条まで、第三十九条、第四十条第一項から第五項まで、第四十一条第一項、第四十二条、第四十三条第一項及び第二項並びに第五十五条の規定は、再審査の申請について準用する。この場合において、第百六十条及び第百六十一条第一項中「矯正管区の長」とあるのは「公安委員会」と、第百六十条第二項中「刑事施設の長」とあるのは「留置業務管理者」と、同法第三十四条第二項中「審査請求人の申立てにより又は職権で」とあるのは「職権で」と、同法第四十二条第三項中「掲示し、かつ、その旨を官報その他の公報又は新聞紙に少なくとも一回掲載して」とあるのは「掲示して」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(7) The provision of Article 16-3(1) of the New Banking Act shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to holding of Shares, etc. (meaning Shares, etc. as defined by Article 2(7) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) of a domestic company (meaning domestic company as defined by Article 16-3(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by a Bank and/or its Subsidiary Companies of which the total number exceeds the Threshold on Holding of Shares, etc. (meaning the Threshold on Holding of Shares, etc. as defined by Article 16-3(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, the provision of Article 16-3 of the New Banking Act shall apply to such holding of Shares, etc. in the Domestic Company by deeming that the Bank and/or the Subsidiary Companies acquire, on that day, the Shares, etc. in the Domestic Company in excess of the Threshold on Holding of Shares, etc. by a cause provided by the main clause of Article 16-3(2) of the New Banking Act. 例文帳に追加

７　新銀行法第十六条の三第一項の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に国内の会社（同項に規定する国内の会社をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の株式等（新銀行法第二条第七項に規定する株式等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を合算してその基準株式数等（新銀行法第十六条の三第一項に規定する基準株式数等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えて所有している銀行又はその子会社による当該国内の会社の株式等の所有については、当該銀行が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、同日後は、当該国内の会社の株式等の所有については、当該銀行又はその子会社が同日において同条第二項本文に規定する事由により当該国内の会社の株式等を合算してその基準株式数等を超えて取得したものとみなして、同条の規定を適用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(a) the amount obtained by multiplying the transaction amounts of the transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (i) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (e)) in each business year by the Problematic Conduct Rate -- which means the proportion of the total sum of the payments made as a result of any Problematic Conduct [which means the Problematic Conduct prescribed in Article 112] in each business year starting within three years prior to the commencement of the relevant business year [excluding payments pertaining to transactions in cases where a Futures Commission Merchant receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market (excluding Commodity Clearing Transactions; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) from a Person With Specialized Knowledge and Experience (which means a person specified in Article 107; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) or receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market by using an Electronic Data Processing System (which means an Electronic Data Processing System connecting a computer used by the Futures Commodity Merchant and a computer [including the input/output devices] used by the customer through a telecommunications line; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) without carrying out solicitation]; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) to the total sum of the transaction amounts of the transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), items (i) to (iii) of the Act and the amount of the consideration for the transactions prescribed in item (iv) of the same paragraph (excluding the transaction amounts and the amount of the consideration for transactions in cases of transactions based on a person's own account and in cases where a Futures Commission Merchant receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market from a Person With Specialized Knowledge and Experience or receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market by using an Electronic Data Processing System without carrying out solicitation -- or the amount equivalent to 0.0001 percent of the transaction amounts, whichever amount is greater (in cases where the amount of liability reserve for commodity trading that has already been accrued [in cases where a specific amount of money is used under the provisions of Article 221, paragraph (2) of the Act, the amount after deducting said amount; the same shall apply in the following item] is less than ten million yen, the amount obtained by adding, to such larger amount, an amount obtained by multiplying -- an amount calculated by dividing the amount that has been obtained by deducting the amount of liability reserve for commodity trading and the amounts listed in (b) to (h) from ten million yen by double the Problematic Conduct Rate, or by 0.0002 percent, whichever rate is higher (or, if said calculated amount exceeds the transaction amount in the relevant business year, such amount shall be the transaction amount in the relevant business year; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) -- by the Problematic Conduct Rate or an amount equivalent to 0.0001 percent of said calculated amount, whichever amount is greater); 例文帳に追加

イ　各事業年度における法第二条第八項第一号に規定する取引（自己の計算による取引及びホに掲げる取引を除く。）の取引金額に事故率（当該事業年度開始日前三年以内に開始した各事業年度における事故（第百十二条に規定する事故をいう。）による支払額（商品取引員が、専門知識及び経験を有する者（第百七条で定める者をいう。以下この条において同じ。）から商品市場における取引等（商品清算取引を除く。以下この条において同じ。）の委託を受ける場合並びに電子情報処理組織（商品取引員の使用に係る電子計算機と、顧客の使用に係る電子計算機（入出力装置を含む。）とを電気通信回線で接続した電子情報処理組織をいう。以下この条において同じ。）を使用して勧誘を伴わずに商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合の取引に係る支払額を除く。）の合計額の、法第二条第八項第一号から第三号に規定する取引の取引金額と同項第四号に規定する取引の対価の額の合計額（自己の計算による取引並びに商品取引員が、専門知識及び経験を有する者から商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合並びに電子情報処理組織を使用して勧誘を伴わずに商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合の取引金額及び取引の対価の額を除く。）に占める割合をいう。以下この条において同じ。）を乗じた金額と取引金額の百万分の一に相当する金額とのいずれか大きい金額（既に積み立てられた商品取引責任準備金の金額（法第二百二十一条第二項の規定により使用された金額がある場合には、当該金額を控除した金額。次号において同じ。）が千万円に満たない場合には、当該いずれか大きい金額に、千万円から当該商品取引責任準備金の金額、及びロからチまでに掲げる金額を控除した金額を事故率に二を乗じて得た率と百万分の二とのいずれか大きい率で除して計算した金額（当該計算した金額が当該事業年度の取引金額を超える場合には、当該事業年度の当該取引金額。以下この号において同じ。）に事故率を乗じた金額と当該除して計算した金額の百万分の一に相当する金額とのいずれか大きい金額を加算した金額） - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Articles 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the general meeting of members of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　会社法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、相互会社の社員総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人（保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項（同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Lawsuit for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the General Meeting of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, executive officer or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　会社法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、相互会社の総代会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人（保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項（同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 53-37 The provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847, paragraph (2), Article 849, paragraph (5), Article 851, paragraph (1), item (i) and Article 851, paragraph (2)) (Lawsuit for Accountability, etc. in Stock Company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for accountability in a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Section 3 of said Chapter (excluding Article 854, paragraph (1), item (i), (a) and Article 854, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive) (Lawsuit for Dismissal of Officer in Stock Company) and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (j)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for dismissal of an officer in a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "shareholders having the shares (excluding the holders of shares less than one unit who may not exercise their rights pursuant to the provisions of the articles of incorporation under Article 189, paragraph (2)" and "Article 423, paragraph (1)" in Article 847, paragraph (1) (Lawsuit for Accountability, etc.) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "Article 53-33, paragraph (1) of Insurance Business Act," respectively; the term "shareholder" in Article 847, paragraphs (3) to (5) inclusive and (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "member"; and the provision of Article 854, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those members or nine (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加